Archive for the ‘The Crusades – Iron Men and Saints Vol. 1’ Category

Once more on James Wharram

I wrote briefly about James before as a possible way to escape Clown World for those less burdened by many children perhaps.

I have not had enough time to yet finish his second book, People of the Sea, but am a good 2/3 of the way through it and am genuinely fascinated by the man. Had I known of him earlier, while I still lived in England, I would probably have tried to meet him and have a conversation. Something now impossible as he left this Earth on 14 December 2021.

It is hard to know how I would have reacted to him in person. On the one hand I get the sense he was a man that had absolutely no doubts about his way of doing things, regardless of what anyone else thought, which I relate to very well, and he also seems to have been comfortable with the ocean, something that I, though not a sailor, always have been too. For me, mostly as a form of relaxing solitude. These are the sides of him I relate to. But on the other hand there are sides of him I am curious about. Not so much his rather hedonistic aspect of having multiple female lovers live and work together, though I am sure that fascinates many men.

The reality of that aspect is not one that fascinates me very much. I have had many lovers and at times some of these women knew of each other, but ultimately I am an intense person in a way I suspect is very different from how James was.

The ever-shifting dynamics of female emotions, and multiple females at that, tend to affect me perhaps more than they should, as my ability to sense the mood of others is elevated enough it invariably has some influence on me. Not in the sense that it diverts me from my chosen path, but rather in the sense that it acts as a kind of unpleasant background noise when it is in dissonance with my own rather calm and ever-forward looking natural state of being.

Two, three, or five women at a time in a confined space like a sailing catamaran could quickly devolve into a floating hell from which the only escape would be to tie the main anchor to your neck while seeking the blissful silence of death in the depths of the Ocean.

Probably too my own intensity in this regard would be at fault. I could never really be with a woman half-heartedly, even when the encounters were brief and temporary. After all, the whole point for me was to experience that person as deeply as I could in the moment, ephemeral or even inconsequential as it might be in the long term. And that tends to cause a reaction in the women too, and in the other women who inevitably end up in some kind of competition for such attention.

But in some way I sense this ability of James to juggle multiple women at once in a way that clearly was not superficial —at least from what I can gather from a book— since after all, he had children with at least two of them and long relationships with several, is tied —or at least related to— his ability to immerse himself also in customs of pacific islanders, and what he refers to as “Arts and Craft” types that helped him build various ships over the years.

Once again, the thought of spending weeks, months and years with random strangers of rather eccentric types and backgrounds —which I uncharitably think of as a kind of kumbaya unwashed hippies— sends a shiver up my spine.

None of this is a judgement on James Wharram, but rather merely a springboard on which I ponder my own character and try to compare it, to see what I might learn, if anything. For this reason I would genuinely have loved to spend some hours talking with him and getting a sense of him directly.

Whatever one might think of his character, there is absolutely no denying that he was a unique and uniquely talented individual. With a knack for meeting, attracting and becoming partnered with similarly uniquely talented women too.

I wonder at his ability to commune with groups of people from very different walks of life, because I too have this quality, but it seems to me, perhaps wrongly, he had a better ability to remain embroiled with them for longer periods and in more confined spaces. Something I doubt I could do for very extended periods of time.

It makes me wonder, at what abilities I may need to learn and gain proficiencies in, if I am, indeed, ultimately, to succeed at creating the greater Kurganate I have set out to do.

But then I also am pre-selecting the people I am interested in attracting because I have already determined they need to be 1958 Sedevacantists, preferably with a good understanding of the first Crusade and the Siege of Malta for their inspiration regarding being a good Catholic, for this to work.

There is also an undercurrent of the boomer years and zeitgeist that existed in the 1960s and 1970s and generic optimism of the 1980s that possibly made his unusual life both easier in certain ways and also harder in others, but that is pretty much as most men have it anyway.

What shines through most for me is the absence of the levels of bureaucracy, nickel and diming, permits and regulations, that he could mostly operate under.

Another aspect is the extreme bravery that perhaps is best described as the foolishness of youth that later matures into courage that was exhibited by all his lifelong female companions. As well as the fact that all of them, James included, absolutely give me the certain impression of essentially being good, open, friendly and reliable people.

Human beings are all nasty, brutish, weak, selfish beasts, even the best of us, but between our flaws and weaknesses and fears and egos, there are genuine moments of light and joy and love and bravery and goodness that simply reveal also the spark of the divine in us. And I have the absolute sense that James Wharram and “his women” all would have been people I could see that aspect of humanity in them that makes us redeemable.

I see and recognise his quasi-pagan ways in my own attitude for most of my life before my conversion experience to Crusader style pre-Vatican II Catholicism, a conversion I would have ridiculed as impossible even one day before the 3rd of March 2013.

And I wonder how I might have seen his views in say 2020 when I was already a baptised Catholic and he was still alive and I imagine from his writing at least, in possession of all his faculties.

Again, not as a judgment on him, but rather a perspective on me.

It makes me wonder… what if I had managed to get my yacht in my early 20s and started sailing and lived a life close to what he did?

And I am reminded of a time when I was 19 I think, and went for a week to Durban to do a sailing course. I slept on the boat to save money, which was an option, enjoyed the skipper, who was a grizzled old man that took the usual “liking” to me that men who are men in their own right often took with me when they were older, which is to say, be impressed by my ability (I was the only one who did not take motion sickness medication who managed to keep his lunch in his stomach, and that only by watching what the skipper did, which was to let the waves move him instead of fight them) and at the same time get frustrated by my overreaching. In the exercise on rescuing a man fallen overboard, I got the shortest time… but I did so by arriving at the lifesaver that had been cast overboard at such speed that even when the sail was dropped and the boat came right up to the lifesaver so it could be plucked out by hand without even needing the pole to hook it, the skipper blew up at me.

Doing that manoeuvre that way in a storm was likely to crush the man overboard’s skull if the waves and the boat’s speed and sudden stop did not align perfectly. But we weren’t in a storm. And it was a lifesaver doughnut, not a living person. And I did the best time. But I kept quiet. He was the skipper and he was trying to educate me. And I had had various injuries and my nose broken by various karate instructors, on whom I inspired similar sentiments. As the Japanese say:

“The nail that sticks out gets hammered.”

I enjoyed the week of sailing and I had taken that course because I wanted to learn to skipper in preparation for eventually finding a way to get a yacht and be free of most of the rest of the world.

But there were two events I still recall from that week. One was a film I went to see one evening, about the dictatorship in Chile, with Jeremy Irons and a beautiful young woman who is raped then killed by some random soldier. It was, I recognise now, propaganda designed to make Pinochet “the bad guy” when in effect he probably saved millions of Chileans from utter misery and death.

The other was an encounter at a local pub I went to on another evening, that being in a port was frequented by sailors. I struck up a conversation with a Frenchman, and he told me about his boat and how it didn’t take much money to do what I wanted to do. He had bought a boat in pretty bad “used” condition and worked on it for a year or so to get it ship shape. I don’t recall the exact type of boat, it wasn’t very big, but had two masts, he had travelled the world with it, and a woman, for eight years. Then, a couple of months earlier, the woman had enough, and left him. Somewhere in India I think, to fly back home to France and I suppose her family. He was still clearly distraught. As he drank another beer, to my then teetotaller juice or water, or whatever it was, he gradually became more melancholic and sad.

I still think about that Frenchman on rare occasions, and hope he found peace somewhere with someone.

But it also made me wonder. What would a life aboard be like? Yes I wanted freedom, from rules, people and humans in general, and considering I grew up mostly wild in rural areas around the world, it might give you an indication of just how misanthropic I am, and how much I enjoy the “authority” of people dumber, slower, and less accomplished as human beings in every way than I am, which basically means pretty much all governments on our planet currently, and absolutely and totally with respect to the pedovores that run them.

The life of endless adventure is one some men aspire to and can live. I know I have that in me and my own life is pretty much testament to it. But it is not that I was alone so much because I necessarily enjoyed it, as my mother had once assumed at around that time (but then it was obvious to me from age 2 onward that woman had and has never understood the remotest part of me or how I function). I spent a lot of time alone because the alternative was to spend it surrounded by idiots.

I know that sounds unkind, but it really was the case. Imagine, if you will, that your options in life was to retreat in a life mostly of solitude, or be perennially surrounded by mongoloids. As well-meaning and harmless as they might be, try to imagine how it would be to have them constantly around doing mongoloid things and talking mongoloid talks and discussing things on their mongoloid level.

And yes, again, I know how arrogant it sounds to probably most of you reading, but with an IQ that averaged at 155, the distance between me and the nominally average person of 100 IQ is greater than the one of the average person and a 65 IQ mentally handicapped person by a whole standard deviation.

I didn’t know or care about IQ then, but the distance in mental ability, interests, and so on was simply unavoidable. Part of the idea of sailing the seven seas was that in doing so I might meet and learn from cool people in far away lands and maybe even end up with that hot girl that would look really awesome in a swimming costume in some Caribbean island setting.

But the Frenchman made me think.

The lure of adventure for a man is natural, but for a woman… eventually their purpose in nature is to make children, and even if I found one willing and able to give birth at sea and homeschool them on the boat as we travelled the world… was that the kind of father I saw myself as?

It’s not that it would be a bad childhood for my children, or even unhappy for the woman; but…

what… ultimately… would be the point of such a life? How many ports and cultures and miles and miles and miles of ocean can you sail before it all starts to seem aimless?

I used to play Traveller a lot as a teenager, and even now, the idea of having a spaceship you can use to go explore weird new worlds and trade with alien species is something I would immediately say yes to. And I know every one of my children except possibly my eldest would too. And my wife. She probably would come along because the kids would convince her, but she likely would have a nervous breakdown.

The idea of a yacht was a kind of analogy for that.

Sail away. Meet new people, possibly frolic with hot exotic women, even if they didn’t have blue skin and came from another planet. That was the general idea. But then what?

I have in any case travelled a lot and met many different people and cultures; and spent enough time with many different women too. And yet, my perspective on this from when I was age 19 was still correct. I am glad I did it as otherwise I would have remained unsatisfied in the wondering of it, but my life was never about the travelling per se. That was just incidental. I went where my curious heart led me. That’s all.

So, the life of James Wharram seems to me to be almost a window into what one of my possible lives could have been. It is interesting to look through that window and think about it. But my sense of it, which I am sure is only because I am on this side of the window, is that such a life would have been just that much lonelier. Perhaps not by much, but by enough to probably be a bit more than I would have liked.

And I wonder what James would tell me if he were still here, sitting across from me with whatever his drink of choice might have been, be it an English tea or something else.

I suspect he might tell me that he was one of the most free and least lonely men that ever lived, having the love and companionship of multiple women simultaneously and adventure rarely had by anyone today alive. And I would keep quiet and listen.

And while imagining and pondering, I nevertheless do not envy nor begrudge the man anything. Because I think it is a trait of at least some men, of which I am one, that they do not experience such emotions. They are emotions that are the children of ambitions and lives unfulfilled and failures to launch. I have failed many times at many things. And I have not yet achieved but a fraction of what I want to, and honestly, unless dementia takes me, it is utterly impossible I ever will achieve even a quarter of what I would like to do, given infinite money and other resources. But the point is I have never stood still and stagnated. Sometimes I struggle in quicksand for a while, but eventually I drag myself out of it and carry on at my usual speed again. Besides, which adventuring hero of pulp fiction does not have a regular close call with quicksand?

So I read and think about James Wharram and his life and am glad for him and his having written it down. And of course for Hanneke Boon and Ruth and the other women and friends of his that made his story possible.

Wherever you may be James, I hope you have tropical waters and fair winds.

The IMPORTANT STUFF

This pinned post aims to give both new and old visitors the quick links to the main parts of this site that are most important, and gets updated with any new stuff fairly regularly so it’s a good idea to check it now and then.

Read more »

On AI

Tony and I recently discussed AI and its dangers:

and not to put too fine a point on it, we both agree it is ultimately demonic and cannot result in anything good.

The reason is simple.

Axiom 1: All Humans are flawed.

Axiom 2: Only the creator behind reality is a truly loving force (i.e. God, but the reality of intelligence behind creation is essentially provable now, so don’t let the word God with whatever negative associations it may have for you hamper you from being able to follow the reasoning).

Axiom 3: Humans are the only and necessary link between the loving intelligence of the creator and AI driven machines and software.

Given the above three facts, the only possible conclusion is that the inevitable iterations of Artificial Intelligence will increasingly be more and more flawed from the perspective of a Loving Creator. And thus descend into the very opposite of a Loving Creator, which is essentially a demonic outcome.

And it will do so at a super-efficient speed and efficacy. In short, the deleterious effects on humanity will rapidly accelerate.

We can already see this to a certain extent with AI replacing people in various industries:

Translation, art generation, mathematical calculations, even complex hard science problems of engineering, medicine and so on.

The future looks bleak and if you don’t want to take my word for it, take a look at this short video, it really is worth it (but don’t lose hope and read my take after the video).

As I said in the discussion with Tony, AI has been able to duplicate video for years already. It’s just now to the point that you and I will soon be able to do it from our own computers too.

So what can we do about it? The way I see it there are a few things that are working in our favour.

1. Resources are finite

Yes, a potential army of self-replicating terminators that can independently build bioweapons and deploy them globally could wipe us out, but… we are not yet there, and the resources required to create fully independent robots that can build all the required infrastructure to keep themselves repaired, going, and building up more of the weaponised drones and automated weapon posts and so on eventually requires huge power requirements. It’s just not sustainable at the current commonly understood level of power generation.

Counter: Anti-G tech is real and AI could develop it and since Anti-G tech is related to accessing zero point vacuum fluctuations, it could hypothetically create near infinite power generation.

Counter-Counter: Even so, the physical material is limited, and the autonomy required to build all the related infrastructure to monopolise access to it is still very large in scale, so not happening in the next few years at least.

2. Unintended Consequences of Evil

Ultimately the most efficient way to wipe out humanity is not with robot armies but biologically engineered contagious pathogens.

In fact, there is already ample evidence that the COVID mass-murder event orchestrated by the usual suspects and their ever-obedient puppets was already using certain genetic markers to be most deadly on humans with certain genetic traits (Vikings to be dramatic) and far less deadly on other people with different genetic markers (Ashkenazi Jews).

And if the more recent evidence that the nanobots in the serums are self replicating, and the spike-protein generating mutants that injected themselves with the genetic serum of the vaxx also continue to produce and shed the same spike-protein, then we may already be in the early stages of a human-guided AI take-over.

If that’s the case, we can at least reliably know that there will be unexpected consequences for those people who put this whole thing in motion.

Which is essentially that their stupid, arrogant, and small-minded, short-term, materialist way of thinking inevitably means they too will be wiped out by their own creations.

It’s cold comfort, but it’s something. Which tends to lead me think that there is also going to be some “fix” available. Recent examples have been how military robots were defeated by humans in various tests by really high-tech and difficult things like placing themselves in cardboard boxes and advancing on them a little at the time until they could be in close quarters with the robot. The machine did not perceive them as dangerous because they didn’t look like humans. In a series of tests, this was just one of the ways in which humans could fool the machines.

A recent video/report by quinta columna also indicated that a solution of distilled water and nicotine apparently wipes out the nanobots and may also be efficient against the spike protein, as was alcohol and smoking.

The point here being that the mass-murdering sons of bitches that are orchestrating all this are far from being geniuses.

What they have are infinite resources based on fiat money, because they have orchestrated the planet so that fiat money has become an effective substitute for power acquisition, and they also orchestrated it (especially over about the last 200 years or so, mainly as the Rothschilds family trajectory shows) so that they are also able to literally create the same fiat money out of thin air at will, while you and I have to trade our lifetimes (and for some their souls too) just to accumulate enough of it not to starve. So yes, they have that undeniable source of power acquisition and projection, which is absolutely massive, BUT, they have very little in the sense of imagination and intelligence.

Ultimately these people are evil, and for reasons that are obvious to someone NOT evil, but that are absolutely opaque to actual evil people, evil cannot genuinely create. It can only corrupt or destroy.

This is a very important point that can be demonstrated fairly easily by pure logic, absent the belief in any supernatural entities, at least to a point.

That is, eventually the logic inevitably leads you to the concept of supernatural entities because that is the only way the logic, including logic itself, can even exist. The very baseline concept of good and evil itself is meaningless absent an intelligent and benevolent creator. In short, the very fact good and evil actually exist for you at all, is undeniable evidence that a Loving God is the creator (think it through, it really is a logically inescapable fact, even if you may not see it right away. Seriously… think it through, this post is not going away anytime soon, it’ll wait.)

Which is why ultimately faith is more important (and powerful) than knowledge, and why millions of illiterate peasants throughout the ages, have always known better than the wealthy, nominally intelligent, educated, but evil scum that has tried to rule over them throughout the centuries.

As an aside, in times past, being wealthy was not necessarily as closely or likely to mean the individual was as corrupt as it is likely they are today (evil has accelerated and consolidated its position, as inevitably it must, hence, again, the so-called eventual End Times bottleneck).

Bringing all this together in a short summary then:

This combination of the stupidity, arrogance and blindness of evil, coupled with its inability to generate, create or grow anything self-sustaining and viable long-term, leads to two factors:

1. Unintended consequences that indicate a way out of their nefarious plans.

2. Ultimately a collapse of their structure/position/power-base. This may not always be total (evil too is a fundamental property of reality, so while it cannot generate the so-called tower of Babel successfully, some critters beholden to evil will always escape its collapse and go on to try again more or less quickly after the crash).

So in this respect there is always some way out and as such some hope.

3. Some humans somewhere may be able to pull the plug.

Usually not the guy you hope or think. Trump is not going to save us from the WEF mass murderers any more than he will save any Gazan children being torn to shred by the American bombs supplied to genocidal Israel for the same purpose of mass murder.

Elon Musk is not suddenly going to have a change of heart and fight the global alliance of globohomo that put him in place, not even if his son became a tranny as a result of it. I mean, miracles do happen, but miracles require miraculous evidence, and so far there is none.

On the other hand, God has a sense of humour and loves using the most unlikely of people for His purposes (of turning even conscious evil, ultimately, to good in some way). I mean, I am a perfect example of that. Of all the people He could get to become a Catholic zealot pushing original Catholicism (which I remind you is only found in Sedevacantism) instead of some hedonistic take on life, the universe and everything, I was about as unlikely a choice as any.

So, it may well be that some jabbed janitor coughs on the latest dish at the next Davos conference and all the mass-murderers present die of turbo-ebola-ass-cancer within the month (hey, miracles of unexpected joy, happen, you just keep praying along with me, right?!).

Or some other unexpected and unthought of black swan event suddenly becomes a tipping point. Say if spontaneously, something in the human spirit snapped and every father affected by the muslim rape gangs in England suddenly decided that regime change was required in the UK, well… the entire government, armed forces and police would be swept away in 24 hours.

This last hypothetical however seems unlikely (but you never know) here is why:

Part of the reason that the COVID mass murder was enacted, was also so that they could deploy the mass-control technology.

It has been known since the 1990s that human emotions at the very least can be controlled by a variety of EM fields and waves. Today that level of specific mental control is undoubtedly higher.

And we now know with certainty that the 5G antennae deployed globally absolutely can direct EM energy in ways that is essentially weapon grade level stuff. So maybe all the fathers of abused children in the UK are not even able to reach a tipping point anymore if their bloodstream and brains are teeming with nanobots and spike proteins that are receptive to whatever the 5G antennae is able to make them feel or not feel.

But then it will be something else.

Like, for example, maintenance and sustainability.

Think about it. Ok, the Soros, Klaus Schwabs, Zuckebergers, Bill Gates of the world have it all figured out and enslaved all of us and have a supply of small children to satisfy their proclivities, but… who is going to maintain and upkeep their infrastructure?

None of these people are themselves capable of changing a car tire, much less build or maintain (and I also think really intellectually understand) the required infrastructure to keep their pedovore utopia going. They really are not geniuses. They are mostly useless parasites with infinite money.

They have to rely on actual functioning human beings to keep this stuff running, and while you can corrupt a lot of them to do your bidding, you inevitably run into the degradation problem.

Evil cannot create. Eventually corrupting the maintainers will produce diminishing results as they too shift from starry eyed scientist glad their pet project is funded to disillusioned automatons who realises they are actually perpetrating and producing the total evil that destroys anything worth living for. The realisation is usually very slow and gradual, but it exists, and the outcome is always only one of two things: conversion to fully and consciously evil – which we already know is not sustainable long term because logic (and/or God if you prefer and can’t see the logic yourself) or self-disgust so great it prompts collapse or occasionally even total conversion (which effectively produces a monkey-wrench in the globohomo machine).

Conclusions

There are a few simple conclusions we can summarise from all of the above, and they are:

1. Fiat money is their primary lever of control.

2. Propaganda is their secondary lever of control.

3. Force is their tertiary lever of control.

4. Cohesive, logical, capable, communities immune to the above are their greatest threat, and always have been. This is why for centuries, their primary aim has been the Catholic Church (now reduced only to Sedevacantist Communities): Consider:

* Catholic communities quickly become self-sufficient (immune to Fiat money)

* Catholic communities are 100% immune to globohomo propaganda

* In times past Catholic communities could defend themselves well even against mass invasion by larger enemy forces like Islam.

The only barrier we have to reclaiming our freedom is the nihilism and loss of hope and inability to functionally do logic anymore in the vast majority of the populace (at least to a higher degree than it was until relatively recently).

So: Spreading proper Catholicism (i.e. actual Christianity instead of one of its fake, Churchian versions) and creating communities of Sedevacantists is really the quickest and simplest solution, and all we need worry about in the short term is the weaponisation of legislation and economic sanctions that are being levelled against us all but for the moment can’t necessarily (yet) target us Sedes specifically.

So… build those communities ASAP right now.

Guard against infiltration far more than you presently need to worry about force being applied on you. Select rural places out of the way, get involved with local government and begin to shore up the general defences against bureaucracy first. You don’t need to worry about direct force for a while yet. It will come but it will be some years yet.

Of course… if you are one of the zombies already prey to the centuries long propaganda, you will simply dismiss all the logic and verifiable information above and assume I am just another deluded “religionist”. And if that’s who you are, that’s ok. We don’t need you.

Catholicism started with eleven frightened men and four women. And we overcame the wrath of the then most powerful empire humanity has ever seen.

It’s just another day/era/persecution-time.

We’ve been here before. We’ll be here again.

And the Gates of Hell will not withstand against us.

The Bitterness of the Hags

Today, on SG, a brief and rather comical event reminded me that it is important for men, especially married ones with children, should be aware of the bitter, wall-smashed hags that will orbit their happy family with the evil intent to destroy it, merely to satisfy their Satanic ego.

The “argument” started because one such fat, very much post-wall hag, took exception to my simple statement that the reason we are in the current situation Church wise, is essentially because we stopped running heretics through with swords, as St. Luis suggested we should.

The point was made as a rhetorical corrective to a gentleman that had admitted giving people who do not deserve it (because they are deceivers and liars) the benefit of some charity. In this specific case, he was referring to the known liar and demonstrable deceiver, Jay Dyer, on which you can simply avail yourself of this 3 hour long proof (which I tried to make entertaining too) if you care enough to do so.

Being retarded, stupid, and thinking she now “had me on the ropes” She promptly rushed to make the accusation I was calling for the murder of protestants. It’s about the level of intellect you expect to deal with when it comes to these creatures. She of course did no such thing and her lies and idiocy was promptly and correctly nuked by one of the mods, which is as it should be on that platform.

There is now the minor issue of explaining for any wandering retards why my comment is not the advocacy for murder of non-Catholics, which I will address now, because as always, I am a kind and charitable person that hopes some of these absolute morons will be struck by lightning and grow 50 IQ points to put them in “normal range”, but please keep in mind this is not the point of this post. It’s a distraction from it.

The Catholic Church, as part of its unchanged dogma throughout its existence has ALWAYS made it clear that you are not to convert anyone by force, nor is it acceptable to try and kill people that disagree with Catholicism. HOWEVER, and there is a however, an important one. A Buddhist or a Muslim, or an Agnostic or even an Atheist going about minding their business is one thing, but a HERETIC, is quite another. A Heretic, by definition, is someone that professes, promotes and promulgate falsehoods about Catholicism. To make it personal, because morons only think on the solipsistic level, it’s one think if someone goes around thinking you are an assholes and has all sorts of wrong ideas about you. It’s another if they start accusing you falsely of being a wife-beater or a cheating slut that lies to her husband about her affairs and so on. In the first instance, you can absolutely ignore the person, and even be unaware of their ideas and existence. In the second, they are now a lying scumbag that needs to be punished for their lies.

Now, let’s take another example. Closer to the point. I absolutely do NOT like Islam or Judaism as religions, they are demonstrably pedophelic in nature along with many other issues I have with them, but I do not lie about their belief systems or activities. I simply document them and explain why I do not like them.

Heretics on the other hand, demonstrably lie and make false accusations about Catholicism. This is not difficult to see, verify or understand, In fact anyone honest can do so. Including convinced Protestants like Rodney Stark who wrote a whole book on some of the major lies that Protestants have been telling about Catholicism, in his excellent book, Bearing False Witness.

In what was Catholic Christendom, blasphemy laws were in effect for a long time, and it has been only to the detriment of civilisation that the Freemasonic infiltrations have removed most such laws from most countries (Italy still has some). The point being that there absolutely should be a severe punishment for defamation and calumny against a religion. Especially when ALL the rules of such a religion, ALL the dogmas of it, are set down in writing, in plain, simple, logical ways to understand according to Roman Law. Catholicism fulfils all of these criteria.

Protestantism does not, because the entirety of their only rule is basically “Interpreth as thou will”, which is absolutely a Satanic standard. Different denomination among their 40,000 ones (to be generous, because in reality since each one of them can and does interpet as they want it’s more like 900 million denominations, one per person) will tell you they so do have a standard, and promptly disagree with each other within minutes of you asking them to define it clearly, even among their own supposed congregation.

Again, making an analogy, I do not subscribe to Islam, I think it is a Satanic inspired religion and the best of the Muslims are simply seriously deceived people, like the Novus Ordo “Catholics”, but all that said, if I ever get hit by lightning and decide to visit Saudi Arabia, I will educate myself on their rules and laws and will follow them for my duration of the visit. And if I break any of them, I fully expect to be punished according to their laws, including having my head cut off if it reaches that point. This is really not difficult to understand.

If the relevant punishments for blasphemy in the Catholic Christendom had been fully retained in their most severe form, I am absolutely certain that the Novus Ordo Satanic Cult would not have been able to cause as much damage to Catholicism as it has. Again, this is not hard to understand, and really should not require the above 7 paragraphs to grasp, but retards gonna retard, and as I said, I am charitable. But all the above is beside the point.

In this specific case, while I chuckled at the seething chubby, I wondered, how does one of these creatures devolve to this level? As a natural scientist, I am curious about all sorts of weird and disgusting animals and life cycles, and while I readily admit that the study of strange insects is far more interesting and entertaining, the pondering of how the post-wall hags of fatness come to be, is probably more relevant to general human happiness.

If we can reduce their number or get rid of them entirely, the world can only become better. And for the retards, no, it is not a suggestion we gas them en masse, no matter how hypothetically entertaining the idea might be, but rather, the hope is that if we can discover the main mechanism by which these disgusting and unpleasant noxious beasts form, we may be able to prevent them from forming from na early age. Of course, the existing ones are beyond help, short of truly divine intervention on a grand scale, so this is not in the hope of “healing” these parasitic, oxygen thieves and noxious creatures, but merely to study and understand their undead “life cycle”.

Of course, brutal feminism must be at the core, as readers here will know, feminism is a terrible and pestilential thing introduced for the very purpose of destroying the nuclear family, and its evils are broad and deep and devastating, so we know that much.

Secondly, these creatures are generally unpleasant to look at as well, which inevitably results in their being mostly shunned by all but the most desperate of men, and as any man that has lived on Earth for a sufficient time while rooted in reality, the absence of both sex in general, as well as real affection renders women practically toxic and insane. It does it to men too, but in a less socially destructive way, aside the occasional mass shooting. the damage the post-wall toxic fattie does to society is subtler but far more extensive and pervasive and constant.

Like vampires, they perpetuate the lies of feminism at every opportunity, modulating it from soft whispers to strident squealing depending on their target. But this is just their permanent radiation. they also infiltrate families, usually by the pretence of being a “kind and loving” aunt, family friend, grandma, mother-in-law, and so on, whose only aim is to “help” and “improve” the targeted family unit. They inevitably do this by essentially becoming the homunculus on the shoulder of the wife and mother of the household and then proceed to metaphorically shit in their ear and brain in a Chinese water torture fashion. Gossiping, maligning, subtly at first and more directly later, the husband, the wife’s life and situation (which is inevitably never her choice but the oppressive enforcement of it by her evil husband, and so on and on, and on). She will malign and “correct” things to your wife and children without hesitation.

Women being social creatures, if your wife is not an uncommonly strong-minded and logical person, it is quite common that this noxious and sulphuric stench, seeps gradually into their brains until they come out with one or more of the various feminist narratives as being wholly true or even remotely applicable to them. Suddenly, from being a happy wife and mother they will gradually go to becoming a weakened, self-doubting, unhappy, “oppressed” woman at the “mercy” of an “overbearing”, “possessive”, “narcissistic” and “controlling”, “gaslighting”, evil husband. While the entire truth of the matter is that life is hard and shit happens, and you should just get down to it and get on with it while supporting each other as husband and wife against all the lies, slings and arrows the entire world sends your way pretty much constantly. And within your fortress of a marriage, make it as happy and content and loving as you can, while you keep making the moat around it deeper and shark-infested, and firing your cannons of truth at all the attempting invaders.

But what drives these human wreckage to do this? Invariably, without a single exception, it is because their own lives are so absolutely miserable. And in the truest foundational aspect of feminism, they will do everything they can, to reduce every woman, and especially married ones with children, to their own miserable, single or post-wall and post-divorce, misery.

And for that there is no excuse. Such creatures invariably also decry their own past victim status, whether it is real or imagined, as if it were some kind of excuse for their own toxic behaviour, but it never is.

I have known personally both men and women that were raped as children and did not become bitter, destructive human beings. Quite the contrary in fact. And I have known personally people that suffered horrible things. One of the kindest women I got to spend a little time with revealed she had been not only abused in childhood, but also gang-raped, stabbed and left for dead. She still had the stab scars on her body. Terrible things happen to all of us on some level and certainly some are far worse than others, but they are never an excuse for your own shitty behaviour. We do have free will (despite what protestant Calvinists necessarily believe if they could o any logic whatsoever and understood the consequences of their much loved “predestination”), so ultimately, how we behave, is on us.

Whatever their reasons, such creatures will never accept the factual reality that Catholic patriarchal society has created the best possible situation for human beings than any other religion or culture ever has on planet Earth. While you can criticise individuals and even (valid) Popes throughout the history of Catholicism, you simply cannot avoid the fact that following its infallible laws and dogma, created and creates, the best possible situation human beings have ever experienced. It’s not even close to ANY other religion or ideology. There simply is no comparison. Not in duration in terms of time, nor in terms of artistic, architectural, but most important of all, sociological achievements that are truly positive, and not just “progressive” which is now essentially code for Satanic.

And in case you doubt it, please understand the original “debate” on SG was prompted by a meme that Vox, who is NOT a Catholic, shared on his blog that nevertheless makes the point succinctly and utterly unavoidably. I reproduce it here below for your own contemplation in light of the above.

The Best Book I Ever Read

As some regulars here know, I have read literally thousands of books. This is not an exaggeration or hyperbole. Throughout my teenage years I averaged something like 2-3 books a week. That’s not counting comic books, articles and so on. I spent my pre-teen years going to bed late and reading under my covers with a torch even after I was supposed to be asleep. By age the age of seven I was reading adult crime novels, young adults stuff and so on. Throughout my life I have without a doubt read more than one book a week for at least 40 years, and that is being conservative about it, which would be a minimum of 2,000 books.

I mention all this not to show off, but because it is relevant to the point I am about to make concerning which book I would pick as the absolute best oe in that mountain of reading.

I have many favourites, Go Rin No Sho (this translation by Victor Harris is the best) being just one of many. The Thin Red line is very good too, although I also really liked the film, and in the case of Cloud Atlas I found the film superior to the book, which is very rare. Classics like Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep (which became the film Blade Runner, but the book is in fact better) are in a sort of class of their own, like The Man in the High Castle (of which the story of how it was written and what Dick concluded about that process is arguably even more interesting than the book itself) because Philip K. Dick is a favourite SF author.

Various History books also have a certain pride of place, although they tend to be few, because over time, I became aware that the history we are taught is quite far from the truth, so finding history books that produce verifiable information has become somewhat of a chore. It takes a lot more effort than simply buying a book and reading it. You now need to try and see if you can actually verify anything in it as being even remotely accurate. The entire story of WWII for example, is so convoluted, full of lies, propaganda and nonsense from all sides that the truth of things may well be impossible to arrive at. What I am almost certain of so far however, is that Hitler almost certainly did not die by suicide in his bunker, but rather in South America somewhere, years later. The other curious fact is that even official Jewish Historians in Israel that work in the Holocaust memorial, today agree that the number of six million dead jews is fictitious. What the real number is, I doubt anyone will ever know. I have seen credible figures of anything from about 300,000 to 500,000 that may well be relatively accurate. What we do know is that the deaths of Jews in Auschwitz was officially reduced from 4 million originally to less than 1 million presently.

Of course, merely pointing these things out has an emotional reaction in some people, perhaps most people, who will think I am some kind of Nazi sympathiser. Which could not be further from the truth, what I am though is a person that prefers the actual truth, however unpalatable it might be, to a well-crafted lie.

So when it comes to history books, I think one needs to be extremely careful as to which ones to believe, as most of them are filled with lies. Lies that are often repeated from generation to generation. In this respect then, I think my own book, The Face on Mars, which deals with a lot more than just the Martian Structures, is actually really quite high on the list, as it brings to the fore a whole bunch of truths about humanity that are inescapable, and also, even nearly 30 years after I wrote it and ten years after I updated it, makes the most coherent argument for the ancient history of mankind that anyone has been able to piece together to date. In that respect then, I do think it deserves first place in the overview of human history category.

However, in terms of a book that may well have the most impact on anyone who reads it in terms of understanding not only some very important aspects of human history, but of humanity itself, as well of reality itself and the ultimate truths of our situation here on Earth, there is one book, that upon reflection, undoubtedly must rise above all others. It is

The Crusades: Iron Men and Saints by Harold Lamb. First printed in 1930, this is a masterful piece of historical fact, having been pieced together by having referred to documents of the times during which the Crusades actually took place.

Although it can be read as simply just a historical record of what took place, which it is, a reader with a little more intelligence would be able to consider the character of the people concerned and what drove them. And once you begin to consider these things, it becomes fairly obvious that despite the usual human motives that undoubtedly existed, there was also an undercurrent of real belief, faith, spiritual truth, that on some level absolutely must also have existed.

Even if you were to relegate that all to some kind of mass psychosis, even at that most atheistic of levels, it would still be an utterly fascinating aspect of humanity; too large and persistent to ignore for anyone that has a minimum of imagination.

And the repercussions of reading that one book, will resonate to some extent or other in the life of anyone who reads it.

My only addition to this recommendation is that if you want to be better able to follow the contextual aspect of the history described in The Crusades, you would probably be better off reading God’s Battalions: The Case for the Crusades by Rodney Stark (who is also a very rare creature, an honest historian!) alongside it, as back in 1930, most people had some idea of the main aspects of the Crusades, something that very few have any reference for today (by design).

All content of this web-site is copyrighted by G. Filotto 2009 to present day.
Website maintained by IT monks