As someone has decided to start a war with Israel, apparently, we should pay attention to the bigger picture.
In the first place, it is absolutely NOT clear to you and me (regardless of whether you are arrogant enough to think otherwise) who has (and why) started the attack on Israel.
Firstly, the media cannot be believed. I have already seen twitter posts accusing the Iranians and Palestinians of going house to house murdering whole families. One small problem, the images show IDF troops entering Palestinian homes from months back. So, accepting any mass media or even alternative media version of events is obviously a bad move, as should be obvious to anyone that has not been in a coma for the last decade and especially the last four years.
Secondly, the idea that Hezbollah, had 5,000 rockets to shoot across and thousands of troops ready, and paraglider commandos in force, all well-coordinated in absolute secrecy from Israel and their deep informants, is totally absurd.
Third, Iran is a problem for the US (((deep state))) that is closer to hand, and in their mind more easily “solvable” militarily, than China. So any excuse to go total hot war on Iran is good, and if it takes a few thousand Israeli casualties to get there, the pedovores in charge are hardly going to be struck by a sudden bout of conscience.
Fourth, all of this was predicted some 20 years ago by a Russian strategist the name of whom escapes me.
Fifth, the Jewish religion has certain conditions that must be met before their supposed messiah (the antichrist to the rest of us) shows up. Two of these conditions have already been met, the building of the third temple and/or consecrating of it, and the use of some red heifers without any imperfections as sacrifice. The last condition is a massive war in the region. Now, you might think this last item is all nonsense, but that’s not relevant. What’s relevant is that the people in charge believe it.
So… for my money, it’s WAY too early to know if the attack on Israel is legit or a false flag. What is certain is that it certainly takes the attention off Ukraine. Which probably means Zelensky is not long for this world. And I would assume it’s his masters that do the deed more than the Russians. I for one, if I was a Russian strategist, would pray Zelensky stays in power as long as possible. Where else am I going to find a gay cocaine dwarf that is so expertly draining the entire swamp of the West of money, weapons, and energy?
Then we must look at what else is going on.
And here, Putin’s most recent speech is important:
I have said this publicly to both our allies and partners. There was a moment when I simply suggested: perhaps we should also join NATO? But no, NATO does not need a country like ours. No. I want to know, what else do they need? We thought we became part of the crowd, got a foot in the door. What else were we supposed to do? There was no more ideological confrontation. What was the problem? I guess the problem was their geopolitical interests and arrogance towards others. Their self-aggrandisement was and is the problem.
We are compelled to respond to ever-increasing military and political pressure. I have said many times that it was not us who started the so-called “war in Ukraine.” On the contrary, we are trying to end it. It was not us who orchestrated a coup in Kiev in 2014 – a bloody and anti-constitutional coup. When [similar events] happen in other places, we immediately hear all the international media – mainly those subordinate to the Anglo-Saxon world, of course – this is unacceptable, this is impossible, this is anti-democratic. But the coup in Kiev was acceptable. They even cited the amount of money spent on this coup. Anything was suddenly acceptable.
At that time, Russia tried its best to support the people of Crimea and Sevastopol. We did not try to overthrow the government or intimidate the people in Crimea and Sevastopol, threatening them with ethnic cleansing in the Nazi spirit. It was not us who tried to force Donbass to obey by shelling and bombing. We did not threaten to kill anyone who wanted to speak their native language. Look, everyone here is an informed and educated person. It might be possible – excuse my ‘mauvais ton’ – to brainwash millions of people who perceive reality through the media. But you must know what was really going on: they have been bombing the place for nine years, shooting and using tanks. That was a war, a real war unleashed against Donbass. And no one counted the dead children in Donbass. No one cried for the dead in other countries, especially in the West.
This war, the one that the regime sitting in Kiev started with the vigorous and direct support from the West, has been going on for more than nine years, and Russia’s special military operation is aimed at stopping it. And it reminds us that unilateral steps, no matter who takes them, will inevitably prompt retaliation. As we know, every action has an equal opposite reaction. That is what any responsible state, every sovereign, independent and self-respecting country does.
Everyone realises that in an international system where arbitrariness reigns, where all decision-making is up to those who think they are exceptional, sinless and right, any country can be attacked simply because it is disliked by a hegemon, who has lost any sense of proportion – and I would add, any sense of reality.
Unfortunately, we have to admit that our counterparties in the West have lost their sense of reality and have crossed every line. They really should not have done this.
The Ukraine crisis is not a territorial conflict, and I want to make that clear. Russia is the world’s largest country in terms of land area, and we have no interest in conquering additional territory. We still have much to do to properly develop Siberia, Eastern Siberia, and the Russian Far East. This is not a territorial conflict and not an attempt to establish regional geopolitical balance. The issue is much broader and more fundamental and is about the principles underlying the new international order.
Putin is not saying anything particularly new in the extract above. Anyone who was not in the same ten year coma also knows that the Maidan of 2014 was specifically orchestrated by the (((same US deep state))) and indeed, (((Victoria Nuland))) that fat, evil cow, proudly announced that they had spent 5 billion dollars on NGOs to affect it. Not to mention her leaked phone call to the US Ambassador stating that (literally) she couldn’t give a fuck what the EU wanted, the next puppet president of Ukraine was already selected. And later, in fact put in place.
What is interesting is that Putin is finally explaining it directly in a language so clear that one hopes even the very brainwashed idiots he refers to, can maybe start to wake up.
In essence:
The way other states run their lives is none of our business. However, we see how the ruling elite in many of them are forcing societies to accept norms and rules that the people – or at least a significant number of people and even the majority in some countries – are unwilling to embrace. But they are still urged to do so, with the authorities continually inventing justifications for their actions, attributing growing internal problems to external causes, and fabricating or exaggerating non-existent threats.
And is Putin the aggressor he’s painted to be? Again, anyone not in a coma for the last decade has been impressed by the man’s restraint. He has warned and warned and politically, diplomatically, asked to please, please, please, stop your bullshit for almost 20 years. Certainly at least 15. And not only was he ignored, he was aggrieved and demonised.
And this is still his response.
To attain these goals, they try to replace international law with a “rules-based order,” whatever that means. It is not clear what rules these are and who invented them. It is just rubbish, but they are trying to plant this idea in the minds of millions of people. “You must live according to the rules.” What rules?
And actually, if I may, our Western “colleagues,” especially those from the United States, don’t just arbitrarily set these rules, they teach others how to follow them, and how others should behave overall. All of this is done and expressed in a blatantly ill-mannered and pushy way. This is another manifestation of colonial mentality. All the time we hear, “you must,” “you are obligated,” “we are seriously warning you.”
Who are you to do that? What right do you have to warn others? This is just amazing. Maybe those who say all this should get rid of their arrogance and stop behaving in such a way towards the global community that perfectly knows its objectives and interests, and should drop this colonial-era thinking? I want to tell them sometimes: wake up, this era has long gone and will never return.
I will say more: for centuries, such behavior led to the replication of one thing – big wars, with various ideological and quasi-moral justifications invented to justify these wars. Today this is especially dangerous. As you know, humankind has the means to easily destroy the whole planet, and ongoing mind manipulation, unbelievable in terms of scale, leads to losing a sense of reality. Clearly, a way out should be sought from this vicious circle. As I understand it, friends and colleagues, this is why you come here to address these vital issues at the Valdai Club venue.
In his place I would have lost patience long ago. After all he has demonstrated he has the nuclear submarines that can, and have, “appeared” quietly and politely within range of Washington DC and every major American city.
If he nuked Washington, New York and LA and then just said “quit now, or I’ll do the rest too” are we sure the death toll would not end there? And thus ultimately be less bloody? No one can say, but if you were a Russian who may have lost sons in the current (((deep state))) game of Ukraine, you might decide to take the chance.
Putin has kept a much cooler head and still is.
(Emphasis added by me)
I am confident that humanity is not moving towards fragmentation into rivaling segments, a new confrontation of blocs, whatever their motives, or a soulless universalism of a new globalisation. On the contrary, the world is on its way to a synergy of civilisation-states, large spaces, communities identifying as such.
At the same time, civilisation is not a universal construct, one for all – there is no such thing. Each civilisation is different, each is culturally self-sufficient, drawing on its own history and traditions for ideological principles and values. Respecting oneself naturally comes from respecting others, but it also implies respect from others. That is why a civilisation does not impose anything on anyone, but does not allow anything to be imposed on itself either. If everyone lives by this rule, we can live in harmonious coexistence and in creative interaction between everyone in international relations.
Putin’s Russia is the physical embodiment of something I and my family have lived for generations. It is the epitome of leave me alone and mind your own business and we’ll get along just fine no matter who you are. Try and fuck with me and mine and you better pray to your Gods.
No rational human being can possibly have a problem with this philosophy, which is why, throughout my life, I have had and made good friends with everything from Orthodox Jews and observant Muslims, to liberal Atheists and heretics like Jehova’s Witnesses.
And no, I am not some civnat boomer saying I don’t see colour or religion or nationality. I absolutely see it. And as long as you leave me alone and/or treat me with respect, I will always extend the same courtesy to you. And that includes not just my family, but also my town and my nation. Being as I too am a displaced person, being Venetian and the Most Serene Republic having been unjustly and illegally annexed by the forcibly united abomination that is Italy, by the two evil Freemasons of Garibaldi and Mazzini I understand very well, the plight of not just my people, but of other displaced persons. Which is why I have always understood the position of the Crimean and Donetsk and Luhansk Russians.
Furthermore, if some misunderstanding or disagreement occurs, I am always first ready to discuss it and find mutually acceptable solutions. However, if you cross certain lines, or don’t respect the agreements in place… well… then is when you find out that my polite and respectful approach was never there as a result of weakness, or to protect me.
It was there to protect you.
Because now you are in a war with someone that really grasps the concept in ways you don’t even imagine. It’s the classic: I’m not trapped in here with you. You are trapped in here with me.
And the (((US deep state))) is slowly finding out just what it means to be trapped in here with Russia.
New Developments
I expect that China would now be looking at Taiwan, but not aggressively. The Chinese are nothing if not patient. And the weaker and more stretched out the pedovores get, the more bloodless and civil the reunification of Taiwan will be. I expect it to be mostly bloodless, perhaps similar to the reunification of Hong Kong.
Iran may be dragged into a hot war imminently, regardless of whether they had anything to do with the attack on Israel or not. But if you’re gonna be blamed for a crime regardless of whether you did it or not, well, all bets are off then. This could become seriously bad very fast. Because tactically, if this is the case, nuking Jerusalem and Tel Aviv, gets rid of the problem in the immediate, but the ramifications would probably be global.
The Jewish diaspora in charge of the US (and most of the West) would pull out all the stops and it’s quite likely nukes would fly with abandon in quite a bit more than just the Middle East. So it’s definitely one to watch.
Turkey is in a unique position, with a Westernised and somewhat secular population that nevertheless is rooted in Islam and understands the injustices perpetrated on the Islamic world, both by the US directly, as well as by those using their people to produce Islamic invasions of Europe, which are all funded by (((Soros and colleagues))). Their direct rejection of the US is ideologically preferred by them but there are real and terrible consequences to that choice, as the recent HAARP induced Earthquake there has clearly shown. So, to me, they are a kind of canary in the coal-mine. The Turkish people are pretty brave and I am fairly sure they would choose separation from the US, but what their leaders will decide is less clear to me.
Overall
It seems that hot war in Europe is certainly a more distinct possibility. If Russia was smart about it (they are not as far as I can see) they would be providing some hints of supports and recognition, even if only diplomatic, to regions wanting independence for decades such as the Veneto, Emilia Romagna, Sicily and Sardinia in Italy. The Basque and the various Spanish Islands of Spain, the Irish in the UK, The French colonies around the world (though they have helped themselves quite brilliantly already) and so on.
And help these people even if only morally and from afar, to make a push for the reduction and eventual total removal of foreign influence.
Italy has some 150 US military bases. Why? Italian interests of the man in the street have absolutely fuck all to do with the interests of the pedophile assholes running shits-his-pants Biden. And never have.
Like it or not, the global mood is starting to sound a lot like:
Yankee, go home.
And in fairness to the honest citizens of that hive of freemasonry and foreign pedophiles, I think the average American too would be very happy with all of their military and interests coming home and leaving the rest of the world to do what they will.
So. It appears the vast majority of us is on the same side. Which begs the question, really…
Revolution when?
But… I fear much darker times still must come, before the man in the street is ready to grab a pitchfork and a torch, and burn out the parasites from the various government offices and buildings.
I don’t know who he is, but you can’t argue with his points. Fascinatingly, it’s also probably the first time I have seen anyone use raw dialectic to elicit humour.
Remember how I wrote about your common, garden-variety rapists, and how they are often living in glass houses hurling feminist epitaphs of general “misogyny!” at normal men that actually get on just fine with normal women and aren’t creepy freaks?
Well.
The same more often than not seems to be the case with murderous atheist.
Start at about 12 minutes in here to get a sense of what may have taken place with respect to this noted atheist and “biologist’s” wife.
And once again we have the same parallel.
The “big shots” of atheism invariably kill millions in their quest to create a human utopia, as all atheist regimes, from Stalin to Pol Pot to any and all communist versions of the God-hating club have demonstrated to us withoutexception since the Jewish invention of Communism and Marxism came about.
A similar trend as the rapists has been noticed by people like me, who notice things, among lefty-woke atheists and their propensity for spousal homicide. One story in particular that I recall dimly from memory concerned some activist green planet, eco-vegan, guy of some sort, you know, a shower dodger of some sort, and how it turned out he’d murdered his girlfriend and hidden the body in a cupboard or a wall or something. Yes. Memory was correct. Another earlylife type too.
Well, well, well. What can one say.
It seems, dear feminists that hate men who still have their own testicles, don’t believe any of your satanic, family-destroying bullshit, nor take any of your nonsense, that as it happens, you’re safer with a God-believing redneck type than you ever will be with a supposed feminist ally who “trusts the science”.
Oh, and another red flag…? Innumeracy.
Which is why I never paid any attention whatsoever to anything JF
Like I said in the piece on your critics, these people are both ignorant and stupid, while putting on airs about being your moral superior. Which is laughable given that they can’t do basic math, recognise simple reality concerning the sex of a boy or a girl, or understand simple concepts such as there not being enough time in the universe for a single sentence of Shakespeare to appear by random chance, never mind his whole works, and much less the “chance” actual life would require.
Moral of the story: tell these people to fuck off directly. Laugh at them AND point.
They are idiots, liars, uneducated buffoons, with delusions of adequacy, and total fantasies if superiority to anyone at anything. They are human wreckage, noxious, dangerous, and especially so to children and women. It is best they so not breed. In fact, it is best if they are socially ostracised from the rest of humanity.
So stop pussy-footing around. It’s time to pit the idiot freaks, potential rapists, child molesters, murderers, ignorant woke-promoters back in the closet. The internet and polite society made the error of permitting these drug addled alcoholics, pedophiles and human waste to get a voice in the public square and it rapidly became a loud voice of madness and demonic insanity.
Time to let them know their time is up and they can ALL shut the fuck back up now. Stop being polite to these degenerate deviants. They certainly never extended you that courtesy, so why on Earth do it to them?
God. Family. Patriarchy.
Catholicism, the family unit —which for the retarded, is one man, one woman, and their children— with the man as the head of the household, the woman the nurturing home-maker, and the children obedient, respectful to their parents, yet ready to take on the world of enemies and friends each as required by life and circumstance. These are the things that created civilisation.
Atheism, Feminism, equality, diversity, sexual degeneracy, these are the things that have ALWAYS destroyed civilisations, throughout all of human history. There has never been a matriarchal society that wasn’t a hellscape of perversion, misery and degradation.
With regard to the tranny issue, an 11 year old I was asked to talk to some years back, gets it.
She was being told at school the utterly absurd nonsensical and demonic lie that girls can be boys and vice versa and that “gender” (a word that has nothing to do with biology, but rather linguistics) is “fluid” (it is not. Not in biology, nor in linguistics.)
My conversation with her lasted about 2 minutes total. One minute and forty-five seconds of it approximately being her telling me the nonsense she was being propagandised with.
My fifteen seconds of education forever demolished the entire tranny agenda. It went thus:
“So (name), tell me: if I stitch a tail to my butt and start to jump around, does that mean I am now a kangaroo?”
She burst out laughing and has never been able to be confused by the lies since. She just turned 16 not too long ago and is an awesome, based, logical, loyal and intelligent young woman.
Her Halloween costume a couple of years ago was Kim Jong Un. Because nothing is scarier than a communist dictator. And no, no one told her about it. No one even spoke to her about communism. Unlike those “just-so” stories where everyone clapped, this one is actually real.
Tell your children the truth and they will be a lot harder to indoctrinate with lies.
And it’s not like we didn’t know this YEARS before covid. In fact, I recall an online conversation with a guy that explained way back in 2018 I think, that the way to really get rid of all the Europeans was precisely to use the kind of genetic modification serum that was passed off as a “vaccine” for COVID. This was not a virologist or doctor. Just a guy with above average IQ who took an interest and read various medical papers for fun and shared his thoughts with a group of online friends I belonged to. So, contrary to the Scott Adams of this world, it was absolutely clear and possible to know what the vaxx would do to you long before anyone took it.
Aside from all that, there is also the graphite and other bugs, of course.
McKernan, who has 25 years’ experience in his field, ran the experiment again, confirming that the vials contained up to, in his opinion, 18-70 times more DNA contamination than the legal limits allowed by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).In particular, McKernan was alarmed to find the presence of an SV40 promoter in the Pfizer vaccine vials. This is a sequence that is, ‘…used to drive DNA into the nucleus, especially in gene therapies,’ McKernan explains. This is something that regulatory agencies around the world have specifically said is not possible with the mRNA vaccines.Knowing that the contamination had not been disclosed by the manufacturers during the regulatory process, McKernan raised the alarm, posting his findings to Twitter (now X) and Substack with a call-out to other scientists to see if they could replicate his findings.Other scientists soon confirmed McKernan’s findings, though the amount of DNA contamination was variable, suggesting inconsistency of vial contents depending on batch lots. One of these scientists was cancer genomics expert Dr Phillip Buckhaults, who is a proponent of the mRNA platform and has received the Pfizer Covid vaccine himself.In September of this year, Dr Buckhaults shared his findings in South Carolina Senate hearing. ‘I’m kind of alarmed about this DNA being in the vaccine – it’s different from RNA, because it can be permanent,’ he told those present.‘There is a very real hazard,’ he said, that the contaminant DNA fragments will integrate with a person’s genome and become a ‘permanent fixture of the cell’ leading to autoimmune problems and cancers in some people who have had the vaccinations. He also noted that these genome changes can ‘last for generations’.
Over the last few days (and years and years) I have posted various things highlighting several of the very disordered aspects of modern society. I have specifically focussed in various ways on relationships between men and women, and how these are affected by so much of the surrounding nonsense.
I have often pointed out the Satanic nature of feminism (literally, it has purely Satanic roots at all levels, no matter how seductive the initial presentation is), which, of course, upsets feminists, and may rub many women the wrong way even if they are not avowed feminists.
The measure of discomfort a woman feels on reading that feminism is a net evil in the world is directly proportional to her lack of understanding of what it means to be a woman in reality, nature and as God intended.
And if that last sentence makes you even more upset, well, it’s unlikely you will have the mental fortitude to read the rest of this post, or ever learn anything useful about correcting the ills of the world, starting with yourself, as we all must.
In fairness to women, and as I have pretty much always stated, the fault of their disordered attitudes to life, lies in great part with men. That said, however, unless women want to be thought of, treated as, and in fact be, the human equivalent of cattle without any agency whatsoever, they need to take at least some responsibility. Incidentally, I advise they do. A vast majority of men would be perfectly happy to assume women have no more agency than ruminants, but I don’t think that’s the way forward.
So, then, according to me, and a lot of thoughtful men, what is it that women are getting so wrong and should make an effort to improve?
Settle down and let me mansplain it to you. Feel free to imagine me manspreading with a cowboy hat on and a redneck accent if it helps. Hell, if it helps go ahead and really fire up your imaginations and try and imagine me with a mullet and a cigarette. Whatever works ladies, whatever works!
The pivotal error most women have been trained to do, is to stop being women. To stop being feminine, and girly, and pretty, and pleasant, and polite, and dignified, and well-dressed. Yes, in effect I am saying that the pivotal error is that they are failing to act, be and enjoy being, like a prim and proper lady straight out of a 1950’s fiction about what the future would have been like.
Allow me to present to you some imagery that may help inspire you a little to at least understand what I mean. Try and grasp the sense of what the woman in these images feels like and how she feels about herself and her place in the world. Imagine it as something eminently positive even if you have been hypnotised to believe the opposite. Imagine their smiles, whether in drawings or photographs are genuine and happy, not posed or faked. Genuinely try to grasp the sense of this, and, if you like, imagine too, what the men in their lives are and should be like for them to genuinely be that happy and content and internally free.
And in case you think those images are too “dated” for your sense of modern style, then allow me to further help you “update” them in modernistic fashion as envisioned back then too.
You see, you can transpose the imagery, you can change the setting, you can manipulate the exterior and the style, but it is the inner sense of things which is the key.
What no man wants is this:
Or God-forbid, this:
In fact, almost all men, certainly all sane, well-balanced, normal ones, being confronted with this in their home,
Will gladly and regularly put up with this:
which, by the way, is pretty normal and natural for a woman to have and be like. And occasionally, when we deserve it, and as we are humans, we all do at times, even this:
ESPECIALLY, if it is presented in this very feminine fashion, which is indirectly and sweetly, VERY direct.
Now, to the squeals of the beached whales complaining, my ears are deaf, but to those perspicacious females that noted the question above as to what the man in their life should look like and act like for them to be happy to be as mentioned above, again, perhaps some inspirational imagery is in order.
And again, the images above reflecting men, are not supposed to “inspire” a bunch of metrosexuals to take on the airs of such imagery as boxers, mountaineers, soldiers, and random adventurers so as to impress women. The whole point of such men is that they do what they do because they want to. The impressing or not of others is inconsequential to them.
And while the entrenched feminist will continue to squeal like a poked pig that such patriarchal oppression is endemic of rape-culture and toxic masculinity and blah, blah, blah, who cares… it will be essentially because deep down in their core, like the hole at the centre of the Gamma male’s soul, entrenched feminists have a similar eternal void of self, and deep, deep down know they will never be able to snag, keep and be loved truly by such a man. So, just like the gamma male, they rage. And their rage tries to burn down all men, all pretty, feminine women and all nuclear families.
But every woman who has not yet succumbed to totalitarian feminism, deep down, knows she would love to be with such a stereotypical manly man. Stereotypes are stereotypes for a reason. And truly, actual manly men, are happy to treat their wives as their princesses as long as they in turn treat them as their kings. It is a mutual admiration society founded in genuine care for the other above our own concerns.
That is not to say the manly man will not screw up from time to time. Or that the feminine woman will not. Humans ALL screw up. But that is not reason enough to give up on them. God didn’t. Jesus let himself be scoured, spat upon and nailed to a cross while wholly innocent in order not to give up on us. So… be kind to each other.
And as we are only human, and not like Jesus, it is perfectly acceptable to completely avoid feminists, not engage with them, not have sex with them, and most certainly not marry or have children with them. And it is equally perfectly acceptable for women to similarly avoid “male” metrosexual “feminist-allies”, and their spineless, manipulative, weak, PUA ways.
What no woman wants, in keeping with the imagery above for what men do not want, is the gamma male:
Ultimately, cliched as it is, the natural order of things is probably most expressed by Tarzan and Jane.
And the 1981 version of the film with Bo Derek as Jane remains one of the better versions. If memory serves, the point where Tarzan meets Jane and sniffs her is very well done. I think it was the 1981 film version, but it’s possible it may have been the 1999 version with Christopher Lambert as Tarzan.
The man being a quasi savage is fine. Dealing with the world, especially if one understands the reality of things, often resembles something not unlike a fight with wild animals (with apologies to all wild animals who do not deserve to be compared to the parasitic classes of human bureaucrats that infest our lives today), but it is the very femininity of his woman that softens his ways with her, and it is his caring and protective masculine efforts that give her that peaceful sense of security that no matter how crazy the world gets, he will take care of her.
Today’s world has made the acting as a man almost illegal. And the acting as a woman something to be disparaged and ridiculed. The effect is most noticeable on women, as they are far more social animals than men are. But the results are destructive and create profound unhappiness in women above all. Quoting various scientific studies is near useless given that overall so-called peer reviewed studies are fake and irreproducible by over 50% of cases, however, you can find some with actual methodology that is explained (if not verified).
Here is an interesting graph that measures overall self-reported happiness (of both men and women) against perceived freedom. From this site.
The interesting thing to note, if you search a bit and try to get a general sense of all these studies, is that general happiness took a dive for everybody starting around 1990, although the trend had been downward already. What happened in 1990? Well, political correctness really started up quite prominently and feminism began its ascendance on steroids.
The world has made it quite difficult for a man to single handedly go and work and provide for a numerous family of a wife and several children.
And equally difficult for a woman to be a home-maker and housewife without being criticised by her (less happy) “peers” for being a spineless doormat, subjugated to the always evil and perverted desires of her male oppressor (aka husband).
The answer needs to be in a certain evolutionary step women need to take and it needs to be a step they understand and choose for themselves.
Just like men had to learn to somewhat curb their temperament. Because challenging a rude waiter, or a slow one, to a death duel with your sixgun or samurai sword apparently is “rude”. And then they went completely overboard correcting in the other direction and outright banning the challenge to a duel as being all “illegal” and “murder-y”, go figure.
Well, anyway, women need to now make the evolutionary step that realises that the opinions of other women, especially, but other people, in general, are pointless to worry about or lose sleep over. My post on whoyour critics most often are, is as valid for women as it is for men. Perhaps even more so (with respect to the who).
If it is rare for an efficient and capable man to be your avowed critic (unless you in fact are, mostly an oxygen thief) when it comes to women, even if they are efficient and capable, they are generally worse than men at gaslighting each other as well as critiquing you unfairly or wholly based on their own failings (usually not to your face though). So in that respect at least, the advice given in that post, is valid for women too.
Biologically, it is objectively harder for a woman to be objective than a man. That is just a fact of nature, and trying to deny it is pointless and counter-productive. Because hormones are real and a thing. Nevertheless, assuming that because of it rationality and good logic are therefore impossible, is a lie. Just as men had to evolve to not let their own hormonally driven instincts direct their actions, so now women need to learn the same lesson.
And remember, always, always, always:
Women are not the enemy. Men are not the enemy. The lies and the liars who speak them are the enemy. And you should give them no quarter and no mercy. Expose them, reject them, and have nothing to do with them.
Safeguard the roles nature intended for us and learn them anew if you must (as most of us have to), supporting each other as you do so and learn together. There is no human unit, group, or community, more important, more necessary, more valid, than the nuclear family composed of one man, one woman and their children. All the rest is shadows and lies and meaningless details in the face of that truth.
So come together and know: You have been lied to. Rediscover. Rebuild. Learn. Marry, for life, make children, and reject the world’s lies and fake “rewards”.
Is it easy? No. Of course not. Your own family, especially if you had boomer parents, is probably riddled with divorce, lack of funds, and dysfunctionality at a core level. That’s the reality. So YOU be the start.
You’re like a rootless couple of shipwrecks on a hostile alien planet. You need to first of all get together, realise you need to make your partnership, your marriage, be the core of everything. Without that, you will not survive. Then do all the things that need doing so your children will be able to start off their lives in a tradition that is worthwhile, healthy and gives them the chance to create a solid footing for their own children.
Make that future bright and real, no matter what difficulties you need to face.
Vintage illustration of a futuristic American family on vacation, with the father driving his wife and two kids in a flying saucer instead of a car, 1950s. (Illustration by GraphicaArtis/Getty Images)
And ignore the human wreckage and misshapen mutants that try and tell you you’re wrong, a racist, some kind of supremacist this or that, a hater, an evil, evil, EEEEBIL (yes with a B) toxic male or spineless female.
They, after all, are evolutionary dead ends. The blind frogs that can’t swim that nature experiments with by the thousands just to have them die off in a genetic cul-de-sac.
Forge ahead and take a picture of the freaks, so you can leave a warning in your photo-album for your grandkids.
Vox Day’s Socio-Sexual Hierarchy nomenclature receives plenty of criticism from some people, and much praise from others. The split itself is telling. Those men who have observable patterns of behaviour most associated with being Gammas reject or try to redefine the entire hierarchy to somehow position themselves as the real “tops”, which is why Vox refers to them also as Secret Kings.
A recent comment on my own post about rapey idiots in glass houses expresses what many normal (Delta) Type men believe:
These famous rich guys who drug women like Bill Cosby and this Danny Masterson must be particularly depraved because being rich and famous they could surely get women without doing so.
This idea shows a fundamental misunderstanding of the inner world of the Gamma and what drives them, in the context of being rapists or at a minimum creeps. I have observed their behaviour for years, with the same kind of disgusted fascination one might observe some parasite burrowing under an innocent’s skin.
The behaviour first became more prevalent and obvious on the internet in the mid 1990s, where frustrated men in alt-dot forums expressed a vitriolic hatred bordering on the psychotic towards any form of female rejection they experienced. Then I saw it in the flesh too and mostly it got told to me by pretty much almost all the women I was with in my life.
At first I though the behaviour of rage, when rejected, must apply to only a small percentage of unbalanced losers, but as I was told the same type of stories, by woman after woman after woman, and indeed saw it with my own eyes at times when a girl I was seeing was being hit on by some guy who usually was unaware she was with me in the specific context. As soon as she made it clear she was with me and therefore not available for his advances, some of these guys went into an obvious instant red-hot hatred. Because I look like I do, they usually just left, very occasionally making some sarcastic jab before slinking quickly away. On some occasions I even got an after-event report. One girl I was seeing for a time was a student at university and we had very much an on-off relationship. She was very pretty and was always surrounded by hangers on that thought they might eventually get with her if they just kept being in her orbit. One guy in particular went overboard with the “friends” cover. Whenever this girl and I were not seeing each other for a couple of days he would go over and try and “keep her company”. All of it was non-sexual “let’s watch a film together” or whatever, but his intent was obvious to me and I think to her too, though we didn’t really discuss it, because frankly, he was a non-entity and there was no chance she would do anything with him. It had not anything to do with looks or money either. He was just that sort of milque-toasty guy that really no woman wants to be with by choice.
Anyway, during one of these “pauses” in our relationship she later told me the guy was at her place for two days straight, during which she bitched to him about me and my uncompromising ways. She was marinated in British Feminist theory, and I simply have never had anything to do with it, nor ever accepted any of their absurd ideology. Her feminist theory invariably failed when confronted with her natural instincts concerning me and she would inevitably return to me with some very intimate ways to “make up”. Over time she would try to get me to bend to some insane feminist idea and I would once more simply reject it. Anyway, after her bitching about this for two days to this guy and his enthusiastically agreeing with her, and finally beginning to think this was his way to finally get with her, I believe, from memory that she recounted to me how her conversation went in the final stages. She had just said that I was impossible and drove her crazy with how I just made arguments she couldn’t really counter and it pissed her off and she “hated” me for it. He nodded and said something along the lines of “yeah, he sounds terrible, you should forget about him.”
To which she replied: “Yes, he’s terrible, makes me so mad… And yet… I can’t do without him. I’m going to go over to him now and be completely on his cock.”
And she did. Now, in that case, I can see the guy being frustrated, in his mind he had been sidling up to her like a proper gentleman of the woke variety, and was agreeing with her all the time and was obviously the “better” man, what with being all woke and pro-whatever feminist crap she spouted, and he affirmed and supported all her patriarchal suffering, or whatever, and then, she promptly announces that she’s off to do the very things he desperately was hoping to get from her with me.
You can see how he’d be upset. But the reality is he was more than just dejected. He was furious. Luckily he did not react physically against her, but the next time I saw him several days later, you could tell he had a murderous rage all about him towards me and her too. He never spoke to her again, as far as I know, which was just as well.
Now, in the above case you can sort of sympathise with the guy a little (not about the rage) at least everyone has felt a little sad or frustrated at being rejected by someone they really liked. But in my case, really that is as far as it has ever gone. Ultimately, if a person genuinely has no attraction for you, how can you get angry at them for that? The idea is just absurd to me. It has never computed and never will.
The reason I recounted that chapter of my life was to try and give you some insight into the fundamental difference of internal mechanism that a Gamma has from other archetypes.
The difference is in the internal world of the Gamma from that of a Delta or an Alpha or a Sigma.
The Alpha may actually get quite stung at rejection, especially if it is public and from a high status woman. His ego and need to be seen as the Alpha may in fact also cause him to be quite caustic or dismissive, but if so it will be generally only in the moment and temporarily. After all, no real Alpha wants to be seen as a pitiful shadow of a man that is pining after some woman. Besides, there are usually several waiting in the wings for him, happy to heal his broken heart. In the Alpha mind, getting angry at rejection from a woman is essentially below his dignity and status to do. He may privately be quite hurt, but rage, even to himself, goes against his nature, which is essentially generous and expectant of plentifulness (be it women, business, fame, and so on). The Alpha is a reacher for things, including women, but usually not a desperate grabber in the normal course of affairs.
The Delta is more of a balanced individual and generally will take rejection on the chin, be hurt, then move on with his life and try and find peace where he can. These are the majority of well balanced men.
The Sigma is a special case and may not care at all about the rejection, or be a freak on which the rejection is really the least of his concerns. Keep in mind that both James Bond as well a the character in the series Hannibal are Sigmas. These are not people who follow normal social conventions, but precisely because of that, their internal world, strange as it may be, is founded on a solid bedrock of self-reliance and hence self-knowledge. While they might be professional killers for hire, they are probably unlikely to get angry at a woman for rejecting them. A case in point from fiction may be Dexter. He killed bad guys with abandon, but was always a loyal boyfriend to the women he was with, and took their rejections or bad behaviours with calm resignation.
The Gamma however has wholly different internal mechanisms and they end up being the really creepy and dangerous ones, even if they present as easy-going, liberal, modern metrosexual men in touch with their feminine side. In almost diametric opposition to Sigmas, the Gamma has a profound (and un-admitted) lack of self-confidence. This is a root cause in their very core and they try to cover up that existential hole in their soul with all manner of fakery. Be it money, status, recognition by the masses for their achievements (real or most often imagined or “manufactured”), it is never enough to really fill that essential lack of self-truth.
A Gamma can be a billionaire (see Bezos) and still behave in a completely creepy/loser/gamma way with women. It is true that an Alpha or a Sigma or even a Delta, that is really a millionaire or billionaire can have his pick of women willing to be his sexual partners, and many of those women, initially attracted by the power, wealth and status, may even end up having genuine feelings for the man in question, but there is a core difference in the dynamics with a Gamma.
The billionaire alpha, sigma or even delta, may be perfectly aware of the sexual liaison with women being purely transactional. Their temporary thrill at being on a private jet, or even just seen with the billionaire in question, is enough for them to permit sex between them. The Delta will eventually be a bit sad at such an arrangement and over time get disillusioned with this woman or perhaps even women in general if the pattern repeats. An Alpha may even prefer the situation to be transactional and be fine with it and get a new “performer” once he bores with the first one, or have multiple ones in play or make a proper business contract out of a “marriage”. A Sigma may do the same or become a pimp, or a celibate monk by choice. But a Gamma will simply think that his material wealth gives him the right and the authority to do what he imagines Alphas do or get away with doing. And this is the tragic error.
An Alpha, whether a billionaire or homeless, will have a woman act towards him intimately because she wants to. Because the man’s internal sense of self is strong and she responds to that, ultimately, aside from his exterior, worldly, if you like, trappings. I have personally known (in my hedonistic days) beautiful women, married to extremely wealthy men, who, nevertheless would get naked and have sex with a man that had no money to speak of, but a sense of self that was of a different order from their husbands. This type of effect cannot be bought. The effect it has on women cannot be replicated nor faked very effectively even by the women themselves. So, what happens when a Gamma has reached some perceived pinnacle of power, wealth, fame or combination thereof, in his abysmal understanding of the female mind and heart, he thinks he is now “entitled” to the female attention that he imagines Alphas and Sigmas get (and in fact do get). When, to his utter shock and horror women continue to dodge him like radioactive plague, his natural emotion is rage. In his broken understanding of “life” he is rich, he is successful, he is famous, EVERY woman OWES him sex at will. HIS will. And if they don’t give it of their own volition, why, they must be defective, and/or it doesn’t matter, because in the Gamma’s mind Alphas just take what they want anyway and the women always go along with it.
And this is how you get the Danny Masterson of the world, the Bill Cosbys and all the other wealthy and powerful executives that end up getting caught groping angrily at unwilling secretaries and colleagues. So, no, the money is not enough. The fame is not enough. The status is not enough. And gammas simply will never get that.
Because all it takes is what in Italian is commonly referred to as “balls”.
And like real courage, real, intimate self-knowledge can’t be faked. And women can sense it.
Rumblings of Proper War
As someone has decided to start a war with Israel, apparently, we should pay attention to the bigger picture.
In the first place, it is absolutely NOT clear to you and me (regardless of whether you are arrogant enough to think otherwise) who has (and why) started the attack on Israel.
Firstly, the media cannot be believed. I have already seen twitter posts accusing the Iranians and Palestinians of going house to house murdering whole families. One small problem, the images show IDF troops entering Palestinian homes from months back. So, accepting any mass media or even alternative media version of events is obviously a bad move, as should be obvious to anyone that has not been in a coma for the last decade and especially the last four years.
Secondly, the idea that Hezbollah, had 5,000 rockets to shoot across and thousands of troops ready, and paraglider commandos in force, all well-coordinated in absolute secrecy from Israel and their deep informants, is totally absurd.
Third, Iran is a problem for the US (((deep state))) that is closer to hand, and in their mind more easily “solvable” militarily, than China. So any excuse to go total hot war on Iran is good, and if it takes a few thousand Israeli casualties to get there, the pedovores in charge are hardly going to be struck by a sudden bout of conscience.
Fourth, all of this was predicted some 20 years ago by a Russian strategist the name of whom escapes me.
Fifth, the Jewish religion has certain conditions that must be met before their supposed messiah (the antichrist to the rest of us) shows up. Two of these conditions have already been met, the building of the third temple and/or consecrating of it, and the use of some red heifers without any imperfections as sacrifice. The last condition is a massive war in the region. Now, you might think this last item is all nonsense, but that’s not relevant. What’s relevant is that the people in charge believe it.
So… for my money, it’s WAY too early to know if the attack on Israel is legit or a false flag. What is certain is that it certainly takes the attention off Ukraine. Which probably means Zelensky is not long for this world. And I would assume it’s his masters that do the deed more than the Russians. I for one, if I was a Russian strategist, would pray Zelensky stays in power as long as possible. Where else am I going to find a gay cocaine dwarf that is so expertly draining the entire swamp of the West of money, weapons, and energy?
Then we must look at what else is going on.
And here, Putin’s most recent speech is important:
Read the whole thing here.
Putin is not saying anything particularly new in the extract above. Anyone who was not in the same ten year coma also knows that the Maidan of 2014 was specifically orchestrated by the (((same US deep state))) and indeed, (((Victoria Nuland))) that fat, evil cow, proudly announced that they had spent 5 billion dollars on NGOs to affect it. Not to mention her leaked phone call to the US Ambassador stating that (literally) she couldn’t give a fuck what the EU wanted, the next puppet president of Ukraine was already selected. And later, in fact put in place.
What is interesting is that Putin is finally explaining it directly in a language so clear that one hopes even the very brainwashed idiots he refers to, can maybe start to wake up.
In essence:
And is Putin the aggressor he’s painted to be? Again, anyone not in a coma for the last decade has been impressed by the man’s restraint. He has warned and warned and politically, diplomatically, asked to please, please, please, stop your bullshit for almost 20 years. Certainly at least 15. And not only was he ignored, he was aggrieved and demonised.
And this is still his response.
In his place I would have lost patience long ago. After all he has demonstrated he has the nuclear submarines that can, and have, “appeared” quietly and politely within range of Washington DC and every major American city.
If he nuked Washington, New York and LA and then just said “quit now, or I’ll do the rest too” are we sure the death toll would not end there? And thus ultimately be less bloody? No one can say, but if you were a Russian who may have lost sons in the current (((deep state))) game of Ukraine, you might decide to take the chance.
Putin has kept a much cooler head and still is.
(Emphasis added by me)
Putin’s Russia is the physical embodiment of something I and my family have lived for generations. It is the epitome of leave me alone and mind your own business and we’ll get along just fine no matter who you are. Try and fuck with me and mine and you better pray to your Gods.
No rational human being can possibly have a problem with this philosophy, which is why, throughout my life, I have had and made good friends with everything from Orthodox Jews and observant Muslims, to liberal Atheists and heretics like Jehova’s Witnesses.
And no, I am not some civnat boomer saying I don’t see colour or religion or nationality. I absolutely see it. And as long as you leave me alone and/or treat me with respect, I will always extend the same courtesy to you. And that includes not just my family, but also my town and my nation. Being as I too am a displaced person, being Venetian and the Most Serene Republic having been unjustly and illegally annexed by the forcibly united abomination that is Italy, by the two evil Freemasons of Garibaldi and Mazzini I understand very well, the plight of not just my people, but of other displaced persons. Which is why I have always understood the position of the Crimean and Donetsk and Luhansk Russians.
Furthermore, if some misunderstanding or disagreement occurs, I am always first ready to discuss it and find mutually acceptable solutions. However, if you cross certain lines, or don’t respect the agreements in place… well… then is when you find out that my polite and respectful approach was never there as a result of weakness, or to protect me.
It was there to protect you.
Because now you are in a war with someone that really grasps the concept in ways you don’t even imagine. It’s the classic: I’m not trapped in here with you. You are trapped in here with me.
And the (((US deep state))) is slowly finding out just what it means to be trapped in here with Russia.
New Developments
I expect that China would now be looking at Taiwan, but not aggressively. The Chinese are nothing if not patient. And the weaker and more stretched out the pedovores get, the more bloodless and civil the reunification of Taiwan will be. I expect it to be mostly bloodless, perhaps similar to the reunification of Hong Kong.
Iran may be dragged into a hot war imminently, regardless of whether they had anything to do with the attack on Israel or not. But if you’re gonna be blamed for a crime regardless of whether you did it or not, well, all bets are off then. This could become seriously bad very fast. Because tactically, if this is the case, nuking Jerusalem and Tel Aviv, gets rid of the problem in the immediate, but the ramifications would probably be global.
The Jewish diaspora in charge of the US (and most of the West) would pull out all the stops and it’s quite likely nukes would fly with abandon in quite a bit more than just the Middle East. So it’s definitely one to watch.
Turkey is in a unique position, with a Westernised and somewhat secular population that nevertheless is rooted in Islam and understands the injustices perpetrated on the Islamic world, both by the US directly, as well as by those using their people to produce Islamic invasions of Europe, which are all funded by (((Soros and colleagues))). Their direct rejection of the US is ideologically preferred by them but there are real and terrible consequences to that choice, as the recent HAARP induced Earthquake there has clearly shown. So, to me, they are a kind of canary in the coal-mine. The Turkish people are pretty brave and I am fairly sure they would choose separation from the US, but what their leaders will decide is less clear to me.
Overall
It seems that hot war in Europe is certainly a more distinct possibility. If Russia was smart about it (they are not as far as I can see) they would be providing some hints of supports and recognition, even if only diplomatic, to regions wanting independence for decades such as the Veneto, Emilia Romagna, Sicily and Sardinia in Italy. The Basque and the various Spanish Islands of Spain, the Irish in the UK, The French colonies around the world (though they have helped themselves quite brilliantly already) and so on.
And help these people even if only morally and from afar, to make a push for the reduction and eventual total removal of foreign influence.
Italy has some 150 US military bases. Why? Italian interests of the man in the street have absolutely fuck all to do with the interests of the pedophile assholes running shits-his-pants Biden. And never have.
Like it or not, the global mood is starting to sound a lot like:
Yankee, go home.
And in fairness to the honest citizens of that hive of freemasonry and foreign pedophiles, I think the average American too would be very happy with all of their military and interests coming home and leaving the rest of the world to do what they will.
So. It appears the vast majority of us is on the same side. Which begs the question, really…
Revolution when?
But… I fear much darker times still must come, before the man in the street is ready to grab a pitchfork and a torch, and burn out the parasites from the various government offices and buildings.
No related posts.
By G | 8 October 2023 | Posted in Social Commentary