Archive for the ‘Christianity’ Category

A Sober Realization

Andrew Anglin posts at the Unz a perfectly reasonable summary of the current Russian situation concerning the terrorist attack.

He basically says what anyone normal already knows concerning Russia, the CIA, ISIS and the Tajik retards hired to kill 139 innocent civilians.

But he highlights one very important point, which is the summary of it all in a nutshell that the average American still finds hard to swallow and understand; which might have something to do with the fact that the average American can’t reliably find Australia, China and Russia on a world map.

In any case, that key principle worth understanding is this:

What the Moscow terror attack shows is that all of the enemies of the US government, and the Jews that control it, will be treated exactly like Palestinians. And the only thing you have to do to become an enemy of the US government is simply disagree with their world domination agenda.

The US government is a mad brute. It is an existential threat to all life on earth.

In that he is absolutely right, and anyone who has had a real understanding of global politics since after the second world war, has been aware of that. The demonic freaks like Kissinger and his sort have been instrumental in creating foreign policy of this nature since the 1940s, and in fact were responsible for the very creation of the conditions that led to the Second World War.

We have all been trained to believe Hitler was a madman that wanted to conquer the world, but if one is to manage to understand anything about our planet and how it works, he has to put aside all the fairy tales we have been raised on and look at the cold hard facts. And those indicate that Hitler made repeated and serious requests for peace. He literally wanted to avoid war and tried to do so repeatedly. Now, that’s not to say that he was necessarily a great and good guy, but the way he has been portrayed as essentially an insane and literally the most evil man that ever lived is not based in reality either. Just as the Jewish Bolsheviks that caused over 50 million deaths of civilians from intentional policies of everything right up to starvation are also never mentioned as anything other than “liberators of the proletariat” is equally skewed, since no one has been taught to think of them as mass-murdering fanatic demons, even though they caused the largest mass murder on Earth. Beaten today and the years to come, only by the people who run the pharmaceutical companies that have tried their best to see to it everyone on Earth is injected with a generic serum that has already killed untold millions, and which may eventually outdo the Bolsheviks in raw numbers. And you might want to look at who the people that run those companies are. You know, out of general curiosity. Or where the hormone replacement injections created to sterilise and mutilate children who are “transitioning” are built and by whom, and where in the world. Again, just out of curiosity.

Anyway, I digress, but do I?

After all, it is useful to understand how the world works at a macro level, is it not? And if and when you do realise what the thread that connects seemingly disparate events becomes obvious, it becomes really hard to continue to ignore it. Especially since seeing it makes your ability to predict the future increase in accuracy by several orders of magnitude.

For example, one of the commenters at that very post at the Unz wrote the following:

Russia should make use of hit squads and proxies in western countries to deal with politicians, military people and officials that sanction killing innocent civilians and terrorism within Russia. Only if they knew that they were going to be targets themselves would they shut their fat mouths. It could be done in such a way that would give Russia plausible deniability, but the big mouths would fear that they might be next and this would go a long way to stopping the terrorism. Russia once had a very effective network of moles, spies and persons willing to work for their cause, in the west, they need to rebuild their network.

And he is exactly right. Wars and the other atrocities that we are now all being conditioned to accept as normal would end instantly if the people that planned them were the ones paying the price of being dismembered by an explosion that tore them and their children into scraps of meat, instead of some poor bastard thousands of miles away from them who has absolutely no power to change anything at all, including the murder of his little children.

Putin, for all his demonisation by the West, is still playing like a true gentleman. A strategist that truly understood the nature of his enemy with less patience or restraint than Putin has shown, would have been building his secret network of assassins from about 2008 on and would now be activating them in earnest. And if he were serious, he would not be immediately obvious, and the people suddenly dropping dead of new cases of suddenly would start at the edges of the circle, with those who are no longer at the centre of things, like retired mass-murdering sow Nuland herself. And would gradually corral the perpetrators into an ever-shrinking circle of concentrated evil.

Nor would this process end, as long as a single one of these monsters that toy with the lives of innocents to satisfy their own personal evil ideologies remains breathing.

Imagine what the world might be like if such creatures as Kissinger not only were no more, but were never born to begin with.

If you do start to think this way, it is common to arrive to the false conclusion that sooner or later, any ideology or philosophy or religion will arrive at a point where some mass murder will happen.

While there may be some truth to that, I put to you this idea: if you really look at the causes, far more mass murderous wars with a far greater death toll have happened as a result of the Kissingers and Bolsheviks of this world than by the rule of any Catholic leader or emperor that ever lived. And not by a small margin. We are talking MANY orders of magnitude more.

Why would that be?

Because Catholicism follows a principle of game theory that makes it clear it is the winning strategy. It is co-operative and does not force itself on anyone but must be freely adopted. In a future post on game theory I will get into more details of this, but in essence the statistically superior strategy is of this co-operative nature that has a rule on it that you are also protective and fight back. If a more complicated game can be set up, where you have sub-factions factions within groups, I would bet a lot of money on it that a group that would statistically be practically unbeatable would be one that follows the same Catholic model but with one small change: one of its internal sub-factions is a dedicated group that goes after any other group, be it the main group as such or one of its sub-groups that is hostile, and does not stop doing so as long as the other side continues being hostile. It would have to be a very complicated game because one of its threats could end up being itself, so one of the rules would have to be that this internal sub-faction can never become larger than a set and tiny fraction of the whole.

Well, Catholic history was pretty much exactly that until it git complacent and stopped training part of its nobility for war. That, by the way, is where the saying Noblesse Oblige comes from.

A similar principle to the word Samurai, which means servant. Yes being a nobleman entitles you to certain privileges; and certain duties. Amongst which, defence of the realm. Catholic leaders ran the necessary wars from the front, not from some subterfugeous tunnel at the back. And yes that makes such leaders somewhat vulnerable, but only if they are unwilling to have trained and specialised defenders that are expert tunnel rat clearers.

One of the reasons I am absolutely dedicated to Catholicism, and yes I need to specify it every time: the real one, the one only Sedevacantists still adhere to, is precisely because even if you were to strip it of every supernatural and metaphysical reality, and kept only the outward behaviour of it, it STILL models the healthiest, fairest, most secure and humane system of civilisation the world has ever seen in its entire history. And once again, if you just put aside the lies you have been told from birth, this become immediately obvious based on the simple and clear facts before us.

We have ALL been subjected to massive lies about pretty much everything, since after all, I too used to hate “Catholicism” because I too had been taught to believe that it was X when it was the exact opposite of X in reality. So this process is not easy, but it is necessary, and all you have to do is look at what’s before your eyes.

Who is it that tries very hard to avoid civilian casualties in the Russia versus the USA deep state? And who instead goes after the civilians?

Who makes it policy to play the victim even as they carpet bomb starving and dying of thirst women, children and non-combatants by the thousands?

Who is demonised for simply defending his nation, his people, or even just his principles or his non-violent religion?

Who is vilified online for simply saying Christ is King on Palm Sunday? And by WHOM are they vilified?

Who has lied and lied and lied about the events that have taken place in the past and are taking place now under our very noses? And who tells the truth?

Who controls the information and who presents it in this or that way?

Who pushes the child-mutilating tranny agenda?

These are not questions without answers. These are questions that have very clear and precise answers that are not difficult to find. The difficulty lies in you allowing yourself to ask them. For you have been trained to think that to simply ask the question itself, which is the most natural and normal thing to do, and that we all should do daily, is itself, somehow a terrible taboo that makes us the bad guys if we do it.

It’s a lie.

Ask yourself all the questions. And then answer them.

When you are ready to become a Sedevacantist Catholic, feel free to join those of us that have taken that step years ago, and help us build a better future that will be thoroughly insulated from the deceivers going forward.

You might be interested in the following posts:

  1. Sex and Relationship Lies
  2. The Weakness of The Wormtongues
  3. For all the retards

By G | 26 March 2024 | Posted in Catholicism, Christianity, Clown World, Freemasons, Impostors and Frauds, Nazi Conspiracies, Russia and GAE, Sedevacantism, Social Commentary, The Enemy Within, The Jews

Some Spiritual Realities

It occurred to me that there is something quite obvious about the various religions that I had never considered before.

Catholicism originated from the most absurdly improbable roots and was so diffused throughout the world that we literally date our time on the basis of the birth of Jesus.

First, consider that Catholicism, or Christianity, since the words are synonymous as ALL Christianity was always and only Catholic before the infiltrations and schisms were created by the enemy, allowed anyone around the world, to participate in a Holy Mass that was identical wherever you were in the world, and regardless of what language you spoke. This was the case since the 1960s when the Satanic impostor Montini, against canon law, dogma and Catholicism itself, changed the Mass in line with the equally Satanic Vatican II events.

Secondly, consider that it started with 4 women and 11 guys too scared to adit they followed Jesus. And it civilised the world. Despite constant attacks from gnostics, other religions, atheists, $cienc-eh and so on. It’s really quite astonishing since the divine principles of Catholic dogma remain unchanged after 2000 years.

So let’s look at what other religions had also a decent run, time-wise at least.

Islam, of course, Hinduism, though it is mostly secularised, 40,000 versions and counting of Protestantism, which can’t really be said to agree on anything other than “Catholicism bad”, Eastern “Orthodoxy” which is starting to split off like Protestantism but much slower and in any case is really quite schizophrenic historically and hasn’t spread itself very far comparatively speaking and the only fruits it can boast of is that presently Russia is the least cucked country on the planet. Novus Ordo fake Catholicism doesn’t really count, because this Satanic institution was only really “born” in 1958, when Angelo Roncalli became the first of the current and ongoing era of fake Popes, but really the infiltrators are mask-wearing Stanists. Satanism itself, in its many, many, many guises and under its legion of names, is, of course older than Christianity, being the first rebellion, or Protestation, against truth. And of course, Pharisaical or Talmudic Judaism which is what people who call themselves Jews today are. There is also Buddhism and Shintoism, and I think that covers the main ones. People LARPing at being “Pagans” really fall in the category of cosplayers at comic book conventions, if not furries and other fetishists, so we can’t seriously consider them, especially given their pitiful numbers and not insignificant mental health issues.

There have been many other religions that fell to the wayside for many reasons, conquest often being the main one, either physical or intellectual/spiritual. The Pagan religions of the Vikings for example died out because they gradually and spontaneously converted to Catholicism. The Mayan beliefs died out because the Spanish conquered them and the survivors converted too. and so on.

But the point is that only religions that have a spiritual basis in reality tend to stand the test of time.

And according to Catholic doctrine and belief, every one of those religions does, to some extent, square with reality, because they essentially are the creation of, or the literal worshipping of demons.

I will give a necessarily very brief and absolutely incomplete and also reductionist view of each of them below. It will be easy to critique any of these thumbnail summaries for being “simplistic” or incomplete, nevertheless, they will give a good and not unfair general sense of each one. And for good measure, I will give an equally brief and objective view of Catholicism at the end so you can get a feel for the level of both reductionism and oversimplification, but also of fairness and no overt or intentional mischaracterisation of any of them.

Protestantism – (See also Catholicism below) – The idea that a unified religion with one set of rules agreed to by a hierarchy that referred directly to God and was promised to be infallible until the end of time, should be split into each individual interpreting these divine truths independently and on their own, from one book alone, that had been edited and had parts removed by the founder of this hydra-like religion, who also expressly stated that because “reason was the whore of the devil” it should essentially be abandoned and all his ideas and theories (or the ones of your own head) should be accepted purely on faith. The obviously deaf, dumb and blind kind, one presumes, since reason could not be part of it.

Islam – the idea that a mass-murdering pedophile could do no wrong, and was the spokesman for a God that does whatever He wants arbitrarily. Reason is once again not required. Merely obedience. Conquest and conversion by force is perfectly acceptable, and should ultimately be done as soon as you are strong enough to impose it on non-muslims. Treating anyone not Islamic as an enemy, lying to them, and pretending to be their friend, but always holding in your heart the concept that they are enemies, being the right way.

Hinduism – Belief in a wide ranging pantheon of Gods for various specific things each deity takes care of. Some of these deities are said to have been historical personages from the ancient past with extra-solar origins, and others are considered to be proper deities. Regardless of either case, human beings are divided into various classes from untouchables to nobles that are like princes and reincarnation is the only way you can move up or down the hierarchy, and this is achieved by burning or not accumulating Karma in your present life.

Catholicism (today only found in 1958 Sedevacantists) – The idea that God came down to Earth as a man to take on all the sins of the world past, present and future, and any human beings who accepted this truth and kept his laws and rules would also be saved from separation from God and thus Hell. The baseline behaviour is to treat others as you wish to be treated and to spread these good news all over the world, but no one can become catholic other than by free choice.

Novus Ordo “Catholicism” – false representation of Catholicism that inverts its dogmatic principles in order to create what is ultimately a false religion, analogous to Protestantism, which informed much of its creation, alongside the push from Jewish interests behind it too and the obvious Freemasonic infiltration the real Church suffered for centuries.

Eastern Orthodoxy – The idea that keeping Christianity mostly confined to your own country, that there is no overarching authority in it, and that splitting from the origins of Catholicism, then asking their help when Muslims go to war with you, and when the Catholics come to help, you literally backstab them and try and murder them 3 times in a row, you are somehow the victim when the fourth time they sack your capital city. You also ignore basic tenets of the original religion like priests being celibate, which were in place both before, during and after the arrival of Jesus Christ.

Buddhism – The idea that life is suffering and eternal permanent death (Nirvana, the absence of all desire and therefore consciousness) is the ultimate aim of reincarnation. Mostly harmless in its wider worldly extent, but ultimately nihilistic.

Shintoism/Zen agnosticism/Taoism – While each is a distinct belief system, they all have Buddhist origins and generally do not refute reincarnation and veneration of the ancestors for guidance. In this respect they are similar to Catholicism (veneration of Saints) although not with regard to reincarnation, which Catholicism refutes as irrelevant and unnecessary at best and possible demonic deception at worst. The emphasis is on trying to achieve serenity, balance and harmony in everyday life in order to achieve it also spiritually.

Judaism – The idea that Catholicism is the worst possible religion on Earth and needs to be destroyed, and that all non-Jews are but cattle to be enslaved in order to serve Jews. According to their own most revered Rabis, the Jews worship the god of this World, known by Catholics as Satan.

What can we deduce by this brief thumbnail summary of religions from a Catholic perspective then?

  • Judaism most directly serves Satan
  • Hinduism could be said to serve various demons and/or long-since dead personages that originated from space
  • Protestantism and Novus Ordo False Catholicism are a perversion of every Catholic Principle
  • Eastern “Orthodoxy” is schismatic at best
  • All Buddhist linked religions that do not worship pantheons of false Gods (ie Hinduism) or even any specific “gods” are the least bad of the Pagan religious beliefs, though far from ideal as while many of them promote generosity and friendliness towards strangers, there is no clearly defined rules on it.

If you also look at the fruits born by each of these religions over time, we see that Protestantism and more recently Novus Orcism (they are Orcs, let’s call them Orcs) are merely tools to secularise Catholicism into a human based false religion The object of “worship” is a false idol. A God with no set rules, no set divine Laws, where everyone is “free” to believe s they will and is saved anyway because they agree Jesus is King. That is literally the same level of “Christianity” that demons have. They too know Jesus is King. the result has also been acceptance of contraception, divorce, and ultimately baby murder because babies get in the way of reckless fornication with people you do NOT want to have children with.

Eastern “Orthodoxy” is slow-burn Protestantism, and hasn’t produced much of anything but its stagnant state is presently proving rather useful as a bulwark to the disintegration of faith in general in the West.

Hinduism is a horrible caste system where your station in life is determined solely by your birth, and can’t be escaped, nor is it desirable to escape it since anyway all is karma, so why bother. The resulting inefficiency, squalor and destitution of the people who practice this religion, compounded with purely worldly attempts to gain more wealth by any means necessary, is rather well-known, and surpassed only by Judaism which is, however, very effective at it, since its central principle is to enslave the world to bring it under the yoke of the Jews themselves who will rule all the non-Jews as their property and slaves.

Buddhist types are for the most part the equivalent of mostly harmless NPCs. Individuals may be positive or not, but overall as a religion they do not cause particularly good or bad societies, and the tendency tends to be towards them being organised, clean, safe and efficient.

Catholicism is the only religion that has drastically elevated the whole of humanity while keeping the individual at its core as the important thing, while also understanding his or her role in the wider social context.

There are really only four routes:

  • Direct Satanism
  • Indirect Satanism
  • Indirect Satanism Lite
  • Catholicism

So take your pick of the oldest religion of all, or one of its offshoots, or Catholicism.

Good Luck.

No related posts.

By G | 18 March 2024 | Posted in Catholicism, Christianity, Sedevacantism

It’s not stupidity

Following on from the point of my previous post about how people are literally unable to see the pattern of the enemy playing both sides of the same coin, is the other problem, of thinking evil bastard are just incompetent fools.

Even Vox, on this post, he says:

The behavior of European leaders like Macron, Merkel, and Boris Johnson does often strike one as significantly out-of-touch with basic reality. When they talk about “defeating Russia” or “sanctioning China”, it makes one seriously wonder if they are even capable of basic math, let alone capable of understanding that the balance of power is no longer in their favor.

But it’s not stupidity that drives these people. It is a personal self-interest that makes your average clinical narcissist psychopath look like St. Francis of Assisi.

People like Macron are not sabre-rattling against Russia because they are dumb.

They do so because they are thoroughly corrupt to the very end of their souls.

Be it that they are involved in sexual things so disgusting and socially taboo that they would be lynched in the public square if the average person was even capable of imaging what they really get up to, or be it their insatiable greed for both fame, power and wealth, or as is usually the case a combination of both, the sad truth is that the average person, or even the well-read and intelligent person, really has absolutely not even an inkling of an idea of just how ferocious these demon-spawned creatures in human skin-suits are.

Your brain, dear reader, is like that of the average “investigator” in a Chthulu Mythos “adventure”. And if you were to find out the truth of these “people” that the WEF has placed strategically around the globe, Hollywood execs have placed in entertainment, and “others” have placed in the chairs of Presidents, Prime Ministers and “Popes”, you would start leaking sanity points from both your ears at a dizzying rate.

It is an uncommon mind that can learn of the things these people do and not take sanity points of damage that risk making their life unlivable.

The only historical type of man that I am aware of that could have been Catholic Knights, who were usually noblemen that had been trained both for war as well as to be Charitable Catholic men from the time they could walk and speak.

It is not a pleasant path, but it is a necessary one.

Never, ever, ascribe to stupidity what can be explained by raw, unadulterated, total, selfish, evil.

Learn this lesson.

Quickly and deeply. There isn’t much time left for you and your progeny to do so.

You might be interested in the following posts:

  1. You are here…
  2. European Theatre Thoughts
  3. Sex and Relationship Lies
  4. Withhold your Charity, Pilgrim
  5. For all the retards

By G | 16 March 2024 | Posted in Billionaire Pedophiles, Catholicism, Christianity, Clown World, Freemasons, Russia and GAE, Sedevacantism, Social Commentary, The Enemy Within, The Jews, Zombie Apocalypse

Gab: The Grift & The Decline

Recently, as everyone who is on the internet and not a boomer might know, Gab has decided to allow only accounts with a checkmark to post pictures and videos. This means paying customers.

The move was not very popular with most Gabbers and as a result Andrew Torba, the CEO of Gab received some flak. Which prompted him to remove a bunch of people that criticised him from Gab and ban them.

Which made him even less popular.

Torba keep quoting scripture to defend his position on everything from changing his mind about free speech to why he did what he did.

There is a post that I fond a while back, that Vox Day also linked to, that seriously made Torba’s motives become questionable. And unlike Vox, I think it is pretty damning in its evidence AND conclusions.

In fairness, Vox tends to take the position of seeing Gab from a viability perspective, and given what I know of Vox and how he thinks, his personal detachment from the intricacies of whether, as he posted, it is a honeypot/grift combination or a genuine attempt at Alt-tech probably features very little in that equation.

Sure, from a practical perspective, ANY genuine Alt-tech will face formidable resistance from powerful enemies, so making the subscriber base put some skin in the game is essential to survival. No one is questioning that, but it’s also basic math, so not exactly an exciting revelation.

Despite its detractors, and among them also the valid ones, which are not few, Gab DID provide a service up to a point. If nothing else it allowed a free flow of information regarding the activities of people whom it is literally now illegal to criticise in any way in many parts of the world: Jews, and their aims, as well as their historical actions. Questioning the Holocaust is literally illegal in much of Europe. Questioning the murder of millions of Christians by the Bolshoviks however, is apparently fine even though the numbers are nearly an order of magnitude higher. Now, why would that be?

The thing is, for me, personally, the truth matters. And it matters more than the strategic aims. Which is not to say I am some spotless paladin of virtue. I think anyone that would accuse me of that would be laughed at by all, and I would be leading that charge, but personally, associating with actual deceivers is really not my thing. Which is not to say I won’t use their shit if it suits me. That includes Faceborg, Gab, and whatever else I may delve into. But I’m not going to buddy up to Zukboy or Torba for that matter, because whether Torba is actually a flytrap to suck in all the “antisemites” or as I prefer to think of some people, individuals that prefer the truth to comfortable lies, and then will sell them down the river or not, what I can ascertain for certain at this point is that Torba is far from honest.

And frankly I doubt he is any kind of “Christian” either. And by that I mean not only that he is not a Christian in the true sense of the word, since, as any reader here knows, only Sedevacantist Catholics are actual Christians, but I mean it even in the more generic sense of all the poor heretics who simply don’t know any better, because they are lazy, stupid, or both and as a result believe themselves to be “real” Christians while loyal to the Novus Orco fake Church, or one of the 40,000 denominations of Protestantism and so on. No, I mean that I suspect Torba is not even one of those guys, but rather puts on the skin suit of a “convinced” and “Christian” man as easily as I change T-shirts. Which is not to say that he may not be playing this part even within the confines of his own home.

But in any case we can definitely ascertain a few things about Torba (and hence Gab, since this relates to that really and not to Torba as an individual):

  • He lies about Gab stats and lies massively on it (evidence below)
  • He can’t be any kind of very convinced Christian as the details of his family and some employees he kept on long past due make clear at the post above as well as this one below:

https://infostormer.com/gabs-former-cto-threatens-to-digitally-murder-radio-host/

  • He has made some poor choices in terms of leading Gab. This in itself would not be meaningful either way, because mistakes are never optional, they simply WILL happen, but it’s the kind of errors that are made that all point to the same general conclusion, which I will lay out at the end of this post.

First let’s look at the evidence for the numbers being fake. Now, you may think all of this rests on only Judge Dread and that we are buddies or something. Truth is he had blocked me almost right away on Gab, I forget for what, I think I corrected him on something about Christianity. Turns on Poast he’s fine. The thing is about this guy that while his take may or may not be to your liking I can’t recall an instance of him posting something false. And in any case he is not alone in his assessment of Gab, in fact, many of his observations rely on information provided by others.

An important point to understand is that when Gab used the mostly open source code from mastodon, it remained open to scrutiny. And this is where a lot of this information comes from.

Here Judge Dread is referring to when Gab left the federated environment of mastodon. Many thought it was because that environment is more like the early internet, except with most of the posters limiting their posts of a socially suicidal level of politically incorrect to mostly politics, race, and noticing the actions of certain ethnicities in particular, as well as generic grifters and so on. It’s like if 4chan was on twitter, and I have to say I am enjoying it. You can find me on there as @TheKurgan but let us continue examining the Gab fake numbers issue.

Second image is larger for legibility it’s a very useful timeline that demonstrates quite clearly that Gab never had the numbers it claimed, and still does not.

The fact that the guy who posted that was immediately banned and his posts deleted is also indicative that it’s real. Otherwise why not post the real numbers, it’s easy enough to do.

So, to my mind, this conclusively proves that Torba lies about how many real live humans he has active in Gab. And I had reached the exact same numbers by other deductive processes. I am not a tech guy and I don’t really care, but I do notice things others tend to miss. One of the surest indicators for me was the number of followers that Vox Day got when he rejoined Gab.

Vox had initially praised Torba’s Gab and joined it and brought several people over given that the man’s blog is visited by over 100k people a day.

But the Nazi-themed pornographers on Gab started to make very rough memes aimed art Vox and his family and Torba refused to take them down or punish the perpetrators in any way. Vox left Gab and denounced it and so did a lot of other people.

After that Torba eventually banned all porn on the site. Supposedly because he’s such a Christian. And eventually he and Vox made peace and Vox returned to Gab. Almost instantly Vox had 35k followers. It wasn’t organic or believable simply because the Gab subculture is pretty obvious, and would be to anyone that hung out in alt-dot forums since the early 90s and used chats to discuss physics that were infiltrated by feds and so on. There are basically three types of gabbers, Boomers making Boomer noises about ‘murica and bootstraps or cruises, or whatever, who are totally irrelevant to reality, then a noticeable amount of feds of various types. Rather lacklustre really. I recall old Dean from my days on the alt-dot antigravity forums, he was a persistent fed who but in his eight hours diligently and though it was obvious if you spot patterns who he worked for, it got so we were even kind of friendly. He debunking the truth and most of us on that board making fun of his government job. I guess you just can’t get good help these day, plus, most of them are probably millennials. Anyway, they are rather obvious and crude in their tactics. And then there are the real Gabbers which can be further divided into two general camps. Obsessed pro-nazi Hitlerites that think the Fürher did nothing wrong, and the more balanced 4chan types who know WWII was not how it was presented but don’t obsess over it and instead make fun of all the grifters, liars, and fakers in no specific order. The point is that none of these demographics would gravitate towards Vox with such alacrity.

I believe Torba immediately gave Vox full access to most of the human Gabbers plus maybe a dollop or two of bots. So the more detailed investigation above confirm things for me as far as I care to have them confirmed.

But OK, you might say, the guy is just trying to make a buck… and yes, yes he is. Based on the linked blogs above, it’s fairly obvious that Torba not only wanted to make a lot of money, but his arrogance and ego made him think he could be the next Elon Musk Lite. In fact he offered Gab to Elon for a couple of billion at one point. I didn’t screenshot the post, because I don’t care either way, but I remember it and thought it was ridiculous, and of course it is.

While twitter is a government, deep-state financed, data collection ad zeitgeist warping mechanism, and Elon is still marching to the general drumbeat of the ADL, Gab, with its roughly 30,000 users at best, a good chunk of which are undoubtedly feds from Israel and the USA predominantly, is at best a blip on the radar which is worth dragging for the names of vicious terrorists that post funny memes. Clearly civilisation destroying madmen. Can’t have Hitler memes and Kekistan frog memes out in the wild there. You think I am joking, but Ireland, Canada, and to a lesser extend Europe are passing laws that will literally land you in jail under a hate crime for years, while muslims that have raped little girl that may not even have reached puberty literally have got away with zero jail time.

The point is that Gab is certainly not worth millions, never mind billions.

And there are other problems, its CTO is, well… see for yourself.

Gab was supposedly a completely dox-free site, but as it turns out, Torba will happily hand over names to any fed agency that asks, despite his loudly claiming the opposite.

So, as I said, we can conclude that Gab was never as popular as Torba claimed, and is practically on life support now, as can be seen by the kind of slating that Torba receives daily on his own posts on Gab, as well as the low response number. We can also conclude Torba was in it primarily for the money, and possibly a little of the fame, or infamy, same-same I think. But things did not quite pan out as he’d hoped.

I don’t thing Torba is necessarily in bed directly with any alphabet soup types, but I could be wrong, after all the level of generic incompetence on both sides of that divide would make it pretty hard to differentiate it from just a generically chaotic and badly managed social media site. I do think it is scraped and infiltrated to the gills with feds from various corners of the globe though.

And lastly, on a personal note, as can be seen by the details in the linked posts by others above, it is absolutely questionable if Torba is even remotely Christian. I mean, to me he clearly isn’t, because as you all know by now, if you’re not a 1958 Sede Catholic, to me you’re a pagan/heretic/whatever, but even by the standards of Protestants, which are essentially the same as those of demons (agree Jesus Christ is Lord, which even demons know) he still doesn’t really pass the sniff test, because the stench that comes off him is not of an earnest believer in error, but rather of a grifter wearing a mask.

And I promplty expect I will be banned from Gab as soon as this post makes it way to Torba or his gay brothers’ beady little eyes.

So, why the long effort-post on all this?

One reason: To Educate those willing to learn.

The most consistent failure of human beings over the last 4 years has been a combination of the following things:

  • Believing the mainstream media and government. On anything.
  • Doing as they are told by the above.
  • Latching on to the first person even remotely hinting at the truth.

It’s that last one in bold that’s the killer. it is Satanic standard practice, used since the dawn of man, to play both sides of the same coin. Freemasons do it as an almost inviolable law. As do Jews in pretty much any business dealing I have personally seen happen. As do the fake “Catholics” I have exposed many times on this blog, like Milo, Emo Jones, Tay-Tay Marshall, and others.

It’s a trap.

I tend to focus on the intentional liars, grifters and deceivers, which all of the above mentioned are, but perhaps an even more dangerous type is the unintentional deceiver, which is where I would place torba. He’s not invested enough, perhaps not personally compromised enough to be blackmail able, and clearly probably not intelligent enough to be used directly and knowingly as a sponge to soak up anyone that might otherwise become effective at changing the zeitgeist.

My best guess is that Torba is an unwitting player at being the “conservative” or “right-wing” or “extremist” that really serves no purpose other than to defuse effective people sick of all the lies from getting together and forming groups of people that might change things, be it politically, in media, or however else. In short, insofar as he is not helpful to the cause of truth and justice, he is so by being a useful idiot to those who run things. And a minor useful idiot at that.

Gab has been “useful” is permitting a certain level of truth to escape the mental barricades they have worked for decades to install in all of us, and that too, in my opinion was mostly by chance and dumb luck. The freakozoid Nazi fan boys, LARPing Pagan “Odin worshippers” neurotypical weaponised autists and memers got a few things over the fence and that is good, but there is no one who will convince me that Gab is anything other than the personal and badly managed grift of Torba. And frankly, I don’t care, it’s fine. What I do care about is the truth, I’m not neurotypical myself, go figure, which is why this post.

Learn to spot the “other side of the same coin” boys and girls. Whether it be intentional or as in this case situational.

Anyway, I will be on Poast more. Here it is: https://poa.st

Go join and if you read my blog you can find me there as @TheKurgan along with several people who were banned from Gab.

This is my take too:

Now excuse me while I go ask Judge Dread about Catholicism and see if he blocks me again.

No related posts.

By G | 16 March 2024 | Posted in Catholicism, Christianity, Clown World, Impostors and Frauds, Sedevacantism, Social Commentary

Catholicism Will Win

My post on “toxic” Catholicism got a friend or two to get in touch. Latest tally:

4 families that pray together have 19 children between them.

The third couple I have either met personally or been consulted with in some manner about life, marriage and so on are now also expecting a baby this year, so that’s 3 for 3 and they are all young men under 30 and their wives are amazing young women, well read, feminine and honestly beautiful.

Sedevacantist Churches are bursting at the seams and more and more proper Catholic priests are being trained and spreading the gospel and giving mass all over Europe, the USA and even Moscow and soon I believe also the Philippines.

We will outnumber our enemies and nothing will stop that. Plus, the effectiveness ratio of Catholics is an order of magnitude more than most humans, because they operate synergistically. Once the first few city states form, it will be a Reconquista that will make the Spanish one look like glacier-speed compared to wildfire-speed.

Deus Gloria

No related posts.

By G | 13 March 2024 | Posted in Catholicism, Reclaiming the Catholic Church, Sedevacantism, Social Commentary

Churchianity is Evil

This is hard for people to grasp on ANY level because they get emotional.

But it’s a simple and clear concept.

There is ONE truth, objectively. Any deviation from it is error.

That is simple enough even Protestants understand it.

The problem is that is ALL they understand and then promptly go on to buy into whatever error they do and then quadruple down on it right into the pits of Hell.

And by Churchian I absolutely include the Novus Ordo branch of Protestantism falsely referred to these days as “Catholicism”.

It literally leads you to death, an ugly one at that, and not just for you but for your loved ones, murdered by your own hand because you trusted some deceiver pretending to speak for the Truth.

With all the historical veracity and evidence of… uh… the last 70 years of Boomerism Narrative.

This is the result os listening to such “preachers”.

There is only ONE true, infallible Church.

And it does not do things in a blinkered, binary, inhuman mechanisation of the world. The truth is very much like math, but reality relies heavily on statistics and probability, not simple number theory like basic addition and subtraction.

The fruits of the most human, joyous and interesting civilisations on Earth are overwhelmingly Catholic in origin.

It really doesn’t matter if you like it, hate it, or are even able to understand it.

Either you do or take the time to learn to do so, or else you’re gonna end up in the place where you inject your own children with deadly poison. Genetic serum or moral relativism; either way the final destination is death, body and soul.

You might be interested in the following posts:

  1. Sex and Relationship Lies
  2. The Lies You are Told

By G | 11 March 2024 | Posted in Brain-Mind Functionality, Catholicism, Clown World, Freemasons, Impostors and Frauds, Medical Science, Sedevacantism, Social Commentary, The Enemy Within

Versus… “Toxic” Catholicism

See the immediately previous post below this one, before reading this one. They are linked and you really need to see that one first.

The image below has been blurred for obvious privacy reasons, nevertheless I asked the two ladies in it beside my wife if it was ok to use and they both immediately enthusiastically said yes.

These are three catholic women with their children.

3 women, 15 children.

This, ladies, is what a strong, powerful, heroic woman looks like.

There isn’t one of the women in the picture who has a husband that wouldn’t take a bullet for them. Or that doesn’t appreciate the daily sacrifices they make and love them all the more for it.

I’m not one to “gush” or pedastalise women, as any reader of this blog will know, but neither am I the supposed “misogynist” some toothless overweight shrews might try to label me as.

The truth is that when I saw this picture, shortly after it was taken, it encapsulated for me everything that life is really about. The kids all played awesomely together, and the two women beside my wife are awesome people. The fact that between three of them they have made 15 children is nothing short of heroic, as far as I am concerned.

One of the mums said, “Nah, not heroes.”

I reminded her, as I will any man reading, that as far as I know, there isn’t a man alive that would consider giving birth ONCE not being heroic. Meeting a woman that has given birth to five or more children, as far as men are concerned, trust me, is the equivalent of talking to a Victoria Cross recipient.

Anyway, try and argue against that, Feminists. And… what’s that? Oh, wait, we can’t hear you over the laughter of our children, and the silence of your non-existent progeny, as ours go on to re-populate the Earth after the depopulation attempts of those who fooled you to begin with.

No related posts.

By G | 11 March 2024 | Posted in Catholicism, Clown World, Fighting SJWs, Increasing Happiness, Relationships, Sedevacantism, Social Commentary

How to Fight Demons

The guy who runs the Postcards from Barsoom substation, has an interesting post on the reality of demons. Aside being cogently argued for normies too, it has some nice art from the RPG Rifts.

I also like his affinity for Edgar Rice Burroughs stuff, I mean my older blog had the tagline a Martian in London, and I loved the film John Carter of Mars and of course have read most of the books. But that all aside, and the article being good too, the reality is that no one there TELLS you how to actually fight demons.

Forgetting about the initial barrier to begin with, that is, your conscious acceptance that demons are real, once you have passed that one, what then?

If it were as simple as arming yourself with a big crucifix, a holy water pistol and a blessed assault rifle that shoots silver bullets, life would be grant.

But that’s not how demons fight. They are evil, sneaky, vile, cowardly and they certainly do not prefer a head-on war when they can act by subterfuge and creeping evil by using their minions and the mechanising ways of bankers, taxation, government and demonc laws designed to cripple humanity.

Nevertheless here are some guidelines for you. I am not going to waste time justifying every aspect of what I say, because by now, you either have learnt to research anything you doubt by yourself, or your mind is already made up, so, what I write here is simply the best advice I have. Take it, ignore it, or laugh at it, I don’t care either way. those who are unlucky or unfortunate enough to end up relying on it will attest to the fact that everything I say here is sound.

1. Catholicism is Best.

Catholicism is the only valid Christianity in existence and always was. Your whiny Protestant or “Orthodox” noises notwithstanding. Go cry somewhere else, no one here cares. It’s just how it is.

In any event, even that is much degraded today because the only Catholics left are 1958 Sedevacantist Catholics. Probably no more than a million souls in all around the planet.

According to Catholic Dogma, only a trained Priest that has had the permission from a Bishop should even think of performing an exorcism or tangling directly with demons. This is a very wise and protective rule. I have had the unfortunate experience of having to deal with nefarious forces at least four or five times in my life, and while two were relatively mild affairs, one a mid-type event but that lasted months, the remaining two were really quite serious, and one of which honestly was a very narrow escape. My point is that dealing with demons is not to be taken lightly at all. Let me try to give you a rough idea:

You’re trying to face up to an entity that is immortal and has been around since the dawn of creation, is totally evil and hates you and everything you love with the passion of a thousand suns, is intelligent and has absolutely no moral qualms. It also is intimately familiar with the entire realm of human existence, while you are barely capable of even believing these entities exist, never mind be aware of their natures, laws they have to obey, what these laws might be, or how to invoke such laws, if they exist, and so on. And you think you’re going to go up against them and just dispatch them as if you were Biff the cool jock in a zombie movie where he brains a few slow zombies with his baseball bat? Think again.

Now let’s add a few more important points. They are telepathic, they can get in your head and make you hear or even see things, that may in fact be true, so as to cause you to question your very sanity. They can even affect material reality, once again, making you question your sanity, when an object you just put down disappears or reappears in a different place. You’re far more likely to think you’re in the early stages of dementia than a demon did it. And let’s not forget that if you do have dementia, they are far more likely to make you think a demon did it, just so you will appear even more unhinged to your loved ones. Are you starting to appreciate just how sneaky and evil they are? Because if you are, about now, you should be afraid. Very afraid, of tangling with one unprepared. And in case I have not been clear, you are always unprepared. But… and there is a but, a tiny light at the end of the tunnel, fear itself is not the answer. It never is. Caution is. And caution is not fear. We may all experience fear from time to time, but you don’t need to surrender to it. The very definition of courage is not to not be afraid, but to be afraid and act anyway.

Alright, say you have followed me up to now and at least intellectually you accept as a premise that not only Catholicism is the only religion that really understands how to deal with demons, but you also accept as a premise that their rules for dealing with them are the best or safest. Cool. So what if you don’t have an actual sede priest anywhere near you and yet you suspect some demon activity is involved? Well… my suggestions in this next section will be purely practical and purely protective. We’ll discuss actual fighting demons later.

2. Practical Protection from Demons

Again, without any justifications and blah, blahs, these are the things that will help keep you safe:

  • Be a properly baptised Sedevacantist (1958) Catholic. If you don’t know what that is, read my books Believe! and Reclaiming the Catholic Church (see Books I wrote and my E-store or look for hardcopies on Amazon at the links provided).
  • Actually believe. As a real Sede Catholic does.
  • Trust, with absolute faith and unshakable certainty, in the dimity, protection and salvation within our Lord Jesus Christ.
  • Attend Holy Mass as regularly and as often as possible.
  • Have a proper Sede Priest bless your home and give you some Holy Water.
  • Pray regularly. Thank God for all the good things in your life as well as the tests you may be facing. Be as properly Catholic and good as you can in all you do.
  • Do sprinkle some Holy Water around your home if you feel the need and invoke the power of God and Jesus to protect you, your home and your loved ones.

These are the basics. If you suspect actual Demonic oppression or attacks, trust in god, and pray and absolutely use the name of Jesus Christ and say it out aloud that you belong to our Lord Jesus Christ. Remember that as a Catholic, you do not belong to a spirit of fear. So trust in your Lord and your Faith in Him. They hate the name of Jesus Christ and that alone has the power to keep them at bay if not dispel them completely from your vicinity.

Do use Holy Water.

Do cross yourself and use an amulet or cross to remind you and reinforce you faith, not as an icon or idol, but as reminder.

3. Fighting Back

Please understand that I will absolutely repeat what the Catholic Church teaches on this matter:

Only trained exorcists that have had approval from the local Bishop should ever even think of attempting to deal directly with a demon.

We do, however, live in dark times, and a couple of things that are still true might be useful to know.

First, given that there is no current valid pope, Bishops have no authority of jurisdiction anywhere, so Priests can act as exorcists in their own right should they so choose, though it is obviously best if they are trained and do get the approval of whatever Bishop they operate with.

Second, despite all of the above, the rules for having exorcisms and dealing with demons be the purview of only trained priests is not a divine Law, but rather a Church Law. It is protective for the faithful, not an absolute. And you need to realise that exorcism is a skill that includes not only training and specific prayers that are generally used for it, but above all it requires an unshakable Faith. Any and all doubts or fears and weaknesses will be exploited ant taken advantage of and used against anyone that dares to attempt tangling with demons. So, while it is absolutely not advisable to do so, in certain emergencies or cases, you might not have any options. And if your back is against the wall, well, you might as well go down swinging. Sometimes, you even get lucky and survive it, as I can personally attest to.

In such an emergency, that is, one that you happen to find yourself in, not one you necessarily went looking for, you may as well fight back. And I repeat again, do not go looking for these fights. Please, just do not. And if you become aware of a situation that might entail these entities, do your utmost to avoid it yourself and get a proper priest to deal with it.

Lastly, be aware that the overwhelming cases of weird behaviour or events that get labelled “demonic possession” or demonic activity are most often actual psychological disturbances and/or rationally explainable events that do not involve demons at all. So keep that in mind. Right then, all the corollaries and warnings having been given, if you have no other choice, here are the best suggestions I have:

In the case of Demonic Oppression.

This is most difficult to identify as it will tend to just feel like a series of things going wrong, continuous bad luck, and so on. It mostly afflicts people who have just been baptised or who are contemplating doing so, or are on the path to discovering real Catholicism. The response is the same regardless of if it is actual demonic oppression by the minor imps of Hell, or just random bad luck. Throw yourself into your faith and Catholicism. Increase your prayer life and spread the gospel to family, friends, and strangers alike (without becoming a Bible thumping nuisance). Personally, when this started happening I wrote Believe!, which has now helped get over a hundred people to proper baptism and Sedevacantist Catholicism. After that I was left alone for quite a while. When it started up again I wrote Reclaiming the Catholic Church, which has become a basic reference book and manual for anyone wanting to understand Sedevacantism in depth, or wanting to refute the many lies told about it. The general demonic oppression I might suffer now is mostly indistinguishable from day to day life problems that crop up in all our lives. The point here is that a good offence is the best defence. If every time you get oppressed you become even more of a firebrand for Christ, and help convince, awaken and convert more people to Catholicism, they will tend to leave you alone more often. It’s just strategically not wise to poke a guy that starts lighting fires for Christ all around him and then some. So their attacks, if they come any more, will tend to be even more indirect. In such cases, simply redouble your efforts and ensure your immediate family are well educated in the Catholic Faith.

In Cases of Demonic Possession of Places.

Here, you really need to try and get hold of a priest to bless and cleanse the home, office or whatever, but failing that, prayer, your own use of Holy Water, and a strong and powerful belief in the cleansing energy of your faith and the protection and cleansing Grace from God, which you might imagine as a kind of “orbital laser” from Heaven to dispatch unwanted demonic entities, can definitely clear areas.

In Cases of Demonic Possession of People.

There are two types of demonic possession that can happen, partial possession and full possession. In either case, mores than in any other case, I strongly urge you to not ever try to deal with his stuff on your own, and to get a proper Priest and exorcist to do so. I personally believe I have seen and been in very close proximity to one partial demonic possession of a person, and it was absolutely freaky, and no, I was not able to liberate that person of the possible demon that may have been partially possessing herald my attempts to do so where weak and unsuccessful, besides the fact that an exorcism I believe can normally only take place when the victim actually also still has some free will to chose to be exorcised, though I am not certain of this. I can’t imagine what it might be like to have to deal with a full possession, not do I ever want to find out.

Final Words.

I again can only reiterate that you should never, ever tangle with this stuff, and if you need a little nudge to further convince you, then read the scariest book I ever read, Hostage to the Devil, by Malachi Martin. I always caution people to not read this book, because when you do, you will become aware of realities that for now you are blissfully ignorant of, and once you become aware of them, you can’t ignore that reality any more. Your ignorance in the vast majority of cases is protective. You basically being an NPC as far as the demons are concerned, means you’re not a threat to them, nor of any consequence. You’re probably just marching along to the general increasing degeneracy of humanity at large and nothing further needs be done to you specifically. The moment you become aware of this alternate reality, you can begin to potentially be a problem. In short, you might begin to attract some demonic attention. The reason people who begin to move towards Sedevacantist Catholicism begin to encounter various difficulties in life, as do the newly baptised, is precisely because once you have chosen a side, newbie that you are, if they can dissuade you or distract you right at the beginning, that’s one less soldier of Christ they have to worry about later.

Reading Hostage to the Devil will make you aware of things you can’t unseen later. So, I suggest you leave well enough alone. If you decide to read it anyway, I suggest you do so as a properly baptised and believing Catholic first. And with a strong faith and a detached approach to the information you will read in that book.

That’s about all the advice I can give you, and I sincerely pray you never have to use it to fight actual demons. But you may end up having to one day, perhaps we all will. If so, may your metaphorical sword be mercilessly sharp and true, and your armour impervious, pure, and perfectly able to deflect every blow the enemies of our Lord try and inflict upon you and your loved ones.

Ave Soldier. March on and remember: Nec Spe, Nec Metu.

No related posts.

By G | 7 March 2024 | Posted in Catholicism, Martial Arts, Sedevacantism

BELIEVE !

Believe! is now available in digital format direct from the E-store. The paper version remains available at Amazon.

This little book surprised me most of all, because with my completely inability to care about marketing myself or my books, it nevertheless found its own audience by word of mouth I guess and I have people emailing me that they bought several copies and they leave them in random churches with a note to take it.

It’s a pretty short book at only 98 pages and can be read in a couple of hours but has plenty of references and covers all the main perspectives of religious thought, or absence of it in turn.

At first individuals, then families would write me to let me know that they were becoming Sedevacantist Catholics, in some cases, nominally “Catholic” people thanked me for finally resolving for them why they had lapsed and felt the Catholic Church was not really any longer the real Church (The Novus Ordo Vatican II heretic mess is absolutely not only not Catholic, it is Satanic in nature and form). They returned to the real Church finding proper Priests and Bishops and getting baptised or becoming members of the scattered churches that are left and going to proper traditional Holy Mass.

The numbers of Sedevacantists, that is, Catholics that are realising what has really happened in 1958 continue to grow. Sedevacantist groups in England, Italy, France, the USA, Canada, Russia and even a budding little group in Finland, started by a young couple now expecting their first child, continue to grow.

You can’t stop the truth.

And although this little book was really mostly explaining my own perspective on things, it was written in the way I would have liked to find someone discussing these topics in my decades during which the closest I came to religion was a generally Zen-Agnostic somewhat existentialist or fatalist view that probably resembled Samurai-era Shintoism more than any kind of Christianity.

Apparently, my very direct take on things, including the nonsense that gets peddled as “Christianity” has resonated with more people than I ever expected. I hope you read it and enjoy it, and more importantly, it helps you in your passage through life.

No related posts.

By G | 27 February 2024 | Posted in Believe, Books, Catholicism, Christianity, Sedeprivationism, Sedevacantism, Social Commentary

Sedeprivationism vs Sedevacantism

There has been a long and quiet suffering by many Catholics (sedevacantists) that goes beyond the mere situation of the Church presently with regard to the non-Catholic, Freemasons, Satanists and impostors presently occupying the Vatican. After all, that situation is easily understood by anyone that cares to look into Vatican II and is in any case prophesied in the visions of many saints as well as in Revelation, so really, there isn’t much to worry about.

The situation concerns the growing gulf between Sedeprivationists and Sedevacantists.

If you are interested in the details, you can either read my Reclaiming the Catholic Church, available on Amazon in paper format, or for less in digital format, direct from my E-Store.

Or you could read the argument as presented here, which is essentially absolutely correct.

I was unaware of the “Totalist” position, when I wrote my book, but logic is logic, and I made it clear in that book, as well as the reasons why, the only nod to the word sedeprivationism that I acknowledge was that technically it was a better name because the chair of Peter is not actually empty, but filled by an impostor that needs to be thrown off it on his ear ASAP.

But that is not what Sedeprivationists mean when they use the term, and they try to hold onto the completely outmoded and outdated theory of Cassiciacum of Father, and later Bishop, Guérard Des Lauriers. As I stated in RTCC, des Lauriers’ theory was a very charitable and possibly briefly “valid” idea to present to the world so as to give the more timid and cowardly clergy of the day (1965 to 1978 or so) a chance to speak up or at least take a position that did not promote the completely heretical Vatican II event and all those associated with it.

The Code of Canon Law of 1917, and simple logic a child can arrive at, is clear that since Roncalli was invalidly elected on at least three separate counts:

  1. He was a Freemason, which means he was not, and could not be, a Catholic.
  2. He was “elected” only after Giuseppe Siri was actually elected twice, and blackmailed into not accepting in order to protect what otherwise he was told would be a massacre of Catholic Bishops in the Communist East. Blackmail and any event that forces a non-free vote automatically renters the election invalid.
  3. Even if you ignore those two points it cannot be contested at all that Roncalli approved and signed off on the first two documents of Vatican II, one of which contains direct heresy in a number of ways and the other though not containing direct heresy was a document that said the heresy of Vatican II should be spread throughout the world by every means possible, so it was heretical in intent if not actual words of the text itself. This even was and is absolutely enough to designate Roncalli an antipope and as such completely invalid.

Montini came up after Roncally, and produced the remaining 14 documents of Vatican II every one of which is replete with heresy and inverts catholic dogma. He also changed the mass, which is absolutely not permitted so there is absolutely no doubt he too defected from the Catholic faith as per canon 188 part 4, and that if we are so generous as to assume he was a valid Catholic to begin with, which is questionable at best.

Every claimant to the Petrine see after Montini continued to promote and promulgate Vatican II and its manifest heresies, meaning they too at best defected from the Faith, but in any case had already done so by not denouncing Vatican II. And the same goes for any supposed clergy that does not reject Vatican II and its fake “Popes”.

This is not a matter of opinion, but one of Canon Law.

The position of the supposed Sedeprivationists is essentially a modified form of “recognise and resist”. On top of which Bishop Des Lauriers’ thesis, which I have in the original French, and have read, is also really doing quite the disservice to Aristotle, using concepts of form and spirit or material and formal that clearly Aristotle never intended to be used that way and which really have no place in Catholic theology.

Nevertheless, I can understand the wish to give some kind of a charitable “out” to people who might have been on the fence in the tumultuous times of the usurpation of the Church from 28th October 1958 to say the end of 1965, after Vatican II finished, but even if we generously allow for a period of say ten or twelve years after that, surely, by 1978 everyone that was going to call a heretic a heretic had ample time to do so, and those who did not and worse, continued to promote Vatican II, like the cowardly Vigano, who even has a doctorate in Canon Law, confirmed themselves as Heretics too, falling foul of the same Canon 188.4.

This is really not hard.

The Sedeprivationist clergy seems bent on “hoping” for a miraculous conversion of Bergoglio and the other pedophiles, Satanists, cocaine-driven homosexuals busy doing gay orgies in the Vatican and so on. That’s not going to happen, and even if it did, the rule is that a reformed heretic should have authority over absolutely no one and should spend the rest of their days in a monastery in perpetual penance, so even if the miracle of conscience, repentance and truth hit every one of those miserable scumbags in the head and they honestly converted right there, they would STILL not be allowed to act as clergy, perform sacraments or do anything else that clergy does, as Cum-Ex Apostolato Officio makes perfectly clear and which is still referenced by Canon 188.4 which in any case is moot since it was an ex cathedra pronouncement valid in perpetuity and was in any case the rule before it ever needed to be spelt out by Pope Paul IV in the 16th Century.

So, by all possible perspectives, the Sedeprivationist view is in error. And while the clergy espousing it are absolutely valid priests and Bishops, no one is questioning that, they are in error. And as this error has now been perpetrated for a long time, with increasing grumblings from the lay people that is reading shores that go from America to Australia and even in Russia, where there are sedevacantist communities that all are starting to realise that you cannot square this particular circle, it becomes incumbent upon the laity to correct the clergy.

We are in the current shameful state because the clergy of the Church in 1958 was weak and the laity initially deceived and when it became obvious that an usurpation had taken place, the clergy demonstrated themselves to be in the vast majority of cases, absolutely weak and cowardly where they were not actively Satanic Freemasons involved in the corruption of the Church for decades.

And when that began t come to light, the laity had been slumbering in complacency and also in weakness and comfort and cowardice and did not call out the corrupt, fake, impostors nor the weak cowardly clergy.

We cannot allow a similar situation to stand today, when the clear error of sedeprivationism continues to be perpetrated with inevitable consequences of further error and ultimately confusion, error, discord and possibly even defection from the faith, as any error or deviation from the truth ultimately results in.

As I am used to being the lightning rod for such discussions and debates, which are not a schism, I want to make it clear, but simply a more perfect ordering and understanding of Catholic dogma, I am presenting the first instance of this discontent among the laity here on this blog.

A more formal and combined public open letter will in due course be presented to those priests or Bishops, that are in error. And that error is the result of one of the following:

  1. In good faith but erroneous understanding, some have not studied the Catholic position in sufficient depth.
  2. Habitual obedience to Bishops even when they are in error and have no authority, since without a Pope there is no authority beyond that of performing sacraments and performing the usual duties clergy does when in an interregnum (between Popes).
  3. They are Bishops of Power instead of Piety and are overreaching their mandate from heaven, authority on Earth and over the laity in their misguided efforts to create a “bigger, stronger” renaissance of the true Catholic Church.

I have extremely good reasons, and plenty of evidence, to suggest that almost all and possibly really all, of the laity falls under points number one and two, above. Possibly many clergy that subscribe to sedeprivationism fall under point two, as well, although it is also clear a few are simply not as educated about Catholicism as they should be and are in fact in error as per point number one; undoubtedly in good faith, but error nevertheless.

More concerning is that Bishop who is acting as he is acting, in flagrant error of Canon Law and with imperious ego, because acting under the impetus of being a Bishop of Power, as defined by Rodney Stark in his History of the West How the West Won.

In brief, a Bishop or priest of Power is one that pushes the advancement of the church for the satisfaction of his own ego or worldly machinations. Despite the natural inclination one may have to see these people as evil egomaniacs, a couple of points need to be kept in mind.

Firstly, in some cases, while their ego is certainly ever-present, their intent may be to genuinely increase the spread, power and resilience of the Church. And in their minds whatever little “rules” or dogmas they may need to trample over are justified by the increased “glory” of the church. This in itself is an error of category, since it is the kind of error that laity, if anyone is supposed to be “okay” doing such things, should be taking on more than the clergy. it was crusaders that went off to war and Catholic knights that defended Malta, not priests and bishops taking up arms. So, whichever way you look at it, they are still in error, but their motives may not be as strictly selfish as one might at first imagine.

Secondly, even if they do happen to be egomaniacal narcissists that want to live in luxury, have big homes with servants and gold goblets to drink from, or whatever, the reality is that as a collateral side-effect, in the history of the Church, such despicable creatures nevertheless enriched the Church which permitted its expansion, the creation of amazing cathedrals and an increase in the faithful. Yes it was kind of a collateral effect, but it is a real thing anyway. So, even if at a personal level such clergy would be vile, God, historically, has managed to make at least some good flow from them, because at a worldly level, the use of funds and commitment towards creating more seminaries, more cathedrals and so on, and increasing the number of faithful, obviously has a positive effect.

As a result, I don’t necessarily object to some of the practices of priests or bishops of power, as long as:

  1. They do not break canon Law of Catholic Dogma.
  2. Their intent is not personal but for the benefit of the Church and this can be demonstrated by their personal living situation and so on.

Many other laymen and women are not as “charitable” as I am in this respect, and the grumblings at grassroots are becoming a low-level murmur reminiscent of an impeding avalanche or earthquake.

And such a thing we would all like to avoid. So, consider this simple, somewhat brutally direct, blog post to be an initial canary in the coal mine, in the hope that certain clergy takes note, some laity make them aware of it and they perhaps take note and begin to adjust accordingly, with all dignity and process due, and thus without any scandal or strife between the various faithful, be they clergy, or laity alike.

In my opinion the hope this will work on the relevant clergy of Power is absolutely remote, but, as our Lord tells us, we should first try quietly, then kindly, before we definitely call people to account.

This situation has been building for years, it’s not a flash in the pan, and it needs addressing.

I pray to our Lord that it gets resolved quietly and expediently by those responsible. And if not… well… we, remnant laity of the Catholic Church take our lead not from the timid types our grandfathers generation but rather from that of the Normans and Franks of 1095, from which, incidentally, on a personal level, my family line originates and can trace itself back to.

Glória Patri, et Fílío et Spirítui Sancto, sicut erat in princípio, et nunc, et semper, et in saecula saeculórum. Amen

No related posts.

By G | 27 February 2024 | Posted in Catholicism, Increasing Happiness, Sedeprivationism, Sedevacantism

« Older Entries
Newer Entries »

All content of this web-site is copyrighted by G. Filotto 2009 to present day.
Website maintained by IT monks