Giuseppe Filotto Cross

What is this site all about? First-timers CLICK HERE

8 Comments

Were dinosaurs ever real?

I have unfortunately spent too much time today reading this series on dinosaur hoaxes at Agent 13 substack. To the point that I am beginning to question how much of the dinosaur theory is real. It is a long series of posts in 5 parts so will take you a while to read, but is definitely worth it, and pretty well-written too.

Let’s be clear that I am not a “the Earth is only 6,000 year old” weirdo, and absolutely, never have been, and never will be a Flat Earther, but the dinosaur thing I always knew was dodgy to some degree or other. It’s just that the degree of it has never been clear to me because primarily I wasn’t too concerned with looking into it. And I like the idea of dinosaurs. And I like the idea of them coming back and eating all the stupid people.

Agent 13 makes a good case and it is also clear he doesn’t disbelieve all fossils, since like amny of us, he has found some himself, but they tend to be little ones mostly of shells and such things.

The one on the left was a gift to me and the one on the right my wife found as a girl in her garden by randomly bashing a rock open with a hammer. So fossils do exist.

What I always questioned, even as a child, was a lot of the narrative around them, such as what they said they looked like exactly, what they ate, or what kind of vascular system they had. I have also been aware for a long time that no actual full skeleton or skull of a T-Rex has ever been found and I became aware of Marsh and Cope as a result of reading Michael Crichton’s book Dragon Teeth based on them and the fictional account of some of the characters around them in one of his earlier books, which I read only a couple of years ago.

I still hope T-Rexes really existed, along with all the other fantastic creatures, however, I am absolutely open to the idea that they were either vastly different than we have been told, or possibly, even almost entirely fabricated.

On the other hand, I am very open to the idea that giant humanoids at least 3 metres (10 feet) or so in height have existed at some point in the past.

You still get banned on sight here for suggesting the Earth is flat though. Especially if you base it on the absolutely ignorant rendering of the word “firmament” in the Freemason Bible ordered by the famously homosexual King James, with it’s 33,000 “errors” of translation, and 700 years of editing by literal Christ killing Pharisees before the German with a penchant for raping maids decided to alter it further before declaring it the one book that is the totality of Christianity on its own (but not before he ripped out books from it apparently).

And my views on the Moon landing have been made clear in both video and my SF series Overlords of Mars, which is wholly encapsulated in the tome Nazi Moon (paper copy), or digital version.

And yeah, I also am not a believer in any kind of Hollow Earth theory, though I do really like the idea of it as a fantasy/escapist concept.

So there you are. Let me know your thoughts.

No Comments

Comment Moderation

Apologies for the last few days of sparse posting and non-moderation of comments, but I have been busy. Hopefully I am now back at a more routine posting frequency and with regard to comments, please note that even if you are a regular commentator here, all comments are moderated and it can take me a day or more to get to them at times. Though usually not a week as it has this time. Partly this is due to whatever update broke the ability to review comments on my phone, so it means I need to log into my pc to view and moderate them.

And also never forget that commenting on here has certain rules that are enforced with a brutality akin to Judge Joe Dredd in the 2000 AD comic. You can disagree with me as hard as you want as long as you are COGENT and ON TOPIC and don’t make the usual idiotic errors of strawmanning, expressing an opinion that has been repeatedly proven to be idiotic and wrong and/or you ignore the actual content of the post to sperg in yet again, mouth-breathing retard fashion. There are no warnings on this blog. If you make a comment that falls under those categories you just get spammed. And I never look back. Life is too short for me to waste time with people whose opinions or comments or “ideas” are absolutely irrelevant to reality and my life.

I welcome intelligent commentary that is relevant, adds to the conversation, or expresses even a personal opinion that is in keeping with he commenting rules. And as a result thought the brutal enforcement has kept commenting to a general minimum, the comments we do have on here are now generally of a very good quality hat I genuinely enjoy reading and responding to when required.

2 Comments

The “Ugly” Truth

Do you ever ponder how much unadulterated bullshit you’re supposed to swallow on a daily basis?

It’s astonishing. From the macro:

  • Men and women are equal
  • Feminism is good
  • Masculinity is toxic
  • All ethnicities are all equally good
  • Except European Caucasians, they are the worst
  • All religions are equally good. Even the ones that say it’s ok to rape toddlers and minors
  • Chemtrails are just a conspiracy theory
  • 9/11 was the result of muslim terrorists and definitely not mossad operatives
  • Epstein killed himself and was definitely not a Mossad operative. The fact he met monthly with the head of Mossad is just a coincidence
  • Neither was Maxwell or his two daughters, including Ghiselle, in any way related to Mossad
  • Freemasons are not Satanists
  • The Catholic Church before and after 1958 and Vatican II and freemason infiltration is exactly the same church.
  • The government is the best decider of how to raise your children
  • Taxes create a better civilisation
  • IQ is just a number
  • There is no connection whatsoever between homosexuality and child sexual abuse
  • There is no pedophile agenda in the LGBT agenda
  • Anyone can have the same opportunity regardless of political affiliation or religion or ethnicity. Except heterosexual white men, they are cheating at life somehow and should be penalised
  • Your vote matters and your politicians are fairly elected.
  • All vaccines are good for you. Even the generic serums that are not actually vaccines.
  • Covid was a totally natural disease due to a bat raping a monkey in a Chinese open air market.
  • The laws are there to protect you
  • So is the police/army/navy/air force
  • There is no vastly powerful clique trying to run the world by first getting rid of their eternal mortal enemy, European Catholics followed by European nominal “Christians” in general.

To the micro… though once you understand the micro it’s all macro.

  • Fluoride in the water is good
  • Kids now are smarter than kids 200 years ago
  • Reading book is boring and outdated
  • Children running around outside in nature is dangerous

And on and on and on and on.

Every

Single

Day

And you have to ask:

What is the common thread among all this.

Who wants this?

1 Comment

It’s already here

Vox wrote an interesting report on warhammer 40,000 and why it survived so long against leftist invasion. The original post he links to specifies that writing an RPG based in hardcore truths is resistant to woke agendas.

Well, this is precisely why I have made my RPG as it is.

Surviving the Current Zombie Apocalypse (SCZA) is written so as to be both humorous and entertaining yet useful as a learning tool too.

You can get it as a full colour hardcopy from Amazon, or as a PDF from my E-store.

And don’t take my word for it. Here is an Amazon review:

Andy Gryc

2.0 out of 5 stars

Verified Purchase

Fun idea, but ultimately not much usable

Reviewed in Canada on March 24, 2022

The “Inside pages” preview gives you a sense that this is a zombie apocalypse game in a world where all the conspiracy theories are real. Fun sounding premise, right? I thought so, so bought the book, but it wasn’t what I hoped for. For anyone else who’s considering buying this, let me explain my issues with it so you can see if it’s worth it or not for you. The book is in two major pieces – the story of the world, and the role playing system. The first part wasn’t really what I expected, and maybe that’s my fault. Here are my issues with the book. 1) By taking most conspiracy theories as factually true, the world it creates has a definite white nationalist tone. It’s all done tongue-in-cheek, but nevertheless, you have an anti-equality, anti-Semitic, transphobic, bigoted world-view that runs throughout. That’s not the kind of campaign I want to run. I play with women and visible minorities, but I wouldn’t want my campaign to be like this even if it was all white men – it just feels a bit gross to my modern sensibilities. Perhaps it’s my bad that I didn’t expect that outcome from the premise, since that seems to be the logical conclusion of most modern conspiracies. It’s a game that’s supposed to be dark, and I understand that – I just don’t want to breathe life into it. 2) The game also veers into pretty distinct religiosity. Again, I know it’s entertainment, but there’s an awful lot of the story dedicated to the Christians, a particular strain of Catholicism that is the “true” religion, good fighting evil, God and Satan, bishops, popes, priests, etc. This is more than just a normal character class or a faction, it seems like it’s the backbone of the new world order. Meh. Just won’t be that interesting to me or my players. 3) I could be wrong on this, but I don’t believe the zombies are intended to be literally zombies. If they are, it’s pretty darn subtle and easy to overlook. While there are a couple bits of colour text that say the “zombies” might even be commanded eat to flesh, it’s really more about how all the vaccinated are under mind control from the evil overlords. In other words, the “sheeple”. Instead of getting World War Z, it feels a bit more like a dysfunctional version of The Office. Again – unique perspective, but not what I was truly after. This is the factor that’s probably the biggest disappointment. 4) Finally, the game system. I give the author kudos for inventing a system that’s simple, uses standard dice, makes the players fragile, and is built on a bell curve. Those are all great attributes, although for me personally that’s only a 50% win. I think the game system is just a bit too simple – specifically character creation. Basically 2 stats and some optional skills. Don’t get me wrong – I hate Pathfinder and feel 5e is burdened with books and books of rules. But I think Chaosium’s Basic Role Playing has it just right. Just enough complexity for the GM and Player to manage easily at the table as well as giving lots of room to grow the character. Also, on the d6 thing – I’m just not a huge fan of d6 only systems. My crew has “invested” in tons of dice, so limiting them to one set only seems almost a bit cruel. Half the fun of an RPG is owning all the platonic solids. In summary, like most anything you’ll get for a real game, it’s a sourcebook. Every GM has their own personal tastes, and some will be able to use more that’s here than others. What I’ll personally be able to salvage from it in terms of good, usable, and playable ideas is less than a single page. I recognize the work that’s gone into it, and I’m not trying to be critical about the result – it just doesn’t match what I need. If you are expecting something more like a playable version of Max Brooks “Zombie Survival Guide” like I was, keep searching. But if you’re more open to taking today’s world and dialling up the dysfunction and conspiracies up to 11, it might be just for you.

All the other reviews are 5 stars, but I am not sure that Andy Gryc’s review is having the effect he intended. I know several people purchased the game as a result of it.

And there is of course a starter set Module for it (E-store PDF)

And for those already willing to experiment with the game system, the game could be easily adapted to play out some of the events found in the recent novella In the Shadows of Monte Castello.

The point is that with much of my fiction writing the baselines are rooted in very solid reality.

The whole Overlords of Mars trilogy as found in one volume (Nazi Moon) is soundly based on The Face on Mars written in 1995 and Systema written in 2011 and the thread of Reclaiming the Catholic Church shadows most things I do today.

So while the route and the road may be flexible, ultimately, if your entertainment is any good, it should reflect recognisable realities, regardless of how fantastic the setting might be.

And real virtues, such as courage, moral fortitude, reason, Justice and so on, are ultimately timeless, no matter how much the woke want to pretend otherwise.

No Comments

Candid Camera

I was reflecting yesterday that if our family ever had hidden cameras everywhere and the footage of them was professionally edited, the resulting reality TV would probably be something along the lines of a humorous version of dark mirror.

Quite seriously, some of the jokes my wife comes up with are probably confession worthy. Still hilarious, but dark doesn’t begin to cover it.

And the kids are sometimes worse. The 3 year old was discussing with the 8 year old a topic I blogged about here before. See if you can figure out what she was referring to.

3yo: Excitedly “… and he didn’t have a face or even a body left. He ate it all…”

8yo: “… What? Like no legs or arms?”

3yo: “Yeth! (She has a little lisp) He was like an among us!” Smiling proudly at having had her elder sister grasp the deeply philosophical implications.

Me: (looking at the wife) Did you hear that?

Wife: Caught the tail end… are they talking about…

Me: Yes, the second dead mouse they found as an offering from the cats.

Wife: Ah. (Stirs scrambled eggs unperturbed)

Me: (To myself silently) I suppose if the Apocalypse does happen, they’ll be well adjusted for it.

No Comments

And it begins

Meme my eldest daughter sent me today.

You want them to be smart… and of course that means they become smart-asses.

No Comments

And Indeed

2 Comments

Quite

No Comments

This is where we are

1 Comment

On the aim of life

So, this is turning into a loooooong back and forth between me and Adam Piggott, concerning the aims of a man.

It was all prompted by a post Adam did based on an email he received from what was obviously a rather depressed guy. Adam has forwarded my post to him too. You can go to this post of mine and read the link on it to catch up if you had no idea what I am talking about.

Adam has since responded by a further post here.

And what has become clear to me is that there is a kind of communication gap, which I feel I am mostly responsible for as it is not a new thing.

I have a tendency to see something that to me is obvious but tends to be clearly less so to others, and so I will try to explain it from my perspective but invariably miss some apparently crucial bit of information that would allow the normal humans to understand my perspective.

Because it is not usually clear to me why so many others don’t see perspectives that are obvious to me, it tends to lead me to be more verbose in my writing than is probably good or necessary. Which also irritates me no end, yet if I write just what I think is necessary it comes across as mystical haikus by an insane person to most people. So I try to cover as many of the possible gaps as I can in the hope to transmit the crucial aspects that differentiate my view from that of most people. And it’s all mostly futile.

Nevertheless, it is good for me to practice trying to communicate better with the species of humanoids found on this planet, so here goes:

Succinctly, Adam effectively says:

  • You need to make something of yourself before you attract the right woman for you.
  • Everything else is details and you should focus on that first because chasing after some dreamgirl is pointless anyway if you aren’t amounting to anything as humans measure success.
  • How you feel about it is irrelevant, this is how it works.

I’ll let him say if I have in any way misrepresented him.

My points instead are:

  • Sure, materially speaking that is how it works most of the time, but (and it’s an important but):
    • Telling a depressed guy that has as an aim to be in a relationship, and who is relatively young, who has had little or almost no experience of women that that is just how it is and he should just buckle up and first make something of himself over the next few years, is unlikely to lead that man to anything positive.
    • Materially speaking is not just semantics; it means related to, involved with, tied to, the material world. That aspect that we as Christians are told to not indulge in.
    • The most important aspects of life are rooted in the metaphysical, not the material.
  • Really, I thought I made it perfectly clear that what I thought was wrong with Adam’s “advice” was that it was not helpful. I didn’t say it was necessarily wrong, but it missed the point of how to motivate the man towards the things he desires.

I mean, the very paragraph where I explain this is taken by Adam to mean I am somehow contradicting myself, which I find astonishing, since it’s a clarifying statement of my critique.

As for “doing things” and leaving a mark before you get the girl, sure, that is generally how it works out, but it’s wrong to think that is how you motivate yourself. The motivation is the other way round. You want the girl? So become someone worthy of whatever fantasy girl you have in your head. 

That aside, the example Adam picked to possibly act as some evidence against my perspective is far from perfect since apparently the individual concerned may have worked as a male escort, and in any case was already known to police, and was a diagnosed schizophrenic. So not exactly your common incel. Frankly I find him irrelevant to the topic at hand.

Nor, did I say the man should try and get his dreamgirl before making something of himself. I simply stated that the motivation to make something of himself will not come from telling him to buckle down and carry on unloved and unknown and unsought for in his crushing loneliness for years before he can even think of getting into a relationship. Which essentially is what Adam’s advice boiled down to.

My whole point was that as a motivator, imagining who that woman might be and using that image as a motivator to get you to make something of yourself is far more effective even if you remain just as single and alone for the same length of time described above as years.

Lastly, while I accept that this is Adam’s and probably most people’s perspective on the matter, it is not strictly a fact that if you meet the right girl when you have not yet made your mark in the world you will either be in constant anxiety at the thought she might leave you, and/or that she would. The first serious girlfriend I had lasted 13 years and I had no mark to be made yet and very little money and I had left home with all I owned packed into a car to get as far from my parents as I could. My “fame” at that point was limited to the fact I was unafraid to get into physical fights regardless of numbers against me. That was really about it. In any case I never had any anxiety about being dumped, and in fact I was not. Ultimately it was me that walked away from that relationship.

I also find his statement that

Becoming worthy is conquering the world, which means making a man of yourself.

Rather telling and also amusing. I certainly never had to “make” a man of myself. I was born male and that is really all there was to it.

I have always been thoroughly unconcerned with the perspective of needing to be thought of as “manly” or “being a man” or such concepts. The simple reality is that I was born male, will live every second of my life as male and will die as a male. It is simply a fact. The obsession the Anglos tend to have with being thought of as “a man” is rather telling and a little Shakespearean. In a “the lady doth protest too much” kind of way.

And if one is that way inclined, that is, to worry about being perceived as, or needing to somehow become a man, then, yeah, I am sure one of the many neuroses such people have will certainly extend to the fear of their girlfriend leaving them. And I can see that manifesting too.

Which brings me full circle back to the depressed guy as well as Adam’s ending point about being “fixated” on finding a woman and that being wrong because it would determine the success or failure of your entire life, while it (the finding of the woman) not being entirely in your control.

There is, from my perspective, quite a bit of bad logic there.

Firstly, one could argue that being able to find the right woman and reproducing with her, for the majority of people, is the real measure of success or failure of your life. Unless you are Nikola Tesla, from any one man’s perspective, your line dying out with you is unlikely to improve mankind. There are always exceptions of course, but as a rule most people think their way and their thoughts would be best and thus, procreating and furthering such is a pivotal aspect of life. It is truly few who intentionally choose to not get married and not have children. Priests are among them. Most other men would consider it a failure at life.

Secondly, I don’t see the looking for the right person to make a family with as being a fixation at all. At least no more than I see breathing as a fixation. I hardly ever consciously think about breathing, yet it is absolutely necessary and I do it all day every day. In short, you can go about your day and do what needs doing and still be breathing, or looking for the right woman.

Thirdly, as I said at the start of my critique, the point is that there really is someone right for you out there, no matter what kind of freak you are. Obviously making yourself as appealing as possible, helps your chances, but even the misshapen, unfortunate gargoyles of life have someone out there that will love them. Knowing this is no more an obsession or a fixation than knowing that one day you will die.

Fourthly, not having something be entirely in your control is a far cry from having no control over it at all. Potentially any number of women I was with could have been suitable or “good enough” to make a life with. Regardless of that, due to my character (which may be seen as unfortunate by many, perhaps) I had certain requirements in a prospective mate that are very probably unreasonable. And yet, eventually, I did indeed find possible suitable candidates, and ultimately, even the precisely right one for me. And if someone like me can do it, believe me, most people can do it, but… you do need to apply yourself. In my experience of life, those men who focus on making money or a career and so on, in turn to eventually, get the dreamgirl, rarely accomplish it. It like guys who work like slaves for 40 years to get to retirement only to find their pension is worthless and you’re out of time and energy to even know what you wanted to do in the first place. The guy who goes through life naturally and who is always on the lookout for the right person, the way one might be on the lookout for a red Pontiac firebird, tends to more readily find it, and he’s usually less obsessive about it than the guy who wants to make a man of himself first, in order to later get the girl.

All of this simply to say that despairing at one’s loneliness and current state of the world, is not the way. And when a person confesses their despair in such a matter, the correct way to advise them, is hardly to double down on their need to be harsher on themselves and their already harsh (and erroneous) perception of the world. The way to motivate them to see the light is to remind them that one day, they will meet that woman, and they can approach life from the perspective that whatever unpleasant task you need to do today, is fine, because it advances you a little further along the path of when you do meet her, and perhaps also in terms of your material well-being.

That’s really the only point I made.

And now you see why writing is a love-hate thing for me.

All content of this web-site is copyrighted by G. Filotto 2009 to present day.
Website maintained by IT monks