Allow me to explain: Gammas are not only stupid, but they are harmful to the environment. they are basically a little sack of human sewage watering around dripping their filthiness all over the place. Poisoning all that is good, true, virile and handsome, beautiful and feminine, and generally lowering the tone of life, joy and happiness.
The damage these vermin have done, is difficult to conceptualise because it is so pervasive that everyone on some level has started to assume it’s normal. It’s not and it never was tolerated before the era of mass messcommunication. That’s not a typo. These people are the worm tongues of The Lord of the Rings, the snivelling, vengeful and disgusting victim-playing traitors that become Himmler on those rare occasions where from failed chicken farmer they become head of some tyrannical state bureaucracy.
In short. Curb stomping them in public and exposing their filthy lies, their vast dishonesty and their deceitful ways is a public service and anyone who is NOT a gamma should immediately realise that these “people” must absolutely have sunlight shone on their face until they shrivel and hide back under the sewage runs they crawled out of, or else (extremely rare) man up and start to become almost tolerable human beings instead of psychic parasites. To that end, then, allow me to show you what the snivelling little turd-eater from yesterday’s post has got up to the next day, and ALL making very sure to not invoke my name even once. Foolishly thinking the myriad snipers at my command would not immediately screen capture his entire gamma “attacks” (think spitballs at a battleship) for your and my entertainment.
And do so before he deleted the whole thread when a tiny inkling of a thought made him realise that maybe, just maybe, his lies weren’t being swallowed by anyone.
Well, here it is in all it’s glory. The gamma whine.
Beating Gammas like the atomised remains of a dead horse is done for instructional purposes and entertainment. Spotting the MO of these deceitful scum is what we do here for fun when time permits.
In this instance I was kindly helped by some true weaponised autists who screencapped everything in order just for me to do this live dissection of a gamma with commentary interspaced to better guide your understanding of the underhanded nature of these bottom-dwellers. As usual this is long because context is relevant when spotting these parasitic worm tongues. Enjoy.
It’s strange days of course, so it’s hard to know precisely what may or may not be happening, and of course, the ways of our God and our Lord are sometimes quite mysterious, however, we do know that God loves to use the weakest, most broken, faulty, and unexpected of people to prove his Authority and demonstrate His Glory.
Whether this is the case with Vigano remains to be seen, but given the current position of the Church, it would seem unlikely that anything will get better without divine intervention.
As anyone that reads either of my last two books will know, I have not only held the sedeprivationist position, but I have in fact demonstrated the absolute correctness of it. The only Catholics left are what is generally called sedevacantists, my using the term sedeprivationsits is only due to the more accurate fact that the Chair of Peter is NOT empty but filled by an impostor. And has been since 28th October 1958.
While there has been plenty of gnashing of teeth, there has not been, nor will there ever be, a valid rebuttal to the factual proofs of the sedeprivationist position I provide in my latest book Reclaiming the Catholic Church. I can say this confidently because I have yet to see a single valid rebuttal since I took the sedeprivationist position, sometime around 2016. Or more correctly known as the actual Catholic position, which has nothing to do with the Novus Orco “clerics” that promote and practice pederastry, fraud and Satanism, being the Freemasonic and molochians that they are. It is important to understand that these impostors, who refer to themselves as “Catholics” are nothing of the sort. Their deity is literally Satan and their intent is the destruction of the Church.
Vigano was, and to all intents REMAINS one of them. He was ordained in 1968 and whether his ordination was valid or not I am unaware, what is know though is that he continued to operate in the Vatican 2 abomination known as the Novus Orco, currently headed by the Vicar of pedophiles on Earth Bergoglio.
His own silence for the last five decades has been a majestic act of cowardice. While there could have been some attenuating circumstances, (his being ordained just when the confusion was highest) his excuse is extremely week since he took a doctorate in canon law. That is the actual canon law of 1917. And even today he has yet to denounce the antipopes that usurped the Holy See from Roncalli on.
Politically, of course, to do so, would be suicide, but Catholicism, embodied in the Church of piety, does not concern itself with politics, but with truth.
Canonically, even if he were validly ordained (questionable) and his repentance were completely genuine, and his self-abesement before God total, Vigano can NEVER have authority over ANYONE. And could only remain (or become, as the case may be) a cleric in the Church that spends the rest of his existence in penance, sequestered away in a monastery. That is the actual canonical rule, not just my personal opinion.
That said, it is strange times and in such times God does find unexpected ways to prove his Glory. And politically Vigano’s letters are certainly making the right sort of generic waves, though of course they are not actually FIXING anything. In fact they are used by fake Catholic grifters like Taylor Marshall and E M Jones to bolster their own Churchianity and pretend-trad-cat “ministries”, which are just the usual Protestant TV evangelist grifter con with a Catholic veneer.
I don’t have access to Vigano, but if I did I bet my life on it that within a half hour of interview, one hour at the most, I would either have exposed him as a continuing fraud, or put some questions to him that would have to result in his abject admission of his own total failure as a possible Catholic cleric and the fact that every Antipope since the death of Pope Pius XII has in fact been a persistent, notorious heretic and thus not even a Catholic, never mind a Pope. And he himself, by having acted as he has since his ordination, too, as per Canon law, has not acted or been a Catholic and he too has been a heretic.
If and only when, Vigano makes such admissions, THEN and only then, and only if throughout the process he explicitly stated he is NOT the Pope but would try to hold the position until an actual Catholic Bishop can fill the Seat, would I in any way support his temporary stewardship of the Holy See.
From a practical perspective I don’t see that happening without him being assassinated first, but as I said, it’s strange days. And God does have a mysterious and humorous way about him.
And should Vigano ever read these words, which I doubt in the extreme, I certainly would welcome the chance to put a few questions to him.
The New book is finally out and you can find it on Amazon USA or Amazon UK or pretty much any other country’s Amazon you may want to use.
As you can see it has a catchy innocuous subtitle, so I expect all the Catholic Grifters, fakers, Novus orcians and so on to studiously avoid talking about it at all, much less responding to it. The truth often has that effect on them. But thanks to the loyal foot soldiers of Catholicism and the awesome converts and fans I am slowly gathering, I think this is one cannonball that will invariably create somewhat of an avalanche, no matter how “silent” and underreported it might be by the usual suspects.
As I had a post on Catholic grifters, liars and so on and a new book coming soon on the actual Satanists that run the Novus Orco due out later this month, it’s only fair I take my two handed sword to a Protestant Churchian next.
Lest it be said I am uncharitable allow me first of all to state that my personal impression is that White is, at least mostly, simply obstinately stupid and probably not a completely knowing deceiver and grifter like the three stooges I discussed here.
White responded to a tweet by James Fox Higgins with a video that I will now dissect below. Here however was the offending tweet by James.
And here is the start of White’s response, which carries on from the linked timestamp below of about 30min in to at least 1:05 before I stopped watching. To be fair the first 5 minutes or so from about 00:30 to 00:35 he just waffles on about how he’s been defending Sola scriptura for 30 years and yet how almost no one, Protestants included, use the term correctly. Cue speTHial reasons why his definition is super SpeTHial. Which is essentially an appeal to his own completely inexistent authority. So he’s been advocating for a completely idiotic idea for 3 decades without learning anything about the idiocy of it. Not a great start.
Here is a link to the roughly 00:30 start of his response.
My own video response for those allergic to reading is here.
And for those who prefer the written format as I do, here are my notes so there is no dodging of anything later.
1. White Defines Sola Scriptura (SS) as only scripture (the Bible) as being “God breathed”. Which according to him is therefore almost as if God Himself had spoken it and this is a higher quality and inerrant aspect that nothing else has.
Counter: What I would like to know is:
A) who defined what the Bible is actually composed of? In other words which books it is made up of exactly that are “God breathed” only? As far as I know White doesn’t tell us but there is a clue as he states that scripture took 1500 years to be put together (at about 39:30 or so). So presumably he is telling us that all those guys who sat around and put the Bible together about 300 years after Jesus ascended, using letters, parts of oral tradition, various books etc etc basically had done a sloppy job until the Fat German with lust for nuns in his heart came along and “fixed” the Bible. Which until then and for the previous 1200 years obviously had “non-God breathed” writings in it polluting it all up.
B) how do you know when the final editing is completed? I mean, if we had to wait for that beer swigging, sweary, “if the wife is not willing (to have sex) use the maid” German to put the finishing touches, how do we know that a flamboyantly gay transvestite who will decide that all of Paul’s vile, vile, comments on sodomites are ALSO just apocrypha like the letter from James that squarely rejects the other idiotic idea of Protestantism, Sola Fides?
I mean that’s why Martin the nun-banging “monk” decided James was not “canon” after all and all those poor martyrs of the previous 1500 years just had it wrong don’t you know.
And who’s to say Kaytlin with a y, (formerly Bruce with the deuce) will not further educate us on the benefits of being a raging sodomite and how all references to the opposite of that were just apocrypha too?
2. At about 38:30 or so – White states that the enemies degrade scripture precisely so it can then be attacked as all just non-God breathed stuff.
Counter: A bit of projection going on there, since changing the supposedly infallible Bible is precisely what Luther did as item 1 on his list really. Especially since the Latin translation of the original Hebrew (Old testament) and Greek (New testament) known as the Vulgate is a better translation than the Protestant KJV which used manuscripts for the Old Testament that had been edited by literal pharisees who rejected Christ (the modern day “Jews” which are Talmudic Jews since original Jews that actually followed their religion became Christians).
And the Catholic Bible certainly hasn’t changed or been edited at all, so… who exactly is degrading things here?
3. At about 40:30 he makes probably the most hilarious hypocritical statement of the decade, accusing non-Protestants of just inserting their own ideas into the Bible and all of them just having their own views instead of God’s.
Counter: Hahahahahahaha. I mean really. That’s the whole point of Protestantism! Everyone to interpret for themselves! Literally interpreth as thou will is the only law of Protestantism.
Catholicism has dogmatic principles and beliefs that are explicitly stated. You can’t be Catholic if you reject any of those dogmatic positions. It is literally the opposite of what he is saying. It is Protestants who make it up to suit their needs, not Catholics, who literally have a book of all the canon laws and dogmatic catechisms all set out in writing. Unified. One Church. One approved Dogma. Not 40,000 and counting.
4. He almost outdoes himself at about 41:30 though when he states that you can’t degrade part of the Bible to make any part of it lower or less “God Breathed” than any other part.
Counter: You know except for the book of James…. and… the other “apocrypha” that made Martin look foolish. That had to be degraded in the first place. Except that wasn’t *akkkshually* degrading the Bible that had existed in the same form for 1200 years, not really, because Martin, like Mohammed really, was just another perfectly good and proper prophet that had to fix the Bible and decide better for everyone what God really meant.
5. At about 42:30 White says that papal infallibility is an example of this “adding in stuff by the reader” and that it happened 150 years ago and is claimed by the Catholics as part of oral tradition.
Counter: This is just flat out wrong and due to either stupendous ignorance and complete lack of even 30 seconds research on google, or just plain outright lying. I’ll assume the first to be nice about it. (Which however means the man is extremely stupid since he speaks authoritatively on things he has literally not even bothered to google for 10 seconds and which any half competent Catholic knows off the bat). The writings of the first 700 years of Christianity ALL described the Bishop of Rome as having Primacy over the other Patriarchates. See the writings of Clement of Rome(~91-101A.D), Cyprus of Carthage (~200-258 A.D.), Pope Leo I, Hormisdas and Agatho (~681 A.D.), to mention a few. Furthermore, Papal infallibility was formally invoked by the Franciscan Pierre de Jean Olivi (1248-1298) when he was worried that a future fake pope (antipope) would strip the Franciscans of their rights. Papal infallibility meant that a future Pope could not undo what a previous Pope had already done. This was highlighted by Olivi, but had in any case always been assumed and used throughout the history of the Church, just like when the Code of Canon Law of 1917 was put together all it did was to formalise in one place the rules the Church has always had. And for those saying but… but… Papal Primacy is not Papal infallibility, you’re not thinking things through, or possibly you are also very ignorant of Catholic Dogma.
Catholic dogmatic positions:
1. The Magisterium of the Church and thus the Church is infallible because of the supernatural protection it enjoys due to the promise of Jesus to always be with his Church. Since Jesus is infallible, His protection means the Church too will be infallible even though at the end only a tiny remnant of the faithful will remain. Nor does this mean the Church will not have bad, flawed, and very fallible men in it. In fact it is assumed all of them are.
2. The Magisterium is headed by the Pope.
3. The Bishop of Rome ALWAYS settled tied votes and disputes between the other Bishops (primacy) and since the Church is infallible and the Pope is the head of it, he also has to be infallible when making dogmatic official (ex cathedra) pronouncements.
In any case Papal infallibility derives from the Bible, primarily Matthew 16:18-19.
6. He then makes the most hypocritical statement of the last ten years at about 43:40 when he states that, well, you can’t have “new” revelation like Papal infallibility (he lies about papal infallibility being new as explained above but that aside…) because it wasn’t taught for the first 1000 years of the church… (it was, as explained above, but let’s leave that aside too…)
Counter: So… you CANNOT have new revelation that wasn’t taught for the previous 1000 years but… you can have *new, super-improved* MARTIN revelation another 500 years AFTER that! Like divorce and banging nuns being A-OK! The hypocrisy…. it just boggles the mind.
7. And lastly at about 1:05 White literally says that Ratzinger is wrong as can be but is still a brilliant theologian. Because he was the head of the modern Inquisition.
Counter: Aside from the fact that Ratzinger is no more Catholic or a theologian of any sort except perhaps of Moloch-ism than Bergoglio is, White is clearly Impressed by titles. Saying Ratzinger is completely wrong yet brilliant at his ONE JOB. Is basically like saying that a pilot that crashes a perfectly functioning plane right on his first flight during standard take off with no adverse weather is nevertheless a brilliant pilot. Of course, given White’s demonstrated sub-normal intelligence, he may very well make such a statement, all while fancying himself a very good judge of piloting ability for the last 30 years!
David Dunning and Justin Kruger should probably present him with a plaque or something.
CONCLUSION
What we can conclude from this is quite categorically a graphical illustration of the level of clarity of thought and reason present in the usual Protestant theologian. Behold:
Remember how I posted all the detailed take-down of that fake cleric, that Novus Orco impostor pretending to be a catholic Deacon? Well… guess what, here you can see him in all his glory and the deep “piety” and “respect” he has for our Lord and how he posts about him.
Look at that face. Doesn’t it just inspire something in your average altar boy?Now with NEW and IMPROVED PedoBeard ™Typical “Piety”, “Respect”, and “Dignity” shown to our Lord Jesus Christ by the impostor fake clerics of the Novus Orco Satanic Cult.
What did he respond to this after a few dozen people took notice? This was his DEVASTATING REPLY:
If his screen capture is a tad too small, here, let me blow it up for you. It’s from the Testimonials page (see sidebar) on the Hypnosis I used to do long before I became a Catholic.
Oh, how will I ever recover from this mortal blow to my very identity!
As those who have been paying attention know full well, I will NEVER doctor my past to pretend it was any different than it was. The concept of course is incredible to dishonest people, who lie more easily than they breathe, but the whole point of not selectively trying to change my past is precisely this, so you can see I certainly was not a “good Catholic boy” who did “nuffin wrong”. Quite the contrary. And that’s precisely the point. If it can happen to me, to become Catholic, maybe, just maybe, there is a little more to it than just being some superstitious fool who believes in “sky daddies” Which is also the entire point of BELIEVE!
Needles to say, the fake Catholic’s attack to my deepest id, my very ego, why, nay, my core, was… well, a little less effective than spitballs at a battleship.
The below Kurgan Production, done with the always cutting edge of technical know how of film from about the 1890s, features the notorious GRIFTERS Stars:
Tay-Tay Marshall – Ex Protestant Con-Man now running the same scam on nominal “Catholics”.
Emo Jones – Shouty boomer vociferously pretending to be a traditionalist while at the same time recognising Vatican 2 as legitimate, Argentinian pedophile protector as Pope, and pretty much every other heresy as being “legitimate” or “Catholic”, all the while, screaming about this or that book he produced and using the phrase “who am I to judge” to avoid any actual question of dogma, copying his fake leader, Bergoglio.
Michelle Voris – Ex homosexual turned pretend Catholic so as to get closer tot hat wonderful nominal “Catholic” money, while sneaking in from behind, so to speak, as if given his past he could testify to anything except his own sins being mortal, but in any case continuing to promote the pederastic agendas of known homosexuals within the Novus Orco and child rape protectors such as Bergoglio while pretending Vatican 2 or Ratzi-n-gear Joe is any more Catholic than Pachamama Demon-worshipping Bergolgio.
Enjoy this subtle motion picture with the suave and demure colourings of truth and actual Catholic dogma, one might experience at the very first light brought on by a limpid new dawn, brought about by a massive nuclear detonation.
Some cretinous little liars think that if they refuse to go public with their lies —on a blog somewhere, in their own name, like any honest man can do freely and easily— that is, if they refuse to put their name to the absolute deceptions they try to pass as Catholic knowledge, I may not savage them in the arena of reason, logic, canon law, and truth.
One such filthy little Brazilian who goes by the name @Ranger on Social Galactic believes his hiding and sniping will prevent him from the rightful scourging he deserves. Well, as the little meme below shows, he miscalculated, so now I will prove beyond shadow of a doubt that he is an intentional liar.
It would be tedious to repost the last 2 months of proofs of his constant deception and extreme gammaness, but it is always instructional to point out a few obvious lies. It helps other see the maggot-like twitching against truth and the plain meaning of words, so that you will be better able to avoid such creatures in all areas of your life. And since he’s certainly nowhere near as important as the fake clergy that was exposed in the last post, this will be a quick Kurganing. Barely enough energy released from this one’s head to charge an AA battery.
Let us begin: Lie number 1
An outrageous lie in multiple ways:
The commission was put together not to have a bunch of rules lawyers argue with laymen or even clergy about how this or that sentence really means the opposite of what it says, or, what the meaning of the word is, is. No. It was put together to ensure that the over 6,000 documents of the Catholic Church that were consulted to make sure the Code of Canon Law of 1917 was coherent and did not go against any of the dogma of the Church, previous rules and so on. In fact, the commission was not even going to respond to ANY questions from laymen, but only to clergy IF they found something from older documents that seemed to contradict the code. As a matter of fact, it was put in place to ensure the continuity of the Code was correct. And guess what, from thousands of even MORE documents that were consulted AFTER the code was published, in some 30 years, there was required the grand total of a single minor change to PART of canon 1099. So Ranger’s suggestion and implication that the Code of Canon Law is a vastly complicated system that only rules lawyers can use, is nonsense. Rules lawyers like himself, as he admitted to being trained in law, but apparently not practicing, thank God for small favours. He probably failed the game of hopscotch that passes for the Bar Exam wherever he lives.
He KNOWS that Roman Law does not operate as Common or American Law, so his intention here was to confuse and make the average person who doesn’t know these things assume that a Pope put in place a bunch of Canon Lawyers to argue endlessly about what the meaning of the word is, is. No. How do I know he knows this is completely not the case with regard to Roman Law. Well… he tells us he knows.
Lie number 2: He pretends that I think Canon 2314 applies in the case of Canon 188 part 4.
It does not. It never has and never will because, come on, you know this by now, Canon 188 part 4 applies instantly, requires no pronouncement from anyone and is judged by the law itself. As it clearly says. In fact, it clearly states in Canon 2314 that when considering the ignored warning given to suspected heretics, one must have due regard for canon 188 part 4. Which, of course states no pronouncement required by anyone. So in actual fact canon 2314 further CONFIRMS that Canon 188 part 4 is an exception. This is obvious to anyone who reads this canon in any language. Though he also tried to say it read differently in French, or English or…so guess what…I put the French, the English and the Latin all next to each other, and lo and behold, it’s very clear in all of them. But in any case Canon 2314 doesn’t even come into it for a second reasons, the people who fall foul of Canon 188 part 4 are notorious public heretics already judged by the law itself. The sentence is ALREADY PASSED ON THEM.
But notice the delicious subterfuge, in his message, while he pretends to be praising my view of not falling for ….whatever nonsense he will say next (see below), he tries to imply that canon 2314 applies at all in conjunction with Canon 188. As we have seen before, it does not. Because…
No.
Pronouncement.
Required.
By.
Anyone.
Ever.
Not for Canon 188 part 4. And further, his implication is that I too agree that Canon 188 and 2314 go together. No. They do not, and you can be sure I made that very clear over the last few months.
Lie number 3: He continues with his deceptions pretending that before you can say Bergoglio is a heretic, you need to prove Karol was. Well, that’s not a stretch at all since Karol, just like Joey-Nazi and Jose Bergoglio and the other antipopes ALL promoted, taught, did not repudiate, and call out Vatican 2 for the heresy it was, making them of course, also fall foul of Canon 188 part 4.
Notice also how he is trying to seed the usual doubt that “Oh well, but the Code of 1917 has been made redundant”. No, it has not. Because non-clerics, non-catholic, public and notorious heretics and their equally non-catholic, heretic, Freemasonic and hence practicing satanist henchmen, do NOT get any say in ANYTHING within the Catholic Church, so their fake Code of 1983 has less authority than second-hand toilet paper.
Lie number 4: coming up… An ignoramus we have met before asks a genuine question, and Ranger promptly goes on to use more subterfuge and lies.
And how does our worm-tonguing liar, that lies lyingly, lie? He lies thusly:
Notice again that he is an accomplished deceiver. He pretends to faintly praise my knowing that the fake code of 1983 did in fact literally try to overturn the entire of Code of 1917 and in particular canon 188, as we have seen in detail before in this post, while still “pretending” that the fake Code is valid in any way. And then goes on to lie about its contents. Again, I refer you to the clear dissection of the fake code against the real one in the post mentioned above.
There are, of course, more lies he spews with practically every text he types, but I trust the above suffices to show the point.
Did you think I’d stop beating the atomised, rotted, ghostly aether of the corpse of the Horse?
Well, that would be foolish of you.
Allow me to explain: Gammas are not only stupid, but they are harmful to the environment. they are basically a little sack of human sewage watering around dripping their filthiness all over the place. Poisoning all that is good, true, virile and handsome, beautiful and feminine, and generally lowering the tone of life, joy and happiness.
The damage these vermin have done, is difficult to conceptualise because it is so pervasive that everyone on some level has started to assume it’s normal. It’s not and it never was tolerated before the era of mass messcommunication. That’s not a typo. These people are the worm tongues of The Lord of the Rings, the snivelling, vengeful and disgusting victim-playing traitors that become Himmler on those rare occasions where from failed chicken farmer they become head of some tyrannical state bureaucracy.
In short. Curb stomping them in public and exposing their filthy lies, their vast dishonesty and their deceitful ways is a public service and anyone who is NOT a gamma should immediately realise that these “people” must absolutely have sunlight shone on their face until they shrivel and hide back under the sewage runs they crawled out of, or else (extremely rare) man up and start to become almost tolerable human beings instead of psychic parasites. To that end, then, allow me to show you what the snivelling little turd-eater from yesterday’s post has got up to the next day, and ALL making very sure to not invoke my name even once. Foolishly thinking the myriad snipers at my command would not immediately screen capture his entire gamma “attacks” (think spitballs at a battleship) for your and my entertainment.
And do so before he deleted the whole thread when a tiny inkling of a thought made him realise that maybe, just maybe, his lies weren’t being swallowed by anyone.
Well, here it is in all it’s glory. The gamma whine.
Read more »No related posts.
By G | 17 December 2020 | Posted in Social Commentary