Archive for the ‘Catholicism’ Category

Why always Catholic or GTFO

You know how once you’ve seen a pattern that you previously ignored it suddenly seems blatantly obvious?
I have had that experience many times over my 51 years on Earth and what generally lets me know the observation of the previously ignored pattern is correct is that it answers multiple questions with rather precise effect.

Questions I had not even asked.
Questions that in hindsight become obvious lacunae in our understanding of the world and which now the “new” pattern (that is newly discovered by you but always there for you to see if only you had looked) answers clearly, distinctly and rather obviously.

Once you unravel the truth about Catholicism and the Catholic Church, the position of Christianity in general with regard to the last two millennia of human history begins to make a lot more sense.
All sorts of disparate and supposedly unconnected things begin to take on a new character and once again, the hidden hand of the enemy becomes that much clearer.

If you have not yet read Believe! or RtCC, you might think I’m just your garden variety zealot pulling for his preferred pederast-infested denomination. That, of course, is what the enemy expects most people to assume of literally ANYONE that is telling the unvarnished truth about pretty much ANY topic, not just religion. Although he does have a special hatred for those who do see closest to the truth of Christianity, because such people are dangerous. They can shed light on things the enemy much prefers remain in shadow. People like me seem to be able to set fire to enemy encampments with ferocious efficiency. And that sheds light. 

Allow me then, to present to you what is a very bird’s eye view of the history of Christianity. Now, before I begin, let us be clear that this is a big picture perspective and the multiple contradicting details of this or that individual or even group of individuals etc etc is utterly irrelevant in the detail itself. Such events may become relevant when and if they themselves form a pattern.

Let me give an example in order to have some clarity on the parameters and the scale I am referring to, so as to help you perceive a larger pattern than most are even lifting their eyes up to notice exists, much less observe or study. Remember this is just one example to help you see the bigger picture that is actually the whole point of this post.

Let us consider the Albigensians in the context of the history of the Catholic Church.
At first glance they might seem as perhaps a somewhat attractive or romantic ancient order of jedi with their asceticism and apprenticeship and rejection of wordly goods and affairs. Then… as you begin to examine their practices you discover it hinges on some rather nefarious concepts of Gnosticism. The idea of a demiurge and sexual practices designed to prevent reproduction as well as constant railing against the hierarchy of the Church. Of course, supporters will say that the evil and corrupt Catholic Church exterminated the poor and pious Cathars and made up a bunch of lies against them. And this is where you usually get lost in the forest for looking at the trees. Allow me to take a little detour to show you how easy it is to get lost before I return you to the broader pattern I’m interested in you seeing for the first time.

The Albigensians or Cathars were wiped out thanks to Pope Innocent III launching a crusade against them and subsequently the inquisition ferreting out the remains. But where they invariably evil degenerates practicing sodomy exclusively and corrupting people at the concept of Christianity at every turn? I doubt it. Were they then truly pious servants of God just going about their business while helping the poor, widows and visiting prisoners between bouts of reverent prayer and fasting? I doubt it. As usual there was probably a bit of both going on in some proportion or other. But in the main, we DO know they were extremely critical of the Catholic clergy and hierarchy. Of course, there are undoubtedly many examples of bad clergy throughout the history of the Catholic Church and these no doubt need and needed calling out, as they always do, but the actual hierarchy itself is not something to be disparaged, because, as I hope you will see, it has worked really spectacularly well given the extend of the corruption that lies in every human heart.

So, to that effect at least, they were indeed heretics. And their contribution to Catholicism and Christianity was in the main internal strife it would seem. Can we categorically assume they were really bad news, probably not, at least not without a lot more research than I have done in the matter (which I assume is basically about 100 times more than most people who read this ever will). On the other hand, their disappearance has not caused any real issues either and what I do know very well from my study of the real facts and figures of the inquisition is that it was one of the fairest judicial processes in human history and well ahead of anything comparable done in Protestant countries a few centuries later. I have provided some of this data in Reclaiming The Catholic Church.

On balance then, it is almost certain that the Cathars were not a net positive contribution and their existence was a probable heresy. There are, of course, many, many examples in the history of the Church of other attacks on it and major issues that threatened it such as the Arian heresy, during which some 97 to 99 out of 100 Bishops bought into the heretic view that Jesus was not co-eternal with God the Father along with some other iterations of non-trinitarianism.

But these heretic persecutions or deflections are not germane to the overall point of: What have the fruits of Catholicism been?

In that respect, without any real valid objection, it becomes impossible to avoid the fact that Catholicism is without a doubt the one philosophy and religion that is most responsible for the betterment of the human condition on Earth bar none.

Catholicism is essentially responsible for:

  • The creation of the scientific method of analysis and discovery
  • The muting of and eventual ending of slavery
  • The treatment of women and children in a manner that, while maintaining their correct position in the hierarchy of the family as subject to the male head of household, nevertheless valued them as individuals and placed the need to look after widows and orphans as a Catholic duty
  • Created multiple high trust societies
  • Created multiple and numerous orders of lay people that tended to the sick and wounded or injured, in effect inventing the very concept of hospitals and sanatoriums
  • Created multiple orders of lay people honour bound to protect those who could not protect themselves
  • Defended Europe from the depredations, ravages and kidnapping of the Muslims
  • Created innumerable works of beauty, art, architecture and cathedrals that could take a generation to complete for their majesty and detail, which ensured permanent places of worship for the faithful throughout the Earth
  • Created a real brotherhood of man by ensuring the mass was done exactly the same and in the same language (Latin) no matter where it took place, the importance of this fact in creating a high trust society cannot be over-emphasised.
  • Insisted in no contraception and that marriage was not subject to divorce. The importance of this in not resulting in the degenerate practices that ultimately culminate in mass abortions cannot be done justice to in writing.

If you are a Protestant, whatever argument your emotions are trying to scream at you to produce now, don’t. Stop. Think.

All of the above things happened CENTURIES before that fat, lustful, dumb-ass German, Martin Luther, and the retinue of autistic cretins that followed like Calvin and the others, were even a twinkling in their father’s eyes when looking at the bovine women that eventually birthed these bunch of degenerate and impious sexual deviants.

You literally have no argument. None. 

No one else did these things. 

No one else existed other than Catholics. And the “Orthodox” didn’t do jack other than hide in their ever-shrinking countries until once again the Catholics mounted various crusades to protect Christendom. And were betrayed by the orthodox every single time. And despite that the Catholics held the Outremer funded almost entirely from Catholic Europe for 200 years, and the Orthodox still refused to even man the walls of the cities and lands that the Catholics protected for two centuries when it became financially impossible to continue to remain there. 

So, yeah, for all the supposed “resurgence” of Orthodoxy, especially in the USA, you’ll forgive me if as a Catholic I notice that this is only due to the fact that the Protestant factions are now disintegrating and morphing into the religious equivalent of “Caitlyn” Jenner at a speed that could be described as “demon-infested, conmen, running”. And “Orthodoxy” At least has some kind of a pedigree, isolationist schismatics and non-proliferators of Christianity though they are.

Did the last couple of paragraphs upset your fragile sensibilities my Porto-Orthodox schismatic friends? 

Well, buckle up boys and girls, because if you can’t deal with the harsh realities of a few details, you sure as Hell are not going to be able to peel your eyes off the tarmac to look up and see the big picture. And the big picture is that without shadow of a doubt, Catholicism civilised humanity far more than any other event that took place in the entirety of human history. That’s an objective fact that anyone historically aware and literate simply cannot honestly deny.

And in the big picture scenario it counts for a lot. Which would seem to indicate that the Catholic Church indeed IS the one, true, Catholic and Apostolic Church.

But let us compare it to the achievements of the “Orthodox”. What did they do? They barely held on to their own lands and lost Constantinople, which used to be the seat of the Empire in the East. Did they spread the gospel far to the East? No. They did not. Which is why it was Catholic being crucified in Japan for trying to spread the gospel there, not the Orthodox. Did they spread it anywhere else? No. They pretty much limited themselves to what had originally been in any case Catholic Christianity before they split from the Church on the basis of what was ultimately a personal dispute and later rejected the offers of reconciliation by the Catholic Popes that followed.

What about the Protestants? Well, let’s see, in a bit picture scenario it is very hard to not see Protestantism as absolutely the Devil’s work, setting the early stage for the eventual destruction of the Royal houses in Europe followed by the final assault of the Catholic Church we have been seeing for the last 70 years or so in full force.

What has Protestantism achieved?

  • Divorce, including no-fault divorce
  • The secularisation of Christian humanity
  • The normalisation of sexual relations before any hint of promise of marriage (a direct consequence of letting divorce happen in the first place)
  • The normalisation of abortion, which is murder, under the guise of “family planning” if ever there was an inversion of terms, which is always Satanic, think on that one a bit.
  • The introduction of literally anyone being a “pastor”
  • The introduction of female “pastors”
  • The introduction of lesbian, atheist, female “pastors” taking the cross down from their “Church” so it is not offensive to Muslims that might wander in by mistake (I am not making this up).
  • The normalisation of homosexuality
  • The normalisation of gay “marriage”
  • The normalisation of sexual dismorphia resulting in the trans movement
  • Increasingly the normalisation of pedophelia
  • The normalisation of dyscivic practices such as feminism, single parent families, sexual deviancy of all sorts.

Now, you might say that most “pastors” of one of the 40,000 denominations of Protestantism don’t necessarily support say abortion, but you certainly cannot say every one of them is dogmatically bound to reject it. None of them are, because it is an absolute tenet of Protestantism that each man has the capacity and indeed should exercise it to interpret the Bible as he or she sees fit. Furthermore, if you bother to notice objectively, you will find that Protestant Churches are not really anything other than a business. One designed to provide profit to the ruling class that formed the corporation…err..I mean “Church” they exercise power over as “pastors”.

Most of the insanity we see around the world is produced and vomited out of one country, the united States of America. They have infected and poisoned most of the planet with their perverse and twisted ideologies, usually always in search of the worldly profit at the expense of human souls. The USA was founded by Freemasons on Freemasonic principles and they did it while bankrupting France to do it and calming the King and his admittedly odious wife Marie Antoniette. They literally lost their heads over it. So it is not any wonder to me that in the big picture scheme, though I am no fan of the Muslim ideologies, I can’t quite blame the name they have given the USA: The Great Satan. Indeed it seems fairly accurate.

Which is not to say that every individual Protestant and every individual American is a foul demon infested enemy. Most are just deceived and simple people. Many are genuinely good and generous, but as a nation (such as it may be for a brief time yet before it splinters into a collapsing giant) America is almost universally bad for humanity. And to a great extent, the fruits of America are largely the fruits of Protestantism.

It is of course a fact that the Catholic Church has been massively infiltrated over the last 200 years or more and as of 28th October 1958 only Freemasons and their puppets (Satanists) have usurped the Holy See and the throne of Peter, and what is worse, pretend to wear the name “Catholic” as though they were any kind of Christian, when in fact, by immutable Divine Law, faithfully written down in the Canon Law of the Church by the infallible Magisterium of the Church, (it is infallible because protected by Jesus Christ against error, not because any one human or Pope is in se infallible) such creatures are absolutely heretics and thus not Christian at all. 

But there are two points to remember:

  1. First of all, the eventual downfall of even the Catholic Church is prophesied and has been for centuries. It is in essence the prelude to the final Revelation, so, while not a good omen, if nothing else, things are on track as we know they should be even if the world is actually going to Hell in a hand basket for the most part. And regardless of this point, we also have…
  2. The demise of the Catholic Church has been greatly exaggerated. For a series of very clear, simple, dogmatic, canonic and divine rules that are gone through in absolute detail in Reclaiming The Catholic Church, the fact we have not had a valid Pope and that most of the so-called “Bishops” and “priests” calling themselves such are not christian at all but Novus Orco abominations and impostors, does not in fact, mean we have no Church. We absolutely do. And it is composed of those lay people and clergy that are normally known as Sedevacantists (though I prefer the more technically correct term Sedeprivationists).

We are in truth the only actual Catholics left, and yes we are a tiny remnant compared to the heights of the glory of the Catholic Church sometime in the 1800s, but we are a very rapidly growing group and more and more “cradle Catholics” in a slumbering stupor and deceived from birth are beginning to become aware, to awaken, to familiarise themselves with Canon Law and actual Catholicism and with the information provided in very brief and simple format in Believe! and in exhaustive detail in RtCC and learning of what their true heritage, the one that was stolen from them by deceivers consists of. 

My point then, if you are a Protestant, or an “Orthodox”, or a nominal “Catholic” with the absurd idea that Bergoglio or Ratzinger are in any way Catholic, never mind Popes, lift your eyes up from your petty pond of your personal bias and personal desires and look at the horizons of history, at the fact that the Holy Mass has been celebrated in the same fashion for almost two millennia in the Catholic Church and see the changes in the world and realise, that only a small remnant, we are told, will remain faithful. So choose wisely where you will cast your lot. Will it be with the non-prosletysing “Orthodox” who betrayed the Christians that came to rescue them from the depredations of the Mussulmans and made alliances with the Muslims instead? Or perhaps you will throw your lot in with one of the over 40,000 denominations of Protestantism, all rebelling against the one true Church that God instituted on Earth to be indivisible under God, denigrating it and lying spectacularly about it without even bothering to check if the lies they drank with their mother’s milk have any basis in fact, all the while, each one of them and indeed the individual members in each of those 40,000 branches living by one creed alone “Interpreth as thou will”.

Or will it be with the impostor Novus Orco Church filled with pederasts of the worst sort, let by a Molochian arch-enemy of Christ who pretends to impersonate a Pope while walking around carrying a Satanic staff gifted to him by two lesbians?

Or, as I hope, will it be with the remaining actual Catholics that hold to the true teachings of the Church, which have remained unchanged in their lively commanded portions for two millennia.

Join us is what I would counsel you. We are not exactly as dead as The Enemy and his minions would like us to be.

World Directory of Catholic Churches

USA Directory of Catholic Churches

 

No related posts.

By G | 8 October 2020 | Posted in Catholicism, Christianity, Sedeprivationism

Mickey the Lesser

A foolish Satanist or at the very least supporter of Vicar of pedopjiles on Earth Bergoglio foolishly stuck his head above the parapet and I noticed. Enjoy.

As usual his words in black and mine in blood-splattered red.

Sedevacantism Is Modern Luciferianism

Michael Massey December 2, 2019

At some time, we have all encountered a sedevacantist — if not in person, at least online.  I won’t bore you with the theology of the sedevacantism except to say they hold that a heretic cannot be pope, with the most common strain affirming that Pius XII was the last legitimate pope (although I did once come across one who believed that Pius V was the last legitimate pope).

I see, so you admit right from the start that you will avoid the actual reasons that Catholics remain Catholics and instead project your own Satanic leading of others into error directly from the title of this drivel throughout the rest of it. Got it. Let us begin the rhetoric war then, silly Hellish Padawan of Novus Orco and let us see how you fare against Lord Kurgan.

Oftentimes, sedevacantists lived through the turbulent times after Vatican II or are the children of those who did. 

Neither applies here and in my experience most remaining actual Catholics are simply people like me: those who still have the almost lost skill of reading comprehension.

They know either first- or second-hand of the terrible persecution of orthodoxy and suppression of the Tridentine Mass. They often fought valiantly against the heresies constantly flowing from the Vatican and were maltreated by many  local bishops and priests. 

Again, none of these things apply. I rejected the Novus Orco impostors out of pure instinct at age 7. My only “error” was believing these “priests” were in fact Catholics. They presented themselves as such, they had usurped the buildings and other worldly trappings of material goods of the Catholics, so I was fooled by their pretending to be Catholics, but certainly not by much of anything else since their theology was so badly flawed as to be obviously evil even to my 7 year old self. 

Many know their faith very well and can easily explain the errors of liberalism, modernism, and countless other heresies. In all respects but one, they are orthodox Catholics.

So, just to recap, we are correct on every point and you can’t and won’t argue against them (because you would have your head handed to you in seconds) but you have the one true silver bullet against Catholics coming right up… (cue spectacular rhetoric fail coming up)…

The one error of sedevacantism is essentially pride. They raise their opinion over that of the Church when judging that the pope is a formal and manifest heretic, while we know that the Church teaches that the First See is judged by no man.

Ahh, yes, that old Canard. Truly, nothing new with you Satanists is there? Once again, your despicable projection is obvious. Catholics to NOT sin of pride in being Catholics, we, in fact, follow the Magisterium of the Church which very clearly tells us that notorious, public heretics are not Catholics, do not speak for the Church, have nothing of relevance to say about Catholicism and that anyone who receives them as Catholics in turn ALSO becomes a heretic. This is all clear and obvious to anyone who, as I previously mentioned has the lost art of basic reading comprehension and reads the Code of Canon Law, particularly code 188 part 4 of the code (of 1917, the only valid code of Catholic Canon Law, the Satanic non-Catholics like this imp here produced a fake one in 1983, but as they are not Catholics of any kind it has no bearing on truth or reality or Catholicism). For the uninitiated, you merely need to read Cum Ex Apostolatus Officio on which much of the Canon Law for canon 188 part 4 is based.

As an aside, you don’t NEED to know what any doctor of the Church said in detail by the way, nor try to interpret it, because the Code of 1917 did that. And no, it does not require Canon lawyers to interpret it for you, poor peasant, because it is written on the principles of Roman Law. Not fake, loophole filled Anglo-Saxon Lawyerspeak. And in any case, the commission that was set up to interpret it already did that job and since it was published the code had one minor revision of one code (1099) in over 40 years and for the last decade or so nothing at all was changed and in all likelihood over 14,000 documents were consulted to ensure no part of the Code contradicted any part of Catholic dogma divine or Church law. So, yeah… reading comprehension. We Catholics dote on it. And reason. And logic. Because that is one of the Dogmas by the way, we use reason and logic and our God-given ability to study and know objective truth, not lies like your father teaches you and your kind.

But what about Luciferianism?

Well, you are the expert there, go on…

With the crisis in the Church since Vatican II, many comparisons have been drawn with the Arian crisis of the 4thcentury, when the majority of the Church’s bishops fell into the heresy of Arianism. There are four parallels that can be drawn between the Arian crisis and the crisis in the Church today. There are, as Michael Davies noted, the heroic Athanasius, Hilary, and Eusebius of Vercelli (not to be confused with the ecclesiastical historian Eusebius of Caesarea or the leading Arian heretic Eusebius of Nicomedia, Eusebius seemingly being a popular name among 4th-century mothers) who are types of the heroic clerics such as Archbishop Lefebvre, 

Lefebvre ultimately belonged to the R&R class, so he’s was not Catholic either from that moment on. 

Recognise (the antipope as pope) and yet “resist” his underlings is, of course, not logical, objective, reasonable, or, frankly, sane. It is based on nothing more than womanish emotions marinaded in a fake worship of “tradition” and pomp instead of truth and logic and objective reality.

Bishop de Castro Mayer, and other orthodox priests who suffered persecution for their defense of the Faith. There are also the diabolical prelates such as Arius, Saturninus, and Eusebius of Nicomedia, who resemble those infiltrators who infected the Church prior to the Second Vatican Council and sowed the seeds of doctrinal and liturgical destruction (think de Lubac, Congar, Rahner etc.). Then there are the orthodox princes of the Church who, knowing the truth, succumb to outside pressures and outwardly join the ranks of the victorious heretics, much like Pope Liberius. 

So…wait, you admit there were infiltrators. You admit Vatican II is replete with heresy and heretics, you admit all this and yet, somehow, those who do all this and point it all out backed up by the MAGISTERIUM OF THE CHURCH (which is what Canon Law is), logic, reason and facts, somehow are the Luciferians? Truly your inversion of roles between us is the usual stunning bold-faced lie your kind subsists on.

Finally, there are those who can see the errors of heretics for what they are and take a heroic stand against them; however, they succumb to their own pride and employ schism to fight heresy.

Ah, so we are heroes who… succumb. You pathetic wormling. You’re not really worthy of a Kurgan inquisition. You have nothing. We are not heroes, just Catholics. And while no doubt some of us will become heroic in their persecution, as martyrs or warriors, as the case may be, it’s not anything a Satanist like you could possibly understand, comment on or know anything about. We are Catholics, you are not. You wouldn’t understand.

It is this final parallel in which we can see the Luciferianism within the sedevacantist movement. There is the remarkable similarity between today’s sedevacantists and a group of schismatics who were spawned during the Arian crisis: the Luciferians.

Oh let’s see what utter reversal of any shred of truth you come up with now wormling.

The Luciferians were less nefarious than their name implies. 

Can’t help throw a little shade to your fellow Satanist names eh? Here is a hint: No actual Catholic would refer to themselves by such a name. Ever. In any age. 

Rather than being devil-worshipers, they were simply followers of the schismatic Bishop Lucifer of Cagliari. (The interesting naming trends of 4th-century mothers continues — what mother looks at her newborn son and thinks, “He looks like a Lucifer”?) Nothing much is known about Lucifer’s origin, save that he was born at some time in the early 4th century. 

Riiiiight…I’m SURE that was his given name at birth by his mommy. What utter nonsense. At most his name MIGHT have been Lucius, which was at least a Latin name, and if it got changed to Luciferus, it doesn’t take a genius to figure out why wormling. You really must do better in your efforts. Not that he is more intelligent or anything, but you should perhaps think of apprenticing under John Salza, who is verbose, long-winded, and easily demonstrated to be a Satanic liar and he is a self-admitted Freemason, so no real struggle to expose, but at least he presents more of a fake argument than this drivel. I’m sure for merely a few sexual favours of the Satanic kind he may well take you on as an understudy. At this rate you’ll not even reach the 9th Circle of Hell, you’ll be relegated to one of the outer and upper layers of torment for your pathetic efforts.

Those familiar with Church history will know that during the Arian crisis, the greater number of bishops had fallen into the Arian and semi-Arian heresies.

Most Catholics know of St. Athanasius’s heroic defence of orthodoxy during the crisis, but few will know of his good friend and stalwart defender of the faith, Lucifer of Cagliari. At the egregious Council of Tyre, Athanasius was condemned and exiled, and Pope Liberius wished to defend him by calling a new Council at Milan to resolve the Arian Crisis. Liberius chose Lucifer as his representative at this council, which was convened in 355 A.D. At the council, Lucifer spoke strongly in favor of St. Athanasius and the Homoousion doctrine (which holds Christ is consubstantial with the Father) and convinced many bishops, including Dionysius of Milan, to support the orthodox cause. Sadly, however, the Arian bishops retained their majority, and with the support of the Arian Emperor Constantius, they confirmed their heretical Homoiousion positions (which holds that Christ is only of a similar substance to the Father); flogged the orthodox prelates; and exiled many, including Lucifer.

Another great blow to orthodoxy was dealt in 357 A.D., when Pope Liberius succumbed to the great pressure of Emperor Constantius; signed the formula of Hosius, which denied the Homoousion doctrine; and excommunicated Athanasius.

In his wonderful work History of the Catholic Church, Fr. Mourett described Lucifer as “an impetuous orthodox bishop.” In 360, Lucifer advocated shunning dealings with Arian heretics in De non consentiendo cum haereticis and compared Emperor Constantius with the idolatrous kings of Israel in De regibus apostaticis. At no stage throughout the crisis did Lucifer succumb to heresy; however, he certainly gave in to imprudence. Finally, after many more trials and tribulations too long to expound upon, Athanasius, Lucifer, and the orthodox prelates were restored, and a council was convened in Alexandria to finally resolve the Arian crisis.

At the Council of Alexandria, which did largely resolve the Arian crisis, the holy fathers deemed that all of those priests and bishops who had worked with the Arians and sided with them in various councils, but who had not publicly professed the heresy of Arianism, could retain their offices and sees within the Church. It further declared that those who publicly renounced their heresy could return to communion with the Holy Catholic Church. This was too much for the “impetuous” Lucifer. He had fought the good fight since the very beginning, was ridiculed, and suffered terrible persecution for the Faith. He had been a loyal servant to his pontiff, Liberius, but even his friend Liberius had abandoned the orthodox Homoousion proposition under pressure. Along with Saints Hillary, Athanasius, and Eusebius, and a handful of others, he was at one time one of the last orthodox prelates in the entire Church.

Seeing the Arians and semi-Arians he had fought against at Milan and elsewhere rehabilitated was too much for his pride to swallow. How could they, who had been at enmity with Christ and His Church, be returned to their sees and positions of power above him, when he, a valiant defender of orthodoxy and veteran of the underground Church, still fought the good fight?

Lucifer turned against his former friend Athanasius and decried the measures taken to restore the repentant Arians. Pope Liberius ratified the decisions of the council, but he was a heretic. He had signed the heretical formula of Hosius, which had rejected the Homoousion doctrine. He had not been condemned as a heretic, but he was a heretic nonetheless, and heretics are to be shunned. Lucifer declared that heretics — even repentant heretics — could not hold ecclesiastical offices, and he proceeded to condemn Liberius, Athanasius, and all the bishops of the Church who would not support him. 

And if the above description of things is true (I haven’t bothered to check because my time is limited, but it is irrelevant because my knowledge on matters of what is heresy and who is a heretic is rather exhaustive) then Lucifer (which I assume was really Lucius and thus re-named by your own kind of people) was 100% correct. A former heretic can only be reconciled with the Church insofar as he retires to a monastery with authority over no-one and spends the rest of his days in penance. Again, this is Catholic Dogma that remains unchanged throughout history and is of course spelt out in Cum-Ex Apostolatus Officio.

He abandoned the Church and retired to Sardinia with his followers, who took up the name “Luciferians.” There Lucifer would live out the remainder of his life separated from communion with the pope, Athanasius, and the Church. The once great defender of orthodoxy died in schism. 

No, he clearly didn’t if your account is at all correct.

When one is tempted to reject the pope and all the bishops of the Church due to the heresy and scandal they constantly promote, remember the example of St. Athanasius, who always fought to remain in communion even with the heretic Pope Liberius. 

Moderates are what God will spit out, remember. While a possible passage of power may require such “compromises” in the first place they are illegitimate compromises and dogmatically in error and in the second, they rarely ever result in an actual transfer of power from the corrupt to the non-corrupt. In fact, they merely tend to provide deeper cover for the most corrupt of all.

When you recognize and resist the pope, you are in communion with St. Athanasius, but when you reject and resist him, you are in communion with Lucifer.

Absolute nonsense. Let me write that in correct English as it actually is:

When you recognise a demonstrable persistent and unrepentant never-was-Catholic as legitimate “Pope” you are in communion with Satan and his henchmen and we like that. When you reject such persons as legitimate “Pope” you are in Communion with the remnant of the Catholic Church.

Writer’s note: I have an uncle whose misfortune it is that I bear his name (we’ll call him “Michael Massey the Greater”). Consequently, when I have written on sedevacantism in the past, a concerned sedevacantist wishing to send me his…ahem…constructive feedback thoroughly confused my dear uncle by sending him a voluminous tract in “refutation” of “his” essay. Suffice it to say, to avoid any confusion, please address any criticisms to Michael Massey the Lesser, and leave poor Uncle Mick alone.

Consider yourself addressed Mickey the Lesser.

Oh, and don’t bother to respond, since your own attack was pure rhetoric and intentional lies, I have zero interest in anything other than further exposing you. You are a supporter of a known paedophile promoter and protector and associate of child traffickers, the vicar of Paedophiles on Earth, Bergoglio, so you know where you fall in the hierarchy of people I sincerely hope get what’s coming to them in this life and the next.

For those readers who are still figuring things out, my latest book here, covers all the objections to Catholicism (Sedeprivationism) in exhaustive and irrefutable detail and since it is written in my usual brutal style, I am told that as well as informative it is also entertaining.

No related posts.

By G | 17 September 2020 | Posted in Catholicism, Humour, Impostors and Frauds, Sedeprivationism

Dr. Taylor Marshall – Just Another Grifter

Well, it is always nice to know that my very first instinct about charlatans is always correct.

I had absolutely no idea Taylor existed and I only became aware of him a few days ago when the High Priestess of my personality cult top fan, told me he was going to go live on YouTube concerning Vigano’s latest letter where he says Vatican II was a mistake and should be forgotten.

Within a few seconds of his starting the video I got a definite stench of protestant televangelist, and as I say, I knew nothing about him. It is only later that I discovered he had in fact been a “priest” in a Protestant branch (sorry I can’t be bothered to recall which of the 40,000 branches of Churchianity he pretended to be a priest in).

He has all the hallmarks. The nice suit and tie, the meticulous presentation, the ritualistic “let us pray” as a leading and pacing of those fooled by his money grabbing efforts and so on.

But one could forgive all that IF he had any valid content. He does not. He plays the same game as all the other “Traditionalists” like the SSPX, Church Militant, E. Michal Jones, etcetera. Unlike people like Ann Barnhardt and Frank of Canon212.com however, whom I believe are genuinely deceived, I sense absolute intentional deception in Taylor Marshall. Oh sorry, DOCTOR, Taylor Marshall, because that matters so much, let’s not any of you non-doctors forget it.*

But let me charitable, as a good Catholic boy should be. I need to clarify that I don’t believe Taylor, (or Tay-Tay, as I think I’ll call him from now on) is an intentional deceiver with malice of the type of say a John Salza. No, I think he’s just your typical Protestant Grifter and he is going after the numbers and in this respect he is playing the three card monty trick quite well. the masses of deceived, nominal “Catholics” is multiples larger than the actual Catholics who understand Sedeprivationsim, but I grant that if that number were ever to start going the other way, Tay-Tay would make the jump in a flash and state how he suddenly saw the light.
Which I’d be tempted to guess is what prompted his jump from Protestantism to “Catholicism”. Besides, he does have 8 kids and a wife to feed after all, you can see why he would go after a larger crowd. Well. Until it remains profitable anyway.

I did, of course, post a question at him and as it was the only superchat with an actual question, his totally ignoring it is at least a little telling. But lest it be said I am not giving the man a chance to answer directly, here it is:

 

My question happens at the 24:24 timestamp.

I won’t hold my breath, and I expect to be studiously ignored, for to shine any light on this at all, would not do him any favours, cash wise.

But as I learnt from my Jay Dyer Internet Bum Fight after action report and seeing Vox’s slow motion surface-to-air-missile books Jordanetics and his SJWS always lie, thorns like me end up festering in your side and eventually taking down the whole gigantic, pink, gay elephant in the room.

As for his book Infiltration, there is a pretty thorough and very entertaining review of it in podcast form here: Enjoy.

Remember, you cam always get the T-Shirt of Truth so you become like a radioactive beacon of truth and will automatically keep such grifters as Tay-Tay at bay. Better than Garlic for Vampires! (And no, I don’t make a cent from it, in case you were wondering, but I like the people who make it and I love the T-Shirt).

* Because bits of paper you pay for to append to your wall mean so much more than truth, fact, or reality. After all, like the good Professor Rupert Sheldrake said, (I paraphrase): “All you need to get a degree or diploma is to stay alive through the 4/2/whatever years and pay for the tuition and the certificate at the end.” You should know this, you low-status monkey!

No related posts.

By G | 24 June 2020 | Posted in Catholicism, Impostors and Frauds, Sedeprivationism

Beating Gammas like Dead Horses

James Lovebirch – enemy of truth, exposed.

The little intro before the taking of yet another gamma head here is for benefit of those new to this game. 

Read more »

No related posts.

By G | 17 May 2020 | Posted in Catholicism, Sedeprivationism, Social Commentary

Replying to Morons who think they have functional IQs

As I have been having nice little flame wars exposing Sophists, gammas, possible actual Satanist deceivers and other cretins for their duplicitous natures, I have challenged them all, as already done previous here to make their arguments in a public forum, with their own names attached. So far there have been no actual takers, which is natural because liars KNOW they cannot survive sunlight, so “people” like @jameslovebirch and @Ranger will in all likelihood NEVER post their “arguments” publicly, and certainly never under their own name, because they know for a fact they would be torn to shreds. Besides the challenge has stood unanswered for months and I expect will continue to do so.

Despite this, one guy, named Stephen Burrows, made a formal public request to be bitchslapped about the face for his inability to read basic English, understand simple concepts, speak of things he is abysmally ignorant of as if he understood them when it is clear he doesn’t even posses the faculties to grasp the concept of apostolic succession, never mind anything beyond that and so on. As the charitable sort I am, I decided I would indulge him here. For your entertainment if perhaps not enlightenment of catholic concepts. mostly because these are so obvious anyone even mildly interested already knows these things.

Below I reproduce the entire question and reply interspaced in red. So you know I have not altered anything in the original, it is also archived here.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is img_0400.jpg

One Question for the Kurgan (was Paul VI validly elected)

Since this is still bubbling away on Social Galactic, I thought I’d have another go at a question:
I ask: Was Paul VI (Who concluded the Second Vatican Council) validly elected as Pope.

For the purpose of this let’s all assume that yes he was.

The question is actually completely irrelevant. It makes absolutely no difference if Montini was validly elected or not. Why? Because as every Catholic knows, the very concept of once saved always saved is a Protestant idiocy and not based in any sort of logic. Every Catholic is perfectly aware that even if you theoretically pay lip service to being a Christian, or, in fact, genuinely have become one, your salvation is NOT assured if you later defect from the Faith. This is elementary level reasoning, and should not tax anyone’s grey cells. And yet…


If:

1. The implementer of the conclusions of Vatican II was a validly elected Pope

Let’s assume he was in order to give your moronic idea that you have some kind of gotcha! going for you the best chance of working. Even though there are valid reasons for thinking otherwise, but no matter, I accept this as the premise for the purposes of showing Stephen the error of his ways.

2. The documents of Vatican II are heretical

They are

Then: Papal infallibility is false

And this is where poor, poor, Stephen falls short, like a special kid with a helmet and a lot of drool. Mostly because he hasn’t got a clue what papal Infallibility is. But here is the logic even a 5 year old grasps. If a validly elected Pope acts as a filthy heretic apostate, sodomite, freemason, guess what, Canon 188 part 4 comes into play and he immediately loses his office. End of. No one requires to say anything further and EVERY action this fake Pope ever took becomes automatically invalid. And it has always been thus.

As the papal encyclical Cum Ex Apostolatus Officio always made clear for the last few centuries.

You really need to change your whole idea of Christianity, oh little Protestant. The only reason you even think that once a Pope is elected he can never, ever, ever fall into Hell again no matter what he does is because Protestantism fosters the idiocy of binary thinking. Something that is properly demonic once you are thinking about anything beyond simple mathematics. And it is intimately tied to the absurd idea of once saved always saved. It’s like saying that once you have decided you are not a thief you can never be arrested for stealing again. Even if you steal. What nonsense. And of course, a Pope who becomes a heretic immediately loses office and all his actions become null and void, including any he may have made while technically still “valid”. Why? Because prudence, logic and the infallible rules of valid Popes and the Church say so. All approved, recorded and codified in Canon Law. Really it’s not difficult to understand if you can read. And have an IQ above 90. Which to be fair, from previous engagements with Stephen, he may well not have.


If Paul VI was not validly elected then can you explain how. 

We have assumed he was. So this point is moot.


Your standard call to Canon 188.4 to indicate why modern papal elections are invalid would seem irrelevant since it relies on cardinals and popes publicly defecting from the faith.

What, prey tell, oh you very special person, is hard to grasp about a Pope publicly defecting from the Faith, which he does the minute he issues official documents replete with heresy for public consumption? Of course it applies. Why would it not apply? It is precisely for this eventuality the canon exists.

Even if assenting to Vatican II counts as a public defection, it can’t apply to cardinals acting before the documents had been published.

What do the cardinals electing a Pope that defects later have to do with it? Absolutely nothing. Insofar as we accept they validly elected him (which we are accepting for the purposes of this argument) they have done nothing wrong. Any cardinal the Apostate fake Pope made cardinals before he became a heretic though also are not considered valid, but these are after the fact. Canon 188 part 4 applies specifically to individuals who fall under it. I don’t understand how anyone can be confused by this at all. It’s very simple.

Now, you may think that I have been a bit harsh on Stephen, and I have, but you need to know Stephen had a massive argument with me about Apostolic succession that clearly showed he has no clue about much of anything, and I suspect he struggles with shoes that have laces. That said, I do salute his attempt since it was public and he apparently put his name to it. I would however advise him to never again question Catholic dogma. He is one of those people best served by getting baptised as a good Catholic, quietly attending Church, doing his prayers and simply doing as the VALID Catholic priest (not any of the Novus Orco impostors) tells him. He clearly does not have the faculties for understanding the basics, but that in itself is not a sin. Plenty of people that are not intellectually advanced make very good husbands, men and friends as well as good Catholics. He just has to become one first.

No related posts.

By G | 14 May 2020 | Posted in Catholicism, Sedeprivationism, Social Commentary

Shooting Down the False Objections to Sede Privationsim

As a result of Vox Day mentioning my earlier blog post challenge to nominal Catholics concerning the fact that we have only had antipopes since 1958, one of the commenters there brought up some supposed studied theologians who claim to have fully refuted the position they call Sedevacantism (but I call SedePrivationism for precision, since words matter). My post on the antipopes and the legal reasoning why is here and it is rooted in the fact that we, as obedient catholics, must believe the fake Popes are fake, and have been at the very least since 1963, for certain, because that is what the Code of Canon Law of 1917 necessarily states, which being put together by the Magisterium of the Church, we, as Catholics could never and should never had ignored when Vatican 2 raised its evil and apostate head from the darkness. Nor can we ignore it now. Remember that the only current and valid code of canon law is the one of 1917, since the one of 1983 was put together by the same impostors, non-clerics and non-catholics that usurped the Chair of Peter in the first place, and it was also specifically designed to try and invalidate the truth of the code of 1917 and obfuscate its clarity and precision.

Not having read or known anything about the two individuals mentioned by the commenter at VP calling himself MisesMat, who later emailed me and assured me both these gentlemen would be happy to debate me, in writing, I did a quick search for one the names that he mentioned and found Salza’s document online, which I reproduce below with my commentary. His words are in black and mine in red. Initially I started out thinking I’d give this guy the benefit of the doubt of being one of the many badly catechised Catholics that have been browbeaten into accepting an untenable position on the basis of emotions alone mostly and brainwashing from an early age, but as I progressed through the document it became absolutely obvious that John Salza is an intentional liar and deceiver of the worst sort, as will become apparent from the thorough evisceration performed on his lies below. Warning: It gets harsher as I go, but also funnier hopefully, so it’s not too boring I hope. In either case, boring or entertaining as it may be, it is important, because it more clearly demonstrates the tactics and lies these people will attempt to use on you (and have done so rather successfully since before they took over the papacy in 1958), so it is good for you to understand their strategy, because once you do, you can’t unseen it. Enjoy.

UPDATE:

If the below is too long for you to bother with, let me simply state that John Salza wrote the below in 2010, meaning he KNEW the issues of V2 were issues even before the Vicar of Pedophiles on Earth, Jorge Bergoglio took over. And, more importantly, he is a 32nd degree Freemasons. And Freemasons can’t be Catholics. Because Satanists can’t be Catholic so, yeah. the below is academic to a certain extent, but necessary anyway.

Read more »

No related posts.

By G | 26 January 2020 | Posted in Catholicism, Christianity, Social Commentary

THE JAY DYER DEBATE – Written After-Report

This is probably going to be a long entry requiring various updates I have divided this into four sections. I’ll add to them as time permits and if required by any commentary.

It refers to a debate between myself and Jay Dyer prompted originally by his zombie-like followers harassing me for months that I should listen to, debate, etc this guy. When I eventually, after a few months of this decided to go look at who or what this guy was it was clear within five minutes that he was deceitful and also exhibited some autistic traits (in the worst possible sense), and those of you horrified at me beating on a poor autist, remember I have Aspergers’ myself, so, relax. 

UPDATE: On that very note, ironically, I have noticed a fault of mine I must admit to. It’s not that I wasn’t aware I had this issue, I did, but the hundreds of comments both on my channel, at Vox’s blog, emails etc I got regarding this debate, there was a thin, yet noticeable pattern that in all fairness I have to admit I am almost certainly guilty of, and that would be a lack of patience and to a certain extent of charity too.

I would like to be precise, since this problem is ultimately one of precision and while from my perspective the issue is simply one of almost everyone else being mostly too stupid to follow things that seem obvious to me, it is also true that that IQ gap issue is a real thing and ultimately, given I am generally the one with the higher IQ, it is absolutely incumbent upon me to bridge the gap (insofar as it can be bridged, which honestly, sometimes I think is just not possible). So I have made an attempt at correcting below, in green so that there is no revisionism and my faults are exposed properly, what could possibly be misunderstandings rather than out and out deception on the part of Jay Dyer. I did make an attempt at this in the debate itself, when I said that perhaps we were talking past each other and I tried to understand if he perhaps meant something different than what I was perceiving, but Jay of course was busy repeating himself, and not really listening to anything so that didn’t work either, anyway, the rest below remains unaltered and my general reasoned and instinctive opinion, however, you could look at any green text as an alternative view I theoretically could have or maybe should have come up with instead if I was giving the befit of the doubt at every turn. 

It’s not something I tend to do because of my general life experience, but I can see that in some instances, and genuine argument/debate is one place, where in proper etiquette, it should probably almost always be extended, so if nothing else I have possibly learnt that, even if, in practice it’s a lost art and I don’t think there are but a handful of people capable of doing it. That said, there is objectively no reason why I could fault the green version of events on deeper reflection, so it’s at least possible.

The debate is here

UPDATE: Apparently the full debate has been deleted for whatever reason. There is however a 3 minute mostly recap of the internet bunfight main points.

SPOILER: It’s well made because I am sure it will let the idiots who follow Jay continue to believe they are right, despite the fact that Jay absolutely wrecks himself with the correct answer to the question: How do you interpret Catholic Dogma Jay? The answer, of course, is CANON LAW, which is precisely the point, the entire volume of Denzinger, or the works of  Ott, or Thomas Aquinas for that matter, are irrelevant, because HOW you interpret it, is by using Canon Law.

Jay Dyer’s original Video I was critiquing is here

and of course, my channel is here 

with a post-analysis for video (not as exhaustive as this post but for those of you who find reading painful) is here

***

PART I – Answering the spergs – This is simply a list of the false accusations made against me by both Dyer and his colony of gamma zombies with responses to the individual items. Some agglomerated for ease of reply, some with examples to show the level of IQ the morons making them have.

PART I A – The Denzinger Debacle – As this was a main point of contention and one his spergy followers couldn’t grasp I devoted a whole little section to it.

PART II – The actual issues – This will be rather lengthy and grow over time as I add details, this first draft is taken from the general notes I had taken and adjusted slightly to try and deal with the points made, it also tries to follow the original format of the debate in terms of Chronology but not necessarily.

PART III – Conclusions – My take on it all

***

Read more »

No related posts.

By G | 15 December 2019 | Posted in Catholicism, Christianity, Fighting SJWs

On My Scandalous Character

A recent development within the organisation that runs the London Latin Mass, prompted me to take some steps toward ensuring that parishioners who wished to approach clergy of their choice could do so freely, without dictates from people who have no canonical authority to rule otherwise, regardless of their position in the Church Structure. As a result my “scandalous character” was mentioned by certain parties. Without further ado then, let me tell you all about it, as I did to the relevant people by the email below.

 

Dear All,

As expected, there have been some rumours concerning me and my character, actions, etc. so let’s clear them up too.

I have had an online presence at least since the early 2000s or earlier and been involved in many things outside of normal life for most people. Until at least about early 2014 or so I also had very little, if any, belief, grasp or knowledge of Christianity even in its broad sense. I have lived pretty much most of my life as what the Bible calls a “wild ass”. That is, a stubborn donkey, whose main characteristic is to fight anyone and anything that gets in their way and whose only quality might be persistence, but certainly not wisdom.

This means I have had dealing with everything ranging from working as an armed bodyguard that dealt with armed criminals, corrupt police, client’s vices, including prostitutes they had on retainer, and seen more than my fair share of evil, sin and perversion on a scale most people fortunately never encounter.

I also lived without God as a guiding principle most of my life, and only a sort of warrior code based on honour, truth and justice that probably most resembled samurai philosophy as that was a large influence in my upbringing.

I was baptised on the 25th May 2017 and my online presence has in any case evolved over the years and no doubt, will continue to do so, but I have zero interest or concern in “doctoring” or covering up any of my past, blog posts, etc. Firstly because it would be an intrinsic dishonesty in denying factual reality, something I am constitutionally averse to doing in the  extreme, and secondly because all this can be summarised into 5 simple points:

  1. Who I am, was or will be is of little relevance to you, your salvation, relationship to the Church, God, your priest, bishop or anyone else. I am not a leader, I have no wish to be your leader in anything, as I said in my first email, and if it seems like I am leading something it is simply because others are either failing to do so or too scared to act directly on things that matter. My intent is to do what’s best for the faithful, the Church, civilisation in general and my family, but I have always strongly rejected anyone trying to follow me as if I am some guru. I like to express my views and opinions and if you find them useful, you’re welcome to them, and if you do not, then ignore them and me. Ultimately, the only person responsible for your soul is you.

 

  1. My past is irrelevant to my present as far as I am concerned and not only do I not care to hide it or pretend it is not what it was, in fact, quite the opposite, because if even someone like me can come to the Church then there is hope for everyone, and this is a good reminder for others to see.

 

  1. Paul used to torture and kill Christians because he was what today would be called a fanatic. Then he had his road to Damascus moment and he wrote half the New Testament and guess what, he was no less of a fanatic after his conversion, all that changed was his intention and focus. Now, I am no Paul, but I relate. Jesus hung out with prostitutes, soldiers, and (what’s worse in my opinion) tax collectors, again, far be it from me to compare myself with our Lord, but I can tell you in all honesty that some criminals I have known had a better sense of honour, truth and justice than many fake clerics of the Novus Ordo Church (or Novus Orco, as I call it). Or even your average trader (banking) for that matter. So again, I don’t care in the least what a person supposedly is or is not. I will judge them based on their actions towards me and the things and people I care about. If you prefer to do differently, then that’s up to you, but I assure you either way, it’s not going to keep me up nights.

 

  1. To those persons who would try to assassinate my character or use any of my past or present or future actions etc, I say, have at it. You have no idea how little I care. I have had death threats from special forces trained people, I had armed men come to my house to kill me and a number of other confrontations of just about every type, be they physical, emotional or spiritual that not only do I not wish on anyone, but would probably crush most people. My point here is simply this: Who I am or what I have done or what I do, does not change the facts or the lies, injustice, or errors that others who purport to be leaders in the Church make. And their attempts to shame me into silence are going to have only the opposite effect. Unlike the hypocrites, I have never denied, nor will I ever, my past or my present. Nor will I change it or doctor it or try to hide it. In time I hope to continue to become a better person, but I generally talk like a sailor and am certainly no one’s idea of a pious wallflower. If that scandalises you, then so be it. My sins are mine and imperil only my soul. I am not a Priest giving guidance or worse, a Bishop ignoring Canon Law. At best I’m a very flawed human being that has a true belief in God, Jesus Christ and who will not be cowed into silence by anyone on such matters, regardless of who they are. My accounting for my sins will be done in front of my Lord when my time comes, and not before any human being on Earth who presumes to have such authority over me.

 

  1. Martyrs are very much higher on the hierarchy of saints than warriors, and I have no illusion which type I am, but God loves His warriors too, so if you don’t, or find them offensive and don’t want to associate at all with them, don’t worry about it; I’m certainly not going to invite myself into your life against your will.

This same message will also be posted on my blog tonight, which I have no intention of taking down. And if you want to know my personal current stance on things, it is changing every day, but if you really want to dig into this, you can get a fair idea of it in my latest short book Believe! I have in fact already moved somewhat beyond it, in what I hope is an even more Catholic direction, but it’s not light years away from where I was when I wrote it, and as a matter of fact, that little book has inspired at least 7 confirmed conversions to the true Catholic Church and interest in doing so from many others, the exact number of which I do not know with any precision.

Lastly, to all those rumour mongering, I issue a simple challenge: I am perfectly happy for every bit of communication I had relating to the current troubles in the London mission to come to the full light of day. Why aren’t you just as happy to let everyone see your true face when you’re hiding behind a screen or “not wanting to cause scandal” or communicating your strategy to browbeat the “dissidents” in plain terms? Do let us know. I for one want more happiness in the world and I found that sunlight always helps.

 

Most Sincerely,

Giuseppe Filotto 

 

No related posts.

By G | 17 October 2019 | Posted in Catholicism, Christianity, Social Commentary

Logical Challenge to Ann and all nominal Catholics

In order to make this very simple and to show that there is literally not a single valid refutation to the position of Sede Privationism* I have constructed the below logical argument.

Please note there are several resources at the end of the post to find legitimate Mass Centers and clerics

Axiom: The Catholic Church is the true and Valid Church instituted by Jesus Christ on Earth. This is the assumed starting axiomatic point. That is, regardless of if you personally agree or not with it, for the purposes of this argument it is assumed to be true and correct as our starting point.

Question 1. Is the Pio-Benedictine code of canon law of 1917 the legitimate code of Catholic Canon Law that was legitimately and correctly put together by the Church?

If Yes, go on to question 2.

If No, demonstrate this with specificity and exhaustive proof.

 

Question 2. The Vatican II documents are 16 documents produced between 1963 and 1965. Do you agree that in every case these documents contain heresy that is not in keeping with the doctrine of the Catholic Church from the start to at least 1958?
Reference:The Heresies of Vatican II

If Yes, go on to question 3.

If No, you’re probably a vile heretic yourself, but go, on, try and refute even just the linked reference document IN DETAIL and specifics. Honestly, you can’t because facts are facts and objective truth exists.

 

Question 3. How long does it take for someone to be a persistent heretic? A day of teaching heresy as if it were correct dogma even after multiple persons point out it is heresy and a simple check would show this to be true? A month? A year? According to canon 2315, it is 6 months. However, since 1965, is far more than that, and MORE than enough time to declare anyone that purports to be a cleric of the Catholic Church and yet continues to publicly teach heresy, a persistent heretic. And a persistent heretic who teaches such heresy in public and acts, talks, and professes such heresy to be doctrine, has, in fact, defected from the Catholic Faith. This is simple and obvious and reiterated also in canon 2314 part 3, which specifically mentions such clerics whilst referring to canon 188 part 4 (see question 4 below). Just as if a person said “I no longer believe in Jesus Christ or the Church or the Catholic Faith.” In brief then, is 6 moths, knowingly teaching heresy, long enough to declare anyone a persistent heretic? 

If Yes, go on to question 4.

If No, explain your position using logic and reason and Canon Law. But keep in mind we are now (as of 2019) 54 years after 1965, and that, surely, is long enough for sure. Again, there really is no argument against this point, unless you ignore reality, and logic, and reason. And Canon Law instituted by the Magisterium of the Church.

 

Question 4. Given all of the above, it is absolutely clear that any supposed cleric of the Catholic Church who did not stop teaching doctrine as per Vatican II by at the latest 1966, was a persistent heretic. We cannot reasonably expect that a cleric of the church was unaware of the heresies of Vatican II given the clamour, uproar and massive abandoning of the Church by the faithful once these pernicious heresies were introduced along with the fake Novus Ordo Mass. Nor can we reasonably expect any modern cleric to be unaware of the heresies of Vatican II since their entire reason for existing is to protect, promote and further the Church and its doctrine all over the world. It would be like saying a physicist should not necessarily be aware of the equation force = mass x accelration. It is a basic, simple and obvious thing, grasped by any literate layman who cares to look into it for themselves, so there can be no excuse of ignorance for the clergy. As such, such “clergy” has, in fact, vacated their office, as per canon 188 part 4 of the code of canon law, which reads:

Any office becomes vacant upon the fact and without any declaration by tacit resignation recognised by the law itself if a cleric:

Part 4: Publicly defects from the Catholic Faith

This means that ANY cleric (emphasis above added) without the need for ANY DECLARATION, by ANYONE, automatically vacates their office, when they defect publicly from the Catholic Faith (which being a persistent heretic, and a public teacher of the faith, they do) because their crime needs no declaration by anyone, the law itself, the fact of it, the divine, simple reality of it itself, condemns them. The fact they may hold on to the MATERIAL office is irrelevant to the fact that they have vacated the SPIRITUAL office. Hence the point of Sede Privationists, the seat is not empty, it is filled. With an impostor that has no spiritual sanction, office or authority. And not just the seat of the Pope, but the one of ANY cleric that does not specifically reject all of Vatican II and all connected to it as heretical.

So the question is: Given that the Law of 1917 was in full effect in 1958, in 1963, in 1965, in 1975 and so on, there is literally nothing that prevents it from being correctly applied to all these heretical false clerics, as such, there is literally no argument that holds water in this regard, why then, should you ever consider any cleric of the fake New Order as legitimate?

The answer is you should not, for they are NOT valid clerics, which also explains why the Novus Orco Church is so filled with pederasts, predatory homosexuals, fraudsters and so on, and why Bergolgio has been intimately tied to people accused of child trafficking, demonstrated child molesters, pedophiles and rapists of every sort.

Should you have a different answer, feel free to explain it using logic and reason in a comment below. Before you do, you may wish to check on this detailed explanation of Canon 188 though.

*Sede Privationism is the position that the Holy See is not in fact empty (Sede Vacantis – from the Latin meaning Empty Chair) but rather filled, by an impostor, non-valid, fake cleric of the Church, thus Preventing (Privating) the seat from being legitimately filled. 

In case you think the thesis above, which I concluded privately by myself merely from purchasing and reading the code of canon law of 1917, is merely the rantings of someone that hasn’t properly understood things, you need to know that it was, of course, not noticed only by myself sometime in 2016, but by many members of the Church closer to the time when the Vatican II deception and subsequent derailing of the Church took place in the mid 1960s. In fact, it was formally stated in a detailed theological argument by the late Dominican theologian, Fr. M.-L. Guérard des Lauriers, a member of the Pontifical Academy of St. Thomas, at one time a professor in the Pontifical University of the Lateran and in the Saulchoir (France). His thesis called Cassiciacum (from the name of the theological magazine that first made it known) is that Paul VI and his successors, are not formally legitimate. And all actual Catholic Clerics have rejected Vatican II ever since its introduction, the fact that these are few in number in no way diminishes the fact that the True, Holy and Apostolic Catholic Church, persists, and in fact, through the spreading of these truths is rapidly increasing its numbers and will, in due course, survive and overcome the Satanic abomination that currently presents itself as the Catholic Church, but which we know to be simply the Novus Orco church.

There are now, some natural truth that follow from the above logical progression:

1. The people who created Vatican II are necessarily at the very least suspect, and in all probability guilty of intentional heresy. And as such all of their diktats and teachings are to be ignored if not treated as intentionally heretical and damaging to the Church and the Faithful. This was already obvious in any case, since the last legitimate Pope of the Catholic Church (Pious the XII) and a few before him too, all seemed to be very aware of:

  • The depth and scale of the infiltration of Freemasonry into the Church (Luciferian worship in all its various forms –Illuminati, Rosicrucians, etc–) as well as,
  • The bankrupt ideologies Freemasonry promotes (Marxism, feminism, homosexuality, pederastry, pedophilia etc.)  

In a slow but determined effort over the previous two centuries or more, the Catholic Church had been infiltrated by these enemies and whenever they reached positions that permitted it, they would   promote and introduce more of their own number into the Church. Which is how Vatican II happened in the first place. Given this, and given the fact that prudence is a Catholic Virtue, it becomes necessary to assume that anyone involved with the creation of the Vatican II documents is suspect at the very least and as such should not be assumed to be a legitimate cleric. Where such a person also continued and continues to act as if Vatican II and the documents it produced where not heretical, the charge of persistent heretic, in any case already applies, but our concern here is with the deceased who may or may not have been heretics that had in fact put together the Vatican II heresies. Such persons, must, at the very least, for prudence, be considered suspect. So, while All the “Popes” from 1965 on are clearly defectors from the faith since they all promoted Vatican II, we must also ignore the ones that initially instigated Vatican II and the ones who helped later to make it happen. In effect, this means every “Pope” since the 28th of October 1958 must be considered illegitimate and not a valid cleric of the Catholic Church. Certainly we know this is the case for every Pope since at the most charitable, 1965. But we have to ignore the ones who started the process of creating Vatican II as well and leave their judgement to God. Prudence demands it.

2. Any Cleric who does not currently and specifically reject Vatican II publicly and all its fruits and adherents as heretical, is clearly a persistent heretic and as such has vacated their spiritual office and has no standing whatever in the Catholic Church other than as an usurper and impostor. They are to be known as Novus Orco (New Orc) clerics. Servants of the Novus Orco Church. The same one that instituted the “Novus Ordo” (New Order) Mass. Guess what, the “New Order” is the same as the old order of Old Scratch – Servants of Satan.

3. The Novus Ordo Mass, or as we call it, the Novus Orco Mass, is clearly not a valid mass, since it is only performed by invalid clerics. In the modern era, some clerics may in fact be ignorant of the Vatican II heresies, but this is irrelevant because they would have been falsely ordained by false clerics, and so are not in fact legitimate clerics of the Church and none of the sacraments they pretend to offer (and in fact try to pervert) are legitimately offered. But if you want a complete and irrefutable proof that the Novus Orco Mass is completely invalid, see this video, it is a nuclear strike.

4. Since the same fake clerics and servants of Satan that created Vatican II and its heresies also produced the documents that came after Vatican II, the “new” code of canon law of 1983 is clearly not a valid code and is to be ignored in toto, as is any document these Satanists produce. This is obvious in any case, since the “code” of 1983 changes the intent and effect of the doctrine and laws clearly and studiously compiled with such care in the code of 1917. All that one needs to do to see an obvious example of this is to compare the 1917 canon of 188 with its “new” counterpart in the 1983 fake code, which is numbered as 194 in that “work”. Compare them side by side:

 

LEGITIMATE CODE OF 1917
Canon 188
Any office becomes vacant upon the fact and without any declaration by tacit resignation recognized by the law itself if a cleric:

[Items 1 to 3 omitted for clarity…]

4.° Publicly defects from the Catholic Faith;

[Items 5 to 8 omitted for clarity…]

FAKE CODE OF 1983
Canon 194
§1. The following are removed from an ecclesiastical office by the law itself:
1/ a person who has lost the clerical state;
2/ a person who has publicly defected from the Catholic faith or from the communion of the Church;
3/ a cleric who has attempted marriage even if only civilly.§2. The removal mentioned in nn. 2 and 3 can be enforced only if it is established by the declaration of a competent authority.

 

The fake code of canon law of 1983 literally invalidates itself, since part 2 of code 194 directly invalidates the whole point defined as “by the law itself”. And note that the ONLY instance in which the law itself remains valid to remove ecclesiastical office is if a cleric loses clerical state. But how does that happen? It is not known by anyone, since it is not defined, and the whole purpose of this “code” was literally to invalidate the very reasonable law of 1917 which, quite naturally states that non-catholics can’t act as clerics for the Church.

The entire point of canon 188 is completley obviated by the new version of 194 in the pile of dung put togehter as the 1983 “code of canon law”. In similar fashion, missals, etc, and of course the entirety of the Novus Ordo Mass (Novus Orco is its more accurate name), all produced after Vatican II are tools of the enemy to confuse, demoralise, depress and destroy both the faithful as well as the Catholic Church.

Nor is canon 188 alone, in the code of 1917, to mention this point, several other codes either directly support it or are ancillary to it, some examples:

Code 823 § 1. It is not permitted to celebrate Mass in the temples of heretics or schismatics, even if at one time [they were] duly consecrated or blessed.

In other words, since the Vatican-II sect is schismatic and an impostor to the legitimacy of the Catholic Church, even if the Novus Orco Mass were valid (it is not), you would still not be permitted to take part in it in the structures used by these Satanists, even though they used to be consecrated Churches.

Canon 2314
§ 1. All apostates from the Christian faith and each and every heretic or schismatic:
1.° Incur by that fact excommunication;
2.° Unless they respect warnings, they are deprived of benefice, dignity, pension, office, or other duty that they have in the Church, they are declared infamous, and [if] clerics, with the warning being repeated, [they are] are deposed;
3.° If they give their names to non-Catholic sects or publicly adhere [to them], they are by that fact infamous, and with due regard for the prescription of Canon 188, n. 4, clerics, the previous warnings having been useless, are degraded.
[…]

Canon 2315
One suspected of heresy who, having been warned, does not remove the cause of suspicion is prohibited from legitimate acts; if he is a cleric, moreover, the warning having been repeated without effect, he is suspended from things divine; but if within six months from contracting the penalty, the one suspected of heresy does not completely amend himself, let him be considered as a heretic and liable to the penalties for heretics.

Canon 2372
They incur upon the fact a suspension from divine things, reserved to the Apostolic See, who presume to receive orders from one excommunicated or suspended or interdicted after a declaratory or condemnatory sentence, or from a notorious apostate, heretic, or schismatic; but whoever in good faith was ordained by such a one as these lacks the exercise of the orders thus received until he is dispensed.

5. Who are the legitimate Bishops and Valid Clerics and how do you find them? Here are some sites, the first, is particularly useful in finding a traditional Latin Mass, the only legitimate form of the Holy Mass, as used to be performed throughot the Earth, always the same regardless of city, nation or continent, always in Latin and equal all over the world before the Vatican II fake Clerics and infiltrators introduced the Novus Orco Mass.

Where to find Latin Mass

Ecclesia Lux Vera’s Site

Sodalitium Pianum

You may also wish to get inspired about the real Catholic Church by reading the following books of historical fact that describe the action of actual, real, Catholics. Compare these men to the effeminate wet rags of the supposedly Catholic Church (in reality those deceived by the Novus Orcians who have not yet realised it, and yet try to be faithful) and you will understand why precious few men attend the Novus Orco services even if they are not aware they have been deceived, while the attendance at the real Catholic Masses is invariably driven by virile men with ever growing families and feminine wives.

God’S Battalions – Rodney Stark

Bearing False Witness – Rodney Stark

The Crusades – Of Iron Men and Saints – Harold Lamb

You may also wish to purchase my own book, which seems to have converted quite a few people to Christianity, everything ranging from Atheist, Protestant, Agnostic and even one Orthodox Jew have turned to real Catholicism or Eastern Orthodoxy as a result of this book.

No related posts.

By G | 7 September 2019 | Posted in Catholicism, Christianity

Fake Catholics Redux

As I have had a few people tell me how counter-productive and wrong, wrong, wrong, it is for me to tell people who are wrong that they are wrong, well… you know how that’s gonna go.

Let the flame wars begin.

The link to the site I mentioned is canon188.com.

For the illiterates: Redux – from the Latin, “bringing back”.

 

 

No related posts.

By G | 11 November 2018 | Posted in Catholicism, Christianity

Newer Entries »

All content of this web-site is copyrighted by G. Filotto 2009 to present day.
Website maintained by IT monks