The Poem IF

You really should read it and know it.

It is one of those few pieces of writing that can sustain and encourage a man even as he gradually or suddenly learns that ultimate truth men must all ultimately face even if you’re surrounded by family and good friends.

We are born alone, live alone, and die alone.

Subscribe

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

A short exchange between myself and a couple of other very cool, very loyal and very faithful Sedevacantists, in my immediate circle of very good friends, prompted this post, which, as you will see from my replies is, as usual, brutally direct. The difference being only that most (some?) of my close friends recognise that my brutality and directness are almost entirely non-personal. And I expect my close friends to know this. This particular interlocutor absolutely does, and his similarly autistically direct replies are refreshing for both clarity (if not of thought, at least of transparently exposing the process) and intent (good).

The conversation started with the death of the arch-heretic, probably never was Catholic, Satanic fake Pope Bergoglio.

Sede man 1

On a serious note, it wouldn’t hurt to give a prayer for him. At least asking for the Justice and Mercy of God to be executed.

Kurgan

You’re a better man than I. I’ll say a prayer for an honest enemy. Not for a servant of Satan and pedophile protector.

Sede man 2 (with thumbs up from Sede man 3)

You should though

Kurgan

That’s your opinion, to which you are entitled.

HOWEVER

Have you asked yourself how on Earth we went from the most numerous religion on Earth, with the best system of society ever invented by anyone human, producing the best societies humanity has ever seen in all fields, to a rearguard action of scattered Sedevacantists?

My contention is that is was through an overabundance of misplaced charity.

And it begins precisely like this:

A very thin wedge of compassion towards the most vile forms of scum.

“Oh say a prayer for the poor evil man that colluded with his Argentinian lover to have hundreds if not thousands or tens of thousands of little lids raped, sold and murdered. It’s the right Catholic thing to do!”

And then it morphs from the above into tolerating all sorts of other nonsense.

So allow me to present my view:

1. Not even God forgives the unrepentant

2. There is ZERO evidence this pedophile promoter ever repented of anything and he was  directly responsible for covering for pedos and enabling child rape by fake “priest” for decades.

3. Who am I to assume he ever repented, and if he did not, try to be more charitable than God?!?! How is that not an absurd error of pride?!

4. If he DID miraculously repent before croaking God knows it and doesn’t need my help.

5. If he did not he absolutely deserves his fate in hell.

6. Points 3-5 are in any case personal and irrelevant because cum ex apostolato officio clearly states heretics should be deprived of EVERY HUMAN CHARITY! So technically it is you who is in error.

7. I will pray though. That all unrepentant pedos and pedo enablers burn in Hell.

Kurgan sermon over.

Sede man 2

Yes, but it’s not “misplaced” charity. You know as well as I do that praying for his soul in no ways needs to entail condoning any of his evil, heretical and downright satanic actions. The point is to look for the good of his soul despite all of that.

Our Lord Himself prayed for literal God-killers as they were crying out for His blood and nailing Him to a cross.

The only prayer to make is not that God’s justice not be done, nor that He not be punished (we pray, hope and know that justice will be done (thank God)), but at the same time we can pray that maybe, just maybe, for a glimmer of a moment before the end, the heart of this horrendous human being may have made the right decision

Sede man 2 (continued)

Prayers for petition are not about making God change His mind, or about knowing things that He knows. Gods decisions are already made. Instead, ultimately, they are about aligning our wills with His.

God wants/wanted this man to repent. And so, let’s pray that He did.

And if he didn’t, he will go to hell, where he belongs.

Sede man 2 (continued)

Deprived of human charity… not divine charity.

Kurgan

I’m human. Not a or even the God.

Kurgan (continued)

And even if one accepts your arguments at face value (I don’t. The logic is terrible) it remains at best a waste of time.

Suppose he did repent, since you have NO WAY at all of knowing, you’re guessing, so already in breach of your duty as a Catholic to remove all human charity from what we can only treat as an arch-heretic given we need to judge him based on his actions and deeds, which have without exception marked him as such.

And if he is not repentant then what are you actually doing? Why not pray for Satan as well then?

Lastly, and again, if not even God has mercy on the unrepentant, why are you trying to?

Your prayer is entirely pointless regardless of the situation AT BEST. And potentially a sin of pride and disobeying Catholic dogma.

What point is there to such a prayer other than self-glorification as being a “really good Catholic” who then can tell other Catholics like me what they “should” be doing to be more pious?

Because your prayer cannot change anything, has zero effect on whatever the situation is, which is in all cases beyond your knowledge or personal power to affect either way precisely because of the circumstance of Bergoglio being a heretic. It’s worse than praying for someone being burnt at the stake, at least they have a possible reason for possible repentance. Bergoglio, in the external forum on which we as humans must necessarily judge him, had none.

In conclusion

My view here is very simple: you want to make this dubious and possibly erroneous and prideful prayer, go ahead. In silence between you and God. But telling others to is, as far as I am concerned, akin to telling them they should accept millions of “refugees” because some may be good people. In fact this hypothetical has more logical merit.

And it is, above all, a further very subtle, and for that reason, very dangerous, infiltration of an overabundance of false piety and false humility that leads to an error of both pride AND tolerance.

It is why we no longer have people willing to skewer heretics and enemies of the church on a sword. And as far as I can tell, nothing will rebuild the church without not only such men, but also such actions.

Anyway, that’s my take and absent God changing my mind, it will remain as is.

And that is the little Sede vs Sede “violence” done with.

But as a larger theme, it needs to be understood and remembered above all that:

1. Evil is most dangerous and effective in its most subtle form, because it is insidious and unnoticed. The danger is not from the heretic blue-haired feminist that shouts 2+2 is 5. Or that Bruce Jenner is a woman. That’s just retarded and obviously wrong and false. The danger is from someone posing as a math professor that sometimes, at a Lunar minimum, when it falls on a conjunction with Jupiter, 2+2 can be equal to 4.000000000000000001. That is the evil that will seep in, and in time, ensure the bridges you build fall down in a stiff wind with “no one to blame because how could anyone know the root cause if such a mystery” because by then math will be akin to an esoteric art performed only by strange men who are obviously right wing radicals.
2. No evil regime that uses lies, deception and force was ever changed or removed other than by force.
3. Absent men willing to defend, fight and if need be die for the faith, but above all willing to build communities of faithful Catholics, the remnants of the Church will atrophy too.

So govern yourself accordingly.

Share

Subscribe

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

So we now have a “commenter” that is an endless spammer that only has one link to probably malwere.

This is “her”:

So ignore all her comments as I have banned and deleted them dozens of times to no avail and now reported them to substack three times. They probably are auto-generating new profiles to spam.

Is it a coincidence that this happened right after I pointed out (yet another) IT tech geek is your usual soft-hand fantasist and keyboard warrior? Perhaps.

Then again, I also have been posting about the (((usual criminals and mass murderers))) so it may be yet again the same usual state actors from the mosUSAd deep state that crashed my OG blog (which is in any case back up with zero losses —see the links above on this substack).

It is somewhat disheartening that so many supposed “tough men of the West” have been exposed on this very substack as nothing more than either complete bullshit artists, or theoretical academics with no grasp of reality, but they (so far) all share one thing in common:

They are ALL IT geeks.

And I have yet to meet an IT geek that is physically capable in the real world of brutal physical reality. So maybe, just maybe, keep that in mind. And for your convenience, here is a little list of the ones exposed so far:

• Tree of Woe (and a few others – long post)
• Texas Arcane
• Johann Kurtz
• Slavland Chronicles (and Kurt Dolittle)

And these are just a few of the ones exposed here. Many more at the OG blog (type their names or my version of it in the Search Me link if you care to know more).

• Emo Jones (E.M. Jones)
• Milo Yankmypolous
• Tay-Tay Marshall (Taylor Marshall)
• Michelle Voris (Gary/Michael Voris)
• “Dr.” James White
• Kurt/Curt Dolittle
• Andrew Torba
• Sachetti
• Andrew Tate (and Ivan Throne, their “wizard” handler, etc)
• Scott Adams
• Bill Gates

And a bunch of other less “famous” grifters I forget off the top of my head.

It’s not that I especially enjoy doing these Kurganings (as they have come to be called), but they are after all necessary, as a recent commenter stated, it’s my way of giving back, think of it as a public service!

So who DO I recommend? On Substack? Not really anyone solidly yet. On Youtube I like a few gun guys.

• Honest Outlaw (don’t always agree with his takes on guns he likes personally but his reviews are always solid)
• Pewview (who is a complete freak of nature that must be a multimillionaire if the amount of ammo he uses in a week is anything to go by)
• Tucotheratt (he’s just cool and honest and his gun skills are impressive even if not superhuman like the Pewview guy)

And there are links to interesting blogs on this substack too, of course.

Anyway… if this blog gets taken down too we’ll know the deep state, or Israel, or whoever, is still pissed off at me.

What can I say, it’s one of my talents: exposing bullshitters and pissing of authority.

But everyone needs hobbies!

Subscribe

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

The Cowards.

As the post on Texas Arcane showed, there are PLENTY of supposed “right wingers” that in reality are just fear porn fantasists.

Ignorant too. I mean…

Tex lost his shit completely when he got called out on various nonsense he wrote, so he then stated that the crusades were just the West’s greed at wanting to take over Islamic lands and pushed by people who wanted power but wouldn’t do the actual fighting, and that the religion behind it was just a ploy.

Sadly I did not screenshot the nonsense he wrote because frankly I didn’t expect him to be such a little bitch that would block me then delete his idiotic comments as well as my replies to them. In fact he went on to delete other people’s comments too because he was being shown up for the idiot he is by other commenters too, as the comments under my post demonstrate .

Is it sad that Tex turned out to be a complete bullshitter and so weak he resorts to hiding his stupidity online? Sure. Is it a surprise though? No.

I mean let’s look at his life according to his own words:

• He is such a genius he figures out everything ahead of the rest of us (according to him)
• He is somehow plagued by bad situations because he’s so smart and “the government” hates him and persecuted him for decades. (Again according to him)
• He is a big strong man and tough guy (ditto)
• He wrote a bunch of stuff on Neanderthals that is primarily supposition, but some might even be correct. No one can really say.
• He is a doomer and his “solution” to the impending apocalypse is to dig a hole underground and create this fallout style bunkers in which to ride it all out.

Now let’s look at the REALITY of his life also by his own admissions:

• He married an Australian and moved there and lived there for 30 years, miserable and under the thumb of this woman who according to him was some kind of government controller who married him and made his life hell because… she was some sort of spy supposed to keep him in check!
• It’s been 30 years and he STILL hasn’t released his home made software for running a bunker. But it will be out real soon.
• He doesn’t actually have a bunker, nor, as far as I can tell, the land/funds etc to build one
• He was so smart but… stupid enough to join the Army, which is the utter submission to the very government he says he hates.
• He describes his army time (zero combat) as hellish because of rules that were imposed on him, but tried/s to use it as some kind of valour credits.
• He tries to say America has less of an immigration problem than Europe but the facts and numbers prove him wrong.
• He tried to argue with me that basically “America fuck yeah!” But his own blog posts state the average American is devoid of any lasting human emotion akin to love.

Is this the trajectory of anyone you should be taking advice from?

Now he does issue some interesting books (not sure how legally as they seem to be under copyright) and SOME of them MIGHT even have SOME useful info in them, but as for the rest, we can make some educated guesses about Tex, or Cleveland Blakemore as he is known. And it is not exactly flattering:

• So stupid that he joins the military, which let’s not forget is that thing where bankers and politicians tell you who to go and kill or die for in order to fulfil their worldly pursuits.
• He marries an Australian
• He MOVES to Australia
• He lives there for 30 years! On purpose!
• He is so inept with women that the above two points are his best shot at getting laid. And he STILL hardly ever did.
• He PRETENDS to be Christian but as his comments about the crusades to me demonstrated clearly, it’s just something he pays lip service to, like most Protestants.
• What is his life like? Would you rate it successful?
• What does he produce or give to the world other than sharing other people’s books (possibly against the wishes of those authors)?
• He is physically unfit to the point of being near death.

Now, don’t get me wrong, everyone makes lots of mistakes, me too, so this is not about the stupid choices he made, but more about his overall validity as someone to emulate or listen to (other than perhaps as a cautionary tale).

I made plenty of errors too. Twice divorced and many women in between too, BUT… Am now happily married and have a sixth kid on the way and I wrote a book about how to best navigate relationships based on avoiding the errors I made. I don’t blog in a whiny tone about how bad the errors were. I try to share what to avoid and what to go for instead with the benefit of experience and hindsight.

I don’t actually have a bunker, because honestly even if an apocalypse happens, I likely don’t need one where I am situated, which was a conscious choice by the way, to be here, but if I did need to have a bunker, I can actually build one here.

I do give advice online but none of it is theory. I live or lived the things I write about.

I actually HAVE arrested people, including armed ones, I had people try to kill me more than once, I have trained in martial arts most of my life and used both armed and unarmed to defend myself or others more than once or twice. I don’t write about those events much at all and I certainly don’t embellish or add things for “colour”, as Tex absolutely does, assuming he doesn’t just make them up out of whole cloth.

But worst of all, Tex doesn’t provide real solutions. He simply spreads more fear porn patched over with some theoretical books about how to survive a nuclear holocaust, while pretending he has a fallout like solution of interconnected bunkers all worked out except for that final patch to his never ready bunker-ready software.

It’s all nonsense.

And there is a LOT of it on the internet. I wrote earlier about how the Tree of Woe guy just writes absurd and fantastically theoretical pieces on how legislation or some other piece of paper will or should work in the near future/post apocalypse blah blah, and he too touted “military experience” until someone called him out on that too and revealed him to be another fake.

The point is this:

Theory doesn’t count for shit in real life. ESPECIALLY in a chaos situation like the collapse of civilisation, which in any case, unless there is a pole shift (likely but the timeline is unknown although my prediction from 30 years ago is on track so it may well be in our lifetimes or even the next few years) the apocalypse is not likely. The powers that be will squeeze you gradually instead.

But if it does revert to a zombie apocalypse or flat out WWIII, then, I assure you, theory will mean NOTHING.

The best thing to determine your outcome (assuming you survive the pole shift itself, which is a BIG if!) aside your ability to make or gather food and water, will be your ability and willingness to use violence to protect what’s yours or take what you need from others.

It’s brutal, ugly, and most “civilised” people have no clue about it at all.

And unless you have been in such situations repeatedly you also have no real idea how you will react, if you will panic and make terrible mistakes, or not.

I actually DO know how I will react. Because I have been there, multiple times, and while it is no guarantee that I will come out on top, overall, statistically speaking, assuming I survive the pole shift to begin with, I am far more likely to survive it than most.

Tex is not.

But in any case, spreading more fear and blackpilling is NOT the answer. The answer is a TRUE and deep faith, a lot of ammo, the willingness and ability to use it if you need to, and preparing everything else that you might be able to prepare as best you can so as to be able to live even without FIAT money or the electric grid at all.

So… you pick who you read and listen to and how YOU decide to prepare for whatever YOU envision might possibly happen.

Because in the end, neither Tex nor I are going to fix any issues for you. Well, unless you live near me, then I might, but even then, you still need to know (for) yourself. Always.

Subscribe

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

The double blind test done demonstrated without a doubt what we anti-vaxxers knew all along: the murder juice was… well… murder juice.

And it killed children at 81 TIMES the rate of normal causes of death among children.

For the innumerate among you, it means that if the chance of death was say 1 out of 100 children normally, after they got jabbed with murder juice, it would be 82 dead out of 100.

Don’t take my word for it. Look it up.

And here is a link to a short video on it .

Watch it.

Then spread it.

EVERYONE needs to a) know, and b) do their best to see everyone involved with this gets suitably punished. Starting with the CEOs of the pharma firms, the Bill Gates and the Soros that pushed it, all the way to your local doctor that told you it was safe and effective to put that poison in your child’s body.

And if you did, I pray to God your child survives and that you have learnt your lesson and NEVER trust your TV, doctor, or politician blindly again.

And if you have lost your child, while I feel sorry for you, of course, I hope you dedicate what is left of your life to make the demonic bastards that planned this pay for their intentional mass murder.

Share

Subscribe

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

And a useless braggart and fantasist

A lot of people assume that from time to time I critique some random relatively popular guy on the internet for reasons that are absurdly far from the truth. In no particular order:

• I am jealous of their suck-cess
• I’m just a hater
• I’m a total zealot Catholic and hate everyone that is not
• I’m just a mean bastard

Now… I’ll be the first to admit I can absolutely PRESENT as the last two, and to the really unintelligent as a possible hater too. What is absolutely NOT the case however, to any degree is that I am jealous of anyone.

I honestly don’t think I have that wiring in my brain, heart or soul. For the most part, anyone really better than me at whatever or better off, or happier I am genuinely happy for them. In some instances it might inspire me to do more or better in that area. But for the life of me, be it my Aspie brain or high IQ or the combo, I cannot even fathom how people are jealous of other people. I mean I see it. I recognise it. I have learnt to tell that twinge from other men when they look at my wife or the number of children we have, or in the past what girlfriends I had or what places I lived and so on. But I can’t actually put myself in a mental space where I look at someone else and think: oh I wish I was him, or had what he has etc.

It’s not that my life is perfect, far from it, but the point, to my mind (perhaps unidirectionally logical as Aspies are) is that it is MY life. Mine. And it can’t be anyone else’s nor can I be anyone else other than what I choose and act as being.

So I don’t get that one at all.

As far as the other things go, let me disambiguate:

• Yes I DO hate: liars, bullshitters, intentional deceivers, evil people and so on. I also have a strong dislike for fantasists (bullshitters) even if they are essentially harmless, and despise (different from hate) cowards. They disgust me. I am not fond of stupid and/or arrogant people and despise —with a passion that rises to hate in certain aspects— hypocrites. This is why I live in a secluded valley and try to stay away from people in general and crowds in particular. The vast majority of humanity sucks. But removed from them by distance and their ugly and stupid faces, I don’t actively hate strangers on the internet. What I may take strong exception to is their lies or nonsense that other, less discerning people, might be fooled by. And as a form of entertainment mostly, I from time to time give them a Kurganing. Expose them to sunlight. I could say I do it as a public service, and it would not be wrong, but much closer to the truth is that I simply like the truth. A lot. And people who peddle in lies would do well to give me a wide berth. Some… however… foolishly wander into my path. Or, occasionally, cause enough of a ripple in my bullshit-o-meter that they get the attention of my baleful eye. Scott Adams being a prime example recently, with a few thousand readers (probably from his YT, site/blog, whatever telling each other about it). So okay. You might call me a hater… but it’s sort of generic and not personal. The focus of my distaste at the vices of humanity just happens to be the lightning rod. And yes they would normally be famous or glorified by the (idiot) masses, of course. But my aim, after entertaining myself (because if you can’t relate to the chimps, you may as well entertain yourself with them) is to perhaps show a far away mind that works, that he is not alone. Or perhaps that he has believed lies and awake. I know, it’s utopic, to imagine any decent number of humans might just become objective enough, honest enough, not scared enough, to simply see things as they are and act accordingly for the good of themselves and their loved ones and the other ten honest people left. So you see… you may THINK I’m a hater. It’s easy to assume I am from many of my posts and actions, but really, I am trying to either be a solace to the few with a working brain, or an instigator of developing one.
• Yes it is true I am a zealous Catholic (if not a particularly good one) but no, I am not brainwashed. I only got baptised at age 43 after some 4 years or more of obsessive study after a road to Damascus Moment. It is not that I am brainwashed. It is that I tested Catholicism (the real one not the Novus Ordo fakery) and it models reality better than anything else I ever came across. Arrogant as it sounds to those who have NOT looked into it (and you have not), Catholicism (1958 sedevacantist version aka actual Catholicism) is simply true. And yes, everyone else is wrong, as was I for 43 years. Deal with it. But I don’t attack your fake religion out of hate. Well, ok, maybe a little hate for how dumb you are at never having questioned your false beliefs. I at least did that constantly. I had never even bothered to look at Catholicism because what I thought I knew of it was so utterly retarded and clearly false it didn’t merit investigating as far as I was concerned. But it did. See Believe! Or Reclaiming the Catholic Church here. So it’s again, more of an attack on deceivers (some knowingly, others not, but people who cause harm with falsity anyway).
• I’m just a mean bastard. Eh. Sometimes.

Aaaaaanyway…. All that to simply say that today I had a little tete-a-tete with Texas Arcane. And it was enough to prove beyond any shadow of a doubt that he is:

• Historically illiterate
• Numerically illiterate
• Either knowingly or not a fear porn producer (and probably consumer)
• Has a completely retarded belief in “American Exceptionalism”
• Is overweight
• Has no real clue about anything relating to actual combat, violent encounters of any kind or actual hand to hand fighting. I knew this already when I read his totally fantasist story of how he went hiking through the badlands of the LA riots or something on his old blog. It was just bullshit that read like bad copy for a B-class “action film” A-team or Rambo IV style nonsense. Just as I spotted bullshit artists like the SAS Andy McNabb and the other guy who wrote books about his solo escape from Iraq or Afghanistan etc etc. Later proved beyond any doubt by a guy who retraced their steps after the war and proved a squad of SAS men was basically destroyed by being discovered by a shepard boy, his lame father and blind grandfather. If you actually HAVE worked with a gun, arrested people, stopped violent criminals and so on, you recognise the guys who make it up after having watched a bit too much Hollywood. But in this case it becomes quickly obvious.

But judge for yourself, here is the thread start:

https://substack.com/@thekurgan1/note/c-109763050?r=2gid6q&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action

Share

Subscribe

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

So the ridiculous puppets pretending to be in charge of the UK have stated a woman is a biological female. In law.

What great strides the Protestant Revolution has made eh?

Meanwhile, even though they are EX- Catholic countries, not a single ex-Catholic country I know of ever had a problem defining what a woman is.

And in my country (so far at least) homosexual pairs cannot adopt children. Thank God, since as we well know from that almost lost science: Statistics, what happens very, very, very, very, often to the children adopted by homosexuals.

Truly, it is becoming clearer by the day that there are only two types of people on this planet:

• Those who love truth
• Everyone else

And sadly, even in those who love truth, the lies and confusion and deception set upon all of us from birth often keeps them on erroneous paths for a long time, sometimes their entire lives. Partly it’s indoctrination, partly it’s brainwashing on top of it, partly it’s a constitutional weakness brought on by generations of cowards and malnutrition designed to make one dumber, weaker and more effeminate, and partly it’s simply an IQ issue. But whatever the causes, the number of men that can still:

• Think for themselves
• Change their mind based on the facts
• Act rationally yet not without passion

is very small indeed.

As is the number of women that:

• Understand deeply and widely why feminism is a net evil designed to destroy them
• Understand the power of a woman is of an entirely different, yet complementary nature to the power of a man
• Are able to put at least some level of control on their innate solipsism and emotions

But —and this is truly a boon for those who are strong, persevering, courageous and hopeful enough— there is a really good thing about it; and it is this:

If you find each other, the sum of your strengths and the number of children you produce and raise, for a time at least, if you act conscientiously and rationally (though NOT according to the narrated “wisdom” of the global, Protestant-dipped, fake Churchian zeitgeist) you will not be hampered enough to stop you by the Satanists currently in charge.

And what’s more, our progeny will be even more zealous, more thorough, and stronger than we are, or were, even if, I pray that God lets me do most of the hardest battles and allows me and those like me to secure a space and time for our children and perhaps even grand-children to rebuild and make impregnable castles. Of rock too, but above all, of mind. Following the ways of our ancestors, the Crusaders, protecting our ways from all enemies, and excising them from our midst with literal fire as needed.

Let them have their 15 minute cities and insect paste, and non-binary freak orgies and Satanic sacrifices. We will build our own impregnable city states in the wilderness, and ensure we rely on our unbreakable spirit and unconquerable minds to develop whatever we need to, to combat their evil, their degeneracy, their infiltrators, their lies and their deceptions.

It may take me another 30 years, but I absolutely aim to build a City State based and modelled on the Catholic fortresses that kept the faith surrounded by murderous and hostile enemies in the Outremer. And the second Sedevacantist is already looking for property near me. Even if it be only one man a year, 30 hardcore catholics in one place can and absolutely will change it.

And I know once it works a little here, others will copy it and maybe (hopefully) do it even better and faster.

The entire Benedictine network of monasteries started with one man and changed the face of Europe. You simply cannot know how far the ripples of your actions will go. Especially if you are consistent.

But I know one thing: It’s a LOT further than any of the freaks dare imagine even in their worst nightmares.

Subscribe now

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

As a hardcore Catholic, I am sometimes faced with Catholics that question/disapprove/critique my ways of achieving effective results.

Which is perfectly fine. These are usually genuine friends that want some further clarity on my various approaches to different issues, whether public or private.

One concept that I think only Catholics of the Warrior caste can appreciate, is the perfectly valid use of the enemy’s own distasteful tactics against them.

If you wish only to read about the effective ways to combat our enemies, then you may wish to skip the philosophy of it immediately below and jump to the Positive Nepotism heading further down.

***

Before I proceed to explain in more detail what this amounts to, it may be necessary to first define a few concepts or terms, so as to hopefully curb the erroneous enthusiasm of various keyboard warriors.

As far as I am concerned, in order of Spiritual Hierarchy, from top to bottom the situation is thus:

1. Catholic Saints
2. Catholic Martyrs
3. Catholic Clergy
4. Catholic Laypeople
5. Catholic Warriors

In terms of Worldly Practical utility/necessity however, the order is thus:

1. Catholic Clergy (and Saints too) – Both are required for continuity Saints Historically, Clergy for present day continuation of the Church, which at a practical level is the most important point.
2. Catholic Warriors – Someone HAS to fight off the enemy hordes. Be it intellectually, spiritually, or physically. Without a defence, the Church could be ultimately destroyed. While we know this will not happen fully (at least until End Times) it is our duty to hold the line.
3. Catholic Martyrs – They can inspire others, but unless there is also some steel in front and behind them too, the martyrs will mostly just be assumed to be anachronistic fools (say similar to the Amish).
4. Catholic Laypeople – Although they are the largest group, for which the others all essentially try to do their best, in terms of practical works, while they do keep the general community going, be they bakers, or office workers, it can be considered that they are mostly the users of Catholicism rather than the builders of it.

Catholics with my kind of mental disposition then are somewhat unusual, as they are the bottom of the spiritual pile, but second in the worldly ways of our fallen world. And even then, the ones of my kind are a mixed bag, usually composed of people that were not Catholic at all, until some event or life path took them to the truth, at which point, they use all the skills they learnt in the secular world, to fight the enemies of God.

In shorthand I say that people like me, would be akin to a long-time mercenary that has suddenly become Catholic. He’s going to be more adept at fighting than those who were raised like good Catholics from the start.

To those who say that people like me are “bad Catholics”, I don’t bother to argue the point, they may well be right. And if Jean Parisot de Valette is not in Heaven, then, well, I guess neither will I, because I think he should be, and he too, acted in ways that might have been questionable, or shocking to his own knights, even when his actions undoubtedly helped to keep the Islamic invaders out of Malta and hence out of Europe. Of course, Valette did far more than I am ever likely to do, since I think an argument could be made that he is single-handedly perhaps the man most responsible for seeing to it Christendom continued to exist after 1565.

But the point is that in using tactics that were thought of as being undignified for a Catholic, de Valette demoralised the Muslims. When the enemy had tortured to death a few captured knights and sent their crucified bodies on the sea for the defenders to see, de Valette ordered all the muslim prisoners be brought up, he then decapitated them and fired their heads out of cannons into the enemy encampments. There are two things to note here, from a tactical perspective:

1. He matched their apparent savagery, but only apparently, because being decapitated is much preferable to being tortured to death.
2. Rhetorically he hit them harder since in the Islamic belief system, a lack of proper burial is a serious issue, which is nowhere near as much of an issue for a Catholic.

Let us now turn to practical concerns for use here on Earth in our times.

Positive Nepotism

The enemies of truth, God, and beauty have achieved various very powerful positions by essentially four primary methods:

1. Secrecy and subterfuge
2. Infiltration and nepotism
3. Financial monopoly
4. Application of Force

As Catholics we tend to avoid secrecy and subterfuge, however, there are historical precedents, since during the period of Roman Emperor Nero, Catholics met in secret in the catacombs and used the fish symbol as a kind of shorthand to recognise each other. While we are not being crucified and set on fire as primitive streetlights (yet), we are certainly being arrested for things like silently praying near abortion clinics while disrupting no one, (UK) and other such insane laws are being passed like ensuring white heterosexual men get longer and harsher prison sentences (new official policy of the UK) than any of the “minorities” (which are actually a global majority) we evil white men supposedly oppress by simply existing. So, while we do not yet need to act in total secrecy, there is no reason to boast too much (unless you are that way inclined, like a few people might be at this here blog… *cough* me *cough* ).

We certainly do not have financial monopoly over the planet, that is something the enemies of Christ have definitely achieved very well.

Nor do we have any kind of very good way to respond to force, especially if state sponsored. Of course, each individual can do so in order to defend themselves, their loved ones or innocents, but the likely consequences are bound to be harsh or terminal. Which is not necessarily reason not to respond with force when faced with force. I mean, if you’re going to be killed anyway, may as well take some of the bastards with you.

But where we CAN absolutely shine, is in positive nepotism.

Nor does it have to be limited to only hardcore Catholics.

That is the avenue I am taking with regard to the Kurganate , but the parameters can be far broader for many other things.

For example, I will absolutely favour competent, heterosexual, white men, over other people if giving out work or favours. And in turn I have been the positive recipient of a similar treatment by other men that are as sick of Clown World as I am or more.

This attitude has the potential to spread faster than any legislation or other barrier than can be placed against it. And then even if laws are passed to outlaw the practice, they can be circumvented by an almost infinite number of ways. This is a tactic the enemy used against us for decades, but they are mostly inefficient and ineffective freaks.

Supporting, giving work, and help, and real world benefits to the European Natives above the various DIE “victims” and creating networks of such people will produce positive results at a speed you will hardly believe.

So get to it.

And if you become a Crusader-like hardcore proper Catholic on the way (1958 Sedevacantist) all the better. Just remember that 600 or so of them kept 40,000 muslims at bay for over a year. And they retained the lands of the Outremer that the schismatic Eastern “Orthodox” let fall into Muslim hands protected for 2 centuries before the cost, along with he constant betrayals by the Eos became too much to bear and they had to retreat back to mainland Europe.

We have a LONG and dignified history of beating impossible odds.

So… study the history of Catholicism properly. Educate yourself on the FACTS , not the lies , and then… consider joining us , and if not, at least consider lending a hand, moral or financial support, or your efforts, however these might be expressed.

Subscribe now

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

Even if you are 100% secular, and in no way believe in non physical entities, this post should resonate somewhat, as it does with anyone objectively rational.

The baseline premise I start from is that the human experience is much reduced and in fact rendered inhumane by ignoring all those subtleties and nuances that make life worth living. The genuine smile or laughter of a small child, your loved ones giving you a heartfelt hug, the moment you catch the reflection of dawn sunlight on a snowy mountaintop, the few minutes of serene respite you get during a coffee break, and the meaningful smile you get from a pretty stranger. The happy coincidence of missing a deadline but it working out for the best for both you and the other parties involved.

In other words, life is not a series of checkboxes to tick off, human beings are not robots, and life on Earth is about a lot more than merely being as efficient as possible at doing our job and maximising our profit margins.

If you agree with me on this point, which could be expanded almost endlessly with ever more refined and detailed descriptions of the nuances of life, then the rest of this post should suffice to demonstrate how AI is essentially the gradual (but ever-increasing in speed, extent, and depth) moving directly away from the very essence of what makes us human, and towards a mechanisation that inevitably makes us less human, less healthy, and ultimately less stable.

In the original Matrix film, there is a scene were agent Smith explains that the machines had created a perfect world for humans to be plugged into, where they all had wonderful and perfect lives as far as their minds were concerned, and yet, that situation made lose “entire fields” of harvested humans.

Why? Well, those of us who believe in the human soul and free will think it’s because you cannot long imprison our essence. Its very nature rebels against the unnatural and artificial version of “perfection” and “order” that is ultimately reductive, stifling, and degenerative in the broader human sense.

If you are a teleologist you might invoke entropy of systems, and if you are an atheist you might invoke a God you supposedly don’t believe in that is just cruel.

This was a comment left on the OG blog by one Andrew Harrison:

I’ve always thought of art as being the synthesis of consciousness through media, therefore as AI is not conscious by this definition what it produces is not art. If you disagree with my definition then most of that which follows may be dismissed as something of a strawman argument I concede.

Furthermore, Human consciousness is the only kind we know of so far that can produce art, animals have some level of consciousness but do not produce art, and whilst in theory an intelligent alien, whether extra terrestrial or crypto terrestrial species might, and whilst some claim contact has already occurred, it isn’t yet publicly acknowledged and so remains no more than a speculative possibility as yet.

In summary AI is not just a tool in the artists hands because it replace his or her consciousness in the production of the work, to a greater or lesser extent, unlike an instrument or paint brush it actually manifests a part of the work, despite needing prompts in and editing out, nevertheless it is replacing part of the artist’s conscious creation of the work and therefore degrades the value of anything which may be created.

Finally the potential for extra dimensional intelligence to interfere with the creative process through the digital media is a further complication which however theoretical should also be considered.

Mr. Harrison concisely expressed the point very well, and finished off with the point that extra-dimensional intelligences may also be able to affect the result.

Whether true or not, there have been consistent rumours, some indicated by supposedly actual scientists, that the people working at and with CERN, are in fact in contact with entities from other realms of existence. In fact, though it is only a fiction point for my fantasy/noir/horror Inferos Vortex series of novellas, (the first two are out already, the third will be out later this year) it is what inspired them.

Other commenters too have made their understanding explicit:

While other worry about the public discourse, for reasons I honestly don’t understand or even see as existing.

Which then turns (as any serious philosophical debate eventually must) theological.

And indeed goes down interesting avenues of thought.

And that IS the point. People DO need to think about this stuff, and not just think on it but take action according to what they think is best for themselves and their lived ones and humanity as a whole.

Most people have absolutely no idea of the level of absurdity, delusion, lies, and control they are subjected to by people who at best believe that human beings are no better than farm animals to be herded, fleeced and used, and at worst truly hate them with a demonic level of contempt.

Take for example the point I have been making for some 4 years by actively working towards it, and have known since I was a young teenager, that is:

The entire FIAT money thing is a giant, absurdity bubble and delusion which puts the lie to literally the entire banking/finance system and consequently the very concept of taxation, and, by extension, almost the entirety of the functions of government and the related justice system. Listen to this brief video by the president of El Salvador Nayib Bukele.

So what is the logical response to that? There can be only one: work towards whatever it takes to become independent of FIAT money.

Easy? No.

Doable? I absolutely know it is. Why? Because humanity did not FIAT money for almost the entirety of its existence on this planet.

And no, it does not mean reverting to the stone age either, but that is material for a longer post, or series of posts, which I will get to. For now, realise the points of this post, and ponder them:

1. AI is a further mechanisation of humanity.
2. So was the Industrial Revolution and the Protestant “work ethic”.
3. Protestantism was the secularising (and thus reduction to materialism) of actual Christianity (i.e. Catholicism).
4. The corruption, frauds, and evil men that did (always) inhabit Catholicism (and always will) is not a reason to reject Catholic Dogma (which is correct, true, and good, and has consistently produced better human societies than any other ideology of philosophy ever devised or tried). It is only a reason to reject and eject such men, as actual Catholics do concerning the ENTIRE Novus Ordo fake “Catholic” Church of the heretic Popes of Vatican II.
5. FIAT money is a scam, a delusion, a trap to keep you in chains stringer and more effective than actual iron chains

I shall return with more on the consequences of becoming independent of FIAT money soon.

Share

Subscribe

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

It’s the same title but the opposite take.

Vox’s take is here.

I disagree with him on several levels.

And since I know there will be digital ringside hecklers, no, disagreement doesn’t mean the other person is hated or disrespected. In fact, between intelligent people, disagreement can result in at least one of them, and sometimes both, refining their thinking to achieve better approximations of reality as it is, since after all, we all see through a glass darkly.

So what are my disagreements?

Let us go through them in order.

It is not true that every writer has copied the styles of other writers.

The current debate about AI in which many writers are engaging is, for the most part, an entirely false one. The truth is that even the most highly-regarded writers, particularly in the SF/F field, have always engaged in highly-imitative practices, not merely limited to the various plots, characters, and worlds, but even the literary styles of other authors. And they have done so intentionally; ironically, the better the writer, the more often they have engaged in these imitative practices.

He goes on to quote an admission to this by Roger Zelazny, but…

1. I don’t consider Roger Zelazny to be a great writer. In fact I have never thought much of his writing or stories.
2. The writers I do admire are for the most part not very well known. Zachary Mason is one, and ironically his debut novel is an astonishing one The Lost Books of the Odyssey. Ironically, this novel is something like 50 summarised pieces or versions of the Odyssey. So you could say it is a hyper-imitation of Homer. Yet I simply do not buy the premise Vox relies on, even if Mason can certainly fit the mould strictly speaking.
3. Tolkien is another and I don’t think he copied anyone’s style.
4. Dan Simmons either.

But above all, it is not my personal experience, and while I know it would be easy to criticise me by saying I am not a great writer, I do have over a million words in published format, and while certainly many writers may have influenced me, there is none whom I have intentionally tried to emulate in any way in any of my books. And I simply do not think anyone worthy of being called a decent writer would really do that other than as a kind of divertimento .

Sure, it might be subjective and even harder to quantify objectively with writers, but just like I do not consider everyone who ever put brush to canvas a painter, or everyone who moulded something out of rock or metal a sculptor, I do not consider every writer an artist.

And when it comes to art, a Michelangelo or a Tintoretto or a Frank Frazetta or Boris Vallejo can be thought of as artists. The retarded frauds of “post-modernism” (the CIA funded uglification of beauty) who tape a banana to a wall on the other hand, cannot be.

But Vox makes his position clear:

But in my opinion, it is absolutely and only the end result that matters; literally no one cares that William Shakespeare merely revised the plays originally written by Lord Thomas North instead of penning them from scratch.

It is a secularist and materialist position. One I share only in the principle, but not at all in its ingredients.

Vox makes a Protestant cake. And while the consumers of it probably can’t tell the difference, it lacks soul. It lacks the je ne sais quoi of humanity.

You could train an AI to read all of the collected works of Philip K. Dick and het it to write you a short story in his style, and it would probably be very good. And maybe PKD too would be astonished by it; but I doubt he would like it. He probably would prefer if a madman like me came along and broke the AI trying to impersonate him.

Vox’s argument is basically that if the machine can fool the readers then why not?

It’s utilitarian, sure, but is it the same as the organic? No.

And it is not so for Vox either.

If it were, he would take his theological musings to a digital AI version of Jesus.

I mean, why not, right? All we have about Jesus after all is only all the words he said that were noted down and what people have written about Him. So why not? The result is all that matters right?

No. It isn’t.

You reading this know it too.

I have never agreed with the statement that the ends do jot justify the means. It’s yet another nonsensical Anglo-based idea like the absurdity of “free speech” ever having existed anywhere on Earth. Any Venetian child knows such a thing is straight up utopic nonsense.

The ends ALWAYS justify the means, at least if you are not retarded. Why? Because anyone of at least what *I* consider normal intelligence, will factor in ALL the costs of the “means”; including emotional costs.

AI has no humanity, and no matter how you spin it, there is something important about that.

The main “hook” of AI is that it flatters the user.

It’s the magic mirror on the wall that tells you every morning that YOU, yes YOU, are the prettiest of all the princesses, and the smartest person in the room too!

And AI will continue to help diminish the humanity of human beings, much as the “Protestant work ethic” has done.

So I agree that the end result is what counts.

Because if it lacks the human part of the artist, then it is not art at all, merely a mechanism to mechanise you.

Personally at least, I will continue to greet everyone I meet as I find them; enjoy their flaws as they get to help me remember that we are all fallen, and flawed, and weak.

AI is not the answer.

Share

Subscribe

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here