Some cretinous little liars think that if they refuse to go public with their lies —on a blog somewhere, in their own name, like any honest man can do freely and easily— that is, if they refuse to put their name to the absolute deceptions they try to pass as Catholic knowledge, I may not savage them in the arena of reason, logic, canon law, and truth.
One such filthy little Brazilian who goes by the name @Ranger on Social Galactic believes his hiding and sniping will prevent him from the rightful scourging he deserves. Well, as the little meme below shows, he miscalculated, so now I will prove beyond shadow of a doubt that he is an intentional liar.
It would be tedious to repost the last 2 months of proofs of his constant deception and extreme gammaness, but it is always instructional to point out a few obvious lies. It helps other see the maggot-like twitching against truth and the plain meaning of words, so that you will be better able to avoid such creatures in all areas of your life. And since he’s certainly nowhere near as important as the fake clergy that was exposed in the last post, this will be a quick Kurganing. Barely enough energy released from this one’s head to charge an AA battery.
Let us begin: Lie number 1
An outrageous lie in multiple ways:
The commission was put together not to have a bunch of rules lawyers argue with laymen or even clergy about how this or that sentence really means the opposite of what it says, or, what the meaning of the word is, is. No. It was put together to ensure that the over 6,000 documents of the Catholic Church that were consulted to make sure the Code of Canon Law of 1917 was coherent and did not go against any of the dogma of the Church, previous rules and so on. In fact, the commission was not even going to respond to ANY questions from laymen, but only to clergy IF they found something from older documents that seemed to contradict the code. As a matter of fact, it was put in place to ensure the continuity of the Code was correct. And guess what, from thousands of even MORE documents that were consulted AFTER the code was published, in some 30 years, there was required the grand total of a single minor change to PART of canon 1099. So Ranger’s suggestion and implication that the Code of Canon Law is a vastly complicated system that only rules lawyers can use, is nonsense. Rules lawyers like himself, as he admitted to being trained in law, but apparently not practicing, thank God for small favours. He probably failed the game of hopscotch that passes for the Bar Exam wherever he lives.
He KNOWS that Roman Law does not operate as Common or American Law, so his intention here was to confuse and make the average person who doesn’t know these things assume that a Pope put in place a bunch of Canon Lawyers to argue endlessly about what the meaning of the word is, is. No. How do I know he knows this is completely not the case with regard to Roman Law. Well… he tells us he knows.
Lie number 2: He pretends that I think Canon 2314 applies in the case of Canon 188 part 4.
It does not. It never has and never will because, come on, you know this by now, Canon 188 part 4 applies instantly, requires no pronouncement from anyone and is judged by the law itself. As it clearly says. In fact, it clearly states in Canon 2314 that when considering the ignored warning given to suspected heretics, one must have due regard for canon 188 part 4. Which, of course states no pronouncement required by anyone. So in actual fact canon 2314 further CONFIRMS that Canon 188 part 4 is an exception. This is obvious to anyone who reads this canon in any language. Though he also tried to say it read differently in French, or English or…so guess what…I put the French, the English and the Latin all next to each other, and lo and behold, it’s very clear in all of them. But in any case Canon 2314 doesn’t even come into it for a second reasons, the people who fall foul of Canon 188 part 4 are notorious public heretics already judged by the law itself. The sentence is ALREADY PASSED ON THEM.
But notice the delicious subterfuge, in his message, while he pretends to be praising my view of not falling for ….whatever nonsense he will say next (see below), he tries to imply that canon 2314 applies at all in conjunction with Canon 188. As we have seen before, it does not. Because…
No.
Pronouncement.
Required.
By.
Anyone.
Ever.
Not for Canon 188 part 4. And further, his implication is that I too agree that Canon 188 and 2314 go together. No. They do not, and you can be sure I made that very clear over the last few months.
Lie number 3: He continues with his deceptions pretending that before you can say Bergoglio is a heretic, you need to prove Karol was. Well, that’s not a stretch at all since Karol, just like Joey-Nazi and Jose Bergoglio and the other antipopes ALL promoted, taught, did not repudiate, and call out Vatican 2 for the heresy it was, making them of course, also fall foul of Canon 188 part 4.
Notice also how he is trying to seed the usual doubt that “Oh well, but the Code of 1917 has been made redundant”. No, it has not. Because non-clerics, non-catholic, public and notorious heretics and their equally non-catholic, heretic, Freemasonic and hence practicing satanist henchmen, do NOT get any say in ANYTHING within the Catholic Church, so their fake Code of 1983 has less authority than second-hand toilet paper.
Lie number 4: coming up… An ignoramus we have met before asks a genuine question, and Ranger promptly goes on to use more subterfuge and lies.
And how does our worm-tonguing liar, that lies lyingly, lie? He lies thusly:
Notice again that he is an accomplished deceiver. He pretends to faintly praise my knowing that the fake code of 1983 did in fact literally try to overturn the entire of Code of 1917 and in particular canon 188, as we have seen in detail before in this post, while still “pretending” that the fake Code is valid in any way. And then goes on to lie about its contents. Again, I refer you to the clear dissection of the fake code against the real one in the post mentioned above.
There are, of course, more lies he spews with practically every text he types, but I trust the above suffices to show the point.
This is really quite long as it is a partial transcription of back and forth that went on on Social Galactic for a period of about 2 months. The nesting/breaks/threads between comments also means that although it is as faithful a reproduction as possible, a few comments may appear out of order. There is no nefarious purpose behind this, it is just the nature of the somewhat chaotic methodology the discussion was had and the limits of the platform, which does not have a thread export function.
In any case, although it might take a little while to read, this lengthy series of back and forth is useful because it highlights really quite well, the exact nature and deception that these fake “Catholics” pretending to be valid clergy of my Church are like. You will notice the supposed humility and wish to simply “dialogue” at the start is soon dispelled, and later, when he thinks he has a “kill shot” (by appealing to the false authority of a translator, no less) the mask slips entirely for a little while.
Do notice how every trick in the book is used. In the upcoming tome that will become the definitive defence for Sedeprivationism each of these tactics is examined in detail, but this is a very good primer in both the type of deception you will encounter and in how clarity of thought and not being fooled into conflating disparate topics serves as a razor-like sword to expose these vicious liars for the frauds they are. Enjoy the digital vivisection this transcript shows.
Well, it is always nice to know that my very first instinct about charlatans is always correct.
I had absolutely no idea Taylor existed and I only became aware of him a few days ago when the High Priestess of my personality cult top fan, told me he was going to go live on YouTube concerning Vigano’s latest letter where he says Vatican II was a mistake and should be forgotten.
Within a few seconds of his starting the video I got a definite stench of protestant televangelist, and as I say, I knew nothing about him. It is only later that I discovered he had in fact been a “priest” in a Protestant branch (sorry I can’t be bothered to recall which of the 40,000 branches of Churchianity he pretended to be a priest in).
He has all the hallmarks. The nice suit and tie, the meticulous presentation, the ritualistic “let us pray” as a leading and pacing of those fooled by his money grabbing efforts and so on.
But one could forgive all that IF he had any valid content. He does not. He plays the same game as all the other “Traditionalists” like the SSPX, Church Militant, E. Michal Jones, etcetera. Unlike people like Ann Barnhardt and Frank of Canon212.com however, whom I believe are genuinely deceived, I sense absolute intentional deception in Taylor Marshall. Oh sorry, DOCTOR, Taylor Marshall, because that matters so much, let’s not any of you non-doctors forget it.*
But let me charitable, as a good Catholic boy should be. I need to clarify that I don’t believe Taylor, (or Tay-Tay, as I think I’ll call him from now on) is an intentional deceiver with malice of the type of say a John Salza. No, I think he’s just your typical Protestant Grifter and he is going after the numbers and in this respect he is playing the three card monty trick quite well. the masses of deceived, nominal “Catholics” is multiples larger than the actual Catholics who understand Sedeprivationsim, but I grant that if that number were ever to start going the other way, Tay-Tay would make the jump in a flash and state how he suddenly saw the light.
Which I’d be tempted to guess is what prompted his jump from Protestantism to “Catholicism”. Besides, he does have 8 kids and a wife to feed after all, you can see why he would go after a larger crowd. Well. Until it remains profitable anyway.
I did, of course, post a question at him and as it was the only superchat with an actual question, his totally ignoring it is at least a little telling. But lest it be said I am not giving the man a chance to answer directly, here it is:
My question happens at the 24:24 timestamp.
I won’t hold my breath, and I expect to be studiously ignored, for to shine any light on this at all, would not do him any favours, cash wise.
As for his book Infiltration, there is a pretty thorough and very entertaining review of it in podcast form here: Enjoy.
Remember, you cam always get the T-Shirt of Truth so you become like a radioactive beacon of truth and will automatically keep such grifters as Tay-Tay at bay. Better than Garlic for Vampires! (And no, I don’t make a cent from it, in case you were wondering, but I like the people who make it and I love the T-Shirt).
* Because bits of paper you pay for to append to your wall mean so much more than truth, fact, or reality. After all, like the good Professor Rupert Sheldrake said, (I paraphrase): “All you need to get a degree or diploma is to stay alive through the 4/2/whatever years and pay for the tuition and the certificate at the end.” You should know this, you low-status monkey!
Now, it needs to be said that from the first time I heard him speak I have pretty much hated Luis with a passion. The only saving grace being he was too crazy and inconsequential to matter at all.
Fast forward 30 years or so and if you asked me now who would I rather have as global President absolute, Billy “deathvaccine” Gates or Luis Farrakhan and without hesitation I would definitely rather have Luis.
And don’t think l I don’t know that he would be a completely mass murderous asshole on a scale that would probably make Mao and Stalin both blush in shame. But Luis has two things going for him:
You can see him coming
While his prejudices could be considered extreme, prejudices are at least akin to principles, a concept Gates of Hell has not even the shadow of an idea about.
And bonus:
Luis never hung out with convicted pedophiles who have their own pedo island, as far as I know anyway.
Over at his blog Vox points out that in France there are now indications the virus was already there in November. Shooting more holes in the official false narrative of Covid-19 which should really be called Covid-15 which is when Billygoat GatesofHell had it patented.
Well, it was news to me that anyone still thought Covid was NOT in europe since October last year because the Italians with over 500 doctors in 42 offices as well as many more in hospitals throughout Italy now have absolute proof that the virus was already in Italy in October, that a third of the population has already had it with zero side effects or symptoms and the virus itself doesn’t kill anyone who doesn’t have already u deleting conditions. It’s basically a strain of flu and the doctor being interviewed literally says anyone proposing a vaccine for it should be “chased away by repeated kicks in the ass”.
Admittedly the interview, article and video are in Italian, but I’m sure you guys can figure out English translations fast enough.
As I have been having nice little flame wars exposing Sophists, gammas, possible actual Satanist deceivers and other cretins for their duplicitous natures, I have challenged them all, as already done previous here to make their arguments in a public forum, with their own names attached. So far there have been no actual takers, which is natural because liars KNOW they cannot survive sunlight, so “people” like @jameslovebirch and @Ranger will in all likelihood NEVER post their “arguments” publicly, and certainly never under their own name, because they know for a fact they would be torn to shreds. Besides the challenge has stood unanswered for months and I expect will continue to do so.
Despite this, one guy, named Stephen Burrows, made a formal public request to be bitchslapped about the face for his inability to read basic English, understand simple concepts, speak of things he is abysmally ignorant of as if he understood them when it is clear he doesn’t even posses the faculties to grasp the concept of apostolic succession, never mind anything beyond that and so on. As the charitable sort I am, I decided I would indulge him here. For your entertainment if perhaps not enlightenment of catholic concepts. mostly because these are so obvious anyone even mildly interested already knows these things.
Below I reproduce the entire question and reply interspaced in red. So you know I have not altered anything in the original, it is also archived here.
One Question for the Kurgan (was Paul VI validly elected)
Since this is still bubbling away on Social Galactic, I thought I’d have another go at a question: I ask: Was Paul VI (Who concluded the Second Vatican Council) validly elected as Pope.
For the purpose of this let’s all assume that yes he was.
The question is actually completely irrelevant. It makes absolutely no difference if Montini was validly elected or not. Why? Because as every Catholic knows, the very concept of once saved always saved is a Protestant idiocy and not based in any sort of logic. Every Catholic is perfectly aware that even if you theoretically pay lip service to being a Christian, or, in fact, genuinely have become one, your salvation is NOT assured if you later defect from the Faith. This is elementary level reasoning, and should not tax anyone’s grey cells. And yet…
If:
1. The implementer of the conclusions of Vatican II was a validly elected Pope
Let’s assume he was in order to give your moronic idea that you have some kind of gotcha! going for you the best chance of working. Even though there are valid reasons for thinking otherwise, but no matter, I accept this as the premise for the purposes of showing Stephen the error of his ways.
2. The documents of Vatican II are heretical
They are
Then: Papal infallibility is false
And this is where poor, poor, Stephen falls short, like a special kid with a helmet and a lot of drool. Mostly because he hasn’t got a clue what papal Infallibility is. But here is the logic even a 5 year old grasps. If a validly elected Pope acts as a filthy heretic apostate, sodomite, freemason, guess what, Canon 188 part 4 comes into play and he immediately loses his office. End of. No one requires to say anything further and EVERY action this fake Pope ever took becomes automatically invalid. And it has always been thus.
You really need to change your whole idea of Christianity, oh little Protestant. The only reason you even think that once a Pope is elected he can never, ever, ever fall into Hell again no matter what he does is because Protestantism fosters the idiocy of binary thinking. Something that is properly demonic once you are thinking about anything beyond simple mathematics. And it is intimately tied to the absurd idea of once saved always saved. It’s like saying that once you have decided you are not a thief you can never be arrested for stealing again. Even if you steal. What nonsense. And of course, a Pope who becomes a heretic immediately loses office and all his actions become null and void, including any he may have made while technically still “valid”. Why? Because prudence, logic and the infallible rules of valid Popes and the Church say so. All approved, recorded and codified in Canon Law. Really it’s not difficult to understand if you can read. And have an IQ above 90. Which to be fair, from previous engagements with Stephen, he may well not have.
If Paul VI was not validly elected then can you explain how.
We have assumed he was. So this point is moot.
Your standard call to Canon 188.4 to indicate why modern papal elections are invalid would seem irrelevant since it relies on cardinals and popes publicly defecting from the faith.
What, prey tell, oh you very special person, is hard to grasp about a Pope publicly defecting from the Faith, which he does the minute he issues official documents replete with heresy for public consumption? Of course it applies. Why would it not apply? It is precisely for this eventuality the canon exists.
Even if assenting to Vatican II counts as a public defection, it can’t apply to cardinals acting before the documents had been published.
What do the cardinals electing a Pope that defects later have to do with it? Absolutely nothing. Insofar as we accept they validly elected him (which we are accepting for the purposes of this argument) they have done nothing wrong. Any cardinal the Apostate fake Pope made cardinals before he became a heretic though also are not considered valid, but these are after the fact. Canon 188 part 4 applies specifically to individuals who fall under it. I don’t understand how anyone can be confused by this at all. It’s very simple.
Now, you may think that I have been a bit harsh on Stephen, and I have, but you need to know Stephen had a massive argument with me about Apostolic succession that clearly showed he has no clue about much of anything, and I suspect he struggles with shoes that have laces. That said, I do salute his attempt since it was public and he apparently put his name to it. I would however advise him to never again question Catholic dogma. He is one of those people best served by getting baptised as a good Catholic, quietly attending Church, doing his prayers and simply doing as the VALID Catholic priest (not any of the Novus Orco impostors) tells him. He clearly does not have the faculties for understanding the basics, but that in itself is not a sin. Plenty of people that are not intellectually advanced make very good husbands, men and friends as well as good Catholics. He just has to become one first.
So, just like in Italy, where a fractured society of 21 disparate nations was forced together by Freemasons, Africans often don’t buy into the narratives of the Western world. Sometimes that means horrible things, like practices of killing and mutilating albinos because their various body parts are deemed a cure all by certain witch doctors, but other times, it results in strokes of genius like the one just enacted by the Tanzanian President who proved without a shadow of a doubt that the WHO tests for covid will return a positive result for literally animal mineral or vegetable. Papaya, goats, all sorts was submitted with fake names and ages to see what the WHO would return.
Enjoy this awesome video because it is hilarious as well as important and begin to understand that the Covid thing has now gone from possible pandemic to absurd measures taken to control you and make you into literal drones at the mercy of Lolita express travellers like Bill Gates.
God bless this man for caring about his citizens and his country for questioning lies.
Robert F. Kennedy’s daughter, who was fighting
Bill Gates on vaccine policy, mysteriously ended up dying along with her boy in a “freak canoe accident”. Obviously it’s not hard to get two bodies dead from asphyxiation loaded onto a canoe and then tip the canoe over in deep water, but the BIG mystery is how both bodies sank to the bottom when dead women float breast up. So obviously Robert is pissed, and he is now letting it all out. See these quotes from Robert with regard to Bill Gates:
This was all said on April 8 2020:
Vaccines, for Bill Gates, are a strategic philanthropy that feed his many vaccine-related businesses (including Microsoft’s ambition to control a global vac ID enterprise) and give him dictatorial control over global health policy – the spear tip of corporate neo-imperialism.
Gates’ obsession with vaccines seems fueled by a messianic conviction that he is ordained to save the world with technology and a god-like willingness to experiment with the lives of “lesser humans.”
Promising to eradicate Polio with $1.2 billion, Gates took control of India’s National Advisory Board (NAB) and mandated 50 polio vaccines (up from 5) to every child before age 5. Indian doctors blame the Gates campaign for a devastating vaccine-strain polio epidemic that paralyzed 496, 000 children between 2000 and 2017.
In 2017, the Indian Government dialed back Gates’ vaccine regimen and evicted Gates and his cronies from the NAB. Polio paralysis rates dropped precipitously. In 2017, the World Health Organization reluctantly admitted that the global polio explosion is predominantly vaccine strain, meaning it is coming from Gates’ Vaccine Program. The most frightening epidemics in Congo, the Philippines, and Afghanistan are all linked to Gates’ vaccines. By 2018, ¾ of global polio cases were from Gates’ vaccines.
In 2014, the Gates Foundation funded tests of experimental HPV vaccines, developed by GSK and Merck, on 23, 000 young girls in remote Indian provinces.
Approximately 1, 200 suffered severe side effects, including autoimmune and fertility disorders. Seven died. Indian government investigations charged that Gates funded researchers committed pervasive ethical violations: pressuring vulnerable village girls into the trial, bullying parents, forging consent forms, and refusing medical care to the injured girls. The case is now in the country’s Supreme Court.
In 2010, the Gates Foundation funded a trial of a GSK’s experimental malaria vaccine, killing 151 African infants and causing serious adverse effects including paralysis, seizure, and febrile convulsions to 1, 048 of the 5, 049 children.
During Gates’ 2002 MenAfriVac campaign in Sub-Saharan Africa, Gates’ operatives forcibly vaccinated thousands of African children against meningitis. Between 50 and 500 children developed paralysis. South African newspapers complained, “We are guinea pigs for the drug makers.” Nelson Mandela’s former Senior Economist, Professor Patrick Bond, describes Gates’ philanthropic practices as “ruthless and immoral.”
In 2010, Gates committed $10 billion to the WHO promising to reduce population, in part, through new vaccines. A month later, Gates told a Ted Talk that new vaccines “could reduce population”. In 2014, Kenya’s Catholic Doctors Association accused the WHO of chemically sterilizing millions of unwilling Kenyan women with a phony “tetanus” vaccine campaign. Independent labs found the sterility formula in every vaccine tested. After denying the charges, WHO finally admitted it had been developing sterility vaccines for over a decade. Similar accusations came from Tanzania, Nicaragua, Mexico, and the Philippines.
A 2017 study (Morgensen et.Al.2017) showed that WHO’s popular DTP vaccine is killing more African children than the diseases it pretends to prevent. Vaccinated girls suffer 10x the death rate of unvaccinated children. Gates and WHO have refused to recall the lethal vaccine which WHO forces upon millions of African children annually.
Global public health advocates around the world accuse Gates of hijacking WHO’s agenda away from the projects that are proven to curb infectious diseases; clean water, hygiene, nutrition, and economic development. They say he has diverted agency resources to serve his personal fetish-that good health only comes in a syringe.
In addition to using his philanthropy to control WHO, UNICEF, GAVI and PATH, Gates funds private pharmaceutical companies that manufacture vaccines, and a massive network of pharmaceutical-industry front groups that broadcast deceptive propaganda, develop fraudulent studies, conduct surveillance and psychological operations against vaccine hesitancy and use Gates’ power and money to silence dissent and coerce compliance. In his recent nonstop Pharmedia appearances, Gates appears gleeful that the Covid-19 crisis will give him the opportunity to force his third-world vaccine programs on American children.
Exposing Duplicitous Little Trolls Too
Some cretinous little liars think that if they refuse to go public with their lies —on a blog somewhere, in their own name, like any honest man can do freely and easily— that is, if they refuse to put their name to the absolute deceptions they try to pass as Catholic knowledge, I may not savage them in the arena of reason, logic, canon law, and truth.
One such filthy little Brazilian who goes by the name @Ranger on Social Galactic believes his hiding and sniping will prevent him from the rightful scourging he deserves. Well, as the little meme below shows, he miscalculated, so now I will prove beyond shadow of a doubt that he is an intentional liar.
It would be tedious to repost the last 2 months of proofs of his constant deception and extreme gammaness, but it is always instructional to point out a few obvious lies. It helps other see the maggot-like twitching against truth and the plain meaning of words, so that you will be better able to avoid such creatures in all areas of your life. And since he’s certainly nowhere near as important as the fake clergy that was exposed in the last post, this will be a quick Kurganing. Barely enough energy released from this one’s head to charge an AA battery.
Let us begin: Lie number 1
An outrageous lie in multiple ways:
Lie number 2: He pretends that I think Canon 2314 applies in the case of Canon 188 part 4.
It does not. It never has and never will because, come on, you know this by now, Canon 188 part 4 applies instantly, requires no pronouncement from anyone and is judged by the law itself. As it clearly says. In fact, it clearly states in Canon 2314 that when considering the ignored warning given to suspected heretics, one must have due regard for canon 188 part 4. Which, of course states no pronouncement required by anyone. So in actual fact canon 2314 further CONFIRMS that Canon 188 part 4 is an exception. This is obvious to anyone who reads this canon in any language. Though he also tried to say it read differently in French, or English or…so guess what…I put the French, the English and the Latin all next to each other, and lo and behold, it’s very clear in all of them. But in any case Canon 2314 doesn’t even come into it for a second reasons, the people who fall foul of Canon 188 part 4 are notorious public heretics already judged by the law itself. The sentence is ALREADY PASSED ON THEM.
But notice the delicious subterfuge, in his message, while he pretends to be praising my view of not falling for ….whatever nonsense he will say next (see below), he tries to imply that canon 2314 applies at all in conjunction with Canon 188. As we have seen before, it does not. Because…
No.
Pronouncement.
Required.
By.
Anyone.
Ever.
Not for Canon 188 part 4. And further, his implication is that I too agree that Canon 188 and 2314 go together. No. They do not, and you can be sure I made that very clear over the last few months.
Lie number 3: He continues with his deceptions pretending that before you can say Bergoglio is a heretic, you need to prove Karol was. Well, that’s not a stretch at all since Karol, just like Joey-Nazi and Jose Bergoglio and the other antipopes ALL promoted, taught, did not repudiate, and call out Vatican 2 for the heresy it was, making them of course, also fall foul of Canon 188 part 4.
Notice also how he is trying to seed the usual doubt that “Oh well, but the Code of 1917 has been made redundant”. No, it has not. Because non-clerics, non-catholic, public and notorious heretics and their equally non-catholic, heretic, Freemasonic and hence practicing satanist henchmen, do NOT get any say in ANYTHING within the Catholic Church, so their fake Code of 1983 has less authority than second-hand toilet paper.
Lie number 4: coming up… An ignoramus we have met before asks a genuine question, and Ranger promptly goes on to use more subterfuge and lies.
And how does our worm-tonguing liar, that lies lyingly, lie? He lies thusly:
Notice again that he is an accomplished deceiver. He pretends to faintly praise my knowing that the fake code of 1983 did in fact literally try to overturn the entire of Code of 1917 and in particular canon 188, as we have seen in detail before in this post, while still “pretending” that the fake Code is valid in any way. And then goes on to lie about its contents. Again, I refer you to the clear dissection of the fake code against the real one in the post mentioned above.
There are, of course, more lies he spews with practically every text he types, but I trust the above suffices to show the point.
No related posts.
By G | 7 July 2020 | Posted in Social Commentary