How to really take on and beat clown world for real

Part 2 – Geography

Assuming you’ve read the previous post, Part 1, and have got your mind in order, strategically speaking, the next most important point is your physical location.

The ideal position is:

Physically defensible from a military point of view, broadly speaking. Ideally it should be suited to a guerrilla type of warfare that can remove most of the advantages from a numerically superior and technologically more advanced foe. Think you’re the Afghan in the mountains now. In a rural setting this would in fact be mountainous or hilly terrain with lots of forest type of ground cover and possibly caves or lots of rocky overhangs. In an urban setting, a close-knit group of multi-apartment estates that forms a kind of maze of pedestrian walkways and so on would be best suited to generally prevent search parties to be successful without losses, think Lebanon or Palestine, but, of course, in a case where artillery type weapons are going to be used, a rural setting is infinitely preferable.

Physically capable of supporting you in a grid down situation. In essence this means rural land area that can grow crops and preferably also has some hunting and/or fishing possibilities, as well as access to clean water, or at least water that is potable after boiling and purification.

In a location that is ethnically similar to yourself. Your sensibilities about race are completely irrelevant in a real SHTF scenario. Your uniform, like it or not, will be your skin tone, your externally apparent ethnical origins, your accent and mastery of the local language, and your genetic similarity to the people in closest proximity to you. That’s just how reality crumbles.

In a political situation that is as close to your own ideals, or at least neutral to them, rather than hostile. Obviously this is quite difficult to gauge in today’s reality-free politics and narrative saturation, but use your best judgement.

Far from military bases, biolabs, or even large industrial manufacturing plants. You want a place that is strategically unimportant in the event of a war or civilisational collapse.

In a country that permits you to own firearms legally. Ideally, you want to be able to own whatever weapons might be suitable in a SHTF scenario. Those countries that do not permit this still have armed forces that can, and will, brutally enforce whatever rules they want on their own citizens.

In a country where the military and police presence is relatively minor, inefficient or limited. For example, while there are many other issues to consider, Panama does not have a standing army.

All of the above suggest that a mostly rural area with some farmable land, in a place that permits you to have domesticated animals and legally own firearms is best.

Most people, unfortunately, are probably not in that situation, and, of course, some will thrive even in positions that are nearly the exact opposite of the situation described above, but if you want to maximise your chances, then the above list is what you should be aiming to move to while keeping an income stream that permits you to buy whatever you need to keep such a place well-equipped for any eventual future catastrophe.

If I were a young, single man, I would probably prefer a cabin in the woods, near a small village where I am earning just enough to keep me in food and ammo and some basic tools, than living in a nice apartment in a city, earning enough money to have all the latest toys but not enough to buy the cabin in the woods and have enough left over to properly equip it.

And if I did live in the city with a decent job and had lived a hedonistic lifestyle until now, I would go full viet-cong in the city style. That is, keep or improve my high paying job, but switch to living in the cheapest, most minimalist position possible and save as much and as fast as I can to at least put a deposit down on that cabin in the woods. Or buy the land where I can build it in due course. Making sure that it is permissible to build what I want in the location I choose. And if all I could afford is a small parcel of land, as long as it’s in a good position and I own it outright, the next thing I’d try and do is focus on buying the tools I’ll need to build that cabin. Starting with a generator if the place is off grid, and some simple power tools and then either get a container to store them in in situ, if safe to do so, or have a vehicle that allows you to transport them to site, and begin working on that cabin in my spare time asap.

There are videos by a guy who did exactly this in the UK, which in my opinion is not a viable country, because politically it is fully invested in globohomo, the level of citizen control is extreme, the punishments for wrong-think have now crossed the line into actual prison time for literally thought crime, and in order for you to own even a relatively innocuous firearm like a shotgun, you pretty much have to fit criteria that are opaque at best and subject to the whim of every bureaucrat that is fully invested in the narrative more than you can imagine. Nevertheless, Kriss built his own home on a piece of land and he did so starting out with a tent and very basic tools, in conditions far from ideal if you go see his early videos.

That such an enterprise can best be defined as “character building” in order not to use vulgar language, is a fact, but it is possible.

In short then, if you assume the worst case scenarios and yet have a strong spiritual, and hence mental, foundation (part 1) and create for yourself a comfortable living situation in a place that has all the strategic benefits identified above, (this part 2) you are then positioned better than probably 99% of the world’s population, and probably better than 99.5% or more. It’s a good start, and in part 3 we will be looking at the social aspects: family, friends, acquaintances and community. In part 4 we will examine the coalescing of all these elements into the winning strategy for whatever the future has in store for us all.

Part 1 – Mind and Spirit

This will be a multi part series, going from most important to still fundamental but able to be deferred until you have the other pieces more or less in place.

You will really need to internalise all of the parts of this series in order to see how the whole strategy is pretty much fool-proof if you actually put it into practice.

The enemies of God, Truth, Justice and Beauty have attacked that God, Truth, Justice and Beauty right from the start.

This blog post will try to lay the very basic groundwork to give you an understanding of how to best see reality, in simple terms that you can then later investigate, refine, and confirm on your own.

Belief in God is an absolutely fundamental part of having an invincible mind.

This is not the mere rantings of a brainwashed zealot. I was an atheist from about age 7 to 16 or so.

By 19 I was essentially a Zen-agnostic with elements of Shintoism possibly, but essentially my view of the afterlife was based on objective observation of natural phenomena mixed in with my understanding of physics. I had read pretty much all of the main religious books available, except the Bible and the Quran, because based purely on what I observed of both the supposedly “Catholic” as well as all the myriad Protestant Churches, I considered Christians to be, at best, well-intentioned mildly retarded people. And Catholicism in particular, with ever-present paedophelia on its horizon, seemed absurd to me. Islam has paedophelia pretty much wired in with their 54 year old “prophet” raping 9 year old Aisha, so that was out too. Just in case the behaviour of the average Muslim, which I often came across in Africa, wasn’t reason enough.

Not only have I not forgotten those days, of atheism and Zen-agnosticism, but they absolutely inform me and make me sympathetic to those who today see things as I used to. A rational, objective person, absent quite a lot of historical truth, cannot be faulted for thinking all the major religions are absolutely bullshit. In fact, even a return to some form of ancient Roman or Greek Gods might seem preferable. Visit the old sites of ancient Rome and Greece and see their architecture and layouts and tell me they are not superior to the CIA-funded and “inspired”, postmodern, Chthulian obscenities we call buildings today.

So, in short, I’m hardly going to be quoting Bible verses at you as though that should, or would, change your mind. Instead I am going to appeal to your ability to be objective, discard your emotions and prejudices and simply look at hard, verifiable facts, regardless of how they make you feel. Of course, as Aristotle warned us more than two thousand years ago, this ability exists only in a minority of people. But that’s ok. Because since time immemorial, it has always been the minority that has changed the course of history, for good or evil.

So here are some simple, broad, but absolutely undeniable facts.

1. Christianity has created the best societies that humanity has ever had, bar none.

2. Christianity was only Catholic for over 1000 years. There were no “denominations”. Being a Christian meant being a Catholic.

3. The great schism, when the East and West “split” resulted in the Eastern empire, which was getting its ass handed to it by the Muslims, and which did NOT spread the gospels far and wide, it remained insular to mostly Greece and Russia with some of their immediate satellites also having a national character to it. The East also called on the West for help (the four crusades) and then promptly betrayed the Catholics by literally making deals with the Muslims to kill them on multiple occassions.

4. The Western Empire fought back against the Muslims and protected Christendom in both East and West for some 200 years, funded by Western Europe and often fighting off the treachery of the Eastern “christians” alongside the mohammedans. The Eastern empire even refused to take over the fortresses the Catholics had built to protect the holy lands when they eventually returned home after sustaining the military force in the middle East from Western Europe, after some two centuries of it, was no longer financially viable.

5. Catholicism then, with really no arguments against worth anything, is the religion that has created the best system of society that any culture on Earth ever has had, in terms of creating the scientific method, creating the best societies with Justice, beauty and strong, healthy, nuclear families with humane-based tenets and principles.

6. The second great schism was some 500 years later and inspired by what looks like was most likely a German Jew in a Jewish plot to take down the Church by the usual suspects. The expansion of the multi-headed hydra that is Protestantism began the secularisation of Christianity and 500 years later we have transgender “bishops”, fault-free divorce, contraception, abortion on demand and 40,000 “denominations”.

7. The third great blow was the infiltration and usurpation of the Vatican, the Papacy and the clergy of Catholicism and its replacement by Satanists, pedophiles and Freemasons, which took about 200 years but was essentially complete in 1958.

8. As a result, in the last 60 years, the world has reverted back to essentially paganistic, libertine, degeneration of faith to the point most use the word “God” without any clear understanding of what that should represent and be.

In short then, the Catholicism that existed from the year 0 to 1958 is the best religion in terms of having produced the best, most humane, most advanced, just, true and beautiful societies ever found in the entirety of human history. You, of course, are mostly unaware of it because:

A) No one ever pointed it out in simple clear language,

B) You have been lied to constantly about what Catholicism actually is and what Catholics actually do and believe, and,

C) unless you are in your 90s, the only exponents of “catholicism” you have seen and interacted with are the impostors that took over the real Catholic Church, and they are a bunch of pedophiles, satanists and globalists.

The ONLY Catholics left are sedevacantists. That is, Catholics who believe the same as the crusaders of 1095 or the knights of Malta of 1565.

If you’ve paid attention, this means that they are also the ONLY actual Christians. Everyone else is just wrong, lost, pretending or just a Churchian.

Hard to believe? Well, look into it. Find out for yourself. I wrote a couple of books on it, you’re free to save yourself some time and check them out and try and falsify the references and facts I have in them.

Life is stranger than fiction.

So, my number 1 suggestion for you, from a practical perspective only, is: study what Catholicism really is and was. Regardless of you believing Catholics are right or not, the factual fruits produced by Catholicism are beyond question, so, an intelligent person should, and would, find out what they did right, and why, and how.

If you do, you might end up becoming an actual Catholic. That is, a sedevacantist. Not a Novus Ordo fake “catholic”. If you do, the strength of character and peace and strength of mind that truth gives you is orders of magnitude stronger than anything else. I know because I have been a pretty steely minded guy all my life, including my zen-agnostic days.

I faced situations I was sure would result in my death at least a few times, and I did so without taking a step back, my mind being essentially Japanese Samurai in those days. And I assure you that the strength of mind I have today as a sedevacantist is absolutely more than one or even two orders of magnitude more. That’s over 100 times stronger. And no, I am not exaggerating. And if you read the Crusades or the Great Siege, and you begin to understand that what drove those men was their unquestionable faith in the Catholic God, Jesus, the Holy Spirit and their utter lack of fear of death, then you may begin to understand —-in a distant and intellectual way only at first, but useful nonetheless—- why and how that can be the case.

Failing to gain, by the grace of God, the Sedevacantist mindset, then, I would suggest you at least try to gain the samurai mindset. That Zen-agnostic mindset with an absolute sense of honour and duty unto death, will carry you quite far too. It is ultimately a bit nihilistic and certainly draws itself more towards death than life, but it is more efficient than most other systems, excluding Catholicism of course.

If that too fails you, it may be that the Eastern “Christian” schismatic sect might give you some strength, but probably only if you’re born into it. It is ultimately hollow, but still a better bamboo shoot than the hollow and rotten reed that is any form of Protestantism.

Agnosticism without the budo of the samurai is essentially merely materialism and that is a bleak, weak, and disappointingly rudderless life.

Atheism is simply wrong, utterly nihilistic and materialistic in the extreme, and even if it has the (stolen from Christianity) principles of honour and maybe justice attached to it, it is still darkly brutal, and that’s the best it can be.

If you have been paying attention then, I am simply stating that your strength of mind —-that is—- your ability to face and overcome adversity, or, sometimes merely survive it, because sometimes that is the best you can do, is based on your spiritual belief system. Which, for the low-IQ atheists, includes them too. Because your pretence of lack of belief in God is itself a spiritual position too.

Personally, I realised Christianity would be fundamental to the rebuilding of a better world, and I am talking of way back in 2014, when I was not a Catholic and had barely begun to look into Christianity as a whole and not Catholicism in detail yet. So by simply making objective observations of real historical events (as opposed to the narrative I was fed) it became obvious to me that Christianity was a fundamentally healthier, more successful and logical belief system that produced the best results. As to which version of Christianity, that took a couple more years of obsessive research to pin down.

But the point is, get your spiritual belief system rock solid and the best it can be. My advice is become a sedevacantist Catholic because it simply beats the other systems by a long margin. But whatever you decide, be sure, and go into it fully. Because it will determine your mental strength and in any and every fight, whatever the nature of the fight, roughly about 90% of it depends on your mind. Your mental toughness, adaptability, flexibility as well as temporary rigidity when required, is what is most likely going to determine the outcome of both your day to day tasks as well as your long term goals.

No one ever won a revolution by being mentally weak and inflexible. So choose wisely.

Part 2 will deal with your physical surroundings.

Midwit is a brilliant term, first coined by Vox Day, and it is a very useful word, as it describes those people who are of above average intelligence but far from as smart as they think. They are a scourge on the planet. While actual idiots are certainly a blight on the planet, compared to the midwit, they are pretty predictable and relatively harmless. The midwit is the kind of idiot that goes around telling people that he’s looked at the $cience! And the best thing for everyone to do is take a genetic serum that has been demonstrated to result in severe illness and death in animal and human trials long before 2020. In reality they never looked at any science at all. They, at most, did some fake statistics based on media provided and totally unfounded numbers, and then, miraculously, come up with a result that would “indicate” the best path is to do what the TV tells you.

Why do I say they do fake statistics?

Because if they actually used the numbers from the media, they would get the results I got, which were more than an order of magnitude worse!

So, since I made that error and initially assumed covid could be a planet killer, how come I never took the jab? Because, unlike Scott, I actually did look at the science, and I kept my eyes open and eventually the fact that the media was giving totally fake numbers became obvious too.

In short, I actually did what Scott claims he did, but in fact didn’t do at all.

I simply observed and initially did some analysis on dodgy, unverified data, getting the danger of covid wrong by a factor of 40 times, but also looked at factual —-established years before data and information—- on the mRNA work.

The data on the mRNA genetic serums would have made the taking of the clot shots a no-go even if the initial totally wrong 40%+ mortality rate figures I came up with were right!

But… by simply continuing to observe both the media and the world around me, long before the clot shots became available, it was clear that the numbers the media was giving were fake and inflated. And all this is not me backwards rationalising, like Scott does, because as you will see from the dates and links to my videos below, it is all documented.

The midwit is the kind of cretin that tells you that the Twin Towers definitely came down as a result of 2 planes hitting them instead of placed explosives by Israeli agents that were even photographed doing “work” in the building weeks prior. And he will tell this to someone who did his civil engineering thesis on controlled demolitions, without the midwit ever having even read up on what a bending moment is. He looks at you like a deer in headlights when you ask him what he thinks brought building 7 down at freefall speed when no planes hit it. Apparently he doesn’t even know of building 7. But he still thinks he’s right. And he’ll tell you it’s because of his superior intellect. It isn’t. He comes to “his” conclusions by watching TV. And being swayed by his emotions. That’s it. That’s all he does. All his verbiage is just backwards rationalising his precious feelings.

Midwits are truly a blight on those of us that actually are a couple of standard deviations above them in the brain department. Imagine, if you will, being told by an actual retarded person, how everything works, and not just them believing it, but most of the people around them sort of going along with them too, because… well… they are just so confident, and smart… they must be right. If it was a one-off you might humour him, or just ignore it. But when these cretins help set policies and influence a lot of people into really stupid paths, well… Then people like me, might delight in exposing them for what they really are.

And what they are, above all, is really stupid.

Yes, I know. The definition is that they are of above average “intelligence”, but really we should say IQ. I consider intelligence the ability to achieve not only the desired and optimal results more often than not, but also the objectively better results. A high IQ certainly helps, but not as much as you might think.

An 85 IQ guy who goes to his manual labour job regularly, takes care of his wife and children well and lovingly, and acts well towards them, is, to my mind, more successful than the millionaire celebrity with 120 IQ that overdoses on opioids because he’s so unhappy with his life.

And here, we have the perfect example of a stupid, and deceitful midwit. And that’s really the key thing. It’s the lies. The clear, obvious, ego-driven lies that really make people like me despise the Scott Adam types of midwits.

You can’t really fault a person for being literally stupid. It’s a genetic thing. You wouldn’t blame a dog for not being able to drive a car. It’s not like he can help it.

Midwits on the other hand, CAN help it. Or rather, they could. If they weren’t entitled, arrogant, hypocrites that think they know better than everyone else while really they are just emoting machines with a backwards-rationalising bullshit producer for a mouth.

Now, I actually have no problem with apparently arrogant assholes who are actually right about what they speak (down) to you about. I impersonate one quite often myself. But you see, the key thing here is the being actually right. Which the stupid midwits almost never are. They are not apparently arrogant. They are actually arrogant. In short, they think they can, when they really can’t. And they will die rather than admit their limitations.

Literally.

Scott, as the entire internet knows by now, was essentially pro-vax and took the clot shots —-supposedly after some very smart calculations—- to “travel” to Greece and Bora-Bora.

My personal opinion is that he took them because he thought if he took her to Bora-Bora, his then wife might actually let him insert his dick in her like maybe a couple of times while they were on the island. But judging from her subsequent divorce, I think the only one to get pricked by Scott was Scott himself.

Eventually, the overwhelming evidence, which is now finally trickling even in the mainstream media, forced Scott to admit he had made the wrong decision. But… in true arrogant midwit fashion, he keeps insisting that he made the right choice based on the “data” that was available then and that the people who did not take a genetic serum relabelled as a “vaccine” did so out of sheer dumb luck.

He is, of course, lying. Desperately. To try and salvage his now genetically modified ego. To prevent his real rage at having taken the shots so he could give some shots and then not getting to give them to his satisfaction. And then the trophy gold-digger getting her shots from someone else.

But above all, being so duped and having been made to look like an idiot by people he considers below his station in life. That’s what really burns him. Him, the great Scott Adams, the millionaire, the cartoon guy, he jabbed himself with a toxic poison that was obvious to anyone with two brain cells was bad for you. And those Neanderthals that should just buy his books and cartoons and admire him didn’t take it. Oh the gall! How dare they!

Look at his twitter feed. you can practically smell the acidic rage in his replies.

He keeps going on about “the data” and how no one could know “the data” was bad, and his analysis was flawless but still led him to the wrong choice, while we supposed peasants just flipped a coin and turned out “lucky”.

Let’s look into that a little bit, ok Scott? And let’s ignore all the obvious signs, the propaganda, and so on. Let’s even ignore the fact that if you KNOW the data can’t be trusted, then, why on Earth would you even use it? It’s retarded. And we KNOW the data couldn’t be trusted, because there was zero foundation to anything the talking heads said. It was just a slow shouting “drink this liquid in this cup! It’s GOOD for you!” That’s it, right?

Well, no. Not at all, because mRNA technology is not exactly new. They have been trying this shit for decades. And we KNEW this wasn’t a vaccine, but a genetic serum shot. And what did we know about mRNA technology when it was tested on animals for this very purpose of “vaccination”? Well, in a word: disaster.

Instead of me rehashing my own research, allow me to present the work of Christian Elliot, because he did a far better job of presenting the information in idiot proof format early on.

The link above is to a PDF that formats better but it has a link there to the original site and the date on that is 15 April 2021, see screenshot below.

The red flags from the mass media alone by the time the clot shots came around were so obvious to me that it meant I assumed most intelligent people knew it was a complete lie, and I did mention the animal studies to my friends and family, but, as we now know, midwits like Scott did no research at all and instead went ahead and bought the kool-aid from the TV.

The work of mr Elliot parallels my own thought process. Why would you ever inject yourself with something the company that produces it is free from any liability for? Especially given who the companies involved are and what their track record is. And all for a “pandemic” where your chance to die from it is really low unless you’re already with one foot in the grave?

And did it matter if the death rates were much higher? No. It did not, because as you can see in this video I did, on 25th February 2020 when there was no real data on the real numbers, I had already figured out that Covid was absolutely a bioweapon.

But later on 12th March 2020, when we were just at the beginning of the lie, I took the Italian numbers as valid and got the scenario completely wrong. I assumed a death rate of some 40% at the time and an overall one that in my best optimistic guess was likely to be over 10% so, you could say I should have been rushing to get a vaccine as soon as it was announced. But if you go to minute 23 or so of that video, you will see that I mention the idea first presented to me by my wife that if and when a vaccine was going to be introduced they would try to make it compulsory. So, given my theory at the time:

1) It was a bio weapon

2) It could have a mortality of over 40%

According to Scott, I would have been lining up to take the clot shot.

So why would I not have? Why didn’t I? Did I really flip a coin?

Because despite this initial data, which turned out to be bad data right? It was exactly the kind of inference the people pushing for the vaccine wanted me to have, after all.

However, despite it, the data point that really mattered here to me was that it was a bioengineered weapon. Which is why I mentioned it in subsequent videos too. I was sure of that. Why? Because the actual science on it told me so. From years before, with names and coronavirus patents too.

Which meant, if it was a bioweapon, some way to be immune from it must exist. Because the people launching it would have a way to survive it. But it also meant that there was an intent to kill a lot of people in a subterfugeous way.

But by May of 2020 I had realised my numbers for worse case scenario were bad and had corrected and admitted my error. And it was now clear you couldn’t trust the supposed “expert” numbers on anything.

This is all long before anything about “vaccines” came out, and it shows a clear logical progression of conservative thinking, showing how the very fact we all had bad data on the numbers is not ultimately relevant to whether you would take the clot shot or not if you were actually capable of logical thinking.

When the genetic serums started being pushed, by then we absolutely knew the numbers being given to us were unreliable. Which means you would not consider them at all in your equation.

Which brings me back to what you would consider, and these are the hard facts, as listed in mr Elliot’s list, which I link to here again.

Pivotal amongst these points for me was the animal trials and the Antibody Dependant Enhancement (ADE) also known as Vaccine Enhanced Disease (VED). That’s sort of a clue in the name there, you see, Scott?

Because this was the main issue in all the trials with mRNA vaccines, and was a permanent issue.

One point that I do not see on Elliot’s list, but that I was aware of through my own research and study of mRNA technology, was also that these fake “vaccines” would permanently alter your DNA. Of course we were told this was not possible, and of course, it has since been demonstrated to be exactly what happens.

On those two data points alone, it was absolutely clear I would not be injecting that crap into my body. Especially given that by then it was clear at least to some extent, (by inference and multiple data points) that the numbers of deaths due to covid was clearly a vastly inflated lie. Something I had already corrected for a year earlier!

So why on Earth would you inject yourself with something that tends to result in destruction of your immune system and changing your DNA, both permanently, to protect yourself from a diseases that has less than 1% chance of killing you in the worst case?

Well you would do that only if you were an idiot.

Or to be more precise, a pussy-starved idiot that thinks he’s smarter than everyone else and does it mostly for the pussy. That’s my take.

And to begin to appreciate just how crushing it is for these people to finally and demonstrably be proved wrong, keep in mind that Scott is now also on record, as of a few weeks ago, that his life, including his health, is now so bad that unless something drastic changes (he gets more pussy is my guess) he will commit suicide in one year.

These people are hollow.

Completely hollow and they tend to eventually reap the reward of their totally unfounded egos.

The blow that brings them low is something most of them tend to not survive well at all. Their ego, even crushed, usually remains too large for them to genuinely accept their error and admit it. If they could do that, their twisted little souls would at least gain some measure of peace, for humility, is really the beginning of wisdom.

Unfortunately, most of them, continue spiralling in a deathroll of shouty sarcasm and bitterness, as can be evidenced by Scott’s twitter account.

This post on pol is what I have been telling people is the plan for you and yours for several years now. Like decades. Yes, even before the planned-dem(on)ic.

You see, it is not going to become Mad Max overnight. Why —-as my wife has understood about me—- if that was going to happen, me and a bunch of others similar to me, would be just fine. Plus, the “elite” of the world would be permanently removed, along with pedophiles and other undesirables, in very short order.

That is not their plan. Their plan is to grind you down with absurd rules, and taxes and regulations, and, of course, by poisoning your food supply, your water sources, forcing you to eat insects, and plastic “meat”, and plant “eggs”, and regulating how much space you can occupy, and preventing you from travelling, and preventing you from trading with anything like paper currency, and forcing you to retreat into the life of a perennial drug addict. If not with actual drugs, then with mindless “entertainment”. Depressing you psychologically, as well as biologically, and physically, by controlling your information intake as well as your nutritional intake, and forcing all sorts of poisons and imbalances into you under the guise of “saving the planet” or “keeping you safe” or whatever other lie based in fear you will swallow.

And if you’re someone with an IQ of 100 or more and belong to an ethnicity that has historically created the best circumstances for humans to live in, then you are target number one.

They are not worried about hordes of 85 IQ or less unwashed masses. They are easy to control, starve, or have them kill each other by the millions in horrific ways.

And do you think you will happily reproduce and make lots of babies when these are the prospects for your future? Probably not. Especially since, under ideal conditions, it means finding a member of the opposite sex to make the babies with and raise them together for the rest of your natural lives.

And since everyone is mindraped 24/7 with fear, porn, temptation, and, above all, utter despair, there is a shortage of such people.

And most of them have taken the genetic altering and often deadly serums.

So… what to do?

I’ll tell you what I’m doing and people near me are doing, and it’s working.

1. Realise that your reality is defined MOSTLY by YOUR actions, or inactions.

2. Your actions or inactions are defined almost entirely by your internal state.

3. Although you have been taught from birth that you can’t help your internal state (and women especially have been taught this more than anyone, because in their case it approaches almost a half-truth) this is a pernicious, insidious, and TOTAL lie. YOU can absolutely control your internal state. There are millions of examples of this that have become famous, like martyrs being tortured to death laughing and trolling their torturers. People in horrific conditions, choosing to feel peace. And so on. Easy? No, not since the brainwashing is constant and severe, but possible? Absolutely. Worth it? Certainly. So learn to do it.

4. Fear is poison, for your whole mind and body, but more importantly, what almost no one realises is that fear is a lie. It is false. “But… but!” I hear the objections by the millions… listen! Just shut up your brain and listen and consider what I am going to tell you here and now:

Fear is a lie. If instead of fear you learn to see properly, understand the situation, whatever it is, then, you will learn two things:

First: Fear doesn’t help you. Focussed decisive and knowledgeable action helps you. Fear only impairs your ability to act that way.

Second: Almost always, the perceived threat or thing feared is not as extreme or bad as you feared, and even when it is, or even when it is worse, the consequences and duration of it are nowhere near as final and catastrophic as you genuinely believe. There has actually been statistical analysis of this with thousands of people that suffered everything from bankruptcy to the death of loved ones. As bad as it sounds, the cliché is true; life goes on.

So: the most important thing you absolutely must do above all is to stop being scared.

That is absolutely the top priority.

“Well, how do I do that given the crappy state of everything you just said?!”

Is the obvious question everyone thinks of.

There are ways, and you will try to argue with me against all of them. Because it’s “easier” for your brain to do nothing and stay scared than to do something and change. Just like it’s easier to stay home watching TV instead of going to a martial arts class regularly where you risk some injury daily. Or going to swim to be fitter. Or going for hikes. Or learning a skill. Or reading a book. Or really doing anything worthwhile.

Nevertheless, here they are, from easiest for your lazy brain, to hardest, assuming you’re the average, secularised, victim. It’s not the whole story or the whole truth, that will become apparent later, but this absolutely works and there is no falsehood in it.

1. Just do it by sheer force of will. Say fuck you to their plans. Say fuck you to your own weakness. Say fuck you to your own fear. That will take you quite far. And if you make it a real habit for at least 90 days, solidly and with conviction, you will then have laid the neurological basis for a lifelong habit. Which is not to say you can then rest your willpower and you’ll automatically not be a lazy couch potato anymore. On the contrary, you will have formed the possibility that you now have the neurology to make getting off your ass and not being afraid a habit. It still requires you to get off your ass and not be afraid, but after 90 days of doing it daily, with feeling, you have created an actual neurological pathway in your brain that will make this behaviour at least naturally possible for you. So I suggest you get your calendar out and fight like a rabid dog against your fear, depression, setbacks, etc. For 90 days straight.

2. There is something bigger than you alone. For the majority, this works best after they have done 1 above. Believing in nothing much, if you push through 90 days of ferocious getting off your ass and saying fuck you to your doubts, fears, weaknesses (which if you do honestly will be many times a day regardless of who you are) your neurology will have changed from a fearful, weak, depressed rabbit, to someone that can now realistically begin to consider the wolf-life. As such, you will begin to see opportunity where others only see tragedy and possibilities where others only see doom. Eventually you will begin to notice that helping and uplifting others —-BUT WITHOUT DIMINISHING YOURSELF IN THE DOING OF IT—- will give you a sense of joy, of well-being. So if this comes to you merely as the sense that your life is better when you make it better for others you care about, that’s certainly enough of a step, but, in time, you will begin to sense there is more to life than mere survival or even glorious procreation. In time, if you observe the world, the sunsets, the flowers and the ocean, the ants crawling along, and the rain lashing down, the snow and the baking sun, the clouds and the parts of unspoilt nature you can find, inevitably, as you let reality in and leave the fake “reality” built into you by the fear they beam at you 24/7, you will not be able to help but notice creation. And creation implies a creator. And maybe for a long time you will, like I did, sense this in a way, but never believe such a creator or creative power or intelligence could possibly care about you specifically and individually. That is, after all, the main thing they brainwash us all to believe above all.

But the reality is that there is in fact an intelligence so vast you cannot imagine it. And not only does it care about you specifically, but it knows you intimately.

God is real and God is Love.

I hope you’ll be smarter than I was and can see it and figure it out and feel it in due course. For me, being dense and obstinate, and probably a bit too capable for my own good, it had to take the road to Damascus path. Falling off the horse badly, and having my blindness revealed to me. It wasn’t pleasant, but it was absolutely necessary and I thank God for it.

If you manage to truly penetrate this second point for real, then ALL fear will very much have been vanquished if not totally certainly to a very great extent. And for those who really do get it, and see it, and know it, then, fear will, in fact, be permanently extinguished.

3. Now do everyone around you.

Great, so you did 1 and 2. But you’re still alone in a despairing world. Not really, because you’re reading this and there are many of us around the planet in different cultures and ways and forms, but don’t look for a saviour or a guru. Instead become that saviour. Do for, and with, others. Get with like minded people. Study. Learn. And if you do, learn the REAL history of the Catholic Church. Learn what actual Catholics did throughout history. Learn about the heroic martyrs and saints and what they did and how they acted. Read up on the real history of Joan of Arc. Read up on the real history of the Crusades. Read up on what actual Catholics did and discovered and created. Realise also that, today, sedevacantists are the ONLY actual Catholics left. Bergoglio and his Novus Orco “clergy” are impostors, frauds and freemasons. And they have all been so from 1958 on. I hope you do learn these things and go and find the details. I did write about them in Believe! and Reclaiming the Catholic Church and you can save yourself some time by reading those books, but you don’t have to buy my books. Just figure it out by yourself one way or another. When you do, you’ll realise that the only long-lasting communities that succeed are religious ones. Where the natural inclination for community, ritual, honesty, fellowship and safety are all satisfied. Yes, even for misanthropes like me, and possibly you. Once you realise that the next steps are simple to understand if not necessarily easy to execute.

4. Become a proper Catholic.

“Oh you arrogant prick!”

Yeah, yeah, I hear you, but it’s true nonetheless. Catholics created the best environment for human beings ever done, all across the globe, and it is only as a result of the infiltration and collapse of the greater part of what used to be the Catholic Church that society has and is going to hell in a handbasket and returning to literally demonic practices. Hey, I get it. I hated organised religion most of my life. I hear ya. But that’s because:

1. You were only exposed to the Satanic fake religions, including, maybe even especially, “catholicism” as “practiced” by the current impostors, who usurped the Vatican in 1958 and have been spreading Satanry ever since instead of the truth.

2. You don’t actually know that God exists and how that even fits in with all the evil you see around you and how could it possibly be real, and, and, and… because once you do realise God exists and God is a Loving God, all those things get real, logical, sensible answers. Which is mind-blowing on its own.

And yes, if you’re a “cradle catholic” that thinks Bergoglio is Pope you have been fooled. From birth. And probably so have your parents and even grandparents. And regardless of their good intents, a lie is still a lie, even if told to you in good faith. So, whether you like it or not, Sedevacantists are in fact the only Catholics left.

Find out what Sedevacantism really is, for yourself. Again, sure, my books help save you a lot of time, but I never ask anyone to take my word for anything. In fact, quite the opposite, I prefer you find out yourself. Which is why I also include an absurd amount of references in my books.

5. But why?

So you can create communities of proper Catholics and thrive. Build your own or join an existing one. I have only been on this path of building a community of sedevacantists for two years, but I have spent the majority of that time simply making my family home liveable and getting the fields on my small olive farm cleared of absolute neglect, and I’m not quite finished with that yet, but already people are eyeing up properties near me. They have come to visit and help out on the farm. They are saving up and teaming up to make offers on property within walking distance. Once I have settled things for myself and my family, which has recently had the fifth child added to it, you bet that it will grow faster. And there will be more people near me that are on the same hymn sheet. In fact, locals nearby are also becoming part of it. Sedevacantism in this area is now growing. As the result of literally one man. And a busy and misanthropic one at that. How much more can someone that can devote more time to it do? My friend Tony, in his 20s, is already organising many things behind the scenes. At least three young couples I know have recently got engaged to be married and a couple of them plan to move here in due course.

Again, I am just one guy with precious little time and a rather bleak view of humanity. If I can achieve this in such a short time, how much more can you do?

Or else join us and help us make it bigger faster.

6. Fake Belief is a Poison. Only zealots thrive.

You can’t fake a true religion or a true religious community. It has an undeniable power that is far more than the sum of its parts. There is a multiplying and supernatural effect in getting even a small gathering of real Catholics together. After every mass or just meeting up at each other’s houses, the sensation of goodwill is purifying and absolutely wholesome. There is none of the fake cuckery of the fake “catholic” church and its adherents. There is real friendship. Real connection. Real help between people that a short time earlier were literally strangers. I have both given and received very unexpected help at crucial times. I have witnessed loyalty between sedevacantist catholics that surpassed that of lifelong friends.

I can’t explain it other than by divine grace. Because if you believe in something true, then it becomes self-evident and produces the fruits of that true belief.

In conclusion.

So there you have it. Just a few simple steps to understand. Whether you get off your ass and do them or not is up to you, but I guarantee you that if you do your life will be infinitely better. Even if you only do the first step it will improve drastically. So I hope you do. And I hope in time, wherever you are, we’ll be able to see and greet each other, whether in person or from the distant walls of your small fortress city-state of sanity to mine.

God protect you and guide you, friend. And remember: Deus Vult means God Wants it.

As those of you who can read without straining your index finger and drooling on yourselves know, commenting on my blog has to follow certain basic rules in order to not get the commenter launched into the eternal pit of despair known as the spam filter.

You get no warnings, no second chances. Break the rules and you’re instantly and forever relegated to the spam folder.

The number of idiotic or spammy comments I get is huge by the way. Especially considering my readership is relatively tiny.

That said, sometimes I get a comment so spectacularly idiotic I have to share it with you, so you can appreciate just how advanced the zombie apocalypse is.

This one was left on my last post, the open letter to Andrew Torba and all Churchians, by a guy who calls himself Jerome Herrington III.

And I am inclined to take him at his word. His family name smack of that sort if Waspy Protestant quagmire of incest and genetic retardation, not to mention lack of imagination in naming. At any rate, here is the full glory of his comment. His comment is quoted in the foggy mess of his mind with background grey.

Are Sedevanticist Catholics the same as Vatican II Catholics?

Right there, we have clear proof that this will be some sort of specimen to be treasured.

The entire post was precisely to explain —in short words— that only sedevacantists are actual Catholics. Novus Orco are Satanists (the clergy) or at best lazy and ignorant churchians (the fooled lay people). That sentence is like asking “Are the American astronauts on the international space station the same as the Khoi-San astronauts in the Kalahari desert?”

It’s so retarded it makes one wonder if this is an actual human being or a badly designed AI interface.

All Protestants are not the same as all Catholics are not.

And he persists… Yes, we know, all Protestants are unique snowflakes of unbridled stupidity, unsurpassed ignorance and historical idiocy that can be seen from space.

But as far as Catholics go, yes, we are all the same in one respect: we ALL believe in the infallible magisterium of the Church. It is literally what makes us Catholic. And you can’t call yourself or be recognised as a Catholic unless you do too.

Notice how his Protestantism is so deeply ingrained, he literally cannot even conceive of a monolithic religion like Catholicism. It’s all more Church “denominations” than Hindu Gods, and each Protestant “pastor” a brand new road that splits into infinity.

So statements that Protestantism is too blame for the acceptance of LGBT are not accurate.

Ummm. No. It is entirely accurate. Even the Satanically invaded and usurped fake “Catholic” Church still can’t openly condone faggotry, lesbianism, and sexual degeneracy of even more twisted kinds openly. That’s because the real Catholic Church has 2,000 years of stating unequivocally that such things are mortal sins. It is only as a result of the secularisation of Christianity (ie Catholicism, since Catholicism is Christianity) that LGBT-Pedos started to come out of the closet. And then tried to rapidly force normal people into it instead. Contraception was universally rightly thought of as sinful in Christendom until Protties came along. Ditto divorce. And now, of course, in Freemasonic created America abortion is considered “family planning”.

Oh and it’s *to* not “too”.

In America the SCOTUS is to blame and its all Catholuc and Jewish. Never was a Prot on this court my entire lifetime until supposedly now, with that black whore claiming some obscure African supposedly Protestant church.

No. The Supreme Court of the US did not force protestant churches to wave rainbow flags, have tranny “bishops”, female “pastors”, and flamingly gay “elders”. Nor to accept gay “marriage”. Nor can any human power force such things on you if you are actually a Christian. Ie Catholic.

And you’re also lying. Only recently have SCOTUS appointees even been nominally “catholic”. They have all been Protestants before. See here. I mean I knew that without even having to look for a source, why didn’t you? Oh, right, you’re retarded. And there are still Protestants on it today.

But here is a bit of history for you:

“Of the 101 men appointed to the Supreme Court in this period 90 were Protestants, the vast majority being affiliated with mainline churches.

In contrast, there were just six Catholics, starting with Robert Taney, appointed by President Andrew Jackson in 1836.”

The Protestants who embraced LGBT first were those closest to the Catholic church, liturgical, who were strangely effected by Vatican II reforms, specifically who used the Roman lectionary and downgraded to the Vatican II Revised Common Lectionary. For instance, Episcopalians.

Your absurd comment is now starting to delve deeply into the delusional, since literally no one, and especially not me, is going to try and grade which heretic sects of Protestantism are more heretic when graded on a curve against the heretical Novus Ordo fake “catholic” church.

Protestanta who do not use lectionaries or have written down liturgy resisted even up until covid and only started falling around that time, if at all becauae some are still strong,

So according to you Covid made Protestant Churches gay. Well. It’s a novel theory at least. Oh and possibly the ability to read too. Got it.

There are traditionalist holdout Protestant groups kind of like Sedevanticism

No. No there are not. Because there literally is not a single Protestant “church” that will commit to writing what defines one to be a Christian specifically, exhaustively, and in detail. And EVERY “branch” of Protestantism has it as foundational that each man can and should interpret the Bible himself. Since, after all, that is the defining characteristic of Protestantism. It’s literally Satanic. The only rule you all have is “Interpreth as thou will”.

althoughthe issue that divides them from the larger denomination they came from is not a pope.

No, I’m sure it’s not. It’s more about whether Aunt Beryl agrees with drinking grape juice only, like Je-ea-sus did, while Uncle Billy speaks in tongues to brother Jim who is snake handling a rattler to prove his faith. And how they all disagree with Bobby the Mormon who believes his prophet read golden sheets from an angel that came out of a tuba hat. Although both Uncle Billy, and Brother Jim Would sure love to have a few more sister wives themselves.

It may still have to do with worship, i.e. groups that reject moves by the larger denomination to bring in women preachers or instrumental music or sappy contemporary praise nonsense that sexualizes Jesus.

Sexualises Jesus. Ok then. Hadn’t heard that one yet, but there is always denomination number 40,001 just around the corner.

And so ends the mercifully short saga of Jerome Herrington III. Now you know why my spam folder is a deep, deep trench.

Inside a volcano.

Andrew Torba, owner and CEO of Gab, commenting on the recent Steven Crowder/Ben Shapiro/Candace Owen controlled opposition thing that anyone reading here should be familiar with by now, recently wrote a long post about how leaders of any kind should be Christians for anyone to essentially pay any attention to them.

I quote the most (only) relevant snippet below, but you can read the whole thing here.

We Need to Support Christian Leaders At Christian Media Companies. Period.

Last summer, I said that to be a leader or influencer on the right, you need to accept Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior and be a Christian. I said in no uncertain terms that people like Ben Shapiro and Jordan Peterson have no place in any serious right-wing movement and resistance to the Regime unless they become Christians. I got a lot of flack for this from the media and many people on the right, but I stand by it, and now you see why.

This Daily Wire situation with Crowder is a great example. Christians don’t act the way Ben Shapiro and Jeremy Boreing act. They don’t refer to themselves as “god-kings.” They don’t write soul-buying exploitative contracts. They don’t refer to employees as “wage slaves.” They don’t force people to throw their friends under the bus. These people don’t act like Christians because they aren’t Christians, and the Christians who do work for them and have made a deal with the Devil–people like Matt Walsh–should be ashamed of themselves. 

So, consider this blog post a kind of open letter to Andrew Torba, and pretty much every other Churchian of every denomination.

Before I begin, allow me to say that while Gab is not perfect, and neither is Torba, no one is, and while Gab might not be perfect, it certainly is a place that allows a level of freedom of expression that I haven’t found elsewhere since the early 90s and the days of Alt dot forums when the Internet was new.

Torba bans porn but lets pretty much any other view to be expressed. So all due credit must go to him for having created Gab. Some accuse him of being just another gatekeeper of sorts, or a sell out, but if so, I’d have to say in terms of a gatekeeper he would have to be the very last line of trying to allow a pressure valve that I don’t see as positive for the powers that be, because once you see the truth of certain lies, even if Gab where to disappear tomorrow, you can never unsee them. And Gab allows these truths to be presented.

But this post is not ultimately about Gab or even about Andrew Torba, I wish him great success in growing Gab, I am “picking on him” because he does have a voice and a loudspeaker and nominally is doing good work, so, when he makes a nonsensical statement that has no foundation, I notice and am going to point out the gaping and obvious flaws in his reasoning.

Axiom 1

There is ONE truth and it is identical for everyone, whether you know it or not, whether you see it or not, whether you even have the capacity or possibility to see it or not. If you do not understand and believe this, then there is really nothing further we need discuss. And if you are one of those “everyone has their own truth” retards, then run. Run away from here as fast as you can.

Axiom 2

God is real, exist and is indeed, Love. Yes he is also perfect justice, mercy, etc. etc, but in shorthand, Love defines Him best.

Axiom 3

God gave us free will, so we are free to disobey His will of what is best for us. However, if we are truly interested in the truth we will seek for it. And seek for it very deeply and truly, because literally nothing else is as important. And we are told, and reason and logic too indicate without a doubt, that if we do seek, indeed not only we should, but we must find this truth. Why? Well because if God is Good (Love) and the truth is one, then God will make it so if you care to, you can find that truth.

Axiom 4

A loving God that makes it so you can find that ultimate truth if only you honestly seek for it, would not leave such a truth to be in doubt, open to personal interpretation, available to only a few select individuals, and so on. In short, He would, naturally and logically, set things up so that:

A) The truth should be self-evident if one but cares to observe things honestly and openly.

B) Given we are made in His image, it is logical to think that the divine spark must exist within every one of us at least as a potential for us to connect with it and therefore want to seek the truth as well as be able to recognise it when we do.

C) Despite the utterly flawed human nature of human beings, that truth remains infallible, incorruptible and visible to any who seek it, regardless of circumstance. Which is not to say it might not be easier for some to see than others, but the possibility exists for all. But the point here is that the infallibility of the One truth relating to God and His will must be infallible, for it is the very foundation of the entirety of creation. It cannot therefore be flawed, or open to individual human interpretation other than as error.

So, in conclusion of the above axioms, in some supernatural, God-protected way, this truth must be all of these things:

1) Discoverable

2) Infallible

3) Protected from error despite humans

That’s at a minimum.

We would also, naturally and logically, assume that such truth, if followed, would lead to the best possible life and situations for those people who do act according to it.

Now, of all the world religions, only Christianity fulfils all of these requirements.

And we are even specifically told in our Holy Book, that:

1) the truth is self evident all around us

2) if we but seek, we shall find it

3) it is infallible and immutable

4) God will be with us in this truth right up to the end

We are also told a few other things that are pretty relevant:

A) most people will not follow this truth which is on a hard and narrow path, but will instead follow the wide road to Hell.

B) at the end only a tiny remnant of believers will hold out. The rest will all be fooled or stop believing.

Now, given all of the above, it is absolutely clear that only Catholicism can properly be seen to be Christianity. It fulfils all of the minimum requirements outlined above and indeed has the fruits to demonstrate beyond a doubt that those people who followed Catholic principles created the best art, the best architecture, overcame vice and human flaws better than any other civilisation, invented the (real) scientific method as well as most modern hard sciences, civilised mass-murdering savages around the globe, created the best environment for the nuclear family ever devised by humanity, and produced the greatest thinkers with a humane nature in the largest number ever, of any other religion.

These are simply the facts.

You might not like them, but it is the truth, objectively speaking.

Certainly, we cannot assume anyone pushing or agreeing with the LGBT agenda, or trannie children (or adults for that matter) or abortion, or divorce, or contraception has the interests of human beings at heart. And yet Protestantism was how these ideas became “acceptable” for “christians” to have.

Of course, any objective observer would immediately point out that “catholicism” is replete with pederasts, homosexuals and perverse satanists of the worst kind.

And they would be right. Because Bergoglio, the Vatican and so on are NOT Catholic. They are the skinsuit of Catholicism being worn by the assassins, impostors, frauds and all-round freemasonic satanists that have subverted it and taken it over.

You see, the Catholic Church was under constant attack from the start, and it certainly had bad men and bad priests and bad bishops and bad Popes in it. Yet… despite this, it also created and compiled and grew the INFALLIBLE magisterium of the Church.

What is that you say?

It is the actual rules of Christianity. The rules which any good Christian should and will follow.

Well, where are these rules you say? The Bible?

Well, not quite. Yes the Bible has the Truth in it. But the Bible alone is not enough. If it were, the Bible itself would have been put together by Jesus Himself. And not by a conclave of bishops some 300 years after Jesus ascended to Heaven before a crowd of hundreds. It took tradition, and even oral as well as written history, to compile the Bible. And those wise bishops, who had been trained by the Apostles and then by those they trained and so on, decided on what was to be in the Bible and what was not to be in it.

Infallibly.

And their spiritual descendants, through legitimate apostolic succession, passed down and refined the self-evident yet deep truths found in the Bible as well as tradition.

Over 2000 years these added up to many, many, many documents, and is what priests and Bishops, in part, where trained to know and refer to when instructing the lay people.

But from about the mid 1700s or so, a new assault on the Church began in earnest. A patient, insidious evil, and by the late 1800s these Jewish inspired Satanists had made serious inroads and infiltrations into the Church. Therefore, Pope Pious X, at the turn of the century, ordered that all of these thousands of documents be reviewed and their essence compiled into one, homogeneous, monolithic document of all the infallible dogma of the Catholic Church. He set up a commission of Bishops and Cardinals to do this, headed by Cardinal Pietro Gasparri, who, with his team, examined tens of thousands of documents in order to create the Code of Canon Law of 1917.

Pope Pious X died before it was finished, but his successor, Pope Benedict the XV (not to be confused with Ratzinger, the antipope that recently died) completed it.

After publication there was another period lasting until the death of the last valid Pope in the current era, Pope Pious XII in 1958, during which any cleric or academic could question or ask about this code, in case there was any contradiction between a rule previously stated, from centuries earlier sometimes, and more recent papal encyclicals, and so on.

So from 1917 to 1958 the Code of Canon Law was scrutinised, and in the whole of that time precisely ONE change was made to part 2 of code 1099. A very minor change, and that by Pope Pious XII himself.

In short, this document, which encompasses the entirety of Catholic rules and dogma, both divine (and therefore eternal) as well as ecclesiastical (and therefore mutable under certain situations) is the most vetted document on Earth and represents the infallible magisterium of the Catholic Church.

Now, according to that document, every “Pope” after Pious XII has disqualified themselves from being Catholic. And hence being valid clergy. Because they publicly promoted heresy. That is, ideas, concepts and behaviours that go directly counter to Catholic infallible truth.

Anyone who does this is automatically no longer part of the Catholic Church and as such is not able to act in any way on its behalf. This simple, obvious rule, which is clear even to a child, is encompassed in Code 188 part 4. Which is a summary of the Papal encyclical of Pope Paul IV, Cum ex Apostolato Officio, and essentially says that anyone who publicly defects from the faith by word, action or deed, loses any office they may have had in the Church. No ifs, ands or buts. No recourse, no, appeal, no pronouncement by anyone required. Because ultimately it is obvious.

Otherwise one would be in the absurd position (which many satanic fake “priests” try to push, absurdly!) where a priest that sacrifices babies on the altar during mass would have to still be “respected” as valid clergy until some “official” pronouncement is made by his fellow fake clerics. Clearly nonsense.

Just as if you try to play basketball using a golf club, you are thrown off the court, so the same here. Act as a heretic publicly and notoriously, or promote heresy publicly and notoriously, and you’re immediately a heretic. No one needs say anything officially. It’s obvious to anyone who actually IS Catholic that you are not.

Now, since 15 of the 16 documents of Vatican 2 have direct and obvious heresy in them, and are documents intended for the entire world, you can’t become more public a heretic than by promoting their content, which all fake Novus Ordo “clergy” do and have done for over 60 years. Meaning they are not Catholics and not valid clergy. In fact, they are not even validly ordained, so they are not clergy of any kind, except maybe as some kind of priest of Moloch or Beelzebub or some other other demon.

The only people who still follow the real Catholic rules of the Church, as present in the Code of Canon Law of 1917, are Sedevacantist Catholics.

And since there is only ONE truth, they are not just the only Catholics, but the only Christians.

The statement that the Catholic Church has always said —in its abbreviated form: outside of the Catholic Church, there is no salvation— is simply common sense.

If 2+2=4, anyone who says otherwise clearly is outside of the Truth.

Protestants don’t have any set of rules written down as to how you can even tell if someone is a Christian or not. And if one sect does, there are at least another 40,000 sects disagreeing with that version (yes it’s a real number, not hyperbole.)

Their standard for being a “christian” is literally to recognised Jesus is King.

Well, even demons know that.

If that’s the sum total of your “rules” then it’s obvious that literally even demons can be, and invariably will be, part of your club.

The truth is often jarring. Sometimes even painful.

And the last three years should make you aware of that; but the truth is always preferable to a lie.

So… if even considering actual Catholicism upsets you, then I suggest you take a good long hard look at it. I did. I didn’t start out Catholic. In fact I assumed Catholicism was one of the worst fake religions out there.

And that’s because what I thought was Catholicism was the fake Church that has usurped the Vatican since 28th October 1958.

But when I studied things, I realised that this was not Catholicism at all.

I wasn’t lazy about it you see.

I actually DID seek. And I did so relentlessly. The only thing I could not falsify, was Catholicism. The real one.

The one that led men to Jerusalem in 1095.

The one the knights of Malta had in 1565.

The one that the authors of the Catechism of Trent had.

What I did manage to falsify was Protestantism in all its forms, which was childishly simple, Eastern “Orthodoxy” which was a lot closer to the truth than Protestantism, but still far off, and of course, almost all of my preconceived ideas and “deep thoughts”.

What I could not find fault with was the Code of Canon Law of 1917. That is: Catholicism.

So I got baptised by a real priest (all Novus Ordo “clergy” are impostors) and became a real Catholic, which are known as sedvacantists today.

We have a very clear set of rules that have produced the best fruits humanity has seen in 2000 years. They are written down. Anyone who cares to can find them and read them.

And it is childishly simple to spot impostors and gatekeepers once you know the truth.

The Milos, and the Emo Jones, and the Taylor Marshalls, and Gary Vorises, and Bergoglios, and Ratzingers, and Woitjlas, and Roncallis, and Montinis, and “Father” Rippergers, and on, and on, and on, and all their retinues of demonic imps, are obvious fake “Catholics” trying very hard and often succeeding to lead especially young men down a neutered and castrated road of submission to evil.

And the Joel Osteens, and other fake “Christians”, like Candace Owen, and Steven Crowder, and so on, and never mind the literal enemies of Christ like the Ben Shapiros and the Jordan Petersons of the world, are actually comical in their attempts at subversion.

But it is not them I write this for.

It is for you. The Andrew Torbas of the world.

Who, if I take at face value, profess to be Christians, but have no objective standards for neither proving nor convincing anyone you actually are.

And regardless of your possibly earnest belief that you are, you have no tried and tested historical results of a positive nature you can point to. In fact, quite the opposite. It was Protestantism that allowed contraception, then divorce, then abortion, the LGBT-Pedo and on and on and on. The slow secularisation of Christianity began with Protestantism. In fact, even the fake, demonic Bergoglian “Catholic” Church, thanks to the momentum of real Catholicism, despite having subverted even the Papacy over 60 years ago, still can’t fully approve of even divorce, never mind contraception or abortion.

It might hurt you, your pride, the memory of people you loved, who taught you lies in good faith, thinking they were doing good instead, but facing the truth means facing these things.

Catholicism is not a religion for spoilt children. It is a religion for people able to face reality and deal with it accordingly.

And if you think Catholicism is all about accepting rapefugees, turning the other cheek, and funding Soros’ open society, think again.

Read the Crusades by Harold Lamb or the Great Siege by Ernle Bradford. Catholicism is more likely to be about firing the heads of your enemies out of cannons as a response to their attempted invasion of your lands than being some cucked version of boomer inspired “love generation”.

So.

To sum up, and just in case Andrew ever bothers to actually read this:

Who is an actual Christian, Andrew?

And how do you tell?

Because by my measure, you’re not one yet. Regardless of what you might erroneously believe.

Those of you who may want to delve deeper into this and save yourselves some time are invited to click on the top left on “books I wrote” and pick up Believe! If you can only muster a couple of hours of reading, or Reclaiming the Catholic Church if you can read a whole 530 pages worth of details replete with impeccable references.

If Andrew ever replies I’ll be sure to link to his response or publish it here.

To all you Andrew Tate supporters and believers. I’ll bet as many of you as I can, $10 each, that Andrew Tate will get prison time.

Happy to set it up with a third party in escrow if enough of you show up to make it worthwhile. If you’re willing to take me up on it let me know or comment below and let’s put our money where our mouth is.

The first Bible I started to read when I began to investigate Christianity was a small portable KJV. I was travelling a lot for work, between London in UK, Venice in Italy and Astana in Kazakhstan. The small Bible was convenient as it fit in my pocket and I could read it on the planes.

But at the same time I had begin to investigate Protestantism, Orthodoxy and Catholicism, as well as the various claims from one group against the other. It became clear early on that the DR Bible was a far superior version, though it needs a little help from the Septuagint too.

The KJV on the other hand was a Bible ordered by a flamingly homosexual King who literally started the freemasonic temples in their current Satanic worship mode.

Below is a non-exhaustive list of “mistranslation” all designed to reduce both Jesus, the truth of the magisterium of the Catholic Church and especially to sideline Mary to a secularised version of events that, in die course, would inevitably lead to the Joel Osteen version of the “gospel”.

With thanks to one Mark Wilkinson for posting it Faceborg.

WHY DOESN’T THE CATHOLIC CHURCH SANCTION THE KING JAMES VERSION TRANSLATION OF THE BIBLE?

Some Examples of Subtle Differences Between the Douay-Rheims [DR] Holy Bible and the King James Version [KJV] that Make a Real Difference!

(Edited by Mark Wilkinson, B.A., M.Th.S.)

Briefly, the Catholic Church does not accept the King James Version/Authorized Version for the same reason that it does not accept as authoritative any Bible containing only the protocanon [only 66 books in total], or containing the deuterocanon only in a separate appendix under the description of the term “Apocrypha” [meaning “hidden” or “obscure” books].

Bibles fitting this description display an understanding of Sacred Scripture very different from the Catholic understanding. This makes it likely that the translation will not be in accord with Catholic teachings. Since this could result in misunderstandings of Catholic teaching, the Church does not use them for liturgical functions, and does not endorse them for devotional use. They may, however, be studied as literary works, or as exercises in comparative translation.

In order for a Bible translation, or any other book, to be considered acceptable or to be considered “Catholic,” it needs to have an imprimatur from the local bishop. The website of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops contains a list of Bible translations approved for devotional use; it recommends any translation with an imprimatur. Other Bibles are all “Un-Authorized,” because the Catholic Church is not interested in approving Protestant translations of an abridged [reduced] Bible.

During the Reformation Era, King Henry VIII of England decided (for seemingly illicit reasons) that he was going to leave the Catholic Church and appoint himself as the head of the Church of England.

The history of England’s monarchy gets pretty messy here, but King Henry VIII died ~1547 and King James I came to power in ~1603.

Now that the Church of England was officially separated from the Catholic Church, and King James of England was the “head” of the Church of England, he was the one who “authorized” requests for new Bible translations.

The King gave his approval and then they made the King James Version (KJV), also known as the “Authorized” translation.

The whole point of this history is that the Catholic Church did not really accept the King James Version, because it was never their Bible and it was translated against their wishes, under an opposing King.

Below are some comparisons of the Douay-Rheims Bible with the King James Bible, and a summary of their significance. In each case, I have put the Douay-Rheims (DR) verse first, followed by the King James Version (KJV). Many of the differences are very subtle.

The words of significant difference between the two parallel verses have been capitalized for emphasis.

The point of making the differences subtle is always the same. A small divergence from truth is all you need to lead souls to hell. Imagine what math would become like is you only accept a “small” change like agreeing that 2+2 = 4.00001. I mean… how could it possibly matter, right? Well, accept such nonsense and in a few decades you can say goodbye to civilisation, including everything from satellites to air travel. Same thing here. Give it 500 years and now the Protties have transgender “bishops” and abortion on demand.

THE HOLY MASS AND THE PRIESTHOOD

*Genesis 14:18

[DR] “But Melchisedech, the king of Salem, brought forth bread and wine, FOR he was the priest of the most high God.”

[KJV] “And Melchizedek, king of Salem, brought forth bread and wine: AND he was the priest of the most high God.”

Here, the DRV shows bread and wine as intrinsic to Melchisedech’s priesthood, whereas the KJV suggests the fact Melchisedech was a priest, and the fact he brought forth bread and wine, are two possibly unrelated facts.

*1 Corinthians 11:27

[DR] “Therefore, whosoever shall eat this bread, OR drink the chalice of the Lord unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and of the blood of the Lord.”

[KJV] “Wherefore, whosoever shall eat this bread, AND drink this cup of the Lord unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord.”

The difference here is that Protestants receive both the bread and wine, whereas Catholics generally receive only the bread (communion in one kind only). The different translations of this verse seem to reflect this difference in practice.

*Jeremiah 11:19

[DR] “And I was as a meek LAMB, that is carried to be a VICTIM: and I knew not that they had devised counsels against me, saying: Let us put WOOD on his BREAD, and cut him off from the land of the living, and let his name be remembered no more.”

[KJV] “But I was like a LAMB or an OX that is brought to the SLAUGHTER; and I knew not that they had devised devices against me, saying, Let us destroy the TREE with the FRUIT thereof, and let us cut him off from the land of the living, that his name may be no more remembered.”

This verse was interpreted by Jerome as a Eucharistic prophecy of the Crucifixion in which Christ’s body is referred to as “bread.” The Protestant translation, by referring to “fruit” rather than “bread,” negates this interpretation.

This also puts the lie to the “Orthodox” position that if you only take the bread it is not a “proper” mass. But then, like the protestants, we know the “orthodox” also don’t read their Bible. Not the correctly translated versions anyway.

PENANCE

*Luke 3:3

[DR] “…preaching the baptism of PENANCE for the remission of sins.”

[KJV] “…preaching the baptism of REPENTANCE for the remission of sins.”

*Acts 2:38

[DR] “Peter said to them: Do PENANCE, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ.”

[KJV] “Peter said unto them, REPENT, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ.”

In these two verses, one referring to the message of John the Baptist and the other to the events of the first Whitsun, the Catholic Bible has penance while the Protestant one only has repentance.

This also plays into the retarded Prottie idea that not only “once saved always saved”, but also, “no works!” It is, of course, idiotic to think you can just say a nominal “I’m a Jesus follower!” And literally need do nothing more to secure your place in Heaven. You have this kind of secularisation of principles to thank for the perennial slide to hell that protestantism inevitably leads to.

MARY

*Luke 1:28

[DR] “And the angel being come in, said unto her: Hail, FULL OF GRACE, the Lord is with thee: blessed art thou among women.”

[KJV] “And the angel came in unto her, and said, Hail, thou that art HIGHLY FAVOURED, the Lord is with thee: blessed art thou among women.”

There is at least a difference in degree between being full of grace and being highly favored.

This of course also goes to the Hail Mary prayer, which, unlike the Prottie lies about “worshipping Mary” is simply asking for Mary’s intercession and prayer for us sinners, and where being “full of Grace” is not just a set of meaningless words. And of course, the difference between “full of (God’s) Grace” and being “highly favoured” is absolutely massive.

LIMBUS PATRUM (Limbo of the Fathers)

*Genesis 42:38

[DR] “You will bring down my gray hairs with sorrow to HELL [Sheol].”

[KJV] “Then shall ye bring down my gray hairs with sorrow to the GRAVE.”

Here, Jacob is fretting about what will happen to him if he allows Benjamin to travel to Egypt and he does not come back. According to the DRV, he expects, on death, his soul will go to hell, whereas according to the KJV, he is talking about the burial of his body. There are several other verses similar to this one.

Prottie secular semi-denial of Hell and how and why you can end up there being very much glossed over is a recurring theme.

PAPACY

*Malachi 2:7

[DR] “For the lips of the priest SHALL keep knowledge, and they SHALL seek the law at his mouth: because he is the angel [messenger] of the Lord of hosts.

[KJV] For the priest’s lips SHOULD keep knowledge, and they SHOULD seek the law at his mouth: for he is the messenger of the LORD of hosts.”

An interpretation of this verse is that it is a prophecy of the Papacy. The DRV says what “shall” happen, a definite statement about the future. The KJV says what “should” happen, but with no guarantee that it will.

Hot take: Prottie conmen approved by KJV under their general theology of: “eh… it happens.”

ROYAL SUPREMACY

*1 Peter 2:13

[DR] “Be ye subject therefore to every human CREATURE for God’s sake: whether it be to the king as EXCELLING; Or to governors.…”

[KJV] “Submit yourselves to every ORDINANCE of man for the Lord’s sake: whether it be to the king, as SUPREME; Or unto governors.…”

Here, the DRV describes the king as “excelling,” but the KJV asserts that he is “supreme.” Not all Protestants believe in Royal Supremacy, but the Church of England does, and King James certainly did (as, indeed, so did several Catholic monarchs). The Catholic Church regarded the Pope as supreme.

This is another very important distinction that most will not grasp the extent of.

In Catholic thought, it is assumed if a man is King it is because God ordained it so to some extent or other, however, and this is important, the onus to be a GOOD and CATHOLIC king is on the man himself, and his subjects are to generally give him his due and even the benefit of the doubt when possible, but are absolutely under no obligation to do so when he reveals himself to act improperly. And should he act as a public heretic, then all bets are off.

Instead, in obvious fashion, flaming king Jimmy, wanted everyone to bow to his wishes no matter what. Reminds you of the LGBT-Pedo lobby today, doesn’t it?

PRIESTS

*1 Timothy 4:14

[DR] “Neglect not the GRACE that is in thee, which was given thee by prophesy, with imposition of the hands of the PRIESTHOOD.”

[KJV] “Neglect not the GIFT that is in thee, which was given thee by prophecy, with the laying on of the hands of the PRESBYTERY.”

*Acts 14:23

[DR] “And when they had ordained to them PRIESTS in every church, and had prayed with fasting, they commended them to the Lord, in whom they believed.”

[KJV] “And when they had ordained them ELDERS in every church, and had prayed with fasting, they commended them to the Lord, on whom they believed.”

The DRV refers to Christian priests being ordained by Paul and Barnabas, whereas the KJV calls them elders. The DRV refers specifically to ordination conferring grace, which the KJV terms a gift, which may reflect a more sacramental understanding of ordination in the Catholic Church. There are several other verses where the DRV says “priest” and the KJV has “elder.” The KJV also has “overseer” in some of the places where the DRV has “bishop,” although the KJV does also refer to bishops (e.g., 1 Timothy 3:1).

Obviously if you’re setting things up so any old Tom, Dick and Harry can set himself up as a “pastor” and earn his living preaching whatever interpretation he wants of the Bible, then, having a sacramental process to authorise priests and Bishops would cramp your style.

SALVATION BY FAITH

*Luke 18:42

[DR] “And Jesus said to him: Receive thy sight: thy FAITH hath MADE thee WHOLE.”

[KJV] “And Jesus said unto him, Receive thy sight: thy FAITH hath SAVED thee.”

The DRV has Jesus talking of physical healing, whereas the KJV suggests salvation, as a result of faith. The KJV translation of this verse is an obvious example of Protestant bias, based on their belief in the false doctrine of salvation through “sola fide” (faith alone).

Self-explanatory false teaching of Protties.

So… while I still have my copy of the portable KJV, it has laid unopened for years. And it will remain so.

Keep in mind the examples above are just a few of the 33,000 “mistranslations” the KJV is replete with.

Of course, the KJV zealots will continue to “defend” their LGBT Bible that is also literally known as the Freemason Bible, but anyone rational should at this point understand it is a Satanic piece of misinformation and to be avoided at all costs.

So the Russian Federation is stating openly that in the village of Karaichnoe, in the Kharkov region, the special forces of Ukraine are planting mines in the grain deposit. The aim there to blow it up and blame the Russians for yet another “barbarous attack” of the “monstrous Russians” which would produce famine and break the accord in place for the distribution of grain both within and without Ukraine.

They go so far as to physically name not only the location of the deposit, but also the specific individuals involved:

⚡️🇷🇺 Comunicato urgente dall’Unità di coordinamento interministeriale della Federazione Russa per la risposta umanitaria in Ucraina

◽️ Il Servizio per la Sicurezza Ucraina sta preparando una provocazione su larga scala al fine di screditare le politiche della Federazione Russa nell’ambito del cosiddetto “Accordo sul grano”, imputandole così la causa di un “deficit alimentare” in Ucraina.

◽️ Nel villaggio Karaichnoe, sito nella regione di Kharkov, i Servizi Segreti ucraini stanno posizionando mine nel deposito locale del grano. Dopo un attentato programmato, l’Ucraina accuserà la Federazione Russa di aver “deliberatamente eliminato le scorte di grano in Ucraina”, provocando “carestie” e “mettendo fine” così all’Accordo sul grano. Sui media occidentali l’incidente verrà presentato come ennesima “atrocità dei militari russi” che richiede una “reazione immediata e dura da parte della comunità internazionale”.

◽️ Per preparare il suddetto atto terroristico, un gruppo di circa 30 persone, composto da esperti del genio militare e da agenti dei Servizi Segreti, è appena giunto a Volchansk, nella regione di Kharkov.

◽️ Il deposito del grano appartiene a un certo V.Uvarov, collaboratore dei Servizi per la Sicurezza dell’Ucraina. È anche nota l’identità del capogruppo, A.Tkachuk, e di altri membri del gruppo, nonché si conosce la loro dislocazione attuale, ovvero presso il Distretto di Reclutamento di Volchansk, in via Volodarskogo 29.

◽️ In seguito a una lunga serie d’insuccessi delle Forze Armate Ucraine e alla vigilia del summit dei Ministri della Difesa dei Paesi NATO a Ramstein (Germania), previsto il 20 gennaio 2023, con queste eclatanti provocazioni, le autorità di Kiev stanno cercando di accrescere la pressione sull’opinione pubblica occidentale, al fine di ottenere nuove massicce forniture di armamenti moderni e di mezzi militari all’Esercito Ucraino.

In English:

⚡️🇷🇺 Urgent communiqué from the Interministerial Coordination Unit of the Russian Federation for the Humanitarian Response in Ukraine The Ukrainian Security Service is preparing a large-scale provocation in order to discredit the policies of the Russian Federation within the framework of the so-called “Wheat Agreement”, thus blaming it for a “food deficit” in Ukraine ◽️.

◽️ In the village Karaichnoe, Located in the Kharkov region, the Ukrainian Secret Service is placing mines in the local grain depot. After a planned attack, Ukraine will accuse the Russian Federation of “deliberately eliminating grain stocks in Ukraine”, causing “famine” and thus “ending” the Wheat Agreement. In the Western media, the incident will be presented as yet another “Russian military atrocity” that requires an “immediate and harsh reaction from the international community”.

◽️ To prepare the aforementioned terrorist act, a group of about 30 people composed of experts in the military engineering and agents of the Secret Service, he has just arrived in Volchansk, in the Kharkov region.

◽️ The grain depot belongs to a certain V.Uvarov, a collaborator of the Security Services of Ukraine. The identity of the group leader, A.Tkachuk, and other members of the group is also known, as well as their current location, namely at the Volkswagen Recruitment District, Volodarskogo Street 29.

◽️ Following a long series of failures of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and on the eve of the summit of the Defense Ministers of NATO countries in Ramstein (Germany), scheduled for January 20, 2023, with these striking provocations, the Kiev authorities are trying to increase the pressure on Western public opinion, in order to obtain new massive supplies of modern armaments and military means to the Ukrainian Army.

 

I dunno about you, but I wouldn’t want to be V. Uvarov or A. Tackachuk for all the grain in Ukraine right now.

And I don’t even think the Russkies will do them in. I think the Ukis probably will.