It is the very foundation of modernity.
Tell me dear reader, how useful, necessary and good would it be for someone to need to sexually objectify themselves (whatever that pseudo-language means) in order to do a PhD degree thesis on the topic itself?
Because this woman apparently is flashing a bit of soft-core covered-up titty on the internet “for her PhD” guys!
It’s resolving big important issues no doubt.
When we look at portraits of women from the past, we’re often quick to categorize them in ways that echo Russell’s observations. We might feel discomfort, a sense that these “sexy girls” are somehow less worthy of our serious attention. But if we can recognize that discomfort — and see how it’s rooted in our cultural biases — we can begin to treat these portraits as legitimate, meaningful acts of self-fashioning. Not many people would agree with me about that – but that’s why I am working so hard to cover every angle in my PhD research. I’m kind of keen to prove a lot of people wrong.
Yup. Right up there with the discovery of penicillin and x-rays.
Trying to make sluttery normalised just a bit more. Because an absence of wanton, gold-digging whores with the sexual loyalty of a bonobo on crack is the existential problem of our age. Somehow we need to get more of that I suppose, judging by her PhD.
But fear not. If you wondered whether she was a smart, deep thinker, well… this is how our “conversation” in her comments went:
I opened with what is basically a rhetorical point. I don’t expect her to in any way change her views etc. But she makes a decent example for the point of the previous post: the total brainwashing women have been subjected to that leaves them feeling and acting (and being validated for it apparently) as if the only thing they cam give is the sexual thrill.
This was my comment:
Her reaction?
Play dumb barbie (except she doesn’t have the figure or looks for barbie, and I’m immune to dumb barbie even in person as I was never much into blondes anyways).
Now, keep in mind the STANDARD, first hit on duckduckgo when you type in sluttery is this:
Imminent Phd recipient there boys and girls!
But she felt she had to carry on since the link takes you to this instead:
Which is the first hit which is linkable.
So she chose to pretend that she had NO IDEA what the word sluttery meant, and NO IDEA of which meaning was appropriate to the context of her post.
Now it’s true they hand out PhDs like candy, but if this is reflective of her powers of observation… well… maybe she should just buy her diploma from an online Indian university for $9.99.
But I am nothing if not helpful:
So dear reader, once again, this is not a Kurganing, just pointing out how this poor dear, who happens to have bought hook line and sinker into the whole boomer ethos of free love (she is an open marriage apparently as of a couple of years ago) and she thinks it will continue to work wonderfully to their grave presumably, has reached the point of being so “normalised” in her sluttiness that she wants to now experience being objectified herself, but it’s for science guys, ok?
And it has NOTHING AT ALL to do with the fact that in their open marriage I would bet her husband gets more action (especially of the emotionally intimate variety, not just sexual) than she does.
Or the fact that when she switched from one roomate as “boyfriend” to the other, the first guy didn’t bat an eye.
Or the fact she was living with two guy at age 20 and ended up banging both.
Nope, nope.
Look, I don’t personally care what sexual kinks people have. I was no saint myself. The fact I am now Catholic, even if of the same variety as the Crusaders (ie actual Catholicism, not Novus Ordo Freemasonic Satanism), I genuinely do not care what YOU do in your bedroom. I DO care if you try to present your personal perversion as though it was fine and good for all. Or that ANYONE should “accept it”. For any reason.
But you see… women are herd animals.
Regardless of if she really IS happy having her husband spend the night with his new girlfriend or not, she simply cannot just keep it to herself. She needs the herd to validate her. Her whole “PhD” is light cover for “accept me!”
Does she have children? Would she? How would they fit in such a dynamic? And if not, why not? Has she, in fact, traded the unknown joy of motherhood for the “thrill” of being slutty in her 40s?
Do you think that is a good trade?
Do you think it is the good and true and healthy progress toward a future of open love everywhere?
Because we have enough data on the boomers and their “effects”, and the results are catastrophic.
So think: How did she get here? How did she go from wondering how other “sexy” women look and what it means so much that she wants to do a PhD on it?
And how does PhD in this case not mean
Pretty Hu-seless Degree?
This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here
