Giuseppe Filotto Cross

What is this site all about? First-timers CLICK HERE

No Comments

And Now For The Positives…

So my last post sort of gave a tiny insight into how the world really works and if you grasped that fully, you might have become suicidally depressed. Well, don’t blow your brains out just yet. Look at things this way:

Everyone likes an underdog film, right? You, the lonely, misshapen, loser at life, with no money, hope or charisma, finding the Shangri-La of happiness!

So, don’t be a wuss. If you DO happen to be a downtrodden unfortunate, think of it this way, you got the intro/first half of the film down pat. Now it’s time to do that heroic montage or perhaps slow middle part grind of the film, where you build yourself up into a quasi-functioning member of society (but still harbour a lot of your insecurities). And in this film, if you do it via reading my books and my blog, you can think of it as a single scene where you pick up some corny book title from some even cornier guru, read it and it ridiculously changes your life, or, is your film is a grittier and grainier one, where you read and take in some of the stuff I say and really apply it and regardless of whether we meet in person or not, you find a way to apply these lessons in a way that measurably improves your life. We might never meet, you might never even drop me an email or anything. I may never know you existed, or we might become very good friends, but the important part is that YOU get better. that you become more successful at life and find a good partner to marry and make and raise happy and numerous children.

And if you just twitched, thinking that getting married is a fool’s game and having lots of children is a recipe for disaster, well, my chicken-hearted and soft-brained youngster, take heart. I used to think the same stupid shit in my 20s and even my thirties. These are not your thoughts. These are the thoughts that have been beamed into your head from birth by an evil entity that controls a lot of things on this planet. It doesn’t matter if you believe in the evil entity and his minions or not. They believe in you. And in fact, your not believing in them makes their job easier.

The problems of life

Are simple. Pretty much everyone, wants:

  • To be loved and have someone they love near them.
  • To have enough (money) to do what they want.

That’s basically Love and Freedom. Not hard to understand.

But the barriers to entry on both of those are massive. And most of them begin in your head, where they have been placed by pretty much decades (if not centuries) of lies.

First Barrier to Entry – Your Beliefs

It really does not matter what reality is like. If you believe you can’t then you certainly can’t. And life can be hard, so even if you believe you can, often you will still fail. That said, if you obsessively work at and believe you can, you generally achieve most things to at least a certain degree.

So let’s do Love first. What might be some wrong/erroneous/unhelpful beliefs you may have:

  • Women are all whores/men are all idiots
  • Women will divorce rape you/men only want quickie sex
  • No one believes in traditional family life anymore
  • I can’t afford to be in a relationship (money)
  • I can’t afford to have children (money)
  • I don’t have a support group to have children (money/people)
  • I don’t trust men/women
  • People lie too much to trust them
  • People are too stupid
  • They don’t have my interests
  • No one is loyal anymore
  • The internet gives us too much choice
  • Hookup culture has destroyed relationships
  • 10% of the top men get 90% of the top women
  • I’m too ugly/stupid/poor/short
  • You bought into a PUA Redpill (really a blackpill)
  • You bought into feminist theory of anything
  • You bought into communist theory of anything
  • You bought into equality theory of anything
  • You bought into any Hollywood idea of “relationships”
  • There is no one out there for me
  • Everyone is now Vaxxed and I am a pureblood
  • I don’t own X and I need X before I can settle down
  • I don’t earn X and I need to earn X before I do Y

That’s just a list off the top of my head I literally did as fast as I can type. I am sure the people reading could add pages to it, but it covers the large issues for the most part and is fairly comprehensive and applicable to all. Right, so what can we notice right away?

Money

Having money solves a LOT of these issues (all in red above). And guess what the other part is, the freedom part, that’s pretty much (not entirely but largely) a function of money too. If you can read this, you are in a position where you can earn some money, regardless of who and where you are. It will be harder for some of you and less so for others, but honestly, if you can read this, you can make money.

Right, so it looks like if we can scratch money off the list, of things we need to have, we would solve pretty much all the Freedom part (to some degree anyway) and several of the Love part of the problem, so, making it, having it, is important.

And here enters another thing. If you obsess about making money and making money itself becomes the goal, you can and probably will, lose sight of the other goals. That’s just how human beings are wired. You get more of what you focus on, to the exclusion of everything else. So if MAKING the money is the important thing, and you do it long enough, and well enough, and you become better at it, and you can do it more, and get more, pretty soon, you are addicted to making money and you necessarily may lose out on other things. That said, having a certain level of money is important. It is not ESSENTIAL, in the true sense, and it might not be true in an existential sense either, but from a practical perspective, it allows you to achieve certain things. the trick is to know you are using money and not money using you.

There are many paths to money. Personally mine have always been extremely haphazard, because the making of money never really interested me much. My curiosity was in exploring places, people, ideas, and figuring those things out. Money was just a necessary tool, but not one I ever had any particular affinity for. As a result I have had period in my life where the totality of food I had to eat was a bag flour, some salt (luxury item) and the tap water in my studio apartment. And I was in my mid-twenties, so not exactly just out of school. I also had periods where I’d fly to see a woman I was involved in, pretty much every weekend from UK to Italy, and this set up happened more than once in my life. I often paid for friends on holidays or dinners and never kept any kind of count, but I am sure it is a staggering amount if it were all added up. I also have had periods where friends or family borrowed or gave me money. So I might not be the best person to advise you on how to MAKE a lot of money, but I can tell you without hesitation that there are many, many, many, ways to make money. Not all are available to you at all times of course, and the older you get and more responsibilities you have, the harder it might be to hop and change from one way to another. I never built a so-called career, not cared to keep rolodexes of colleagues and contacts to network and socially climb any corporate ladder. I literally got by on my intelligence and ability to pick anything up really very quickly. it’s fine for a young man to live that way for a while, but it’s not ideal or even good for older or for family men to do so.

What I can tell you with some authority is that, concerning money:

  • Where there is a will there is a way, you can make some
  • Consistency and persistence pay off
  • In the long run, honesty pays off too (arguable by some, see below)
  • It is easier to make more money if you compromise your integrity and principles, but personally, I think that’s a complete fool’s trade. And I really don’t care if it’s for billions. I have turned down a LOT of money on repeated occasions because I like to have a clean-shaven face and that requires me looking in a mirror. I can’t really quantify the value of that to you, but I assure you that for me, it is pivotal. You might be different from me. Most people are. As always, as the oracles at Delphi used to say: Man, Know Thyself.

That’s about all the advice I feel comfortable giving you about money, plus one more point:

Money is pretty much all inherently fake. People in Eastern Europe and South America and other places too, throughout history, woke up one day and their Fiat money was suddenly worthless. So… keep that at the back of your mind too. To a degree it’s true of material possessions too, the government can appropriate your land or property but generally things have to get fairly more drastic (See Red Indians, Zimbabwean Farmers, Soviet Union, etc. etc ad infinitum).

Ideologies

The items in bold on the above Love list are all ideas. Very bad ideas. Of course, one could say that any belief is an ideology, but there are subtle but important differences between reality being observed, understood (to whatever extent we can do so) and then catalogued into a convenient but not completely inflexible shorthand. For example, the speed of light is thought to be absolutely fixed. In reality, experimentation tends to suggest it may vary perceptibly depending on various factors, some of which are unknown, but for most models, pretending the speed of light is fixed, works well enough. This is vastly different from it is so. Good enough is not It is so. Ideology is: It is so (wrong). Reality Perception is Good Enough.

Some examples of ideology are the whole idiotic “gender-fluidity” nonsense. The observed natural order of things is that dimorphic species have males and females, and they mate to produce offspring. Anything else is a deviation from nature and what actually works and perpetrates the species. Now, you may have a fetish for inserting unripe bananas where they do not belong, or golf balls by the bucket for that matter, and you say “But if I harm no one…” And therein lies the trick. For you to TRULY harm no one, your unripe banana and golf-ball insertion deviancy should be very much closeted and discussed with precisely no one. The minute you try to pretend your deviant, aberrant, unnatural behaviour is “normal” you begin to damage banana production economics, upsetting golfers, and incentivising proctologists to pretend certain plastic surgery reconstructions are “routine”.

Other examples of ideology are as listed:

Feminism – It’s made no one happy and destroyed untold millions if not billions of lives, fostering a complete fake narrative of what women “should” want or “need” instead of what they are biologically designed to be like. And of course, the same applies to the damage done to men and especially young boys. Literally every statistic on human happiness and suicide bears this out.

Equality – It’s completely false. Not even twins are equal, and certainly not men and women, or different ethnicities, religions, cultures and so on. Of course, if you are a Venetian, you are smarter, better looking and already know this, since we know very well the rest of the world is composed of other humans. And humans are just the worst. But at least we are better than all of you. I am sure you think otherwise, but you’re just wrong about that. See? I just proved the point. Stop and review your thoughts. Seriously. Review.

Communism – Another Jewish lie (Karl Marx was a Jew, and yes, I put this at his and their collective feet, like usury. Why? Because facts. What? what? Antise-what? Yeah, shut up. Go look up who came up with feminism mostly. And immigration on a huge scale “for thee but not me”. I got more. Just ask.) Communism is basically the idea that everyone is the same and everyone should get the same. Except the guys in charge. Oh and also, we need to kill millions of people to make it work. Every single time. Because all the other times wasn’t really done right. But this time, with this pile of skulls, we will perfect it. Seriously, read a fucking book. Communism is a gigantic lie and always has been.

PUAs – blogged about these cretins at length for years. Use the Search me link on the right.

There is no one out there for me – Pretty much ALL of the above ideologies are not rooted in reality but rather your Achille’s heel of deep down believing you’re unlovable. And so the whole world needs to stop spinning on its axis, become a flat disc, to suit the flat-earther morons, and life must all bend to your specific will, with all your flaws, so you can feel validated. Except you won’t, because shrivelled, crippled, addicted to all drugs and booze as your miserable soul is, it still KNOWS that you are as you are, and no amount of fake outside validation will fill the gaping maw of despair that is in your heart. Only truth and reality and facing it will do that.

It was always thus

See the green items? Yeah…. pretty much the same throughout world history. To whatever degree these items are “true” they have always been so. The proportions may vary a little, but believe me, only a little. Most humans are really fucking terrible. Didn’t I already tell you that? What are you, some Algerian or something? Obviously not Venetian eh?!? Jeez. Pay attention will you?

OK what’s left?

So the items in normal text have some truth right? Ok, for the most part, all this means is that your task of finding a suitable mate are made even easier. Because they are so much easier to identify.

A woman that believe in most of the ideologies listed in bold, and acts out most of the things written in green and also flags the normal text items, is probably a waste of time. On the other hand, there exist, men and women who:

  • Believe in traditional family life
  • Agree having a support group to raise a family is great, but not absolutely essential
  • Agree that the internet and hookup culture have given everyone unrealistic expectations, which are based on completely false concepts. A few of them might even understand that most humans are a bunch of ugly idiots, and you too and them too. And that the best they can do is find an idiot just as ugly and stupid as they are and build a life on it.
  • Both the Vaxxed and non-vaxxed tend to admit it freely. Males it easier to select your group: Mutants or Pure Strain Humans. Then roll our Gamma World stats.

The selection process has become more discerning. That’s all. If you are reading this you now have the top of the top 0.1% information to make a good go of scoring the perfect partner. You realise he or she will not be a millionaire, supermodel, nymphomaniac, who enjoys sharing you with his/her disease-free stripper friends.

So you select someone of similar 1-10 scale looks to you that shares at least some of the more important values you believe in and if those values are not based in reality, you know your relationship will most likely catch fire, go into a tailspin and leave a messy crater below.

Work on yourself to shave off the mono part of your mono-brow. Learn to talk to EVERYONE. Learn to approach ANYONE, without being a creepy, stalkerish type. Go out in the real world and join activities that you enjoy where likely partners might be found.

And keep at it.

One thing I am certain of, is that if you do these things, and also work on removing whatever negative beliefs and traits you have (NOT WITH SURGERY, YOU MORON! NOT UNLESS YOU’RE THE ELEPHANT MAN!) there absolutely IS a person out there that can love you and truly actually love you. Yes, even if you are a crippled hunchback. And yes I do know actual crippled hunchbacks (more than one, yes) who made something of their lives and are happily married. Are their partners supermodels? No. But you know what, after a while that really doesn’t matter. I obviously hope nothing of the sort ever happens and my wife would be devastated if it did, but if she had some horrible accident and was disfigured, my attraction to her would not really make a twitch on the needle. There was a time I was absolutely attracted to her looks, I still am, and she still has them, but the shift has moved for me already, and it is not a function of age so much, but of intimacy. I have always noted that if I was serious about a woman, although her looks originally attracted me, afterwards, they made little difference. It is also true that the important ones in my life have been very few compared to the “just for fun” ones.

The ability to connect deeply on the things that really matter in life, far supersedes the temporary allure of the merely physical (albeit they can last a few decades with good care). The more time I spend with her, the closer I feel and if the feeling is mutual and she too feels closer then, our level of true understanding and intimacy grows exponentially too, and honestly, nothing “looks” better than that sensation.

So keep these things in mind.

As I can, I will next post about how the entire world lies to you and how to spot it.

5 Comments

The Root of All Evil

This is probably going to piss off most of my readers. Well, brace yourselves, boys and girls, after all, I am not a millionaire because I really suck at telling people lies they’d rather hear instead of cold hard facts that upset their fragile egos.

Some premises are in order before I blow your minds:

  • This overview is a synergistic whole based on VALID and VERY significant statistical realities.
    • Which means Not All X Are Like That is an OBVIOUS point, and being obvious needs not be mentioned. Especially in screaming, frantic, Bommer CAPS LOCK.
    • While stacking statistical reality on statistical reality generally reduces the overall “certainty” of the final conclusion, that also depends on the size of the data set and the certainty of each statistical reality being stacked. The data sets here are absolutely staggeringly huge and also consistent over several centuries of time, so… kinda like: The Sun Rises in the East type of thing. Sure it might not ALWAYS have had, hypothetically, if the Moon is an alien dormant spaceship placed there by Annunnaki, or a meteor hit the Earth long ago and changed a lot of its astronomical properties, or… theoretically, if it might happen yet… you see where I am going with this.
  • The historical realities I will mention are probably not all known to you and you may very well be skeptical about them, please do your own research and realise google and most search engines are quite compromised on pretty much anything involving the Jews, Freemasons, and so on. That said, don’t take my word for it, check it out for yourselves. If you want a general reference book that has a LOT of the murkier stuff already proven beyond doubt, along with references and so on, you can read my Reclaiming the Catholic Church. It’s 530 pages, but not a single person I know that has read it has said it is in any way boring. But otherwise, do your own work. I will not spend weeks providing links etc to every premise detailed below. I will add enough general information to give you a starting point and then if you want to refute what I am saying, please, unless you want to be banned without any warning whatever (and permanently because I just spam you and never look back) read the rules for commenting here. Intellectual honesty is not optional. Neither is the dialectic form of argument. You can add rhetoric at will to it, but the point must be solidly founded on dialectic. Sophistry of any kind is an immediate ban too.

Right Then. Let us begin, so that you may learn where and what the real root of pretty much all evil on our planet today comes from and is based on. In order to do so, we need to be aware of several things.

Here is the TL;DR version:

Know the History of Evil

The History of it of course, goes back right to the very creation of mankind, but here, today, we will concern ourselves only with the last 500 years or so of it.

Protestantism is not Christianity

  • Martin Luther was probably a Jewish hit-man, with the task of literally trying to destroy Catholicism. He changed the Bible that had been used for over 1500 years by literally everyone, denied the Papacy which, again, literally everyone for over 1,000 years accepted as it was, and then, totally illogically, said the Bible was the ONLY source of doctrine or theology, when:
    • The Bible itself refers to traditions outside of it
    • He changed the Bible to begin with, so we must suppose that he meant the Martin Bible, as opposed to the one that…
    • Oh, yeah, CATHOLICS put together, some 300 years after Jesus ascended, using…
    • OOOPPSSS…oral and written tradition to decide what went in and what was left out of the actual Bible. Yeaahhh kinda embarrassing for the whole Sola Scriptura thing.
    • Oh an also tried to remove James entirely from the Bible and add the word “alone” after the words “justified by faith”. Yeaahhh kinda embarrassing for the whole Sola Fide thing.
  • Over 40,000 denominations of Protestantism exist today, and that’s being generous since literally, the entire premise of Protestantism is that each man should interpret the Bible by himself, so in reality there are some 700 million versions and more. A ridiculous situation that clearly goes against the Biblical instructions to be one Church united, to not accept any teachings that are not apostolic ally approved and so on.
  • Since anyone can be a Protestant “pastor” there is absolutely no Apostolic succession and literally no difference in “teachings” from one Protestant “pastor” or a Wiccan or a reader of Harry Potter, since, literally, the only rule Protestantism has is the demonic: “Interpreth as thou wilt”. They literally have no firm standards at all and as such can’t even call each other heretic, because they all are.
  • The lies spread by Protestants about Catholicism and the Catholic Church are literally endless, but even honest Protestants are at least somewhat aware of this. See Rodney Stark and Rod Bennett.

Protestantism created Freemasonry

There really is no way around this at all.

  • King James, a flamboyantly gay man, a fact that was known then and somewhat hidden now, except that his love letters to hi various male lovers are published, so there really is no doubt, started Freemasonry with their temples, black masses, sodomitical and sacrilegious orgies and so on. He also commissioned the King’s James Bible, which is also known as the Freemasonic Bible. It contains over 33,000 “errors” of translation to reduce the importance and place of Mary, the Holy Spirit and Jesus too. And was taken from the version of the “Bible” that had been edited by the literal Pharisees that hated Jesus, and had him killed by the Romans.

Freemasonry is Satanic

Again, there really is no way around this. This is not the only 5 hour long video, on the topic, and though slightly irritating in presentation format, if you get over the first few minutes and move to the factual stuff that is presented and undeniable, you will find it impossible to deny. There are several such videos. And books. Go research on your own.

Freemasonry, Illuminati, Carbonari, Rosicrucians, their name is Legion

All of the above structures operate on three baseline principles:

  • Secrecy. This is a typical aspect of gnosticism, that is heretics, Satanists and so on. They will give various excuses for why their demonic nonsense needs to remain secret, but the reality is that the internal practices after a certain level has been reached, become progressively and more obviously Satanic. Secrecy allows them to indoctrinate people for long periods of time before they “move up the ladder” so to speak, by which time, even if perhaps originally ignorant, the “student” has now been corrupted and compromised to the point that he is both indoctrinated as well as blackmail able.
  • Playing both sides of the same coin. Freemasons will have people in both the extremely liberal side of an issue as well as the supposedly “conservative” side of an issue. Both sides will work at getting “true believers” to avoid the path of true Catholicism, truth, courage, honesty, and basically all the Human virtues of Western Civilisation which Catholicism propagated. Examples of such gatekeeping grifters are Emo Jones, Milo Yankmypoulos, Tay-Tay Marshall and Gay Gary “Michelle” Voris, and that’s just to name a few of the “pretend Trad Catholics”. There are many, many, many of these freemasons and their lapdogs in all spheres of life, from comic books, to the mass media (where they are a large majority), almost the entirety of the entertainment world, and of course politics of any kind.
  • Reducing and undercutting as well as subverting any type of human dignity, heroic impulses, and generally the virtues that make heroes. This is covered in more detail in my book Reclaiming The Catholic Church and is a stated strategy of theirs, which is also perfectly in line with their “god” Lucifer, who, of course hates Humanity and revels in making human beings debase themselves in every way imaginable.
  • It is, of course a given that they will pretend to be ANYTHING, while lying so ferociously, and unashamedly, that normal people are usually unable to grasp that anyone can really lie on that scale, and as such they often think along the lines of “Well, perhaps they are exaggerating a bit, but where there is smoke…” And yes there is fire, but not because anything they say is true, but only because in every way it is designed to make you go to Hell.

Freemasonry is responsible for the destruction of all Royal Houses in Europe

Once again, this is really not in dispute once you look into it. It does take some digging though, because they obviously don’t advertise this point much, but the documents of the Carbonari made this extremely clear, as well as the known actions of known Freemasons like Mazzini in the “unification” of Italy, and later of Europe by similar means and so on. The extermination of the Russian Tsar, etcetera. the only Royal house to “survive” is the entirely corrupted on of Windsor, where the male sons are all circumcised by a Jewish Rabbi, and have been for centuries. One might ask why, of course, but one is unlikely to get an answer.

The reason for the destruction of the Royal Houses was because since the days of Charlemagne, Kings had been thought of as Divinely ordained to be Kings. That is, NOT that a King was put there by God Himself as the rightful ruler and everyone should obey him, but rather that God allowed such men to become Kings. It was then up to such men themselves, to comport themselves in keeping with being good Catholics. As such, the populace understood that if a man was good and obeyed the Catholic rules, their lot would be lighter and easier, and if he was not, it would be darker and heavier. And indeed this was the case for centuries. The First World War was instigated in part in order to “break” the link of loyalty between peasants and the nobility. The Marxist (who was a Jew) ideas of Communism (also a Jewish concept) were supposed to destroy the social gap between the working class and aristocracy. And yet, despite the tragic loss of life in these fomented brother wars, in the main, people still accepted mostly, that they belonged to this o that social strata, and aside some possibility of movement here and there, in the main accepted it. Because once again, the concept of Royalty being a Godly ordained (albeit very human) order, resided in most people’s minds.

The Church was far too powerful to attack directly as long as the enforcing arm of the Church (lay nobility) continued to exist and command the respect of the common people. And so, the work began in earnest right away, pretty much as soon as the Freemasons and the Illuminati and the Carbonari each were “started”.

America is a Freemasonic Country and was so from the Start

The American revolution against Britain was funded by French money. French money which was “advised” to be spent thusly by the Freemasons at the court of King Louis XVI and Marie Antoniette, and had already begun to cause troublesome economic hardship right before the War of independence started in 1775.

From Wikipedia (hardly a bastion of historical truth in such matters, proving that even there these facts are not exactly refuted, even if not highlighted):

By the time of the Flour War of 1775, a series of riots (due to the high price of flour and bread) had damaged her reputation among the general public. Eventually, Marie Antoinette’s reputation was no better than that of the favourites of previous kings. Many French people were beginning to blame her for the degrading economic situation, suggesting the country’s inability to pay off its debt was the result of her wasting the crown’s money.[40] In her correspondence, Marie Antoinette’s mother, Maria Theresa, expressed concern over her daughter’s spending habits, citing the civil unrest it was beginning to cause.

The blame of the country’s economic downturn being laid at the feet of Marie Antoinette and her husband was a somewhat convenient approach to also removing the entire royal house from power, as was the main concern of Freemasonry at the time.

And the rumours persisted throughout the American Revolution to its end in 1783.

In 1783 the queen was busy with the creation of her “hamlet“, a rustic retreat built by her favoured architect, Richard Mique, according to the designs of the painter Hubert Robert.[92] Its creation, however, caused another uproar when its cost became widely known.[93][94] However, the hamlet was not an eccentricity of Marie Antoinette’s. It was en vogue at the time for nobles to have recreations of small villages on their properties. In fact, the design was copied from that of the Prince de Condé. It was also significantly smaller and less intricate than many other nobles’.[95] Around this time she accumulated a library of 5,000 books. Those on music, often dedicated to her, were the most read, though she also liked to read history.[96][97] She sponsored the arts, in particular music. Marie-Antoinette preferred to hold her musicales in the salon of her Petit appartement de la reine in the Palace of Versailles, or in the Théâtre de la Reine. She limited the audience to her intimate circle and a few musicians, among them the Chevalier de Saint-Georges. “Admitted to perform music with the Queen,”[98] Saint-Georges probably played his violin sonatas for two instruments, with Her Majesty playing the fortepiano. She also supported some scientific endeavours, encouraging and witnessing the first launch of a Montgolfière, a hot air balloon for the first time in human history; this extraordinary feat which represented a turning point in human civilization was done by Jean-François Pilâtre de Rozier.

Once the matter of the American War was over, the efforts to remove the royals redoubled:

Marie Antoinette began to abandon her more carefree activities to become increasingly involved in politics in her role as Queen of France.[118] By publicly showing her attention to the education and care of her children, the queen sought to improve the dissolute image she had acquired in 1785 from the “Diamond Necklace Affair”, in which public opinion had falsely accused her of criminal participation in defrauding the jewelers Boehmer and Bassenge of the price of an expensive diamond necklace they had originally created for Madame du Barry. The main actors in the scandal were Cardinal de Rohan, Prince de Rohan-Guéméné, Great Almoner of France, and Jeanne de Valois-Saint-Rémy, Comtesse de La Motte, a descendant of an illegitimate child of Henry II of France of the House of Valois. Marie Antoinette had profoundly disliked Rohan since the time he had been the French ambassador to Vienna when she was a child. Despite his high clerical position at the Court, she never addressed a word to him. Others involved were Nicole Lequay, alias Baronne d’Oliva, a prostitute who happened to look like Marie Antoinette; Rétaux de Villette, a forger; Alessandro Cagliostro, an Italian adventurer; and the Comte de La Motte, Jeanne de Valois’ husband. Madame de La Motte tricked Rohan into buying the necklace as a gift to Marie Antoinette, for him to gain the queen’s favour.

When the affair was discovered those involved (except de La Motte and Rétaux de Villette, who both managed to flee) were arrested, tried, convicted, and either imprisoned or exiled. Madame de La Motte was sentenced for life to confinement in the Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, which also served as a prison for women. Judged by the Parlement, Rohan was found innocent of any wrongdoing and allowed to leave the Bastille. Marie Antoinette, who had insisted on the arrest of the Cardinal, was dealt a heavy personal blow, as was the monarchy, and despite the fact that the guilty parties were tried and convicted, the affair proved to be extremely damaging to her reputation, which never recovered from it.[citation neede

The machinations continued not just in France but Austria and aBavaria too and by the end of 1793, both Luis XVI and Marie Antoniette had been executed by Guillotine and the monarchy had been abolished in France as of 10th August 1792.

The period of the French Revolution, from 1789 to the late 1790s also produced some of the worst crimes against Catholics since the time of Henry the VIII.

And the Freemasonic stamp of “fraternity” still echoes today in the French motto of Liberté, Ègalité, Fraternité, it’s always the same with them. Preach liberalism to be rid of the “oppressive” old “regime” and crowbar in degenearcy of every sort to weaken and demoralise the entire citizenry, then push the fable of “equality” between people, cultures, physical and intellectual abilities of vastly different capacities and possibilities, while masking it as “spiritual enlightenment” but in reality producing further corrosion of the capacity to maintain a functioning society. Not hard to do when 85 IQ semi-illiterates are now put in charge of say nuclear power plants, and you begin to have brown-outs if not total core melt-down, to select an extreme but obvious example.

From History.com:

IIn late August, [1789] the Assembly adopted the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen (Déclaration des droits de l’homme et du citoyen), a statement of democratic principles grounded in the philosophical and political ideas of Enlightenment thinkers like Jean-Jacques Rousseau.

The document proclaimed the Assembly’s commitment to replace the ancien régime with a system based on equal opportunity, freedom of speech, popular sovereignty and representative government.

In April 1792, the newly elected Legislative Assembly declared war on Austria and Prussia, where it believed that French émigrés were building counterrevolutionary alliances; it also hoped to spread its revolutionary ideals across Europe through warfare.

On the domestic front, meanwhile, the political crisis took a radical turn when a group of insurgents led by the extremist Jacobins attacked the royal residence in Paris and arrested the king on August 10, 1792.

The following month, amid a wave of violence in which Parisian insurrectionists massacred hundreds of accused counterrevolutionaries, the Legislative Assembly was replaced by the National Convention, which proclaimed the abolition of the monarchy and the establishment of the French republic.

On January 21, 1793, it sent King Louis XVI, condemned to death for high treason and crimes against the state, to the guillotine; his wife Marie-Antoinette suffered the same fate nine months later.

Notice how the intent of the Freemasons was to spread this war on the established systems of Europe throughout the land, not just France.

And the reign of Terror followed, and please note its central tenet: The abolition of Christianity. Which is and always has been the aim of Satanists throughout the ages, the Freemasons merely having been more successful than most at implementing their aims.

Reign of Terror 

Following the king’s execution, war with various European powers and intense divisions within the National Convention brought the French Revolution to its most violent and turbulent phase.

In June 1793, the Jacobins seized control of the National Convention from the more moderate Girondins and instituted a series of radical measures, including the establishment of a new calendar and the eradication of Christianity.

They also unleashed the bloody Reign of Terror (la Terreur), a 10-month period in which suspected enemies of the revolution were guillotined by the thousands. Many of the killings were carried out under orders from Robespierre, who dominated the draconian Committee of Public Safety until his own execution on July 28, 1794.

Did you know? Over 17,000 people were officially tried and executed during the Reign of Terror, and an unknown number of others died in prison or without trial.

The Crimes against Catholics, including horrific mutilations and tortures of babies and children was well-documented at the time even by the perpetrators, and was honestly one of the most horrific and disgusting periods of human action that undoubtedly pleased many demons in Hell.

All of the above is merely to give a TINY bit of context to the point that America was essentially funded with French money, the use of which was then used to blame and frame the French Monarchy and cause further revolution throughout Europe along with the rapid abolition of other monarchies in Europe in quick succession.

Austria-Hungary, Prussia, Germany, Montenegro, Portugal and Russia had ALL lost their kings by the end of the First World War. You might think some 120 years or so is a long time, but not really when your machinations to change the entire world of Europe from a Catholic and orderly group of individual nations to a homogenous grey soup of “Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity” that can then be fully controlled by the purse-masters of the world.

The remaining monarchies were abolished or made into constitutional republics by the end of the Second World War, which any historian worth anything agrees was really an extended continuation of the First World War. And the end result of all this was finally what?

The Establishment of the American Empire

It cannot be argued that America was founded by Freemasons and on Freemasonic Principles. Washington was widely known to be a Freemason and to this day, the various secret societies of Skull and Crossbones and so on are essentially Freemasons by another name. But in any case, of the 45 presidents America has had at least 15 are KNOWN to have been Freemasons without a doubt, Including the first, as already mentioned, as well as BOTH Roosevelts.

Theodore Roosevelt, who was president from 1901 to 1909, immediately followed by Taft, also a Freemason, from 1909 to 1913, and as everyone knows, the First World War’s start in 1915 was set in motion in these years, even if Woodrow Wilson was actually president during WWI, who is not known to have been a Freemason, but who is still widely thought to have been one of the worst presidents in American history. And probably still has that “honour” Since Biden clearly was not legitimately elected. Then again, who knows if Wilson was either.

We also have Franklin Roosevelt who just so happened to be president from 1933 to 1945, followed by fellow Freemason Truman until 1953, so the entire period leading up to WWII and quite a bit after it.

After WWII, by deft economic manipulations that both funded and started both wars, the American Empire was pretty much established globally.

The placing of American military bases all around the world as well the usurious practices of tentacled creatures like the IMF, the WEF, the trilateral commission and on and on and on, ensured that other states became vassals of America and were destroyed economically if they did not obey.

The establishment of the Universal Commercial Code set of rules effectively made pretty much every country on the globe a subsidiary company of the business of the United States of America. Look it up. It’s a giant rabbit hole. One I have been aware of for almost 30 years and that almost no one even has any idea about. Italy for example is STILL subjected to rules that are literally secret and not able to be seen by anyone in Italy, that were signed off after WWII and which fundamentally makes a mockery of the idea that the Italian state is in any way sovereign. That is in case you couldn’t figure it out from the over 150 American military bases placed throughout Italy. And the fact that our current prime minister, Georgie Tits, sorry, I mean Georgia Meloni, is absolutely known to have had a “master” in her 20s when she followed occult practices. And remember that having a “master” is a Freemasonic thing. And touting her as a “right-wing” leader is absolutely ridiculous and merely the posturing of the usual crack whores doing as their are told (with apologies to crack whores for using them as descriptors for journalists and the mass media), which is simply the usual Freemasonic thing of playing both sides of the fake “divide”.

With America as the powerhouse of the world, American “entertainment”, began making its way across the airwaves to literally every place on Earth. Sitcoms made in the USA are known throughout the world and if you think that doesn’t change the zeitgeist of the planet, then I have some transgender floating bridges to sell you in Shangri-La.

And all this stuff is all run by the (((usual suspects))) who, Cohen-cidentally, I am sure, are always, always, always, but only every single time, at the very root of ALL of these machinations, be their financial and economic, propaganda or “entertainment” or “news” based, and lately also “scientifically” based (don’t let me start of the incestuous plagiarist Albert Einstein and his lies, as this is long enough as it is!)

So, it can be now perhaps better understood why brown people who get the crap bombed out of them, their kids and families killed and used as training grounds for the absolute worst rejects and sad examples of “soldiers” America has produced since “generation kill”, might refer to the USA as The Great Satan.

What with their “soldiers” literally shooting peasants for sport and out of boredom in many cases, often via drones controlled from an air conditioned room tens of thousands of kilometres away, run as just any other 9 to 5 job, and this then being presented as “heroic war action”.

Pretty much regardless of whatever religion, culture, ethnicity, or IQ you may have, it’s not difficult to see why if your children or loved ones are on the receiving end of people that do what the CIA and NSA and Abu Grhaib and Guantanamo Bay “prison wardens-slash-torturers” do, you might think it’s perfectly acceptable to Strat 20kg of C4 to your chest and walk into the nearest American mall to detonate it.

Finally

So, yes. Unpleasant as it may sound, the real root of pretty much most of the evil present in our world today does originate from the USA. Which is not to say that the average American is specifically guilty of doing this.

By and large, the average American is a drug-addled fattie, stunned by GMO foods and processed crap that most animals in the wild would not dream to ingest even if starving, maleducated to the point that some Africans in small villages have a better grasp of reality, and thoroughly brainwashed into believing whatever the tell-lie-vision in their lounge, bedroom and even bathroom, tells them 24/7. In short, the average American is for the most part a victim of his handlers. True, he’s a lazy, cowardly sort, but one must understand that the brainwashing was very gradual and very well orchestrated. Think about it:

  • Most American men are circumcised. The “reasoning” is that it’s supposed to be more “hygienic”. And if you believe that, you probably believe men can get pregnant, that the wage gap is real and that women can fight in a war or in the ring, just as well as men. So, figure out why this is the case. Who did it? Why? And then look into why the royal house of Windsor (that is the British Royals) all have their maps circumcised by a Rabbi even though they are not Jewish and never have been.
  • They legal system is absurd and essentially allows for anything to be done. Which is why their food is unfair for animal consumption, yet is shovelled into their faces until they explode or die of the inevitable cancer it produces when you eat plastic cheese and fake foods.
  • They are maleducated to believe that America is the best country in the world because they “won” WWII, “went” to the Moon, and have the most nuclear bombs (ok, had). And somehow that translated to you, Johnny, the illiterate and innumerate teenager who reads at 5 year old’s level in the Europe I grew up in, being somehow “naturally better at everything” than the other people around the world. And they really believe it. Even after reality smacks them in the head with a brick repeatedly as soon as they step out of the USA.
  • The zeitgeist in America is driven by absolute terror of legal-warfare, that is being sued in one form or another, and making enough money (mostly to buy creature comforts that help rot your brain, but also to protect yourself from the legal-warfare). The concept of family may still exist in a few cousin-marring hillbillies or rednecks, but even if so is essentially limited to specific families or very small groups.
  • Money, and fame are the real American Gods, regardless of whatever veneer of “humanity” they plaster over themselves. And those few genuine people left who don’t think that way are not only a tiny minority today (as they are in most nations thanks to the American zeitgeist being exported) but are also completely ostracised from mainstream American reality.

I don’t blame the average American citizen any more than I blame the average Mexican or Italian or Chinese. But first and foremost, I really wish every single American (and Mexican, and Italian and Chinese) remained in his own country, and kept all of his ideologies, programmes and military in their own fucking country too.

Of course, the Average American has about as much say in where his government places American military bases as I do about Georgia Meloni’s letting boat after boat after boat of invaders land on the shores of Italy, which is to say, pretty much zero right now. And that’s because the average American has zero representation, because the entire system is rigged and the people who actually run the US government are mostly foreigners and their puppets.

And if you still have to ask who that is today, when you notice what the American government and deep state does, who it supports beyond any reason, and who it will jail you and cancel you and punish you for criticising or even just not wanting to deal with, well… If you STILL haven’t figured it out, I can’t help you. Just go back to your Netflix series.

But not to leave you on a downward note, let me assure you that my next giant post will be on what the solutions are for this apparently unsolvable situation and what you, at an individual level can and should and must do about it.

PS: I have NOT spell-checked this and my autocorrect inevitably mangles a lot of words, aside any errors I make myself. I will correct this as time permits over the next day or two, but hopefully you get the gist.

No Comments

Blog Stats Update

So, I have achieved my original modest goal of over 100k views from 30k unique vistors.

It looks fairly certain that barring some sudden shift, I will not hit any of the “blue sky” goals, which where 200k views from 100k visitors, but I think it should be just with reach to possibly hit the revised goal which, as I said, I would be happy with, of 150k views from 50k visitors.

I’m currently at 134k and change views with every month since February of this year averaging over 10k views, and just over 40k visitors, with the monthly average therefore somewhere just over 3,000 visitors a month.

This month is already past 10k views and we are just halfway yet, so the 150k views should be achievable unless there is a drastic drop off in December. The 50k visitors will be harder to reach, but not out of the realm of possibility.

The realistic likelihood is that I will be about 5k short on each of both views and visitors to hit 150k and 50k respectively, but we’ll soon find out.

A more interesting stat is the comments which went from a total for the years 2018 (end of it only when the counter was added) to 2022 inclusive, of 298 comments to 544 comments in 2023 to date, and that is with my brutal perma-spamming with no warning anyone who doesn’t follow the rules. And said rules are not exactly prominently displayed.

Plus the comment link is also not prominently displayed being at the top of posts rather than the bottom, which probably discourages many from even trying or knowing that one can comment.

So, overall, I’m quite happy with the results achieved. I’ll post a final update at the end of 2023 and look forward to bettering the stats for 2024, assuming I am not hunted down for my views by clown world death squads, nuclear war and the resulting EMPs don’t wipe out the internet as a whole, or the WEF doesn’t do it somehow, or one of the fake asteroid or alien craft Von Braun warned us about crash lands or craters me and mine, or the chemtrails finally get me, or, you know, something else happens.

4 Comments

Victory!

At least, that is how I would have to describe Vox’s enthusiastic response to my “theological challenge” if I were using the Western’s zeitgeist concerning the war with evil Russia and how they are now obviously on the ropes.

The Kurgan makes his pre-Vatican II Roman Catholic perspective clear in a recently published article; to which I may or may not respond at some point in the next ten years depending upon my time and interest.

As you can see he’s obviously a hair’s breath away from total conversion!

Be that as it may, and probably surprising to many that read his blog, Vox is actually a very subtle writer, and even subtler reader. I think he admitted it himself as being, if I recall correctly our conversation, a “literary snob”.

Which means the man can both read and write at a level that is today rapidly becoming as rare as finding an original Atlantean. So, totally unwarranted, but driven by my ungentlemanly curiosity, I will take a few of the things he wrote and comment on them.

Evil observably exists. Mankind is observably fallen into evil. The world is observably ruled by an immortal being that hates Man, Jesus Christ, the Good, the Beautiful, and the True. Jesus Christ, the Son of God and the Living Word, is literally and observably the only hope of Man.

And that is the full extent of the theology I am willing to assert and defend.

This, is why I have very little issue with Vox’s theology. In essence, his position is really not that different from the one of millions and millions of illiterate Catholic peasants throughout the ages that were in fact good catholics despite their inability to read or write. And yes, I know how this looks based on the previous paragraphs, but I am not actually taking pot shots. On a personal level, my own theology is not far from this either, with the only added point that, as far as I can tell to date, the REAL Catholic Church, has made no errors in dogma or doctrine, and even those parts I personally resist, or dislike, are objectively better for making as a whole to follow and in fact cause no harm in any case.

That being the case, it is absolutely of imperative importance from my perspective, to make as many people as possible (especially the fooled “Novus Ordo” laypeople) aware of the fact that, actually, yes, an infallible Church does exist, as reason and logic demand, and here it is. And yes it was fought against and infiltrated and also comprised corrupt men from the very start, because, duh: Humans. Do you even READ the Bible? Or LISTEN to the actual Church? They been telling you this from the start too. And yet, every single infiltration, usurpation and attack against it has ultimately failed, the doctrine remained unsullied and in fact more explicit and clarified as time passed, precisely to fend off the further and future attacks, culminating in the saintly and to my view obviously infallible and supernaturally protected Code of Canon Law of 1917, which comprised and summarised EVERY bit of Catholic doctrine, rule and law since Christianity began, all the way to 1917. And since the last valid Pope died on October 9th 1958, whatever other writings he pronounced ex cathedra, could also be added to it. I especially like his encyclical, Mystici Corporis Christi even if the link it’s from is from the current Satanic coven pretending to be Catholic clergy, so perhaps save a local copy before they start editing in how sodomy is part of it all.

The point of agreement I think are likely to be valid for both me and Vox are, aside from his above professed theology, the fact that human beings need rules for civilisation to thrive, as a generic but EXTREMELY statistical significant fact. And by civilisation he and I would both mean something both he and I would recognise as civilised and good and beautiful, despite possible minor details being different.

There are another two points he makes that I think can be seen as quite meaningful. The first:

Nor do I take my own occasional contemplations on the subject terribly seriously; I am from the “glass darkly” school of theological thought.

One can hardly argue with him on this point. In fact, it is a very wise perspective to have. One thing we can ALL be absolutely certain of, is that every single one of us is in error.

I think that once one really begins to appreciate the magnitude and type and kind of error you are in, you begin to be far more likely to think that perhaps, St. Augustine, which Vox is not particularly fond of, mostly, if my memory is correct, or at least in part, because of St. Augstine’s habit of referring to himself as the most miserable of miserable sinners and wretches and so on and on. I get it, when you have a healthy self-esteem, or you build one, as the case may be, for most of your life, you’re not likely to look favourably upon some guy grovelling in a manner that appears to you as some kind of worm-tongue looking to not be squished like the maggot he clearly is.

And that is indeed so.

Until you have a moment before a tiny part of the radiance of God. Or as in my case, and/or people Like Saul/Paul who tend to fall off horses and go blind for a few days when it happens. Then, when faced with the true dimensions of your multiple and seemingly endless errors, you begin to start, to have an inkling of an idea, that perhaps, good old St. Augustine, really did know something about reality. And probably a good fat chunk of it more than you or I.

Since we are ALL in error, it makes logical sense to some degree, that any absolute conviction about Christianity (or Catholicism, as it should be properly called, heh!) must be also in error. And absolute errors are bad, so should be avoided. Kinda.

Because far worse than a categorical and absolute error, is relativism. Putting an innocent man to death, or a young woman, in the case of Joan of Arc, is very, very bad (and in her case done by corrupt evil bastards too, so sort of beside this point), but letting all blasphemy and various crimes of ever escalating violence go unpunished, inevitably results in a failed civilisation, as history continues to show.

The difference, then between Vox’s theology and my own, as I suspected, comes down to the precise things he and I would agree or disagree are non-negotiables.

And I am sure there are some. But probably less than he suspects.

The Catholic Church itself has it as doctrine that while there is such a thing as Papal infallibility (explained many times of this blog, so use the Search Me link on the right if you are not sure what it is) and that the Magisterium of the Church is similarly infallible (hence why the CoCL of 1917 also is, since it was put together by the Magisterium of the Church and approved by two valid Popes), the Church itself is NOT necessarily always infallible.

There are doctrines that are deemed to be absolutely and forever unchangeable, of course, known as divine doctrine, as they come straight from God and there really is no question about them, or are evidently simple to understand and extrapolate from such rules (the idea of non-catholics not being valid catholic clergy being an obvious one) but other rules might just be for the running of the Church or apply in almost but not all cases and so on. A deep understanding of Roman law and Catholic doctrine may be required for some of these, but in essence the Church clearly states that ultimately, the only true infallibility comes from God.

Which is not to say that infallible doctrine might be flawed, but rather, that humans within the Church can and do make plentiful errors as well as some making consciously and known heretic attacks on it.

One of the points Vox makes that could be construed as a criticism is this:

My chief criticism of all theology and all theologians is this: they tend to artificially narrow the art of the possible, by which I mean they usually assign divine significance to one of several possible interpretations of a phrase – often a phrase that has already been translated one or more times – and then deny all potential legitimacy to the other possible interpretations.

I don’t really have any objection to this point, and I think Vox may have it possibly as being more familiar with the endless squabbling that goes on amongst Protestant theologians. But in this respect, it could possibly be applied to the idea that Peter was not only the leader of the Apostles but also the first Pope and the Rock upon which the Church is built, and what follows from it, as I explained in my original post from which this one stems from.

But the fact is that as far as I am concerned, the whole “Peter is the Rock” thing is absolutely not limited to one quote from the Bible. This attitude of selecting a tiny piece of text from the Bible and then applying it patch-work style to whatever nonsensical idea your average protestant is trying to defend, is really a Protestant hobby, not so much a Catholic one at all. And when I say Protestant, I include the fully Protestant, satanic Novus Orco Vatican II fake Church.

Peter being the Rock is borne out by not just one or two lines in the Bible, but several passages taken in context, as is the entire 2,000 year history of the Church. Christianity literally would NOT EXIST without THAT specific interpretation of it. And even more stunningly, is the fact that the Catholic Church is literally the LONGEST form of reign that has EVER taken place in the entirety of known human history. All the attacks against it ultimately failed. Including the Arian heresy during which 97% to 99% of ALL then existing bishops subscribed to it. Or as the current era when out of nearly 2 billion nominal “Catholics” there are maybe say a million Sedevacantists. This crisis too will pass. Because either the Catholic Church is true and real and infallible, as it has proven itself to be for two millennia if you bother to really look into it, or it is not, in which case ALL of Christianity is a complete fairy tale. Which happens to be what I USED to believe for over 40 years of my life.

The inescapable conclusion I make, is based not on this one, or that other single scarp of evidence, or quote, or Biblical sentence, or other evidence in its singular form. No, my conclusion is based on the absolutely overwhelming totality of evidence that:

  • Catholicism created the absolute best conditions for human beings bar none in the entire history of mankind we know of.
  • Catholicism in the main and almost alone in this was responsible for the creation of the actual, valid, real scientific method that ultimately created science, engineering and so on, and this was done precisely because Catholic doctrine hinges of God being a Loving, Just, Merciful and LOGICAL God. That is, reason is a thing. And that theological concept meant that the Universe could be studied and greatly understood. Protestantism both thanks to the explicit statement of Luther that “Reason is the whore of the devil” and the abundantly clear and obvious evidence presented by Protestants in general, rejects reason entirely. It’s all about the feels and possibly some foggy notion of following “God-breathed” theology, which is unfortunately indistinguishable from pastor-con-man-grifter farted theology.
  • Catholic doctrine and dogma did this and I can find no flaw or fault in it once I properly examined any specific dogma or doctrine as it actually is, instead of how people might tell you it is.
  • Catholicism literally is Christianity and “Christianity” that is not Catholicism:
    • Would not exist at all without Catholicism, since they are all bastardised and corrupted offshoots of Catholicism, first split-off in this specific manner by the fat German maid-raping, nun-banger, Martin.
    • Secondly has DEMONSTRABLY created a far worse lot for humanity, since it has slowly and consistently corroded Catholicism to the point that now we have accepted as a general, global whole: sex before marriage, contraception, divorce, and ultimately baby killing (abortion). And now have shifted on to “transgenderism” and tranny “bishops” in Protestant Covens oh… sorry… “Churches”.
  • And that’s just to scratch the surface. Keep in mind about 500 years ago, Jean Parisot Le Valette beat a man nearly to death for blasphemy and he did only four months in jail.

In 1538, while on Malta, Valette was sentenced to four months in a guva (a hole in the ground) on Gozo for nearly beating a layman to death, and he was subsequently exiled to Tripoli for two years to serve as military governor. Upon his return he was punished again for bringing a negro slave not liable for servitude. 

As you can see, even back then, Catholicism was way ahead of the rest of the world on even things like slavery.

In short, and to clarify, my position on Catholicism does not hinge simply on Matthew 28:18-20, but on, as I said, a staggering preponderance of evidence, of which the above are really just the highlights.

This is also the reason why I remain interested in further investigating the issue. If I were utterly closed to the concept, as many assume, I would not care to. And in truth, in MANY aspects of “Christianity” I have zero interest left in “exploring” the issue. Not because I am “closed off” but because those particular rabbit warrens have been thoroughly excavated, mined and blasted and there is simply nowhere else to go.

Catholicism (the sedevacantist one, which is the original one) is the truest philosophy of reality bar none that I have found to date. And it is so by many, many, many light years of distance from the next truest thing I had found up to then, which was a mixture of semi-Shintoists, Zen-Agnosticism, with elements of Feudal Japanese Samurai philosophy.

And surprising as the revelation of actual Catholicism being absolutely true AND the best descriptor of reality was to me, it remains the case. And the reason it was so surprising was because essentially, EVERYTHING I thought I knew about Catholicism was actually a carefully crafted network of absolute lies concocted by various “Christians”. What I thought was Catholicism, was in fact “Catholicism” or Novus Orco “Christianity” which is absolute Satanry of the worst sort. And of which, Protestantism was its initial offshoot of evil intended to pervert and twist.

So, there are some of my clarifications.

I look forward with baited breath to Vox’s additional, en passant, coincidental, possibly related, commentary on same, in the next fifteen to twenty years; probably without fail!

4 Comments

What you think is normal, is not

I have had several rather interesting conversations over the last few days and a recurring theme has been how so much of what is accepted as normal today, really is not.

Some are obvious things, that only the unhinged think are normal:

  • Mutilating children to supposedly give them the sex they “desire” instead of the one they were born with
  • That trans-anything is anything other than mental illness
  • And the consequent nonsense that men can be women or vice-versa
  • That math is somehow “racist”
  • That only white people can be “racist”
  • That there is any such thing as “White Privilege”
  • That Black Lives Matter is actually based on statistically relevant data concerning the incidence of shootings of black males by white police instead of statistically significant on the basis of incidence of violent crime by black males
  • That there is any such thing as the “gender” pay gap
  • That men and women are equal in any way (psychologically, or physically)
  • That diversity is a strength
  • That all cultures/religions are equivalent in civilisational values
  • That different ethnicities are equivalent in terms of IQ, physical performance of various activities, intellectual performance of various activities, and cultural approaches to different concepts

Then there are what I would call “second tier” observations, which really are (or should be) obvious is you realise the obvious issues above and simply extrapolate them a little bit:

  • That anyone on Earth is not somehow “racist” (literally anyone with a brain that works and eyes and ears that function will notice differences in people and will make instantaneous value-judgements on the basis of those differences. In short, you’d have to be deaf, dumb and blind, not to have what are intrinsically “racist” judgment calls. Literally everyone is “racist”. Including you. Deal with it and stop lying about it to yourself and others).
  • That sexual deviance is somehow “normal”. It clearly is not. Anything that does not naturally perpetuate the species is a deviant and unsustainable sexual dysfunction. that’s just a fact. More subtly, anything that is not geared towards a family unit comprised of one husband, one wife and the purpose of their lifelong marriage being to make and raise children is of markedly, objectively, lower civilisational value than any other set-up, even if they could reproduce children (polygamy of Mormons and Muslims for example, Polyamory, swinging, and so on).
  • Since men and women are not equal and since the best civilisational set-up is the one of the family unit as described above, it become objectively obvious that the roles of men and women are different and complementary in that family unit. Pretending otherwise, regardless of technological advancements is a recipe for disaster, since we have some 2 million years of biological wet-ware to over-ride and also a LOT of unchangeable hardware that simply is never going to go away or suddenly stop making us be men or women, no matter how many hormones and puberty blockers and deranged surgeon’s scalpels you go under.
  • In view of all the above and the historical evidence of some 2,000 years, it also becomes obvious that Catholicism has undoubtedly produced the very pinnacle of human civilisation around the world. this needs a little more fine-tuning to realise for a couple of aspects:
    • The Industrial Revolution was primarily a Protestant driven change, and touted as a benefit to mankind, but on deeper reflection, whether the Industrial Revolution really was of benefit to humanity is at best, very questionable, and rationally speaking, almost certainly a turn for the worst.
    • The working systems that came along as a result of the Industrial Revolution, similarly allow people to produce a higher output of work, but this is not rewarded by a correspondingly higher effect on people’s standard of living. In fact, it eventually settles down into a corrosive process that fills every waking hour of ever longer work-days, to fulfil and endless drive for “more”.
    • This “mechanisation” of human beings further corrodes time with family, the very dynamic of how a family works and operates, and consequently the type and level of education that the children in a family unit receive both directly and indirectly.
    • These are less obvious points and not applicable in all cases, but overall, the pattern’s statistics are as described in three above points.

And once you have digested all of the above, you begin to see a whole other level of reality that has been obfuscated by the creeping demonic lies that have been filtering into human life since the start but really took off after 1521 and then got turbo-charged during and after WWII and then started taking steroids in the mid to late 1990s and meth and cocaine from about 2008 on and finally a whole bunch of LSD since about 2016/7.

  • You begin to realise that corporal punishment in general, and the death penalty in particular, is absolutely reasonable and logical for certain level of crimes. No, not the ones that the current zeitgeist would put you to death for if they could, which might be calling Bruce Jenner, Bruce Jenner, or stating unambiguously that there are only two sexes and that homosexuality is a deviant sexuality that is not conducive to a natural continuation of the species, and that adoption by homosexual is in essence, child trafficking.
  • You realise that the desensitising to certain stimuli is beneficial while to others it is detrimental.
  • Given the above two points alone, the whole concept of training people like soldiers, police or other force on force/warrior types would drastically change.
  • As would the education/disciplining of children depending on their aptitudes and interests.
  • And intelligent education would be treasured and asked for by anyone who understood the above principles. And education that follows the baseline principles of things like the Trivium, the study of logic, reason. Basic principles of mathematics like ratios, sets, percentages, trigonometry, statistics, and algebra, taking the time with each not to just learn the formulae off by heart, but understand the principles. Along with a study of history beginning with the classics, explained and recounted at appropriate age level of understanding, starting with the Illiad and the Odyssey as stories and then the gradual introduction of the Greek classics, the study of Sparta and Athens, Rome, and the Roman Empire, and Egypt and its unexplained structures. As well as, of course, the study of dinosaurs, which really every child loves if properly introduced, and astronomy and geography, with a hint of exploration, archaeology and discovery. After which, biology and chemistry and physics can be tackled with a more reasonable background to build upon.
  • The study and use of various weapons and principles of martial disciplines.
  • The learning of basic home economics such as balancing a budget, the basics of cooking and keeping a clean home, and so on. All of these topics could be integrated into equal parts indoor and outdoor activities.

Described as I have above it all sounds like a super expensive classical education, but in reality it is something easily achieved by a group of parents that are willing and able to organise themselves and get this done.

And doing so would probably be considered some radical alt-right, Neo-nazi, eeeeeebil indoctrination of children. When in reality it would simply be giving them the tools to observe and evaluate the objective universe as it exists, instead of the lies it is presented as.

Do not accept the current twisted ideologies of Clown World. Study and re-learn what has been hidden from you and presented under a tsunami of lies and fakery the likes of which no generation before the present ones has seen.

Rebuilt the concept of objectivity and the study of both the physical and natural world as well as the metaphysical one.

8 Comments

Oh No! Kurgan vs Vox Day Theology!

I know there are now going to be heads exploding in various gamma hives around the internet as they hope and pray to their slithering nether-gods for a major rift between myself and Vox.

While I am sure nothing of the sort is or will be the case. In fact, many moons ago, I asked Vox if he would be willing to have a friendly discussion/debate on Catholicism vs Protestantism, or to be more precise, my Sedevacantist Catholicism and his specific brand of Protestantism which I believe hinges on the original Nicene creed.

Even back then, somewhat to my surprise, he said he wasn’t against it in principle, but the time required for it (and I suspect utility of it) was not really worth it. Which, in general I agreed with.

That all said, my brain can’t help but want to continue down paths that in my view are likely to increase my understanding of reality. Christianity, is one of those paths that is essentially endless in this regard, so, like say learning to paint, or make music, is a lifelong continuous investigation.

With such endeavours, after a time, there comes a point where your understanding or skill in the topic is good enough to outdo the common men and women in the field and then even the well-known ones. In short, it becomes difficult to find other minds against which you can confront yourself in order to learn more of the topic that interests you. And when you do find one, naturally, at least for me, you’d like to investigate it and push and prod at it and test your theories and ideas and baselines against.

Well, Vox has such a mind. I also consider him a friend and few things in life are as enjoyable to me as philosophical conversation of some substance with a friend. Preferably over a good wine and light meal, or with decent cognac after a good dinner. Alas, distance and circumstance prevents such discourse in the customary civilised fashion I just described. So I find myself limited to this rather barbaric format. Blog to blog. Well, perhaps we might do a livestream on it one day, but be as it may, I will now simply dive into the post Vox put up which prompted this one for me: This is it.

As baseline axioms I think I have the following, which are:

  • Pretty sure both Vox and myself do not like having human authority over us. I think the generic difference might be that I am willing to go along with it for the greater good as long as the human with “authority” over me continues to follow the correct rules. As far as Catholicism goes, if the priest/bishop does not himself contravene Canon Law (as per Code of Canon Law of 1917) and his advice is in line with it, I will obey. The reason I believe the Code of Canon Law is correct is because at core, I believe that Jesus would not have left a FALLIBLE Church on Earth. He wanted a Church and we are instructed to use reason and logic to figure stuff out, but not that it’s all guesswork. Having read the CoCL twice, while I find rules that personally bug me, in objective consideration, even those rules are civilisational, and my personal preference is the one that is not ideal to building a truly civilised world. The classic example is duelling. I am all for it, but Catholicism forbids it, because, in general, duelling would be a sin of pride. Not really my problem, but if it were widespread you can see that the sin of pride would be what motivates it for most, instead of a burning desire to see justice done.
  • Pretty sure we both dislike dishonesty in general and especially dishonesty designed to lead people astray spiritually.
  • One thing I think we differ on is that I think Vox is more prone to the error of Erroneous Loyalty. Something I discussed in Reclaiming the Catholic Church at some length. It is an error I used to live myself for many years, so I think I understand the dynamic well. As an extreme and hypothetical example that ignores human laws for the purpose of the intellectual exercise, I recall a long while back, in one of his posts, Vox mentioned that under certain circumstances, a friend that was guilty of certain crimes would be best served by being handed a pistol with one bullet in it and leaving him alone in his room, giving him the dignity of suicide. I believe he was referencing a supposed “friend” of John Scalzi that had been discovered to be some kind of sexual predator, and if memory serves Vox’s comment was along the lines of what you would do if someone you considered to be a friend turned out to be, say a child rapist. In my case, my loyalty of friendship would NOT prevent me (again, in a hypothetical world of no human laws being present) from helping the man pull the trigger, or even doing it for him. You don’t want to leave these things to chance! In fact, as per my comments many times, I absolutely believe that the punishment for child rape should be the legalised and accepted method of burning at the stake. Suicide is considered a mortal sin by Catholicism and as such, judgement by the community so you burn at the stake gives you the chance to repent while you burn and possibly enter purgatory and eventually heaven instead of eternal Hell. So, in broad terms, I think Vox may be more prone to being loyal beyond the just point. As I say, an error I myself had for a long while in my youth, but that I gradually got out of over several years until I finally realised that the line of Justice is more important than the line of loyalty. Vox may have other theories on this, which I am unaware of but that’s the sense I have of it presently.

Given the above premises/axioms, I will then look at the above linked post critically. And consider that I am absolutely in no way defending the Boomertastic Doug Wilson. I read a couple of his post years ago, before I was even a Christian and the illogic and hypocrisy prevalent in Protestantism made me conclude he’s an idiot and not worth listening to at all.

  • One more difference between Vox and myself I need to point out, the man is certainly more patient than I am as well as far more forgiving. I remember we briefly discussed Jordan Peterson at the time and Vox stated the man was intelligent. I was astonished and asked why on Earth he thought that, he quite correctly pointed out that in order to spew the level of bafflegarble nonsense he does and fool a lot of people into thinking he is not some absolutely insane globalist with severe psychological issues, takes a certain level of IQ. Personally I evaluated the bafflegarble nonsense and concluded the man is mentally unstable and absolutely wrong and a liar. I can’t reconcile that with being intelligent, but strictly speaking, that is an error on my part conflating ethics and sanity with intelligence.

Vox concluded that Doug Wilson is a gatekeeper but still keeps tabs on him clearly, which is understandable, as I keep tabs on other gatekeepers like Milo and EM Jones and Taylor Marshall and so on. But perhaps does not condemn him as thoroughly as I do, and perhaps, in general he might not condemn the gatekeepers as thoroughly as I do. I may be wrong, but I suspect he is more forgiving than I am on such matters.

Anyway, to examine the post in more detail:

I will first note that this is precisely the same defense that is regularly offered up on behalf of other gatekeepers like Jordan Peterson and Ben Shapiro, and also of books like the Harry Potter series. Don’t criticize the obvious errors and the demonstrable falsehoods when they are otherwise doing so much good? Don’t you understand that if they tell the truth instead of lying, they won’t be able to reach as many of those who need the truth? Isn’t it better that they read godless tales of evil being portrayed as good than not read at all?

And the answer is no. This is a false, pernicious, and fundamentally short-sighted perspective. It is less a defense than an attempt to negotiate a guilty plea in exchange for a lesser penalty.

And so far we are in absolute agreement. For example, the Catholic Church teaches that it is better to leave aborigines in jungles alone and not instruct them at all than to instruct them with Protestantism. Because as per Church doctrine, a savage that has never heard of Christ might yet enter heaven judged by God on the merits of his own conscience, but one that has taken on a perverse version of Christianity is far less likely to escape the mortal sins of pride and in essence, choosing “me and my way” over “God and His ways”. I have always had the same idea. I met some of the last Khoi San that were free of any influence from so-called civilised men, and I found them to be honest, reliable, friendly, and just. Their society might be very primitive, but within the confines of that limitation they were essentially innocent and good people. Take a couple of generations of essentially Protestant “education” and a previously scrupulously honest primitive people become dishonest, haphazard, unpredictable and liable to suffer from everything to alcoholism to being criminals.

Let me be perfectly clear: No one who advocates equality of any kind, and no one who is a civic nationalist of any variety, and no one who falsely asserts that which is not a sin is a sin, should ever be considered a genuine or reliable advocate of the Good, the Beautiful, and the True, no matter what their other positive attributes might be.

Because liars cannot, and will not, defend the truth. They will always produce one reason or another for refusing to do so. And if you are foolish enough to trust or follow a liar, you will come to regret it, as all of you – and readers here should recall, the vast majority of you – who used to lionize Jordan Peterson and consider him to be a great intellectual champion should know.

Again, I agree whole-heartedly. Although, I realise Vox here was referring specifically to Civic Nationalism and so on, the fact remains that:

no one who falsely asserts that which is not a sin is a sin, should ever be considered a genuine or reliable advocate of the Good, the Beautiful, and the True, no matter what their other positive attributes might be.

And this remains the absolute point for me which I cannot reconcile with Vox’s theology.

Vox, is, after all, a Protestant. A very unique one he might be, but he (as far as I know) does not subscribe to the rules of the Catholic Church as per the Code of Canon Law of 1917 which in essence simple explains/extrapolates from both the Bible and Catholic (Christian) Tradition and has compiled and summarised all the various extrapolations, dictates, and dogma of the Catholic Church into one volume that covers all of those documents from the period of human history up to the year 1917. As a Catholic, you then may also wish to add the Papal ex-cathedra commentaries made from 1917 to 1958. After that we have not had any valid Popes since, so everything else can be safely ignored.

I am fairly sure Vox has not read the Code of Canon Law. And if he did I think the things he might object to are probably not as many as he might envision, but I am (foggily) aware he has some issue with some aspects of Mariology, though I am not sure what they are. I feel fairly confident he is well-read enough to be aware that Catholics do not actually “worship” Mary, but simply ask for her intercession, as we do to various Saints. In essence, the difference between catholics and Protestants is that we don’t stop communicating with our dead friends and people. We pray for them and we also ask them to pray for us.

One of the only times we briefly discussed my Catholicism (sedevacantism) and I pointed out some of the main issues he immediately said words to the effect of “Oh, well, those are Catholics I can get behind”. So again, I doubt the differences between us are huge in terms of theology.

He also agrees with me that in general humans need rules, otherwise they will pretty much eat each other alive in the street, which, to a certain extent we are starting to really see on a global level when Christianity fades.

We are also both smart enough understand that, while perhaps a certain optional rule for people may not really be designed for me or him specifically, we can’t really have rules for thee but not for me. And if there are exceptions, they should be based on sound reasoning, logic, and justice, not personal preference. So, in short, I ask myself:

“Why is Vox not actually a sedevacantist?”

I am presently only aware of one possible hitch which is his specific interpretation of the Trinty. Which I will not attempt to speak for him on as I would probably get it wrong. For myself, I do not pretend to know the intricacies of the Trinity, and I am perfectly happy to act in this regard very much as an illiterate peasant from the year 800. The Church says the Trinity works thusly, and I accept it as a given. I see no possible profit in trying to atomise that concept, nor do I have any interest in it.

While I may atomise the concept of not duelling and understand it very well, and instinctively want to say: “But Bishop, I don’t want to run that guy through with a rapier because I am proud, but because he defrauds little old ladies and steals candy from children, and blasphemes! C’MAWN…Just this one (ok, half-dozen) time?!” But intellectually I understand I must just bow my head and NOT challenge the man to a duel to the death. And if I do confront him, it would be a sin to smack the living crap out of him until he makes amends. I know that. Which makes it a bad sin. But… y’know… I’m only human. Maybe next time I’ll give him a warning first. You know, if I really see the error of my ways. Otherwise all I can do is really try to work on it over time. But in the meantime: no duels have been had. #winning.

So, it might be an intellectual disparity, perhaps the things that interest Vox to dissect are so different from the ones that interest me that it causes him a problem with Catholicism. And this, THIS is the real interest to me.

What are those details? Is he seeing something I am not, or is it vice-versa? Or is there a third possibility that we are both missing?

Such conversations, or investigations, if you prefer, are what fascinates me, and the ones that I think help us to see more truth when done with an intellectually honest person that is also curious enough and interested enough to examine such details.

I seem to recall for example that Vox also labelled Once Saved Always Saved as a retarded concept (he may have been more polite about it) and I would expect he similarly considers Sola Scriptura as absurd, but I never asked him the question. I also seem to recall that his generic approach to the Bible was not that this or that version was “better” but to just read one and go with it as best you can, which is “close enough” for really about 99.99% of people.

I suspect that his avoidance of hardcore Catholicism is linked to what he believes are “lies” or untruths that the Catholic Church has as various dogmas. What these are, however I am unaware, and it is my experience that most such ideas are usually rooted in some Protestant fake news about Catholicism. Several aspects of which, honest historians like Rodney Stark have pointed out even though they are not Catholics.

At any rate, I would certainly be interested in looking at what the differences between his and my theological philosophies are.

I suspect he doesn’t have the time, but the invitation is open.

UPDATE: A reader pointed out I have not explained the absolute point that anyone who advocates that a sin is not a sin should not be trusted. As often happens with me, I thought the point was obvious, but I failed to realise it is not as obvious to many as I think. So, to clarify, The very concept of Protestantism that each man can interpret the Bible as he wishes, is a pernicious sin of pride. Even the sola scriptura retards must know that man is perfectly honest, clean and good as well as smart and reasonable. It very clearly states this in Hebrews and elsewhere if memory serves.

Secondly, it is just as obvious that a good and loving God would not leave a DYI kit for interpreting His Will and what the rules He wishes us to follow are. Because given the fact we are all a bunch of retards to one degree or other, we are guaranteed to screw it up. And the idea a flawless and loving God would leave us a flawed theology is equally retarded.

Therefore, a FLAWLESS theology MUST exist. And there must be a way to know which it is. As it happens, there is. Jesus Appointed Peter as the Head of His Church, instructed the Apostles to teach His teachings and Paul tells us also that we are to reject things that are not as per their teachings as given to them by Jesus (that is, Apostolic succession, is a thing).

All of which would still screw up if it were not for the fact that Jesus also told us He would be with us to the end of time. Now, if Jesus is with us always to the end, and He commanded the Apostles to teach what He taught them, then their teachings cannot be in error. Not because even the Apostles are flawless, but because Jesus is.

That is the whole point of Papal infallibility. It’s not due to some superhuman characteristic of Popes. There have been plenty of greedy, power-hungry, deviants as Popes, but they did not teach erroneous dogma when speaking ex-cathedra because of the supernatural protection due to Jesus’ promise. Who can speak erroneous or wrong doctrine? People who are not protected by Jesus’ promise and who is that? People who are not the foundation on which the rock is based, which has two parts. The non visible supreme one, Jesus, and his vicar on Earth, which is the man holding the position that Peter held as leader of the Apostles.

18 And Jesus coming, spoke to them, saying: All power is given to me in heaven and in earth.

19 Going therefore, teach ye all nations; baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost.

20 Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and behold I am with you all days, even to the consummation of the world.

Priests can lie or be wrong. Bishops can lie or be wrong. Popes can lie or be wrong. But valid, legitimate Popes talking officially for the entire Church on matters of faith and morals, that is the foundational principles of Christianity, cannot be wrong. Again, not because they are infallible in and of themselves, but because Jesus specifically said he was specifically with them to the End of the World. And Jesus cannot be wrong, nor is he a liar. And what He taught the apostles is true and He also specifically stated he would build the Church on Peter,, renaming him from Simon to Peter, which in Latin, Aramaic and most Latin languages literally means Rock.

Regardless of whatever brain-twisting Protestants come up with to try and say Jesus didn’t mean or say what he meant and said, even a child can understand that if someone says, to a guy called Simon:

“Hey buddy, come here, gonna run a little test by you…”

And he does, and Simon passes, and the guy says:

“You know what buddy, I’m gonna call you Rock from now on, and on this rock, I will build my church.” It’s a fairly clear point that Good old Simon/Rock, is now the head of the Church. Seriously, a child gets it. You need to be indoctrinated into lies from birth not to see this as it is.

So, the first lie is to tell people that to not be Catholic is not a sin. It is. You’re ignoring God’s Will. And the entire retinue of sins that follows from anyone following that advice is literally endless. And frankly, it ALL stems from pride to begin with. Some German fattie with a penchant for sexing up nuns and raping maids and swearing and calling reason literally “the whore of the devil”, comes along some 1500 years after Christ and the Catholic Church which has been the ONLY valid Christianity to that point and he FIXES everything? It’s moronic. Jesus didn’t say:

“Oh, by the way, all the people for the next 1500 years or so that call themselves Christians, and all the Popes which everyone agrees for that long are the main dudes, yeah, well, forget about all of them, they are all wrong and Pagan worshippers that ask my mother and a bunch of dead guys of no importance whatsoever to put in a good word for them with me. Anyway, all those guys? Going straight to Hell. Only when that rotund German with the beer and all the sex comes along will AKCHUAL Christianity be fixed. And he will do it by changing the Bible before he says it’s the only thing you should refer to at all. But only the one he changed, not the one everyone used for 1200 or so years and that was put together by the same Catholics who got it all wrong. And oh that Bible that the German guy changed, which was also changed by the Pahrisees, you know, the guys who had me killed, for 700 years before him, that’s the good Bible, scrap that other one. And oh, oh, one more thing: The best Bible, it’s the one with 33,000 translation errors ordered to be put together by a flamingly homosexual English King. Jimmy boy, that’s his name. He also starts up the Freemasons, which are Satanists, but don’t let that bug ya, seriously, his version of the Bible is the best one.”

So… yeah. I hope it’s kinda obvious now.

No Comments

Schizophrenia – Good for Writers!

As I continue book 3 in the overlords of Mars series, I am continually surprised at how much can enter the persona of one of the characters, then switch to a completely different one and get into a very different mindset.

It is a very useful exercise for reminding us that we are not our ideas, or ideologies or even our most deeply held beliefs. And yet…

Something at the core that is absolutely founded on a bedrock of truth must remain. The mistake most people make is to think that such a bedrock is also formed in part by their political affiliation, belief in this or that ancestor’s idea about this or that “truth” or “tradition”. All the while, most of it is if not arbitrary, at least just optional.

Once you destroy the ego monsters that keep what you think of as your personality, what is left is truly quite simple and small, yet eternal.

And when you go digging into that, and it does not reduce at all, then that little fire expands and eventually… you reach an inescapable conclusion. that fantastic as it first seems, absurd, unrealistic, and counter to everything you have been told from birth… in truth… becomes undeniable.

You might have hated the idea. You might have railed against it from time to time. I certainly did. You might have thought it all a lie or stifling, or a way to control the masses and evil. You might have been fooled by the VAST number in modern times of people who used this undeniable truth for their own evil and truly dark ends. Almost all of us have been fooled in this way, really. And yet… it remains true.

No Comments

Poor Pietro

I watch and listen, on and off, when I have some spare time, to the videos of Pietro Bisanti, they are in Italian so this will not apply to too many people in terms of those bilingual enough to see them for themselves. But Mr. Bisanti does speak and I am sure reads English quite well, so I will be sending him a link.

A quick summary before I criticise the man, and I think he is intelligent enough to realise that unlike some idiots he recently lambasted (rightly) for being Internet drama queens/grifters and various species of retards, I do so, not with the intent to reduce him in any way, but, since he is a let’s say semi-public persona, being on the internet of his own volition, and dispenses general advice and his opinions of life, the universe and everything, I think it’s fair for me to comment on them when I think he is doing a MASSIVE error and thereby also leading others astray. Fair enough that most who listen to him don’t listen to me and we do so in different languages, but you never know, and in any case, the issue is a global one that I recently addressed with respect to Karl Denninger on this very blog, so, although Bisanti is GenX and not a boomer, he is not going to be immune to a similar beam of light on him, highlighting a more typically Millennial disease, which, however, also afflicts a few GenXers.

Bisanti was an ex-Carabinieri (Italian Military Police) who became Maresciallo (usually the head guy at a station as far as I know) and worked as a Carabiniere for over 20 years. Today he works as a legal consultant and “igenista” which is, at my rough understanding, a guy who preoccupies himself with how different foods and activities and so on affects your health, including mental health, and who looks at health in general. He admits he made several errors over his journey in this field, being a vegan and a fruitarian at different times, which he states were both mistakes. He also suffered the usual “vaccines” for military service, but as far as I know refused all the covid nonsense.

I can’t really comment on his food-related stuff, as I am generally ignorant of it and I also tend to be supremely uninterested in that stuff since I can’t figure out the truth of various statements without doing my own research and I think it would take years of study and testing to know with any precision. Plus, I think each person is a little different, so, in my 54 years on this Earth I figured out what works for me mostly, and I try to stay within certain parameters and as I age I try to be a bit more careful. My personal favourite would be to eat mostly fish and other generally white meat that is healthy and natural with the occasional steak and some salads and some fruit and so on, otherwise I avoid grains and generally that’s about it, but I am not against the odd drink, or even, once in a blue moon, a cigar.

So my commentary has nothing to do with his primary chosen career, in which he gives seminars around Italy.

No, my commentary today comes only as a result of noting over the last year or two, that when Mr. Bisanti talks about women, relationships, marriage and children, his view can essentially be summarised as mostly negative.

Now, unlike a lot of the incels, would-be pagans, and MGTOW chronic masturbators, I don’t think Bisanti has or would have any real issues to get with women for a sexual relationship. He’s confident and fairly level-headed, has a generally healthy approach to reality as far as I can tell (except in this area I am going to gently rake him over the coals for) and I am sure there would be no shortage of female companionship if he actively searched for it. And yet…

Let me first point out, in no specific order, some of the comments he made that are so wrong that it caused me to think to write this post, in the (vain I am sure) hope he maybe takes a step back and reconsiders a few things and thereby also, I sincerely hope, improve his life, as well as perhaps give better general advice on the topic to his many followers. After each point, I will also critique as relevant. This should give a fairly comprehensive perspective of the man and his views, after which I can present my conclusions.

  • He commented on a documentary he says he saw based on some African tribe in Tanzania if memory serves me, where he said the general attitude was that the various adults would all have sex with whomever they fancied that was up for it, and there was no jealousy, possession, and so on, and —in essence— he thought this was a good thing (as well as believed it apparently). In short, a bit of the same concept of “free love” of the 60’s boomers.

Now… having lived in Africa for some 25 years, I can say that on hearing this comment of his I actually burst out laughing. Because I would bet you any amount of money that this fantasy place and tribe, is a pure myth invented by the producers of the ridiculous documentary. That is not to say that there aren’t rides or people in Africa that copulate with each other more or less with the same kind of abandon than a troop of bonobos. In fact, generally, in Africa this is not uncommon. But if you think that all the consequent jealousies, bitterness, and yes, assaults, violence and murder don’t go hand in hand with such practices, well, then, like our Mr. Bisanti, I can summarise your view as: “Tell me you have never been to Africa and don’t know a damned thing about it or its people, without telling me…” And yes I know Africa is vast and has many people and many tribes of Africans on it. And my statement remains unchanged. But to give you a perspective, think of the average hippie commune, be it in Europe or America, where it was Caucasians that tried this sort of “free love” experiment and then look at the results. It’s much the same. With quite a lot less murder, generally speaking, but really in no way a recipe for happiness.

  • On the video I saw today he said that if you live with a woman she:
    • Dictates the rules
    • Uses up all your time
    • Doesn’t let you pursue your interests
    • In general that basically a relationship or a marriage is a miserable way of living

Now, we all have our trauma, I am sure, and I am the first to admit that as a general rule the average Italian woman, compared to other nationalities I am familiar with, are more of a clingy, whiny, pain in the ass, but as always, that is a generalisation. And there are Italian women too that are far from it, as always, you gotta know what you want and what you’re getting into. But in all the relationships I had no woman ever “used up all my time” and sure as death and taxes, no woman I lived with “made all the rules”. Mostly because the very idea is absurd as far as I am concerned. The only “rules” any adult normal person should need are the basic ones of civilised behaviour towards each other and then whatever quirks you may have you need to adjust for each other. As for any woman not letting me pursue my interests, again, I am wondering what kind of women the man got with, or maybe I am wrong and he is a kind of incel. I just can’t fathom it.

I pursued things I wanted to do without that even ever being an issue. I trained in martial arts most of my life and pursued plenty of other things, I wrote books, scuba dived, learn and practiced hypnosis, travelled a whole bunch, enjoyed target shooting, hunting, and probably a dozen other things I was interested in and did for some time that I am just not even remembering right now. And while relationships that go wrong can be the source of the worst pain you may ever feel (yes, I am a survivor, please donate generously) they also represent the source of the best joy one can ever feel too. The fact that Bisanti seems to think the negatives outweigh the positives, does give me several clues about him and/or his life.

  • Children are NOT the source of joy. In fact he categorically stated that in the main, children are not a source of happiness.

Here I need to take a little pause to try to understand if the man even has the same definition I have for happiness, or if he has the same one that 19 year old bubble-heads on tik-tok have for it. So let me explain my definition. Happiness was one of those words that I asked myself if I knew what it was and remained mute to myself. Quite a bit like love. For a long time, I would think: “Am I happy?” And not really know how to answer that. Similarly, I’d meet or be with a girl, that I found interesting, or attractive, or sexy, and I’d ask myself “Is this love?” And again remain mute to the reply. I didn’t know.

Perhaps my own level of self-awareness is well beyond that of normal people, it’s possible, but I recall the very first time I realised what happiness was. I was 26 and driving a beat up old VW Golf and wherever I was headed I was contemplating this sensation that I had achieved a couple of times when doing karate kata repeatedly and non-stop, to the point that I could barely lift my arms and legs anymore, then, breaking through the exhaustion barrier, I got a sensation like a kind of light inside my head and then I could carry on a lot longer and nothing felt heavy anymore. It was like being a little in a dream but fully focussed and calm and the movements just came naturally. I knew about breaking through that wall of resistance from swimming years earlier, but the experience when doing kata was markedly different. In swimming I would just become like a kind of human robot, just moving, moving, moving, tumble, twist, turn, push off, moving, moving and so on, length after length of the pool. But this brightness, this kind of light in the middle of my head, felt different and it was while driving in my beat up blue and white VW that I realised “Oh! that’s what happiness is!” Finally I knew this word. And that is what I think objective happiness is like. It is a kind of unexpected consequence of something you do, you need to do, you want to do, you should do, you must do, duty means you do it, desire means you do it, all of the above. And eventually, if you do it well enough and deep enough, and hard enough, you get this pervasive sensation of happiness.

Yes, yes, I realise how sexual the above description sounds, and many women in my past no doubt recognise the issue. You’re all welcome.

But seriously, the point is that happiness is not about you getting everything you want on a silver platter with no effort. That’s not happiness. Nor is it the whine of the tik-tokker that wants the white knight with a Ferrari and the millions who is sensitive but also takes charge and who loves hearing her talk about the mindless minutia of her day.

Conclusions

In short, Mr. Bisanti probably has a somewhat limited perspective on the women of the world, being mostly familiar with Italian ones. Perhaps his specific brand of personality attracts especially clingy and/or “we must be serious about the relationship by doing x y and z” types (something I suspect, as he tends to be a pretty intense and decisive guy, so maybe a woman naturally thinks she should be too, so as to keep up with him, when usually, the opposite is more true).

Perhaps he’s just had a run of bad luck in his relationships. And undoubtedly, he also has bought into the boomer rhetoric of “free love”, which I understand, I had a somewhat similar approach to sex and women for some years after I decided that obviously I wasn’t cut out for long term relationships since the two major ones I had had had failed and the next two did too in a much shorter time period. After that, as soon as a woman irritated me I nexted her, and I did that for a long while. But then I realised that way of living was really ultimately quite unsatisfying. Perhaps Bisanti hasn’t quite reached that point yet, even though he is 48. On the other hand, all the Boomer nonsense people of his and my generation were marinated in, does tend to retard the process of realising certain things, especially about relationships.

He mentions however that he is the third of 11 children. Which mystifies me even more with his view of children. And says that at his mother’s house he never feels harassed, people talk if they want to, don’t if they don’t want to and everyone is chilled. Well, why should it be any different in your own house with a woman you choose to be with?

Maybe he just hasn’t found the right one? But I doubt it. I think that despite Mr. Bisanti being moderately intelligent and decently in touch with reality as it is, including on many aspects that it is quite hard for many people to realise, never mind speak openly about, be it the covid lies, immigration, crime and justice and so on, the man has been embittered.

I think he has let whatever negative crap he saw or sees daily affect him in a terribly sad way. And this is almost certainly the result of Mr. Bisanti being a reasonable man.

Luckily I was never afflicted by this pernicious issue of being a reasonable man. As I think Mark Twain said (I may be wrong), reasonable men see the world as it is and adapt to it. Unreasonable men see the world as it is and unreasonably expect it to adapt to them. So all human progress, is the result of unreasonable men. Which, in essence, is basically true. Sadly, most unreasonable men are also usually neuroatypical, and we polite, mild-mannered, Aspergers types are heavily outnumbered by the psychotic narcissists. But there it is.

And sure, life can always throw you absolutely unexpected and vile curve-balls; but buddy, Pietro, if you expect anything of worth to just stumble into your lap and “make you happy” you seriously have it wrong.

And if you expect your children to be a constant source of joyous entertainment, again, you are probably prancing in meadows looking for fucking unicorns too, but that’s not the point. Because even when at 3 am, covered in baby projectile vomit, all in your bed, and a leaky diarrhoea-filled nappy is dribbling all over you as you try to get the little bundle of screaming snot to a dry spot to clean him off, when you look into the face of that little dude with snot-running down his face, hiccuping and tear-filled, you can only feel love and the sensation that you wish you had all his troubles so he’d feel better. And buddy, no amount of tik-tok “happiness” or dozens of nymphomaniac sluts with model looks trying to drain you dry even begins to compare.

And that’s the bad days. The good days are truly awesome. You’re basically watching a sacred soul grow and learn and evolve in this world and you somehow had a part in making that happen and you will continue to do so until you drop dead yourself. And if I have any say in it, you’ll still look over them even after your body here has rotted away to dust.

You’re thinking too small Pietro.

You’re missing out on what really matters.

You’ve been afflicted by the Italian sadness. A thing I noted even as a teenager when I came here on holiday. Oppressed and squished economically and mentally and in so many other ways, the mind, the intellect, the imagination, the soul, of the average Italian was so limited. So incapable of imagining bigger and better things and then doing insane stuff to make them happen. Mind you it is not limited to Italy, I recall at age 16 when I was new in the UK and at school I asked one of the guys there what his life dreams were, the reply I got was:

Oh I’d like to just get married, and have like… two cars, a couple of kids, a nice house…

I looked at him incredulously and said:

“Man, that’s what happens if you just sit on your ass and do nothing. Don’t you want to sail the world in a 70 foot trimaran with an all female crew? Drive a Ferrari, something?!”

I’ve never forgotten his reply, and to this day it sends shiver of mediocrity down my spine: “Oh,” he said, “that only happens in the movies.”

I replied:”For you, with that attitude, that’s definitely the case.”

Now, as it happens I have not sailed the world in a 70 foot trimaran with an all female crew. Mostly because to get that trimaran is a lot of really hard work, and so is sailing really, and it really was much easier to experience the all-female crew on dry land one at a time (well, not at the same time anyway), and travel the world by aeroplane. And I did a bunch of other stuff and saw and experienced things that even most super-rich people who never have to work haven’t seen or experienced, and certainly not the way I did.

Sure, my life has had extremely deep pits of pain and heartache, but so what? I have experienced peaks of ecstasy, human intimacy, and love that few men get to experience in their life. I don’t really regret any of it. A life well-lived is indeed, and adventure. And you know what they say about adventures: They make great stories after you’ve survived them.

If you survive them.

So, my sincere wish for Mr. Bisanti, and all those like him, is to shake your fossilised little heart and brains up. Consider why you have such a dismal view of relationships. I am certain I have been through far worse heartache as a result of women than Mr. Bisanti ever has, or is likely to, and yet I never felt as negative and downcast about the concept of living with one woman for the rest of my days, and making children with her, as poor Pietro is.

In the last video I saw, here, about 7 minutes in, he states that those people who would criticise him and try to present their marriage as blissful paradise are liars, who might even lie to others or themselves, but can’t fool him.

Well, man, you’re just plain wrong. No marriage is all bliss and tik-tok “happiness”. None. Also, you can’t find any Unicorns or Pegasi. I know, the Pegasi thing especially is a cruel lie, but then I think it comes from Islam, so what do you expect. But I guarantee you man, some marriages absolutely can be like karate kata happiness. If you work hard enough and pour sweat and tears and blood out of you enough and you picked the right one, nothing compares. Really. Nothing does.

I wish you a better view of things Mr. Bisanti.

1 Comment

Educated Women

As a result of the last post, on SG the discussion had various points. One of the (many) poorly understood “red pills” that are probably the result of your average incel believing/taking advice from your average PUA, is this idea that women should not have an education.

In typical incel fashion, the pagans, the “red pilled” retards, and so on, seem to think that the general aim for humanity is for women not only to reject feminism (a good thing), but also to be semi-literate baby machines (not a good thing – the semi literate part. Like it or not, only women can make babies and everyone normal is fine with it. I know, shocker!).

That may work for you if you are of a certain religious persuasion that tends to hang around camels as nomads in the desert, but by and large is not a great idea for a happy marriage. At least, certainly not for me.

The problem is not a woman being well educated. The problem is if she buys into the feminist and other utter idiocy that the nonsense farms (colleges, universities, schools in general) put on blast every day you are there.

Even in the past, it was thought that for a woman to be well-read was a bonus. And personally, I have always been quite impressed by those women I came to know that had a varied and sometimes surprising number and type of books that they had read.

My wife has a facility with words for example and she is usually way ahead of me in things like anagrams, or play on words, and puns that I dare not repeat, for they are truly awful, as puns are meant to be. But more recently, she has even begun to mix English and Italian words into new constructions. Piggolina for example a mix of Piglet and Piccolina, for our second youngest, who has yet to find a food she does not like munching on.

And although she has not exactly had time since we have been together, she enjoyed reading Jane Eyre and is quite particular about enunciating words correctly and so on. She even managed to read through a couple or three of my fictions books. At least one before we were even together, a feat I don’t think many (any?) women accomplished, including the previous ex-wives. More importantly, I can talk with her about pretty much any topic and receive a reasonable feedback. You know, in the fleeting moments between various work things, and one or more of the five children climbing a wall after some fashion, needing to eat, or get changed, or somehow interrupting in new and varied ways.

The point is that a good education is a good thing, as long as the basics of life are understood. And increasingly, it looks like going back to earlier paper versions of books is really a good idea. I have four daughters, and while I do hope they find good men early and make lots of babies and live happily ever after, I fully intend to see to it they have a decent grasp of logic, reasoning in general, mathematics, and language(s), as well as reading and writing skills that are today seen as exemplary, but that in my day and opinion are merely normal. And if they should pick up how to change a tire, clean out a carburettor, fire a few types of weapons, survey a parcel of land, balance accounting books, and (please God) learn to operate the sewing machine stored in the side room, well, so much the better.

Which reminds me, Vox recently pointed out that books 1 to 8 I believe, of the Castalia House junior classics, are ready for shipping. And you can pick up the entire ebook set for $35 right now, so although if you can get the paper version it’s safer from the EMP strikes of nuclear war, and thus more reliable for when you’re hunkered down in your bunker, it’s certainly a good investment of great stories you can read to your children and then pass on for them to read to theirs eventually.

Along with a hand-written manual with a few blood spots on it of how to survive and navigate our own fast-approaching version of Alpha Complex.

15 Comments

Karl does Bad Reasoning. Again.

I have criticised the boomer Karl Denninger before. Here, and here.

And now I will do it again, but on an entirely different basis, which actually ties in with a MUCH larger picture I have been trying to explain to other people for a long time.

Karl has a long very black pilled post about having children and the future, here.

In fairness to him, I think his overall point is not necessarily that high IQ, K-select people should not have children, as many have accused him of doing. I am quite sure he is merely pointing out why it is unlikely that they will. And insofar as his boomer level of analysis goes, he is “right”. That is, the average NPC will think and “reason” much along the lines Karl indicates. So my critique is not really with his observation of all the negative facts he points out. In the main he is “correct” about his individual examples of reasons why people are less likely to choose to have children.

The desirable people he and I both mean, that is, high IQ, K-select, generally honest and responsible, and reliable people with a good sense of justice, common sense and the ability to do at least decent levels of logic, math, writing and reading comprehension.

But as usual, Karl is missing the big picture. As is typical of the boomer mentality, that thinks primarily in terms of me, me, me, and even when describing global events is guided by their perennial laser-like focus on how anything affect them in the specific, he seems largely incapable of the very concept of synergism.

It is a rare skill generally, but it happens that some of us (mostly GenX) are naturally talented at it, so allow me to point out the errors of his thinking, starting from the exact opposite direction that boomer thinking begins at: that is, the REALLY big pictures frames first. The ones that ignore us, that is you and me specifically completely. Here we go:

1. Nature doesn’t care about you specifically

In the big scheme of things, those who do not reproduce sufficiently die out. Nature is pretty brutal about it and tends to operate on the principles of large numbers. And exceptions to that rule because of different large numbers.

It may just be humanity’s lot that we go the way of mouse utopia aka Universe 25. In which case, we’re all doomed and so are all our children. And if so, why worry about it. Worrying about it would be a total waste of time. Besides which you do NOT know this for certain, so assuming it off the bat is an error. So, as a function of reason and logic, this specific idea must be ignored.

Treating it as valid or true can only lead you to depression and misery in a situation where your irrational belief in a “certainty” you cannot possibly know is a certainty, becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. This point alone, the Universe 25 possibility, should make it obvious that similar thoughts that lead down similar (if less total) outcomes are also to be ignored.

So for example, the idea that “all white people will soon be extinct” or “high IQ people do not breed together because there is not enough of them” or the more common “marriage and children is a loser’s game because all women are whores and will divorce-rape you” and all the various variants of that kind, are in essence self-fulfilling, loser’s bets on life. The fact that your specific marriage may turn into a hellscape, or your specific life becomes a dead end is not relevant to the entire sub-species you represent.

Yes nature does not care about you specifically, but you specifically can and do affect nature. Make 15 children and chances are most of them survive. If they all too make 15 children from age 20 on, like you did, guess what the landscape of your tribe looks like 100 years from now if you just start out with you and your wife as Adam and Eve? On that basis, starting with you and your wife having had 15 children by the time you are both say 40, if all your children and theirs and so on do the same, meaning that every 40 years they all have a batch of 15 children each, if you lived to be 140, you would have over 17 thousand descendants. 17,275 to be exact. And if the average age of death was say 80, then almost all of them would still be alive, since the first iteration (at year 20) is only 135 people. And that’s only ONE family. Imagine if you have ten such families in the same area. You now have a small nation after one century. Which in the scheme of things is not so much time. And if the genetic serums actually sterilise and wipe out most of humanity, you will not only be a small nation, you will be the majority within it. And it might not be such a small geographical area after all. Now imagine them all of the same religion that takes no crap from depopulationist satanists like Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates and their pedophile friends.

“But people don’t make 15 children each, and how do you feed them all, and send them to college?!?”

Patience grasshopper. People who bought the lies and live in clown world no longer make 15 children. But people did do that for centuries in Catholic countries. And that was before the internet, and Amazon deliveries, and often before indoor plumbing and central heating, and certainly before electricity and tractors and industrial fertilisers and automated harvesting machines… so let that sink in a little and park it in your brain somewhere while we continue to look at reality and possibilities instead of the ghosts boomers put in your head.

“But even if smart white people with good ethics, strong Catholic religious beliefs and enough money/land/whatever start reproducing at that ridiculous and unrealistic rate, they will still be outnumbered by the millions of dumb, brown, evil, people!”

First of all, even if things were reduced to that simplistic level of thinking, realise that the number of white people on the planet always was a minority when compared to the number of non-white people. And probably always will be.

Remember when I said nature doesn’t care about you specifically and operates on the principle of large numbers, with the exception of other large numbers? White people, and the Japanese, are two such examples, just to pick a couple. Despite not being a majority, white people have managed to secure lands and space for themselves very successfully over the millennia. A combination of strong imagination, higher average IQ, and religious beliefs that fostered high-trust and co-operation, served them well when they ejected infiltrating and noxious tribes, ethnicities and behaviours, which they did in the past with ferocious attitudes.

Similarly the Japanese have retained a really quite unique culture on this planet by similarly ruthlessly avoiding to entertain the admixing of their population with the teeming masses.

A perhaps even more shocking example is Catholicism itself, which around 400 AD or thereabouts, when it really was a dark time on pretty much all fronts for humanity in general and Catholics (i.e. the only Christians that ever existed) in particular, St. Benedictine decided to retire to some apparently godforsaken regions and start monasteries. And some 600 years later, the Catholic world was (and remained for a long time) the utter pinnacle of human achievement in everything from the arts, to the courage of men, the safety of lands that were previously the domain of brigands, the ending of women and children as chattel, and generally the betterment of humanity as a whole while being perfectly capable and able to fight back against less civilised barbarians that hounded them.

And keep in mind that Catholic monks do not even reproduce at all! But just by their influence, they firstly created self-sustaining monasteries, then spread the gospel and civilisation all round them, so much so that they even converted the Vikings that used to raid and murder them mercilessly, by giving them lands and asking for their protection. And after a couple of centuries, those same blonde giants were off to the Crusades to defend Christendom. All this was supposedly impossible if you accept Denninger’s base premise which is simply that basic math has all the answers.

Basic math has a lot of the answers, but life is always more interesting that that. As I wrote almost 30 years ago, in original version of The Face on Mars published in 1995, when dealing with math and reality, the theory looks like 1+2=3 or perhaps x+2=3 so we can figure out x easily. In theory.

Better scientists realise that things are a bit more like x+y=3 so both x and y can have a wide range of values. And synergists like me realise life is most accurately described as x+y=z, where both x and y and even z have ranges of probabilities and while computers can in theory predict things very accurately (if the input data is very accurate) they cannot and will not ever be able to account for human nature and reality as a whole. Because the fly in the teleporting machine, the asteroid against the dinosaurs, and the “crazy” St. Benedict, or the iron minded King Leonidas, will throw your entire large number theory set right out the window. And in fact, a human mind that can see these patterns of relationships and figure them out analogously, usually has a better chance of getting it right than any computer prediction of the future.

So. The realisation from point number one is that while nature does not care about you specifically, you specifically can affect nature. Crazy as that sounds. And the main item required for you to have a chance to do so? Unreasonable belief that defies current “popular” thinking, but is based in sound synergistic principles, like large number theory, persistence, and of course, the most successful human belief system ever used by humans, actual Catholicism.

2. Becoming that different large number.

If you want to avoid becoming the leaf in the stream that just ends up being compost, and if your entire tribe, way of life, family, looks like it is just being carried on by world events, guess what, you need to become one of those large numbers that is the exception to the large number concept that you will become extinct. How do you do that? Simple, really, if you think about it.

By being utterly passionate, unreasonable, counter-intuitively absurdly dedicated and persistent, over an equally absurd, unreasonable and “crazy” length of time. St. Benedict didn’t just decide to try his hand at monastery creation and life for a few years. He spent the rest of his life doing it. Relentlessly.

The reason I have achieved so many different things, visited so many places, speak three languages fluently and a couple or three others haltingly, and learnt so many different skills at a high level enough that I could reasonably be considered a professional at several very different endeavours, is because I simply put in more time, more effort, more obsessive thought and action into those things that interested me than most people do, and even than most supposed “professionals” in that field do in many cases.

So, if you want your DNA to make it, you need to go counter to the zeitgeist. Which is healthy in any case since the current “Western” zeitgeist is that you should submit to different cultures and ethnicities than your own. That the family unit is evil, marriage terrible, and making children a very selfish thing unworthy of civilised people. Oh and you should also be gay. Or a cross-dressing, self-mutilating tranny. And make your kids, if you were so unwise to have any, become gay, underage drag queens too.

Really, regardless of your intentions, going 180 degrees away from the current zeitgeist in the West is healthier than not doing so on any scale. But if you want to go the whole hog, then peruse this blog and the various articles I wrote on farming, beating clown world, and so on, and above all realise two things:

  1. Yes it’s hard. Very. Get used to it. It’s just how it is.
  2. Win. Build it. Find the impossible way. Keep getting back up and keep saying “Fuck them”. Eventually everyone dies, so make your life here count.

You overcome the statistics of nature by becoming your own large number anomaly. So git to it, you unreasonable madman.

3. The black pill is a lie.

All fear is a lie, ultimately. And the black pill of doom and gloom is pure fear-based poison. It doesn’t matter what type of fear it is. Fear you will not have a job. Fear you will not have enough money. Fear you will hate your life. Fear you will be a bad parent. Fear your kids will suffer. Fear you can’t do it. Fear you will fail. Fear.

Well, let me reassure you: You will lose your job. Somewhere along the line, if you haven’t yet, you will. You will never have enough money. Never. Elon Musk still doesn’t. Just ask him. Your life will have giant events of major suckage in it. Everyone’s does. You will fuck up multiple aspects of parenting. Everyone does. Your best bet is to keep the damage to a minimum and try and ensure your children understand reality and still love you when they are all grown up. Your kids will suffer. Everyone does. You will fail. Multiple times, at multiple things. You will feel fear in your life. Many times for many different reasons.

There. Got all that? Good. Now get off your ass and go do all those scary things anyway.

No one learnt to walk without falling down. A lot.

No one learnt to read and write without scrawling and misspelling first. A lot.

No one has achieved great things without persistently improving on his or her own screw ups. Failing is not the problem. Quitting is. So, as I explained, become your own large number anomaly. And if God is gracious he will give you enough of a brain to realise the miracle point of when it is not worth bashing your head into the same rock and when, instead, doing so, will eventually form a thick enough skin and skull that you will break the rock and break through to a better place.

Life is hard. Bad shit happens. People die. Evil exists. And on and on. So what? You can whine and bitch and cry and hide in a corner and try and have someone, anyone, everyone, feel sorry for you, or you can get up and become a large number anomaly. Them’s the choices, and no one gets a free ride. So pick one. I picked mine long ago.

4. Being afraid of 10 things means you miss the big opportunity.

If you do go and read the whole long litany of fear compiled by Denninger, you might get depressed. You might think he has valid points and they stack. Let me present just one case or two of his flawed theory.

Then you think about the child getting older.  He or she is rather bright and would perhaps like a college education.  You see the bills pile up on those who are there now, and the growth of that price over the last 20 years.  You see $100,000 or more in debt larded up on someone who studies gender or black history and a “professor” who claims that capitalism is horrible — while pulling down a six-figure salary and forcing your child to pay the next kid over’s tuition in Calculus class because you, not your child, have more money than his parents do.  You think “oh, my kid is a math whiz and will study programming” which sounded great 20+ years ago but then you remember the many H1bs that multiple large firms brought in to replace all of their American citizen programmers, forcing said Americans to train their replacements before being fired in order to get any severance at all!  Thus that $100,000 taken on in debt to go to college, you realize, can be rendered worthless by said corporations even if your kid makes good choices as soon as someone from India will do the work for less money.  This wild escalation in the cost of an education is not by random luck either, which would be a risk everyone has to take — three decades ago there was no Internet and colleges were the only real place you could learn a lot of things.  Today anyone can learn anything from literally anywhere with nothing more than a $50 cellphone, a $200 laptop and $50/month for Internet service so why has the cost of learning and proving it at a college level of competence gone up by five or more times in the last 30 or so years instead of costing almost nothing to simply take a set of proctored tests and prove competence?  Reality is that all of this is due to the deliberate policies and actions of universities, governments and corporations which will screw your child without any possibility of redress when he or she grows up — and there is no evidence that it is slowing down or will be stopped.

So he points out that:

  • College/University is stupidly expensive
  • They don’t even teach anything useful in most cases
  • You can learn most things to a decent level by doing your own research on a $200 laptop

And yet he’s really SOLD on sending kids to college.

Can you see the boomer level thinking? Screw college. Learn how to distinguish and grow the plants that can be used to make tinctures and remedies for various things and sell them only to people who you know. I guarantee you that when the next load of mRNA crap embedded in food, “normal” vaccine shots, or anything else comes along, the people with a still functioning brain will not care too much about your lack of a PhD if the stuff you use on yourself and your loved one works for them too.

Do you really need a degree to be able to put plumbing pipes together, or learn the principles of electrical wiring? Sure, insurance and such is a thing and if you screw things up, or even if you don’t you might be sued into ruin.

Yes, these are real problems, and sometimes have good reasons for being there. I certainly don’t want a pedophile like Oprah’s John of “God” cutting into me or mine as if he were a surgeon. I’d like to know that anyone that needs to actually do a surgery is competent and properly trained; and can in turn be sued into poverty if he screws up because he is not.

But the problem is that over the last 4 years these supposed paragons of ethics have in the main been mass-murdering bastards who lied and lied and lied to your face. Like good old Fauci and his buddies did. So… while I am not really keen on the local witch-doctor’s bone-throwing, the local GP dispensing covid genetic serums is certainly not higher on the totem pole as far as I am concerned, thank you very much. Which means what? It means that firstly I will try to educate myself better. Without the use of google, thanks, because mostly google is also a lie now. And secondly I will go only to people I know, whose work I can personally verify and see for myself by meeting their clients, whatever their field might be.

Denninger hasn’t realised that the entire idea of college is dead. Why would you participate in it other than for a very few and very select reasons, and even then, who knows for how long? Clearly homeschooling and learning your own trade is the way.

Here is another and more “total” point he makes towards the end:

I could go on for hours with this but I think you get the point.  People don’t choose to have fewer or no children because “that’s how it is” as technology improves.  Technological improvement adds choice but society molds opinions and incentives — for good or bad, like it or not.

People make the decision to not have children not because they’re “selfish” but rather on an entirely-rational basis because they look back at their childhood for the baseline and then forward in time and what they see is not improvement but impoverishment, not prosperity but privation, forced compliance and costs shoved upon them while the mandating parties are immune from consequence even when they’re later proved wrong or worse, someone is injured or killed, rampant illegal immigration and destruction of the common person’s standard of living without boundary along with a documented history of forcing the voluntary costs taken by others down their throats along with myriad scams across the board.  When projected forward 20 years they recognize that any child they produce today is highly likely to be screwed blind and has a very low probability of having a good life, say much less a better one than they had.

Indeed if they judge that their childhood sucked they may well expect their kids’ childhoods to suck worse and nobody who actually cares about a child they’re contemplating bringing into the world voluntarily signs them up for that.

The people you want to bring children into the world are those who value children and have reason to believe their children will have at least as a good a life as they grew up with and enjoy now, with hope for even better, never mind a belief that their kids will have a fair shake and rational odds of success if they choose to apply themselves.

All of the policies of the last few decades of both government and industry have demonstrated beyond doubt that none of this is likely to be true and thus only those who don’t give a wet crap about their children’s future, or are so rich they believe they can guarantee it even if everyone else has their standard of living go straight to Hell, choose to reproduce.

About the only truly valid point he makes here is the very first one:

society molds opinions and incentives — for good or bad, like it or not.

That is essentially true. And as I have already pointed out, “society” in general today is very sick. That’s the problem. So what’s the solution? Simple: Firstly, realise, as I have been saying often and repeatedly since age 16, there is no such thing as “society”. It doesn’t exist. What you have is a large number of individuals and the large number probabilities that they produce. In reality you have a large number of in-DUH-viduals, which makes the illusion that such a thing as “society” exists quite realistic, but it doesn’t.

You have essentially zombie hordes. And zombie hordes are easily manipulated and pushed into this or that direction or over this or that cliff or fire-pit. So, as a first step don’t be a zombie. Don’t associate with them. Don’t surround yourself with them.

Secondly, begin the process of isolating yourself from zombies and building up relationships with other human beings. This in itself acts as a already quite a good “wall”, or defence from the zombie hordes, but over time, don’t be shy to build literal walls to keep the zombies out of your areas. And the more humans you have in your community that help to built them, the better.

Thirdly, do not let zombies in at any time. Exclude them and exclude anyone who allows them in the village. This sounds harsh, but is basic survival and also basic game theory. St. Benedict “won” precisely because of this point. He allowed in only Catholic monks that had dedicated themselves not only to Catholicism, but his even stricter rules added to the already rather strict rules for Catholic monks. That unwavering zealotry kept the monasteries pure and therefore effective. A bunch of men who spend all their time, praying, meditating on scripture, and working, will soon produce extremely functional communities. And in fact monasteries became wealthy, for they had a surfeit of food or other things they made, so that they became rich enough they became favourite places for the Vikings to raid. So the Catholic monks co-opted the Vikings too, and now Catholicism also added fearsome, pious warrior types to their ranks, alongside thoughtful, intellectual, pious, and studious ones.

If you refuse to allow any people into your midst that don’t subscribe to your general tribe’s zeitgeist (ideas, religion, world-view), then you cannot be corrupted, And over time, your converting of others increases your number. This is basic game theory and works in the natural world as it does in the abstract one of math. It works because it is again based on the principle of large numbers. A persistent, unexpected, but resilient statistical anomaly, becomes its own statistical normality.

Alongside with not rejecting “society” or if you prefer, forming your own, Denninger is (typical for a boomer) preoccupied with the hypothetical suffering of hypothetical children.

Well, guess what, the very vast majority of human beings, including the ones with really terrible lives, still prefer existing to not existing. We know this because aside from the odd cult, or recently mutilated confused teenager that has been indoctrinated into the child abuse ideology of transgenderism, most human beings don’t commit suicide. So, bad as it might be, life still seems to have the win over non-life. Pretty much for everyone. I know for a fact that every one of my children prefers to be here than not having existed. And it is that way for most people. So suck it up buttercup. Remember how I told you life is hard and everyone suffers? It’s true. But it still beats being dead or non-existent by a couple of light years, never mind country miles.

Finally he tries to justify his own weakness, cowardice and fear by appealing to your own sense of concern for your (hypothetical) children. In a most ridiculous manner if you have followed the discussion up to here; that is, by telling you if you really cared about your children, you wouldn’t have them, because they might suffer.

No Karl, no. They absolutely will suffer. And they will cry and feel pain and heartbreak. And then they will dust themselves off, get up and carry on. And make children of their own and if they need to fight off some evil bastards in the future that I didn’t manage to get to myself before I dropped dead, well, so be it, they will have got as much as they can from me in terms of learning how to do that.

Because guess what, you fragile and egomaniacal boomer, my grandparents went through two world wars, massive economic depression and yes, even lack of food. And they made children too. Otherwise I would not be here. And my children wouldn’t be here. And if I had continued believing the horse-shit your generation still shovels around a bit longer than I did, I might not have had any children at all. Instead now I have five of them. And my own daughter, off her own ideas, with no prompting from me on the matter, because she’s still young for me to discuss such things with her in any detail or seriousness, already has it as a pretty solid idea that she wants to have two children by her mid twenties. And if her babysitting of her younger siblings is anything to go by, she probably will, and be a really good mother at it too. And the smaller ones love each other even as they fight and argue and then play and hug a few minutes later.

Because what you missed Karl, in your ranting and raving at the injustices of the world, is the simple fact that yes, things are bad. And yes they could be better, and yes there is wild evil about, but… on one level or another, it has always been this way. Do you think the Spartans and Athenians about to be wiped out by the Persians had an easier life than you do? Or me?

And they would have been wiped out if it weren’t for a “crazy” guy who took his personal bodyguard to the Hot Gates and held off perhaps up to a million Persians for three or four days.

You Karl, with your fears and your impotent rage, ultimately, are more like a whiny, mostly fake, mostly gay Athenian. Me and mine are more like the Spartans that went with Leonidas. And yes, I include my wife and children in that, because she can keep up with me, which is rare and courageous beyond most women, well-beyond certainly all the normies out there worrying about their pedicure and whether they can land a guy with a six or seven figure salary if they just slut it up enough. And my children are on the same path, which can already be seen by the steps they take and the way they relate to the world and themselves in it.

And am I a lone voice in the wind? No. Not by a long shot.

Every sedevacantist family I know has multiple children, at least 4, and counting. And even we Sedevacantists are not even the only ones.

The current Mrs. USA for 2023 has 7 children and lives on a ranch. This is what she said at the finals for her beauty contest:

“When have you felt the most empowered?”

Mrs America 2023: “I have felt this feeling seven times now as I bring these sacred souls to the earth… after I hold that newborn baby in my arms. The feeling of motherhood…is the most empowering feeling I have ever felt.

So go on Karl, invent all the reasons why no one can have multiple children and then whine and whine and whine about it. Meanwhile, Catholics over two millennia created the best civilised nations on Earth by going precisely against every “point” you made, and under conditions that were almost certainly harder than any most people face today. Especially if you remove the conditions created by our own deficient reasoning, Karl.

Reasoning like yours is the real problem. The rest, human beings have dealt with successfully for millennia. And it won’t be the insipid Bill Gates and Klaus Schwabs of the world that will stop me and mine from being here another now and in the future too, a few millennia from now.

All content of this web-site is copyrighted by G. Filotto 2009 to present day.
Website maintained by IT monks