Welcome to The Blog of the Kurgan

So I finally got a new phone after 11 years. And this one lets me post on substack too, so I can get back to posting more frequently.

Stay tuned because I still have three or four days of hard work, but you should see the frequency (and I hope the quality too) increase.

Several new things coming to provide even more good stuff to you loyal subscribers.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

Over the last few years, I have received an unusual amount of questions about relationships, especially from young men. At first I thought these must just be mostly unfortunate men that perhaps didn’t have a lot of game, or maybe just were not very attractive or accomplished, and as a last ditch attempt thought to reach out.

I received enough such emails and other messages over the last few years that I was finally pushed to produce Caveman Theory (only available in digital format as I doubt Amazon would let that book stand as is). I had resisted the impulse to write that book for at least 20 years, because frankly, human relationships are so complex, unique, subtle, intense, varied and so on that in my slightly autistic take on the world, any work that discussed that topic would forever be incomplete. That said, I believe I now have reached a marriage that will last until the end of our days, we have (almost) four children between us and a couple more from previous relationships, and therefore, after now 8 years together, and the impending sixth child now only a few weeks away, I figure, ok, I probably know enough about this stuff to put down a few thoughts.

Nevertheless, the amount of requests for advice did not relent. In fact they increased. And then, as I took more time with each request, I started to notice that my initial assumption was in error. The men that were asking for this advice were not the Quasimodos of life, struck with unfortunate genes, poverty, and a low IQ. Quite the contrary, these were well groomed, educated, intelligent young men, most were well above average in looks and some also practiced a sport semi-regularly. In fact, about the only pattern I noticed was that these guys were mostly a really good catch for any woman of their age. The other slight trend is that most of them did not practice a sport regularly, but that is not to say they were unfit, just that they often were not familiar with regular attendance at say martial arts classes, or some other sport.

In general too, they listen and applied the advice I gave and overall had really positive results in most cases. This in itself was perhaps the most shocking feature. Usually human beings that come whining to you with an issue just want to bitch and moan, and even when you give them a ready made solution they ignore it.

This factor is usually multiplied by a few thousand times when applied to relationship advice. And yet, here I was seeing the exact opposite. Young men paying attention and following through with my advice, and generally speaking (say about 80% or so of the time) getting better results than they had up until that point. Sometimes with a specific woman they were interested in, other times in general in their approach to finding a partner.

The other common factor, was that each of these men was looking for a wife. They had either already got over the whole hook-up culture, or were never interested in it to begin with. That too was surprising, because as I said, most of these guys would have no problem getting together with a string of women just for sex if that is what they focussed on. I assumed (wrongly again) this was probably because I blog about being a zealot Catholic in the style of the Crusaders from 1095. But then their questions and general attitudes made me reflect on a bunch of things, including my own life, and reaching back through the decades, I remembered that I too, was never originally intending on being the kind of man-whore I eventually become and indulged in for some years after my relationships failed in increasing frequency.

My original plan was to just find one woman, the right one and spend the rest of my life with her. The fact that the right woman was rather elusive to find and/or evolve from the raw material I had available seems to reflect the same difficulty these young man have today in finding the right woman too. And then it became clear (which should have been obvious from the start, and would have been if I had had a simpler life) that in fact, most men do NOT actually want to bang their way around the world with random women. Most men, in fact, actually would prefer to find the right woman and settle down and have children. Raise them and live happily together until old age and eventually death. It is not for lack of men wanting this that it seems so rare. There really has ben a huge effort from the usual nefarious entities, to ensure that the very idea, never mind the reality of the nuclear family is destroyed.

My own path has gone full circle, and I went from a relationship of 13 years to a marriage of 4, then a couple of shorter relationship before I gave up and just decided to next a woman as soon as they irritated me. After a while I got bored of that too and had another marriage that lasted barely over 2 years before it crashed and burned in spectacular fashion. After that I had essentially given up on even thinking about long-term relationships. Not because I didn’t want one, but because clearly, I was not fitting in with how the world apparently expected me to be, and I sure as hell wasn’t about to compromise on who I was either, since, to my mind then —and to my mind now too— it was not me that was in error, but rather, the world. I know that sounds spectacularly arrogant, but as it turns out, it really is not arrogance, merely objective fact. Nor is this a unique occurrence. The world is generally wrong about most things.

I had no interest in playing games, I was never much of a small-talk kind of guy, I never saw the point of it, and in fact, pretty much every relationship I had up to then had started to be sexual usually with 24 hours of meeting. Nor was I interested in ever entertaining any of the nonsensical feminist idiocy that so much of the human population has been infected with, and the same went for things like the illogical ideologies of any other kind, be they communism, counter-factual things like “equality” and so on. My Asperger’s brain simply saw things as they are, and I could no more say there were 5 lights than Picard could .

So, a kind of limbo of existence, relationship-wise, was pretty much all I figured I could have. I would spend time with a woman but not be committed to really much of anything beyond that temporary companionship. Because ultimately, I did not engage with, nor care to acknowledge, any of the preconceived ideas about the nonsensical stuff they might have had in their mind. It was really more of an existing life rather than actually living. And I recognise in these young men, if from different lives and situations, a similar malaise. Absent my years of hard experience, they might not be able to see the whole picture yet, or how to navigate life in that respect, but they can sense all is not well. And they sense too the danger they might be in if they make a wrong step. Marry the wrong woman, or get the wrong one pregnant, and in some instances, just perhaps make an off-colour joke.

And so, I try to reply to their emails and requests for advice. Caveman Theory has helped several already, but not everyone that probably needs to has read it, and some might have more unique situations that need a specific issue that is not addressed in a book that ultimately cannot address the details, but that does at least present the overall problem in all its constituent parts and gives you a map of how to sail around the rocky shores of it.

It has come to the point that I am thinking of having some subscribers only posts, where I will anonymously post the requests or questions asked on this blog, and provide the answers as a subscribers only content, (removing any identifying information a reader might include). If you want to receive such advice, in order to make it both more useful for others as well as providing me a small compensation for my time, just put Kurgan Agony Column in the subject heading and send it to [email protected]. I will then post your email on this substack (after making sure anything that might identify you or anyone else is removed or censored to the best of my ability) and provide a reply.

That way people who subscribe get the benefit of the reply too, I get some of that income, and everyone learns a bit more. You don’t need to be a subscriber yourself to ask the questions, I will send you a copy of the reply too.

I did sometimes wonder why these young men might come to me to ask their questions, after all, I am on marriage number three (though this one is indeed for life) and I have been through a rather undignified number of women previous to that. But then, the question answers itself. Who would you ask advice about combat in a war from? Some pristine general with a spotless uniform that never saw a trench in his life (this is the general approach Vox Day suggests, as he has repeatedly stated one should not ask for marital or relationship advice from a divorced man), or a guy that has survived every trench, frontal assault, special ops, parachuting at night behind enemy lines that he has been in?

I know who I’d ask. And sure, there may be some good advice from the pristine general that did all the right moves to be an officer and never get down in the trenches, but most guys who write in are already either in a trench already, or about to be sent out to the front, metaphorically speaking. Besides which, there are as many different constitutions and types of men as there are women, and those who might have a few more passions burning, a few more neurons ticking over, a bit more thirst for the zest of life, and so on, might just not be suited for the pristine life of an officer.

Which is not to say everyone should aim to be a scar-covered, special ops soldier of fortune either, most people fall in the middle of those two extremes after all.

So, sure, obviously, try to make the right choices from the start, but if it were that easy, who would ever go wrong? No one intentionally makes bad choices.

Besides, it’s just the law of averages that some guys will marry their high school sweetheart and never divorce, but thinking that guy has achieved that lasting marriage solely as a result of his preternatural wisdom is obviously a flawed conclusion. Nor is it necessary to work your way through the supposed Sigma grindset of a revolving door retinue of women in order to become sufficiently wise in picking out the right woman to marry.

Both extremes have plenty of dangers and opportunities for massive and lasting life-long damage. A good friend of mine reflects the almost polar opposite of myself, he was with the same woman for something like 25-30 years, had two kids with her, and then she blew up his life, took a bunch of life-changing money from him and left on a whim. Nor is he the only one I know that has happened to. And the devastation of that story is something very hard to deal with. On the other hand, there are guys who get lost in the pussy-hunting phase and end up jaded, cynical, and either alone or unhappily married to someone they don’t respect.

My journey is not advisable, most guys that go through things I have been through do NOT come out well on the other side of it, but then I do not advocate for you to do as I did. Quite the contrary, I point out all the dangers you are likely to encounter in life with respect to relationships and how to pre-emptively try to avoid getting hit by those hidden roadside IEDs that society has currently scattered all around the entire field of dating, relationships, and marriage.

And apparently, so far, the advice I give tends to produce good results. So… feel free to spill your tender hearts out to the kind mercies of your Uncle Kurgan, who will do his best to teach you how to stay out of jail, divorce-rape court, and lead a happy life with a nuclear family.

Of course, as always, I take ZERO responsibility for anything you may decide to do or not do as a result of taking or ignoring any advice I may give. Remember the golden rule above all others:

Know (for) Yourself.

Anyway… the lines are now open. Write in with your heart-tugging, feelz-filled, romantic issues laden, emails.

***

All this just goes to show… you really never know what life might throw at you. I certainly never imagined I might become an agony uncle online, but here we are.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

The Ice Spartan and I had an exchange of emails on Dr. Taraban , and sometimes, the best way to get a point across is by listening to two guys discuss a topic philosophically. In fact, philosophy itself etymologically means lover of wisdom, but historically it has always been friends discussing the meaning of things and in so doing discovering truths about our reality and our place in it.

Now, Dr. Taraban generally dispenses decent advice for the most part, mostly on his YouTube channel. He clearly is doing well for himself and appears on various YT podcasts regularly too. Mostly because he is providing generally useful, rational advice on dating and relationships, albeit… within a totally secular framework.

I have sent some of his shorts to friends or young men that wrote for advice, however, I do believe his approach does have some gaps. And these are the ones that relate to long-term, permanent relationships, that is… marriage. Of course I should say proper Catholic marriage, since that is the only one left that expects people to actually stay together until they die.

The Ice Spartan and I had various philosophical conversations when we worked on the farm, and when he discovered that my wife and I are married as proper Catholics (that is, the only Catholics left, 1958 Sedevcantists) in a real Catholic Church, and that neither of us cares at all for the government contract version of a “marriage” it was as if a lightbulb moment went off in his head.

They way he interpeted it was something like:

“Oh, that’s awesome, so you bypassed all the government contract stuff and the marriage is just between you and her!”

“Us and God.” I added.

The modern landscape of relationships is considered by most, especially young men, to be a veritable hellish post-apocalyptic landscape, and in some ways they are right, of course, so Taraban’s utilitarian approach, which generally will produce better results than average, is rightfully seen as a net positive. And it is… up to a point.

You see, the things Dr. Taraban discusses I lived through and learnt from on my own, and as such, now that I am married as a Catholic, I can tell you that despite being well aware of all the practical elements of a relationship, how to get into one and so on, there was always something missing. I wrote Caveman Theory assuming most readers would be secular, and so I addressed them in that fashion, however, I also tried to cover the element that Dr. Taraban is missing.

The following exchange below between the ice spartan and myself may better lighten you too on what true love is, what marriage is, and perhaps, how to find both, if, like the Ice Spartan, you are in the market for an actual marriage for life instead of a general hook-up.

The bits with a green line to the side and in bold are the Ice Spartan commenting. Normal writing with a green line to the side is a quote from Dr. Taraban’s book, The Value of Others . The replies without green line to the side are mine

So, now you can pretend you’re just sitting around the campfire listening to the Kurgan and the Ice Spartan talk about Dr. Taraban. Enjoy.

************************************************************************************************************

I don’t like his face or voice.

He’s not an attractive man. I’m neutral on the voice. However, precisely BECAUSE he’s not attractive, one must give him credit where it’s due. He has, despite serious disadvantage in looks, managed to figure out enough about male and female dynamics to be at least somewhat effective and useful for many men. It’s not a small achievement. Is it all good? Certainly not and far from it, but compared to the average advice a young man might get today he’s head and shoulders above that.

He comes across as libertarian, or as I prefer to call it, lucitarian / liberferian.

Hahhahaha cool name.

I would say he is simply secular and the inevitable getting batted back by women when he was not yet famous, MAY have left a residual bitterness that is mostly unconscious and exhibits as his simple “rational observation of the facts”. So it’s hard to accuse him of being intentionally nihilistic or black pilled. He certainly does not act that way or feel that way, and the only reason I say there MAY be residual bitterness at the unconscious level is because of his persistence in reducing most of what he says to the secular (material) perspective, which, ultimately, is a limited and incomplete model of reality. Ignoring the spiritual to the extent he does (which is far from complete ignoring, he is aware of it and has talked about transcendence at least) is ultimately an error. A flaw of character in some respect. Not unusual for it to be the result of rejection at some level.

He is well-read and does have some good advice for men and women. This is about some of the things I disagree with him about. I don’t make a comment on everything. If you think he is spot on about something or everything, please feel free to let me know where we differ.

No one is spot on about everything.

Your tendency to notice the flaws and weaknesses is because you’re a scout (in my simpler and also more accurate SSH, what Vox calls a Sigma).

He says “partner” all the time. This word has stuck in society even faster than “Judeo-Christian.” “Partner” used to just be a term used by fags and lawyers (also fags).

Indeed. Secularism is of the devil.

Secular advice on relationships and marriage has to fall short in one way or another.

Many! All really.

All quotes are from his book. “…….” means that I cut out a paragraph.

Anything in bold is my wording.

The Value of Others: Understanding the economic model of relationships to get (and keep) more of what you want in the sexual marketplace
Orion Taraban

“CHAPTER 9
LOVE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH RELATIONSHIPS
The goal of this book is to offer a universal theory of relationships: a framework capable of explaining the widest spectrum of phenomena across as many types of relationships as possible. Its fundamental premise is that relationships are the media in which value is transacted. People come together because they want things from others, and they attempt to satisfy these wants by trading unequal things of comparable value. Where this does not occur – for whatever reason – no relationship exists. This is true of all consensual relationships on this planet.
In this chapter, I’d like to address the most common criticism of my economic model of relationships, namely: not everything is transactable. These critics balk that reducing all relationships to a quid pro quo exchange cheapens relationships. They argue that the most valuable and precious gifts that can be shared between people are non-transactional and that explicitly emphasizing the transactional dimensions of relationships is precisely what is wrong with the world today. They also maintain that purely transactional relationships cannot explain certain human behaviors – like altruism and compassion – and must, therefore, be (at most) only part of the story.
So how do I respond to this criticism? Leaving aside the judgmental associations that almost always attend these arguments, I agree with the crux of the scruple: not everything is transactable. And these goods constitute some of the highest states to which people can obtain. They are often ennobling, encouraging, and enlivening. I call goods like friendship and loyalty and love non-transactable goods (or NTGs) because they cannot be bartered for something in return. However, this technically means that these goods are not valuable. Even if the price tag is exorbitant, a valuable good can be bought. On the other hand, NTGs cannot be bought at any price – which makes them invaluable (or, what might be the same thing, valueless). Like virtue, they must be their own rewards; otherwise, we would call them by other names.”

Love has everything to do with everything that is good in this world.

Of course. But he has just told us that his whole book has nothing to do with love. It’s an economic model of reality, and since everything and anything useful, interesting or effective about economics can be written on a postcard, we now know this book is of no utility whatsoever to anyone with an IQ that matches at least mine at age 4 when I realised the concept of fiat money was absurd. Of course people then tell you it’s all very complicated and you as a child just don’t understand so you grow up pretending to not understand until one day you decide “ok, am old enough now! I’m gonna look at this thing!” And you do, and realise 4 year old you had it right. It’s all fucking nonsense.

“The problem with the criticism that not all goods are transactable is not that it doesn’t have a point but that its point is irrelevant. It should only take a little effort to understand why. If relationships are the media in which value is transacted, and certain goods are invaluable and non-transactable, then it would follow that relationships would not be necessary to transmit these goods.”

Logical flaw in that reasoning. Along the lines of: a table has 4 legs, a dog has 4 legs, so a table is a dog.

Every one of the invaluable things he mentions: love, loyalty, friendship are only even detectable IN relationships. So he’s obviously wrong.

This is exactly what we see when we observe human behavior: non-transactable goods fall outside the purview of relationships. So arguing that the economic model is flawed because it fails to account for goods that it has no business accounting for doesn’t make much sense.

Trying to justify his bad logic from above.

Let me explain.

If non-transactable goods required relationships, then we should not be able to find evidence of these goods outside of relationships

More bad logic. Example: sex requires relationships so you will not find sex outside of relationships. So what do you call the activity of the guy who fucks car exhausts? Or sheep for that matter. Bit of a stretch to call either one a “relationship” but not quite right to pretend the activity is not sexual at its core. Just because X can be found in A, does NOT mean X cannot also be found in NOT A. It’s very basic logic he gets wrong. Kinda disappointing. But then secular houses of cards really ARE this fragile once you look at them with any level of care and detail.

– and this is hardly the case. Take loyalty, for instance. At this very moment, millions of people are enacting their loyalty to athletes or entertainers or politicians who have absolutely no idea these particular fans even exist. And this loyalty isn’t just the fair-weathered allegiance of bandwagoners. Many have devoted their lives – have killed and been killed – in the service of this loyalty. What’s more, these devotees receive nothing in return for their loyalty from their idols,

Wrong. They get something. The appearance and countenance of that person, which they interpret (wrongly) as meaningful. But just because someone shits on the pavement and you go and scoop it up and convince yourself it’s chocolate and eat it, doesn’t mean it’s valueless to you.

And that’s the thing about transactional things, the BUYER determines the value, not the seller.

who (again) often do not know these people are even alive.”

The “buyer” does NOT require a direct relationship to exist in order to give a VALUE to some perceived thing that his idol does or says. Because he is the buyer, so he can set whatever value he wants on anything, including the vapid actions or words of a celebrity.

“When vetting for a long-term relationship, it’s generally a good idea to take a page from human resources: hire slow and fire fast.

When has human resources EVER improved anything in ANY firm? Never in any I ever worked in. I hire fast and fire fast too. I can go through 100 candidates in the time they go through 5 and I will have therefore sorted practically , not theoretically, for the best candidate.

This is true for several reasons. As previously discussed, the first of the three principal crises through which most couples must pass is the Crisis of Disillusionment, in which each party’s projected fantasies are shattered by the impinging reality of the actual other. Since the honeymoon period in which these fantasies are predominant can typically last up to a year, it is wise to hold off making a life-changing commitment to someone until you’re in a position to accurately perceive the person to whom you are committing.

Eh. Without exception, every one of the actually meaningful relationships I have had (P/A/L/E/G/R/L) [<— hahaha funny I put the initial of each woman that mattered, to make sure I didn’t miss one and it spells out Pale Girl! Hahahah]

that were ultimately good and made up of good people (P/A/L/L) was the result of an instant perception that happened in seconds when I first met them. The exception to this was the three of which one could be said to be extremely solipsistic (E) and the attraction there was instant too but almost entirely physical (pretty much a 10 by anyone’s standards) and the red flags obvious, but the dick was driving. So much so the brain was like… just bang her enough and move on. But weakly, if you bang a REALLY pretty one enough, and she is also very good in bed, you tend to try to fool yourself into becoming Captain-Save-A-Broken-Bitch. Never ends well. The other two the attraction was enough physically that I decided to do the Orion thing and “take my time”. During which the narcissist (G) played her part at Oscar level ability and me being now “reasonable” went along with it and by the time her true nature had demonstrated itself in full force she had kidnapped my daughter to Brazil. So that’s what being “careful, and reasonable” got me. After that the other very attractive and also broken woman was a conscious choice of not quite Captain SABB but at least Captain let me stick around this Broken Bitch and see if she fixes herself. Which was perhaps not altogether useless and possibly a life can be built on that IF you have enough stuff to keep you BOTH entertained for several decades. Short of increasingly freaky sex fetishes or at least ones that become mutually obsessive and co-dependant, I can’t think of anything that would actually ever manage to do that for say 50 years; so, such a relationship is ultimately, by default, temporary. Whether it’s one day or two decades.

The relationship that was ultimately my marriage (for life because now as believing and baptised Catholics) is the one where the day I met her I had a weird flash-forward of our whole life together and four kids and old age together. I would have married her there and then. The fact we only properly had a try at it a decade and a bit later is only by the Grace of God, because our personalities still had so many boxes we would have destroyed each other. Many of our boxes needed to be removed (by others, life, etc) before our souls would have a chance at recognising and operating on each other past the boxes (see Theory of Boxes at my OG blog )

That said, it can still take time after the Crisis has passed in order to determine whether or not sufficient compatibility is present to justify a lifetime appointment. This is why, in most cases, a reasonable minimum due diligence period for a spouse or co-parent is at least several years. Those who would collapse this timeline are likely putting their own ambitious designs ahead of the good of the organization. This is hire slow.”

Ridiculous rationalisation of material reality due to general cowardice, due to the vast amount of pain that facing reality in ALL its facets usually entails for the average person, given that doing so means facing both your own flaws as well as your fears.

I have heard of people courting for three months and having a marriage that lasts until death. I have seen plenty of people date for years only to later divorce. Time is not that important of a variable as he makes it. If two people have the wrong ingredients going into a marriage, it doesn’t matter how many years they ‘vet’ before marriage.

You are correct.

“CHAPTER 12
PEOPLE DON’T REALLY WANT RELATIONSHIPS
After reading through an entire book dedicated to discussing why people enter into relationships and under what conditions, this chapter title may come as a shock. However, to the extent that you’re surprised by this claim, you haven’t been paying attention. I said as much in the first pages when I defined relationships as the media in which value is transacted. People rarely form even temporary relationships out of the simple joy of connecting with others – and when they do, they are still transacting the value of connection (which, by definition, requires a relationship). Where there is no transacted value, a relationship neither exists nor can it exist.

And yet… the transacted value can be one of those invaluable things, which he denies is even possible. Eg. What do I get from God or Jesus other than the fruits of their perfect love? And what do they get from me other than my weak, ever-flawed, pathetic attempts at loving them?

We’re not transacting Hail Marys for gold bars after all. Only Love for love (and badly at that as I hardly do any part of my part). So again, demonstrating his broken logic.

The only rational conclusion from all this is that what people really want is value – not relationships, per se. For many people, entering into relationships constitutes their best possible chance of securing that value. As previously discussed, it is a common strategy for dealing with the problem of other people. However, it is only one such strategy. If people can secure the same good more cheaply, more easily, and more safely in other ways, then they will predictably (and understandably) do so.”

Sorry to say, but this guy, being American, has interpreted and confused the word “relationship” with “business transaction”. More logic errors.

Some people do want relationships. As Rainer Maria Rilke said, “that something is difficult must be one more reason for us to do it.”

Indeed.

“As disturbing as the recent relationship trends might be, we will likely need to contend with them for the foreseeable future.

No Orion. YOU do. I don’t. Because I have a far more clear model of reality, and as such I am not a blind man jumping on a recent volcanic crust hoping not to land in lava. I can see the pits and as long as I pay attention, I’ll not fall prey to the dangers that blind people on that landscape have to face. I’m Catholic. I see where Orion doesn’t even know there is a light switch. And as do others that while not possessing the BEST torch (The Catholic Truth 11,000 [TM]), even a weak Zen-Agnostic quasi-Shintoist (open-source homemade) torch sees further than the cheap American knock-off known as: The Orion Transcendental Meditation and Secularism Luminary 100,000, which barely lights up your shoes, never mind the ground ahead.

This is because disrupting the decline in relationships would practically require the prohibition of birth control – which, in turn, would undermine all of women’s social advances of the previous 60 years. Not only would supporting such a solution be tantamount to social suicide in today’s political environment, but the idea would also be functionally impossible to implement in reality. The genie cannot go back into the bottle. At this point, a return to a male-dominated, patriarchal society capable of implementing such a solution would likely require such a horrendous catastrophe – something on the scale of global nuclear conflict or protracted civil war, in which most of the population is forced back into the game of survival, necessitating a return to traditional gender roles – that no sane person could prefer the cure to the disease. For better or worse, going back is not an option: we can only move forward and adapt to circumstances as they evolve.”

Weak man.

Yes. But do you know precisely HOW he is weak? Try to answer and perhaps consider the following:

Is he really wrong about the idea that banning birth control is unlikely and impractical?

And if he is right about that, how is he weak?should we try to ban birth control by force?

And if not, again, how is he weak?

before reading further below try to answer with specificity about HOW and perhaps WHY he is a weak man.

***

Orion is probably mentally stronger than most men, and he is not exactly wrong about not being able to put the the genie in the bottle.

His weakness is lack of faith.

If you have faith (in the one true loving God) you will look for, find, or help direct a woman to the very same idea of no contraception being how things are meant to be. What is the ONLY religion on Earth that makes it a dogmatic point that birth control/contraception is wrong? You know it… say it with me: Catholicism. How do you know if some couples really are? They have the first baby in year one of their marriage and more until menopause every couple of years (assuming no health issues). Or you know… are still making children at age 55 and 43 respectively.

“Women today have half as many children as they did just 75 years ago, and half of the population of the world currently lives in countries that exist below self-replacement rates. Much of the “civilized” world is skirting on the fringes of population collapse, as social structures that have been preserved for centuries are disintegrating in real time. How did this happen?

Satan and his imps the Jews.

The confluence of variables that has given rise to this situation is extremely complex.”

It is not extremely complex.

Indeed. See above.

“For instance, it’s not wrong to assert that – without their own economic power – women could never truly become a social and political force that men would need to take seriously. However, any truth in this statement was rendered functionally irrelevant when women were pregnant for the better part of their adulthoods and saddled with childcare responsibilities that only they could discharge. The advent of birth control is what allowed a critical mass of women to step out of the domestic sphere, to develop social identities independent of their reproductive capabilities, and to secure an unprecedented amount of freedom and autonomy for themselves. It was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 1960, immediately preceding the rapid changes in relationships just described.

The pill was invented by a Jew and the boomers flocked to it immediately after the Catholic Church had been infiltrated to the point that by 1958 a Freemason had been placed on the Throne of Peter, pretending to be Pope. It was all a co-ordinated effort on multiple fronts.

Personally, I don’t have a problem with any of this.

Because you are either a silly secularist mired in the false narrative of the obscene and mass-murderous Satanic ideology of feminism (seriously it has Satanic origins), OR you’re too chickenshit to disagree with said narrative publicly.

To be honest, it would be morally precarious to argue in favor of less freedom and self- determination for any particular demographic of human beings.

Really? No Orion, it is the moral DUTY to for example argue for far less freedom and even the right to life for say pedophiles. As it is the moral duty of any decent man to simply ignore, not have anything to do with, and especially not procreate with a feminist woman. But it IS politically and socially dangerous to be such a man of principle. We get who you are now.

These goods are not the issue. The issue is precisely the slowly dawning realization that these goods are inseparable from certain consequences for the sexual marketplace – consequences that reverberate all the way to the core of civilization. They are two sides of the same coin: try as you like, you cannot have one without the other………..

All this changed with the widespread use of birth control, which functionally separated sex from reproduction. By reducing the likelihood of pregnancy to a negligible possibility, the rational necessity for commitment prior to sex was eliminated.

Not morally. Only physically.

What’s more, given the fact that women can (and do) earn their own money, that fathers are legally obligated to provide financial support to their children’s mothers (even if they never explicitly consented to such an arrangement), and that heavily funded social welfare programs exist to subsidize single mothers, the stakes associated with pregnancy outside the context of a committed relationship are now significantly lower for women.”

Weak man.

Yes, but again, I ask you to be specific about the how and why. The answer is the same as above but the way it plays out is a bit different. See if you can define it.

“Fortunately, these are not the only two options. The capacity to see beyond this dichotomy – the choice between the way things have always been or nothing at all – is the opportunity inherent in the current relationship crisis. The idea would be to supplement marriage (and the conventional relationship pathway that leads to marriage) with additional relationship structures (and pathways) that optimize goodness of fit by solving certain problems of living.

Hahahahhaha sure! The Utopia of communism! It’s never been done right before, Orion! Let’s see how many millions have to die to do it right this time! Hahahha

Ideally, people could then choose the arrangement that works best for them rather than attempt to force themselves into a single monolithic structure (or forgo structure entirely). Most of Western civilization has already created a precedent for this solution in the legalization of same-sex marriage, which fundamentally expanded what a large portion of these societies was willing to recognize as a “legitimate” union. We will see the potential of this moment fulfilled when this same tolerance and acceptance is extended to heterosexual relationships that deviate from the conventional ideal. Just as there is more than one way to be queer, there is more than one way to be straight…..

Ah yes… the degeneration of society into what Walter Jon Williams labelled Condecologies in one of his fiction books. Gigantic city-sized condominium blocks with their own rules about everything from what sex you can have to what TV programs you get.

What Orion misses, as a secularist, is that society functions like a multi-cellular organism, in which the cell is the nuclear family. Biology dictates it. You disorder that and the “animal” eventually dies.

And “more than one way to be straight” has always existed. In the closet, just like faggotry always was. While as humans we may never manage to avoid our flaws, errors of degeneracy and lust, we absolutely should and must punish, disallow, and condemn such behaviours at a public and social level. And protect, with all necessary force if required, the creation, tending to and thriving of the nuclear family composed of one man and one woman joined in marriage until death, and their children.

And whatever perversion you can’t do without, you better do it behind locked doors, in a closet, in the dark. Upon pain of severe punishment.

Among other factors, the marital ideal consists of a wedding, a legal contract, a solemn oath before God, emotional commitment, resource provision, sexual exclusivity, cohabitation, and child-rearing. This means that every spouse must be a celebrant, a business partner, a soulmate, a best friend, a sponsor, a monopolized lover, a roommate, and a parent. What’s more, this ideal somehow expects each partner to unite the security and stability of companionate love with the passion and excitement of romantic love. And with the decline of civic communities and extended kin networks, each person is required to perform countless ancillary roles previously discharged by an entire village: nurse, therapist, playmate, cheerleader, activity buddy, chef, mistress, personal assistant. Finally, both parties typically expect a host of non-transactable goods – things like love and loyalty and friendship – from a relationship that might be predicated on attraction and lifestyle opportunities.

Some children also want to be astronauts. When they are born in Italy or Africa and have zero access to any space programme. Such children quickly learn also that Leprachauns and unicorns don’t exist. So, adult men and women should be able to figure all this out too.

Unfortunately, no person can be all people, and no actor can perform all roles. A caring mother might be a disinterested wife. A family man might not be monogamous. A loving relationship might be sexless. The institution of marriage has been overburdened with a weight that it was never designed to support.

Well, bitch… better buckle the fuck up and make it support! Or perhaps you would prefer to live in the year 1200 and tell me how much “easier” relationships with 12 kids and tilling the earth by hand without electricity or indoor plumbing was.

Much like a chain is only as strong as its weakest link, modern marriages are only as resilient as their most fragile component.

True. And weak men and women should immediately be sidelined and avoided. You only pair up with the ones that can cross the apocalyptic wasteland with you.

The durability of the others too often becomes irrelevant if and when this component fails. Under such conditions, the outcome is generally a foregone conclusion: either divorce with all its attendant emotional and financial hardships, or a quiet resignation that has surrendered hope and responsibility……

The function of marriage is to provide a stable context for people to raise children. That’s it.

Indeed. So stick to that as the goal, and add on the bonus stuff only as possible.

Everything on top of that is additional weight that the institution of marriage was not designed to support. A marriage was never meant to be a partnership with your best friend, an exciting adventure with a lover, or a union with your soulmate

Well, it is all that, IF you both agree that its PRIMARY purpose is to have children and raise them. Cause I sure as shit don’t enter into that kind of situation with someone I can’t laugh and cry together with!

– or any of the other ideals you’re prone to hear at modern weddings. Rather, marriage was created to provide a stable context for people to raise children. It is fundamentally an instrument of social organization that became necessary once people started living in communities that exceeded Dunbar’s number. From this perspective, we can understand that it isn’t necessarily a problem when, say, a co-parent doesn’t reciprocate sexual interest: the problem resides in expecting reciprocated sexual interest from a co-parent.

Kak. Marriage is defined as the literal gifting of your body to the other person. Your body does NOT belong to you, but to your spouse. And if they want to have you as a free use sex partner, guess what: You’re it! It’s their property, if they want to fuck you six times a day daily, barring health issues, you get to say only yes.

This is why marriage fails: we want it to be more than it is, and so we expect our partners to be more than they are.”

The problem is not that people are expecting too much from a marriage. Humans are capable of more than one thing. I can work a job and also cook pasta. Sometimes I do put the pasta in before the water is boiling, but it is still edible. A problem is that people are not educated much on or given good examples when growing up about what all goes into a marriage, so maybe it seems like a lot at first. It is like like someone trying to become a farmer when their parents weren’t farmers. There will be some pain.

Indeed. Tell me about it. Me and L had a shitshow for examples of family units. It’s only because of instinctive barbarian male levels of “toxic masculinity”, that we function, and L’s primal femininity; as well as my confirming all my ideas with a little look into historical facts that have escaped the notice of how people think about the past.

“Americans now work an average of 12 jobs in their lifetimes, and no one expects a pension anymore. Globalism and digital technologies disrupted entire industries. Established businesses that refused to adapt were left behind, and innovative new companies sprung up to take their place. Greed and entitlement – neither of which were invented in the 1980s – persist today. People continue to work about as hard as they need to……
The pundits of my youth could only view current events through the lens of what they had known, which is why all they saw was ruin. The old ways were falling apart. However, every crisis is simultaneously an opportunity. Globalism may have signaled the end of America’s consumer production industries, but it also marked the beginning of its digital economy. Every benefit is also a liability.

No. Again, wrong. Overall the change has been a consistent loss of humanity at the “benefit” of materialism. Only a secular materialist could possibly believe humanity is “progressing” or even just remaining about the same. It is not. It is progressing materially at the expense of a loss of humanity and what makes life worth living (those invaluables).

Workers today might not enjoy the job security they once had, but they are also not practically constrained to devote the better part of their lives to a mismanaged organization. Success is possible under most any circumstances, provided the players are willing and able to adapt as conditions evolve. While those who could not (or would not) accommodate to change encountered difficulties, many others found ways to thrive in the new marketplace.

For various definitions of “thrive” that might better be described as “survive”.

The point of this extended digression is that something comparable to the transformation just described is occurring in the sexual marketplace today. The old ways are falling apart. However, the pundits of the present day are as misguided as those of my youth. Contemporary social conditions have not created the intersexual dynamics discussed throughout this book: they have revealed them.

Sure. And the reveal is precisely what the Catholic Church has always said about humanity: we are a bunch of fallen, drunken, petty, cowardly, greedy, weak, lazy, envious, angry, rats. Also: water is wet.

Like it or not, men and women today are as opportunistic and self-interested with respect to whom they mate and date as they have ever been (or been allowed to be). Loyalty and integrity haven’t changed as much as the network of incentives that differentially reward (or punish) their expression.

Wrong. It has demonstrably degraded.

People continue to commit about as much as they need to….

Again, what he is noticing is simply the fact that given the temptation, most humans succumb to it, and in the process slide all of us closer to a general degradation of humanity (the ultimate Satanic objective).

Given human nature and individual limitations, it has never been – nor will it ever be – possible to get everything you want from a single person. Traditional marriage understood this, and its most enlightened response to this difficulty was to treat these frustrations and disappointments as an opportunity to self-transcend.

Nothing has changed it in that regard. The opportunity remains.

Your wife no longer has sex with you? Excellent! Use your involuntary celibacy as a chance to examine your own carnal attachment. Your kids leave you no time for yourself? Wonderful! Use your maternal responsibility as the means to overcome your residual selfishness. You’re no longer satisfied with your relationship? Phenomenal! Use your dissatisfaction as an opportunity to realize that you are entitled to absolutely nothing in this life. And this perspective isn’t necessarily wrong. Marriage did demand that people self-transcend –

Correct and good.

at least as long as they couldn’t get out of it.

And here is the devil’s temptation; rendered all the easier and more frequent thanks to the scourge of Protestantism, and general increase in Satanic zeitgeist brought about by it. After all, it is above all Protestantism that brought contraception to the world.

And while it may not have been exactly what people wanted, the argument could be made that it just might have been what people needed in order to mature into fully functional adults.

By this point I’d say the argument has been demonstrated to be as firm a law as gravity. While the argument against it still has to come up with anything even remotely coherent or descriptive of reality.

The issue is that willingly entering into difficulty because it can be used as an opportunity for growth is about as appealing to most people as running a marathon on their day off…..

True. And most people are…? Say it with me…. Weak, cowardly, selfish… etc etc

So, fewer people are getting (and staying) married than ever before.

Good. We don’t want the idiots to reproduce any more. It’s enough of a tragedy they reproduce at all! In the meantime, those of us who can better see through the glass darkly will continue to increase our numbers.

Even casual sexual relationships are at historically unprecedented lows. The main reason for this is that people are continuing to rely on a previously successful mating and dating strategy that is becoming increasingly obsolete with each passing day, namely: the optimization of value in a single individual.

You carry on pansexual boy. We’ll see 100 years from now how your idea of normalising whatever form of sexual congress stacks up against a bunch of us Catholic zealots who repress our human perversions in at least the social context. We will then be able to determine is giving free reign to human flaws produces anything better (or at all) than tamping down on those same flaws.

However, it might be possible to get more of what you want from many people. The mating and dating strategy that will become increasingly effective in the foreseeable future is the optimization of value across individuals. Rather than attempting to find one person capable of effectively discharging all the hyperconflated roles of a modern marriage (which is a tall order, at best), people will progressively find many partners, each capable of discharging one (or some) of the hyperconflated roles of the same (which is a significantly more realizable goal).

Sure, sure, just like the utopia of Communism is a “more realizable goal” than a religious theocracy right Orion? Except we have had religious theocracies throughout our human history and NONE of them have EVER stacked up a body count throughout their centuries old existence that even remotely comes close to what about 100 years of communism have done.

You’re dreaming utopian dreams of harems and you will awake in a living nightmare of zombies tearing at your flesh my boy.

This prediction is value-neutral. For better or worse, those who are willing and able to flexibly adopt this strategy will thrive, and those who cannot (or will not) will encounter difficulties.

We’ll see won’t we.

I have 5 children of my own that will carry forth my way if life. How many you got?

This strategy can be implemented consecutively, simultaneously, or both. For instance, rather than making a commitment for life – a commitment that, apparently, is too weighty for many to carry (especially now that they are living much longer) – people might intentionally make a commitment for, say, 20 years to complete the task of raising children in a stable and sustainable context. The co-parents might choose to cohabitate during this time, or they might not.

Oh what wonderful and stable people THAT will create… it’s not like we have stacks and stacks of data on what these type of situations create in terms of people, right? Oh… wait… actually we do, and It’s a fucking horror show!

They might choose to be monogamous sexual partners, or they might not. They might choose to enter into a contract pertaining to their wealth and property, or they might not. They might cultivate a deep, abiding love for each other, or they might not. They might participate in shared interests and activities, or they might not. They might commemorate their commitment with a religious ritual, or they might not.

Pray tell, what “religious ritual” has ever been made on these absurd utopian ideas? None. So you are referring to new and invented wholly pagan/satanic false religions not even yet invented.

They might assist each other in ways not directly pertaining to their duties as co-parents, or they might not. And when their mission is complete,

As I said. Welcome to Business America! Reducing ALL human interactions to a sale! Would you like an extended warranty with that, for only 10% more of your soul?

Who knows? We may even end up celebrating the end of such an arrangement at least as much as we currently celebrate the beginning, given that doing so would recognize a relationship that actually completed what it set out to do.

No wonder he has a tendency to “appreciate” Buddhism, he’s a nihilist ultimately. Even if he would deny it even to himself, as do most buddhists.

This is the opportunity inherent in the crisis: people might be able to get more of what they want. The catch is that they won’t be able to get more of what they want from a single person. With the dissolution of marriage as a monolithic social institution, individuals might finally have sane and compelling alternatives to the “everything or nothing” Hobson’s choice that still dominates the sexual marketplace.”

He is like an economist who is explaining his super amazing model by using an island as an example. IT’S NOT BASED ON REALITY. Humanity is not at this level. Marriage should be one way within a given society. Down the line, there is no society with the view he talks about. It’s all about the Individual Consumer ™.

Precisely correct!

He ends with a story from the Bible.
“There is a story in the life of Jesus, and it goes like this:

One day, a group of people approached Jesus and asked, “Is it right that we should have to pay taxes to the emperor?” They were trying to trap him with his words.
In response, Jesus requested that they show him some of their money. He asked the group, “Whose image is on this coin?”
The people answered, “Caesar’s.”
So Jesus continued: “Render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s, and unto God what is God’s.”
When they heard this, the people were amazed, and they let him be.”

Funnily enough, this very parable destroys his entire model. Hahahhaha

Addendum: The reason is that things related to “value” in and of “the world” should remain in and of “the world”. And things relating to God and His Will for us, should remain outside of “the world”, and given that marriage is a sacrament, it foundation (like all else by the way) remains rooted in God. The point is not “enforcement” of rules to keep people married. The point is that indeed we all have to grow up. So it is no longer about having rules enforced against you, but rather, it is about you actually making a choice, and sticking to it. The sticking to it part? That can only happen in one of two ways:

1. Due to brutal, tragic, pig-headedness without mercy, (the secular way, which usually fails by the way, like 90+ percent of the time, eventually), or,
2. By having faith in a religion, philosophy and way of life that is larger than your own personal squabbles, and provides the context in which you find the way to resolve the issues even as you grow closer together for doing so.

*************************************************************************************************************

PS: On a personal level, I think I would actually get along with Orion Taraban, and he also has some of the same interests I do apparently (physics, astronomy). He’s an intelligent and reasonable guy, and while my criticism of his model of relationships here is pretty brutal, it is ultimately a disagreement on the foundational underpinnings of our life philosophies. I would have disagreed with him even before I became a Catholic, in much the same way the ice Spartan (who is not a Catholic) does above. Nevertheless I think he is a very interesting guy, and one that is I believe honest and really does mean well for his fellow man. So do not take my criticisms of his flawed philosophy as an indictment of the man. It is not.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

The human brain works in almost all aspects by NOTICING differences and patterns.

If it did not, you would get killed every time you cross a busy road. You would stumble around in the dark for hours looking for the light switch in any room you entered that was not already lit.

It is impossible for you to NOT notice differences between people, cultures, objects, weather patterns, and pretty much everything else.

It is also impossible for you to not notice patterns of recurrence. It’s why you stop stepping in muddy puddles by age 6 or 7 or so.

Given the above then, ANY human who says they do not see any difference between people of different ethnicities, cultures, physical appearance and so on is quite simply just outright lying. And it’s a stupid lie so obvious that anyone that uses it should immediately and forever never be trusted to tell the truth about anything, ever again.

Now, the illogical screaming banshees of wokedom will say that it is only MORAL EQUALITY they refer to, not actual physical reality. Which, of course, as is their way is just another lie, and is easily proven by asking them to answer some pointed questions, such as:

Do you find the woman on the left or the one on the right more attractive?

And note that the woman on the right is almost certainly older by several years if not a whole decade.

You can do the same with average population IQs for various ethnicities, or ability to swim, run the 100 metre dash and on, and on, and on. And the woke liars will continue to lie. But the point is not that some races or ethnicities are inferior to others on various ways. That is just a fact. Japanese society is intrinsically more honest polite and orderly than European society, for example. There are infinite examples of such disparities, and only a liar who is also an idiot would deny it.

As for the MORAL equality, well, let’s look at it.

Are we, or am I, saying the Aborigine lady has less right to life, liberty, happiness, justice and so on than the Caucasian on the right? No. Of course not.

However, the realities of life are such that if both applied to be air hostesses or TV presenters, one will definitely have an advantage over the other. Which says absolutely nothing about their moral character. And if you as a man of any race, had to choose to spend the rest of your life on a desert island with one of these women, I’m fairly sure that some 99% plus, would choose the one on the right. Which in woke terms of course, makes you a vile racist. Told you right in the title didn’t I?

So, now that you know, you may as well embrace it and carry on your life doing precisely what you prefer doing with the people you prefer doing it with, regardless of the fact that a bunch of lying morons will call you racist.

Now, I know what you’re thinking…

But perhaps I can let the readers help me out on this one a little…

I have hidden the totals so that readers will not get influenced but peer pressure. The poll lasts three days and I will release the results then.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

I am certainly on the radar of whatever gay spooks keep tabs on people that like the truth and speak a little too much of it for their liking. And I have absolutely for certain, and confirmed by a national intelligence operative that was number 2 in the structure at the time in South Africa, for at least 30 years.

It’s what happens if you write on subjects like I did back in 1995 and then updated in 2014 . Subjects like Antigravity technology, the real history of the human race, the real engineering properties of the Great Pyramid and other similar structures (especially if you know, you actually studied civil engineering), or topics like telepathy (on which I am far from the only guy talking about it seriously, but perhaps I am one of the few that has got video and and a book out that teaches you how you can learn to do it to a certain extent.

I have been pretty clear to point out I am not a complete moron and I have no intention of releasing schematics of how to build your own spaceship, or whatever. Because yes, the planet is basically run by unquestionably evil people and there may not be any decent humans at the helm of anything important. And yes, if logic is a thing (it is) and anti-G tech is a thing too (it is) then a lot of other things become logically clear. One is that other intelligent races around the Galaxy and even further afield may have got there long before us. And if so, they would be smart to keep an eye on anyone on the cusp of getting the same technology. And if so, flat-out war becomes untenable if there are multiple races with that tech. And if so… there actually IS a chance aliens are curtailing humanity. And if this sort of speculation takes your fancy, well, I have a really nice trilogy in one doorstopper of a book in paper format or digital format .

Even so, if you talk about things like the Bank of International Settlement, how FIAT money is a complete fraud and fiction that we all partake in like a mass hallucination except millions live and die by it, if you notice how some tribes can exterminate other tribes with impunity and zero consequences and not even a calling out in the mass media they control, while other tribes are presented as eternal victims forever by every means possible despite their being the primary instigators of genocides, war and all manner of pestilential practices, you’re still going to get on that list and have some unfortunate things happen.

Getting random insane emails. Various digital hacks, like my long standing blog received in October of last year (since rebuilt and hosted in a different place (see links on the right), possibly some future cancel-culture blamed thing will make this substack disappear too, and if so, all the posts from here are being mirrored on the OG blog too, so nothing will be lost (again, because we have fail-safes).

Nevertheless, it is a pain in the butt when these things happen and you already have a full life trying to get a farm going with very little funds to do it with, because after 4 years the savings have dried up, and there are other circumstances I am not at liberty to discuss just yet, preventing me from doing my regular work in countries where I practiced it for years, like the UK. It’s nothing dire, in fact in the big scheme of things it’s a good thing, but just a hard one to deal with at a practical level because it limits my ability to earn as I always did before.

But this is all to be expected. I am after all pioneering a certain concept and the guy who cuts through the snow first always has it harder.

To make my farm truly off grid and self-sufficient I would need another 150k or so.

30-50k for a really top quality solar panel system that would be truly off-grid reliable, though in fairness I think I could adapt a decent system that would be just as reliable for 20k if I had the time to do it, (which in itself takes money). Then there are some home alterations and explosion I’d like to do that would probably run another 50k or so at least. After which a natural well with pumping and filtration, and then some property border fencing/markers/gates and more surveillance cameras than exist now.

At that point, I could then focus on really farming in earnest and making us completely self-sufficient food wise. So yeah, it’s not easy, especially if you are short on both time and money. But… keep in mind it will not always be this way. The plan is to attract other Sede Catholics and like-minded people, and that is slowly but surely happening, despite my Kurgan-like personality and sunshiny disposition.

The reason it’s happening is because the genuine people that get in touch find out I am exactly as I am online too and keep my word despite whatever may be going on at any given time in my life.

I have written before on the importance of having a strong mindset, both here and in the TMOS series at the OG blog , so if you are interested go read it there.

My point here is another one though. Whatever difficulties you may face in life, remember that:

Imagination is more important than knowledge, courage is more important than intelligence, and perseverance is the key to getting anything done. No matter how crazy it may seem to other people.

As for any attacks you receive, be clam, bat them away and just carry on as best you can. You’ll take hits here and there. Everyone does. But the ones that count keep getting back up. And if you have read and understood more about Sedevacantism and are that way inclined, you could do worse than joining us .

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

One of the reasons you can tell we are under the Dominion of the Prince of Lies on this planet —and yet it remains worth living and beauty is everywhere if you but pay attention— is not only because almost everything you have been taught is a lie, but also because the people who actually seek and find some aspects of the fundamental truth of anything, tend to get sidelined, forgotten, buried and instead a perverse version of the truth thy discovered gets plagiarised and spread by their inferiors, random con men, plagiarists, idiots and liars.

Vox Day recently posted on the origins of the term Sigma and his related Socio-Sexual hierarchy, and personally I found it enlightening as well as useful.

I relate very much to this on my own terms of course, since my book The Face On Mars , whose central topic was essentially plagiarised by Graham Hancock (who definitely made a LOT more money of his erroneous version than I ever did) has also been used by others and yet they keep getting the facts wrong, even when they steal them outright from the originator. Hancock admitted his theft by the way in front of my then girlfriend too, so it cannot be said he did this “by error”, though he said “ghost writers” did most of the work, so apparently he doesn’t even write his own plagiarism, but he certainly read my book before writing his as it is listed in the notes and I personally had sent it to him when he called me to ask for it.

I have certainly relied on other people’s information to reach my own conclusions that have some basis in an aspect of their work, but I have always made it a point of pride that I always reference where any specific data point I use comes from if I am ever able to do so. And I always will.

Make no mistake, I am not Tesla, but I do believe I am if not THE top guy on the planet that’s figured out the real origins of human history, at least I am certainly in the top maybe 5-10 people on Earth that do not have super top-secret clearance to access far more information than I ever had access to when I wrote the original FOM in 1995 to do so. And frankly, I do believe I was the top guy in 1995. Even now, anyone that may have figured out a bit more (I am not aware of anyone figuring out MORE, only of their confirming what I already had concluded in 1995) would have done so only by relying on that initial overarching perspective I presented back in 1995. And in the scheme of things, absolutely Tesla was robbed far more than any other guy I am aware of, nor do I come anywhere near his genius, but… I do think it is kind of important and cool to know just how absolutely astonishing our real history is and that it involves spaceships, aliens, and actual inter-solar wars. and no, I am not hallucinating any of it, though for anyone not familiar with basic physics and astronomy it may sound as if I am insane when I just rattle off the “end result” like that. The truth is that ALL the conclusions I come to in the FOM are the pure result of objective observations that are all detailed in the book. You can’t say I made anything up or that the information I provide is “suspect” or incorrect. All the information (and more) is still there and you can check it yourself. And the conclusion I get to is only the logical putting all of these pieces together. I guess no one had done that before, everyone just being focussed on the details of his little piece of the puzzle. But once assembled my theory has proven to be able to explain a bunch of other things that were not well understood, as well as also being predictive, which is again a good sign it is broadly correct.

I am not alone in this issue of being the original inventor/creator/innovator and then some less capable, less intelligent, less honest person swooping in to “take the credit”, which is ultimately almost always a financial thing. They do it for the money (and the glory, false though it is). And ultimately, if I had to choose between the money and being a plagiarist and a lair and the truth and not making a penny, I already know my choice remains as it has been.

I think that is true of most men that have a belief in something bigger and more noble than themselves, but I have also seen men be consumed by the unfairness of it (Professor Searle was one I met in person). The think is, you need to be philosophical about it, and you can only be that if your philosophy is based on truth too.

Would it be nice to make enough money from my honest work on the Face on Mars (and other books I write that are also useful and interesting, or entertaining and fun to read) to support my family? Absolutely. It really would. And I could put out more useful stuff more often too, which would be even better. But… I know how life works and it is unlikely to happen, because most people tend to prefer the fast, easy and flashy, even if it is a lie, and a theft and a perversion of the truth.

Most people prefer a one minute Tik-Tok video to a 400 page book filled with details that though not hard to read or follow is educational, shows you the incredible realities of astronomy and many other subjects, but requires you to actually, you know… read!

Besides, they are certainly trying to see to it everyone is so rushed all the time, so stressed, so anxious, so busy just trying to survive that you never even have time to read. And if you do, that you don’t have time to think about it. And who has the time to even research and write all this stuff? Can you see the angle of attack they aim all their weapons at?

Your time.

YOUR.

TIME.

So the first fight is to claw that back. Then to put it to use by educating yourself on things that actually matter. And no, it’s not always (or even mostly) about being the most efficient “worker” that way madness lies. The most efficient way to get free of the mental prisons is to claim back your time. And if for a time , you just need to lie on the grass and see the clouds roll by (hopefully uninterrupted by chem-trail), that is good. Do it. See how it feels. Then train yourself to KNOW (for) YOURSELF . And then you may really want to begin with the real history of humanity , perhaps followed by what the best model of reality I have ever found and that absurd as it seemed to me, actually explains more of our reality than anything else and has two millennia of history of proving it creates the best societies humanity has ever seen to date .

And if in doing so you also help me produce more things on different topics that also prove useful, especially to young men , then, well, then it’s a win-win-win.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

I have been absent a few days lately because am reorganising a lot of stuff and farm life in spring is the busiest time ever. Nevertheless, I am also trying to streamline my content and since substack seems to work well, I am considering how to make the people who subscribe here get as much extras as I possibly can provide. There will be some announcements soon along with a slight increase in yearly subscriptions (currently $80 and likely to go to $100 and in any case no more than $120 at most) But if I read the rules correctly and I remember right, people who get yearly memberships at one rate keep that rate so if you want to save $20-40 on a yearly membership get in before the next week or two when I plan to announce some freebies which are outside of substack and will be available only to yearly subscribers.

Thank you to those readers who do subscribe monthly too, I will see if there is some way to reward you as well, though the book keeping is a lot easier with yearly subscribers.

In any case, I will endeavour to keep this and the OG blog going with as much useful information as I can, or at least entertaining, and with any luck, also continue to expose frauds and other bad actors too.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

The level of mental caging that has happened in the last 120 years or so is astonishing. And it’s an exponential curve, not a straight line on a graph. That is, most of the brainwashing designed to turn you into the human equivalent of domesticated herd animals raised for slaughter and profit, happened in the last 25 years; and most of that, in the last 10 years, and so on.

Consider:

• Income tax did not exist

• Passports did not exist (I know!)

• Laws regarding seatbelts did not exist

• Many of the laws restricting, regulating, or outright banning the use of firearms did not exist.

• Men could have a fist fight to regulate issues between them and no one would even think of using lawyers to settle minor disputes.

Now, sure, a few things have improved, from a legal point of view, but in the overwhelming and huge majority of cases, the reality is that these additional laws, rules, and social engineering, affect the way people behave towards one another, and in general, it essentially leads to a mechanised, artificial, fake, superficial and perfunctory way of being.

Humanity is lost. Empathy and sympathy are lost. Some beauty, and pleasantries, and human contact and connection are lost. Everything is reduced as a result.

And what and whom does it benefit most?

Those “people” that were rather quite removed from initial human connection anyway. The so-called, vampiric, pedophile-prone, “elite”.

The more mechanised and inhuman human relations become, the more profit to them, as well as camouflage for their proclivities, which tend towards the type of stuff that a hundred years ago would have got crowds with torches and pitchforks to burn down the ivory towers they inhabit with the “elite” and their kin inside them.

The ultimate proof of this is the rape and sexual abuse if TENS OF THOUSANDS of children in the UK by Pakistani gangs and little to nothing done about it, or to prevent its recurrence. Not only that but even something as mild as an official inquiry into this sordid affair has actively, and successfully been blocked by the very same people and government that at minimum allowed it to happen and more likely promoted and was complicit in the procurement of children for abuse. After all, that the high places of power are a hive of pederasts is hardly news at all to anyone that has been paying even mild attention.

This constant being hemmed in, regulated, controlled, watched, measured, profiled, evaluated, taxed, and made to jump through ever more complicated bureaucratic processes, happening in complete parallel with a total ignoring of actual reality on the ground concerning real crime, never mind petty crime as well as the seeming lack of consequences to those people who traditionally, ethnically and tribally ignore all the supposed rules is not a coincidence.

It’s meant to demoralise and atomise you and your people and co-nationals of whatever western country you live in. And yes, it’s intentional. Yes it’s by design, and yes it has a centuries long history. I have written before about it and the thread through it —at least as far as the modern times go— starts in a way that is easier to trace if you care to, with the start of the Illuminati around the late 1700s, their hydra-like mutation in Carbonari, Freemasons, Rosicrucians, and whatever other sect of Satan they came up with. They financed the American revolution by bankrupting France, they founded the first Freemasonic based country in the world, the USA, which has subsequently infested the planet with its “Hollywood Values”, warmongering, profit above all, brutalisation of anything human and inevitable deep state embedding of Satanic forces in all intelligence agencies and ultimately almost every government on Earth thanks to blackmail, fraud, payoffs, and every other dirty trick in the book, all supported by the biggest lie if all:

Fiat money, based on nothing, created out of thin air, by the very people who invented the entire farce, which they then use to control the economic future and lives of entire nations.

So… if you have read this far and perhaps even bothered to confirm the summary I wrote above, you might be feeling slightly depressed. Powerless to change any of it. After all, you’re only one person, right?

Well, no.

First of all, there is a power to the psychic pressure of a lot of people becoming aware of a gigantic lie. There are huge numbers of massive historical events that confirm the reality that the truth, no matter how unpalatable, in the end, collapses regimes built on lies.

So just your KNOWING the truth about how the world really works is already something in and of itself.

But so is any and every little or large act of defiance you do and the spreading of that truth to others too. The truth cannot be ignored forever. It’s like the proverbial drop of water that eventually breaks a massive boulder. So be that relentless drop of water.

Connect and reconnect in real life with old and new friends and begin by sharing these thoughts. From there you will find the ones you have affinity with while the ones who are NPCs will self-remove themselves from your orbit.

And that is how you begin to form your own group of like-minded people.

Secondly, becoming aware of this reality means that whatever your age, job, income, and situation, you can begin to structure your life so that you can become as anti-fragile as possible. If you work for yourself you tend to be more immune to cancel-culture even if not totally so. If you own your own home in a country that unlike the USA doesn’t have absurd property taxes, you can get by on a modest income, or make improvements with a good income that means even if your income disappears you will do well.

If you have your own land and produce your own food and clean water, the next thing is your own electrical energy. If you have managed to create a self-sustaining environment, or at least one that is partially so, with respect to food, water and electricity, the weak link will be fuel for machinery, but if you have the space, and a safe way to do it, that too can be stockpiled. Like ammo.

Because weapons and ammo WILL at some point become necessary.

The more successful you are at removing yourself from the bureaucratic grasp of the servants of evil, the less happy they are about it. And if you manage to create an enclave, a group of people that see it as you and I do, and they create an alternative to the wage-slave reality, you can be certain that some grey men, in grey suits, with grey minds, will try to find a way to criminalise you. At which point, if and when force gets used against you, the only sensible response is to respond with force too.

There is nothing revolutionary about any of this, so don’t let some homosexual in a clipboard tell you that you are in violation of anything. You are not. Self-defence is an inalienable human reaction to being attacked.

Push back at the nonsense. Say no. Tell the freaks to get back in the closet.

And don’t do it online only; get out there and CONNECT! That’s where it counts the most and has the most impact.

Sure, memes are your friend. And online can lead to IRL, but act in the physical world too.

It all adds up.

So do not despair. Instead, recognise you are the lone special ops soldier behind enemy lines. Build up your network. Sabotage their propaganda.

You are that lone soldier in the mist.

You are the single rebel in a seemingly unwinnable war.

You are that freedom fighter hiding in plain sight.

You.

You are the one.

And if I am acting as any kind of successful rebel radio outpost, the coded call from a leader of the resistance deep in a rural valley, you decipher almost daily, and soon even more frequently, and if it helps you, and if you can afford to, think of subscribing to this substack. I plan to provide additional benefit to subscribers, with content from outside of substack too, so I can keep the posts free for all to see if possible.

Your contributions help me produce more useful content you can ACT on. And produce goods you can use too.The olive that has a positive impact on health like nothing else would not have been possible to produce without the sponsorship of a few people that volunteered to help finance it.

The time I get to write and produce things that help you in some way, is directly related to my income, and if I could spend all my time producing things of use to our side of the perennial war between good and evil, I would be posting schematics and test results on devices I am trying to find the time to put together that are supposed to produce energy for free or near free.

In any case, whether you can help or not, please see things as they are and put my advice to the best use you can in your own life. We are many. And all it takes is a spark from any one of us to begin the collapse of Clown World and the rise of a new age or Men of Iron.

Onward, my unknown friend. Onward and don’t hesitate; nor look backward. We forge things by going forward.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

William Briggs posted about Adams and his idiotic choice to get vaxxed .

Although Briggs seems to be a decent sort trying to be fair to all, and he mostly does a good job of it, he is still a little too unnecessarily polite for my tastes. Now… is it necessary to be rude? No. Surely not. However, when an idiot, who does idiot things and advises others to do idiot things and tries to defend his idiot behaviour and idiot advice like an idiot, who cause the kind of damage only idiots can cause (see Professor Cipolla’s seminal work and specifically Law 5), it is time for someone to very firmly and clearly make the world aware that this is a dangerous idiot and no one should ever listen to him again about anything.

It’s not about Scott. I don’t care about Scott one way or another. I had one brief email exchange with him years ago and realised then he is a third rate “hypnotist” at best, despite his claims.

In any case, I already did a more detailed take down of him long ago, here , but in any case, the VERY simple FACT is that Scott Adams is not just an idiot, but a liar too.

His contention that “no one knew anything” is absolute nonsense. We knew for a FACT that mRNA technology has NEVER worked in the fashion they planned to use it, and it has not done so for at least 30 years. mRNA tech was failing in the early 1990s.

So that is point number 1.

Point number 2. is that pretty soon, even the fake numbers the media was showing did not stack up, and there was no way to hide that the mortality rate was about 1% at most and that kids were essentially immune too. And I am one of the people that initially got it completely wrong because I based my initial data analysis on the fake media numbers. I owned up to that error, which was getting the mortality rate wrong by a factor of 40. So I calculate that potentially Covid could kill 40% of those who got infected. I did this publicly and when it was clear I was wrong I said so too. More than once.

There is no shame at all in coming to the wrong conclusions based on wrong data that was intended to fool you. But even so I did not and would never have got Vaxxed even if Covid was a 40% killer. Why?

Logic.

mRNA tech failed 100% of the time and caused massive issues and eventual death 100% of the times. Sure, you need to delve through a lot of scientific jargon and read a bunch of papers that try and hide the plain facts unless you read also the follow-up studies, but the long and the short of it is that mRNA tech is bad news and also alters your DNA. ALL of this was known years before Covid even appeared. I recall an online friend laying out precisely the whole point of potential “vaccines” to depopulate the planet and mRNA tech is one way to do it and it will also be passed on to any children you might have (if any survive, which is a challenge in itself if you look at the still born stats for the vaxxed).

So I have a 100% chance of major, crippling, health injury that eventually leads to death, or 40% chance of death IF I catch the bug.

It’s really elementary level math if you ever bothered to do ANY research on ANY of the decades old available data.

So we know with absolute certainty that Scott is a liar as well as a moron.

So why does he insist on pretending no one could “know anything”?

Well, ego. And it’s more complicated than you think.

Now… I do need to add that what follows is just my opinion and I can’t prove it to 100% certainty, however, there are enough indicators and enough evidence that certainly points in the direction I think. And if some can’t see it, well, that’s ok. As someone else said about my powers of observation, for some people, of a certain IQ and knowledge base, there is such a thing as single data point pattern recognition. And it is something I have indeed always been good at, which is why The Face on Mars has proven only more correct in the intervening 30 years since I wrote it, why Reclaiming the Catholic Church remains unassailable, and why the things I wrote about in Systema: The Russian Martial System are slowly starting to be accepted by mainstream sports scientists. So, with that little intro, here is why I think Scott took the Vax, and why he is SO resistant to admitting he simply screwed up.

He did it to impress his then wife and take her on holiday to, Bora Bora I think, or maybe just Greece, which makes it even worse. 1

Anyway, in case you did not know, Scott had been married to well known gold-digger model Kristina Basham who was a divorcee with 2 kids from a guy actually called Chad.

Now, you can tell me I am dead wrong, but at a wild guess, I would say that Kristina did not fall madly, deeply, in love with Scott because of his smouldering good looks or his prowess in the bedroom. I know, I know, I’m a cynic you say… but it is not so. I actually am a romantic idealist, but even rose-tinted glasses types like me cannot be fooled by supernova lever red flags of this nature. See for yourself. And I intentionally picked as best an image of Scott as I could find and as unfiltered and small a face image of Kristina.

True Love you say?

Yeah… colour me skeptical on that.

She also apparently cucked Scott with three people, including Andrew Tate, and is now re-married to what appears to be an airline pilot and she has taken his surname since she now goes by DeGennaro, and had one baby, (presumably with the new husband, but I really don’t know).

So… to recap, his marriage already probably on the rocks (he announced the divorce on 10th March 2022) and his trip to Greece was in June 2021, and they had married a scant year earlier on July 11th 2020. So the marriage did not last even two years. Curious since they were together since 2016 supposedly no? And isn’t marriage what you do when you are sure it will last?

I mean, hey, I’m not one to point fingers, I am on wife number three (as she likes to remind me). It can happen to the best of us that we make a bad decision based on thinking with the small head, being fooled by acrobatic bedroom performances and Oscar level acting. And while it certainly is not my style at all, I can understand if Scott, in his continuing attempt to keep Kristina on side decided to make the classic error of marrying her in the hope of cementing the relationship (I never did such a foolish thing myself. I married them in the honeymoon phase! You can say I was even more foolish if you like, but at least it’s the pathetic I have never been). And then taking her on whatever expensive holiday she wanted to go on (Bora Bora) followed by another one with HIS friends (look at their age) in Greece.

Again, it’s a mistake but I can understand it. What makes it beyond just pathetic and desperate though, and strays right into the so pathetic and desperate to delve fully into the suicidal is the taking of the Vaxx so he could take her on holiday.

And later he realises he’s totally screwed himself. With the Vaxx, and for no real good reason, since she allegedly banged up to three guys before the actual divorce (I don’t know. Internet rumours) and then was pregnant as of early December 2023.

So now what’s he going to say?

If I am right, the real reason makes him sound absolutely pathetic, and certainly far from one of the world’s “greatest influencers”, which is literally what he tried to pass himself off as for years. Not exactly the model of hypnosis cool. calm and collected he tries to present himself as.

In any case, the point is, as always KNOW (for) YOURSELF and never listen to any “celebs” on anything of note. And in case you wanted to avoid being as bad at relationships as Scott is, you can get Caveman Theory exclusively here , which more than a few people have now read and used to good results in the girlfriend/wife department.

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here