The last two Kurganings of Kurtzy-Boi seem to have been well-received, by those capable of reading. That said, I had at least one acquaintance question why I went “so hard” at this flour-puff pastry of a poseur. The reason should be obvious, but since reading for comprehension is basically a lost art practiced by only a few remaining dinosaurs from the golden era when men were men and not able to get pregnant (supposedly). allow me to lay it out in the most basic of syllogisms:

1. I am, and my blogs are (even more so at the OG blog, see link below the header of this blog) and always have been, primarily aimed at sharing useful, practical, considerations about life, the universe and everything. If you have been a long-time reader, and own some of my books, especially the non-fiction ones, you will have learnt a bunch of demonstrable stuff that is of pretty high importance, very briefly and at a minimum:
   1. The real history of humanity (The Face on Mars) including of this solar system too (not opinion, but fact-based empirical observations that lead to fairly conclusive hypothesis that have stood true for now 30 years and in fact only been confirmed further during that time).
   2. At least some of the human potential we are capable of (Systema)
   3. The real history and truth concerning Christianity and the actual Catholic Church (Believe! and Reclaiming the Catholic Church)
   4. A bunch of other stuff related to human performance (hypnosis, information gathering via non-verbal and non standard methods), Physics, Astronomy, History, Archeology, and various other interests that can also include the prediction of things like the current dystopia and how it will progress, the inevitable victory of Russia in Ukraine (and elsewhere) as predicted years ago, and so on.
   5. An interest in finding a way forward that promoted the nuclear family, faith based in reality, and the observable universe,1 that helps young men (and women, for communities that will in time be absolutely able to resist the ever increasing totalitarian evil and dictatorial dystopia we are sleepwalking towards.
2. As a result, I always call out the impostors and gatekeepers, or the blithering idiots that though earnest, are so stupid that they unknowingly and unwittingly push a completely noxious and false agenda that leads anyone who listens to it down a path to hell, perdition, sadness, and lost opportunity and wasted lives. You don’t have to believe me. Just go to the OG blog here, and type in the names of any of the following imps of the devil in the Search Me function on the right sidebar and you will see what I mean:
   1. Milo YankmyPolous (Yiannopoulous)
   2. Gary (or Michelle) Voris of the ex-Church Militant
   3. Emo Jones
   4. Tay-Tay Marshall
   5. Brittany Spears
   6. Shia LeBouf And of course many others. I have not bothered to mention people like Alex Jones and so on being essentially just the “right-wing” side of the same Freemason coin that prevents people like you and me from having spaceships to go exploring the Galaxy and hop to the existing bases on the Moon and Mars for fun.
3. Kurtzy-boi has a blog that is “read” by thousands, who apparently are mostly functional illiterates impressed by “smart sounding” but totally content free expressions. Which means he is leading people, especially young men, astray. A recent comment on the previous post on him, highlights very well who Kurtzy-Boi is. Tarcisius wrote:

   His writing reminds me of assignments in school where I had to write an essay with a minimum number of words, 1000 words for example. Since I did not enjoy writing assignments, and because I did not have anything worthwhile to say, and because I suck at writing, I would break out the thesaurus and try to string together 1000 words with only the barest hint of an underlying theme or topic, all the while saying absolutely nothing of substance.

   At least I knew I had nothing worthwhile to say. This guy really thinks he has something substantial here, and proceeds to bloviate over several long essays about it. Like you said, it’s just a strawman attack on meritocracy.

   What I don’t get is that there are so many others heaping praise on him for this nonsense. It’s just a bunch of mindless NPCs congratulating eachother on what wonderful smart-boys they are.

   It is indeed one of the most perceptive comments I have received, but not the only one. Wolly Ram:

   He mistakes the assigned middle managers of evil for “elites” and builds an entire solopsistic thesis around this error, baffling.

   So that is why I bother. He is a little, pasty, weak, parasite, pretending to be a wise and noble man. He is no such thing. He is a wormtongue, and the fact my blog has a tiny readership compared to his, especially after the state sponsored hack of the OG blog that resulted in this blog being launched as it currently exists, is not relevant. Like any Catholic worth his salt, I really don’t care bout the odds or the numbers. One must simply stand for truth, regardless of the “popularity” or “infamy” of it.

No doubt, people who read this blog as if he were a wise man speaking wise words of manliness, will be loathe to accept they have been fooled by a smoke-merchant too afraid to even use his own name, putting the lie to his entire thesis of “becoming noble” as his sophistic and strawmannirg excuse for a blog is called.

Cognitive dissonance is a hell of a drug and people will sooner risk death than admit they are dumb or were fooled like an idiot, and so on. But it happens to the best of us. Including me. The mark of a decent human being is not his ability to pretend he was never wrong, but to simply admit and accept when he was and then move on with the new knowledge now firmly part of his constitution.

I hope therefore, that if you care about your friends and family or even total strangers, you can make them aware of these sort of snakes in the grass. As for Kurtzy-boi, he as an individual is a pointless cartoon character no more relevant than an NPC “of note” in any RPG pen-and paper game, but eat a social (game level) he can influence relatively large numbers of people (mostly the young men who might be real adventurers in the analogy of Roleplaying Games) to take a false path.

And as he has just released yet another smelly turd of a post on his absurd and false concept of “meritocracy”, it’s probably my duty, to take that one down in a blow-by-blow account too. Because… Noblesse really does Oblige . No honourable man can allow such a rat to run around pretending to be a nobleman. It is a rat, and it belongs in the sewer, not in the polite (albeit illiterate) company of human beings.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

I promised the Youtube Subscribers a Video on Antarctica, however I also have very cool paid subscribers on Substack, so I am thinking of testing the video capability of Susbstack and copying the eventual stream here. There is apparently also the ability to do livestreams on substack, but not for me as my phone is ancient, so the livestream version may have to be on YouTube only. In any case, this is just a short video to test the ability of the platform.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

The idiotic, fake “nobleman” and ineffective wanna-be “warrior-philosopher” with the cowardly fake name of Johann Kurtz has ejected from his pasty, weak, cowardly body, another effluent of regurgitated strawman arguments, sophistry, lies and seething rage at his not being one of the “elite” he so desperately aspires to suck off for recognition.

This ambulatory piece of human exrement irks me because he is one of the ten thousand voices of the liars, deceivers, fake wise-men, fake religious, fake everything that is infecting especially young en with false and untenable nonsense ideologies. These parasites prey on the dissatisfaction of young men primarily and feed it lies upon falsehoods, wrapped in deception, self-aggrandisement and a wish to appear knowledgeable or important or, even more laughably, effective.

Before we start the vivisection of his latest blog post, which will be autistically complete, let me remind you that this “paragon” among men, who wants to “become noble” is a shrinking violet too scared and hemmed in by his ACTUAL life, where he is at best a middle manager in some software firm, to even use his real name.

He clearly has always kissed and licked the right assholes to climb the corporate ladder like the soulless little mommy’s boy he is and he tells other young men this is the only way to achieve… suck-cess, his specialty. 1 In other words, he is precisely the opposite of what he pretends to present himself as, a rugged, manly man, of man-like virtue.

And his series of meritocracy is absolute dogshit and he deserves to be exposed for the utter fraud he is, hence, is second Kurganing. The first being here.

But let me now commence the total demolishing of his latest post , sentence by sentence. My comments in bold.

***

The tragedy of elite human capital

Meritocracy IV: The corruption of the elite

Our critical series on meritocracy now comes to a head.

Who is this “we” Kurtzy-boy? You made it all up and literally no one who can read English and owns a dictionary can agree with you on any of it. As I clearly demonstrated in the first Kurganing, you literally don’t even understand the meaning or definition of the wort meritocracy.

We have found that configuring society around an impoverished political philosophy which fails to live up to its name – meritocracy – has various deleterious effects, including the destruction of childhood and the impairment of family formation . Perhaps it is no surprise that it has corrupted our elite, too.

“WE” did no such thing. Notice the sophistic method used here, by using the royal “we” he pretends you are in agreement with his absurd definitions, false narratives and endless strawman “arguments”.

To briefly recap: we first discovered that ‘meritocracy’ is a far more dubious concept than the term, on its face, would imply:

No, again, “we” did no such thing. YOU invented an absurd definition for meritocracy, (who puts in the most effort has “merit” according to you) that no one else has, (Meritocracy means rule by those most effective at producing results, not rule by those making the most (or pretending to do) “effort”. Effort means nothing. Results do.) then tried to pretend it was the actual definition and then “shot it down”. Classic strawman argument.

“What we discovered is that the new concept of meritocracy is… reductive and exclusionary. It represents an attempt to expel a whole range of human richness from traditional understandings of ‘merit’.

No. It does no such thing. In fact meritocracy is how societies largely functioned in Catholic Europe until a bunch of soft-bellied and soft-handed bureaucrats like yourself managed to reproduce by remaining safe in the village, as the local village idiot, while men conquered the world.

Meritocracy is the notion that it is illegitimate to reward a person based on criteria other than a specific and artificial definition of merit, typically characterized by formal examinations and structured evaluations of narrowly-defined performance. Meritocracy adopts tests, reviews, qualifications, credentials, and the quantification of performance and ability. The meritocrat is the ‘Spreadsheet Man’.

I demolished this nonsense in detail in my first Kurganing of this effeminate poseur.

Under meritocracy, it is illegitimate to elevate an individual based on broader criteria, such as whether they are a friend, relative, local, particular sex, member of a known family, member of your faith, member of your class…

In other words, meritocracy is the antithesis of the concept of birthright. It is an attack on the integrity of sovereignty, undermining the ability of the steward of an asset to entirely determine to whom that asset is apportioned according to their own values.”

In Meritocracy is not a good thing , we began an exploration of the logic that inevitably leads to morally diminished elites within ‘meritocratic’ systems:

“Unfortunately, making ‘merit’ synonymous with ‘maximally economically productive’ also makes merit synonymous with a range of less desirable factors: a lack of inconvenient moral values, a lack of desire for a distracting family life, and an absence of ties to a particular locality.

Merit as economic productivity preferences a bias towards tolerance for inhuman working hours, a subservient and predictable personality type, and compliance over criticism or revolt.

Meritocratic institutions embrace those subjects who are transparent rather than complex; those whose achievements are easily summarized on a paper resume, and those who are willing to devote their lives to filling that paper in…

The quality naively implied by the term ‘merit’ and the qualities which are selected for in practice thus diverge widely. In fact, precisely because it subjects elites to Darwinian pressures while not selecting for virtue, meritocracy has the consistent effect of corrupting elites. Careerism is a poor teacher of morality.”

Here we see the whole house of cards of his ideology collapse in flames and ashes. Not only is he so stupid to say he thinks meritocracy is based on effort (instead of results) but he also equates any results to being solely equivalent to the amount of money a person produces (notice he unconsciously implies for others , not even for oneself, which would already be bad enough!) If this is not retardation at levels only seen by generations of inbreeding, I don’t know what is.

Money, especially fiat money, as we have on this fake, gay, and satanic world, is hardly ever a representation of any merit beyond the ability to play the rigged game in such a way that permits you to have a certain level of the fake Monopoly money we unfortunately all need currently to have a semi-decent standard of living.

It is no measure of you being meritorious of anything other than that, which as it is a rigged game, generally means the more money you “have” the more morally compromised you are likely to be. Just ask Elon (Musk), or Jeff (Bezos).

So once again, Kurtzy-boy gets it spectacularly wrong. A man has real merit in the world if he is effective. At what? At being a decent and honourable man. Merit inherently means it is something that has been achieved and demonstrated by results. And if you are broadly speaking, considering a moral society, then its citizens must be a moral people. Meaning any meritocracy that is likely to build such a civilisation, necessarily will be composed of meritorious (i.e. broadly speaking, Good, or Honourable) men.

Many readers, however, will doubtless remain unpersuaded by the notion that meritocracy corrupts – rather than refines – an elite.

Many readers will also remain unconvinced that 2+2 = Purple. Which is analogous to what you are doing in this post.

My view is that the corrupting effects are, in fact, obvious: elected officials, heads of companies, and expert organizations have never been less trusted. There are other explanations for this, of course, like DEI and its predecessor ideologies. But the perverse logic of ‘meritocratic’ processes plays a central role in the decline, as we shall demonstrate.

No it does not. In fact the very opposite thing is true. The overwhelming REASON why those elected officials and so on are not trusted is precisely because they are a bunch of ineffective cretins with egomaniacal delusions of mere competence. See for example ALL the legacy media and ALL the bought and paid for politicians that assured us Russia was out of weapons, ammunition and manpower within two weeks of March 2022. A blind newt could have predicted a better outcome for the War but corruption, endemic and even genetic incompetence prevails in all those spheres of influence, precisely because a bunch of inbred tribalist have got a stranglehold on the financial mechanisms of the planet as well as the mass media, entertainment and general zeitgeist creation on Planet Earth, as dictated by the puppet-masters behind Hollywood, the Bank of International Settlement and the Davos meet-ups and the World Economic Forum. These Vampiric Pedophiles are not even mildly competent, they are literally retarded in many cases, and yet, they hold the levers of power precisely through the “mechanisms” this faker with the fake name says we should use, which is basically nepotism for the inbred genetic misfits he represents.

“A culture that celebrates the prom queen over the math olympiad champ, or the jock over the valedictorian, will not produce the best engineers… More math tutoring, fewer sleepovers.”

— Vivek Ramaswamy (2024)

Wherein the supposedly Anglo-Saxon manly man, quotes a foreigner in a foreign land to make his point.

As elites have transitioned from focusing on the management of hereditary estates to maintaining status through personal labor, the intense demands of their narrowly-focused professional careers have left less and less room for broader interests, knowledge, and passions.

The people he considers “Elites” are nothing of the sort. They might be the foot soldiers (or more often footstools) of the Elite. And yes I do know. I worked for, and have personal acquaintance with more than one Billionaire.

Keir Starmer – Britain’s premier – has professed to having no favorite books, no favorite poems, no dreams, and no fears. When asked what single book he would take before being stranded on a desert island, he replied ‘an atlas’ (a truly midwit answer – as if it would help ) .

He is the right man leading for a people such as yourself. Talkers and whiners and the envious losers that do not have the testicular fortitude to even protect their own children from Pakistani Rape Gangs.

Under meritocracy, it is the elite who gravitate most intensely to hyper-specialization and a life dominated by professional labor. We saw illustrative statistics and a causal explanation in the last essay :

No, “we” did no such thing. You made some shit up based on your utterly preposterous and nonsensical strawman argument.

“The economic logic causing elites to work harder than ever before is straightforward: a digitized and financialized economy allows a highly capable individual to be more ‘productive’ than ever before. In such an economy, the greater the individual’s capacity, the more marginally productive they are than the next best worker.

In many sectors, there’s an exponential financial return on an individual’s additional capability. This is why you see power law distributions of earnings, exaggerated in sectors which are particularly digitized, financialized, and scaled.

The incredible financial returns on high-performing individuals’ efforts are seductive, causing them to work harder and harder. As these working patterns solidify into institutional and sectoral norms, they move from being optional to required. These industries then recruit from colleges which have selected for students who have demonstrated an incredible capacity for work. This becomes an accelerating feedback loop.”

I’ve heard that senior managers at Elon’s companies who wish to secure an hour with him must value the decision to be made at over $20m. That is what every hour of his professional attention is worth. $180m a nine-hour day.

Again, you retard, it is YOU who is the spreadsheet man, believing such nonsense, and also to stupid to realise that Elon is simply an actor playing a role, and never has created much of anything except the Elon Musk myth.

There is literally nothing an hour of time with Elon Musk would get you or anyone else unless it forwarded whatever demons he is serving today. The calculation is an abstract piece of art signifying nothing.

This same logic aggressively punishes dissenters. The more elite one becomes within a meritocracy, the less secure one’s position is, as smaller differences in performance produce exponentially greater differences in rewards.

Again, this is literally the inverse of the truth. And we can take me and Kurtzy-boy here as perfect parallel examples. While I have no doubt Kurtzy-boy is probably financial more well off than I am today, certainly from a monthly/daily/yearly “money coming in vs. money going out” perspective, the truth is he has to hide like a rat and do as he is told. I can say and do what I want in my own name. I am free. He is a drone.

The measure of the effectiveness of a man, is when he is perfectly willing to stand against the tide, secure in the knowledge it is upon us, but also secure in the knowledge that he is in the right an he will overcome or die trying. I am a dissenter according to Kurtzy-boy, and yet, I am more free as a human being than he is likely to ever be.

In other words, at the top of the meritocratic scale, by working slightly less hard on one’s narrow professional focus, massive financial opportunity costs can be incurred.

A portrait of Kurtzy-boy, saddened by his not being an “elite” and being snubbed by them. Seriously, he posted this image a promos of nothing.

All of the world’s wealthiest men are now-self made , and yet most continue to work long hours in their professional fields. This makes sense; figures like Zuckerberg and Musk are essentially tasteless and unlike previous elites are ill-prepared to be generative figures in the spaces of culture, faith, aesthetics, architecture, manners, and art. They are ‘merchant class’ through-and-through; they are not elite in any sense except their professional capacity.

Wrong. They are puppets put in place for being obedient servants of the ones that actually rule entire continents with structures like the IMF, the BIS, and so on. And you are fucking stupid , for not knowing this, because it is obvious!

We could categorize the various eras of transition into a modern meritocracy as follows:

1. Early and pre-20th century: Elites – then known as the ‘leisure classes’ -did relatively few hours of professional labor, focusing on managing estates, politics, hobbies, and culture. Their wives did no professional work, and focused on family, socializing, and charity.
2. Mid 20th century: Elites worked a moderate amount in white collar professions like law and finance. Culture – as expressed by elements like fine tailoring and refined manners – remained important. Their wives still did not have professional careers, and continued to focus on family, socializing, and charity.
3. Late 20th century: Elites worked a lot, and their wives, seeking status and increasing financial returns on elite labor, increasingly worked too. Focus on family formation, high culture, and service declined.
4. Early 21st century: Both men and women work long hours. Other interests are relegated to lower-order concerns.

What absolute nonsense. Seriously, how can anyone take this guy even half-seriously?

In other words, meritocracy takes the most gifted in society and instrumentalizes them into workers, more akin to office drones than previous generations of the elite. This has the effect of making these individuals exponentially more economically productive than the middle classes, increasing societal inequality and angst, while also locking elites into crushing work hours and a myopic focus.

You really have no concept of what Elite means, nor of how it is used in today’s social context. An impressive level of blithering ignorance!

We can thus see why our elites naturally gravitate towards the bureaucracies favored by the ‘professional managerial class’. As Strauss foresaw, without a broad, indulgent, noble education they have become “specialists without spirit or vision and voluptuaries without heart.” They are more technical instruments than human aristocrats . Markovits describes:

What part of “Technical Instruments” did you not understand?

“Traditional wealth, held as physical and financial capital, does not just free its owner from the need to work; it also enables him to become more fully himself. Human capital works in almost exactly the opposite way… Meritocracy, moreover, applies this idea most intensively to the elite. It makes the elite worker’s talents, skills, and training—her own self, her very person—into her greatest economic asset, the overwhelmingly dominant source of her wealth and caste… To secure her eliteness, the superordinate worker must ruthlessly manage her education and labor—training to develop skills that others value, and then working intensively in jobs and at tasks again set by others…

See that sentence? “ To secure her eliteness, the superordinate worker must…” That proves you are a complete idiot Kurtzy. If you are a “worker” the one thing you can be certain of is that you are NOT elite. You blithering moron.

A person whose wealth and status depend almost entirely on her human capital simply cannot afford to consult her own interests or passions in choosing her job…

Aaand again. You see here that Kurtzy-boy, not only is not elite, but he never, ever, ever, will be. He is literally genetically unviable for anything related to actual nobility. The old saying in my language that nobility is in the blood referred far more to the intrinsic nature of character that men who come from a long line of actually philosophical noble men have than any nepotistic generational privilege. Kurtzy here literally cannot even imagine a human being that puts other things and interests above their “economic capital” i.e. money. But the very NATURE of a noble man is that he cannot be bought. He will die or kill over a principle, regardless of consequence, and he is a literal force of nature because of it. Kurtzy here tells us so often and in so many ways that he is merely a lapdog of whoever holds a purse.

Moreover, as wages become increasingly concentrated among the very highest-paid workers, a smaller and smaller share of jobs and job types support top incomes. Someone who wants an elite income—or, critically, even just an income sufficient to buy his children the schooling on which their own eliteness depends—must do one of a narrowly restricted class of jobs, heavily concentrated in finance, management, law, and medicine.”

Ah yes, I see Johannie, the mark of an “elite” in your mind is to get on that hamster wheel as soon as possible and stay on it all your life, running ever faster, in the hope you ever graduate to being one of the rarefied “elites” you are so desperate to belong to, but to which you never will, ever. Because Kurtzy… you and your progeny… are fucking hamsters!

— Daniel Markovits, The Meritocracy Trap: How America’s Foundational Myth Feeds Inequality, Dismantles the Middle Class, and Devours the Elite

It is not clear that these hyper-specialized individuals are even particularly skilled. Under meritocracy, we have seen the increasing incentivization of credentialism and gamification over authentic development.

NOOOOO. Under Credentialism and gamification, nepotism, tribalism and using high-trust cultures to infiltrate them with low-trust values, you have seen the collapse of ability, efficiency, and authentic skill. As usual, Kurtzy has it precisely backward.

Acquiring a job is no longer just about becoming proficient in the relevant skills; it is equally about posturing, developing one’s LinkedIn presence, and perfectly formatting one’s CV for AI processing.

For YOU it is. For people like me, who can and have produced bundles of cash for their employers at pretty much anything they were tasked with, no, I don’t need any of that crap.

This is because meritocracy attacks traditional divisions which exclude applicants on principle.

Again, no. You have it completely reversed as usual. CREDENTIALISM does that. Meritocracy couldn’t care less what your origins are, only results. And this is why I said I have the utter certainty that Kurtzy here has never entered a boxing ring, had a dojo kumite, or ever faced off with fisticuffs to anyone. Because if he ever had, he would know that credentialism matters for NOTHING once things get serious. As the entirety of NATO and the US military is finding out thanks to Russia.

Now, anyone of any origin is free to apply for a job. Massive, unmanageable numbers of applications from unknown candidates result, and reductive comparative measurements become necessary to mitigate the challenge of volume. Gaming the system by exploiting the weaknesses of these measurements becomes first an opportunity, then – as more people do so, a necessity.

John Glanton of Social Matter illustrates the intellectual poverty of this ‘meritocracy at scale’ with the example of a spelling bee:

“…if you were to administer a spelling bee to a given middle-school classroom, there would be a fairly significant correlation between success at the bee and overall writing ability… if you foisted an impromptu spelling contest on some group of unsuspecting eighth-graders, it’d be likely to shake out that the ones who did well in it know their way around a book. And that they could on the whole write sentences with more clarity and grace than their lower-scoring counterparts. But the national spelling bee is a different animal altogether. Success at that level doesn’t mean you’re an “avid reader” or the kind of student who writes little short stories and poems in her spare time… It means you’re willing to forego in large measure normal childhood entertainments. It means you’re willing to grind out hour after hour of tedious rote learning, inscribing obscure etymologies and variant spellings and all manner of curious linguistic fauna in careful runes upon your young heart…

And that is what you are PRETENDING is meritocracy, which as I stated already plenty of times, is retarded.

But you can observe the same sort of phenomenon all over the place. Once a basic tool of training or assessment becomes incentivized heavily enough, it tends to lose all relationship to the qualities it was originally meant to train or assess… Just a bizarre arms race of ever-specializing techniques… once something becomes worth gaming, it will be gamed. And it will lose almost all of its former virtue in the gaming process.”

Meritocracy – and its brutal requirements for self-improvement – necessitates an inwards turn, rather than outwards beneficence. It leaves little room for authentic charity or public service.

I find it interesting, if not at all surprising, that Kurtzy here sees self-improvement as being “brutal”; instead of how I and anyone who actually owns a dictionary and knows what meritocracy actually means, perceive it; which is a good and fun thing to go after your entire life.

Aristocrats used to view military service as a right of passage, but this kind of service cannot be incentivized under meritocracy. Now, military service for the meritocratic elite would be just an awkward interruption to explain on their CVs.

No you moron. The time of aristocrats being also warriors and soldiers began to end with the rebellion against God and truth led by the Protestants, godless creatures more concerned with money than truth.

Channelling José Ortega y Gasset, Christopher Lasch writes:

…the value of cultural elites lay in their willingness to assume responsibility for the exacting standards without which civilization is impossible. They lived in the service of demanding ideals. “Nobility is defined by the demands it makes on us—by obligations, not by rights.” The mass man, on the other hand, had no use for obligations and no understanding of what they implied, “no feeling for [the] great historical duties.” Instead he asserted the “rights of the commonplace.”…

Lacking any comprehension of the fragility of civilization or the tragic character of history, he lived unthinkingly in the “assurance that tomorrow [the world] will be still richer, ampler, more perfect, as if it enjoyed a spontaneous, inexhaustible power of increase.” He was concerned only with his own well-being and looked forward to a future of “limitless possibilities” and “complete freedom.”

— Christopher Lasch, The Revolt of the Elites and the Betrayal of Democracy

There can be no ‘ noblesse oblige’ in a system in which there is no ‘ noblesse’ (noble birth).

Damn but this retard gets everything wrong. Noblesse Oblige as I explained before is NOT in specific reference to anything related to bloodline, but to CHARACTER. A man of noble heart feels obliged to do or not do certain things. For example, putting pedophiles to death regardless of the “laws” any given freemasons-controlled government might have on the books. Defend the innocent (as Catholic Dogma demands). Tell the truth when it is hard but necessary, and so on. But what does Kurtzy know? He’s just angry he wasn’t born in a wealthy family and he still feels like he’s not got enough to become part of the circle of those who are. And he is right, he will never be one of them, but even more laughably, wealthy people are no indication of nobility at all, yet Kurtzy here can’t help himself.

The moral logic which underpinned the duties of the aristocracy to the lower classes was that their privilege could only be justified with commensurate beneficence (an echo of Luke 12:48: “Everyone to whom much was given, of him much will be required, and from him to whom they entrusted much, they will demand the more.” )

In a system in which the elites believe that they have ‘earned’ their privilege, it is less clear that they owe anything to others. Indeed, quite the opposite: in a ‘meritocracy’ in which people receive what they merit, the lower classes merit their low status, having been ‘given every opportunity and failed to make much of it’. There is no such thing as the less fortunate , only the less deserving .

Thank you for yet again, demonstrating to all, for all time, the true nature of your inner character. Or rather, I should say, the chasm in it that can never be filled, where other people actually have that sense of duty that makes them noble.

As Michael Young describes, “For the first time in human history the inferior man has no ready buttress for his self-regard”, and they thus become, in the words of Daniel Markovits, “victims without a language of victimhood.”

The morality of this situation is of course highly dubious, given the advantages many of the elite have had from the circumstances of their birth, like natural gifts and diligent parents. Indeed, the effects of this delusion inevitably result in great cruelty:

“…meritocracy inclines elites to chauvinistic contempt or even cruelty regarding inequalities that cannot be cast in terms of identity politics. Political correctness does not denounce calling rural communities ‘backward,’ southerners ‘rednecks,’ Appalachians ‘white trash,’ and the bulk of the United States ‘flyover country.’ Indeed, considered elite opinion as commonly rationalizes as condemns these slurs: a widely read essay in the National Review, for example, recently attacked white working-class communities as “economically … negative assets,” as “morally … indefensible,” and as “in thrall to a vicious, selfish culture whose main products are misery and used heroin needles,” before concluding that “they deserve to die”; and a columnist for the New York Times, after observing that immigrants outperform native-born Americans in meritocratic competitions, called native-born citizens “the stagnant pool in which our national prospects risk drowning” and proposed (now tongue-in-cheek) that only mass deportations of the native-born could save America.”

— Markovits

Quoting a jew on a publication that is a known gatekeeper for at least a decade or two as your “evidence” for the correctness of your “position” is probably NOT going to convince anyone with am IQ above room temperature. In Alaska.

Lasch notes that escaping from the common lot – this white trash milieu – becomes the “very definition of meritocratic success” and the logical ambition of the meritocrat. Success is synonymous with active alienation from the middle and lower classes.

This alienation also expresses itself geographically, as detailed in works like Charles Murray’s ‘Coming Apart: The State of White America, 1960-2010’. While the old aristocracy of the land , which had to manage immovable rural estates, was necessarily dispersed throughout the country, meritocratic human capital is the opposite; it not only can move but must concentrate in the quest for maximum economic productivity.

Meritocrats must go where the ‘best’ schools are, and then where the best jobs are, often moving frequently throughout a career. There is a compound effect on the colocation of human capital, attracting the preponderance of elite human capital to specific geographic centers while leaving the rest of the population – and their own families – behind.

No, this is not the behaviour of the actual elite. It is the behaviour of parasites. Or cancer cells.

This breaks relations between both the classes and the generations. The new centers are:

“Populated by transients, they lack the continuity that derives from a sense of place and from standards of conduct self-consciously cultivated and handed down from generation to generation.”

— Lasch

The meritocrat has no sense of the special value of a ‘family business’, and under meritocracy a family business has no moral logic to privilege the next generation of their own family. This logic also means elite families have little motivation to generate heirs – for what good is an heir without an estate to pass down?

Ok Kurtzy, we get it, you too had boomer parents, and they gambled it all away on horse-racing, cocaine and hookers. Get over it boy. You’re not the only one. But you ARE whining a hell of a lot!

This concludes my essay series criticizing meritocracy. I hope you have enjoyed it! But this series will only have value if I am able to identify a superior system and some mechanism by which to transition to that system. Stay tuned.

Yes, the superior system is called….drumroll… MERITOCRACY! Buy a dictionary, read it and start again. -5/10 Johann must not just try harder, but he must try harder than all the other children, it may not help much but it’s better than him infecting the other children with retarded nonsense.

This series will ultimately inform my forthcoming book, Leaving a Legacy , which charts a course for the patriarch who wishes to guide his own family out of this destructive practice and into greatness. Stay tuned.

Anyone taking advice from you on how to lead a family is already a casualty as far as I’m concerned.

If you found value in this piece, please consider liking it using the button below, and upgrading to become a paid subscriber. All revenue goes towards supporting my family and goes a long way in helping me to continue to write.

But, aren’t you a techie manly man, that works for an employer in middle management work and who is “leaving England” because a strong white man can’t make it there any longer? Or something along those lines you spoke on?

You will unlock the full archive of over one hundred similar essays and podcasts, and a guide on where to start. All support is hugely appreciated.

I’ll get right on that as soon as I manage to sell second-hand toilet paper to India. I know it’s a long-shot, but if any country in the world might go for it…

Sic transit imperium,

Shhh… Don’t try to use the language of your better. You never were an Empire. Nothing has passed, because nothing was ever built. And if you are referring to the ex British empire, well, that didn’t last anywhere near the 800 years of the Roman one whose language you are trying to use, did it.

Yopu’re a peasant Kurtzy. And always will be.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

Within 24 hours 3 tins have been sold. There are now only 4 left. As usual, first come, first served. See last post for details on how to get one.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

Why?

Because genuine, Unprocessed, and Unblended Extra Virgin Olive Oil turns out to be the healthiest thing ever. Literally nothing else compares to it. See the bottom of this post for the details.

For those of you who want the hard facts first:

There are now 7 tins, of 5 litres each of the extra virgin olive oil from my trees, now available in the USA. Once they are gone, they are gone, it’s a first come, first served situation and works as follows:

1. The cost is $65 per litre and due to the limited quantity available we intend to ship it out ONLY as a 5 litre tin. Inclusive of shipping and postage to anywhere in the USA, the price per 5 litre tin therefore, will be $350.
2. If you want to purchase one of the 7 tins available you will need to send me an email at [email protected] that includes:
   1. Your full name and address in the USA
   2. Upon my response with the requisite bank details, payment in full for the tin/s you wish to receive
3. Expect most places will take a week or so for the delivery to arrive, but some places (e.g. Alaska) may take longer.

For those of you who want the full story:

My American partner has decided to attempt to register for importation of my olive oil to the USA and done an amazing piece of work in that respect. He decided to take a working holiday to see a bit of Italy and then come and visit me on the farm for 10 days, where I have to say, he worked harder than anyone that has come over to lend a hand. 1

On his return home he took some olive oil back (all perfectly in regulation) and that is why he has some available for shipping before we have finalised all the other requirements for larger shipments later (which may cost more depending on a variety of factors related to shipping we are still trying to resolve).

The first question most people will have is probably related to the price: “$65 a litre? are you crazy?”

Actually no. I could probably charge a lot more. Why? Let me list the reasons:

1. Most olive oil you buy in ANY shop is simply NOT pure olive oil. It tends to be a blend of oils or a somewhat inferior version of what it says on the tin. Our olive oil is absolutely PURE, really extra virgin, and UNFILTERED. This means you get ALL the benefits of the oil that are essentially dissipated or even almost entirely lost in the ones you buy in a shop.
2. The price is not unreasonable at all when you consider shipping costs and the regulatory costs added. The same stuff sells here for about 40-45 Euro, so we’re certainly not in any way overpriced.

The Real Reason for Extra Virgin Olive Oil – Health

Brian Johnson , who spends some 2 million USD a year on trying to find the best ways on Earth to live longer, after all his testing on multiple medications as well as far more extreme things, like blood transfusions using his son’s blood (and his own to his father) has discovered that literally nothing on Earth removes inflammation like real, extra virgin olive oil.

• He sells his olive oil at €42 per 750 ml (which works out to about the same as my oil per litre once you convert it to USD) (you can see this on his site at the link provided)
• But his oil is NOT the best one in the world. Our literally is. The oil from this region cold pressed and unfiltered has won the world’s best olive oil in the world expo at Dubai in 2021 and Monte Carlo in 2022. The region did not produce in 2023 so the oil mills here did not compete, and the oil of 2024 is yet to compete as it has just been collected in November/December 2024, but is of excellent quality as the chemical analysis we do on all our oil for each batch have proven.
• I have personally tested the truth of this issue. I had semi-chronic inflammation of my elbow joints due to over-working on the farm, and even taking a couple of weeks of rest from the physical work did not help the situation. as soon as I went back to my duties on the farm my arms would ache. I started to take at least 15ml of olive oil pure every day, and usually more like 30-40 ml, so a few tablespoons just on their own through my day and within about two to three days my joint-pain was either completely gone or much reduced. For a bout a year I experimented with this and as soon as I stopped taking the oil, within a couple of days the pain would return, and would go away after a couple of days that I started to take it again.
• I had also had Covid in 2022 and then pneumonia twice. By early 2023 I was functioning at a much reduced breathing capacity and was not completely healed. I was suffering from “long Covid” essentially. But I was determined to recover. It’s taken a while, mostly because I am inconsistent with my diet, but since the last few months of 2024 I decided to be disciplined about what I eat and my regular intake of our olive oil and it has made a huge difference. While I struggled to go up and down the stair through 2023 and part of 2024, I now work outside at the same rate I was doing when I first arrived in 2021. I have no doubt in my mind that the olive oil is the biggest factor in this and the research I have done on covid/spike protein etc backs up what I have experienced on my own body as Olive oil and olive leaf extracts seem to be among the best cure of these sort of ailments because… again… they are all inflammation related issues.

I have written to Mr. Johnson a while back to see if he was interested in using the oil from our region as I have now built up a network of producers that would allow for large shipments, but I have not heard back, so I have decided to create my own distribution channel, which hopefully will be active in the USA shortly. In the meantime, this is the quickest and easiest option you can have to get your hands on some.

Please Note

• It’s first come first served. Whoever emails me first has the slot first and whoever pays first secures it first.
• We are not going to re-bottle the oil into fancy tins or smaller quantities. The oil was transported in 5 litre tins that are sealed and remain so. Rebottling etc would require the additional paperwork that wee are putting in place, so unfortunately you either buy the whole thing at $350 per tin or nothing.
• The tins were flown as personal luggage by air so may be cosmetically a bit dented or whatever, but the olive oil therein is pure, and our direct from our trees. We do not use glass because any sunlight can lower the quality of the product and even dark glass bottles let some light through.
• Shipping to the USA in due course should become available but due to Italian bureaucracy no one can say when this will happen and it may be many months yet (I hope not, but it’s out of my hands). Shipping to the USA is a considerable expense and the recent addition of potential tariffs will make it definitely more so. This is genuinely a price that may well not be repeatable in the future.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

To those of you who have purchased paid subscriptions, thank you. It is much appreciated, as although the income from it is modest, it shows your genuine support and in any case makes a difference for me and helps me be able to write more frequently and on topics I hope you find above all else useful and able to implement in your life.

If you are a paid subscriber, especially if you have subscribed for the whole year, please leave a comment on a blog topic you would like to cover and I will do my best to do so.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

It is time this absolute joke of an excuse for “a man whom one should listen to” for his “wisdom” and “insights” in how to navigate the modern dystopia, is finally exposed for what he is, by someone that can read for comprehension. It is a sign of the times really that this pustule on the ass of competence was ever awarded a “featured blog” for his substack in 2024. Good God. It’s like people literally can’t read at all anymore.

Prepare yourselves dear Substakers, for what at my OH blog (where I currently released part 6 of Theoretical Models of Society , which as a series puts the lie to all that this moisturised, sedentary, ass-in-butter, theoretical wanna-be “aristocrat” has ever cogitated in his sub-par, midget skull) is called a Kurganing.

Kurganing: Verb – The unfortunate result of what happens to a deceiving liar, sophist, Freemason, general heretic, arrogant (but incapable) idiot, when he attracts the attention of The Kurgan and receives a public vivisection of his all too mortal inadequacy, incompetence, weakness of character, cowardice, and general faggotry, and as a result becomes the star in a blog post by said Kurgan.

Let us first of all identify the main posts (but really all of them will do) this ridiculous clown ( Johann Kurtz , whose tag line is [in total humourless seriousness, I assure you]: Forming the new nobility: become beautiful, dangerous, and worthy of power at his idiotic blog “ becoming Noble ”) has created that immediately prove he is an idiot with delusions of elitism.

Here they are:

Meritocracy is not a Good Thing

Idiotic quote from the idiocy at that post (this one is especially relevant a little later)

Meritocracy necessitates and idealizes the destruction of traditional boundaries. This began with the attack on class structures, but after the moral primacy of ‘merit’ is accepted, it must also be conceded that other structures which impede the centering of ‘merit’ should be questioned: national borders, gender divides, insular communities, and prejudices of all kinds.

The seeds of meritocratic thought arose in the West with the broader Enlightenment, which held that the scientific process – with its advocacy of quantification and objectivity – could be turned upon politics and human affairs more generally, in order to progress society towards utopia.

A provable meritocracy thus demands that all achievement must be explicit, documented, legible, and acceptable. Meritocracy can only be conducted on the basis of what we can measure; this thing we call ‘ merit’.

Of course, distilling the ineffable qualities of human existence into quanta has always proved challenging for the social sciences , which is why they have strayed while the hard sciences have progressed.

The central question at hand is: “What is the definition of this thing we recognize as ‘merit’ within a meritocracy?” How is it measured, by whom, and when? Is the ‘good’ we are attempting to capture an intrinsic quality of the human subject or an objective outcome we are trying to engineer? What scale and timescale do we care about?

Notice how this idiot is TRYING to define/qualify/”explain” meritocracy as being some sort of magic formula of quantifying attributes into a…well a spreadsheet format? Notice how NO ONE ELSE ON THE PLANET does that, only him? It’s his idea, his way of trying to define it? Remember that, it’s important and it’s the biggest clue (among an ocean of them) that this guy is:

1. A moron
2. An “intellectual” (read: Midwit who thinks he is the smartest person in the room. Also, See 1.)
3. A Perfumed Prince – that is someone that EITHER was born relatively well off, never had anything very hard in his life, went to the right schools, kissed the right asses, sucked off the right bosses, and got himself some middle or maybe even eventual middle-high management position earning decent money (and/or he had some from daddy anyway) that makes him think he is a “self-made” man. With the manly in man, and the smarts. And regardless if he goes to gym regularly or is a weedy nerd or chubbster, he fancies his (self-invented and self-deceived) moral superiority somehow makes him in any case “better” than the “rabble” that laugh at his pontificating bullshit. OR a guy that maybe did come from not the lower classes but not particularly well off, and did work hard at being a good little drone of the system and managed to pull off some decent situation… that is… by… well, you know… going to the right schools, or doing well at the ones he went to, kissing the right asses, sucking off the right bosses to achieve… you get it. And the only difference is that now he feels even MORE entitled to be a smartboi ™ because he (in his feverish mind) really IS a self-made man.

But let us see how he demonstrates this in his own words.

Meritocratic Education Ruins Children

Quote from the runoff produced therein:

Meritocracy is the notion that it is illegitimate to reward a person based on criteria other than a specific and artificial definition of merit, typically characterized by formal examinations and structured evaluations of performance. Meritocracy adopts tests, reviews, qualifications, credentials, and the quantification of performance and ability. The meritocrat is the Spreadsheet Man.

Under meritocracy, it is illegitimate to elevate an individual based on broader criteria, such as whether they are a friend, relative, local, particular sex, member of a known family, member of your faith, member of your class, or a representative of a range of ‘protected characteristics’.

In other words, meritocracy is the antithesis of the concept of birthright. It is an attack on the integrity of sovereignty, undermining the ability of the steward of an asset to entirely determine to whom that asset is apportioned.

To doubt the moral monopoly of meritocracy is thus not to insist that merit should be restricted in the opposite direction (ie. characterized entirely by birth ) but to broaden one’s conception of merit to contain both the notion of qualifications and the legitimacy of other factors, as may be relevant in different circumstances.

See that GIANT strawman he sets up in part one? Meritocracy “defined” as some arbitrary quantification of the ineffable into a spreadsheet type format that has no bearing to reality? Only to…

Knock it down in part two, to “prove his point”. A point no one ever before him ever made because it doesn’t exist.

There are illiterate Khoi San and Amazonian Pirahã that are perfectly capable of understanding and explaining what meritocracy means, because especially in their societies, it is still a thing. And it is only because men with brass balls and iron wills managed to create such bounty on the Earth —where the village idiot was safe to reproduce and foster upon us a melange of genetic misfits like this pale, belly-frogged constituted “man”— that it is no longer required in the general West for larvae-spawns such as Johann to continue to survive and even do “well” for himself.

So let me explain it to you in short words of few syllables:

Meritocracy: from the word MERIT, which is defined as the the state of becoming entitled, deserving of, have earned either a reward or a punishment on the basis of one’s behaviour, actions, effectiveness at [something].

Literally, little children understand what merit is. And a meritocracy is simply a society in which the person that is best at doing a specific task is placed in the position of doing it. You know where meritocracy is absolutely clear and obvious to everyone and anyone? A violent fight. Or a group of fighters in a ring, dojo, or street. In Systema, the guy who can kick everyone else’s ass best teaches. It is the surest form of meritocracy I have ever encountered and I would bet money that our perfumed prince Johann has never entered a ring or dojo floor in his life. Nor is he likely to. How do I know? Well, he either hasn’t got the first clue about meritocracy at all, which means he is a fully “theoretical” creature, and it’s bad theory at that. He apparently works in some kind of tech/IT/software field, so you can see what I mean. Maybe he can code, but he can’t do much else. He has no concept of physical results in the real world beyond that artificial bubble he has been raised, grown and produced in, like a clone from a vat-factory in the RPG game of Paranoia . There are another six just like him, called Johann-Smarty “Pants” Kurtz – 001 through to 007.

And just like a dweller of Alpha complex, if he ever pokes his head out of the underground artificial world he lives in, and sees some trees and a squirrel he may well freak out and push the nuclear launch codes.

So we have already established he is an impractical man that has never taken a punch (or ten) in the face and has certainly never given any (it might have spoilt his little prefect-perfect schoolboy-cum-teacher’s-pet road to “riches”).

We also know that he has delusions of grandeur, and is little more than a hopped up peasant, who is grasping, like a drowning man for what he perceives as his supposed “due” of “new nobility”. Which he will never achieve. Because nobility is first of all a matter of intrinsic character, one he absolutely lacks, and secondly, no one is handing out family crests to retards anymore.

We know he thinks that the path to “nobility” is achieved by being a good drone that goes to the good schools, and does the “good” things he is told and kisses ALL the asses (with a little lick for extra credit) in order to climb the corporate/status/suck-cess ladder. How do we know? Well, because he expressly tells young men to do just that.

He first posited this “way” here , and the title is oh so telling: Jobs for sensitive young men, and then defended it here . So we also know Johann is/was/sees himself as/ will never grow out of, the idea that he (is) was a sensitive young man. Oh so sensitive. Because of his smarts you see. The poor lad was just smarter than all his peers who cruelly did not respect and understand his sensitive thoughts. It is the sort of duplicitous and self-serving as well as intrinsically false narrative people like Johann invariably have about themselves. It’s the midwit gamma complex. Johann’s excuse is that anyone with a “higher” IQ would simply avoid physical brutality, don’t you know. Unless they were evil. Evil I tell you. The concept that anyone with a 155 IQ would indulge in physical activities like martial arts or being a bodyguard or a doorman simply does not parse for him. He may lie about it if he ever reads this, but I know this type of creature. Violence is only for the “evil” brutes of life. Or… or… well, yes, okay, the very NOBLE people, but only as a last resort (that he prays in his suburban home “ivory tower” never, ever, ever comes to pass) and only for the NOBLEST of reasons (all so rarefied and theoretical that not even tardigrades can survive in that atmosphere) none of which will ever activate even as he is raped to death by marauding pirates.

He also has ZERO understanding of how to be a man in relation to a woman (this is to be expected, he is after all English). We know this thanks to his “enlightenment” level idea that women do not or will not have children because it implies a loss of status.

And one has to ask… What Status? What Status is he talking about? And it is obvious he is talking about what HE perceives as being a desirable sign of status:

• Financial success (having enough money to be living well above average)
• Knowing and being seen by the right people in the right way
• Driving the “cool” car
• Going to the right schools
• Having the right clothes
• Probably having a trophy wife (though I doubt he does)

And of all of the above, the only one that personally makes a difference is having enough money to say “Fuck you” to whoever. And by “makes a difference” I simply mean that it makes it less of a concern at all to do so. Not that you don’t do it if you lack the money. I certainly have never held back saying “Fuck you” to anyone I ever felt deserved it. Regardless of pretty much anything other than my personal sense of justice. But sure, a bunch of cash makes life easier. I’ve had money and had no money, so I can tell the difference, but it will never be something that defines my character.

But do ANY of these things really matter to a woman? No. Not really. They only matter to her in the context of the zeitgeist of the disturbed society we inhabit. And of course, no woman wants to live under a bridge with ten kids she has no means to feed and a deadbeat for a husband. But my point is simply that as long as you are:

1. Actually a man, not some facsimile of a metrosexual, moisturised, vegan, midwit “intellectual”, and therefore provide the required practical support for your wife, and even if that should collapse (due to war, unforeseen circumstances, bad luck, whatever) she has the unwavering certainty that if anyone can climb out of a hole and rebuild a good life it is you, and you with her and your children, and,
2. Provide her with the natural experience of being with an actual man, as described above, she will NATURALLY return to her “prime directive” as a woman, which is to make a bunch of kids.

Are there women too damaged by the dystopia we live in to “change” or evolve past the lies and deception they were raised with? Sure. But are MOST women this damaged? No. They are just mostly lacking any actual men to provide the 2 things above. Plenty of soyboys like Johann there, but actual men? Eh… it’s slim pickings.

The truth is that a woman safe to exhibit her femininity and natural sensuality and sensitivity RELISHES in being a mother. Her life feels meaningful and full and worthwhile, and all the struggles and heartache she might suffer, in the light of a happy family become badges of honour, medals on her uniform as glorious mother and loving wife of a… MAN.

But does our Perfumed Prince stop here? Oh no, no, no, he persists in his imbecilic, literally mouth-drooling, arrogance. Behold his latest piece:

Meritocracy Kills Fertility

and the requisite quotes from it:

This time he prefaces it with a kind of “hands up gesture” to try and prevent the obvious stupidity of his argument from being well… blindingly obvious.

Editor’s note: this is a continuation of my series on meritocracy . The motivation for this series is to establish the logic which will be presented in my upcoming book ‘Leaving a Legacy’, in which I will attempt to convince wealthy individuals to not squander their estates in donations to the inefficient and destructive ‘charity’ industry.

The book will instead empower heads of families to establish rooted, virtuous dynasties which can sustain communities for generations. Necessary for this project is to convince fathers that it is not good to disinherit their children in a misguided attempt to force them to generate their own wealth in a ‘meritocratic’ system. This destroys their childhood , closes their minds, and interrupts their ability to raise the next generation – as we shall see.

You see, it’s all about the boomers not leaving money to their children. Which sure, who can argue that’s not a thing. It is. Boomers are the most narcissistic, destructive, toxic, generation that has ever crawled on the face of the Earth. Maybe Johann here is trying to tell daddy to not leave the family castle to the SPCA or something. But regardless, if this is the “argument” against meritocracy he wants to write a whole book on, it’s really quite pathetic.

He’s again, setting up a strawman, that supposedly, if you are wealthy, you will cut your kids off in order to “teach them meritocracy”. What complete nonsensical fabrication is that, pray tell?

If I had a few millions to leave to my children, I would. And if I were a billionaire I am sure I would also give them experiences that they would otherwise not come by, but their learning to be effective, efficient and good at whatever they decide to focus on, in other words, their putting in the work required to become good, has absolutely nothing to do with how much money I have or don’t have or leave to them or not leave to them. As far as I am concerned: THIS. IS. SPARTA!

You will move your ass and RUN, not walk. If you fall you get up. If you’re still breathing you can still get up. You will NOT give up, you will find a way. I am not worried about money or my children not having enough of it. I will teach them to merit whatever they aim for. By simply going after it and becoming good enough to get it. Regardless of the barriers to entry idiots like Johann naturally want to impose on their actual betters, for the usual obvious reasons.

But let’s continue to delve in this festering pile of bull manure.

I will quote quite a long piece here to prove that I am not selectively picking bits out of it. He really is this fucking stupid. It’s enough to make you wonder if perhaps he is of “noble” birth; you know, from one of those families that have been fucking each others’ cousins and occasional half-sisters for generations!

Behold, the very first sentence is the summary of the rest of the absolutely wrong “definition” he gives to meritocracy.

The key proposition of meritocracy is that the person who deserves the greatest reward is the person with the greatest aptitude who invests the greatest effort .

That is really all it takes to prove he is a complete moron. One who can’t afford a basic dictionary apparently.

Meritocracy is a society based not on the greatest effort someone puts in, you moron. It’s a society based on the results someone produces.

RESULTS, monkey boy. Results. Not effort, you blithering idiot.

But let him hang himself in his own words.

Meritocracy is a curious creature: it is a political philosophy which could be described as ‘progressive but inegalitarian’. As with all progressive philosophies, it is a liberal child of the Enlightenment and its advocates champion it as a repudiation of the hereditary class system.

Ultimately, however, it remains an inegalitarian system for defining who should rule over others. The term ‘meritocracy’ is the combination of the Latin-origin “merit” (from mereō meaning earn ) and the Greek suffix “-cracy” ( power, rule ). In other words, it is rule by those who have earned it.

Meritocracy is progressive to the degree that it denies that one’s ultimate status should be defined by the circumstances of one’s birth. There remains an inconvenient fact, however: intelligence and other key attributes for success are parameterized at birth, and are nurtured by the family circumstances which one is born into.

To avoid the decidedly illiberal proposition of replacing one birthright caste with another – bloodlines by IQ – meritocracy opens the possibility for social mobility by integrating a factor which only emerges after birth: how hard the individual works. This factor serves as the moral heart of meritocracy.

It is feasible that the college selection process could, for example, operate entirely on a simple combination of 1) an intelligence test; 2) basic evidence of diligence via applicants’ key grades; and 3) demonstrating intellectual curiosity in an interview.

The typical elite selection process extends far beyond this, however. Evidence is required of an extraordinary record of effort. Extracurriculars, languages, instruments, volunteering, internships, startups, projects, and so forth are required. Aptitude is not enough.

If two applicants with the same level of intelligence are presented, the one who has ‘worked harder’ will be chosen, even if both have worked hard enough to have confidence that they would fulfill their responsibilities as students. The same is true of two candidates for a professional opportunity: the stacked résumé wins.

Elites from athletes to bankers brag about how hard they work. This bragging would have been alien to the generation of elites which preceded the ‘meritocratic elite’ – indeed, elites used to be known as the ‘ leisure classes’ . But the centralization of effort is necessary to the moral logic of meritocracy, and underpins the system’s justification for existence – and effort therefore manifests as a virtue to be advertised.

It is clear that Johann advocates in his other pieces like the “jobs for sensitive young men” to become and be precisely the kind of one-dimensional, ass-kissing, ivy-league educated, smarmy, two-faced, parasites that end up having to rape children on Satanic altars while being ridden by a man in a donkey mask while snorting cocaine, because they are so utterly dead inside that this is an approximation of something that might make them feel something.

And yet, here he says, that the system that puts these vermin in the places where they have access to the levers of power is based on “meritocracy”. It’s absolute nonsense. Johan is CLEARLY one of those wanna-be’s that has never quite made it into the “high society” he so longs to be a part of, and is really very bitter about it, despite his airs of “being” or rather, “becoming” noble.

Aside the fact that he has no clue what meritocracy is or even means, as evidenced beyond a shadow of a doubt above —and that the vermin in question do NOT get there through it, but rather PRECISELY by his supposed preferred method of nepotism, knowing who to threaten, blackmail, pay off or suck off— it becomes clear that he also proves his own advice is retarded, ineffective, a lie and produces only a hellish life devoid of meaning aside the chasing of the ever elusive dragon of “status”. Which clearly he has not achieved; nor will anyone who takes his idiotic advice.

So let me explain it in perspective:

If you are a middling guy, maybe from a not well to do family, trying your best to have a monochromatic CV with ONE direction only, for your choice of career and sticking to it like a soulless drone, because ultimately you have the kind of brain that worries about that more than actually living a meaningful life and/or because to you that reach for the 2.5 kids, white picket fence and the fake “respect” of your peers for your “status” IS what life is all about, then… by all means, sunshine, you go right ahead. It’s what’s best for you for sure.

On the other hand, if you are not an average person, or even a midwit totally lacking in imagination, actually have an at least partially functioning brain, and realise there is more to life than Johann’s ever elusive “status”, and perhaps want to live some of it, you may notice that there are plenty of jobs that will still keep you comfortable and also allow you to have a family, if you simply apply yourself, but it is not required you sacrifice the details and joys of life for them.

In short, this guy tries to baffle you with bullshit. His veneer of “becoming noble” is a façade. He pretty much admitted as much when he wrote that he is “ leaving Britain ” (I wonder if he really ever will) which appears to be his whining lament that Britain is no longer a place where you can “make it”. But it never was. Britain is still one of the countries in which his much praised “class structure” continues to exist. He is too stupid to realise it is the very thing he wants to be a part of that will forever keep him out of it.

As for his piece of meritocracy reducing fertility it’s the usual nonsense. By “defining” meritocracy as “effort” instead of results, he concludes that:

Now we find something of a fertility ‘perfect storm’ developing. Three factors are now true which together would seem to inexorably suppress birthrates among those parts of the population which play the meritocracy game:

1. Elites – and aspiring elites – work longer and harder than ever before;
2. Elite children are more time-intensive to raise than ever before;
3. Elite children are more expensive to educate than ever before.

(For more commentary and data on points 2 & 3, see my last article. )

Something has to give!

But this is of course the “reasoning” of someone who can’t do a BASIC logical calculation of cost analysis.

It’s not hard to do:

Do I want to work 16 hour days and have no real life outside of my work for 30 years in order to be a billionaire (maybe, assuming the best case, because there are PLENTY of people who TRY to do this who are not even millionaires, and there are very FEW billionaires)?

Now, me, even if the billion was guaranteed? I would say (and did say, multiple times in life) a resounding, loud, echoing: “Fuck NO!” In fact I said no to much lower thresholds than that. Why? It doesn’t really matter, the point is that to ME my personal freedom to explore whatever facet of life I decide takes my fancy, is FAR more important than money or artificial success, or what really anyone besides a VERY small number of select people think about me or my life choices. And even those few only matter up to a point, because first and foremost, I have to be honest to myself. If you look at my life trajectory , or the things I have done , it would give Johann a brain embolism.

And you’ll also notice at least a couple more things about him that differs from me. I mean if you are deaf, dumb and blind, because otherwise you may notice many, many, many dozens of things, but in any case, at a minimum, I —unlike Johann— actually am noble. I literally come from a line of men that in the gold branch were awarded perpetual status of Marquis for the first-born, and in the Silver branch which I belong to of Patrician. In both cases the title to nobility was achieved as a result of martial prowess, by basically being better than everyone else at a given time and place at killing people. And as a member of the nobility, I can assure you, that Johann is not, and never will be one of us. And it really has nothing to do with titles that he may purchase along the way. because you see… they will not be merited. They will not be earned.

But more importantly, you might notice that Johann is a pseudonym. He writes anonymously. I do not. My OG blog is right there, my books have my name on it, and so on. While I use the nickname The Kurgan that was given to me by a group of online people I used to frequent, I do not hide who I am. And I write what I write.

So, why does Johann hide like a fearful, soft, and Perfumed Prince in fear? Because he simply CANNOT afford to say “fuck you” to whomever. Johann has neither the money (neither do I) not the balls (I do) or the supposed mythical “status” to do so.

In short, Johann, is, like his theories, a fraud.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

I talked about him before and mentioned he MIGHT be interesting if only because of his anti-Putin take, which purported to be from the Slav perspective. Perhaps some of his points were even valid. But overall he was like a Slavic Never Trumper.

Is Trump man’s salvation? Or even just America’s? Nope. Not even close. But is he waaaaay better than KamelToe Harridan? Even if he really is a Jewish owned goyim? The answer there is still yes. And ditto Putin. Is he some kind of saviour of man, or even just Russia? Nope to the first, although he may well be with the second one, but in any case, the overall point is Putin is without a doubt the best thing that could happen to Russia when you compare him to… who should have taken over? the Jewish British spy Russian guy pretending to run for President that died (of purely natural causes I’m sure?) Yeah, right.

But that aside, his latest piece glorifies an absolute retarded incel: Curt/Kurt Dolittle who, as providence invariably has it has a telling surname. In case you don’t know, and believe me you are luckier for it, Mr. Dolittle is a complete moron. He has come up with absurd theories of society based on “property rights” that run to thousands of pages of mind-numbing idiocy pulled straight from his nether regions, where he does all of his “thinking”, mostly in a bitter rant towards women and why none of them ever did anything other than possibly vomit a little on first contact with him; and has drawn the most retarded conclusions to try to justify his natural repulsiveness to women and pretty much life in general.

And Rurik lionises him as some great intellectual.

It is also clear that our would-be slav Rurik is really an incel himself, this was clear from his writing in general long before this post, but even more so in this piece that is almost homoerotic in its vacillating fever-dream of the deep complexities of male friendship and his vivisection of a concept that is about as plain and simple as it can be, and then trying to draw some deep parallels between Anglo and slav “friendships”.

All of which message could be summarised in a postcard.

But to make Dolittle the master avatar of Western male friendship is a bit like putting Bruce Jenner on the cover of TIME and making him woman of the year. Only more absurd.

Suffice it to say that I no longer subscribe to his substack even out of mild curiosity, and literally nothing he ever has to say again is of any relevance if that is the best he can do and in fact appears to be just the first post in a series!

But don’t despair, I see Johann has written another post on meritocracy and although I have only read the title so far, I deeply suspect after the last retarded nonsensical post on meritocracy, that this one might well outperform it in how many IQ points it murders if you read it. But I will delve in for your benefit dear readers…. exposing the nonsense on substacks so you don’t need to take sanity hits to your walk through these Chthulian corridors of misinformation, bullshit, lies, and rampant idiocy.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here