A Question for a hypothetical Scenario

While the “criticisms” on the last two posts were entirely predictable, the interesting emails were actually from younger men that managed to see pretty much what I was hoping they would.

Here is a small extract from an email by a reader:

I explained to him that Schopenhauer was an idiot, and it is a mystery to me why anyone took anything that bitter goblin of a “man” said as being meaningful. Same thing with Nietzsche, really. Why anyone thinks those two Germans were great philosophers is explained only by professor Cipolla’s first law of human stupidity: There are always more idiots than you can possibly imagine.

This led me to think about the primary issue with young men today and what they are being sold as a bill of goods and “true”.

Keep in mind that today’s young men, by and large, have either no father figure or a feminised neutered version of one. They are taught usually by women in school and/or pink haired sexual deviants with a sodomy agenda. Normal masculinity is labelled as “toxic” and so on.

If one had to try and pinpoint the single most damaging lie that most deeply affects the correct development of men today, it would be quite the challenge to select just one, however, if properly understood, I would say the most damaging lie is that “violence is never the answer”.

It is an objective lie in multiple ways, but, given modern levels of bullshit and brainwashing, it may take a little explaining for even the above medium intelligence people to get it. So, let us first list the objective points, the see how the positives of it relate to normal men in general.

Firstly: Violence is always the answer.

What they don’t want you to realise is that the people who do and use violence, want total exclusivity. Government and their lackeys are the ones who want to have exclusive use of violence. You pay your taxes because of violence. You follow the rules imposed on you because of violence. And nowadays you will even have violence done at you for tweeting the wrong thing. Scratch that. In fact, today, in the UK you will have violence done to you for praying silently in your mind. Or making a simple observation of fact that a specific policewoman looks like your own lesbian grandma. Apparently this last offence is a “hate crime” too, which confuses the crap out of me. Is saying someone looks like a lesbian a hate crime? Are lesbians illegal now? Or are lesbians especially evil and toxic to the point mentioning someone looks like one is so offensive as to be a hate crime? I am just not sure. And the seven police required to arrest the 16 year old autistic girl who simply made the observation, didn’t seem to explain it either. And, as anyone who understands the most basic aspects of autism knows, it is simply how they do things, express themselves as objectively and naturally as things appear to them. Much like small children, autists are very bad at lying or making things up. They simply call it as they see it. But apparently that is now worthy of having some good, old fashioned, monopolised, state violence on you.

The point here is simply this: violence, for good or for evil, is, and always has been, and continues to be, and most likely will continue to be (at least until the return of Christ, as far as any religion/mythology/concept any humans have ever come up with to date goes) the final answer.

All the problems humans face, individually, as a group, etc when they become intractable enough, serious enough, and dangerous enough, can come to a violent resolution. And usually do. Please note this says nothing about right and wrong, justice or injustice. It is just a fact.

Which, since we need to spell it out to some retards that read this blog, this does not mean violence should always be the go to response or that it is always a good response. Nor that it is or should be always necessary. The point being made here is that any issue that becomes intractable enough by talking, understanding, compromise, or some other form of dispute resolution, in the end, throughout human history is resolved by violence. And the government, as all thieves already know, hates competition. And as Lysander Spooner correctly stated, all that government is, is a group of people that use violence or the threat of it, to get what they want, who in the normal course of human affairs inevitably band together and get organised. And eventually call themselves government. See especially Chapter III, part II. The entire work is only 8 pages when printed in PDF on A4, so go on, read the whole thing, not just Ch.III pt.II

Secondly: Equality is a lie.

At every level and in every way. Men and women are not equal and never will be. Even twins are not equal. And you certainly are not equal to government. Are you allowed to own a fully automatic weapon and a tank? How about an attack helicopter or a jet with nukes? An ICBM with nuclear tips? No? Sounds crazy? I tell you what sounds more crazy to me. That a pedophile, dementia patient that stole an election as obviously as any banana republic on the planet, who an’t string together a coherent sentence and regularly shits his pants, apparently has all of those things, and can use them. By the the thousands. As well as the fact that every corrupt government on the planet (all of them) has them. And no, it doesn’t make me feel better it’s really his handlers and butt-wipers that have those.

I would most certainly trust my neighbour and friend, who is a factory worker, more with all that stuff than I do my current nominal leader and confirmed occult-practitioner since her early twenties, Giorgia Meloni.

So, you are not equal, to anyone else, no one is, and you have varying degrees of hierarchies that you belong in and that compete against each other. Just a few examples should suffice:

Socially acceptable vs. Honest.

Good father and husband or good mother and wife vs. Politically correct social “norms”.

Objectively protective of your family in an extreme situation vs. Not in jail.

This last one may need some explanation, but in most of Europe, if an armed intruder shoots at you and your family in your own home and you somehow manage to shoot him back and kill him, you will have plenty of legal problems. Can anyone explain why this should be in a way that makes sense from a point of view of justice? No. No one can. It makes perfect sense, however, when you understand that the point of it is to neuter the natural instinct of any man worthy of the name. The last thing any government wants is a bunch of able bodied men that have an acute interest in actual justice (see all the text you will ever need to be proficient in this in only 8 pages, here) who are also willing to ensure justice becomes the norm in the land, instead of the exception. How long would any government last if thousands of able bodied men who truly understood and wanted justice as the primary law of their land, suddenly decided to act on that wish? Elections would suddenly become initially absolutely done away with, while the tyrants are removed and processed for their various crimes in accordance with actual justice, and later, would become fair, since men would man and ensure those ballots were physically secure. And when violence was done to them for ensuring that fairness, violence would be returned to the thugs that tried to impose it. And so on. Imagine what the thousands of fathers that had children abused by the rape gangs in the UK could have achieved if they had banded together and demanded, not asked for, demanded, justice. The entire police force of those areas would have been turfed out on their ass and the related politicians too, if not jailed for criminal negligence. Again, to be clear, I am just making observations of fact.

Thirdly: The most violent almost always win.

Even during justified (as opposed to CIA manufactured) regime change or revolution, the people that end up taking over, are usually the most brutal and able to do violence on others. It is almost an extinct species of man who is able to do massive, justified violence, yet steady his hand and his passions and emotions and refrain from it when it is not called for. The last men able to do that were the Crusading knights of old, the Spartans, some Roman legionnaires, the Samurai. And even then, it was not an attribute shared by all those of those classes, but rather a virtuous, and rightly admired for it, part of them.

The art of learning to master your emotions as a man, and learn the science of justice, as well as the ability to do violence when required, used to represent the natural formation of the male human. Obviously not all men are constitutionally prone to this, but many, most, are. But you have been fooled into thinking that none are, and, more importantly, that none should be.

So who ends up being a policeman or a soldier? The men least likely to be able to have those virtues. Instead, those jobs are now filled by the thuggish types who are too stupid to become viable criminals without government sponsorship. Are ALL cops and ALL soldiers thuggish scum? Of course not. Are a majority of them practically useless, ill-suited for the job of enforcing justice, instead of pedophile ruler imposed “laws”? Yes. Absolutely. And do some of then even look like someone’s lesbian grandmother? Undoubtedly. Though apparently it’s illegal to point this out in the specific.

The point remains however. The thuggish idiots, more willing and able to do violence than the normal man today, get to impose absurd and obviously unjust “laws” on the better behaved and less violent members of society. It always has been this way and always will be. The only thing that ever changes that, is groups of organised men willing to do violence that have somewhat better sense of justice than the current despots. Such has been the way of humanity since the dawn of time. And periodically that process results in large scale bloodlettings of one kind or another.

In Conclusion:

Given that the above three points are undeniable facts, borne out by all of human history as well as the current state of things all around you on a daily basis, what do you think is best?

• Training men to be able to work and organise themselves cooperatively and objectively. Train men to be capable of doing violence in a just manner when required by the ideal needs of justice, whilst learning to control their emotions so as to act with objectivity, logic, and fairness to that very concept of justice. Train men to reject falsity, dishonesty, unbelief in objective reality and relative morality.

Or

• Train men to never aggregate with other men on any serious matters. Keep all other men as mere acquaintances but never face challenges that may create bonds of friendship that would extend to even dangerous or unpopular situations in defence of ideals of justice and fairness. Train them that violence is always wrong, never the answer, and to simply submit to whatever dictates of the ruling government and their hired thugs is the order of the day regardless of how unjust. Train everyone, that truth is relative, that objective reality is false and that a biological male can ever become a woman, or vice-versa.

It depends, of course, on which team you are on.

The current Satanic pedophiles running everything from the media to government offices, or, Joe Normal who’s slowly and gradually —and more recently quite suddenly— being trained to be corralled into 15 minute cities with regular gene-altering injections, digital currency that allows you to purchase only what your betters decide is good for you, eating insect paste, wearing only three sets of clothes a year, own nothing, live in a pod and do as you’re told, all while being scrubbed of your history, your nationality, your heritage, your rights and your freedom.

If you have not done so yourself, learn some form of martial art or system. Make sure your sons do. Move to a place or country where you can be as free as possible to live freely and build a community of like minded people.

Some things cannot be predicted with precision, but can be known to occur at some point as a certainty.

A gigantic economic crash is absolutely inevitable. It may happen tomorrow or it may take up to a decade (I’d be very impressed and surprised if it takes that long, but then, I misjudged the 2008 crash by assuming it was at most 5 years away in about 1996). And when that happens, those men who have not been subjected to the brainwashing that the Europeans have been subjected to, will revert to violence.

In fact it’s already happening. Literal hordes of looters in broad daylight, be it in various American cities, or in Oxford Street, London, which I used to walk down regularly 15 years ago and though it was a fairly clean, orderly and pretty area of a large city, as far as that goes anyway.

So yes, it is already taking place. You can get assaulted by 15 underage thugs with knives and get killed by them, but should you lash out and in your own or your family’s defence hit three or four of them hard enough to crack their skulls, you’ll do time in jail. The fact they were trying to stab you or your loved ones to death, will be summarily ignored.

And now, we await the predictable criticisms from the mouth-breathing morons about how I am “advocating violence” or “armed revolution” or whatever other nonsense.

So, to be clear: I am simply advocating for you, as a man, to learn and be able to have the skills to act in self defence, of yourself or others, and/or under the Catholic principle of Just War. Both of these aspects are actual dogmatic duties of any Catholic, especially men. And of course, Catholic means Sedevacantist. Anything else is just Churchianity.