Social Commentary « The Kurgan Blog

Giuseppe Filotto Logo

Special Operations & Exploration

Archive for the ‘Social Commentary’ Category

TMOS Concepts – Part 2 – Reality is Based on Spiritual Underpinnings

If you understood part 1, then you know that the spiritual necessarily comes before the physical, but the physical too, is required. As always: The intro Paragraph:

This is the second in the Theoretical Models of Society series of Posts. Use the category of the same name or the Search Me function on the right-hand sidebar to find all related posts in the series.

It is generally helpful to a reader if they are already familiar with some of my other work, in order for this stuff to have the most useful effect on your life. In particular, The Face on Mars and Believe! would be the top reads to have done to have the generic global perspective of reality well in hand. Systema and Reclaiming the Catholic Church would have the most impact on a more personal level. On health/security/self-protection, and on the reality of Catholicism as it was (and remains with Sedevacantists) before Vatican II and why the Novus Ordo Church is not only not Catholic, but Satanic at its core. I will repeat this little paragraph on each new part, as I think it is important to have a general foundation if one is really interested in more than skim-reading before returning to the general slumber we are all being attempted to be forced into.

If your spiritual cohesion is weak, your physical one will be non-existent. If your spiritual cohesion is based on something real but partial (non-violence, do no harm, meditation on the abstract realities, communion with nature), that is lacking the other side of reality (violence is at times required so you better be good at it, a little harm early sometimes prevent a bigger harm later, practical considerations, dealing with humans as they are not as you wish they were) then our physical cohesion will only last while there are no real stressors to it. MS-13 gangs have it good… until an active government or group of vigilante citizens large and equipped enough decide they had enough. Then MS-13 gangs disappear or become the new government if they win. The Amish are fine… until the MS-13 gangs decide they want the Amish compound.

Only if the spiritual is holistic does the physical become resilient.

You may disagree with it, but like it or not, Islam is holistic. Suicidal zealots on one end and devout prayer on the other end. Because of it, it is resilient. Judaism is complex, because its spiritual aspect reflects both the concept of a higher power, but also the idea that you can circumvent its laws by clever rules-lawyering, and this translates to a physical cohesion that is founded on deception of anyone not part of the club to a great extent. It is resilient and successful… until the deception is understood and seen on a scale that tips the balance, then its exponents tend to get exiled and removed from polite society en masse.

China as an entity is resilient, and its people hard to counter in terms of work ethic or perseverance, but from a spiritual perspective their way of doing things, with mass subjugation to the state, is not sustainable for Western style civilisations. So they are insular and non-integrating. More of a slow rolling behemoth than an instant threat to survival.

Fake religions that only have veneers of ideologies, but are really just the equivalent of a spiritual fake meal and physical cardboard cutout, will have inconsequential physical manifestations beyond the zombie horde. Protestants, Novus Orco “Catholics” the millions and millions of agnostics and atheists, none of them make any difference. At most they are a brainless zombie horde that might be manipulated to stumble this or that way for a brief period of time; and yes, in that time they can make a lot of damage, but they don’t decide anything.

Eastern Orthodox are currently the pre-eminent resistors of clown world, but they tend to be isolationist (which is good but means you as a Westerner are not of them really) and stagnant spiritually. Physically they are solid and generally reliable and they have large enough numbers to make a difference. That said, the failure of their societies is built in: they are essentially tribal. Even the Mongol Empire collapsed when Genghis Khan died. And their own internal stresses prevent them from ever becoming a truly civilising force.

Tiny, low-numbers as it is Catholicism (Sedevacantism) is actually the only perspective that has a real chance. The spiritual element is solid and factual and has no problem pushing back as hard as required, right up to taking on even the fanatical elements of their enemies with calm and determination. Physically this too translates. Their weakness for now is numbers. But given each woman we know that is Sede has (or intends to) at least 5 or more children, we will become a larger force over time.

Pacifist in intent but not afraid to defend as hard as required, also makes us resilient. Building up Sede communities is the aim and process currently happening in real time. Organisation and forming economic communities is the next step. And after that, political and civil defence will come rapidly.

Regardless of if you heed my thoughts on what the best spiritual practice to provide a deep coherence is or not, the fact is that you need to create a physical coherence too. That is, a community of people in the flesh, that can stand united against whatever horror they may have to face, together, as a real community that shares pains and glories as required.

You can have all the best ideas in the world (I have several myself!) but if you don’t learn to create and be a part of a community of men that are willing and able to become warriors on the spot if events require it, you will not survive any SHTF events, nor the more likely constant and progressive squeezing you with taxes, laws, rules and increasing costs for everything.

You need to surround yourself with people that will work well together inside foxholes, instead of panic and crap themselves. And then you need to lead them if you can, and follow the leader if you cannot.

You simply will not achieve anything, no matter what type of “revolution” you might want to have, peaceful, educational, economical, or even outright war, if you do not have something prepared to replace whatever it is you are trying to do away with.

So build it first.

By G | 16 September 2024 | Posted in Social Commentary, Theoretical Models of Society

How to find a Husband

More women than I thought (that are unmarried apparently) read this blog.

So ladies, here are some general pointers. Just like I tell the men to become as presentable as possible, do the same.

*Wear clothes that highlight your best features.

*Wear SOME make-up (do not trowel the stuff on, it’s off putting).

*Don’t be a disgusting lard-ass. Stay healthy and fit.

*Personal hygiene is NEVER optional, and especially so for a woman.

*Unless you suffer from some disfiguring malformation, as a general rule, do NOT get any plastic surgery/botox/lip-filler, etc. Yes, we CAN see it. YES we DO KNOW, and no it’s not enticing. In fact, in almost all cases, it’s very off-putting.

*Learn interesting stuff. It doesn’t even really matter what, but a woman with a SKILL is unusual and makes a man pay attention. I dated for a time, quite seriously, a woman that was an underwear model, had been a model in general, then quit because she didn’t like the environment and she had no driver’s licence, so got around on a scooter, which only required a reduced licence. But she had a valid pilot’s licence. Now, I never needed her to fly a plane, but the idea of her being the pilot on some smuggling adventure in a Tales of the Gold Monkey style fashion, lived permanently in my head the whole time I was with her. All we would have needed was a small plane that could land on water, and a broom-handle Mauser pistol. If you have to ask why the Mauser, you will never understand. And if you have not seen that one off series, trust me, it’s absolutely worth it, get the set and binge on it. But I digress. The point is a woman that CAN change a tire, or use a spreadsheet, or, like my wife, has preternatural ability to find/buy the weirdest gadget I didn’t even imagine might exist, that turns out to be useful, and so on, is a bonus point. More so if it’s actually useful. BUT… DO NOT OVERSELL IT. Ok, so you know what a carburettor is, great, but don’t go on about it the way Vegans go on about their eating habits.

*Learn to actually LISTEN. For all that the running joke –in the dystopian narrative we live in– is that men don’t listen, the reality is that it is WOMEN that are almost functionally incapable of listening.

The way a male brain generally works is in one of these two ways:

Information comes in —> Gets processed in context —> action or response is taken within that context.

Nagging comes in —> gets identified as nagging —> internally ignores the nagging and ponders life, his bad choices in women, abstract math, and above all: What would a Roman Centurion Do? —> Makes noncommittal noises to pretend some random semblance of listening.

Women get upset and say men don’t listen in the second instance.

Unless you are good at really not listening.

Again, true story, I once had a girlfriend that was really almost a ten in looks and bedroom skills, but her brain was a close representation of tapioca mixed with random electrical discharges and she would start arguments with me for no earthly reason known to man. She once did this over the phone and I really wasn’t in the mood. Instead of my usual response, which would generally be composed of two words and hanging up, I simply put the phone down, far enough I could not hear a word she was saying, but just a squeaky kind of white noise and I proceeded to have my lunch. If the squeaky noise paused I’d grab the phone and go: “Hmmm.” And put it back down. I had a pleasant lunch that took about 30-40 minutes, and when I next heard a pause in the squeaky noise and grabbed the phone, the statement on her side of it was:

“Oh… wow, I am really impressed. this is really the first time you just listened to me without arguing back that none of what I say makes any logical sense. Thank you! Can I come over tonight?”

To which I said “Sure.” And to this day I have no idea what stupid shit she was talking about, but I guarantee you it was stupid shit, because she never brought it up again, not that evening when she came over, nor any other time or during any of the other arguments we had. Now, why is this? I’ll explain, it; has to do with how the female brain works when someone is talking to them, and it is invariably this:

Information comes in—>depending on how attractive/personally invested she is already in the person speaking FOR HER OWN MOTIVES, the ability to actually take in the information as presented and process it in context varies, from an effective almost 0% to a maximum of 80% even if she is madly in love and really trying. Whatever the information is, from a male perspective it would be the equivalent of you receiving truncated messages over radio. The information was: “Would you like a starter? Do you like pasta, like me? or prefer meat?” Depending on her level of personal investment in you this could be received as anything between:

“Would you lik… start…me?” To which she says an enthusiastic YES and expects you to take her to your place, or in the opposite case, throws a drink in your face and accuses you of attempted sexual assault.

AND

“Would [you like] pasta, me [meat]” If she is hungry and likes pasta but not you she will say “pasta.” If she likes you too she may respond “meat” with a meaningful glint in her eye.

The point is women do not hear the objective universe. They crush-grind it and funnel it through whatever emotion, random thought, specific obsession, or other thing in her head either temporarily or semi-permanently, is already lodged in there. And they generally never answer whatever question or topic you are asking them about, but at best a lose interpretation of what they THINK you might have asked.

Which is why engineers, rocket scientists, snipers, mathematicians, and basically anyone where people die if you don’t do detailed shit correctly, is male.

So ladies, despite your seething rage at the above few paragraphs, please understand two three things:

Men who understand women to a certain level are all aware that by our standards you are generally incoherent, batshit crazy, incongruent to a degree that would get men shot on sight, messy, chaotic, emotional and hormonal. Autists and men with little experience of women do NOT get this anywhere near as well.
While we understand you think the entirety of creation revolves around your wishes, needs and desires, the inconceivable and horrible reality is that it absolutely does not. It’s even much more worse than that in fact: The Universe doesn’t generally care about you at all, and even if God loves you, reality will still bitchslap you in the face all day long, every day, and continue to do it all your life. It would really be helpful if you learned to understand that:
- Objective reality is COMPLETELY independent from how you feel about any of it
- The more you are able to reason and do logic, the more it improves your life in every way, AND it impresses every man you know in ways you can’t even imagine

3. Truly, you ability to think and react logically and consistently will be like magic unicorns singing rainbows to any man that has had to deal with a few of the average women present in the West today.

Although different to the above, though very much related, always remember that while you generally get to decide who and if they have sex with you, pretty much at will, men get to decide who and if he gets married to them. Pretty much at will. So check your entitlement at the door.

And here is the absolute silver bullet for most men:

DO NOT BREAK HIS BALLS. DRAIN THEM INSTEAD.

Crude? Sure. True? Also real.

A woman who is a genuine help instead of a drag on a man’s already busy life, and who is kind, does not nag, and is genuinely and respectfully attracted to a man and shows it to him regularly, is like the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. Or to put it in even more crude, but really simple terms in meme format:

And the TL;DR version

Now, if you are an actual Church going, Catholic lady, forgive the crudeness, and bad language, but honestly, I very much doubt a proper Catholic woman really needs any advice on finding a husband. The sad fact is that twe have a complete TSUNAMI, of entitled, thinks-she-is-a-ten (when she is a six at best), bratty, ignorant, spoilt women who assume they deserve the best of everything all the time.

And that’s just not how reality works. Another VERY useful ability, is for you to rate yourself on the traditional 1-10 scale, which is ONLY used for looks. That is your overall face and body. You might not like it, it says nothing about you as a person, but men, simple creatures that we are, pretty much DO rate you this way. And while a man may well have sex with anything right down to a 0, they will generally NOT marry anything 2 points lower than them on the physical attractiveness scale. So select your potential match accordingly. If you are a 7, you’re NOT going to get a 9 who also has money and a decent career. That guy is not having any trouble finding sexual partners and has very little incentive to get married until he finds at least a 9 that is feminine, helpful, intelligent, submissive, sexy and entertaining. And he CAN find that, at his level.

A man will tend to marry maybe one point lower or two, if he is a generic Delta type who is himself either a 6-7 or hasn’t got a lot of self-esteem, and so on, but generally men are looking for something between a point lower than them and two points higher (which is their own delusion in many cases, but far less so than is the female delusions of what they can get married to.)

Anyway, those are the basic pointers and should really be plenty for most women. if there are any specific comments of emails that repeat a particular point, I will address it too.

By G | 16 September 2024 | Posted in Relationships, Relationships, Social Commentary

Theoretical Models of Society

So as per the results of the Poll in the previous post this category came out on top, which I admit surprised me, but pleasantly so, as it means the readership here is of the sort of intellectual caliber I prefer to cultivate.

The “down” side of such a series, from a personal perspective, is that I tend to be extremely results orientated even in my theoretical concepts, so while I think about all sorts of things, from a public effect stance, I prefer to dedicate my energy to things that can or will have an impact.

This is easily verifiable by the fact that all of my non-fiction books have been relatively successful at changing the zeitgeist about a specific topic as well as have been relevant in more than a few people’s lives. The one possible exception (too early to tell so far) is Caveman Theory because I have only released that in a digital version on my own platform and not on Amazon or elsewhere. Even so, given the relatively tiny readership of this blog, the fact I use absolutely ZERO Search Engine Optimisation and the only way it spreads is by people organically promoting it or sharing posts I write, it has so far done okay.

The Face on Mars was a much more impactful book for many people back when it was written at the end of 1995. But because the topic is quite heavily suppressed by the powers that be, (human history, advanced antigravity technology, Nikola Tesla, the Egyptian pyramids, and various other topics that are unavoidable once you realise Mars’s true and undeniable history due to its geology and astronomy) and as such is not widely known in context, a periodic renewal and update of the concepts in it is helpful and it has still affected quite a lot of people’s perspective on the real history of humanity with the more recent update in 2014 too. It is one of the more difficult books to evaluate the impact of because it is only available in paper format from Amazon, and its initial run was pretty much before Amazon existed and did rather well in the traditional book publishing world, even if the publisher was small and now defunct.

The Systema book has done very well over time and remains a fundamental work used by many people around the world to improve their ability not just in Systema but in other martial arts as well as other activities and life in general. I am not merely self-aggrandising when I say this, i het regular emails on this and this is one of rhe more recent reviews even though the book has been out since 2011.

It also is only available on Amazon, but that made easy to track in terms of sales. In fact, I am currently busy writing a second book that I have had in mind for some time, which will be about advanced Systema concepts for people who are already familiar with Systema and/or the concepts I described and explained in this book.

Believe! Is a very short book that can be read in a couple of hours, but has perhaps had the biggest impact of any other book I have written, and its ultimate ripple effect might be far wider than I might ever know. What I am aware of is that well over 100 people, and entire large families have converted to proper Catholicism because of it (that is the Catholicism that existed prior to Vatican II, also known as 1958 Sedevacantism).

The long term impact of this fact alone could potentially be world-changing, so I was very pleased with that somewhat unexpected result. T

he follow up to it, a much larger work stuffed to the gills with exhaustive references is Reclaiming the Catholic Church (in fact the full titles of both books are quite entertaining in and of themselves if you bother to go look at them). This was the weaponised autist version of an in depth look to what Catholicism actually is and what its rules are (we are the only religion that has its dogmas very well defined in a code of canon law that encompasses 2000 years of history and that does not contradict any of the rules laid down over that period. Tens of thousands of documents of the Church were vetted to ensure consistency and continuity with the past to produce it). And as a result explained in detail both what the Sedevacantist position is, why it is irrefutable that Sedevacantists are the only actual Catholics left, and why since 1958 the Vatican has been infested only by Satanists, pedophiles, homosexuals and generally anti-Catholics, as well as why there has been no valid Pope since 1958 and the Novus Ordo is an impostor and fake Church that is the antithesis of Catholicism. This information is now spreading like a wild fire and has resulted in the growth of Sedevacantist numbers to the point that our churches are very often standing room only and filled with younger couples making a bunch of babies. Both books are available on both Amazon (links above) or my e-store for less.

The overall point being made here is that generally speaking, I will write non-fiction with the intent that it has a real and positive effect on the people who read it that is of some meaningful overall impact. Firstly to them, but also to society at large. If more people were aware of real human history, did martial arts and were aware of the quantity and viciousness of the lies presented by its enemies on the actual nature of Catholicism, the world would undoubtedly be a far better place.

My concern with regard to doing a series of posts on how to improve societies around the world at large, is that it would be like howling in a tornado. That is, would it meaningfully affect anyone to really do anything or take any real action? My view is that this is unlikely. That said, if just one or two people go on to actually take meaningful action with respect to it, it is certainly possible that they could spark huge changes in their local, national, or even international arena.

So even if the expected return on investment is extremely tiny (it is zero in monetary terms, I am talking about human life improvement in general) it may be worth doing anyway because if a black swan event happens, it would be awesome.

So… I guess I will begin the series. And I will add a new category and tag for it: Theoretical Models of Society and label them as part 1 through to X. This is just the introduction to the concept but some posts will follow soon on what is a huge topic.

By G | 15 September 2024 | Posted in Social Commentary, Theoretical Models of Society

Meta Barnhardt

So Ann Barnhardt writes about the cognitive dissonance of people so brainwashed they still think Bergoglio is the Pope even after he does the textbook apostasy of saying other religions lead to God, all while she herself ignores her own cognitive dissonance on the very same topic, which is espoused in the heretical documents of Vatican II which essentially say the same thing.

She is basically saying:

“Look at these fools pretending Bergoglio is the Pope when he is clearly doing a Satanic dance all over the altar!” All while she pretends Ratzi the Nazi was not doing the exact same Satanic dance all over the same altar.

It truly is a remarkable study in the ability of human beings’ astonishing ability to convince themselves of the most obvious and absurd nonsense in order to simply protect their own ego.

Barnhardt would have to admit she was just simply flat out wrong about actual Catholics (1958 Sedevacantists), and her position as a result being in deep error too. And I think her ego (pride) will simply not allow that. Despite her intelligence, and —I am sure— deep devotion, Ann may appear to be a very stubborn woman, and that in itself is fine, stubborn people can be wrong or not, but in her case, stubbornness is not the issue.

Pride is.

I have always given her the benefit of the doubt for years, putting it down to an over-zeal of loyalty to people who don’t deserve it because of the mistaken idea that they somehow serve or are connected to our Lord. I said as much in my book Reclaiming the Catholic Church back in 2020 and I think before that on this blog.

But in reading her posts, it has gradually become clear that her issue is pride. Personal pride at that. Oh I am sure Ann is perfectly contrite to her imagination of what and who our Lord is. I am sure of that. But… when it comes to admitting her error to anyone else on Earth, and I mean a real error, an error that matters to her, I think she is almost wholly incapable of doing so, out of sheer pride. She is a woman alone and been so all her life, pretty much against the world, and I think having to face the reality of having been wrong about the nature of the only, and absolutely most important, relationship she has ever had, would probably be utterly devastating to her.

It would be the equivalent of a spiritual divorce on a person of deep faith. So, her ego prevents her from seeing it, even if the truth is that God would in no way abandon her, He never does. We abandon Him, not the other way round. But her shame, hurt pride, and having to admit a crevasse-like flaw in her thinking to the entire world, including all the uncharitable people who have attacked her over the years, is too much for her to deal with. I can’t say I condone it, but I do understand it, and in all honesty, feel sorry for her. I do hope she can find the strength to see the truth and proclaim it widely though. I have just prayed for her, and I hope God sees fit to give her the Grace she so clearly needs. Godspeed Ann.

UPDATE: As it apparently was not clear to someone new here, the ONLY Catholics left are 1958 Sedevacantist. You can find out more by typing “Ann Barnhardt” in the Search Me function on the right hand sidebar.

By G | 14 September 2024 | Posted in Catholicism, Sedevacantism, Social Commentary

The transhumanist agenda and possible solution

UPDATE: I have a much better idea that yes, this information is accurate.

~~I have no idea how accurate any of this is,~~ but if true, the use of nicotine and water solution details from the original paper (in Spanish is fine) would be very welcome if one of you can find it.

I ~~tend to think~~ am fairly certain there is more than some truth to it, because when researching this my desktop spontaneously restarted a few times and it took ages to be able to save a archive of Substack that may be complete nonsense (the reference David Icke) but also has some names and bits that could be interesting to follow up: you can find it here:

https://archive.is/ZBJQ9

More relavntly perhaps is the exhaustive work of The Quinta Columna.

The Quinta Columna is in Spanish mostly but their work as far as i have looked into it has been impeccable and I have verified the various issues concerning 5G and the ability to modify people’s thoughts etc long ago, as I was aware of this technology in the mid 1990s.

Their latest claim is that anaesthetic shots from dentists appear to contain some of this graphene stuff and this has apperently now been confirmed. Good thing my last visit I went for I refused the shots then. And that a solution of distilled water and nicotine appears to heavily degrade the nanotech in them. Similarly, alcohol does too. Delgado explains some of the reasons in more detail, and I found a text on it here.

Here is the relevant extracts:

Remember we were told that alcohol caused the supposed vaccine to lose its efficacy, right? And remember also those studies that were brought out by different countries that talked about nicotine, apparently, having some kind of integration and they were studying it because there was less COVID-19 disease with nicotine, remember that? With smokers there were fewer infections? Well, all this has a scientific basis based on graphene.

Moreover, you see, it happened that COVID-19 patients had inhibition of an enzyme called myeloperoxidase. Right. This means that it is an enzyme that acts as a neutrophil, that is to say, what it supposedly does is to trap and engulf macrophages macrophages (SARS-CoV-2), but it really does it with graphene. Myeloperoxidase is an enzyme that biodegrades graphene.

What are these myeloperoxidase enzyme disruptors?

Well, it is precisely alcohol (ethanol) that degrades graphene. Ethanol biodegrades graphene in the body because it increases myeloperoxidase production. Nicotine increases myeloperoxidase production. Therefore, it also degrades graphene.

That is why these studies were related in terms of this popular disease (COVID-19) caused by the inhalation or inoculation of graphene, by various methods. In other words, we have literally hunted them down.

Graphene has been inhaled not only by those FFP2 masks —which were originally installed and then removed. Graphene, once inhaled, causes bilateral pneumonias. When it is at the neuronal level it causes neurodegeneration or neurodegenerative in general. Why? Because what is done when one measures with a multimeter the people who are magnetized after inoculation, is the graphene, which is looking for magnetocytes —which are neuronal cells that do precisely what they do is thinking—. Thinking is electrical impulses and they generate electromagnetic fields. Magnetocytes are magnetic cells that we have naturally in brain tissue. However, they are now enhanced by the superconductor graphene. Therefore, they receive signals much better and emit signals. Magnetized or vaccinated people (which is the same thing) emit and receive a signal. The objective was to behaviorally control the population.

What is done is to emit frequencies, so that when we have measured with a multimeter —placing the electrodes at the occipital base of the skull—, we observe currents that oscillate between 180 mV, positive and negative in an alternating manner. When alternating currents are made -we are also going to present the study so that you know it-, what is done is to depolarize the cell bioelectrically: the transmembrane potential is altered. What you get is a sweep at the cellular level. That is to say, the phenomenon of cell necrosis and apoptosis appears. The cell commits suicide because it never finds dialectic equilibrium. It is constantly being changed with alternating currents.

This variable electric field is what generates variable electromagnetic fields. That is why the magnet adheres in some areas and repels in others at the same time. Okay, all this based on observation, which is the scientific method and not based on mRNA or protein Spike papers, which is just another tall tale. Get to understand it yourselves.

With this, as I say, all the tissues are broken, first at the neuronal level and then at the tissue level, and this is the consequence of the inoculation of people with memory loss, lack of memory, pronounced Alzheimer’s disease —if they already had it—, loss of memory capacity, loss of ability to think easily, and strange and bizarre behavior: neurodegeneration in general. And that is why a “brain tsunami” of mental delirium, bipolar disorders, abnormal psychological behavioral phenomena, a brain tsunami in July —in the official version caused by the coronavirus that we never had sequenced, evidently due to the global and simultaneous switching on of this 5G technology— is announced for next month. Some will say, “No, the technology is on.” Yes, it is on, but not the emission of frequencies that they are going to send to cause those alternating variable electromagnetic fields. This is what these “smart” people who want to talk so much do not know.

As I say, all this information will be broken down point by point in the nightly live broadcast of La Quinta Columna today, probably the most interesting, since we have been at the forefront of the planet in this investigation, in this track, and we have definitely finished with the plandemia from the point of view of the origin; from the point of view of what is currently happening; and from the point of view of what they intend to do.

He also states that he does not mean for people to start smoking and become alcoholics with this information and that soon, more in depth information and studies will be done.

The weird thing is that I have never been a drinker but since COVID, I have absolutely felt the need to take short sips of wine at the oddest and most random of times. My liver has a disorder by which alcohol generally disagrees with me. All booze with sulphides basically gives me liver ache from as little as a sip, except tequila, because it doesn’t have them. And yet, despite this, I felt the need to drink a quarter glass of wine with the main meal and sometimes take a literal sip in the morning. Weird behaviour I never had before, but I did listen to my body and did it.

This appears to also explain the rather constant inflammation I have kept at bay with my most excellent olive oil, and the general reduced lung capacity or efficiency I have experienced to a degree never before seen in my life.

I shall be experimenting myself and updating you all on the effects.

The olive oil export to the USA is being hampered by some fear by the local oil mill, which I hope to get past, or it may have to be limited to individual orders mailed at the expense and risk of individual buyers, but it would be very expensive as the posting to the USA is no joke and there is the possibility that customs does not let it through, even if theoretically as far as I can tell they should. The situation is easier if you are in Europe or the UK, but I have not given up.

Anyway, I truly hope this helps and I hope coldfury.com and Western Rifle Shooters as well as anyone else with blogs or an online presence will push this information far and wide. Thank you.

By G | 13 September 2024 | Posted in Actual Science, Freemasons, Medical Science, Social Commentary, Zombie Apocalypse

Advice to Sub-Optimal Men

This Xeet prompted this post.

Note the 27,000 reposts, and in case the writing is too small, here are the 4 images the commenter “Myka” does not give any fucks about at all.

Now my general feeling on this sort of thing is that the men who whine about this just need to grow a pair. Or not, and die without reproducing, with any luck.

And of course that no man at all should ever reproduce in any fashion, or even have any sex, whatsoever, indeed ANY involvement at all with women like Myka. If men followed this sensible advice, within about a month, the entire world would be aflame with how all men are evil and so on. After about a year, feminists would have almost died out, and after a decade the only feminists left would be in mental institutions for the unfortunately insane.

But I am trying to be more compassionate and understanding to those men that have been already crushed by life, their single mothers, or whatever. Maybe you’re a short, hairy goblin with nothing going for you. And it would be unfair for me to simply tell you to “man up” if you understand that in the context of you being able to marry a supermodel not being possible only because of your lack of confidence.

So let me spell things out.

Absolutely you need to change what you can. Get fit, make sure you are always clean, dress better, shave or laser your over-hairy ass, improve your job prospects and career, and so on. Sure, do all of that, but above all, the ONE thing you absolutely CAN do is fish in your level.

As a man you should be able to be brutally objective. So first fix all you can reasonably fix. Then give yourself a fair rating.

Personally, even when I had hair, i never rated myself above a 7 or so, even if objectively I knew that for a not insignificant number of women I was definitely at least an 8 in looks. And in ambition and what I was doing in life, again, for any woman overly concerned about material wealth I have fluctuated from a 2 to an 8 and in some cases a 9, but any woman that understood my nature at all was more liable to rate me a 6 or at most a 7. What I always had in spades however was an unflinching dedication to simply be me. Regardless of what anyone else thought of it. And that, at least temporarily, despite all my other numbers being lower or even much lower, made me at least an 8 and often an 8.5 or even 9.

I provide all the different metrics because unlike men, women do not rate us simply on looks.

It is not a councidence that most of my girlfriends, and certainly all the ones I was interested in to some more or less serious degree were invariably rated at least as 8s by men that generally had been successful with women and often as 9s and rather often as 10s by all the men who had been more averagely successful with women. Many a time I have been told by literally dozens of co-workers from multiple companies, that I was “punching above my weight” and more than once at various large company Christmas parties I was noticed by literally the entire firm, including the owners who would act deferentially to me despite me being merely one of the several people at my level they employed.

I have literally had random strangers stop me and a woman I was with in the street to congratulate me for the beauty of the woman I was with. And even today, I get friends who, without in any way saying this to “get in my good graces” rave about my wife.

I am not telling you this to depress you or show off.

I am trying to explain to you an important point that if you can internalise it will aid you in your quest for a genuine, long term companionship, marriage and a family more than any other single thing you can do.

The reason I did so well, was because I correctly evaluated all my metrics and played to my strengths. And my strengths are absolutely real, forged in the deepest fire of personal self-knowledge.

I have turned down large amounts of money, very hot women, and all sorts of other things in order to not do anything that would compromise my own sense of integrity. So, bending to some temporary whim of a pretty woman was never in the cards for me. This, of course, has the effect of immediately seeing off pretty much any woman who is not a full blown psychopath/narcissist but has those tendencies. Their need for some form of manipulative control over the man (victim?) they select simply drives them crazy when faced with someone of my temperament.

On the plus side, normal women wired in a healthy way, tend to be attracted to that level of confidence (so do all the pretty but damaged ones, which brings up another set of problems we won’t go into here).

The point is that deep and true self-knowledge is always the key. That is step one. Step two is to improve all you can, but it is step three that is the absolute silver bullet insofar as one exists:

Look in your own range.

It would probably be difficult for a guy that is 5’5”, has the genes of predisposition to fatness, is born poor and has a single mother raising him, to have the same level of hard-headed conviction I seem to have been born with. And I absolutely believe part of it is due to my Aspergers, which does not present as such due to high IQ and the luck I had in my rather unusual early life. But the point is that if I had been born in that body but retained my mental attitude, I would probably have been comfortably married a lot sooner, have more children and my friends would rave about how kind and pleasant my wife is. And she would probably be a 6 or maybe a 7 at most. Because that is where I would fall overall if you removed the physical advantages I have.

But let’s say you are overall just a 2.

I actually know people like this. Literal cripples with disfiguring handicaps, no real money or any special prospects. And yet both the ones I know personally are happily married and have been for years. One studied hard, became a lawyer, made money, then travelled to the East and essentially “bought” a filipino wife, being brutally honest with her. He really is about a 2 and she is about a 5 or at most a 6. But his overall number is probably a 4. He is wealthy. And the difference between a possible 4 and 6 is his level of self-knowledge. When I first met him and we spoke a bit he simply stated exactly what I said above and his wife was present. They had been married and living in London for over ten years. He praised her for being loyal and helping look after him. Maybe she was more nurse than wife. Maybe there was a financial arrangement we know nothing of. But his wife did not look or present as miserable and neither did he.

The other guy is married to a woman that also has some physical handicaps. They clearly love each other, have been together for decades and she is a very kind and decent person no one can say a bad word about.

The point is that both men went after a woman within their own numbers.

As did I. And let me tell you that the search at the lower end of the pool, once you accept this truth, is FAR easier than at the “pretty” end of the pool.

The reason was well known to me even decades ago, as is evident by one of my very first posts back in 2007 in a now permanently parked ancient blog (Take note of the relevant image here.)

And has been known by men worldwide at least since the days if the crazy/hot matrix of the early 1990s.

So. Do not despair. It’s only 4 simple rules:

1. Fix what you can fix externally (looks, hygiene, clothing, income, etc.)

2. Chose who you are internally. Learn and know deeply who you really are, so no matter the situation, you will almost always already know how you will react to it. If you are mot how you wish to be yet, do whatever you need to do to become it.

3. Rate yourself honestly in all categories and hence in the overall number you are and then go fish in the pond of your own level.

4. Do not despair. Just correct any errors and persevere.

That’s it.

If you want more detail and context you might also want to get Caveman Theory, but honestly if you just do the 4 steps above, you will eventually succeed.

And never forget point n. 4.

By G | 10 September 2024 | Posted in Caveman Theory, Caveman Theory, Female Socio-Sexual Hierarchy, Increasing Happiness, Relationships, Social Commentary