If you are NOT Catholic, this may not interest you.
If you think you ARE Catholic (attend Novus Ordo masses, or Latin masses by Novus Ordo “priests” you absolutely MUST watch this.
If you are a “Ratzi-the-Nazi was the real Pope”, so a 2023 Sedevcantist, you REALLY need to watch this for sure, while you also explain what the difference supposedly is between YOU and US, the 1958 Sedevacantists. And I have a further question for you, if you think that TIME between the death of the last valid Pope (Pius XII) and today is “too long” for the Church to be without an Earthly head (valid Pope) then you need to explain two things:
WHERE is it written, agreed, or dogmatically stated that an interregnum has a finite time? It is not. Anywhere. Also, if you are going to say the maximum was the one already experienced in the past of some 2 years with ZERO people on the Throne of Peter, well… you’re now at that same time so…again…When will YOU become as “crazy” as us actual Catholics that have called out the Freemasonic infiltrating pedovore satanists for nearly 70 years? Please give a precise date.
Explain why this situation is any different from the one already experienced by the Church when there were 2 and even 3 Popes in a period that lasted 70 years with no one really being sure which one was the legitimate one.
Finally, if you are a Sedeprivationist, after you have seen this video, you should really go read the Totalist nuclear bombardment of absolutely infallible logic presented at
Contra-Thesis.com
There is no coming back from that level of absolutely flawless reasoning. The Sedprivationist thesis is (and always was) dead in the water, as I pointed out in
my own work of 2020
.
It might not be the call to arms that Urban II did in 1094, but in modern times, it’s as close as we are likely to get.
This blog is at least partially shadow-banned and already under some censure in the UK. Even if you don’t subscribe, please share it, because it’s about the only way it will get more exposure. Better yet, bookmark the OG blog and share this one.
Probability Zero
is Vox’s brand new best-selling work that absolutely crushes Darwinian Evolution. To all the naysayers, I simply don’t care to even argue with you. I read his book and there is simply no question his work is solid and factually unimpeachable. If you have not read it, shut up. I don’t care for your views on it. And if you
have
read it, you had best be able to follow the issues he presents so as not to make a truly ignorant critique.
As soon as I read his book, I was absolutely aware that it was a foundational work that would rock all of academia, and also, incidentally, form an absolutely unshakable pillar in support of my own long-held ideas.
That said, I then took a page from his book and decided to use Claude 4.5 as a stress tester for my own work,
The Face on Mars
, which keep in mind was written in 1995, under conditions VASTLY different from the ones possible today. As a friend put it after he read it recently : “You figured all that out 30 years ago! In Africa! With little more than a library card?!”
I never thought about it quite that way, but he’s not far wrong. The internet was fairly new in 1995 in Cape Town, and information that took me months to figure out then is accessible in seconds now. It’s also true that there is also a LOT more misinformation and outright lies, but when it comes to NASA this was always the case.
The “catbox” Image of The Face was certainly just par for the course.
1
Anyway, I fed the book to Claude 4.5 and asked it to critique it.
The I asked it to assume Vox’s book Probability Zero was correct (it is, but I didn’t want to argue with the “established consensus” side on which the AI is trained to date) and produce a revised score of likelihood of my core ideas being correct for each chapter of the book and overall.
Now, before I show you the table of results, keep in mind that my book was written in 1995, and the update in 2014 I did to it was very partial and incomplete. I had a lot of things going on at the time and I essentially tacked on in front and after the book some of the new discoveries and more recent information I had become aware of in the intervening years.
A LOT more such information, all essentially confirming my theories has since come out. But that is not included in the book evaluation you will see below. So the values you see in the table below are a “worst possible result” currently.
I think with updates of the new information the final scores will be impressive, and as of today, I believe it is already superior to any other Ancient Astronaut theories ever produced. Primarily because I kept my speculations relatively simple and based almost entirely on the hard evidence that can be demonstrated beyond any doubt and that anyone willing to do so can confirm by themselves.
In fact, even Graham Hancock, who absolutely made more money from his books than I ever have, and who plagiarised some of the main concepts of my book,
2
not only didn’t get the basics right even after stealing some concepts, but he didn’t even check the work he got others to do for him, since he blamed his ghost writers (yes plural) for the “oversight”. I hear he is drinking a lot of Ayahuasca these days, so all is as it should be I suppose.
Still, it would one day be nice if the record of who did what and who discovered what, and when, was corrected for posterity at some point; vain hope though it may be.
But I digress. Here are the results:
SUMMARY TABLE (Based on PZ)
Key Insight
The PZ assumption functions as a
keystone
that restructures the entire evidential landscape. Under standard assumptions, each anomaly (Face, Pyramid, UFOs, human origins) must be defended separately against mainstream explanations. Under PZ, they become
mutually reinforcing elements
of a coherent picture:
Intelligent actors exist (proven by PZ)
They intervened in human development (proven by PZ)
Evidence of their presence (Face, Pyramids) is therefore EXPECTED
Their technology (UFOs, antigravity) fits the pattern
Cover-up of this knowledge is logically motivated
Your book, under PZ assumptions, transforms from “collection of interesting anomalies” to “documented evidence of known intervention.”
Note the overall score increase from 5.6/10 to 7.0/10. That’s a pretty significant jump, especially considering I have not updated the book with any of the myriad bits of information that I have since been aware of, and then only by paying scant attention to them, since to my mind, my thesis was proven long ago anyway.
The point here is not just that yes we have alien origins, and yes my book is revolutionary in proving it. The point is that in order to make my own conclusions I relied heavily on the very detailed work of others, be it Vox, Carlotto, Lemesurier, Schoch, West, and others.
My contribution was mostly that of putting all these pieces together, and seeing a pattern no one else had seen before, because no one had found the puzzle pieces with matching edges, (and they still haven’t) that proves that Mars was inhabited and that the “Gods” of all our Earth-based legends were more than just myths or fiction.
And to the usual question I get next, which is:
How do you reconcile the Face on Mars with your being Catholic?
My answer is very simple: Easily.
In fact I struggle to see why it’s even an issue. Alien involvement in our “evolution” or flat out creation, in no way diminishes Catholicism
3
at all. And I think the issue is people’s tendency to have become binary thinkers. Whin is due in great part —in my considered opinion— as a result of the simplified, degraded, version of corrupt “Christianity” that was ushered in by Protestantism, which tends to a far more binary way of thinking than classical Catholicism.
Anyway, I will be doing a complete overhaul of the book and reissuing it with all the new data I have and then some, after I copy Vox’s process of stress-testing the ideas even more throughly than they have been to date.
My thanks to Vox for his patience and persistence in his detailed work at a facet of the story that is absolutely important for my own views, but which I never had the patience, (or time) nor the inclination, to delve into myself. I may have been justified in my view that it was unnecessary to do in order for my theory to be correct, but it is absolutely a fact that someone having done this work absolutely bolsters my own even if I changed nothing else or had zero new information than I did 30 years ago.
I also owe Vox a debt of gratitude for inspiring me to take this up again, as I had pretty much resigned myself to the fact that my work on this would be only understood decades after my passing (if then). I am more hopeful now.
Oh and finally… the main point of my book is not even the issue about human origins and alien involvement. It’s about the technology that absolutely must exist if I am right. And which we already know in fact DOES exist, because we have verifiable proof of elements of it since the 1920s.
NASA produced an image of The Face that was taken at Martian dawn with some light cloud cover (which is not supposed to exist on a planet with 7 millibars of air pressure at the surface), at an extremely low angle, with washed out resolution, and then they reversed the image. None of this was done “by accident”, and Mark Carlotto, who is probably the world’s foremost expert on imaging technology by satellites (he developed programs to highlight camouflaged structures in war theatre for the military among other things, he is a literal genius, and honest, which might be why you know who Carl Sagan is, abut not necessarily who Mark Carlotto is.
Yes it’s demonstrable as he references my book in his, though very badly and also because he essentially admitted it to my face when I confronted him at a talk he gave at the University of Cape Town in 1997 if memory serves, and my girlfriend at the time (as well as a few strangers) were witnesses to it. He blamed ghost writers, so, as a typical journalist
This book is the academic version of the supposed asteroid impact that wiped out the dinosaurs.
Except, unlike that theory, this one is absolutely factual, and undeniable. The target is the Darwinian theory of evolution by natural selection, and probably, the careers of pretty much every evolutionary biologist that ever believed in it, and quite a few professional atheists who have always subscribed to it as an article of faith.
Vox proves —with a math so rigorous that it literally has odds that even physicists consider to be certain— that evolution by natural selection is, as the title makes clear, simply impossible.
The math is not even particularly complex, and every possible avenue that could be explored, or that ignorant or innumerate people try to come up with as a knee-jerk reaction before even having read this work, has been covered.
The point is simple: There really is no way out. Whatever the mechanism is that produces fixed and differentiated species, randomness, natural selection, or survival of the fittest, simply cannot account for it. Not even remotely.
The effect of this book will resonate through the ages. People will vilify, try and falsify, and scream blue murder at a non-expert in the field upsetting ALL the apple carts. But then, an eminent scientist back in the day assured the president at the time, and the world, that the Wright brothers would never make any kind of flying machine, because according to him it was all “impossible”.
Well, we have 747s today thanks to two bicycle enthusiasts not listening to people who are pompously and egregiously wrong.
And now, a games designer, music enthusiast, and economist has just nuked the entire field of evolutionary biology, then salted the Earth of it, then nuked it again.
A few decades from now, evolutionary biology will be relegated to the same closet as phrenology, and possibly be less valid than aura readings by gypsies with a fondness for your wallet. Whether Vox gets the credit or not, it will happen, because he has now brought the unvarnished, beautiful, shining truth out into the light, and once that happens, error, lies and egos, will, in due course, melt in the sunlight.
The ripple effect of this work is almost impossible to overstate. It has single-handedly dealt a mortal blow to the materialist philosophy that has crept in and slowly degraded humanity for the last 250 years or so, because Darwin’s
Origin of Species
has been the false religion of people who apparently have the same aversion to calculators, or even slide-rulers, that vampires have to crosses.
Far be it from me to try and take the glory for any of what is happening, which you really need to see below, however, I did want to start with a little prologue about the effects that the actions of a single man can have. If you don’t care about my specific journey, just skip to the next bolded title, my part here is not important, but this post absolutely is. The Introduction to my specific history in it is only intended to motivate a reader who might assume he can only be a spectator instead of a main character in this. Do NOT live like that. Don’t be an NPC.
In 2013, in the space of a week,
1
I went from a Zen-Agnostic heathen with a rather hedonistic approach to life (and rather effective at it too) to a week of absolute Hell, and then, in a Road to Damascus moment, to a believer in a loving God that actually knew, and loved
me
specifically
2
along with everyone else, in their specific detail too.
Quite different from the intelligence behind creation I had always assumed existed from my logical and mathematical observations from my teens and early 20s, which was, at best, a very remote and somewhat abstract intelligence.
I spent the next four years obsessively researching Christianity, because by age 26 I had already dismissed pretty much all the main religions and quite a bit of side-issue ones too. I had read through the Bhagawad Gita of the Hindus, the writings of pretty much everyone from Krishnamurti to various Taoists, Buddhists, and so on and so forth. By that time, I had written
The Face on Mars
and concluded that there absolutely is an intelligence behind creation, and yes, one that went beyond the ancient astronaut hypothesis I laid out (correctly as it happens, but more on that elsewhere); in other words, I did believe in a “God” of some kind, but the rising from the dead story, the ever-present pedophiles in the “Catholic Church”, and the obvious con-men and frauds of Protestantism, had seen to it that Christianity in general had been also dismissed. And the next 17 years, bringing me to age 43 had not changed that view. In fact, if anything they had mostly solidified it in certain respects.
But now, I had an experience I could not deny, and the God I had personally experienced, certainly most closely resembled the Christian one. So I started to look into Christianity in detail.
Protestantism being absolutely absurd from any objective, logical perspective of anyone that is not brainwashed into it from birth, or mentally retarded, or both, I focused on the only three versions of Christianity that made any sense as possibly being true: Eastern Orthodoxy, the Copts or Catholicism.
Catholicism obviously had the strongest claim, since the Mass, when you look into it, has remained the same from the earliest times, even before the Bible was put together, to the present day.
And the Catholics, of course are the ones that actually put the Bible together, once they already had Popes, transubstantiation, a perpetually Virgin Mary, and so on, all things Protestants either ignore, deny in abysmal ignorance, since we have patristic writings proving them all, or lie about.
The Pope was always from the beginning known to be not only the first among equals, but the resolver of any disputes within the Church. And of course, when the Bible was put together Popes had already existed for a few hundred years.
Nevertheless, while historically the Catholics undoubtedly had the best claim, the current state of what I thought was the church was abysmal. Pedos everywhere, liars, cocaine fuelled gay orgies in the Vatican, it was Sodom and Gomorrah.
So I carried on studying and almost immediately I was attracted to the Eastern Orthodox. I had been training in Systema and then teaching it for years and the Russians were almost all orthodox and I liked their approach to theology and life. Practical, serious, no nonsense and yet aware of the mystic side of life even if… they appealed to the “mysteries” of God’s ways a little too often for my liking and with little regard to basic logic and reason. So I started again from the beginning and that is when I came across the Code of Canon Law of 1917. I bought it and read through it. Not for everyone, but then I used to read dictionaries as a kid.
And I came across Canon 188.4 and realised what had gone wrong with the Church.
Vatican II was a takeover by Jewish inspired Freemasons and Protestants.
Best case; because many of them are actual pedophile Satanists masquerading as “Catholic” clergy, and almost all have homosexual tendencies, and very often far worse than that: pedophile mental illness.
What I realised is that the Catholic Church is the One True Church and where the “Orthodox” shied away from “complex” issues, the Catholics did not. Nor did Catholicism do away with the mystical side of Christianity or the rituals. the Problem was not Catholicism. The Problem is that what most people THINK is Catholicism is a completely corrupt, false, and never was true, version of it, and has been so since 1958.
So I then delved into the whole effect of Vatican II, and in 2018
I produced a little book called BELIEVE!
, mostly because I wanted to have a brief, not technical, yet still useful and referenced short book to cover the various belief systems prevalent around the world, and point out how all of them except one really not only fail in the logical tests, but failed to measurably improve humanity’s lot. Again… except ONE.
I wrote that book also without any real expectations of it doing well. I am abysmal at self-promotion, I care very little for fame or accolades, or what people in general think of me, and I write primarily as a way to leave the information in a permanent format for those who seek it and for my children.
As my grandfather said once I explained The Face on Mars to him: “You wrote it too early. Maybe in 200 years they might have caught up to what you are saying and they will agree with you then.”
Nevertheless, somewhat to my surprise, BELIEVE! did do well,
3
and now I have lost count of how many people wrote and told me they and their friends, extended families, and so on, have converted to proper Catholicism, which, detailed though the issue is, for those who care, the only valid clergy left are Sedevacantists, (the ones who say the last valid Pope was Pius XII, who died on 9th October 1958, so are generally known as
1958 Sedes
) and the only ones without serious error are the Totalists (see the details below).
Well over a hundred, and possibly two hundred or more people now, that I am aware of, have converted as a result of reading BELIEVE! The real number may be a lot higher for all I know. I have several emails from people who bought up to ten copies and sent them to friends, gave them away, and even left them lying around on Novus Ordo Church
4
pews.
And because of that I have made life-long friends that saw my YouTube Videos and read that book and became hardcore 1958 Sedes like myself.
Back in 2020, in RTCC, I had already concluded the obvious:
The Fake Novus Orco Church is entirely false from top to bottom. There is NO redeeming it possible.
By infallible magisterium and Divine Law, any heretic clergy, even if he should honestly EVER truly repent, will NEVER be allowed to offer the sacraments legitimately or have ANY authority over ANYONE. The entirety of the rest of their life should be spend sequestered in a monastery in perpetual penance until death. That is the rule, which is perfectly logical and spelt out in detail in the Papal Bull of Pope Paul IV in Cum Ex Apostolato Officio, which specified that anyone, including a Pope, who went heretic, could NEVER return to any kind of official position within the Church. And anyone that promoted heresy publicly and pertinaciously, was a heretic regardless, and no tribunal, judgement or official pronouncement was required, the law itself being judge, jury and executioner, as Canon 188.4 explicitly states. this means NONE of the Satanists pretending to be Catholic in the Vatican can EVER be redeemed or trusted with the offices they have usurped and occupy totally illegitimately. This matters because the Sedeprivationists instead like to pretend that such people could spontaneously “repent” and become “good Catholics”, which is absurd on its face, but also completely illogical, it is saying you should trust a lying murderer when he simply says he is no longer a lying murderer. Take him at his word why don’t you!
People like Vigano are just another version of snake-gate-keeper, and maybe even worse so than the obvious homosexuals like Milo and Gary of now defunct “Church Militant” who pretend to be “Catholics” in the fake New Orcs so as to prevent actual men from finding their way to the TRUE Church, which still exists (and always will since the Gates of Hell shall not prevail against it).
And finally, that not only was sedevacantism the only place Catholicism remained, but the Sedeprivationist version of it was nonsensical and clearly wrong.
Therefore, the ONLY way the Church was going to recover was for the remaining valid clergy to call an imperfect council (a specific technical term that allows for a council to be called just for such an eventuality to elect a valid and real Pope from the available possible men able to be one.
The danger here is only that since Sedevacantists are a minority today, doing so would result in the easy accusation from the now fooled majority of lay people that such a Pope was a “trailer park Pope”. There have been various rather bizarre and frankly not mentally adjusted people who got themselves voted as “Popes” by their mother and neighbours and possibly their dog.
Some are just relatively harmless crazies, some are the usual brand of con-man that infests Protestantism top to bottom, and some are actual spooks (see the “Old Catholic Church” that was involved with everything from Lee Harvey Oswald to Jack Parsons and the Jet Propulsion Laboratories) trying to further discourage the last remnant of the Church.
Nevertheless, this having to call a real council with the remaining bishops and priests, and voting in a real Pope, remains the only way to heal the Church, and while it may LOOK hopeless, you need to remember two things, that we Catholics absolutely not only believe, but we have two-thousand years of proof for:
Numbers mean nothing. The Crusaders often fought odds of 100:1 against them and won. Catholicism (i.e. Christianity) was started with eleven men that feared for their lives and four women. There are countless times when against absolutely hopeless odds Catholicism rose beyond anyone’s reasonable or even unreasonable expectations. Catholics were persecuted, fed to lions, burned alive after being crucified, and killed on sight by the most powerful Pagan empire the world has even seen, that lasted longer than any other empire the Earth has ever had, and ended up converting it to Catholicism. The Arian heresy converted to error 97 to 99% of ALL Bishops alive at the time, not unlike the crisis today where literally every single official or “clergy” in the Novus Orco is a fake, a fraud, a homosexual, communist, freemason or pedophile.5 In short, we are not intimidated by numbers. Catholicism is not a social club. It’s the truth. And whether it be one against a billion or not, we do not retreat a single inch, just as St. Bernard wrote for Catholic Knights.
Jesus is King and He said He would remain with us. The reason that there is such a thing as Papal infallibility, and the Infallible Magisterium of Catholic Dogma, is not because anyone human is infallible, including any Pope. What Catholicism does have however, is the promise of Christ that He will always be with us until End Times. So the infallibility is provided not by any human attribute, but only by Christ’s infallibility, which will intercede when a valid, real Pope speaks officially for the Church. Hence the doctrine of Catholicism has remained valid and unsoiled even by the various degenerates we had as VALID, Popes. Though abysmal people at a human level, the various Borgias, occasional gay Pope, or the ones indulging in orgies, or promoting relatives to Cardinalship for power and money, though they did much damage, they never attacked the DOCTRINE of the Church. As Catholics, we know all humans are one variety of scum or other, including even the valid Popes, (though some have been truly saintly people, Pope Pius X being an example), but we also know God did not abandon the Church during the persecutions by Nero, the heresies of the Arians, the many, many, lies of the Protestants, and on, and on, and on. And we have prophecies from various Saints spanning centuries that the harsh times of the present were always going to happen, before either the end times comes, or a renewal of the Church that lasts another thousand years before the actual End Times. Now, it is pointless to speculate which it is, because no one, not even Jesus knows the hour, only God the Father, so you may as well act as you always should as a Catholic, regardless. And that means to help yourself, to be as Catholic as you can. And trust God will help you too, as long as you do your part! Spread the truth, as far and wide as you can, and do your utmost best to renew, reinvigorate and grow the real Catholic Church.
Now, six years after I wrote Reclaiming the Catholic Church, others, some of whom I am sure were at least a little influenced by some of my work,
6
have produced a brilliant site
(in multiple languages too) that once and for all clarifies that the only CORRECT Catholic clergy are the 1958 Totalists, as they are known. And that every real Catholic should now rally behind that view.
The Sedeprivationist clergy, we need to be clear, are VALID Catholic clergy, but they are in SERIOUS error, and at least one Bishop of that ideology is clearly so enamoured with his own standing that he wants everyone to bend to his ideas of the Sedeprivationist thesis, and expects any priests being ordained under his purview to adhere to the absurd thesis in order to go through seminaries he has instituted or has control over.
A New Beginning
Well… now, a very brave, young, and awesome Bishop I had not heard of before, His Excellency Bishop Pierre Roy, I believe he is Canadian, has given a sermon that will send shockwaves throughout ALL Sede types, and probably utterly terrify the pedophiles in the Vatican, and their Protector and Vicar of Pedophiles on Earth, fake “Pope” Bob.
The post he refers to at the beginning, (along with his blog) is
here.
He is effectively calling ALL actual Catholics to rally, and this will undoubtedly boost the effect that has already been happening, and that I have personally seen for the last 5 years: A rapid increase in young people who make a lot of children, or already have a lot of children, joining Totalist Sedevacantist churches and Holy Masses.
Coincidentally, just a few minutes ago, I got yet another message of a man I have been in contact with for a few years: His wife recently just got baptised and took the first proper Holy Communion. He said (before even reading this, as it is not yet published as I write this): “Add another one to your list.”
I have seen a Protestant man with 10 children get swayed over the years, by my vicious arguments on Facebook in a group that I used to be in before it was nuked by some tranny at Faceborg, suddenly become Catholic after he researched the truth, and his father was a missionary protestant that was killed in Turkey before he was born. Meaning he had very strong personal reasons not to do so. Yet… for those of us who care about the truth above all else, we can’t live a lie.
God bless this Bishop the people who wrote Contra-Thesis, and all Catholics around the world.
And if you are a layman that thinks this must be some weird little cult, please educate yourself. You don’t need to buy my books, but if you want a detailed reasoning with all the references of what really happened to the Catholic Church in 1958 and where we are today, you will save yourself a lot of time by reading RTCC.
I will be posting more on this topic in the days, weeks and months to come.
And just to be clear, again, my own personal story and involvement is ONLY to be taken as inspiration for your own life. As Pope Pious XII clearly stated, the most heroic of all Catholics are the day-to-day men and women who become husbands and wives and make Catholic families. And you have no idea whatsoever how any action you take may ripple out to affect so many others over the years and time.
So… spread the word. And become a proper Catholic. Don’t assume you are an NPC.
It is starting. Because never until today has any valid Bishop had the audacity to do what His Excellency Bp. Pierre Roy
7
has just done.
I feel a little giddy, maybe like the Catholic Knights, Barons and Princes present at the speech Urban II gave in 1095.
Of course, I am only a minor noble, being a mere Patrician, so my contribution to the new crusade may be small, but then… everything is weaker and more degraded today, which… coincidentally, given how God operates and has done over the last two millennia, and allowing for His very funny sense of humour, probably means the forces of Evil are in for a very rough time starting from the day of this sermon: 1/1/2026.
My 15 month old daughter was kidnapped to Brazil by her mother. After not sleeping for a week, I went to see the film Cloud Atlas without any interest in it whatsoever, it was just a way to try to distract my brain from the mental torture I would not wish on anyone, that I was experiencing. I did not try to follow the plot really, I was just letting it go through me. And when I walked out of that three hour film, I had an experience I can never relate to another person in a way that doesn’t seem the result of drugs, (never took any) hallucination from lack of sleep (yes you CAN go 7 days without sleep. I don’t advise it, and apparently the record before you literally go insane is 11 days) or some other mental process. But the reality is that now 13 years after the fact, that experience remains the most objectively real event I ever experienced. And I had a pretty crazy life and seen and lived through some very strange things already. I knew then, God not only existed, but the statement God is Love, is the closest and most accurate description of Him.
Which until that day was a totally absurd concept; that an actual omnipotent God could care about me personally! How improbable, when you consider the size of the known universe, never mind the unknown universe. And it took me years to at least accept it intellectually. And even today, I struggle with it sometimes, despite evidence so overwhelming, that I can only apologise to Him for my being such an ungrateful retard, pretty much every second of my existence.
In the sense that a lot of people have been affected by it. My books are not and have never been a main source of income for me, And the number of professional writers who can survive just writing, never mind to really well, are less than the number of professional baseball players, though it would be nice if one day I would become one of them.
Incidentally, his name is a French slightly corrupted version of the word King. And some of the Prophecies mention that a French King would start a rebirth of the real Church, that there would be wars, that France would nearly be obliterated, but in the end, the Real Church would be restored and reign anew for a 1,000 years, before the real End times come. So… I don’t put any stock in prophecies, but it’s still worth mentioning. Yes I know he’s Canadian, but they are basically exiled French.
This post was originally published on my Substack. Link
here
No related posts.
By SubStackSyncer | 11 January 2026 | Posted in SubStack
So this has been going on for about a year, but it seems to be intensifying lately.
I have been the recipient of various psyops for 30 years, since the publication of
The Face on Mars
and then they died down for a bit, picked up again when I wrote the
Systema book
, and then they went nuclear when I started to talk about the
Talmudic child rapists that control all fiat money
, with an OG blog infiltration designed to shadowban me internally then finally nuking my blog just before the elections in October, but we’re back and the OK blog is alive and well and all the posts they tried to nuke recovered and present.
Now they are resorting to something they tried before, which is to register my relatively public email with various dating/sex-services, and probably a bunch of other sites. The effect is that my own public email becomes a bit spammy and causes minor issues if I use it to mail anyone as it may go directly to spam, and with AI now, for all I know they will try to upload pictures of video of “me” to compromise me in some way. And I am like…eh… whatever. The people I care about that know me, know the reality of this and the ones that don’t that will believe whatever they are cooking up, well… whatever. I don’t lose sleep over strangers on the internet.
Here is a screen cap of at least three different “dating” profiles asking me to confirm my email for signup…
The dating.com one that has a reply from me is because it was the only one that wasn’t a no-reply email, so I wrote back saying I have no idea who they are and that as I never tried to sign up, please remove me from their lists. Which I doubt they will, but hey, worth a shot.
Anyway… point is, if you do ANYTHING that upsets the usual suspects, you will be targeted in various ways. I have had my apartment broken in shortly after The Face on mars came out, then I had all sorts of crazy emails, had attacks on my then computer that was extremely targeted with technology that the IT guys who physically repaired hard-drives had never seen before, had various weirdos try to rope me in to all sorts of crap, had supposedly legitimate people offer me to do serialised TV shows on my ideas as long as I was happy to dumb them down to Alex Jones gatekeeper territory.
So… as with demons, there is only one sane response… the more you try to shut me down, the bigger a bonfire of your rubbish I will build. So spread the next post I am doing, concerning the events happening in the Catholic Church, far and wide, and do it by hand, please. Share the post, bookmark
the original blog
which will still be up when they eventually kick me off Substack, and so on.
I have not yet read Vox Day’s book
Probability Zero
, but I have followed the arguments for it on his blog since inception, and that is absolutely enough to be sure his take-down of Darwinian Evolutionary Theory —which he called MITTENS— is more akin to a mauling, disemboweling, and leaving the remains as digested dropping of evolutionary biologists by a sabre-toothed tiger than a cute and cuddly kitten playing with a ball of wool.
The take-down is in fact now so complete, and fully formalised mathematically by Vox, that it simply cannot be refuted at all by anyone even merely conversant with basic math, never mind anyone actually competent with it.
Of course, this means biologists will probably take another fifty years to catch up, and I would not be surprised if instead they de-volve into a semblance of pseudo-science like phrenology, as they become less and less relevant.
Nevertheless, Vox’s patience and thoroughness on this work is of extreme importance.
Not only has Darwinism in all it’s iterations, fables, and fantasies poisoned rigorous research and actual science in biology, as Vox also points out, it has been the unspoken philosophical underpinning of secular materialism, with all its nefarious consequences, not least of which is the posturing arrogance of imbecilic atheists like Dawkins.
Though, as I had already pointed out (softly) 30 years ago in the
Face on Mars
, Darwin’s theory of evolution had some rather worrying holes in it, that wasn’t my main concern at the time.
The main point of
The Face on Mars
was that I had gathered enough hard evidence that humans, or human-like people, almost certainly lived on Mars, and that the destruction of that planet was not a natural event, but rather an “intelligent” effect of technology that was usable not only to destroy planets, but also to travel to the stars.
While I had made various comments that made it clear I was not exactly convinced by evolutionary theory, I did not discount it altogether, though I did not subscribe to any Darwinist interpretation of it. A passage from the original work in 1995 proves the point:
In Sheldrake’s book,
A New Science of Life
, a description of this process is quoted from another book,
[1]
where it is shown, that if there are only two possible states in which individual ‘branches’ of a polypeptide chain could exist (in fact there are many states in which these branches can exist) then, the number of different outcomes for a chain of 150 ‘branches’ is 10
45
.
If each of these possibilities could be explored in turn, even at the speed of a molecular rotation (10
12
sec
-1
) then the process of going through all possible permutations would take about 10
26
years.
In fact, the process of formation of such a molecule actually takes place in about 2 minutes, so it’s clear that all the possible permutations are
not
examined.
What happens, is that the molecule chain ‘settles’ in one particular way out of billions and billions of possible alternatives. The mechanists (that would be so fond of burning Sheldrake’s book at the stake) scream blue murder at the suggestion that fields of morphic resonance play a part in this, or even at the suggestion that the Universe has a purpose. For them, the answer is simple: the molecule chain forms in just that particular way simply because it’s the most stable alternative.
But no one can deny that the atoms that form such chains can indeed come together in an untold variety of ways, each of them stable in itself, so why should they always form in just one particular way given certain conditions. Surely at least in some of the chains, even if all external conditions are the same (temperature, pressure, etc.) there should be some variation? Those who say “No” simply on faith, have not understood the complexity of protein molecules.
To say that there would be no variation in the shape of one polypeptide chain from the next, would perhaps be equivalent to saying that if you had an alternate Earth, with exactly the same geography and just as many people on it as this one has, things on it would be exactly the same as on this one.
All our common sense tells us that it’s impossible to predict how some six billion people would all behave on a carbon copy of our planet. In fact, if it was shown that such a planet did exist, and that indeed everyone on it was just a carbon copy of each one of us here, few of us would remain atheists. And yet, although the analogy is an approximate one, this is what happens in the minute world of large molecules.
There are an almost infinite number of ways in which the atoms that compose a polypeptide chain or a blade of grass can join with one another, and yet, they almost always build just a polypeptide chain or a blade of grass.
[2]
Why?
The mechanist’s answer (it’s the most stable state) is failing in all fields of science, in particular in quantum mechanics and the higher aspects of physics, but now, also in biology (where the mechanist theory that living things are just like machines, never really had much success in explaining any of the more complex functions of living beings anyway) and of course, its cousin chemistry.
Similarly, the religionist’s answer (because God ordained it so) leaves one with a sense of frustration.
A time is arriving, when regardless of whether they like it or not, religion and science will not only be pushed together, but will have to permeate each other’s beings, shedding the lies and ignorance of both sides so that something new and powerful can be born.
The scientists will not hail it as a good thing while it’s happening. The priests will not hail it as a good thing while it’s happening.
A few individuals though, will.
[1]
Anfinsen C.B. and Scheraga H.A. Experimental and Theoretical aspects of Protein Folding, from
Advances in Protein Chemistry
(1975).
[2]
Of course there is a small percentage of mutant blades of grass, but this is also an orderly process. Occasionally, those mutant blades of grass, go on to produce a new type of grass altogether, which may be better suited for the changing environment, so the process of mutation, is a necessary one.
You will note that I did subscribe to a living organism adapting to a changing environment, even if I did not get into the specifics of the how of it.
1
This was because I never took the time to do the math or try to understand the specifics of what the Darwinists were saying. Firstly because their statements never really made complete sense to me (because we now know they are obfuscating bafflegarble and nonsense) and secondly because it did not interest me nearly as much as the far simpler and more reliable astronomical events, and movements of astral bodies, and their effects, that could be quantified and verified far more easily (if not explained in their overall vastness and origin as well as proponents of the Big Bang might think).
There is a funny sort of parallelism between Vox’s interests and my own, where he does extremely detailed work (on economics, and now evolution) on topics I pretty much dismissed the mainline theories of as dubious, erroneous, or flat out nonsensical based on raw logic, but without doing the detailed work to prove it to a large number of people whose opinions I really don’t care much about if at all anyway.
I did do the work with respect to
The Face on Mars
, and the implications of humans having lived on Mars in a remote past. But even then, the disparate topics I touched on to make the case were (and remain) so gigantic in each case, that a complete detailed statistical work is only possible in small elements of the whole theory, conclusive though they are.
Such as the statistical analysis of crater impacts on the Southern hemisphere of Mars compared to the Northern, which is inexplicable if due to supposedly natural causes; or the fact that if my theory was right, Mars MUST have had a magnetosphere, which it turned out it in fact did, though I did not know this at the time of writing as it had only recently been discovered at the time, and back in 1995 the internet was relatively new, and such information was not as readily available as it is now.
My process is essentially to look from the big picture down to the details and only when the first few iterations of the big picture still remain coherent as they narrow down, do I persevere into the further details. But if a logical obvious issue craters the whole theory one, two, or three steps in, then the theory is untenable, and my interest in proving that in the absolute wanes unless it happens to pique my curiosity enough.
With Mars, the first hypothesis that The Face and nearby Pyramids and other objects were artificial was initially absurd to me; because the implications of it would be too far-reaching. In fact I had started to write a FICTION book, based on the premise they WERE artificial because I found the hypothetical results of such a discovery to be entertaining and interesting and I wanted to explore them in a fictional story.
It is only as a result of doing quite a lot of actual scientific research on the Face and Pyramids and Mars, and its surrounds, that I kept finding a higher than what I thought possible probability that in fact they
were
artificial.
This naturally led me to try and falsify my own theory by going to the next logical point that would necessarily need to be true if the Face
was
to be artificial.
On the assumption they were human-like the coincidence of humans on Mars and Earth was again so astronomically small (especially in a mechanistic, atheistic, or materialistic Universe) as to be absurd.
So I looked at the original composition of the atmosphere, and lo and behold it had enough oxygen and nitrogen or other inert gases. Then I looked at water, and… yup… it had lots of it. And so on and so forth, at each turn, the gross picture was resolving into sharper and sharper focus, and I still recall precisely the moment I put it all together.
It was late at night (or rather early in the morning) as I was writing a chapter of the fiction book and then it hit me, what had really happened on Mars. And how.
It was a shock, and so fantastic that my first instinct was to think: “No! It can’t possibly be that incredible!”
It was then I set out in earnest to try and prove my theory wrong in every way I could think of it. And all I found was instead more supporting evidence for it.
It is undeniable that I was the first person to put together what happened to Mars and what our real human origins are, at least in a large picture sense of things.
Graham Hancock may have plagiarised the core elements of my book (as he did) and made a lot more money out of it than I ever did or am likely to (even if he STILL gets it broadly wrong, because like a typical journalist he’s more interested in the fame and the money than the truth or the details of it) but I and my family and close friends (the few that bothered to read the book anyway) are aware of the reality of my discovery, and that is really all that counts the most for me personally. Of course, if anyone wants to throw a few million Euros, Pounds Stirling, Dollars, or gold bars my way, well, I will graciously accept.
Others will almost surely take the credit for it, but that was why I published the book back in 1995 and updated it in 2014. And it can probably do with another update and polishing if I ever have the time, because Vox’s Probability Zero certainly adds a LOT of credibility to what I had already surmised 30 years ago, and that is:
We have been genetically manipulated by extra-terrestrial entities long ago.
And unlike those who initially came up with various somewhat outlandish theories of it, like Erik Von Daniken (who self-admitted he was the clown to attract people into the circus tent) I think I proved it far more scientifically than anyone before me. Vox’s book in a sense is the cherry on the top of a large cake I produced by synthesising a lot of other people’s work, not least of which, Mark Carlotto, who remains to my mind, the one who did probably the most important work on the Face and other artefacts near it, with a statistical analysis that mirrors Vox’s one on the impossibility of evolutionary theory.
My synergistic approach was certainly enough to prove the point to a high degree of probability that bordered on the certain already anyway, but elements of work like Carlotto’s and Vox’s produce signposts of such firmness and foundational rigour that my own theory —which may seem somewhat nebulous to minds not used to thinking in ratios, probabilities, and patterns of a very firm logic— becomes not only bolstered by them, but really takes shape like a gigantic mountain of granite appearing out of the clouds as sunlight melts them away.
Beside the REAL origins of humanity, if my theory is correct (which I am certain it is, and even more certain today than I was 30 years ago) then we have also got to contend with the FACT that antigravity technology not only is possible but absolutely existed and indeed exists now on scales most people assume are wild science fiction.
That antigravity is a fact was already proven in the 1920s by Thomas Townsend Brown, but I am talking about current day space-craft that people only imagine might exist in films.
And this makes my fictional trilogy
The Overlord of Mars
even more impressive, because much of the fiction in it may in fact have been really rather closer to reality than even I imagined at the time I wrote them (at least when I wrote the first two books).
The implications of
The Face on Mars
are going to be massive, and possibly unlike anything else that has happened in currently known human history, because in part, they will include the implications of antigravity technology and intelligent beings that already had it in our most remote past (on the order of 40,000 to 12,000 years ago or so at minimum and probably a long time before that, as I explained in more detail in The Face on Mars).
So you might just want to order a copy to be ahead of the curve.
In fact, I may just have got the impetus to add to it soon… if only I could find the time… we’ll see how I do.
Incidentally, Vox’s latest work has explained to me —at least at a gross level— what that mechanism is: Something I called “Adaptive Speciation Based on Natural Pre-existing Potential Genetic Diversity” in an email I wrote to Vox earlier today. Not the most elegant name, but I wanted to try to differentiate it from the current biologists definition when they use the words “Adaptive Speciation”. In gross terms, Vox has explained that the differences in specific species of animals that have been isolated from the mainland for very long periods of time, are really not so much as entirely new species as mutated forms that have adaptations specific to their environment. He has not replied yet, but if he does and corrects my superficial understanding of this aspect, which is based on my own observations over some 40 years of living in various places around the world, and a basic grasp of epigenetic, I will announce it on this blog.
This post was originally published on my Substack. Link
here
No related posts.
By SubStackSyncer | 8 January 2026 | Posted in SubStack
As usual, the lesson here was to have a placid lake mental attitude.
There was heavy snow and firing with the heavy clothes also took a little adjusting, especially since the hood of my jacket can easily fall forward so I shot a couple of times basically trying to do a Kevin Costner in the film bodyguard (firing blind).
I came across this somewhere (honestly don’t recall where), which was a link to a post on X that linked to this guy’s website. However the link/post on X was taken down but somewhere in the comments, another autist, posted the link again, and so I found it. And then I went to read it.
And now, since the various powers that be are probably TERRIFIED of people like this guy, I am posting about it here for the other autists that read my blog to get involved and make it all happen ASAP.
It’s a fairly well laid-out website, and if you can help, support or add to his effort, you should absolutely do so. I certainly need a backhoe I can attach to my tractor, so… you know… maybe focus on that one first.
Just remember that the things that canned the course of history have far more often been the efforts of lone geniuses, “crazy” scientists, absurdly brave warriors and so on.
INDIVIDUALS instead of committees.
And I have no doubt this guy would dedicate himself to this project for the next 30 years with little to interrupt him.
Even more importantly, he is creating a community of people who from online can become organised offline too. That is supremely important.
Europeans working in co-operation have and will create anything from the bicycle to the faster than light travelling spaceships that I am sure already exist given what I understand about anti-gravity technology.
