While this starts out with a critique and someone else’s video, and a mild rant about why things are bad now, it ends by making something fairly obvious really clear to everyone, and it is the simple answer to actually creating the kind of West that we want.
I am not a particularly huge fan of Andrew Wilson. He talks a pretty good game and he seems to have a solid marriage and generally be what the boomers call “based”, however, in making his living he sort of promotes a stereotype of vapid OF girls, gold-diggers and so on. The Whatever podcast he appears on regularly is basically reality TV for “men”, and his knowledge of his “Christianity” is such that as an Eastern Schismatic he had no idea what the Haga Sophia is. Oh and he point blank refused to argue with me on the merits of Eastern Schismatics vs Catholic Sedevacantists. Which I suppose is fine since he calls himself an entertainer and political commentator.
I mean, sure there are worse people than him on the internet, no doubt, and he is sort of at least holding the line in some respect. Although his “Christianity” is more of a shield for the grift I suppose and I am not a fan of that.
All that said, this video he comments on the two women on for the first few minutes then segues away into child rearing and he does make excellent points in both cases, so take the ten minutes or so and watch it.
What is particularly interesting is the first part of the video where the two women are positively horrified at the thought that even nominally “Christian” men are basically avoiding pairing up with the likes of them and essentially turning away from any woman that is not ready, able and willing to be what for want of a better word, most Americans refer to as a “traditional” wife/woman.
Allow me then to correct a few basic principles, so that you may act upon the correct reality of things and not a cheap clone that malfunctions shortly after being “activated”.
The so called “traditional” wife is, and can only be, an ACTUAL CATHOLIC WOMAN.
This means a 1958 sedevacantist.
You do not have to believe me.
You do not have to like it.
You can insist on being wrong about this as hard and with as many false “facts” as you like, but the simple truth of the matter is that there are only very few societies that had an actual FUNCTIONING family relationship. And I use the term functioning rather loosely. Off the top of my head:
- Ancient Romans – The man was the head of the household with literal power of life and death over wife and children. He could kill them and they would be considered merely disposal of his own property.
- Feudal Japan – It was accepted that Samurai class types would have a mistress or more and a wife to bear him the legitimate children.
- Ancient Greeks/Sparta – Not too dissimilar to the Ancient Romans
- Imperial China (I believe. I am not as clued up on their history)
Now, many an intel would love to be in one of those systems, but personally,I would not. And I would guess most women would not either.
There has been only ONE religion where the following list of features applied:
- Marriage has to be VOLUNTARY by bot parties, without coercion or any outside pressure on it taking place.
- The marriage is for life without possibility of divorce.
- The primary purpose of it is to make and raise children.
- The woman is cherished for her role as mother, wife, and woman. Her duties, sacrifices and roles being well understood and her being protected, cared for and treated respectfully for it.
- The man still heads the household.
- The man has the absolute duty to protect and provide for his family and loved ones and to protect the innocent.
- The concept of Just War, as well as defending of innocents absolutely allowed for violence to take place if needed, even pre-emptively. Self defence being a duty too.
- The death penalty for certain crimes is dogmatic.
- The rule of law is based on Roman Law. That is, the principle governs the law. A far superior legal system, where each crime is judged on its individual merits or illegalities, not based on case law. Murdering an old lady to steal her pension carries the death penalty. Murdering a pedophile caught in flagrante delicto, might not even constitute a crime at all.
- The religious duties, dogmas and rules are all written down in one document, based on 2,000 years of success with this religion and the societies it created.
But as we are focussing on marriage and women, and children, there really is simply no other religion that has been as objectively valid and correct on marriage. Protestants were directly responsible for the very concept of divorce, which of course leads to sex before marriage (try before you buy) which then leads to sport fucking, which then leads to killing babies because they get in the way of sport fucking. So yeah, if you’re a Protestant, be silent. Your entire fake 40,000 versions of heresy have only served to secularise actual Christianity and then infiltrate it to the point that as of 1958 on we have not had a valid Pope or anyone Catholic presently in the Vatican at all.
But I told you I’d give you a solution right?
And here it is:
Reject all women who are not down to making a bunch of babies with you and staying married even if you become a nasty alcoholic (which should NOT be your aim in life, just to be clear). And of course, the same goes for you, you stay married even if she becomes a crack whore.
Some 80% of women are already not finding men to marry that they think are suitable for them and about 60% of them are likely to die alone, except maybe for the cats that will feed on their rotting corpse for days after they overdose on cookie dough and despair.
More than 50% of them will not have children apparently.
Some people think that is sad and a tragedy.
Being somewhat of a contrarian, I’m all for it. The stupids are self-selecting out of the gene pool.
Since I got married as a Catholic 7 years ago, we have had 3 children, one more about to be born possibly today, and unfortunately one miscarriage. And we started late. I am 55 and my wife is 43.
When we get together with two other Catholic families, I think we had 15 children a year or so ago and I think we are now at 18. Young Catholic families we know who all got married last year are all already on baby number one and probably soon working towards baby number two.
Ask me how worried I am that idiots who think the West is lost are not making a bunch of children. Or those who believe any number of heretical nonsense (which is their way to hold onto their personal views on “reality” because it suits their feelings, not because it matches observable reality).
Ask me how worried I am that the third worlders are the only ones matching us for number of children produced. Sure, it’s a little concern, but if you are a student of history you will know that the Crusaders often, regularly in fact, beat odds of more than 100 to 1 when fighting Muslims. I really don’t think much has changed in that regard despite all the modern technology. In fact it might be closer to 1,000 to 1 now.
It really doesn’t matter what you think.
It doesn’t matter what your theories on men and women are.
It doesn’t matter how much of a raging intel you might be.
The only thing that matters is that only those women willing and able to make a bunch of children with their chosen husband will make a difference. So those are the only ones you should be looking to wife-up.
They really are the best of women. I have yet to meet a properly Catholic wife that I don’t have the utmost respect for. They tend to be outstanding women. Capable in a way and to a degree of functionality under the most trying conditions that makes me literally be in humble awe of their female skills.
I am rarely impressed by the skill of most men at most anything. It does happen of course, my friend’s knowledge and ability with tractors. My dad’s ability with guns. Or my grandfather’s which was even better at it. Some men I have met who have some skill at a level I either don’t posses or in any case admire. Generally however, it is a single skill. With Catholic women I suppose you could reduce it to “motherhood” or “wife” but the reality is that both those categories include a veritable cloud of skills.
I often make the joke that what women mean when they say that they can “multi-task, unlike men,” is that they can screw up five things at once instead of just one.
However, with Catholic wives, which inevitably have more than four or five children (we have six now, and most have 7 or 8 and more on the way) their ability appears to me not exactly to be to multi-task, but certainly far above a mere singular endeavour. It’s more like holding at bay, or even directing, something similar to a tsunami, or a fog.
It makes me wonder if such a skill were transferrable and applied on a battlefield, how it would play out. I am also almost entirely certain that a woman would not be able to transfer that very ability, which is ultimately life-affirming, dedication, and self-sacrifice, into its diametrically opposite endeavour, which is the ending of lives in a military context.
But in any case, the point is:
If you do not hitch your wagon to anyone other than a properly Catholic woman, your chances of ensuring your progeny lives on, are greatly improved.
And yes, yes, I know all the issues:
Oh but there are so few of them! Not true, go to where they are.
No but seriously, there aren’t any even in my country! Never mind City! Great. Make one/some.
Oh but the courtship is so weird! Deal with it.
Oh but [insert life is hard and chances of success are small variation on a theme here]. Yes it is. Yes they are. That’s the odds. And not playing only guarantees you too become just another faceless statistic.
Good Luck young man.
This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here
