IMBC Oratory needs some help

The usual suspects running the planet all suffer from a disease that is incurable in their ranks:

They are completely deluded regarding how reality works. They essentially, and at its deepest level, believe in magic. And more specifically, in their ability to do this magic and have reality warp to their will.

This is a complex subject and I hope at least some of what I write here will be understood at the level I intend.

Depending on your outlook, you might say that “magic” to a certain level does exist, if you assume things like miracles can, have and do occur. Describing and defining this level of metaphysical reality is complex and difficult in part because of the very subject matter not easily lending itself to what I would call strict scientific testing procedures on the one hand, and partly because we quite simply don’t even have the right words to describe certain aspects of the phenomenon, so we use analogies and approximations and the result is sub-optimal; especially given the constant efforts by the wicked to increasingly pervert language at even the most basic level, such as using the word “gender” —which is a purely linguistic related word to define words in romantic languages that have a masculine/feminine— to try and describe imaginary, false, and absurd concepts of sexuality as if they were a natural and normal part of life.

So let me try and define a few concepts first, which will, if understood, not only explain why nothing works anymore, but how the world “rulers” are ultimately as doomed as the “useless eaters” they hate so much, though their eventual downfall and demise is on a much longer and gradual path, but I am not sure it is necessarily preferable to the relatively short and brutal one they have in store for us.

Please keep in mind that none of these definitions are necessarily perfect, or complete, except the first one that defines reality.

Reality: While we may not always be aware, or even capable of being aware or understanding every aspect of it (or even perhaps the majority of it when considered in terms of the entirety of creation) it remains a fact that reality is objective. That is, for any specific event, situation, perspective, at any given time and place, there is an overarching reality or truth that is true independent of the positions or relative aspects of perception or fact of any of the constituent parts of the situation, circumstance event or concept. As a result, our powers of observation, deduction and induction, based on logic, are fundamental in our ability to understand and deal with reality in a useful manner.

Ethics: All ethics, if they are to be objective, must, necessarily and inescapably, be tied to the Will of the Creator. Absent a creator, no system, behaviour or action can be said to be any more or less ethical or moral than any other. At best you can claim a preference of one kind or another, but there is, nor could be, any objective reason why murder or rape could be considered intrinsically wrong when compared to acts of charity. And ultimately, absent a creator and thus a valid, objective authority for any ethics or morals, nothing matters. Not only does the individual return to meaningless dust, but so does the entirety of the human race, with the same total absence of meaning. As an aside, for the nodding nihilistic atheists, this in itself is not the only reason or evidence for there being a Creator, it is just one of many data points.

Practical aspects of physical reality

While there are many and important aspects of abstract reality as well as philosophy and logic which may be considered non-physical, there are many aspects that concern primarily the physical realm, even if they may well be driven by non-physical realities, and the average human being is mostly concerned with this aspect of reality in his day to day life. This is not to say the non-physical aspects are not important, or even primary in their influencing and directing our actions and reactions on the physical plane, they absolutely are, and as such, the question inevitably arises for each one of us of how and why you do as you do. Or not do, as the case may be. In short, your behaviour on the physical plane, is absolutely informed by your philosophical belief. This is true even if you are not aware of what that belief is.

You might say as an Atheist you don’t believe in a creator (and as such you also don’t believe in ethics as objective, even if you will argue the opposite until you go blue in the face, all you can argue for is your preferences, which have authority over precisely no one outside of yourself unless you are willing to impose your preferences by the use of force. And yes, this is the absolute reality, even if you don’t realise it. Trust me, as an ex-atheist I at least understood this point even then) and so your “unbelief” informs your choices. You might never have considered any of these things deeply, as most have not, and thus inhabit the general morass of vague Agnosticism and Churchianity that most people exist in, which is really just a more comfortable self-deception to allow you to deny you only do what you prefer instead of what is objectively more just.

You may also ascribe to various philosophies, ideologies, religions and beliefs that are mostly wrong, or in any case at least partially wrong. In fact, it is a given, certainly in real Christianity that not a single human on Earth is perfect and only Jesus was, by virtue of being God made man as per the mystery of the Trinity.

Nevertheless, some ideas, philosophies and so on are demonstrably closer to reality and consistently produce better overall results than others. As such, it certainly matters what your beliefs are, regardless of whether you even know what they are in any depth or not.

Once you understand these three basic concepts, it becomes obvious why certain people behave in ways that are relatively absurd in terms of objective reality that is cognisant of an objective aspect of Truth, Justice and Ethics.

Let us now think about such things in some more detail and see why this naturally leads to a generic degradation of services at all levels.

Some moral points to determine your overall philosophy.

Let’s begin with a few easy ones.

Would you say a philosophy that accepts child rape as natural and normal is something you personally prefer as a philosophy? Or that at any rate you think is the best approximation of objective reality? If not, would you then agree that any such philosophy as might exist that has the normalisation of child rape as part of its tenets is a philosophy that even if it had other components that might be accurate in reflecting reality, this one glaring error in it is enough to declare the whole thing suspect and therefore not to be used or accepted in any general way as a whole?

I am certainly of that persuasion. If you are too, then you clearly cannot be a Muslim or a Jew, since both those religions make it explicitly clear that child rape is perfectly acceptable in their belief systems.

Of course that leaves a great many other systems of belief, but if you are similar to myself in regard to child rape, you may at least be steering clear of those two. Hinduism results in strict caste systems determined by birth, not any kind of meritocracy, and thus, aside from any other aspects of it I tend to be inclined to think it is nonsense, since I have met people from all walks of life and their character is not determined purely from who or where they were born to, but also by their choices in life. That still leaves Buddhism, Taoism and Shintoism, along with a general Zen Agnostic Stoicism. Buddhism has many facts and most rely on the principle of not doing harm, which is a good start, however, those versions that did rely on non-violence to extreme levels have been for the most part taken over by other philosophies that are quite happy to use force. See Tibet for example. Or the Amish when rules against raw milk came into force.

Taoism, shintoism and generic Zen agnosticism and Stoicism all are generally relatively practical, can encompass aspects of self-defence and do not concern themselves overmuch with the after life, other than a generic reverence for the dead ancestors and maintaining a good overall family name reputation. Its adherence to various principles of justice or ethics can be somewhat arbitrary in that they are most often coloured by regional, cultural or geographic aspects and can vary greatly from place to place. This tends to suggest a general lack of coherence that indicates it cannot be a good approximation of reality beyond general over-arching views that are held together by a feeble reliance of possibly tradition or general amorphous concepts of “justice” that in any case each individual may feel personally different about and thus react differently to. Absent an overarching moral imperative beside a generic “do good” perspective, what exactly “doing good” entails, as well as its opposite, remains at least partially subjective to each person and thus ultimately not particularly fair or objective in the finer aspects of life.

When you look at Christianity, the situation is not much different. Almost all versions of what people call “Christianity” do not, in fact, have detailed, written down, specific positions, rules, principles or laws that one can refer to, other than one: Catholicism.

The result is that in every other aspect of Churchianity, the adherence tends to again be of a generic, amorphous, undefined type, of “overall do good” with the only real difference from say Buddhists, being that they ascribe their behaviour to being “Jesus followers” instead of “Buddha followers” or imitators. Leaving aside the fact that in both instances the practitioners fall very far short of the imitation of their supposed Godhead.

Only Catholicism took the step of ensuring its rules were codified and written down throughout the two millennia of its existence, and even that was a rather messy and difficult thing to follow as the documents piled up and only a select few had full access to them as well as the capacity to grasp their nuances and details. Finally however, all of these documents were vetted, examined and checked for ensuring no contradiction existed and were summarised and encoded in the Pio-Benedictine Code of Canon Law of 1917. This astonishing document essentially comprised (and referenced for completion) all of the dogmatic beliefs of the Catholic Church into one volume. No other religion has ever done or even attempted this. And here are a few important points to note:

Firstly: The broad history of Catholicism demonstrates many things, but among the two most important ones are that:

• It was ferociously attacked from the very start, and many attempts at subverting and changing and perverting it have been made constantly throughout its history. The very fact it continued and continues to exist unchanged in its core (divine) philosophies, while making various changes and allowances (all of which can and at times have been returned to origin and/or done away with) for the human aspect of managing a world-wide organisation is in itself probably indicative of supernatural and miraculous protection given the absolute flaws in every human alive and the clear infiltration in the Church from the earliest times of frauds, impostors, nefarious enemies of the Church, greedy and power-hungry misers and so on.

• Catholicism has not only civilised the world in terms of providing many human improvements like the scientific method, the abolition of slavery, the elevating of women to a role in the family that is respected while not pedastalised, an increase in art, architecture and beauty in general, as well as the raising of logic, mathematics and philosophy as a whole towards a more holistic, humane and charitable aspect, but it has done all this all while respecting the individual instead of mechanising him and his contributions to the human race.

These two aspects of catholicism are absolutely fundamental to evaluating it in the proper human and historical context. Despite many evil and corrupt men that pretended to be Catholics throughout the ages, the overall contribution of Catholicism to the human race has been overwhelmingly positive to a degree that absolutely no other philosophy in all the known history of mankind can make claim to. It’s not even remotely close. And this point alone should immediately make you begin to suspect that perhaps then, at least certainly in its overarching ways, Catholicism may indeed be the best representation of reality we have ever been able to come up with. This in itself, as a purely intellectual exercise is a fascinating topic to explore. If you do take the time to do so, it becomes pretty obvious fairly quickly that the Catholic Church too, suffered a huge tectonic shift as a result of the Vatican II heresies where two millennia of dogmatic and divinely inspired rules were literally flipped to their opposites. Luckily, prior to this event, the Code of Canon Law of 1917 had already been put together since Pope Pius X had seen the writing on the wall with regard to the massive subterfuges infiltrations that had started since the late 1700s and by the start of the 20th Century were Hellhound towards the destruction of every royal House in Europe (because since Charlemagne nearly a millennium earlier, European nobility had been recognised as the defenders of the Catholic faith). By 1958 however, the last valid Pope (as per Catholic dogma) had died and impostor antipope had usurped the Throne of Peter (this was not a unique occurrence, there have been over 40 antipopes in the Church’s history before 1958). This is clear and obvious if you simply follow the rules defined and described for all eternity in the Code of Canon Law of 1917, which covers the entire period of the history of the Church up to 1917. The only other ex-cathedra documents which need to be considered are those published by valid Popes from 1917 to 1958. After 9th October 1958, there has, to date, not been a valid Pope back on the throne of Peter, although valid Priests and Bishops continue to exist, that is, the ones that never faltered and continue to follow the proper Catholic rules as set out in the CoCL of 1917, the valid Popes, accepted catholic tradition and the Bible. None of these people are in the Vatican currently, which is now an infested hive of pedophiles, freemasons, satanists and homosexual orgies fuelled by cocaine.

There is a third aspect of actual Catholicism (now referred to as Sedevacantism [from Latin: Empty Chair, as the chair of Peter being empty of a valid Pope]) that is also extremely important: A willingness to defend itself by whatever appropriate means, including violence if necessary. This universal divine right every living creature has, is a natural part of Catholicism, as is the concept of the death penalty for certain crimes. This means that Catholicism does not suffer from the “non-violent” trope that has been pushed on humanity by those who want to have the monopoly on violence. In this respect then, Sedevacantist Catholics are the biggest real threat to those who would rule us by virtue of their “magic” word-spells.

And if you look around, the Satanists in the Vatican rail against sedevacatists with more vitriol than any other group, while they extend brotherly love to religions and people that literally would prefer every Christian on Earth dropped dead. It’s quite the contrast to observe. Now, why should this be?

Well, consider:

The ruling class that sees itself as lords and masters of humanity with everyone not a member of their club being at best their slave or sexual plaything to be discarded and used at will, from children all the way to adults, operate by subterfuge and manipulation. In their view, their cleverness at making you believe, agree with and even celebrate increasingly outrageous nonsense is indeed their very power. And you can hardly blame them for believing their word-magic is a real thing. They have, after all, achieved almost all of their objectives to date, even if it took several millennia. The point is that just like the Gordian knot was “dissolved” instantly by Alexander’s sword, all the carefully crafted web of lies overlaid upon falsity, baked in with deception, fermented in duplicity and matured in subversion, to which you have been subjected constantly since birth, will come crashing down in one fell swoop once you see the pattern and investigate it and recognise the constant, pervasive deception you have been subjected too. Once you dig deeper into human history and go to primary sources instead of the narratives you have been fed, and once you begin to follow the money, all the way back to their origin today, and once you follow it in the media, in entertainment, in politics, and you see it, and you keep seeing the same pattern over, and over, and over, it becomes impossible to be fooled any more.

Once that happens, the word spells no longer work on you. The “magic” of the usurpers is forever broken. At that point, you realise that you and we have something that is akin to Alexander’s sword: The simple ability to build. To do. To create. And that as long as we ignore, excise, ostracise, and eject the “wizards” from our midst, there is very little they can do. They are completely incapable in the real world of things and truth and objective reality. Like the wizard of Oz they are absolutely impotent when faced with such things as objective, factual, physical reality.

If you doubt it, look at the war in Ukraine. Incapable of doing anything physical with any kind of skill themselves, they bamboozle, and “word-magic” hundreds of thousands or millions to their death in wars that they orchestrate but never take part in. How many wars would take place if the people behind the curtain were paced on the very front of the first front line? Almost none. What would have happened if every Ukrainian male had said, “No. I will not fight. Let Putin come in, demolish the CIA offices and the CIA biolabs and take out the puppet government the USA has frankly admitted it placed in charge of Ukraine from 2014 using word magic, money and Mossad operatives to cause the Maidan “revolts” as they do everywhere when they start their colour revolutions.”? There would have been no war. Millions of people would not have been displaced, the totally corrupt elements of Ukrainian society would have been removed and the people controlling America would have screeched to high heaven with little consequence.

If you can understand all of the above, you will begin to understand that nothing works only because you have been fooled into believing a complete web of interwoven lies at every level and have been rendered practically useless in the physical world. You have been coerced and manipulated to stop learning any real physical skills and farm out the whole thing to third and fourth worlders. So much so that in the intervening 70 years, some of those guys have since got really good at the manufacturing of everything from widgets to microchips. See China.

Even as a child when the concept of “export of goods” was first presented to me in primary school at age 7, I thought it made no sense because they told me the best stuff gets saved for export. I was like…”Why? Keep the best stuff for us and sell the less good stuff to those who have none of it and need it even if it’s not the best.” It literally is a concept so simple a child gets it that you do not outsource your defence weapon construction and key industry manufacturing abilities. But this is apparently too difficult for the puppeteers to understand. Why? Because, remember, they believe in word magic.

All you need to do is get back to basic, rebuild things yourself, educate everyone around you about the wizards and their lies and word-magic nonsense and simply keep them and their lies out of your head first, family second, friends next and community last.

Let them have no hold on you at all. Eventually, they may well try to use some of their brainwashed servants to try and apply force to you, but by then you should have built up enough reality-based effects that you should have quickly become a veritable force to be reckoned with and as the education of these concepts continues, the wizards will become less and less powerful.

The current demise in the service quality at all levels is a direct result of this nonsensical belief in lies and word-magic over the practical, empirical and factual reality that makes your nose hurt when you walk into a wall.

Whatever you decide to do, do it yourself. Do it well. You want to code? learn it yourself. You want to farm? Farm. You want to build engines, you start learning how to do it. That’s all you need to do. And surround yourself only with people of this mindset. Marry and make as many children as you can. Do that, and even if you have passed the half-century mark, like I have, there is a good chance you will see some good fruits amidst the chaos that is coming even before you drop dead. You will quite likely see the beginnings of flourishing mini-city states and communities that are so self-sufficient that in a couple of generations they will likely really begin to consider becoming a star-spanning civilisation. The technology exists. It the communities free of the parasitic invasion of the liars that are lacking. So, do as I do. Build them. You build them. You. Not your neighbour, not some other guy… you. Or if not, at least join one. Not everyone is born to create and do. Some are better at following and supporting, but do one or do the other. any other option is a loss for you and your entire progeny, if it even will exist, without your choosing to either do or support.