Archive for the ‘Sedevacantism’ Category

Creating the Resistance

The tree of woe has one of the most interesting articles or blogs I have read in probably a decade. It is really good, and although a little long, and using a few technical terms I had not come across before, and while also a little bit theoretical, it is nevertheless one of the best pieces I have read in a long time, simply because he explains things so clearly that I would have struggled to explain in such an easily digestible fashion.

In essence he explains the various dynamics of how a successful rebellion to any tyrannical system, or really any system, is constructed. It is interesting because he provides concrete examples and some historical context too. But what I found quite fascinating is that I came to the same generic conclusions long ago, although my own explanation is a lot cruder (lower resolution if you like) but also a lot simpler to grasp at a baseline level, and it is this:

A group that removes infiltrators with absolute rigour and has a pretty difficult threshold to entry in terms of infiltration, and that has the ability and capacity to go and “convert” strangers to its group rules, all other things being equal, in due course will either be completely destroyed due to no one joining it, or grow to its maximum potential and remain stable once a large enough population to make itself-sustaining is reached.

If the group is also non aggressive as its default setting, it will tend to not attract too many attacks by similarly peaceful groups, and if the response to attacks is a ferocious, instant, counter that is also quite lasting in time, any group that is not overwhelmingly larger will tend to leave such a group alone.

Well. Guess what.

Sedevacantist Catholic communities are all of these things naturally. And they happen to be growing fast too.

I had not considered things in the way that the Tree of Woe guy* did, but given that his presentation makes sense, as does mine, it is always pleasant when a completely different baseline approach to a problem comes to the same conclusion. It is generally an indication you are on the right track and modelling reality relatively accurately.

So… in short, if you want to be part of the Resistance, you really need to become a proper Catholic and join a community of people that are too. Which is why I have started the process here three years ago.

Think about it:

  • It’s going to be pretty hard if not almost impossible to keep up the pretence of Sedevacantist Catholicism if you actually not one, in a community of people who are.
  • As a rule, Sedes will not start an argument or fight, and are essentially peaceful by nature. IF however, they are wronged, the tendency leans towards Just War, Crusades and Inquisitions. In the modern day this generally does not devolve to massive war parties going out to fight, it tends to lean towards ostracism of infiltrators or bad actors, relentless countering to any enemy attacks (which being as they are generally not physically violent in nature, are responded to proportionally) and if it does get to extremes, Catholic fighters/soldiers/warriors have absolutely no problem with doing what is necessary without hesitation. In fact, protecting oneself and innocents is a duty for a Catholic man, dogmatically.
  • The number of people it takes to make a stable community is really quite low. At a gathering not too long ago, three Sede women (among which my wife) lined up for a group photo and there were 15 children there. Another group in another continent has 19 children from 4 women. Get ten such women in a community and you are going to have around 50 other humans being born to them. At least, because none of the 3 women I know have yet reached menopause. Imagine a village or area that has 100 such women and think about the numbers of hardcore Catholics you will produce in a few generations.

Catholics (real ones, i.e. Sedevacantists) are the only ones reproducing at well over replacement numbers (see my previous post on this topic.)

And for all the reasons mentioned in that previous post, no, Protestant “communities” will not be able to muster the same kind of cohesion or numbers. So… if you really mean to make a difference, you may want to start working on why Catholicism is actually the only Christianity that ever did exist, and is the only one that is in fact the Church Jesus wanted to exist on Earth.

*Which, if I read that post right, might be Alexander Macris, since he is supposedly some scary Alt-Right guy. Or whatever. The term Alt-Right was invented by foppish glowie Dick Dispenser as I call him (Richard Spencer) and was retarded from the start, given its origins. But since nowadays stating simple facts like that men cannot ever be pregnant, is apparently equivalent to being Hitler (except you know, the Nazis were National SOCIALISTS, so it’s a bit of a stretch, since, if they even had gas chambers for such things, the Nazis would probably have gassed you if you said men could get pregnant back then, I mean, they certainly burnt the books about trannification and so on, but I digress).

** Oh and Cold Fury and Western Rifle Shooters Association have both been picking up some of my posts, so thanks for that, since I am dismally bad at promoting myself even when it’s a skill I should try and learn one day.

Why Protestantism is the Destruction of the West

Andrew Torba has written his regular newsletter, which you can see as a blog post here.

In it he laments the various issues that are ensuring the American population, along with the European one, are falling (and have been for a long time) below replacement value.

He does this by mentioning the issues, while apparently being totally oblivious of how any of these issues became issues in the first place, and what the root cause of all of them was and is.

It’s really quite astonishing. But I think it can be useful to look at this peculiar blindness of his as a starting point to show with a certain level of clarity and obviousness what the baseline issues are originating from, and how, specifically, in each case, this can be demonstrated to have massive evidence for the fact that, at root, all of these issues have the starting point of the Protestant rebellion against the Catholic Church.

Now, if you are a Protestant, irritating as you may find me and my perspectives, I sincerely hope you settle down, muster as much objective consideration for the rest of this post as you can, and consider it calmly and objectively. And if some of my rhetoric infuriates you, pay attention to that, and notice which bits do so the most (these are where your biggest logical hurdles and fallacies are going to be found), then let them go and try, for the sake of argument at least, to imagine they are true and correct anyway (they are, my rhetoric is so unpleasant for people because it invariably is laced with painful truth).

And then see if you can’t understand my points from a bird’s eye view, instead of taking it personally against you as a person, the people who taught you to be a Protestant that you care about, and so on.

Being as Torba is a Protestant himself, and being that Protestants, like solipsistic women, only backwards rationalise any reality in the past that factually makes them responsible for anything, instead of facing the facts squarely on, he seems to think this situation is totally divorced from anything to do with Protestantism. In fact he blindly points out the issues while completely oblivious to the reasons of why, how and when these things became issues.

It really is a kind of perspective of extreme selfishness or self-centeredness to the point of being oblivious of the destruction one leaves in one’s wake. Any damage done is just some magical thing that just happens on its own and is always fully justifiable in just such a way (by some magic) that means it is never, ever, ever, that person’s fault.

What a selfish, stupid, spoilt brat, or a woman (men too, but they generally are more consciously aware than women in this regard) would do on an individual level, Protestants do on a massive social level that covers the last five centuries.

So allow me now to quote Torba from his post and comment on each point in some detail. If you are able to divorce your personal feelings on each issue, and note the broad historical facts in each case, I think you will see that what I say about Protestantism is not just true, but that on some level, you have always known it, because the plastic, veneer feel of the disconnect between the entire Protestant mish-mash chaos non-structure of it, has never married properly to the deep sense of culture, tradition, history and ancestors that created and protected Christendom from the time of Jesus, to:

  • The formation of Benedictine monasteries,
  • The crusades, and the 200 years they held the Outremer while being attacked by both Muslims and the Eastern schismatics they came to the aid of (after they had already split themselves off from the One True Church),
  • The rebellion against God’s Church, under the guise of it being a Protestation against the corrupt men within it, which have always been there, but who never changed the truth of the Church,
  • The siege of Malta and the Catholic knights that defended it from the consequent destruction of Christendom as a whole if Malta had fallen,
  • The gradual, intentional and devastating infiltration of the Church by freemasons (illuminati, satanists, carbonari, etc their name is legion), communists, homosexuals and pedophiles, starting in earnest in the late 1770, alongside the planned and executed destruction of every European royal house; because since the time of Charlemagne, the nobility had been associated with being the protectors of the Church, that is, the physical and worldly protectors of the Church (the guys who fight, as all nobles who took part in the crusades did) and they had to be broken before the Church could be damaged meaningfully from within,
  • The noticing of this by various Popes, culminating in Pope Pious X who started the putting together of the code of canon law of 1917, an amazing document that reviewed tens of thousands of documents written over the last two millennia, in order to ensure there was no conflict, contradiction or logical fallacy among them all, so they could be summarised as the essence of Catholic dogma in one volume, which was completed and promulgated by Pope Benedict the XV in 1917 and stood the test of time from then, through to the death of the last valid Pope, Pious XII, and even beyond it, as the Satanists finally took the throne of Peter in 1958, and have held it since, yet the True Church remains, as does the impenetrable fortress of the Code of 1917, and the last remnant of faithful Bishops and Priests that retain Catholicism as their faith, and not the false, Satanic version of “Catholicism” espoused by the promulgators of Vatican II and its manifest heresies in the form of the deceitful Novus Ordo fake “Church”.

The simple fact is that on some level, every protestant senses that deep down, no matter how genuine their wish to be one with God the Father, Christ the Son, and the Holy Spirit, the entire history of their supposed religion is littered with disconnects and logical fallacies that simply cannot be reconciled. And deep down, they sense too, that one cannot simply be united with Christ by merely saying he is. There are rules. There always were from the start, and they do not change. But I have mentioned the historical perspective starting from the beginning, many times before, and few are willing to take that journey. So today, we will do something different. We will take Torba’s newsletter and dissect the issues he mentions and see how and where they came from in the first place.

You Need To Be Babymaxxing: A Call to Action for Christians A disturbing trend has been emerging over the past few decades: the birth rate of every US state, along with the birth rate in most western nations, has dipped below the replacement population level. This has sparked widespread concern and fear, as this demographic shift could have catastrophic consequences for the long-term survival of some of the world’s most prosperous and influential societies and people groups.

And what might have led to that catastrophic drop in birth rate, when third world Africans, Indians and others keep producing children despite conditions most Westerners can’t even imagine, much less are able to take on in their own lives? Let’s ponder it a bit, shall we?

The root causes of this demographic decline are complex and multifaceted, but there are a few key factors that stand out. First and foremost: the rise of secularism and individualism has led to a decreased emphasis on traditional family values and a growing number of people choosing not to have children. Our culture of atomized individualism in the West has transformed so many into self-centered and selfish monsters.

So… the increase of secularism, individualism and atomisation of society. Where, O WHERE might such an idea come from? Could it possibly have ANYTHING at all to do with going from a global religion that was prevalent throughout the entire West and even much of the East (though slightly perverted and erroneous there) to CHANGING that religion to be… what was it oh yeah…

  • Individualistic (every man interprets the Bible (which was changed from the original used for 1200 years) as he sees fit.)
  • Schismatic at its very root. We now have over 40,000 versions of Protestantism, but even then each of these is really only a shadowy illusion of coherence, because in truth EVERY Protestant feels entitled to be his own Pope, Bishop and Priest and interpret the Bible, and Christianity as a whole, (including the ancient traditions he is usually abysmally ignorant of) as he sees fit, which is why Protestants will change Church like normal people change socks. They are not Churches at all, just lose coalitions where you pick and choose the bits that suit you. What do you think the effect of that is on society as a whole? Might be just a tad atomising? Just a smidge of secularisation creeping in? You think? How would that play out over 500 years?

Additionally, the increasing cost of living and the pressure to pursue higher education and career success have made it more difficult for many couples to afford to have large families. It’s tough, but not impossible, to have a large family when the economy is so rigged against you doing so. Making it happen requires a lot of self-sacrifice and a reevaluation of your priorities.

No lie there, but where does this incessant need to have a “career” and prioritising work come from? Well, let’s see, historically where can we trace this sudden absolute importance of WORK over LIFE? What’s that, I hear? The Industrial Revolution? Right. I agree. Which was taught to me in school as a young boy as this marvel of British Engineering and know-how and just an overall great thing for the advancement of humanity. Except… no one mentioned the social consequences. They all presented the creation of trains and railways and machinery as all positive technological advancements while completely ignoring whether:

  • They actually were positive overall for humanity, or
  • Regardless of that, what social conditions did the much vaunted “Protestant Work Ethic” actually entail in day-to-day activities and family dynamics?
  • What priorities do you think you need to have to come up with the Industrial Revolution in terms of valuing your family time and your work time? What effects on general human interactions do you think are going to be more prevalent? Would a general disconnect from other human beings being seen as other human beings you necessarily relate to, regardless of personal differences, purely on the basis of the reality in front of you that they too are human beings, be useful to foster a general perception of other people being seen more as potential cogs in the machinery of “society” than actual human beings? The deeper implication of this are manifold and absolutely fundamental. A perfect example of this, which is an extreme case, in order to highlight the difference, is that if a Protestant mind were to say, be forced into a war of strife against invading foreigners, he would execute it more or less in cold blood for the most part as a negative but necessary thing. A Catholic would execute it with quite a different frame of mind. Alongside the same practical need, the Catholic would further be driven in his righteous rage that such an event has become necessary as a result of the other side refusing to act like reasonable human beings. So their extermination is not just a necessity for practical purposes, but also a necessity from an educational and spiritual perspective. A Protestant cuts a tree down because it’s in the way. A Catholic evaluates if the tree is noxious, in which case he will dig it up from the roots and burn it, or merely in the way, in which case he will endeavour to dig it up from the roots and replant it somewhere appropriate. It is a MASSIVE psychological difference and affects every aspect of your attitude towards life and all its challenges.

Finally, the widespread availability of birth control and abortion has enabled people to easily prevent pregnancies and terminate them when they do occur, further exacerbating the problem. We are making great strides on banning abortion in many states across the nation, but decades of damage has already been done.

And where did that magical birth control come from? Oh wait, the pill was invented by a Jewish guy. Just a coincidence I am sure, regardless of the fact that Jews (Talmudic Pharisees) have hated the Catholic Church from the start and have tried to destroy it at every turn including their deep infiltration of it over centuries and the Protestantisation of it with Vatican II in which they were instrumental in forming.

But what about the adoption of it? Which kind of people adopted birth control in this form? Not Catholics. Even today, some 66 years after the throne of Peter was usurped by Satanists, the momentum of the real Catholicism that still exists (though crumbling rapidly in the Novus Ordo fake Church) makes it nigh on impossible for the fake Pope Bergoglio to say it’s ok to use. It was Protestants in their legion of denominations that began to accept socially the concept of divorce in the first place. An event that was forbidden by the Catholic Church and only permitted in the sense of an annulment, which has very specific rules to be granted.

But if divorce becomes acceptable, then the entire concept of marriage becomes a store-bought idea, no longer a sacrament for life. And once you accept marriage as a kind of diploma you can buy in a store, well, you should be able to switch diplomas at will if one loses its lustre. And since it might go wrong, it only makes sense to take it for a test run first. Which means sex before marriage. Which could end up with babies with a person you’re just taking out for a test ride! I mean they have a nice body, or maybe are rich, or whatever, so you want to see if you’re “compatible” in terms of orgasms per month, you know, like miles per gallon and so on. So of course you need some baby making prevention thing!

And then it’s a short step from treating sex as a test run for marriage to making it just for fun. I mean sex is really a LOT of fun. Like a lot, lot. Like it messes with you brain and body chemistry level of great fun. So why wouldn’t you want to get addicted to this natural rush that doesn’t even require drugs, and is better than all the rushes you get from a drug anyway, if you practice it enough to really get good at it? Well, of course sex would go from being a test ride for marriage to a sport. And once sex is for fun, the last thing you want is a baby with someone you can’t even have a decent conversation with, but oh my God are they awesome at the orgasms per mile, or whatever the measure was, right?

So, “naturally” the next thing that happens if a baby does come into the equation… and marriage is not a sacrament anymore as a dedication to bringing in new life (that is what marriage is for, making children, I know, it’s a shock, but seriously, look it up historically, sport-fucking doesn’t feature at all. Not even a little bit), well, what else are you gonna do, other than kill that baby, since it’s a nuisance. And so we have gone in a few short steps from allowing divorce –> sex before marriage –> sex for fun –> contraception –> baby killing.

And remind yourself, which secularisation of Christianity movement did that? You can’t blame Catholicism for it. Even the fake “Catholic” Church to date at least can’t advocate for contraception (they will in due course, no doubt, because Satanists are gonna Satanist).

While there is undoubtedly a lot of fear-mongering surrounding this issue, it is not without merit. If the current trend continues it could lead to a significant decline in the population of some of the world’s most prosperous and influential nations, which would have far-reaching consequences for global stability and economic growth.

Note that Torba’s first concern is global stability and economic growth. The ever present and Jewish –> Protestant belief in their true God, the almighty dollar. Profit, wealth. An amorphous “stability” of people and lands so far removed from us you will never see them even once in your life. There is a reason why America is called the great Satan by the Arab world, and while their religion is demonic too, they are not entirely wrong, which is what I tried to explain as gently as possible here.

More importantly it would also represent a tragic loss for the unique cultures, traditions, and values that have been cultivated by these societies over centuries.

Again, while he is not wrong, the point is not that any one specific culture or tradition is really all that relevant in the scheme of things, UNLESS, that tradition and culture also happens to be the best, surest, most tried and tested true and real approximation of how reality actually works as God intended. Then it’s kinda like… ALL IMPORTANT. So, despite your specific and particular distaste for Catholicism, which is based on nothing but lies about what it is, perpetrated down the centuries that you never bothered to look up yourself and the same sense of things passed on to you by your relatives and people you loved, who were just as ignorant of the truth (or more) as you are and they too believed the lies and inaccuracies, you should really make an effort to educate yourself on these things and figure them out by yourself.

Christians are called to be fruitful and multiply (Genesis 1:28). We need to be babymaxxing. This commandment is not just a suggestion or a personal preference, but an essential part of our mission to spread the Gospel and disciple the nations. By having large families and raising our children to be faithful, God-fearing people we can ensure the continued growth and prosperity of our communities and the preservation of our shared values and traditions.

Sounds good? Sure. But it’s a plastic American commercial. “Buy this product, it looks good, it makes you look cool and it’s needed!”

Tell me Andrew, with SPECIFICITY:

  • Continued growth and prosperity for your communities. Exactly WHAT and HOW do you mean this? What do you think will happen if people have a lot of children with only a vague sense of community brought on by a generic, amorphous, non-specific, “belief in X” that has no set rules, no set tradition, no set reality.
  • What “community” are you referring to, PRECISELY. Are the Methodists gonna get along with the Mormons, and the Mormons with the Seventh Day Adventists, and they with the Amish, and they with the Anabaptists, and they with the Baptists, and they with the Lutherans, and they with the Calvinists, and they with the lesbian “bishops” of whatever “Church” that is, and they with the transgender “bishop” that was in the news of another faction and they with…(repeat for 40,000 iterations). Is that the “community” you refer to? Those people all gonna band together under the banner of “Christ” are they? I think not. I think the entire history of America, and all Protestant nations, has shown such people will band together only under the banner of the (previously) might dollar, or German mark, or Pound Stirling. And then only until it profits them. And any true believers in the mix will get stampeded in the overall melee. It’s hard enough to have a community when they actually ARE all Catholics, but it does work and it has for many centuries. It has never worked in any protestant country other than to create more government, more regulation, and a perpetual chase for profit.

Moreover, by focusing on our own households and prioritizing the growth of our families, we can counteract the destructive influence of our enemies, most of whom do not have children of their own. As their ideas and ideologies die with them, our faith and values will continue to thrive, passed down from generation to generation through the strong bonds of family and community.

What faith and values and traditions would those be? The ones that did not manage to survive other than as a thinly veiled veneer of false honesty, respectability and dignity to cover over the perpetual search for profit, worldly fame and fortune? The one that has not managed to keep trannies from claiming the “right” to get “married” in your protestant “Churches” and have “pregnant men” as part of the “accepted reality”?

And before you say “Oh but that doesn’t happen in MY denomination number 38,792!” Stop and think for 5 seconds, what the Hell you’re actually saying and how you are missing the ENTIRE point of what Christianity and being part of the ACTUAL “body of Christ” means and how and where your illogical, historical clown-world “religion”, came to be.

So, what can we do to address this crisis and fulfill our divine calling as Christians?

Well, you can start by actually becoming actual Christians, to begin with, which means the ONLY denomination of Christianity that has always been there from the start: Catholicism. And which today exists ONLY in Sedevacantist Catholicism, aka Catholicism, since the buildings, property, wealth and outer garments of Catholicism have all been usurped, infiltrated and corrupted by the Satanists pretending to be “Catholics” that now infest the Vatican and everyone remotely connected with Novus Ordo heresies.

Here are a few practical steps we can take:

Embrace the concept of “babymaxxing”: This means prioritizing the growth of our families and actively seeking to have as many children as possible. It may require making sacrifices and reevaluating our priorities, but the rewards will be immeasurable.

Support and encourage other Christian families in their efforts to have children: This can take many forms, from offering emotional support and guidance to providing material assistance, such as helping with childcare or contributing to the financial costs of raising a large family.

Advocate for policies that support large families: This can include lobbying for tax breaks and other financial incentives for families with multiple children, as well as pushing for educational and healthcare policies that make it easier for parents to raise large families.

Promote a culture of life: This means working to end the scourge of abortion and advocating for the sanctity of human life at all stages, from conception to natural death.

These are all good suggestions, but completely doomed to fail is they are not founded on a solid bedrock of being connected to truth and reality, and that means, a religion that is itself based in truth and reality. Anything that is a watered down version of the original, with literally tens of thousands of roads down false paths, simply cannot stand the test of time. It has never worked in ANY human endeavour, much less in the experience of mankind other than by the enforcing of it by brutal methods and force, be it Islam or communism. The ONLY philosophy that has thrived and done so entirely voluntarily, is Catholicism, which imposes force ONLY on its declared enemies, and even then, usually only after patiently trying to dissuade them from their evil paths of attack.

Educate and disciple our children: It is not enough to simply have many children; we must also ensure that they are raised in the fear and knowledge of the Lord, instilling in them the values and principles that will enable them to carry on our faith and traditions for generations to come.

Name me ONE Protestant denomination that has lasted unchanged and retained anything even resembling a constant tradition and heritage without multiple schisms for even just 100 years. It doesn’t exist. Not a single one. The Catholic Church has remained steadfast and its rules and dogma unchanged for almost precisely 2000 years.

The demographic crisis facing the world today is a serious and urgent challenge that demands our immediate attention and action. Christians have a unique responsibility to confront this issue head-on and work tirelessly to ensure the continued growth and prosperity of our communities and the preservation of our shared values and traditions. By embracing the concept of “babymaxxing” and focusing on our own households, we can secure the future of our faith and our people and leave a lasting legacy for generations to come.

Not really. Doing so within the context of a properly Catholic community (that is, sedevacantist) has a chance of succeeding because historically Catholicism has risen from the ashes many times, as it will continue to do, because it IS the real Christianity and Jesus promised us He will be with us to the End. Pretending or play-acting that role in a fake “Christian” denomination will only last barely the duration of one human lifetime IF the parties in question happen to have a real personal affinity, that is obviously totally absent from any group of people beyond a couple of families that get on with each other. Catholic communities are not held together by the ephemeral characters of any of its constituents, but by a shared absolute belief in God that transcends petty personal and human failings, of which we are ALL riddled with.

Babymaxxing is not just a personal decision, but a collective responsibility that requires the support and encouragement of the entire Christian community. It may involve making sacrifices and reevaluating our priorities, but the rewards will be worth it.

No group that is not tied together by a bond of religious belief that goes far deeper than mere words and appearances will ever give anything even remotely resembling the kind of helping hand they will inevitably secure for their own family above others. Even among Catholic families this is still an issue, though one that is absolutely muted to a huge extent. I have absolute certainty that if I or any other of the Catholic families we know suddenly won a billion dollars at the lotto, or even just a few million, ALL the Catholic families near them would benefit too. I for one would literally buy houses and land in other people’s names to have them and their children as neighbours, but I am NOT the only one by far. Any one of the people in our Sedevacantist community would act the same, I am certain of it, and this was never the case in any other “community” I was ever a part of, be it people I trained for decades in martial arts with, people I worked as an armed security professional with, and literally risked my life alongside theirs, nor even childhood friends. The bond created by a true religion is of a quality and nature you simply have no experience of until you are in it. And it does not happen as a result of any of the 40,000 Protestant denominations. It might happens between a few families and even then will not last beyond the second generation, but it has been demonstrated to exist and work and remain in Catholic communities even some 100 years after the basic infiltration of the Church was already complete.

All of the chips are on the table with this issue. Those who take it seriously will inherit the future by default as their continued growth and reproduction will ensure the long-term survival and prosperity of their communities, cultures, and values. While the rest of the world struggles with declining birth rates and the threat of extinction-level events, Christians can take comfort in the knowledge that our faith and values will continue to thrive, passed down from generation to generation through the strong bonds of family and community.

No Andrew. The reality is that all groups that are not homogeneously coherent, that is, all the varied Protestant denominations, will gradually be chewed down by the wolves at their edges, and continue to degrade and become diluted generation after generation until they are assimilated by the globular mass that is the entire plan of those who have been putting it in place for literally millennia.

Get married. Babymax. Get to Church. We are going to win.

The advice is sound, but not just any pretend, clown-costumed, “Church” will do. Only the real one will make a difference, as it always has throughout history. And while ULTIMATE victory is assured, no one, not even Jesus knows that day or hour of when that will come, only God the Father. So, the concept of you seeing this victory in YOUR lifetime is iffy at best, so best to not worry about it and get busy building the impregnable, un-infiltratable, ready to throw out anyone not part of it, community that is the only one to have overcome everything from the Roman Empire to the Arian heresy, and who, in time, will also triumph over the present desolation of the real Church, were only Sedevacantists are left to carry the faith.

Andrew Torba
CEO, Gab.com
Christ is King

A Clarification on Nazism

Due to my writing on the Nazi regime of a fictionalised situation, as presented in my overlords of Mars series, culminating in the full trilogy currently available only under the single title Nazi Moon, as well as my continuing observations of the Talmudic religion, Jewish Leaders of the state of Israel and even Jewish behaviour in general, some readers have assumed and ascribed positions to me that I do not hold. In order to be absolutely clear on the matter, allow me then to state my position in very simple (but hopefully not simplified) terms.

1. No human being is precluded salvation other than by choice, as Catholic dogma clearly states. We all have free will and we all are able to know in our heart the order of the Universe because it is written in every grain of sand and every sunset and sunrise. Even lost tribes of indigenous people who have never heard the name of Jesus have a possibility (vanishingly small though it is) of being saved by a merciful God.

2. No human being is guaranteed salvation, not even after conversion. The idea of once saved always saved is an illogical nonsense only a people so historically and logically incapable as Protestants have been trained to be could possibly hold in their poorly functioning minds.

3. In my opinion, in the eyes of God, the soul of any human being has equal importance and He hopes and wishes for every one of us to be saved, but forcing it would invalidate free will, so ultimately, the choice is down to us, and if we seek the truth, by His Grace, He will see to it we find it eventually. Only extremely hard headed idiots like myself need a Road to Damascus event to show us the Way, for most, simple logic and observation is enough to lead to the ultimate truth of Catholicism. I console myself with the fact that even the Apostles were among the ones who had a hard head, Thomas being my favourite Apostle.

4. With regard to Nazism specifically, my position is precisely the one the Church held as per the Papal Encyclical of Pope Pious XI which in part reads:

8. Whoever exalts race, or the people, or the State, or a particular form of State, or the depositories of power, or any other fundamental value of the human community – however necessary and honorable be their function in worldly things – whoever raises these notions above their standard value and divinizes them to an idolatrous level, distorts and perverts an order of the world planned and created by God; he is far from the true faith in God and from the concept of life which that faith upholds. 

9. Beware, Venerable Brethren, of that growing abuse, in speech as in writing, of the name of God as though it were a meaningless label, to be affixed to any creation, more or less arbitrary, of human speculation. Use your influence on the Faithful, that they refuse to yield to this aberration. Our God is the Personal God, supernatural, omnipotent, infinitely perfect, one in the Trinity of Persons, tri-personal in the unity of divine essence, the Creator of all existence. Lord, King and ultimate Consummator of the history of the world, who will not, and cannot, tolerate a rival God by His side. 

10. This God, this Sovereign Master, has issued commandments whose value is independent of time and space, country and race. As God’s sun shines on every human face so His law knows neither privilege nor exception. Rulers and subjects, crowned and uncrowned, rich and poor are equally subject to His word. From the fullness of the Creators’ right there naturally arises the fullness of His right to be obeyed by individuals and communities, whoever they are. This obedience permeates all branches of activity in which moral values claim harmony with the law of God, and pervades all integration of the ever-changing laws of man into the immutable laws of God. 

11. None but superficial minds could stumble into concepts of a national God, of a national religion; or attempt to lock within the frontiers of a single people, within the narrow limits of a single race, God, the Creator of the universe, King and Legislator of all nations before whose immensity they are “as a drop of a bucket” (Isaiah xI, 15). 

12. The Bishops of the Church of Christ, “ordained in the things that appertain to God (Heb. v, 1) must watch that pernicious errors of this sort, and consequent practices more pernicious still, shall not gain a footing among their flock. It is part of their sacred obligations to do whatever is in their power to enforce respect for, and obedience to, the commandments of God, as these are the necessary foundation of all private life and public morality; to see that the rights of His Divine Majesty, His name and His word be not profaned; to put a stop to the blasphemies, which, in words and pictures, are multiplying like the sands of the desert; to encounter the obstinacy and provocations of those who deny, despise and hate God, by the never-failing reparatory prayers of the Faithful, hourly rising like incense to the All-Highest and staying His vengeance. 

13. We thank you, Venerable Brethren, your priests and Faithful, who have persisted in their Christian duty and in the defense of God’s rights in the teeth of an aggressive paganism. Our gratitude, warmer still and admiring, goes out to those who, in fulfillment of their duty, have been deemed worthy of sacrifice and suffering for the love of God. 

14. No faith in God can for long survive pure and unalloyed without the support of faith in Christ. “No one knoweth who the Son is, but the Father: and who the Father is, but the Son and to whom the Son will reveal Him” (Luke x. 22). “Now this is eternal life: That they may know thee, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou has sent” (John xvii. 3). Nobody, therefore, can say: “I believe in God, and that is enough religion for me,” for the Savior’s words brook no evasion: “Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father. He that confesseth the Son hath the Father also” (1John ii. 23). 

15. In Jesus Christ, Son of God made Man, there shone the plentitude of divine revelation. “God, who at sundry times and in divers manners, spoke in times past to the fathers by the prophets last of all, in these days hath spoken to us by His Son” (Heb. i. 1). The sacred books of the Old Testament are exclusively the word of God, and constitute a substantial part of his revelation; they are penetrated by a subdued light, harmonizing with the slow development of revelation, the dawn of the bright day of the redemption. As should be expected in historical and didactic books, they reflect in many particulars the imperfection, the weakness and sinfulness of man. But side by side with innumerable touches of greatness and nobleness, they also record the story of the chosen people, bearers of the Revelation and the Promise, repeatedly straying from God and turning to the world. Eyes not blinded by prejudice or passion will see in this prevarication, as reported by the Biblical history, the luminous splendor of the divine light revealing the saving plan which finally triumphs over every fault and sin. It is precisely in the twilight of this background that one perceives the striking perspective of the divine tutorship of salvation, as it warms, admonishes, strikes, raises and beautifies its elect. Nothing but ignorance and pride could blind one to the treasures hoarded in the Old Testament.

I held this position in essence even before I read the Papal Encyclical for the first time today, although, while familiar with many other aspects of Nazism, my disinterest in Catholicism prior to my conversion was such that I did not care about the relations the Church had with Nazism.

Keep in mind that encyclical was written in 1937. But even before I was Catholic, I have always had a very strong preference for Justice and Truth above all else, so my position was never really far from the actual Catholic Church, which today is to be found only in Sedevacantism, and of which not a shred remains in the Vatican or the impostors of the Novus Orco satanic sect.

I hope this clarifies the situation.

The Nazi reaction to the usual financial skulldrugery, sexual degeneracy and perversion, destruction of basic principles of Christian truth and justice the Jews invariably indulge in was certainly understandable and to some extent even justified, but to assume that Adolf Hitler was some kind of saint, or the Nazis a pure and righteous people without sin is as absurd as thinking every Jew under the sun is an evil monster deserving of death.

Broadly speaking, generalities, like clichés, are based in factual truth and if I say that generally speaking the Jews are an underhanded, sneaky people with principles of philosophy that diverge immensely from Catholic concepts of honour, truth, justice and reality, it is an undeniable fact.

Just as true is the fact that, generally speaking, the Germans of the WWII era were a people so desperate for leadership, and an ingrained sense of following orders and hierarchical authority that they would blindly march into behaviours more commensurate with sociopaths than normal human beings.

Is every Jew a monster? Was every Nazi one?

No. I am certain that in each camp some outstanding examples of human courage and honesty existed. Who, precisely, they might have been, only God knows for sure.

But are Jews today a dominant force for almost all that is wrong in the current dystopian global landscape? Absolutely, yes. Though I need to specify that the string pulling is done by an exceedingly small faction within the Jewish realm, and those within that subset have no problem at all subjecting even other Jews to the same (if not worse) genocidal pressures they envision for the rest of us; as prescribed by their Satanic religion after all, since a sacrifice of their own people, a literal Holocaust, is required before the emergence of their “Messiah”, that is, the Antichrist of our Catholic religion.

In case you were not aware

A friend sent me a link to an interesting blog that has some rather rare finds concerning freemasonry and their origins.

While Freemasonry as we find it today (i.e. Satanism) was founded by the rampantly homosexual British King James, the same who had the KJV “Bible” put together, also (and more accurately) known as the Freemasonic Bible, since it has 33,000 errors of translation and worked to minimise the actual Christian dogmas as well as the presence of Mary in it, the roots of Freemasonry which are also the same as those of the Illuminati, Carbonari and so on, are rather interesting.

Enjoy these two posts in particular, you can read each image better by clicking on it.

First name of the Masons

The “Scottish” Rite

And he has an even more interesting post on some of the origins of Vatican II. I covered the infiltration of the Church in order to have Vatican II happen in some detail in my own book, RTCC, but this specific piece is one I had not come across before.

The fake conversion of the V2 intruders

It’s quite astonishing with what fervour and tenacity the Christ killers have gone after Catholicism specifically since the very start, which should be no surprise given that they are the spiritual descendants of the very same Christ killers who saw to it Christ would be crucified.

This page was disappeared as apparently so was the old blog, but the wayback machine still has a copy.

On Malachi Martin.

Gab refuses to censor

Whatever the faults of Andrew Torba, and I have blogged before on at least some of them, if it is true that Gab was the only platform to refuse to censor the publication of a video of the attack on the Assyrian Christ The Good Shepherd Church in western Sydney, then, more power to him.

The Australian government has apparently threatened to sue Gab for $500,000 to get them to stop having the video on their platform, but Torba has told them to pound sand.

I have been an advocate for the non-censorship of what happens in war zones too for a long time.

When the Internet was still young and Yougoslavia became a war zone with incidents of “ethnic cleansing” or to call it what it is, genocide, including organised gang rapes and so on, the footage was censored by mainstream media.

If people had any idea what war and is like and what happens in it, and what some soldiers will do when they feel they can get away with it, every time some jumped up coke-head degenerate pretending to be a leader decides to start a war pops up, the mass of fathers of those who should become soldiers would grab the little clown, dress him in a bullseye outfit and prod him with long sticks to go and fight on the front line.

It should be an absolute law that any politician advocating for war, from president down to janitor, should absolutely be first in line at the front.

How many wars do you think would be fought then?

Oh but wait, isn’t this exactly what should happen in a democracy?

Oh, you thought you lived in an actual democracy? Tell me, how long have you been suffering from this delusion? And is this “democracy” present in any aspect of your life right now?

You trust the government on ANYTHING? Really?

Are you aware of things like this? Oh don’t worry, this is not war footage, this is just how how ticks have been engineered to cause diseases that never existed from ticks before. You can see a short video at the link below.

Bioengineered ticks

You don’t need to like a person at an individual level in order to appreciate any good they do in the world. I intensely dislike people who I perceive as hypocrites or dishonest beyond some minimal tolerance barrier I have, and Torba has exhibited various behaviours that I find less than ideal, nevertheless, the usefulness of his commitment to trying to keep his platform as open as possible is commendable.

Even if he does turn out to be some government shill to get all our names on a list, it may still work out ok, because, firstly, our names already are on all the lists and if you read this blog, that undoubtedly means you too, and secondly, because fuck them anyway. The only reason they keep pushing at your life and trying to squeeze you into an ever shrinking cage of taxation, lies, deadly “medicine” and sexual degeneracy is because everyone is too afraid to say “Fuck you, I am not doing that.”

So, get some spine and start being open and clear about your opinions that you are absolutely entitled to have. No law on Earth is going to get me to “like” Israel or the genociding and mass murder of innocents and children. And if I want to dislike the Jews in general because as a religion they accept child rape, as their Talmud makes clear, again, you aren’t going to legislate your way into my opinions. So don’t let them do it to you either.

You’re free to hate whoever you like and no one can tell you otherwise. And if you happen to hate tall, bald, Venetians, so be it, I don’t care, go right ahead, after all, there is no accounting for taste.

Personally my hate is reserved first and foremost for those who think they have a right to tell me how to live or what to think. And who feel entitled to pass whatever “law” they deem necessary to impose their despotic and megalomaniac will on my life. You should all just have left us alone to go about our lives peacefully and thinking and expressing whatever we thought freely and openly. Instead you insist on trying to rule the world. Well, there are more people that feel as I do than not, and it’s time they all woke up and started being direct about who they are.

Race, Religion and Nation

Adam wrote an excellent piece on this here, and I urge you all to read it.

Adam is a proper Catholic (Sedevacantist) and has got this point about race and religion right.

Nevertheless, I, as a Venetian, have some more nuanced view (or extremist, take your pick).

My country, my nation, has been usurped and annexed first by the French under that megalomaniac Napoleon, and essentially dissolved by the French on 12 May 1797,

He then gave it to the Austrians, who then gave it to the Italians in 1805 (under Napoleon still) but then took it back by force in 1814 with help of the English. Between then and 1866 it went back to independence, then back to Austria, then back to France, then finally to the Italian Kingdom in 1866. Despite this, there has been an undercurrent of Venetian wish for return to independence that has never ended, and that will never end.

On April 25th 2016 I was in St. Mark’s Square during the traditional feast for the patron Saint of Venice. The mayor started out strong claiming Venetian nationality but then went full diversity and the crowd pretty much turned their backs on him with not a few shouts of “bastard” and “traitor”.

It was more than the Catholic religion that held those people together and that calls to me too. Despite my having never felt any loyalty to Italy as a country in general, I feel one towards Venice.

I grew up all over the world and when I lived in Cape Town for over a decade, I loved that city, and the sea, and when I would come back to it after a trip, driving in, seeing the Ocean below I always wondered “Is this my place?“ I liked it and I had chosen it, but it never felt truly mine, even though I liked it more than any place I had been before. It was much later, in 2004 or so when I worked in Aviano’s US base that on one of my forthrightly trips to London, when the plane took a turn over it and I saw the waterways and laguna not close to the city really, that instinctively, powerfully, seeing that desolate and water-logged land from the porthole-like window of the plane, I felt a pull in my chest and the words came into my mind unbidden:

That is my land.

I was shocked by it. I had been a nomad all my life and spent more time in various countries in Africa than I ever had in Europe. I had refused and avoided military service in Italy thanks to having lived overseas since a young age, but on principle I hated the idea of being enrolled in a military if not by my own choice.

I knew my grandfather was Venetian and I went there on holiday with him and my grandmother as a little boy of 2 and 3 years old, where they (both champion swimmers) taught me to swim.

I loved the sea, unlike my brother who was scared of it as a little boy.

But I barely had ever taught of Venice or being Venetian. But from that day, that visceral, instinctive pull made me aware of it.

Then in 2016 I lived in Venice for a year and there it become clear. This was, my city. And the Venetians, ornery critters that they are, are recognisably my people, both in the things I detest about them as well as those I like.

There is more to it than mere religion, though I agree it is the main glue that binds a people.

And there is more to it than race, for it has never prevented me from loving a person I cared about, although differences are undeniable, even if we happen to share a religion.

But there is a deeper sense yet, and it might be in the blood, genetics, or maybe there is even a link to the soil, because I can no more explain why a place I was not born or lived in for my entire life other than one year in 2016 should have ever had such a pull on me, in 2004, and when seen from the air that. And not the city or the glory of it, but the swamps and waterways unpopulated by anyone other than birds and fish.

So, yes, while religion binds us above all, so does race and even nation.

Venetians have always been a mixed breed of bastards, because we travelled and explored and traded with the whole world, and we partook of pretty women wherever we went and the Venetian girls were known throughout Europe for being if not easy to keep, certainly adventurous.

We are not phased by difference from us. I certainly have never been. But that is not to say we don’t recognise it.

We are a nation of explorers, and explorers try and do and see. And they learn to appreciate it all; even as we remain ourselves.

My children have a Venetian father and an English mother, and already, I can see, like me, (and their mother too) they are curious and explorers at heart, and like us, they too, are people of the sea.

And I will teach them their ancient history. And see they ignore the lies of the demons trying to conquer us all and make us all the same.

Brigante se more

Song at the end of the third episode of Brigands.

The title translation is not great the real translation would be “A brigand you die” as in, a man you may be born, but a brigand is a choice and for life.

Several other places are not exactly right either.

It’s our rifles we want to sing with.

Of this Bourbon king we don’t give a fuck

The wolf that eats creatures (can also be children)

A man you’re born, a brigand you die

Brigands – A Review

Just started watching Brigands and it’s actually an Italian production, which I didn’t know, based in Sicily and shows Garibaldi in the opening scene being the scumbag he was. The acting is all in Italian with heavy Sicilian accent and some dialect. There is a little mistranslation in the first episode as the Piedmontese are referred to simply as “soldiers”, which is corrected later but makes a non Italian miss the point that each region of Italy, before the forced and unwanted “unification” was really a nation in its own right.

In the second episode, towards the end is a popular song. The words are very cool. I reproduce them in Italian as that is how they rhyme. They rhyme in the Sicilian dialect too but google translate is not going to help you with that. You can use google translate for the rough meaning from the Italian spellings.

Com’è bella la luna

E questa vita quando è in fiore

Col brigante e il contadino

Lotta contro l’oppressore

Che del mondo e del cielo

Pensa di essere il padrone

La terra ci ha donato il Padre Nostro (play on words here as Padre Nostro means Our Father)

Proteggi la famiglia

Brindiamo a lu guaglione (guaglione = boy but also street urchin in Napolitan slang)

A morte gli invasori

Prendiamo i loro denari

Finche siamo insieme

Non abbiamo paura

Delle cose che ci possono accadere

Accadere

Seguiamo il lupo che ci guiderà

Non è per l’oro ma per la libertà

Per ogni uomo o donna che verrà

Dalla terra un brigante nascerà

Seguiamo il lupo che ci guiderà

Non è per l’oro ma per la libertà

Per ogni uomo o donna che cadrà

Dalla terra un brigante nascerà

It really has everything. The reality of the oppressors who think they own the land and the sky, and the fact that the so-called brigands, like the farmers, are just people that want to be free of them. And that for every man or woman that will be born, or killed, a new brigand will rise from the Earth.

I have never been one for singing around a fire, but I can listen to it when it is not done by drunks at least. I’m no singer, and no musician, I only know at most two songs off by heart, (linked below) but that is because mostly I am apart from most human beings. Some men are like that partly by nature, partly by what life makes them, I think it is what happens to a natural man that does not lose his nature and survives the slings and arrows of so-called modern life, with all its barbaries. Which is why I always got along with farmers, though I am not one, not by nature, temperament or talent. And why I also got along with brigands, at least those honest ones that have a code of sorts, even though I am not a brigand either, not by nature or temperament, the skill I have if I wanted to use it that way, but I do not. And both farmers and brigands, though recognising I am neither, also get along with me.

All natural people who have not lost their true nature are similar in some way. I am not Sicilian and though most think Sicilians are not reliable people, I always got on with them and found them reliable and honest. Then again, most people think Venetians are arrogant, underhanded schemers, while I see them as not falsely modest, proud, and hard to fool or take advantage of. So maybe Venetians and Sicilians have more in common than most other regions despite the distance and superficial differences in culture.

Anyway, I hope you translate the song. It’s a good hymn for present times, whoever you are.

Russia speaks directly

The Russians have seen the sabre rattling of the French Chihuahua, Macaroon, the brain damaged Polaks, and other assorted neurotic European poodles, all pushed by the increasingly neurotic Jewish masters at the helm behind the obese, fake-food filled, brain-stunned by drugs, Americans.

And since the Russian softly, softly diplomacy followed by surgical military precision designed to remove the roots of the cancer at their doorstep, rather than just the cancer itself, has not been heard by the Satanic pedophiles, bankers, and deluded idiots behind the deep state of the USA, the Russians are now making sure that this time they speak plainly.

For anyone to think the Russians are bluffing on this score, they literally would have to be abysmally ignorant of Russian culture/philosophy/strategy (checked that box! The gay freaks in charge are all of the above, and arrogantly assuming the things that worked in 1915-1917 will still work today), and also completely retarded (also checked this one! Maybe it’s the generational inbreeding).

Here is another, and the guy talking is not just a tv presenter or some random Russian guy. He is the press secretary for Vladimir Putin.

In other words, Russians don’t do American chest beating displays a la Trump. As it used to be the same in Italy when I was small, and watched karate competitions where my dad taught and trained, a brash display of ego, for Russians of a certain age, mine or higher certainly, is thought to demonstrate weakness. Unmanliness.

The Americanisation of the planet means that young people today have probably never seen a martial arts bout where the fighters fight, bleed, win and lose, and maintain a stoic bearing, no shouting, no smiling, nothing on their face but focus, and the crowd too, silent. Watching two men size each other up and fight fairly even if hard and brutally.

Russian culture still has this idea in its own way. As do all men worthy of the title in any meaningful way. They are not bluffing. They just realised that Americans and even more so, the people who run and own America, simply do not understand this concept. To them, words are the “thing”. And they need to be punched in the face every time they open their stupid mouth; and it takes several times before they learn that it will happen every time they do it, and so learn to shut it. Even then, they will never stop scheming and plotting. They really are like an entirely different species of creature, and the very concepts of honour, justice, love, and so on that are the very bedrock of European origins and Christian perspective, are thought of simply as weaknesses to exploit by these creatures. There can really never be a coexistence of such entirely different beings.

Separation or annihilation are the only possible outcomes, and sooner or later one of those two answers is what ultimately takes place between such diametrically opposed philosophies.

You can see this playing out in real time as Israel tries to exterminate the Palestinians by bombing and killing hundreds of thousands of Palestinian civilian men, women, children and babies, starving them, destroying their hospitals and killing them in mass graves while they are helped by the American forces to have news blackouts. The very concept of mercy, or empathy for innocent children does not exist, Netanyahu has labelled them Amalek, and as such deemed worthy of extermination down to their pets. Nor is there going to be any guilty consciences among the Jewish soldiers, because in Jewish thought, and their religion, anyone not Jewish is only a beast of burden put on Earth to serve them. That is literally the belief their own Rabbis have expressed many times over the millennia and expressed it really clearly in multiple ways in their Talmud. Can you coexist with “people” that see you only as a beast of burden? Who believe your life has no value at all when compared to theirs? No more than you might feel for a flea or a mosquito? In fact I would put it to you that if you are a normal human being, I have no doubt that the logic of the idea that even the flea or the mosquito or the bed-bug, or some other irritating parassite, has some right to exist probably at least touched your mind. Not so with people who murder children in cold blood and rape and murder innocents for fun and because they do not consider them human. And so I ask you: should such “people” that think and act that way be given the privilege of being treated as humans themselves? Not to my mind.

Any adult that sees me and my children and my people or any people, as simply some disposable thing to be used or killed or whatever at their whim, gets the same exact consideration from me that I would give to a rabid dog.

Just as you cannot have good and evil coexist, it is impossible to coexist with such beings.

Any attempt to entice you into doing so is simply how evil operates. It’s only the seller of sewage that will ever suggest you add it into your ice cream, never the ice cream seller that says you should blend the two.

Russia is sending out a clear message.

Those who have eyes to see will be starting to understand a lot more besides. Pay attention and chose a side, because there are only two sides and there is no middle, only war zones. And while it is entirely true that your choice is Jesus Christ or Lucifer, the details matter. At least they do if you don’t want to be just a private in the midst of the bloodbath with no perspective, no say, no choice in what part of the meatgrinder you end up in.

If you pay attention, even as a lowly private your chances improve greatly. So I hope you’re paying attention, whoever you are, and whatever your rank. Take note of how the enemy fights and who they are. And conduct yourself accordingly.

And now on the R&R…

This is a detailed commentary on the Catholic Church. If you are a regular reader here you should know all this, but as readership here has gone up considerably lately, here is a cliff’s notes. For a better cliff’s notes read Believe! Or for really in depth stuff read RTCC.

If you already know the below, skip to the next section below.

1. What the Catholic Church actually is and is not.

The Catholic Church is the Church created on Earth by Jesus Christ. Its members put together the Bible and had a hierarchy with Popes, Bishops and Priests from the start. The Church went on unchanged in its divine principles and with rules for these as well as for the governing of the human aspects of law, that were all eventually codified in one document called the Code of Canon Law of 1917. This collated all the rules in one place from literally thousands of documents spread over 2000 years. This document, along with whatever Papal encyclicals or ex Cathedra rulings of valid Popes were issued from 1917 until 9th October 1958 constitute the official rules of the Church under Roman Law. Which differs very much from Common or Anglo-Saxon law and even more so from American “law” which is really a joke.

After 1958, fake Catholics (Freemasons, Communists, homosexuals, pedophiles, and Satanists of every kind (carbonari, illuminati, etc etc)) had so infiltrated the Church that Angelo Roncalli, a confirmed freemason and thus a non-Catholic satanist (Catholics can’t be Freemasons) was falsely and illegally elected “Pope”. Effectively being an antipope. This is not new. The Church had over 40 antipopes before 1958. However, we have had nothing but antipopes since 1958. So what most people think is the Catholic Church is instead a hive of pedophiles and Satanists of various persuasions. There is not a single Catholic in the Vatican today.

The only Catholics left are those that still follow the same Catholicism that always was and that is embodied in the CoCL of 1917. Because as a result of Roncalli and his next Satanist in line, Montini, the heretic and abominable Vatican 2 documents were produced which literally tried to invert Catholicism from the ground up and has largely succeeded in the minds of most people who are not Catholic as well as a majority of supposedly “Catholic” people who, ignorant (by design) of their own religion, assume that Bergoglio or any of the antipopes before him were valid. None are. These impostors are all Novus Ordo (New Order) fake Catholics that have inverted the whole of Catholicism including the Holy Mass. I call them Novus Orco as they are simply the latest breed of Orc.

And the reasons for this are very simple and clear and laid out in the CoCL of 1917, which specifies anything these impostors do is fake and irrelevant to actual Catholicism and a lie.

So… the only Catholics left are now known as Sedevacantists (from when the seat of the Pope is empty because between Popes usually when one dies). The rules of Catholicism are such that certain things are done differently when between Popes, a condition known as interregnum (from latin, between realms).

We have now been without Pope, that is, in an extended interregnum since 1958. Contrary to the intentionally maleducated masses, the Catholic Church does not end without a Pope, it simply waits for a real one, and cases of over 70 years of confusion have happened before. Nevertheless, a Catholic believes that no matter how bad things get, the true Church will always remain visible until the return of Jesus (by which time the End Times will be upon us and only a tiny fragment of believers will remain, as told in Revelation).

And while Sedevacantist Catholics are a tiny percentage when compared to the fooled millions who think they are Catholics, but are just fooled ignorants, our Church is certainly far more visible today than it was, say, under Emperor Nero. And we are growing in numbers every day. That said, the attacks against us are many and multiform, which is to be expected, since we are the last Christians left on Earth.

The most pernicious nonsense is not the lies that comes from Bergoglio and his Imps, or the brainwashed Protestants screeching at us try at “I am too a Christian!!” As they tear up, or even the schismatic and insular “Orthodox” of the East, (or their almost extinct friends the Copts) who, at least, are both worlds closer to the truth than any Protestant can ever be. No, the worst attacks come from closer to home, the Recognise and Resist crowd.

These are supposed Catholics that advise, against all reason, logic, and Catholic dogma, that you should both recognise Bergoglio as a Pope yet resist his rules as he is behaving badly. This is nonsense. If a Pope is actually a Pope then his rulings are valid and as a Catholic you should obey them. If he is not a Pope then his rulings are lies and nonsense and should be totally discarded along with him and anyone that agrees with him.

There is no grey area here.

The society of SSPX is one such R&R organisation.

2. Why anything other than Sedevacantism is NOT Catholicism.

In one image:

The Protestant pushed idiotic idea that if you put a man in a situation where sex with women is forbidden he will turn into a pedophile, is about as cogent as saying that if you put a lion in a crocodile enclosure he will somehow become a reptile. No. Straight men that choose the priesthood do not become pedophiles because they give up sex. Pedophiles join the Satanic Novus Ordo cult to get access to children.

The SSPX is ultimately merely an extension of the Novus Orco Satanic tribe. While many good people came out of it and in due course became priests or bishops or lay people of proper Catholic persuasion, ultimately only Sedevacantism is Catholicism. And while much, much, closer to sedevacantism, the traditionalist sedeprivationists, who still cling to a very charitable thesis printed in Cassiciacum back in the 1970s are clearly clutching at straws.

This theory says that the fake Popes might have been elected validly (they were not and we now know conclusively none were validly elected) and this might “materially” be Popes but not formally or spiritually. Which for practical purposes was at the time a very charitable attempt to appeal to the conscience of the fake clergy and those who went along with it to repent and start acting like proper Catholics and reject the heresies of Vatican 2. But with the benefit of time, it is clear that those who side in any way with the Novus Orco are either orcs themselves, or soon will be, and as such we should have nothing to do with them.

Lastly, a quick reminder that as a priest, as with any type of leadership position, the penalties for fraud, misconduct and taking advantage of people you preside over, should be much harsher than for a normal person.

Which is why in proper Catholic times, if a priest ever did molest a child, he was taken to the nearest bog by the town’s men and drowned in it. Usually with the child that was offended as witness, so that they knew that no man there thought less of him for what had been done to him, and all loved him enough to risk jail for… well, we can’t call it murder, lynching without a license? Executing justice outside of official channels? Something like that anyway. And in many cases if the local police chief or sheriff did come to question anyone, the same group of me would all stand, possibly armed, shoulder to shoulder, and the law officer would invariably decide no crime had been committed.

If you are a father of children, ponder these things and ask yourself what world would you prefer to live in? Sedevacantists already know, as actual Catholics have known throughout the ages.

You may not be or care to become a Catholic, but you can hardly argue against the culture we built for the rest of the world, or the one we still have and are busy rebuilding for future generations, who will remember us and our names, as even Protestants may recall the names of Crusaders from a thousand years ago that they somehow conveniently forget were all, to a man, Catholics like us, and not Protestants of any kind.

The message is always the same. There is only ONE Church. The same one since He built it and told us to keep His rules. And you are either in it, or you are outside of it. Accept no substitutes, imitations, or plagiarisms.

All content of this web-site is copyrighted by G. Filotto 2009 to present day.
Website maintained by IT monks