See that tag line/sub-heading there? That’s to make sure all the retards get outraged right away and don’t waste my time trying to “argue” how “AAAAKKKKSSSHUUALLY” Protestantism is just how the Bible was written in proper ‘murican English by our Pastor Bob from our Church of the Latter Day Grape-Swilling Multi-Child-Bride Saints. Or other “arguments” along those lines (i.e. all of them) that try to justify Protestantism in any guise as anything other than brainwashing and/or mental retardation mixed in with a pathological aversion to facts, logic, reading for comprehension, or historical reality that is verifiable thanks to there being multiple sources of surviving documents written by those living at the time that all synch up.
So… now that we have established that this post will be a further proof that Protestantism is retarded in all it’s infinite ways, let us now proceed with the topic at hand, which is a bit more nuanced than the totally retarded ones like Sola Scriptura, using the Freemason-creating, totally homosexual King James’ “Bible” as “the bestest Bible EVAH!” and other drooling retard things on that level.
Because Protestantism was one of the Enemy’s most successful attacks on Christianity (i.e. Catholicism) it permitted the slow and gradual infiltration of Christianity with flawed, erroneous, and outright heretical ideas and modalities. By about 250 years after its introduction, the Illuminati in 1776 were born. And these Jewish inspired, Freemason-like facet of Satanism (along with Freemasonry of course, which good old King James the flaming faggot begun, along with his version of the most translationally corrupted Bible ever created) were hellbent, along with all their various permutations (Carbonari, Rosicrucians, etc etc, their names are legion after all) to destroy the Church (the only real, one, holy and apostolic Church), and began by first destroying the protective arm of Christianity, that is the royal and noble houses that as armed laypeople always protected the Church in the physical realm. Kings, Princes, Barons, and so on. Once they had essentially got rid of the Royal houses in Europe, they then began infiltrating the Church in every way and means possible as well as, of course, start a couple of World Wars for good measure to increase the chaos and desolation.
By 1958, they had taken over the Papacy with Roncalli, and hence the Vatican, and today only a remnant of proper Catholicism remains in the few valid Bishops and priests that are 1958 Sedevacantists of the Totalist persuasion. The only Catholics in the Vatican might be lay tourists that in error think it’s still a Catholic country worth visiting instead of a nest of pedophiles and Satnaists that needs exorcism and the cleansing purification of fire.
Over that time, (about 1520 to 1776) the zeitgeist has changed from one of personal loyalty unto death to Jesus Christ and the dogmatic and divine principles of Catholicism, to a gradual but very real degradation of humanity by the secularisation of Christianity, as well, of course, as the normalisation of a wholly unnatural and disordered relationship between the sexes, which was a slow burn but then took off at breakneck speed over the last 100 years.
As a result, Protestants were the very first (and only people in pretty much all of human history) to push, claim and insist on “equality” between men and women.
This was, and is, as absurd an ideology as pretending that men can become women by cutting off their dicks and inserting plastic tits in their chests. Or stating that “men” can get pregnant.
Any objective observation of men and women will immediately realise they are different biologically and immutably. From their reproductive systems to the density of their bones, their relative muscle mass to fat ratios, hormones, and literal physical composition and structure of their brains, men and women are, and will forever be, different.
The Demonic inspired Zeitgeist of “equality” invented, created, and pushed by Jewish activism (and funding) ugly, bitter harpies that want all other women to be as miserable as they are, and weak, sexually frustrated men of the Protestant delusion, has been relentless for centuries, and since the invention of the contraceptive pill (by a Jew) has accelerated to near-light speed towards damnation.
The prevention of babies as a result of having sex has secularised the position that used to exist, that sex was a sacred thing, and that doing it was binding for life in a marriage that could only be dissolved by death, to an exercise-routine whose main purpose was to “feel good” for those few moments of lust, orgasm, and ever-more intense sexual activities required to chase the new “high”.
Once you pretend that women have the same degree of rationality, capacity for logic —and hence agency— as men, you have effectively done something that would be analogous to letting 6 year olds carry loaded weapons, drive cars, and pilot airplanes.
Now… all you Protestants (that already stopped reading a while back because I so offended your feelings and your brain can’t read for comprehension, facts, or logic anyway) and all you feminist women (that are screeching at what a woman-hating pig I must be, in your usual 100%-wrong-all-the-time fashion) that imagine I am saying women are somehow worth less than men because of this, take a pause.
Go have a camomile tea. Do a bit of holistic Zen breathing. Use your crystals, etcetera, and pay attention to the next bit of writing below instead.
It is PROTESTANTS that hate women.
Because just like giving a six year old a loaded gun, and telling him to drive to the airport where he is to then pilot the 747 to London, is not an act of love, pretending women are as capable of acting rationally and logically as men are, is not a kindness. Quite the contrary. It is absolutely a vile and hateful thing to do.
By pretending they are as capable in that regard, you are then justified in similarly accusing them of being useless. And factually that’s hard to disprove when presented in such a context. Which of course makes women pissed off and upset (rightly so) and then the backlash is an even grander idiocy, like “believe all women”. Or simply never holding women accountable for any of their behaviours because…oh well, they are women, so we must look after them.
Returning to the analogy of the six year old, this is the equivalent of blaming the six year old when she shoots his own brother, or a stranger, crashes the car, or destroys the plane (luckily before even taking off). Then when the six year old gets pissed off at this injustice (even if he doesn’t really know the reasons why he is right to be so) we begin to accept all his excuses as valid. So we then become a society that gives loaded guns to six year olds and then forces all of them to never play cowboys and Indians. We let them drive cars, but pretend all the roads are built out of gigantic rubber barriers all over and with speed limited to 10 km/hr. And planes that don’t really fly, but just use a special railway line (also made of giant rubber kit) that we call “flying” so everyone is now “safe”.
Quite frankly, if you can’t see this is Demonic, I don’t know what to tell you.
Oh, wait, actually I do: You’re fucking STUPID!
Now… let us also notice a few other things:
- The almost visceral hatred Protestants have for Mary, who LITERALLY gave birth to Jesus, who even Protestants (mostly) admit is God. This is not a coincidence. It’s been the poisonous trickle-thought of Protestantism starting right from Luther —who expressly stated if the wife was not willing (to have sex) you should rape the maid— his later enthusiastic sponsor, Henry; he of the murder-to-divorce attitude, not to mention all those sexually repressed degenerates of the puritans, which are really just offshoots of Calvinism, a most retarded branch of Protestantism. The visceral hatred towards women, mostly because they were and remain unfuckable, unattractive and intellectually sterile men, is palpable in the Protestant zeitgeist. And even the attractive, intelligent, genuine Protestant men, still consider women at best as second-class citizens because they can’t match up to men in capability in most respects that men are active in. As a result, the veneration and respect afforded to Mary irks them, and is a kind of witch-test of its own. How DARE anyone make a woman so important!
- The generic viciousness, lack of charity, incivility and at times outright hatred against women and the very attributes that make women lovable, is a strictly Protestant perversion of reality. Even the Muslims, while abusive, degrading, and certainly far from “good” in their treatment of women, haven’t gone so far as to essentially try to deny the intrinsic differences between the sexes as much as the Anglo and Teutonic Protestants have. It is a peculiar aspect of the Anglo-Saxons that they are, as a race/ethnicity/culture, possibly the most inept men sexually in relation to women, in broad statistical terms. No one has ever accused the British, nor their offshoots, Americans, Australians, New Zealanders, Canadians, and so on of being great lovers, seducers, or ladies men in general. And while the Anglos being inept, shy, puritanical, or totally degenerate, with little balance or good calibration in between, is a definite aspect of their character, with the Teutonics it seems to be either an almost sterile and mechanical view of sex, or the most perverse and extreme version of “sexuality” one can imagine. Both Anglos and Teutonics are essentially Protestant in zeitgeist, and even before Luther, the Brits and their various ethnic composites were always kind of pussy-whipped. I mean the Romans had to fight a FEMALE leader (Boudica) way back when. No self-respecting people ever needed a woman to march them to war, except the Anglos.
- The Germanic (Teutonic) people on the other hand treated women essentially as ball-emptiers and child producers with little other value beyond that. In either case, whether motivated basically by fear of the female sex (as the Anglos) or contempt for it (as the Teutonics), this is the general “vibe” of Protestantism and what it has led to over the last five centuries.
Let us now compare this to the attitude the Catholic-inspired countries and people have towards women.
First of all, the reverence shown to Mary, the literal human mother of God, is interpreted by the pussy-fearing Anglos and Teutons as some kind of “weakness” or some kind of elevation of Mary above Jesus. Neither of which is true, but as you may have noticed, guilty people tend to project their flaws on those they hate for being their betters.
As Catholics, we give tremendous respect to Mary, because imagine what that poor young girl had to go through as the mother of Jesus. One can hardly imagine a more painful life, and yet so utterly devoted and loving.
The attitude then, also to women in general is completely different. And it is also a fact that the Italians, Spaniards, and even the Portuguese (closer to Australopithecus than the other romantic tribes) are generally known to be more shall we say “capable” with the fairer sex.
But the attitude is completely different. As a man we do not expect women to be as capable, logical, or rational as we are. It would be idiotic. Instead we appreciate their sense of nurturing, their care of the little things we ignore or tend to think are, if not a waste of time, not very important, but that nevertheless make a difference in beauty, day-to-day living, and the overall sense a home, or a child may express or feel.
Dads don’t worry if a child of theirs has the right sandwiches for school. We’d as easily give the kid a tin of tuna as a slice of cake or a bunch of ham slices. Mom makes them sandwiches with the crust cut off.
Similarly, the irrational warmth a woman provides to a man she loves makes him a better person. It tends to make him care for her, look after her and ignore her regular irrational freak-outs at minor events from time to time. A woman is not there to organise life for society. She is there to maintain the social fabric of politeness, loving concern, dignified beauty, and pleasant small-talk that makes the shitty neighbour tolerable and prevents the issue of their noise-making at odd hours resolve in a bloody murder by claw-hammer at 4 am after one stern warning and no more.
As men, we Catholics recognise that the shortcomings women may have in the male sphere, are merely mirrored by these we have in the female sphere. And since that female sphere, that femininity, that irrationality that gives life a certain zest only a woman we care about can provide, and since only they can literally create another whole human being inside their body before bringing them into the world, it is our duty to care for them. To give them enough safety and care and love to have them bloom into helpful, loving, happy creatures.
And yes, it is true that there is now a preponderance of gold-digging whores in the West, but it is not really the fault of women any more than it is the fault of a child that he gets a stomach ache if you leave them unsupervised in a candy store.
It is MEN who failed themselves, society and women too.
It is MEN that let the enemies inside the gates, and it matters not if they were scheming Jews hellbent on destroying Catholicism, Satanists by all their various name, genetic misfits like the atheists, and materialists, flat-out enemies of God, or any combination of the above.
If your own brother starts to talk about “equality” and the boons of “diversity” and how “all religions” say “the same things”, punch him the face, then drag his bleeding nose to the pages of the Talmud, the Koran, the Baghdad Gita and the Bible, and if need be smack the back of his head every time he misses the obvious and irreconcilable differences between them.
Protestantism is NOT Christianity. It is the abdication of maleness, responsibility, AND Christianity.
It is the very antithesis of Christianity.
Christianity recognises the intrinsic value, truth and beauty of the irrationality, hormonal, and right-brain way of “thinking” (feeling) of women. And while doing all that, also recognising that letting a woman pilot the ship is going to get your ship smashed on rocks or stuck on a sandbar. So you don’t do that.
But by all means let her pick the colour of the sails and decorate the cabins, and cook the meals that keep you alive and fed at 3 am in the gale you need to navigate your ship through. But don’t let her near the cannons, the charts, or the compass and sextant. Do listen to her description of the sunsets. In fact notice them. And look at the curve of her hip as she contemplates that pod of dolphins that follows your ship from time to time.
The current state of things is almost entirely the fault of men. Or I should say, the weak men that have permitted liars, schemers, and women, to rule over them.
And it’s time the Protestants shut the fuck up, repent, and start to look into what it means to be an actual Christian, instead of LARPing at it.
This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here
In traditional society women went from being the uncle/father’s responsibility to being the responsibility of either the church or their husband. There was no ‘responsibility’ for women beyond domestic arrangements.
I wanted to share an anecdote – in my own domestic setting there’s often accidental (or unspoken/subconscious) division of labour – a slight (pleasant?) friction – for example – a meal – where you both make it excellent but if one of you or the other hadn’t been involved it either wouldn’t have happened or would have been mediocre. Either my wife or I do the 80% of the task and the other half does the 20% that makes it 100% enjoyable.