Pretty much all wars have been about money and power.
Vox Day, in his The Irrational Atheist proved that of all the known wars in the three volume Encyclopaedia of Wars slightly less than 7% are actually caused by religious differences and of those that fit that cause, more than half of them are caused by Muslims. So, all the other religions on the planet, account for less than 3.5% of all wars, in a sample that is about as comprehensive as anyone alive or dead, in the entirety of human history has ever bothered to catalogue.
So that takes care of that. And in reality, I personally think even some of those assumed to be “religious wars” had a great motivation based on money and power. By power I mean the control of money, wealth, goods and people for personal profit of those commanding the wars. And by commanding I mean the people making it happen, not the generals and commanders directing the activity of war on a day to day basis.
So for example in Ukraine, the people who made the war happen are the supposedly American elite controlling the billions of laundered money that has been run through the Ukraine. The Victoria Newlands, Bidens, Pelosi and so on that all had sons working on the board of the gas giants in Ukraine. Just another Cohen-cidence surely.
If you then take the time to look at who pushed the related financial interests, I bet that a lot more than 7% of all wars were in all likelihood started by people of a certain tribe and certain ethnicity.
In Israel, it is now a know and verified fact that Net-a-Yahoo, leader supreme and puppet master of all American politics that actually matters, not only allowed, but probably helped orchestrate the October 7th attacks by Hamas, with the objective of getting rid of all Palestinians from Gaze and the West Bank and have them become refugees in the USA and Europe.
Once again, the motive is money and power. And once again, the people pulling the strings that result in the death and mutilation and displacement of millions of human beings are almost invariably associated with a certain tribe and ethnicity of people.
I don’t own the three volume set of the Encyclopaedia’s, but I find it interesting that as far back as 55 BC, Roman emperors and senators were complaining of a certain tribe and ethnicity as troublesome, causing war and being a parasitic drain on any host nation that allowed them to enter in their midst.
Now, you might choose to believe that such a tribe has been kicked out of 110 countries over 1000 times in total because of pure coincidence, or just a really persistent “racism” towards one particular people that seems to be shared by different races, people and ethnicities around the planet. That’s quite the odd coincidence to say the least. Personally, I think that any reasonable person of normal intelligence would conclude that perhaps these people are best served by staying in their own country and not living anywhere else. And that everyone that sees their behaviour for what it is, may similarly wish to ensure they are not permitted to enter their nation, much less enter in positions of power or government. After all, a nation should be run for the benefit of its natural nationals, which means the people born and raised in that nation for many generations with their own culture and religion and ethnicity. There is absolutely nothing wrong with Germany being for ethnic and cultural Germans, Aragornian Spaniards for Aragorn, Catholic Irish for Catholic Ireland, Basques for Basque Spain, Venetians for La Serenissima, Romans for Lazio, Greeks for Greece Nigerians for Nigeria, and Jews for Israel.
No foreigner should ever have a position of any sort in any government office, or influential position, such as the mass media, television, film, any of the armed forces, the judiciary or any legal profession, nor anything even remotely related to the culture, art and history of a nation.
I am married to an Englishwoman and I absolutely would be fine with her never holding any such position in my country, nor I in hers.
Furthermore, the recent law just passed by Russia that a naturalised “citizen” can have his citizenship revoked and be sent back to his country of origin if they break the law and are convicted of any criminal activity, should also be a global one adopted by all nations. And in fact, I personally wonder if any such citizenship should ever even be granted to begin with.
You can live a perfectly normal life as a permanent resident and if you have children with a co-national of your ethnicity, they can get permanent residence too, and always be subject to deportation if they break the law.
Anyone that thinks this sounds “draconian” is simply either too stupid or too naive to know how human beings actually operate. Anyone who think it is “racist” really needs to define that term, because I fully support nations composed of people that are not Caucasian to have exactly these rules too. And there are a lot more people that are not “white” on the planet than those who are, so, exactly, what is the problem?
If your go to is “oh, historical pillaging” My answer is two-fold:
- Mostly bullshit, because wherever caucasians went they raised the local technological level. Is it perfect? No. But nothing is, and every caucasoid nation has been enslaved by someone at some point, which leads me to the second part:
- Tough. Get over it and stop whining.
Besides, Niger has recently shown the process is easily reversible. They got rid of all the French and their natural resources will now be paid for at whatever price the Nigerians decide is fair.
If these simple rules were taken on by everyone, guess what would happen? The world would suddenly have a boom of technology, peace, and dignified human relations between countries and people of completely different backgrounds, religions and ethnicities. Would there be some upsets? Undoubtedly. A place like South Africa, if the caucasians were limited to a smaller area, would soon boost their technology way past the rest of the country even if it was run by the best educated Africans in the region. This is in any case already happening and it would degrade very fast. Would that result in some wars? Sure, for a little while, some borders would be contended with by the less able (especially if more numerous) but would soon be stopped by the more able. Give it 5 years or so and everything would be normalised.
Except for most likely one country on Earth. Where the people with it would be seething with rage at having to co-exist only with their own and not be allowed to infiltrate and corrode other nations with heir specific brand of “foreign policy”.
Can you guess which nation that might be?
How not to get strangled
I’m going to tell you a true story. It genuinely is a true story, and interesting, however, it may also be an allegory for our times.
How does a sneaky predator try to kill and eat you?
Sneakily.
It tries to gently slide up to you and then strikes suddenly and tries to choke you to death. That’s what it does naturally. Of course, some of us are so foolish as to think such a natural predator might be a cute animal or make a fun pet, or can be played with because we are generally familiar with predators and are aware the dangers are usually exaggerated. Or perhaps, you just want to keep the python alive, which is a noble idea —at least as far as pythons go (the same is not noble or smart when it comes to the metaphorical pythons you may encounter in urban life)— and yet, also make the python safe for others by removing it to a place where it is not likely to eat small children or other innocents. So maybe you just want to pick it up to put in a bag for transport to a safer place.
And at such times, a small lapse in attention can result in you being quickly smothered by the sneaky snake, like say, a python, that you may have thought was perfectly safe to try and place in the bag, because you’re familiar with them, and besides you are surrounded by other people you know quite well and surely if anything happened they would intervene.
And then, it turns out the people you thought you knew well have a sudden “phobia” about snakes in general, or pythons in particular, or just are generally not made of the same stuff you are, and so panic, or get scared or simply decide, hey, it’s not my problem, and you’re now nicely wrapped up by a giant python that has decided you’re a tasty snack to eat. And despite your previous experience, you may suddenly find yourself in trouble and with no actual help forthcoming from anywhere. Pinned too hard to free yourself and the constriction continuing to increase, if you panic, are prone to try to be civilised about it, rely on the help of “friends” or the general “public”, you can rest assured that your not too distant future will be to be transformed into python and a giant python turd of the parts of you he couldn’t digest.
A natural fighter however, doesn’t think that way. A natural fighter uses that small grip he still has on the snake’s head to bring it close enough, yes, even closer than the constricting snake is already doing, and…
bites it in the head, breaking it’s skull open and wrecking its brain.
No hesitation, no worries, and no more python problems.
I hope this true story serves you as a good metaphor for certain situations that may occur in your life in the future.
Happy New Year dad.
No related posts.
By G | 31 December 2023 | Posted in Social Commentary