Now, it does need to be stated clearly that Fr. Esposito is not the brightest bulb in the Sanborn stables, in fact, having tried to listen to one of his sermons once, years ago, I think it may have reduced my IQ by 50 points. And still left me 25 points ahead of him.
But regardless, the point is that this “priest” has been trained, no, sorry, brainwashed, in the Sanborn driven, nonsensical theology of Cassiciacum. And CLEARLY it espouses exactly what I have been saying for at least 7 years now, which is, a completely untenable and illogical nonsense, if you are feeling charitable. But, if like me, you are aware that excessive charity is exactly how we got here, because the Satanists appeal to it, you realise the underlying issue is really a Satanic, whether intentional or not.
There is materially zero difference between that position and sacrificing a baby on the altar while you carry on claiming you’re “Catholic”.
Which is precisely the analogy I used years ago and which makes all the sedeprivationists mumble and disappear.
It is absurd, nonsensical, bullshit. And it’s time Sanborn, and his continued practice of ignoring and breaking canon law was called out publicly and loudly, for this nonsense is now CLEARLY heretical.
While I know personally, and recognise some misguided priests that consider themselves under the sedeprivationist banner will NOT support Fr. Esposito’s absurd post and false theology, they nevertheless cling to sedeprivationism, probably out of misguided loyalty and excess charity.
But this has to end now. Sedeprivationism, and the Cassiciacum theory it stems from is nonsensical, illogical, not canonically supported at all in any way, shape or form, and as a result is ABSOLUTELY AND CLEARLY HERETICAL.
It doesn’t matter what the “intention” of Sanborn is. Catholicism does not concern itself with such unknowables. Canon law is absolutely clear: if it walks like a duck, flies like a duck and quacks like a duck, it’s a duck, will be treated like a duck, and the fact the duck imagines it is an eagle is irrelevant.
The fact Sanborn may just be simply too stupid to understand Canon Law is based on Roman Law, and that Roman Law has NOTHING to do with the Talmudic and Satanic American legal system of loopholes he seems convinced applies to Canon Law, is immaterial. I do think this is the most likely explanation (along with a lot of pride, ego, love of power, fame, money and status) but I certainly cannot exclude at all that he may be intentionally trying to weaken or destroy the Church even further. And that’s the point, the real, internal reasons don’t matter. You act as a heretic, you are a heretic.
Fr. Esposito is another case in point, if I had to guess, I would guess he is probably a decent enough guy (not what I think of Sanborn), but as far as I am concerned, and as far as his theology is concerned too, he may as well be functionally retarded, and retards can’t be valid priests, no matter how nice they may be.
And if you are wondering why I refer to Sanborn as Sanborn, without the “Bp.” before it, it’s because as far as I am concerned, anyone who teaches, promulgates and acts as a heretic, is one.
I do not consider him valid clergy, and in fact, not even Catholic anymore.
And no, I am not being “harsh”. I am following canon law (canon 188.4 to be precise) and the Papal Bull it was based on and still refers to:
Cum Ex Apostolatus Officio.
It is time for the Church to reject, eject and be rid of heretics and rebuild from the ground up.
On which note, you could do worse than reading and signing up here .
This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here
