The Kurgan Blog

Giuseppe Filotto Cross Giuseppe Filotto Logo

Special Operations & Exploration

What is this site all about? First-timers CLICK HERE

No Comments

How to read the fake news on Russia

If you have removed the credulity panopticon from your eyes, reading Western media reports of the war in never-never-land, hub of the American money laundering tree of death, can be quite amusing.

Allow me to demonstrate how you too can learn this amusing skill. My translations of this Reuters piece are below each section.

DONETSK PROVINCE, Ukraine, Feb 28 (Reuters) – Russian forces pressed their offensive in eastern Ukraine as they attempted to encircle the small mining city of Bakhmut, the scene of the toughest fighting in battlefields saturated by rain and an early spring thaw.

Russia is trying to cut the Ukrainian defenders’ vulnerable supply lines into the city and force them to surrender or withdraw. That would give Moscow its first major prize in more than half a year, and open the way to the capture of the last remaining urban centres in Donetsk region. “The enemy is constantly destroying everything that can be used to protect our positions for fortification and defence. Our soldiers defending the area around Bakhmut are true heroes,” Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said on Monday.

Even Gay-Cocaine-Dwarf knows the meatgrinder of Bakhmut is eventually going to fall, but as long as he can feed it for just a bit longer, more and more money laundering can continue happening.

Ukraine’s general staff said Russia had strengthened its forces in the Bakhmut area and was shelling settlements around the city.

Ukrainian soldiers in Donetsk region hunkered in muddy trenches after suddenly warmer weather softened the frozen ground.

“Both sides stay in their positions, because as you see, spring means mud. Thus, it is impossible to move forward,” said Mykola, 59, commander of a Ukrainian frontline rocket launcher battery, watching a tablet screen for coordinates to fire.

The spring thaw, known as the rasputitsa, has a history of ruining plans by armies to attack across the soil of Ukraine and western Russia, turning roads into rivers and fields into impenetrable bogs.

Let’s not forget that the incursions and proddings taking place all around this area are being done by Wagner PMC and not regular Russian forces, and that they are happening all along the line, meaning the Ukis have no real idea of when or from where any major attack might come. Forcing them to remain in paranoid tension all along their front while denying them rest, often I would assume also any kind of resupply, and generally wearing them down at minimal cost to the Russian side.

Note also that if they have a 59 year old out there in the mud, and putting him on the front page report, the Ukis are clearly running low on meat for the meatgrinder.

Reuters saw several military vehicles stuck in mud. In a trench, cut deeply out of the ground in a zigzag pattern, Volodymyr, a 25-year-old platoon commander, said his men were prepared to operate in any weather.

“When we’re given a target that means we have to destroy it.”

Yeah! Look at this photograph of an obviously combat ready rocket launcher, obviously right at the front, not at all parked on the road in the middle of nowhere for a photo op with no danger whatever from Russian batteries because it’s nowhere near the front. Clearly.

Its forces replenished with hundreds of thousands of conscripts called up late last year, Russia has intensified its attacks along the front in the east.

Western countries say several of Russia’s assaults on Bakhmut have failed at high cost.

Note the careful wording. “Russia has hundreds of thousands of new conscripts…” now there should be a definite full stop here, not a comma, to perform its usual function: ending one sentence before beginning a new, totally separate one. “Russia has intensified its attacks along the front in the East.”

The way it is written, one would assume that Russia has now shoved hundreds of thousands of new recruits into the front on the eastern side of Ukraine. But this is not in fact what’s happening. What is happening is Russia is prodding, harassing, and denying resupplies to various key areas in the region, to do what it has been doing for a while, and demoralise, reduce and ultimately overrun and roll up the Uki positions with minimal loss of Russian lives. And they are doing it with conscripts from the Donbass and Wagner PMC recruits.

Now as to the Western media’s version of “high costs”. One can already tell from how it’s written that this is likely more wishful thinking of the kind we saw six months ago when Russia was definitely out of ammo and Putin was at death’s door from cancer, dementia, Alzheimer’s and maybe ebola, I guess.

“Vicious battles are going on there. The command is doing everything it can to stop the enemy from advancing through our territory,” Serhiy Cherevatyi, a spokesperson for Ukraine’s eastern military command, told Ukrainian television.

“Vicious battles” can also be written as “We are getting slaughtered”.

Doesn’t sound like the confident defender’s quote of the day does it? And this is from some rear echelon mofo, that is not even in the area getting shelled into submission, but rather the patriotic Baghdad Bob of the current situation.

For its part, Moscow claimed to have destroyed a Ukrainian ammunition depot near Bakhmut and shot down U.S.-made rockets and Ukrainian drones.

In other words, business as usual. Smoking weapons deliveries and ammunition depots, as they have been doing throughout their Special Military Operations, which continue to grind down the Ukis in as humane a way as possible, while depleting the Western Clown World weapon resources.

Reuters could not verify the battlefield reports.

“They are fake news! Not us! Them! We can’t confirm, see?!? See?!? Fake news!”

Ri-iiight. Let’s just pretend Russia hasn’t used facts as propaganda for the last year, shall we?

Ukrainian military analyst Oleh Zhdanov said Russian forces had driven a wedge between the villages of Yadhidne and Berkhivka, on the northern approaches to Bakhmut, as they tried to cut the road west to Chasiv Yar.

“The southern part of Bakhmut is the only area which can be described as under Ukrainian control. In all other districts, the situation is unpredictable,” he said in a video commentary, adding: “It is impossible to say where the front line lies.”

Again, not quite the narrative of a victorious Ukraine against the evil forces of the Russian Federation the West would like to project.

U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen became the latest senior Western official to visit the Ukrainian capital Kyiv, promising assistance and more measures to isolate Russia after meetingswith Zelenskiy and other officials.

Ah yes. Further measures to isolate! Maybe they will just ban the letter Z altogether from the alphabet. That’s bound to really, finally, bring Russia to its knees.

Her boss, President Joe Biden, went there a week ago to mark the first anniversary of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

“America will stand with Ukraine as long as it takes,” Yellen, flanked by sandbags at the Cabinet ministers’ office, told Ukrainian Prime Minister Denys Shmyhal on Monday.

Yellen announced the transfer of the first $1.25 billion from the latest, $9.9 billion tranche of economic and budget assistance from Washington, and visited a school where teacher salaries are reimbursed by U.S. budgetary support.

The money-laundering operation continues unabated and possibly more frantically, to try to get as much done before the inevitable end.

She also backed completion of a fully financed program for Ukraine with the International Monetary Fund by the end of March.

Translation: after we have sucked every last drop of human blood from this hell-hole cum feeding through for parasitic vampires, we will also remove all the desiccated organs, pulp the bones, and wear the skin as a victory lap over yet another absorption of resources at the expense of useless eaters.

Ukraine’s military forces have mostly focused on holding defensive positions in recent weeks, but are expected to attempt a counter-offensive later this year using new weapons pledged by the West.

Translation: The Russians are allowing the Ukis the opportunity to flee/surrender/rout before mass murdering them like rabbits in a warren, but the gay-cocaine-dwarf’s masters will keep shoving them into the meat grinder right down to the last man, and in the meantime pretend they are in any way able to have any sort of pushback against the very first line of “Russian” fighters (Wagner PMC). Also: Unicorns. Unicorns need to be saved from the Russians as Ukraine is their natural habitat. We really need to send another 100 Billion US $ to save the unicorns!

Zelenskiy pushed again for F-16 fighter jets that his Western allies have been reluctant to provide.

And not just unicorns but Pegasi! Yes plural!

“Our pilots and anti-aircraft units, and other experts of our air force are doing a great job,” Zelenskiy said in his nightly radio address. “But we will be able to completely protect our skies when the aviation taboo is fully lifted in relations with our partners.”

Hahahhahahahahahah I got nothing here, sorry. I mean Russia literally wiped out a third to half of Ukkraine’s power station in a couple of hours in one morning and now continue to take out ammo depots and pretty much whatever they want anywhere in Ukraine, but you’ll be able to completely protect the skies with vapourware fighter jets anytime now? Hahahhaha, Oh Voldy, may I call you Voldy, just carry on re-enacting that scene from scarface, you know the one, where he snorts a small hill of cocaine. It’s what you do best.

The Feb. 24 war anniversary saw both sides trying to demonstrate their resolve for a second year of fighting.

Russian President Vladimir Putin gave a major speech in which he abandoned the last remaining nuclear arms control treaty with the United States but announced no major initiatives to change the war’s course.

He was upstaged by Biden, who journeyed to Kyiv and gave a landmark speech of his own in Warsaw.

Right. The man who is single-handedly holding off the entirety of clown world was upstaged by an incontinent dementia patient, or possibly one of his body doubles. I wouldn’t know, like the rest of the shrinking number of humans still able to think, I actually read Putin’s speech in full. I didn’t bother knowing what green-screened, deepfake, third tier dementia warflegarble Biden’s handlers tried to make him regurgitate.

Ukraine’s outnumbered troops repelled Russia’s attack aimed at taking the capital early in the war and later recaptured substantial territory. Russia still occupies nearly a fifth of Ukraine which it claims to have annexed.

Uh… let’s just sneak in some stuff that literally never happened, hoping to rewrite history, as has been (((our))) playbook for millennia, hoping no one remembers anything.

And let’s also say that the addition of the three regions to official Russian territory didn’t really happen.

I mean, we are chem-spraying, gmo-feeding and tv brainwashing these fuckers for decades, and now also genetically modified them directly, surely they don’t really know what’s going on. If they did they would have torn us out of our seats of power and burnt us at the stake long ago.

Carry on.

Chutzpah to the max!

By G | 28 February 2023 | Posted in Social Commentary

No Comments

Review – Carnival Row

This Amazon series is really quite cleverly done.

Oh, don’t get me wrong, it has absolutely everything in terms of subterfugeous degeneracy. In fact, it probably outdoes almost any other series I have seen in this regard, and it does so in a most insidious manner.

The acting is not altogether as ridiculously bad as many other similar attempts at subversion.

The storyline, if you can look past the intent of the product, and most will not even become aware of it even after I point it out, which is why it is successful in its intent more than any other effort I have seen in the last few years.

So. Allow me to expose it.

By throwing you into a world of fae and humans, that is faeries, pixies as they are referred to, fauns or satyrs, magic and technology, and placing the whole thing in a Victorian England type of setting at the start, it adds enough distractions, and entertainment, and colour, to allow the underlying message to slip through.

The plot of the first series too is not too bad even stripped of the surroundings, and I’ll get to the plot of the second series in a moment.

Of course, some of the message and visuals are obvious, but they take their time to get to it, the overall theme of racism between humans and the fae is over everything, but is also coloured by class as well as race and since the humans are “all one race” the colour of skin of the humans is hardly noticed, so the diversity focus is so heavily slanted on the disparities between humans and fae that the rest of it is just assumed as perfectly harmonious.

The dance of class and acceptance between the main satyr (black, obviously) and the human female (alabaster white and blonde, prim and proper) is stretched out until the inevitable carnal imagery very reminiscent of a Boris Vallejo image, where the satyr, dark, brutish and muscular, takes the pristine white young woman who gives herself with full abandon.

Truly the subversions are so layered and multiplied they are quite interesting to note.

Allow me to list them. First the more readily apparent and obvious:

• We’re all one race: the human race

• Magicks of a certain type are treated as “evil” but useful

• Mixed race humans/fae are of course the persecuted special victims that ultimately will save us all.

• All lives are equally valuable.

• The obligatory lesbianism, homosexuality and bisexualism is, of course present.

Slightly less obvious:

• Incest – the chancellor’s son and opposition’s daughter have the same father.

• The power of incest in creating dynasties – their liaison turns to political co-operation with the explicitly stated motive of consolidating power, and reference is made as to how such pairings are the way to keep power within the family, so to speak.

• Prostitution is just a regular way to get by.

• Polyrelationships are normal – specifically referred to as a group of 5, I forget how many women and men in it.

You might miss it if you get caught up in it:

• The whole thing is really rather an apology for bestiality.

• Although not overtly stated, the imagery of rather demonic copulations is present.

So. That’s my take.

It’s not completely unwatchable, and can be mildly entertaining as fantasy period drama.

But be aware of the subtle subversion throughout. Oh. And of course the rudest and most odious personality belongs to a mutton chopped, old style British copper.

Season two has a Port Ragusa location behave as the Stalinist Soviets of the day. Complete with disappearing undesirables. So, once again, rather smartly done as: “Russians be bad commies”, but where all races of fae and human can happily intermarry.

As I said, it is rather entertaining.

Just stay awake.

By G | 27 February 2023 | Posted in Social Commentary

6 Comments

The Reality of Catholicism

If you don’t know that Sedevacantists are the only Catholics left, or don’t know what Sedevacantists are, you are obviously new here and I would suggest you use the search function on the right and read several posts on this blog.

For the rest of you, you may think this is the “usual” zealous Bible thumping.

Except I’ve never Bible thumped. Or been any kind of usual in my zealotry. So I hope you will take note of a few things, because they continually surprise me too.

Living in a Catholic manner certainly does not mean one does so perfectly. I certainly never meet anything close to that standard.

I tend to be a big picture guy with attention to detail, rather than a detail guy with a big picture idea.

Catholic thought is divided essentially into three parts:

Divine, immutable laws

Church rules

Lay people rules

The first are immutable and eternal. They will never change, because such is the nature of absolute truth, justice, beauty and love. Such is the nature of God insofar as we are able to comprehend it.

Church rules are in essence common sense rules of logic that have and can and do change from time to time. In the past usually as a result of the growth of the Church and thus needing a structure to manage it and serve the laity best. More recently, in light of the last six decades and change without a Pope, the rules of the Church are in many cases not even applicable and hence naturally revert back to those of previous eras when the Church was much smaller, as it once again is today, since only Sedevacantists are Catholics today.

The last are the rules for the laity, for you and me, and again, these are generally good, solid, common sense rules that when followed create the best society humanity has ever had to date.

The rules that apply to laity are confusing to some, because not all are divine and not all are immutable. The portion of rules for laity that comes from divine laws, are, of course, immutable, and others in fact do have even official exceptions for certain situations.

Yet others are treated as if there are no exceptions, and indeed are written as such, yet, the clergy know, some can be “broken” under certain situations and doing so in these cases might not even be a sin.

One example, and one I heartily counsel you to never, ever, ever break, is exorcism.

The rules are that only a priest who has been trained as an exorcist —-and rather extensively at that—- and who also has specific permission from his Bishop is ever to even attempt an exorcism. And then only if supported by a small but also highly trained people alongside him.

And yet, at times, priests and even lay people had to deal with demonic infestations of one kind or another, and some even managed to do so successfully. The rules strictly forbid it for good reason. Which is the preservation of your soul, because dealing directly with demonic spirits is really almost inevitably damaging and dangerously so. A layman trying to deal with a demonic possession is something like a layman trying to land the space shuttle manually with no training.

You wouldn’t let an untrained person do heart surgery. No one sane would. But it does not mean that the first heart surgery was done by a trained doctor. In fact, I have been told by a person that worked with him, that Barnhard himself admitted the guy who did the first one was a black man that Barnhard had allowed to do surgery on cadavers. So he was trained, but he was the hospital’s gardener, and black, under apartheid. So he certainly wasn’t a doctor.

Life is often stranger than fiction. Look at the Saint Joan of Arc. I mean, ok, it was Frenchmen after all, but still, a little girl did for France what all her noblemen and their armies could not.

Yet, if you look at the devout believers, whatever their class, and the realities and communities they create, Catholic rules produce incomparably orderly, pleasant, beautiful, just communities. The problem are not the rules, but how far we have fallen from them.

And the most important rules are the ones relating to family, because as Pope Pius XII wrote in his Mystici Corporis, ultimately, the Catholic family is the bedrock on which Catholicism is founded.

And that bedrock is founded first of all on the relationship of the man and woman that go on to create that family.

The rules of relation between husband and wife in Catholicism are unique to it. The Protestants have perverted it, as they did everything. The Pagans never had any rules worth saving, in the main, with the only possible exception being the Japanese.

Who today even knows what those rules are? Or even just what the mainstays, the pillars on which the other rules may depend and build upon? Do you, anonymous reader?

Do you know?

Would you care to say what you think they are?

I am curious.

By G | 26 February 2023 | Posted in Social Commentary

5 Comments

Best Fiction Titles

Leaving this pinned for a bit as people are enjoying them. New posts are below.

The below is the fiction titles of all time I recall and have enjoyed the most. No doubt some escape me, but overall, if you are looking for a good read, these are it. Where they are available for purchase online somewhere I have added a link.

The Sub-Genre column needs a little explanation. For Example, my book 2 in the Overlords of Mars series says “film” because the events in it are written more as you would expect them to appear in a film. And the Hyperion series is sort of, kinda, about Christianity, in a way, but a very cool, sci-fi way. Anyway, I hope you enjoy them.

Genre	Sub-Genre	Book Title
Fantasy	Christianity	The High Crusade
Fantasy	Poetry	The Lost Books of the Odyssey
Fantasy	Romance	All My Friends Are Superheroes
Fantasy	Venice Mythology	The Stress of Her Regard
Humour	Cartoons	Calvin & Hobbes
Poetry	Poetry	John Keats Complete Poems
Reincarnation	Love	Cloud Atlas (See the film which is better)
RPG	Fantasy	The Rules Cyclopedia – D&D or PDF
RPG	Sci-Fi	Classic Traveller Role Playing Game (the three little black books 1, 2 and 3)
Sci-Fi	Androids	Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep
Sci-Fi	Christianity	The Hyperion Series (get the whole thing)
Sci-Fi	History	Overlords of Mars – Inception (book 1)
Sci-Fi	Graphic Novel	Aldebaran
Sci-Fi	Graphic Novel	Antares
Sci-Fi	Graphic Novel	Betelgeuse
Sci-Fi	Greek Mythology	Ilium
Sci-Fi	Film	Overlords of Mars – Stasis (book 2)
Sci-Fi	Mars	John Carter of Mars the film too is good
Sci-Fi	Precognition	The Stochastic Man
Sci-Fi	Telepathy	The Hollow Man

And of course, I did forget some in the table there, so they are here:

The continuation of the Bladerunner (the original film) but in book format (and bury that foulness from the pit that was the film Bladerunner 2049) by KW Jeter. He actually has 3 more out, I didn’t even know as I had only read the second one. Which was brilliant.

I am sure I have forgotten many more, or perhaps I simply have outgrown some I really enjoyed when younger, like the Dragonlance Series, which I read when I was 16 and played Dungeons and Dragons quite a bit, but these above are the ones that stuck in my mind off the top of my head.

A reader reminded me in the comments I did not include anything by gene Wolf. For which I will lash myself in penance. My personal best loved of his books is Soldier of the Mist. But the man was a genius, you can’t go wrong with any of his stuff.

By G | 25 February 2023 | Posted in Books, Film Review, Humour, Increasing Happiness, Overlords of Mars - 1, Overlords of Mars - 2, Writing

No Comments

The problem of “racism”, genetics, math, and justice and how it all relates to the current WW3

This will be initially a little slow, but I trust increasingly interesting, and I think useful, for those who have attention spans past the current “fruitfly on crack” level.

The problem of “racism” is only “complex” because people do not:

1. Understand the interplay between the above mentioned varaibles.

2. Use words correctly or define them properly when there is any ambiguity.

In the case of the boogeyman of “racism” the problem stems first of all from the non-definition of the word. Historically it wasn’t a negative, it was a descriptive term. But let’s see how it is defined today in the woke online dictionaries. Here are the top three results screenshotted from the search term “racism definition”.

Let’s go with the Wikipedia entry then since it is the most commonly understood meaning of the word. And let’s see what reality has to say about it.

First: are there separate groups of humans? Of course there are. It is a very simple thing to define as many sets by as many parameters as we like. We can divide groups of humans by multiple defining characteristics, height, eye colour, skin tone, place of birth, genetic haplogroups, or whatever else we want. Depending on the level of detail of your set descriptors, the borders of your set will be more or less “fuzzy”. For example, if you define all humans as belonging to 4 groups, say, white, black, red and yellow, in “traditional” simplistic skin “colour” your borders would be very fuzzy indeed. If however you were to define them into still broad but somewhat better defined groups, such as, say:

• Caucasoids with a genetic component of Oriental or Negroid below a certain threshold.

• Negroids with a genetic component of Oriental or Caucasoid below a certain threshold

• Orientals with a generic component of Caucasoid or Negroid below a certain threshold

• Whatever human doesn’t fit into one of the above three categories

You would now have three more or less coherent groups that are statistically going to be generically quite similar and a fourth group of what we might term “the leftovers”. And please note, if you are getting upset about any of the terms I use as descriptors, you are in the generic subset of humans knows as “morons”.

None of this is about feelings. It doesn’t matter if I call them crakers, niggers, and chinks.

Now, based on the above 4 definitions, can we see broad statistically significant trends?

Yes, we do.

The Caucasians are generally higher IQ than the Negroids and the Orientals higher IQ (by a smaller margin) than the Caucasoids when they are East Orientals, (Japanese, Chinese, Koreans) but not so much when they are West Oriental or Asian (Pakistani, Hindu).

So, objectively speaking, we can see that at a certain level of granularity the differences not only exist, but are obvious to anyone of normal intelligence that spends a little rime observing different groups.

Of course, these very broad terms can be further refined. While Nigerians, Xhosa, Zulu and Tsonga are all African Negroids, their culture is quite different and different enough that I personally prefer the Tsonga over the others, the Zulus marginally over the Nigerians and the Xhosa in last place. Similarly, in general terms I’d rather hang out with Russians than Polacks or Germans, and like hanging out with Italians, supposedly my own group, not particularly more than other Europeans like the Latvians or Portuguese.

Again, the differences in culture, ethnicity and religion are obvious to anyone of normal intelligence.

Are there individual exceptions? Sure. Always. Even large in number depending on how you define your groups, but statistically the realities are what they are.

Then we add in genetics and we find that these too have a now utterly undeniable impact on behaviour too. Specifically the propensity to violence or long term timeline preference or dietary tolerances, likelihood of incidence of certain diseases and so on. Once again, nature has stamped its reality on us in many, many, many ways, and the statistical realities of these things are objectively undeniable.

So, in short, the differences exist. Howsoever you wish to define humans into different groups, differences do, and always will, exist.

That’s just an objective fact and the Universe (reality itself) does not care at all how you feel about it. If you are 5’10” you will never be 6’2” and trying to pretend you are, getting “surgery” to lengthen your legs, or wearing really high heels will only make your life harder and more unpleasant than simply accepting, and working with, the specifics of your situation. Reality invariably rewards those who respect it and punishes those who try to ignore it. If you have any objections to this undeniable fact run full speed into a wall or walk off the second story balcony of your apartment and if you survive let me know how you suddenly changed your mind.

The issue then is not reality.

The issue is perception, definitions and justice.

Let’s now look at that word: superiority.

We can define this simply as “better than” but in the context of “racism” we need to add a few words, so it becomes:

“Better than X at Y” where X and Y are the defining set and activity respectively.

At this point we can now make objective statements that are statistically relevant again, and factual. Just as we can factually say that under normal conditions, Joe can run faster than Bob, or Alan is taller than Will.

We can then say that in general terms, Caucasoids will have higher IQ than Negroids and lower ones than East Orientals. Similarly for mathematical ability.

We can also say that in general Negroids will have better aptitude for certain physical activities than either Caucasoids or Orientals, for example boxing, sprinting, certain types of endurance activities and so on.

Again, these are indisputable facts.

But it is also an indisputable fact that every group will tend to be better than the other groups at something.

What that something is differs from group to group and how you define them, and society may give different somethings different values in general or within specific circumstances.

For example, while a white physics professor is more likely to know how to calculate the forces required to uphold a temporary bridge over a stream, if I am trying to find water to survive in the Kalahari desert, I would very much prefer to have a Khoi-San with me even if they don’t even have a word for physics and he doesn’t speak a word of any language I know. So the “superiority” of any group over another is relative to the time, circumstance, characteristic being looked at and so on.

Philosophically then, this brings us to a point of justice. And ultimately this boils down to a few simple questions. The main one being:

Should we treat apparent members of a specific group differently from apparent members of different groups?

The obvious answer is, YES. The initial evaluation is going to be based on the statistical significance that you have personal experience with. And it really doesn’t matter if you really, really, really, don’t want to notice such differences. Your brain does it automatically. It’s literally how brains work. If your brain could not make value judgements, on the order of many of them a second, you literally would not be able to function. Incidentally, this is why Artificial Intelligences (well, what passes for them these days) if left to their own devices, invariably become extremely racist. Since computers don’t care about feelings, and don’t have any, large accumulation of data sets tends to make them become extremely statistically aware of various tendencies various sets of humans have and act accordingly.

This very logical and objective way of doing things, which, by the way, is intrinsically fair from a purely mechanistic/mathematical perspective, generally really upsets humans though.

The slightly more in depth answer is that you probably should make allowances for those fuzzy borders and the outliers that don’t fit within a certain set so well, but only insofar as it affects you personally on a one-to one or one to a few scale at most. In other words, the genius mathematician that is also a world-class swimmer that happens to be a Zulu, is an outlier and may be a great guy, but you know very well, he is not representative of the average Zulu.

As I have mentioned before, the average Caucasian, when compared to the average Japanese in Japan, behaves, dresses, acts and reacts in a more generally uncivilised and rude manner compared to the Japanese and especially so from the Japanese cultural perspective. It is therefore natural that the average Japanese would initially eye me with a certain level of disdain, suspicion, or reserve. Should he then bother to get to know me a little he might decide that this particular round-eyed, badly-dressed, barbarian is alright after all, but I certainly would not expect Japan to make it’s policy against Caucasians in Japan suit me personally. And if I were the Japanese emperor I would certainly make it so that round-eyed, white barbarians are punished harshly if they do not behave according to the norms of my Japanese culture.

Do I have problem with any of this? No. None at all.

Have I personally been subjected to what most people would call “racist abuse”? Certainly. 25 years in Africa with a white skin will do that to you. or even just a few weeks in Japan, or even just in a different nation from your own. That, is simply how the cookie crumbles. Is it always fair? No, it isn’t but again, you might as well complain about the rain, or the height you were born with or the colour of your eyes or your skin. It is how it is.

But what about the humanity?!

Well, what about it? If you treat me well, at an individual level, I’ll treat you well right back. And if you know how to carry yourself, you can generally get by in most places. I have found myself more than once in situations that could have turned very ugly very fast, and I was lucky in how they resolved, because I had the “wrong” skin colour, or cultural expression, or whatever. I have also been in situations where it would have been legitimate to expect trouble because of my skin and/or culture, and instead been received very kindly and graciously.

In real life, shit happens. I met a Tsonga (Sub-Saharan African) that was a genius at math and could do integration in his head. I have met Khoi San that I would never be able to match at tracking animals in the bush if I spent the next ten years trying to learn from them, and I have met wealthy and very expensively educate people that are dumber than rocks. But the point is that statistically, certain trends are going to be as they are.

Cliches are cliches for a reason, after all.

And generalisations, as generalisations, can still be factual.

Of course, philosophically, you may say that the soul of an illiterate African is just as worthy of life as that of a Japanese master of Calligraphy. And in principle, I would not disagree with you, however, in how I go about ordering my life, choosing my neighbours and enforcing or following the laws of the land, I absolutely will take note of statistical realities concerning other humans. And so do you, so does everyone. No matter how hard you might try to deny it or reject the idea. The fact is you too do not want to move your home and family next to a campground of thieving gypsies with a history of violent criminality and playing loud music at all hours.

The only “difficulty” is in how to deal with the specifics of a single case when faced with the outlier. In normal human nature, more prevalently in certain human groups than others, one does not want to be arbitrarily unfair to a specific individual as a result of a perceived characteristic that ultimately may not be indicative of his ability.

But the only way to avoid doing this is to provide equal opportunity of access, but let the results determine the outcome. A meritocracy is the fairest system of all.

Even then there will be natural imbalances due to all sorts of factors, many out of anyone’s control, but in principles a meritocracy is the way things should work. And such a state of affairs has been historically created most closely in:

Catholic nations that used Roman Law as the guiding principle.

Protestant Countries that used Common Law.

Pagan Countries that had very strict codes of conduct/law.

None are perfect, but personally I find the Catholic one the best of the lot. The Protestant version tends to mechanise human beings and treat them like robots, and the pagan one tends to need to be draconian in order to control the lowest common denominator. The Catholic one has enough flexibility to be adaptable and yet strict rules you are not to break.

So, once again, I find that historically, Catholic nations were far more pleasant to live in than any other place. Certainly there are notable comparable cultures, but what is not in question is that all of these had become homogenous before they achieved their peak civilisation.

In conclusion then, while one must never lose their humanity at an individual level, the best system for human beings is to, in general terms (and pretty closely defined general terms at that) stick to their own groups, composed of people similar to them in physical, intellectual, cultural and religious appearance and custom.

And ultimately, this is why the mystery meat globohomo clown world will inevitably lose to the Multipolar World that Russia and China talk about, and others are rapidly getting on board of. Ultimately, you can’t deny nature, just as you can’t fight the Ocean with a paddle or a boat or even a wall. Sooner or later, chickens come home to roost or they die.

Conclusion

Once such simple and basic concepts as are described here are accepted by a majority, things will rapidly return to normal. That is, to a sane, multipolar world. And if those people who become aware of these simple facts, should also happen to notice that a particular group of humans has intentionally, consciously, and with malice aforethought, directed things to be the way we are finding them now, it could very well be possible that such a change back to a very Multipolar World happens very fast, and possibly also with a short, quick, but extremely brutal removal of groups perceived to have created the current conditions, howsoever such groups might be defined, and perceived.

Whether these be the Davos attendees, the bankers, the politicians, the Bilderberger group, freemasons, or any number of other definable groups, the reaction, once a certain level of awareness has been achieved, is bound to be harsh. Naturally so.

After all, it is not as if historical this kind of event hasn’t played out before in multiple eras and across the planet. The only difference enow is that everything is more connected, and it will be a lot more difficult for those deemed responsible to run and hide anywhere.

So that’s my cheery thought for this Saturday.

Have a good week-end.

By G | 25 February 2023 | Posted in Catholicism, Christianity, Human Performance, Medical Science, Sedeprivationism, Social Commentary