Archive for the ‘Social Commentary’ Category

Riposa in Pace Don Berardelli

Il martire Padre Giuseppe Berardelli ha dato la sua vita perché una persona più giovane potesse vivere.

Non so nulla di lui eccetto questo, e presumo che sia probabile che fosse, almeno teoricamente, parte della falsa “Chiesa” del Novus Orco (i nuovi Orchi), eppure, con la sua azione di estremo sacrificio, ha dimostrato di essere un vero prete, disinteressato con le cose del mondo e dedicato alla vita, la gioia, la verità, e l’amore, come Dio comanda.

Non so nulla dei dettagli dei suoi studi, le sue messe e così via. Forse sapeva e agiva comunque nel bene, e perché no, se alla fine gli permetteva di farne? O forse ignorava e si disinteressava dei dettagli, di nuovo, probabilmente per lo stesso motivo. Dopotutto, cos’è più importante, la forma o la realtà?

Comunque sia, Padre Berardelli si è dimostrato un vero prete, della Santa Chiesa, che non ha niente a che fare con quell’impostore, e tutti gli altri della sua stirpe che non meritano di essere nemmeno indicati per nome, cosicché non insudicino il nome del caro Don Giuseppe.

Riposa in pace Don Giuseppe, e spero che un giorno potrò sedermi con voi e ascoltare le vostre idee e saggezze.

Ave Padre Berardelli.

UPDATE: Apparentemente il reportage potrebbe essere falso e Berardelli non ha infatti dato la sua vita per il prossimo.

Se è falso che l’ha fatto, vergogna alla falsità dei giornalisti. E Berardelli era solo un altra casualità del virus e falso prete, nonché apparentemente ben visto da tutti. Cosa non rara alla fine. Ci sono tanti ciarlatani che una volta ben nutriti alle spese altrui fingono bene la parte del prete cattolico o alte fantasie. Alla fine anche certi stregoni africani fanno bene a qualcuno qualche volta.

Se è vero e in fatti si è sacrificato per il suo prossimo, sempre vergogna ai giornalisti che hanno mentito e calunniato un uomo giusto, e onore e gloria a questo uomo che anche se falso prete (presumendo fosse del Novus Orco) e quindi non capace di dare i sacramenti validamente, qualunque fossero le sue motivazioni e idee, se non altro, almeno alla fine, si è dimostrato agire come un buon cattolico e esattamente come sarebbe ideale per un vero prete agire.

In quest’ultimo caso, si spera quindi che Dio gli perdoni quali grandi errori di catechismo e dogmatismo Cattolico egli abbia perpetuato nel suo ruolo di invalido prete, e gli dia il suo giusto compenso, qualunque esso sia.

Ad ogni modo, Dio sa, e Dio deciderà.

Amen

In Case You STILL Don’t Get It About Who Bill Gates Really Is

Because apparently even when I spoon feed people about the details they still ask me if I can make them chew and swallow too, here is more information that no doubt will add to my status as a “conspiracy theorist”. who just happens to be right about pretty much every conspiracy I ever presented for some 30 years in a row now.

This is the archived screenshot of the patent to the modification of Coronavirus by the Pirbright Institute who just happens to study all sorts of viruses. And yet, currently no mention of the coronavirus on their website, which is odd, since they patented a genetic modification of it back in 2015 as the first link above shows.

The Pirbright Institute is also sponsored quite actively by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and apparently they are currently looking for someone to model some sort of… (guess, go on) Mucosal immunity. “But, but, it’s all about just chickens and pigs and cows…I hear you say incredulously.” No. No it isn’t; it’s about human stuff. Read the advert for the post, screenshotted below.

Well, just coincidence right?

I guess so is the fact that the same Bill and Melinda Gates Foundations sponsored Event 201 via the John Hopkins Centre for Health Security. What was Event 201? Oh, just their clever name for the outbreak of coronavirus pandemic tabletop prediction…oh…errr…no….exercise, not prediction, scratch prediction, test run, model-before-you-do-it, etc all those words are badthink; just conspiracy theory craziness, you know. Here, you can see video clips for yourself of how they are also thinking of using algorithms to scour the net for “false stories” about the pandemic…you know, when it breaks out, as in how do we control the narrative fully type of questions. Which given the holes in everything Bill has ever done in the software world, and everything else, the literally broken crap he sold for billions and called windows, doesn’t inspire all that much confidence in me. But I’m sure I’m just paranoid. That must be it.

And of course, the same Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation would never, ever, ever, partner with the seat of Satan itself to make everything even worse for everyone everywhere in some other good ways, right? Like say, defining ethics. As if Microsoft and Bergoglio together did not amount to practically Beelzebub and Asmodeus copulating with each other in a sewer in the middle of the Vatican while they try to tell us they are our moral and ethical masters. Right. They would never do such a thing.

Besides, it’s not like Bill Gates wants to mass murder a few billion of us. Of course not. That would be crazy talk on my part.

God acts in mysterious (and funny) ways

So, it seems that the probable Herald of the AntiChrist, Vicar of Pedophiles on Earth, Jorge Bergoglio, may have caught the coronavirus.

Destroy the Church in China, sell out actual Christians to the attentions of dog-torturing atheists, collide with their communist government to make an even bigger mockery of the Church in China, and what do you get?

And let’s not forget slapping that Chinese supplicant.

Corona-chan slaps you back!

Why Italy just shut down major cities – Coronavirus update

The video below is all in Italian but in essence it states what I had already confirmed separately and individually via various sites including an advert for a geneticist for this level 4 bio-warfare/design facility in Wuhan that zerohedge had reported on. But they go much further.

Basically at Wuhan there is a level 4 bioweapon/research facility that was opened 6 years ago jointly by France and China but is not actually controlled solely by the Chinese government but also has a research facility run by the World Health Organisation (WHO).

It would be the height of simplicity of course for some western powers to infiltrate this facility in other words. But here is the kicker, as far back as 2015 a version of the infectious and genengineered coronavirus was registered and patented. Yes you read that right. The thing that’s killing people is actually patented and is the “mild” form with the reported mortality of only 2-3%. The non-mild form is much worse.

So as of 2018 the current form was deployable.

Who patented it? The Pirbright Institute which is a UK government body sponsored by the WHO, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and the EU among others.

In March 2019, several months before the first reported case of coronavirus, which was in November 2019, Canada, from its National Microbiology Laboratory, send a few vials of the lethal version to the laboratory in Wuhan.

This was done as a secret operation, and we know about it only because in typical globohomo “efficiency” they got caught red handed by the Chinese government which basically said “WTF?!”.

The response was along the lines of “Oh but we sent that packet of deadly viruses only because we’re just trying to help you study super virulent man-made killer viruses for your own safety” which makes one wonder why you’d do that secretly of course.

Remember, whatever your beliefs about Q, there is absolute certainty that he does get at least one thing right when referring to the swamp critters:

“These people are stupid.”

Yes they are also evil and disgusting, but never forget they are stupid and get away with so much because of secrecy and the general unwillingness of the population to put their heads on pikes forthwith.

And finally:

On 18th October 2019, a mere 2 weeks before the first reported case, (2nd November 2019) the John Hopkins World Health Security Forum, The WHO and The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, held a meeting of some 15 world leading figures (unspecified governments, industry leaders and business people, among which the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation) to SIMULATE a global pandemic of coronavirus that would kill some 60 million people and this was called event 201. In the simulation the virus started out in Brazil.

Keep in mind also that on the 15th October 2019 so 16 days before the first reported case of coronavirus (which has a 2 week incubation period) 300 US soldiers were deployed to Wuhan for some military world games. To Wuhan. Specifically.

Wuhan happens to be a main train nexus for transport throughout China and is in fact the central hub for all internal travel and the 2nd November falls in Chinese New Year, the only time where nationwide there is a holiday and large masses of people move around all of mainland China.

And finally remember that the geneingeeenring is done to be far more deadly to Asians.

Oh, and coincidentally, I have also seen it widely rumoured that as nationalism increases in Europe, large numbers of the Jewish diaspora mean to relocate to China. China however apparently wasn’t playing ball very much. This last piece is rumour admittedly but it’s one that was rather prevalent many months before the coronavirus appeared.

Ann keeps getting closer

It’s interesting to see that Ann keeps encountering the same general lies, subterfuge, bad thinking, “confused” canon “lawyers” (spelt liars) and wilful suspension of belief that we sedeprivationist (erroneously called sedevacantist, but whatever) have been dealing with since 1958.

And it’s interesting to see that she has now started to run into the same demoniac liars.

Just a few weeks ago I did a detailed takedown of John Salza, here.

Shooting Down the False Objections to Sede Privationsim

And today Ann has a post about him too, here.

She is, of course, still hanging on desperately to the idea that Ratzinger is Pope, though at this point, her reasons for doing so have completely evaporated like dew in the glare of a Saharan summer sun.

I believe that when Ratzinger kicks the bucket, the cognitive dissonance will be even higher and Ann *may*, I say may, finally look at the fact that when that happens, there will literally be nothing left to distinguish her from sedevacantists.

In fact, the only way she can keep pretending that Ratzinger is Pope is by pretending that the code of canon law of 1917 did not exist in 1958, or 1964 or 1966. And also to keep pretending that Siri was validly elected in 1958 (he wasn’t see here), but it’s wholly irrelevant anyway since Montini and all those after him in any case were and are clear defectors and hence vacated their office as per canon law 188 part 4.

Ann Barnhardt is Spiralling

I have written before about Ann’s blind spot, namely her refusal to look at the simple fact that the papacy has not had a valid claimant since 9th October 1958.

The logic — a Catholic virtue she correctly is always championing — is inescapable, and yet, she still refuses to accept the inevitable conclusion that Sedeprivationism is obviously correct. Recently, however, she has done the intellectual equivalent of taking her objections to Sedeprivationism for a long walk in the woods and then shooting them in the back of the head with a .44 magnum.

Before I present the post-mortem on the bodies, let me quickly summarise for any new readers:

Truly, if the Catholic Church is indeed the One, True, Holy, and Apostolic Church instituted by Jesus Christ on Earth, and therefore its Magisterium is supernaturally protected from drastic and fatal error, the ONLY viable conclusion we can logically, legally and in accordance with the Magisterium of the Church, arrive at, at this point, is that every “Pope” since 28th October 1958 has in fact been either invalidly elected, or has vacated their office due to heresy in accordance with the Canon Law then in use (The one of 1917; which consequently also means it remains the only Canon Law still in use, since the 1983 version is created by the same non-Catholic impostors that have either never been Catholic to begin with, or have vacated their office for the same charge of public defection from the faith already discussed in some detail before).

Even if you are not Catholic and don’t believe the Catholic Church is the one true Church, if you can actually do logic and follow the applicable Canon Law, you cannot come to any other conclusion that, as per Catholic Doctrine and Canon Law, the Catholic Church has been infiltrated by impostors and has had no valid Pope since in all probability 9th October 1958, but, even at its most charitable, as already explained elsewhere, definitely and without question since 7th June 1966, at the most outlandishly generous. 

In fact, I believe that Ann is now starting to struggle with the cognitive dissonance that is assailing her. She is increasingly spiralling, complete with smoke, flames, and mentioning things that frankly are out of place unless you are a Sedeprivationist, since they don’t make sense in the context of someone who accepts Ratzinger. Remember that Ratzinger (or RatNazinger, as I call him) was one of the chief architects of the Protestantisation that was the infiltration and dumpster fire of treachery and cowardice that bears the name Vatican 2. Remember he is German and Ann herself documented how he was a proponent of the destruction of the Papacy by making it some kind of German union of Bishops. And trust me, as someone who has seen Germans have 9 hour meetings and resolve absolutely nothing, such a proposal is far more worrying than a simple dirty nuke going off at the centre of St peter’s Basilica.

And now we come to the death of her objections. Consider for example Ann’s ONLY stated reasons for not accepting Sedevacantism as recently as her podcast 101 and then view them in light of the two comments she makes (below).

Her two objections to Sedeprivationism were, as she clearly stated in her podcast 101 and documented here:

1. The Church has to be visible

Well… in this blog post, she torpedoes that point exactly as I have been saying for some years now. Besides which, given the internet, I think even actual blind people are aware and have visibility if they want to at all be interested in the point. Extract from her post:

 Remember, the Visibility of the Church is NOT a matter of how many people see it, or claim that they can’t see it.  The Church will always be visible – lit up by the Light of Christ – but people fallen into the darkness of sin will be blinded to it. Imagine Ray Charles standing on the Las Vegas Strip.  Ray’s blind.  He can’t see it.  That doesn’t mean that Las Vegas is “invisible”. It just means that Ray is blind.

And 2. Well….62 years is JUST TOO LONG. Of course, there is NO prescribed time limit on an interregnum so…that one is just a “this is what I want/feel/desire” and has nothing to do with Catholic Dogma, Canon Law or historical tradition of the Church, all of which line up perfectly with my position of Sedeprivationsims.

But take a look at this comment, which I would say goes precisely to the fact that heretics can’t be clerics, and consequently, all they do will become increasingly Satanic, banal and trash. Her post this is in is here.

 When instruction and correction are framed as “attack” by default, only stagnation and then profound retrogression result.

There is no clearer cultural example of this today than the post Vatican II – Novus Ordoist Catholic Church.  Banality, primacy of individual conscience, toxic sentimentality, all yielding REBELLION manifesting as a contempt for sacred tradition, beauty, objective truth, and ultimately contempt for the Law, which is nothing less than hatred of God Himself.

And notice also…she specifies Novus Ordoist…it’s a short step Ann… it’s called Novus ORCO. Say it with me. They are not Popes or Priests or Bishops. They are Spiritual Orcs. Twisted by Satan to do evil.

And honest Catholics around the world are starting to awaken from their slumber and realise it.

Join us Ann. You’re a good fighter and I believe, despite your struggles with reality of late, ultimately and fundamentally honest and a good servant to our Lord.

Also, because your continued request to pray for Ratzinger to be recognised as the true Pope is about as likely as God listening to prayers of people asking Him to make Bruce Jenner accepted as the most beautiful woman in the world.

Ann Barnhardt’s error and how she just proved Sedeprivationism is correct

My imagined conversation with Ann Barnhardt after her podcast number 101:

“It’s funny how you spent several minutes shouting how if Ratzinger died and Bergoglio didn’t for 45 minutes that is “COMPLETELY DIFFERENT FROM THE 1958 SEDVACANTISTS!”

Why Ann? How?”

“Well… well… they are saying it’s 62 years!!”

“Yes, and?
Can you show me anything that puts a time limit on it?”

“No. But…..” (Sits down looking shell-shocked)

“Hmmm-hm. Thought so.
Welcome to SedePrivationsim Ann.

Would you like a glass of water to make you handle the shock?
Perhaps something stronger?

I have some awesome good tequila.”

“Shots you say?”

In her 101st podcast here, Ann (infuriatingly I might add) admits that Canon Law is what determines what the current situation of the Papacy is. This is true and correct. She goes on to bless St. Raymond of Penyafort, for having written the first draft sometime in the 13th Century and sing the praises of it since it lasted until 1917 and the Pio-Benedictine code, so far still so good. Then she also goes on to admit that the “code” of 1983 is a dumpster fire with flammable juice in it, again, so far so good, and then… then comes the infuriating part, she says that despite this the code of 1983 is the one we must use because “it’s the one we are under”.

No Ann. We are not.

Read more »

Shooting Down the False Objections to Sede Privationsim

As a result of Vox Day mentioning my earlier blog post challenge to nominal Catholics concerning the fact that we have only had antipopes since 1958, one of the commenters there brought up some supposed studied theologians who claim to have fully refuted the position they call Sedevacantism (but I call SedePrivationism for precision, since words matter). My post on the antipopes and the legal reasoning why is here and it is rooted in the fact that we, as obedient catholics, must believe the fake Popes are fake, and have been at the very least since 1963, for certain, because that is what the Code of Canon Law of 1917 necessarily states, which being put together by the Magisterium of the Church, we, as Catholics could never and should never had ignored when Vatican 2 raised its evil and apostate head from the darkness. Nor can we ignore it now. Remember that the only current and valid code of canon law is the one of 1917, since the one of 1983 was put together by the same impostors, non-clerics and non-catholics that usurped the Chair of Peter in the first place, and it was also specifically designed to try and invalidate the truth of the code of 1917 and obfuscate its clarity and precision.

Not having read or known anything about the two individuals mentioned by the commenter at VP calling himself MisesMat, who later emailed me and assured me both these gentlemen would be happy to debate me, in writing, I did a quick search for one the names that he mentioned and found Salza’s document online, which I reproduce below with my commentary. His words are in black and mine in red. Initially I started out thinking I’d give this guy the benefit of the doubt of being one of the many badly catechised Catholics that have been browbeaten into accepting an untenable position on the basis of emotions alone mostly and brainwashing from an early age, but as I progressed through the document it became absolutely obvious that John Salza is an intentional liar and deceiver of the worst sort, as will become apparent from the thorough evisceration performed on his lies below. Warning: It gets harsher as I go, but also funnier hopefully, so it’s not too boring I hope. In either case, boring or entertaining as it may be, it is important, because it more clearly demonstrates the tactics and lies these people will attempt to use on you (and have done so rather successfully since before they took over the papacy in 1958), so it is good for you to understand their strategy, because once you do, you can’t unseen it. Enjoy.

UPDATE:

If the below is too long for you to bother with, let me simply state that John Salza wrote the below in 2010, meaning he KNEW the issues of V2 were issues even before the Vicar of Pedophiles on Earth, Jorge Bergoglio took over. And, more importantly, he is a 32nd degree Freemasons. And Freemasons can’t be Catholics. Because Satanists can’t be Catholic so, yeah. the below is academic to a certain extent, but necessary anyway.

Read more »

@Jack seems to be pro-pedophiles

I am banned from twitter at the IP level since I had pinned a couple of telling tweets by @Jack (the CEO of twitter Jack Dorsey) that referred to satanic verse and pizza in a way that suggested links to the other people involved in pizzagate, the high profile pedophile scandal that the mainstream media is hell-bent, literally, on covering up.

Given the latest revelations by the FBI that the satanic ritual abuse of children complete with underground tunnels and all other manner of evil that most normal people can’t even imagine, we are on the cusp of a majority of people finally beginning to grasp just how pervasive organised child abuse and trafficking is.

It has been my OPINION that Jack Dorsey is deeply involved in pedophile activity, and this little fact below explains why I think so.

Especially in light of the ABC journalist video that recently surfaced.

@Twitter has completely removed #EpsteinCoverup from the USA trending list. Over 100,000 tweets in 9 hours and it has now vanished.

On My Scandalous Character

A recent development within the organisation that runs the London Latin Mass, prompted me to take some steps toward ensuring that parishioners who wished to approach clergy of their choice could do so freely, without dictates from people who have no canonical authority to rule otherwise, regardless of their position in the Church Structure. As a result my “scandalous character” was mentioned by certain parties. Without further ado then, let me tell you all about it, as I did to the relevant people by the email below.

 

Dear All,

As expected, there have been some rumours concerning me and my character, actions, etc. so let’s clear them up too.

I have had an online presence at least since the early 2000s or earlier and been involved in many things outside of normal life for most people. Until at least about early 2014 or so I also had very little, if any, belief, grasp or knowledge of Christianity even in its broad sense. I have lived pretty much most of my life as what the Bible calls a “wild ass”. That is, a stubborn donkey, whose main characteristic is to fight anyone and anything that gets in their way and whose only quality might be persistence, but certainly not wisdom.

This means I have had dealing with everything ranging from working as an armed bodyguard that dealt with armed criminals, corrupt police, client’s vices, including prostitutes they had on retainer, and seen more than my fair share of evil, sin and perversion on a scale most people fortunately never encounter.

I also lived without God as a guiding principle most of my life, and only a sort of warrior code based on honour, truth and justice that probably most resembled samurai philosophy as that was a large influence in my upbringing.

I was baptised on the 25th May 2017 and my online presence has in any case evolved over the years and no doubt, will continue to do so, but I have zero interest or concern in “doctoring” or covering up any of my past, blog posts, etc. Firstly because it would be an intrinsic dishonesty in denying factual reality, something I am constitutionally averse to doing in the  extreme, and secondly because all this can be summarised into 5 simple points:

  1. Who I am, was or will be is of little relevance to you, your salvation, relationship to the Church, God, your priest, bishop or anyone else. I am not a leader, I have no wish to be your leader in anything, as I said in my first email, and if it seems like I am leading something it is simply because others are either failing to do so or too scared to act directly on things that matter. My intent is to do what’s best for the faithful, the Church, civilisation in general and my family, but I have always strongly rejected anyone trying to follow me as if I am some guru. I like to express my views and opinions and if you find them useful, you’re welcome to them, and if you do not, then ignore them and me. Ultimately, the only person responsible for your soul is you.

 

  1. My past is irrelevant to my present as far as I am concerned and not only do I not care to hide it or pretend it is not what it was, in fact, quite the opposite, because if even someone like me can come to the Church then there is hope for everyone, and this is a good reminder for others to see.

 

  1. Paul used to torture and kill Christians because he was what today would be called a fanatic. Then he had his road to Damascus moment and he wrote half the New Testament and guess what, he was no less of a fanatic after his conversion, all that changed was his intention and focus. Now, I am no Paul, but I relate. Jesus hung out with prostitutes, soldiers, and (what’s worse in my opinion) tax collectors, again, far be it from me to compare myself with our Lord, but I can tell you in all honesty that some criminals I have known had a better sense of honour, truth and justice than many fake clerics of the Novus Ordo Church (or Novus Orco, as I call it). Or even your average trader (banking) for that matter. So again, I don’t care in the least what a person supposedly is or is not. I will judge them based on their actions towards me and the things and people I care about. If you prefer to do differently, then that’s up to you, but I assure you either way, it’s not going to keep me up nights.

 

  1. To those persons who would try to assassinate my character or use any of my past or present or future actions etc, I say, have at it. You have no idea how little I care. I have had death threats from special forces trained people, I had armed men come to my house to kill me and a number of other confrontations of just about every type, be they physical, emotional or spiritual that not only do I not wish on anyone, but would probably crush most people. My point here is simply this: Who I am or what I have done or what I do, does not change the facts or the lies, injustice, or errors that others who purport to be leaders in the Church make. And their attempts to shame me into silence are going to have only the opposite effect. Unlike the hypocrites, I have never denied, nor will I ever, my past or my present. Nor will I change it or doctor it or try to hide it. In time I hope to continue to become a better person, but I generally talk like a sailor and am certainly no one’s idea of a pious wallflower. If that scandalises you, then so be it. My sins are mine and imperil only my soul. I am not a Priest giving guidance or worse, a Bishop ignoring Canon Law. At best I’m a very flawed human being that has a true belief in God, Jesus Christ and who will not be cowed into silence by anyone on such matters, regardless of who they are. My accounting for my sins will be done in front of my Lord when my time comes, and not before any human being on Earth who presumes to have such authority over me.

 

  1. Martyrs are very much higher on the hierarchy of saints than warriors, and I have no illusion which type I am, but God loves His warriors too, so if you don’t, or find them offensive and don’t want to associate at all with them, don’t worry about it; I’m certainly not going to invite myself into your life against your will.

This same message will also be posted on my blog tonight, which I have no intention of taking down. And if you want to know my personal current stance on things, it is changing every day, but if you really want to dig into this, you can get a fair idea of it in my latest short book Believe! I have in fact already moved somewhat beyond it, in what I hope is an even more Catholic direction, but it’s not light years away from where I was when I wrote it, and as a matter of fact, that little book has inspired at least 7 confirmed conversions to the true Catholic Church and interest in doing so from many others, the exact number of which I do not know with any precision.

Lastly, to all those rumour mongering, I issue a simple challenge: I am perfectly happy for every bit of communication I had relating to the current troubles in the London mission to come to the full light of day. Why aren’t you just as happy to let everyone see your true face when you’re hiding behind a screen or “not wanting to cause scandal” or communicating your strategy to browbeat the “dissidents” in plain terms? Do let us know. I for one want more happiness in the world and I found that sunlight always helps.

 

Most Sincerely,

Giuseppe Filotto 

 

All content of this web-site is copyrighted by G. Filotto 2009 to present day.
Website maintained by IT monks