Archive for the ‘Sedevacantism’ Category

WWIII – The Nuclear Threat

Simplicius does the work I am too lazy (and bored by the subject) to do in terms of explaining in detailed steps what exactly is going on at the front lines of WWIII that we have been in since early 2020 when the biological, genetic, and psychological attack on much of humanity was started by the Satanic Pedophiles that run most of this planet. His post on the (more) recent attempts by the gay cocaine dwarf to create a nuclear incident is rather detailed and informative, and takes you through the whole things well.

The likelihood of some kind of nuclear incident soon at one of the two nuclear plants is definitely raised to “probable” in my mind, due to the fact that they have a lot of embedded foreign media types now reporting (totally illegal, by the way) from the area of Russia that the Ukis have managed to push into.

Here is a small part of his post:

Right now, the information campaign being coordinated in parallel with the Kursk offensive is reaching a deafening fever pitch. NATO and its vast intel machinery are working overtime to push the narrative that the Kursk campaign is ‘overwhelming’ Putin and Russia, that internal fissures are threatening to swallow Putin’s ‘regime’ whole, and that things are generally collapsing for Russia. Even the latest Western articles are switching to this last blind shot in the dark to give Ukraine a chance: 

The latest push includes all kinds of provocations, such as foreign journalists—from UK and Italy—embedded with the AFU, illegally entering sovereign Russian territory to report from it. 

Here’s British CNN correspondent illegally entering Russian territory:

[Go see the two short videos on his site]

This includes infamous American mercenary outfit ‘Forward Observation Group’ flaunting the fact they too are allegedly in Kursk: 

This is a timed and calculated provocation, meant to push Russia to the brink, hitting every conceivable pressure point of outrage, stoking ancestral Russian pride and patriotism. And it’s true, the invasion is a black eye on Russia, to an extent—but it must be considered within the grander overall scope of the situation: things feel terminal for Ukraine; Zelensky is accelerating as if propelled by some unprecedentedly urgent impetus. By his own actions, he’s demonstrating that Ukraine appears to be on the brink, and the West is giving its all in what may amount to be one final heroic propaganda provocation to try to stir Russia out of its comfort zone. 

[see video of that warmongering asshole ex-mayor of London Boris Johnson at Simplicius site]

We can see the two-pronged urgency emerge from the dire situation on Ukraine’s eastern flank in Donbass, as the collapse continues to accelerate there. 

Do read the whole thing, especially if you are still somewhat prone to reading Western Newspapers or watching Western News Channels, or caring about Western pretend voting charades and so on.

If however you want the unfiltered Kurgan summary, here it is:

It’s all kabuki as usual. The Ukis, pushed by the (((US-Bankers))) led NATO puppets, managed to get a foothold in Russia somewhat near a second Russian Power Station in the Kursk region, (the first one now being in “new” Russian territory if I recall right). The idea is to either:

Promote Russian willingness to come to the negotiating table, which is totally retarded, because Putin has already made it clear there will be no negotiations with people who are agreement incapable, so any “negotiations” will be limited to Putin saying: “Do this.” And the Ukis and combined Clown World saying “Yes sir, thank you sir.”

The other alternative is to try and provoke Russia into a nuclear event response. What I mean by this is that the Bankers running the USA like their bitch, and the USA running most of Western Europe like their poodles, will try to cause some kind of nuclear-like attack on Russia. I mean by this, the destruction of one or both of the nuclear plants, a dirty “tactical” nuke or two in the area or something similar. Prodded to this extent, Russia will have no real alternative but to respond in some fashion. What that response would be is hard to say, but keep in mind that apparently UK spies from MI6 and the usual American mercenaries and CIA types are all helping with he attacks on the power stations. And this is being confirmed by Russia but pretty much by the fact that countries like the UK and Italy already have embedded presstitutes in the forward operations of the Ukis (with my deepest apologies to crack-whores, street-walkers, and prostitutes who are a far more honest, dignified, and honourable lot than your average Wester journalist).

If the Clown Worlder Pedovampires manage to push Putin to a nuclear response, the gloves are pretty much off and Europe is likely to become a literal wasteland, complete with mutants, radioactive craters, and a scorched Earth, to one degree or other. This is the hoped for response by the Satanists. I know its hard to believe, but you really need to educate yourself about what Freemasons are, what they believe, who they are serving, and what their ultimate master-plan, as laid out in quite some detail by their guru Albert Pike is. It literally is the bringing of Hell on Earth to satisfy their master Lucifer and bring on what they see the new era of “enlightenment”. Which is one of their pet phrases, along with “equality, brotherhood of man, and freedom”, yes, the egalitè fraternitè and libertè of the French revolutions, which murdered Catholics by the tens of thousands, including torturing babies, bankrupted the French government and blamed it on Luis and Marie Antoniette, who lost their heads on it, and the money was used to fund the American revolution that created the first Freemason country in the world, the USA. Which is why all manner of degeneracy, filth and absolute inhuman crap spews forth from there.

Programs like Jerry Springer, in the early 1990s were unknown in the rest of the world, and the first time my brother and I saw them we were flabbergasted at what a cesspool of total degeneracy America was. We called those shows “Why did you fuck my uncle’s dog.” because in essence, that is what they were. And most of that stuff is pushed by the people who run Hollywood and many of the media there, which, Cohen-cidentally, also happen to mostly be Jews, who also Cohen-cidentally, if you listen to their Rabbis and read their Talmud, tell you quite clearly that the Judaic religion worships the ruler of this world, that is, Satan, not God the Father.

This is not hyperbole. You really should investigate the matter yourself if you don’t believe me. Please go ahead and prove me wrong.

Now, as to whether they will succeed or not in making Europe the hard battleground for WWIII, I think it’s always possible, but somewhat unlikely.

First of all, even the puppets of the “Americans” running America and by extension Europe, are starting to realise that if it does devolve to Nuclear War, they too will get fried. But more importantly, the average European citizen has absolutely no wish whatsoever of even entering a conventional war with Russia. Never mind a nuclear one.

The Clown Worlders in Europe are banking on Putin’s decency, which is to say, that they think even if they produce a dirty nuke bomb somewhere in Russia (that is not say Moscow, or St. Petersburg) Putin will be too humane and polite to nuke London or New York. Maybe. If I was him, I also probably would not nuke one of those two cities. But Langley in Virginia? You bet. Or maybe Quantico. Or one or two of the Amrican Nuclear bases in Europe. Not with a Tsar Bomba, mind you, just an equivalent tac nuke. Probably a clean-ish one to let the citizens know, “Hey, sorry, but if you guys don’t get rid of these pedovampires, we have to, and if you live near them and continue to support them, well… we’ll try to not nuke you with dirty bombs, but ya know, omelettes and eggshells.”

So that’s my take.

Reaction?

The one I always tell you guys. Get out of the cities, prepare as best you can to be fiat-money independent, water and food secure, security secure (guns, ammo, defences of your home and family), and build a community of co-religious people with common mindset and interests. For me it’s Sedevacantists, and only Sedevacantists, because in our brief 3 years here we have already noted that people who wanted to be part of this community but were not proper Catholics invariably flaked, gave up, or turned on us. All things I expected, but was refreshing to see happen in real terms. It’s solidified the remaining people to see things as they are and it is a unanimous perspective now among us. If you’re not a proper Catholic (the only Catholics left are Sedevacantist), we’re basically not interested in your joining us.

Catholicism has risen from the ashes time and again, and overturned heresies and situations that by all metrics should have wiped it out countless times. The reason is that Jesus promised he will be with His Church until the End Times. And that’s good enough for all of us here to have utter faith in. Our job is simply to prepare and make things as ready as we can for His return. Which, as far as I can tell from Revelation, simply means to hold on and not lose faith no matter what foul evil befalls us.

I know the people who usually link to these updates are unlikely to do so now, because I think most of them are protestant, but hey, if you think your Church from the year 1800 or even 1521, or your Novus Ordo fake “Catholicism” is going to out-perform the only Christianity that has ever existed on Earth, you go for it. Create your community of co-religionists and good luck to you.

Idiot Fatigue

I have written before about WWIII Fatigue. Idiot Fatigue is somewhat worse.

It is the realisation that only a minute number of people are not entirely fooled by most of the absurd lies we all have to live under, like Fiat Money, the given reasons for War (instead of the valid reasons one may have for the murder of evil people), the concept that anyone anywhere is actually living in a Democracy instead of a tyrannical and demonic machine, lies so blatant you have to be functionally retarded to believe them: 9/11, the “official” story of the Moon landings (as opposed to what I think happened), the covid scam, “vaccines”, and on and on, and on.

The reality is that we are surrounded by idiots. Imbecilles. People too stupid to have an original thought if their life depended on it. People who are so dumb they are literally self-euthanising themselves and their entire people in the name of some absurd lie that boils down to having “good manners” towards people that literally want to rape and murder you and your people.

And professor Cipolla was, and remains, absolutely right. The number of idiots is ALWAYS more than you can possibly imagine.

Which means that things will get very dark eventually.

It’s not that the evil Satanists trying to kill most of us are any smarter really, no, they are just more evil, more focused and driven by the demons that own them, to perpetrate their monstrous plans on us in the hope that they will rule in Hell instead of be playthings like they plan to make the survivors among us.

But they too are stupid.

For one they bet on the evil guy, which is KNOWN will and can only, ultimately lose.

But such is the way of the fly. They have no concept of long term planning, or even thinking of tomorrow. Tomorrow is someone else’s problem. Even if that someone else is them in the future, because to them, that guy in the future is not them, but some random guy they don’t care about. That is how short time preference works. Only the perennial here and now exists in their stultified brains.

And so I wonder, if the Satanists were smart, all the idiots would already be dead, and then they would have a problem because while the survivors may not all be good, at least some of them would be, and if they are not idiots, they could prove a problem. But the Satanists are idiots too. Cunning, but not actually intelligent as such.

So what will result is an ongoing drawn-out chaos that will fatigue even the few smart evil Satanists in due course. The cattle will not die off fully in their lifetime you see, and if they need to escalate to a full nuclear war they too may end up as casualties, regardless of how well they think they have planned, because… that’s the trouble with idiots, as professor Cipolla stated, they are far more dangerous than mere evil people. Their idiocy makes them unpredictable and makes them do things so stupid no one can predict or prevent the damage they can cause; least of all the idiots themselves.

So, whether you are a smart (and ridiculously wealthy, because of fraud and lies and so on) Satanist, or a smart Catholic (surviving by your wits and reflexes alone probably) the reality is that you may be in a similar state of being, which is to wait until all the idiots, or at least a large enough number of them, have died off. Only at that point, can you then begin to rebuild, or if necessary, fight back. Put it this way, if 7.5 billion people died all tomorrow, whoever is left, will have trouble enough to survive and create a functional way to continue surviving, whether it will be by foraging for food in the post-apocalyptic ruins, or gathering enough half-dead slaves to keep the airflow in your underground evil Satanist ™ bunker going by tying them up to manual windmills once the power fails (because of some idiot you thought was an electrician).

If you are a secularist you may find little between the Satanist and the Catholic, or you may prefer the Satanist because he has the illusion of comfort, but that comfort is, like the “pride” of the homosexuals, merely a fake. A veneer. That is… just another lie. What they do not have, what they will neve have, is an inner comfort. The Catholic’s life may seem harsh, and unforgiving and painful, and it is, externally. But internally we are at peace. We need not hope, nor fear. Because unlike the Satanists, who deep down know their debt WILL become due, and they WILL be eaten, and not quite last, but rather, before even the Catholic, certainly from the metaphysical perspective. While we Catholic know that no matter what befalls us, our souls are on the side of Justice, and God. Their master will consume them eternally for their brief, temporary, and anxiety-wracked lives. Ours will give us eternal life and serenity in our hearts.

But the Satanists cannot think, nor see ahead. They’re the flies, of the Lord of the flies.

Secular Dating Advice

The videos of Orion Teraban are generally good advice and this one is too, concerning what he refers to as the present day dating market.

However, it is not correct to say that things were really any different ten or even twenty years ago.

I have been essentially out of the dating market since early 2017 now, but I was certainly in it from about 2004 or 2005 until then, with a hiatus of some 5 years or so between 2008-9 and early 2013 which is how long my second marriage lasted. Before that, online dating wasn’t really a thing for me because I had been in a long relationship since before the internet until that ended and I met my first wife shortly thereafter, which sort of imploded about the 2004/2005 point.

There are some observations I found interesting in comparing my own experience with what Orion states in the above-linked video, and as these may be useful to younger men that are still in the process, I thought it would be useful to share them.

The first point is that the advice concerning the having high hopes but low expectations is absolutely correct and is probably pivotal if you’re not going to he a bitter and resentful weirdo. Personally, maybe because of my slightly autistic but high IQ perspective, this was never really an issue after a certain point. At first my main frustration was really more about my perception that women’s brains appeared not to function properly. Logic appeared to be a mystery to them and when you layered that on top of the basic 30 point IQ communication gap that I tend to have with most people, it honestly felt as if I was trying to have a meaningful relationship with monkeys.

If you are a woman reading, I realise how all this sounds misogynistic, etc. etc. But your feelings on the matter are irrelevant, because this is not about you, but rather my lived experience. So, you can either continue reading and possibly learn something about male and female interactions that may be useful to you, or you can get offended and stop reading or rage against it, either way, my life and perspective will not change one iota. So, comport yourself accordingly, and consider this your lesson number one in basic logic.

Now, returning to us, men, the experience felt disturbing to me because on the one hand I had the vague idea (instilled by boomer lies) that men and women were supposed to have equivalent brains, and on the other, my lived experience was that I was generally dealing with creatures that were possibly more akin to a pet you can have sex with than a real, thinking, human being.

It seemed to me that the female brain was hardly at all interested in any of the abstract things that interested me on almost any level, and were instead apparently fixated almost entirely on the human interaction level, to the point that gossip, drama, and needless emotional negativity consumed their lives. The only positive aspect of this was the sexual component, in which they could become as interested as I was, even if they started out relatively tame. Once I demonstrated to them certain aspects of their own physical and/or mental sexuality they had either not explored or encountered before, they generally speaking became, sexually at least, quite entertaining. And they quite often also mistook sexual compatibility with being deeply in love. A facet I tried very hard to prevent them from confusing, certainly when I was not interested in them in that way.

I did not want to have a pet-like relationship where the main component of the relation was essentially only great sex. It got to the point where I started to worry that I would end up seeing women in general as just that, creatures to have sex with but not even bother trying to engage in any other meaningful discourse. I knew this was not reality either, though it also quickly became obvious that the boomer lie of equality between male and female brains was just that: an outrageous lie.

As a result I also took up reading about the differences between male and female brains and although the literature on it is scant (because God forbid anyone tells the truth, doing so gets you cancelled if not incarcerated these days) one of the more useful books on it is Mapping the Mind by Rita Carter. Though I note with some cynicism that the linked book is an “updated and revised” edition, so I am not sure if it still says the things it used to or if the “updating” has resulted in a sanitising of any politically “unacceptable” facts.

At any rate, the reality is that the male and female brains have noticeable structural differences. And once you know this, a basic grasp of logic will immediately tell you two things:

One: they will perform differently

Two: they will have developed (or been created) differently for a reason that is valid in reality, regardless of what political narratives by homoglobos, boomers, satanists, feminists, or anyone else, will tell you to the contrary.

In large part, that is how I developed my Caveman Theory, (see books I wrote) and using it as a model certainly proved very useful in my life.

What changed for me was that I began to study the women I dated more as a scientist might, and noted a number of behaviours that while irrational in the specifics of my circumstances with them, had an original logical and biological imperative behind it. Once I catalogued these behaviours and recognised their origins as per my model of reality, it was then just a matter of on the one hand accepting reality as it is, which was the easy part for me, and on the other, reconciling what my tolerance for humanity could be raised to without me losing my mind.

I discovered that I could genuinely enjoy the company of women, regardless of what I would have labelled as their chicken-headed behaviour a few years earlier, as long as it was somewhat limited, or at least when they had a certain level of self-awareness. Women that were aware of their irrational behaviour were quite entertaining and even endearing at times, which made up at least for a bit of the times they behaved essentially insanely from a male perspective.

The change was that I had gone from processing women as:

beings incapable of reason that had only sex and a generic companionship level to offer for the relative trouble having them around entailed

To:

Partial aliens that had biological motivations stuck in reasons that originated from millennia in the past if not millions of years ago.

Suddenly they were interesting beings again, and I could appreciate them not just generally but also at the individual level.

Yet, I was also aware that becoming overly invested in one of them that did not cross the threshold of minimum ability to reason and be self-aware that I required, was a stupid thing to do and entirely my fault.

This realisation was of course gradual and only improved over time. Nor did it necessarily make me aware of various pitfalls that can be encountered, such as getting involved with narcissists that have oscar-like acting abilities, and ignoring various red flags because you’re into exploring all the facets of this partially alien species.

The outcome, from a purely secular standpoint is indeed a rather brutal one. You will bounce from one woman to the next, leaving behind the ones who you can’t tolerate beyond a certain level or who vice-versa can’t tolerate you.

It is true that in this purely secular mode, it becomes easy enough to bed various women and it is true that in that milieu, you find plenty of women who also are just interested in the sex and not much else. Certainly I had plenty of encounters where the main factor was just to satisfy our respective curiosity of each other’s bodies. Those situations usually lasted no more than a few days, and sometimes only mere hours.

But then you realise too that even though you are now able to fulfil pretty much any purely sexual desire you may have, there is still something missing.

Considering women as a kind of partially alien species still does not permit that level of intimacy that gives you a sense of deep fulfilment. Yet, at the same time, and paradoxically, as so many deep truths are, if all you focus on is your desire for that deep connection, you are almost certain to never get it, or experience it, other than perhaps only as your own delusion; which is all the more devastating when the illusion inevitably collapses, and the faux-relationship ends.

It was then that I realised that the only thing left in terms of relationship challenge and goals was the very thing that boomers have advised my generation against all our lives: creating a family and having children.

My first attempt at this succeeded only insofar as my daughter was created, but failed by every other metric after which I had a revelatory experience and began to study the reality I had encountered concerning the reality of a Loving God I had never really believed in before.

In reading parts of the New Testament I realised that the nature of the relationship between a man and a woman that led to the creation of functional families, was not only absolutely correct and made perfect sense, but it was also so far removed from my own experience and even way of seeing things that it might as well be in another Galaxy.

I resolved to simply drift through life with whatever female companionship I could tolerate. I had no specific need for a permanent relationship, personal loyalty beyond a few (but relatively absolute) aspects, or even much in the way of connection beyond any woman I had anything to do with not irritating me past a certain level.

I did not try to mask any of these realities and I still wasn’t short of female companionship, but I was mostly indifferent to it beyond some biological and emotional basic needs for sex, some human connection, and a certain level of peace.

Gradually however, as I deepened my understanding of God, and concluded the Christian God was the real one, and more specifically the Catholic God, and even more specifically that only the sedevacantists were still actual Catholics, a natural, organic, and quite honestly mysterious change came over me, and in some way, mysterious and unknowable in human words, yet, life, God, myself, and the Universe, all seemed to conspire to get another, extremely unlikely one, to come closer to me over time and then, all of a sudden, in one day, move in with me.

The first few years were certainly difficult, and there are plenty of practical issues left even today, but for the most part, the emotional and intellectual ones we have worked out. And in some ways though we have been married 7 years already, it all feels as if it happened a few weeks ago. And in other ways it feels as if we have been together for 40 years.

The difference between my marriage now, the only one I did as a baptised Catholic in a Church with all the correct Catholic procedures for it by a real Catholic priest and also a Bishop, and the relationships I had before, is not something that is in any way easy to put into words.

What I can say without ANY hesitation at all is that it beats all the other experiences put together in terms of fulfilment and peace it brings to my life.

The connection is real and deep and although generally speaking my wife is not especially interested in astronomy, martial arts, or even, the theological details of Catholicism, I certainly can converse with her about pretty much any topic and she is more than capable of keeping up with any of them, being as there is no IQ communication gap, and this is undoubtedly absolutely fundamental for me. And although women on that IQ range definitely have a bunch of quirks, some of them truly trying for an impatient man like myself, (for example, she simply has no conception of time, and can take hours to get ready then sometimes do it in minutes, but it’s a process so random that no computer will ever be able to model it), I can handle them, because the positives she brings —in far more important aspects of life— clearly outweigh any minor irritants.

But none of this can transmit the sensation of connection I have with her that goes beyond anything I can explain in secular terms. We just barely even have the words in any language to even address it, and I don’t intend to try.

My best advice to you is to first discover the truth about God, the rest will take care of itself.

My book Caveman Theory is geared towards secular people, but the thread in it is based on pure logic and if you can do logic well, the natural place you end up at, by the way, is the same one that Catholics have taken for centuries:

Proper marriage and making children.

May you find your right path.

On Success with Women, evaluating types of men and IQ

Vox made an interesting post on Chris Langan.

It’s definitely worth a read.

I find it interesting primarily for reasons of philosophical intellectual differences I note between people of high IQ.

It’s the one place where the uniqueness of a human mind can become really quite interesting; if you’re into noticing such things anyway, which I am. A little explanation of what I assume is Vox’s general perspective, as well as how mine differs follows, all of which is merely a preamble to explaining what I think are the differences in how Vox and myself rate Chris Langan; allegedly the smartest man on Earth.

Vox’s SSH is the result of his observations of men within various social settings. Whether he was influenced by the PUA nomenclature or even their theory or not is unknown to me and somewhat irrelevant. The process of evaluating other men en masse is a relatively natural one, at least for men who are essentially unconcerned with other humans for the most part, aside how to mostly be left alone by the vast majority of them. I.e. what Vox has labelled the Sigma.

His version is far more detailed and specific about the sexual aspect. My own version of the SSH is something I came up with long before Vox’s version or knowing anything about him or PUAs. I talked about it before, along with a version of the female SSH I came up with much later.

The point I find interesting is that Vox’s version of the SSH is indeed more detailed and more clear in defining large swathes of the male population, but I think his generic motivation for noticing is probably quite different from my own.

I can’t speak to his motives but I would assume they are rather rarefied and somewhat detached from any specific issue. It’s more the approach if a butterfly collector I would assume.

My own version was far more akin to the intent of a hunter, identifying potentially dangerous animals, generic ones that may be useful or irrelevant and other hunters, which likewise could be dangerous, useful or irrelevant.

As a result, my version of the SSH only had three types of men:

Alphas: The natural leaders in a group. Generally my perspective is taken mostly from a very primitive and physical aspect. My Alphas differ somewhat from Vox’s in that I was primarily concerned with the physical alphas. Some captains of industry that are Alphas in every other respect, become practically irrelevant when the SHTF in a physical confrontation. This was probably a combination of growing up mostly in rather primitive societies, doing martial arts pretty much from the time I could walk, and working in close protection in South Africa for some years. The Alphas in this world can literally lead gangs, have other men do violence on their behalf and so on.

Betas: pretty much everyone that wasn’t an alpha. A very few may be technically proficient in physical confrontations, but this generally limits itself to the individual level, and I became relatively proficient at not worrying too much about any confrontation one on one quite early in my life. I was, of course, aware of there being a large variety of sub-categories in this one, but my approach was to deal with each type as they came up. Some were useful, (bravos) some annoying, (gammas) some irrelevant (omegas) and most a mix of the above (deltas) that could be useful, annoying or irrelevant depending on the specific situation, but overall, as a class they were not dangerous in general terms.

Scouts: my own class. These could be unpredictable and dangerous if you got on their wrong side, for whatever reason, and if dangerous could be a far more formidable enemy than an alpha even if generally they would not have anything like the social resources of an Alpha. They also tend to be chamaleontic and able to infiltrate other cultures or societies more successfully than any other type.

The Chris Langan’s evaluation

Vox’s is in keeping with his way of seeing the world. He gives Langan his due stating it is clear that the man is smarter than he is, yet notes rhat Langan’s lack of success with women is also a fundamental aspect of his mostly Delta status. And I think this is entirely correct. Langan’s biggest chip on his shoulder is that no one is smart enough to evaluate his grand theory of everything, (CTMU) and paradoxically, that no one is giving him the accolades he deserves. Which is fully in keeping with a Delta’s concern for being respected for their work as well as having someone tell them what to do.

As for having the thought that most people are too dumb to follow my ideas, that’s nothing new to me either. I published my concepts on The Face on Mars, Systema, the Catholic Church and Catholicism, and relationships between men and women, and then, once done, I can’t even be bothered to self-promote enough to make even a modest living from it. Which is the difference between Langan and myself, regardless of IQ.

More importantly, from my perspective, I don’t rate Langan at all on any scale that I care about.

Whether he is more or less intelligent than I am is irrelevant from my perspective. What I look at is his effectiveness. And in this respect I believe he is essentially a non-entity. I don’t mean fame-wise or even society-wise. I mean on a personal level. And while I am not in Langan’s head, I think it’s fair to say that it is fairly obvious he is far from pleased with his achievements in life, by his own metrics, whatever those are.

And he certainly is less successful than I am by my own metrics.

* He does not seem to have fathered any children (at least not that I could find any evidence of it)

* He seems to have been unable to let go of the resentment built up over his hard childhood (something I managed though I think his situation was far harder than anything I had to endure)

* I believe he is not wealthy enough to have at least a comfortable life, I may be wrong on this, but given it’s just him and his wife it seems to me he is still chasing fame and fortune in his 70s.

He also had a very hard childhood, so I am not denigrating the man, I am merely stating what are objective facts as I see them.

I also read his CTMU and frankly, it is nothing revolutionary. First of all he uses a lot of unnecessarily convoluted self-defined language in a dense format. This is both unnecessary and a sign of some degree of showmanship.

While creating neologisms for efficiency can be useful, packing a half-dozen of then in every sentence or two is not the way to be efficient. Nor the way to be understood by people you deem to be a lot dumber than you are. My IQ was measured at 152 and 157, but none of my books are anything that is too complicated for a person of normal intelligence to follow.

Could I make the books shorter? Sure. Probably by 80%, but then the number of people that could appreciate them would be minimal. In fact, one of my better achievements is Believe! Which at only 98 pages has nevertheless resulted in over 100 people getting baptised into Sedevacantist Catholicism (aka actual Catholicism).

Vox also rated Jordan Peterson as smart (which he is technically, with an IQ in the 120-130 range) so he is entirely correct, but I have largely ignored the guy because he is clearly an only partly sane occultist, pathological liar and grifting conman.

Vox’s more highbrow perspective is certainly more in keeping with what society gauges as being success, intelligence, and achievement, but none of those social metrics are anything that I ever thought of as being particularly important in general, and certainly not for me specifically.

I find it interesting that given the difference in childhoods, Vox, Langan and myself also seem to have rather different ways of measuring success and effectiveness, even if broadly speaking we see the same things (covid scam, 9/11 inside job, chemtrails, etc).

It is sobering to see that emotional events that we go through in childhood may be significant for the rest of our lives, regardless of IQ. This is not news to me, as I have been intimately aware of this aspect of humanity for a long time and confirmed it many, many times thanks to the hypnosis work I do. But it is good to remind ourselves of the weaknesses we all carry around, even, or especially, the ones most hidden to ourselves.

The economic crash

May finally be starting.

Nearly 3 Trillion USD wiped off the stock market in one day.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1931549/global-financial-meltdown-markets

Tel Aviv diplomats leaving Israel.

Iran saying a “decisive” response to Israel is coming in the next 24 hours

(((America))) sending warships to the middle East

It is starting to line up quite a bit.

Hypothetically, is Iran were to actually nuke Israel, as in really wipe it off the map, the Jewish bankers running America would undoubtedly try to go for global nuclear war in a fit of demonic rage, so it could get really bad.

Then again, the guys actually pulling the nuclear triggers MIGHT suddenly be struck by conscience (doubtful) either way, it is unlikely that is Israel was wiped out the global war would not intensify.

The point is that the puppeteers, whatever you believe about them and whoever your own research states they are, are not, ever, going to be removed from power by peaceful means.

Nor will they stop with their demonic agenda.

Once you DO do your own research and look into it, the conclusion that these people are operating under a spiritual, that is, religious, belief system to at compels them to act as they do is inescapable.

And that religion is “Illuminism” and their God is Lucifer, the light-bringer. And their coming of the “Messiah” is what Catholics have predicted for centuries: The Antichrist.

I was never a religious person and I thought Catholicism was absurd (because the Novus Ordo Satanic “Catholic” Church that has masqueraded as Catholic since 1958, IS absurd, AND Satanic).

It took a literal road to Damascus moment to show me God is real and God is Love. And I then spent the next 4 years obsessively educating myself on Christianity. And finally concluded real Catholicism (only espoused by Sedevacantists today) was indeed the closest and best representation of reality, and in testing it ever since, I have only had repeated, unfailing proof that it is in fact the best and truest way to interpret reality as it is.

I no more wanted Demons and Satan to be real than any other libertine still stumbling around addicted to pleasure and excitement. But reality is as it is, not as we wish it to be, and ultimately, no one will be left on the sidelines.

As our Lord explained some 2000 years ago:

Either you are with Him, or you are against Him. Those are the only two choices available. Ultimately the choice between Good or Evil is binary. Though the road to it is far from binary, the final choice is.

And you will not be spared the having to choose; because not choosing is also a choice for the darkness.

So. Pick your master, for we all have one.

I pray those of you as hard-headed as I was get your road to Damascus moment right now, and that those of you a little smarter can get there by logic and reason alone, but I pray you all get there.

God is real. So is Free Will.

You are not a puppet. You get to choose.

I hope you choose well. Sedevacantism is indeed the Way. Research it for yourself, don’t take my word for it.

And the Fearmongering Continues

If you are the intellectual type, you can read this long-ass screed by Simplicius here, about how it’s all about to close in and the technocrats are going to own your blood with digital chips embedded in your ass (because that is the closest point to where the brain is for a lot of people) and Putin is also in on all of it, And you and me and everyone is doomed, doomed, DOOMED! Except if maybe you sit in the lotus position and meditate and pray that Generation Alpha (my son and daughters) will save you.

And in case you survive like a rat, you are even more doomed because then Nuclear war will wipe you out. According to this woman anyway, who.. WROTE A BOOK! So you really need to panic.

Here is one guy who at least puts a little reality back into the nuclear war scenario. And who also gives excellent book recommendations. For fun. That is fun books. I mean, he misses me out, but hey, I didn’t know about him either, but I feel we might get along. UPDATE: Adam Piggott tells me the man is a Covidiot who thinks Ukraine are the good guys. Oh well. You see how I am too optimistic still about humans…

The truth is really a LOT simpler. Especially if you understand one very, very, very, simple point:

NOTHING HAPPENS WITHOUT ACTION

I wish that single sentence would be enough for most readers to think about for 15 seconds, make the relevant logical syllogisms and then act accordingly.

If that were the case, there would be no COVID, the Satanists would have all been burnt at the stake and almost everyone would be a decent (sedevacantist) Catholic.

But instead we have OnlyFans tikTokers trying to discuss economic theory with their anus winking at the screen.

SO… allow me to expand…

You need to stop believing ll the bullshit on your screens.

You need to stop being such a fat, lazy, comfortable, weak, moron.

You need to simply get off your ass and start working towards what you want and ignore the naysayers, the black-pillars, the weak, the scared, the retarded.

Get fit, buy land in rural areas, get/built/buy a home there, I wrote plenty about how to defeat Clown World and yes, I know most of you are penniless and have no way to do this big style, but I addressed that too. Get a backpack, get a go bag. Figure out the geography, and at least prepare, but above all, DO NOT BUY INTO ANY OF THEIR BULLSHIT.

Start with civil disobedience and speaking your mind. I don’t care if I am in public, in polite company or anywhere else. I make sure everyone is aware of my stance of everything from the child-mutilating sex changes that Clown World wants to impose on children, to the genetic death serums they tried to force us to take, to the fact that it is mostly Jews that run the World economy and media, and that these bankers have been behind (and continue to be) behind every war, and human misery that has happened.

I don’t go around with a sandwich board, but anyone that engages in conversation with me that is not limited to the specifics of what the interaction is or the weather, and who asks my opinion or proffers their own is not left in any doubt of what I think about any of the topics they care to mention.

I had a guy that services gas bottles almost run out of the house thinking I was some kind of Nazi, which I think he was too scared to hear when I told him I don;t subscribe to Nazi ideology either.

The point is, I don’t do this with “fire in my belly”. I just do it. Like eating a sandwich or drinking a glass of water, and to the occasional shocked:

“Oh Mah Gawd! Are you Racist/Homophobic/Misogynist?”

I explain my position succinctly while testing theirs:

“Are you ok with raping little children? Are you ok with people whose religion is ok with it? I am not. Please answer.”

“Are you aware of the incidence of child sexual abuse both within the homosexual communities as well as their active incidence of perpetrating it? Why not? Are you aware if everyone was homosexual the human race would end? Can you define “natural” for me?”

“Are you aware women are more emotional than men? Do you think children have the same capacity for emotional control that adults do? Why don’t 4 year olds vote? Please explain to me how FIAT money works. Or define to me the principal foundational points of the three main world religions that affect life on this planet. Can’t do it? Why should you even vote then?”

It has a very salutary effect.

First, I have yet to meet a single person that openly disagrees with me. Secondly everyone is polite, regardless of their real opinions. Thirdly, they either stay far away from me after that, or else become friendlier.

But above all, I don’t CARE about what they are saying. And neither should you. Build your community. Build your food independence. Build your water independence. Stop relying on smart-phone anything.

Make them all work in cash money and paper, and if a shop refuses to deal in cash, stop using it.

The whole point is, as I said some 10 years ago:

City states will return.

Real Christianity (actual Catholicism in the form of Sedevacantsm has the only legitimate claim to it on Earth, regardless of if you like it or not) is what will make the difference.

They can’t impose their rules on people who don’t need them for anything and who are willing and able to resist them. You still have time. Move your ass. Stop whining and complaining and doing absolutely fuck all.

Act.

And now if you want to understand the future…

Particularly of Europe, but also of all the West, read this post, it only takes a few minutes and it absolutely describes precisely and exactly what the game-plan is and how it has already succeeded in Germany.

Except of course it’s worse because there isn’t even mention of the chemtrails and other ways they are trying to wipe us out completely.

Finally, ask yourself a two-part question, it is the most important question you can ever ask for your future and that of your children:

Who is pushing this agenda?

Why?

Once you answer those two questions fully and in depth, I would not be surprised is you:

1. Decide to become a sedevacantist Catholic, and

2. Want to move to the Kurganate regardless of where you live now.

There simply are no known alternatives that have been tested in time and worked as genuine solutions.

Crosses

I got the little Viking and Piglet tiny metal crosses as they keep noting my simple steel one.

The little Viking’s is silver and pretty plain and simple on a silver chain.

Piglet’s is a little fancier gold-plated chain and gold plated little cross.

As it turn out the little Viking doesn’t like the feel of something around his neck so he leaves it off, though he is very conscious of it and its symbolic importance. Today he saw it next on the bedside table and asked about it, wondering if I got him a silver one so it looks similar to mine. I replied that was indeed the case.

Piglet (3) who was standing up on the bed near me, says:

“He’s got a silver one and I have a gold one…”

Then she flings her arms up to the sky, her fuzzy curly haired head also looking up at the sky like some miniature pagan and shouts:

“I love gold!”

In case there was any doubt, she’s obviously from Viking raiders stock too.

Challenge for the Naysayers

Statement: Catholicism has been the best civilisation humanity has ever experienced.

Go ahead and try and disprove that.

Some baseline issues to consider:

  • Catholicism is considered to be the religion that started (depending on your view of things) sometime between the year 0 and 34 AD, since the life, death and resurrection of Christ is the pivotal and foundational aspect of Catholicism (Christianity).
  • All other versions of “Christianity”, be it any of the 40,000+ versions of Protestantism, Eastern “Orthodoxy”, and including all Novus Ordo “Catholicism” are mere perversions of actual Catholicism, which is the only Christianity that ever has existed or ever can exist, since God is not likely to produce thousands of false and dead ends.
  • Catholicism in its best exterior-known fashion was absolutely infiltrated over roughly two centuries and ultimately almost completely converged to active Satanism by 1958 when Angelo Roncalli became the first of the currently unbroken line of Antipopes. Effectively this means that the Catholic Church has been greatly reduced and has been living in an Interregnum (between royal realms) since 1958. A condition that happens every time a Pope dies before another valid Pope is elected. It is an unusual situation but not entirely unprecedented since there have been periods of up to 70 years where is was very difficult to know which Pope was the real Pope since up to three of them laid claim to the throne of Peter and resolving who were the antipopes happened generally after they were dead, and there has also been a period of at least two years without anyone at all on the See of Peter too. The conclusion of all this is that the only Catholicism left is that espoused by Sedevacantists (ie those Catholics left who recognise that Vatican II and all things related to it are anything but Catholic, and continue to follow Catholicism as it always was and has been encoded in the Pio-Benedictine Code of Canon Law of 1917).

On that basis, I challenge anyone to find a civilisation in the entirety of human history that was superior for human beings than Catholicism.

So far I have been presented with only two possible alternatives, both absurd.

  1. An unspecified antediluvian civilisation (Eg Atlantis, Lemuria, etc.) Considering I literally wrote The Face on Mars in which I essentially proved that such a civilisation not only existed, but likely was responsible for the destruction of certainly one, and possibly two planets in our solar system and then continued to have a war here, on our planet, the idea that such people were technologically more advanced certainly follows, but that they were a superior civilisation, is laughable. Certainly by the way I measure a civilisation anyway, which is not limited to mere technological capacity. And which should be obvious to anyone not mentally deficient: Destroying a couple of planets and then continuing a generational war between the few survivors on a third planet doesn’t exactly inspire one with confidence in such a people’s concepts of mercy, charity, humanity, and so on.
  1. An equally unspecified pre-Christian people. This smelt rather badly of some Pagan LARPing nonsense, since the “pre-christian” people in question were intentionally left unspecified. Possibly because I have been rather clear in making fun of people that pretend that their supposed Viking ancestors were “superior” in civilisation/religion/belief system to Catholics. Which is hilarious for a large number of reasons, but I’ll identify only three. First of all, the barbaric, vicious and rape-oriented “civilisation” of the Vikings was absolutely a fucking horror show that modern people barely have any concept of, and secondly, because that’s just based on the little that we have left about their practices we are absolutely sure of, because a bunch of the other things that they believed or engaged in remains lost to the fact that they never bothered to write any of it down, preserve it or even bother to continue perpetrating it. But personally, and most hilariously of all for me, is the fact that my own ancestors absolutely were from those genetic people. The Franks and Normans that formed overwhelmingly the largest part of the first Crusade (1095 AD) were the descendants of the very Vikings that up to a couple of centuries earlier (about 900 AD) raided and murdered many Catholic monasteries and monks. In order to stop this, the Catholics offered them lands and space to protect themselves from their raids, on the understanding that they would fight off their kinsmen who wanted to continue raiding. And over time, all of these people converted to Christianity, without losing their talent for battle. My own family line can directly be traced back to the returning Crusaders when the Outremer was essentially beginning to be overwhelmed after a couple of centuries of occupation with no help at all from the “Orthodox” Easterners who had asked for Catholic help to begin with, and with ever increasing costs borne by Catholic Europe alone, and increasing numbers of belligerent Muslims. The returning crusaders with my surname came to Italy via present day Albania, quashed a feud that had been ongoing for 200 years, then split into two branches, one that remained in the south; the Golden branch, since the King of Sicily had made them Marquis (as well as all future first-born sons), and a Silver one (wilder explorers) who went further north to Venice and took part in the war of Candia were they were again rewarded for military bravery and given a perpetual noble title of Patricians (the lowest of Nobles). So, if anyone at all knows anything about such people, it really is me, and no, the Vikings absolutely were NOT in any way, shape or form a superior “civilisation” to Catholicism. In fact it is questionable if one should even consider them a civilisation at all. And pretty much the same goes for any other ancient culture, Spartan, Athenian, Roman, all were far from pleasant societies than anyone alive today normally imagines. Nor can we say the Chinese dynasties, or the Imperial Japanese ones were superior civilisations. The Chinese were far more numerous sure, but in terms of conditions of life for the average Chinese? It’s laughable.

In conclusion, the only “attacks” that will be forthcoming will be from:

Boomer tier ‘Muricans saying “We went to the Moon!” No, you didn’t the Nazis did it for you, and no, you didn’t really go anywhere near the way you think you did. And in any case, Protestantism has only and purely been the secularisation of Christianity (Catholicism) which has got us to where it is today, with their transgender Bishops, 40,000 plus “demon-nimations” and one rule to rule them all: “Interpreth as thou will!”. The rampant Clown World face of the West currently is Protestantism writ large. It is the “acceptance” and “tolerance” for the demonic, which is, of course, the very intent of the founders of America, since it was financed and created by Freemasons with funds from the French Revolution and the same Freemasonic Mottos of Equality, Fraternity (brotherhood of man) and Liberty, which all translate ultimately to “Do as thou wilt shall be the whole of the law”. And since Protestants are absolutely ignorant of anything even remotely Christian, let me spell out that that law is literally the one Satanic Law, as espoused by Alistair Crowley.

Ignorant Eastern “Orthodox”, who will claim they are the true keepers of the faith, while trying to avoid the fact they are as split as the Protestants, with no visible head, their Churches segregated by nationality, but the final nail in their coffin being that they neither spread, the gospel anywhere close to how much the Catholics did, but rather, they stagnated, and secondly, their achievements in terms of humane evolution remained similarly stagnant, as did their art and philosophy. They didn’t create the scientific method, abolish slavery or change much of anything for the better. Catholics did.

Randoms. These can range from people who will try to pretend they are knowledgeable of Japanese civilisation, or Tibetan ones say, while missing the main point that even if we accepted the premise that Shintoism and the Samurai age was superior to Catholicism (it was not, but it certainly has a level of aesthetic appeal), or that Tibetan monasteries were the pinnacle of civilisation (they were and are not, and anyway the Chinks have taken them out) it remains a tiny fraction of the level and number of effects that Catholicism created on Earth when compared to these alternatives. The random brainwashed Protestants left bleating in the dark really have nothing meaningful to say. The so-called “Protestant work ethic” together with the Industrial Revolution, which can be placed under Protestant “achievements” is merely a mechanisation of human beings and ultimately does not actually produce the best quality of work, though it does produce large quantity of it while mostly dehumanising the people in it, reducing them to cogs in the giant machine dedicated to “profit”. And obviously all the evils that Protestantism has allowed to become “normal” by “tolerating” them remain too. Finally, pedophilic religions like Islam or Judaism are clearly inferior religions and systems of belief, one essentially still relegated to little more than desert nomads in terms of technology, ability and discovery, since all they have is taken or paid for and produced by Westerners, and the other hyper-focussed on enslaving the rest of humanity while turning a profit, in case their proclivities for raping children wasn’t enough.

I would certainly welcome anyone cogent, and dealing solely in dialectic, that would be willing to debate the fact that Catholicism is without question the best system for human beings that humanity has ever come up with, but so far the only two people that I thought might make a reasoned argument have either declined outright (Andrew Wilson – Eastern Orthodox), or stated that they may at some distant future date, possibly engage the topic with me (Vox Day – Protestant). And so far, I haven’t really come across anyone, on or offline that might have the intellectual capacity to hold up their end in an honest intellectual debate. Perhaps I should try to get a hold of William Lane Craig.

Commenters feel free to have a go, but respect the blog rules.

The Kurgan view through the Catholic Glass

A recent conversation with a guy I have a lot of time and respect for took me a little by surprise, since it appeared that somewhat out of the blue he went a little anti-Catholic.

It’s not that in itself that was the surprise, but rather that he seemed to have made some assumptions about my perspective which frankly, I am at a loss as to how he did that, since my views are pretty clearly identified both her and on my YouTube channel, on pretty much everything I care to discuss.

In order to make it even clearer, I thought it best to identify perhaps more clearly, if somewhat succinctly (for me anyway) some of my positions.

The use of generalities will be very common, and if you’re too stupid to understand that “in general” does not mean “every single time”, well, I can’t help you.

On Catholic crimes of conquest

Perhaps the most touted is the one concerning South America. Did Catholics do som bad shit there? Sure. Did they destroy Mayan codexes and such? Sure. Although if my memory serves one of the few salvaged was by a monk (I may be wrong). Did this somehow lower human knowledge of human history in some important ways? Perhaps. Am I really torn up about it?

No. No I am not. And keep in mind I was big on trying to figure out stuff about that culture for years. But the reality is that ultimately it was an extremely cruel and vicious culture, and there is more than a little evidence that some of the symbols used in it are reflective of some used in Freemasonry, and there is a guy who has written at least one book on the topic of Satanic cultures having such common threads. In case tearing open 20,000 living men, women and children to rip their hearts out to appease their gods wasn’t evidence enough.

On the Catholic practice of building Churches on top of Pagan shrines they had destroyed, so that the Pagans would still show up, and over time be converted, once again, I am not going to shed any tears of it. Might this have possibly reduced human knowledge with regard to lay lines and potentially some astronomical correlations and aspects? Possibly. But even if that were the case, what are the societies that were replaced by Catholicism like? Almost without exception (certainly none I am aware of) they were more brutal, violent, oppressive and vicious than Catholicism.

And as for the Inquisition supposedly being this bloodbath of thousands of innocent women being burnt at the stake, it is perhaps one of the biggest lies ever perpetrated by the Satanists of the so-called French “enlightenment” and revolution. Did you ever ask yourself why it is called the “enlightenment” and Lucifer is known as the light bringer? Or the fact that the American revolution was financed by Freemasons with French money to create the first country that actually operated from the start on the basis of Freemasonic principles barely covered over by a veneer of Protestant puritanism?

The grand total of “witches” killed by the Inquisition over more than 100 years is 12.

And they also killed only 163 pedophiles in the same period. I could top that in a week-end just by clearing out the Vatican.

So, overall, in general, no, I don’t care about the “atrocities” that Catholics may have committed against some supposedly innocent group of heart-eating, child-raping, goat-fuckers.

And while I am sure some innocents somewhere, invariably get killed in any kind of war or uprising and so on, by and large Catholicism has only improved life for all people under it when compared to what it replaced.

The simple proof of it is that no one can point to any other civilisation under which human beings have flourished and generally had as good a time than under Catholicism. Similarly, the greatest number of works of unparalleled beauty have happened under Catholicism. And please note that I am not saying beauty is a uniquely Catholic perspective, for example, I have always found Japanese aesthetics to be appealing too, I said the “greatest number” of beautiful works of art.

The de-chattalisation of women, children and the abolition of slavery all also followed.

Not to mention the literal invention of the scientific method.

So, overall, despite the inevitable collateral damage, conquering Catholics inevitably brought a better life than the alternative. And let’s not forget that while we as Catholics will convert and then happily mix with whatever we conquered (see South America) the Protties tend to exterminate (see North America).

On Race and Culture

It would be hard for anyone to really accuse me of racism if they have even the tiniest glimmer of insight into my personal history, but let me be clear that I absolutely am aware and notice and see and consider race. Because my brain functions normally. Just like I notice sunshine, rain, and any other number of things.

My position is again, very Catholic. But this probably needs further explanation, because the overwhelming zeitgeist of “Christianity” is really Churchianity and not actual belief. Protestantism has made it so a “Christian” is anyone that says he is. The reality is that unless you are literally willing to die rather than denounce Christ, you are simply NOT an actual believer. You’re a pretender.

So:

IF you are an actual believer,

AND you actually understand agree with and do your best to follow Catholic dogma,

THEN, your race, culture, etc matter less to me. That said, I am not blind to either race or culture, and 25 plus years in Africa has made it abundantly clear to me that the average African is not suited to live in the average Traditional Catholic European country any more than the average Catholic European is suited to live in the average Traditional African Village. And there is nothing wrong with that. In fact I am absolutely for the Africans to have their own ways and cultures and nations and for every people to have theirs. I for one would very much like my nation to return: The Most Serene Republic of Venice.

Since that is not really how things are, I am absolutely for having very clear and strong borders and repatriating any illegals by the most expedient, efficient ways and I don’t care if they are a bit brutal too. Nor am I in favour of second or third generation people of a completely different religion and culture pretending to be natives of a country their ancestors came to.

It’s really not hard to understand. My father has lived in Africa over 40 years but he will never act, think, or behave like an African any more than a Zulu who has lived in Venice for 40 years can be a Venetian. And I absolutely wish to preserve every culture possible. The Zulus in Zululand and with their rules and ways to be respected by any visiting foreigner or foreign resident, and Venice for Venetians, with our rules and ways.

That is real diversity. I can then experience Japan in Japan and Botswana in Botswana and Venice in Venice.

And if your claim is that some people (say white Europeans) are far more technologically advanced than some other people (like say black Africans or Brown Indians) well, sure, I also agree there are differences between races and cultures. These are simple facts to observe. And the best thing one can do is to simply allow each culture and ethnicity to grow on their own terms.

There really is nothing any more “unfair” about it than saying a humming bird has an unfair advantage in flight over a lion. So what? They are different and let them carry on in their own way.

Not all cultures are equal. Some are objectively better than others. And Catholicism is unquestionably the best culture Humanity has ever seen. It doesn’t matter if it upsets you. It’s just as true that Japanese Katanas are the best kind of sword ever built for the purposes they fulfilled.

As for the outliers… sure… they exist in all aspects of life. Generally speaking I have been one myself in multiple aspects of life and have I been discriminated against for it? Sure. So what? The outlier will find a way. And again, my approach here is perfectly Catholic. Just like nothing could prevent Joan of Arc from being Joan of Arc, if God wills it, nothing is impossible. The priest Joan initially told her visions to told her to shut up and stop being crazy. Because he knew, most likely she’s just crazy, but if not… God will find a way. And even when I was not Catholic I always understood this very simple principle: life is not fair. So what? Buckle up sunshine!

On the LGBT-Pedos

Just like it is a fact that generally the IQ of caucasians is higher than that of Africans, no matter how many people it upsets, the fact also remains that the incidence of child sexual abuse committed by homosexuals is over ten times that committed by non homosexuals. And that’s on reported cases, which we all know are a fraction of the real number. So, at a bare minimum, no child should be given into “adoption” to homosexuals. And that is far from the only argument against it, by the way.

Secondly, from a purely natural perspective, it is absolutely clear that homosexuality is a deviancy, a clear defect, regardless of your opinion of how it comes about. Because if we all went homosexual, the human race would disappear and be unrecoverable after about 4 decades. And by the way, the only study I am aware of on it, which I read over 30 years ago, concluded that in about 90% of cases homosexuality in men was a result of either a choice, or sexual trauma and was reversible, while only about 10% of cases seemed to be a birth defect.

That said, I am no more for burning homosexuals at the stake than I am for doing so for people born with six fingers or missing a leg. I certainly will be absolutely wary around them, as I would be around anyone with proclivities that might play out as harmful towards my children, but ultimately my position is indeed that what they do behind closed doors, with other consenting adults, can and should remain behind such closed doors. Proselytising your deviancy as normal is not, and should not be permitted. And if you disagree, I would like you to now defend my personal preference for hunting pedophiles down on horseback with lances and making a corrida of it through all towns around the world.

If you are a pervert, you KNOW you are a pervert. So shut the fuck up, stay in your closet and lane, and don’t you dare try and normalise it.

Just like it would be absurd to tell golfers how it’s perfectly normal to shove a bucketful of golf balls up your arse every Friday night, it is absurd to teach that homosexuality is “normal”. It isn’t. And it never can be. Just like being born with only one leg is not normal. So as far as I am concerned, the rules Russia has imposed concerning the LGBT nonsense are perfectly fine. With one exception:

Pedophiles really should be burnt at the stake, and as my recent survey shows, (feel free to add your vote) most men really agree with me.

Conclusion

So, that covers the main topics. And feel free to try and critique my “bigoted” views but be mindful of the rules of this blog if you want to avoid an insta-ban.

All content of this web-site is copyrighted by G. Filotto 2009 to present day.
Website maintained by IT monks