This pinned post aims to give both new and old visitors the quick links to the main parts of this site that are most important, and gets updated with any new stuff fairly regularly so it’s a good idea to check it now and then.
I have done this mostly as a joke and experiment as well as a learning curve for people like me who have stayed away from crypto for years, but I now have created a cryptocurrency called Kurganbond (KBD).
You can find it on pump.fun (that is the whole site address) by typing that name in the search bar.
It’s doing unreasonably well so far:
There are at least six of you crazy enough to have invested some money in it, here you are:
The little blonde emoji with (dev) next to it is me, the other addresses are whichever crazy six readers you are.
Still, I think this could become a very interesting experiment if enough people who read my stuff are willing to try an experiment which, I have to admit sounds a little insane but I think could work and make everyone money long term.
Let me explain how it works.
There is a description of the KURGANBOND that I wrote up when I created it which sort of defines the process although because I AM such a noob it’s wrong in two aspects, which I will explain.
Here is the description of KBD:
And here is how it’s wrong:
1. The timeline. On thinking about this and noting the number of readers I have has been much reduced due to the hack that meant the recreation and relocation of this blog it is clear that it will take a lot longer to get say 1000 people investing in this even with just throw away money, which is all you should ever invest in cryptocurrencies anyway.
2. The amounts. I didn’t know this when I created the KBD, but it seems that the lowest amount you can buy of KBD is 0.1 SOL. And that is at present about $20. So that is probably the least amount you can buy of KBD.
For the other noobs like me, if you decide to play this game with us in a very safe way, assume the following:
doing this will teach you about cryptocurrency and how to invest/play, and maybe even become good at making money with it; and even if not, you will have developed a new skill that seems to be increasingly required in the coming days and years of elite dystopia. Just because the game is absurd, doesn’t mean it won’t kill you if you don’t know how to play, and learning to use, profit from, and at least understand crypto is probably more important, or at least as important, as understanding that in the event of a hot war, even if you are well armed and well positioned geographically, you need to consider combat drones in your defensive strategy. The best long range rifle you have and group of friends well trained in the terrain and so on will be obliterated in minutes if you do not account for drones and night vision today.
Crypto is the same. Like it or hate it, it is an avenue to learn to navigate the financial markets, which even if you plan to be an off-grid farmer with anti-drone defence who doesn’t need fiat money… will still be useful.
So here in this post you can get all you need to start from zero and learn a LOT in a single bit of reading and doing. And all it will cost you in the worst case scenario is $20.
Assume it as the cost of learning and forget about it.
Except that there is actually a chance that if my insane idea works and is taken up by enough of you here, you will make your money back and not have lost anything. And if that happens there is then even a good chance you make more money than you ever put in, potentially a lot more, and you don’t need to sit in front of your PC like a cocaine-fuelled day trader either.
So if you want to take part, here is the main “big idea” I have, which is actually fairly simple. It is “crazy” only because for it to work it has to rely on the best part of human nature. If you know what a misanthrope I am, you know that my trust in human nature is mostly that humans are petty, vicious, fearful, cowardly, greedy, nasty little creatures with a petty and devious mind.
However, and not many know this about me, because unless you can read between the lines of my fiction work you may not suspect it, but I am an absolute believer in the human spirit —despite all our flaws, that we all have— overcoming all our weaknesses and errors, and through it all, at times, redeeming us all. It is, at heart, a completely and fundamentally Catholic sense of reality, but I have always believed this way even when I was atheist. Even in a world without God or meaning, the crazy man that gives his life for that of a stranger’s child, the woman who believes beyond sanity in a man everyone else has written off and that gives him the spark to become a man that ends up doing a huge amount of good for many, the little boy who got his face scarred horribly for life for saving his even smaller sister from a vicious dog… these humans, these actions, in some way they redeem not just those individuals, but humanity too.
As I say, it is a fundamental reality of Catholicism, it is the very reason why Lucifer hates us, and does everything in his power to degrade us, and humiliate us, and see us fail due to our own many flaws. The very fact that such imperfect creatures as humans —grubby, little Earth-dwellers as we are— has the potential to “judge angels” as our Lord tells us, who are essentially “perfect” creatures (and yet, with free will, making their revolt against God so much worse and therefore permanent, for they have none of our weaknesses) drives him to his eternal rage against us.
I know, I know, what the hell does crypto have to do with the spiritual human condition?!?
Well, as with everything relating to humanity: that is up to you. Nothing if you are a materialist, or everything (just like everything does) if you are a believer.
I will explain more on this further on, but for now, let me explain the mechanics of my idea and then the mechanics of how you go about doing this even if you are a two finger typer with a deep suspicion of all things digital, as am I.
The idea
The concept is simple:
We all invest $20 in KBD and then we tell people about it (hopefully people you like and trust, but also people online, friends, people on social media etc) and either help them do it or tell them to read this post (there is a share button at the end of this post as long as you are reading it by having clicked on its title instead of just scrolling on the blog).
As more people slowly put their $20 in, the value of each share of the roughly 1.1 or 1.2 billion shares of KBD that exist, goes up. Currently, just under a billion shares are held by the bonding curve (see image above where me and the six crazy guys are). Once a total of $113,000 has been bought into it, (the total of the binding curve) then The KBD graduates and becomes available on raydium. What is raydium?
That’s the jist and you can read up more by google searching and learning more about crypto in general. Now we are at 3% of doing that with only 6 guys, so at the same level of buy-in we just need another 97×2 = 194 people to put $20 in it because roughly speaking, 200 people at $20 is only $4,000 and as you can see below the bonding curve has about $6,500 in it.
You can see this screen and information on any of the people who bought KBD (and on the bonding curve) by clicking on their name (see the second image in this post)
The bonding curve is basically a system storage for the value of the created crypto (in this case KBD) so that Inas the creator cannot just buy up a huge amount in my name, wait for a bunch of people to put money it and as soon as the value gies up sell the whole lot, make a killing and leave everyone else empty handed.
In this way I need to buy KBD myself if I want any, just like anyone else, and I did, buying about $20 worth (0.1 SOL).
If enough people do the same and the bonding curve is bought out, then the value of each of the KBD shares will go up, and here is where it gets into my idea and interesting (if slightly crazy idea).
What would happen if as new people come in and the price goes up, the people who invested first did not sell their KBD and make a profit right away but instead only very gradually took their original investment out.
So… when your $20 in KBD goes up in value and Is now worth $30 you left it in. And left it in at $40 too. And when it hit $60 you sold $10 worth and put that $10 back into your wallet and when eventually KBD goes down a bit (because of the sales to get back that $10) you just held it, until it hit $60 again and then you take out another $10. At this point you have recouped your original investment and still have $50 in KBD in the game.
If once you have recouped your original investment you let the money ride until it goes back up even higher, to say $80, before you sell off another $10 or so, and if everyone that joins holds this strategy and does this for a year, all while still spreading the word and the philosophy of KBD, over time, many people will not only recover their initial investment, they will have made a profit. And as long as new people keep coming in, the benefits will be reaped by MANY, not just a few. As gradually and slowly as it goes, but it would make KBD a fairly safe bet, as long as no one with too much of the initial investment pulls the rug on everyone, over time KBD would become a relatively safe bet.
This by the way is how many of the more established crypto currencies work. Things like SOL and even more bitcoin have become so well-funded that their value is relatively safe and people have and do use it as essentially fiat money.
The point of KBD would be it’s slow and steady because a core of the initial investors commit to this sort of more ethical behaviour. As I said, yes, it’s an insane idea, but am not the inly one to have it, others are trying it, for example with LOTTLE. (A crypto coin also available on Pump.fun)
But as far as I know I am the only one spelling it out and making the strategy public.
NOTE: All figures shown here change quite fast as new people come in so the values of the bonding curve have already changed before I even finished this post. Focus on the principles because the numbers change fast.
Let me explain about LOTTLE.
LOTTLE was initially created by about 20 guys who are all pretty big fish in the crypto market from what I understand (big relatively speaking I mean) and because if this it skyrocketed as the news spread that some solid money had been pumped into it. Everyone who came in on the first 2-3 days doubled their money in 24 hours. Now… I believe the original investors did not mean to pull the rug from people’s feet, and I think I am right on that because there is some proof.
On day six or so LOTTLE crashed from 5.4 million to 0.5 million. In the space of about 20 minutes. I missed it because I had a sandwich. And because it was doing well and I had been seeing the patterns in the sips and rises I had foolishly put some of the cash I had already take out back in. I wanted to hit a very reasonable and reachable target quickly so I could get out altogether and double the $300 I started with.
So now I had crashed back to a total of about $100 when I had been sitting at about $550. Not the end of the world in the scheme of things but painful, especially due to it being my own stupidity. Not greed, but impatience. Just before the collapse and the idiot move I had $150 already out and $411 in LOTTLE. Had I followed my own advice not only would I NOT have put the $150 back in at what I thought and looked like the end of a dip and the start of a rise, I would have got another $150 out and kept the original $300 investment as safely recovered and would still have had $261 in LOTTLE.
The crash would not have affected me.
The sting to my ego was painful.
But… I let it all ride and became aware that NONE of the initial 20 investors had pulled out. What had actually happened is that the TRUMP official meme coin had come out and it has sucked cryptocurrencies from all over the world. It increased in value by ten times in 24 hours. Had I been registered on the right cryptosites I would have bought some too. But I had nothing left and no energy to begin registering and doing ID verifications and learning new sites. But I waited.
And sure enough, LOTTLE recovered. Not to 5 million but it hit 4. I sold most of it and eecivered my original investment of $300 and had $50 or so left over so I bought $25 of my own KURGANBOND memecoin and decided to write this up as a help to other noobs who want to start and learn.
The point about LOTTLE is that even if most of the people who bought into it did not stay with it, because the original guys did, those who had faith in them did not lose it all and we had a chance to make it back and even make a little profit despite a black swan event no one could predict.
The principle behind my KBD would be the same. The original investors who get in early, should be the type of people who will stick to the strategy outlined above for KBD.
Because I assume the only people who will buy KBD are people who read this blog, I also assume they would be on with this. As long as you spread the message, and this post, and people join up over time the KBD will grow (very slowly compared to most memecoins) but that’s ok.
Because you got in early you will have PLENTY of KBD for a few dollars so your investment will grow faster than the later entrants, but because we want as many people as possible to make money, the general rule is you wait until your money has tripled before you take out 50% of your original $20 or so. And you wait until that happens again (or more) before you take out the other 50%. After that, you hold for a long while giving later entrants a chance to do the same as newer people get in.
Yes, over a long time it will not work for people at the end, but guess what? The exact same “Ponzi scheme” mechanism applies to fiat money too. It’s just hidden more because literally the entire planet uses it and is so diversified into various currencies (and now also crypto!), but the reality is that all fiat money you use every day is created out of just as thin air as a memecoin.
The difference is I am telling you about it and am explaining how if we don’t all act like Jewish bankers, we can actually be a force for good and cause more wealth to be more fairly distributed.
Yes it’s not perfect, nothing is, but if we hold fast, and spread the word well, whether over a month or ten years, we have the possibility of increasing the investment people made and teaching everyone about crypto and also helping them ease into it.
And depending on if it gets big enough, even make some money. And since we are talking about $20-30 as initial investment, so what if you lose it all? If nothing else you will have learnt something new that may help you become proficient at something that potentially can be a source of income for some people who do it full time.
Anyway, that’s the crazy idea and a seventh guy came onboard in the time I wrote this and the bonding curve funding requirement is less than 100k now… so… it may just work.
Feel free to let me know if you join with a comment below.
So, it has come to my attention that yet another deceitful gatekeeper, by the name of Teresa Stanfill Benns, who runs a website called Betrayed Catholics, has been making complete fabrications concerning Catholicism in general. And to what end, you may ask? Well, the usual one: Trying to make sure that nominal (already deceived) Catholics, who are merely ignorant of the lies that have been forced upon them since birth, do not get wind of the actual Catholicism which is today held ONLY by 1958 Sedevacantists.
In short, this deceitful shrew lies about a great number of things, but all of them come to the same conclusion: You must follow the fake “Pope” Bergoglio who is just a “bad Pope” and not the gay handmaiden to Satan that he actually is.
It is complete nonsense of course, but then another moron who should also hold her tongue (and typing fingers) as per 1 Corinthians 34-35 and even more clearly 1 Timothy 2: 12-13:
12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to use authority over the man: but to be in silence.
13 For Adam was first formed; then Eve.
14 And Adam was not seduced; but the woman being seduced, was in the transgression.
15 Yet she shall be saved through childbearing; if she continue in faith, and love, and sanctification, with sobriety.
Hilariously calling herself “The Thinking Housewife”. But also tragically, because she gives actual housewives with a brain a bad name. Her piece is here, and it is very simple to refute… IF you actually understand the basics of canon law and Catholicism. But she is merely quoting Benns and Benns style, is very much like the one of John Salza, a supposed “ex” self-confessed freemason who pretends to teach people how the Novus Orco Church is the Catholic Church.
Well, it isn’t it is the result of usurpation by Stanists and it is a full inversion of Catholicism of course, as readers here will know by just looking for the words “Vatican II” or “Canon Law 118.4” or “188 part 4” and reading the relevant posts. And John Salza, having been a Freemason even though a layman is absolutely forbidden from teaching anyone anything about Catholicism. In fact, even if his repentance were real (it is not, by all measures one can reasonably observe) this would still be the case, since, once a heretic, even clergy who repent are to have authority over precisely no one, and spend the rest of their days in a monastery in perpetual penance. That is the dogmatic law. Imaginbe how much less authority a heretic layman has then to tell anyone anything. About anything.
So let’s dispense with the unthinking and at best illiterate “housewife”, which is really a dismissing of Benns, since all the “housewife” does is parrot the same lies Benns does.
Benns assertion is quoted in full by the Housewife and we will do the same here and also take it apart piece by piece in the usual Kurgan style.
Her lies in filthy bold, my pristine truth in normal text.
“TRADITIONALISTS argue that necessity knows no law and they can resort to epikeia to justify their ordinations and consecrations.
She begins in the usual freemasons fashion, intentionally trying to obfuscate simple concepts by use of jargon and unnecessarily “scholarly” wording. I say “scholarly” because it is of course a lie, a deceit and an attempt to wrap oneself in the in any case logical fallacy of argument from authority. Using the Greek word for “reasonableness” is simply obfuscation in the first place (most people have no idea what Epikea means and the slight confusion the causes to them puts them in the immediate mental state of assuming the writer must be very “scholarly” indeed). Well, she is not, and in fact this transparent deception shows she is not even mildly intelligent. Just vicious and nasty from the start. The deception is that there is no need to use the word “reasonableness”. There is a very sound and logical concept at play here, which is simply this: ROMAN LAW. Which Canon Law and the Church has always used. The point of Roman Law is that it is based in absolutely sound yet humane logic. So, for example, unlike the mechanistic and inhuman British Laws, or worse the American ones, in the context of a criminal act, in Roman Law, there is no specific prescribed action other than generally. Each case is evaluated on its merits. The murder of a pedophile is not the same as the murder of an innocent shop owner, and so on. But more importantly, Roman Law is soundly based in logic. So for example it follows the rule of silent assent and the reasonable and logical concept of the negative application of a rule being valid when such situations are fulfilled for it. Two relevant examples will suffice: There is NO prescribed maximum duration of an Interregnum (time between when one Pope dies and another valid one is elected). Therefore, no specific limit can ever be prescribed for it. We could go 1,000 years before a new and actually valid Pope is finally voted in after the usurpers have been done away with it and this would in no way mean the Church has defected, otherwise it would mean the church had defected as soon as St. Peter died. or when for almost 3 years there was literally no one at all even pretending to be Pope a few Centuries ago. In short, you cannot assume things that don’t make sense.
But furthermore, the sentence above is a lie. NO ONE has ever said “reasonableness” is why ordinations by Bishops of other Bishops is why Sedevacantist Bishops can ordain new Bishops.
Whenever a Pope dies Bishops have no jurisdictional authority, and neither do Priests. In essence all a Bishop can do and priests too is issue the sacraments to the faithful, which of course includes doing Holy Mass and doing so WITHOUT the name of any Pope joined to the prayers, since no pope exists presently. Because the Pope is the one that has final say in if ANYONE is actually allowed to become a Bishop, what the liar Benns is pretending to say is that: “Only the Pope can validly make someone a Bishop, so Sedevacantist ordinations are invalid and a sham.” this is a filthy lie and the entire history of the Church proves it. Whenever Popes died and before another was elected Bishops were ordained, the eventual new Pope had absolute authority to veto any of those ordinations that happened before he came to the throne. And in the era of the Borgia and Medici, this veto power was used a lot. But even then, Popes would generally not make any comment of people who had been ordained as Bishops who were not some kind of threat or power-play. In fact, throughout its history, most Bishops are ordained and the Pope says not a thing about it. And because it’s Roman Law and the rule of silent assent is a given, it means that if the Pope says nothing, the ordination is assumed valid. And that is how it has ALWAYS been. So she lies straight out the gate. And then she gallops on to the next lie.
The link leads to a screed of John Salza-like absurdities, obfuscations, lies and so on. It really is the Freemasonic way. She invokes the Papal writings of Pope Pious X and Pious XII Vacante Sede Apostolica and Vacantis Apostolicae Sedis, as if they agreed with the lies she is saying. they do no such thing of course. And it goes on to several lengthy pages of lies and obfuscations. it is the Argument ad infinitum Salza also uses. Writing page sand pages of lies so enmeshed and so twisted with the facts that one’s brain gazes over and once again they do this to give the impression that they are great and wise scholars that have “done their homework” but of course, it’s all nonsense, because we have already seen that the ordinations are simply assumed valid and always have been, until a new and VALID Pope says specifically otherwise.
And as explained at length in a separate work, Pope Pius XII’s 1945 election constitution, Vacantis Apostolicae Sedis, (VAS) — which infallibly decrees what can and cannot be done during an interregnum — forbids any correction or change in the law during an interregnum. ‘The laws issued by Roman Pontiffs in no way can be corrected or changed by the assembly of Cardinals of the Roman Church while it is without a Pope, nor can anything be subtracted from them or added or dispensed in any way whatsoever with respect to said laws or any part of them… In truth, if anything adverse to this command should by chance happen to come about or be attempted, We declare it, by Our Supreme Authority, to be null and void.’
Note again the strawman. She is trying to imply that VAS says “You guys can’t ordain Bishops when a Pope is dead or not valid!” But that is not what it says at all. All it says is what has already been known from the very first Pope on. When a Pope dies or is not present on the throne, no one has authority to do anything other than give the sacraments. We already know that. and we already know that Bishops and priests were ordained throughout the history of the Church without a Pope necessarily being validly on the throne. And after one did come validly to the throne, unless they specifically stated so-and-so was actually NOT accepted as a valid Bishop or priest, it was assumed by all, positively, definitively and permanently that they in fact were validly elected.
“Here we are talking both papal laws and Canon Law, which is largely taken from papal and conciliar law.
Again an obfuscation of nonsense. There are only two kinds of Laws in the Church. Divine Laws and Church or Ecclesiatical laws. Divine Laws are immutable and eternal. For example, a public defection from the faith makes you a heretic without anyone needing to say or do anything, regardless of your status, which includes even a previously valid Pope. Another divine Law is that no one can be forced to become Catholic or get married say, again their will.
Ecclesiastical rules on the other hand are generally for the smoother running of the Church as it got larger. For example, the requirement of 70 Cardinals to vote in a Pope. this is merely a human rule that was not followed in the past, and therefore need not be followed in the future if circumstances make it obsolete or irrelevant. For example, in the current state of things there is not even 70 valid Cardinals. but then, neither were there ANY Cardinals at all int he year 400. And yet we had the Church and Popes were getting elected, by non-cardinals every one. So all that one requires to know is if a rule is of Divine Law, in which case it is absolute and eternal, or if it is of ecclesiastical law, in which case the specifics and the reasons for it need to be looked at and logically understood so that if things have changed to the point that the rule no longer makes sense, this is understood and acted upon intelligently.
Some may object that Can. 20 advises the use of epikeia, and to invoke it would not be a violation of the law. But Can. 20 specifically states there must be no other provision in the case considered, and such provision was already laid down in VAS.
We have already covered this above. She is just lying.
It also recommends consulting the laws given in similar cases and the common and constant teaching of approved authors.
Here there is the hint that she is well aware that ecclesiastical rules are not immutable, because Divine laws don’t change, and there is no such thing as “similar cases”. Either a law is divine or it is not. So in this case, it is a divine law that the Pope (if he exists and is valid) is the ultimate, supreme authority of the Church on Earth, as representative of Jesus Christ. It is also the case that JESUS is the ultimate head of the Church and NOT the Pope, and that any infallibility a Pope has is limited to when he makes official pronouncements on faith and morals, which in essence, for 2,000 years have almost entirely been composed of refining of divine law; required usually because gnostics, statists and protestants started to teach false doctrines in precisely this fashion, so what was always a law and a rule known by all now needed to be spelt out in detail to avoid the sophists and deceivers to confuse the faithful.
It is also a law that if a Pope does not exist, then any ordination performed in accordance with the rules of ordination is automatically assumed to be valid and this becomes NOT the case ONLY after a valid Pope IS elected and said valid Pope for whatever reason deems that an ordination was in fact not valid.
Also, the “teachings of approved authors” is yet another bit of nonsensical theatre thrown in to confound things and make it seem as if you need to consult 12 tomes from the archives to know if a “pope” putting demonic effigies on the altar is sacrilegious or not. But you do NOT need to do that. Because Canon Law is the distillation of every behaviour and rule a Catholic should follow. And because it was put together by a group of cardinals expressly for the purpose of ensuring that there was no contradiction in the 40,000 or so documents that the team of Cardinals looked at to compile the CoCof 1917, it is also part of the infallible magisterium of the Church, which is why in over 100 years, NO ONE has been able to find defect with ANY of its rules or laws. Instead the New Orcs (Novus Orco) simply said in 1983 that a new code was required and they made up a document that literally contradicts itself several times over and is just a typical mis-match of gnostic stuff blend with some roadkill.
What even St. Thomas Aquinas may have to say on a topic is irrelevant if you have Canon Law of 1917, because it is the final judge of how behaviour should be undertaken for a Catholic, Be they clergy or lay people. So it is totally pointless to refer to “esteemed authors”. It’s like saying you need to go have a coffee with the guy who wrote the book you need to study to pass your driving test, in order to be able to do the exam. It’s nonsense. There is no instance in which Canon Law does not supersede the thoughts, opinions, or writings of any Catholic
Laws given in similar cases point to the summoning of the bishops to elect a pope (Council of Constance) and a good number of authors agree on this, namely St. Robert Bellarmine and those supporting his teaching.
Once again, arguing for a straw man. Under normal circumstances, sure… but when your “Pope” is a henchman of Beelzebub, and so are his “cardinals” you don’t call these indemoniated freaks together to elect the baddest of them to be a horned minor demon. And St. Bellarmine simply laid out the procedure that should be followed when/if things are X. Which no one is arguing. But things are now Z and X is really not that relevant now.
St. Bellarmine also recommends the calling of an imperfect council in the absence of a pope if the cardinals cannot elect.
Oh…so…we CAN deviate from the ecclesiastical rules when it makes sense. Just as I said and she has been denying from the start until… now. Freemasons are not smart. Aside picking evil, which is dumb, they also can’t think on their feet. But the problem is not this, the issue is that fake Cardinals who are also fake Catholics, heretic every one of them, have no business electing anyone, much less one of their number to be “Pope”.
Finally, Can. 20 cannot be used in anything involving penalties. And VAS is a document levying several penalties.”
Again irrelevant. Because VAS says nothing about Bishops being elected when there is not a valid Pope being somehow illegitimate.
And there you have it. Just another gnostic/heretic trying to get you to be “in communion” with Satan’s henchman instead of with the infallible magisterium of the Church.
To act in the name of good (which means the dogmatic position of the Catholic Church as far as I am concerned. You, dear reader are unlikely to agree unless you too are a 1958 Sedevacantist, but I understand, I too was a heathen for most of my life).
And acting in the name of good, whether you realise it or not, means permanently removing pedophiles, child killers and rapists from society. And of course also removing permanently all those people who aided and abetted them and hid their crimes. It also means getting rid of fraudsters, con-men and usurers, if not permanently at the very least to place them in such a situation where they are not able to practice their deceptive ways, and where their labour is used to provide compensation to the offended parties.
In short, it means dealing justice to all who deserve it, charity to those who deserve it AFTER justice has been served, and ONLY then, not before. Mercy to those who deserve it but also punishment to those who deserve it too.
The death penalty absolutely needs to come back for certain crimes, that too is non-negotiable. And secret societies of Satanists, that is Freemasons, illuminati, carbonari, skull and crossbones and so in should not only be outlawed, but membership of it should be grounds for receiving the death penalty in fact.
Freemasonry is a Satanic, anti-human, evil thing as is all Satanism.
There are many other social rules that it would be good to impose too, but this post is not primarily about that. Each group or society of people will have certain things most agree need to happen. What I wrote above is generally acceptable to most people, and the only real exception might be those too innocent, or too ignorant and lazy to look into freemasonry properly who assume it’s just a friendly social club.
If they bothered to research things a bit, they too would mostly agree that what might seem as a harsh punishment (death penalty for membership) is in fact quite sensible.
So let me now add the part no one wants to talk about:
If you agree with the above in general terms, then you also need to recognise that NONE of the political alternatives being presented to you currently are based in truth. None.
They are only different shades of lies.
Trump is not going to save anyone nor drain the swamp. And the swamp creatures that are almost certainly pedophiles of the worst sort have just had their homes NOT burn down when every house around them has in fact been lasered from the sky into ash. The trees have not however. Isn’t it amazing how Tom Hanks, Oprah, and such people have not had their home burn down?
Weird trees that don’t catch fire eh?
Do you remember Tom Hank’s face/reaction when Ricky Gervais presented the golden globe awards and accused the entire room of being pedos? It was a very worried face. And there is plenty of evidence, circumstantial though it may be. As for Oprah, she’s been feeding young meat into the machine for decades.
My point is this:
No one is going to get justice by voting for any politician. They ALL need to go. And a lot of them need to be punished for horrific crimes, along with their puppet-masters who are mass-murderers of the worst kind.
No one will get justice other than by creating a literal alternative society that is based in truth above all and has a moral foundation that equates child rape to a death sentence. And preferably not a quick death either.
Even if you are a young atheist and still do not understand this yet —think it through and you might realise it— any moral foundation of that sort has to be rooted in belief in a higher power (i.e. God). Absent a higher authority than man, there is no reason at all, for any morality whatsoever. Nor can you defend there being one. If it’s all just one nihilistic black hole of meaninglessness then, whether one rapes and kills children to satisfy their urges or serves in a soup kitchen is neither here nor there. You may prefer one over the other but there is absolutely no logical reason you can claim one is objectively “better” than the other aside your personal preference; and you have zero objective argument why your preference should be superior to anyone else’s.
So… once you realise every actual functioning society humanity has ever had was based on a religion and its morality, and if you agree with my idea that pedophiles deserve death, as do those who help them, hide them and cover for them, guess what, at removes a couple of world religions from the equation right away, because they have child rape as acceptable in their unholy books: Islam and Judaism.
There may be other views that are at least not pro-child rape, like shintoism, at least some buddhism, or generally zen-agnostic type of views like Taoism or Daioism. But in any case, false versions of any of those religions, that is, people who may pay lip service to them but don’t actually follow them, are really not relevant, which of course means most “christians” too are just another species of lukewarm NPCs.
Which means that the only people who might actually have a chance of changing the world for the better are those of us who:
1. Have a religion that is essentially good which means does NOT include child rape as part of it, or in any way acceptable to it.
2. Actually live their religion.
3. Reject the falsity and evil of the world in favour of their religion.
That is the baseline premise of the people who MIGHT actually change things.
The follow-on from that is that they therefore also need to:
1. Create an alternate society that comes into being, sustains itself, and grows that does not rely in any way on the current ones populating our Satanically dominated planet.
2. Is able to defend itself from the inevitable attacks that the Satanic Clown Worlders will eventually launch.
3. Must become able and willing to remove the evil doers and replace them with both people and systems that better guard the good, freedom, and above all justice based on truth for all, the most defenceless first: i.e. children; and rewards based on merit not fictional ideologies.
Ultimately this means to re-conquer all those positions of power that are currently inhabited by corrupt and evil people who are as allergic to truth and goodness as bacteria is to ammonia and sunlight.
The astute reader may also have realised that of all the world religions, only one clearly states that it is not just a decent thing to do, but the dogmatic duty of a man to defend the innocents.
So. Gentle reader. Guess what?
This means if you plan to serve the good, your very first step, needs to be to stop serving the evil of the machinery we are all currently being trapped by to various degrees.
Young men (and women) think that when they come across a “Bible Zealot” or “hardcore Christian” which is what most would assume I am (they would be wrong because I am not a Bible alone moron and what passes for both “hardcore” and “christian” today is laughable) that talks about “hedonism”, we are imagining young people are on some orgiastic drunken revelry on the daily.
Allow me to correct that misguided view.
First of all I am GenX not a boomer so I neither resent nor hallucinate the situation of millennials and zoomers. In fact I mostly pity them, at least when they are not completely pathetic, in which case I am mostly frustrated by their lack of animus.
More importantly, I understand better than most that hedonism today is not really the orgies of the collapsing Roman empire. It is more a wasting of time while waiting and hoping against hope for “something better” to come along.
When you are raised with no understanding whatsoever of what Catholicism actually was and has always been and continues to be in those small number of families who still hold to it, you cannot help but go wrong in life.
The only sense of “the right way” I had in my upbringing was a code of honour that can best be defined —as John C. Wright did— as being that of the noble heathen. That is a man who keeps his word and does as his personal honour commands. It is a far cry from Catholicism and possibly the best level of civilisation that sort of way can aspire to is that of feudal Japan.
Possibly Imperial China too, but my understanding of Japanese codes of honour is superior (and closer) than the Chinese version of it. The Roman Empire too fas founded on it on arguably surpassed both Japanese and Chinese achievements, but in any case, no one can deny that all of those systems were far more brutal, uncharitable, and lacking in mercy and kindness when compared to Catholicism.
The point here is that absent the framework of what a good life actually is, meaning the proof of it, the reality of it you can see and verify for yourself, how is any young person to decide on how to best approach life?
If you DO know, things become a LOT simpler. But if you do not know, what a good life really means, you’re almost certain to get lost in all sorts of distractions.
I never saved really. I did buy some property (land) at age 26 after writing the first edition of the Face on Mars, and some 25 years later it helped me to sell it and put a deposit on a house in Italy. But as I had no intention to make any children (until I was 40 and gradually I had realised a lot of life’s “givens” were contemptible lies spread by boomers) I spent most of my time indulging those interests that caught my attention. And unbelievable as it may sound, the main one was a search for true love. Which resulted in much heartache and a lot of women. After a while it got so I sort of stopped believing in it but carried on enjoying the women. The rest of my time was filled with doing what I liked or interested me. Reading, martial arts, studying the human mind, ancient things and places, writing, visiting places I wanted to see… but always also that search for that one woman.
And eventually I found her.
But it was a very long, tortuous and far more painful and difficult road than it needed to be.
Had I been taught, and more importantly, shown, that family is the main point of life. Had my own family I was born into been less of a shitshow, how many years of distraction would I have saved. How much more could I have done and thus be leaving my children?
I don’t regret my life at all, because every part of it brought me to where I am now, married to the right woman finally and with enough children too. And if I had not taken this particular road I would not be with her or have the children I do, and as was very cleverly shown in a delightful film called About Time, that reality is inconceivable to me.
But the point is that if you are say in your twenties, or even thirties, (and yes, even 40s or 50s, I am living proof of this: It’s never too late) and you realise deeply that the main purpose of life is actually to create a family that is as happy and prosperous as you can make it, then, regardless of your actual situation, your priorities, your actions and your activities will be radically different than if you think having the latest iphone, knowing the latest political gossip, or cheering for this or that sports team, or traveling to see X place for the instagram cred, or getting another notch on your belt, matters at all.
And the kind of actions and activities that you will focus on will be such that, yes, perhaps you might have less “fun” (or time wasted on things that ultimately don’t matter, depending on your perspective) but you might also have a more concrete base from which to start that family.
Had I aimed to built something for the future starting in my early 20s, I would probably be able to live off rental income even with six kids by now. It’s also true that for my particular character that was never really going to be a likely road, so there is that to counter, I have always been too curious, and probably, as a good friend pointed out, too capable, to ever worry about the future, and indeed I am not especially worried about it now either, but it certainly is a lot harder than it could be.
Having a much harder life is not necessarily a bad thing. It makes you more capable in many ways (assuming you survive and overcome). But there is certainly something to be said for not having to work into your 80s. Probably anyway. Then again, I have Jean Parisot de Valette as a somewhat inspirational figure; and he was swinging his two-handed sword on the walls of one of the castles of Malta, wounded in a leg and not wearing his full armour at age 71, so… if you have that kind of character, what I can guarantee is that your life might indeed be very hard, but not boring. The issue however is not you, but your children, and while for some the idea of swinging a sword at muslim invaders’s heads in our seventies might be appealing (and for some of us possibly inevitable!) the fact is that if you’re instead leaving your children a few well-stocked and well-defended castles, and yet have also instructed them in the proper running of a city-state, you’d be far better off.
My children on the other hand will have to learn on the job, as it were, and perhaps that is as fate or God ordained. After all, we do have an 800 year known history of doing things this way; and while my branch of the family is indeed the silver one (that is filled with curious explorers and war-like adventurers, of minor noble rank) and not the gold branch that had the much higher nobility titles and actual castles to their name, it is also true that our side of the family has some truly extraordinary people in it; several of whom have been talked about in history books or left monuments with their name on it for a time.
But… if I had somehow a crystal ball at age 20 that told me I would have six children all under the age of 14 at age 55, aside the utter shock, I probably would have worked like a possessed man (as I tend to do most things) towards securing far more land and property and wealth than I have done. And even without the crystal ball, if I had simply thought creating a family was the main aim in life, I would have done so too.
Instead, the boomer poison of “the world is horrible, why would you want to bring more innocents into it?” Infected me well into my early 30s at the very least. And that is a lie that is directly related to someone not having any belief of any real substance in a Loving God.
Generic Zen-Agnosticism tinged with Shintoism is not exactly ideal for the consideration of family creation. And there hasn’t been as much need for wandering samurai, thankfully.
It took until the end of my 30s to realise that having children was the right way to live. And I am not unintelligent, which is demonstrated by the fact that I had come to this conclusion even though I was still essentially agnostic, and very much aware of how the levers of power on this planet work, which is not a position a person as objectively rational as I am is likely to come to without having a belief in God.
In fact I had come to this conclusion based only on the possibly irrational belief that my capabilities were enough to protect a child of mine even under such dystopic conditions as we have on this planet. Whether you think that is arrogance or confidence is debatable, but I am basically certain it would have been true if I limited myself to one or two children.
Adding the knowledge of a Loving God has removed a HUGE amount of the concern about having more children. And no, it does not mean miracles fall unceasing from the sky, the practicalities of feeding six children instead of two, as well as clothing them, educating them and so on are real, but you tend to find a way as you reorganise your priorities. And yes, maybe they will not all have the latest iphone and brand name clothing, but guess what: that’s not necessarily a bad thing. It makes them more imaginative and capable if they need to work for things, and if you are a decent parent you will also be able to help them get over a truly noxious aspect of modern life: caring excessively what other people think.
It’s a little different for girls than boys, but generally speaking, it is always best to err on the side of NOT caring what other people think than vice versa.
The emotional scars left by being overly concerned about other people’s opinions can be a truly devastating thing, particularly for girls, but boys too. Luckily my three youngest children already exhibit many traits that make me pretty secure in the view that this will not be an issue for them. If anything, the main worry might be to keep them from being arrested or chased out of towns for being possibly too cavalier about social rules in general!
All the people I knew at school that were from wealthy families, as a very frequent general trend, almost invariably tend to become what I would consider less accomplished human beings that even some of the absolute social rejects that everyone assumed would amount to nothing.
As a rule they tend to hold on to their wealth but be rather vacuous creatures with little to offer in terms of interesting personalities or life stories.
These apparent digressions, are not meandering, meaningless recollections and reflections of my life, they are intended to show you, and hopefully help you, see different aspects of life from different perspectives so that you might realise several things:
The nihilistic depressive narrative of the boomers is a lie.
The aimless apathy of the millennials or zoomers who are afflicted by it is weak, pathetic and unseemily for anyone with an ounce of self-respect.
The “hard” road may often be the better road, and even if not, at least you will have more cool stories and have seen a side of life the cocooned and perfumed princes of the planet will never know.
In short, the old adage is still mostly true: wounds heal, and chicks dig scars
All that said… it is only a foolish or imprudent man that does not plan (somewhat loosely, to allow for life’s inevitable detours) for the future. Especially when he envisions a numerous family in it.
Plan accordingly young man, and realise that hedonism might just be your indulgence in fancy clothes and package holidays, without a single Roman orgy in sight.
Playing old style RPGs like Dungeons and Dragons really was far more useful than anyone could guess at the time. And the almost 40 years we have had of computerised “RPGs” have now conclusively proven the benefits of the old style pen and paper, in-person games around your living room table, are in no way similar or even remotely close to any benefit of playing online versions.
The difference, of course, is due to the old style RPGs being an activity that stimulates and therefore develops the imagination. It literally improves your ability to think. Across the board. You improve your interpersonal skills by relating to other human beings face to face and in real time while also having to imagine (and describe) scenarios and situations presented to you and your reaction to them as a player character (which may have quite a different outlook than you as a real person do). Such activity promotes neural connections that would normally not be achieved in anything close to the same duration of time.
You also need to improve your generic reading comprehension as well as writing (if you create scenarios), and elementary mathematics as well as concepts such as economies of scale, troop movements, and depending on the game the math can be quite advanced. We knew how to do gravity assisted slingshot calculations by age 15 or so because it was a way to ensure your scout ship with damaged drives could still refuel and escape the gravity well of the gas giant before hyperspace jumping out of imperial hunters’ range.
This is why I created STCZA, both in paper format on Amazon or cheaper PDF you can print yourself.
But my point here is another.
In any large scale campaign with a good referee and decent players, you sometimes have to deal with the inevitable horde.
It can be a horde of orcs, or a horde of irate NPCs out for your party’s blood, or any other number of situations where a force composed of not particularly effective, strong, or intelligent creatures mass together in such numbers that regardless of how powerful, smart and efficient your party is, it has to give way or be overrun.
In our case, the real world here on Earth in 2025, the situation is not really different from a very large campaign world where different player characters and their respective groups, can play at various levels of difficulty whilst facing the situations posed to them.
In broad terms, we live on a planet that is run by an extremely evil and somewhat balkanised oligarchy. Some tiny pockets of resistance, goodness and genuine player characters trying their best to safeguard what they can also exist; but… as in all epic films, they are very much the underdogs.
It’s not exactly that the evil overlords are so numerous or even effective or intelligent per se.
It’s rather the way things are.
The pedovores in charge, are a class of vampiric creature with a penchant for raping, torturing and eating children. While this is generally known amongst the Player Characters (PCs) of Earth, it is mostly unknown by the largest swathes of Non-Player Characters (NPCs) and even assiduously denied by the boomer generation. Furthermore, the pedovores have a stranglehold on global news and entertainment as well as politics of every balkanised nation. They do this by a combination of applied brute force, deception, constant propaganda and having a monopoly on the very creation of the medium of exchange, which they then dole out to their lackeys.
The NPCs are mostly divided into three categories:
The puppets – they run governments, pretend to be famous entertainers of great talent and great and wise scientists of importance. They do the bidding of the pedovores on pain of death or similar, exposure as vicious pedophiles, total financial ruin and so on.
The bought – these guys basically do the bidding of the pedovores secondary roles for the concessions of having more money, protected lives and generally living far better than most. As long as they keep the wheels of the satanic machinery turning without asking questions. A few may even think they are just good guys in good jobs. But these might be the few brain damaged ones.
Standard NPCs – Oblivious to most of reality that does not immediately impact them directly, the sheer number of these, and the ease with which they are directed, means that they are effectively the equivalent of an unthinking zombie horde.
Now, as a PC, what would you think is the smart play?
Think on it a second.
The answer should be relatively obvious.
Consolidate (create hardcore communities of PCs with great and varied skills and abilities, but all focused on resisting and eventually defeating the enemy).
Reclaim Power (This applies mostly to grass roots political movements that range from the PTA, to the HOA to the local council, local police station, university posts and so on. Take them over, don’t give an inch and get like-minded people in next to you as they did for the last 70 years, then push back on all their nonsensical bureaucracy, lies, transgenderism, DIE false ideology, godlessness, etcetera, etcetera. In the second stage it also means the ability to hold on to whatever community you have built by the use of force, because sooner or later, the pedovores will want to take you out)
Rebuild (This means everything that leads to total self-sufficiency and self-protection)
So: what are YOU doing to build a community of zealots?
In the interim, somewhere along the line, this will also likely mean to direct the zombie hordes in directions that in the end do serve them best, but in some way, leading always involves directing large numbers of NPCs. Not in a self-serving way, it needs to be highlighted. And leaders who truly serve the people’s needs only end up in one of two ways: lionised at best for a bit, and often crucified for it sooner or later. In no case is such leading the fruit of democracy though. It is always, inevitably, far closer to a benign dictatorship. And in that respect, you should not be fooled into thinking Trump is anything akin to that. He is part of the same Cabal, just the other side of the coin.
How can we know? Look at his comments concerning the ongoing genocide in Gaza.
Non Serviam – TMOS 5a
There is only one true way to improve things.
Above all: to deal in truth.
To act in the name of good (which means the dogmatic position of the Catholic Church as far as I am concerned. You, dear reader are unlikely to agree unless you too are a 1958 Sedevacantist, but I understand, I too was a heathen for most of my life).
And acting in the name of good, whether you realise it or not, means permanently removing pedophiles, child killers and rapists from society. And of course also removing permanently all those people who aided and abetted them and hid their crimes. It also means getting rid of fraudsters, con-men and usurers, if not permanently at the very least to place them in such a situation where they are not able to practice their deceptive ways, and where their labour is used to provide compensation to the offended parties.
In short, it means dealing justice to all who deserve it, charity to those who deserve it AFTER justice has been served, and ONLY then, not before. Mercy to those who deserve it but also punishment to those who deserve it too.
The death penalty absolutely needs to come back for certain crimes, that too is non-negotiable. And secret societies of Satanists, that is Freemasons, illuminati, carbonari, skull and crossbones and so in should not only be outlawed, but membership of it should be grounds for receiving the death penalty in fact.
Freemasonry is a Satanic, anti-human, evil thing as is all Satanism.
There are many other social rules that it would be good to impose too, but this post is not primarily about that. Each group or society of people will have certain things most agree need to happen. What I wrote above is generally acceptable to most people, and the only real exception might be those too innocent, or too ignorant and lazy to look into freemasonry properly who assume it’s just a friendly social club.
If they bothered to research things a bit, they too would mostly agree that what might seem as a harsh punishment (death penalty for membership) is in fact quite sensible.
So let me now add the part no one wants to talk about:
If you agree with the above in general terms, then you also need to recognise that NONE of the political alternatives being presented to you currently are based in truth. None.
They are only different shades of lies.
Trump is not going to save anyone nor drain the swamp. And the swamp creatures that are almost certainly pedophiles of the worst sort have just had their homes NOT burn down when every house around them has in fact been lasered from the sky into ash. The trees have not however. Isn’t it amazing how Tom Hanks, Oprah, and such people have not had their home burn down?
Weird trees that don’t catch fire eh?
Do you remember Tom Hank’s face/reaction when Ricky Gervais presented the golden globe awards and accused the entire room of being pedos? It was a very worried face. And there is plenty of evidence, circumstantial though it may be. As for Oprah, she’s been feeding young meat into the machine for decades.
My point is this:
No one is going to get justice by voting for any politician. They ALL need to go. And a lot of them need to be punished for horrific crimes, along with their puppet-masters who are mass-murderers of the worst kind.
No one will get justice other than by creating a literal alternative society that is based in truth above all and has a moral foundation that equates child rape to a death sentence. And preferably not a quick death either.
Even if you are a young atheist and still do not understand this yet —think it through and you might realise it— any moral foundation of that sort has to be rooted in belief in a higher power (i.e. God). Absent a higher authority than man, there is no reason at all, for any morality whatsoever. Nor can you defend there being one. If it’s all just one nihilistic black hole of meaninglessness then, whether one rapes and kills children to satisfy their urges or serves in a soup kitchen is neither here nor there. You may prefer one over the other but there is absolutely no logical reason you can claim one is objectively “better” than the other aside your personal preference; and you have zero objective argument why your preference should be superior to anyone else’s.
So… once you realise every actual functioning society humanity has ever had was based on a religion and its morality, and if you agree with my idea that pedophiles deserve death, as do those who help them, hide them and cover for them, guess what, at removes a couple of world religions from the equation right away, because they have child rape as acceptable in their unholy books: Islam and Judaism.
There may be other views that are at least not pro-child rape, like shintoism, at least some buddhism, or generally zen-agnostic type of views like Taoism or Daioism. But in any case, false versions of any of those religions, that is, people who may pay lip service to them but don’t actually follow them, are really not relevant, which of course means most “christians” too are just another species of lukewarm NPCs.
Which means that the only people who might actually have a chance of changing the world for the better are those of us who:
1. Have a religion that is essentially good which means does NOT include child rape as part of it, or in any way acceptable to it.
2. Actually live their religion.
3. Reject the falsity and evil of the world in favour of their religion.
That is the baseline premise of the people who MIGHT actually change things.
The follow-on from that is that they therefore also need to:
1. Create an alternate society that comes into being, sustains itself, and grows that does not rely in any way on the current ones populating our Satanically dominated planet.
2. Is able to defend itself from the inevitable attacks that the Satanic Clown Worlders will eventually launch.
3. Must become able and willing to remove the evil doers and replace them with both people and systems that better guard the good, freedom, and above all justice based on truth for all, the most defenceless first: i.e. children; and rewards based on merit not fictional ideologies.
Ultimately this means to re-conquer all those positions of power that are currently inhabited by corrupt and evil people who are as allergic to truth and goodness as bacteria is to ammonia and sunlight.
The astute reader may also have realised that of all the world religions, only one clearly states that it is not just a decent thing to do, but the dogmatic duty of a man to defend the innocents.
So. Gentle reader. Guess what?
This means if you plan to serve the good, your very first step, needs to be to stop serving the evil of the machinery we are all currently being trapped by to various degrees.
Hence… we stop serving it.
Non Serviam.
No related posts.
By G | 14 January 2025 | Posted in Social Commentary, Theoretical Models of Society