Giuseppe Filotto Cross

What is this site all about? First-timers CLICK HERE

No Comments

Why Clown World is Passing Censorship Rules…

…at breakneck speed, in one picture:

No related posts.

By G | 28 January 2024 | Posted in Social Commentary

No Comments

What Women Want vs What Women Get

I have posted a couple of videos by this guy and I have watched a few more. So far, he’s got a pretty high percentage of videos watched (maybe 6-7 or so) vs videos I personally generally agree with in regards to relationships, and this video covers a lot of ground and I think gets it mostly right. I have summarised his percentages in a simple table below for ease of “first glance” summarising all he says in one image.

As he says, there are only 5 possible end games for a woman. I have summarised his percentages but any notes in italics are my own additional notes.

A – She is a High value woman, keeps her high value and gets the High Value man she wants

B – She is a High Value Woman, but lowers her Value in Order to get the High Value Man she wants

C – She is (or more likely by far, perceives herself to be) a high value woman, she does NOT lower her (usually self-perceived/deluded) high value, fails to get the high value man she wants, and settles for a lower value man.

D – She lowers her value, still fails to secure the man she wants and settles for a lower value man.

E – She fails to secure a man, even if willing to settle for a lower value man. This can be because she is really low value herself, (ugly, crippled, damaged from trauma to the point she avoids men altogether, etc) or because she is deluded about her value and has delusional expectations compared to her actual value, whatever that is in reality.

Now, the interesting thing is that as per the above chart, only 1% of women could be assumed to be in what they consider a happy relationship.

Another 6% of them also should be happy, but they may at times feel they deserve a little more time/attention/from their spectacular husband.

The rest, can be said to be at various degrees of disappointment. The smart ones, will understand that facing reality head on and making the most of it is the smart play. If we were optimistic and aid about half of the women in C and D did this, that would still leave about 30% of women that will in all likelihood eventually file for divorce. In my estimation nowhere near half of the women in C and D will make the smart play, so divorce rates will approach more like 40 to 50%

And then there is roughly one on four women that never pairs up.

He also mentions that 80% of women who end up childless do so UNINTENTIONALLY, and only 10% of those are the result of medical issues.

Furthermore, the ones then up being left on the shelf, are skewed more towards the high value women that did not secure a husband earlier, and are now less physically attractive, closer to the age at which being childless is normal, and probably are heavily invested in their work or career, so it is not advantageous for a man to commit to her fully.

In short, these are the cold hard numbers, and while exceptions exist, they are even rarer than the 1%of “power-couples” that supposedly exist on the planet.

Personally, I never settled on the things that mattered to me, and although it’s far from scientific, if I use this calculator, the chances of finding a woman that fit my criteria when I first met my now wife were in the region of 0.4%. Interestingly enough, my own calculations at the time, before this online calculator existed, placed the chances of me meeting the ideal woman at quite a bit lower than that, because I also had a minimum IQ requirement, that while not hard-fixed, still needed to meet a certain level of intellectual ability that is really quite rare among women.

And that figure did not really change in those things that mattered to me about her, but by the time we did get together, slightly over a decade after we first met, I had relaxed on one point, if it was for a woman that fit the other criteria that mattered to me, and using the same calculator the value had changed to roughly 0.8%, which means it doubled, but was still below 1%.

From her perspective I think she is somewhat atypical because although they counted, the things that most women probably place high on the list were not as important to her, so on the female delusion calculator, she was probably looking for someone that externally was probably relatively “easy” to find when compared to most female delusions, and she was probably at the 2% or even 4% mark in terms of the externals she wanted, however, she is a rather complicated woman, and even if I dare say so myself, I think the internal qualities that she looked for, coupled with the ones she would swear blind at the time she did not want or need, but in fact both wanted and needed, probably means the number of men she would actually end up staying with permanently is, honestly, less than 0.1%. Frankly I doubt if it’s 0.01%, but we’ll give her the benefit of the doubt.

Add to this the fact that we both had a considerable amount of baggage, both practical as well as historical, and the chances of things working out well for us, by all indications that apparently make a difference, was kind of like some of those absurdly unlikely propositions in the stupidest and most unrealistic action adventure films. You know, the sniper shot that hit exactly the right button from 5k away in a high wind, at night.

In short, Luke blowing up the Death Star is quite literally much, much, much, easier than my wife and I having worked out, given the train-loads of “red flags” that conventional wisdom would allocate to each one of us separately and then a few more train loads if considered together.

And yet… here we are. And this is why I always say that our relationship has often reminded me of the ending of the Mel Gibson film Payback.

From my perspective, I did get the woman I wanted, but… probably at least a decade later than would have been ideal. From her perspective, she would probably make unkind but funny comments about how she doesn’t know how to use morse code to signal a need for a special ops team to extract her, but if she doesn’t turn up late at my death bed, (no chance if she has to get herself to a hospital in time. If I am dying at home, perhaps she might make it, assuming she doesn’t get distracted by making the tea just right, a shiny reflection in the window, or ordering a gadget that just came out for rescuing shrikes from bullfrogs) and assuming I last another 50 years or so to give her “perspective” she would probably confess, to my ears only, that she got the man she wanted too. If I croak first though, she would spend the rest of her days regretting not shouting it from the rooftops. She’s English. They are weird that way.

The point is that anyone that would plan their chances at blissful marriage based on our parameters is at best retarded, and quite possibly clinically insane. And I really am not joking. So, although, yes, the heart wants what it wants, I STRONGLY recommend teaching your heart to be quite a bit more reasonable and practical. Especially if you are a woman, because while for the decade or so between 20 and 30 you very often can take your pick of men if you are moderately intelligent and good looking, if you do not curb your delusions of what you “deserve” in the next decade, between 30 and 40, you will find yourself being used and discarded with increasing frequency, and have a more than 1 in 4 chance of ending up alone and childless. And probably another 1 in 4 chance of being with child/ren but perennially “single”, if you consider serial relationships as not being permanent, because… well, they aren’t, are they.

Do not be fooled by the illusions. Films, TV, the Internet. Do the cold, emotionless, hard numbers, ladies. That middle aged guy who doesn’t look like Brad Pitt and is not a millionaire, but is kind and handy around the house and actually loves you? It may make a lot of sense to love him right back and make it good. After all, to a great big level, love is a choice.

So choose wisely.

No related posts.

By G | 27 January 2024 | Posted in Relationships

1 Comment

Life’s Biggest Paradox

The recent posts on IQ, the intelligence gap, etcetera on Vox’s blog and his Sigma Game one too, along with a number of other recent considerations I have been mulling over with regard to the general malaise of this planet’s humanity both as a whole and as considered in their multiply fractal subdivisions right down to the individual, have got me to a point where I may begin to try to articulate a concept that I have been living with most of my life.

In simple terms it goes something like this:

Broadly speaking, almost nothing is really relevant, and yet, your life is absolutely relevant (regardless of whether you are aware of it, reach anything like your full potential in various facets of life and so on).

If you have read my post on violence and gunfights, you may be able to better understand what I mean. The long and the short of that post was that pretty much 95% of everything related to those two topics (assault/violence/gunfights) that you come across is bullshit.

The fact is that even if you train obsessively, unless you kinda go looking for it, the likelihood of you being in an actual gunfight are pretty close to nil. The chances of you being in some violent altercation are somewhat higher, but you can mostly negate those by the simple expedient of increasing your situational awareness in general even if you take zero time training in martial arts or using a firearms under stressful situations.

In the event that you DO end up in a gunfight, again, most of all the detailed supposedly pivotal information provided by armchair and paper experts, but even, too often, by supposedly highly trained “operators” is, again, mostly almost entirely irrelevant. If you can operate your weapon effectively under duress and hit a head-sized object repeatedly at twenty feet or less almost all the time, you are in the top 0.1% of people when it comes to being effective in a gun fight. The calibre or type of gun you use being a minor consideration at best.

Now, extend that sort of general realisation to pretty much everything else.

Unless you are in Ukraine or Gaza, the wars in those places are essentially mostly irrelevant to you. Not completely of course, because your petrol and heating costs go up, and so on, but the impact is not immediately drastic for 99% of the population on Earth compared to those who are actively involved. If you are generally prepared for the apocalyptic economic collapse that maths says will happen at some point, you are well ahead of the curve with respect of most of the rest of humanity. Obsessing about every detail of those conflicts can only lead to added anxiety and lowered immune systems without providing you any further benefit.

Given this overall philosophy, life could easily become seen as a futile exercise and one could easily slip into depression. That too is a trap, because while it is true that 95% of literally everything is bullshit, there is that 5% that makes it all worth it. And it would do so even if it was only 1%.

I always excelled at my job when I was in the corporate rat race and outperformed every financial target that was expected of me, even in those jobs where I was ultimately fired. And yes, I was “let go” on a number of occasions. And an even higher number of times I walked away on my own. How is it possible, you say that I double the expected profit margins and yet get “let go”? I must be lying, or missing out some part of the story, right? Not really. The only part of the story I am missing out is that several times I uncovered either outright fraud or incompetence within the higher ups. I didn’t even make it public for the most part, but the higher ups were aware I was aware. And they were also aware I was not corruptible. The idea a person would not either join them nor be against them necessarily, threatened them instantly (which is understandable).

My work in the UK was never seen by me as a “career”. If I had viewed it that way and applied myself that way, I would undoubtedly be a very wealthy person. That route however would have required a level of internal repression of my basic nature that made the prospect absolutely intolerable to me. I simply saw it as a job. In fact, as a job with a specific firm that would last as long as it lasted. Several years in the best cases, a few weeks in the worst cases. When I did my job, I did it very well and I put as much effort into it as needed to ensure I did outperform every target they had for me. I could do that precisely because it wasn’t that important to me. I am honest and I was hired to do a job so I did it well, but the job itself was not particularly interesting or meaningful to me. I took my satisfactions where I could and so on, and it’s nice to have a nice portfolio of prestigious jobs behind me, but I was perfectly happy being a mercenary that understood the value of both being a team member in a good team, or working independently when required.

I mention this to try and explain the perspective that most of life is filled with irrelevancies. Even the big events, while meaningful to you and some certainly will feel or even be life or death events from your perspective, are ultimately, in the scheme of things, not all that big a deal.

Your divorce and family implosion is a huge deal to you and your children, of course, and yet, most divorces are survived somehow. The culture is going to crap mostly everywhere, and yet you are generally comfortable enough as the world goes to Hell in a handbasket. From a bird’s eye view, very few things matter, and those that do are often things most people have very little control over.

So, if you have this perspective, I wanted to share with you my method for absolutely avoiding nihilistic despair, because I see people, especially younger people, falling into this absolute trap of thinking that since life is so “bad” nothing really matters. That is a mistake, a big, big error and one you should never make.

So here is my recipe:

  • Never, ever, assume the global is the personal and vice versa
  • Find the level of “resolution” that is important to you for different aspects of life and operate there. For example:
    • My professional work was relevant to me as maybe an 8 bit grayscale arcade game. You can still enjoy it and do well at Prince of Persia in monochrome, but you will not cry tears of despair if you need to switch to another 8 bit monochrome game like Bubble Bobble.
    • My personal life was always in full 8k colour and maximum level graphic card importance to me, though it had many facets and perspectives and within it each facet and perspective had a generally high level of resolution but not all had the highest resolution setting.
  • Have a compelling future. Without a target, something to aim for, an idea that motivates you to get out of bed in the morning, life can be misery, so, create something to work towards. And yet…
  • Be flexible in the extreme towards that future goal, because life invariably will throw monkey wrenches, the whole monkey, and the whole monkey’s troop with their monkey wrenches and also a few grenades in whatever plan you make. Life is essentially war, and as Clausewitz supposedly said, no plan survives contact with the enemy. This does not mean you are a butterfly with never solid targets, but rather the opposite, that whatever happens, and whatever route-changes you need to make, including drastic ones, you nevertheless continue heading towards the same goal from whatever unlikely position you end up finding yourself. The truth is that many high-minded concepts are usually extremely unlikely to happen in one or even two years, but relentless action in a specific direction almost always produces effective results over say 20 years.

I can attest to that “20 years” concept in a number of fields, where my interest was always high. In some cases I achieved a level of understanding or competence that then resulted in me deciding I had achieved what I wanted in that respect and then moved on to other interests, and in some cases the interest remains or even deepens and will continue to do so until death. A few examples (not to boast, but to give examples to those who might be new readers here as the numbers increase regularly):

  • Astronomy – I figured out the real history of Humanity to a previously unrealised degree, what happened on Mars and probably in other places of our Solar system to a degree that everyone else is still catching up to, including those who admitted plagiarising some of my work. I have reached a level of understanding of this that is sufficient for me to not devote much time to it now, primarily because my children and other endeavours occupy me and interest me more. Left to my own devices in a bubble universe, I would probably continue to explore this topic endlessly. And I still dream of building my own mini observatory.
  • Martial Arts – At age 54, and with a farm to try to get into some if not profitable at least break-even production level, 5 children and other things to do too, my interest for physically training with other people is not zero, but again, other priorities come into effect. If I won the lottery tomorrow and I could have my own little dojo build next to the house, I would happily entertain regular training with others, preferably not as teacher (unlikely, given the location) or at least, if I am to teach, so that I can also train with the guys while doing so. But as it is, my training today is mostly along a different route, which involves more generic concepts, like overall health, situational awareness on a daily basis and weapons training.
  • Catholicism – Having been a Zen Agnostic until age 43, so given only some ten years of study on it, I am still a relative “novice” at being a Catholic (compared to my own somewhat obsessive-compulsive standards, though I surpass many supposed “professional” theologians at understanding the dogma, application of it, history and realities of Catholicism) and the lessons in it, like those of martial arts, are infinite, so I think in some way this topic will continue to deepen for me with time.
  • Hypnosis – Having done and studied this deeply for nearly 20 years now, this remains a fascinating topic, though in deepening it, some related aspects have probably taken a front-seat, even if directly related to hypnosis, like the neurology and physiology of the brain as well as aspects of the mind, electromagnetic fields we all have, and other aspects related to mirror neurones and so on, all fasciante me and continue to be of interest.

Those are just my “hobbies” so to speak, my most important topics relate to relationships with women and ultimately marriage, relationships with my children, and loved ones, and relationships with my friends and the things we can achieve if we work together on some things we care about.

I certainly am not short of things that keep my interest despite me being acutely aware of the hellscape we live in and the mutant wastelands we are surrounded by, with roaming radioactive mutants, polluted skies and rabid zombies, along with gay, mentally ill, would-be “overlords” that want to destroy people like me down to the very last DNA strand.

Before I was Catholic I kept myself busy this way and never fell into despair. After becoming Catholic, not only is despair impossible, but I am at times mildly euphoric as I recognise that however hard things may temporarily seem from any given perspective of the day, eventually, due course, whether I see it myself with my own eyes or not, victory, for our side, is absolutely inevitable.

I hope therefore, to have given a few of you reading this some positive concepts to think and act on.

You might be interested in the following posts:

  1. The importance of the “Placebo” effect
  2. The Lies Lie Heavy
  3. Reality is Quite Different than you Think
  4. Ignore your Critics
  5. What Next?

By G | 27 January 2024 | Posted in Brain-Mind Functionality, Face on Mars, Increasing Happiness, Reclaiming the Catholic Church, Sedevacantism, Systema

No Comments

It’s just like I keep telling you people…

It seems violence really is the answer!

I have known this since I was a child. People in war zones rarely commit suicide. Interesting isn’t it. It’s almost as if men are designed to strive against something… say like… an immortal evil trying to defeat them… just saying.

You might be interested in the following posts:

  1. Clown World Fatigue
  2. The Lies You are Told

By G | 25 January 2024 | Posted in Actual Science, Brain-Mind Functionality, Human Performance, Increasing Happiness, Medical Science, Zombie Apocalypse

No Comments

This is What Real Racism Looks Like

No one can figure out the why apparently. Well, let me tell you, after 25 years in Africa, I know with 99.99999999999% certainty what the reason is. And the remaining 0.000000000001% chance is that she’s schizophrenic.

For my money, if I was Emperor and could establish global laws, a parent that saw that and turned that freak’s head into a pink cloud, right there in the mall, would be facing some disciplinary charges for creating an obscene spectacle in a public place, and depending on angle and trajectory, possibly unsafely firing a weapon in a public space. Some community service, gun training, and possibly a fine. That’s it.

Absent that, the subhuman scum would be charged with attempted first degree murder, (minimum sentence is life, and possibly the death penalty) and jail time in my world is hard labour or you don’t eat.

No related posts.

By G | 25 January 2024 | Posted in Social Commentary

2 Comments

Free Entertainment

As John Adams said, the unintended entertainment value in the comments is better thanmost netflix series. Or something like that.

If you want to have a laugh, go to this Sigma Game post and read the exchanged between “Grace” and me (The Kurgan). The last comment I just typed out on that thread should be enlightening about how women process things when they get emotional (and all too often even just in general).

No related posts.

By G | 25 January 2024 | Posted in Humour

No Comments

The Correct Response

I never really followed UFC beyond the first few fights with no weight class, and the odd fighter here and there, so I don’t know who this guy is, but his response to the sodomy promoting “journalist” is exactly how every normal man should react to that sort of activity.

https://x.com/tinkerb65712648/status/1749262193357688853?s=46

Even in polite company, I never bend to the insane LGBT-Pedo agenda, this guy clearly does not, and neither should you. Nor should you apologise for it.

Call the mentally ill what they are: mentally ill.

Nothing will change until YOU change things in YOUR immediate vicinity.

No related posts.

By G | 24 January 2024 | Posted in Social Commentary

1 Comment

Beware the Betrayer

No one likes to be betrayed, but I am not talking about infidelity in your marriage here, rather, I am trying, as I have for years, to make you understand a core deceit that you have been living with all your life, like a hooded hawk, without even realising it.

It has always amazed me over the last 4 decades or so, how often the masses, but also a decent number of supposedly, or even apparently intelligent people get fooled, and deceived by what to me, at first glance immediately give off a whiff of… sulphur? Deceit? Lies wired into the DNA. In short, the nefarious stench of the Freemasonic gatekeeper.

If you were to study the history of the Catholic Church, you would come across plots so devious and intricate and ancient that any desire to delve into old conspiracies would be sated within hours and last probably the rest of your natural life if you wanted to keep digging. I covered the main aspects in RTCC, but the fact is that since the official formation of the Illuminati in 1776, the strategy of the Satanists (they have, like their boss, many, many names, Carbonari, Illuminati, Freemasons, Rosicrucians, and on and on and on) has always been the same:

  • Foment the masses into “regime change” by using class structure (marxism), race (BLM, Critical Race Theory, Math being racist, white “privilege” etcetera), religion (Islam vs everyone, Judaism being an innocent bystander/victim only wanting the best for humanity, Christianity in all it’s forms needing to be Protestant and less “problematic” about things like family, marriage, homosexuality, and so on), sex (feminism, homosexuality, gay adoption, trannies, bestiality, and pedophelia) and whatever else they can think up that is a Satanic inversion of the truth, that will get the useful idiot cattle into creating a stampede. It doesn’t really matter who gets trampled, chaos and the breakdown of cvil society and the inversion of justice is good.
  • Because naturally a percentage of people who are not COMPLETE morons will not like this, set up a number of “leaders” in the political, intellectual, legal, and social arenas, as “opponents” or “truth-tellers”. The purpose of this is manifold:
    • It gives the Satanists a good sense of the mass trends and success/failure of their campaigns
    • It identifies with specificity any potential resistors and “troublemakers” to their plans, so they can be dealt with in a number of ways.
    • It controls the followers of these “leaders” because invariably, they are “ineffective” they “fail” or they simply do a 180 degree about face.

The point is that the Satanists, always, always, ALWAYS rig the game. Bet on red they win, bet on black, you lose.

And even relatively sharp people like James Delingpole get taken in by these deceivers. His recent talk with David Icke and his post about it explain it, but he does not do a very good job in either case. If you look at the podcast from about one hour and thirty minutes in or so, James misses the opportunity to nail Icke to the floor by hammering the one nail he is absolutely correct on.

Aside his fantastic, reptilianoid theories (which he has mutated into more palatable stuff over the years since he first started) even if you were to accept his ideas as somewhat coherent, James makes a very solid point: If Icke’s theories are correct, and we are being run in a simulation by demonic entities that use human bloodlines to control and enslave us and our “waking up” just means we see the bigger “allness” of it all but there is no God, no loving creator, no actual specific saviour, then what’s the point? And what is the origin of it all? Icke avoids the question like a greased eel and never gives a straight answer, and James gets flustered and lets him slide off.

I would never waste 15 seconds of my time on Icke other than to expose him, so I would never have given him my time to begin with, but if I had been on that panel, I would have relentlessly hammered the point home. What’s it all about David? Where is “God” in your philosophy? And Icke kind of admitted there isn’t really a God, just an “allness”. But if that’s all there is, why the demons? Why their need to corrupt humanity? Are they just interdimnsional parasites and we are unlucky in this part of the Universe? It is, of course, nonsensical, and insofar as it could be making sense to a point, you lose sight of the fact that its real, subterfugeous and hidden aim, is really to distance you from the truth of God and hence the truth of how to fight back and not fall into deception and eventually the despair of hell.

Icke and Alex Jones, Joe Rogan, and Milo YankmyPoleUs, Jordan Peterson, Andrew Tate (and his Gamma wizard that runs him), Emo Jones, Gay Gary Voris, Taylor Marshall, black science man, bowtie “do butt stuff’ science man, the entire Vatican, Bergoglio and his retinue of pedophiles and frauds, Protestantism as a whole, the “right” and “left” political parties, really pretty much everything in modern life is really just designed to distract you, delay you, and waste your life in inconsequential, or (better yet for them) self-destructive, nefarious, degenerate nonsense, and if you begin to get an inkling of an idea about the truth, then they want you wallowing in the retard pool of the fake “truthers” that tell you tidbits of information and then blend it in with complete nonsense. The Flat Earth stuff is a typical example. Mix it in and get operatives to bring it up in groups that maybe are actually looking at real stuff, like antigravity technology, and it gives the whole exercise a sudden stench of retardation and so-called normal people don’t even look at any of it because it’s like picking sewage out of your ice-cream.

And these are not coincidences or temporary efforts, there are endless money and conscious plots to stop any truth, and real resistance, and any truth about Catholicism at all getting out. There are powerful people with essentially infinite resources dedicated to this stuff. So they are not going away and no, none of them are “salvageable”.

I have been explaining this in as many ways as possible since my early to mid-twenties. It is literally a strategy identified in the Permanent Instructions to the Alta Vendita (Carbonari) and these documents were captured and discussed in the Papacy some 200 years ago. I mention them in RTCC and translate some extracts and related documents, so you don’t have to take my word for it, I give you the references.

But above all, my point is simply this:

BEWARE the gatekeepers. When a nobody suddenly shoots to fame for being “a good guy” against the homoglobos, be extremely suspicious, and look into his background. Especially if they are heavily funded.

Of course, aside the gatekeepers there are also a bunch of cracked eggs that believe all sorts of insane stuff, like the Flat Earthers, and so on, but the David Ickes of the world can be both in your face as well as subtle, and you need to learn to spot them in the wild.

And if you are despairing right now and thinking, but then, what is true? What refuge is there?

Refuge? Not much son, we are at war don’t you know? It’s a war between Satan and his minions, in all their forms, and Christ and his soldiers, on the other side. Here, learn about 1958 Sedevacantist Catholicism, AFTER you learn about REAL Catholicism first. Then tell me if that doesn’t describe and fit and make sense of the world as we have it today better than any other philosophy since the dawn of man.

No refuge, but there is an almost dry trench here, plenty of ammo, a good bayonet and trench clubs, and if you keep on your toes, you might even get a cup of hot coffee and some toast and jam before we crawl through the mud in the dead of night to go send those demons back to the pit they crawled out of.

Welcome. (Pats you on the back as he hands you your rifle and ammo).

No related posts.

By G | 23 January 2024 | Posted in Believe, Impostors and Frauds, Reclaiming the Catholic Church, The Enemy Within

No Comments

Catholics and Sex

As regular readers of this blog know, I am not exactly the spiritual guy to go to for correct advice on the Catholic perspective on sex.

I don’t actually have any issue with the Catholic position on sex, I believe it is indeed the best way for a married couple to relate to each other.

Thanks to Adam for this video, which he posted at his blog a little while back, and which I present here below:

It is definitely one of the better discussions I have seen on the topic, even though it is clear both are Novus Orco believers, so, I do take everything they say with a pinch of salt. It may be of interest to readers here that I give the video high marks, because my position on sex in Catholicism has at times been seen as wrong, or perhaps leading people to sin, or something along those lines, so, if you had a rather debauched sex life, as I did for most of my life, it might interest you to see the interview, since I found it very well done for the most part.

Given my first 40 plus years of sexual experiences prior to becoming a Catholic I think it’s fair to say that it wasn’t going to be an easy transition. And there are some aspects of the theology behind it that I find difficult to reconcile with logic from a spiritual perspective. Nor is sex the only area I have this with, just because I am Catholic does not mean I don’t think about these things. For example, my perspective on Confession is that at a practical level it makes you into a better person, so it is a definitely good thing overall, and there is no reason not to do it or not to have it, but the idea that God would not be aware of my sin, or conversely, send to Hell despite my genuine repentance and atonement to the best of my ability if I did not manage to go to confession before I drop dead, is, to me, at the very least extremely unlikely, and honestly, I think erroneous. Nevertheless, if everyone said “oh that’s not how it works” pretty soon you’d get… well… Protestantism; because humans without rules are for the most part, no better than cattle or sheep without a Shepard to keep them in line.

Similarly, I have no problem with the Church’s teaching on sex, which in a nutshell (forgive the somewhat “scandalous” pun) is as follows:

  • No contraception, ever, of any kind, except for NFP (Natural Family Planning) which in the related video starts around 1 hour 30 minutes or so and is well explained.
  • No homosexuality.
  • No refusal of sex from either spouse other than for serious reason, like illness, the potential duty to NOT have any more children, for whatever reason, and so on. The concept here is not that you are the other person’s sex slave, but rather that marriage itself is the gifting of yourself to the other person bodily and your body is literally now their property and vice versa. That, along with the reason of producing children, is literally a fundamental aspect of marriage. This of course is seen as evil, rape-adjacent, sexual slavery from all the degenerate feminists, but it is spelt out very clear in Corinthians 7: “3 The husband should meet his wife’s sexual needs, and the wife should do the same for her husband. 4 The wife doesn’t have authority over her own body, but the husband does. Likewise, the husband doesn’t have authority over his own body, but the wife does. 5 Don’t refuse to meet each other’s needs unless you both agree for a short period of time to devote yourselves to prayer. Then come back together again so that Satan might not tempt you because of your lack of self-control.” The level at which a man or woman understands this passage, in my experience, is pretty much indicative of their level of spiritual understanding of sex and intimacy in marriage.

Modernised women have now been “taught” for almost 100 years, that using their bodies to withhold sex from their husbands is “obviously” their “right” and the reality of it is that it has been “weaponised” to essentially cow men into a kind of sex-starved submission.

Even in my pre-Catholic days, I found that there was broadly speaking (and I will generalise a lot here) two types of women:

Those who instinctually understood that using sex as a bargaining tool in a relationship (other than perhaps as a joke in some role-play) was a despicable way to act, and never indulged in it.

Then there were the others, who, as my brother once crudely put it, thought their pussy had the key to an actual spaceship in it (he knew I cared nothing for gold if I could just get access to a small hyperspace capable starship!) and limiting access to it in order to get what they wanted (regardless if it was some specific (and usually unnatural) behaviour from me, or more crudely, material things) was how they operated. This second type of woman tried that tactic with me precisely once. Because the minute they tried it, the relationship was instantly and permanently over. Their shock at this reaction, which was delivered calmly and with absolute finality, was always somewhat amusing. And I can’t recall an instance where they did not then (sometimes immediately) try to reverse the situation, but there was never any coming back from it. A woman that behaved that way was in a space mentally that I wanted nothing to do with, and I strongly advise all men to take a similar approach in this regard. It’s nothing to do with “needing” sex so desperately, or being “angry” at the lack of it, and so on. It is to do with the very foundational issue of how she sees sex, intimacy and indeed marriage as a whole and in context.

Frankly, I find an actual prostitute that says it will cost X amount for a set time to be with her sexually, to be less offensive to the entire concept of intimacy than a woman that uses sex as a tool to “control” or manipulate a man. And similarly, I find any man that submits to such behaviour to be unworthy of being called a man.

There was also another type of woman, and these were those that unfortunately had been sexually abused, and given the numbers, it is inevitable that I came across everything from incest to gang-rape. One positive aspect of it was that as far as I know, every woman I was with that had that happen, felt comfortable enough with me to share it, and a second positive aspect is that, again, in I think almost all cases, the resulting physicality between us, helped them resolve many issues.

There was also, a notable example or two of women that had been sexually abused (rather extremely, really) who, while not at all shy or withholding sexually, at least with me, did have certain difficulties, and occasional really strange behaviours, and I am not referring to various kinks, which can be understandable, but I mean sudden bouts of sadness, depression and so on. These were more difficult aspect to improve rapidly, but in any case, open and honest communication always improved things for them, and did so even in their subsequent relationships, which they did let me know about in most cases.

Now, setting aside the cases where sexual abuse was present, and given our secularised approach to sex in today’s day and age, it is interesting to note that the women that were most balanced sexually, instinctively never treated sex as a bargaining chip.

It is a quite fascinating topic really, and one that older women (grandma aged ones) with successful families that are happy and well-balanced will (if you have their confidence) unashamedly tell you that their husbands were never turned away from their bodies. Conversely, a lot of supposedly “Catholic” women, especially in Anglo-Saxon countries, will be prudish and miserly with their bodies even from their husbands.

The women have been taught this is their God-given right as a “strong independent woman”, their “dignity” as a human being and not being a sex object and so on. Totally inverting the reality of the issue.

It is precisely because sex has become transactional and objectified in the extreme, that most people have absolutely no idea of what an actually properly intimate sexual act can feel like, or even is, that they assume and “teach” that as with any disposable property, you have to “work” to get it. An analogy might be making your four year old “work” before he can get access to eating food for his dinner. It is an absurd inversion of the concept of a sexual relationship, as much as making your little child work for his food would be an inversion of a parent’s duty.

So even mentioning this aspect of essentially unrestricted access to your spouse’s body, gets you labelled as some kind of sexual slave-trader, probable human trafficker, or whatever.

The reality is, of course, as usual, quite different. Although in the modern day, the pleasure of truly gifting your body to another has, for the most part, in many women, been reduced to a pleasure in being especially submissive during the sex act, the reality is that a true and natural submission to your spouse (husband or wife as they may be) is of incomparably finer and deeper beauty than a mere sex act, however “accomplished” that might be.

It is a difficult concept to transmit to another human being that has not experienced both the degraded version (which almost everyone today that is asexually active knows only too well) and the correct one, but the difference is obvious and unforgettable once experienced.

The unfortunate (and intentional) barriers to understanding these things have been hammered into all of us with such persistence and over all of our lives, that regaining a properly ordered sexuality is going to be quite the task, and will require conscious effort. But I assure you it is worth it.

I hope the video helps clarify many things for a lot of people.

No related posts.

By G | 23 January 2024 | Posted in Catholicism, Increasing Happiness, Relationships, Sedevacantism

No Comments

Stating the Obvious

Sometimes, it is actually worthwhile pointing out something that even the most basic wide-angle or bird’s eye view observation of affairs on Earth would make blindingly obvious, and yet, seems to escape the vast majority of humanity. More often than I’d like, including me too.

If the last four years have made anything absolutely crystal clear it is that this whole planet is almost entirely under the rule of people and organisations that not only lie blatantly about pretty much everything, but that, in the main, are hell-bent on trying to kill us, wipe us out and destroy our families, children and general lives.

If you pay attention at a global level in a dispassionate, objective, coldly mathematical sense, it become absolutely obvious that IF we accept the premise that “most people are basically good” then something is badly wrong with the world. Because literally most of everything that goes on is certainly not good for you. From the foods they promote and produce to “feed” you, to almost everything pharmaceutical, to the ways in which governments around the world work (in case you are wondering, in the parasitic and self-sustaining-at-your-expense way, best explained by Lysander Spooner in his outstanding piece on Natural Law) to how the “laws” are applied, to how commerce between people is often designed to “work” and that’s even before we bring up usury, banks, and the absolutely criminal practices those bunch of degenerate thugs indulge in. How is it possible, that if “most people are basically good” so much wrong, so much structurally painful, and really outright evil is going on.

Statistically, even if you were to put it down to the average person being a complete moron (well intentioned as they may be, morons cause all sorts of problems) you have two problems: That level of global stupidity would not be capable of creating, nor maintaining the very evil structures we now have in place. In short, there needs to be a certain level of intelligence behind it. And yet, even in countries where the average IQ is relatively low, sometimes even greater evil is absolutely prevalent (see the kind of things that go on in African genocidal wars of the 1990s). Secondly, even if you consider “stupid but basically good” people as indeed damaging (they are) the (supposed) preponderance of intelligent and also basically good people, would build systems that the average moron can navigate with relatively little potential for causing endemic evil.

So, while stupidity is certainly a contributing factor, it cannot be a pivotal factor. Nor can misplaced “good intentions”. Because again, if “most people are good” the intelligent ones go ahead and build systems that are safer from “good intentions” with bad outcomes.

Then you take another data point. The average human. Or even just you, the superior kind of human being that reads this blog (and understands it). Well, good as you may be, you lie. You may only lie infrequently, and mostly to avoid hurting others, but the reality is all human beings lie. It’s just a matter of degree. Personally I have a sliver-thin tolerance for it in general and pretty much none in my private and family life. And of course, yes, I have lied in my own private and family life. Nothing big, really pretty innocuous stuff for the most part (but hey, if I was some kind of freak it’s not like I’d tell you on my blog, right?). And we all have such hypocrisy in our lives. Of course the reasons “vary” but not really. In essence, lies all originate from fear. A fear of the consequences of the truth. Whether to us or loved ones.

But let’s imagine a planet where no one lies. Where everyone just always tells the truth as objectively and unafraid as possible. If we also assume that human beings on this planet also have the same general emotional maturity (or rather lack of) that we have now, and that event (the no lies thing) switched on suddenly at midnight today, the body count would be astronomical within 24 hours.

But let’s say after a week, when most of the human population has killed each other off because of the radical honesty, and there are only a few of us left, strong and emotionally secure enough to survive the truth and noting it daily (assuming such a rose-tinted outcome would even happen, because the mass murders would lead to more, etcetera), what would such a planet look like? Well, it might actually be a kind of paradise.

Imagine the consequences. No stealing, no theft, no injustice. Because if everyone was honest, we all know what is right and wrong, and if you are truly honest, you can’t justify any of your shitty behaviours. And really, why do we not live on such a planet? It would clearly be a better world. So what keeps pushing humanity into ever deeper pits of deception and self-deception? And why is it we tend to crucify those few who really try to tell the truth?

Well… and here is the obvious part:

Do you realise that the Christian explanation of reality fits these conditions precisely, explains them and can be used to predict many, many, many things accurately?

And in specific I mean the Catholic (yes, yes, only the 1958 Sedevacantists are Catholics today) explanation. Original sin explains the fact that despite our supposedly “good intentions” and our supposedly all being “mostly good” we all behave like shitty humans. We are all, literally, flawed.

And the fact that this planet is under the dominion of evil and lies, can hardly be denied when you look at things from a bird’s eye view.

Plus, if you look at history with the same bird’s eye view, (assuming you can find the truth in the events that actually took place) then the general trend you will note is that literally every other philosophy aside from Catholicism has led humanity to a place of, at the very best, not totally horrific stagnation. And in most cases utter malignant societies. And Catholicism is literally the only perspective that has factually improved humanity’s lot.

In short, regardless of your personal beliefs, if you actually take the time to observe the human story of the last few thousand years, it is utterly undeniable that Catholicism explains reality better than any other model.

Of course, today, the supposed “catholic” Church as presented in the Novus Orco is yet another nest of indemoniated pedophiles, and only a remnant is left. But this too happened before and, again, if you educate yourself on all the times Catholicism by all rights should have disappeared from the Earth, it become nigh-on impossible to explain how it has survived unless it is miraculously protected, at least on some level, by a benevolent and all-powerful force.

And as I always say, regardless of your own ideas, if a model works, use it, at least until you find a better model that better predicts reality in all its multi-faceted possible outcomes.

And if the model works, then there really is no reason to not embrace, it. Or at least, to seriously investigate its less obvious underpinnings.

Well, at least that’s the way those of us who are not playing the part of the apes in our very own version of Planet of the Apes.

So, I hope you will at least consider this obvious but oft-ignored perspective, and may it be fruitful to you.

No related posts.

By G | 22 January 2024 | Posted in Catholicism, Christianity, Increasing Happiness, Sedevacantism, The Enemy Within

« Older Posts
Newer Posts »

All content of this web-site is copyrighted by G. Filotto 2009 to present day.
Website maintained by IT monks