Welcome to The Blog of the Kurgan

So, although it’s a fairly small sample of just over 50 people, I think I can make a few predictions. Only about 10% of those who opened/read it replied, which is low and expected, because as soon as you see a swastika most people still don’t want to be involved with it even peripherally.

The ones that responded however, in the main did not think the swastika should be banned, and where “meh” or “it didn’t happen” about the holocaust, which is quite the change certainly from about 30 years ago.

Now the “conclusions” from this (rather badly designed) experiment are for most people just a random data point in a lot of noise, but… I have a LOOOOOOOOOONG history of being able to predict various things from tiny data sets. And predict them correctly. Now the data from this experiment is hearthening. More so than I expected.

Most of my readers are middle aged men. And the audience is self-selecting because it means they are, generally speaking, not easily “offended” by reality. A shrinking demographic, but the one with the most capacity to impact the world.

The remainder tend to be younger men and a scattering of atypical females. Atypical in that they can do logic and reason to an extent that, if we listened only to (anti)”social” media, we would assume is non-existent.

So: where does this leave us?

By now, anyone reading here knows a couple of things about the future they have planned for us all. Pedovores want to squeeze you into a drone-like husk controlled at every turn.

They did this by controlling the very lifeblood of ALL commerce and pretty much all global transactions: they invented a completely artificial and entirely fabricated concept called fiat money. That is, money that has no intrinsic value and is created out of thin air by the people who decide how much of it there is and to whom it goes. You work your ass off to gain enough of this cloud of nothingness, that today is 90% of the time not even paper, but just digital pixels on a screen.

As a 4 year old child the concept of “money” as it exists made no sense to me. Then I thought I must be missing something and I was too small and ignorant to understand it all. Well, I was not. But what happens, what almost every one if you reading right now is thinking, deep at the back of their lizard brain, probably not even fully consciously, is that

“this guy is just going to say some completely impossible thing none of us can actually do in reality, and our world will always be controlled by the pedovores of the Epstein class and Epstein Alliance.”

And the only thing preventing this ENTIRE planet from pulling those demon-infested clowns from their thrones built on the shattered bodies if the children they tortured to death, then ate (no, it’s NOT an exaggeration, read those fucking Epstein files), and hanging them from the nearest tree ir lampost, is simply and ONLY, that BELIEF. Not the reality of life or anything else.

So let me tell you how that, works. And I will use myself as the typical case in question, so you don’t feel too bad about being so completely zombified and brainwashed yourself, though, for our American readers, your trance-state is generally a lot deeper than the average citizen of just about anywhere else.

When I was 16 we had a “holocaust survivor” come to our school in the UK and do a survey about how we felt about the Holocaust and the poor six million Jews gassed to death.

Now, I didn’t know much about it, but I had been indoctrinated more than most since at age 7 I was given a geography project to do and I got Germany, which meant I found out about the absolute evil of the Nazis then. And of course even as a child I was shocked at how coukd a WHOLE COUNTRY become so EVIL?!

Right? And that childish thought, of believing that instant narrative of absolute evil vs. Good stayed with me a long time. It was also reinforced by the fact that at about that time too, at school we were told about Fascism and how terrible it was. Which was a bit weird because the very name means to join together (fasce is a bunch of sticks tied together used by farmers to start fires mostly), and it was fairly hard to understand what was so bad about joining together to protect your own country. Nevertheless, the fascists were like the younger, not quite as evil cousins of the prime evil Nazis.

No one told us about Weimar republic and what was done to the Germans. And certainly not by WHOM.

The swastika became a symbol for prime evil.

And yet, when that aging Jew came to our school eleven years later, I instinctively did not trust him, and in my survey, despite his sob story about his whole family having been gassed to death, (which at the time I had no knowledge of the reality/impossibility of various holocaust claims, so I took at face value as being real) in my survey, i stated clearly that the so-called holocaust had zero relevance to me. Because even if it HAD happened as they had told us, and even if the Nazis HAD been all completely evil, it still, is exactly as relevant to us today as the slave trade to America when I interact with a black person. I.e. zero.

Aside the fact that the slave trade and the first and second world wars were actually instigated for profit by the same tribe that has been a parasitic drain on every host nation that ever had them since at least the time before Christ, as recorded by various Roman emperors and senators if the time, the simple fact is I have ZERO guilt or duty to ANYONE for ANYTHING I did not SPECIFICALLY and INTENTIONALLY have anything to do with.

Just as I generally dislike the French or the Austrians based on their generally shitty character (don’t worry I think that way about pretty much most of humanity), but not specifically for their part in destroying/annexing my country (The Most Serene Republic of Venice). Because no living Frenchman or Austrian had anything to do with it.

And yet, the brainwashing for people of my age concerning the evil of pretty much all of Germany, the swastika, and of course, the most evil man that ever lived, Adolf, was embedded at a very early age and constant.

Even after I discovered the impossibility of the 6 million, the fact the very plaque at Auschwitz was changed at least twice, from 4, to 2, to now less than 1 million deaths, and going from all being Jewish to now “most of them”, the absurdity of gas chambers with wooden doors locked from the “inside” only, and on, and on, and on, I STILL find it hard to not recoil internally at the sight of a swastika or armband on a Nazi uniform.

Now, if you were to take a time machine and travel to 1941, the sense of that symbol around the world projected an entirely different sense to the average person. Perhaps still scary, sure, but also of strength, unity, and a united people fighting for their country.

The rebel flag of the USA I always found attractive, again, instinctively, even as a child, as I did the headband of the Japanese Kamikaze. Possibly because in the Japanese, whatever ideology you have, the idea of one warrior taking out an entire ship by self-sacrifice is still heroic, regardless of any ideology you may have. And with the South in the American Civil War, by the time I was told the reason was to free the slaves, I could already smell the bullshit. And I properly think of that “civil” war now as it should correctly be labelled: The War of Northern Aggression.

The point here however is not about good guys vs bad guys. It’s about your completely erroneous belief that fiat or digital money or total surveillance is inevitable. It’s not.

You need to AS AN INDIVIDUAL, realise fiat money is nonsense. And sure you and me still need it and use it, but I will continue to do so less and less as I try to become entirely self-sufficient. Then I will try to make others join me in it. Humanity lived for most of its existence without fiat money. And that is the stranglehold the pedovores have on us all. So start to figure out how to not require that falsity in your life.

Because if we manage that, removing the pedovores becomes really easy after that.

“Oh but How?!?” You say? I explained that a lot on this and my OG blog, so read it, but also: figure it out. Yourself. Because you’re it. No one, including me, is coming to save you.

Be that guy. Once enough of us are “that guy” we will change everything.

Subscribe

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

First of all a NECESSARY set of caveats:

1. I am NOT a Nazi sympathiser, nor have I ever been.
2. I am not a FASCIST sympathiser, nor have I ever been.

I will explain why below and it should be definitive. However…

3. I am also ABSOLUTELY NOT a Communist Sympathiser
4. I ABSOLUTELY HATE WITH A PASSION any religion that states that the raping of children is not a crime. This means that Judaism, which says it’s not a crime to rape children under age 3, and Islam, which says it’s ok for a 54 year old man to rape a 9 year old girl, are ANATHEMA to me. While I accept that not ALL supposed adherents of those religions are necessarily aware of these issues, it absolutely makes zero difference to me. If YOU profess to belong to a specific religion it is on YOU to know or not know what it is. I will treat you exactly as though you ARE aware of it, as you should be. Therefore, while it is possible an individual Jew or Muslim might not be a pedophile, ideologically, they all are.
5. I ABSOLUTELY don’t give a tiny speck of shit if that supposedly makes me an “anti-semite”. I am not, because I absolutely feel for the innocents, especially the thousands of children Israel is massacring in Gaza and intentionally shooting at to wound and kill toddlers, which is an uncontested fact.

Finally, and above all other considerations, there is the two overriding principles by which I have always lived my life to the best of my ability since I was a small child, consciously, and they are:

1. TRUTH ABOVE ALL
2. JUSTICE

You can’t have LOVE without Justice, not the real one, so, although it is to my mind true that God if we were to reduce it to one word IS LOVE, and it is true that Love encompasses, Truth AND Justice, in human terms, we very, very, very, very, often avoid truth and are especially bad at doing Justice too.

Right, now, give the above points it should be clear that, as concerns my two Polls below, I do NOT have a “gotcha” agenda trying to make the Nazis be the good guys, or exposing YOU as a Nazi, or a Jew hater, or whatever. I don’t care about any of that. This thought experiment is designed to measure something entirely, which will NOT affect you individually, since in any case, I have zero way of knowing who voted what. I will explain the purpose and the results after the polls are closed.

Second question:

By restored I simply mean that its use should be no more controversial than the Rebel flag of the US civil war, or the Kamikaze headbands of the Japanese WWII suicide pilots.

After you answer the poll, if it made you reflect on some aspects of why you feel as you do, please leave a comment giving more details.

Lastly, optional one you can also answer in the comments, what does the image below make you feel at first impact, as soon as you saw it (either in the preview of this post or now)? The more detailed you can be the more useful for the purposes of the experiment.

Thank you for your participation.

Subscribe now

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

This is long, and imperative to read

If you wonder how the WEF and the pedovores in charge plan for you to quietly go into the night, preventing you from ever having any sort of rebellion, much less an armed one, you really need to read this whole, very long, but very thorough article on what Japan is like today. And in fact, what it was like already 33 years ago when I visited it with my Karate Team.

If you want to know the future you need to read the whole thing .

And if you want to know how to prevent it from happening, you need to basically read me and my writings for the last… well… since I started writing a blog really. And you may prefer to go to the more complete version that has been around since 2009 and taken out by feds or Israeli in 2024 but has been fully rebuilt without losses. The search me function on that blog lets you search for key words like “clown world” “community” “farming” and all sorts of related things, and it has a pinned “important posts” section at the top. Here it is:

Thekurganblog.com

But in a nutshell, the core idea is simple to lay out if not necessarily easy to do:

1. 1. Become a zealot. A human needs an idea, a religion, a purpose, larger than himself and ideally one that extends to infinity. The closer that concept is aligned to how reality ACTUALLY functions, the more likely his success at building whatever it is he wants to build. Historically, the most successful concept in human history at producing the most beautiful art, safe societies, and warriors unmatched by anyone was actual Catholicism (not the inverted version Satanists have created since 1958). The same Catholicism that created the Dominican monasteries, that converted the Pagan Vikings, that created the Crusader Knights that fought Muslim hordes of 100:1 and more against and won, that had the 600 knights of Malta foil an Islamic invasion force of 40,000 enemies. That Catholicism today exists only in the last few Catholics left that actually still are Catholic, believe as their ancestors and the Catholics before them did and are known as 1958 Totalist Sedevacantists, but our real name is Catholic, it’s just most have been fooled by the Freemasons, Communists, pedophiles, faggots and deceivers currently led by Bob. Not a single Catholic is left in the Vatican, and the sedevacatist clergy has been in an interregnum, without a Pope, since the last valid one died on 9th October 1958. I became a Catholic because of a mystical experience I would have laughed at you had you told me it would happen to me and that Catholicism, of all the religions would be where I landed. I too thought the pederasts in the Vatican represented it. Then I had a road to Damascus moment and I spent 4 years studying Catholicism like an obsessed man, because even after that event, I could not reconcile the Vatican squatters as being exponents of what I had seen. And indeed they are not. They are impostors. And Vatican II was their almost (but not quite) total victory. Anyway, YOU don’t need to be a Catholic zealot like I am. I mean, you should be, and it would be best if you were, and we joined forces, wherever you may be. I certainly have met and been involved in seeing the beauty of the lives of several young men that have gone on to get married, have children, produce great works for the faith, and all helped me on my farm. And it would be even better if many such men moved near me and we built a physical community that can thrive, which it would because such zealots are extraordinary in loyalty and ethics. We help each other in any way we can, and as a community we would put the Amish to shame. But that’s my mission. It would be great if you join it, but you don’t have to. Go ahead and build your own community, but realise that you need to do that and that it needs to outlast generations. No ideology has done that better than Catholicism. Nor will it. We have been here for 2000 years, and shrunken though we may be, that too was prophesied so no worries. We’ll be here 2000 years from now too. But you do you.
2. 2. You need to get land in a rural area.
3. 3. Get married and stay married no matter what (picking the right person is paramount. I fucked it up twice before I got it right. Shit happens. But you are at a decided advantage if you start off as a Catholic. Divorce doesn’t exist in our faith.)
4. 4. Have plenty of children.
5. 5. Become as self sufficient as possible so pick your location so that you can have free water, grow food and protect your land.
6. 6. Build a community of zealots like you.

That’s it. Get to it.

Subscribe

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

…of doing what I advocate, using AI to defeat the purposes of the very people trying to make sure you stay sick, alone, and despondent!

The Gen Z fighters will be fine.

Subscribe now

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

This video is only a few minutes long, but extremely interesting, I strongly suggest you watch it. My most recent book, which includes protocols for fasting up to 14 days at a time is also linked below the video, and below that is my best educated guess as to why the Russians got the results they did. Remember that modern psychiatry and psychology cure literally NO ONE. These so-called “professionals” psychologists and psychiatrists were interviewed at random and asked how many patients they cured and ONE of them said “Maybe…one.” All the others said none.

The only thing I (was) aware of that helps and can cure at least some mental disorders is hypnosis properly done, for two reasons:

1. The work of Milton Erickson, which I am probably the only person on Earth who has read every single thing Erickson ever wrote (approximately 20,000 pages in total). And,
2. Because I have achieved it myself with a person that was on medication and officially diagnosed as “Paranoid Schizophrenic”, and yet after four sessions he was no longer on medication, resumed his studies, got a girlfriend, and went on to live a normal life.

So why would fasting work? See the video, which is only 7 minutes long and covers some amazing work done by the Soviets during the Cold War. My thoughts on it are below it.

Subscribe now

Share

If you don’t care for my explanation and just want to know how to go about it with zero filler, here is the book . Link is to the digital PDF version, you can print yourself, but the description there also has links to Amazon so you can order ready-made paper copies. It’s only 48 pages and then nearly 30 pages of plans for your notes.

It has daily diet and supplement plans, along with fasting Protocols from 3 to 14 days, and also 8 recipes of how to do your own fermented foods; As well as exercise routines for during, after and beyond the fast (each thing can be done separately or all three [better eating, exercise, and fasting]).

Subscribe now

Share

My View of Why it Works

The relationship between our mental processes and the gut biome, is, in my opinion, far, far, far more relevant than pretty much any current medical “professional” understands. Just like I have demonstrated things like close range telepathy on video, as part of the 40 videos you get when you purchase my seminal work on Systema, The Russian Martial System, or the effects of Hypnosis not just on the mind, but also on the physical body ( see the effects on eyesight ), there are far more interesting physiological, and neurological effects and links between our mind, body and gut biome than pretty much anyone can even guess.

The Body-Snatcher Issue

I personally experienced a very real “hijacking of my brain” by the parasitic overgrowth of Candida I had developed by about 2014 or. so, without realising what it was, I went almost overnight from basically fit, training regularly and being healthy, to being fatigued, always bloated, with fur on my tongue and no real explanation as to why. Doctors couldn’t tell me either. This continued until early 2016 when I moved to Venice. It was then through a Facebook friend in a group I was part of, that someone suggested it was an overgrowth of Candida. So I did a 3 day water fast, and then basically only ate bresaola, octopus, and water, for months. The occasional fish or meat only stew for diversity, and a tub of 1kg of natural Greek Yoghurt once a month (yes in one go). I lost weight, got healthy again and the Candida issue disappeared, however… one evening, a few weeks into this Spartan regimen, I was lying on my couch, watching an episode of Montalbano (hilarious, well made and gives a real insight into Italian way of life) and out of the blue, I had a sudden, and really STRONG urge to eat an entire tub of Nutella. I didn’t have any such thing in the house, and it was 2 am anyway, but I was off the couch and half-way to the fridge before I realised… Wait… WHAT THE FUCK AM I DOING? AND WHY? And I realised that the “need” of suddenly a tub of Nutella, was nothing to do with what. my body actually needed, or even my brain wanted. It was the closest thing to awakening from being directed by a body-snatcher that was parasitically attached to my brain-stem. It’s really quite disconcerting when you become suddenly so consciously aware of it.

And it was that very realisation that gave me the impetus to kill the damned parasitic bacteria (we all have Candida in our gut as part of our natural flora, but what it does, and if it’s even useful at all remains open to debate. What is sure is that sugar feeds it and almost everyone on processed food has an excess of it, and it is NOT good.)

Throughout 2016, 2017, and 2018 to about 2021 or so, I was healthy, then we moved to Italy, I got a bad case of Covid (no jab for me thanks) and then 2 pneumonias in 2022 that nearly finished me off. Recovering from that and being busy on the farm and making another 2 children with my wife meant I did not take care with what I ate, when, how, etc.

Mental Stability

It make sense to me that, given all sorts of bugs can and do exist in our gut, some can react with out nervous system in ways that are truly very much analogous to a parasitic creature taking over our brain. And not in a good way. This is very much known to be the case in the animal world, not just with insects, but mammals too (cats, rats, etc.) so I seen reason why it would be any different for humans.

The Reset

And lately I again was under the weather, constant joint inflammation and so on. So… I decided to reset everything with a full 14 day water only diet (see how to do it in the book) and I can attest that not only am I feeling a LOT better, but the inflammation has gone, a ganglion cyst I had that formed on the inside of my palm and made using any tool painful has now almost completely re-absorbed (it was probably the result of my fracturing my elbow when I slipped and fell on ice in January, the elbow is still tender in that area).

But my thinking is also a lot clearer, and I believe it’s because I essentially starved the body-snatcher known as Candida. And I will continue to do so. I have entered a regimented refeeding protocol (you need to be careful after you do a long fast how you start eating again to avoid serious complications), which is now at an end, however, I have once again, eliminated:

• All sugar, in ANY form
• All dairy products, in ANY form
• Sticking to healthy meats (properly raised, zero antibiotics wherever possible)
• Some vegetables (small amounts, but not the carbohydrates ones like potatoes)
• Zero Carbs (any alcohol, breads of all kinds, any pasta of any kind, and things like potatoes are all out)

I do take a few supplements and drink salted water.

I know to most people such a regimented and limited diet is unrealistic, but I have done. this plenty of times before when I was training in karate at my peak and later in Systema too, so I know it’s doable, but it DID need a mental reset, which the 14 day fast provided, as I ignored the tasty foods my wife prepared (supposedly for the kids, but possibly to torture me) and just drank my salty water and took the magnesium and couple of other things. Now, I can ignore. their eating cake in front of me easily, and it’s not an issue, also because, I get a kind of pleasure from knowing I am murdering colonies of Candida in my gut by the millions. Nothing drives one like an active enemy to defeat.

Exercise and Return to Peak

That is how my diet will stay as I gradually increase the exercise routine in order to get back to my peak performance from about age 35 or so, which will be hard enough to do at 56 with a compromised left lung. That is partly damage from the pneumonia, and partly due to a reduced diaphragm mobility on the left side that may have been congenital, the result of trauma (I was certainly kicked and punched there enough times over the years), or possibly also due to the Pneumonia. It was something discovered over the last year due to chest X-Rays. So I apparently have an atrophied ability to fill the left lung to full capacity. Due to all that, if I get back to age 35 performance I will be quite happy. Projected for 12-18 months of training, I think it should be fairly achievable, and possibly even go beyond it. My forest gym is in place now, I do need a better spinning bike because the one I got is fine for someone like my wife, but too light for me to train properly with.

I also commissioned a metal frame to perform some maximum effort static resistance training exercises with, but that’s made to measure for me and the. wife, so may not be useful for most people, but if they manufacture it properly and with proper technical diagrams I may put the plans for it on sale for a modest fee as it is adjustable for people between 6’ 2” and 5’ 7” and with a few adaptations could suit people up to 6’ 4” too.

I don’t do weights, as I find it too mind-numbing for me, but they are essentially irrelevant for me as I was always able to outperform most so-called body-builders (amateur level) of a size comparable to my own height and weight, mostly because the exercises I trained in most of my life are fast twitch and endurance body-work against gravity type of things, which is known to pretty much outperform weight-pushers in every respect, but especially cardio work, long-distance work like hiking, etc.

One thing I keep thinking would be beneficial is Tai-Chi, but I am mostly ignorant of it and not sure how much I could learn from videos or maybe a book, but I also can’t see myself travelling to any classes s I can’t afford the time, still, it interests me a lot more now at my age than it did when I was 30 years younger.

So… I had long ago promised you guys some health posts for subscribers and kind of failed at that, but. here I am… returning to it and probably with more useful information in one short place than you will know what to do with.

And yes, it reads great exactly for people like me, who HATE reading about diets, and healthy eating, and blah, blah, blah, zzzzzzzz….

So hopefully it will be useful for more of you than most supposed “health plans”.

At least, that is my hope.

Subscribe now

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

Subscribe now

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

As you can tell, I am right up there following “current events” in great detail… Supposedly Shotgun fired six times, no one, hit, Kash Patel staring into the middle distance, possibly contemplating the fact his lack of understanding of the concept of toilet paper was helpful in retaining it all in his underpants, naked guy mobbed by burly SS men, something, something. And I could not care less, because it’s all very obviously fake and very, very, very, gay.

Thomas Crooks appeared in a Blackrock Commercial..

Ryan Routh was filmed by Newsweek in 2022 about his effort to recruit mercenaries to fight in Ukraine.

Cole Allen appeared in an ABC News report back in 2017..

Isn’t it weird how all the would be assassins appear to be MKUltra Project Artichoke Assets?

I’m sure they are all just Cohen-cidences.

Subscribe now

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

Satan never sleeps. So, be ever-vigilant.

There are some structural changes to the original post, because for one, now Bishop Sanborn is directly named, and a few clarifying points have been expanded on for the benefit of both Catholics and those who are not but want to understand more of the current situation.

Please note that I was clear about Sedeprivationism not being valid already back in 2020 when I wrote Reclaiming the Catholic Church, but it is now blindingly obvious to really most of the remaining Catholics, and it is high time, this absurd “Thesis” was called out and rejected once and for all.

The Original Post unchanged, written in January 2025 is here:

Subscribe now

This post will not mean a lot to you if you don’t even know what the issue is, so there is a cliff’s notes version directly below labelled introduction. If you already know what a Novus Ordo impostor clergy is, a fake 2023 “sedevacantist”, an una-cum 1 “sedevacantist”, a sedeprivationist, or finally a 1958 sedevacantist is (i.e. and actual Catholic), then you can skip the intro and go directly to the core post.

If you are a little fuzzy on the above (or even totally ignorant of most of the terms) then the below intro should really help. Let me preface it by saying that it will simply be a summary of the facts. I do not intend to provide exhaustive (or even any) links and references. Mostly because almost all that work has already been done in BELIEVE! and Reclaiming the Catholic Church. This merely aims to explain the concept in very accessible layman’s terms so ANYONE reading it can understand it.

Please be aware that mental retards that start to spout off some mentally retarded nonsense about Catholicism, ignoring the post in order to spout their retardation, will immediately be banned from ever being able to comment again. So, protestants, curb your heretical tongues if you will and instead contemplate this image.

The Kurgan’s Substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Introduction

The Catholic Church was instituted by Jesus Christ Himself, putting Peter at its head as the first Pope. The Church then put together the Bible some three hundred years after the ascension of Christ, from both written and oral tradition. At this time, the Church already had 300 or so years of Popes, Holy Mass complete with transubstantiation, the perpetual virginity and immaculate conception of Mary and so on. And despite attacks from various Magus , (magicians, wizards, deceivers) described even in the Bible itself, gnostics, heretics and their heresies of all types, not to mention the most barbaric and vicious persecutions by various Roman emperors (and later by various European kings and emperors), the Church continued to grow and spread the gospel.

The schism of the Easter “Orthodox” was nothing more than their usual (aptly named) byzantine politics rooted in worldly matters. Keep in mind that until 1054, literally EVERY Christian until then knew and accepted that the Pope in Rome was the ultimate authority on Church matters wherever and whenever a dispute appeared. Evidenced by plenty of times when the Pope was exactly referred to in order to settle any disputes. There was only ONE Christianity, and it was absolutely, and ONLY Catholic, in every single respect. In any case, the fact the “split” of 1054 was mostly just “politics as usual” for the Byzantines, is clearly evidenced by the fact that when they called for help from the Islamic depredations of their cities and lands, some 40 years after splitting from, and rejecting, the West and the Pope —that had in any event tried his best to reconcile with them— the Catholics immediately mounted the First Crusade, at the behest of Pope Urban II, who gave a rousing speech that convinced the most wealthy and noble families to go so far as sell all their lands and possessions and fund the Crusade to save the Eastern schismatics. And when they started to do so, the Eastern Schismatics immediately made alliances with the Muslims and literally attacked and tried and kill the Catholics that had saved them.

This happened repeatedly and incessantly through the first, second, and third crusade. By the time of the fourth crusade the Venetians had enough, so Constantinople was sacked (rather gently as these things go in history, by the way). The Backstabbing Eastern Schismatics are still whining to this day about how the Catholics “massacred them” for no reason at all other than greed. Right.

Some 500 years after that, we get that maid-raping, nun-fetishists, probably Jewish, fake Monk, Luther who is at first rejected by everyone, including Henry VIII, until old impotent Henry gets bored of his wife and wants to murder-divorce her, and the Pope says: “No. Marriage is for life.” At that point Henry splits from the Church massacres Catholics en masse, and steals all their lands, wealth, Churches and so on, and invents his own version of the “Christian” religion, and by extension gives licence to many other “nobles” on the mainland to do the same. Their motives are entirely obvious and historically documented as having to do with money, land, and power, and almost precisely nothing with the in any case absurd theological “differences” (wild lies, exaggerations, and errors Martin made up) that Protestants supposedly had then with Catholicism. 2

From this time on, it became increasingly required for the valid Popes of the Catholic Church to spell out things that everyone, including illiterate peasants, had always known, understood and never questioned. But as is Satan’s way, the gnostics, various tribes of Satanists, and the entirely Satanic Freemasons, whose temples the flaming homosexual and heretic King James instituted as we find them today. Along with his version of the “Bible”, which aside having already been severely edited by Luther, had also been edited by the enemies of Christ (the Pharisees) for 700 years, and which today contains more than 33,000 “errors” of translation. This is the “Bible” revered by the most retarded of the Protestants sects, the KJV, also known as the Freemason Bible, which is basically saying the Satanic bible, because Freemasonry is absolutely, 100% Satanism, and anyone who says otherwise is simply an outrageous liar (i.e. Satanist).

So… as a result of the hydra-like spawning of the people rebelling against God’s Church and “Protesting” it, Popes (the valid ones anyway, because there have been more than 40 anti-popes even before 1958) had to start issuing papal encyclicals that spelt out in autistic detail, what everyone who had not been deceived and lied to by these heretics already knew. So things like Cum Ex Apostolato Officio , which says the most obvious and logical thing, which is: if you behave like a heretic, guess what, you’re not a Catholic, and therefore not a priest, or bishop, or Pope. You are nothing but a heretic, and no one needs to make any big deal about it, nor is an official pronouncement required. Again, this is not rocket science, and yet, there are so many morons on this planet, especially Sedeprivationists, that even if (when?) Bergoglio Bob, starts to sacrifice babies on the altar, they will still try to say he really is a Pope.

Nevertheless, this constant having to explain that 2+2 is still 4, has always been 4 and so on, gives the enemies of truth and God, the latitude to say “Aha! It was never 4, you guys only stated to say that in 1451! This means it was always 3.5!”

And once again, because the average person really is best to just be silent and do as his VALID priest says, a LOT of confusion and lies and infiltration of the Church began to become possible.

In fact, the Satanists (in their Legions of names, be it Illuminati, Freemasons, Carbonari, Rosicrucians, Golden Dawn, Skull and Crossbones, etc, etc, etc, ad nauseam) began to infiltrate the Church with Satanists, homosexuals, pedophiles and communists (see Bella Dodd and many other Papal encyclicals, most notably by Pious X) in earnest from the late 1770s. And by 1958 they had finally managed to make so complete an infiltration that the first of so far an unbroken chain of false Popes was “elected”: Angelo Roncalli. 3 And the Church has been absent a Pope, and today, absent ANY valid clergy in the Vatican.

Vatican II is composed of 16 documents which ALL contain direct reversal of positions the real Catholic Church always had unchanged for 2 millennia. What the Satanists tried to “change” are of two sorts, neither of which has ever changed, nor will it:

1. Clarifications of what should already have been obvious to any Catholic because it always was the case. For example: the papal encyclical of Pope Paul the IV, Cum-Ex Apostolato Officio, summarised (and not abrogated) in Canon 188 part 4 of the Code of Canon Law of 1917, which basically states that heretics are not Catholics and a heretic pope is not a Pope, and when this abandonment of the faith is done publicly, regardless of rank, no one needs to say anything officially, nor make a ruling etc. That person is a heretic and should forever be treated as one by all Catholics.
2. Changes to ecclesiastical rules or laws, which is entirely permitted, because these are not divine laws. So for example a rule was introduced you need 70 cardinals to elect a Pope. This is not a “forever rule” it became necessary as the Church became global in size. But in the current situations, there doesn’t even exist ANY valid Cardinals, and yet, neither did Cardinals exist in the year 250 AD, and the people voting for a Pope were sometimes not even clergy. And it is a dogmatic principle of Catholicism that the truth is immutable, so any divine rule that was true in the past cannot be changed in the future, and vice-versa. The only rules that CAN and HAVE changed are human rules. But a an imperfect general council of remaining valid clergy (Only 1958 TOTALIST Sedevacantists are fully and correctly Catholic in their theology) could happen tomorrow to elect a newly valid Pope. Because Sedevacantists number probably a million or two at most (but have HUGE numbers of sympathisers, and our numbers keep growing) this would not necessarily be wise, and the enemy would immediately shout with all the power of their wealth and mass media that this is a ridiculous act by a few crazy people. Not too dissimilar from what the Roman Empire did to the first few actual Catholics, but they are not crucifying us and setting us on fire (yet). And it is absolutely necessary that the Church continue as it needs to, because after all, it’s not a numbers game, Catholicism started with eleven scared men in hiding and a few (braver) women. It’s not about numbers. It’s about truth.

So, in reality, the real rules of the church that matter (divine law) has not changed at all in 2 millennia. And the entirety of these rules (both divine and human) were finally put down in ONE document that took years to compile because it required the vetting of some 40,000 documents in total (and maybe several thousands more) to ensure that no aspect of the rulings of all the Popes and doctors of the Church expressed in various writings from the start of the Church to 1917 was in any kind of conflict or contradicted each other. In short, the Code of Canon Law of 1917, is the most vetted document humanity has ever created, and was put together by two valid popes (Pious X and Benedict XV) and a college of Cardinals, to ensure no error in it. So, it has the indelible stamp of infallibility, which the magisterium of the Church, as per dogmatic Catholic belief, has.

In short, ALL the rules of the Church and Catholicism can be found in this document and the documents produced by the valid Popes from 1917 to 1958 as official pronouncements ex-cathedra (from the chair of Peter, that is, a Pope can be a completely flawed man, but when he issues a decree officially from his position as Pope of Faith and Morals, we Catholics believe that pronouncement will be supernaturally protected from error, not because the Pope is infallible per se , but because Jesus promised He will always be with us, so a valid Pope cannot pronounce a heretical document.)

Now… according to the CoC of 1917, Roncalli, and all the other impostors became heretics by producing, promoting and promulgating the heretical Vatican II documents. In short, the ONLY actual Catholic clergy left are those that reject everyone who promoted and did not refute Vatican II and all its heresy.

Anyone claiming to be “Catholic clergy” who does not reject all of Vatican II and its fake “Popes” is absolutely NOT a Catholic, never mind validly ordained clergy.

Right… if you have followed all that, we now have reached the issue about sedeprivationism vs sedevacantism, which, ultimately, as it turns out, is just the latest Satanic attack against the last remaining Catholics.

A last point before we get into the autistic level of details (what, you thought the above was convoluted? Wait, you sweet innocent!): Some lost souls, like Ann Barnhardt, pretend that Ratzi the Nazi was a valid Pope, which is of course absurd as he was one of the main architects of Vatican II. Nevertheless these confused souls, illogical morons, or knowing deceivers, whichever the case may be individually, all “believe” that as Ratzi was the “Pope” when he died, because Bergy-the-oleous was clearly a Satanist from all he did, they too suddenly became “Sedevacantists”. But these are 2023 “Sedevacantists” (when Ratzi went to finally meet his master in Hell), which are, at best, just another deceived mass of well meaning (but erroneous) Catholics.

So, to be clear, when I say Sedevacantists, I am always referring to ACTUAL Sedevacantist, that is, those who recognise we have been without a valid Pope since the 9th of October of 1958; the day Pope Pious XII died.

Now contemplate this little image if you’re thinking Bergy-the-Oleous was, or Bob today is “Pope” instead of the Satanic defiler of the Church he is.

Sede vs Sede

Now we have reached a point that has been brewing behind the scenes for several years.

If you paid attention to the introduction, it should be obvious that the situation with Catholicism today is as follows:

1. There is a HUGE number of nominal Catholics4 that are almost entirely ignorant of these details and believe themselves to be Catholics in good faith and are increasingly becoming despondent, disillusioned, let down, distraught, and even leaving Catholicism because the constant heresy of the Pedophile Protector Jorge Bergoglio, pretender to the Throne of Peter, are so outrageous that no sane man can think he really is a Catholic of any sort, never mind a Pope. I mean, the placing of a demonic symbol of a baby-eating demon (Pachamama) on the altar of Christ during supposed Holy Mass, and then doing the ritual to that same demon in the Vatican with a bunch of “Cardinals” and “Bishops”, is kind of a clue. Even if you are deaf, dumb, blind, and have the IQ of a lobotomised rat on crack. To be clear these fooled/ignorant/lazy lay people, ARE catholics, but they have been fooled massively and are in error. However, if they have read this far, they now have an obligation to educate themselves on these matters, or else possibly become guilty of a mortal level sin of sloth. Because we’re not talking about leaving some dishes undone here. We are talking about not taking the time to learn the truth about your supposed faith, and thus your allegiance to God and Jesus Christ and the Truth above all.
2. There is also a HUGE number of INVALID and FAKE “Catholic” Clergy. These impostors are, in the first place NOT validly ordained, because the ritual for ordination was changed and thus made invalid; and in any case, heretics cannot ordain valid clergy. But even if they had been somehow validly ordained by someone legitimate, they become non-Catholics, and heretics, the minute they do not reject Vatican II and all its fake “Popes”. So, these are all just impostors in “Catholic” clothing. And even if a few of them might be well-meaning ignorants, then they are at best, criminally incompetent. Because being a “priest” and being unaware of these things is like saying you’re an engineer but have no clue what a bending moment is. Sorry buddy, if you really don’t know, there is no damned way you should EVER be let near a construction site, or, in their case, the supposed robes of a clergyman. But for the most part these people are absolutely knowing and conscious deceivers, as demonstrated by the homosexual orgies in the Vatican (Coccopalmieri etc.), the scandals of child abuse that have skyrocketed since the 1960s (and even earlier because the infiltration had been ongoing for a long time), and the continued heresies these freaks keep pushing.
3. Then there is a small number of still VALID Sedevacantist clergy, that, however, as we have been in an interregnum since 1958 (from the Latin “between realms” the period when one Pope dies and before another valid one is elected) have no jurisdictional authority at all. Because all jurisdictional authority derives from the Pope. So, valid Priests and Bishops can continue to dispense the sacraments, perform Holy Mass, and Bishops can ordain Priests and other Bishops,5 but there are no dioceses, and no Bishop nor priest has any authority over a specific territory, congregation, etc. In essence, all Bishops and Priests become first and foremost dispensers of sacraments, and teachers of catechism and Catholic dogma. And of course, they can keep teaching and doing their duties, but no layman is obligated by anything other than his own sense of what is right and true, and his conscience, to give his or her loyalty or obedience to any of them, beyond that of not behaving in a way that contravenes Catholicism. What I mean by this is that NO ONE, No Bishop, no Priest, currently has the right to tell a group of lay people “You can’t discuss theology amongst yourselves”.” Or, “You can’t take sacraments from THAT guy!” (pointing to another valid clergyman). This point is EXTREMELY IMPORTANT to keep in mind for a little later.
4. A generally unknown but relatively small number of laypeople that are Sedevacantists, are aware of these issues, and attend only valid masses given by valid clergy. And herein lies the snake.

Within the Sedevacantist movement, keeping in mind that no Bishop nor priest has any more power than any other. And none have any Jurisdiction over anything, because it all stems from, and is assigned by, the Pope; and only a VALID POPE can do that. Again, this is an extremely important point to remember.

Now, the thing about Catholicism is that it is ONE True Church, undivided. So, while the mouth-breathing and drooling retarded Protestants, devious “Catholic” Novus Orcians, Eastern Schismatics and other gnostics, all want to pretend Sedevacatists are just like Protestants because they don’t recognise the “Pope”, the truth, of course, is simply that we don’t recognise a wild otter as the Pope either. And Bergy-the-oleous and Ratzi the Nazi, and Wojtla the Pole, and Luciani the murdered would-be Vatican Banker Investigator, and Roncalli the Freemason, and Montini the handmaiden to Satan, and now Bob the American, along with all their imps, are no more Catholic than a wild otter either. And possibly considerably less so, in fact. So yeah, we don’t recognise ANY of them as clergy of Catholicism.

I mention that because, while it is true that Catholics are one, this does not mean there aren’t open debates about various theological things. So, if you are Catholic you absolutely must believe in the Trinity and say that conversion to Catholicism (or confirmation to it) must be done of your own free will without coercion, same with marriage and so on, but there are other things that can be thought of slightly different from different people, and here now enters the sulphuric smoke of what the deceivers love… Any tiny doubt, any discrepancy, any honest inquiry, becomes for them, a way to infiltrate and parasitically bend, and twist the truth so as to confuse, deceive, and deny both innocents and faithful alike into error.

So, let us now enter into the difference between what is known as the Totalist position of sedevacantism (aka correct Catholicism) and the sedeprivationist position of sedevacantism (aka flawed Catholicism).

The basic difference is that father Gerard de Lauriers, a theologian of note, came up with the theory of Cassiciacum (it was first published in the French magazine by that name). In my opinion, it was a way to explain to those clergy who may not have been immediately prone to saying “Wait a minute, Satan, this Vatican II stuff is ALL HERESY!” and throw Montini off the Papal throne, and preferably off the balcony into St. Peter’s square, you know, to send a bit of a message to the other Freemasons infesting the Vatican. It was a polite way of saying “Look guys, maybe you believed he was really a Pope, maybe you guys really are not Satanists too, and you just made a mistake, but once you read the Vatican II documents, and the totally heretical changes to the Mass (which is not permitted, as per the eternal Papal Encyclical Quo Primum ), surely you can see he really isn’t a Pope, and we should do something about it?”

In a nutshell, and yes, it is accurate, the Thesis (as I will call it from now on) is a long treatise that delves into philosophy, Aristotelian logic and so on, but in essence tries to say that a Pope can be a “Pope” from the “material” (Physical) aspect, but fail to be a real(TM) Pope “spiritually” if he doesn’t behave like one.

Now, this is absolute nonsense and completely illogical . As well as going against basic logic it also goes agains Catholic dogma. And while I believe Father (and later Bishop) De Lauriers had good intentions… well, sometimes the best efforts of mice and men still means good intentions lead straight to Hell eventually.

First of all, there is absolutely no way anyone can definitively say what anyone else’s “material” or “spiritual” intent is. In Catholicism we have two levels of knowledge concerning a human being and his “fitness” in relation to God:

An External forum and an Internal forum

The external forum is what we can all see, hear and know by the use of our senses. So, if someone acts pertinaciously and publicly in defection of the faith, we MUST judge him to be a heretic. This is not as if a priest makes a mistake at mass, or teaches something in genuine error and then when corrected figures it out and corrects himself. This is the persistent denial of Catholic Dogma by people who are supposed to be the protectors of it.

As for the internal forum, that is between each man and woman and God. Only He truly knows what is really going on inside them.

But that is NOT our concern. Our concern as Catholics is to:

a) Obey the infallible magisterium of the Church (eg CoC 1917), and

b) Call out heresy wherever we see it as obvious and clear. And nothing can be clearer than Vatican II, since those 16 documents upturn 2,000 years of dogma with total heresy, and were published in the most notorious fashion possible since they are supposed to be for the whole world. And as Cum-Ex Apostolato Officio clearly says, anyone who behaves as heretic must be treated as a heretic, and anyone that knowingly receives a heretic as if he was not one, becomes a heretic too.

This is really basic, and simple logic.

Canon 188 part 4 is absolutely clear:

Canon 188.

Ob tacitam renuntiationem ab ipso iure admissam quaelibet officia vacant ipso facto et sine ulla declaratione, si clericus:

4º A fide catholica publice defecerit;

Any office becomes vacant upon the fact and without any declaration by tacit resignation recognized by the law itself if a cleric:

4.° Publicly defects from the Catholic faith;

Note the important points:

UPON THE FACT – Their actions alone make it so.

WITHOUT ANY DECLARATION – NO ONE needs to make any pronouncement, judgement, investigation, nothing. Literally, no one needs to do anything at all to make this heretic finally be a heretic officially. It is done. The fact itself does it, and…

BY TACIT RESIGNATION – That is, again, no one need say anything or do anything, the instant resignation of that heretic’s position is caused by…

THE LAW ITSELF – The entire conviction and judgement is done by the law itself, that is, this rule itself. No judge, no tribunal, no congregation of cardinals, or anything else is required.

Just as if you sacrifice a baby on the altar, this means you are absolutely not a Catholic, and is not anything that ever needs to be discussed or argued about. The law is clear and unambiguous, and the logic is such that a 5 year old child gets it.

There is no mention of material/spiritual duality or weird separation of these things in some amorphous idea that has zero basis in Catholic dogma, basic logic, Canon Law, or indeed, common sense.

In essence, such a thesis is really basing itself on some version (not even necessarily correct) of Aristotelian “logic” and possibly a gnostic element of “duality”.

The way that the seminarians, priests, and Bishops that follow the Sedeprivationist Thesis defend this illogical, nonsensical idea, is by essentially appealing to “charity”. Which in many cases is certainly true charity in their heart, but this “giving the benefit of the doubt” is an absolute deadly error, and in fact goes against Canon Law and Catholic Dogma.

The Danger of Sedeprivationism

Because Sedeprivationists are essentially saying that not only the “Pope” but also all the fake Novus Ordo “clergy” are “materially” valid but “spiritually” invalid, potentially, all Bergolgio Bob, and his Satanic imps have to do, is say:

“Oh yeah, by the way guys, the sedes (without saying which ones) were right, Vatican II is really bad stuff, but hey it was only a “conciliar” council so, blah, blah, anyway, ok guys, we agree, Vatican II was bad. We all repent and we’re gonna be the good guys ok? Not getting caught raping little kids while we sort cocaine off each other’s asses anymore. Alright? We all good? Cool. Now come to our (invalid, fake, sacrilegious) Mass and be good Catholics!”

And at this point what would the nominally sedeprivationist clergy do? They would accept Bob, and his retinue of pedophiles, commies, 6 and Satanists as the now legitimate Catholic Clergy! After all, their “idea” has come true, the “Pope” has repented, and now all is well! Right?

Except…

NO!

Because from Cum-Ex Apostolato Officio (note especially the bold part):

• (ii) that, moreover, they shall be unfit and incapable in respect of these things and that they shall be held to be backsliders and subverted in every way, just as if they had previously abjured heresy of this kind in public trial; that they shall never at any time be able to be restored, returned, reinstated or rehabilitated to their former status or Cathedral, Metropolitan, Patriarchal and Primatial Churches, or the Cardinalate, or other honour, any other dignity, greater or lesser, any right to vote, active or passive, or authority, or Monasteries and benefices, or Countships, Baronies, Marquisates, Dukedoms, Kingships and positions of Imperial power; but rather that they shall be abandoned to the judgement of the secular power to be punished after due consideration, unless there should appear in them signs of true penitence and the fruits of worthy repentance, and, by the kindness and clemency of the See itself, they shall have been sentenced to sequestration in any Monastery or other religious house in order to perform perpetual penance upon the bread of sorrow and the water of affliction;
• (iii) that all such individuals also shall be held, treated and reputed as such by everyone, of whatsoever status, grade, order, condition or pre-eminence he may be and whatsoever excellence may be his, even Episcopal, Archiepiscopal, Patriarchal and Primatial or other greater Ecclesiastical dignity and even the honour of the Cardinalate, or secular, even the authority of Count, Baron, Marquis, Duke, King or Emperor, and as such must be avoided and must be deprived of the sympathy of all natural kindess.

In short, once you have been a heretic, you simply CANNOT EVER be rehabilitated, and you will have authority over precisely NO ONE. Even if your repentance is accepted as valid, (which can only be done by a valid Pope) the very BEST you can hope for is to be locked away in a monastery to remain in perpetual penance until you drop dead.

It really can’t be made clearer than that.

But now, with Sedeprivationism, we have again, a snake entering the Church, and there are already rumblings of some sedeprivationist Bishops or Priest making some funny noises about maybe someone like Vigano could convince a few Cardinals and other Bishops to “repent” just like he did, and then vote in a “real” Pope this time. And then everyone can clap.

No. As I stated already in 2020 in my book Reclaiming the Catholic Church , at which time I was trying to redeem the word sedeprivationist, 7 I nevertheless stated that Vigano was a heretic, and that even if he were elected Pope tomorrow, he would just still be a fake “Pope” and a heretic. And even if he truly did repent and denounce not just Vatican II but all the false Popes (which to my understanding he still has not done, because he still considers them “valid” just like the SSPX, and other supposed “traditionalists”) by inviolable Catholic Dogma, and hence infallible and Divine Law, he should have authority over precisely NO ONE. Ever.

But, as I have repeatedly stated since, in any case, Vigano is a snake, and always has been. Vigano has a Phd in Canon Law and he received this long before the fake “new” canon law of 1983, created by the Satanists in the Novus Orco for the express purpose of trying to “delete”the last and real code of Canon Law that Catholicism ever needed, that of 1917. This means his Phd is precisely in Canon Law of 1917, that is, the REAL Canon Law. Which means it is absolutely IMPOSSIBLE, for him to NOT know that all the fake Popes and himself too, are not even Catholics, never mind valid clergy. They are Satanists, impostors, and at BEST heretics. And he kept silent for over 50 years, and NOW he pretends to be all for the “real” Church. But we have already seen a heretic like him, at best, should be locked away in a monastery in penance, what business does he have pretending he is anything but a heretic? None.

HOWEVER, we already have at least one Sedeprivationist Bishop and possibly others, and possibly sedeprivationist clergy too, that appear to be starting the rumours or posing the idea that well, if only Vigano repented, as he did (did he? Then why does he not denounce all the fake Popes as fake, and in any case, even if he does… monastery. Perpetual penance. Fin.) and his buddy cardinals did the same, and Bergy Bob, bites the dust, maybe they can just cause a “revolution” in the Church. That is: a fake takeover by one group of Satanists to replace another group of Satanists, in order to better fool the masses, who are starting to hear about Sedevacantists and 1958 Sedevacantists in particular, and starting to understand what the Totalist position is. And starting to ask more questions, and starting to become sedevacantists, and getting communities together, and producing lots of children, and living like actual Catholics.

So at this point, we need to ask:

Can we trust any sedeprivationist clergy to do the right thing and protect the church?

THAT is the question.

And some people reading this who are sedes of one type or another, will be deeply offended by this question, because trained like dogs to obey their Bishops or Priests, even when they are flat out wrong (which is how we got here in the first place) makes them think I must be wrong.

For a number of reasons:

1. Sedeprivationist clergy are still valid clergy, whatever their errors may be. This is true (for now).
2. There are undoubtedly very honest, good, innocent Priests and possibly even a Bishop or two who are genuine and have too been fooled by a lot of words, and their overabundance of “charity” in giving the Satanists a totally unwarranted and erroneous “benefit of the doubt”. I say let’s call it niceness, though, not charity, because real charity can include the shooting someone in the face to put them out of their misery, and in my view, these type of Priests and Bishops are all the types who would hold the suffering guy’s hand to the end and deliver last rites (which is fine, no one expects or needs them to be like me, God forbid) but far too nice to do such a sometimes needed thing. And THAT, paradoxically is the problem. I am no one special, I am not clergy, I am just a layman and a very imperfect one at that (genuinely, this is not false modesty) but if and when a real crusade begins, I’m the guy you want at the command of your troops, or in your foxhole. And surely I need good people behind me, because so busy might I get in the battle, I may well forget to do the right thing and say a Hail Mary over the fallen enemies I would trample by the hundreds given half a chance. The fact these good men exist in the ranks of the sedeprivationists is not in doubt by me, but neither is the fact that they are in error with respect to the validity of the Thesis.
3. Humans get attached to their ideas, and only few of them are the ones who can turn on a dime once their idea has been demonstrated to be wrong. So, even if someone following a sedeprivationist clergyman started to get some doubts, it’s unlikely they would begin to rock the boat too much. And when some “rude bastard” like me comes storming in upsetting applecarts, and making waves for fishing boats, and whipping everyone into a theological frenzy, they react like wounded animals and tend to attack the messenger instead of the culprits.
4. Some, regardless of what they are, are always brainwashed in one way or other. Be they Clown World believers or the most devout Catholics.

In any case, the answer to the question, regardless of how anyone feels about it, is clearly NO. We cannot trust them.

Because they are holding on to a nonsensical, invalid, and completely outdated theory that is now obvious has no basis in fact . And it is this Thesis, and this Thesis alone, that might (falsely) “redeem” the Viganos of the Satanic Novus Orco cult, and thus reduce the numbers of real Catholics even further.

The reality is that there is even the potential that perhaps one or more of the sedeprivationist clergy are actually consciously aiming for this. Whether under misguided good intentions or intentional evil devious ones, only God knows, but certainly, one could see how what Rodney Stark calls a clergyman of Power, say a Bishop, who is more concerned with establishing greater and grander Churches and seminaries and perhaps glorifying himself as the leader and saviour of the “ real” Church, might just feel that if he manages to convince the Viganos of the world to denounce Bergoglio , Bob, hey, maybe he can become the next “Pope”, or if not, at least he can be part of the “saviours” of the Church and his influence and power will increase. And potentially he may well be so poorly educated in Canon Law, Catholicism, reality and truth, that his avarice, his greed for power, blinds him to the truth, and maybe in his heart of hearts he believes it’s a good thing (honestly I find this implausible. Again, you cannot be a Bishop and not consciously know these things).

But in any case, whether misguided or intentionally trying to further destroy the remnant of the real Catholic Church, such a Bishop, would absolutely be furthering the goals of the devil and the other devils currently squatting like Gargoyles in the Vatican.

How to Identify Problematic Sedeprivationist Clergy

In the first place, you can immediately conclude that ANY sedeprivationist clergy is in error with regard to the Thesis, and as such, even if honest and good men, to be first of all made aware of these issues and then see how they react.

But that aside, we can immediately tell if any clergy is abusing their power if they act in total contravention of Canon Law.

For example:

1. Do they claim to have authority where none exists (because we are in an interregnum)? If yes, they are talking nonsense, should be immediately called out on it, and be asked to correct their error. In private first, as the bible commands, with a few friends or colleagues, preferably other clergy, if any will be so brave, in a second instance, and finally publicly and openly if they still do not reverse their error. Bishop Sanborn falls into this category and I have done exactly all of the above.
2. Do they deny the sacraments to the faithful on the basis of either the thesis or their error in 1 above? If yes they are now also breaking Divine Law and are committing a serious error and sin against the faithful. Again, Bp. Sanborn has done this.
3. How do they answer the question of a heretic supposedly never being allowed to return to a position of ANY authority in the Church? Other than by falsely claiming that Cum Ex Apostolato Officio is “abrogated”8 or that “well some guy somewhere was allowed to return to his clerical duties at some point so it must be okay.” Which is nonsense, because even if it were true, (which to my knowledge so far it invariably is not true),9 any previous error that may have been committed, is not a sanction to re-do it. What arguments do they have against this? (Pro-tip: none exist, only waffling). Again, Bp. Sanborn, and hi Sanbornites, tend to try this tactic.
4. Do they bar would-be seminarians from studying at their seminary unless they adopt the erroneous Thesis? If yes, then again, they are perverting the path of would-be good clergy, and forcing onto them an erroneous belief system in a false theology. Once again, Bishop Sanborn has done this.

So, if your Bishop has done any of these things, and continues to defend the Thesis with nonsensical appeals to “we need a judgment” or “no one can judge the Pope” that is a flat out lie. We can no longer call it a mere “error”. As Sedevacantists, we are not “judging a Pope”, first he is not the Pope, and secondly the infallible magisterium of the Church in the form of CoC 1917 does so by the law itself, not us. You need to realise that anyone acting like Bishop Sanborn has been doing now for years, is NOT protecting the church, and valid Bishop though he may be, he absolutely does NOT deserve your respect at a human level. He needs to correct himself, repent and heal himself and become a FAR better custodian of the church before he really opens his mouth on anything else. Valid Bishop though he may be. For now. Because he is now beginning to stray rather deeply into territory that smells of sulphurous heresy.

Why deprive him of all human respect, though? Even if you acknowledge (as I do) the validity of his orders? Again, let me point out how heretics are to be treated, as per Cum Ex Apostolate officio:

(iii) that all such individuals also shall be held, treated and reputed as such by everyone, of whatsoever status, grade, order, condition or pre-eminence he may be and whatsoever excellence may be his, even Episcopal, Archiepiscopal, Patriarchal and Primatial or other greater Ecclesiastical dignity and even the honour of the Cardinalate, or secular, even the authority of Count, Baron, Marquis, Duke, King or Emperor, and as such must be avoided and must be deprived of the sympathy of all natural kindess

See that emphasised phrase? Now, any valid clergy that refuses to give sacraments, under pretence of needing to be heeded as if they have jurisdiction, or refuses to allow would-be seminarians to study at their seminary unless they adopt the nonsensical Thesis, or refuses sacraments to Catholics that do not adhere to the Thesis, are not (yet) full blow heretics, but they absolutely are bad for the church and should be called on it.

And removing any human respect from them is the first step towards giving them a little taste of what becoming a heretic further down the line might feel like.

Also, it removes their power over the congregation, whom are slowly but surely leading to Hell, as more and more congregants engage with what may at first appear “scandalous” to them, but in time, if they bother to research it on their own, they will see is simply the unvarnished dogmatic truth of Catholicism.

Lastly, you need to consider the possibility they are infiltrators too, or bought out by their own greed and lust for power.

Unfortunately you can never let your guard down. The enemies of the church are Legion, and this time of darkness has been prophesied by many Catholic Saints through the ages and by our lady of La Salette and Fatima (despite the many attempts to deviate, change, and confuse the actual events as they took place).

Conclusions

This long post is merely a retelling, this time with name attached, against that Bishop (Sanborn) and any other clergy (that for now remain unnamed) that know very well who they are.

I was aware of their errors at least seven years ago, and I pointed them out openly to the congregations they affected. I also offered Bishop Sanborn a chance to correct himself privately, and offered that if he did so I would immediately apologise for my calling out his erroneous behaviour and respect him as the valid Bishop he is but also as a theologian. His response was to tell me I could no longer receive sacraments from him. As details in the post with his name on it of a few days ago.

Supposedly because on my ( original and still current ) blog I had the image of a naked ex-girlfriend in the gallery. A picture posted there many years before I ever became Catholic, and with the total approval and acceptance of the woman in question. Besides, she is tastefully posed and there are more pornographic paintings and sculptures by well-known patrons of the Catholic Church when it was still Catholic. See, for example the sculpture of David below.

The implication of his “banning” me, being none of “his” priests, trained in his seminary would likely offer them to me either, which of course was NOT the case, because any clergy knows that without Jurisdiction, no Bishop can impose such a rule on any clergy. And in any case his reason for denying me sacraments was rooted solely in the fact that I pointed out the authority he was claiming to have over a group of faithful Catholics was non-existent. My blog wasn’t going to change, because I have never been in the habit of being a hypocrite or changing my history to suit the present moment. In fact, many, many, people have come to Catholicism proper (1958 sedevacantism of the Totalist position) precisely because in BELIEVE! I don’t mince my words nor deny who I was and how I came to become a Catholic (with no one being more surprised by my conversion than me).

After his email telling me I was banned from receiving sacraments from him I replied, that very well, he had made his choice. And now we would see what would transpire over the years to come. This was in November of 2019. In the intervening fiv e six and a half years, the emails, and comments, and messages, and rumours, from Catholics as far apart as Australia, the USA, the UK, mainland Europe and so on, began to trickle in. I was not the only one who had noticed this behaviour. Nor was I the only one who had seen the grab for power and the attempt to spread and infiltrate the Thesis into all sedevacantist circles.

Unbeknownst to me, there were others that rejected the Thesis and also had far stronger motives for doing so, and a lot more context on the players involved and the history behind their actions as well as the history of Sedevacantism from as far back as the 1950s.

With the recent death of Father Anthony Cekada and Bishop Daniel Dolan however, a lot of the Totalist “fighters” lost their impetus, and the Thesis side has continued to advance. Or at least, so it appeared.

Now think ahead, regardless of how you feel about the people involved, one path clearly leads to eventual perdition, and the other does not. So… what are you going to do?

Keep silent and keep your head down, and make no waves? Like you grandfather or great-grandfather, and your parents before you while the Church was being infested and corroded by parasites?

Or are you going to speak up and point a finger and say: “You! Change. Fix this. Admit your error and turn back while you still can, or else say you will not and prove who you really serve.”

Is it necessary to be as confrontational as this post? As I tend to be?

No. Surely not.

BUT… do NOT be weak. DO NOT be silent.

You can be as well-educated and as polite and erudite as you like. Certainly these are virtues, of which I am not a great owner, and you can surely present your case better than me; but just as steadfastly.

But without a doubt, it is now time to find out if you are a Catholic man, who serves Jesus Christ, the Truth, and God, regardless of the cost, or if you are a mouse. One that may well soon inhabit a false Church.

Only you can decide. Study, confirm and verify what I write here so crudely. By all means. But once you know, and don’t take too long, if you are a man, act.

May God’s Grace fill your heart and mind, may He protect you and guide you.

All glory is to and for God alone.

Let His Will be done.

Subscribe now

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

Aside the fact that their Thesis makes no sense, is circular in reasoning, devoid of any historical excuse for ever having existed, and is just completely inverse to reality due to their simply being intellectually incapable of understanding the vast difference between Roman Law (on which Catholic Canon Law is based) and the absurdity and travesty of Justice that is all forms of Anglo-Saxon “common” Law or worse still, American Jurisprudence; we can also see that Sedeprivationism is a fringe, minority position. One driven mostly by a cult of personality and the blackmailing of parishioners and seminarians alike that unless they adopt the sedeprivationist position, they may not receive orders, and I know from personal experience some parishioners have been threatened with not being allowed to receive sacraments if they also attended CMRI masses.

Subscribe now

Share

Let’s start by looking at some numbers, somewhat imprecise though they may be.

Q1. How many sedevacantist (1958) Bishops are there in the world (i.e. presumably actually Catholic)?

There’s no registry, and any count depends on which filter you apply to “valid.” Three filters are in play and they give different numbers:

Filter 1 — sacramentally valid consecration (pre-1968 rite, valid matter/form/intent, traceable apostolic succession). This admits quite a few, including much of the wider Thuc-line fringe.

Filter 2 — publicly professing sedevacantism (excluding sedeprivationists like the IMBC, conclavists like the Palmarians or Bawden, and “resistance” non-sedes like SSPX/Williamson successors).

Filter 3 — mutually recognized within mainstream sedevacantist circles (the real bottleneck — SSPV has historically questioned Thuc-line validity over Thục’s faculties in his final years; Thuc-line camps in turn sometimes question things on the other side).

Taking the intersection of all three — publicly sedevacantist, sacramentally credible, and actively functioning as of late 2025 / early 2026 — the core is remarkably small. The best-accepted bishops are in two succession streams:

Méndez line (universally accepted because Méndez was a pre-Vatican II Roman bishop consecrated under papal mandate, 1960):

• Bp. Joseph Santay (CSPV/SSPV, cons. 2007)
• Bp. James Carroll (CSPV, cons. 2018)

Kelly died December 2023, so SSPV/CSPV is now down to these two.

Thuc line (Carmona → Pivarunas branch):

• Bp. Mark Pivarunas (CMRI, cons. 1991)
• Bp. Giles Butler (CMRI)
• Bp. Martín Dávila Gándara (Unión Católica Trento, Mexico, cons. 1999)
• Bp. Andrés Morello (Argentina)
• Bp. Germán Fliess (CMRI)
• Bp. Rodrigo da Silva (Brazil, cons. 2021 by Dolan shortly before Dolan’s death in 2022)
• Bp. Roy (Our Lady of Joy Mission) Cons. 2024 by da Silva. Eastern Canada (Maritimes), French-speaking apostolate, ex-SSPX

Thuc line (des Lauriers → McKenna → Sanborn branch — strictly sedeprivationist, but adjacent and often counted):

• Bp. Donald Sanborn (RCI, cons. 2002)
• Bp. Joseph Selway (cons. 2018)
• Bp. Geert Stuyver (IMBC, Belgium) — IMBC proper

So the realistic mainstream count sits around 9–13 actively functioning bishops worldwide, depending on whether you admit the sedeprivationists and where you draw the line on smaller Latin-American operations. If you widen to include anyone with a plausible Thuc-line claim who identifies as sedevacantist (independent chapel bishops, small breakaway groups), you can push it into the 20s or low 30s, but most of those are disputed even internally.

Two caveats that matter for the 1958 framing:

1. The recent deaths of Dolan (April 2022) and Kelly (December 2023) — plus Cekada (2020) — thinned the Anglophone bench substantially. Carroll and Selway are the youngest, and consecration activity is rare.
2. If you apply strict 1958 criteria and reject the 1968 Pontificalis Romani episcopal rite as doubtful, you still get the same answer for this cohort, because nearly all of these bishops (or their consecrators going back to Thục 1938 and Méndez 1960) pre-date 1968 or use the traditional rite.

The functional episcopate keeping the sacraments available for a global sedevacantist population of ~30,000 is, in other words, tiny — roughly a dozen men, heavily concentrated in the US with outposts in Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, and Europe.

Q2. Approximately how many sedevacantist priests are there?

Best estimate: ~120–180 priests worldwide, with a likely error band of roughly ±40.

Breaking it down by group, using current public directories and the most reliable available counts:

• CMRI (Congregation of Mary Immaculate Queen) — the largest single body. Its directory currently lists Mass centres in 12+ U.S. states plus Canada, Mexico, New Zealand, Australia, the Philippines, Vietnam, Poland, Czech Republic, Germany, the UK, Russia (including Crimea), and Italy. Older sources cited 12 priests; the present footprint and the active Mater Dei seminary suggest something closer to 25–35 active priests today.
• Sanborn / Roman Catholic Institute + Most Holy Trinity Seminary — successor network to Dolan’s Cincinnati operation. Probably 15–25 priests across the U.S., with associated chapels in Europe and Latin America.
• SSPV / CSPV (Kelly’s group, now under Bps. Santay and Carroll) — a tighter U.S./Canada-only operation. Roughly 15–20 priests.
• IMBC (Istituto Mater Boni Consilii) — sedeprivationist rather than strictly sedevacantist, but commonly counted in this universe. Based in Italy, with priests in France, Belgium, Spain, and a few other locations. Around 15–20 priests.
• Sociedad Sacerdotal Trento (Mexico, under Bp. Dávila) plus the Carmona-line Mexican network — 10–15 priests.
• Argentina / Brazil clusters — Morello’s group (CJM, Argentina), Bp. da Silva’s seminary in São Paulo, plus the smaller Mexican-derived missions — 10–20 priests combined.
• Independents — sedevacantist priests not affiliated with any of the above, including former SSPX/CMRI/SSPV men running solo chapels and missions in the U.S., France, Italy, Spain, the UK, the Philippines, Vietnam, etc. — 20–40 priests, and this is the largest source of uncertainty because no one tracks them centrally.
• Conclavist and fringe groups (Palmarian remnants, Bawden’s group, the late Pulvermacher’s “True Catholic Church,” etc.) — usually excluded from a strict count, but if included add 5–15 more.

Sum of midpoints: ~135. Sum of low bounds: ~95. Sum of high bounds: ~175. Adding a margin for overlooked Latin American, Eastern European, and Asian missions gets you to roughly the 120–180 band, with ~150 ± 40 as a reasonable point estimate.

Q3. How Many Religious are approximately Sedevacantist?

There’s even less data here than for priests, because religious communities don’t publish member counts the way dioceses publish ordination figures. Working from what’s documented:

Best estimate: ~150–250 religious (sisters + non-priest brothers/monks) worldwide, central figure around 200 ± 60.

Women religious — the bulk of the total:

• CMRI Sisters (Mount St. Michael, Spokane; City of Mary, Rathdrum; and the various school foundations). Older sources cited about 50 sisters; the 2007 split removed 15 who reconciled with Rome, but vocations have continued and a new novitiate is being built. Realistic current count: 40–60 sisters, plus novices.
• Daughters of Mary, Mother of Our Savior (Round Top NY motherhouse, ~20 sisters in Long Island, ~11 in White Bear Lake MN) — founded by Bp. Kelly in 1984, associated with SSPV/CSPV. Total roughly 45–65 sisters.
• Sisters of St. Thomas Aquinas — small U.S. sedevacantist congregation, perhaps 10–20 sisters.
• Congregation of the Mother of God — also small, U.S.-based, 5–15 sisters.
• Carmelites of the Holy Face (Thuc-line foundations, mostly in Mexico) and various small Dominican and Carmelite tertiary groups affiliated with the CMRI and Sanborn networks — collectively perhaps 15–30 sisters.
• European and Latin American convents associated with IMBC (Italy), Bp. Stuyver (Belgium), the SST (Mexico), CJM (Argentina), and Bp. da Silva’s seminary network (Brazil) — small, scattered, perhaps 15–35 sisters combined.

That gives roughly 130–225 sisters worldwide.

Men religious who are not priests — a much smaller category:

• CMRI Brothers (lay brothers and seminarians not yet ordained at Mount St. Michael and Mater Dei) — perhaps 10–20.
• CSPV Brothers (Round Top) — a handful, 2–5.
• Most Holy Family Monastery (the Dimond brothers in Fillmore NY) — formally claims to be a Benedictine monastery but is essentially a two-brother operation with perhaps a few associates; mainstream sedevacantists generally do not recognise its religious standing. 2–10 depending on what you count.
• Monastery of the Holy Cross, Nova Friburgo (Brazil) — small Benedictine community linked first to Williamson, now with sedevacantist sympathies through Bp. da Silva. 5–15.
• Various OFM and Capuchin friars who appear in CMRI directories (Fr. Francis Miller OFM, Fray Leon Speróni OFM Cap., etc.) — these are mostly already ordained, so they’d already be in the priest count, but a few non-ordained brothers exist in these clusters. 5–15.

That gives roughly 25–60 brothers/monks worldwide.

Sum: approximately 155–285 religious , with my central estimate at ~200 .

Why the error band is so wide:

1. Convent populations turn over silently. Unlike priest ordinations (which get announcements), sister entrances, professions, and departures rarely make the public record. The Daughters of Mary’s loss of one sister to a 1988 family-instigated removal made the news; routine departures don’t.
2. Definitional scope. If you count only solemnly-professed sisters, the number drops by perhaps 20–30%. If you count novices and postulants, it rises again.
3. The “third-order” and oblate question. Several of these communities have associated lay tertiaries, oblates, or “consecrated virgins” who live a quasi-religious life without formal vows. Including them adds perhaps 30–80 more, mostly women.
4. Latin American visibility is very low. The CMRI directory lists sisters in Mexico and Argentina but doesn’t give numbers; similarly, the Mexican Trento and Carmona-derived networks have small religious houses that appear in passing references only.
5. Dimond-type “monasteries” are a category problem. MHFM and a few similar one- or two-person operations call themselves monasteries but have no canonical standing even among other sedevacantists. Counting them is largely arbitrary.

Ratios worth noting:

Against ~150 priests, ~200 religious gives a religious-to-priest ratio of roughly 1.3 : 1 , which is dramatically lower than the historical Catholic ratio (globally somewhere between 4:1 and 7:1 throughout the 20th century before the post-conciliar collapse). The sedevacantist movement is, in other words, structurally clergy-heavy and short on contemplative and active sisters — partly because forming a religious community requires more lay infrastructure than forming a chapel does, and partly because the demographic pool feeding sedevacantism is small enough that the men who feel called to consecrated life are funnelled almost entirely into the priesthood, where they’re more urgently needed.

Against ~30,000 laity, roughly 1 religious per 150 faithful — again, much higher than the modern global Catholic ratio, but driven entirely by the small denominator.

Q. 4 Extrapolating from all of the above, can we divide the populations of 1958 sedevacantists from the ones of sedeprivationists, by n. of bishops, priests, and laity that follows one route over the other?

First some distinctions: “1958 sedevacantist” isn’t strictly synonymous with “all sedevacantists who aren’t sedeprivationists.” Historically there have been intermediate positions (the See vacant from 1963, or from 1965, or from Paul VI’s promulgation of the Novus Ordo in 1969). In practice, however, those intermediate positions have largely collapsed —partly through CMRI’s intellectual influence, partly through generational attrition— so today “strict sedevacantist” ≈ “1958 position” for roughly 90%+ of the strict camp. The remainder (a few independent priests, some older laity holding Paul VI as valid but his successors not) is small enough to round into the 1958 column without much distortion.

Why laity skews even more 1958 than clergy does:

The clergy split is roughly 70/30 (1958/sedeprivationist), but the laity split is closer to 78/22 (~25,000/~7,000 of an estimated ~32,000 total). Three reasons:

1. CMRI’s chapel density. CMRI alone runs ~120 Mass centres globally — more than the entire sedeprivationist world combined. Each centre may only see a priest monthly, but the laity attached to it count as part of the 1958 universe.
2. Sedeprivationism is an intellectual/clerical position. The Cassiciacum thesis requires lay understanding of the materialiter / formaliter distinction to be consciously adopted. Most laity attending IMBC or RCI chapels are functionally just “trad Catholics who don’t trust the post-conciliar popes” and would not, if asked, articulate the Cassiciacum framework. They’re counted here as sedeprivationist by chapel affiliation, but their actual position is closer to undifferentiated traditionalism.
3. Strict sedevacantism has the more emotionally compelling story. “The See has been vacant since 1958” is intelligible to a lay Catholic in a way that “the popes are material but not formal” is not. This matters for retention and for the conversion of SSPX/independent laity who arrive at the position through reading Bellarmine or Pius XII rather than through systematic theology.

Important caveats and known gaps:

• The ~32,000 total laity figure is itself uncertain (Wikipedia uses ~30,000, citing pre-2010 estimates; a realistic 2026 figure is probably 30,000–40,000 given two decades of slow growth from SSPX defections and trad-Catholic conversions). The percentage split is more reliable than the absolute numbers.
• The SSPV/CSPV is officially silent on the 1958 question —Bp. Kelly was famously cautious about formal declarations— but the clergy and laity functionally occupy the 1958 position, so they are placed there.
• The “una cum” sedevacantists embedded in SSPX (perhaps 9–12 priests + a hard-to-estimate number of laity) are excluded entirely; if counted as 1958-leaning, they would push that column up by maybe 1,000–3,000 laity.
• Conclavists (Bawden’s “Pope Michael II” successors, Palmarian remnants) are excluded; they are technically 1958 sedevacantists who have resolved the vacancy by electing their own pope, and add perhaps 500–2,000 more if you want to count them.

The takeaway ratio: for every sedeprivationist bishop there are roughly 2 strict 1958 bishops; for every sedeprivationist priest, roughly 2.5 strict; for every sedeprivationist layperson, roughly 3.5 strict. The 1958 position is the dominant operational form of the rejection of the post-conciliar Roman claimants — by a wide and probably widening margin, are in aggregate larger and more vocations-rich than IMBC’s formation house in Verrua Savoia.

Subscribe now

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

I am one of those people who, when someone starts to talk about diets, healthy eating, and vitamins and supplements, my brain switches off, eyes glaze over, and I mentally check out, thinking about chasing down politicians, galloping at them on a mottled horse, on the grasslands of Argentina or the steppes of Mongolia, either with a lever action Winchester, or a medieval lance.

Now, if you are similarly inclined, you may want to read this post and check out the short, easy to follow, and filler-free booklet I produced at the end of this post.

But so you know it’s not just some grift shoved together to make a quick buck, below, I give you the context behind how I came up with it and why.

Subscribe now

Share

Of course, if you don’t care about that, just scroll to the bottom and order the book by the pallet load. I created it to be genuinely healthy, easy to use and as practical and useful as possible in a compact yet more complete way than I have seen in books ten times the size, but I am not averse to making any money from it if people find it useful.

How it works, what’s in it, and what it does

I think of it similarly to my also short book BELIEVE! That has now had well over a 100 people convert to proper Catholicism (Sedevacantist). The reason it had that effect is because it was written without filler, without apology, and truthfully, from a perspective most people can relate to because it’s based in reality, not some theoretical, dry, theological perspective. It’s certainly not like any book on theology you ever read.

And similarly, this is unlike any health book you ever read, and it covers a lot more than most:

• fasting and why it is beneficial (with protocols to follow), including supplements to take daily.
• Healthy eating, with day to day foods you can eat at breakfast, lunch and dinner, along with any supplements.
• Exercise routines week by week for the stages of refeeding (for longer fasts you need to restart eating carefully); building up muscle and fitness over a period of weeks, and a routine for long-term maintenance.
• 8 recipes for making your own fermented foods that will help rebalance and fix your gut biome.

And all in 48 pages, and leaving you some 24 pages blank for notes and recording your targets, results and so on.

The point is for you to be able to read this and hit the ground running, whether you want to fast or not, just eat healthier, or exercise properly. Or any combination of the three. No filler, no nonsense, just the facts.

Why and How I came to do this

In about 2014, quite suddenly, I noticed that I suddenly had some weird symptoms that I never had before. Excess bloating, my tongue felt weird and developed spots, and I just felt more run-down than I ever had. Doctor I went to didn’t figure any of it out, and It seemed things did not improve. Then in 2016 I moved to Venice for a year and a random acquaintance on facebook told me it sounded like I had excess Candida. So I did a Candida clearing protocol, 3 day fast and strict ketogenic diet for about 3 months. I literally only ate bresaola, octopus, occasional fish and meat only stew and once a month a tub of plain yoghurt. i deopped to my peak fighting weight and was very fit and healthy.

Then in 2017 I moved back to London, my now wife moved in as girlfriend then fiancée, and finally wife in 2018, and over the last 9 years we moved home twice and changed country, and had four children from 2019 to 2025. The time and pressure of fixing up the house in Italy, keep the farm in some semblance of order and doing writing meant my diet and lifestyle took a big dive, and at 56 you don’t recover as you do at 26 or even 36.

For the last year or so we have all been in less than ideal health, and in 2021 I had a bad bout of Covid then in 2022 two bouts of pneumonia that nearly killed me and getting back to a fit state has been a hard long road. Over the last year and a half I have build a mini-gym in the forest, and am having a special static resistance training frame built just for me and the wife, and I decided to take control of my health.

As a result, I did a bunch of research once and for all, and realised part of the reason why I glaze over when people talk about this “health stuff” is because it’s so generic, doesn’t cover the things I KNOW about what works and does not work and is paradoxically also over-specific in weird little ways that are not adequate for me or maybe anyone other than the person talking.

In researching this stuff, I wanted to design a protocol that got rid of Candida as much as possible and kept it gone, that reduced visceral fat, and got me back to a fit state, able to perform the kind of activities I always did, martial arts, swimming, and spinning (static bike work to maintain my knees. After years of karate and hiking with heavy bags I am one of the few people that has not had a knee operation, and God willing, I’ll keep it that way.)

That protocol will work for most people that don’t have some fairly serious underlying medical concerns, and possibly (followed by proper medical advice) may even cure or alleviate such issues. Given that Candida excess is essentially now a fairly global issue, especially in the West where it is almost impossible to eat food that is not processed and has loads of sugar in it, I felt many more people than just me could benefit from it.

So, after I figured out my own 14 day fast protocol in autistic detail, and did the fast, I also realised the wiggle room available for it and that it was essentially the same kind of protocol that would work for most more or less healthy adults. It seemed a shame to keep it to myself, so the booklet was born out of my wish to share the health, absent all the personal anecdotes, wishy-washy filler to fill an entire book with 99% irrelevant minutiae, making the book practically unusable for anyone serious, unless they took notes and essentially created their own version of the booklet I just built. And who has time for that?

So, you got all the anecdotes here on this blog post, all the filler and the booklet is clean, direct, and even has space for any changes or adjustments you may want to include for your specific regimen.

One small request: If you buy it and find it useful, whether on Amazon or my site, in either case, PLEASE leave a review.

Here it is, now available in physical paper format on:

• Amazon.com in America
• Amazon.co.uk in the UK
• Amazon.de in Germany
• Amazon.ca in Canada
• Amazon.it in Italy

And all the other Amazons around the world too.

If you want a cheaper digital only copy as a PDF you can print yourself or read on a screen, you can get it at my personal book store here: The Easy Spartan Guide to Health

Subscribe now

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here