With regard to the tranny issue, an 11 year old I was asked to talk to some years back, gets it.
She was being told at school the utterly absurd nonsensical and demonic lie that girls can be boys and vice versa and that “gender” (a word that has nothing to do with biology, but rather linguistics) is “fluid” (it is not. Not in biology, nor in linguistics.)
My conversation with her lasted about 2 minutes total. One minute and forty-five seconds of it approximately being her telling me the nonsense she was being propagandised with.
My fifteen seconds of education forever demolished the entire tranny agenda. It went thus:
“So (name), tell me: if I stitch a tail to my butt and start to jump around, does that mean I am now a kangaroo?”
She burst out laughing and has never been able to be confused by the lies since. She just turned 16 not too long ago and is an awesome, based, logical, loyal and intelligent young woman.
Her Halloween costume a couple of years ago was Kim Jong Un. Because nothing is scarier than a communist dictator. And no, no one told her about it. No one even spoke to her about communism. Unlike those “just-so” stories where everyone clapped, this one is actually real.
Tell your children the truth and they will be a lot harder to indoctrinate with lies.
And it’s not like we didn’t know this YEARS before covid. In fact, I recall an online conversation with a guy that explained way back in 2018 I think, that the way to really get rid of all the Europeans was precisely to use the kind of genetic modification serum that was passed off as a “vaccine” for COVID. This was not a virologist or doctor. Just a guy with above average IQ who took an interest and read various medical papers for fun and shared his thoughts with a group of online friends I belonged to. So, contrary to the Scott Adams of this world, it was absolutely clear and possible to know what the vaxx would do to you long before anyone took it.
Aside from all that, there is also the graphite and other bugs, of course.
McKernan, who has 25 years’ experience in his field, ran the experiment again, confirming that the vials contained up to, in his opinion, 18-70 times more DNA contamination than the legal limits allowed by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).In particular, McKernan was alarmed to find the presence of an SV40 promoter in the Pfizer vaccine vials. This is a sequence that is, ‘…used to drive DNA into the nucleus, especially in gene therapies,’ McKernan explains. This is something that regulatory agencies around the world have specifically said is not possible with the mRNA vaccines.Knowing that the contamination had not been disclosed by the manufacturers during the regulatory process, McKernan raised the alarm, posting his findings to Twitter (now X) and Substack with a call-out to other scientists to see if they could replicate his findings.Other scientists soon confirmed McKernan’s findings, though the amount of DNA contamination was variable, suggesting inconsistency of vial contents depending on batch lots. One of these scientists was cancer genomics expert Dr Phillip Buckhaults, who is a proponent of the mRNA platform and has received the Pfizer Covid vaccine himself.In September of this year, Dr Buckhaults shared his findings in South Carolina Senate hearing. ‘I’m kind of alarmed about this DNA being in the vaccine – it’s different from RNA, because it can be permanent,’ he told those present.‘There is a very real hazard,’ he said, that the contaminant DNA fragments will integrate with a person’s genome and become a ‘permanent fixture of the cell’ leading to autoimmune problems and cancers in some people who have had the vaccinations. He also noted that these genome changes can ‘last for generations’.
Over the last few days (and years and years) I have posted various things highlighting several of the very disordered aspects of modern society. I have specifically focussed in various ways on relationships between men and women, and how these are affected by so much of the surrounding nonsense.
I have often pointed out the Satanic nature of feminism (literally, it has purely Satanic roots at all levels, no matter how seductive the initial presentation is), which, of course, upsets feminists, and may rub many women the wrong way even if they are not avowed feminists.
The measure of discomfort a woman feels on reading that feminism is a net evil in the world is directly proportional to her lack of understanding of what it means to be a woman in reality, nature and as God intended.
And if that last sentence makes you even more upset, well, it’s unlikely you will have the mental fortitude to read the rest of this post, or ever learn anything useful about correcting the ills of the world, starting with yourself, as we all must.
In fairness to women, and as I have pretty much always stated, the fault of their disordered attitudes to life, lies in great part with men. That said, however, unless women want to be thought of, treated as, and in fact be, the human equivalent of cattle without any agency whatsoever, they need to take at least some responsibility. Incidentally, I advise they do. A vast majority of men would be perfectly happy to assume women have no more agency than ruminants, but I don’t think that’s the way forward.
So, then, according to me, and a lot of thoughtful men, what is it that women are getting so wrong and should make an effort to improve?
Settle down and let me mansplain it to you. Feel free to imagine me manspreading with a cowboy hat on and a redneck accent if it helps. Hell, if it helps go ahead and really fire up your imaginations and try and imagine me with a mullet and a cigarette. Whatever works ladies, whatever works!
The pivotal error most women have been trained to do, is to stop being women. To stop being feminine, and girly, and pretty, and pleasant, and polite, and dignified, and well-dressed. Yes, in effect I am saying that the pivotal error is that they are failing to act, be and enjoy being, like a prim and proper lady straight out of a 1950’s fiction about what the future would have been like.
Allow me to present to you some imagery that may help inspire you a little to at least understand what I mean. Try and grasp the sense of what the woman in these images feels like and how she feels about herself and her place in the world. Imagine it as something eminently positive even if you have been hypnotised to believe the opposite. Imagine their smiles, whether in drawings or photographs are genuine and happy, not posed or faked. Genuinely try to grasp the sense of this, and, if you like, imagine too, what the men in their lives are and should be like for them to genuinely be that happy and content and internally free.
And in case you think those images are too “dated” for your sense of modern style, then allow me to further help you “update” them in modernistic fashion as envisioned back then too.
You see, you can transpose the imagery, you can change the setting, you can manipulate the exterior and the style, but it is the inner sense of things which is the key.
What no man wants is this:
Or God-forbid, this:
In fact, almost all men, certainly all sane, well-balanced, normal ones, being confronted with this in their home,
Will gladly and regularly put up with this:
which, by the way, is pretty normal and natural for a woman to have and be like. And occasionally, when we deserve it, and as we are humans, we all do at times, even this:
ESPECIALLY, if it is presented in this very feminine fashion, which is indirectly and sweetly, VERY direct.
Now, to the squeals of the beached whales complaining, my ears are deaf, but to those perspicacious females that noted the question above as to what the man in their life should look like and act like for them to be happy to be as mentioned above, again, perhaps some inspirational imagery is in order.
And again, the images above reflecting men, are not supposed to “inspire” a bunch of metrosexuals to take on the airs of such imagery as boxers, mountaineers, soldiers, and random adventurers so as to impress women. The whole point of such men is that they do what they do because they want to. The impressing or not of others is inconsequential to them.
And while the entrenched feminist will continue to squeal like a poked pig that such patriarchal oppression is endemic of rape-culture and toxic masculinity and blah, blah, blah, who cares… it will be essentially because deep down in their core, like the hole at the centre of the Gamma male’s soul, entrenched feminists have a similar eternal void of self, and deep, deep down know they will never be able to snag, keep and be loved truly by such a man. So, just like the gamma male, they rage. And their rage tries to burn down all men, all pretty, feminine women and all nuclear families.
But every woman who has not yet succumbed to totalitarian feminism, deep down, knows she would love to be with such a stereotypical manly man. Stereotypes are stereotypes for a reason. And truly, actual manly men, are happy to treat their wives as their princesses as long as they in turn treat them as their kings. It is a mutual admiration society founded in genuine care for the other above our own concerns.
That is not to say the manly man will not screw up from time to time. Or that the feminine woman will not. Humans ALL screw up. But that is not reason enough to give up on them. God didn’t. Jesus let himself be scoured, spat upon and nailed to a cross while wholly innocent in order not to give up on us. So… be kind to each other.
And as we are only human, and not like Jesus, it is perfectly acceptable to completely avoid feminists, not engage with them, not have sex with them, and most certainly not marry or have children with them. And it is equally perfectly acceptable for women to similarly avoid “male” metrosexual “feminist-allies”, and their spineless, manipulative, weak, PUA ways.
What no woman wants, in keeping with the imagery above for what men do not want, is the gamma male:
Ultimately, cliched as it is, the natural order of things is probably most expressed by Tarzan and Jane.
And the 1981 version of the film with Bo Derek as Jane remains one of the better versions. If memory serves, the point where Tarzan meets Jane and sniffs her is very well done. I think it was the 1981 film version, but it’s possible it may have been the 1999 version with Christopher Lambert as Tarzan.
The man being a quasi savage is fine. Dealing with the world, especially if one understands the reality of things, often resembles something not unlike a fight with wild animals (with apologies to all wild animals who do not deserve to be compared to the parasitic classes of human bureaucrats that infest our lives today), but it is the very femininity of his woman that softens his ways with her, and it is his caring and protective masculine efforts that give her that peaceful sense of security that no matter how crazy the world gets, he will take care of her.
Today’s world has made the acting as a man almost illegal. And the acting as a woman something to be disparaged and ridiculed. The effect is most noticeable on women, as they are far more social animals than men are. But the results are destructive and create profound unhappiness in women above all. Quoting various scientific studies is near useless given that overall so-called peer reviewed studies are fake and irreproducible by over 50% of cases, however, you can find some with actual methodology that is explained (if not verified).
Here is an interesting graph that measures overall self-reported happiness (of both men and women) against perceived freedom. From this site.
The interesting thing to note, if you search a bit and try to get a general sense of all these studies, is that general happiness took a dive for everybody starting around 1990, although the trend had been downward already. What happened in 1990? Well, political correctness really started up quite prominently and feminism began its ascendance on steroids.
The world has made it quite difficult for a man to single handedly go and work and provide for a numerous family of a wife and several children.
And equally difficult for a woman to be a home-maker and housewife without being criticised by her (less happy) “peers” for being a spineless doormat, subjugated to the always evil and perverted desires of her male oppressor (aka husband).
The answer needs to be in a certain evolutionary step women need to take and it needs to be a step they understand and choose for themselves.
Just like men had to learn to somewhat curb their temperament. Because challenging a rude waiter, or a slow one, to a death duel with your sixgun or samurai sword apparently is “rude”. And then they went completely overboard correcting in the other direction and outright banning the challenge to a duel as being all “illegal” and “murder-y”, go figure.
Well, anyway, women need to now make the evolutionary step that realises that the opinions of other women, especially, but other people, in general, are pointless to worry about or lose sleep over. My post on whoyour critics most often are, is as valid for women as it is for men. Perhaps even more so (with respect to the who).
If it is rare for an efficient and capable man to be your avowed critic (unless you in fact are, mostly an oxygen thief) when it comes to women, even if they are efficient and capable, they are generally worse than men at gaslighting each other as well as critiquing you unfairly or wholly based on their own failings (usually not to your face though). So in that respect at least, the advice given in that post, is valid for women too.
Biologically, it is objectively harder for a woman to be objective than a man. That is just a fact of nature, and trying to deny it is pointless and counter-productive. Because hormones are real and a thing. Nevertheless, assuming that because of it rationality and good logic are therefore impossible, is a lie. Just as men had to evolve to not let their own hormonally driven instincts direct their actions, so now women need to learn the same lesson.
And remember, always, always, always:
Women are not the enemy. Men are not the enemy. The lies and the liars who speak them are the enemy. And you should give them no quarter and no mercy. Expose them, reject them, and have nothing to do with them.
Safeguard the roles nature intended for us and learn them anew if you must (as most of us have to), supporting each other as you do so and learn together. There is no human unit, group, or community, more important, more necessary, more valid, than the nuclear family composed of one man, one woman and their children. All the rest is shadows and lies and meaningless details in the face of that truth.
So come together and know: You have been lied to. Rediscover. Rebuild. Learn. Marry, for life, make children, and reject the world’s lies and fake “rewards”.
Is it easy? No. Of course not. Your own family, especially if you had boomer parents, is probably riddled with divorce, lack of funds, and dysfunctionality at a core level. That’s the reality. So YOU be the start.
You’re like a rootless couple of shipwrecks on a hostile alien planet. You need to first of all get together, realise you need to make your partnership, your marriage, be the core of everything. Without that, you will not survive. Then do all the things that need doing so your children will be able to start off their lives in a tradition that is worthwhile, healthy and gives them the chance to create a solid footing for their own children.
Make that future bright and real, no matter what difficulties you need to face.
Vintage illustration of a futuristic American family on vacation, with the father driving his wife and two kids in a flying saucer instead of a car, 1950s. (Illustration by GraphicaArtis/Getty Images)
And ignore the human wreckage and misshapen mutants that try and tell you you’re wrong, a racist, some kind of supremacist this or that, a hater, an evil, evil, EEEEBIL (yes with a B) toxic male or spineless female.
They, after all, are evolutionary dead ends. The blind frogs that can’t swim that nature experiments with by the thousands just to have them die off in a genetic cul-de-sac.
Forge ahead and take a picture of the freaks, so you can leave a warning in your photo-album for your grandkids.
Vox Day’s Socio-Sexual Hierarchy nomenclature receives plenty of criticism from some people, and much praise from others. The split itself is telling. Those men who have observable patterns of behaviour most associated with being Gammas reject or try to redefine the entire hierarchy to somehow position themselves as the real “tops”, which is why Vox refers to them also as Secret Kings.
A recent comment on my own post about rapey idiots in glass houses expresses what many normal (Delta) Type men believe:
These famous rich guys who drug women like Bill Cosby and this Danny Masterson must be particularly depraved because being rich and famous they could surely get women without doing so.
This idea shows a fundamental misunderstanding of the inner world of the Gamma and what drives them, in the context of being rapists or at a minimum creeps. I have observed their behaviour for years, with the same kind of disgusted fascination one might observe some parasite burrowing under an innocent’s skin.
The behaviour first became more prevalent and obvious on the internet in the mid 1990s, where frustrated men in alt-dot forums expressed a vitriolic hatred bordering on the psychotic towards any form of female rejection they experienced. Then I saw it in the flesh too and mostly it got told to me by pretty much almost all the women I was with in my life.
At first I though the behaviour of rage, when rejected, must apply to only a small percentage of unbalanced losers, but as I was told the same type of stories, by woman after woman after woman, and indeed saw it with my own eyes at times when a girl I was seeing was being hit on by some guy who usually was unaware she was with me in the specific context. As soon as she made it clear she was with me and therefore not available for his advances, some of these guys went into an obvious instant red-hot hatred. Because I look like I do, they usually just left, very occasionally making some sarcastic jab before slinking quickly away. On some occasions I even got an after-event report. One girl I was seeing for a time was a student at university and we had very much an on-off relationship. She was very pretty and was always surrounded by hangers on that thought they might eventually get with her if they just kept being in her orbit. One guy in particular went overboard with the “friends” cover. Whenever this girl and I were not seeing each other for a couple of days he would go over and try and “keep her company”. All of it was non-sexual “let’s watch a film together” or whatever, but his intent was obvious to me and I think to her too, though we didn’t really discuss it, because frankly, he was a non-entity and there was no chance she would do anything with him. It had not anything to do with looks or money either. He was just that sort of milque-toasty guy that really no woman wants to be with by choice.
Anyway, during one of these “pauses” in our relationship she later told me the guy was at her place for two days straight, during which she bitched to him about me and my uncompromising ways. She was marinated in British Feminist theory, and I simply have never had anything to do with it, nor ever accepted any of their absurd ideology. Her feminist theory invariably failed when confronted with her natural instincts concerning me and she would inevitably return to me with some very intimate ways to “make up”. Over time she would try to get me to bend to some insane feminist idea and I would once more simply reject it. Anyway, after her bitching about this for two days to this guy and his enthusiastically agreeing with her, and finally beginning to think this was his way to finally get with her, I believe, from memory that she recounted to me how her conversation went in the final stages. She had just said that I was impossible and drove her crazy with how I just made arguments she couldn’t really counter and it pissed her off and she “hated” me for it. He nodded and said something along the lines of “yeah, he sounds terrible, you should forget about him.”
To which she replied: “Yes, he’s terrible, makes me so mad… And yet… I can’t do without him. I’m going to go over to him now and be completely on his cock.”
And she did. Now, in that case, I can see the guy being frustrated, in his mind he had been sidling up to her like a proper gentleman of the woke variety, and was agreeing with her all the time and was obviously the “better” man, what with being all woke and pro-whatever feminist crap she spouted, and he affirmed and supported all her patriarchal suffering, or whatever, and then, she promptly announces that she’s off to do the very things he desperately was hoping to get from her with me.
You can see how he’d be upset. But the reality is he was more than just dejected. He was furious. Luckily he did not react physically against her, but the next time I saw him several days later, you could tell he had a murderous rage all about him towards me and her too. He never spoke to her again, as far as I know, which was just as well.
Now, in the above case you can sort of sympathise with the guy a little (not about the rage) at least everyone has felt a little sad or frustrated at being rejected by someone they really liked. But in my case, really that is as far as it has ever gone. Ultimately, if a person genuinely has no attraction for you, how can you get angry at them for that? The idea is just absurd to me. It has never computed and never will.
The reason I recounted that chapter of my life was to try and give you some insight into the fundamental difference of internal mechanism that a Gamma has from other archetypes.
The difference is in the internal world of the Gamma from that of a Delta or an Alpha or a Sigma.
The Alpha may actually get quite stung at rejection, especially if it is public and from a high status woman. His ego and need to be seen as the Alpha may in fact also cause him to be quite caustic or dismissive, but if so it will be generally only in the moment and temporarily. After all, no real Alpha wants to be seen as a pitiful shadow of a man that is pining after some woman. Besides, there are usually several waiting in the wings for him, happy to heal his broken heart. In the Alpha mind, getting angry at rejection from a woman is essentially below his dignity and status to do. He may privately be quite hurt, but rage, even to himself, goes against his nature, which is essentially generous and expectant of plentifulness (be it women, business, fame, and so on). The Alpha is a reacher for things, including women, but usually not a desperate grabber in the normal course of affairs.
The Delta is more of a balanced individual and generally will take rejection on the chin, be hurt, then move on with his life and try and find peace where he can. These are the majority of well balanced men.
The Sigma is a special case and may not care at all about the rejection, or be a freak on which the rejection is really the least of his concerns. Keep in mind that both James Bond as well a the character in the series Hannibal are Sigmas. These are not people who follow normal social conventions, but precisely because of that, their internal world, strange as it may be, is founded on a solid bedrock of self-reliance and hence self-knowledge. While they might be professional killers for hire, they are probably unlikely to get angry at a woman for rejecting them. A case in point from fiction may be Dexter. He killed bad guys with abandon, but was always a loyal boyfriend to the women he was with, and took their rejections or bad behaviours with calm resignation.
The Gamma however has wholly different internal mechanisms and they end up being the really creepy and dangerous ones, even if they present as easy-going, liberal, modern metrosexual men in touch with their feminine side. In almost diametric opposition to Sigmas, the Gamma has a profound (and un-admitted) lack of self-confidence. This is a root cause in their very core and they try to cover up that existential hole in their soul with all manner of fakery. Be it money, status, recognition by the masses for their achievements (real or most often imagined or “manufactured”), it is never enough to really fill that essential lack of self-truth.
A Gamma can be a billionaire (see Bezos) and still behave in a completely creepy/loser/gamma way with women. It is true that an Alpha or a Sigma or even a Delta, that is really a millionaire or billionaire can have his pick of women willing to be his sexual partners, and many of those women, initially attracted by the power, wealth and status, may even end up having genuine feelings for the man in question, but there is a core difference in the dynamics with a Gamma.
The billionaire alpha, sigma or even delta, may be perfectly aware of the sexual liaison with women being purely transactional. Their temporary thrill at being on a private jet, or even just seen with the billionaire in question, is enough for them to permit sex between them. The Delta will eventually be a bit sad at such an arrangement and over time get disillusioned with this woman or perhaps even women in general if the pattern repeats. An Alpha may even prefer the situation to be transactional and be fine with it and get a new “performer” once he bores with the first one, or have multiple ones in play or make a proper business contract out of a “marriage”. A Sigma may do the same or become a pimp, or a celibate monk by choice. But a Gamma will simply think that his material wealth gives him the right and the authority to do what he imagines Alphas do or get away with doing. And this is the tragic error.
An Alpha, whether a billionaire or homeless, will have a woman act towards him intimately because she wants to. Because the man’s internal sense of self is strong and she responds to that, ultimately, aside from his exterior, worldly, if you like, trappings. I have personally known (in my hedonistic days) beautiful women, married to extremely wealthy men, who, nevertheless would get naked and have sex with a man that had no money to speak of, but a sense of self that was of a different order from their husbands. This type of effect cannot be bought. The effect it has on women cannot be replicated nor faked very effectively even by the women themselves. So, what happens when a Gamma has reached some perceived pinnacle of power, wealth, fame or combination thereof, in his abysmal understanding of the female mind and heart, he thinks he is now “entitled” to the female attention that he imagines Alphas and Sigmas get (and in fact do get). When, to his utter shock and horror women continue to dodge him like radioactive plague, his natural emotion is rage. In his broken understanding of “life” he is rich, he is successful, he is famous, EVERY woman OWES him sex at will. HIS will. And if they don’t give it of their own volition, why, they must be defective, and/or it doesn’t matter, because in the Gamma’s mind Alphas just take what they want anyway and the women always go along with it.
And this is how you get the Danny Masterson of the world, the Bill Cosbys and all the other wealthy and powerful executives that end up getting caught groping angrily at unwilling secretaries and colleagues. So, no, the money is not enough. The fame is not enough. The status is not enough. And gammas simply will never get that.
Because all it takes is what in Italian is commonly referred to as “balls”.
And like real courage, real, intimate self-knowledge can’t be faked. And women can sense it.
One of the principal reasons I have been a misanthrope from an early age is because of the hypocrisy and stupidity of the average human.
As I have recently posted concerning your potential critics being usually drug-addled alcoholics with dysfunctional children trying to tell you how to parent or live your life, and how supposed gurus of sexuality and relationships tend to be involuntary celibate, socially inept desperates, I wanted, as is normally the case, to also try and give some hope and inspiration.
I don’t know who needs to know this or indeed if anyone will actually investigate this deeply enough that it becomes a factor in their life, but I know many people have done so, as a direct result of things I have written, and they inform me periodically about how much healthier and happier their life is as a result.
Any regular readers should already be aware of the fact that I have presented in depth how a properly Catholic people not only have created the best civilisation ever recorded in human history, but how I believe they will do so again.
I was baptised on May 25th 2017, so not long ago in the scheme of things, although, in my life, one should probably measure things in dog years, since in the intervening six and a half years I changed job at least 4 times, moved home 3 times, got married in Church, had three children, bought a small farm, moved country, and started the makings of a small Catholic community. The first person to purchase property near me and join those efforts is currently signing on his house purchase contract in the next couple of days.
Despite all that movement and associated turbulence, the reality is that I have been practically helped by other Catholics (all sedevacantists as my family is) to a degree that I have never had before in my life by any group of people or individuals.
The main issue between me and other humans has never been one related to intelligence. Yes, the disparity is a thing, and yes the IQ communication gap is very real and has real effects on your life, mostly negative at an interpersonal level, but IQ per se has never been a factor in my friendships. One of the most loyal and honest people I ever met, a young Motswana I worked with for a few years, was (and remains) incapable of grasping the concept of square metres. Yet I would trust him with a million dollars in cash or taking care of one of my children long before I would do so with almost any of the Europeans I worked with since.
No, the deciding factor has never been IQ, culture (insofar as it does not apply to the real reason), race or much of anything else. The main, pivotal, key factor is the dishonesty.
Hypocrisy is the worst form of dishonesty as far as I am concerned. And the level of it in most humans surpasses my tolerance for it, which is, admittedly, very low. When you add stupidity to hypocrisy, well… let’s just say that my tolerance drops to a frosty 0 degrees Kelvin.
Catholicism, the real one only continued presently by Sedevacantists, is, undoubtedly a net good. It produces strong and helpful communities of people that you can rely on and that rely on you. It produces healthy, balanced, happy children, and couples that correctly understand the nuclear family dynamics for the good of not just themselves or their children, but for the entire family.
But even if you are not Catholic, consider: what is the level of hypocrisy in your own life?
In the life of your supposed friends or relatives?
Who do you most get on with? What is their level of hypocrisy?
If you are like me, the key factor that makes other people creatures you simply do not enjoy the company of, is, and always will be, hypocrisy.
And for those too lazy to google it:
But for me, the absolute definition is a fourth one:
Applying, or trying to apply, or impose, rules, laws, judgements or behaviours on others that you avoid and do not comply with yourself.
You can see why, if that is your key philosophy concerning how you value other humans, entire classes of people are almost instantly excluded from consideration:
Politicians, most so-called law enforcement, all heretical, apostate, fake “clergy”, any kind of “woke” person, since their ideology is inherently hypocritical, and so on and on.
So, while the habitual drunk that smokes dope daily right next to their small child with soiled nappies, obviously become a complete nullity with zero value in your life whatsoever, there are also less obvious results.
For example, people that are stereotypically considered “bad guys” can in fact be more honest and less hypocritical than the stereotypically “good guys”.
Who would you trust more, after all, one of the bought and paid for supposedly professional doctors that pushed hard to inject your child with a genetic serum that in the BEST of cases was demonstrated for the previous 30 years to eventually result in an autoimmune disorder that becomes fatal in all animal testing, and that it is now also demonstrated in various batches contained graphite, HIV virii, and other nefarious substances, OR, a bank robber that for all his criminal activity has a code that he will never hurt women or children?
It is not always immediately obvious where anyone’s lines of behaviour are, but once you are able to figure out their level of hypocrisy, everything suddenly clarifies a great deal.
In my experience for example, I have always found that people that work primarily with their hands, as a general rule, are more honest and less hypocritical than most white collar workers.
Be they farmers, metal workers, soldiers, are they rougher? Sure. Are they less polite? Absolutely. Are there more liable to try and punch you in the face if you piss them off? Yes.
And most people stop there and see no further.
So, try to see the net good from a perspective of the absence of hypocrisy.
But are they also more fundamentally honest than the soft-handed white collar workers you exchange pleasantries on a daily basis at the office? In my experience, also yes.
Coincidentally to my own piece on the lefty rapist types that are frenzy-whipped by the shrews in their life, Vox posted the response of a CEO of a comics publishing house to the suggestions that Chuck Dixon, an iconic comic book creator, should be deplatformed for… reasons. I have no idea. I don’t care at all. I read plenty of comic books as a teenager and earlier and the ones I liked best would probably get people jail time today.
Jonah Hex was my favourite one of the I think they are silver age comics we used to have hundreds of before my dad got rid of them all after we left home. It’s why I don’t feel bad he helped me buy this farm. If he hadn’t chucked those out I probably would have been okay getting it on my own. Maybe ten years ago.
Interestingly, DC also made a roleplaying game that my brother and I briefly owned and it had little cards for each of the DC heroes, that included a motivation for each one of them. Jonah Hex’s was correct: Seeking Justice. It’s why that character resonated with me so much. I think if I were reduced to a cardboard cutout that would be my primary motivation too. And as it was a Western, Jonah blasted a few bad guys per episode. The themes were quite adult and the writer of the stories was brilliant. Jonah Hex was discontinued and then they kind of did to him in real life what happens to him in the comic book. In a future he gets wormholes into, Jonah finds out his own body was embalmed as a circus attraction. Well, the subsequent restart attempts and the film made were kinda that. Whoever wrote those stories and film should be horse-whipped.
Aaaaanny way, I digress, the point is the CEO of the publishing house producing the latest Chuck Dixon comic told the entire woke world to go pound sand. And then cry a bit and pound it a bit more.
Good. And so should say all of us to every insane, retarded, Satanic, nonsense that is currently being peddled by the perennially offended. Common sense needs to prevail and courtesy and good manners be reserved for those who deserve it and earn it.
To the screeching “social justice”, cultural marxist, types trying to convince your three year old son that he can become a girl or that your three year old daughter can become a boy, we should have a resounding: “Fuck right off, groomer!” ringing in their ears until they disappear back into whatever festering hellhole they climbed out of.
And it should be loud and clear and backed up by legislation, and penalties, and consequences. These toxic excuses for “equality” in the name of “respect” and “fairness for all” are really evil. There is no other word for it. they intend to do harm and they do. The last thing they do is respect anyone, or try to be fair. They, in fact, are the very worst little tyrants, and everyone normal has had enough. So it’s time to put the mentally ill, the unbalanced, the insane, and the intentionally evil child predators back into proper health care, be that a mental institution, a home for the criminally insane, or being noted as a potentially unstable person that an eye should be kept on, for their own safety and that of others.
Have you ever noticed how most of the nu-male feminist “allies”, who are permanently woke, go “yes ma’m, no ma’m, three bags full ma’m” and whose wives (when they are married) seem to have their testicles in a jar by their bedside, despite all their tut-tutting about “toxic masculinity” this or “misogynist” that, quite often, turn out to be actual rapists?
And also often enough, with incontrovertible video evidence of their rapist inclinations?
Kind of strange huh?
What I can’t fathom, is in what world to these wormtongue-like weaklings think they live? They feel entitled to point to a guy who’s maybe just living his life, as a man, and try and make him out to be this evil, woman-hating psychopath, all-the while, at any minute, they can be exposed for precisely exactly what kind of sexual predator they are.
Is it hubris? Stupidity? Both? Or are they pushed to do it? And if so, is it by their evil and knowing masters? I put it to you that aside from the rich and famous, there are probably a high number of your average, run-of-the-mill household rapists, that are probably put to championing the feminist flag by their unknowing, woke, feminist wives.
And they may well live in a state of semi-constant terror that one day, they may be pushed to criticise, or try to #metoo, a guy who doesn’t give a shit and has the will and ability to burn their whole life down by exposing them in an incontrovertible fashion for their own real and actual behaviours, instead of the fake accusations they cast about towards their betters.
It is fascinating really.
Let me make a random and at least partially hypothetical example.
Take Tyson Fury, the boxer also known as the Gypsy King.
Go read his wikipedia page, it’s actually really quite interesting. And see how he had anything but an easy life, and also how he was lambasted by the media for his stance on homosexuality, pedophiles, abortion, his belief in Jesus Christ being King, and so on.
The limp-wristed, nu-male allies of feminism, joined in the chorus of shouting about how Tyson Fury is an obvious misogynist, “homophobic”, woman-hating tyrant, to the tune of some 140,000 signatures trying to deny him the title of Sports person of the year in 2015. Can’t give it to a man such as Mr. Fury! Egads!
“Homophobic” Tyson Fury – the word makes me laugh, it literally means afraid of “homos”. Does Mr. Fury look like he’s prone to much fear of… anyone?
And yet, I’d bet money that the likelihood of Tyson Fury ever having raped anyone is very, very, very, low to none. I don’t know the man. I never met him. I saw a fight or two of his and I saw more of him telling journalists in no uncertain terms what they are and what actually matters. He certainly can present as arrogant and controversial. Which I understand very well. It’s a quick way to get rid of the weak and unintelligent. Oh they will snipe from afar, but they daren’t open their weak mouths in your presence. And that is a measure of peace.
Anyway, like him or hate him, Tyson Fury is clearly a man that says what he means and means what he says. He seems to have a family that does well and despite his very hard life, he and his wife are teenage sweethearts and still together with six children. No one imagines everything between them has always been a garden of roses, and given the pressures the man has endured, regardless of what the outside world thinks, I have no doubt that him and his wife have a bond that most marriages simply can’t even imagine. I would not be surprised at all if Tyson Fury was to sacrifice his own life to protect his wife or children at a moment’s notice. As I said, I don’t know the man at all and maybe if I did sit down with him for five minutes I’d not like him. Or maybe I would. But if ever the opportunity presented itself, I’d take that five minutes. Not because I care about his fame or his boxing status. But because whatever his faults, he is a man. An interesting guy who has overcome things that would have destroyed weaker ones.
Now let’s take this guy:
Looks like just the sort of suave nu-male that is woke about the plight of women, while being all trendy and metrosexual right? Yeah. Right.
If by woke and trendy and aware of the patriarchy obviously oppressing women, you mean, drugging and repeatedly raping them over a period of years. And note that even after he was found guilty —being a darling of the trendy jet-set life that all pretend to be so concerned about women— he had letters of support from his famous colleagues in the entertainment industry.
How much do you want to bet that if Danny Masterson’s wife, had ever seen Tyson Fury talk about how he is the King of his household, she would have had something to say about the awful, awful, evil, brute of a man that is Tyson Fury? And so would all her friends and all his friends too. And Danny himself would have made some disparaging comment about Tyson Fury to the delight of all present, haw-hawing at the “beastly” Mr. Fury?
Yeah. It’s amazing isn’t it?
So, perhaps, all those closeted, or not so closeted, creepy rapist types hiding in the shadows, should have a think. Do you really want to keep poking at the Tyson Furys of the world? Because I think the Tyson Furys of the world have had about enough, and they would all be well within their rights to start their own movement against rapey creeps hiding behind façades of modern sensibilities and social justice.
I’m thinking that instead of #metoo though, it might be called #youtoo.
Just pause and think for a moment what it was that ever persuaded you, at any time in his career, that Russell Brand was a thing, someone you should have at least a semi-soft spot for, rather than someone you should recoil from as you might from a recently soiled wank rag.
What I think you’ll probably find is that you never really liked him. He looked greasy, dirty, like the junkie boyfriend your daughter dragged home in the small hours and whom you would happily have shot but for the tearful plea ‘But Dad, I LOVE him.’ Even though he was trapped inside a TV screen, you could still almost smell the whiff of stale sweat and smegma permeating your sitting room.
I can honestly say, nothing. I never was persuaded he was anything but a lecherous creep from the very first time I saw him.
As for Jimmy Saville, I always found him absolutely disgusting. I could never watch a second of him on TV at all. I would literally change the channel instantly if he came on.
It seems then, my pedophile/wanker/creep radar functions well above the norm. But it’s been (and often still is) a mystery to me why that is. The difficulty for me is not in why I am able to instinctively spot these slithering vermin; no, the difficulty for me has always been the trying to understand why so many can’t.
This is gonna be a long post, and many will interpret it as either some kind of general shit-cannon against all sorts of supposed “gurus”, or some way to tell you all how clever, smart, and cool I am for having seen the obvious more than a decade ago, or whatever. So let me disabuse you of that notion right from the start.
The ENTIRE point of this post is simply one:
To show, by showing ample working out, with indelible proof, that the best path for men to take, especially young men, is to choose the ancient and classical virtues. Above all seek truth, honour, courage, perseverance, beauty, and justice. Never compromise your personal integrity. Learn from your mistakes. Reject degeneracy, lies, puffed up ego, material status over integrity, and understand why a small deviation into the lies and nonsense of the World, can lead you to perdition, even in only the material sense, even if you are not a believer.
If you learn just this, even only from a secular perspective, later, you may begin to compare the life of a righteous man and how it compares to the life of pious man, and recognise they are the same path. And later still, you may realise that Catholicism has always championed the virtues and rejected the lies. But that is a far-away hope. For now, I want to demonstrate to you, how the snake-oil salesmen, the liars, the peddler of sexualised fantasies, have, and continue, to lead men astray into distraction, nonsense, and perversion, and away from a life that can be truly worth living and is rooted in all that is good in mankind.
Let me show you the ways of the serpents exposed.
PUAs
Pretty much as soon as I became aware of them, I was critical of PUAs, and not once, randomly, but rather, consistently.
From my February 2010 piece linked above, which was probably one of the more gentle criticisms:
By the time that I discovered anything about PUAs I had developed quite happily on my own into a man more than capable to satisfy his curiosity of women. This was a fortunate thing because it allowed me a perspective on PUAs and their techniques that was free of being sucked into the promise of alluring women falling at my feet almost as if by magic. To a degree, I already had this power (insofar as it can be had let’s say) so I could look into and study and evaluate the information with eyes already filled of my own experiences. To sum up PUAs briefly is difficult, however I will try. Initially, most of these guys are frustrated geeks that have broken down social interactions between naturally successful ladies’ men and attractive women. They then practice these routines like social robots and begin to have some success at obtaining sex with these plastic techniques. As their confidence grows they refine the techniques and become more adept at luring an ever increasing series of women to their beds. The more daring then continue into experimenting with multiple partners at a time as well as multiple girlfriends at a time. Some openly, others secretly. By and large though, certain truths remain evident. Even if successful at having multiple sex partners most of these individuals are still what I would consider socially inept people. They may have achieved an ability at obtaining sex from women but that per se does not make them good people necessarily. Or likeable. Or happy. Furthermore, the level of hyperbole in this community is rather extreme; especially when you consider that many of the so called Pick-Up Gurus sell products that supposedly will increase a man’s ability to bed stunningly beautiful women.
In brief, PUAs are not really picking up women. they are picking up men. In order to sell them fancy stories and elaborate processes by which they can supposedly gain sex from alluring women.
Later, they tried to morph into a general, self-betterment community and even went into how you could use PUA tactics to keep your marriage intact.
And later still they even tried to morph into how real relationships were a mixture of game and Churchianity.
At every turn, the targets were other men.
It is probably true that some desperate men did gain some benefits from some of these guys, but that’s more along the lines of me coming closer to Christianity by reading the arch-heretic Pierre Teilhard de Chardin. In other words, more by random luck, effort on their part, and that leading to something positive. Overall, however, the whole PUA movement was mostly a con. And the people who set themselves up as gurus often poor excuses for functional human beings. One of the most egregious examples was a guy who called himself Mehow, who produced a whole host of products and seminars and books, all aimed at men and teaching them “Game”.
From the same 2010 post:
Mehow has been in the pick-up community pretty much to the exclusion of everything else (it’s his day job as well as his lifestyle) for some 10 years. He also has spent by his own admission about $500,000 of what seems to mostly be daddy’s money to set himself up in the “PUA business”. Again by his own admission in 10 years of hard partying day and night full-time and being trained by the biggest and best Pick-Up Artists in the world, gaining invaluable knowledge of body-language, NLP and who knows what other mystical seduction arts of his own invention, and spending half a million dollars essentially on this sexual crusade, what is Mehow’s tally? By his own admission again, as of about mid 2009, Mehow had had carnal knowledge of “something like 30 to 40 girls”.
So, yes, most PUAs are hyperbolic, dishonest, socially inept guys, preying mostly on desperate and other sexually inept men first and foremost, and possibly the occasional drunk, indiscriminating, kind of woman they might get a one night stand with.
But it gets more insidious than that.
The mindset created by PUAs is one of accelerated mechanisation of human beings. In this respect, the mechanisation of women as mere sexual masturbation devices for men. And, by cause and effect, the mechanisation of men as masturbation devices, and/or, walking wallets for women.
In short, it is a destruction of intimacy, humanity and genuine connection between men and women.
And I wrote this even during the relative “height” (or depth, if you prefer) of my own depravity, when I was never short of female company. Even in my hedonistic phase, I always preferred a genuine connection, however brief, rather than mere sexual relief. I especially never indulged in sex with any woman that was under the influence of anything. Certainly not as a beginning anyway. Once I was comfortable with a woman I had been seeing for some time, it did happen here and there that they may be a little drunk after a party (I never was, I have been drunk precisely once and that was by choice under rather controlled conditions), but certainly compos mentis enough to know precisely what was happening and be quite enthusiastic about it.
My point here is that even as a non-christian of any kind, even in my zen-agnostic, hedonistic general approach to life, I never saw the PUA stuff and the related attitudes as anything other than the weak, pissing about, damaging, cowardly actions of sub-standard men.
And time has proven me eminently correct.
The point here is not to focus on how smart or cool or prescient I am/was, but to note the pattern. To notice what made me notice (lack of virtue in their ways and at least basic adherence to at least some virtue for myself).
And to notice the path and the trajectory of these “men” who instead either fell into, or promoted the PUA grift and general attitude.
Let us then, notice the paths of some of these characters and who and how and where they link to and where they ended up.
A relatively decent article (despite it being by buzzfeed) and already 4 years old, overall is pretty good about the whole situation of PUAS, and Mystery and some of the early PUAS. Mostly, they really are scattered like rats, with a few hangers on like Mystery himself, trying to reinvent himself (and failing).
Some, like Tyler Durden (Owen Cook) as can be seen from this review video of his “skills” which also includes some of his seminar antics (about 6 minutes in and later too) make both men and women marvel at the fact that he managed to procreate. I mean, does this not look like a macho-man that women naturally swoon over to you? No? Why then, the problem must be with you then, naturally!
But ok, enough of these sad creatures. I think you can do your own research to figure out they are basically noxious beings. They are pathetic, but they also have contributed to the ongoing degeneration of life in general as far as it relates to intimate relationships. But where did they originate from?
The “Hypnosis” and NLP Connection
And here we come to some little known truths. A LOT of the whole “Game” and PUA stuff started with Hypnosis, and NLP (Neuro-Linguistic Programming), which is the brainchild of two guys: Richard Bandler and John Grinder. I know. God has a sense of humour.
Dick Bandler and John Grinder (the gay app… was it named after him? One has to wonder).
There is one last point that I cannot help but enjoy needling the hordes of NLP enthusiasts who seem to consider Richard Bandler as their guru with. Milton Erickson practiced hypnosis and cured many, many people of sometimes very serious afflictions and certainly cannot be disputed to have been overall a power for good in the world. The man usually mostly credited with the “discovery” of NLP is Richard Bandler —in great part also due to his own self-marketing as such— it is interesting to note that Bandler was one of only three people in the room when one of those three people, the only woman in the room, was shot in the face with a .357 magnum revolver and killed. Neither Bandler nor his then friend James Marino was ever convicted of her murder though it was clearly not a suicide. Bandler also was demonstrated to be a fantasist about more than a little of his past, somewhat obsessed with violence, having threatened innocent people with firearms on at least some other occasion before as well as being a heavy drinker and also user of cocaine in large quantities. Personally, I am also extremely dubious that Bandler was a force for good in anyone’s life that he acted on directly, though of course I have met many of his devoted followers, who have attended his seminars and trainings at rather expensive prices for the privilege of being trained by a fantasising, heavy drinking, cocaine user that was somehow or other involved in the murder of an unarmed woman in circumstances that can only be described as suspect in the best of cases. [1]
Because pretty much all the hype about how you could use hypnosis to get women into bed supposedly at magical will, pretty much all originated with the whole PUA “gurus” reading up and trying to learn NLP to “trick” women into bed. The same was somewhat true of magic tricks, which Mystery himself still practices, as the buzzfeed article points out.
So, a bunch of socially maladjusted, sex starved, incels (involuntary celibates) learn the BIG SEEEECRIT of how to “hypnotise” women into becoming sex slaves from… a cocaine snorting, con man who is responsible either directly (my personal opinion) or at the very least by proxy, for the murder of his then on-off girlfriend.
What could possibly go wrong?
And who else took up the Bandler flag of being a master-guru of manipulation to achieve riches, glory and concubines?
Yeah, this is not gonna make anyone look good. Brace yourselves.
And let’s look at what handler in his prime affected as his guru look:
Now, I don’t want to say for sure it was Bandler, but in one of my delving into various subcultures of cults, I took a Tony Robbins seminar, which generally tried to upsell you other stuff during it. One of which was some advanced guru magic of some sort or other and you could go meet the guru in question briefly if you wanted to take the add on course for some eye-watering cost that I forget. Anyway, I went to see what this guru’s guru looked like and if it was not Bandler (I honestly don’t recall the name that was given or even if it was given) it was his spiritual twin. He had black painted fingernails, a leather vest very much like the one in the image above, a graying pony tail and some odd rings and other accessories on and about his person. It fairly screamed new Age Hippy Boomer dipped in narcissism and lies. I didn’t even listen to his free presentation.
Now let’s look at what Miles Sonkin looks like:
Honestly that’s the most flattering image I could find of the man.
Here he is with the War Room’s supposed main guy Andrew Tate and some of his victims successful peers.
According to the credible side of the reporting done on Miles, he really is the main brain behind the whole War Room thing, that apparently, and credibly, teaches men to essentially brainwash naive girls into becoming their cam girls as well as getting their names tattooed on them, as Andrew Tate himself has done to several women. Supposedly a few dozen of them having tattooed his name on their bodies. A kind of branding really that is not uncommon in various prostitution rings, and sex cults, like the notorious NXIVM one that involved the actress from the Superboy Smallville TV series.
It is fairly obvious from pretty much everything about Miles Sonkin that he has styled himself, literally, as a wizard and very much on the lines and methods pioneered by Bandler.
And insidious as the “hypnotist” NLP/PUA guru persona is, and as much damage as it does to those unfortunates that decide to “follow” them, the fall-out goes well beyond the directly affected.
The mannerisms and manipulation techniques of these conmen affect to one degree or other many other second-tier snake-oil salesmen.
Second Tier “Gurus”
Here we see a link between Miles the “wizard” and Ivan Throne, the boastful deaf salesman of supposedly man-improving seminars, and self-help… packages of… “Dark Triad”… I dunno, books, grandiose bullshit, etc.
I interacted with Throne directly online for a time as I had introduced him to an online Facebook group I was part of before it was nuked. Something I soon regretted when I saw his bluster was padded with what he thought was grandiloquent language, unfortunately for him, despite English being my second language, I actually know how to use it and was not the only one to notice that, more than once, he did not know the correct meaning of the “big” words he used. Something I took him up on, which caused him to get rather upset and use more words he misused, thus losing a bit of the shine anyone in the group may have had for him. The group has long since been nuked and I never had anything else to do with him.
Chernovich, he of the ever present lisp, gorilla mindset and, “it wasn’t me, it was a friend who sucked off the ladyboy, even though it was on my blog as a first person experience without explanation” infamy, also has attended the war room in some capacity or other.
The whole War Room, Secret Knowledge, I was born to be King and have women fall eat my feet, is as old as humanity.
It is by no means new.
Nor are the scams they pull, the dishonesty, the manipulation and the grift.
In the past however, the damage they did was limited by their reach. Today, their reach is the entire world, and Andrew Tate has managed to convince an untold number of young men that somehow manipulating young women to be your personal cam-girl whore, and stealing her money and being essentially a digital pimp, is the epitome of what success as a man is.
And keep in mind that Andrew Tate is on the record on video, stating that he would rather be with a 10 looking transvestite (that is a man, pretending to be a woman) than a much lower number looking woman.
Yeah. Peak heterosexuality right there boys. I just wonder if Tate will be the pitcher or the catcher when he eventually gets jail time in Romania for the things he is being charged with: sex trafficking, rape, and other stuff, including, I presume, tax evasion, which historically governments look to as a far more serious offence than mere rape and sex trafficking.
So. What was the point of showing you all these links?
Is this just an extended gossip girl column of pointing fingers and showing you just how “bad” these guys are. And how “smart” and “good” I am?
No.
Personally I don’t really care about any of these guys. I have known their associations and methods for years. I avoid them as soon as I become aware of them and don’t interact with them after I recognise them for the unethical people I judge them to be. I haven’t even shown you all the links by any means. I trained in hypnosis with a guy that is probably one of the best hypnotists in the world, but he too was pretty useless with women and fell into the PUA thing enough to “learn” some of the “tricks” of people like Mystery and then trying to use them at his teaching seminars. He wasn’t a bad guy. He was ambitious and he tried very hard, and I believe he was trying to be a really good and honest guy. But, as is the case with pretty much all “thirsty” men, his lack of ability with women, meant he was not in a satisfied relationship, and as far as this guy is concerned, I believe he would have been happy with just one woman. That’s actually true of most men. If they could get with a woman they were attracted to that treated them well, they would probably be unlikely to stray. Or at least would be a lot less prone to it.
In short, it doesn’t necessarily mean that everyone that had anything to do with any of these linchpins of the PUA movement and related scams is by default a complete loser, manipulator or freak. Some are just sad guys that want to get a girlfriend or wife. And have no idea of how in the modern setting of things, so they try to find some knowledge from people who tell them “this is how you get all the sex and glory an riches”.
PUAs are the sexual equivalent of Nigerian Prince e-mail scams.
The difference is that not only are they after your money, they are also polluting the general zeitgeist of human interactions.
It’s the difference between the 1950s’ dishonest door-to-door seller of encyclopaedias or vacuum cleaners and today’s online marketers of get-rich-quick schemes. The financial damage the old version could do has been amplified by several orders of magnitude. And in addition, the degradation of humanity has taken several steps closer to hell.
The whole point, of this loooooong post, was not just to show you the links between these people —and believe me, there are many more that go to both, higher places of power, and lower ones— but more importantly, how they percolate into the grander overview of life that you are slowly being boiled alive inside of.
Take this post together with the one I wrote immediately before it and think about them a bit. Then you may begin to appreciate why it is probably far safer for you to strike out on your own and make your own mistakes, always with a critical eye on taking note of how reality works and how to better adjust yourself to reality, rather than fool yourself into being into some fantasist’s scenario that you would prefer to believe in.
If you want to meet women and eventually make one your wife, start talking to people in general. Become someone you are happy and proud to be regardless of the attention of lack of it you get from anyone else. Learn to mix and talk with everyone. Become comfortable in the presence of people, then women, then beautiful women, and learn to talk and interact with them. Learn from your mistakes and failed interactions, keep your cool, adjust and correct your approach to whatever it is, be it becoming comfortable with women or learning to pilot a plane. Obviously, in the latter case, you really need to study enough to ensure you don’t go into a tailspin. Recovering from a bad relationship can be hell, fatal even at times, but no one walks away from a plane screw-driving into the Earth with you in it.
Above All
Learn this one thing: Honour, Truth, Justice, Beauty, Courage, the traditional virtues of Catholicism and manhood even before it, are Good. They are true. And they are a better guide for you than any guru. Have faith. Trust yourself to be good. To be able to become virtuous in these true ways, not the fake ones of Clown World. And beware, there are a lot of Clowns out there, and “Wizards”, and snakes in the guise of doves, and gay wolves in the guise of heterosexual pet dogs.
Be careful my adventurer friend. Count your gold pieces, equip yourself well, and follow no man but your own heart.
Are you a Kangaroo?
With regard to the tranny issue, an 11 year old I was asked to talk to some years back, gets it.
She was being told at school the utterly absurd nonsensical and demonic lie that girls can be boys and vice versa and that “gender” (a word that has nothing to do with biology, but rather linguistics) is “fluid” (it is not. Not in biology, nor in linguistics.)
My conversation with her lasted about 2 minutes total. One minute and forty-five seconds of it approximately being her telling me the nonsense she was being propagandised with.
My fifteen seconds of education forever demolished the entire tranny agenda. It went thus:
“So (name), tell me: if I stitch a tail to my butt and start to jump around, does that mean I am now a kangaroo?”
She burst out laughing and has never been able to be confused by the lies since. She just turned 16 not too long ago and is an awesome, based, logical, loyal and intelligent young woman.
Her Halloween costume a couple of years ago was Kim Jong Un. Because nothing is scarier than a communist dictator. And no, no one told her about it. No one even spoke to her about communism. Unlike those “just-so” stories where everyone clapped, this one is actually real.
Tell your children the truth and they will be a lot harder to indoctrinate with lies.
No related posts.
By G | 5 October 2023 | Posted in Social Commentary