What is this site all about? First-timers CLICK HERE
When/if a woman sees past all the deception and lies and nonsense, both internal and external, and sees the truth, once seen, it cannot be unseen.
And none of the lies about equality, grrrrrl power, careers in cubicle farms or billionaires on white horses can ever make the reality fade again.
Translated from the Italian, this is is from the noted Italian journalist, who died in 2006, yet could be writing today. Or perhaps not. Today she might be jailed for writing basic facts as what follows.
Taken from her book: Oriana Fallacci Interviews herself – Apocalypse
(Originally written in Italian the English Translation is by me)
Oriana Fallaci
WITH WHAT RIGHT DOES A HOMOSEXUAL COUPLE ASKS TO ADOPT A CHILD?
A human being is born from two individuals of opposite sex. A fish, a bird, an elephant, an insect, the same. To be conceived you need an ovum and a spermatozoon. Like it or not, on this planet life works this way. Well, some experts in biogenetics say that in the future one could do without the spermatozoon. But not without the ovum. Whether dealing with mammals or oviparous, the ovum will always be required. The ovum, the egg, which in the case of human beings is inside the belly of a woman and when fecundated transforms into a spark of Life then a sprout of Life, and through the wonderful journey of pregnancy becomes another Life. Another human being. Therefore. A male homosexual does not have an ovum. The belly of a woman, the womb to grow it in, neither. And there isn’t any biogenetics in the world that can resolve such an issue. Clonation included. The female homosexual, yes has the ovum. The belly of a woman necessary to complete the marvellous journey that brings a spark of Life, then a sprout of Life, then another Life, another human being, ditto. But her partner can’t fertilise her. And so, if she doesn’t join herself to a man, or doesn’t ask a man to please give her some sperm, she finds herself in the same conditions of the male homosexual.
And a priori, not because she is unlucky and her babies die before they are born, she does not take part in the continuation of her species. To the duty of having to perpetuate her species through who comes and will come after her.
With what right, then, a homosexual couple (male or female) asks to adopt a child?
With what right do they pretend to raise a child within a distorted view of Life, that is, with two dads or two moms in place of a dad or mom?
And in the case of two male homosexuals, with what right does the couple use the belly of a woman to procure for themselves a child and perhaps buy it like one might buy a car?
With what right, in short, do they steal from a woman, the pain and miracle of maternity?
When they talk of gay adoption, I feel robbed in my female belly. Even if I don’t have children, I feel used, exploited, like a cow that births calves destined for the abattoir.
And in the image of two men, or two women, that with a baby between them play the comedy of Virgin Mary and Saint Joseph, I see something monstrously wrong. Something that offends me, or rather, humiliates me as a woman, as a mother who could not be, unlucky mother. And as a citizen.
Therefore, offended and humiliated, I tell myself: I am outraged by the silence, the hypocrisy, the cowardice that surrounds this issue. I am infuriated by the people who remain silent, who is scared of talking about it, of telling the truth. And the truth is that the laws of the state cannot ignore the laws of Nature. They can’t falsify with the ambiguity of words like “parents” and “spouses” the Laws of Life.
The state can’t deliver a child, that is, a defenceless and unknowing creature, to parents with whom he or she will live, believing that one is born from two dads or two moms instead of one dad and one mom. And to those who blackmail us with the story of children without food or without a home (a story which in any case does not hold, since in our society we have an excess of normal couples ready to adopt them) I say: a child is not a dog or a cat, to feed and that’s it, house and that’s it. A child is a human being, a citizen, with inalienable rights. Far more inalienable that the rights, or rather, presumed rights, of two homosexuals with paternal or maternal manias.
And the first of these rights, is to know how one is born on our planet, how Life works on our planet, how Life works in our species. Completely impossible with two “parents” of the same sex.
Apparently, somewhere in Mexico, the parents of children that went to an institution where LGBT propaganda was being pushed, took matters into their own hands, piling up the LGBT books in the courtyard of the place, and setting fire to them.
I am sure this scene reminds me of something… another group of people that liked to burn books. Books on how boys could become girls through genital mutilation, oh right… “surgery”.
I just can’t quite recall… but anyway, I am sure the news, and propaganda at the time, and historians later on, told the absolute truth about them, whoever they were, not making anything up or anything like that.
As I have written before, Catholicism has always accepted that certain crimes deserve the death penalty.
This is, of course, entirely reasonable and logical. Avoiding capital punishment for such serious crimes as child rape, aggravated murder, and so on is not only unfair, but it is demonic. The point of giving the perpetrator of such viciousness the “mercy” of undeserved life is not at all to be merciful, but rather to reduce the victim and their families to some subhuman status that is not worthy of justice, and dignity.
Doing away with the death penalty is being for the degradation of victims, that is, the weaker and least powerful, the wronged, and as such, drags all of humanity a step closer to the filthy, degenerate state demons love to see us in.
Furthermore, the demonic inspired and paid for mass media, invariably pushes a completely false narrative in order to appeal to your charity, mercy and sense of justice. In short, they utterly pervert the intent of those noble virtues.
See for example the example below.
CNN presents this as if two homosexuals, engaged in quiet sodomy behind closed doors are about to be put to death for their sexual deviance which, however, they let you imagine by removing all context, was merely an innocent fetish hurting no one.
Now imagine someone anally raped your little son, or disabled brother. And let’s say such crimes are called “aggravated homosexuality”; are you really against the death penalty then?
I fully support Uganda’s right, as a sovereign state, to make their own laws in accordance with their culture and sense of justice, which I find to be closer to Catholic doctrine than anything in the West presently. May we learn from them soon to return to a time where justice was dispensed more correctly than it is now.
It really doesn’t require any further explanation than this.
I say “real” because these are the numbers they are allowing us to see. Who knows what the real numbers are, especially when you include those that died as a direct result of the gene altering serum they call a “vaccine”.
In any case, it is interesting that they are beginning to release this information in light of the potential fear porn post that has been making the rounds telling us that the evil powers that be plan to release version 2.0 that will kill anyone that is vaxxed, meaning about 3 billion people and assuming another 2 billion will die from related chaos. The story goes that they will release the information that all governments knew the vaxxs would cause the autoimmune disorder that kills off everyone that took it. This will cause widespread chaos and revolution adding to the death toll what with the non-existent services and healthcare. It’s the apocalypse scenario, which frankly, for some of us would not be as terrible as some think, but I expect it’s just more fear porn and not a real thing.
Still, the fact this is now out in the official government stats and literally NO ONE is going to jail, much less being hung for mass murder, is telling of how far along Universe 25 we have come.
Africa has always been ahead of America
A lot of first world citizens, really have only a tenuous grasp on reality. But don’t worry, I am here to help. Just as I predicted way back a year ago, though I have been trying to explain that to people (without bitch-slapping them to prove the point, you understand) for years, physical reality beats any and all propaganda. Just like physical engineering beats any and all scientific theory about how something is supposed to work.
Africa has always been relatively impenetrable at a high resolution.
Oh, sure, whole countries were nominally aligned with the USA or the old USSR or now China, and so on. Sure. Down at ground level, however, the initiatives of things like transgenderism, homosexuality as being “normal”, or worse, homosexual sex being taught in schools to underage children, was never going to take. Oh you can poison them, inject them with gene altering or sterilising “vaccines”, as the foundations of Bill Gates have done for years. You can kill Africans in large numbers, rig their elections, and do all of that stuff. But in reality, at ground level, they will never comply.
There have been experiments done in South Africa, in order to try and shake off the yoke of sanctions due to apartheid, where they gave productive and already ongoing farmland to Africans, along with all the machinery, all the training and all the tools to keep the farms going and being profitable. After the training and so on, they also told the natives that if they had any problems, for example one of the tractors broke down, or they ran out of fuel for not having called earlier, or whatever else, they just had to call and some white guys would be along to fix it. Guess what happened after a year or so, without few, if any, calls being made for help?
The place was completely reduced to abandoned status, machines broken, fields unworked, and so on.
Now, various African states are kicking out their (nominally) French masters (but really the usual suspects, which we will explain exactly who they are in a subsequent post), starting with Niger, then Mali, Burkina Faso, and now Gabon.
BRICS, seems to also be doing a bit of a number on the USA deep state, but, as we will see later, this is questionable to some degree. That said, what is not arguable is that the African Nations are doing a bit of a Zimbabwe.
And although I still have family out in the Southern region of the continent, from an objective perspective: Good on them.
And the Russians are the only ones that understood how to actually deal with and/or get the Africans “on side” as it were. Give them some weapons, point out the enemy and then let them get on with it. There is no guarantee they won’t turn to bite you later, but… eh… that’s Africa. The Chinese take the long approach and hope to change the situation over several generations. Good luck with that, boys.
Africa is a continent that by and large is sort of immune to the globalism of the Gay, Transgender, Fake, Talmudic, Bankers and overall self-identified “Masters of the Universe”. The only way Africa would ever be “tamed” is by literally exterminating all the Africans. So, although it certainly is not going to be a place where having a white skin is necessarily going to be an advantage in the coming decades, I think Africa will prove to be more of a messy thorn in the side of the USA and their de facto deep state operators and (((masters))). In that sense, Africa has always been ahead of all American attempts at bringing it to heel.
So: Good luck, my black brothers. I wish you well. And with any luck, we will also eventually help, by sending your co-nationals back to you. After all, as Putin says, a multi-polar world, is best. And true diversity is really achieved only by having distinct nations of distinct ethnicities. After all, the Jews certainly think it should be this way, look at Israel. And we know that ethnic homogeneity brings a complete lowering or even absence of crime. Let us then, work towards global peace, for real. Africa for Africans, and Europe for Europeans. Once that’s sorted, we can then go about being good neighbours, thanks to great big, walls, and experiencing true diversity of cultures, food, behaviours and so on. By visiting each other’s countries only as guests and/or legal and approved residents, due to some relevant and acceptable need, all, of course, while observing the required local customs and laws.
No related posts.
By G | 1 September 2023 | Posted in Social Commentary, The Enemy Within, Travel