Messages about the blog

Perhaps because I don’t take prisoners at the comments section, or maybe because people prefer to thank me more directly or specifically while remaining more anonymous, I often get emails instead of comments.

It would appear the blog is proving useful to more people than I expected, and they are learning to use the search me function on the blog, as I see much older articles being brought up. Honestly that does make me feel good, not in the usual egomaniacal way of “oh I am so smart”, but because it genuinely gladdens my heart when someone’s life gets improved somehow, and honestly, I don’t cate at all about taking the credit for it, and my usual response to the thank yous is that they did the work and any glory belongs to them and God. At best,I was just an incidental tool.

The more important point is that I noticed that the ratio of email to comments is roughly the same or a bit more on the emails, but the ratio of spam email is practically zero, and given the readership of the blog, which is relatively small, perhaps if it had wider exposure it would help more people.

I don’t do any SEO or any of that stuff, so any increase in traffic is purely organic by people forwarding a link or word of mouth etc. in short, I know my readership is of real people because I do not bother at all with all the usual “marketing” stuff beyond altering people I have a new post up on Gab and SG when I recall. And on telegram. But I think I may even phase that out like I did for the last two days.

My intent is to have my readers come here daily because they choose to and enjoy it and/or find it useful, entertaining or stimulating. So, it’s up to you guys and girls, and I hope you share the blog with your friends if you find it worthwhile.

From my early teenage years on, I have always thought the phrase “The ends don’t justify the means” as pretty idiotic.

It’s right up there with the absurd and fantastical concept of “free speech”. Speech has never been, and will never be free. Nor should it be. But that’s another post I’ll get into later.

The ends not justifying the means, in an everyday context of work, general life and especially war-related issues or justice related issues was, in my opinion, coined to curb the baser instincts of mediocre men of questionable character. You know the types: soldiers, cops, lawyers, judges, and probably most of all, bankers, traders and finance industry types.

If you’re an average intelligence cop (remember, they are not allowed to have an IQ of 120+ by imposed rules of hiring!) who “thinks” that mr.X is guilty and you plant evidence to make the case, chances are that a bunch of mr. Xs that end up in jail are actually innocent.

In short, it is an admonition to follow proper procedure (whatever the context) even when it is uncomfortable, non-ideal, and may produce less than optimal results. As a general rule, of course, this is good advice. Especially seen from my selfish perspective. When the average person around you has more than a 50 point IQ gap from you, and the smart ones more than 30 points (the limit of communication IQ gap), the last thing you want is the monkey and apes taking what they consider to be “smart” shortcuts.

And frankly, in that context, it applies to me too.

One of the reasons I have been successful in my work is that, unlike most people in the construction industry, I always stuck to the rules. In fact, because I did, I was able to often outperform my counterparts. Their “shortcut” filled work generally allowed me to take advantage of their gaps and make more of a margin for the people that employed me.

That all said, as an absolute and literal statement, which is how my aspie-brain processes such popular phrases (because language can be, and should be, precise) it is complete nonsense.

The equation is very simple.

On the result side you have the total value of the result: moral considerations, ethical ones, legal ones, financial, material, spiritual, physical and whatever other measure of value you can think of.

On the cost side you have the total of exactly the same items you have on the results side.

If the cost (means) of doing a thing outweigh the benefits of the results (ends) then, clearly it is worth doing. And if not, not.

This is elementary, however, note that your cost/benefit analysis is particular to you and you alone. Certain actions that would be perfectly acceptable to you, on the cost/benefit analysis might be absolutely abhorrent to me, and vice-versa.

So once again, we see that the original phrase only makes sense in a general and social context, not on a personal one at all.

Since as a functioning civilisation we agree on certain procedures and rules, we all need to respect them in order to keep that society functioning. In our personal life, however, the equations can yield different results.

And now we enter an even murkier realm.

If in your personal life you do what in neurolinguistic programming is known as sort by self instead of sort by others, you may, or will, take actions that tend toward the narcissistic, which, in broad terms, is NOT a good thing for society at large. Since you put yourself first, and you act in ways that ultimately are more beneficial to you, and you value others less than you do yourself, your actions will tend to be what we may refer to as selfish. And possibly extremely so.

If, on the other hand, you sort by others (that is, place other people, in varying degrees, before yourself) then your actions will tend towards an ordered and well-functioning society.

This is the pattern in normal times and situations. Under duress though, most people, beyond a certain level of stress, will have their survival instinct kick in and begin sorting by self, including to extreme degrees. Afterwards, depending on if they normally sort by self or others, they would either go on normally, believing their actions where necessary and they had no other options, or, they might be wracked by guilt and self-recrimination.

As a general rule, women will tend/pretend to sort by others, but their general tendency, for biological reasons, is to extreme solipsism, and it only takes a relatively tiny amount of stress to induce the survival mechanism to kick in, and hence have the potentially narcissistic behaviour kicking in.

Men, as a general rule have higher stress tolerance, but those who sort by self are tendentially on the narcissist axis from the get-go. In short, men can be assholes pretty much top to bottom as a whole, while women tend to have at least a veneer of civility. But… scratch the surface and most women will turn out to be assholes on a broader spectrum than men.

This is largely a biological issue and as such there is nothing much you can do about it in general terms. The first step to wisdom is to accept things as they are. To then try and better them is the work of saints and madmen.

I say biological because the primary motive of self-preservation is always higher in the female. The reason is simple. While one man can produce many offspring with many women, each woman can only produce one or maximum two or so (rarely, twins, triplets, etc) babies at a time and then remains occupied for several years to ensure that child’s survival. In short, men are far more expendable than women when it comes to propagation and survival of the species. And while our present day technology means these biological imperatives are not necessarily as stark and absolute as they have been, you’re not going to just be able to ignore a couple of million years of genetics because now we have striped toothpaste and underground trains.

All of the above, explains a lot, perhaps even most of the serious disagreements between couples that may be in a high stress environment for a time. We all have tolerance levels of stress beyond which mechanisms of survival kick in.

If you comfortably navigate trench warfare in your day to day life, your tolerance level is going to be considerably higher than someone who had to survive a childhood with abusive parents.

To the extent that one person’s well intentioned actions, can be interpreted by the other person as either insane, dangerous, or manipulative, when in fact they are none of the above. Similarly, and unfortunately in direct contrast, an actually selfish manipulator can gaslight someone with relatively high stress tolerance into thinking the manipulator is somehow being victimised by them.

Being aware of your own stress tolerance, whether you sort by self or others, and where you fit in the general hierarchy of humanity on those traits is a useful beginning, however, until you are able to also know what those parameters are for others is when you can begin to have meaningful successful relationships.

It is by no means an easy skill to master or even become aware of, but most interpersonal relationships, whether intimate, or work, or friendship related, will play out on those axis at a fundamental level. Other aspects, like mutual respect, mannerisms, quirks etc also obviously play their part, but the underground foundation of the entire edifice is based on these concepts of biology, means, ends and sorting by self or others.

I hope this is useful to some of you.

Vox was commenting on the recent merger of things I could not care less about, two golfing organisations, PGA and LIV and predicting that LIV football (calcio) would be next , because LIV is backed by Saudi Oil money.

He ended the post with this:

Whenever money or power become central, the richest and the most ruthless are guaranteed control. Keep that in mind when you set your own priorities.

Which is perfectly true.

There is a however though.

The richest can buy almost all the power.

Almost.

And the powerful can monopolise almost all violence.

Almost.

But there are some men, few, it is true, and a lot fewer these days proportionally speaking, than say at the time of classical Greece or Rome, or feudal Japan, or the Catholic barons and knights of only a few centuries ago, that cannot be bought, and that are very hard to kill even when you have overwhelming firepower.

The classic version is the noble Samurai or the fearless Spartan.

Less classic and generally less liked, is the jihadi martyr willing to make himself into a human firework.

They are not confined to one nationality, ethnicity, race, age or religion.

And while —if and when they act against the most ruthless and wealthy— they are unlikely to survive, the damage they can do is considerable.

And if so much as five such men got together and agreed on a course of action, with their leader being the unquestionable decision maker, there is not a wealthy and powerful tyrant on the planet that doesn’t shiver in fear at the thought of it.

Furthermore, my more than half century on this Earth, has shown me beyond doubt, that you can’t predict very well at all who might turn out to be a secret samurai.

This report by Vox on the current state of Germany makes it clear there are no actual Germans left.

Ethnic Germans, faced with one of their own having to undergo this sort of ineptitude would already be building camps, with gas chambers this time, and making sure the wagon trains to them run on time.

Apparently the threat of death cures homosexuality, at least in the corporate world.

Individuals may still get beheaded or thrown off roofs, I’m not sure.

I have pretty much known that all the alphabet soups style letter agencies, from any government in any country are entities that serve evil from a pretty young age, and now that we have absolute confirmation of their involvement in assassinations, mass shootings, false flags, child trafficking and literally every sin under the sun, enjoy this rather mild reaction towards one of their own that simply tried to tell the truth.

https://youtu.be/BuDLEEloB1A

So, as a general rule, the Sicilian Mafia, though it was exported briefly to some American cities, remained mostly in Italy. Admittedly it later mutated and took over the Italian government in one way or another and that activity managed to corrupt even the old gangster style sense of honour, but in essence, at least, it mostly remained a homegrown criminal entity.

As with many Italian things, the general style may have been copied by inferior practitioners, be they the Russian Mafia, the Romanian Mafia, and so on. But in each case, even these cheap knock-offs of the real thing remained mostly national affairs with some forays into foreign lands.

The Jewish Mafia, on the other hand, goes after whole countries. Case in point, Iceland.

What’s that you say? You want your country to stop mutilating little boys by snipping the end of their dicks for absolutely no valid medical reason whatsoever? Well, that’s a nice country you have there, wouldn’t it be a pity if it just became an international pariah and its economy crashed based on some lies some people might spread?

Which also beings to mind, what do you think the chances are that the American Academy of Pediatrics might have been lobbied by… oh, I don’t know… some special interest groups that might be over-represented in certain areas of American life?

In fact, given the supposedly overwhelmingly “Christian” religion of the United States of America and the Jewish overtones of Freemasonry, and the supposedly “Christian” roots of the American founding fathers but in reality the noted Freemasonry of a good portion of them, which is acknowledged by both freemasons and non-freemasons, one wonders why and how circumcision became so prominent among a supposedly Christian people like the Americans.

As well, one might wonder at the clear thread of financing of the war of independence by French Masons that ultimately left the bankrupted France’s problems at the feet of Louis the XVI and Marie Antoniette, who literally lost their heads over it.

George Washington himself, of course, was a Freemason, and while the average American, understandably, has been raised to believe that Freemasonry is little more than a charitable fraternal organisation, Europeans familiar with a little more history are very clear on the fact that Freemasonry, like Rosicrucianism, Illuminism, theosophy and the various other gnostic “mystics” are simply Satanists. Their names, after all, are legion.

And let’s not forget that Iceland up there was threatened as an entire nation for not wanting to allow the practice of circumcision, which, when performed by Orthodox Jews includes the sucking of the bleeding penis of the baby by the relevant Jewish man that performs the despicable act. An act that can and has resulted in infection, the contraction of herpes and has at times even resulted in eventual death of the baby.

I don’t know about you, but I’ll take a criminal trying to strong-arm me into paying protection money for my shop, by threat of violence, every day over one that tries to force me to accept genital mutilation of male babies by economic destruction. For some reason, I just find the latter more instinctively creepy and objectionable.

The Freemasons refer to all who are not part of their clan as Useless Eaters, which is why their main aim is to kill them off or make them slaves.

And only the ones of some use to them, as playthings or servants would be kept as slaves.

The Freemasons and their masters are certainly making a lot of headway in the last three years, and while all of humanity is considered as useless eaters by them, western man, specifically caucasian males, are the only people that historically have kept them at bay, regardless of the names they had through the ages. The bankers of the world that control all the levers of power have been ejected from nations and brought low many times throughout history, but only temporarily and generally only by Catholic communities, rulers and warriors.

Certainly for at least 80 years they have spared no effort in creating a zeitgeist of feminised, neutered, ineffective males, especially western males; and this has aided them greatly in their endeavours these last few years.

There are, however, still a few strands of male DNA that has not been metrosexualised. They are scattered, not centralised and for the most part are no longer Catholic, nor know anything true about Catholicism.

The non-crusading masses of normies, as in all times throughout history, are essentially NPCs and will only follow the flow that is created by those who count and as such lead them.

That tipping point momentum of normie numbers suddenly joining anything has to do with the perception of possibility to achieve victory.

This is a pivotally important point to understand.

It is not the objective reality or reasonable assumptions based on logic that convince a normie to get his ass off the couch and take action against the tyrants.

If that were the case, no-one would have injected the genetic serum/murder juice or gone along with lockdowns or anything else.

The enstupidation, softening of, and general mollyfication of men, logic, justice and the truth of the Catholic Faith over the last 80 years saw to it that there is not going to be anything close to the revolutions that have occurred throughout history. Nor would they be successful for the most part, because there is no cohesion left between those who might be so inclined.

Of course, if every father of every child that was sexually abused by the muslim rape gangs in England had marched on their local police stations first, with torches and pitchforks, and the relevant pedophiles at the same time or shortly thereafter, you can bet that the issue of rape gangs would have disappeared within a week. Because 1200 men is an army; and 1200 men willing and able to string pedophiles to the nearest lampposts would result in pedophiles swinging from lampposts.

The military response that could result would fire up every right-thinking man in the rest of the country and the establishment would try to defuse things by having an enquiry, trying to slowly prosecute the leaders one by one and so on. If the 1200 fathers of those children however were willing to die in defence of justice and punishing pedophiles and their enablers, there is hardly a policeman, judge, or politician that would condemn those 1200 fathers, much less try to take action against them.

Because they know if they did their police station, home, office or government building would be next to go up in flames.

Whether you like it or not, condone it or not, think it’s morally acceptable or not, is irrelevant, violence is what, in the end it boils down to. And the mass-murdering pedos in charge have the upper hand in that, if not the monopoly, for sure.

So, 2nd generation warfare, that is steel on steel force, is a losing proposition. And much of the current technology being implemented and already in place now makes most of 4th generation warfare —-that is, guerrilla warfare tactics—- at the very least extremely difficult and impractical if not impossible.

The answer then, currently lies in non-violent opposition, starting with the internal processes and community building. In brief, the process of saving humanity (that part that can be anyway) is as follows:

1. Gain, learn, have, the internal motivation and fortitude to remain proactive and positive in the face of seemingly impossible odds. Ultimately, once it gets really bad this boils down to religion and faith. And once you drill down further, it means Catholicism, and once you drill down even further it means Sedevacantism. I don’t care if you don’t take my word for it. I certainly don’t expect you to. But the truth os the truth.

2. Commit. To a marriage, and creating a community of people with your same mindset and religion.

3. Commit. To owning land and becoming self sufficient.

That’s it. That’s all you need to do for the foreseeable future.

If you can’t build such a community find one and join it.

That is really all you need to do. Do it well and the rest will come as it needs to.

But point n.1 is your mindset. And Black-Pillers, junkies, desperate incels, merchants of doom, or any pent-up group of despairing people who spread their misery are like mould in your food.

They truly ARE useless eaters, for they have, nothing to offer except despair, which corrodes mindset and serves only to extend the perception of inevitable defeat, which is in reality, absurd. The evil ones are a minority and if the silent normies suddenly had a 30 IQ point jump upwards, the evil ones would disappear in about a week.

If all you can do is point out the bad without offering a solution or at least give advice on avoiding said bad, then, what purpose do you serve?

Ignore, ridicule, or cut put from your life, all those who act this way. Nihilism was never cool. Never, and it’s certainly not cool now either.

I have read pretty much everything I could find on Tesla since my twenties. I even had a book of all his patents until thanks to my family’s utter contempt for my stuff it got lost/destroyed in a flood/disappeared by aliens.

The thing which most astonishes about Tesla is that he clearly had understood so much more about how electromagnetism and resonance work than anyone has to date.

He invented things before those to whom they have been attributed and he is the only man to have refused the Nobel prize.

The plagiarist, thief, elephant murderer and liar Thomas Edison is credited with inventing the light-bulb, but Tesla had invented a different version of it before him. Marconi is credited with inventing wireless radio transmission but it was Tesla who got there first and in fact, Marconi used some of Tesla’s coils to get there.

Above all, Tesla invented the alternating current motor, without which we’d still be mostly in darkness and the modern era would not properly exist.

But Tesla’s genius, though now being somewhat recognised, was almost unheard of 30 years ago. And this because he was scrupulously honest and never took a ticket. He changed the world yet died in poverty, alone in a hotel room in his eighties.

But the thing that fascinates me the most is that it is obvious that his way of seeing and thinking about electricity, magnetism, resonance, radio and so on was completely different to what is taught in electrical engineering courses today.

And his name still hets used by ticket takers, deceivers and plagiarists, like Elon Musk more recently.

I truly hope Nikola Tesla is sitting in Heaven, looking down on is miserable and ignorant humans.

Aside from Jesus, he is probably the man I would most like to have time to listen to and ask questions of.

God bless you Mr. Tesla. And may your genius bring us the peace, light, and freedom you had hoped for humanity.