I promised the Youtube Subscribers a Video on Antarctica, however I also have very cool paid subscribers on Substack, so I am thinking of testing the video capability of Susbstack and copying the eventual stream here. There is apparently also the ability to do livestreams on substack, but not for me as my phone is ancient, so the livestream version may have to be on YouTube only. In any case, this is just a short video to test the ability of the platform.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

The idiotic, fake “nobleman” and ineffective wanna-be “warrior-philosopher” with the cowardly fake name of Johann Kurtz has ejected from his pasty, weak, cowardly body, another effluent of regurgitated strawman arguments, sophistry, lies and seething rage at his not being one of the “elite” he so desperately aspires to suck off for recognition.

This ambulatory piece of human exrement irks me because he is one of the ten thousand voices of the liars, deceivers, fake wise-men, fake religious, fake everything that is infecting especially young en with false and untenable nonsense ideologies. These parasites prey on the dissatisfaction of young men primarily and feed it lies upon falsehoods, wrapped in deception, self-aggrandisement and a wish to appear knowledgeable or important or, even more laughably, effective.

Before we start the vivisection of his latest blog post, which will be autistically complete, let me remind you that this “paragon” among men, who wants to “become noble” is a shrinking violet too scared and hemmed in by his ACTUAL life, where he is at best a middle manager in some software firm, to even use his real name.

He clearly has always kissed and licked the right assholes to climb the corporate ladder like the soulless little mommy’s boy he is and he tells other young men this is the only way to achieve… suck-cess, his specialty. 1 In other words, he is precisely the opposite of what he pretends to present himself as, a rugged, manly man, of man-like virtue.

And his series of meritocracy is absolute dogshit and he deserves to be exposed for the utter fraud he is, hence, is second Kurganing. The first being here.

But let me now commence the total demolishing of his latest post , sentence by sentence. My comments in bold.

***

The tragedy of elite human capital

Meritocracy IV: The corruption of the elite

Our critical series on meritocracy now comes to a head.

Who is this “we” Kurtzy-boy? You made it all up and literally no one who can read English and owns a dictionary can agree with you on any of it. As I clearly demonstrated in the first Kurganing, you literally don’t even understand the meaning or definition of the wort meritocracy.

We have found that configuring society around an impoverished political philosophy which fails to live up to its name – meritocracy – has various deleterious effects, including the destruction of childhood and the impairment of family formation . Perhaps it is no surprise that it has corrupted our elite, too.

“WE” did no such thing. Notice the sophistic method used here, by using the royal “we” he pretends you are in agreement with his absurd definitions, false narratives and endless strawman “arguments”.

To briefly recap: we first discovered that ‘meritocracy’ is a far more dubious concept than the term, on its face, would imply:

No, again, “we” did no such thing. YOU invented an absurd definition for meritocracy, (who puts in the most effort has “merit” according to you) that no one else has, (Meritocracy means rule by those most effective at producing results, not rule by those making the most (or pretending to do) “effort”. Effort means nothing. Results do.) then tried to pretend it was the actual definition and then “shot it down”. Classic strawman argument.

“What we discovered is that the new concept of meritocracy is… reductive and exclusionary. It represents an attempt to expel a whole range of human richness from traditional understandings of ‘merit’.

No. It does no such thing. In fact meritocracy is how societies largely functioned in Catholic Europe until a bunch of soft-bellied and soft-handed bureaucrats like yourself managed to reproduce by remaining safe in the village, as the local village idiot, while men conquered the world.

Meritocracy is the notion that it is illegitimate to reward a person based on criteria other than a specific and artificial definition of merit, typically characterized by formal examinations and structured evaluations of narrowly-defined performance. Meritocracy adopts tests, reviews, qualifications, credentials, and the quantification of performance and ability. The meritocrat is the ‘Spreadsheet Man’.

I demolished this nonsense in detail in my first Kurganing of this effeminate poseur.

Under meritocracy, it is illegitimate to elevate an individual based on broader criteria, such as whether they are a friend, relative, local, particular sex, member of a known family, member of your faith, member of your class…

In other words, meritocracy is the antithesis of the concept of birthright. It is an attack on the integrity of sovereignty, undermining the ability of the steward of an asset to entirely determine to whom that asset is apportioned according to their own values.”

In Meritocracy is not a good thing , we began an exploration of the logic that inevitably leads to morally diminished elites within ‘meritocratic’ systems:

“Unfortunately, making ‘merit’ synonymous with ‘maximally economically productive’ also makes merit synonymous with a range of less desirable factors: a lack of inconvenient moral values, a lack of desire for a distracting family life, and an absence of ties to a particular locality.

Merit as economic productivity preferences a bias towards tolerance for inhuman working hours, a subservient and predictable personality type, and compliance over criticism or revolt.

Meritocratic institutions embrace those subjects who are transparent rather than complex; those whose achievements are easily summarized on a paper resume, and those who are willing to devote their lives to filling that paper in…

The quality naively implied by the term ‘merit’ and the qualities which are selected for in practice thus diverge widely. In fact, precisely because it subjects elites to Darwinian pressures while not selecting for virtue, meritocracy has the consistent effect of corrupting elites. Careerism is a poor teacher of morality.”

Here we see the whole house of cards of his ideology collapse in flames and ashes. Not only is he so stupid to say he thinks meritocracy is based on effort (instead of results) but he also equates any results to being solely equivalent to the amount of money a person produces (notice he unconsciously implies for others , not even for oneself, which would already be bad enough!) If this is not retardation at levels only seen by generations of inbreeding, I don’t know what is.

Money, especially fiat money, as we have on this fake, gay, and satanic world, is hardly ever a representation of any merit beyond the ability to play the rigged game in such a way that permits you to have a certain level of the fake Monopoly money we unfortunately all need currently to have a semi-decent standard of living.

It is no measure of you being meritorious of anything other than that, which as it is a rigged game, generally means the more money you “have” the more morally compromised you are likely to be. Just ask Elon (Musk), or Jeff (Bezos).

So once again, Kurtzy-boy gets it spectacularly wrong. A man has real merit in the world if he is effective. At what? At being a decent and honourable man. Merit inherently means it is something that has been achieved and demonstrated by results. And if you are broadly speaking, considering a moral society, then its citizens must be a moral people. Meaning any meritocracy that is likely to build such a civilisation, necessarily will be composed of meritorious (i.e. broadly speaking, Good, or Honourable) men.

Many readers, however, will doubtless remain unpersuaded by the notion that meritocracy corrupts – rather than refines – an elite.

Many readers will also remain unconvinced that 2+2 = Purple. Which is analogous to what you are doing in this post.

My view is that the corrupting effects are, in fact, obvious: elected officials, heads of companies, and expert organizations have never been less trusted. There are other explanations for this, of course, like DEI and its predecessor ideologies. But the perverse logic of ‘meritocratic’ processes plays a central role in the decline, as we shall demonstrate.

No it does not. In fact the very opposite thing is true. The overwhelming REASON why those elected officials and so on are not trusted is precisely because they are a bunch of ineffective cretins with egomaniacal delusions of mere competence. See for example ALL the legacy media and ALL the bought and paid for politicians that assured us Russia was out of weapons, ammunition and manpower within two weeks of March 2022. A blind newt could have predicted a better outcome for the War but corruption, endemic and even genetic incompetence prevails in all those spheres of influence, precisely because a bunch of inbred tribalist have got a stranglehold on the financial mechanisms of the planet as well as the mass media, entertainment and general zeitgeist creation on Planet Earth, as dictated by the puppet-masters behind Hollywood, the Bank of International Settlement and the Davos meet-ups and the World Economic Forum. These Vampiric Pedophiles are not even mildly competent, they are literally retarded in many cases, and yet, they hold the levers of power precisely through the “mechanisms” this faker with the fake name says we should use, which is basically nepotism for the inbred genetic misfits he represents.

“A culture that celebrates the prom queen over the math olympiad champ, or the jock over the valedictorian, will not produce the best engineers… More math tutoring, fewer sleepovers.”

— Vivek Ramaswamy (2024)

Wherein the supposedly Anglo-Saxon manly man, quotes a foreigner in a foreign land to make his point.

As elites have transitioned from focusing on the management of hereditary estates to maintaining status through personal labor, the intense demands of their narrowly-focused professional careers have left less and less room for broader interests, knowledge, and passions.

The people he considers “Elites” are nothing of the sort. They might be the foot soldiers (or more often footstools) of the Elite. And yes I do know. I worked for, and have personal acquaintance with more than one Billionaire.

Keir Starmer – Britain’s premier – has professed to having no favorite books, no favorite poems, no dreams, and no fears. When asked what single book he would take before being stranded on a desert island, he replied ‘an atlas’ (a truly midwit answer – as if it would help ) .

He is the right man leading for a people such as yourself. Talkers and whiners and the envious losers that do not have the testicular fortitude to even protect their own children from Pakistani Rape Gangs.

Under meritocracy, it is the elite who gravitate most intensely to hyper-specialization and a life dominated by professional labor. We saw illustrative statistics and a causal explanation in the last essay :

No, “we” did no such thing. You made some shit up based on your utterly preposterous and nonsensical strawman argument.

“The economic logic causing elites to work harder than ever before is straightforward: a digitized and financialized economy allows a highly capable individual to be more ‘productive’ than ever before. In such an economy, the greater the individual’s capacity, the more marginally productive they are than the next best worker.

In many sectors, there’s an exponential financial return on an individual’s additional capability. This is why you see power law distributions of earnings, exaggerated in sectors which are particularly digitized, financialized, and scaled.

The incredible financial returns on high-performing individuals’ efforts are seductive, causing them to work harder and harder. As these working patterns solidify into institutional and sectoral norms, they move from being optional to required. These industries then recruit from colleges which have selected for students who have demonstrated an incredible capacity for work. This becomes an accelerating feedback loop.”

I’ve heard that senior managers at Elon’s companies who wish to secure an hour with him must value the decision to be made at over $20m. That is what every hour of his professional attention is worth. $180m a nine-hour day.

Again, you retard, it is YOU who is the spreadsheet man, believing such nonsense, and also to stupid to realise that Elon is simply an actor playing a role, and never has created much of anything except the Elon Musk myth.

There is literally nothing an hour of time with Elon Musk would get you or anyone else unless it forwarded whatever demons he is serving today. The calculation is an abstract piece of art signifying nothing.

This same logic aggressively punishes dissenters. The more elite one becomes within a meritocracy, the less secure one’s position is, as smaller differences in performance produce exponentially greater differences in rewards.

Again, this is literally the inverse of the truth. And we can take me and Kurtzy-boy here as perfect parallel examples. While I have no doubt Kurtzy-boy is probably financial more well off than I am today, certainly from a monthly/daily/yearly “money coming in vs. money going out” perspective, the truth is he has to hide like a rat and do as he is told. I can say and do what I want in my own name. I am free. He is a drone.

The measure of the effectiveness of a man, is when he is perfectly willing to stand against the tide, secure in the knowledge it is upon us, but also secure in the knowledge that he is in the right an he will overcome or die trying. I am a dissenter according to Kurtzy-boy, and yet, I am more free as a human being than he is likely to ever be.

In other words, at the top of the meritocratic scale, by working slightly less hard on one’s narrow professional focus, massive financial opportunity costs can be incurred.

A portrait of Kurtzy-boy, saddened by his not being an “elite” and being snubbed by them. Seriously, he posted this image a promos of nothing.

All of the world’s wealthiest men are now-self made , and yet most continue to work long hours in their professional fields. This makes sense; figures like Zuckerberg and Musk are essentially tasteless and unlike previous elites are ill-prepared to be generative figures in the spaces of culture, faith, aesthetics, architecture, manners, and art. They are ‘merchant class’ through-and-through; they are not elite in any sense except their professional capacity.

Wrong. They are puppets put in place for being obedient servants of the ones that actually rule entire continents with structures like the IMF, the BIS, and so on. And you are fucking stupid , for not knowing this, because it is obvious!

We could categorize the various eras of transition into a modern meritocracy as follows:

1. Early and pre-20th century: Elites – then known as the ‘leisure classes’ -did relatively few hours of professional labor, focusing on managing estates, politics, hobbies, and culture. Their wives did no professional work, and focused on family, socializing, and charity.
2. Mid 20th century: Elites worked a moderate amount in white collar professions like law and finance. Culture – as expressed by elements like fine tailoring and refined manners – remained important. Their wives still did not have professional careers, and continued to focus on family, socializing, and charity.
3. Late 20th century: Elites worked a lot, and their wives, seeking status and increasing financial returns on elite labor, increasingly worked too. Focus on family formation, high culture, and service declined.
4. Early 21st century: Both men and women work long hours. Other interests are relegated to lower-order concerns.

What absolute nonsense. Seriously, how can anyone take this guy even half-seriously?

In other words, meritocracy takes the most gifted in society and instrumentalizes them into workers, more akin to office drones than previous generations of the elite. This has the effect of making these individuals exponentially more economically productive than the middle classes, increasing societal inequality and angst, while also locking elites into crushing work hours and a myopic focus.

You really have no concept of what Elite means, nor of how it is used in today’s social context. An impressive level of blithering ignorance!

We can thus see why our elites naturally gravitate towards the bureaucracies favored by the ‘professional managerial class’. As Strauss foresaw, without a broad, indulgent, noble education they have become “specialists without spirit or vision and voluptuaries without heart.” They are more technical instruments than human aristocrats . Markovits describes:

What part of “Technical Instruments” did you not understand?

“Traditional wealth, held as physical and financial capital, does not just free its owner from the need to work; it also enables him to become more fully himself. Human capital works in almost exactly the opposite way… Meritocracy, moreover, applies this idea most intensively to the elite. It makes the elite worker’s talents, skills, and training—her own self, her very person—into her greatest economic asset, the overwhelmingly dominant source of her wealth and caste… To secure her eliteness, the superordinate worker must ruthlessly manage her education and labor—training to develop skills that others value, and then working intensively in jobs and at tasks again set by others…

See that sentence? “ To secure her eliteness, the superordinate worker must…” That proves you are a complete idiot Kurtzy. If you are a “worker” the one thing you can be certain of is that you are NOT elite. You blithering moron.

A person whose wealth and status depend almost entirely on her human capital simply cannot afford to consult her own interests or passions in choosing her job…

Aaand again. You see here that Kurtzy-boy, not only is not elite, but he never, ever, ever, will be. He is literally genetically unviable for anything related to actual nobility. The old saying in my language that nobility is in the blood referred far more to the intrinsic nature of character that men who come from a long line of actually philosophical noble men have than any nepotistic generational privilege. Kurtzy here literally cannot even imagine a human being that puts other things and interests above their “economic capital” i.e. money. But the very NATURE of a noble man is that he cannot be bought. He will die or kill over a principle, regardless of consequence, and he is a literal force of nature because of it. Kurtzy here tells us so often and in so many ways that he is merely a lapdog of whoever holds a purse.

Moreover, as wages become increasingly concentrated among the very highest-paid workers, a smaller and smaller share of jobs and job types support top incomes. Someone who wants an elite income—or, critically, even just an income sufficient to buy his children the schooling on which their own eliteness depends—must do one of a narrowly restricted class of jobs, heavily concentrated in finance, management, law, and medicine.”

Ah yes, I see Johannie, the mark of an “elite” in your mind is to get on that hamster wheel as soon as possible and stay on it all your life, running ever faster, in the hope you ever graduate to being one of the rarefied “elites” you are so desperate to belong to, but to which you never will, ever. Because Kurtzy… you and your progeny… are fucking hamsters!

— Daniel Markovits, The Meritocracy Trap: How America’s Foundational Myth Feeds Inequality, Dismantles the Middle Class, and Devours the Elite

It is not clear that these hyper-specialized individuals are even particularly skilled. Under meritocracy, we have seen the increasing incentivization of credentialism and gamification over authentic development.

NOOOOO. Under Credentialism and gamification, nepotism, tribalism and using high-trust cultures to infiltrate them with low-trust values, you have seen the collapse of ability, efficiency, and authentic skill. As usual, Kurtzy has it precisely backward.

Acquiring a job is no longer just about becoming proficient in the relevant skills; it is equally about posturing, developing one’s LinkedIn presence, and perfectly formatting one’s CV for AI processing.

For YOU it is. For people like me, who can and have produced bundles of cash for their employers at pretty much anything they were tasked with, no, I don’t need any of that crap.

This is because meritocracy attacks traditional divisions which exclude applicants on principle.

Again, no. You have it completely reversed as usual. CREDENTIALISM does that. Meritocracy couldn’t care less what your origins are, only results. And this is why I said I have the utter certainty that Kurtzy here has never entered a boxing ring, had a dojo kumite, or ever faced off with fisticuffs to anyone. Because if he ever had, he would know that credentialism matters for NOTHING once things get serious. As the entirety of NATO and the US military is finding out thanks to Russia.

Now, anyone of any origin is free to apply for a job. Massive, unmanageable numbers of applications from unknown candidates result, and reductive comparative measurements become necessary to mitigate the challenge of volume. Gaming the system by exploiting the weaknesses of these measurements becomes first an opportunity, then – as more people do so, a necessity.

John Glanton of Social Matter illustrates the intellectual poverty of this ‘meritocracy at scale’ with the example of a spelling bee:

“…if you were to administer a spelling bee to a given middle-school classroom, there would be a fairly significant correlation between success at the bee and overall writing ability… if you foisted an impromptu spelling contest on some group of unsuspecting eighth-graders, it’d be likely to shake out that the ones who did well in it know their way around a book. And that they could on the whole write sentences with more clarity and grace than their lower-scoring counterparts. But the national spelling bee is a different animal altogether. Success at that level doesn’t mean you’re an “avid reader” or the kind of student who writes little short stories and poems in her spare time… It means you’re willing to forego in large measure normal childhood entertainments. It means you’re willing to grind out hour after hour of tedious rote learning, inscribing obscure etymologies and variant spellings and all manner of curious linguistic fauna in careful runes upon your young heart…

And that is what you are PRETENDING is meritocracy, which as I stated already plenty of times, is retarded.

But you can observe the same sort of phenomenon all over the place. Once a basic tool of training or assessment becomes incentivized heavily enough, it tends to lose all relationship to the qualities it was originally meant to train or assess… Just a bizarre arms race of ever-specializing techniques… once something becomes worth gaming, it will be gamed. And it will lose almost all of its former virtue in the gaming process.”

Meritocracy – and its brutal requirements for self-improvement – necessitates an inwards turn, rather than outwards beneficence. It leaves little room for authentic charity or public service.

I find it interesting, if not at all surprising, that Kurtzy here sees self-improvement as being “brutal”; instead of how I and anyone who actually owns a dictionary and knows what meritocracy actually means, perceive it; which is a good and fun thing to go after your entire life.

Aristocrats used to view military service as a right of passage, but this kind of service cannot be incentivized under meritocracy. Now, military service for the meritocratic elite would be just an awkward interruption to explain on their CVs.

No you moron. The time of aristocrats being also warriors and soldiers began to end with the rebellion against God and truth led by the Protestants, godless creatures more concerned with money than truth.

Channelling José Ortega y Gasset, Christopher Lasch writes:

…the value of cultural elites lay in their willingness to assume responsibility for the exacting standards without which civilization is impossible. They lived in the service of demanding ideals. “Nobility is defined by the demands it makes on us—by obligations, not by rights.” The mass man, on the other hand, had no use for obligations and no understanding of what they implied, “no feeling for [the] great historical duties.” Instead he asserted the “rights of the commonplace.”…

Lacking any comprehension of the fragility of civilization or the tragic character of history, he lived unthinkingly in the “assurance that tomorrow [the world] will be still richer, ampler, more perfect, as if it enjoyed a spontaneous, inexhaustible power of increase.” He was concerned only with his own well-being and looked forward to a future of “limitless possibilities” and “complete freedom.”

— Christopher Lasch, The Revolt of the Elites and the Betrayal of Democracy

There can be no ‘ noblesse oblige’ in a system in which there is no ‘ noblesse’ (noble birth).

Damn but this retard gets everything wrong. Noblesse Oblige as I explained before is NOT in specific reference to anything related to bloodline, but to CHARACTER. A man of noble heart feels obliged to do or not do certain things. For example, putting pedophiles to death regardless of the “laws” any given freemasons-controlled government might have on the books. Defend the innocent (as Catholic Dogma demands). Tell the truth when it is hard but necessary, and so on. But what does Kurtzy know? He’s just angry he wasn’t born in a wealthy family and he still feels like he’s not got enough to become part of the circle of those who are. And he is right, he will never be one of them, but even more laughably, wealthy people are no indication of nobility at all, yet Kurtzy here can’t help himself.

The moral logic which underpinned the duties of the aristocracy to the lower classes was that their privilege could only be justified with commensurate beneficence (an echo of Luke 12:48: “Everyone to whom much was given, of him much will be required, and from him to whom they entrusted much, they will demand the more.” )

In a system in which the elites believe that they have ‘earned’ their privilege, it is less clear that they owe anything to others. Indeed, quite the opposite: in a ‘meritocracy’ in which people receive what they merit, the lower classes merit their low status, having been ‘given every opportunity and failed to make much of it’. There is no such thing as the less fortunate , only the less deserving .

Thank you for yet again, demonstrating to all, for all time, the true nature of your inner character. Or rather, I should say, the chasm in it that can never be filled, where other people actually have that sense of duty that makes them noble.

As Michael Young describes, “For the first time in human history the inferior man has no ready buttress for his self-regard”, and they thus become, in the words of Daniel Markovits, “victims without a language of victimhood.”

The morality of this situation is of course highly dubious, given the advantages many of the elite have had from the circumstances of their birth, like natural gifts and diligent parents. Indeed, the effects of this delusion inevitably result in great cruelty:

“…meritocracy inclines elites to chauvinistic contempt or even cruelty regarding inequalities that cannot be cast in terms of identity politics. Political correctness does not denounce calling rural communities ‘backward,’ southerners ‘rednecks,’ Appalachians ‘white trash,’ and the bulk of the United States ‘flyover country.’ Indeed, considered elite opinion as commonly rationalizes as condemns these slurs: a widely read essay in the National Review, for example, recently attacked white working-class communities as “economically … negative assets,” as “morally … indefensible,” and as “in thrall to a vicious, selfish culture whose main products are misery and used heroin needles,” before concluding that “they deserve to die”; and a columnist for the New York Times, after observing that immigrants outperform native-born Americans in meritocratic competitions, called native-born citizens “the stagnant pool in which our national prospects risk drowning” and proposed (now tongue-in-cheek) that only mass deportations of the native-born could save America.”

— Markovits

Quoting a jew on a publication that is a known gatekeeper for at least a decade or two as your “evidence” for the correctness of your “position” is probably NOT going to convince anyone with am IQ above room temperature. In Alaska.

Lasch notes that escaping from the common lot – this white trash milieu – becomes the “very definition of meritocratic success” and the logical ambition of the meritocrat. Success is synonymous with active alienation from the middle and lower classes.

This alienation also expresses itself geographically, as detailed in works like Charles Murray’s ‘Coming Apart: The State of White America, 1960-2010’. While the old aristocracy of the land , which had to manage immovable rural estates, was necessarily dispersed throughout the country, meritocratic human capital is the opposite; it not only can move but must concentrate in the quest for maximum economic productivity.

Meritocrats must go where the ‘best’ schools are, and then where the best jobs are, often moving frequently throughout a career. There is a compound effect on the colocation of human capital, attracting the preponderance of elite human capital to specific geographic centers while leaving the rest of the population – and their own families – behind.

No, this is not the behaviour of the actual elite. It is the behaviour of parasites. Or cancer cells.

This breaks relations between both the classes and the generations. The new centers are:

“Populated by transients, they lack the continuity that derives from a sense of place and from standards of conduct self-consciously cultivated and handed down from generation to generation.”

— Lasch

The meritocrat has no sense of the special value of a ‘family business’, and under meritocracy a family business has no moral logic to privilege the next generation of their own family. This logic also means elite families have little motivation to generate heirs – for what good is an heir without an estate to pass down?

Ok Kurtzy, we get it, you too had boomer parents, and they gambled it all away on horse-racing, cocaine and hookers. Get over it boy. You’re not the only one. But you ARE whining a hell of a lot!

This concludes my essay series criticizing meritocracy. I hope you have enjoyed it! But this series will only have value if I am able to identify a superior system and some mechanism by which to transition to that system. Stay tuned.

Yes, the superior system is called….drumroll… MERITOCRACY! Buy a dictionary, read it and start again. -5/10 Johann must not just try harder, but he must try harder than all the other children, it may not help much but it’s better than him infecting the other children with retarded nonsense.

This series will ultimately inform my forthcoming book, Leaving a Legacy , which charts a course for the patriarch who wishes to guide his own family out of this destructive practice and into greatness. Stay tuned.

Anyone taking advice from you on how to lead a family is already a casualty as far as I’m concerned.

If you found value in this piece, please consider liking it using the button below, and upgrading to become a paid subscriber. All revenue goes towards supporting my family and goes a long way in helping me to continue to write.

But, aren’t you a techie manly man, that works for an employer in middle management work and who is “leaving England” because a strong white man can’t make it there any longer? Or something along those lines you spoke on?

You will unlock the full archive of over one hundred similar essays and podcasts, and a guide on where to start. All support is hugely appreciated.

I’ll get right on that as soon as I manage to sell second-hand toilet paper to India. I know it’s a long-shot, but if any country in the world might go for it…

Sic transit imperium,

Shhh… Don’t try to use the language of your better. You never were an Empire. Nothing has passed, because nothing was ever built. And if you are referring to the ex British empire, well, that didn’t last anywhere near the 800 years of the Roman one whose language you are trying to use, did it.

Yopu’re a peasant Kurtzy. And always will be.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

Within 24 hours 3 tins have been sold. There are now only 4 left. As usual, first come, first served. See last post for details on how to get one.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

Why?

Because genuine, Unprocessed, and Unblended Extra Virgin Olive Oil turns out to be the healthiest thing ever. Literally nothing else compares to it. See the bottom of this post for the details.

For those of you who want the hard facts first:

There are now 7 tins, of 5 litres each of the extra virgin olive oil from my trees, now available in the USA. Once they are gone, they are gone, it’s a first come, first served situation and works as follows:

1. The cost is $65 per litre and due to the limited quantity available we intend to ship it out ONLY as a 5 litre tin. Inclusive of shipping and postage to anywhere in the USA, the price per 5 litre tin therefore, will be $350.
2. If you want to purchase one of the 7 tins available you will need to send me an email at [email protected] that includes:
   1. Your full name and address in the USA
   2. Upon my response with the requisite bank details, payment in full for the tin/s you wish to receive
3. Expect most places will take a week or so for the delivery to arrive, but some places (e.g. Alaska) may take longer.

For those of you who want the full story:

My American partner has decided to attempt to register for importation of my olive oil to the USA and done an amazing piece of work in that respect. He decided to take a working holiday to see a bit of Italy and then come and visit me on the farm for 10 days, where I have to say, he worked harder than anyone that has come over to lend a hand. 1

On his return home he took some olive oil back (all perfectly in regulation) and that is why he has some available for shipping before we have finalised all the other requirements for larger shipments later (which may cost more depending on a variety of factors related to shipping we are still trying to resolve).

The first question most people will have is probably related to the price: “$65 a litre? are you crazy?”

Actually no. I could probably charge a lot more. Why? Let me list the reasons:

1. Most olive oil you buy in ANY shop is simply NOT pure olive oil. It tends to be a blend of oils or a somewhat inferior version of what it says on the tin. Our olive oil is absolutely PURE, really extra virgin, and UNFILTERED. This means you get ALL the benefits of the oil that are essentially dissipated or even almost entirely lost in the ones you buy in a shop.
2. The price is not unreasonable at all when you consider shipping costs and the regulatory costs added. The same stuff sells here for about 40-45 Euro, so we’re certainly not in any way overpriced.

The Real Reason for Extra Virgin Olive Oil – Health

Brian Johnson , who spends some 2 million USD a year on trying to find the best ways on Earth to live longer, after all his testing on multiple medications as well as far more extreme things, like blood transfusions using his son’s blood (and his own to his father) has discovered that literally nothing on Earth removes inflammation like real, extra virgin olive oil.

• He sells his olive oil at €42 per 750 ml (which works out to about the same as my oil per litre once you convert it to USD) (you can see this on his site at the link provided)
• But his oil is NOT the best one in the world. Our literally is. The oil from this region cold pressed and unfiltered has won the world’s best olive oil in the world expo at Dubai in 2021 and Monte Carlo in 2022. The region did not produce in 2023 so the oil mills here did not compete, and the oil of 2024 is yet to compete as it has just been collected in November/December 2024, but is of excellent quality as the chemical analysis we do on all our oil for each batch have proven.
• I have personally tested the truth of this issue. I had semi-chronic inflammation of my elbow joints due to over-working on the farm, and even taking a couple of weeks of rest from the physical work did not help the situation. as soon as I went back to my duties on the farm my arms would ache. I started to take at least 15ml of olive oil pure every day, and usually more like 30-40 ml, so a few tablespoons just on their own through my day and within about two to three days my joint-pain was either completely gone or much reduced. For a bout a year I experimented with this and as soon as I stopped taking the oil, within a couple of days the pain would return, and would go away after a couple of days that I started to take it again.
• I had also had Covid in 2022 and then pneumonia twice. By early 2023 I was functioning at a much reduced breathing capacity and was not completely healed. I was suffering from “long Covid” essentially. But I was determined to recover. It’s taken a while, mostly because I am inconsistent with my diet, but since the last few months of 2024 I decided to be disciplined about what I eat and my regular intake of our olive oil and it has made a huge difference. While I struggled to go up and down the stair through 2023 and part of 2024, I now work outside at the same rate I was doing when I first arrived in 2021. I have no doubt in my mind that the olive oil is the biggest factor in this and the research I have done on covid/spike protein etc backs up what I have experienced on my own body as Olive oil and olive leaf extracts seem to be among the best cure of these sort of ailments because… again… they are all inflammation related issues.

I have written to Mr. Johnson a while back to see if he was interested in using the oil from our region as I have now built up a network of producers that would allow for large shipments, but I have not heard back, so I have decided to create my own distribution channel, which hopefully will be active in the USA shortly. In the meantime, this is the quickest and easiest option you can have to get your hands on some.

Please Note

• It’s first come first served. Whoever emails me first has the slot first and whoever pays first secures it first.
• We are not going to re-bottle the oil into fancy tins or smaller quantities. The oil was transported in 5 litre tins that are sealed and remain so. Rebottling etc would require the additional paperwork that wee are putting in place, so unfortunately you either buy the whole thing at $350 per tin or nothing.
• The tins were flown as personal luggage by air so may be cosmetically a bit dented or whatever, but the olive oil therein is pure, and our direct from our trees. We do not use glass because any sunlight can lower the quality of the product and even dark glass bottles let some light through.
• Shipping to the USA in due course should become available but due to Italian bureaucracy no one can say when this will happen and it may be many months yet (I hope not, but it’s out of my hands). Shipping to the USA is a considerable expense and the recent addition of potential tariffs will make it definitely more so. This is genuinely a price that may well not be repeatable in the future.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

To those of you who have purchased paid subscriptions, thank you. It is much appreciated, as although the income from it is modest, it shows your genuine support and in any case makes a difference for me and helps me be able to write more frequently and on topics I hope you find above all else useful and able to implement in your life.

If you are a paid subscriber, especially if you have subscribed for the whole year, please leave a comment on a blog topic you would like to cover and I will do my best to do so.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

It is time this absolute joke of an excuse for “a man whom one should listen to” for his “wisdom” and “insights” in how to navigate the modern dystopia, is finally exposed for what he is, by someone that can read for comprehension. It is a sign of the times really that this pustule on the ass of competence was ever awarded a “featured blog” for his substack in 2024. Good God. It’s like people literally can’t read at all anymore.

Prepare yourselves dear Substakers, for what at my OH blog (where I currently released part 6 of Theoretical Models of Society , which as a series puts the lie to all that this moisturised, sedentary, ass-in-butter, theoretical wanna-be “aristocrat” has ever cogitated in his sub-par, midget skull) is called a Kurganing.

Kurganing: Verb – The unfortunate result of what happens to a deceiving liar, sophist, Freemason, general heretic, arrogant (but incapable) idiot, when he attracts the attention of The Kurgan and receives a public vivisection of his all too mortal inadequacy, incompetence, weakness of character, cowardice, and general faggotry, and as a result becomes the star in a blog post by said Kurgan.

Let us first of all identify the main posts (but really all of them will do) this ridiculous clown ( Johann Kurtz , whose tag line is [in total humourless seriousness, I assure you]: Forming the new nobility: become beautiful, dangerous, and worthy of power at his idiotic blog “ becoming Noble ”) has created that immediately prove he is an idiot with delusions of elitism.

Here they are:

Meritocracy is not a Good Thing

Idiotic quote from the idiocy at that post (this one is especially relevant a little later)

Meritocracy necessitates and idealizes the destruction of traditional boundaries. This began with the attack on class structures, but after the moral primacy of ‘merit’ is accepted, it must also be conceded that other structures which impede the centering of ‘merit’ should be questioned: national borders, gender divides, insular communities, and prejudices of all kinds.

The seeds of meritocratic thought arose in the West with the broader Enlightenment, which held that the scientific process – with its advocacy of quantification and objectivity – could be turned upon politics and human affairs more generally, in order to progress society towards utopia.

A provable meritocracy thus demands that all achievement must be explicit, documented, legible, and acceptable. Meritocracy can only be conducted on the basis of what we can measure; this thing we call ‘ merit’.

Of course, distilling the ineffable qualities of human existence into quanta has always proved challenging for the social sciences , which is why they have strayed while the hard sciences have progressed.

The central question at hand is: “What is the definition of this thing we recognize as ‘merit’ within a meritocracy?” How is it measured, by whom, and when? Is the ‘good’ we are attempting to capture an intrinsic quality of the human subject or an objective outcome we are trying to engineer? What scale and timescale do we care about?

Notice how this idiot is TRYING to define/qualify/”explain” meritocracy as being some sort of magic formula of quantifying attributes into a…well a spreadsheet format? Notice how NO ONE ELSE ON THE PLANET does that, only him? It’s his idea, his way of trying to define it? Remember that, it’s important and it’s the biggest clue (among an ocean of them) that this guy is:

1. A moron
2. An “intellectual” (read: Midwit who thinks he is the smartest person in the room. Also, See 1.)
3. A Perfumed Prince – that is someone that EITHER was born relatively well off, never had anything very hard in his life, went to the right schools, kissed the right asses, sucked off the right bosses, and got himself some middle or maybe even eventual middle-high management position earning decent money (and/or he had some from daddy anyway) that makes him think he is a “self-made” man. With the manly in man, and the smarts. And regardless if he goes to gym regularly or is a weedy nerd or chubbster, he fancies his (self-invented and self-deceived) moral superiority somehow makes him in any case “better” than the “rabble” that laugh at his pontificating bullshit. OR a guy that maybe did come from not the lower classes but not particularly well off, and did work hard at being a good little drone of the system and managed to pull off some decent situation… that is… by… well, you know… going to the right schools, or doing well at the ones he went to, kissing the right asses, sucking off the right bosses to achieve… you get it. And the only difference is that now he feels even MORE entitled to be a smartboi ™ because he (in his feverish mind) really IS a self-made man.

But let us see how he demonstrates this in his own words.

Meritocratic Education Ruins Children

Quote from the runoff produced therein:

Meritocracy is the notion that it is illegitimate to reward a person based on criteria other than a specific and artificial definition of merit, typically characterized by formal examinations and structured evaluations of performance. Meritocracy adopts tests, reviews, qualifications, credentials, and the quantification of performance and ability. The meritocrat is the Spreadsheet Man.

Under meritocracy, it is illegitimate to elevate an individual based on broader criteria, such as whether they are a friend, relative, local, particular sex, member of a known family, member of your faith, member of your class, or a representative of a range of ‘protected characteristics’.

In other words, meritocracy is the antithesis of the concept of birthright. It is an attack on the integrity of sovereignty, undermining the ability of the steward of an asset to entirely determine to whom that asset is apportioned.

To doubt the moral monopoly of meritocracy is thus not to insist that merit should be restricted in the opposite direction (ie. characterized entirely by birth ) but to broaden one’s conception of merit to contain both the notion of qualifications and the legitimacy of other factors, as may be relevant in different circumstances.

See that GIANT strawman he sets up in part one? Meritocracy “defined” as some arbitrary quantification of the ineffable into a spreadsheet type format that has no bearing to reality? Only to…

Knock it down in part two, to “prove his point”. A point no one ever before him ever made because it doesn’t exist.

There are illiterate Khoi San and Amazonian Pirahã that are perfectly capable of understanding and explaining what meritocracy means, because especially in their societies, it is still a thing. And it is only because men with brass balls and iron wills managed to create such bounty on the Earth —where the village idiot was safe to reproduce and foster upon us a melange of genetic misfits like this pale, belly-frogged constituted “man”— that it is no longer required in the general West for larvae-spawns such as Johann to continue to survive and even do “well” for himself.

So let me explain it to you in short words of few syllables:

Meritocracy: from the word MERIT, which is defined as the the state of becoming entitled, deserving of, have earned either a reward or a punishment on the basis of one’s behaviour, actions, effectiveness at [something].

Literally, little children understand what merit is. And a meritocracy is simply a society in which the person that is best at doing a specific task is placed in the position of doing it. You know where meritocracy is absolutely clear and obvious to everyone and anyone? A violent fight. Or a group of fighters in a ring, dojo, or street. In Systema, the guy who can kick everyone else’s ass best teaches. It is the surest form of meritocracy I have ever encountered and I would bet money that our perfumed prince Johann has never entered a ring or dojo floor in his life. Nor is he likely to. How do I know? Well, he either hasn’t got the first clue about meritocracy at all, which means he is a fully “theoretical” creature, and it’s bad theory at that. He apparently works in some kind of tech/IT/software field, so you can see what I mean. Maybe he can code, but he can’t do much else. He has no concept of physical results in the real world beyond that artificial bubble he has been raised, grown and produced in, like a clone from a vat-factory in the RPG game of Paranoia . There are another six just like him, called Johann-Smarty “Pants” Kurtz – 001 through to 007.

And just like a dweller of Alpha complex, if he ever pokes his head out of the underground artificial world he lives in, and sees some trees and a squirrel he may well freak out and push the nuclear launch codes.

So we have already established he is an impractical man that has never taken a punch (or ten) in the face and has certainly never given any (it might have spoilt his little prefect-perfect schoolboy-cum-teacher’s-pet road to “riches”).

We also know that he has delusions of grandeur, and is little more than a hopped up peasant, who is grasping, like a drowning man for what he perceives as his supposed “due” of “new nobility”. Which he will never achieve. Because nobility is first of all a matter of intrinsic character, one he absolutely lacks, and secondly, no one is handing out family crests to retards anymore.

We know he thinks that the path to “nobility” is achieved by being a good drone that goes to the good schools, and does the “good” things he is told and kisses ALL the asses (with a little lick for extra credit) in order to climb the corporate/status/suck-cess ladder. How do we know? Well, because he expressly tells young men to do just that.

He first posited this “way” here , and the title is oh so telling: Jobs for sensitive young men, and then defended it here . So we also know Johann is/was/sees himself as/ will never grow out of, the idea that he (is) was a sensitive young man. Oh so sensitive. Because of his smarts you see. The poor lad was just smarter than all his peers who cruelly did not respect and understand his sensitive thoughts. It is the sort of duplicitous and self-serving as well as intrinsically false narrative people like Johann invariably have about themselves. It’s the midwit gamma complex. Johann’s excuse is that anyone with a “higher” IQ would simply avoid physical brutality, don’t you know. Unless they were evil. Evil I tell you. The concept that anyone with a 155 IQ would indulge in physical activities like martial arts or being a bodyguard or a doorman simply does not parse for him. He may lie about it if he ever reads this, but I know this type of creature. Violence is only for the “evil” brutes of life. Or… or… well, yes, okay, the very NOBLE people, but only as a last resort (that he prays in his suburban home “ivory tower” never, ever, ever comes to pass) and only for the NOBLEST of reasons (all so rarefied and theoretical that not even tardigrades can survive in that atmosphere) none of which will ever activate even as he is raped to death by marauding pirates.

He also has ZERO understanding of how to be a man in relation to a woman (this is to be expected, he is after all English). We know this thanks to his “enlightenment” level idea that women do not or will not have children because it implies a loss of status.

And one has to ask… What Status? What Status is he talking about? And it is obvious he is talking about what HE perceives as being a desirable sign of status:

• Financial success (having enough money to be living well above average)
• Knowing and being seen by the right people in the right way
• Driving the “cool” car
• Going to the right schools
• Having the right clothes
• Probably having a trophy wife (though I doubt he does)

And of all of the above, the only one that personally makes a difference is having enough money to say “Fuck you” to whoever. And by “makes a difference” I simply mean that it makes it less of a concern at all to do so. Not that you don’t do it if you lack the money. I certainly have never held back saying “Fuck you” to anyone I ever felt deserved it. Regardless of pretty much anything other than my personal sense of justice. But sure, a bunch of cash makes life easier. I’ve had money and had no money, so I can tell the difference, but it will never be something that defines my character.

But do ANY of these things really matter to a woman? No. Not really. They only matter to her in the context of the zeitgeist of the disturbed society we inhabit. And of course, no woman wants to live under a bridge with ten kids she has no means to feed and a deadbeat for a husband. But my point is simply that as long as you are:

1. Actually a man, not some facsimile of a metrosexual, moisturised, vegan, midwit “intellectual”, and therefore provide the required practical support for your wife, and even if that should collapse (due to war, unforeseen circumstances, bad luck, whatever) she has the unwavering certainty that if anyone can climb out of a hole and rebuild a good life it is you, and you with her and your children, and,
2. Provide her with the natural experience of being with an actual man, as described above, she will NATURALLY return to her “prime directive” as a woman, which is to make a bunch of kids.

Are there women too damaged by the dystopia we live in to “change” or evolve past the lies and deception they were raised with? Sure. But are MOST women this damaged? No. They are just mostly lacking any actual men to provide the 2 things above. Plenty of soyboys like Johann there, but actual men? Eh… it’s slim pickings.

The truth is that a woman safe to exhibit her femininity and natural sensuality and sensitivity RELISHES in being a mother. Her life feels meaningful and full and worthwhile, and all the struggles and heartache she might suffer, in the light of a happy family become badges of honour, medals on her uniform as glorious mother and loving wife of a… MAN.

But does our Perfumed Prince stop here? Oh no, no, no, he persists in his imbecilic, literally mouth-drooling, arrogance. Behold his latest piece:

Meritocracy Kills Fertility

and the requisite quotes from it:

This time he prefaces it with a kind of “hands up gesture” to try and prevent the obvious stupidity of his argument from being well… blindingly obvious.

Editor’s note: this is a continuation of my series on meritocracy . The motivation for this series is to establish the logic which will be presented in my upcoming book ‘Leaving a Legacy’, in which I will attempt to convince wealthy individuals to not squander their estates in donations to the inefficient and destructive ‘charity’ industry.

The book will instead empower heads of families to establish rooted, virtuous dynasties which can sustain communities for generations. Necessary for this project is to convince fathers that it is not good to disinherit their children in a misguided attempt to force them to generate their own wealth in a ‘meritocratic’ system. This destroys their childhood , closes their minds, and interrupts their ability to raise the next generation – as we shall see.

You see, it’s all about the boomers not leaving money to their children. Which sure, who can argue that’s not a thing. It is. Boomers are the most narcissistic, destructive, toxic, generation that has ever crawled on the face of the Earth. Maybe Johann here is trying to tell daddy to not leave the family castle to the SPCA or something. But regardless, if this is the “argument” against meritocracy he wants to write a whole book on, it’s really quite pathetic.

He’s again, setting up a strawman, that supposedly, if you are wealthy, you will cut your kids off in order to “teach them meritocracy”. What complete nonsensical fabrication is that, pray tell?

If I had a few millions to leave to my children, I would. And if I were a billionaire I am sure I would also give them experiences that they would otherwise not come by, but their learning to be effective, efficient and good at whatever they decide to focus on, in other words, their putting in the work required to become good, has absolutely nothing to do with how much money I have or don’t have or leave to them or not leave to them. As far as I am concerned: THIS. IS. SPARTA!

You will move your ass and RUN, not walk. If you fall you get up. If you’re still breathing you can still get up. You will NOT give up, you will find a way. I am not worried about money or my children not having enough of it. I will teach them to merit whatever they aim for. By simply going after it and becoming good enough to get it. Regardless of the barriers to entry idiots like Johann naturally want to impose on their actual betters, for the usual obvious reasons.

But let’s continue to delve in this festering pile of bull manure.

I will quote quite a long piece here to prove that I am not selectively picking bits out of it. He really is this fucking stupid. It’s enough to make you wonder if perhaps he is of “noble” birth; you know, from one of those families that have been fucking each others’ cousins and occasional half-sisters for generations!

Behold, the very first sentence is the summary of the rest of the absolutely wrong “definition” he gives to meritocracy.

The key proposition of meritocracy is that the person who deserves the greatest reward is the person with the greatest aptitude who invests the greatest effort .

That is really all it takes to prove he is a complete moron. One who can’t afford a basic dictionary apparently.

Meritocracy is a society based not on the greatest effort someone puts in, you moron. It’s a society based on the results someone produces.

RESULTS, monkey boy. Results. Not effort, you blithering idiot.

But let him hang himself in his own words.

Meritocracy is a curious creature: it is a political philosophy which could be described as ‘progressive but inegalitarian’. As with all progressive philosophies, it is a liberal child of the Enlightenment and its advocates champion it as a repudiation of the hereditary class system.

Ultimately, however, it remains an inegalitarian system for defining who should rule over others. The term ‘meritocracy’ is the combination of the Latin-origin “merit” (from mereō meaning earn ) and the Greek suffix “-cracy” ( power, rule ). In other words, it is rule by those who have earned it.

Meritocracy is progressive to the degree that it denies that one’s ultimate status should be defined by the circumstances of one’s birth. There remains an inconvenient fact, however: intelligence and other key attributes for success are parameterized at birth, and are nurtured by the family circumstances which one is born into.

To avoid the decidedly illiberal proposition of replacing one birthright caste with another – bloodlines by IQ – meritocracy opens the possibility for social mobility by integrating a factor which only emerges after birth: how hard the individual works. This factor serves as the moral heart of meritocracy.

It is feasible that the college selection process could, for example, operate entirely on a simple combination of 1) an intelligence test; 2) basic evidence of diligence via applicants’ key grades; and 3) demonstrating intellectual curiosity in an interview.

The typical elite selection process extends far beyond this, however. Evidence is required of an extraordinary record of effort. Extracurriculars, languages, instruments, volunteering, internships, startups, projects, and so forth are required. Aptitude is not enough.

If two applicants with the same level of intelligence are presented, the one who has ‘worked harder’ will be chosen, even if both have worked hard enough to have confidence that they would fulfill their responsibilities as students. The same is true of two candidates for a professional opportunity: the stacked résumé wins.

Elites from athletes to bankers brag about how hard they work. This bragging would have been alien to the generation of elites which preceded the ‘meritocratic elite’ – indeed, elites used to be known as the ‘ leisure classes’ . But the centralization of effort is necessary to the moral logic of meritocracy, and underpins the system’s justification for existence – and effort therefore manifests as a virtue to be advertised.

It is clear that Johann advocates in his other pieces like the “jobs for sensitive young men” to become and be precisely the kind of one-dimensional, ass-kissing, ivy-league educated, smarmy, two-faced, parasites that end up having to rape children on Satanic altars while being ridden by a man in a donkey mask while snorting cocaine, because they are so utterly dead inside that this is an approximation of something that might make them feel something.

And yet, here he says, that the system that puts these vermin in the places where they have access to the levers of power is based on “meritocracy”. It’s absolute nonsense. Johan is CLEARLY one of those wanna-be’s that has never quite made it into the “high society” he so longs to be a part of, and is really very bitter about it, despite his airs of “being” or rather, “becoming” noble.

Aside the fact that he has no clue what meritocracy is or even means, as evidenced beyond a shadow of a doubt above —and that the vermin in question do NOT get there through it, but rather PRECISELY by his supposed preferred method of nepotism, knowing who to threaten, blackmail, pay off or suck off— it becomes clear that he also proves his own advice is retarded, ineffective, a lie and produces only a hellish life devoid of meaning aside the chasing of the ever elusive dragon of “status”. Which clearly he has not achieved; nor will anyone who takes his idiotic advice.

So let me explain it in perspective:

If you are a middling guy, maybe from a not well to do family, trying your best to have a monochromatic CV with ONE direction only, for your choice of career and sticking to it like a soulless drone, because ultimately you have the kind of brain that worries about that more than actually living a meaningful life and/or because to you that reach for the 2.5 kids, white picket fence and the fake “respect” of your peers for your “status” IS what life is all about, then… by all means, sunshine, you go right ahead. It’s what’s best for you for sure.

On the other hand, if you are not an average person, or even a midwit totally lacking in imagination, actually have an at least partially functioning brain, and realise there is more to life than Johann’s ever elusive “status”, and perhaps want to live some of it, you may notice that there are plenty of jobs that will still keep you comfortable and also allow you to have a family, if you simply apply yourself, but it is not required you sacrifice the details and joys of life for them.

In short, this guy tries to baffle you with bullshit. His veneer of “becoming noble” is a façade. He pretty much admitted as much when he wrote that he is “ leaving Britain ” (I wonder if he really ever will) which appears to be his whining lament that Britain is no longer a place where you can “make it”. But it never was. Britain is still one of the countries in which his much praised “class structure” continues to exist. He is too stupid to realise it is the very thing he wants to be a part of that will forever keep him out of it.

As for his piece of meritocracy reducing fertility it’s the usual nonsense. By “defining” meritocracy as “effort” instead of results, he concludes that:

Now we find something of a fertility ‘perfect storm’ developing. Three factors are now true which together would seem to inexorably suppress birthrates among those parts of the population which play the meritocracy game:

1. Elites – and aspiring elites – work longer and harder than ever before;
2. Elite children are more time-intensive to raise than ever before;
3. Elite children are more expensive to educate than ever before.

(For more commentary and data on points 2 & 3, see my last article. )

Something has to give!

But this is of course the “reasoning” of someone who can’t do a BASIC logical calculation of cost analysis.

It’s not hard to do:

Do I want to work 16 hour days and have no real life outside of my work for 30 years in order to be a billionaire (maybe, assuming the best case, because there are PLENTY of people who TRY to do this who are not even millionaires, and there are very FEW billionaires)?

Now, me, even if the billion was guaranteed? I would say (and did say, multiple times in life) a resounding, loud, echoing: “Fuck NO!” In fact I said no to much lower thresholds than that. Why? It doesn’t really matter, the point is that to ME my personal freedom to explore whatever facet of life I decide takes my fancy, is FAR more important than money or artificial success, or what really anyone besides a VERY small number of select people think about me or my life choices. And even those few only matter up to a point, because first and foremost, I have to be honest to myself. If you look at my life trajectory , or the things I have done , it would give Johann a brain embolism.

And you’ll also notice at least a couple more things about him that differs from me. I mean if you are deaf, dumb and blind, because otherwise you may notice many, many, many dozens of things, but in any case, at a minimum, I —unlike Johann— actually am noble. I literally come from a line of men that in the gold branch were awarded perpetual status of Marquis for the first-born, and in the Silver branch which I belong to of Patrician. In both cases the title to nobility was achieved as a result of martial prowess, by basically being better than everyone else at a given time and place at killing people. And as a member of the nobility, I can assure you, that Johann is not, and never will be one of us. And it really has nothing to do with titles that he may purchase along the way. because you see… they will not be merited. They will not be earned.

But more importantly, you might notice that Johann is a pseudonym. He writes anonymously. I do not. My OG blog is right there, my books have my name on it, and so on. While I use the nickname The Kurgan that was given to me by a group of online people I used to frequent, I do not hide who I am. And I write what I write.

So, why does Johann hide like a fearful, soft, and Perfumed Prince in fear? Because he simply CANNOT afford to say “fuck you” to whomever. Johann has neither the money (neither do I) not the balls (I do) or the supposed mythical “status” to do so.

In short, Johann, is, like his theories, a fraud.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

I talked about him before and mentioned he MIGHT be interesting if only because of his anti-Putin take, which purported to be from the Slav perspective. Perhaps some of his points were even valid. But overall he was like a Slavic Never Trumper.

Is Trump man’s salvation? Or even just America’s? Nope. Not even close. But is he waaaaay better than KamelToe Harridan? Even if he really is a Jewish owned goyim? The answer there is still yes. And ditto Putin. Is he some kind of saviour of man, or even just Russia? Nope to the first, although he may well be with the second one, but in any case, the overall point is Putin is without a doubt the best thing that could happen to Russia when you compare him to… who should have taken over? the Jewish British spy Russian guy pretending to run for President that died (of purely natural causes I’m sure?) Yeah, right.

But that aside, his latest piece glorifies an absolute retarded incel: Curt/Kurt Dolittle who, as providence invariably has it has a telling surname. In case you don’t know, and believe me you are luckier for it, Mr. Dolittle is a complete moron. He has come up with absurd theories of society based on “property rights” that run to thousands of pages of mind-numbing idiocy pulled straight from his nether regions, where he does all of his “thinking”, mostly in a bitter rant towards women and why none of them ever did anything other than possibly vomit a little on first contact with him; and has drawn the most retarded conclusions to try to justify his natural repulsiveness to women and pretty much life in general.

And Rurik lionises him as some great intellectual.

It is also clear that our would-be slav Rurik is really an incel himself, this was clear from his writing in general long before this post, but even more so in this piece that is almost homoerotic in its vacillating fever-dream of the deep complexities of male friendship and his vivisection of a concept that is about as plain and simple as it can be, and then trying to draw some deep parallels between Anglo and slav “friendships”.

All of which message could be summarised in a postcard.

But to make Dolittle the master avatar of Western male friendship is a bit like putting Bruce Jenner on the cover of TIME and making him woman of the year. Only more absurd.

Suffice it to say that I no longer subscribe to his substack even out of mild curiosity, and literally nothing he ever has to say again is of any relevance if that is the best he can do and in fact appears to be just the first post in a series!

But don’t despair, I see Johann has written another post on meritocracy and although I have only read the title so far, I deeply suspect after the last retarded nonsensical post on meritocracy, that this one might well outperform it in how many IQ points it murders if you read it. But I will delve in for your benefit dear readers…. exposing the nonsense on substacks so you don’t need to take sanity hits to your walk through these Chthulian corridors of misinformation, bullshit, lies, and rampant idiocy.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

Let me start with an extreme example to focus your brain.

Say a vice principal of a school has had intimate knowledge that the principal, and most of the teachers in the school are actually sexually abusing the children in it with abandon. He doesn’t participate in it himself but he keep quiet about it. For almost 60 years. he has plenty of evidence, including cctv video from the school grounds, emails, whatever, but he just keeps quiet about it. In fact, he has a PhD in child rearing for teachers, a guid elf how things should be in order for a child to develop in the best way possible. Yet he remains silent.

Then one day, he talks! After 60 years of silence FINALLY, he admits that the Principal of the school and pretty much all the teachers that ever taught there were actually child predators. Let’s go a step further and say he even calls them out by name and provides evidence to have them all arrested for their crimes.

Now imagine this scenario happens in a really large city and this is the largest school on the planet.

And now imagine that you live in that city and find that the other people of that city all praise and glorify this Vice Principal as the best thing that has ever come along for educators and the school. Many call for him to become the new principal.

Here are my questions for you based on that hypothetical:

1. How do you feel about your fellow citizens who are praising this VP?
2. How do you feel about the VP?
3. What should happen to the VP, if anything, in our current more or less global/western legal system, let’s say that of London or New York?
4. What should happen, if anything, to the VP in a theoretical planet on which you are absolute emperor and can make all the laws and rules you want?

Once you are done answering, now consider the concept of the fake, heretical “Archbishop” Vigano, which everyone from supposed “Sedevacantists” to Protestants that have no love nor even understanding of the Catholic Church are fêteing as if he was not just a valid Catholic (he is not) but the answer to the infiltration and usurpation of the Catholic Church by Freemasons and Satanists.

When you consider that:

1. Vigano has a PhD in Canon Law (the real, valid one, of 1917, not the fake, Satanist created version of 1983),
2. He has kept silent on the heresies of Vatican II for 60 years,
3. He still has to name the fake Popes individually as what they are, fake and invalid Catholics, never mind Popes,
4. He has failed to admit that even if his repentance were genuine, it is his duty to recluse himself in a monastery in perpetual penance for the rest of his days, as per the infallible, permanent and still absolutely valid Cum Ex Apostolate Officio, which is referenced in it summarised canon of 188.4 precisely because it remains in force, and always will.

Is there really any difference between the hypothetical VP at pedi-school and Vigano?

And here are my answers to the questions I posed you, dear reader:

1. They are retarded, ignorant, and lazy.
2. And 3. That he should pay for his crime of silence and by it, collusion, as per Roman Law of silent assent. As such he should be barred from ever holding a position in anything to do with the Catholic Church. IF it can be determined that his ordination as a priest was valid then he MAY serve as monk in some monastery who shall remain faceless, nameless, unknown, not permitted to publish anything not perform any sacraments to or for anyone, in, as per the law, in perpetual penance and some labour so his maintenance is not provided at the expense of others for free. All after any secular charges he may be subject to for his silence in the face of the crimes committed by his fellow non-Catholics, heretics and Satanists pretending to be Catholic clergy. A for n. 4. it’s pretty much like n. 3.

So… realise this is NOT about being harsh, or tough, or a zealot. It’s about reality, truth and justice.

Vigano is still a scumbag and his “mea culpa” is not even a mea culpa, it’s more of a sua culpa. (It’s everyone else’s fault I’m the good guy).

No Vigano, no. You are a liar and a coward and have been that for 60 years and that’s best case scenario, because from your behaviour and the movements of the fake “Catholic” Church and their fooled ignorant “believers” it looks increasingly likely that you are just the usual other side of the coin, that pretends to be on “our” side, just to stave off the rightful tide of righteous outrage and consequence that every fake “Catholic” Clergy in that hive of pederasts that has become the Vatican would incur.

So… keep that in mind people.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

Please bear with me a little. In order to explain something that may well be the most important concept you might ever take in, I need to make it relatable to something you can verify for yourself, which is basically me and my life insofar as you can be aware of it as an online reader. If you already know me personally, feel free to skip this part and go to the next bold heading below.

Anyone who reads my original blog (link is also in the header of this one as it is still going and we are trying to integrate it with Substack) or my previous one (now abandoned) or has followed me online for years or knows me personally will be aware that I have absolutely zero interest in leading anyone.

However, they will also be aware that I have actually led people (almost exclusively men) in a variety of fields, martial arts, which I taught for some time in two different styles, (Shotokan Karate and the Russian Systema) at different times, including a “breaking” from power structures within those hierarchies when they became of dubious ethics (usually linked to money) and they became focused on things other than the purity of the martial system being taught.

I also held various positions of at least partial and at times almost total leadership in various fields of the construction industry, having managed sites from a young age, and later even teams of quantity surveyors.

I have also, unwittingly for the most part, “led” a lot of people back to actual, real, original Christianity, which today is only found in Catholics that are 1958 Sedevacantists of the Totalist position, all other versions of “Christianity” either being a departure from the truth to some degree or other (eg. the Eastern Schismatics whose theology literally inverts what the Bible quite clearly states, as well as having been traitorous backstabbers many, many, many times, not having spread or defended the faith in any adequate way when compared to Catholicism, and have reneged on multiple agreements of faith and so on during the centuries).

On this last point, I have no delusions of either grandeur nor effectiveness. While I wrote the books , made the videos , and created avenues of learning on many different topics that though completely separate, when seen together make more sense of the human condition than frankly, anyone else’s work I have come across— I believe that any conversion that may have been prompted by my writing or work is ultimately the work of God, and I am just an incidental aspect of that path, so any “glory” is His, not mine. I am of course happy to be a useful instrument, but, in my heart of hearts, that is really all I feel I am in this respect. Any accolades or “glory” I might get would be the ones given to me by others, and not anything I seek or even look forward to. I do get regular emails thanking me from some aspect of my work, and I am very grateful for them, as they let me know I am on the right track, and it’s nice to know I may have been useful for someone.

Of course the people who buy paid memberships here even though my substack is completely open, definitely help me materially and also emotionally and spiritually. It’s always nice to be appreciated, but it has never been why I do what I do, write what I write, and live as I live.

As for effectiveness, I have no delusion that I will change the world. My aim is merely to change enough of my immediate surroundings that it will give my children a chance to be free of the dystopian pedovores currently running the world. At least in my little corner of the planet, I hope a viable city-state develops that will become too much trouble, or too strong to attack directly, and that my progeny and their friends are completely inured against the infiltration of rot that has taken over everything from the Church to the universities, every facet of government and education, and so on.

Why do I tell you this?

Because my point is that you can verify for yourself if you just read enough of my writings that what I wrote above is true. My only aim is to help YOU open your eyes to the world as it is (and it’s fucking far more horrible than you imagine, unfortunately) but not for any personal gain. Not for some sadistic pleasure in seeing you despair, nor because I have any interest in having a cult of personality follow me. I only have one aim:

First of all, the Truth above all. The Highest Truth at all times. Because everything else is secondary to that.

Secondly, yes, I do have an aim, but it is only that enough of you open your eyes and create communities of resistance and rebellion and complete reversal of the current zeitgeist of demonic pedophile that are running this planet, for the most part.

I would LOVE for a bunch of 1958 totalist sedevacantist zealots to all flock to this part of the world and buy up all the property around me and form our own city state in earnest. It’s frankly what I plan to have happen in the next decade or two or three or however long I have left.

That is indeed my aim, sure; but even if you will never even visit Europe and you form a community of zealotous Lutherans (heretics all!) and yet you manage to fight off the pedovores well, then more power to you, even if I think your entire clan is wrong about God and will ultimately end up in Hell.

In fact, there is such a group already: Orania , in the South African Karoo. When they started in the mid to late 1990s I thought it would go nowhere. Thirty years later they are a thriving and effective community. Do I agree with their NG Kerk Protestant retarded theology? No. Do I like their Orcish and equally retarded language of Afrikaans? No. Do I think for the most part they are not exactly geniuses? Yup.

BUT!

Do I respect them? Absolutely.

Would I be rude or not follow their rules if I ever visited their place? Never.

Would I make fun of them in some disparaging way even here on my blog? No.

They may not be my people. They may not be my cup of tea, as my English wife might say, but I am absolutely certain I can and do respect them more than most people on this planet, and I would absolutely abide by their rules if I ever were among them, and I would apologise for my brain’s refusal to learn their language. Nor is there any hypocrisy in any of this on my part. I also truly believe that at least some of them, if they got to know me, as much as they would think I am a salt-cock, pagan-Catholic, not quite white, olive-nigger, they too would respect me and be quite happy to stand next to me in the proverbial foxhole, as much as I would be proud and consider myself lucky to be standing next to them.

So my point here is simple: Yes, I absolutely believe Catholicism IS the only one true religion. And YES it was absolutely infiltrated and subverted by Satanists since the 1700s and they have created the Satanic Novus Orco Church which fools a majority of ignorant and lazy Catholics, so the only ones left that are properly Catholic are the 1958 Sedevacantists that know all the impostors after Pope Pious XII were not even Catholics, never mind Popes. And YES, Protestantism is the work of the devil and the secularisation of actual Christianity. And YES, Sedeprivationism is a BAD error and leads nowhere good and eventually only to the same Satanic Novus Orco Church being “redeemed” which is impossible. And YES I ONLY want 1958 Sedevacantists to become part of my eventual Kurganate . YES to all of that.

But I want YOU to make it too. I want YOU to wake up too. I want YOU to see things as they are too. And I don’t care if you hate my guts and want to create your own outpost of free people far, far, away from me. Go for it. I hope you win. You don’t need to send me money or make me your guru, or believe or agree with me on everything, or even most things. I hardly agree with anyone about most things anyway. I am an ornery bastard, and I don’t even like people in general much at all, because most of them are cowardly, weak, petty, stupid and selfish rats with the shrivelled hearts of pestilent mites.

But as long as your irritating, weak, flawed, erroneous, and petty ass is far away from me, in truth, I truly do love you; and I wish the absolute best for you and your children and loved ones. Truly I do, I am not just saying it. I certainly also DO wish you were smarter, not such a weak-ass, coward and idiot. Because if you were better you too would be a 1958 Sedevacantist, because you’d be able to figure it out yourself since you’d be smart and not lazy; and able to do logic; and base your view of life on objective facts instead of your ephemeral emotions. Of course, I wish all that too, but the important point is: I will never hold it personally against you that you are not.

I truly love you like a brother and hope you make it.

We are all flawed, and me too and in many ways that God only knows, so please don’t think I judge you in any spiritual sense. Of course, here on Earth, on the material world, if you come break my balls on my terms on my land, apocalypse in full swing, I might shoot you in the face. But be sure I would say a Hail Mary over your corpse before I dispose of it too, and will hold no animosity towards you and your soul.

It’s important you know that, because the next part I write about is really maybe the most important thing you might ever read in your life, and if you actually learn it, it may change your life radically, and for the better (which hardly ever means “easier” just so you know).

The Most Important Thing You Will Ever Learn

Notice I say LEARN. Not read. Because you can read it all and intellectualise it and sing its praises, and write songs to it… but… actually not learn it at all.

Intellectualising and pontificating is NOT the same as knowing and doing. In fact even knowing is not really knowing until there has been sufficient and repeatedly successful doing of it based on that knowing.

Realise that first. Then read the rest below and do whatever you need to do to LEARN IT.

Know (things) Yourself

This is the central theme of my book on Systema , the most effective martial art I have ever practiced and taught, and covered there in far more extensive fashion, but the point remains that until you become an actual independent thinker, able to reason things out from first principles on the basis of being able to reason correctly (that is, by the use of logic, setting aside your emotions and biases, as much as anyone can, and at least be aware of the ones you are not yet capable of doing so with), you will remain an automaton. A guided zombie. Raised on the “beliefs” instilled in your great-grand-parents, and eventually to you via your parents, siblings, classmates, friends and family, from birth. Almost none of the things you believe are things you have personally looked into objectively yourself.

If you had, for a start, your religion would almost certainly change drastically. At a minimum. The exception would be if you are already a 1958 totalist Sedevacantist Catholic.

So what do I mean?

I mean you have been lied to about everything. Short of maybe basic mathematics and SOME science, and if you actually know what it is, the use of the scientific method (very few people actually have any idea of what this REALLY is and how it actually works, and even fewer have any concept of its inherent limitations), almost everything else you have been told is badly flawed in major ways. And I include the “hard” sciences like Physics, and Electronics in this. And certainly Biology, Medicine, and Chemistry. Never mind the “soft” and almost pseudo-science subjects like psychology, psychiatry, and so on.

If you have not spent years digging up odd scientists who actually operated more as engineers (engineering is the only science you can really trust, because whatever the theory says, if you can get it to work in practice, then… the theory is irrelevant even if it said it was “impossible” ). 1

Your FIRST point of inquiry should be the understanding of formal and informal logic.

The basics of logic are simple, but the iterations of it become more and more refined, and yet, remain consistent and true, because we live in a Universe where objective reality (however confusing or unknowable it may at times appear to us) is indeed how it works. A simple extract from any site that defines the three laws of logic will give something along these line:

There are three fundamental laws of logic. Suppose P is any indicative sentence, say, “It is raining.”

The law of identity: P is P.
The law of noncontradiction: P is not non-P.
The law of the excluded middle: Either P or non-P.

The law of identity says that if a statement such as “It is raining” is true, then the statement is true. More generally, it says that the statement P is the same thing as itself and its different from everyhting else. Applied to all realty, the law of identity says that everything is itself and not something else.

The law of noncontradiction says that a statement such as “It is raining” cannot be both true and false in the same sense. Of course it could be raining in Missouri and not raining in Arizona, but the principle says that it cannot be raining and not raining at the same time in the same place.

The law of the excluded middle says that a statement such as “It is raining” is either true or false. There is no other alternative.

Just being aware of this and living this way, immediately puts the lie to a LOT of Clown World.

A man is a man.

A man is not a woman.

A man cannot get pregnant.

Basic? Yes. Obvious? Yes, to anyone even remotely sane. Important? You bet. If you can’t keep the basics founded on reality then your life and everything related to it is going to get increasingly chaotic and disrupted.

The next thing you may want to look out for is lengthy and lofty “explanations” of life by people professing to be using the “deep thoughts” of various grand-philosophers.

The reality is that the ancient philosophers of Aristotle, Plato, Socrates, and Marcus Aurelius, are still generally superior to most “modern” philosophers who in some cases are, and were, complete retards.

Nietzsche for example was a lifelong incel (involuntary celibate, i.e. incapable of getting laid for love, money or fame, because his personality was so radioactive to women), who died of syphilis, which apparently also rendered him insane, though I think I could make the case he was off his rocker long before the disease settled it.

Schopenhauer was a similarly afflicted goblin of nasty character as well as repulsive exterior, and even his own mother found him unpleasant. Yet, for some reason best known to themselves, a lot of people have been convinced these two guys were some kind of geniuses (I mean they were GERMAN FFS!) I assume it’s because almost no one has read the absolute bullshit and nonsense they wrote, particularly with respect to the females of the human species.

Machiavelli is considered a military and political genius, but almost no one is aware that after he wrote The Prince, a general in the army challenged him to be able to so much as get a platoon of men to march around a square. There was no trick. The commands were explained to him clearly and simply, and yet good old Niccolo couldn’t issue coherent enough orders to get a bunch of disciplined men to march on the perimeter of a square.

Clausewitz is a better and more practical philosopher than any of the above and his little book On War, is a mere tiny fraction of the vast volumes of trees the other three above wasted in their writings.

But no one knows. No one reads. No one learns for themselves.

Hitting a human sized target at 1.5 kilometres with a .300 Winchester Magnum rifle is supposed to be something only the best snipers can do. But with a month of training and some basic ability or talent to begin with, I think most men can make that shot in relatively good weather conditions most of the time.

Special Ops guys are supposed to be the best of the best, but I have trained and known several, and some of them I don’t even rate as particularly good. One guy died falling from a rock face on a hill that my father and I had hunted and climbed various times, shotguns in hand and no safety ropes to speak of. Of course accidents happen and I do not mean to speak ill of the dead, but our family, composed of twelve or thirteen year old me, my younger brother, my mother, my dad and a friend of his, beat a team of South African military men that used to play paintball matches together after having served together. And it wasn’t coincidence. I had evaluated their military tactics as basic, and ineffective against a determined enemy that wasn’t scared of them from the start.

So often in life I have been told what is or is not possible, only to discover for myself that most people who give advice haven’t got a clue about much of anything. After a while, you begin to learn who speaks just out of ego and who speaks only when necessary and out of personal experience.

This applies to every field, in every job or career or human effort in anything.

Given the above, I hope you at least take a few days to look into Catholic 1958 Totalist Sedevacantism. If only because I read the Koran, the Bhagavad Gita, countless books on Zen, Taoism, Daoism, Hinduism, and some other stuff too. And I have infiltrated several personality cults at various times, as well as different “Churches” just to see and study all sorts of weirdness people will throw themselves behind, including “gurus” of absolutely corrupt moral character, from alleged pedophiles (Sai Baba) and sexual assaulters (Amma the hugging saints), to brainwashing freaks like the Scientolgists, and others. And after 43 years of basic Zen-agnosticism, I found my way to a philosophy and model of reality that is simply vastly superior and answers far more questions than any other system I ever looked into.

I had discarded “Catholicism” early on, because what I was told was Catholicism, and what I experienced as Catholicism in the brief encounters I had with it, was in fact the result of impostors infiltrating and perverting and utterly INVERTING the truth of Catholicism and presenting THAT twisted lie as if it was Catholicism.

Once I looked at it again, and more properly this time, and started to read and study the patristic fathers and the ancient writings they put down even before the Bible was put together, it became clear that actual Catholicism has nothing to do with what Bergoglio and his retinue of homosexuals, drug addicts, pedophiles, fraudsters and Satanists pretend is the “Catholic Church”.

But even if you do not research Catholicism proper, PLEASE, learn to think for yourself. Check the things you have been told.

And when something seems just too perfect, or too clean, or too simple an explanation… well… look into it.

Was EVERY single Nazi an evil monster? Did six million Jews actually get gassed?

Did the Jewish Bolsheviks not kill almost ten times that number? And did Communist regimes the world over not kill millions too? Was Pinochet really the “bad guy”?

Did a Jewish plan after WWII actually kill over 10 million non combatant German civilians through mostly starvation? Did you ever read about that part anywhere?

Did WWI really start because some prince got shot in Yugoslavia?

Was Mother Theresa really a good person? Is the Dalai Lama? And is he funded by the CIA? Is antigravity technology really just science fiction? Who was Thomas Townsend Brown? Did the Nazi Bell exist? What was it? What was operation Argus? Or Operation Highjump?

You can play this game for years and the more you find out, the more you realise two things:

1. If aliens exist, this planet MUST be interdicted. We are too stupid, too vicious, too chaotic to be allowed to play around unchecked with antigravity devices. To that extent then, we must be living on a sort of prison planet.
2. The main coin of the realm is lies. Which fits with the Catholic belief that at least on this Earth (and possibly the entire material Universe) we are under the Dominion of the Prince of Lies.

Knowing that, you may want to explore a few of the links I put up above and figure out a few things; like say, about prayer and how it actually works . Who Jesus was. What God is. And so on.

Because above all, if you ever DO become the type that wants to think and know things for himself, the foundation of everything you do, should, as much as humanly possible, be based on the best model for reality you can find.

So I hope you look carefully at Catholicism. I have not found anything that even comes remotely close to explain the reality of our Universe. And it also has a couple of millennia of proven history that it has inevitably always generally improved life for the humans that adopted it as their way of life.

In any case, your ultimate belief about the Universe is fundamental, and will colour everything you think, believe and do, so choose wisely.

Only once you have a model of reality that is very good, can you begin to become properly effective. What do I mean by that?

I mean that money and wealth and power is not enough. You also need integrity, and congruency with your model of reality and belief system in it.

Wha you will find online, and on Substack too, is a bunch of guys who write a good story, but ultimately, what they are selling (often actually selling as they will have private posts for paid members only, unlike here) is just a distraction. Nonsensical theories that have zero application in the real world.

The Tree of Woe guy pontificates about better systems of government and “practical” approaches to law and order while pretending to have served in the military in some “active” capacity that turns out to have been a lie. And it is clear he pontificate sin ignorance, because until you have faced an armed mob in a thin line, and there isn’t any police, or army or anyone else that’s going to save your ass, and lived through that, or faced off against looters and held your ground and your stuff, and so on, you really don’t know jack-shit about the realities of law and order in a society that has broken down or is at war. And your theories are worth less than wind.

John Carter of Mars is a nice enough man, and he writes some interesting stuff, to be sure, but again, he is a theorist. None of his writings could be said to be practical. At most he might inspire you by reporting on this or that event or describing a PART of a theory that sounds nice.

The Johann Kurtz from Becoming Noble substack, which I briefly thought might actually be a doer, just published a nonsensical piece about how meritocracy is not a good thing, where, along with his “argument” selectively picking just this or that piece of fact, seen just through a specific direction, he tries to make the case that a society driven by meritocracy is not a good thing. But he hasn’t got a clue about the reality of what he speaks. I have lived in societies where more or less, meritocracy does get you somewhere (even the UK does this to an extent) and ones where it does nothing (Italy has plenty of very capable people, who can get nowhere, because my country is nest of networked relationships that stretches from getting a decent cup of coffee, to whether you will be fined by the tax man for some imaginary infraction or left alone to do whatever you want if you know the right people, and trust me, it sucks). I know that lack of meritocracy in a place like Africa condemns hundreds of thousands, or millions to indescribable poverty and injustice, and meritocracy can make a whole nation wealthy and prosperous. A benign dictator like Malawi had was a boon for his people. Remove him because was a “dictator” and suddenly you have connected morons becoming “professors” at the university where his citizens used to be able to quote Shakespeare and do physics and chemistry, who now light fires in the middle of the lounge because they have no clue what a stove is. I am not making this up. But good old Johann, who clearly can spin a good story and has a huge readership, writes drivel like this:

Meritocracy necessitates and idealizes the destruction of traditional boundaries. This began with the attack on class structures, but after the moral primacy of ‘merit’ is accepted, it must also be conceded that other structures which impede the centering of ‘merit’ should be questioned: national borders, gender divides, insular communities, and prejudices of all kinds.

The seeds of meritocratic thought arose in the West with the broader Enlightenment, which held that the scientific process – with its advocacy of quantification and objectivity – could be turned upon politics and human affairs more generally, in order to progress society towards utopia.

He sets up a complete straw man where if for some reason you put effectiveness above say, birthright class structure, for some reason this should also mean you now believe nations should not exist or have borders, women can be men, people no longer have the right to associate with who they wish in the groups they wish to be in, and all of a sudden we are all super-communists. It’s bullshit. And Johann is not a stupid guy, so all I can assume is that either he is a bullshitter and a fraud who writes whatever will get him the most paid subscribers, regardless of truth or fiction, or he is an arrogant prick who may even believe some of the stupid shit he tries to sell to you. The man supposedly has done well for himself in monetary terms in a high tech and high responsibility job. And he apparently did so by being a good boy and following all the rules to aim for such a career and life. And sure, if you are a soulless robot, or if you are just not that bright and really need to line all your ducks up to make a good life for yourself it’s a good strategy. And I certainly don’t mean to imply anyone should live as I have, which was basically as a character from an RPG game who decides to go “adventuring”. But frankly, anything I put my mind to I did well at. And sure, if I had followed his plan I would probably be a lot better off financially, but my soul would have shrivelled and I would be ignorant of reality to a far greater extent than I would ever be comfortable with.

The point here is not to crap on all the other Substackers, and make myself out to be some hero, but the reality and objective fact of the matter is that while you are obviously free to spend your time reading whatever you like, certain information only goes you the illusion of learning something worthwhile, which in reality is just a mirage.

How hard is it to understand that effectiveness at any given task or process is superior to adherence to some inefficient and completely artificial hierarchy? And I know of what I speak. I ran building sites using men that were efficient but that no one else wanted to use because they didn’t speak English well, or weren’t Irish like the company owners, or didn’t get drunk at lunch with the “old boys” on the site, Or were Russian, or whatever. And my sites outperformed everyone else’s sites in the entire firm. Meritocracy works. And anyone who says otherwise has simply never lived in the real world where what you actually get physically done counts. And in an economic crash and zombieland scenario, I’ll take the effective guy who understands how to put up fences, shoot instinctively and grow crops and dig a well, over some aristocrat wanna-be who pontificates about class structure. Besides which, buddy, I actually AM nobility. We have the family crest and history to prove it that goes back 800 years. And in my experience, ACTUAL Nobility, unlike you pretend wanna-bees who write blogs about “becoming noble” has no problem getting their hands dirty with the lowest of peasants. Because the term “Noblesse Oblige” actually means something to those of us who understand what it actually means, which is, that if we supposedly are “better” (at least here on Earth, by our station granted to us in this world by the Good Grace of God) then it is incumbent upon us, to the best of our limited ability, to be our brother’s keeper.

As for his other sentence about the Enlightenment, and trying to tie meritocracy to the works that Satanists spent centuries to achieve, is historically ignorant to a stunning degree. Catholic monks invented the scientific method, and they did so centuries before the Satanic instigators of the French Revolution and the creation of the first Freemasonic country in the world (the USA, in case you were not aware).

Science proceeded along hand in hand with Catholicism and Christianity for centuries, and it is only the lies of the Satanic freemasons and indeed the Illuminati of the Enlightenment that have pretended to rewrite history and make a lie of it.

The buildings and feats of Engineering throughout Catholic Europe are a testament to the reality of how history actually played out. Venice alone, my city, is a living testament to feats of engineering that in some cases we are still struggling to recover. The Cathedrals and buildings created remain feats beyond our current ability to imagine, and indeed repeat in some cases. Galileo was placed under house arrest because he was an unpleasant little shit for the most part, and not as claimed for his being such a smart-not (TM) he figured out the Moon moves (which was not unknown before him). The Ancients did not think the Earth was plat. That took the CIA and a bunch of American retards to even become a thing, and that is TODAY. The Ancient greeks not only knew it was a sphere, but because they could do math and think, had even approximated its circumference. Columbus called the red Indians “Indian” because he thought he’d gone all the way round and landed in India, which makes it obvious he too knew it was a sphere.

Einstein was a plagiarist, a sex pervert of incestuous leaning and a disgusting father and husband who abandoned his first wife and son to crushing poverty. Martin Luther King was a rapist and plagiarist and now it’s FINALLY being made public, and Lee Harvey Oswald never shot JFK and anyone who ever thought he had is an idiot who has probably never shot a rifle in his life.

Again, reader, my point is not to show you how “smart” I am and how stupid everyone else is, and yes it is a fact I tend to be about 20 to 30 years ahead of most everyone else in terms of figuring out how things really work, but that’s not the point. The point I want you to be the kind of guy (or girl) who makes it. Who finds their own way over the tsunami of lies and murderous intent they have in for us and finds a way to build a castle on a rock that holds them off and eventually we take them out for good and have our children free to roam the Earth and live their lives without being brain-chipped, monitored 24/7 and controlled in terms of every aspect of their life. I want them riding the range with their six-guns and rifles in the saddle and no care about digital “money” or vaccines, or having to register your DNA in order to grow your own potatoes.

And that is what I write for and I am not theorising anything. I moved to a rural area, and am learning to become a farmer day by day and it’s not easy and it takes a lot of different skills, which I try and tell you about as I can when I have a little time.

But first of all buddy, friend, guy I’ll never meet but I hope you do well… First of all, above everything else, man… you REALLY need to learn to”

1. Think. And,
2. Think for yourself.

Everyone likes to believe they do that. I assure you that over 90% of people reading this do not. And the people reading this are the cream of the crop, trust me. I don’t write “filler” and my “long-form” is beyond the average fruit-fly like attention span. And my run on sentences would make a writer from the 1800s proud, but the average millennial gets lost and has to have an emergency latte to cope with them.

So… I sincerely hope you look into logic. Then that you jettison mainstream media and history and if you really want a boost, sign up to Kurgan TV or my YT channel , or read some of my books , but even if you don’t please, do learn to think for yourself.

May your efforts leads you and your loved ones, and the rest of us too, closer to freedom from the rulers of this fallen Earth.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

This post will not mean a lot to you if you don’t even know what the issue is, so there is a cliff’s notes version directly below labelled introduction. If you already know what a Novus Ordo impostor clergy is, a fake 2023 “sedevacantist”, an una-cum 1 “sedevacantist”, a sedeprivationist, or finally a 1958 sedevacantist is (i.e. and actual Catholic), then you can skip the intro and go directly to the core post.

If you are a little fuzzy on the above (or even totally ignorant of most of the terms) then the below intro should really help. Let me preface it by saying that it will simply be a summary of the facts. I do not intend to provide exhaustive (or even any) links and references. Mostly because almost all that work has already been done in BELIEVE! and Reclaiming the Catholic Church. This merely aims to explain the concept in very accessible layman’s terms so ANYONE reading it can understand it.

Please be aware that mental retards that start to spout off some mentally retarded nonsense about Catholicism, ignoring the post in order to spout their retardation, will immediately be banned from ever being able to comment again. So, protestants, curb your heretical tongues if you will and instead contemplate this image.

Introduction

The Catholic Church was instituted by Jesus Christ Himself, putting Peter at its head as the first Pope. The Church then put together the Bible some three hundred years after the ascension of Christ, from both written and oral tradition. At this time, the Church already had 300 or so years of Popes, Holy Mass complete with transubstantiation, the perpetual virginity and immaculate conception of Mary and so on. And despite attacks from various Magus , (magicians, wizards, deceivers) described even in the Bible itself, gnostics, heretics and their heresies of all types, not to mention the most barbaric and vicious persecutions by various Roman emperors (and later by various European kins and emperors), the Church continued to grow and spread the gospel.

The schism of the Easter “Orthodox” was nothing more than their usual (aptly named) byzantine politics rooted in worldly matters. Keep in mind that until 1054, literally EVERY Christian until then knew and accepted that the Pope in Rome was the ultimate authority on Church matters wherever and whenever a dispute appeared. In any case, the fact this was mostly just “politics as usual” for the Byzantines, is clearly evidenced by the fact that when they called for help from the Islamic depredations of their cities and lands, some 40 years after splitting from, and rejecting the West and the Pope that had in any even tried his best to reconcile with them, the Catholics immediately mounted the First Crusade, at the behest of Pope Urban II, who gave a rousing speech that convinced the most wealthy and noble families to go so far as sell all their lands and possessions and fund the Crusade to save the Eastern schismatics. And when they started to do so, the Eastern Schismatics immediately made alliances with eh Muslims and literally attacked and tried and kill the Catholic that had saved them. This happened repeatedly and incessantly through the first, second, and third crusade. By the time of the fourth crusade the Venetians had enough and so Constantinople was sacked (rather gently as these things go in history, by the way). The Backstabbing Eastern Schismatics are still whining to this day how the Catholics “massacred them” for no reason at all other than greed. Right.

some 500 years after that we get that maid-raping, nun-fetishists, probably Jewish fake Monk Luther who is at first rejected by everyone, including Henry VIII, until old impotent Henry gets bored of his wife and wants to murder-divorce her, and the Pope say “No. Marriage is for life.” At that point Henry splits from the Church massacres Cathoiliics and steals all their lands, wealth, Churches and so on and invents his own version of religion and by extension gives licence to many other “nobles” on the mainland to do the same. their motives are entirely obvious and historically documented as having to do with money, land and power, and almost precisely nothing with the in any case absurd theological “differences” (wild lies and errors Martin made up) that Protestants supposedly had then with Catholicism.

From this time on, it became increasingly required for the valid Popes of the Catholic Church to spell out things that everyone including illiterate peasants had always known, understood and never questioned. But as is Satan’s way, the gnostics, various tribes of Satanists, and the entirely Satanic Freemasons, whose temples the flaming homosexual and heretic King James instituted as we find them today, along with his version of the “Bible” which aside having already been severely edited by Luther had also been edited by the enemies of christ (the Pharisees) for 700 years, and which today contains more than 33,000 “errors” of translation. This is the “Bible” revered by the most retarded of the Protestants sects, the KJV, also known as the Freemason Bible, which is basically saying the Satanic bible, because Freemasonry is absolutely, 100% Satanism, and anyone who says otherwise is simply an outrageous liar (i.e. Satanist).

So… as a result of the hydra-like spawning of the people rebelling against God’s Church and “Protesting” it, Popes (the valid ones anyway, because there have been more than 40 anti-popes even before 1958) had to start issuing papal encyclicals that spelt out in autistic detail, what everyone who had not been deceived and lied to by these heretics. So things like Cum Ex Apostolato Officio, which says the most obvious and logical thing, which is, if you behave like a heretic, guess what, you’re not a Catholic, and therefore not a priest, or bishop, or Pope. You are nothing but a heretic and no one needs to make any big deal about it, nor is an official pronouncement required. Again, this is not rocket science, and yet, there are so many morons on this planet that even if (when?) Bergoglio starts to sacrifice babies on the altar, they will still try to say he really is a Pope.

Nevertheless, this constant having to explain that 2+2 is still 4, has always been 4 and so on, gives the enemies of truth and God, the latitude to say “Aha! It was never 4, you guys only stated that in 1451! This means it was always 3.5!”

And once again, because the average person really is best to just be silent and do as his VALID priest says, a LOT of confusion and lies and infiltration of the Church began to become possible.

In fact, the Satanists (in their Legions of names, be it Illuminati, Freemasons, Carbonari, Golden Dawn, Skull and Crossbones, etc, etc, etc, ad nauseam) began to infiltrate the Church with Satanists, homosexuals, pedophiles and communists (see Bella Dodd and many other Papal encyclicals, most notably by Pious X) in earnest from the late 1770s. And by 1958 had finally managed to make so complete an infiltration that the first of so far an unbroken chain of false Popes was “elected” Angelo Roncalli. And the Church has been absent a Pope and absent ANY valid clergy in the Vatican today.

Vatican II are 16 documents which ALL contain direct reversal of positions the real Catholic Church always had unchanged for 2 millennia. What the Satanists claim were “changes” are of two sorts:

1. Clarifications of what should already have been obvious to any Catholic because it always was the case. For example: the papal encyclical of Pope Paul the IV, Cum-Ex Apostolate Officio, summarised (and not abrogated) in Canon 188 part 4 of the Code of Canon Law of 1917, which basically states that heretics are not Catholics and a heretic pope is not a Pope, and when this abandonment of the faith is done publicly, regardless of rank, no one needs to say anything officially, nor make a ruling etc. that person is a heretic and should forever be treated as one by all Catholics.
2. Changes to ecclesiastical rules or laws, which is entirely permitted, because these are not divine laws. So for example a rule wa introduced you need 70 cardinals to elect a Pope. This is not a “forever rule” it became necessary as the Church became global in size. But in the current situations, there doesn’t even exist ANY valid Cardinals, and yet, neither did Cardinals exist in the year 250 AD, and the people voting for a Pope were sometimes not even clergy. And it is a dogmatic principle of Catholicism that the truth is immutable, so any divine rule that was true in the past cannot be changed in the future, and vice-versa. The only rules that CAN and HAVE changed are human rules. But a conclave of remaining valid clergy (Only 1958 TOTALIST Sedevacantists are fully and correctly Catholic in their theology) could happen tomorrow to elect a newly valid Pope. Because Sedevacantists number probably a million or two at most (but have HUGE numbers of sympathisers and our numbers keep growing) this would not be wise and the enemy would immediately shout with all the power of their wealth and mass media that this is a ridiculous act by a few crazy people. Not too dissimilar from what the Roman Empire did to the first few actual Catholics, but they are not crucifying us and setting us on fire (yet).

So, in reality, the real rules of the church that matter (divine law) has not changed at all in 2 millennia. And the entirety of these rules were finally put down in ONE document that took years to compile because it required the vetting of some 40,000 documents in total (and maybe several thousands more) to ensure that no aspect of the rulings of all the popes and doctors of the Church expressed in various writings from the start of the Church to 1917 was in any kind of conflict or contradicted each other. In short, the Code of Canon Law of 1917, is the most vetted document humanity has ever created, and was put together by two valid popes (Pious X and Benedict XV) and a college of Cardinals, to ensure no error in it. So, it has the indelible stamp of infallibility, which the magisterium of the Church, as per dogmatic Catholic belief, has.

In short, ALL the rules of the Church and Catholicism can be found in this document and the documents produced by the valid Popes from 1917 to 1958 as official pronouncements ex-cathedra (from the chair of Peter, that is, a Pope can be a completely flawed man, but when he issues a decree officially from his position as Pope of Faith and Morals, we Catholic believe that pronouncement will be supernaturally protected from error, not because the Pope is infallible per se, but because Jesus promised He will always be with us, so a valid Pope cannot pronounce a heretical document.)

Now… according to the CoC of 1917, Roncalli, and all the other impostors became heretics by producing, promoting and promulgating the heretical Vatican II documents. In short, the ONLY actual Catholic clergy left are those that reject everyone who promoted and did not refute Vatican II and all its heresy.

Anyone claiming to be “Catholic clergy” who does not reject all of Vatican II and its fake “Popes” is absolutely NOT a Catholic, never mind validly ordained clergy.

Right… if you have followed that, we now have reached the issue about sedeprivationism vs sedevacantism, which, ultimately, as it turns out, is just the latest Satanic attack against the last remaining Catholics.

A last point before we get into the autistic level details (what, you thought the above was convoluted? Wait, you sweet innocent!): Some lost souls, like Ann Bernhardt, pretend that Ratzi the Nazi was a valid Pope, which is of course absurd as he was one of the main architects of Vatican II. Nevertheless these confused souls, illogical morons, or knowing deceivers, whichever the case may be individually, all “believe” that as Ratzi was the “Pope” when he died, because Bergy-the-oleous is clearly a Satanist from all he does, they too suddenly became Sedevacantists. But these are 2023 “Sedevacantists” (when Ratzi went to finally meet his master in Hell), which are, at best, just another deceived mass of well meaning (but erroneous) Catholics.

So, to be clear, when I say Sedevacantists, I am always referring to ACTUAL Sedevacantist, that is, those who recognise we have been without a valid Pope since the 9th of October of 1958; the day Pope Pious XII died.

Now contemplate this little image if you’re thinking Bergy-the-Oleous is still “Pope” instead of the Satanic defiler of the Church he is.

Sede vs Sede

Now we have reached a point that has been brewing behind the scenes for several years.

If you paid attention to the introduction, it should be obvious that the situation with Catholicism today is as follows:

1. A HUGE number of nominal Catholics that are almost entirely ignorant of these details and believe themselves to be Catholics in good faith and are increasingly becoming despondent, disillusioned, let down, distraught, and even leaving Catholicism because the constant heresy of the Pedophile Protector Jorge Bergoglio, pretender to the Throne of Peter, are so outrageous that no sane man can think he really is a Catholic of any sort, never mind a Pope. I mean, the placing of a demonic symbol of a baby-eating demon (Pachamama) on the altar of Christ during supposed Holy Mass, and then doing the ritual to that same demon in the Vatican with a bunch of Cardinals and Bishops, is kind of a clue. If you are deaf, dumb, blind, and have the IQ of a lobotomised rat on crack. To be clear these people ARE catholics, but they have been fooled massively and are in error. However, if they now have read this far, they now have an obligation to educate themselves on these matters or else possibly become guilty of a mortal level sin of sloth. Because we’re not talking about leaving some dishes undone here. We are talking about not taking the time to learn the truth about your supposed faith and thus allegiance to God and Jesus Christ and the Truth above all.
2. A large number of INVALID and FAKE “Catholic” Clergy. These impostors are in the first place NOT validly ordained, because the ritual for ordination was changed and thus made invalid, and in any case, heretics cannot ordain valid clergy. So these are all just impostors in “Catholic” clothing. And even if a few of them might be well-meaning ignorants, then they are at best, criminally incompetent. because being a “priest” and being unaware of these things is like saying you’re an engineer but have no clue what a bending moment is. Sorry buddy, if you really don’t know there is no damned way you should EVER be let near a construction site, or, in their case, the supposed robes of a clergyman. But for the most part these people are absolutely knowing and conscious deceivers, as demonstrated by the homosexual orgies in the Vatican (Coccopalmieri etc.), the scandals of child abuse that have skyrocketed since the 1960s (and even earlier because the infiltration had been ongoing for a long time), and the continued heresies these freaks keep pushing.
3. A small number of still VALID Sedevacantist clergy, that, however, as we have been in an interregnum since 1958 (from the Latin “between realms” the period when one Pope dies and before another valid one is elected) have no jurisdictional authority at all. Because all jurisdictional authority derives from the pope. So in essence, while valid Priests and Bishops can continue to dispense the sacraments, perform Holy Mass, and Bishops can ordain Priests and other Bishops,2 but there are no dioceses, and no Bishop nor priest has any authority over a specific territory, congregation, etc. In essence, all Bishops and Priests become first and foremost dispensers of sacraments. And of course, they can keep teaching and doing their duties, but no layman is obligated by anything other than his own sense of what is right and true and his conscience to give his or her loyalty or obedience to any of them, beyond that of not behaving in a way that contravenes Catholicism. What I mean by this is that NO ONE, No Bishop, no Priest has the right to tell a group of lay people “You can’t discuss theology amongst yourselves”.” Or, “You can’t take sacraments from THAT guy!” (pointing to another valid clergyman). This point is EXTREMELY IMPORTANT to keep in mind for a little later.
4. Laypeople that are Sedevacantists, are aware of these issues and attend only valid masses given by valid clergy. And herein lies the snake.

Within the Sedevacantist movement, keeping in mind that no Bishop nor priest has any more power than any other. And none have any Jurisdiction over anything, because it all stems from, and is assigned by, the Pope and only a VALID POPE can do that. Again, this is an extremely important point to remember.

Now, the thing about Catholicism is that it is ONE True Church, undivided. So, while the mouth-breathing and drooling retarded protestants, devious Novus Orcians, Eastern Schisatics and other gnostics all want to pretend Sedevacatists are just like protestants because they don’t recognise the Pope, the truth, of course is simply that we don’t recognise a wild otter as the Pope either. And Bergy-the-oleous and Ratzi the Nazi, and Wojtla the Pole, and Luciani the murdered would-be Vatican Banker Investigator, and Roncalli the Freemason, and Montini the handmaiden to Satan, along with all their imps, are no more Catholic than a wild otter either. And possibly considerably less so, in fact. So yeah, we don’t recognise ANY of them as clergy of Catholicism.

I mention that because, while it is true that Catholics are one, this does not mean there aren’t open debates about various theological things. So, if you are Catholic you absolutely must believe in the Trinity and say that conversion to Catholicism (or confirmation to it) must be done of your own free will without coercion, same with marriage and so on, but there are other things that can be thought of slightly different from different people, and here now enters the sulphuric smoke of what the deceivers love… Any tiny doubt, any discrepancy, any honest inquiry, becomes for them, a way to infiltrate and parasitically bend, and twist the truth so as to confuse, deceive, and deny both innocents and faithful alike into error.

So, let us now enter into the difference between what is known as the Totalist position of sedevacantism (aka correct Catholicism) and the sedeprivationist position of sedevacantism (aka flawed Catholicism).

The basic difference is that father Gerard de Lauriers, a theologian of note, came up with the theory of Cassiciacum (it was first published in the French magazine by that name). In my opinion, it was a way to explain to those clergy who may not have been immediately prone to say “Wait a minute, Satan, this Vatican II stuff is ALL HERESY!” and throw mounting off the Papal thrown and preferably off the balcony into St. Peter’s square, you know, to send a bit of a message to the other Freemasons infesting the Vatican. It was a polite way of saying “Look guys, maybe you believed he was really a Pope, maybe you guys really are not Satanists too and you just made a mistake, but once you read the Vatican II documents and the totally heretical changes to the Mass (which is not permitted, as per the eternal Papal Encyclical Quo Primum), surely you can see he really isn’t and we should do something about it?”

In a nutshell, and yes, it is accurate, the Thesis (as I will call it from now on) is a long treatise that delves into philosophy, Aristotelian logic and so on, but in essence tries to say that a Pope can be a “Pope” from the “material” (Physical) aspect, but fail to be a real(TM) Pope “spiritually” is he doesn’t behave like one. Now, this is absolute nonsense and completely illogical, as well as going against basic logic it also goes agains Catholic dogma. And while I believe Father (and later Bishop) De Luriers had good intentions… well, sometimes the best efforts of mice and men still means good intentions lead straight to Hell eventually.

First of all, there is absolutely no way anyone can definitively say what anyone else’s “material” or “spiritual” intent is. In Catholicism we have two levels of knowledge concerning a human being and his “fitness” in relation to God:

an External forum and an Internal forum

The external forum is what we can all see, hear and know by the use of our senses. So, if someone acts pertinaciously and publicly in defection of the faith, we MUST judge him to be a heretic. This is not as if a priest makes a mistake at mass, or teaches something in genuine error and then when corrected figures it out and corrects himself. This is the persistent denial of Catholic Dogma by people who are supposed to be the protectors of it.

As for the internal forum, that is between each man and woman and God. only He truly knows what is really going on inside them.

But that is NOT our concern. Our concern as Catholics is to:

a) Obey the infallible magisterium of the Church (eg CoC 1917), and

b) call out heresy wherever we see it as obvious and clear. And nothing can be clearer than Vatican II, since those 16 documents upturn 2,000 years of dogma with total heresy, and were published in the most notorious fashion possible since they are supposed to be for the whole world. And as Cum-Ex Apostolate officio clearly says, anyone who behaves as heretic must be treated as a heretic, and anyone that knowingly receives a heretic as if he was not one, becomes a heretic too.

This is really basic, and simple logic.

Canon 188 part 4 is absolutely clear:

Canon 188.

Ob tacitam renuntiationem ab ipso iure admissam quaelibet officia vacant ipso facto et sine ulla declaratione, si clericus:

4º A fide catholica publice defecerit;

Any office becomes vacant upon the fact and without any declaration by tacit resignation recognized by the law itself if a cleric:

4.° Publicly defects from the Catholic faith;

Note the important points:

UPON THE FACT – Their actions alone make it so.

WITHOUT ANY DECLARATION – NO ONE needs to make any pronouncement, judgement, investigation, nothing, literally no one needs to do anything at all to make this heretic finally be a heretic officially. it’s done. the fact itself does it, and…

BY TACIT RESIGNATION – That is, again, no one need say anything or do anything, the instant resignation of that heretic’s position is caused by…

THE LAW ITSELF – The entire conviction and judgement is done by the law itself, this rule itself. No judge, no tribunal, no congregation of cardinals, or anything else is required.

Just as if you sacrifice a baby on the altar, this means you are absolutely not a Catholic and it’s not anything that ever needs to be discussed or argued about. the law is clear an unambiguous, and the logic is such a 5 year old child gets it.

There is no mention of material/spiritual duality or weird separation of these things in some amorphous idea that has zero basis in Catholic dogma, basic logic, or Canon Law.

In essence, such a thesis is really basic itself on some version (not even necessarily correct) of Aristotelian “logic” and possibly a gnostic element of “duality”.

The way that the seminarians, priests, and Bishops that follow the Sedeprivationist Thesis defend this illogical, nonsensical idea by essentially appealing to “charity”. Which in many cases is certainly true charity in their heart, but this “giving the benefit of the doubt” is an absolute deadly error.

The Danger of Sedeprivationism

Because Sedeprivationists are essentially saying that not only the “Pope” but also all the fake Novus Ordo clergy are “materially” valid but “spiritually” invalid, potentially, all Bergolgio and his Satanic imps have to do, is say:

“Oh yeah, by the way guys, the sedes (without saying which ones) were right, Vatican II is really bad stuff, but hey it was only a “conciliar” council so, blah, blah, anyway, ok guys, we agree, Vatican II was bad. We all repent and we’re gonna be the good guys ok? Not getting caught raping little kids while we sort cocaine off each other’s asses anymore. Alright? we all good, cool. Now come to our (invalid, fake, sacrilegious) Mass and be good Catholics!”

And at this point what do the nominally sedeprivationist clergy gonna do? After all, their “idea” has come true, the “Pope” repented, and now all is well! Right?

Except…

NO!

Because from Cum-Ex Apostolate Officio (note especially the bold part):

• (ii) that, moreover, they shall be unfit and incapable in respect of these things and that they shall be held to be backsliders and subverted in every way, just as if they had previously abjured heresy of this kind in public trial; that they shall never at any time be able to be restored, returned, reinstated or rehabilitated to their former status or Cathedral, Metropolitan, Patriarchal and Primatial Churches, or the Cardinalate, or other honour, any other dignity, greater or lesser, any right to vote, active or passive, or authority, or Monasteries and benefices, or Countships, Baronies, Marquisates, Dukedoms, Kingships and positions of Imperial power; but rather that they shall be abandoned to the judgement of the secular power to be punished after due consideration, unless there should appear in them signs of true penitence and the fruits of worthy repentance, and, by the kindness and clemency of the See itself, they shall have been sentenced to sequestration in any Monastery or other religious house in order to perform perpetual penance upon the bread of sorrow and the water of affliction;
• (iii) that all such individuals also shall be held, treated and reputed as such by everyone, of whatsoever status, grade, order, condition or pre-eminence he may be and whatsoever excellence may be his, even Episcopal, Archiepiscopal, Patriarchal and Primatial or other greater Ecclesiastical dignity and even the honour of the Cardinalate, or secular, even the authority of Count, Baron, Marquis, Duke, King or Emperor, and as such must be avoided and must be deprived of the sympathy of all natural kindess.

In short, once you have been a heretic, you simply CANNOT EVER be rehabilitated and you will have authority over precisely NO ONE. Even if your repentance is accepted as valid, the very BEST you can hope for is to be locked away in a monastery to remain in perpetual penance until you drop dead.

It really can’t be made clearer than that.

But now, with Sedeprivationism, we have again, a snake entering the Church, and there are already rumblings of some sedeprivationist Bishops or Priest making some funny noises about maybe someone like Vigano could convince a few Cardinals and other Bishops to “repent” just like he did, and then vote in a “real” Pope this time. And then everyone can clap.

No. As I stated already in 2020 in my book Reclaiming the Catholic Church , at which time I was trying to redeem the word sedeprivationist, 3 I nevertheless stated that Vigano was a heretic, and that even if he were elected Pope tomorrow, he would just still be a fake Pope and a heretic. And even if he truly did repent and denounce not just Vatican II but all the false Popes (which to my understanding he still has not done, he still considers them “valid” just like the SSPX, and other supposed “traditionalists”) by inviolable Catholic Dogma, and hence infallible and divine law, he should have authority over precisely NO ONE. Ever.

But, as I have repeatedly stated since, in any case, Vigano is a snake, and always has been. Vigano has a Phd in Canon Law and he received this long before the fake “new” canon law of 1983, created by the Satanists in the Novus Orco for the express purpose of trying to “delete”the last and real code of canon law that Catholicism ever needed, that of 1917, meaning his Phd is precisely in Canon law of 1917, that is, the REAL Canon Law. Which means it is absolutely IMPOSSIBLE, for him to NOT know that all the fake Popes and himself too, are not even catholics. They are Satanists, impostors and at BEST heretics. And kept silent for over 50 years, and NOW he pretends to be all for the “real” Church. But we have already seen a heretic like him, at best, should be locked away in a monastery in penance, what business does he have pretending he is anything but a heretic? None.

HOWEVER, we already have at least one Sedeprivationist bishop and possibly others, and possibly sedeprivationist clergy too, that appear to be starting the rumours or posing the idea that well, if only Vigano repented, as he did (did he? then why does he not denounce all the fake Popes as fake, and in any case, even if he does… monastery. Perpetual penance. Fin.) and his buddy cardinals did the same, and Bergy bites the dust, maybe they can just cause a “revolution” in the Church. That is: a fake takeover by one group of Satanists to replace another group of Satanists, in order to better fool the masses, who are starting to hear about Sedevacantists and 1958 Sedevacantists in particular, and starting to understand what the Totalist position is, and starting to ask more questions, and starting to become sedevacantists and getting communities together, and producing lots of children, and living like actual Catholics.

So at this point, we need to ask:

Can we trust any sedeprivationist clergy to do the right thing and protect the church?

THAT is the question.

And many people reading this (because believe me, little as my reach is, it eventually gets there, because sedevacantists search incessantly for the truth) who are sedes of one type or another will be deeply offended by this question.

For a number of reasons:

1. Sedeprivationist clergy are still valid clergy, whatever their errors may be.
2. There are undoubtedly very honest, good, innocent priests and possibly even a bishop or two who are genuine and have too been fooled by a lot of words, and their overabundance of “charity” in giving the Satanists a totally unwarranted and erroneous “benefit of the doubt”. I say let’s call it niceness, though, not charity, because real charity can include the shooting someone in the face to put them out of their misery, and in my view, these type of priests and bishops are all the types who would hold the suffering guy’s hand to the end and deliver last rites (which is fine, no one expects or needs them to be like me, God forbid) but far too nice to do such a sometimes needed thing. And THAT, paradoxically is the problem. I am no one special, I am not clergy, I am just a layman and a very imperfect one at that (genuinely, this is not false modesty) but if and when a real crusade begins, I’m the guy you want at the command of your troops, or in your foxhole. And surely I need good people behind me, because so busy might I get in the battle, I may well forget to do the right thing and say a Hail Mary over the fallen enemies I would trample by the hundreds given half a chance. The fact these good men exist in the ranks of the sedeprivationists is not in doubt by me, but neither is the fact that they are in error with respect to the validity of the thesis.
3. Humans get attached to their ideas and few of them are the ones who can turn on a time once their idea has been demonstrated to be wrong. So even if someone following a sedeprivationist clergyman started to get some doubts, it’s unlikely they would begin to rock the boat too much, and when some “rude bastard” like me comes storming in upsetting applecarts and making waves for fishing boats and whipping everyone into a theological frenzy, they react like wounded animals and tend to attack the messenger instead of the culprits.
4. Some, regardless of what they are, are always brainwashed in one way or other. Be they Clown World believers or the most devout Catholics.

In any case, the answer to the question, regardless of how anyone feels about it, is clearly no. We cannot trust them. Because they are holding on to a nonsensical and invalid, and completely outdated theory that is now obvious has no basis in fact. And it this thesis, and this thesis alone, that might (falsely) “redeem” the Viganos of the Satanic Novus Orco cult, and thus reduce the numbers of real Catholics even further.

The reality is that there is even the potential that perhaps one or more of the sedeprivationist clergy are actually consciously aiming for this. Whether under misguided good intentions or intentional evil devious ones, only God knows, but certainly, one could see how what Rodney Stark calls a clergyman of Power, say a Bishop, who is more concerned with establishing greater and grander Churches and seminaries and perhaps glorifying himself as the leader of the saviours of the real Church, might just feel that if he manages to convince the Viganos of the world to denounce Bergoglio, hey, maybe he can become the next Pope, or if not, at least he can be part of the “saviours” of the Church and his influence and power will increase. And potentially he may well be so poorly educated in Canon Law, Catholicism, reality and truth, that his avarice, his greed for power, blinds him to the truth, and maybe in his heart of hearts he believes it’s a good thing (honestly I find this implausible, again, you cannot be a Bishop and not consciously know these things).

But in any case, whether misguided or intentionally trying to further destroy the remnant of the real Catholic Church, such a Bishop, would absolutely be furthering the goals of the devil and the other devils currently squatting like Gargoyles in the Vatican.

How to Identify Problematic Sedeprivationist Clergy

In the first place, you can immediately conclude that ANY sedeprivationist clergy is in error with regard to the thesis, and as such, even if honest and good men, to be first of all made aware of these issues and then see how they react.

But that aside, we can immediately tell if any clergy is abusing their power if they act in total contravention of canon law.

For example:

1. Do they claim to have authority where none exists (because we are in an interregnum)? If yes, they are talking nonsense, should be immediately called out on it and be asked to correct their error. In private first, as the bible commands, with a few friends or colleagues, preferably other clergy, if any will be so brave, in a second instance, and finally publicly and openly if they still do not reverse their error.
2. Do they deny the sacraments to the faithful on the basis of either the thesis or their error in 1 above? If yes they are now also breaking divine law and are committing a serious error and sin against the faithful.
3. How do they answer the question of a heretic supposedly never being allowed to return to a position of ANY authority in the Church? Other than by falsely claiming that Cum Ex Apostolate officio is “abrogated”4 or that “well some guy somewhere was allowed at some point so it must be okay.” Any previous error that may have been committed is not a sanction to repay it. What arguments do they have against this? (Pro-tip: none exist, only waffling).
4. Do they bar would-be seminarians from studying at their seminary unless they adopt the erroneous Thesis? If yes, then again, they are perverting the path of would be good clergy, but forcing onto them an erroneous belief system in a false theology.

So, if your Bishop has done any of these things, and continues to defend the Thesis with nonsensical appeals to “we need a judgment” or “no one can judge the Pope” (we are not, first he is not the pope, and secondly the infallible magisterium of the Church in the form of CoC 1917 does so by the law itself.), you need to realise that he is NOT protecting the church, and valid Bishop though he may be, he absolutely does NOT deserve your respect at a human level. he needs to correct himself, repent and heal himself and become a FAR better custodian of the church before he really opens his mouth on anything else. Valid Bishop though he may be.

Why deprive him of all human respect, even if you acknowledge (as I do) the validity of his orders? Again, let me point out how heretics are to be treated, as per Cum Ex Apostolate officio:

(iii) that all such individuals also shall be held, treated and reputed as such by everyone, of whatsoever status, grade, order, condition or pre-eminence he may be and whatsoever excellence may be his, even Episcopal, Archiepiscopal, Patriarchal and Primatial or other greater Ecclesiastical dignity and even the honour of the Cardinalate, or secular, even the authority of Count, Baron, Marquis, Duke, King or Emperor, and as such must be avoided and must be deprived of the sympathy of all natural kindess

See that emphasised phrase? Now, any valid clergy that refuses sacraments, under pretence of needing to be heeded as if they have jurisdiction, or refuses say to allow would be seminarians to study at their seminary unless they adopt the Thesis, or refuses sacraments to Catholics that do not adhere to the Thesis, are not (yet) full blow heretics, but they absolutely are bad for the church and should be called on it, and removing any human respect from them is the first step to give them a little taste of what becoming a heretic further down the line might feel like.

Also, it removes their power over the congregation they are slowly but surely leading to Hell.

Lastly, you need to consider the possibility they are infiltrators too, or bought out by their own greed and lust for power. Unfortunately you can never let your guard down, the enemies of the church are Legion, and this time of darkness has been prophesied by many Catholic Saints through the ages and by our lady of La Salette and Fatima (despite the many attempts to deviate, change, and confuse the actual events as they took place).

Conclusions

This long post is merely a first salvo against those Bishops and clergy that know very well who they are. I was aware of their errors at least seven years ago, and I pointed out these errors openly to the congregations they affected. I also offered such a Bishop a chance to correct himself privately, and offered that if he did so I would immediately apologise for my calling out his erroneous behaviour and respect him as the valid bishop he is but also as a theologian. His response was to tell me I could no longer receive sacraments from him. Supposedly because on my blog I had the mage of a naked ex-girlfriend in the gallery. A picture posted there many years before I ever became catholic, and with the total approval and acceptance of the woman in question. Besides, she is tastefully posed and there are more pornographic paintings and sculptures by well-known patrons of the Catholic Church when it was still Catholic. The implication of his “banning” me, being none of “his” priests, trained in his seminary would likely offer them to me either, which of course was NOT the case, because any clergy knows that without Jurisdiction, no Bishop can impose such a rule on any clergy. And in any case his reason for denying me sacraments was rooted solely in the fact that I pointed out the authority he was claiming to have over a group of faithful catholics was non-existent. My blog wasn’t going to change, because I have never been in the habit of being a hypocrite or changing my history to suit the present moment. in fact, many, many people have come to Catholicism proper (1958 sedevacantism of the totalist position) precisely because in BELIEVE! I don’t mince my words nor deny who I was and how I came to become a Catholic (with no one being more surprised by it than me).

After his email telling me I was banned from receiving sacraments from him I replied, that very well, he had made his choice. And now we would see what would transpire over the years to come. This was in November of 2019. In the intervening five and a half years, the emails and comments and messages and rumours from Catholics as far apart as Australia, the USA, the UK, mainland Europe and so on, began to trickle in. I was not the only one who had noticed this behaviour. Nor was I the only one who had seen the grab for power and the attempt to spread and infiltrate the Thesis into all sedevacantist circles.

Unbeknownst to me, there were others that rejected the Thesis and also had far stronger motives for doing so, and a lot more context on the players involved and the history behind their actions as well as the history of Sedevacantism from as far back as the 1950s.

With the recent death of Father Anthony Cekada and Bishop Daniel Dolan however, a lot of the Totalist “fighters” lost their impetus, and the Thesis side has continued to advance.

Now think ahead, regardless of how you feel about the people involved, one path clearly leads to eventual perdition, and the other does not. So… what are you going to do?

Keep silent and keep your head down, and make no waves? Like you grandfather or great-grandfather, and your parents before you while the Church was being infested and corroded by parasites?

Or are you going to speak up and point a finger and say: “You! Change. Fix this. Admit your error and turn back while you still can, or else say you will not and prove who you really serve.”

Is it necessary to be as confrontational as this post? As I tend to be?

No. Surely not.

BUT… do NOT be weak. DO NOT be silent.

You can be as well-educated and as polite and erudite as you like. Certainly these are virtues, of which I am not a great owner, and you can surely present your case better than me, but just as steadfastly. But without a doubt, it is now time to find out if you are a Catholic man, who serves Jesus Christ, the truth, and God, regardless of the cost, or if you are a mouse. One that may well soon inhabit a false Church.

Only you can decide. Study, confirm and verify what I write here so crudely. By all means. But once you know, and don’t take too long, if you are a man, act.

May God’s Grace fill your heart and mind, may He protect you and guide you.

All glory is to and for God alone.

Let His Will be done.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here