Giuseppe Filotto Cross

What is this site all about? First-timers CLICK HERE

No Comments

The Correct Response

I never really followed UFC beyond the first few fights with no weight class, and the odd fighter here and there, so I don’t know who this guy is, but his response to the sodomy promoting “journalist” is exactly how every normal man should react to that sort of activity.

https://x.com/tinkerb65712648/status/1749262193357688853?s=46

Even in polite company, I never bend to the insane LGBT-Pedo agenda, this guy clearly does not, and neither should you. Nor should you apologise for it.

Call the mentally ill what they are: mentally ill.

Nothing will change until YOU change things in YOUR immediate vicinity.

1 Comment

Beware the Betrayer

No one likes to be betrayed, but I am not talking about infidelity in your marriage here, rather, I am trying, as I have for years, to make you understand a core deceit that you have been living with all your life, like a hooded hawk, without even realising it.

It has always amazed me over the last 4 decades or so, how often the masses, but also a decent number of supposedly, or even apparently intelligent people get fooled, and deceived by what to me, at first glance immediately give off a whiff of… sulphur? Deceit? Lies wired into the DNA. In short, the nefarious stench of the Freemasonic gatekeeper.

If you were to study the history of the Catholic Church, you would come across plots so devious and intricate and ancient that any desire to delve into old conspiracies would be sated within hours and last probably the rest of your natural life if you wanted to keep digging. I covered the main aspects in RTCC, but the fact is that since the official formation of the Illuminati in 1776, the strategy of the Satanists (they have, like their boss, many, many names, Carbonari, Illuminati, Freemasons, Rosicrucians, and on and on and on) has always been the same:

  • Foment the masses into “regime change” by using class structure (marxism), race (BLM, Critical Race Theory, Math being racist, white “privilege” etcetera), religion (Islam vs everyone, Judaism being an innocent bystander/victim only wanting the best for humanity, Christianity in all it’s forms needing to be Protestant and less “problematic” about things like family, marriage, homosexuality, and so on), sex (feminism, homosexuality, gay adoption, trannies, bestiality, and pedophelia) and whatever else they can think up that is a Satanic inversion of the truth, that will get the useful idiot cattle into creating a stampede. It doesn’t really matter who gets trampled, chaos and the breakdown of cvil society and the inversion of justice is good.
  • Because naturally a percentage of people who are not COMPLETE morons will not like this, set up a number of “leaders” in the political, intellectual, legal, and social arenas, as “opponents” or “truth-tellers”. The purpose of this is manifold:
    • It gives the Satanists a good sense of the mass trends and success/failure of their campaigns
    • It identifies with specificity any potential resistors and “troublemakers” to their plans, so they can be dealt with in a number of ways.
    • It controls the followers of these “leaders” because invariably, they are “ineffective” they “fail” or they simply do a 180 degree about face.

The point is that the Satanists, always, always, ALWAYS rig the game. Bet on red they win, bet on black, you lose.

And even relatively sharp people like James Delingpole get taken in by these deceivers. His recent talk with David Icke and his post about it explain it, but he does not do a very good job in either case. If you look at the podcast from about one hour and thirty minutes in or so, James misses the opportunity to nail Icke to the floor by hammering the one nail he is absolutely correct on.

Aside his fantastic, reptilianoid theories (which he has mutated into more palatable stuff over the years since he first started) even if you were to accept his ideas as somewhat coherent, James makes a very solid point: If Icke’s theories are correct, and we are being run in a simulation by demonic entities that use human bloodlines to control and enslave us and our “waking up” just means we see the bigger “allness” of it all but there is no God, no loving creator, no actual specific saviour, then what’s the point? And what is the origin of it all? Icke avoids the question like a greased eel and never gives a straight answer, and James gets flustered and lets him slide off.

I would never waste 15 seconds of my time on Icke other than to expose him, so I would never have given him my time to begin with, but if I had been on that panel, I would have relentlessly hammered the point home. What’s it all about David? Where is “God” in your philosophy? And Icke kind of admitted there isn’t really a God, just an “allness”. But if that’s all there is, why the demons? Why their need to corrupt humanity? Are they just interdimnsional parasites and we are unlucky in this part of the Universe? It is, of course, nonsensical, and insofar as it could be making sense to a point, you lose sight of the fact that its real, subterfugeous and hidden aim, is really to distance you from the truth of God and hence the truth of how to fight back and not fall into deception and eventually the despair of hell.

Icke and Alex Jones, Joe Rogan, and Milo YankmyPoleUs, Jordan Peterson, Andrew Tate (and his Gamma wizard that runs him), Emo Jones, Gay Gary Voris, Taylor Marshall, black science man, bowtie “do butt stuff’ science man, the entire Vatican, Bergoglio and his retinue of pedophiles and frauds, Protestantism as a whole, the “right” and “left” political parties, really pretty much everything in modern life is really just designed to distract you, delay you, and waste your life in inconsequential, or (better yet for them) self-destructive, nefarious, degenerate nonsense, and if you begin to get an inkling of an idea about the truth, then they want you wallowing in the retard pool of the fake “truthers” that tell you tidbits of information and then blend it in with complete nonsense. The Flat Earth stuff is a typical example. Mix it in and get operatives to bring it up in groups that maybe are actually looking at real stuff, like antigravity technology, and it gives the whole exercise a sudden stench of retardation and so-called normal people don’t even look at any of it because it’s like picking sewage out of your ice-cream.

And these are not coincidences or temporary efforts, there are endless money and conscious plots to stop any truth, and real resistance, and any truth about Catholicism at all getting out. There are powerful people with essentially infinite resources dedicated to this stuff. So they are not going away and no, none of them are “salvageable”.

I have been explaining this in as many ways as possible since my early to mid-twenties. It is literally a strategy identified in the Permanent Instructions to the Alta Vendita (Carbonari) and these documents were captured and discussed in the Papacy some 200 years ago. I mention them in RTCC and translate some extracts and related documents, so you don’t have to take my word for it, I give you the references.

But above all, my point is simply this:

BEWARE the gatekeepers. When a nobody suddenly shoots to fame for being “a good guy” against the homoglobos, be extremely suspicious, and look into his background. Especially if they are heavily funded.

Of course, aside the gatekeepers there are also a bunch of cracked eggs that believe all sorts of insane stuff, like the Flat Earthers, and so on, but the David Ickes of the world can be both in your face as well as subtle, and you need to learn to spot them in the wild.

And if you are despairing right now and thinking, but then, what is true? What refuge is there?

Refuge? Not much son, we are at war don’t you know? It’s a war between Satan and his minions, in all their forms, and Christ and his soldiers, on the other side. Here, learn about 1958 Sedevacantist Catholicism, AFTER you learn about REAL Catholicism first. Then tell me if that doesn’t describe and fit and make sense of the world as we have it today better than any other philosophy since the dawn of man.

No refuge, but there is an almost dry trench here, plenty of ammo, a good bayonet and trench clubs, and if you keep on your toes, you might even get a cup of hot coffee and some toast and jam before we crawl through the mud in the dead of night to go send those demons back to the pit they crawled out of.

Welcome. (Pats you on the back as he hands you your rifle and ammo).

No Comments

Catholics and Sex

As regular readers of this blog know, I am not exactly the spiritual guy to go to for correct advice on the Catholic perspective on sex.

I don’t actually have any issue with the Catholic position on sex, I believe it is indeed the best way for a married couple to relate to each other.

Thanks to Adam for this video, which he posted at his blog a little while back, and which I present here below:

It is definitely one of the better discussions I have seen on the topic, even though it is clear both are Novus Orco believers, so, I do take everything they say with a pinch of salt. It may be of interest to readers here that I give the video high marks, because my position on sex in Catholicism has at times been seen as wrong, or perhaps leading people to sin, or something along those lines, so, if you had a rather debauched sex life, as I did for most of my life, it might interest you to see the interview, since I found it very well done for the most part.

Given my first 40 plus years of sexual experiences prior to becoming a Catholic I think it’s fair to say that it wasn’t going to be an easy transition. And there are some aspects of the theology behind it that I find difficult to reconcile with logic from a spiritual perspective. Nor is sex the only area I have this with, just because I am Catholic does not mean I don’t think about these things. For example, my perspective on Confession is that at a practical level it makes you into a better person, so it is a definitely good thing overall, and there is no reason not to do it or not to have it, but the idea that God would not be aware of my sin, or conversely, send to Hell despite my genuine repentance and atonement to the best of my ability if I did not manage to go to confession before I drop dead, is, to me, at the very least extremely unlikely, and honestly, I think erroneous. Nevertheless, if everyone said “oh that’s not how it works” pretty soon you’d get… well… Protestantism; because humans without rules are for the most part, no better than cattle or sheep without a Shepard to keep them in line.

Similarly, I have no problem with the Church’s teaching on sex, which in a nutshell (forgive the somewhat “scandalous” pun) is as follows:

  • No contraception, ever, of any kind, except for NFP (Natural Family Planning) which in the related video starts around 1 hour 30 minutes or so and is well explained.
  • No homosexuality.
  • No refusal of sex from either spouse other than for serious reason, like illness, the potential duty to NOT have any more children, for whatever reason, and so on. The concept here is not that you are the other person’s sex slave, but rather that marriage itself is the gifting of yourself to the other person bodily and your body is literally now their property and vice versa. That, along with the reason of producing children, is literally a fundamental aspect of marriage. This of course is seen as evil, rape-adjacent, sexual slavery from all the degenerate feminists, but it is spelt out very clear in Corinthians 7: “The husband should meet his wife’s sexual needs, and the wife should do the same for her husband. The wife doesn’t have authority over her own body, but the husband does. Likewise, the husband doesn’t have authority over his own body, but the wife does. Don’t refuse to meet each other’s needs unless you both agree for a short period of time to devote yourselves to prayer. Then come back together again so that Satan might not tempt you because of your lack of self-control.” The level at which a man or woman understands this passage, in my experience, is pretty much indicative of their level of spiritual understanding of sex and intimacy in marriage.

Modernised women have now been “taught” for almost 100 years, that using their bodies to withhold sex from their husbands is “obviously” their “right” and the reality of it is that it has been “weaponised” to essentially cow men into a kind of sex-starved submission.

Even in my pre-Catholic days, I found that there was broadly speaking (and I will generalise a lot here) two types of women:

Those who instinctually understood that using sex as a bargaining tool in a relationship (other than perhaps as a joke in some role-play) was a despicable way to act, and never indulged in it.

Then there were the others, who, as my brother once crudely put it, thought their pussy had the key to an actual spaceship in it (he knew I cared nothing for gold if I could just get access to a small hyperspace capable starship!) and limiting access to it in order to get what they wanted (regardless if it was some specific (and usually unnatural) behaviour from me, or more crudely, material things) was how they operated. This second type of woman tried that tactic with me precisely once. Because the minute they tried it, the relationship was instantly and permanently over. Their shock at this reaction, which was delivered calmly and with absolute finality, was always somewhat amusing. And I can’t recall an instance where they did not then (sometimes immediately) try to reverse the situation, but there was never any coming back from it. A woman that behaved that way was in a space mentally that I wanted nothing to do with, and I strongly advise all men to take a similar approach in this regard. It’s nothing to do with “needing” sex so desperately, or being “angry” at the lack of it, and so on. It is to do with the very foundational issue of how she sees sex, intimacy and indeed marriage as a whole and in context.

Frankly, I find an actual prostitute that says it will cost X amount for a set time to be with her sexually, to be less offensive to the entire concept of intimacy than a woman that uses sex as a tool to “control” or manipulate a man. And similarly, I find any man that submits to such behaviour to be unworthy of being called a man.

There was also another type of woman, and these were those that unfortunately had been sexually abused, and given the numbers, it is inevitable that I came across everything from incest to gang-rape. One positive aspect of it was that as far as I know, every woman I was with that had that happen, felt comfortable enough with me to share it, and a second positive aspect is that, again, in I think almost all cases, the resulting physicality between us, helped them resolve many issues.

There was also, a notable example or two of women that had been sexually abused (rather extremely, really) who, while not at all shy or withholding sexually, at least with me, did have certain difficulties, and occasional really strange behaviours, and I am not referring to various kinks, which can be understandable, but I mean sudden bouts of sadness, depression and so on. These were more difficult aspect to improve rapidly, but in any case, open and honest communication always improved things for them, and did so even in their subsequent relationships, which they did let me know about in most cases.

Now, setting aside the cases where sexual abuse was present, and given our secularised approach to sex in today’s day and age, it is interesting to note that the women that were most balanced sexually, instinctively never treated sex as a bargaining chip.

It is a quite fascinating topic really, and one that older women (grandma aged ones) with successful families that are happy and well-balanced will (if you have their confidence) unashamedly tell you that their husbands were never turned away from their bodies. Conversely, a lot of supposedly “Catholic” women, especially in Anglo-Saxon countries, will be prudish and miserly with their bodies even from their husbands.

The women have been taught this is their God-given right as a “strong independent woman”, their “dignity” as a human being and not being a sex object and so on. Totally inverting the reality of the issue.

It is precisely because sex has become transactional and objectified in the extreme, that most people have absolutely no idea of what an actually properly intimate sexual act can feel like, or even is, that they assume and “teach” that as with any disposable property, you have to “work” to get it. An analogy might be making your four year old “work” before he can get access to eating food for his dinner. It is an absurd inversion of the concept of a sexual relationship, as much as making your little child work for his food would be an inversion of a parent’s duty.

So even mentioning this aspect of essentially unrestricted access to your spouse’s body, gets you labelled as some kind of sexual slave-trader, probable human trafficker, or whatever.

The reality is, of course, as usual, quite different. Although in the modern day, the pleasure of truly gifting your body to another has, for the most part, in many women, been reduced to a pleasure in being especially submissive during the sex act, the reality is that a true and natural submission to your spouse (husband or wife as they may be) is of incomparably finer and deeper beauty than a mere sex act, however “accomplished” that might be.

It is a difficult concept to transmit to another human being that has not experienced both the degraded version (which almost everyone today that is asexually active knows only too well) and the correct one, but the difference is obvious and unforgettable once experienced.

The unfortunate (and intentional) barriers to understanding these things have been hammered into all of us with such persistence and over all of our lives, that regaining a properly ordered sexuality is going to be quite the task, and will require conscious effort. But I assure you it is worth it.

I hope the video helps clarify many things for a lot of people.

No Comments

Stating the Obvious

Sometimes, it is actually worthwhile pointing out something that even the most basic wide-angle or bird’s eye view observation of affairs on Earth would make blindingly obvious, and yet, seems to escape the vast majority of humanity. More often than I’d like, including me too.

If the last four years have made anything absolutely crystal clear it is that this whole planet is almost entirely under the rule of people and organisations that not only lie blatantly about pretty much everything, but that, in the main, are hell-bent on trying to kill us, wipe us out and destroy our families, children and general lives.

If you pay attention at a global level in a dispassionate, objective, coldly mathematical sense, it become absolutely obvious that IF we accept the premise that “most people are basically good” then something is badly wrong with the world. Because literally most of everything that goes on is certainly not good for you. From the foods they promote and produce to “feed” you, to almost everything pharmaceutical, to the ways in which governments around the world work (in case you are wondering, in the parasitic and self-sustaining-at-your-expense way, best explained by Lysander Spooner in his outstanding piece on Natural Law) to how the “laws” are applied, to how commerce between people is often designed to “work” and that’s even before we bring up usury, banks, and the absolutely criminal practices those bunch of degenerate thugs indulge in. How is it possible, that if “most people are basically good” so much wrong, so much structurally painful, and really outright evil is going on.

Statistically, even if you were to put it down to the average person being a complete moron (well intentioned as they may be, morons cause all sorts of problems) you have two problems: That level of global stupidity would not be capable of creating, nor maintaining the very evil structures we now have in place. In short, there needs to be a certain level of intelligence behind it. And yet, even in countries where the average IQ is relatively low, sometimes even greater evil is absolutely prevalent (see the kind of things that go on in African genocidal wars of the 1990s). Secondly, even if you consider “stupid but basically good” people as indeed damaging (they are) the (supposed) preponderance of intelligent and also basically good people, would build systems that the average moron can navigate with relatively little potential for causing endemic evil.

So, while stupidity is certainly a contributing factor, it cannot be a pivotal factor. Nor can misplaced “good intentions”. Because again, if “most people are good” the intelligent ones go ahead and build systems that are safer from “good intentions” with bad outcomes.

Then you take another data point. The average human. Or even just you, the superior kind of human being that reads this blog (and understands it). Well, good as you may be, you lie. You may only lie infrequently, and mostly to avoid hurting others, but the reality is all human beings lie. It’s just a matter of degree. Personally I have a sliver-thin tolerance for it in general and pretty much none in my private and family life. And of course, yes, I have lied in my own private and family life. Nothing big, really pretty innocuous stuff for the most part (but hey, if I was some kind of freak it’s not like I’d tell you on my blog, right?). And we all have such hypocrisy in our lives. Of course the reasons “vary” but not really. In essence, lies all originate from fear. A fear of the consequences of the truth. Whether to us or loved ones.

But let’s imagine a planet where no one lies. Where everyone just always tells the truth as objectively and unafraid as possible. If we also assume that human beings on this planet also have the same general emotional maturity (or rather lack of) that we have now, and that event (the no lies thing) switched on suddenly at midnight today, the body count would be astronomical within 24 hours.

But let’s say after a week, when most of the human population has killed each other off because of the radical honesty, and there are only a few of us left, strong and emotionally secure enough to survive the truth and noting it daily (assuming such a rose-tinted outcome would even happen, because the mass murders would lead to more, etcetera), what would such a planet look like? Well, it might actually be a kind of paradise.

Imagine the consequences. No stealing, no theft, no injustice. Because if everyone was honest, we all know what is right and wrong, and if you are truly honest, you can’t justify any of your shitty behaviours. And really, why do we not live on such a planet? It would clearly be a better world. So what keeps pushing humanity into ever deeper pits of deception and self-deception? And why is it we tend to crucify those few who really try to tell the truth?

Well… and here is the obvious part:

Do you realise that the Christian explanation of reality fits these conditions precisely, explains them and can be used to predict many, many, many things accurately?

And in specific I mean the Catholic (yes, yes, only the 1958 Sedevacantists are Catholics today) explanation. Original sin explains the fact that despite our supposedly “good intentions” and our supposedly all being “mostly good” we all behave like shitty humans. We are all, literally, flawed.

And the fact that this planet is under the dominion of evil and lies, can hardly be denied when you look at things from a bird’s eye view.

Plus, if you look at history with the same bird’s eye view, (assuming you can find the truth in the events that actually took place) then the general trend you will note is that literally every other philosophy aside from Catholicism has led humanity to a place of, at the very best, not totally horrific stagnation. And in most cases utter malignant societies. And Catholicism is literally the only perspective that has factually improved humanity’s lot.

In short, regardless of your personal beliefs, if you actually take the time to observe the human story of the last few thousand years, it is utterly undeniable that Catholicism explains reality better than any other model.

Of course, today, the supposed “catholic” Church as presented in the Novus Orco is yet another nest of indemoniated pedophiles, and only a remnant is left. But this too happened before and, again, if you educate yourself on all the times Catholicism by all rights should have disappeared from the Earth, it become nigh-on impossible to explain how it has survived unless it is miraculously protected, at least on some level, by a benevolent and all-powerful force.

And as I always say, regardless of your own ideas, if a model works, use it, at least until you find a better model that better predicts reality in all its multi-faceted possible outcomes.

And if the model works, then there really is no reason to not embrace, it. Or at least, to seriously investigate its less obvious underpinnings.

Well, at least that’s the way those of us who are not playing the part of the apes in our very own version of Planet of the Apes.

So, I hope you will at least consider this obvious but oft-ignored perspective, and may it be fruitful to you.

No Comments

What all women should already know

And especially the younger ones, really should understand this from a young age. He puts it in a very nice and digestible way that MIGHT get some women to actually listen to the whole 10 minutes.

This one on the other hand, the conclusion regarding women apologising and why they should, is solid gold advice. And some women probably need it tattooed on their forehead so they see it every time they look in a mirror.

I do not know this guy and only came across the first video as a result of a comment on gab from TrevorGoodchild which was synthesised more along the way I tend to present this stuff when I do:

The point is that as a general rule, since a very early age, I learnt that presenting information in a synthesised, or boiled down form was (and is) an excellent filter for gauging the general intelligence of the person receiving it. And because stupid people absolutely surround me at all times in pretty much every setting, and as they are unbearably tiresome, boring and often also irritating, their getting “offended” and then leaving me mostly alone after a few encounters is a feature, not a bug.

I read somewhere, long ago, that warrior souls never lose their fire, but as they get older wiser they may tend to burn at a lower temperature. My personal experience is that there is no drop off in intensity overall, really, perhaps in fact an increase, but… the frequency of the smouldering and flare-ups changes. I ignore or only smoulder a little at the smaller stuff, but some of the things that matter to me, I am more ready to go to absolute war for than before. And not as a simple flare-up, but as a relentless, steel-melting, sustained, furnace level.

I mention this because, in the various discussions I have had and written about here concerning community, it is obvious that my natural/instinctive misanthropy is not the best way to build a solid group of people. As I mentioned before, I am not general material. I’m more special ops small team commander material. But given I don’t seem to have any generals around me, a certain level of “normal” human interactions is useful to try and if not master (I simply am not built in such a way I will ever want to do so) at least learn the basics of.

Intimate relationships have invariably been the thing I cared the most about and given my aspieness and IQ, also the things that have caused me both the best highs and the lowest lows.

Aside the fact that women will generally not take any good advice from pretty much anyone anyway, and if they do it will be from a random stranger before it’s their husband, brother, father or other man that actually cares about them, but will generally jump at the chance to take some “advice” from their female friend (or other women in general) that will tell them to get a nice haircut to be “hotter”, the fact remains that given how the female brain works (for the aspies out there… I use the term loosely!) regardless of how good the information you present to them might be, women are pretty much incapable of simply processing the dialectic facts.

Prove to them with scientific evidence done on humans for 100 years that has all been verified that eating X amount of dark chocolate a week is good for you in simple, cold, hard facts, shooting down all their objections from cosmopolitan magazine, Cadbury adverts, their idiot doctor, their gay friend Charlie, and all her fat friends with blue hair, and she will ignore it.

Let her best friend tell her in hushed and conspiratorial tones that she just tried this new “chocolate” that is made from “sterilised” dogshit, and she will wolf-down a bar of it just to prove she’s “with it”.

At the lower end of the female scale of intelligence, it is literally not too different from communicating with your pet dog. It matters little what you say, as long as it’s in soothing, calming tones, or happy excited ones.

Oh, yes, yes, I know, the feminists are climbing the walls on that one: “How dare he! Comparing women to dogs!” Well, no, I am not. For one, dogs are far more loyal than women (men too to be fair). And said feminists, throughout my life, have invariably completely lost their shit whenever I actually spoke to them precisely the way I would to a man. While very rarely has a man lost his shit with me for being brutally direct.

All this long introduction, simply to say that it probably pays to find a nicer, easier way to get your point across without needing to water it down, nor feel you’re being deceitful, since, after all, presenting the information in a way that it is received more easily, is simply a skill, like any other.

And as a bonus, since that ship has pretty much sailed for me at about age 16, and given that I don’t give a rat’s ass about being labelled whatever the gynocracy is going to label me, you could probably do worse than directing women you care about to these two videos, and feel free to tell them to “Look at what videos this chauvinist pig has on his blog! Ha, ha, so funny!” Well, ok, maybe don’t do that unless you’re a metrosexual male feminist, but you get what I mean. It will be quite interesting to see what they say (if anything) after viewing the total 15 minutes or so both videos come to.

No Comments

YES! Finally.

The Dark Herald finally says out loud what all sane people who read The Watchmen have knows for years and years, but that the prevailing narrative of leftydom has been pretending was not the case the entire time.

“The streets are extended gutters and the gutters are full of blood and when the drains finally scab over, all the vermin will drown. The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the whores and politicians will look up and shout ‘SAVE US!’…and I’ll look down and whisper ‘No.” – Rorschach, Watchmen

Twitter decided to go into Goblin mode last week on the question of Rorschach and whether or not he was the real hero of Alan Moore’s Watchmen. I won’t be going into that question here because my colleague Literature Devil did a much better job of answering that at Fandom Pulse.

And by the way, the answer is YES, obviously. He was the only one that didn’t compromise with Ozymandius about his retarded plan to save the world by faking an Alien attack. This short bus idea was based on sci-fi scribbler and pedo Arthur C Clarke’s belief that if Aliens attacked Earth, we’d drop all our differences and unite against it, which anyone who has ever read a history book knows is utter drooling idiocy.

Rorschach was indeed, the only character who had the concept of honour and ethics, and above all, Justice. Pretty much all the fictional heroes I ever liked have that as their prime characteristic.

The old DC Heros RPG game used to have little index cards for each of the known characters of the DC Universe, and in it they had various attributes. Aside the usual Strength, Intelligence and whatever was an attribute that was I think called Primary Motivation (I could be wrong about the descriptor, it was a long time ago), anyway, pretty much the only comic book character I ever read at the time anymore was Jonah Hex, and his Primary Motivation was perfectly stated: Seeking Justice.

The other fictional graphic novel character I relate even more to, Dago, has really the same motivation, coupled with a really unhealthy curiosity and a decided lack of fear/wisdom about the kinds of things he ends up getting involved in because of that combination of traits, which in the case of Sago is a lot more fully developed since the character has been going for over 4 decades I think.

Batman was a poor substitute to me, since he never killed anyone, and that made no sense to me. The Joker tries to kill of (and usually does) bunches of people and Bruce Wayne just gives him a bit of a beating. What? Jonah Hex would have strung him up to the nearest tree and watched him choke out to make sure he was dead. Dago would have run him through with sword and dagger and kicked his gasping into the nearest open sewer.

And Rorschach.

As far as I am aware, only these three comic book supposed anti-heroes, ever really had an honest concept of Justice.

And it is funny to me that Alan Moore, the noted super-woke artist who plagiarised the character, in his attempt at making Rorschach into a crazed and bloodthirsty nut, failed so spectacularly that he didn’t realise that most normal people empathised with him the most.

There is, of course, another thing about Alan Moore, [Correction: it was probably Frank Miller my brother spoke of, since Sin City is his creation, but Moore and Miller know each other and are apparently friends] which my brother pointed out, as we both read most of his graphic novels, and that is that my brother recons (rightly in my opinion) that Moore has a very severe case of what is known as “Captain save-a-whore”. In some of the Sin City stories, the protagonist literally looks like Moore, disgustingly shaggy hair and beard and all, except he can fight; and of course, it’s some tragic whore-saving story.

Of course, I don’t know any details about Moore’s life at all, (or Miller’s and I enjoyed Miller’s works) nor do I care, but given how he looks, I can imagine how he might have gone about getting some intimacy and affection throughout his life. I’m just saying. After all, write what you know, eh?

No Comments

Dirty Harry Philosophy

He really does.

A lot of people are wondering what they can do about the current situation in their lives, and perhaps struggling to come up with answers. Generally, I have always advised that you really don’t know what you can do until your back is against the wall and you have no options. So, generally, fight like a bastard is the go-to. And generally, it is a sound philosophy, after all, you can rest when you are dead, right?

Furthermore, your doubt about what, if anything, you can do, almost always stems from your simply not knowing yourself well and deep enough. It is the central aspect of what I explained in detail in my Systema book. And it long been knows that this is the very base of any man’s life. The same concept was also written down at the Oracle of Delphi in Ancient Greece: “Man, know yourself.” So it is really imperative you do the necessary work (usually involving blood, sweat and tears in large quantities) to figure out right down to your DNA, who you really are.

At times, though, and if you have had enough life experience to really know what your limitations are —which are generally at least an order of magnitude more than you think when you are in your teens and twenties and maybe even early thirties in some respects— life will come along in a way that will basically be a nuclear bomb going off too close, Godzilla stomping you, or a horde of orcs surrounding you on a plain.

Of course, if there really is no way out, then, you may as well take as many heads as you can on your way out.

But at times, the issue is simply one where you’re going to have to realise, you can only walk away. And nothing more.

No Comments

And what the Genocide in Gaza is really all about

Aside the psychotic hatred of Christianity and the general wish to exterminate Palestinians entirely, the Israelis are well known for, their usual greed also is in play. In case you did not know:

Concerning oil, it was confirmed in a 2019 UNC-TAD Report that occupied Palestinian territory lies above large reservoirs of oil and natural gas wealth, with The Levant Basin estimated to have 1.7 billion barrels of recoverable oil. This oil has a net value of $71 billion. 

Beyond oil, there are also gas fields beneath Gaza including the Gaza Marine which holds over 1 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. This amount can not only power Palestine but could be used to advance the Palestinian economy if exported.

But, Palestinians have not been able to exert autonomy or control over their gas and oil reserves due to Israeli occupation, and instead, Israel exploits these resources for their gain. In fact, Israel has recently given 12 licences to six companies, including BP (UK), Eni (Italy) and Dana Petroleum (Korea), to allow them to explore natural gas off of the Mediterranean coast. 

Israel hopes Tel Aviv will become an energy hub to export gas to Europe. In this alone, we see why Western nations have put monetary gain and power above Palestinian sovereignty. 

It is clear that Israel’s colonisation of Palestine’s water and land is, again, for Israel’s economic advancement. Since 1967, Israel has appropriated over100,000 hectares of Palestinian land, which has given them the ability to build residential and tourist settlements as well as establish international businesses and agricultural systems. 

Businesses, agriculture and settlements are all dependent on water, which is why over 80% of water reserves in the West Bank are controlled by Israel. 

No surprises there for me, but I bet most didn’t know that left to its own devices Palestine could easily be self-sufficient.

More relevantly in a global context, Israel is clearly trying to position itself as the new supplier of energy to Europe after its puppet masters have orchestrated the ongoing creeping globalisation that finally forced Russia to defend itself. And the US’s (Israeli directed) special forces that blew up the gas pipelines, plus all the various sanctions their bureaucrat counterparts enacted too, ensured that Europe would be more receptive to Israel’s stolen goods.

But let’s all not forget that the poor Jews are the real victims here. Because of the holocaust. Obviously. And the other 1000-plus times they were ejected from some 110 countries. For absolutely no reason at all other than our irrational hatred of Jews that we obviously all have, also for no reason at all.

No Comments

The Truth About Casualties of War

You may have noticed a rather clear total ignoring on my part about the current and ongoing wars.

This is because similarly to the whole Covid scam, when it first hits, it is good for you to be prepared, regardless of what the truth turns out to be, and always with a view that first and foremost, especially in the Clown World section of planet Earth, the most immediate threat to your life, liberty and general happiness is your own government.

Similarly, when the start of Special Military Operations began in Ukraine, or the current Palestinian Genocide ongoing in all of Palestine by the Israelis, began, it is good to take stock, observe what is happening and prepare as best you can for anything ranging from the potential introduction of the draft where you are, restrictions on anything from travel to stocking of various items, and even war and revolution preparations.

The vast majority of people on Earth that are not directly affected by these conflicts will assume such an approach borders on the paranoid. Yet many of those same people would not leave the house without a GPS navigator even though they live in a city where it is impossible for you to get lost.

The reality about actual war casualties in modern warfare, except for how the Russians do it, is that the vast majority of casualties are civilians. This is absolutely the case when the main aggressor is part of the Clown World brigade (the puppeteered Western World) and absolutely so when the leader of globohomo is doing it (Israel).

Even so, the reality is that with a little bit of preparation and awareness, your chances of survival, barring being directly in an area that is sure to come under heavy artillery fire or air-to-ground bombing runs (not very common today) are really very good.

Your biggest worries, even in a city that is under attack, aside the aforementioned, will be:

  • Access to clean water
  • Access to reliable food sources (especially if you have small children)
  • Access to medical facilities for emergencies (including dentistry)

In most cases that don’t involve actual street to street fighting by armed forces, even your personal protection will probably not be as important as those three points above; although, it needs to be said that if it does become an issue, not having the option of being armed becomes item number one on the list above all else.

As usual, your biggest threat will come from your fellow man, and being able to resist those threats is best done by being armed and proficient in the use of those weapons you have.

In this respect, I would like to remind you of my philosophy concerning all the “operators” discussions on violent encounters and the various benefits of one handgun and its endless accessories versus another, that I previously discussed here.

The point of this topic is the same general philosophy as applied to pretty much everything else and every other “worry” you might have.

Remember that 95% of literally everything is bullshit. That said, when that 5% hits and it’s a nasty 5% instead of the good 5%, a little preparedness goes a long way to ensuring the damage you take is minimised and your survival and recovery is very much more likely and quick. And again, this applies to everything in life, from how you drive to having a sudden divorce catch you unawares, to war breaking out in your country, and pretty much everything in between.

There are simple, basic steps that if you have already taken pretty much guarantee you are in a better position than 99% of the people around you.

If you already live in a relatively rural area, and have done the following:

  • Got a way to generate at least some electricity without access to the power grid
  • Have a sustainable access to clean water not connected to the main water grid
  • Have some way to generate at least some food without resort to anyone else
  • Own at least some weaponry to be able to defend your person, family and home
  • Are able to heat your home and cook your food without access to the electric grid
  • Are not in or near a path or natural or military resource or base
  • Are not in an area or country where your ethnicity and religion is obviously and clearly different from the majority around you

Then you are well above the 0.01% of most prepared people. That means in the larger scheme of things you would be in the top 0.0001 to 0.00001% of all human beings without question. In fact, in some ways, you might even be more likely to survive global events than even one of the puppeteers like Mark Zuckeberg, who in his infinite wisdom has a huge underground bunker built on Hawaii. Which in case you were not aware, Hawaii is yes in the middle of a tectonic plate and the volcanoes it is composed of are probably among the most stable on the planet, and yes, I am sure he will have a fleet of yachts or whatever, to deal with the distance from everywhere. And years worth of stocked food and ability to produce more. However, when even your own bodyguards, and surrounding villagers recognise you as being one of the puppeteers, your ten foot thick armoured bunker walls really are not as comforting as you might think.

So that, at an individual level, is why I have been mostly posting on the more general topics of being prepared on how to survive Clown World. You are, overall, far more in danger from being able to survive the next fake pandemic mandates to inject you with turbo-cancer causing genetic serums than rape and pillage by Russian soldiers. In fact I would say that even if you are a pretty female combatant in the Ukrainian army and get captured by the Russian forces, you are probably still less likely to be raped than to be killed by the generic serums they want to inject you with.

This is because we now know that about 10-15% of the serums kill you quite quickly, within weeks or months or a year or two after injection at most, but the long term impacts out to five or more years are obviously not known yet, although a trend is already forming that in my best guesstimate means about 30% of the injected will likely die or have serious complications (that will ultimately kill them an unspecified number of years into the future) within 5 years. And less than that if they keep “boosting”.

Repeated “pandemics” bio-engineered for the purpose of depopulation, possibly augmented by the massive increase in chemtrails and 5G towers are far more likely to threaten your survival than active war-participants unless you literally are living in Gaza.

About the chemtrails and 5G, in my view, there is non-tin-foil-hat evidence that these two separate “conspiracy theories” i.e. indisputable facts, do combine together and possibly also with the genetic serums to create specific disease and death in various “programmable” and specified areas at will. And quite possibly, even create more disturbing effects on the population, which I have written on before.

So. I hope it is clear why all the talk about Germany about to start war with Russia and the US and UK declaring war on Yemen but then… errr… not really… and so on, is all, ultimately, for the most part, theatre.

Concern yourself with the things they are actively trying to distract you from:

  • A way to generate income or the bare necessities (energy generation, clean water, food, self-defence) for a free life that is anti-fragile and can bypass the coming enforced digital cash.
  • A solid grounding in reality, which, in my humble opinion and long and varied life experience, is without a doubt best expressed by several orders of magnitude in the philosophy of actual Catholicism, today found only in 1958 Sedevacantist Catholics. And I say this having totally rejected Catholicism specifically from the age of 7 to 43.
  • Nurturing and growing your traditional nuclear family and teaching your children first of all by example, to do the same.
  • Creating a face-to-face (no digital connectivity required) community of people that are on board with these overall concepts. Have regular meet-ups, friendly dinners, community barbecues, coffee and cake or beers and Prosecco at each other’s homes. Let the men go to the range together and the women share recipes or have tea and scones regularly. And since the only one coming to save you is you, you begin. You organise the meet-ups. You organise the get togethers. You involve the others. You begin it.

I know, I know, thinking about being Rambo with the face paint and the sniper rifle, or being one of Leonidas and his 300, or just, you know, as you do every day, thinking about being a centurion in the Roman Empire, is a lot more fun and romantic, but you have to have Sparta in order to have Spartans, and Rome in order to have Roman Centurions. So, begin to build brothers and sisters. And may our eventual city-states be near each other.

1 Comment

Withhold your Charity, Pilgrim

This post by Vox on AI and its “uses” sparked in me, for the millionth time, what I call my Arnaud Amalric* state of mind. Not in that I think it’s fine to wipe out innocents, but rather that a LOT of people that are given a “pass” as potentially “ignorant” and/or “innocent” are in fact, absolutely knowing deceiver and Satanic pushers of destruction, and should be treated as such.

The ONLY purpose of AI is to further infantilise, mechanise, enstupidate, entrap, retard, brainwash, and push false narratives as the ONLY narratives in existence in EVERY sphere of human existence. As I blogged about in more detail here.

That’s it. That is its entire purpose and raison d’être. Any marginally useful aspect of it that might result is a side-effect. Salad dressing to the poisonous salad.

And even supposed absolute “bigots” like Vox (i.e. discerning individuals that actually understand these things and note the truth of them) are, in my view, ever too gracious, charitable and kind to absolutely demonic scum that needs to be, at minimum, incarcerated, placed in proper mental institutions where a certain level of care for them is yes provided, but mostly to protect civilised and healthy human beings from their criminal insanity, or, tried in a properly just court of law and, given the levels of their crimes, hung by the neck until dead.

The “oh well, maybe…” approach to everything from the usual WEF political puppets and their masters, the supposed “right-wing populists” that inevitably sell out their own nations to the globohomos, the genocidal Jews in charge of and executing the mass-murder of innocent civilians and children, the filthy child-predators, frauds, and satanists pretending to be “catholic” clergy, the people behind ALL the covid vaccines, mandates, rules, etc. right down to that elementary school teacher trying to tell the children in their class that all religions and all cultures are equal and meritorious of the same “respect”, the feminists, gays, and pedophiles pushing the LGBT agenda, especially on children, and on, and on, and on, needs to absolutely stop.

People simply need to grow a spine and call out any and all demonic-infested and inspired people, policies and rules for what they are.

And to be clear, people like Vox are absolutely not hesitant to do that, the man can’t be accused of being shy with his condemnations, but from the Kurgan perspective, if we were standing next to each other, watching a field of pedophiles being burnt at the stake, I would be toasting the event alongside him, clinking glasses of refined Champagne or Prosecco which he has certainly got better taste than me on, but I would also be the guy politely saying something like: “Theo… I notice we still have plenty of wood off in that corner of the field and we have so many journalists, politicians and well, you know, I hesitate to say, but occasionally, also rude waiters…”

My point is simply that even the best of us, to me, seem far too forgiving or charitable of people who REALLY don’t deserve it. And I’m not really talking about the rude waiters.

These “people” absolutely, consciously, intentionally, and schemingly, use your own sense of justice, fair-play, charity, mercy and forgiveness against you. Do not let them. Ever.

Being far too “charitable” (meaning weak and cowardly for most people, in truth) is how we got to the homoglobo Hellscape where we are today.

So.

Curb your charity; and put a better edge on that sword, man. Do you not see and hear the sounds of war all around us?

*

Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius.” is a phrase reportedly spoken by the commander of the Albigensian Crusade, prior to the massacre at Béziers on 22 July 1209. A direct translation of the Medieval Latin phrase is “Kill them. The Lord knows those that are his own“. Papal legate and Cistercian abbot Arnaud Amalric was the military commander of the Crusade in its initial phase and leader of this first major military action of the Crusade, the assault on Béziers, and was reported by Caesarius of Heisterbach to have uttered the order.

Less formal English translations have given rise to variants such as “Kill them all; let God sort them out.

All content of this web-site is copyrighted by G. Filotto 2009 to present day.
Website maintained by IT monks