At Sigma Game Vox has posted something regarding the results of feminism and the dystopia it has caused in relationships, nuclear family destruction and all the other ills we are all familiar with here. In his view the effect will be:
There are two solutions. Either female nature magically transforms itself or society starts instituting structural affirmative action in favor of men.
That’s it. There are no other options.
And transforming female nature is never going to be an option because women are so immune to reality that they are genuinely shocked to discover the vast majority of men are not six feet tall.
Well, I disagree with his take. I have already given my own view some time ago, and in greater detail, at this post that went quite viral .
The part of his post I do agree with is that last paragraph quoted above. Something I also pointed out rather more specifically thanks to statistics on some 50 million users.
Now, while we can all agree that the current dating/marriage/relationship/clusterfuck that is modern sexual relations between Western Men and Western Women is indeed something of a dumpster fire, it appears to me that all the so-called “solutions” that are being suggested, are essentially retarded.
It really doesn’t matter if it’s some Pagan LARPer intel, or MGTOW chronic masturbator, or academic intellectual, or generalissimo wanting to outperform Pinochet in ridding the world of Communism, Marxism and the vermin that peddle it.
ALL of these proposed solutions of going back to the idealised America of the 1950s, will all have about as much chance of existing as the promotional poster for the series Man in the High Castle, which was deemed so offensive it has been practically memory holed and is almost impossible to find on the internet now.
The reason all of these proposed solutions are nonsensical is really quite simple:
- The West, or at least parts of it, is not really similar to Asian countries that are quite happy to live under totalitarian regimes, or Islamic ones. It is simply not really The Way, especially for the Southern parts of Europe. Anglos and Teutons are indeed more likely to fold under their masters, and the Australians are the most servile, cucked, weak, faggoty of all the supposed Western nations, but the Russians are not really that way. Neither are the Italians, the Spanish, the Portuguese, and so on. Now, each country and nation of the so-called West has its own problems, but overall, we don’t submit all that easily to some dictatorial way of being. And Covid has taught a LOT of people, including the injected ones, that simply “following orders” is not the best way.
- Human nature. You are simply not going to put the genie back in the bottle by force. Every time that has been tried in the West it has failed. Soviet style communism has failed. Nazism failed. Fascism failed. And now, the fake nonsense calling itself “democracy” (rule by hidden oligarchs) is collapsing too. What will arise is chaos, fragmentation and uncertainty. And in THAT environment, if ANY Western people survive at all, it will be the result of a very organic, natural, and inevitable reaction to the chaos.
Which means that those men capable of foreseeing what is coming, preparing for it in meatspace, and forming viable communities of like-minded men, will have the best chance of making it. Are there enough of us? Do we have enough time? And can we build large enough mini-states, with the states we are in, to survive the slide to chaos? Only time will tell, but what is certain is that such communities will not be armed compounds where the women are kept in check by draconian measures enforced by Western style Muslim enforcement.
Perhaps there will be armed compounds, but the women in them will be there because they very much WANT to be in there, and there will be a great many more women that WANT to be in there who will NOT be allowed in, because they will not be the right kind of woman.
What will happen is that such men will simply NOT pair up with ANY woman who is unwilling to simply submit to the reality of what it means to be what I refer to as a Good Wife.
pleasant, obedient, loyal, and sexually and sensually available to their husbands for whom they will happily produce multiple children, and keep a pleasant and well-organised home.
These women will not do this under duress. They will do it because they want it, and choose it, and the men they choose for it are actually capable, effective, and cherish their wives without pedastalising them, nor relegating them to second class citizenship.
The ONLY culture that got this right is proper and actual Catholicism. Protestantism with it various extremes of puritanism on one end and complete liberalism on the other has only been a demonic and disastrous secularisation of actual Christianity, of course, and we can see this in the state of the family unit in literally EVERY Protestant denomination country. Ex-Catholic countries, despite being without actual Catholic Popes or any valid clergy in the Vatican since about 1958-1964 still retain more examples of mostly functioning family units than the absolute abyss that is the Anglo-Saxon and Teutonic worlds.
The natural order of things between men and women has been best expressed as model in Catholicism. Nothing else came even remotely close in terms of human happiness and fulfilment. That there were other functioning societies is true, but the state in which the people in those societies functioned, is, in my opinion, far inferior to Catholic societies. Be it Feudal Japan, Imperial China, any Islamic state, the totality of Hinduism, or any of the African or native American tribes, literally none of them are even distantly comparable in terms of human comfort, harmony, beauty, and prosperity within the family unit.
And that is why IF the West will survive at all, which frankly is not certain at all that it will, it can do so only by the natural return to the religion and ways that have stood the test of over 2,000 years. The crusaders were the only people who called out the Talmudians for what they are, defended their lands and people, yet had also the capacity for charity, mercy, love and justice, even as they lopped off as many heads as necessary to keep their lands free of intruders, interlopers, subterfuges and other vermin.
The answer is not some police state controlling of women. It will be a natural return by those women capable of more rational thought, to their own natural role within a society that allows them all their dues, and simply rejects and prevents entry to any woman that does not willingly and out of her own agency, perform her expected duties.
Welcome to the real brave new world guys and girls.
It has only one simple rule:
Women: Don’t breed with metrosexual faggots
Men: Don’t breed with anything even remotely feminist
Just like Catholicism, no forced conversion is ever required or acceptable. Either you see and choose the truth, or you suffer the consequences. No one will force the truth upon you. The Universe itself will take care of that.
As a last aside, and because I know how the internet works, my disagreeing with Vox is not some attempt at criticising the man or his ideas out of some spite, or whatever. The fact is that there really aren’t all that many interlocutors or writers of blogs who have an intellect worth engaging with. In my “disagreements” with Vox, I am ultimately looking at his perspective and pointing out my own. As I did with the discussion on epigenetics of some time ago for example. The intent is not malicious or even competitive. Rather, if and when he might respond, or come up with other ideas, I appreciate that at times his thoughts further my own, or point out things I didn’t consider, and I suppose the reverse may also happen. In any case, it is more “arguing” in the style of the ancient Greeks, for the purposes of getting closer to objective truth, than any kind of internet hobo-fight.
This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here
