There are so many labels for a supposedly “new” sociopolitical order, and pretty much all of them are totally infested with the completely Protestant plague of binary, exclusionist, absolutist thinking that is most obvious in their most retarded of exemplars; the Calvinists.
This means the labels are useless, because ill-defined. Word salads:
- Alt-Right – as opposed to what? The “conservatives” that conserved nothing? Not to mention the fact it was coined by a Fed-funded, trust-fund baby, state sponsored gatekeeper/infiltrator whose name is very much Dick (di)Spenser – and people don’t realise God has a sense of humour!
- Christian Nationalism – this is the Churchian version of “White Nationalism”. A retarded phrase of absolute zero meaning because coined by Americanism in general, meaning the 45,000 and counting, versions of “Christianity” they subscribe to which all have precisely zero dogma beyond that which demons too have: Recognising Jesus is Lord. Literally that is the only dogma of any Protestant “denomination” (heresy).
- National Socialism – the frustrated incels glorifying Hitler and the Nazis, while a certain level of sympathy can be assumed IF you actually know the truth behind the financing if Hitler, the various absurdities of the Holocaust narrative (starting with the “official” numbers) we have all been fed, and just precisely what books the Nazis were burning, and why, as well as the crazy but real technological advances they made, the fact is that as a political ideology it is fairly terrible, was corrupt to the core in the higher echelons of power, murderous to a vile degree and in any case is completely toxic to most people who simply drank the kool-aid of the 20 billion deaths caused by being dropped from space vehicles that we have all been force fed (or other equally absurd and false “history”, such as eagle and bears in cages, human skin lampshades and so on).
- Patriot Front – (and all their various European analogues) totally transparent fed-operated trap to identify potential rebellious inclined men.
And whatever else they will coke up with. All of them are ill or non-defined and are just buzzwords in essence.
I propose therefore a new and precisely defined term:
Ethnoreligious Order
What is meant by that is as follows:
A political and social ideology that focuses primarily on the needs, security and defence of the native people of a country, state, nation or self-determining geographical area, that is predominantly catering to the native religious belief and practice of said people and which allows only a set minority of people from alternative ethnicities and religions to inhabit the same geographical area, without any official representation of different religions.
While nowhere on Earth other than possibly some Arab states follow this general set of principles, in practical terms, in the West this is pretty much a radical idea that most normalised NPCs would find “abhorrent” not because it would produce bad results, but simply because they have been brainwashed into thinking sewage is spring-water.
In practical terms then, and in order, the following things would be important:
- The ethnic background of the individuals in the geographic region should be at minimum 95% coherent.
- The official religion of the nation in question should in fact regulate daily life and the laws of the nation. While there should be some separation between the secular enforcement arm of the nation, and the religious order/hierarchy of it, the general rule is that the ecclesiastical powers would largely dictate the laws of the nation on the basis of the religion, with some margin of “error” or latitude allowed to the secular enforcement arm of the nation.
- While people would not be forced to belong to the national religion, it is understood that undermining it, blaspheming against it, or trying to subvert it would be punishable to various (usually civil) extents.
- No other religious orders would be permitted to have temples, official representation, or Churches, Synagogues, Mosques, or anything else. Private practice of alternative religions would not be forbidden, but proselytising for them would be, with again, mostly civil penalties for breaking the law in this regard.
- Tourists/Visitors would be warned well in advance and upon entry what sort of behaviour is expected from them and what will not be tolerated. Punishments for transgressions should be swift and decisive along with permanent banning from re-entry when required.
-
Persons of a different ethnicity/culture/religion are of course permitted to become residents of the nation, but with certain provisos:
- They are not allowed to vote or hold ANY government office, not sponsor, advise, lobby, or in any other way try to influence local and national government or their officials in any way. Transgression of this would be reason for immediate and permanent expulsion from the country.
- Any children of theirs would similarly be affected.
- Any children of a mixed marriage would be similarly affected, but their children, if done with a native, would be considered full citizens, but not if done with a non-native.
- The total number of individuals not of native descent should be always limited to no more than 5% or less of the native population.
- Marriage would generally be subject to the religious practices of the native religion, so foreign practices of polygamy, divorce, etc. would not be considered acceptable, recognised, or valid from a national/governmental perspective.
Does this sound incredibly radical? I am sure it does. Would it be really an oppressive authoritarian hellhole? It may devolve into that, eventually, because humans have the capacity to reduce everything to its worst possible version, but presently, it would be a much needed improvement and a breath of fresh air in Europe.
For one, crime statistics would absolutely plummet.
For another, after some initial grumbling, things would fast become so efficient and positive people would find it hard to disagree.
Of course, the actual religion itself needs to be followed, not some facsimile of it, so for example, the Novus Ordo fake version of Catholicism that is actually an inversion of the real Catholicism would need to be recognised for the Satanic practice it is.
Yes, I realise this is a rather Utopic term in terms of making it happen on a global scale, but then, as we know, only the unreasonable men cause actual human progress. And before that happens, it needs to start with an idea.
And yes, I have absolutely no problem with the Indians reverting back to their Hindi practices, the Muslims to theirs, the Jews to theirs, each in their OWN nations, not in mine.
The point is that such a nation, by allowing but also placing a limit of the divergence from the religion and cultural ethnicity of its members would function very efficiently.
I for example, in theory, would be able to live in Japan. I am an outlier as a Westerner in that regard because I am fairly drenched in understanding of Japanese culture from a young age, have visited the place and found it quite liveable, despite, of course, my being extremely aware that I am a barbaric foreigner in their land and will be judged as such by some, regardless of how I actually behave. And that I will NEVER be Japanese, no matter how long I would live there, even if I had a Japanese wife and made a bunch of half-breeds with her.
Because you see, gentle reader, that is REALITY.
And nothing good comes of pretending reality is not what it is.
There is nothing wrong in noting and even legislating for our differences. I for example tend to generally agree with somewhat lower sentences for violent crimes committed by women that are identical to violent crimes committed by men.
But of course, beyond a certain point, the death penalty applies anyway, and in some instances, that penalty should be served by burning at the stake.
I know you think me a crazy reactionary absurdist. But I assure you, if I become Emperor for a year, you would see such improvements within months that you would struggle to retain your brainwashed idea of what is “fair” and “just” and “democratic”.
So, I hope you will actually ponder the idea for a bit. Regardless of your own religious and political beliefs, try to imagine a country run on these principles, with YOUR religion, and YOUR ethnicity at its core. Think on it. Imagine it. Feel it.
This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here
