Clown World Comparatives

So… I can really see this becoming a thing:

I saw and heard earlier today a fake video of a somewhat known internet guy with fake audio.

This was not done by a hollywood studio, but a guy in his basement with a normal pc.

It was obvious from the words spoken that it wasn’t the real guy, but you couldn’t tell from the voice. And this had been done by simply training an AI by feeding it a few hours of the guy’s audio.

It reminded me of the first series of Altered Carbon (I didn’t watch the second or whatever came after), and how unexpected it was that they had Catholics in that series that would choose death over their version of “endless life” which reminded me in turn of the utterly inhuman Star Trek “beam me up technology” which clearly destroys the original human and rebuilds some soulless simulacra of a human being every time it’s used.

And then there is this utter insanity:

Which in my opinion totally justifies putting tarring and feathering back on the law books as a citizen inspired act of enforcing sanity and order.

Seriously, if these are our future options… well…

Apparently, on the 25th of August the EU will adopt some scrutinising spyware/digital fingerprint/social credit thing that will detect how many hair on your butt are grey and of what length they each are individually?

Why? Because perverts run the world, that’s why.

And here is the list of (gasp!) digital sellouts (OMG! How could they?!?) that are all signed up to it:

Alibaba

Aliexpress

Amazon store

Apple store

Booking dot com

Facebook

Anything Google

Instagram

Linkedin

Pinterest

Snapchat

Tiktok

Twitter

Wikipedia

Youtube

Zalando

Bing

As I read (in shock, I tell you) the list to my wife, I finished “… they will be watching our every move you see, not at all like they have been not doing for the last 30 years.”

Wife: “Yeah… I was enjoying my privacy…”

And then we dished out the stir fry she made. It’s a really good one too.

The original equations of Maxwell, apparently were eight equations, but supposedly referred to as 20 because six of them were reproduced as being in three parts. This at least is what I have read so far.

What I am sure of is that the quaternions they were later presented as is an aspect of math that is essentially not taught anymore and that the “semplifications” of Heavyside to Maxwell’s equations did away with the scalar component, which is a fundamental concept that modern EM and gravity theory simply ignores.

So I tried to go look for the original paper of Maxwell. This is the link to the original 1865 paper, though apparently he had mentioned these equations, or at least some in an earlier 1861 paper.

And I am also not clear on whether Maxwell himself originally then changed the equations to quaternion formats, and Heavyside then “simplified” them, reducing them in his attempt to make them more “practical”, or if Heavyside did this to Maxwell’s original equations.

If anyone can clear this up with some proof of the entire history I would be most grateful, as my time in this research is limited.

While, sadly, we are not yet at the point where actual inquisitors are examining evil satanists/statists/gnostics and so on, it can be argued that eventually we will get there.

Secondly, theoretically, any member of the armed forced or law and order can potentially double as secular versions of inquisitors.

Vox, in his recent post on why he will never relax the rules on his platform of Social Galactic concerning clean speech, and certainly will not be making any exception for foul-mouthed Owen Benjamin, or anyone else, made a very important statement:

The problem is that most justifications for initial change not only sound reasonable, they are reasonable.

He is correct, but I do feel it might be useful for the average normie to perhaps have a little more explanation, in order not to fall into the usual binary trap.

For example: Let us assume that one lives in a country where the penalty for murder is death.

Sounds great initially. No murders very likely and if some happen the perpetrator is soon dealt with.

However, what about a dad who catches and kills a serial killer pedophile. According to the rules, he should get the death penalty. But it is clearly against the concepts of justice and fairness. So we may be in lined to make a rule “except if you kill serial murderer pedophiles”.

And then along comes one that says what if it was just two kids the pedo has killed? Is that serial? Hmmm… ok yes.

What about just one? Yeah ok fine. And most people would still be ok with that but then it goes to “well my 99 year old grandmother was in awful pain from cancer and she asked me to end her life on video, so I did…”

And you see that before too long, a couple of generations or so, it would become ok to shoot someone for stealing bread.

So… what is a good inquisitor to do?

Well, depending on his level of authority and ability to act in the specific situation, he could simply let that heroic dad go. Pretend he didn’t see anything. In the modern age, with cameras and DNA and so on this becomes very difficult. Unless you have 2000AD style “judges” the situation is likely to end up in “the machine”.

And once you are in that system, chances are you’re not getting out unless you have a good inquisitor style judge. Why do I say inquisitor style? Because in reality, the inquisition was far fairer than any current court in the modern era.

But that aside, the inquisition ruled using Roman Law, which is a far superior legal system than anglo-saxon so-called “common law”.

The reality is that Roman Law works on the Principle as the large frame, but the details being relevant to each specific case. So, while we can all agree that murder is wrong, certain murders are far worse than others. And some probably require a medal and a small lifelong pension, or at least a large bounty.

A judge acting under Roman Law has a lot of latitude in how he evaluates a crime or an injustice, and, if the judge is a good, honest and fair one, his judgements will generally be correct and appropriate.

This needs to be balanced, however, by the needs of society. For example, during the Spanish inquisition, contrary to popular belief, homosexual sodomy was not usually punished legally. The individuals might be shunned or ridiculed if their proclivities were made public, bit in general only pederasts of a violent nature were killed, and then only too few of them: 163 in total. Similarly, what you have been told about the thousands of pretty women being burnt at the stake for refusing the advances of corrupt priests, is not true either. The grand total of women burnt at the stake for witchcraft in the 200 year period of the Inquisition was… drumroll… 12.

Yes. Not quite the feminist holocaust it’s been presented as. But you know what did happen in Protestant countries? Up to 700 executions a year for something like stealing a loaf of bread to feed your family.

Protestantism is binary.

Catholicism is human.

So, while the Inquisitors need to be wise and merciless with the heretics, impostors, frauds, and evil persona with nefarious designs, they need to know when to be absolutely inflexible with rules that may appear extreme to the secular degenerates that compose out society today, and when to let that supposed “violent monster” get a pass, because in reality he is just a man doing what no one has the courage to do nowadays, which is, to right the wrongs that should never be allowed to go unpunished, like the rape of children, as one example.

And beware of the “reasonable” idea that the death penalty is barbarous and never to be inflicted on anyone. It is a lie. The death penalty is just and entirely appropriate for certain crimes and it is, and always has been, and always will be, Catholic dogma that the death penalty is a necessary part of any just and actually any Catholic legal system.

Beware the “reasonable” man. He’s more likely to be a Freemason than the “unreasonable” man that acts as per Catholic dogma.

So, I have been looking for a paypal alternative, and have been using Wise for several months and have to say that it works very well even though it is not as known. It is basically a bank account that allows you to use multiple currencies.

I have no illusions that once it becomes big enough it will probably ask you sign your soul away in blood or whatever, just like all the other bank-y type things, but it’s good to have options if you don’t own your own army, private island chain and nuclear submarines yet.

Here is my invite code:

https://wise.com/invite/i/giuseppef593

which you can use to join and then get your own code to send out. They give you a small bonus if and when enough people use the service, as Amazon used to do when they started out. Of course Amazon is now a portal to some lower dimensions of hell, no doubt, but I have no problem using the devil’s tools if they further my aims of spreading Catholicism. On some level we all do it, so, pick your way carefully.