Social Commentary « The Kurgan Blog

Giuseppe Filotto Logo

Special Operations & Exploration

Archive for the ‘Social Commentary’ Category

Sam Melia update and Voting

There are a lot of synchronicities happening lately, more than I can keep up with. Here is just one.

In Italy, it has become “fashionable” by various supposed counter-culture, counter-narrative types to black-pill people into not bothering to vote.

Most prominently this is done by people that “in general” I think are, probably, genuine anti-vaxxers and anti-satanist, so with overall probable good intentions. A prime example in Italy is a guy called Leonardo Santi who has some 45k followers on Telegram. He puts out excellent info on how to avoid the poisons they want to inject in your children “by law”, and he also created a platform during the scamdemic to get people to link up and help each other called neoprometheus. I am not a fan of the name, but that’s an irrelevant quibble on my part.

Despite this Leonardo invariably ridicules and discourages people from voting, which after considerable thought on it I disagree with.

It took me a while to consider my position because, on one hand, I myself have voted only once in my life, two years ago, in Italy for a guy who wanted to Italexit. He didn’t even get the minimum 3% to get a vote.

I essentially made up my mind long ago that all politics is lies and liars and the best strategy is to ignore them and do my own thing as much as possible. However, things have changed. Primarily, these parasites are simply not going to let you mind your own business, and while I have no illusion that a genera vote will ever be:

A) actually permitted to happen and be honestly done, nor,

B) ever really change anything

Voting still matters, for a number of reasons which as I said took me a while to consider and I will list below.

Another reason it took me a while to come to a public conclusion is because on reading Leonardo and others like him, like Weltanschauung Italia, it became quite clear to me that while perhaps I might get on with him in person (I don’t know and I doubt it really) it also became clear that in my opinion Leonardo is a pompous asshole.

That in itself is not, and should not, be a disqualifying characteristic. I am absolutely certain I come across as a pompous asshole too to many people. Maybe even most. And I don’t care. Those too stupid to see or too far removed to perceive what is important instead of what their preferences may be are not people whose opinions matter. In short, I wanted to be sure my criticism was purely objective and not coloured by my opinion of the man based on my subjective perceptions.

That long introduction is not self-obsession, by the way, it’s a prompt for you to try to take a similar approach to others you may find distasteful. I find Hitler to be distasteful, but if you listen to his speeches with proper translation, he is not exactly saying too many outright lies, and he is certainly inspirational to a people that had been absolutely downtrodden as a culture and nation. It’s not that I think I would have been a Nazi or a Fascist (my family has a long history of saying “fuck you” to pretty much everyone and anyone that would impose arbitrary or “social” rules on us), but I can see how the masses would have definitely been swayed by him.

So, now, why do I think voting matters?

Several reasons:

First of all it matters in local spheres. Get your people in the PTA. In the school library and in the teachers. In the mayor’s office and the local council. Rebuilt the grass roots with proper zealots. That is what the Satanists did and it works. Get them in the military officers. Get them in the local Church or like us Sedevacantist, hold on to the original and rebuild it again.
The big political guys will absolutely not be voted out, but in a generation or two they absolutely can be removed from power relatively bloodlessly. It’s too late for that as we see, since they are willing to kill 37 candidates to put their puppet in place, but the more “little” political things you take over the easier and less violent the transition will be.
Popular action DOES work. It DOES produce results. Not always, not fast, not ideally, but it often does and sometimes it really makes a huge difference. Case in point: Sam Melia

Remember him?

Well, after that was posted on X and other places, this happened:

🤍 Thank you all so much 🤍

I’ve just received a call from Sam Melia in HMP Hull. His Probation Officer has just informed him that they’ve been “inundated” with letters and emails complaining about Sam not being able to have any contact with his children. As a result, they‘ve decided to remove all but one of the restrictions. This means that Sam can now:

– Receive photographs of his children

– Receive letters from his children

– Talk to his children on the phone

– Talk about his children

He is still unable to receive visits from his children, however HMP Hull have advised they only haven’t removed this because they legally aren’t allowed to as an assessment has already started to take place. This means the assessment is already moving forward so hopefully the final restriction will be lifted very soon too, all being well.

This goes to show that:

A) Public pressure does work

B) They didn’t actually have to put all those restrictions on Sam in the first place, they just chose to

Thank you so much to everybody who complained to the prison. Honestly, from the bottom of our hearts. It means so much to me and Sam. I’ll let you all know what happens with the visit restriction as soon as I know more.

This goes to show that:

A) Public pressure does work
B) They didn’t actually have to put all those restrictions on Sam in the first place, they just chose to

Thank you so much to everybody who complained to the prison. Honestly, from the bottom of our hearts. It means so much to me and Sam. I’ll let you all know what happens with the visit restriction as soon as I know more.

And that’s just a writing campaign. We know it works at least from back in 2014 or so and GamerGate where the gamers simply emailed and wrote to the advertisers of the various fraudulent, fake, and converged publications that tried to make out all gamers as some kind of evil people, and got several of those publications defunded and broke them into liquidation.

As frustrating, time-consuming, and often apparently futile as it is, activism does work. Aside the practical effects, it also inspires others.

The enemy has been masterful at ensuring people that think like us are atomised and separated. They essentially weaponised our natural K selection biology against us by ensuring we are even more insular and mistrustful of each other as well as everyone else. That’s not going to change, but we can be as insular as we like, because we will never be rabbit-like, but we can still individually make the same choice. The sensation is different. Instead of:

“Yay, in the comfort of the crowd I too am brave and throw a brick” which is the way of rhe rabbit, we are more:

“Even of it be 10,000 enemy, I go to fight them.” (That’s a quote from Gichin Funakoshi, the father of Karate-Do.)

Of course if you are the only one that shows up it can go badly for you (See Sam Melia). At first. But once there are 10 Sam Melias in a row the ride changes. And then Sam may well become the mayor of his town. When 10,000 Sam Melias all come to the same conclusion is when nations change leaders borders and ethnic compositions.

That is all it takes.

So yeah. As a life-long non-voter, I have changed my mind because the conditions have changed. And only an idiot does not change his mind when the facts before him show his thought to be wrong.

I will let Leonardo know about this post. We’ll see if he responds or not.

By G | 7 June 2024 | Posted in Social Commentary

The Entire Problem and the Ultimate Solution

UPDATE: This was posted yesterday and as I was surprised at the low engagement I came to look at it and the post had been deleted. Luckily we are prepared for such things and it is now restored, but it is interesting to note that it definitely was published yesterday as several people I contacted had in fact read it. What do you know, I must be over the target again. And if I get cancelled here, not to worry, we have prepared for such events if they happen.

Vox’s most recent post has helped me coagulate the necessary elements of communication that I have been obviously missing —those troublesome 30 IQ point bridges of communication— in order to transmit to the average person concepts that should be absolutely obvious to everyone, at least as far as I am concerned, but that are apparently completely opaque to the average person.

This has been so much so an issue that throughout my life I am continuously… not exactly surprised, but something similar to it, perhaps the right word is repeatedly disappointed in the average human response to various events and specifically to events of a wide-ranging, global nature.

I have lived long enough that it is not a surprise, and I concluded long ago that the average person is a moron that has quite literally not a single original thought in his entire lifetime, being driven by the nonsense he sees on TV or that the media in general presents as a narrative.

This infects everything and creates a reality that is many orders of magnitude uglier, stupider, more boring, irrelevant and inconsequential in every respect than it needs to be.

And I mean everything. I am not taking about merely technological advancements that would mean we could already be travelling amongst the stars, not just between the moons and planets of out solar system (and no, I do mot mean in theory, I mean in practice, the technology not only existed but was even already developed decades ago, and that’s before we even bring antigravity technology into it — see The Face on Mars for further details). No, I am literally referring to everything in your life, from the type of interaction you have instead of what it could be, with your child, your wife or even your pet or a walk in nature, to the experience of beauty, love and intimacy you could have for everyone and everything around you, as well as the practical, real world, effective applications of reality based technologies and methodologies that could quite realistically cure almost every ailment we know of and bring humanity to live on other planets.

I know, it sounds like utopia and a pipe-dream. I KNOW how it sounds, but what have you got to lose except a few minutes reading this, and what if I am right? Strange as it seems, what if I can show you just how twisted and insane and stupid what you think is the limit of how things are is?

And what if you spread this around and other people get it too? Because I tell you right now that from all I know about resonance and its effects, it takes approximately only 1/1000 of a population, whether of living beings or of things like photons, to resonate at the same frequency, after which a tipping point is reached and the rest of the population (of living beings or photons) all “convert” to the same frequency and you get an effect that is so unexpected, so miraculous that it completely shatters the previous paradigm.

Simple light becomes a laser that cuts through steel. A population of frogs all suddenly learn a skill none of them previously even had. A small vibration becomes an earthquake. And I am not even convinced we need 1/1000 of the entire world’s population, which given we are about 8 billion now would mean 8,000,000 people. And Eight million people is not that many. There are plenty of YouTubers with many more followers than that. So this article could easily spread through the aether and change the world. The ideas I will present here are certainly not beyond anyone’s grasp in and of themselves. The difficulty is not in understanding or even testing and realising the truth of any one of its components or even a few of them. The greatest difficulty is in understanding (and verifying if necessary so it is real knowledge, not merely a theory held for a few minutes only to be discarded because it makes us feel uncomfortable) each part of the whole theory, each component, and then holding them, or putting them, all together into one coherent whole and seeing how each part affects the others and causes the inevitable, inescapable, resonating effect that no force can stop. No human force or even demonic force if you believe in such things.

Because unexpected as it may be, while each component part does not in itself necessarily present as part of a greater and more wholesome whole —in fact, some parts may even appear or even be, brutal, separate and “ugly” in and of themselves— when joined and infused with the other parts they too change and morph into something altogether wholesome and truly a harmonious whole.

So, allow me then to present first each component part of this larger idea. Each subset is simple, easy for anyone to understand and verify for themselves, you will not have any trouble here. The second half of each of these steps is to show you how that very simple and obvious truth was perverted and changed to the point that you yourself, while agreeing with the obvious point later come to think of it more in terms of “yes, but…(insert insurmountable objection here)” instead of “yes, that’s true and obvious and not a problem or difficult to put in practice.”

The third step is the big one, and that is to show you that if you can keep the simple and obvious true concepts in mind all together and link them, you come up with a system of behaviour for yourself and humanity at large too, that produces the “miraculous” conditions I mentioned above. The beauty of this is that even if you are the only one to do it, your own life will immeasurably improve in every way. It will not be the “miraculous” fly to the stars version it would be if at least 1/1000 of the planet gets it and acts it too, bit it will still kick the crap out of whatever your life is like now. Big claim? Sure. Real? Absolutely. Demonstrable? Provable? Yes, also absolutely. All you need to do is apply the concepts I will list below and understand how and why they have been perverted, and reject the perverted version and apply the original, true and obvious aspect together with all the other true and obvious and original aspects. Just doing that, I guarantee you, will absolutely change your life for the better.

And to be clear, better does not necessarily mean easier. Easy is a mutable concept and you may want to remember that old meme, that lists a bunch of things that are hard, and their opposite also being hard, and ultimately coming down to you choosing your hard.

For example, learning to read is hard. Being illiterate is hard. Choose your hard.

Being healthy is hard. Being unhealthy is hard. Choose your hard.

So I warn you now that like everything else in life, this too is like that. Reading all of this and putting it into practice is not easy. Continuing not to do it is far worse. So, choose your hard.

Right then, to the concepts first and later to how they have been perverted.

The Simple, Basic, Truths, and their Inversions

SIMPLE TRUTH

PERVERTED INVERSION

1. Physical Force Trumps everything else.

Regardless of if it’s money, gold, status, influence, etcetera, when push comes to shove, physical violence is, always has been, and always will be, the final arbiter of any conflict resolution.

Corollary to 1.

Eventually, anything important enough, will come down to physical violence.

2. Objective reality exists

It doesn’t matter if you believe it or not, if you like it or not, if you understand it or not, or even if you are ABLE to understand it or not. Every single experience of life we have confirms again and again and again that objective reality exists and is absolutely the same for everyone in the Universe. Your delusion that you are living in a dream, can fly, have your own “truth” or anyone else does, is absolute nonsense and has zero impact on reality, other than causing harm to yourself and anyone else stupid enough to believe such lies. You can easily disprove this by trying to flap your arms to fly off the fifth floor of any convenient building, thus removing your own delusion, as well as the negative effects of it for anyone else inclined to listen to your nonsense.

3. Equality has never existed and never will. this is an objective aspect of reality.

Men and women are intrinsically different. Each man is different form every other man and groups of people of a certain ethnicity, culture or religion differ from each other in massive ways. While philosophically no one person has more of a “right” to life or is even necessarily “superior” in every respect (because the superiority depends on what you are measuring) only a mentally deranged person is unwilling to admit these differences, and similarly, only a coward is unwilling to admit that they affect much of life. People of differing origins, cultures and religions, should, as a general rule, stick to their own kind for the most peaceful and best results. Diversity and proximity inevitably results in conflict and conflict eventually leads to violence (see rule 1 above). The only sensible approach in life is to be aware of the differences, accept them, evaluate them on their own merits and act appropriately in the context within which this all takes place. Broadly speaking, each person should generally stay in their own nation, marry and reproduce with his or her own kind and people, and respect any different cultures or nations when visiting them. Genetic assimilation is not really possible in periods that relate to individual human lifetimes, and generally are not a good idea. While regulating these things with laws is seen as cruel and inhumane, there isa path to it that is acceptable. Reducing permanent immigration by foreigners to a small percentage in each case, using work-permits or temporary work visas, being tough on illegal immigration and so on is all perfectly humane and sensible without affecting any but a small percentage of people. The exception should never govern the rule.

4. Everything you do and say has consequences. Always did, and always will.

“Free Speech” is a completely Freemasonic idea that was perpetrated and could only be believed by possibly the most gullible population on Earth: Americans. It has never existed in the entirety of human history and never will even millennia from now. It is an idea so stupid that I was aware of this even as a young teenager, immediately upon the first time I came across the ridiculous concept.

5. Almost all political systems devolve into a struggle for the levers of power by those implementing the systems. Secular system absent a divine doctrine do so faster by orders of magnitude.

The only partial bulwark agains this has historically been been adherence to religious principles that unfortunately do need to be enforced and invariably the enforcers tend to become corrupt over time and correction becomes required. A system that recognises this and has produced the best results and been tested over many centuries, and has so far produced the best results for humanity has ever seen has been Catholic Christianity. At least until it was infiltrated (which took centuries) and perverted and twisted to produce the fake Novus Orco inversion of it. The only remnant of it being the fast-growing Sedevacantist (or unchanged and original version of) Catholicism. A corollary to this may have been the methodology invented and adopted by the Venetians to elect a Doge. No other system on Earth was as concerned with Justice as Catholicism. While other relatively stable systems did exist (Shintoism under Feudal Japan, Taoism under Imperial China, Traditional beliefs under the iron-fisted empire of Genghis Khan, the Rule of Imperial Rome prior to Christianity, Spartan culture, and others) none of them lasted anywhere near as long as Catholicism, which, though much reduced, still exists, against all odds, and has risen again and again throughout history, despite events that should have snuffed it out (the Arian heresy, the Roman Empire’s persecution of it, the infiltration of it by Satanists (Freemasons), the destruction of the protecting arm of the Church (the Royal houses of Europe)). Furthermore, it continues to exist and once again is growing. It is also single-handedly responsible for the largest increase in Justice, Beauty and the behaving with Virtues (Courage, Temperance, Justice, Fortitude, Loyalty, Honour, and so on) than any other religion, ideology or philosophy in the entire known history of Humanity.

The Catholics are the only people to originally ban Usury and recognise the Christ-Killers (Jews) as needing special prayers for their salvation, since they had chosen to be generationally guilty for the crucifixion of Christ.

6. Jews do NOT have the same belief system or veneration of the same virtues we have.

They simply believe they are the Chosen people, the only ones with real souls and everyone else is a beast of burden designed to serve them and no perpetration against them, including murder is a crime in their belief system. Present day Judaism is Talmudic and the laws of the Talmud are absolutely clear that anyone not a Jews is at best a beast of burden for the Jew to exploit.

Their ejection from some 110 countries or more is the direct result of their behaviours towards the host nations, and not a coincidence based on irrational hatred of Jews for no reason.

The Talmud specifically states any crime including murder of non-Jews is not a crime and that having sex with children under the age of three is also not a crime, along with many other behaviours that are intolerable to normal people being perfectly acceptable when perpetrated on non-Jews.

The BIS (Bank for international Settlement) is a giant superbank that yes, does control the finances of the entire planet and is run by the Jewish Rothschild family among others, though under a hidden veil of secrecy for the most part.

1. Violence is wrong, evil and never the answer.

From “toxic masculinity” to “words can never hurt you” to jailing people for self-defence or even defence of others, we have all, globally, been trained to believe violence is ALWAYS wrong. This is, of course, and absolute lie.

Corollary inversion to 1.

Certain classes of people/crimes should NEVER be responded to with violence. Women, homosexuals, the criminally insane, or whatever. This is, of course, just a furthering of the lie. If a black, handicapped lesbian is about to stab my child, you can bet your ass I would happily turn her head into a pink cloud and sleep like a baby, consequences be damned even in current clown world. In a sane world, of course, such an event would just be followed by the crowd giving a gentle golf clap of approval.

2. Everyone has their own “truth”

A man can be a woman, women can be men, men can get pregnant, everyone is equal but black/brown/off-white people are oppressed, homosexuality is perfectly normal, natural and to be celebrated, “adopting” babies from surrogate mothers to fulfil homosexual fantasies of having a “family” is not child trafficking and a perversion of the very essence of human nature. Pedophiles are just normal people and we should all accommodate them because age is just a number, sex with children is fine as long as the child “consents”. The objective statistics on child sexual abuse by homosexuals, higher incidence of suicide by sexually mutilated people undergoing a “sex change” and the incidence of violence in lesbian “marriages” are all just coincidences or part of a vast right-wing conspiracy, as Hillary Clinton would put it. I could add about 17,000 other insane nonsense to this list. You get the idea.

3. There is only one race, the Human race.

And everyone is equal. Except if they are white, then they are more racist, evil, oppressive and undeserving than anyone else. Racism can only be done by whites. George Floyd was a saint murdered by a racist policeman and no factual proof that he died of a heart seizure induced from a fentanyl overdose and that he was a violent criminal that threatened and injured a pregnant woman, among other felonies should ever be brought up. Systemic oppression, internalised misogyny, and internalised racism are real things and don’t you dare say otherwise. The fact that an Australian Aborigine and a Swedish woman look about as different as any other subspecies of creature might, and also have measurably different cognitive capacities and drastically different approaches to everything from problem-solving to adequate medical care or food consumption is not to be noticed. The jews are also absolutely never, ever, ever, the bad guys. they are victims and always will be, even when they genocide other peoples. Also, stop noticing it.

4. Free Speech is the best and truest way for a “democracy” to work.

This lie was invented simply so the Freemasons could ignore blasphemy laws to begin with and gradually every other moral, ethical and decent concept of behaviour.

5. God is dead and Science and Secularist Atheism is the only sensible way forward. Please ignore the 100 million dead bodies this ideology in its various forms has produced in just the last 100 years or so. Above all, Catholicism is the worst of all, and filled with dirty pedophiles (ignore the fact that they are known as poor victims called Minor-Attracted-Persons when not part of “Catholicism”. Further ignore that such people were burnt at the stake in higher numbers than any other class of perpetrator during the Spanish and Portuguese inquisitions and were never tolerated by the Catholic Church prior to the Vatican II inversion and the first of the current fake Popes from 1958 to today). Every other religious belief is also not ideal, but they are ALL, without exception, better than Catholicism. Catholicism is the absolute worst. It is also the only religion that is specifically “antisemitic”. Well, originally anyway, the Novus Ordo has finally realised the Jews are like our older brothers and we should respect and revere them.

6. Jews are persecuted innocents that can’t help being so successful in so many spheres of life because they are just smarter and more hard-working than everyone else.

Their success has nothing to do with nepotism, bribery, blackmail, underhand financial behaviours, usury, murder, or any other immoral tactic. It is also illegal and antisemitic, to notice that they have a higher incidence of child sexual abuse than anyone else, that their Talmud specifically states crimes against non Jews are fine, or that sex with children is acceptable. In fact, criticising the Jews in general or suggesting 6 million of them did not die in the Holocaust (even though they admit as much even in the Holocaust museum in Israel) is a crime and punishable by imprisonment and fines in many areas around the world and it should be a crime to criticise Jews anywhere by anyone in the world as per NOAHIDE Laws. The idea Jews control most of the world finances, mass media and entertainment is just a lie, And when it is demonstrated it is not a lie it is just because jews are so intelligent and successful.

That will do for now. Just six little (big) truths and if you can process them all at once in your head, then some other very basic, also simple, truth naturally will coalesce out of knowing the six above facts. In brief these are:

1. The need for a holistic, virtue-based (real virtues, not fake ones promoted today like the aptly named D.I.E. Ideology (Diversity, Inclusivity, Equality) system of belief that is as much as possible resistant to corruption, infiltration and subversion is required. It must necessarily be:

Based in reality
Exclusive of those with bad intent
Inclusive of those with good intend but remaining separatist in terms of culture, ethnicity and cultural preferences
Promoting of meritocracy based in virtue and achievement
Helpful to those weaker or less able but not to detriment of those stronger and more capable

2. The need to act as required in defence of the natural order of things, that have formed part of the most successful system of beliefs that has brought the most good to the largest number of people in the history of Humanity, that being, being the nuclear family, traditional marriage, traditional male and female roles and a reliance on honour, beauty, truth, honesty, charity, mercy and justice. But never at the detriment of truth, and above all justice.

3. The need to reject as a whole the current system/s of control, which ultimately means the need to separate yourself from the need of FIAT money, at least until when such a new system has been implemented that does not permit usury and does not rely on the current systems of banking in place as control mechanisms. In the short term this means to achieve the self-sufficient production of food, clean water and energy for your immediate family and then your expanding community guided by the above points.

4. The need to have the capacity to protect yourself, your family, and your way of life, by all available means and avoiding violence when and if possible, but including it when this is no longer possible to avoid, under the principle of self-defence and Just war.

If you do realise these four principles, then you may find that the initial point is in fact, the cohesive belief system. Because without it, nothing lasts in time. And that System, as far as the human experience goes, has been Catholicism. It really doesn’t matter if you like or believe this, because remember, objective reality is a thing, and if you bother to study human history at all, the benefits of Catholicism overall, compared to any other system are simply undeniable by anyone even remotely honest. If that is the case, and if you are honest, then at the very least it deserves further investigation; and if you feel so inclined to save yourself some time you may wish to read Believe! (short quick read of a couple of hours) or Reclaiming the Catholic Church (more than five times as big as Believe! and packed with references you can verify for yourself.) But in any case, you need not buy my books specifically. Just educate yourself and see why Catholicism worked and still does. Then get up and begin forming your own community of Sedevacantists or join one of the ones already in place and forming, like the one I am building.

Once this veil of lies has been ripped from you, you can begin to see, even if you are not yet a catholic, so much of what you believe is an absolute lie. From the way you relate to your spouse or children or co-workers, to the way we live, work, and think about money, time, life in general, education and human worth and value as well as fundamental concepts like sex, marriage, love, intimacy, and so on. If the interpersonal relationships interest you, then you can also read Caveman Theory, which unlike the other books is NOT available in paper format on Amazon due to its content being politically “unacceptable” as is all truth today and throughout most of human history.

In any case, realise that you are in no way as powerless and without options as you feel. And that the people ruling over you have almost no power once you see them and their lies for what they are and begin, without fanfare, without rage, without much of anything except steely-eyed determination, to remove yourself from their systems of influence. Use, leverage, and make us of their systems as you can and must in order to remove yourself gradually and permanently from them. Consider these simple but very true facts:

Taxes are not needed to have all the services we currently have
Fiat money is NOT the only way to have mediums of exchange
Leaving your family to go and work in order to provide for them is not how things were done for most of human history
Tangible assets like land and gold do not lose their value regardless of economic fluctuations artificial or real as they may be
Force trumps everything in the final analysis, so be able to deliver it if necessary
Respect from your spouse and children is not optional and never was throughout human history
Charity and cherishing your wife is also not optional towards her
Your physical ability matters, but your virtues are measured in your actions and inactions aside from your specific talents or lack thereof and remember that God often prefers to use broken tools to make His point
Putting your children in a box where they have to sit for 5 or 6 hours to learn mostly by rote a bunch of things that are aside from learning to read, write and do various forms of mathematics, as well as learn real (not falsified) history is not education but indoctrination
A violent reaction to an injustice, in proportion to the injustice, is perfectly natural and normal, regardless of what local laws may say about it. Obviously, acting intelligently in this regard is also not optional. Proportionality is also not optional. Killing someone because they bumped into you or damaged your car, is not acceptable. Killing someone raping your child or attempting to murder you is.

Think through these concepts and see if you still recognise the world we currently live in as even remotely sane.

By G | 4 June 2024 | Posted in Believe, Billionaire Pedophiles, Brain-Mind Functionality, Caveman Theory, Caveman Theory, Christianity, Clown World, Fighting SJWs, Increasing Happiness, Reclaiming the Catholic Church, Social Commentary, Systema, The Crusades - Iron Men and Saints Vol. 1, The Enemy Within, The Jews

Go-Bag Request

Discussing the intensifying of WWIII lately, friend who has a mostly nomadic lifestyle asked if I would do a go-bag post.

He is single, male, has no children and can work from essentially anywhere and is under 30 and enjoying being able to more or less go where he wants when he wants.

His situation may also apply to most young single men that have no real deep attachments or much of a family or extended family, which in today’s world unfortunately is possibly even a majority of young men. At least the ones who are an only child. But it may also apply to a couple of brothers or maybe a couple or even a small group of single male friends.

Anyway, it is not unusual for single young men to not worry too much about anything until bombs start to drop. Even so, with very little effort, it’s possible to put yourself in a much better position than almost all your peers even if you had to start your journey as an escape from a zombie apocalypse hot zone like say London or New York.

So here it is:

If you live at all in a country where it is legal for you to own a handgun, you should already own and be familiar with using one. If you are not, make that your priority. Your handgun is your primary defence weapon and method of preventing your becoming a victim in extreme situations. Become PROFICIENT in its use. This is not optional. If you are going to own a gun and not be proficient with its use and its use under stressful conditions, statistics make it absolutely crystal clear you are better off not having it, because the likelihood is you will be harmed by your own gun. Either because you do something dumb, or because you let someone else get control of it.
You should have at a minimum the following in a go bag:
- Multi-tool/knife (ideally both)
- Medi-kit with at least some gauze, disinfectant, emergency steri-strip and different sized plasters. Meds for fever symptoms (paracetamol, iboprufen) if available some general purpose antibiotics though you should know what for, water purification tablets, kinetic tape and also stretchy sticky tape/bandage like elastoplat brand (if they still make it). Powder/cream for burns. Toothbrush/paste and emergency tooth filling kit. Fishing line and hooks, needles and thread. Paracord.
- At least a few energy bars and some drinking water.
- Paper style topographical maps of your immediate area and/or any place you would aim to go to for long term survival.
- Compass (unless you know how to navigate by starlight) and/or analogue watch with hand dials (you can use it to navigate).
- Small hand-crank powered flashlight that also can be used to charge communication device like smartphone or small portable computer.
You may want to NOT have any smartphone depending on the situation. If there is more than one of you, an inexpensive set of walkie-talkies can be very useful.
At least one roll of toilet paper or some tissues.
Space blanket
Lighter
Change of underwear and socks
Any specific thing you may need, eg:
- Eyeglasses or contact lenses
- Diabetic or other medication
- Specific drug/medicine you require
If you have space, some relevant clothing for the relevant season
Small towel
Instant Coffee
Metal cup/cooking pot combo
Never ending match/flint/magnesium firestarter.

If you also plan to be in the wilderness then you probably need a tent or lean to, a sleeping bag and small gas stove and a trenching tool.

It will take you a day or two if you are starting today to get a backpack and put these things in it.

It’s a very low level of effort for potential maximum gain in a real fast SHTF situation.

You can also have 2 go bags, a little one as above and a second larger one with more stuff like clothes, camping gear, food, etc in case you get a chance to take both and shove them in the car on your back, whatever.

I hope this very obvious and basic set of information is at least inspirational.

And of course, for the more serious minded, get land somewhere rural, build a community of like minded people etc. etc. all the stuff I have blogged in various ways multiple times on this blog.

By G | 4 June 2024 | Posted in Social Commentary, Zombie Apocalypse

Even Alone…

Vox posted on the current escalations of Clown World against Russia and concluded that:

Yes, it’s true that Russia might well struggle if forced to face the combined might of Clown World alone – which is the USA, the UK, the EU, and Japan – but Russia is not alone! Russia is very far from alone, being more closely allied to Chinathan Japan or any of the European satrapies are to the USA.

He’s half right. Maybe 2/3 right. Certainly China would be on Russia’s side and I expect many of the BRICSA people would be too, especially Africa, but eventually (and mot very relevantly militarily) also India once they saw which way the wind was blowing.

But that aside, even if Russia had to face NATO completely alone, while it would certainly be a fight, it would not be a close one.

I have posted why before, here.

And for those too lazy to read the whole thing I reproduce the key point here:

And keep the following in mind:

Russia on its own has more soldiers than the whole of Europe combined.
Russian soldiers on active duty are now all combat hardened and experienced. No European country is.
Russian command is homogenous and contiguous through its forces, European militaries are not even co-ordinated internally very well and speak over a dozen different languages, have different capabilities and equipment that is not interchangeable and unfamiliar from one country to another.
Each European country would require its own logistics separate from all the others countries. Russia only needs to co-ordinate one overall scheme. And the reserve troops are also more in Russia than the entirety of Europe.
There would be massive resistance in many or even all European countries to a draft or even just activation of the armed forces against Russia, including from active and serving military right now.
Russian missile interception has been shown to be effective to a decent degree.
European or even American missile interception capacity has been demonstrated to be negligible.
Every capital in Europe is within reach of hypersonic nukes and literally nothing can stop them.
One Satan missiles of Russia can nuke and wipe out the entirety of a territory of France. And there is nothing in Europe that can stop them.
Even if America joins Europe full on, then we also have these issues:
- American logistic lines have to cross the Atlantic and have the same issues the European lines have.
- They still have zero protection from hypersonic missiles.
- American capitals and main cities or anything else in the continental USA or even Canada is absolutely within reach of Russian hypersonic nuclear missiles that can be launched from submarines that have been demonstrated to come off the shore of Washington DC and New York without the Americans being able to do anything about it.
- America has no satellite or space weapon based advantages over Russia either.

And this is all just assuming China is not even in the picture.

Russia could literally reduce the while of Europe to ash in about 6 minutes. And have a good chance of protecting itself from any American ICBMs. Or doing so at least a lot more effectively than the USA has of protecting itself from Russian ICBMs. 20 Russian Satan ICBMs would take about 20 minutes to reach the USA and reduce over half of it to ash too.

In short, no one is going to take out Russia even in a nuclear war. Literally no one. It’s not even a remote possibility. So the West, sooner or later, will either have to STFU or be reduced to ash.

The irritating point is that it is not any of the citizens of the West causing all this, but rather the parasites running things, which are neither American, nor Europeans. They are Ashkenazi bankers with an odd smattering of non-Ashkenazi banker in their midst.

Absent these puppet-masters, one wonders if the world would not suddenly descend into a level of cooperative peace unprecedented in human history.

A reductionist might decide a single missile not even a third of the Satan one would suffice to send a really big message to the relevant tribe if it simply disappeared Israel from the fave of the Earth. This of course would be wrong and genocidal and millions of innocents would die, but it would still be several orders of magnitude less innocents dying than allowing the puppet masters to continue on the current path.

I’m also sure there are probably reasons why small surgical strikes against specific puppet masters would have consequences, and logistically a simultaneous beheading of all the hydra heads would be difficult, yet, it could easily resolve a lot of issues and if repeated a couple of times after the initial strike, it would certainly get the perpetrators that survive to get back under the rocks from which they breed and crawl, and stay there.

In any case, it is my considered opinion that the parasite class ruling the West is far more insidious, dangerous, and evil than any of our would-be Russian overlords.

By G | 2 June 2024 | Posted in Social Commentary

The Definition of Respect

Having caught up reading the Sigma Game blog, I found this post to be quite interesting from the perspective of the definition of respect. And probably because this other post brought home to me why Vox always said he didn’t care about the why of the SSH.

This last one made me aware that having had years more practice at responding to the masses as a result of his blog, he is better skilled at communicating with people some 30 points or more lower on the IQ scale. The very idea that someone would assume that because they can’t imagine or understand something it doesn’t exist or doesn’t have a motive, or origin, literally never crossed my mind. Surely, I dimly thought wordlessly to myself in the depths of my mind, the point of asking why is to understand that which you do not… yet.

But once again, I forgot Professor Cipolla and his 5 rules of Human stupidity. Therefore, on reading about respect as Vox wrote on it, I asked myself how would I define the concept? Because I didn’t (and don’t) immediately agree with the descriptors Vox gave. And even more interestingly, how would I define the concept in a way that it makes sense and is mostly understandable to other people outside of my own head?

Personally, I have no need to define the concept in words, its limits and dimensions are crystal clear to me, however, as someone else said somewhere, the unverbalized thought is as the unrealised idea. Or words to that effect. And putting things into words certainly helps my ability to converse meaningfully with others. So let me try.

First I think it useful to define and separate two terms that can and often do become conflated, and which I think perhaps, Vox also conflated to some extent (maybe not, it’s hard to say without sitting across from him with some decent wine to hand); this is love and respect. While both can be present, they are totally separate terms. I can respect even people I hate, and I can love even people for whom my respect is negligible.

Fundamentally, I think for me respect is related to consistency and integrity even in the face of adversity. The Priest who would rather be executed than break the sacrament of confession. The man who right or wrong as he may be will suffer whatever consequences for his belief, the people or ideas he loves, is deserving of respect. It is why it is perfectly possible for me to respect an actual criminal more than a guy who has maybe never broken a single law, but who simply will go along with whatever rule comes along not because he agrees with them, but because he doesn’t believe anything strongly enough to resist.

In that respect, a person who takes the Vaxx despite having been warned about it, their contents, and so on, certainly will never have the same level of respect I have for someone who despite great difficulty refused to take it.

It does not mean I love them any less, but love does not require respect to exist. Friends and even family took the vacs. I still love them just as much. Maybe even a little bit more because now I am better aware of just how fragile and weak they were, but I can’t respect them as much as if they had not taken it.

The key passage for me were these four:

Respect should not be granted solely on the basis of approval, agreement, or perfection.

I agree wholly with this.

I was disappointed by the decisions of many of my friends and family members to get vaxxed. In a few cases, I was even surprised by them. But in no way did it lessen in any way my respect for them as individuals, or my regard for them as human beings.

It makes me wonder how Vox defines respect, because I don’t agree with this statement. I certainly don’t love any of the people less because of it. In fact, as I said, in a way I feel more sorry for them, which could be considered as a kind of love. A certain level of concern for their lives, and frankly, more so their spirits, which I think are weaker than I had thought.

But respect? No, it certainly has lowered from where it used to be. Conversely, people who I thought (and may well still think) are kind of assholes, but who resisted the vaxx, I have definitely more respect for.

Despite her disappointment, the wife should be able to at least respect the husband for ultimately being willing to listen to her and even to accept her advice in regards to his own actions.

Fair enough, this is a valid point, and I agree with it. She should take comfort in the fact that although he was wrong he listened and adjusted or at least let her direct him correctly. There is nothing wrong with this and in fact it is a good trait for a man to have, since we are all flawed, we will make mistakes and the ability to hear your wife out and adjust accordingly when required is certainly a quality deserving of respect.

I find that it is easier to develop respect for people who listen to me and then change their minds than for those who simply continue stubbornly on a path leading to a bad outcome.

I would say this is obvious for most human beings, although that is mostly because we all like to be “right”. Though I am pretty sure Vox here means it rather differently, and in a way I agree with again. I respect a person able to review the data and change their mind based on the facts, rather than someone who will blindly continue on because of their emotions and inability to cogitate like a thinking creature capable of reason.

Certainly respect might not be so easy to define clearly in words, which is perhaps why it covers two full folio sized pages in my Volume VIII of the Oxford English Dictionary. Nevertheless, I would sum up my own definition as the admiration one may have for a person that is willing to undergo personal sacrifice or duress in order to maintain congruency with their world-view and the attending consequences and duties that should follow from holding that world-view.

Of the 23 different definitions of the word respect found in the OED, most of them refer to a relationship with. A contrast. A relation to. Which is only part of the equation. Only four of the first 17 definitions approach something closer to the meaning I would give it:

13: Regard, Consideration.

14: A consideration; a fact or motive which assists in, or leads to, the formation of a decision; an end or aim.

16: Deferential regard or esteem felt towards a person or thing.

17: Deferential or courteous attentions; actions expressive of respect for a person; politeness, courtesies.

In the second appearance of the word, there are 6 more definitions and only one fits to some degree:

4: To treat or regard with deference, esteem, or honour; to feel or show respect for.

There is one more that also ties in somewhat to my definition:

15: Dread; fear.

Overall then, I would say that respect is something that gives one consideration, regard, appreciation (which can even be in the form of caution, or fear) for a person or thing. And that sensation, consideration and so on can also result in actions that can be interpreted as being respectful. But the origin of that sensation, of that noticing, of that appreciation necessarily comes from some attribute (real, imagined or faked as it might be) that the person or thing has (or that we ascribe to it).

For me, congruency, things like keeping your word, behaving honestly and honourably, and so on, are all aspects that can and do merit respect, but perhaps the largest part, personally, is probably the willingness to stand against difficulty, society, bad odds, whatever, in order to do, or act, or defend, or protect what is true and just and good or innocent.

Those who took the Vaxx did none of those things. They bent.

Therefore, I don’t see how my consideration for them in that regard cannot possibly have been lowered. It has. And it should have. I don’t love them any less, but yes, I do respect them less. Inevitably.

Why such a post? Who cares how Vox defines it? Well, the man has an interesting brain, and there aren’t too many of those around, and one can always learn something going down occasional random rabbit holes, you never know what you might learn. And conversely, one never knows who might find this post useful too.

By G | 30 May 2024 | Posted in Brain-Mind Functionality, Human Performance, Increasing Happiness, Relationships, Social Commentary

To Young Women

This post goes out to them mostly, but really to everyone too. We have all been subjected to the absolutely toxic and dysgenic ideology of the narcissistic Boomers and their destruction of all that came before them that was good and healthy and worthwhile. They built nothing, climbing on the corpses of the things they destroyed only to aggrandise themselves while feverishly blocking their own offspring from either being born in the first place, or any effort to have them catch up to them.

And while there are exceptions here and there, the extremely absolute vast majority of boomers are an absolute toxic sludge of modernity, self-obsession and narcissistic demonry. And to one extent or other, we have all been polluted by its stench.

So… please read this post at S igma Game, where a comment by a GenX lady was posted in full. Read the whole thing there, but here is the pivotal jist of it:

Most women are natural followers and need an in-group of other women to build and grow their identity. And the older Boomer women who should be our matriarchs are STD-ridden, Diamond Princess-cruising nightmares.

When I left my stunningly-successful-early-in-my career professional position to (a) stay home with babies and (b) turn my professional skills toward supporting my husband’s business endeavors, every single one of the Boomer women in both of our families let me know how shocked and disappointed they were in me. How I was setting myself up to be too dependent on my husband, and was throwing away all the opportunities they fought so hard for. This included both my mother who was living vicariously through me, my you-go-girl mother-in-law, all three of their sisters, and three boomer aged step-sisters.

Notably, all but one of them are divorced. The one who isn’t is miserable. So it didn’t take long to look at their lives and think, well, if they’re all disappointed in me it must be the right call for not ending up as a miserable old biddie like them.

And the comment on it by Vox is spot on:

This woman did exactly what I fault young women, particularly of the Millennial and Gen Z generations for not doing, which is paying attention to the outcomes of the older women who are attempting to advise you! Misery loves company, and failures love giving advice; in both cases, the wise young woman will reject both.

However, this will inevitably create a challenge for the woman who has neither mentors nor matriarchs from whom she can learn. I know one Gen X woman who rejected her Boomer mother’s insane ways, but it took her literal years to learn how to cook, clean, and make a home from scratch as a post-college adult, because she had no female role model younger than her grandmother upon whom she could rely.

Both the lady who wrote in and Vox absolutely right. And I can attest to it myself, since I certainly did not have a good role model for marriage, but I was lucky enough to spend a few formative years with my grandparents, which on both sides were an model of stability so solid that as a child you just took it for granted. And that is not because things were necessarily rosy between my paternal grandparents. But whatever things they may have gone through, it was kept intensely between them and never touched us as their grandchildren. The love they had for us was never conditional or faked. The primary concepts my brother and I picked up in growing up were probably limited to a limited warrior code of being honest, keeping your word, not taking any shit from anyone, but not be obsessive about it. Justice was the thing, not your ego. And self-reliance, mostly not because it was taught but because we were left to our own devices pretty much unless it was something extremely serious. And even then, sometimes it was down to us anyway. I suppose you could put it down to being raised by a Sigma boomer father in that respect. He wasn’t very present and when he was it was mostly corrective (even when he was wrong). But that all said, I have no animosity at all towards the man, and he certainly always came through when it counted, nor was his love ever in question. Even so, I can’t say the example we had was a good one, in terms of creating a stable family life.

My wife had even less of any kind of even distant view of a traditional marriage and family life, and it has indeed taken her a long time to find her way in even the basics, which given my own examples probably made everything harder on both of us. One thing that has however held everything together is that we both have either a learnt or natural element of deep loyalty. In general, to each other, and to our children. It is an odd kind of loyalty, because it doesn’t necessarily mean it’s shared in the same way at the same time, we are only getting to that point now, after 7 years of marriage, before that, I would say it was our own, individual sense of loyalty and justice that kept us on course even when things were not ideal.

And certainly, I think a lot of grace, or divine assistance too, came into it. By all metrics, our marriage should have been an absolute train derailment, caused by a car-crash pile up on the railway, due to an airplane smashing into a level crossing. At rush hour.

Instead, it’s starting to become what I might have imagined in. my most fevered and fantastic imagination, as an idealistic 16 year old wondering what the perfect life might look like.

And if I have to point to a single thing that made it most possible (you know, after miracles, divine intervention, possible cohorts of angels and so on) when it comes to our human attributes, I would say that it is without a doubt my wife’s ability to do something that very, very, very, very, few women are truly capable of to any decent degree, and it is this:

She has the capacity to pause, review, and recognise logical paths before her and her own errors regarding them.

It is really quite astonishing, because she is absolutely female. Her emotions are truly like a storm at sea, both in the good and the bad. I really believe no man has any real clue the levels of emotional tides that women experience, and I say that being a man that clearly has a wide range of them beyond most normal men. The astonishing thing, which I tried to transmit also in Caveman Theory, is that the more of a safe realm you give your woman’s emotions to run free, yet are able to keep them also “contained”, that is allow her to do her freak-outs but don’t get phased by them nor let them steer you onto the rocks of dissent, disrespect, or utter madness (and that last one can be hard to define!), the more, if she is at heart a healthy person (and not a raging narcissist, in which case, you may not survive) she may become able to reason herself back to sanity once the tsunami of whatever it was has passed.

Perhaps it’s because she’s English. Those people have the almost alien-like ability to simultaneously not know themselves very well or very deeply, and yet to try to do so by the use of cold and calm logic. Unfortunately the study, use and practice of logic in the last century or so has been vilified, negated and denied to most people. So, great damage to this ability has been done, and the Anglo-Saxon female realm has gone from trying to reason things out during the calm between emotions, to the simple rationalisation/justification of whatever emotion happens to be running them in any given moment.

Certainly she also has an IQ that is well above average, which also helps, firstly because there isn’t an actual 30 point IQ communication gap between us. Or at least, mostly there isn’t and those little gaps that can happen if not taking the time to examine them can be bridged by a calm conversation.

But whatever the reason, she has the ability to do logic if given time and space to do it. She still needs to sometimes be “corralled” to the “logic box” because there are things that otherwise will be ignored for years, and being that as well as extremely feminine, she also has the tendency towards wanting to be as free as the proverbial mustang running in the prairies, that corralling is really something only a vastly experienced cowboy with the talent to make it an art might be able to do. The fine line has to be taken that she has to see it for herself. The corral, needs to be seen from a distance, because if she suddenly finds herself in one, even one of her ow making, then it’s usually panic stations and red alarms going off. And she also has to see it is good, from a distance, because again, it might be perfect but if in her imagination it comes as a sudden imposition she will panic without even evaluating what it is. And then see has to see it is not a prison but a home, a place you return to, not one that prevents you being free, but in fact one that allows you even more, and real freedom, once you accept the responsibilities of it.

It is not always easy, and I have never been a patient man, which may be a curse for some, but perhaps, in her case, it is a good thing. Pretty women invariably get away with murder with men. Most are too timid to even point out certain things, never mind make it something they will insist is part of their life. In short, sometimes, it takes a bastard to point a spoilt pretty girl in the right direction. It is not a trope in all the girly romantic novels for no reason after all, cliched as it sounds.

But the point is that above all, as I have been saying for literally decades, women need to begin to learn how to do actual logic. Their wild emotions and crazy feelings need to be learnt to be put aside and things reasoned out. And not with a view to justifying their feelings, emotions or what they want to happen, but so that objective reality can be evaluated and where they have lacunae (gaps, holes of knowledge, behaviour, understanding, intimacy, or whatever) they, not their husbands, not their children, not society, not the universe, not God, but they, they themselves, need to change and take the appropriate action to rectify and improve the issue. Very few women do this process consciously.

Most women who have read this will at this point be screaming at the screen, saying that sentence is so much nonsense because they…(add endless list of self-recriminating statements here). So let me explain it another way, and if you are a woman, please, put your emotions aside and pay attention.

Being able to observe yourself critically but in an objective fashion is very difficult for all human beings, men as well as women, because we are mostly selfish, weak, petty, ego-driven, flawed, nasty, little creatures. Yes, all of us, in varying degrees, but all of us.

Women, being far more governed by their emotions than men, naturally find this exercise far more difficult than even most men. Compounded by the biological solipsism intrinsic to women, which they can no more help than other attributes of their biology, and it is really quite hard to do. This process, has nothing to do with, and is very different from, the constant self-recrimination that most women who are not actual full-blown narcissists do. Allow me to give an example that will be instantly familiar to any woman.

Every normal woman, no matter how physically attractive she is, will invariably find some flaw with herself if standing naked in front of a full-length mirror. I know because I have observed this myself with literally every woman I have been with. And trust me, at the risk of sounding arrogant, I have had some very pretty girlfriends. And yet, they will absolutely crap all over themselves about some non-issue, that can range from the shape of their fingers, to the way their hair falls on them, a slight defect like a birth-mark, a tooth that is not perfectly straight, you name it, they will see flaws that no man would care at all about when looking at the rest of them. Women do this not just about their bodies but any number of other utterly irrelevant things.

If I ask a friend over to my place, it hardly makes a difference to me if there are dead bodies stacked by the front door. He’s my buddy, he’s not coming over for the decor. My wife (and this is natural and a good thing, I am not saying it is not) will freak out and try and spic and span the whole house like a tornado if the postman is dropping a parcel off and I invite him for coffee. She is starting to learn (the hard way) that in rural setting with 5 children, she may as well ask for herds of unicorns to line up outside for filming. But regardless she still gets rather upset at life, the universe, and sadly, herself, for not having things as perfect as she would like.

But I am not talking about these sort of recriminations. they are mostly a slight disease of the mind, quirks, and the general approach a man should have is to try your best to put her mind at ease and let her see her efforts are appreciated and her “flaws” are meaningless or even endearing to you.

When I talk about correcting a behaviour or flaw, I mean important shit that can fuck up your life, like excessive solipsism, or disrespecting your husband for some idiotic feminist concept that has no place in a healthy society. If you are a stay at home housewife and your husband works all day, learn to cook. Learn to take care of the home. And if you think that is “below your standard as a woman” then explain to me why driving a truck for 15 hours a day and getting a back injury from it, or being a plumber and literally fixing people’s shitty pipes all day, or an. oil rig driller and being covered in slurry and toxic shit day and day out is not below a man’s standard. looking after your family as you are able to is your duty. And yes, we all have duties if we are human beings even worthy of the name. And yes, your duties are more important than some fake, magical, Disney/Hollywood fairy tale life. If I need to crawl through a pile of rotting dead bodies for my family to be safe and happy, I will not even hesitate. Hell, I wouldn’t hesitate if I have to MAKE the pile of dead bodies before I crawl through it. And I full expect my wife to be able to do the same if called upon it. Though I will volunteer first for the dead bodies stuff, so it’s only fair she is the primary cook at home. There is absolutely nothing intrinsically wrong in each one having different roles. Not respecting those roles or not performing our duty-bound actions in their regard is the problem. Not the thing or the doing of the thing.

The moment women learn to do a lot more logic than they have been taught in the last hundred years, the sooner they will get back to being the kind of heroines that their grandmothers and great-grand-mothers probably were; with the added bonus that the “feminizing” of the men that has taken place over the same period, has resulted in the minority of men that have remained men, instead of becoming metrosexual, androgynous, confused fools, better able to appreciate a woman who is properly a woman instead of a spoilt brat or a slovenly slattern.

In short, the attitude that having a big family with lots of children, that being as self-sufficient as possible, and that the traditional roles of a wife and husband in a traditional family are not just good things, but things to aspire to, today takes a conscious effort to understand and put into practice. Plus, as the doing so is not necessarily easy or the process entirely rosy, you need to work at it even as you gradually get an appreciation for it as you climb over the hurdles, especially at the starts, which without fail tend to be rooted in the following:

General laziness
General selfishness (greed for time to waste, consumer crap no one really needs, keeping up with the Joneses, lust for ever-changing sexual partners and gratification, gluttony to eat/travel/do as you please every minute of your day outside of work because your duty is ultimately and primarily focused on your having as easy a life as possible, gluttony for distraction TV/videogames/random hobbies with no real effect on your life)
General weakness. The usual “It’s too hard” without even trying. “I don’t know how” without ever trying to learn or find out. “I’m just not that kind of person” (too lazy). Which all falls under my label of, well, guess what, if you had a guy shoot you in the foot every time you whined about how you can’t, you’d learn to do it hopping on one leg after the first shot, and you would learn it right away. So it’s a matter of laziness and weakness of character ultimately.

Now, if you are wondering why anyone should put themselves through so much just to have a numerous and worthwhile and loyal family… well, I can’t help you. You’re probably the kind of person that will never do, achieve or teach anyone anything, other than possibly as an example of how not to be.

There is no substitute on Earth for a functional, loving, big family. I didn’t have one like that growing up. Neither did my wife. But we sure are going to keep working at making sure our children (and ourselves) do.

By G | 30 May 2024 | Posted in Caveman Theory, Female Socio-Sexual Hierarchy, Relationships, Social Commentary