Aside making us all dumber if we ever rely on it for anything, the start of skynet may have already begun, in a subtler and smarter way than terminator robots too.
It’s been reported by Chinese State TV, and supposedly the minister of Defence of China, that China will launch a reunification attack in early June.
There have been other rumblings about a June kick-off with respect to the whole (((NATO/USA))) war on Russia.
So… IF China does attack Taiwan, it may well do so in early June. They currently have their fleet surrounding it already, and I read at least one report that they either may or may have already cut some internet ocean floor cables.
Sure, there is a lot of propaganda, BUT, if China does launch a hard takeover of Taiwan in June, Russia would be stupid to not take this as an opportunity to secure Odessa and block the Ukraine from ever having a port again. And if you do that, you may as well open up a route to Europe for goods via Romania, as well as liberate Transnistria. Which will give the Eastern European nations currently held hostage by the (((usual suspects))) running the USA, a chance to slip out of the economic noose they have round their neck. It won’t prevent brave politicians from being shot, corrupt ones being blackmailed and so on, but it’s still better than nothing.
And given that Xi and Putin are being pretty good buddies of late, a co-ordinated effort to give (((the usual suspects))) some nightmares is certainly not far fetched.
Israel continues to behave like the typical stereotype of lying, duplicitous and genocidal psychopath we have come to expect, and if America is suddenly trying to feed three fronts, as well as failing in their various colour revolutions and coups around the world (Georgia, Moldava, Kazakhstan, Congo, etc) the arabs might just decide that America is finally weak enough to make Israel return to a desert-like state of emptiness. At that point Israel MIGHT actually go nuclear but it would not save them.
Anyway, my prediction for Taiwan is that it will be in a state of war or reunification this year. It might also begin as early as June, but I would expect that to be more towards the middle or end of it, not the beginning of it. And it might only take place later in the summer, but I would guess before the end of September.
Mark Bisone asked me to review this post of his after I took my approach to John of Barsoom’s Pagan nonsensical writings about Jesus really being Julius Ceasar and the Gospels being weird “stories” mutated about old Julius instead.
Hi apparent defence of John is basically a MUCH watered down version of my own take, however, this is NOT good. And all it takes to know this with certainty is the first part of his post, which I reproduce below with commentary in the usual way.
Before I do, allow me to point out that the recent olive-branch shared between myself and various writers like the Three of Woe, John of Barsoom and Mark Bisone is a positive thing and I hope it continues and spreads to anyone even just a little bit sane, so that our ideas propagate and eventually rebuild civilisation in a stronger, better, faster, version of the best system we ever had on Earth, which is, of course Catholicism.
So by “our ideas” I mean, of course, the (real – Sedevacantist) Catholic Church (as opposed to the fake, Satanic Novus Orco one), because the ideas of John and Mark and so on, are essentially, fundamentally, structurally, weak. They are wide open to massive infiltration, subversion and degradation over time. So, to be even clearer, I don’t hate these potential allies. And I don’t even begrudge them their false ideas, erroneous thoughts, and cowardly natures. I see them as basically benign NPCs.
I know, I know, that sounds insulting, but look, if you ever played D&D, or any of the awesome pen and paper RPGS from which the term NPC comes from, you know that only a few are adventurers. The rest are NPCs. And while the primary adversary are evil NPCs, a good adventure also has plenty of GOOD NPCs. And sometimes NPCs will literally save your character or even the whole adventure. They are definitely good guys and on our side, but they can’t do the baseline stuff. Or at least, their exposed thoughts, so far, have not given me any indication whatsoever that they are anything other than mostly benign NPCs. I reserve judgement on the Tree of Woe guy on that count because he made a very significant post which I commented on too, which has the potential to really make a small but absolutely fundamental tectonic shift in the zeitgeist of the various intellectuals that might read it. And while my own approach is probably eminently more practical at a tactical level, his perspective is far largere and acts on the strategic level.
But back to Mark, and my dissection of why his “good intentions” are really, just another paved road to Hell. He is referring here to John’s post about the Julius/Jesus thing.
As per usual, it is brilliantly written and elegantly argued. Also as per usual, it’s controversial to the sabre-tip of provocation. But — as I once said to a group of other writers on a somewhat contentious, late-night chat — “That’s what’s great about John.”
I stand by that statement. Still, I knew this series was certain to ruffle some feathers on one side, and attract some ne’er-do-wells on the other. I haven’t read through all the comments on this latest post, but combining those I have with those made on the prior entries, most reactions thus far seem to line up with one or more of the following categories:
John is a blasphemous idiot, cloaking his hatred for the Living God in a trendy bit of revisionist pop-history. By identifying Julius Caesar as the “True Christ”, he inverts the principles of Jesus while simultaneously pretending to understand and advocate for them. The devil has seized hold of his mind. May God have mercy on his soul.
John is trying to build an impossible bridge atop quicksand. He’s clever, but the acrobatic leaps he makes to try to connect the events and character of Jesus’ life to that of Caesar’s would make Béla Károlyi beam with pride. Some of these longer leaps are even counter-productive, as they sound more absurd than the traditional story he’s trying to debunk.
John is really onto something here. The story as he presents it makes much more sense than the Gospels, which describe events that cannot have possibly happened as recorded because of (atheism, materialism, rationalism, historiography, blah, blah, blah). It also fills in certain blanks in my own brain-movie about the first millennium that have always left me scratching my head.
John is on the path to achieving Gnostic enlightenment, the first steps of which are to invert the spiritual roles/identities of Yahweh and Satan, reformat their relationship to fit the Titanomachy, Prometheus and other classical myths, toss the whole mess in a basket alongside Hermeticism and a jailer-demiurge, and reach the stunning conclusion that all received works of history have been a lie (except for the version he’s stumbled upon, which reflects the unvarnished truth).
There have probably been some other reactions, but these four seem most common. I must be a very different breed of cat, though, because none of them really describe my own.
And so far, so good. Even his generalisation of the 4 reactions is fairly accurate. For clarity, my position would be about 1.5, and I have already explained it at length (see the link early on). That is that while I acknowledge that John is smart, a relatively engaging writer (he is too longwinded, but look from which pulpit comes the preaching of the kettle about the pot!) and he does cover interesting topics and so on. All true. And while I wouldn’t IMMEDIATELY burn him at the stake, as I explained before, he could certainly get himself there with a bit of Giordano Bruno-like persistence. But now we come to Mark’s absolutely broken views.
First off, I don’t have the temerity to go around accusing others of blasphemy. If the search for truth was as easy as reading a book aloud and shouting down anyone who dared to question or differently interpret of any part of it, then Creation is precisely the prison many Gnostics believe it is, and I would gladly seek out a million “lies” with them instead.
At least he admits it right away he is a coward. Filled with fear at the very thought of correcting anyone.
Allow me to explain why. Do you think would be as fearful to call someone that said 2+2 is purple, a moron or wrong, or someone that need psychiatric help? Probably not. Why? Well because he is sure of his facts in this case. So all that Mark is telling us is that:
He’s been too lazy to have a position. He couldn’t be bothered to spend the required time, energy and effort to know what he REALLY believes about the very nature of reality.
Even if he did have a position, he’s far too timid to share it, or test it, or correct someone driving off a philosophical cliff, because God forbid someone thinks badly of him. I mean THERE MAY BE DOUBT! It’s fine to say a guy that says 2+2 is purple is simply wrong at best, but say that the Filioque is obviously right as the Catholics see it and not the Orthos, and OH MAH GAWD! Someone might point a finger at you and call you a bigot or wrong, or whatever. So… yeah… on this basis alone, I could dismiss Mark entirely as any kind of defender of civilisation. I certainly wouldn’t post him at the gates, or even the parapets. Mark might be a good baker for all I know, and he should stay in the nice, safe, village we Catholics will one day build and he should focus on making bread and being the nice guy I am sure he is. But if I become emperor Mark doesn’t get to vote on much. Certainly not on who keep in or out of the village, nor how the laws of the place are made.
Secondly, he is clearly marinated in the Protestant Zeitgeist, either having been too uninterested, bored, indoctrinated, or incurious and illogical to ever care enough to learn enough of the basics about Christianity, that basic logic clearly demonstrates any of the 40,000 branches of Protestantism must be fake. But he also goes a step further, stating that IF the truth really were all spelt out in one book (it isn’t because the idea, as well as the concept of sola scripture is brain damaged level of retard, but let’s go with the hypotheticals here) and you could shout down anyone who didn’t respect the messages in the book, then God would have to be evil.
I mean, think of how absurd that is. If God, gives you free will, and also the means by which to know his will, easily, simple, readily available just for the asking, but you choose to reject it, then when you end up in Hell. And this is somehow all God’s fault and terribly unfair… why, exactly, Mark?
The truth as it happens resides in more than one book and in a long tradition too, but if you read a decent Catechism from before the 1958 fake Popes, the actual Bible (a Catholic one with all the bits the Protties have removed) and the Pio-Benedictine code of Canon Law of 1917, you do have pretty much all you need to grasp the jist of things, and have enough references within these two books, to go after and use to further educate yourself to the point that to build this knowledge means to live it too. But here is the Protestant Zeitgeist in two concepts:
Reason is the whore of the devil, and
Once saved always saved.
So as a Protestant, God is some remote figurehead you just have to swear allegiance to once, then you’re set, no matter what, and… don’t you go using your brain, boy, it’s all about the feelz! Nor do you have to DO anything. Like the Hindus, you can just sit on your ass and wait to be called to playing a harp on the clouds (or in their case be reincarnated into a fly, since they love cow-shit too). And while you think a smart guy will see through these moronic facets of that fake religion (yes, Protestantism, and yes, Hinduism) well… don’t be shocked. Professor Cipolla was absolutely right: There are always far more idiots than you can possibly imagine. Everywhere.
The second group doesn’t really reflect my view either, though it’s probably closest to it. In fact, while reading the second essay, part of me suspected the whole series was the setup for an elaborate joke (while simultaneously being a fascinating thought experiment in itself). For example, his contention that “Jesus had an affair with the prostitute Mary Magdalene,” seems not merely to be a reference absent a referent1, but the kind of sophomoric begging that John is far too smart to do by accident. Was the point to inflame and provoke? I didn’t know. But John’s a great writer, so I was willing to let the string play out.
In short: It’s nonsense. I know it’s nonsense, John knows it’s nonsense, we all know it’s nonsense, but hey, John writes great, so let’s just enjoy it.
Riiiiiight Mark… except this is not an Arnie film, or a Stallone film, where it’s all nonsense but it’s so ridiculous it might be funny, so we can excuse it as “mostly harmless” entertainment (it’s far from harmless, but that’s another post), time wasting entertainment to be sure, and not good for you, but hardly a matter to burn you at the stake for. But here we are literally talking about the very core and nature of reality. It deserves a LOT more seriousness and thought than the excuse of “hey, I like how he frames it.” Let me put it this way: Would you ever take the reality of actual child rape and murder by Satanic pedophiles who actually do this, as a real, serious topic, and then say it doesn’t really matter if it’s really happening because it makes a great story? Would you Mark? I pray not. Because if you would then, you sir, are a moral relativists and are scum. And indeed if I become world Emperor you will be left alone as long as you don’t try and infect anyone else with such degenerate, absurd, and ultimately damaging lies and moral turpitude.
There were other epic reaches peppered throughout part two, including that crowds heralding the arrival of two famous men was compelling evidence of their interchangeability. I laughed out loud at this one, recalling the crowds that gathered at a mock-funeral Howard Stern put on for rival DJ Lou DiBella back in the late 80’s. It also put me in mind of Charles de Gaulle. who led a famous march on the same day as Caesar 1891 years apart (and with a very different reception).
Ha-Ha Mark. Funny, Mark. Here’s a colourful beach ball, Mark, bounce it on your nose while you clap like ea seal Mark, ha-ha! Wha-aat?! It’s funny Mark! Go on, post a video of you doing it! Worth it! C’mooooon… I just don’t get why you wouldn’t! What are you some kind of rigid bigot?
Starting to see how this works yet, Mark?
Regardless, none of it angered me. I merely found certain aspects of it intriguing, others less so. Moreover, I had a theory about where it might be leading, and was curious to find out how correct it was. Turned out it wasn’t, but that’s no great loss. It was still well worth the read, because it got me thinking about stories (and “histories”) in a much deeper way than before. And as John himself notes: how strong is one’s faith of Christ if some Barsoomian Internet Warlord can wound it with a few thousand words, to review some book you’ll probably never read?
The only correct point is the one about not getting angry because, quite rightly, what care I if an ant tries to bite me through a Moon-boot? Zero. But the point is this vicious nonsense gets read by ten people, who then spread an even more watered down and absurd version to a 100 people, and so on. Before long you will have some Satanist trying to print the Julius Caesar Bible.
I am not wounded, nor angered. But you bet your ass every time someone says 2+2 is purple, I will be there to take sure that nonsense is exposed. And if the perpetrator keep insisting, and trying to get, say my children, or people at large, to believe that 2+2 is purple, then he may well come to a new conclusion that 2+2 , whatever his idea about it is, actually is a very painful thing if you don’t get it right.
As for John’s conclusions, I think what he has found is a way to re-shoot and re-edit the history movie in such a way that aligns with his spiritual sensibilities. This isn’t in itself a problem — that’s what we’re all doing, all the time.
No. It is not what we are ALL doing, ALL the time. I have no story I need to make up about Jesus. I accept the version the Catholic Church teaches and always has done, found in the Gospels and related traditions. There are probably many little things that I don’t specifically like about Catholicism (because I am a flawed human being like all the others), but that’s not important. The TRUTH is important. And here, in the end, we see that in his error, Mark is so deep, he literally spouts the Satanic inversion of the truth, and that is, that it can never really be known. Which, is of, course, like the entirety of his “reasoning” absolute nonsense.
The problem as I see it is when people confuse this story-editing process with an unearthing of the Actual, or even of the Truth. That is something human beings simply cannot do. It’s a lie we tell ourselves about our capabilities.
Truth exists, Mark. And human beings are and have always been able to discover it. They do it all day, every day. It’s how buildings are built, how math is done, how pretty much everything even remotely related to engineering is done. It’s literally how you manage to tie your shoes in the morning, Mark. There is ONE ABSOLUTE TRUTH about reality. it doesn’t even matter if you believe this or not, because it’s true regardless of anyone’s approval, understanding, wish, or anything else. If you don’t think truth is achievable by human beings, then you should obviously just do whatever you want. Who advises you that “Do as thou will shall be the whole of the law?” again? Do you recall Mark? Red guy? Horns. Hooves.
Ring any bells? Anything at all?
Or worse, it’s a lie that others tell us, in order to gain power over our minds and lives.
The final Gnostic kick at truth, reality, beauty and love.
So THAT is why these people are not your allies. Not really. How can you trust a self-admitted coward who has no idea, nor wish to engage with the truth of anything, since he thinks it’s an illusion? You gonna let that guy fly your plane? Or make you a cup of tea for that matter. Or think of him as some stalwarts defender of civilisation? I sure as Hell will not.
Or in these case pedophiles in charge of children.
This is the state of things. And all that is required of you for it to end is to stop participating in any of it in any way.
You don’t need to start an armed revolution. At least not yet. Perhaps it will eventually come to that because these vampires are not going to give up their power due to anyone “voting” (as if they even allow that to happen anymore), but if the 90% of the population that has had enough of the insanity of the trannification agenda, the rampant pedophelia, the insane money laundering and so on just simply stopped co-operating, supporting, or being quiet about it switched to loudly and clearly saying “no, that is insane and you belong in a mental asylum or jail for even suggesting it” without apology, you inspire others near you to do the same.
In Europe it’s beginning to happen. Keep in mind that the Roman salute is illegal in Germany and cause for arrest, yet we have videos of young Germans dancing to the tune of Germany for Germans and “waving” in a particular way.
Meanwhile in America you have a mentally ill man pretending to be a woman running a huge chunk of your Navy.
You want that guy to decide in any way the fate of any men enrolled in the Navy or who they should fight and why? I wouldn’t want that guy to be involved in so much as moving pre-packaged Amazon shipments onto a truck. Never mind making a cup of tea. I cannot imagine him running any part of anything like the US Navy.
This here below is the way. Do this, and make all your friends get on board. It’s the surest and safest way to avoid a lot of the inevitable bloodshed we are all being corralled towards by people who revel in the destruction of pretty much all humanity except themselves.
Keep in mind that ALL income taxes were always “temporary” when introduced and NONE were ever needed for humanity to have roads, working plumbing and even pretty advanced stuff for entertainment even if you are unlikely to have approved of flooding a whole colosseum to re-enact naval wars with real people getting killed in it.
Just to prove the point that IQ is really not a safeguard against indoctrination with false ideas, here is Chris Langan, supposedly the smartest man on Earth with a 200 IQ who apparently remains unsure as to whether this was done as a random mistake instead of with malice aforethought.
Now let’s see if you, dear reader, can move past the inevitable sensation of pearl-clutching while you gasp “racism!” Under your breath and let’s consider a few undeniable facts that have been proven time and again with controls for every possible socio-economic indicator you care to come up with, and these are:
Caucasian vs Negroid IQ have approximately (and at least) 1 standard deviation difference between them (15 points for IQ). So, 100 vs 85.
Keep in mind that IQ testing has been going on for over 100 years and the g factor of intelligence is the best single predictor for educational, and economical outcome decades later, but aside the socio-economic implications are some far more important ones, and that is the capacity of people of IQ below 85 (most of Africa as a whole) to be able to be functionally capable of anything at all.
The US military spent many, many, many, years and untold billions to try and dismiss a truth that they finally had to simply accept, and that was that a human being with IQ 83 or lower was in essence of zero use. You cannot train them to perform any meaningfully useful task in a military context. And it’s not as if ANY military in the world is populated by rocket scientists to begin with.
So, purely on that basis, if basic ability was the only factor defining where you would end up academically, it would be the case that about one quarter to one third of Caucasian children would excel, with a few outliers being truly exceptional (and there is plenty of evidence that if you expect them all to be exceptional that number would be more than a few outliers). The rest would be average and maybe a fifth would perform at about the same level as the top tier Africans, which would be noticeably worse than caucasian average, with more than half of the blacks performing well below this threshold and the final quarter or fifth of the Africans having to be actively prevented from eating the crayons.
Now imagine these groups all being mushed together and the situation not being that meritocracy is the way, but idiocracy is. Everyone has to be taught at Tyrone’s level of crayon eating ability. Imagine the mental and spiritual oppression of spending every day of your life except the occasional Saturday or Sunday in that environment if you’re not a crayon eater. Imagine what it does to your spirit of adventure, imagination and creativity.
Because that is what you subject your child to when you send them to an integrated school where “equality” reigns supreme.
Are you starting to understand why one of my mottos is “Leave every retard behind?”
You’re not just not going to the stars if we all have to keep pace with Shaniqua and Tyrone. We’re not even going to have electric power or indoor plumbing. And I am absolutely not exaggerating here. 85 IQ cannot MAINTAIN infrastructure that is already there. Never mind create it.
And there is no theory on Earth that will change that not “convince” someone like me of anything different. Because 25 years of Africa dispel any such mythology. Just like engineering disproves fancy sounding but wrong theories of how things “should” work.
As someone else wrote:
From an early age, we are forced into a mandatory school system that requires and encourages children to attend for a large portion of their human life, for six hours or more a day, which is ironically similar to office working hours a system where each child is then required to learn the accepted version of reality in order to fit into the specific mold desired by the elite. Just like television, a large part of school is simply programming. While sat at a desk instead of running outside in nature, learning about it while you also learn to count, read, write and how to formally think.
It’s also Ironic how the same families behind the funding for this education system are responsible for many inhumane atrocities that took place throughout history.
They are also behind big oil, big pharma, and big food.
Kids who do not fit into the system and do not resonate with it are usually labelled and medicated. Essentially, the whole point of school is to shape the reality of the student and prepare you for economic slavery.
Forcing 100 IQ Whites to learn at an 80 IQ level has turned school into a decade long prison sentence where the child graduates with no marketable skills or hope for employment.
And was this all just a natural and organic “mistake” fostered on Europeans by nothing other than misguided good intentions?
Even memesters on the internet know that it was not just a coincidence.
And in case you think that was just one incidence or some “isolated” incident of the past, this is what is happening today:
And how long will it take you, my NON-200 IQ reader to figure out who precisely is driving this “Diversity, Integration and Equality” (DIE)?
Think it’s all coincidence and bad luck? Or Cohen-cidence and Talmudic plan?
When you figure it out give Chris a call and try to explain it to him in small words. I would do it but he blocked me the second I very politely pointed out a flaw in his thinking.
Anyway, forget Langan and his IQ. Worry about the reality of things and the effect it is having right now on you and your children.
And while as far as I am concerned all politicians are bought and paid for servants of evil, even the most modest of reforms meets with wild success, which only highlights how bad things are.
Giving parents the choice between public school and homeschooling or charter schools has resulted in the total collapse of the woke public school system. No one wants any part of it.
Florida’s largest school districts are facing staggering enrollment declines — and grappling with the possibility of campus closures — as dollars follow the increasing number of parents opting out of traditional public schools.
Failed dismally, but was launched from America, geographically. And I’d like to know where the money for the 50 to 100k that was offered to the young Daniel came from with specificity.
Daniel Gonzalez, a former teammate of the two Utah residents caught up in the foiled coup, told The Associated Press that Marcel had offered him $50,000 to $100,000 to spend four months in Congo as a security guard for his politician father. The 22-year-old FedEx worker strongly considered it, but said it lacked concrete details. He ultimately declined so he could spend the summer with his girlfriend.
“I feel really sad for Tyler and Marcel but, at the end of the day, I can just be grateful that I didn’t go because I would be stuck in the same scary situation,” Gonzalez said.
You know this story will never, ever, ever, end. The heat death of the universe is more likely than a Gamma just shutting up and going away forever. Yes, you guessed it, today must be special retard day.
ShadoHand, the furious intel is back.
I honestly can’t be bothered to dissect him as I did Ken. I’t just going to be more of a mercy killing style drive by. And his future comments might well be spammed.
And yes, you mentally ill retard. It is absolutely and perfectly fine to institutionalise people who have such severe mental illness or defect that they prove a danger to themselves or others. And while I do not agree with using them for medical experiments, as unfortunately they have been, historically, nor the use of the kind of drugs they are given, I do absolutely believe many can be helped, as Milton Erickson demonstrated for years in man cases.
You will also note this guy is a tad unbalanced (in case the previous, what half-dozen posts weren’t enough proof) where he:
Accuses me of wanting to institutionalise people at will, without any process for it (where he came up with that he only knows).
He equates drug taking as though it was a known Satanic ritual. I mean, drugs, even psych drugs are all pretty bad and the Pharma companies are certainly evil, but I’m fairly sure the people doling out drugs to mental patients aren’t (in the main) performing specific black masses.
Makes some nonsense up about Catholicism being incompatible with mental institutions, which is nonsense, since the Catholic Church has always tended to the care of the mentally ill from the very earliest times. And in fact, before anyone can even THINK of talking about exorcisms or possession, a full examination of the patient/victim must be had by both qualified doctors and specially trained clergy to first of all establish that the person is not merely disturbed, rather than wrestling with demons, so, no, you absolute freak, the Catholic way is most certainly NOT the abolition of mental asylums. As for your claim of psychiatric abuse, it is absolutely clear that you are not neurotypical by any stretch of the imagination, so I fully believe you absolutely need some psychiatric help, which is also why this is likely the last time you will feature on this blog and will henceforth, in all likelihood, be relegated to spam. Your entertainment and teaching moment value has rapidly depreciated.
I hope tomorrow brings a better quality of commenters. One lives in such faint hopes…
Or a million for that matter, because the village idiots keep reproducing.
Allow me to introduce Ken.
Ken is one of the mouth-breathing retards who thinks he can “git me” with his tenuous grasp of metaphysics, Christianity, basic logic and special needs level of reading comprehension.
He thought he would post a wise and deep comment about “the Filioque” without even bothering to understand that word, where it comes from, what it signifies, or why it even exists.
Kind of like the equally stupid and drooling flat Earth cretins who hang on to the word “firmament” (from the freemason Bible intentionally mistranslated in over 33,000 places under the commission of flamboyantly gay King who also started the Freemason Temples in their current Satanic form, which is why the oh so revered KJV “Bible” is also known as the Freemason Bible (Satanist Bible, right, sounds like a good version to you)).
Just as the people who one truly hopes COULD walk off the edge, continue to think the word “firmament” for reasons best known to themselves means “giant bubble of glass that holds back an infinite ocean” without EVER bothering to find out what the word was in the original text nor what it meant. because if they did, they would find it means “the expanse”. You know, just like the Sci-Fi series of the same name all set in… (drum roll please) SPACE! In short, the very word the flat-brained idiots hang on to literally means sky in Hebrew.
Here, we have another version of what is basically a. lemur, trying to come to grips with the reading skills a normal six year old has mastered, enter (is it, could it be… “master” Ken, but of theology instead of bullshido?!) Let us begin dissecting this parasitic hanger-on:
The filioque is not so simple, because that phrase in the creed comes straight out of the gospel of John, and the gospel doesn’t have the filioque in it:
Right there, ladies and gentlemen, with that single first sentence, this moron has disqualified himself. Because he thinks (like all Protestant thinkers do, in grayscale at best) that the word Filioque is somehow MAGICAL! And if it’s not spelt in America-huh-n English like JE-AASUS spoke it, then you must REJECT the unholy pagan rites of Kath-hole-icism.
We will show below that the word is merely a CONCEPT. But we can’t expect Ken to understand things like abstract concepts. He clearly is one of those people who can’t even imagine an apple, never mind a concept.
% “When the Helper comes, whom I will send to you % from the Father, that is the Spirit of truth % who proceeds from the Father, % He will testify about Me” John 15:26
Even the Douay-Rheims doesn’t have the filioque:
% But when the Paraclete cometh, whom I will send you % from the Father, the Spirit of truth, % who proceedeth from the Father, % he shall give testimony of me. John 15:26
Note the second thing that proves he is absolutely retarded: That word that Jesus says: *I* or in full context “whom I will send you”.
Let’s do this at the pre-primary school level for Ken, shall we children?
Who sends it? Jesus does!
Where does it come from? The Father!
But who sends it? The Son!
YAY!!! Now clap your hands and take your blank and go lie down for a little nap after that exhausting use of brain cells, eh Ken?
The easiest thing for the various council fathers to do is to stick with scripture. To change the creed would require extraordinarily good arguments.
And here it is LADIES AND GENTLEMEN! In case you were wondering when it would make its appearance, here it is, the full blown special retardation that only Protestants can ever conjure up! Sola Scripture! Except, well, it isn’t what he believes it to be, is it. Because we literally just did look at the scripture, and guess what, it really quite clearly says the Holy Spirit comes from the father THROUGH the Son. So… yeah… you see why I use the word retarded so much when discussing Protestants who also would pretend to be faux-Orthos, because, oh, yeah, the Orthos too think that Sola Scriptura is completely retarded just as much as the Catholics know it is. But we’ll not tell Ken that, eh? He might cry.
Instead of providing those arguments, Rome has agreed to allow the eastern Catholics, and the Orthodox when they re-unite, to keep the creed as they have always known it.
There is no reunification, you special breed of incestuos experiment. But if there ver were to be, it would be under the One, True, Holy and Apostolic Catholic Church and its edicts and dogmas.
Now let’s look at how dumb Ken was to even comment on my blog.
How difficult would it have been to at least TRY to grasp the situation before shooting his retarded mouth off?
Second result on duck duck go if you type Filioque brings up this, which even though is Novus Ordo based, (so beware) is actually quite correct, because it is such a basic and simple and obvious thing that even the impostors of the Novus Ordo see no point in belabouring it.
The Western Church commonly uses a version of the Nicene creed which has the Latin word filioque (“and the Son”) added after the declaration that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father. Scripture reveals that the Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son. The external relationships of the persons of the Trinity mirror their internal relationships. Just as the Father externally sent the Son into the world in time, the Son internally proceeds from the Father in the Trinity. Just as the Spirit is externally sent into the world by the Son as well as the Father (John 15:26, Acts 2:33), he internally proceeds from both Father and Son in the Trinity. This is why the Spirit is referred to as the Spirit of the Son (Gal. 4:6) and not just the Spirit of the Father (Matt. 10:20).
The quotations below show that the early Church Fathers, both Latin and Greek, recognized the same thing, saying that the Spirit proceeds “from the Father and the Son” or “from the Father through the Son.”
These expressions mean the same thing because everything the Son has is from the Father. The proceeding of the Spirit from the Son is something the Son himself received from the Father. The procession of the Spirit is therefore ultimately rooted in the Father but goes through the Son. However, some Eastern Orthodox insist that to equate “through the Son” with “from the Son” is a departure from the true faith.
The expression “from the Father through the Son” is accepted by many Eastern Orthodox. This, in fact, led to a reunion of the Eastern Orthodox with the Catholic Church in 1439 at the Council of Florence. Unfortunately, the union did not last. In the 1450s (just decades before the Protestant Reformation), the Eastern Orthodox left the Church again under pressure from the Muslims, who had just conquered them and who insisted they renounce their union with the Western Church (lest Western Christians come to their aid militarily).
So let’s take a little look at Acts 2:33, shall we?
But let’s read it in context too, shall we, instead of doing the Prottie select a random text to twist it at will dance.
31 Foreseeing this, he spoke of the resurrection of Christ. For neither was he left in hell, neither did his flesh see corruption.
32 This Jesus hath God raised again, whereof all we are witnesses.
33 Being exalted therefore by the right hand of God, and having received of the Father the promise of the Holy Ghost, he hath poured forth this which you see and hear.
34 For David ascended not into heaven; but he himself said: The Lord said to my Lord, sit thou on my right hand,
35 Until I make thy enemies thy footstool.
36 Therefore let all the house of Israel know most certainly, that God hath made both Lord and Christ, this same Jesus, whom you have crucified.
37 Now when they had heard these things, they had compunction in their heart, and said to Peter, and to the rest of the apostles: What shall we do, men and brethren?
38 But Peter said to them: Do penance, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ, for the remission of your sins: and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.
Oh, so, this passage refers to Jesus again, receiving the Holy Ghost and then pouring it out to the others, just as… He said in… GASP! John 15:26! WOW! Will you look at that? it corresponds perfectly! It’s almost like MAGIC. If only you can read at the second grade level!
But wait, it’s not just one (or ok, two) simple trick, there is MORE!
(Perhaps I should use more fonts colours here and some more exclamation marks, so as to keep the brain damaged Protestants that are used to swallowing only adverts and soundbites into their atrophied brains more “engaged”? – let me know!)
We have Galatians 4:6 too! And again, maybe let’s read it in a bit of context eh? Like Catholics do, not like mouth-breathing retards like Ken PRETEND to (he can’t read, he obviously just repeats things he was told by rote).
6 And because you are sons, God hath sent the Spirit of his Son into your hearts, crying: Abba, Father.
7 Therefore now he is not a servant, but a son. And if a son, an heir also through God.
So… uh… what Spirit is it that God the Father might possibly send to the people? Oh, wait… the Spirit of his Son. So… what Spirit could that possibly be? Some other Spirt, that is NOT the Holy Spirit? Wait, have we got it wrong all this time? Is there really TWO Spirits, the Holy Spirit and then another mysterious unnamed one? Which doesn’t appear anywhere else and is not named in the passage that proves the Trinity beyond any doubt? Well, Ken apparently must believe this, but anyone that can read does not. Because clearly what is being referenced here is the Holy Spirit, and lo and behold, once again, it proceeds from the Father at minimum THROUGH the son, because a very strong argument can also be made that if the Father sends them the Spirit OF the Son, then that spirit is an intrinsic part of Jesus (as it is, being it’s the Holy Spirit) and as such proceeds from him too.
And does Matthew 10:20 contradict anything? Nope, It just says that the spirit of the Father will speak through you. There is no contradiction here. If he had stated the Spirit of Christ instead of The Father, it would have been the same, given that the Trinity is all three of them. It was obviously just a normal sentence spoken as anyone would. He could have said the spirit of God and left it at that too. It makes no difference and is certainly nothing to hang on to as if Matthew had some how EXCLUDED Jesus specifically. In short, it is the usual Protestant nonsense of people trying to find some Calvinistic absolutism and getting it retiredly wrong.
And finally, one last point, note that the Orthos, once again, AGREED with the Catholics and rejoined them over 400 years after their schism and repeated betrayal and murder of many of the Catholics who came to help them despite the fact they were already schismatics for 40 years.
And then, once again, they put their tail between their legs and did as the Muslims told them to do. Not exactly what real believers in Christ would act, is it?
So there you have it Ken. And he has the honour of having forced me to add a whole new category to the topics on this blog, though they have featured many times, Ken prompted the addition of the topic: Retards.
Probably about the only thing he will ever achieve in life, if his reading comprehension is anything to go by.
AI – Enstupidation/Murder
Aside making us all dumber if we ever rely on it for anything, the start of skynet may have already begun, in a subtler and smarter way than terminator robots too.
No related posts.
By G | 28 May 2024 | Posted in Artificial Intelligence, Social Commentary