Archive for the ‘Catholicism’ Category

Choose your character, player one.

Assume you are playing a game, whether a computer or pen and paper one any you get to choose if you play a villager or a Spartan. The villager has a low chance of instant death but his existence is composed of basically grinding his job until he hits the grave. The highlights would be getting married, avoiding divorce or plague-death, having children and getting a bigger home/more land or more success at the chosen grind path.

The Spartan can be killed instantly by a bunch of things, enemy soldiers, his own traitorous wife/best friend/political opponent, he owns little in the way of material wealth except a functional home and a little land and the latest in weapon technology. He has duties he can’t avoid that might also get him killed and his rewards are: not dying, surviving assassination attempts, being glorified from afar by the masses (or vilified, regardless of heroic or vile deeds) and not answering to anyone you don’t want to, though you will be put on wanted posters for defying the local baron.

Now… in a game…who do you pick?

Most people go for the heroic Spartan.

In real life?

Almost no one.

Why, oh meek-hearted friend?

The real-life timid Times are those so terrified of divorce and their own ineptitude with women that they self-label as “I’m really choosing to be sexless by choice, see, so I am not a loser” aka MGTOW aka incels.

I have nothing but respect for those who work the grind, support their families and do well by them, they are truly heroic people. But while it is an admirable trait in practical endeavours of all kinds, it is an absolute lamentable thing in metaphysical matters.

Regardless of your religion, if any, where is your sense of Justice? Of ethics? Of truth? Honour? Courage? Virtue?

Where, of timid man?

What thing or person or concept are you willing to die defending?

And if none, then what kind of man are you?

Choose sir. Choose what kind of man you are.

I have been a proper Catholic (sedevacantist) since I was baptised in 2017, and I researched it obsessively for 4 years before that, but even when I was a Zen-Agnostic, and lived more by samurai-type principles, I never turned away from a potentially deadly situation even when I was working for people whose lives were corrupt to the core. It was not about them. It was about me. And as helpful to those who hired me that mentality was for them and less so to myself, it still had a value, it still had an honour and a courage and a point. Misguided though it may have been.

That zealotry may have not been pointed in the exact best direction then, but it was not evil or wrong per se. I was more like an efficient tool that if used correctly would be a force for good and if used wrongly might help more the less good (but not for long, because my sense of justice too was not impaired, mostly).

Ultimately, the point is that regardless of anything else, I have always placed an extreme value on truth. And I really believe the world is composed of people who merely pretend to be that way, and they are the very vast majority, and a few who really are that way.

Those few are the ones who make a difference.

I might fail or not at creating a community of hardcore Catholics in Italy, but you can bet everything you own I am not doing it for any reason other than truth as best as I can see it and live it.

So.

Which character are you? And what are you doing with you game-life?

Sibling Cooperation

The four year old leads the three year old into the tool shed which he knows he’s not supposed to go into without me. There are power tools in there but nothing connected or that can be switched on. At most he can trip and bump himself against a shovel or something.

The wife sees them sneaking in and lets me know.

I observe from afar and they come out and one of them says to the other, “Ok, now let’s go back inside.”

Their secret mission of minor rebellion achieved in what they think is complete success and conspiratorial loyalty, they return to the main house in harmony.

This is how you know you’re parenting them right.

Christianity is the Older Religion

This needs repeating, and in the case of Americans, and Evangelicals in the specific, it needs to probably be driven home with a rubber mallet.

Sede Priest Explains Cassiciacum, etc.

Father Steenbergen is one of the most awesome people I know, and I am glad he did this interview. He even refers to the Finnish couple who came to visit me towards the 1:17 mark, and shortly after, indirectly, to people like me, with words to the effect of… you wouldn’t BELIEVE the kind of people that are coming to get baptised these days! Meaning people with no Catholic history in their background whatsoever that come to it in almost miraculous ways. And it’s true. Just over a decade ago, the idea I would one day be a hardcore Catholic would have made me spill my drink if I had been drinking. And here I am now.

All sorts of people are waking up to the truth, and it’s accelerating from the attendances I have seen over the last few years.

What Next?

There are three paths I can go down with respect to the next book I write.

NAZI MOON (linked) is now available at least in the US and CANADA and should be available soon in other countries too.

Do you Prefer I next write:

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

I have been asked to do the relationship book by friends and men in general for years; at least 20 of them. I resisted the impulse* for at least a couple of decades, primarily because, as one of my alter egos/nicknames —given to me by friends in Italy over 20 years ago— said in one of the graphic novels he appears in: “Any man that says he has understood all there is to know about women, is either a liar or insane.” And it’s close enough to the truth in some ways. Nevertheless, I feel that after two divorces, a lot of women in between, and finally a proper Catholic marriage, not to mention 4 children I fathered, I have probably made —and persevered!— and (one hopes), learnt enough that it is probably acceptable to pass on a few pointers to younger men; at least on those issues I feel I have now got enough experience to retroactively note when I did the right thing (regardless of outcome), and when I did the wrong thing (again, regardless of outcome). I mention this, because as I say, there have been a lot of people asking me for this for a long time.

With regard to my non-fiction, each book I have written so far, is really mostly a compilation of my theories and conclusions formed with many years of experience.

The Face on Mars was the result of a lifelong interest in Astronomy from very early childhood. I understood what a light-year was at age four, thanks to an uncle who was, and remains, a total geek to this day. He also sent me a telescope in my early teens, with which I observed the mountains of the moon, and how the moon itself moved. I also saw Haley’s comet with it, from our home in Africa at the time. And to this day the concepts I put forth in that book were then, and for the most part continue to remain today, unique. Some have badly plagiarised aspects of it (hello Graham Hancock) but the overall main issue had not been understood by anyone I am aware of before I saw it. And most remain totally ignorant of it, despite the predictions and theories I made back in 1995, playing out as correct in the intervening time. The update in 2014 also added a new dimension to the reality of my ideas, which is partly expanded on a lot more in my fiction work.

Systema was similarly, a book I wrote after I had personally spend decades in the martial arts world. And I wanted to demystify a LOT of the nonsense that goes with many martial art “concepts” and their related egos, and which —in particular— seemed to have a vortex of “mystic ninjas” concerning the Russian system. Which is an impression many martial artists might have if they have not experience of it firsthand. By merely watching YouTube videos or hearing “fantastic” stories of almost magical ability, they are most likely going to assume it is some woo-woo nonsensical “martial art”. That thought is disabused within minutes of confronting any of the top exponents of it. Unfortunately, as always, along with the really good practitioners, there were also a lot of “mystic ninjas” and some of the practitioners did nothing to demystify the situation, so I did it. I have been doing martial arts since I was a very small child, thanks to my dad, so I had pretty extensive knowledge of it before I put hand-to-keyboard after almost four decades of it.

Reclaiming the Catholic Church was in some ways the “odd man out” because I had a road to Damascus Event in 2013 and the book came out in 2020, that is, only 7 years later. However, I had been reading different books on all the main religions, mysticism, “spiritual” and even New Age stuff, again, since my teens, and literally infiltrating various cults as a hobby, in order to see if anyone had anything that was demonstrably true, real, or worthwhile. I had settled on a basic Zen-Agnosticism, with a clear understanding there must be an intelligence behind creation (the math, astronomy, biology and physics, as well as logic, pretty much confirms it many, many, many times over) but no sense of a God as such that was specifically interested in us mere mortals, much less me specifically. That changed in a radical, unexpected and utterly surprising way, that while “subjective” in the sense that I cannot prove it to anyone else, was absolutely objective and very much so for me. The other part that helped was that because the Catholic Church has ALL of its rules and dogmas written down, it was fairly easy to follow the thread of its history and see the astonishing truth it is founded on. As it was, to see that the current inhabitants of the Vatican are, without putting too fine a point on it, flat out Satanists.

BELIEVE! Instead, published a year before RTCC, was a much smaller work, putting out my new, or updated, basic outline philosophy. For those who have read both books, you will notice that BELIEVE! is not even a fifth of the size of RTCC, at just under 100 pages, and is a lot more open with respect to overall views and concepts. RTCC was the follow up that basically said, “OK, so that’s sort of where I am with respect to religion as a whole (BELIEVE!) now let’s take a look at this one path that I state is the best one I can see so far, and in this book, (RTCC), I went full autist, covering every aspect of Sedevacantism (i.e. the actual, current, only Catholicism left) and demonstrating it in a manner that no one has so far even attempted to refute, much less succeeded. The result is that RTCC is the foundation on which BELIVE! is really sitting on, which is probably why even if a much smaller and less detailed book, BELIEVE! has resulted in now over 100 people converting to Sedevacantist Catholicism (aka simply: Catholicism).

The reason I point all this out, is because in these last two non-fiction books, it becomes obvious that even my overall looser and more generic ideas, as expressed in BELIEVE!, for example, clearly have had a lot of genuinely positive effects on people who read them. And we know it was this that sparked the results, because BELIEVE! came first, and yet, even without all the details (presented in RTCC), it had a serious impact on people’s lives.

I see a LOT of confusion, struggles and heartache among young men today concerning intimate relationships and finding the right woman.

I literally get questions, emails, or messages on the topic to a frequency that is starting to become hard to keep up with. And as anyone that reads my blog knows, I have a rather low opinions of PUAs, and would very much hate to be mistaken for one. That said, I know for a demonstrable fact that my advice benefits these younger men, because they are getting married, having babies, and resolving issues they had for many years of their lives. I have literally had everything from friends, neighbours and even strangers, asking for advice, on an ad hoc basis, to hypnosis sessions with people that were under clinical care as supposedly paranoid schizophrenics under medication that went on to stop the medication (yes with doctor approval and full knowledge of my sessions with them) and go on to have a productive life with a functioning relationship, when prior they were 29 year old virgins. And I have been doing this for at least 15 years, with positive results.

So, perhaps, there is some utility in putting together some of the baseline concepts concerning male-female interactions and so on.

The other options (SF saga continuation) or YA SF books are, respectively, more a divertimento for myself and, a less fun, but I think helpful addition to the current dearth of adventure stories for boys mostly. I am not aware of anything like the Hardy Boys and so on coming along anytime recently, which is why Castalia House is doing well printing old classics. I would not enjoy writing such books as much as my own adult Science Fiction, but it would not be too difficult to do and they should be able to be produced fairly quickly. Although, I am not likely to be acclaimed as a children’s author anytime soon, or even long after I am dust, so the effort might not be worth it.

Anyway, I’d appreciate your thoughts on the matter, so please feel free to leave comments after you vote, thanks. 

* Vox, on this post, referring to someone else, Taleb, in this case, said something that holds true for most of us. Personally I have always genuinely tried to resist the temptation, and often people have been quite “deflated” when trying to make me their “guru”, when, after being asked something I know little or nothing about or at least I don’t feel qualified to take a stand on, I simply say “I have no idea”. Some were quite insistent nevertheless and I always consciously dissuaded that, as I explained in some detail in my book Systema: The Russian Martial System.

Church Militant?

Oh, what, you want my opinion on the Gay grifters pretending to be Catholics? Ah… when will you guys begin to take heed of the things I tell you about gay and fake Catholics being Grifters?

I told you about at least three of them back in July 2020. Which was late for it anyway.

Or you could just type in their names like say Milo in the Search Me button on the right there.

Seriously, are any of you who read here even a little bit surprised by any of what was going on/is going on/will continue to go on at Church Militant?

If you read my blog regularly and you are… well… there may be a place for self-flagellation in proper Catholicism yet.

Indeed

And this is why you can know without a doubt that NOVUS Ordo is NOT Catholicism, and why the only Christians left are Sedevacantists.

Interestingly though, the Sedes are more like the Empire… down to a few but loyal “emperors” and their “henchmen” going out there and through their diligent work, recruiting and uplifting proper Catholics, even as they spread the truth to rebellious fools.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is 1xbi8x-591642492.jpg

While we mere laymen, do the Lord’s work with heretics.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is Screenshot-2023-12-08-at-16.45.35.png

The Dyer Debate Revisited

It is now something like 4 years after the original debate and as always, time demonstrated that I was in fact right and everything the man said was nonsense or a lie.

I recently received this comment on YouTube which reminded me of the debate again, which is now, here, with all the commentary from me to give the full context, while the originals have all been memory-holed and disappeared. I wonder why, eh?

I’m at about minute 36 of your video, where you’ve read out the various canons and shown that they bear no relation to what Jay claims they are speaking about. I am struck by this because a few years ago I was watching his series on Tragedy and Hope, with a copy of the book in hand, same edition as Jay’s. He was summarising it page by page, citing where he was, and yet I found that his ‘summary’ bore no relation what so ever to the pages he was referencing. I don’t know why he was doing this, but it was very strange.

Interestingly enough, the comment itself has now apparently disappeared from YouTube, which has been behaving increasingly bizarrely. So I will not mention the man’s full name other than to say that if Stephen wants to get in touch and make his full name public so I am not accused of making things up, he can do so. In any case, it may be he deleted the comment himself not to receive the usual barrage from the dyer-bots, which can indeed be quite annoying.

At any rate, if you are into autistic theological debates interspaced with entertaining ridiculing of deceivers, you may wish to get some popcorn and go see it here.

The Complete Deceiver Stephen Fry

Stephen Fry, outright LIES about Thomas Moore, and pretty much everything else regarding the Catholic Church in this 20 minute presentation.

The adoring comments by historically illiterate people under the litany of nonsense this deviant spouts is nauseating.

Fry’s historical knowledge doesn’t even rise to Wikipedia level of understanding. And we can hardly assume such an “erudite and intelligent” “man” (excuse me while I laugh out loud) is ignorant of these facts, can we.

So we MUST assume intentional deception.

Fry, at minute 7 and some 20 seconds begins with this outrageous lie:

“…just imagine in this square mile, how many people were burned, for reading the Bible in English. And one of the principal burners and torturers of those who tried to read the Bible in English, here in London, was Thomas Moore.”

and here is the relevant part of the wikipedia entry, which, as I say, is hardly a defender of the Catholic faith.

Controversy on Extent of Prosecution of Heretics

There is considerable variation in opinion on the extent and nature of More’s prosecution of heretics: witness in recent popular media the difference in portrayals of More in A Man for All Seasons and in Wolf Hall. The English establishment initially regarded Protestants (and Anabaptists) as akin to the Lollards and Hussites whose heresies fed their sedition.[note 5] Ambassador to Charles V Cuthbert Tunstall called Lutheranism the “foster-child” of the Wycliffite heresy[66] that had underpinned Lollardy.

Historian Richard Rex wrote:[49]: 106 

Thomas More, as lord chancellor [1529-1532], was in effect the first port of call for those arrested in London on suspicion of heresy, and he took the initial decisions about whether to release them, where to imprison them, or to which bishop to send them. He can be connected with police or judicial proceedings against around forty suspected or convicted heretics in the years 1529–33.[note 6]

Torture allegations

Torture was not officially legal in England, except in pre-trial discovery phase[67]: 62  of kinds of extreme cases that the King had allowed, such as seditious heresy. It was regarded as unsafe for evidence, and was not an allowed punishment. 

Stories emerged in More’s lifetime regarding persecution of the Protestant “heretics” during his time as Lord Chancellor, and he denied them in detail in his Apologia (1533). 

Many stories were later published by the popular sixteenth-century English Protestant historian John Foxe in his polemical Book of Martyrs. Foxe was instrumental in publicizing accusations of torture, alleging that More had often personally used violence or torture while interrogating heretics.[68] Later Protestant authors such as Brian Moynahan and Michael Farris cite Foxe when repeating these allegations.[69] Biographer Peter Ackroyd also lists claims from Foxe’s Book of Martyrs and other post-Reformation sources that More “tied heretics to a tree in his Chelsea garden and whipped them”, that “he watched as ‘newe men’ were put upon the rack in the Tower and tortured until they confessed”, and that “he was personally responsible for the burning of several of the ‘brethren’ in Smithfield.”[20]: 305 

Historian John Guy commented that “such charges are unsupported by independent proof.”[note 7] Modern historian Diarmaid MacCulloch finds no evidence that he was directly involved in torture.[note 8]  Richard Marius records a similar claim, which tells about James Bainham, and writes that “the story Foxe told of Bainham’s whipping and racking at More’s hands is universally doubted today”.[note 9]

More himself denied these allegations:

Stories of a similar nature were current even in More’s lifetime and he denied them forcefully. He admitted that he did imprison heretics in his house – ‘theyr sure kepynge’ – he called it – but he utterly rejected claims of torture and whipping… ‘as help me God.’[20]: 298–299 

More instead claimed in his “Apology” (1533) that he only applied corporal punishment to two “heretics”: a child servant in his household who was caned (the customary punishment for children at that time) for repeating a heresy regarding the Eucharist, and a “feeble-minded” man who was whipped for disrupting the mass by raising women’s skirts over their heads at the moment of consecration, More taking the action to prevent a lynching.[70]: 404 

Execution allegations

Burning at the stake was the standard punishment by the English state for obstinate or relapsed, major seditious or proselytizing heresy, and continued to be used by both Catholics and Protestants during the religious upheaval of the following decades.[71] In England, following the Lollard uprisings, heresy had been linked to sedition (see De heretico comburendo and Suppression of Heresy Act 1414.)

Ackroyd states that More zealously “approved of burning”.[20]: 298  Novelist Richard Marius maintained that in office More did everything in his power to bring about the extermination of Protestants.[72]

During More’s chancellorship, six people were burned at the stake for heresy, the same rate as under Wolsey: they were Thomas HittonThomas BilneyRichard BayfieldJohn TewkesburyThomas Dusgate, and James Bainham.[20]: 299–306  However, the court of the Star Chamber, which More was the presiding judge of, as Lord Chancellor, could not impose the death sentence: it was a kind of appellate supreme court.[73]: 263 

More took a personal interest in the three London cases:[49]: 105 

  • John Tewkesbury was a London leather seller found guilty by the Bishop of London John Stokesley[note 10] of harbouring English translated New Testaments; he was sentenced to burning for refusing to recant. More declared: he “burned as there was neuer wretche I wene better worthy.”[74]
  • Richard Bayfield was found distributing Tyndale’s Bibles, and examined by Bishop Cuthbert Tunstall. More commented that he was “well and worthely burned”.[20]: 305 
  • James Bainham was arrested on a warrant of Thomas More as Lord Chancellor and detained at his gatehouse. He was examined by Bishop John Stokesley, abjured, penalized and freed. He subsequently re-canted, and was re-arrested, tried and executed as a relapsed heretic.

Moynahan alleges that More influenced the eventual execution of William Tyndale in the Duchy of Brabant, as English agents had long pursued Tyndale.[75] This was despite the fact that the execution took place on October 6, 1536, several years after More had resigned as Chancellor and been executed, as well as in a totally different country. A historian has called this “bizarre”.[49]: 93 

Go on and read the whole entry, by ALL accounts, Moore was a very fair man, as mentioned, going on to whip a man to save him from a lynching. He was a loving and devoted father and step-father and he promoted the education of women more than anyone else had ever done at the time.

Everything else Fry mentions is very much as with this one historical character assassination based on nothing but outrageous lies and his own deviant nature, rebelling at the fact that Christianity has always known that his specific sexual deviancy, leads to nothing good, since it is, in a very obvious and fundamental level, simply unnatural. The human species would literally die out after 45 years if everyone on Earth decided to become a homosexual. And that’s without even mentioning a litany of other problems that lifestyle creates for both those who practice it, as well as those it is inflicted upon by sexual violence when they are children.

And to be clear, I see homosexuality as an unfortunate deviancy if it is there from birth (which it is in a MINORITY of cases, as evidenced by science done over 30 years ago, which was widely reported at the time even in scientific American and such publications but that has been memory holed since), much like one might be born with six fingers, or without legs.

And a sexual deviancy for those that progressed into it consciously and gradually, and a case of particularly vicious trauma for those that end up there as a result of sexual abuse and/or rape. There are known cases where men who are repeatedly raped for years in jail, who absolutely were not homosexual when they went in, come out and are unable to perform sexually with women any more. But such things are not talked about. And lest Stephen Fry accuse me of wanting to burn homosexuals at the stake, let me be absolutely clear that I personally do not care at all if someone choses to be a homosexual, as long as he doesn’t try to tell everyone, or anyone, else that it is a normal and natural thing to do. It is not. Math is also not racist and men cannot become women or vice-versa. And night follows day and water is wet. I also would like it that those people who chose to stop being homosexual and decide to heal whatever ails them, are allowed to do so without persecution, which, unfortunately, the LGBT lobby does.

And let’s not forget, in case, you are unaware, or assume I am simply “casting wild aspersions” that Stephen Fry has certain “predilections” shall we call them? And as the images below would seem to indicate, has had them for years. He also regularly comes up with rather odd things to say.

Cohen, (above) incidentally, was dumped at age 40 for a 26 year old, when Fry was 54 and supposedly offered Cohen a bunch of money from the sale of a house Fry owned in exchanged for signing an NDA.

Who is Steven Webb, which it is reported Fry introduced as his new partner? he’s the guy in the image below.

And who did Fry get engaged to after Webb?

And they went on to get “married” too.

Make up your own mind, but —unlike his accusations against Thomas Moore, which are completely false— there is certainly nothing untrue about what I have linked to here.

What that says about Fry in the specific, I will leave for the reader to decide. I will however, point out that this is just one point of his 20 minute rant, and the other 19 minutes or so could all be gone into similar level of detail.

This exercise is one worth doing if you care to, because it will once and for all demonstrate to you, the precise way in which people like Fry intentionally and expertly, twist, manipulate and pervert facts, in order to present a totally false narrative. Once you have seen the breath-taking facility with which they lie and misrepresent, obfuscate, and pervert facts, you will become a lot more immune to their lies. Which can only be a healthy thing.

If you want to really delve, deep, I do identify the 11 things that deceivers do in my book, Reclaiming the Catholic Church. They only have those 11 modus operandi, nor is it limited to religious lying, it applies in any context in life where they are trying to gaslight you into some false belief based on lies, and once you have seen each one of those methods, the world will suddenly make a lot more sense.

Once you see things as they really are, it might be a bit grimmer, but you can’t fix anything if you’re not even aware what the problem is. And the main problem in this world is liars and deceivers like Fry, and the people in power who make him look like a good choir boy.

And just in case…

If reading my previous post left ANY doubt for you that the Bergoglian Novus Orco “Church” is a Satanic parody of Catholicism, well… you go on and explain this latest among the daily things this demon worshipper pretending to be a Pope does.

All content of this web-site is copyrighted by G. Filotto 2009 to present day.
Website maintained by IT monks