What is this site all about? First-timers CLICK HERE
Benji tells us how much we should never let Charlie’s voice be forgotten! Let’s make sure it’s not!
We need to be respectful and spread Charlie’s voice all over the place, just like Benji wants! Come on, don’t let me down guys, make it happen!
Go ahead and forward this to everyone you know! This was one of Charlie’s last interviews, so it is very relevant, we want to send out his message! Right Benji? Right!
This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here
The sacrifices men make, and the difficulties they encounter are very different at their core from the ones women encounter.
The lies they have been subjected to have been designed specifically to affect them even more than men, and they are more susceptible to social pressure because biologically that’s just how they are wired. None of which is specifically their fault.
Picture this:
A new mother, who has had a family history that is far from rosy, gets ganged up on by a medical establishment that actually caused her severe issues due to their own incompetence, presuming their own medications and the effects they caused where her fault instead of their own telling her to keep taking them and then forgetting they were the ones that had told her to do so and/or not accounting for it.
They then keep her from her new baby because of this, their own medication causing issues, not anything the mother did, so her milk doesn’t come in. Making things worse.
They inject the baby with the totally unnecessary vitamin K against the mother’s wishes, then try to push for the baby to get all sorts of “vaccinations”. This is today, after countless actual scientific studies have demonstrated beyond a shadow of a doubt that unvaccinated children are healthier throughout life and the FACT that not a single vaccine on the planet has EVER undergone clinical safety trials. Not one. And if they say it has ask for the data on it. There isn’t any.
And if they do give you some “data”. Look at it. I mean really look at it. Check the references they quote. It’s so unbelievable because it sounds absurd. But it’s not. The lie of vaccines is so enormous that it boggles the mind.
The man she had the baby with can’t be bothered to educate himself at all and assumes the same doctors that already completely fucked everything up and made the baby be at risk of not thriving because they ensured the mother can’t breastfeed by keeping the baby away from her for two weeks know what they are doing so he also says yeah the baby should get vaxxed.
But it is up to her if her baby gets vaxxed or not. No one else. No law compels it anywhere.
She’s alone, surrounded by these fucking demons trying to hurt her and her baby even more than they have, she has no real support anywhere near her, is a first time mother and in a tiny closed off community.
Everyone ganging up on her, using her family background, past errors or whatever to make her give up and agree with them. She’s a first time mom, alone, hormones all over the place and not helped by the medication they had her keep taking IN ERROR, has no financial means. And all she has is her instinct and her baby.
And now the doctors threatening to refer her to social services, so she’s now also naturally afraid that they are going to try to declare her “unfit” so as to take the baby from her.
How would you react?
Think how isolated and concerned you would be and your health affected by the stress on top of everything else. Think how easy it would be to just let these bullies twist your mind enough you give in.
But does she?
No. She does not.
Because she is actually exactly what a good mother is. Someone that will put up with pressure, stress, and evil and stupid people, far beyond what anyone should ever have to do, in order to protect her baby.
And this is not a hypothetical situation. This is someone we know personally.
So now I am looking into the possibility of suing this fucking excuse for a hospital their doctors and nurses individually too if need be, into oblivion, for the documented fuck-ups, unprofessionalism and flat out malpractice they have indulged in.
This lady may not have the time, energy and funds to do so.
But I and people I know just might decide to go on a little crusade against the clowns masquerading as doctors and nurses in this particularly nasty little corner of the planet.
This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here
Everyone is talking about it, of course, and I have no proof of anything, but this is what I think happened to Charlie.
I think he got approached by the usual (((tribe))) members to be a “pundit” and who knows, maybe Charlie even believed it was for a good cause. After all a lot of Americans are brainwashed into thinking that the people who originally set up their whole country with a revolution funded by France and designed to ignore logic, pervert Christianity, and introduce Talmudic legalism really is their greatest ally. Even after they sink American ships, machine gun survivors, blow up buildings and have dance offs about it, cause false flags on themselves and all the other terrorist shit they do.
So maybe he took the manufacture fame and money and glory and became yet another gatekeeper of the “right” that prevents overall “noticing”.
But then maybe Charlie really was a decent guy at heart and didn’t realise what he had got into. And maybe by the rime he did, he realised it was too late and he was in too deep.
Maybe he saw someone else that had the same trajectory. That is, started out being funded and then maybe turning on the hand that fed it… maybe…
And maybe Charlie, in his naiveté, and genuine innocence thought maybe he too could turn around and say “hey, I didn’t sign up for this! I didn’t know what you guys got into!” And maybe he started to have some thoughts that he too might survive a bit of an about face.
Although he suspected it might not be so easy.
And maybe Charlie didn’t realise that a dead black woman that starts to look into and maybe tell the truth about certain topics would only inflame those very topics and cause a lot more people to notice there may be something pretty big, that has been blown up like a lot, like over six million times, just to pick a number at random. And if she was suddenly assassinated, maybe other stuff like the agenda of some of these people and what they do and what they believe and so on would fall under more scrutiny. So in the case of a black woman, making her out to be a screaming, crazy banshee, complete with head-shaking “nu-huh yu’ just didn’t!” And a finger wag to go with it, is the way. Crazy black woman works pretty well at discrediting anything she says. Along with deplatforming of course.
But semi-famous super pro-Israel guy who inflames young people suddenly deciding “fuck this, I AM American, I do believe in truth and justice for all after all, and fuck yeah, the fame and money was good, but maybe I just want to be honest above all!” Suddenly telling hard truth about a certain group of people?
Like in the video at the start of this post?
Can’t really run the “crazy black bitch” agenda on him.
But you know what would make him REAL useful AND get rid of him for good?
Well, just make him a martyr and let the very tribe what has the most to gain from it, praise him as their champion. Because, hey, Americans are pretty simple anyway and if we kill him and then say what a good guy he was, everyone will only remember when he was saying all these cool things about us, before he found out what we are really like and all about.
I for one would never want a war-criminal, mass-murdering, genociding motherfucker like Bibi to speak well of me.
Of course, I don’t KNOW anything with certainty. I don’t have the shooter, I hardly ever listened to Charlie because as far as I could tell he was a shill bought and paid for, as I thought Candace was too. And I don’t think I am wrong. But people can awake from their errors or the lies they believed. If you are honest, sooner or later you will realise you believed some lies, far more than you think, too.
And maybe you decide fuck this. I’m gonna tell the truth. And then you do. And the consequences for telling the truth have always been very high.
And I think Charlie almost certainly just paid the ultimate price for realising what the truth was, and then starting to say it out loud.
I never listened to Charlie precisely because of his original stances, just like Candace. But… I listen to Candace a lot more than I did now, still only with half an ear but I think she may have turned a corner a while back. And my ears had definitely perked up with Charlie. Only recently, but they had.
So that’s my theory.
In any case, I never, ever, nor would I ever, think someone like Charlie was anyone that would ever deserve to be killed, nor was he ever a real threat to anyone other than possibly at the end to those creatures that live in the shadows.
I pray for his wife and children. Robbed of their husband and father by the scum of the Earth. Whatever faults Charlie may have had, as we all have, he did not deserve this at all.
May God burn eternally everyone responsible for his death.
This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here
Due to my previous post, a reader had the following to say:
Since you read Anarchonomicon, I was hoping for a Kurganing of his recent blasphemy:
Or this LARPing:
Now, before I begin and do a quick beheading, it needs to be said that since truth is truth, the previous post remains 100% good.
And in fairness, despite the controversial title of the Epstein essay, I can sympathise with his attitude, because what most people THINK is the Catholic Church has in fact been a hive of pedophiles, homosexuals, Satanists, Freemasons, thieves, liars, drug addicts, and well… you get the idea… since 1958 in full swing and overtly and about 200 years before that in subterfuges and gradual ways.
The Actual Catholic Church has been subverted since the mid 1700s, which coincided (but not by coincidence) with the formation of the first Freemasonic Country on Earth founded by and on Freemasonic principles (of perverse law, the “brotherhood and equality of men of goodwill, and so on) by the bankrupting of Franc Eto fund the American revolution.
So yes… what passes for the Catholic Church is absolutely evil, converged, effeminate, and basically a Troon in drag pretending to be a priest just so he can get to rape some kids at tranny story hour. So, yeah, I can get how he’d throw out the baby with the bath water.
However, actual Catholicism has ALWAYS had the following dogmatic principles (and its history proves these were not just things Catholic paid lip service to):
And let me remind you that Jesus Himself stated quite clearly that pedophiles would best be drowned at sea with a millstone around their neck. I of course, being only a humble mortal, and thus being weak of faith or any mortal’s ability to really find the error of their ways in such a simple manner, believe pedophiles should be burnt at the stake in the public square. No, I am not joking, and yes I think there should be a minimum age to see it, but I am deadly serious. And if you think I am hyperbolising or being sadistically cruel, you are wrong. It would be a most unpleasant task, however, it would have multiple beneficial effects:
So… if when you think “Catholic” you think, Jewish/Protestant corrupted cuck, I understand you, but in truth you are not thinking of Catholics, the Catholic Church, or Catholic doctrine. You are thinking about Arch-heretics and mostly never have-been and never-will-be “Catholics” that in fact are freemasons, Satanists, or perverts of some kind or other, or best case, invalidly “ordained” and abysmally ignorant men that are LARPing at being Catholic Clergy. Properly speaking, in such instances, you are thinking of the Novus Orcos, as I call them (the New Orcs of the New Order, (Novus Ordo) same as all the previous Orcs).
If you actually want to think about Catholics, then think of people like Bohemond from the year 1095, the first crusade. Read Harold Lamb’s The Crusades – Iron Men and Saints and then try and tell me Catholics are ineffective non-fighters.
But you need to understand that the only actual Catholics left are Sedevacantist. And even those small numbers are being infiltrated by a pernicious false doctrine called Sedeprivationism, which we will expose as the heresy it is in due course.
The point is that we don’t (yet) have the numbers to change anything meaningfully, but we will. Because our churches, though banned from the traditional ones that have since been rendered profane by the usurpers, continue to grow with young couples that make a lot of children. I have six and other couples we know and are friends with personally have six, seven, eight kids each.
So, I would consider this a gentle smack upside the head of Kulak with a word to “Do your research properly.”
If he insists on calling proper Catholicism fake and gay, as the Novus Ordo fake Catholicism is, well, then I will school him with a more in-depth Kurganing, but for now, the error is understandable. At least on that post.
I am sympathetic to anyone that thinks Catholicis is absolutely absurd, responsible for terrible repressions, widespread pedophelia, horrible crimes against humanity, the dark ages, blah, blah, blah, because I used to think the same, as anyone who read my very short but apparently rather effective book BELIEVE! is aware of, as it has resulted in many people converting fully to proper Catholicism. I wrote that book because it was the kind of information no one told me when I was not even remotely Catholic. If someone had presented me with the actual facts of the matter, I may have found my way to Catholicism without needing to get the Cosmic smack in the head that a Road to Damascus Moment inevitably entails.
And no, Catholicism is not a crutch for me. I didn’t “need” some fairy tale to believe in because life was too hard. I could no longer deny the truth after my experience, and everything since that day on the 3rd of March 2013 has confirmed and reconfirmed over and over and over again, that Catholicism, the real one, models reality to a degree that nothing else has ever done, and has done so perfectly throughout human history.
It really is quite astonishing.
So… I hope you will at least find things out for yourself and investigate Catholicism properly. Of course, I have written rather extensively on it in Reclaiming the Catholic Church, but I don’t make my living from my books and I don’t care if you buy them or not. They are there if you want to save yourself some time and get the best references you are likely to find, but by all means, do your own research instead. I insist on it.
So, heretic, Pagan, heathen, schismatic, or even atheist as you may be. If you will, actually take an honest day to look into this before you continue in your terribly flawed path. I know. I have been down most of them before you.
This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here
Discovering the truest model of reality is not easy. I mean think about it:
So… yeah, finding a model of reality that actually encapsulates reality well is hard work.
But the answer is absolutely gobsmackingky insane.
Let me put it in perspective:
I recall the exact moment I figured out what happened on Mars. I was writing a science fiction book about it at the time. Except I did a LOT of research to make the science as true and real as possible. And then I had a flash of insight. I figured out what had happened on the red planet, and if I was right, it meant an intelligent civilisation lived there and had some kind of war that nearly burst that planet apart. It was a shocking moment. It felt absurd. Like some kind of SF film with a giant reveal that upends the entire history of humanity in one stroke. I stopped writing that SF book and started researching obsessively for the next nine months. I was trying to falsify the flash of insight I had. It was too crazy an idea. It had to be wrong. Surely it would be easy to prove it was nonsense. Because in order for such a crazy idea to be true, a whole bunch of other conditions would have had to exist. So I methodically set about proving those conditions didn’t exist. Surely.
Except they did. Except every thing I knew would have to be true for my crazy idea about Mars to be true turned out to be true. And this made me aware of even more things that needed to be true and all of those fit as well. Finally I was left with a few big ones that would also need to be true but that no one had proven one way or the other yet. So I put those in the Face on Mars too. And sure enough, over time, even those things were discovered to be true. And now, 30 years after I first wrote it and 11 years after I updated it, no one objective, sane, and honest, can deny that my theory is basically correct and unfalsifiable.
So if you want to know what happened on Mars, and the true history of humanity, which is abso-fucking-lutely more incredible and awesome than any SF film you ever saw, go ahead and buy and read The Face on Mars .
Anyway… I mention that because being the first (and pretty much only) guy that actually put all that together is pretty wild. Unbelievable. Kind of freaky. And yet… finding out the best model of reality made THAT whole Mars event feel like about the same as receiving a postcard from a friend in terms of surprise.
And if you had told me 20 years ago that I would advocate for what I am about to tell you now, I would have:
So… if you have a similar reaction when you read the next few lines, I understand. Can’t blame you at all really.
And so as not to make you wait, because I know your millennial/zoomer brain can’t wait for anything, here it is:
The best model of reality is the one that the Catholic Crusaders around the year 1095 had. Or the Catholic Knights of Malta had around 1565 .
Sounds crazy, absurd, outdated?
Sure. Wanna know why? Two reasons mainly:
If you get over those two stumbling blocks, you will have (eventually) a realisation that the truth about reality is far more shocking than anything you ever imagined in your wildest dreams.
It’s truly, absolutely, completely, astonishing.
The truth is so much more than any fiction could ever come up with.
That’s it.
That’s all I wanted to tell you today.
This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here
The Pagans are retarded, historical illiterates without an ideological leg to stand on, but the cretins egging them on are worse.
They are masquerading as the modern “erudite intelligentsia” while in reality they are incels without the possibility of reproduction spouting the usual black-pilled faggoty-nihilism repackaged as if it was some highbrow romanticised truth instead of what it is: historical ignorance writ large; presenting a demon-inspired age as some mythical past golden age that never actually existed other than in their febbrile, adolescent, perennially fantasising but ultimately impotent “brains” (which based on their effectiveness could be more productive if replaced with a warm bowl of tapioca).
Here then, is a typical comment from one of these idiots and my response, because this faggotry needs to be set on fire in the public square.
This retard —fancying himself some kind of intellectual that might “engage me meaningfully” no doubt— made the stupid mistake of thinking that because I indulged a few moronic walls of text previous comments as somehow worthy of a response (they were nothing other than my using his idiocy as a polite way to point out to other readers the stupidity of his “positions” such as they were) thought he was going to “learn me” some theoretical secularism LARPing as theological concepts worth anything more than a fart in a tornado.
Well… let’s see how that goes for him…
[email protected] wrote :
The issue with you answer is that it ignores the forest for the trees, this isn’t in truth a religious question but a political and racial one. Simply put while the Western White mind has been neutered by the (mal)education system to the point it can’t describe the problem. It still senses there is one despite this brainwashing. Grasping for Norse/Roman/Greek paganism is simply an attempt to find something that was made by your people for your people.
Christianity (plus Judaism and Islam) are increasingly being put under the microscope here in the Anglosphere. Many of us are increasingly coming to the conclusion that Abrahamism in the vast majority of it’s varieties effectively encourages the invasion of the West (or in the case of Islam, does the invading) and therefore is an enemy of ours.
Note: Before you scream that your specific branch of Catholicism is the only Christianity realize that however true that may be theologically that theology isn’t what the “noticers” (such as Barsoom) give a damn about. The results on the ground are what matter to them, and the results are not good. Say what you will of Ares, Mars, and Thor but they would never tell a man to just lie down and accept an invasion by foreigners. Can the same be said of Christianity as a collective?
And my gentle response…
I ignore nothing. I am just not historically retarded and illiterate. Entering a sewer while pretending you are finding Shangri-La is idiotic, counter productive and totally nonsensical. Which is why Jews and their imps NEVER object to this idiocy, but they DO get very upset about Sedevacantists even as they try to dismiss them as “irrelevant” despite the fact they are far more organised and real than any Pagan “group” (which don’t exist at all because they are just LARPers).
That’s point 1.
Point 2 – I don’t give a shit what any retarded, historically illiterate, ineffective academic theoretician incel “thinks”. They are completely irrelevant and amount (and barring a personal miracle will amount in the future) to precisely nothing in the best of cases and a net negative due to their pervasive neo-nihilism masquerading a “serious intellectualism”.
Postcards guy, tree of woe guy, marc bison guy, they are all functionally and practically sperging masturbators that affect nothing materially and practically other than possibly causing a little more despair. And when called out for it have NOTHING to counter with other than “Oh, Kurgan mean!” Meanwhile CATHOLICS, actual Catholics, not “my branch” of anything, but simply the actual remnant of Catholicism, continues to grow and rise and produce children, while you keep being too fucking stupid to understand the basics of how the enemy has, and continues to, successfully misdirect you into every theological dead end bar the ONLY ONE that has successfully fought him and his minions to a standstill.
YOUR problem is that you’re just like them a theorethical academic and a practical faggot. Listen up: NO ONE today would die fighting in the name of “Ares”, “Mars” and “Thor”, and certainly not you. While I and people like me absolutely would die fighting in the name of Jesus Christ, just like my ancestors did a thousand years ago, and given I am here, were more successful at killing the enemy than dying themselves.
And in time, if ANYTHING of the West survives, it will be because of people like me and our children and grandchildren than any spineless incel too concerned about the theory of “gods” they don’t believe in any more than I believe in batman.
Now, it probably needs to be pointed out to some of you that haven’t already caught on, that his very first sentence makes him out to be an especially stupid specimen of his kind.
There is not, and never has been, a “political question” that has lasted beyond seven or eight decades before totally collapsing, and even that was only held in place by a level of force and mass murder never seen before to 20th century.
It ultimately always boils down to religion, because even race is not enough.
Why do you think the homogeneous nations of Europe, absent a single brown body, still killed each other until they were disparate nations?
Because of ethnicity/culture. And where does that lie, ultimately? Right next to what makes that ethnicity and culture in the first place: a shared system of beliefs, which is called…? Go on, you can do it… that’s right: Religion.
While race/tribalism/and blood is undoubtedly the start of ethnicity, as its population expands and becomes the prevalent culture of a geographical area, what differentiates this “tribe” from the next one (that may well be, and in fact almost certainly is, still genetically related) is the belief system, that is, ultimately, its religion.
Religion is what ultimately binds a people together, and the only religions that do so successfully, are based in reality.
There are only two realities: the truth, or lies with real underpinnings of a demonic nature.
In short: Catholicism, i.e. the truth, that models, answers the questions of, and mirrors, objective reality, or…
…any of a number of fake religions (including Novus Ordo fake “Catholicism”) that are underpinned by the inversion of reality designed to lead humans to horrific and ultimately hellish ends. They are lies but lies that produce “results”. Same as one could say the way to produce food is to grow some, and that is true and good, and another can convince you that stealing it from someone else is “better” because faster and easier. But ultimately if everyone steals and no one grows it… well… Hell and death. See also: Zimbabwe.
And of ALL the religions on this Earth, only ONE has produced consistently positive effects for humanity when compared to all others, and only ONE has survived EVERY attack, attempt to stamp it out and excise it from the world, and only ONE still exists and continues to do so unchanged: Catholicism.
There is no “Christianity as a collective”. And anyone using such a phrase is the kind of moron that thinks ice cream and sewage can mix and still be thought of as “ice cream”.
There is Christianity, which is only and has ever been only, actual Catholicism —which today remains only in 1958 Sedevacantists of the Toatalist position— and then there are an untold number of heretics PRETENDING at being “Christian” in 50,000+ “denominations” of nonsense. And it was always thus. Whether we were few and hiding in Catacombs, or triumphantly building cathedrals all over Europe and civilising demon-worshipping, mass-murderous savages like the Aztecs, or reduced to a remnant as we are today, Catholics and Catholicism endures, and will fight until the end of time against the Enemy and his minions.
All else is lies and nonsense.
And no; there is no weak-assed “turn the other butt-cheek to immigrants” nonsense in Catholicism.
In your fake Churchianity pretending at Christianity? Sure, all the time.
In Catholicism? None. Never has been, never will be.
And that, is really all there is to it.
This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here
As it has always been.
This post was very well written , although it is long, I strongly suggest you read the whole thing.
My own take has been very much the same for decades. As I documented here and in various other pieces in the past. Note how the hackers that took out the OG blog last October had memory holed this specific post (scroll down to the table if you can’t be bothered to read the intro, and you’ll see my very first point on that post’s table)
There is no doubt in my mind that the OG blog was attacked by state level actors, as everything we discovered about it points to that.
The point is, that I have been making this historically undeniable observation for decades, but the article linked to by Kulak is very well put and makes the case in an undeniable fashion.
Though, I am sure he was unaware of me, it needs saying I have said the same thing long before he did and not anonymously either.
Violence IS like it or not, unfortunately, always the ultimate answer.
This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here
Another theological Kurganing is required. Sadly, this specimen came to my attention due to Postcards from Barsoom , who thinks it was really profound. I like John, but he’s basically retarded on anything theological.
***
A silly Pagan , thinking he’s very erudite and studied and knowledgeable and blah, blah, blah, has written a tragically long exposition of what he calls Roman Hellenism, and this being the “religion” he now believes. If you are already familiar with Greek and Roman mythology you can skip 2/3 or maybe 3/4 of his essay and lose nothing, but the last part if the one I will focus on, taking it apart one point at a time given that his title is:
In my view , Christianity demands intellectual and spiritual surrender to a framework that contradicts both divine justice and natural order.
Christianity 1 clearly does no such thing, since it is verily founded on divine justice, and love, and permeate the entirety of the natural order as we find it.
But we will see all his errors as we proceed to quote him, then correct him.
I cannot accept a religion that negates the nobility of the soul, the legitimacy of ancestral tradition, and the manifold revelation of the divine across time and peoples.
What the HELL (and yes, it is hellish what he “argues”) is he even talking about? Only he knows, because the very premise of Christianity is that every soul is absolutely wonderful and worthy of God’s love. What could be more noble than that?
Is he joking? Christianity has the longest traditions of any other religion.
And as for divine revelation, there is not other religion that has had as many miracles, revelations, both personal and public, as our Lady when she appeared in various very public way from time to time.
My rejection is not a rebellion. It is a reasoned refusal.
Nonsense. It’s not even remotely based on fact, as you would know if you’d spent 20 minutes with an actual Catholic, or actually researching Catholicism. So AT BEST it’s a totally ignorant position based on the retarded delving into actual demonology, without ANY counter-research, OR, he’s just that stupid, OR he’s an actual deceiver intent on fooling others into following in his footsteps.
Christianity asserts that salvation is possible only through one man, one book, One historical revelation.
Leaving aside the specifics for a moment, let’s not forget that regardless of WHAT you may think that truth is, there is ONLY ONE, possible truth. Not a kaleidoscope of nonsense where “everyone has their own truth”. So… IF we find out what actually works, what actually fits reality, what, in short, is TRUE, then guess what Pagan-boy, EVERYTHING ELSE IS WRONG.
In a world shaped by centuries of culture, myth, and philosophy, I cannot accept that the divine would restrict access to truth so narrowly.
Translation: The truth hurts my fee-fees, so I am going to reject it in favour of whatever perverse nonsense I want to “believe in” not because it’s true, but because it suits me.
The truth is ONE. Even absent God, it would still be the case that the ultimate truth is simply ONE.
See the cognitive dissonance this idiot/liar tries to pass off as “wisdom”.
This claim not only denies the dignity of all other traditions,
You mean like the “dignity” of the Muslim saying raping 9 year olds is fine cause their “prophet” did it? Or the Jews saying raping toddlers and babies under 3 is not a crime in their Talmud? Or the practice of the Hindus to burn the wives of dead husbands on the pyre? Or maybe of the Aztecs cutting out still-beating hearts from men, women and children to their sun God? Or the blood-eagle of the Northmen? No, no, please, go on… enlighten us.
but makes the sacred a bound to geography and timing.
It does neither. Obvious lie. Jesus went to Hell to free all those souls prior to Him that were trapped there and did not deserve eternal damnation, and has given the way to salvation since. And anyone not aware of Him gets judged on their conscience. So, yeah, I am leaning towards dishonest liar at this point, since this is a basic tenet of Catholicism. And if he is not intentionally lying, then he is criminally incompetent metaphysically and his rubbish should be exposed (as I am doing).
It implies that the majority of human beings, before Christ, outside the Church, or beyond the West, are condemned or excluded.
Already dealt with this deceptive idiocy above.
I find that morally untenable.
I find liars morally untenable. And idiots as verbally/scriptorially untenable. As in they should STFU until they actually have anything even remotely non-retarded to say.
By contrast, Roman Hellenism sees truth as something revealed in many forms, to many peoples.
And here we have it… the “everyone has their own truth maaaan…(puffs on some weed/tmc/ayuhasca/peyote/cocaine blend)
The gods speak with many voices.
Indeed because these “gods” are LEGION. As is perfectly explained in the Bible, verified by reality as we find it, etc.
Each land has its rites. Each people honours the divine in the way proper to them.
Yes, we already covered this above…Hinduism, Islam, Judaism, blah, blah, blah… So you are saying you are pro-child rape. Got it.
Universality does not mean sameness.
It literally does. Invest in a dictionary, you moron.
The Roman framework accepts that truth is refracted, not monopolized.
Wow. For word-salad, content-free expressions, this one is quite the mouthful. You clearly have a career in politics.
No single revelation can contain the whole.
Here, let me prove you wrong:
Understand that and you’ll have all of math sorted. Ergo all of logic in due course. Ergo, truth ultimately.
The sacred is not owned.
Wrong. God owns it.
It is recognized.
At which you clearly failed.
In my view, Christianity teaches that man is inherently broken and incapable of rising by his own strength.
This is an observable fact that anyone objective can verify pretty quickly by simple observation, testing and noticing how reality works.
This doctrine offends my understanding of the soul.
AAAAAAAnnnnndddd here we have it ladies and gentlemen. What did I say above? It’s all about what upsets HIM! Because HE, you see, is the most important hing in the Universe. His feelings! Not truth, not reality, BUT HOW HE FEELS! It’s HIS Fee-Fees! How Could you?!?!?!
Her’s a newsflash buddy: Reality doesn’t care. No one else does either. God might care about you, but even He lets you be as retarded as you want and choose your own ego, and the Hell that comes with it, instead of facing reality, if that is the egomaniacal path you want to choose.
I hold that the soul, while capable of error, is divine in origin and capable of returning to the good through reason, virtue, and divine guidance. It does not require a supernatural pardon to be worthy. The idea that even the most righteous pagan is lost without belief strikes me as a betrayal of divine justice.
No one gives a shit what you think. You’re stupid, make gross errors of basic logic and research, and no one sane could possibly give your nonsensical “ideas” a minute of time, given the overwhelming evidence of how flawed your thinking is already, as exposed above.
Roman Hellenism affirms that the soul is a spark of the divine. It is placed in the world not as punishment but as trial.
Show me where in Christianity it says we are placed here as punishment. The fucking lies man. You gotta quit doing that.
The gods do not require us to abase ourselves. They call us to rise. Through discipline, sacrifice, and contemplation, the soul returns to its origin.
Show me where Christianity says you should be undisciplined, not sacrifice, and not contemplate, and show me how what you wrote above is the diametrical opposite of what Christianity says, which is what you are implying. We’ll wait.
The rites prepare the soul. The virtues shape it.
Uh… again… I think you’re stealing concepts from Christianity and pretending they are Pagan ideas —which by the way, they are absolutely not. The Pagan concept of “salvation” doesn’t even exist. It’ Hades for everyone except those favoured by the Gods, who MIGHT have got to Elysium. And you get “favoured” by pleasing the gods or being liked by them because they want to fuck you (literally) or use you in some scheme of their own backstabbing “mean girls on Olympus” games. Ever heard of the Illiad? The Odyssey? No? Nothing? Always up there in the stellar department on basic concepts and research eh?
Nothing is owed to original sin. Man is not born damned. He is born capable.
And yet here we are, with morons like you wandering the streets thinking they are capable… go figure.
Christianity scarcely integrates other sacred traditions.
Rephrasing: Mathematics hardly integrates the colour purple and the concept of “clouds” in its calculations!
Alternative rephrasing: We must stop this NOT mixing of sewage (lies) with ice cream (truth). We MUST blend them for best results!
It has historically demanded their abolition.
Just as I will continue to demand abolition of retards that say 2+2=Wednesday.
It replaces the rich plurality of the divine with a single absolute.
Translation: It replaces endless lies, confusion, sophistry and fog with truth, clarity and beauty.
It declares the old gods to be lies, demons, or dead metaphors.
Because they are. Again, just basic observation of the claimed behaviour of the “gods” suffices to prove the point. The reference to them in Psalms especially further proves the point unambiguously.
Roman Hellenism does not behave this way.
You mean demons don’t admit to being demons??!?! Gasp! Say it’s not so!
It places no contradiction between universal divinity and particular forms.
Translation: It places no distinction between truth and lies. It’s all the same, and nothing is ever true. You have your own “truth” you special breed of creature, you!
Christianity insists on a monopoly.
Translation: Truth insists on it being the only truth.
I believe divinity is not exclusive.
Translation 1: I believe everyone has their own “truth”.
Translation 2: I want lies to be the “truth” so I can appease my fee-fees and perversions.
Roman Hellenism acknowledges the gods of other nations as part of cosmological order.
Translation: As is clearly explained Biblically the Demons have reign over some specific places.
The Romans built temples to other European gods and linked them to native ones through understanding, not destruction.
Translation and observation of fact: You gotta respect the lies of other demons lest they start people thinking maybe there is only ONE truth.
The world is full of divine powers.
He spelt demonic entities wrong.
The more we honour, the more we understand.
Honour what?
Real meaning: The more you serve a specific demon, the more fake power and ego-boosts they will give you to continue down the wrong path.
There is no fear of multiplicity.
I.e. we like and accept all the lies. We have to. Otherwise I can’t do my perverse shit if I ban you from doing your perverse shit. Anything goes! Oh… wait… except ONE THING: The actual truth. We gotta ban that!
The gods are not in conflict.
Actually demons are in conflict all the time, they just happen to hate us more than each other at least until they get us to Hell, then in their own realm they hate each other just as much. What he means here though is: All the lies live together in harmony in the Pagan lifestyle.
They exist in a hierarchy.
Oh, so he DOES know demons have a hierarchy too.
I extend this view to Christianity as well. I don’t know who, or where the Lord God, or Yahweh as he is called truly belongs to, but I won’t deny a Christian’s own personal faith, or influence he may have.
As long as it’s more of the same nonsensical non-truth (i.e. Protestantism) with 40,000 versions. The one you will NOT accept is the only real one that rejects all the lies and says plainly that unless you follow the truth you will be lost. i.e. Catholicism.
Many forms, and what seems to be dominant forms of Christianity separate man from his ancestry, his nation, and his sacred rites.
No. There is only ONE actual form of Christianity, always has been and always will be only one. Actual Catholicism. Which today is espoused uniquely by Sedevacantists that are aware there has been no valid Pope since 1958 and hold the Totalist position (I.e. Actual Catholicism as it has always been). And in no way does Catholicism separate a man from his ancestry, quite the contrary.
I descent from marauding Vikings, who then converted to Catholicism and became Crusaders in due course. You are probably an American, or Canadian, or some Anglo, descendent from Protestant heretics who lost their way from the truth a few centuries ago and are now the inhabitants of freemasonic created countries.
It teaches that true loyalty is owed to a spiritual kingdom, not to one’s people, laws, or gods.
So in communist Soviet Union you would be a good Stasi right? In Aztec culture you would murder babies. Or even today, in secular West you also would murder babies when you get some slattern pregnant and it’s inconvenient for your sport-fucking habit, right? Hey, I mean, it’s the LAW! And hey, some of the Gods think it’s fine to rape anyone you find attractive, and all sorts of other evil shit. But hey, that’s the gods, so you gotta do… well… whatever you ant right? That’s the Pagan way, do as thy will. Wait… who says that again? Hmmm…. Horns, hooves, red guy… nope..can’t think of it…
This is not how I understand the divine.
Clearly you understand very little about very little. Starting with BASIC research. BASIC logic. Etcetera. Focus on things you can cope with, such as using the velcro straps on your shoes. Because shoelaces are clearly a trap for someone like you.
The gods dwell in hearth and home, in the customs of one’s ancestors, in the ceremonies that bind the living to the dead. Religion that denies these, to me, is not liberation. It is alienation.
My ancestors were Catholic Crusaders and Pagan Vikings before that. Yours were clearly inbreeders if your level of “intellect” is anything other than go by, and just like mine stopped being murdering marauders, you should try not to breed with family anymore, mhhhm-kay? To each the baby steps they can cope with, eh?
In Roman Hellenism, the gods are not distant. They live in the household shrine, in the laws of the city, in the soil of one’s homeland. To honour them is to honour one’s father and grandfather.
Wait, were your father and grandfather practicing rites to Apollo? Gutting doves to read their entrails and divine what Athena might wish of them? They killed heifers and gave libations to Zeus? Really? We wanna see the 8mm films of that shit. What’s that? You only have some stills from Bohemian Grove? Ah… okay, we see.
To remember them is to uphold one’s duty. The soul does not rise by shedding its roots.
Souls do not have Pagan roots you cretin. We were created sinless by God (Adam and Eve? Ever hear of that?) then they corrupted themselves and everyone after them and we kept fucking things up by breeding with demons…errr… or as you would have it “being favoured by the “gods” whenever they got horny near a sexy looking human, which made the “Titans” Nephilim, or “Demi-Gods” and God had to flood the Earth and start again, but yeah… still didn’t go well, so he devised a perennial solution for all time with the only condition being we need to choose it of our own free will to not end up separate from him (in Hell). Seems you have made your choice.
It rises by fulfilling them.
Which means going back to source, i.e. God. Not his fallen angels pretending to be “gods”.
There is no conflict between the divine and the ancestral. There is harmony.
Depends on the ancestral. And keep in mind in secular terms you are saying the idiocy that there is only “harmony” with you and whatever your ancestors got up to. Including their raping and murdering people, because it was “fine” in their time/place/era/belief system.
It is not necessary to reject my Christian ancestors in order to reject the framework they inherited. I believe their Christianity, for all its dogma and later distortions, was still a real expression of reverence and order. I do not see their prayers as wasted or their churches as empty. They carried forward the sacred under a different name. They did not choose their religion in the way we do now.
Thanks for admitting quite clearly you will choose your religion based on your wishes and personal perversions and not reality, truth, or objective fact.
It was the world they inhabited. Their altars were directed toward Christ, but their instincts remained Roman.
Word-salad number 2, not as good as the earlier one, but still pretty decent totally content-free expression.
The way they built their cities, ruled their homes, honoured their dead, and upheld their kin bore the same structure that shaped the ancient world. Their piety was not erased. It was redirected.
What nonsense. Catholicism upended the entire Roman pantheon and consequently the way people acted, behaved and related to each other. Anyone not seeing this (or rather, pretending no two) is an abject deceiver.
The last thousand years of Christian history are not a betrayal of what came before. They are a vessel of it. The rites changed, but the impulse endured. Their sense of virtue, hierarchy, and sacred time mirrors the older tradition more than it mirrors modernity.
More nonsense. Catholicism overturned all the inhuman and vicious practices of the barbaric demon-imbibed cults that preceded it.
Their devotion to saints and martyrs was functionally the cult of heroes. Their festivals echoed the civic calendar.
No. They are a literal re-creation of Jesus’s life and resurrection.
Their liturgies were not drawn from Scripture, but from temple rites.
Factual absurd lie. In case you haven’t noticed, we don’t offer burned meats at the altar.
The incense, hymns, and consecrated spaces were preserved forms. Christianity did not invent metaphysics. It inherited them. Its deepest theologians—Augustine, Boethius, Aquinas—were shaped by Cicero, Seneca, Plotinus, and Plato. Even Dante could not consign the noble ancients to hell. They stood in peace, in limbo, bathed in honour.
If not in heaven. Because as we have already stated, those who were deemed good before Christ did not remain in the torments of Hell. It’s why Jesus descend into Hell. Remember? And Dante was Catholic and knew this. You absolute moron.
That vision admits the ancient truth: that the soul can ascend without revelation, and that the gods never ceased speaking.
No. It admits, as it always did that God is perfect Justice, Mercy and Love, and no one ends up in Hell by anything other than their own choice and actions. Just like you are doing here, lying through your teeth.
Roman Hellenism affirms what Christianity once preserved. It gives me a vision of the sacred that is rational, ordered, and plural.
The sacred, (i.e. truth) by definition, cannot be plural. You deceiving, egomaniacal idiot. It can ONLY be one.
It does not demand erasure of my ancestors but helps me understand them.
Show me where Catholicism demands the erasure of the past or truth?
In fact it specifically reminds us of the historical truth of the past precisely so we can avoid re-committing the same errors.
They walked in the light they were given. I walk in mine. We are not in conflict. We are a procession. The blood did not break. The line did not end. What lived in them lives in me, but with clearer vision and a truer name.
Yes. It’s clearer today. You’re choosing, of your own free will, to serve lies and demons in order to appease your base vile desires. It’s very clear.
Of course, to be clear the ONLY Christianity that exists and has EVER existed is Catholicism and the ONLY valid Catholicism left today is the one espoused by Totalist Sedevacantists of the 1958 persuasion.
This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here
***
On the post on Balls , I explained why women like Catherine will self-deceive, and drop their knickers for a man that they will either:
Women generally tend to be publicly incredulous of such men having an effect on them, but privately they do know that it can indeed happen to them.
But there are also male skeptics who just assume such situations are just fairy tales that only happen in porn movies (which they are intimately familiar with). Even then, the porn film scenario “irks” them because they see it as “unrealistic”.
Now, if you are one of those kinds of men that has had this sort of thing happen to him on a fairly regular basis, or a woman that has succumbed to this sort of instant attraction, you know full well it’s a real thing that happens.
If you’re also a logical human being, you will similarly understand that just because it happens doesn’t mean it’s necessarily common (though it can be relatively common for those whom are of this type).
This is easily understood and accepted in pretty much any other field.
If I told you that you’d likely die trying to race the same car and match the speed Ayrton Senna did at any of the circuits where he did not die, you would probably accept that there is a fair chance that is true.
In the realm of sports, intellectual endeavours, art, and pretty much any other field, most people are ready to accept their limitations and recognise that a small percentage of men are far more capable than them.
When it comes to sexual chemistry and the ability to become intimate quickly, or be found almost irresistibly attractive, to a woman, especially a woman that most think would not behave in such a fashion, for some reason, a rather larger group of men and women both become far more dubious.
Perhaps it’s because many people lie about their sexual conquests, or prowess, perhaps it’s because the average man is really not very enticing at all and in fact, less and less so as time passes, and so women find it difficult to imagine such men still exist. And men themselves continue to be ever more feminised so they can’t imagine themselves being those kind of guys, much less actually be them.
But whatever the case is, the types that are most stridently against believing such power exists in some men are entrenched feminist women (i.e. usually the embittered and unfuckable ones, because no one wants them, and it is in fact true for them that short of an actual miracle, no one will ever glance in their general direction with the kind of animal attraction we are describing here). The other type that will tend to not believe this are Gamma males, Omegas, and a large chunk of Deltas.
The more aware Omegas may appreciate that such events happen, but they rightly realise it will likely never happen to them specifically. Most Deltas, will also imagine this is all part of some Hollywood fantasy and women either don’t behave like that, or no men really elicit that kind of response in women. Some Deltas that have seen it happen before their eyes because they may be on friendly terms with some guy that does have this presence, will tend to be like the more aware Omegas “Yes it can happen, Mr. X cleans up and women love him, but it’s because [insert rationalisation here, accurate or not as it may be (usually not too accurate)]”.
And then there are the really bitter ones. These are guys that may even look decent, have money, wear good clothes and have manicured hands. In other words, they are guys that have spent time and effort to make themselves into what the world tells you that you need to been order to be a “catch” any woman will want.
And they still fail.
There are two types, the Elliot Rodger incels, who eventually probably do become a mass shooter risk, because they drank the Kool-aid of “what women want” but continue to have utterly pestilentially-radioactive personalities, and aside possibly paying for it, they will not get laid at all. And may in fact even be rejected by professional prostitutes, because they may well sense the intrinsic hatred such men end up feeling toward women in general.
The other type is the kind that actually does get laid fairly regularly, but ultimately remains incapable of forming lasting or meaningful relationships. This type can be confusing because there is a tendency to assume all fukbois are equivalent, but as with anything, if you pay attention there are subdivisions. Broadly speaking (ladies, pay attention) there are three types of fuckbois, and they can be a bit confusing to differentiate, if you are a young innocent. They are:
This last, the Fake Man, is the one that will disbelieve other men get the kind of instant and instinctive attraction, especially from the type of women that they pine for secretly, more than anyone else, including the feminist woman. And if and when they see such an interaction take place, or are presented with inescapable proof of it (say the woman in question admitting to the event that got her to now be with a Mr. X) between what they assume is an “inferior” man and a woman they were hoping to attract until a second earlier, rather than re-evaluate their skewed view of reality, they will act like a deranged feminist and try to deny reality instead. Suddenly the very woman of their dreams is now obviously a dirty and faithless whore and their bitterness at women in general only increases.
Which brings up to the four or five things that actually attract women. Regardless of what women say, it is these things (listed in order of importance – but see below):
Anyway, the point is that items 1 and 4 are the important ones. And they are the two things you simply can’t buy. You either have them or you don’t. And the type 3 “fuckbois”, that is, the Fake Men , just don’t really have these things. Which is why regardless of if married or not, they will continue to be bitter and hate men with a passion that can get genuine devotion from a woman, even while they deny such things are possible. And later, at home, they will cry into their pillow about why THEY don’t get that level of passion, and almost worship, that they see women give to men they deem must be “losers” because they don’t wear a 20k wristwatch.
I am not sure what such men are in the SSH category described by Vox Day, as some can appear to be genuinely superficially successful with women, but are inevitably clearly bitter and unfulfilled with their conquests, and remain envious at a visceral level of men who casually attract devotion from women without even much effort.
Externally they may present as Alphas, or Sigmas, sometimes as Bravos (to a more powerful/rich/more “successful” man in a position of authority over them) but honestly, in my estimation such men are absolute gammas.
Take a Jeff Bezos, in terms of money he has enough that it trumps all sorts of things when compared to almost all men, but take a Clint Eastwood in his prime, or even just a Charles Bronson, and put him next to a Jeff Bezos in his prime, and there is no honest woman on Earth that will say they have the same possibility of “feels” for Jeff that they would for a Clint or a Charles (you young ones will have to google these old (or dead) guys, I don’t know if there are equivalent types in the millennial actors of today). A Yul Brynner for example could hardly be said to be conventionally attractive, yet he had that presence, which a fake like Ben Affleck simply doesn’t have. And yet you can tell Ben sees himself as “the man”. But scratch the surface and there is only a neurotic guy that would seethe until his ears smoke at a Yul Brynner walking in the room and instantly having women of all types take note, even the ones that “don’t think that bald guy is attractive at all”.
Anyway, this rather detailed descriptor of some male equivalents of the embittered feminists have been labelled as pseudo-incels because even if they do get laid, it’s never really satisfying. Not for them, and not for the poor women who get fooled enough to do so. And especially not viable for the long term.
I hope it’s of some use to some of you.
This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here
Car trips with the Young Viking are fast becoming one of my favourite times with him.
Aside the fact he keeps up when I invariably move at “Catholic civilisational speed” whenever I go do errands (usually at the hardware store), and is helpful carrying odds and sods on our way to the car when I have heavier stuff with me, the conversations are positively fascinating and usually of better quality than I have with most adults.
We don’t let them go on iPads and so on, limiting the exposure of screens to the odd duo-lingua “game” but sometimes one of them manages to sneak a YT video on the TV when we are otherwise occupied, less so now that we are getting. more organised, but somewhere along the line they had got enough exposure that he was interested or knew who Mr. Beast was.
I barely know who he is other than a YT “personality” that is a ticket-taking fake that has some or various associations to some or multiple pedophile adjacent generic evil scum. It’s part of the reason why YT type videos are banned and they can only watch the occasional full feature film. I have explained to them in basic terms why that is, in accordance with their age, and he is generally keen to impress me with his ability to grasp the concepts I discuss with him, but keep in mind that I have NOT discussed with him any theology at all aside taking him to church when HE asks me, or his sisters do (they are all generally always happy to do so as a little team of savages). The full extend of my theological conversations with him has been limited to me showing hm how to kneel and cross himself on entering a Church and doing so before meals.
My reasoning is that knowing my children and the DNA they received from both myself and their mother, trying to impose anything on them by edict is a guaranteed way to have it fail miserably. So I just go about my own way to demonstrate gratefulness to God and as they observe and ask questions I answer them as briefly and simply as possible. Given my general slackness in piety, it’s also a rather subtle event for them to notice. But I know trying to impose any artificial sense of duty on them is absolutely not going to work. Call it Sigma genetics, contrarian DNA, rebellious spirit of freedom, or what have you, but such is the way of my family DNA as far back as anyone ever cared to look.
So… to the story.
We are driving and at some point, out of the blue he mentions Mr.Beast:
YV: Mr Beast is a stupid Youtuber, so I am not going to listen to him, but he has a LOT on money dad. How did he get that?
(He is inordinately aware of the concept of money, and was since I think he could speak. And the value of Gold. I have no idea why or how, as it’s not anything we particularly care about or discuss)
Me: Well, guys like that, they get given a lot of money to present in certain way, or try to influence how people think.
YV: But who gives them money?
Me: Not good people. People who want you to believe all the lies they say. So you see people like that on YouTube and you think he’s cool and good, but really he’s teaching you lies while you don’t realise.
YV: So they take money to lie?
Me: Pretty much, yeah.
YV: But why?
Me: People are weak son. There are two types of people, the ones that will take money if you offer them enough of it, and the ones who will not.
YV: How do you mean?
Me: Ok, let me make an example. Remember when I gave you and your sister 10 euro for helping clean up the drive?
YV: Yes
Me: Ok, that was like getting paid to do a job, right? It was no problem to do that, I didn’t ask you to do anything bad, or wrong.
YV: Yeah.
Me: Ok what if I or someone else said: “I’ll give you a 100 euro, but you need to punch your little sister in the face” what would you say then?
YV: (indignant) No!
Me: What if it’s a thousand euro?
YV: No! I don’t care how much money they say.
Me: Good. That’s the right way to be son.
YV: I don’t care if it’s a lot of money, because family is the most importantest thing! (yes he said it that way, not a typo).
Then he paused for about two seconds and added:
YV: Except for God. God is the most important of all.
I am not often at a loss for words, but I did glance at him while driving, he was his usual impassive and calm self, looking out the front of the car at the road.
I mean, he is 6.
I was well over my mid-forties before I tentatively concluded the same, and sometimes I am still hovering on the brink of family before God now, and got it at age 6.
In the end all I could say was just…
Me: Yes. You’re right [YV name].
Honestly I think he’s teaching me more about God than I ever will teach him anything on the subject.
This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here
