Exposing Milo the Freemason in more detail

In case you are new here, you may want to get a sense of this vermin from an earlier post here:https://www.thekurganblog.com/exposing-the-fake-clergy-of-the-novus-orco

As usual is too cowardly to use his real name, but he tried to come to the rescue of his fellow freemason Milo (3 posts, the first one here: https://www.thekurganblog.com/milo-yiannopoulous-gatekeeper-to-the-puppet-starlets-of-catholicism-with-pictures)

His nonsensical and self-defeating “attack” on me is here

(Archived because these vermin tend to memory hole things.):

https://archive.is/807uH

He uses the Argumentum ad Infinitum right from the start (I detail this strategy of the deceivers starting on page 288 of RTCC) with a lot of pointless and useless details about the other 7 parts of canon 188, trying to fool you into believing they are all identical. They are obviously not. Becoming a heretic (188.4) means you vacate your office in every sense. Taking up an incompatible post within the same legitimate Church as a legitimate cleric (188.3) clearly only vacates the wordly aspects of the office. So you can ignore most of the text, but I have highlighted below the gems of his nonsensical position, which is all that is required to show him up for the deceiver, and idiot, that he is.

Let us quote him here as the highlighted parts:

1 – If you are an apostate, heretic, or schismatic, you are excommunicated. This penalty is called a censure, and happens automatically, at the time of offense. Kurgan is correct about this. What’s important to realize is this  takes place in the internal forum, as this is a spiritual separation from the Church.

No, it doesn’t not when the individual in question makes his heresy PUBLIC and NOTORIOUS, which, yeah… when you publish a heretical document intended for literally every human being to know and see, it counts. And that is what the V2 docs are.

Then he goes on to lie by quoting this point:

2 – Unless they respect warnings, they are deprived of benefice, dignity, pension, office, or other duty that they have in the Church, they are declared infamous, and [if] clerics, with the warning being repeated, [they are] are deposed;

And saying this about it:

2 – Once again, we see that you are given a warning (if you have not publicly defected from the Faith) before your offices are declared to be vacated. It’s not the the Bishop is removing you, but that you have removed yourself. You have resigned, you haven’t been fired.

He is, of course lying, because he tries to say that part 3 of the commentary he is referring to says…uh…the OPPOSITE OF WHAT IT SAYS:

     3 – If they give their names to non-Catholic sects or publicly adhere [to them], they are by that fact infamous, and with due regard for the prescription of Canon 188.4, clerics, the previous warnings having been useless, are degraded.

See that part 3?

It clearly states that if a public, notorious heretic gives his name to a heretic sect, or in any case publicly act as such, they are, by that fact alone INFAMOUS, and, here is the important part: APART FROM THE PRESCRIPTION OF CANON 188.4 WHICH MUST BE TAKEN INTO DUE REGARD, if these apostates have ignored the previous warnings (warnings that DO NOT APPLY TO Canon 188.4 because… see below) they are then degraded.

What does canon 188.4 say? WITHOUT ANY DECLARATION AND BY THE FACT (The action) ITSELF They therefore vacate their office, and despite his feeble and fake protestations, that INCLUDES ALL CLERICAL STATUS FOR HERETICS. 

And they are public and NOTORIOUS heretics remember?

He then tries (with abysmal stupidity) to gloss over the fact that these are notorious and public heretics for all to see, thus:

     The crime of apostasy, heresy, or schism must be exteriorly manifested either in words, writings, or acts which betray defection from the Christian Church, denial of some article of faith, or separation from the unity of the Church according to canon 2195.1; because merely internal apostasy, heresy, or schism do not belong to the external forum and therefore are not intended here. From merely internal transgressions, even though they be grievously sinful, any confessor may absolve. 

Heresy must be externally manifested to be covered by canon law. Therefore, merely remaining silent concerning possible heresy in the Vatican 2 documents is not covered. The kurgan needs to believe that silence (in reference to the documents of Vatican 2) equates with one being guilty of heresy. This is not the case in canon law, or in any law. Kurgan needs this to be true in order to wave his heresy wand and call almost all clergy heretical.

We have already seen the fake Popes are notorious and public, but clearly this likely Freemasonic fake Catholic is trying to say people like him who have remained silent on V2 cannot be called public and notorious. Once again, a lie. Because he has not remained silent. Not just on SG and here, but all over where he walks and breathes, he continues to spout the heresies of V2 as though they were Catholic Dogma. They are not, they are of Moloch, as is this impostor, and that makes him public and notorious too.

I wish this would resolve the matter once and for all, but as we know, The Prince of Darkness is really the Prince of the Gammas, so this worm will turn in his hole until the next time. And no doubt, my hammer will be there again.

This is a general post so do not expect exhaustive references of any kind, that said however, each of the points below is easily verified by yourself and you can check them for accuracy on your own, which is always best.

Given that:

1. Luther was quite possibly Jewish and a plant to create a schism in the Catholic Church (See Miles Mathies site for details)

2. Henry the VIII pushed for Protestantism only after the Pope denied him a murder-divorce and then used it as an excuse to rape and pillage and take over every Catholic Church and monastery in his lands

3. King James, who ordered the KJV to be made was a sodomite and a freemason who hand picked the 54 “translators” to put the Bible into English.

4. Freemasons are Satanists and King James was instrumental and pivotal in the organisation of Freemasons by having them build lodges.

5. The KJV contains over 33,000 “mistakes” all designed to lower the importance of Mary, twist various commandments etc two examples suffice: the commandment in the original is “do not murder” the secularised protestant KJV renders it as “do not kill”. Mary is greeted by the Angel as being “highly favoured” instead of “full of Grace” which is where the Ave Maria comes from.

6. The KJV used texts that had been fiddled with by pharisees for 700 years and given these guys believe Jesus is boiling in a lake of shit, they are not exactly going to give the best translations. The Vulgate was a far better translation having been done from the original Greek and Hebrew before Pharisee intervention by St. Jerome in the 4th Century.

7. There are of course millions of other data points of Protestantism that allow us to comfortably dismiss this schismatic and heretic offshoot of Christianity as Satanically inspired, perhaps best of all, their secularisation of Christianity to render divorce and contraception a reality and ultimately the mass murder of millions of unborn babies once sex has become a sport and babies an inconvenience to it.

So that deals with the entirety of Protestantism, we are left with the fake Bergoglian Moloch inspired “Catholic” but really Satanic Church which is, of course, just the larges branch of Protestantism to date and as such just as Satanic, the last Pope died on October 9th 1958. After that it’s been Freemasons all the way down.

This leaves the Eastern “Orthodox” and there are four types really:

1. Russian “Orthodox” – while the average layman of this group is relatively based and sound, the clergy has long had a lick-step with politics and as can be currently seen, they march to the orders of their masters.

2. The Greek “Orthodox” – they may be my favourite of the schismatics. The monks of mount Athos at least are certainly interesting.

3. The Byzantine rite “Catholics” don’t really count because as they give allegiance to Rome and Rome is currently the See of Satan, they are just Churchians at best, like all other Bergoglio or Ratzinger is “Pope” types.

4. American “Orthodox” – these are mostly ex protestants that are attracted to the ritual and ancient roots of the schismatic sect and find it more accessible physically and tolerable to their protestant sensibilities than real Catholicism. In essence they are a kind of cosplay version of “Christianity”.

And so we are left with the Copts, of which I know little but believe they have some of the same schismatic errors of the “Orthodox” and also, by their fruits, you shall know them, or rather, lack of them in this case since they certainly did not spread the gospel far and wide. And neither did the “Orthodox”.

There is also the matter of the splitting of the “Orthodox” into various branches now as the infighting heats up.

Their official stance on the fake vaccine and the plandemic is also, like that of the Bergoglian Satanic “Church”, pro-narrative and anti-human souls.

We are left then, with only the remnant, those happy few who have kept the original faith and continue to do so in an unbroken line of apostolic succession since the days of Christ:

Sedeprivationists (aka sedevacantists).

Yes it may be hard for you to find a priest or a place to receive Mass near you, but this is what we have been told to expect.

On the up side, not a single sede that I am aware of is pro fake vaccine and they all respect the dogma of the Church from the beginning.

Sure does sound to me like it is the right party to join.

So, as I have mentioned before, despite the fact that I quite like Ann Barnhardt, she is not only completely wrong about Ratzinger, but her delusions on the matter I believe are firmly rooted in ego.

And her cognitive dissonance on the matter has now reached clown world proportions.

In her latest post here she writes:

(Originally penned and posted in December of ARSH 2020 before we even knew how toxic and lethally dangerous the ClotShots would be. Now that Antipope Bergoglio is banning the non-DeathJabbed from his Masses, and faithful Catholics are being lyingly told by their GrindrPriests and GrindrBishops that they have no right to refuse the ClotShot based on any appeal to Catholic conscience, perhaps a few more people will now be ready to drop the totally irrational and infantile “Fwanciss is definitely Pope, Stoopid!” imbecility and acknowledge what has been glaringly obvious for years: Pope Benedict never validly resigned, and the See of Peter is being squatted upon by an evil criminal and servant of satan…)

What part of RATZI THE NAZI IS NO DIFFERENT FROM BERGOGLIO is difficult to understand?

Come on Ann, you think if Bergoglio of Moloch gets hit by lightning today Ratzi will suddenly say it’s ok to not wear masks nor get clotshotted to go to Mass?

Ratzi was a main ARCHITECT of V2 and the heresy in it is spectacular and obvious.

Stop ignoring the Magisterium of the Church Ann. The only actual Catholics left are those who are called sedevacantists or sedeprivationists by yourself and others. You, however, unlike most of the sleeping masses, have a functioning brain and can do logic, so you have far less of an excuse for ignoring the canon law of 1917.

Repent Ann. And if you need a refresher on how to be Catholic let me know where to post you one of these.