Archive for the ‘Catholicism’ Category

Bruce The Deceiver is at it again

In typical, cowardly, effeminate, weak, English, passive-aggressive fashion, Bruce Charlton, or Brucie, as he will henceforth be named, has obviously seen my latest exposition of him for the liar, blackpiller and general heretical gnostic and non-christian sophist that he is.

Because trust me, that little wormtongue checks to see what I say. Except he is too cowardly to actually come out and try and respond, so instead he makes some vagueposting about sedevacantists.

So, because he probably has some kind of humiliation fetish, in line with all his other “quirky” passive aggressive, worm-tonguing, I will oblige, and once more vivisect his rubbish right here at my blog. His rubbish has a grey background to represent the fog-fart nature of his shrivelled soul.

JRR Tolkien and the disaster of the Second Vatican Council (Vatican II) – implications for the legalistic sedevacantist position

To judge by his behaviour (if not by his explicit statements) there seems little doubt that JRR Tolkien regarded the consequences of the Second Vatican Council with a combination of deep dismay and horror; indeed, I once wrote that Vatican II may have been the most deeply dismaying event of Tolkien’s whole life. 

His friend (and fellow Catholic) George Sayer; believed that Tolkien saw little or nothing wrong with the pre-Vatican II Roman Catholic Church. 

Well, Brucie, that would be because there was little to nothing wrong with the pre-Vatican II Catholic Church. I mean, it was already infested to the gills with communists, homosexuals and Freemasons, as history has proven, and Bella Dodds has confessed, along with other undeniable proofs, some of which I highlighted in my book Reclaiming the Catholic Church. But that problem aside, the Dogma of The Church was as pristine as it has ever been. Not that most would know it, since most have literally no actual idea what the dogma of the Catholic Church is. They only THINK they do, thanks to 500 years of Satanic/Protestant lies, as even other honest Protestants will readily admit, like the Baptist Rodney Stark in his Bearing False Witness, or the man who wrote The Four Witnesses, Rod Bennett, who ended up converting as a result of reading up on the first 200 years of Christianity.

This is worth contemplating because it shows that a Catholic as devout as Tolkien could be in deep opposition to Vatican II; but without making reference to “legalistic” aspects of the validity of Papal elections. I imagine Tolkien would have found that whole “sedevacantist” line of argument on both sides to be extremely distressing and fraught with dangers – especially when engaged-in by lay people. 

God, Brucie, you’re such a raging faggot. Let me explain ladies and gents: Here, Brucie, while he waves his wrist limply in my general direction but without ever making eye contact, is trying to imply that because people like me (probably, as far as Brucie knows, and thinks, and expects) respect the memory of Tolkien not just as a writer (personally I respect him a lot more for having literally invented the Elvish language. JRR would have been an absolute genial game master for a Dungeons and Dragons game!) but as a Catholic.

So, because Brucie says so, I (and other sedevacantists) are supposed to now assume that Brucie had a direct line of knowing what JRR would have thought or said about Sedevacantism, and because Bruce says so, we should recoil in horror at taking a position Brucie imagines JRR might have had (should have, according to Brucie, nay would have had) with respect to Sedevacantism. That’s right ladies and gents, we are supposed to assume because Brucie says so, that Tolkien would have wagged a stern finger in our direction and told us: Bad Catholic! Submit to a fake Pope.

Seriously. How passive aggressive and sophistic and gay, GAY, Brucie, GAY, do you have to be to behave like such a little, whiny, bitch?

Besides which, what do you care? You like the Moronic Mormons. Go find yourself a tuba hat with a “seer-stone” in it so you can decipher your own bullshit, eh, Brucie?

This may have some implications for traditionalist Catholics who all agree that the RCC took a severe wrong turn, a down-turn and movement towards apostasy, with the Second Vatican Council. 

Oh Mah GAWD! Brucie! Bring out the fainting couches! IMPLICATIONS you say (with emphasis on YOU SAY) Good God Brucie, what’s next? Will CONSEQUENCES ever be the same again, now, after the IMPLICATIONS?

My point is that the disastrous nature of Vatican II may be regarded as common ground among serious Roman Catholics. And indeed all serious Christians of any- or no-denomination, who wish for the recovery and renewal of spiritual health in the largest and most influential Christian church – this may be common ground quite apart from the legal arguments. 

What a transparent and ineffective satanist you are Brucie.

Translation: Because Catholics recognise that the Novus Ordo is just the latest and most noxious branch of Protestant heresy (with apology to the Protestants, really, because the Novus Orco really is Satanic) everyone should come together and all be “christians” together. Making the satanic nonsense of the fake churches a common cause, why a… a… dare I say it, a fraternity even, you know, like in the Freemason words of “Spiritual Fraternity among men of Goodwill”. What’s your code name in the “brotherhood” Brucie? I propose if they haven’t given you a Freemason codename yet you ask for Brucie-of-the-flower.

In other words; sedevacantism can reasonably be regarded as one of several (or many) possible hypotheses for explaining the disastrous effect of Vatican II; and, most importantly, how to set it right. 

And here he is, trying to add sewage to sedevacantism. The usual sewage by the way, nothing original even.

“Oh it’s just a THEORY!”

“Just one of many HYPOTHESES, you see”

“It’s all very LEGALISTIC and COMPLICATED, you see.”

No Brucie, No.

It’s childishly simple. The Catholic Church has and always had, unchangeable divine dogma, which is ALL codified, and was ALL collated and summarised and approved by the INFALLIBLE Magisterium of the Church in the Code of Canon Law of 1917.

That’s ALL the Rules of Catholicism from the year zero to 1917 all in one place, Brucie. And guess what, as Code 188 part 4 makes eminently clear, as do ALL the other even tangentially related codes to it, ANYONE, who publicly defects from the faith —which teaching heresy as though it was valid doctrine counts and always has counted as doing so— is no longer a representative of the Church, and NO ONE need say or approve, or pass ANYTHING. Its done. The law itself convicts them. It’s VERY clear, and VERY simple. A Child gets it. If you are NOT a CATHOLIC, you are not in the club. You can’t speak for it, you are not part of it, you are irrelevant to it, and even anything you did while you might have been a member before then, becomes instantly invalid and worthless. It’s Very, very, very, simple and only sophists and freemasons like you have tried to make it “complicated” by lying, and lying, and lying, with every breath you take.

It is indeed possible that the sedevacantist legal arguments for why the papal seat is empty might be true; but the legalistic solutions may nonetheless be ineffective or counter-productive in solving the Roman Catholic Church’s many and deep problems. 

Hahahhahahah and here he reveals his true nature. Pay attention to what he says:

“Oh yes, X may be true, but we can’t have truth be used to solve anything!”

“No, no, truth is counter-productive to solving anything, you see?!”

What a disgusting creature. He probably has candle-lit dinners with Jordan Peterson, while they agree on truth being untruth.

That is, indeed, my opinion – I mean that the sedevacantist solutions (i.e. their advocated approach to dealing with the RC problems) are ineffective, and would be counter-productive: they are wrong in their spirit. 

Firstly Brucie, no one, literally no one on Earth gives a flying crap about your opinion. You are absolutely irrelevant to everyone with the possible exception of your cat, if you have one. But even if some misguided soul cared anything for your opinion, let me assure you that not a single Catholic does. That is Sedevacantist or even just nominally ignorant lay Novus Order kind that is simply fooled by the impostors pretending to be Pope and Bishops and priests. Because you are NOT Catholic Bruce. You’re a Gnostic. You are the enemy. We really don’t consider you at all other than as I am doing now, to make an example of you for others to point and laugh at the tarring and feathering and ass-kicking you’re getting here metaphorically speaking.

Secondly, who on Earth would YOU be to judge what is or is not wrong “in the Spirit” whatever that new-age-gnostic phrase is supposed to mean. You silly, cowardly wormtongue, Brucie, go fret for your tuba hat and the Angel Moroni, go on, get out of here, you spiritually empty sack of lies.

And third, Sedevacantism is growing by leaps and bounds. Our Churches are literally bursting at the seams, with often standing room only, and guess what, it’s young people in them. People making children. LOTS of Children Brucie. I know, I know, a lifelong incel like you can’t understand, especially given the faggotry you speak, but believe me Brucie, Sedevacantism is booming.

Because I think it can be known in advance – from multiple experiences in multiple churches – that legal solutions will not have a good effect; that a re-set is impossible (and the attempt undesirable) because it will empower the wrong people and set faithful Catholics at each others throats… 

Again, first, NOTHING can be known in advance, especially not by “people” to use the term loosely, like you.

Secondly there has never been any such thing as “multiple experiences in multiple churches” the way you mean it, because there is no such thing as “multiple churches”. There is ONE Church, Brucie, the ONE, True, Holy, and Apostolic CATHOLIC CHURCH.

It doesn’t matter if YOU believe in it or not. None of us care. It is an unchangeable Catholic dogma that there is no salvation outside of the Catholic Church, so there IS only one Church. The Catholic one. Obviously. And logically. Because unlike what “people” like you want to pretend, Brucie, there is only ONE truth. Can only BE one truth. Either Catholicism is true, in which case we are right, or it is not, in which case Christianity doesn’t exist. And again, it doesn’t matter if you and the rest of the world disagrees. We don’t care. We never have cared in two millennia. Catholicism IS Christianity and the ONLY Christians are Catholics.

Thirdly, there is absolutely nothing to “re-set”. The Catholic Church continues as it always did undisturbed. All that Vatican II did is expose all the fake Catholics, those too lazy to learn the facts, those too lazy to hold the line. And of course, the infiltrating Satanists. It’s fine, we’re fine. As I said, our Churches continue to grow and basic game theory makes it mathematically obvious that by being as we are, either eventually we win, or, it’s the end times and we win anyway too. Besides which, either way, the current goings on are all prophesied, so we really have nothing to worry about.

Lastly, faithful Catholics are never at each other’s throats. Stop making shit up. Catholics call out deceivers, gnostics, satanist, and liars like yourself, because it is the duty of every Catholic to do so, and we will always call your kind and Bergoglio’s and all the fake impostors out. But there is never any issue between faithful Catholics. Because we’re all one family. Of course, those genuinely deceived into thinking the Novus Ordo is the “real” Church are just fooled ignorants at best and very lazy ones in the worst cases, but all it takes is a little study and they will see the truth. And THAT is what you fear Brucie, which is why you keep attacking the Sedevacantists, unlike any other of the fake denominations you carry water for. Including the absurd Mormons with their insane idea that a sex pervert with a tuba hat with a “seer-stone” in it was the only one that could decipher the hidden scrolls from the Angel Moroni, and that those pronouncements created the Book of Mormon. That is who you publicly carry water for the most in fact. You’re such an obvious degenerate, infiltrating, miserable, sad little clown Brucie.

That this negative potential can be known in advance from experience, and legalism eschewed, even despite that (probably) nobody has yet proposed any other clearly promising and practical way of genuinely revitalizing the Roman Catholic Church in the West. 

There is nothing to “revitalise” never has been. The Novus Orco is not Catholic, so you go ahead and “revitalise” it any gay way you want, Brucie. The actual Catholic Church and its practitioners will continue on as we always have and continue to grow our churches and communities and families.

For what little it is worth; I suspect that an answer might be found in the actual practice of Roman Catholicism at its Christian best; rather than in abstract theories about the matter. 

Sedevacantism IS the practice of Catholicism, Brucie. So you have that as a pesky little spanner in your intended works of subversion. Because nothing else IS.

Something to do with the lives of ordinary Catholics (including ‘ordinary’ Saints); rather than the models and hypotheses of canon lawyers, theologians, philosophers, church bureaucrats or the like.  

Look at the wormtongueing. It’s almost impressive. Here Brucie is trying to say that Catholic Canon Lawyers, Catholic Philosophers, Catholic Theologians and validly ordained Catholic Clergy (that’s what he means by bureaucrats) have the wrong model of Catholicism. The arrogance in even trying this trick is stunning. Incidentally exposing Brucie’s narcissistic streak in thinking he can get away with it.

It’s a sleight of hand of course, he’s pretending your average street crier with a megaphone is the equivalent of an actual Catholic priest. Or that your current day “philosopher”, who is unaware after 4 years of University that Logic is indispensable in philosophy, is somehow comparable to, say, Thomas Aquinas. It’s all implied you see, none of it spelt out, typical sophist language. Letting your own mind fill in the false “gaps” he implies without stating.

And ending off with that “humble” appeal to “just ordinary folks” don’t you see? Good old Marxist approach, eh Brucie? I’m starting to wonder if you may have been born in a synagogue, Brucie.

The problem you have Brucie, is that “ordinary Catholics” who are actually Catholic, are all, in the main, kinda like me. Really not susceptible to your lies. Because once you have seen the truth Brucie, you can’t be so easily fooled again. And the lies of your kind are failing more and more regularly and more and more people see you for the masked soul-robber you are.

Maybe the most luminous, rich, and inspiring aspects of the pre-Reformation Catholic ‘world’ – something rather like GK Chesterton’s imaginative pictures of “Merrie England” – could be found to contain clues toward the changes that are needed and would work and could grow; and also (and vital) what aspects ought to be de-emphasized… 

You shameless vermin, someone should really slap your mouth for daring to mention good men like Tolkien or Chesterton in that whore’s hole you speak your nonsense out of. Chesterton and Tolkien were proper Catholics, which is why Tolkien made a point to LOUDLY protest the Novus Ordo fake Mass every single time he went to Church. He would have got on just fine with us other Catholics. i.e. Sedevacantists. Especially since he died in 1973, when the situation had hardly crystallised, since Vatican II ended at the end of 1965, and people were still trying to see if there was anything salvageable. De Laurier’s only published his thesis on Sedeprivationism in 1979, six years after Tolkien had already passed on. And Lefebvre opened his SSPX seminary only in 1970. Both of these in continental Europe, not England. So Brucie is also imagining things that are counter to likelihood by many orders of magnitude. I feel quite certain that had Tolkien been able to transported to today, he would almost without a doubt be a Sedevacantist.

Selected cuttings from that ancient tree of faithful living might be planted to yield new and different fruits, but recognizably derived from the same root stock. 

And again, in the end, he gives himself away as the modernist deceiver he is.

No Brucie, Catholicism is not Protestantism. We don’t do “branches”.

Oh, and Brucie…? Every time you lift your head above the parapet to try and lob dirt on Catholicism, that is, the ONLY Catholicism left, Sedevacantism, I’ll be here.

No related posts.

By G | 22 November 2023 | Posted in Catholicism, Freemasons, Gammas, Impostors and Frauds, Sedevacantism

Kurgan Woodchipper Time!

Behold, ladies and gentlemen, yet another volunteer, sacrificing himself on the altar of the gods of retards, at the pious hands of your dutiful servant, my humble self.

Let us begin the mental flaying of this latest of LARPing retards.

First off, Moron of Simba, I don’t actually read Z blog. I have read it perhaps a handful of times in 10 years and certainly not in the last several months for sure, so I am not sure what made you think that. But then, as some famous Romans probably said before crushing some now extinct species of troglodytes: There is no accounting for retards.

That’s a literary joke for those who know some latin. Never mind, just hear the WOOSH sound and move on Moron.

Secondly, I have zero narcissistic personality traits. If you could actually read and if you did, you would have discovered that long ago, since I have explained my specific type of neurology in some detail. In any case, everyone that knows me personally can also attest that I have zero narcissistic personality traits. You, of course, being the usual retard, couldn’t tell the difference between a chicken and a donkey anyway, so it’s pointless to try to explain anything to you, nor, provide you with factual evidence. We know this without shadow of a doubt because you claim to be a someone who worships a “god” who sucks semen out of other men’s penises, including those of dead men. I didn’t claim this, you have:

Now, we know for a fact, that no one, literally no one, including retards like you, would get martyred in the name of the mythical cocksucker Odin. So, yes, you are a LARPer. To every single effect.

You are stupid, ignorant, obviously have massive latent homosexual tendencies or might be a raging homo yourself, given who you worship —or pretend to worship to be more accurate— and without doubt you are also a liar. We know this because you say you “don’t mind” about any of the false things you accuse me of doing, and yet, you felt the need to write this comment to show me how much you don’t mind.

Moving on…

You also conflate confidence with narcissism, once again, demonstrating your sub-par IQ and poor language as well as reasoning skills all-round. And ascribe my confidence to my success with women. Another tragic error. While learning about women, being a skill like anything else, certainly made my confidence in being able to attract women I was interested in grow —again, as with any other skill, if you practice it you get better at it— my personal generic level of confidence did not arise from this, but was there long before that and was developed in pretty early childhood; insofar as it can be developed beyond being an innate quality that is probably genetic on some level.

And the cherry on the top being your accusation that Catholicism is a) MY brand of anything, which is clearly absurd unless you think I am Jesus, in which case, your mental problems are even more severe than even I can imagine, b) “random”, given it’s literally the very root, beginning, middle and eventually end (at least insofar as the End Times are the “end” of anything) of Christianity. Catholicism IS Christianity. Now, if I were a Protestant, you might be able to accuse me of having rolled dice (lots of them!) or, more realistically using a large random number generator to pick a brand of fake Christianity, but you’re really shit out of luck on this one. Especially if you could read. At all.

So, yes, overall, you have succeeded in demonstrating (as usual) that:

  • “Pagans” are fake, gay retards
  • Actual “viking type” Pagans have gone the way of the dodo, except about a thousand years ago. Know why, retard? Because they ALL converted to Catholicism and then went on to become Crusaders, you stupid, stupid, ignorant, illiterate, ahistorical LARPer.
  • You can’t read. And never have picked up a book beyond probably Harry Potter, who you thought was ok but only a Wicca, not a real Shaman.
  • My detractors are by and large idiots like yourself who need to wear sandals because shoelaces prove impossible for them to figure out.

Thanks for playing. Buh-bye now.

*Shoves drooling idiot into mass grave of spammed morons*

No related posts.

By G | 20 November 2023 | Posted in Catholicism, Humour, Social Commentary, Zombie Apocalypse

The Bonobo Problem

Imagine if you Bonobos could speak like humans, with a near full vocabulary, but retained their bonobo interests and brains although they were trying to pretend to be the rightful rulers of Earth. In short: Planet of the Apes, the original film.

Then imagine these apes pretending to discuss an item of basic philosophy or religion, or metaphysics. And imagine how you might feel and what you might think observing them.

Any attempt at trying to seriously engage with them on the topic would be utterly frustrating, as you might only get a few basic concepts across before their limited ape brain got them back to talking about bananas and how they are intrinsic to the question at hand. Or how rutting with the nearest female bonobo right then and there was. All the while pretending they are sophisticated philosophers even as they rape the nearest female and shortly eat the banana she was trying to keep for herself.

Would you get angry and beat the male and try and educate him? Would you take the banana from him and at least try to prevent him from stealing it from the other ape? Would any of it be worth doing at all?

Or you might poke at them with a stick or a sentence, to see what they might do. You might get more fond of one or two oft mhm who seemed to have some beginning of a kind of understanding, or more human-like behaviour. But in the end, you would realise they are bonobos.

Arrogant as it will sound, this is very often the case I encounter when I come across the average “theologian on the internet”. They say the most absurd and retarded things, with no basis in the factual information they are pretending to base their opinions on. Literally none.

So, I am often finding myself making comment like this one:

And people think “Oh, what a rude bigot!”

Insofar as they think of anything at all past the nearest fetching female ape with a banana in hand, that is.

But you see, for the half-dozen or so of you that might not be apes who actually read and comprehend… the fact is that I didn’t just become a Sedevacantist (that is a proper Catholic) by chance. I wasn’t born into it. I rejected religion as a whole in general and Catholicism as it was preached to me by the then Novus Ordo (but probably validly ordained) priest we had come talk to us in school when I was 7. I have read thousands of books and probably hundreds on various concepts of physics, astronomy, philosophy, various religions, and metaphysical beliefs. I literally read hundreds of research papers on everything from neurology to ESP testing. I practiced various forms of martial arts and the associated exercises of mental and physical control that goes with them. I have read pretty much everything Milton Erikson wrote on hypnosis and practices self hypnosis on myself for over a year and a half before I tried it on anyone else. I have yet to fail at a single session of smoking cessation done on others and have helped people heal even from clinically diagnosed paranoid schizophrenia that meant they were on mandated medication. I have read enough stuff on neuroscience and tested various practices on myself to know most doctors haven’t got a clue of the level of brain-body-mind connection that exists and how much it is interrelated.

So, when I had a unique, Road to Damascus experience, I didn’t just go “Oh, right, I’m Catholic now!”.

Nope, I spent the next 4 years obsessively reading and researching Christianity, which I had already read up on a lot of stuff before already, but now I went back to the very earliest writings on it and started there. And slowly but surely it became obvious that Catholicism was far and away the closest interpretation of reality as it actually is that exists. And I didn’t just assume this. I tested it. I tested it scientifically with prayer and various methods of belief and so on. And my life radically changed path in ways that are literally nothing short of miraculous.

If you take the approach I did to Christianity, which is to assume nothing, to release all and any preconceived ideas you had and just do the work of researching it from the very baseline, it becomes absolutely impossible to assume that Protestant-anything has any validity whatsoever.

That’s because Christianity absolutely has rules. Which, of course, is perfectly logical. If God is good and loving and logical (the word Logos literally is part of Christianity) it makes absolute sense that you have rules and things you can do and things you should not do. And things that you need to do and things you need to NOT do. Simply saying “I believe in God and Christ is King!” just is NOT enough. Nor would it be enough for anyone even remotely reasonable and good. That level of “belief” is literally identical to the one demons have. They know God is real and they know Jesus is King. Which is why they have to flee before him and people who invoke his name with true faith in our Lord.

And if you study Christianity, you realise that Catholicism IS Christianity. It always was. Infallible Popes and everything else. And you realise the lies told about it and the eternal and relentless attacks against it from the very start. And you also begin to see how the politics and byzantine machinations of the East led them to splinter away for purely human and worldly reasons, even though they recanted their errors several times, even four centuries later at the ecumenical council in Florence. What is more, you see the fruits of Catholicism literally throughout the world. And as you continue to study you begin to realise the evil of freemasonry, Satanism and the Judaic principles behind it all. And you begin to appreciate a lot more exactly what Jesus meant in Revelation 3:9. Or how America came about and who made it as it is, and who controls it to this day.

You begin to see the French Revolution and the so-called “Enlightenment” and the Industrial Revolution in a new light and why they had to happen after the staged Rebellion by the fat German sex pervert, aided by the wife-murdering, impotent, English King.

You begin to understand the absolute majestic heroism of the Crusaders and the vicious lies told about them by Protestant historians for centuries.

You begin to grasp the treachery of the Eastern “orthodox” backstabbers and the further lies they tell about the oh so “unjust” fourth Crusade that sacked Constantinople. Which was eminently just in the scheme of things, and rightly and deservedly so, by the logic of any reasonable man.

Then you read the Code of Canon Law of 1917 and you begin to now really understand why what you always thought WAS the Catholic Church in fact is no such thing and hasn’t been since 1958, when the first fake Catholic, a confirmed freemason named Angelo Roncalli, took over the papcy by an completely invalid “election” with many more fremasons already entrenched in the Vatican. After that foul day on the 28th October 1958, there has not been a valid pope since and almost the entirety of the catholic Clergy became apostate and heretical by continuing to promote the absolute and obvious heresy of Vatican II. Absolute and obvious to anyone who has bothered to do what I did and research the history and the ways of Christianity from the very first principles, without any preconceived idea of what I might or “should” find.

So, you then go and investigate both he fake Bergoglian-led home of pederastry, communism, and lies, and you compare it to your investigation of Sedevacatnist priests and bishops and their congregations. And here it becomes obvious that the Novus Ordo clergy are really Novus Orco. Just new orcs, spouting the same gnostic and satanic lies all attackers of christianity always spouted. They are fake and they know they are fake. Perhaps the very newer and younger priests aren’t aware even of Vatican II, but if that is so, whose fault is it? If I study to be an engineer, do I not learn about bending moments? Catholicism is not magic. It is based on reasons and logic. there is a REASON why it was Catholic monks that invented the scientific method and applied it to pretty much everything.

But the Novus Orco “Church” is fake and gay and pederastic, and the fruits it produces are the same, rancid and abusive. It literally has nothing to do with actual Catholicism, which is now, exclusively the purview of Sedevacantists. Nor is it my opinion that makes it so. It is the same, logic, reason, and scientific method that does so. With he added benefit that it is supernaturally protected from error by Jesus’s promise to always be with “us” that is, the church.

All the rules of Catholicism are written down. And why would they not be for any ACTUAL RELIGION BASED IN TRUTH?!?

It’s not write your own rules, nor choose your own adventure book and if you don’t like the outcome you just choose differently until you get the result you want. A real God that Loves us would have a way for us to KNOW the rules and for them to be clear and simple, and available. Even despite EVERY human being being flawed and imperfect. THAT is the amazing, miraculous thing. If you read the Code of Canon Law of 1917, it is absolutely obvious that a society based on these rules would produce amazingly good results. And we have 2,000 years of proof of it too. Literally no other religion on Earth even comes close to having done what Catholicism has done for humanity. CATHOLICISM. Not some vague and corrupted “christianity”.

And protestantism has brought us, in straight line order:

  • Contraception, which leads to sex before marriage and sex for entertainment. Which in turns leads to…
  • Divorce. Which was only accepted by Protestant denominations in Christianity and at first still thought of as pretty scandalous, so they went ahead with…
  • Fault-free divorce. Which of course led to…
  • Sex as mere sport/entertainment/pleasure with no connection to marriage, which naturally led to…
  • Killing babies so they don’t get in the way of having sex just for “fun”. And killing them by the most horrific way possible by sucking them out of the womb in pieces, ripping them limb from limb. And by the MILLIONS. Every. Single. Year.
  • Gay “marriage” which leads to…
  • Child trafficking. Because that is literally what adoption by homosexuals is, since they are obviously unable to reproduce naturally. Which leads to…
  • Transgenderism and the associate child abuse and sexual mutilation.

And so on and so forth. You can scream and shout and tell me that the Novus Orco “Catholic” Church is now heading down the same path led by its “pope” Bergoglio, and I of course agree with you. The Novus Orco is a creation of Protestants and Jews.

No seriously, I am not making this up. The entire set-up of Vatican II was the result of consultation with protestants and Jews. People who historically obviously never had any input whatsoever into Catholicism. Don’t take my word for it. I wrote a book of 530 page with lots of references in it. Try and prove me wrong if you can.

So… perhaps now you understand why when some brainwashed protestants, with all the best of intentions, I am sure, gets all shouty about how the Catholic Church is not the Real, One, True, Holy and Apostolic Church, I hover between wanting to bitchslap them le Valette style, until they recant —and I’d probably be happy to do the same 4 months in jail for it if it means every other cretin becomes aware of the reality of behaving like such a retarded ape— or laughing in their face and scrubbing them entirely from my life forever, as I would any annoying and irrelevant insect.

In fact, it is my rather miserly level of Christian charity that keeps me engaged from time to time with the rutting bonobos and their cursed bananas. Because I know, in such efforts, the few who are capable, who can read, who are not impossibly lazy and illiterate, may and do pick up the thread and do the research, and in time, they may get there. And getting there is the important part.

Whether they do so through my books or not is not important, though it does save a lot of time, since I have put a lot of references for people to verify for themselves within them.

I have been told by several people who also happen to admit that on investigation, they really cannot falsify or deny my logic and hence they too should really be Sedevacantists, that one of the things that prevents them from doing so at times is the WAY I present this information. With sarcasm, humiliating examples of people’s ignorance, and ridicule of their sophistry and ruthless exposition of their lies. You can go look at the videos I did on Jay Dyer if you want, to see their point.

But I feel the only point they have is that perhaps, my behaviours in that respect might earn me a little more time in purgatory (assuming I make it there). Firstly, Jesus himself was not averse to insulting, ridiculing and generally making the Pharisees and the idiots look like liars and morons, so, you know, I feel I’m on fairly solid ground here.

But more importantly, the number of people who have written to thank me and have gone on to get baptised, confirmed, married and proceeded to have their friends and family become interested and closer to doing so themselves outnumbers the complainers of my lack of “decorum” by at least two orders of magnitude. That’s times 100 for those of you who are not sure what an order of magnitude is (x 10).

So… if you’re holding your breath for me to become a softer, gentler, kinder Kurgan with the fake Pagans, the sophists, the morons, the Protestants, the “Orthodox”, the liars and especially the fake, Satanic Clergy of the Novus Orco, well… good luck with that.

No related posts.

By G | 19 November 2023 | Posted in Actual Science, Believe, Catholicism, Christianity, Reclaiming the Catholic Church, Sedevacantism, The Jews

The Root of All Evil

This is probably going to piss off most of my readers. Well, brace yourselves, boys and girls, after all, I am not a millionaire because I really suck at telling people lies they’d rather hear instead of cold hard facts that upset their fragile egos.

Some premises are in order before I blow your minds:

  • This overview is a synergistic whole based on VALID and VERY significant statistical realities.
    • Which means Not All X Are Like That is an OBVIOUS point, and being obvious needs not be mentioned. Especially in screaming, frantic, Bommer CAPS LOCK.
    • While stacking statistical reality on statistical reality generally reduces the overall “certainty” of the final conclusion, that also depends on the size of the data set and the certainty of each statistical reality being stacked. The data sets here are absolutely staggeringly huge and also consistent over several centuries of time, so… kinda like: The Sun Rises in the East type of thing. Sure it might not ALWAYS have had, hypothetically, if the Moon is an alien dormant spaceship placed there by Annunnaki, or a meteor hit the Earth long ago and changed a lot of its astronomical properties, or… theoretically, if it might happen yet… you see where I am going with this.
  • The historical realities I will mention are probably not all known to you and you may very well be skeptical about them, please do your own research and realise google and most search engines are quite compromised on pretty much anything involving the Jews, Freemasons, and so on. That said, don’t take my word for it, check it out for yourselves. If you want a general reference book that has a LOT of the murkier stuff already proven beyond doubt, along with references and so on, you can read my Reclaiming the Catholic Church. It’s 530 pages, but not a single person I know that has read it has said it is in any way boring. But otherwise, do your own work. I will not spend weeks providing links etc to every premise detailed below. I will add enough general information to give you a starting point and then if you want to refute what I am saying, please, unless you want to be banned without any warning whatever (and permanently because I just spam you and never look back) read the rules for commenting here. Intellectual honesty is not optional. Neither is the dialectic form of argument. You can add rhetoric at will to it, but the point must be solidly founded on dialectic. Sophistry of any kind is an immediate ban too.

Right Then. Let us begin, so that you may learn where and what the real root of pretty much all evil on our planet today comes from and is based on. In order to do so, we need to be aware of several things.

Here is the TL;DR version:

Know the History of Evil

The History of it of course, goes back right to the very creation of mankind, but here, today, we will concern ourselves only with the last 500 years or so of it.

Protestantism is not Christianity

  • Martin Luther was probably a Jewish hit-man, with the task of literally trying to destroy Catholicism. He changed the Bible that had been used for over 1500 years by literally everyone, denied the Papacy which, again, literally everyone for over 1,000 years accepted as it was, and then, totally illogically, said the Bible was the ONLY source of doctrine or theology, when:
    • The Bible itself refers to traditions outside of it
    • He changed the Bible to begin with, so we must suppose that he meant the Martin Bible, as opposed to the one that…
    • Oh, yeah, CATHOLICS put together, some 300 years after Jesus ascended, using…
    • OOOPPSSS…oral and written tradition to decide what went in and what was left out of the actual Bible. Yeaahhh kinda embarrassing for the whole Sola Scriptura thing.
    • Oh an also tried to remove James entirely from the Bible and add the word “alone” after the words “justified by faith”. Yeaahhh kinda embarrassing for the whole Sola Fide thing.
  • Over 40,000 denominations of Protestantism exist today, and that’s being generous since literally, the entire premise of Protestantism is that each man should interpret the Bible by himself, so in reality there are some 700 million versions and more. A ridiculous situation that clearly goes against the Biblical instructions to be one Church united, to not accept any teachings that are not apostolic ally approved and so on.
  • Since anyone can be a Protestant “pastor” there is absolutely no Apostolic succession and literally no difference in “teachings” from one Protestant “pastor” or a Wiccan or a reader of Harry Potter, since, literally, the only rule Protestantism has is the demonic: “Interpreth as thou wilt”. They literally have no firm standards at all and as such can’t even call each other heretic, because they all are.
  • The lies spread by Protestants about Catholicism and the Catholic Church are literally endless, but even honest Protestants are at least somewhat aware of this. See Rodney Stark and Rod Bennett.

Protestantism created Freemasonry

There really is no way around this at all.

  • King James, a flamboyantly gay man, a fact that was known then and somewhat hidden now, except that his love letters to hi various male lovers are published, so there really is no doubt, started Freemasonry with their temples, black masses, sodomitical and sacrilegious orgies and so on. He also commissioned the King’s James Bible, which is also known as the Freemasonic Bible. It contains over 33,000 “errors” of translation to reduce the importance and place of Mary, the Holy Spirit and Jesus too. And was taken from the version of the “Bible” that had been edited by the literal Pharisees that hated Jesus, and had him killed by the Romans.

Freemasonry is Satanic

Again, there really is no way around this. This is not the only 5 hour long video, on the topic, and though slightly irritating in presentation format, if you get over the first few minutes and move to the factual stuff that is presented and undeniable, you will find it impossible to deny. There are several such videos. And books. Go research on your own.

Freemasonry, Illuminati, Carbonari, Rosicrucians, their name is Legion

All of the above structures operate on three baseline principles:

  • Secrecy. This is a typical aspect of gnosticism, that is heretics, Satanists and so on. They will give various excuses for why their demonic nonsense needs to remain secret, but the reality is that the internal practices after a certain level has been reached, become progressively and more obviously Satanic. Secrecy allows them to indoctrinate people for long periods of time before they “move up the ladder” so to speak, by which time, even if perhaps originally ignorant, the “student” has now been corrupted and compromised to the point that he is both indoctrinated as well as blackmail able.
  • Playing both sides of the same coin. Freemasons will have people in both the extremely liberal side of an issue as well as the supposedly “conservative” side of an issue. Both sides will work at getting “true believers” to avoid the path of true Catholicism, truth, courage, honesty, and basically all the Human virtues of Western Civilisation which Catholicism propagated. Examples of such gatekeeping grifters are Emo Jones, Milo Yankmypoulos, Tay-Tay Marshall and Gay Gary “Michelle” Voris, and that’s just to name a few of the “pretend Trad Catholics”. There are many, many, many of these freemasons and their lapdogs in all spheres of life, from comic books, to the mass media (where they are a large majority), almost the entirety of the entertainment world, and of course politics of any kind.
  • Reducing and undercutting as well as subverting any type of human dignity, heroic impulses, and generally the virtues that make heroes. This is covered in more detail in my book Reclaiming The Catholic Church and is a stated strategy of theirs, which is also perfectly in line with their “god” Lucifer, who, of course hates Humanity and revels in making human beings debase themselves in every way imaginable.
  • It is, of course a given that they will pretend to be ANYTHING, while lying so ferociously, and unashamedly, that normal people are usually unable to grasp that anyone can really lie on that scale, and as such they often think along the lines of “Well, perhaps they are exaggerating a bit, but where there is smoke…” And yes there is fire, but not because anything they say is true, but only because in every way it is designed to make you go to Hell.

Freemasonry is responsible for the destruction of all Royal Houses in Europe

Once again, this is really not in dispute once you look into it. It does take some digging though, because they obviously don’t advertise this point much, but the documents of the Carbonari made this extremely clear, as well as the known actions of known Freemasons like Mazzini in the “unification” of Italy, and later of Europe by similar means and so on. The extermination of the Russian Tsar, etcetera. the only Royal house to “survive” is the entirely corrupted on of Windsor, where the male sons are all circumcised by a Jewish Rabbi, and have been for centuries. One might ask why, of course, but one is unlikely to get an answer.

The reason for the destruction of the Royal Houses was because since the days of Charlemagne, Kings had been thought of as Divinely ordained to be Kings. That is, NOT that a King was put there by God Himself as the rightful ruler and everyone should obey him, but rather that God allowed such men to become Kings. It was then up to such men themselves, to comport themselves in keeping with being good Catholics. As such, the populace understood that if a man was good and obeyed the Catholic rules, their lot would be lighter and easier, and if he was not, it would be darker and heavier. And indeed this was the case for centuries. The First World War was instigated in part in order to “break” the link of loyalty between peasants and the nobility. The Marxist (who was a Jew) ideas of Communism (also a Jewish concept) were supposed to destroy the social gap between the working class and aristocracy. And yet, despite the tragic loss of life in these fomented brother wars, in the main, people still accepted mostly, that they belonged to this o that social strata, and aside some possibility of movement here and there, in the main accepted it. Because once again, the concept of Royalty being a Godly ordained (albeit very human) order, resided in most people’s minds.

The Church was far too powerful to attack directly as long as the enforcing arm of the Church (lay nobility) continued to exist and command the respect of the common people. And so, the work began in earnest right away, pretty much as soon as the Freemasons and the Illuminati and the Carbonari each were “started”.

America is a Freemasonic Country and was so from the Start

The American revolution against Britain was funded by French money. French money which was “advised” to be spent thusly by the Freemasons at the court of King Louis XVI and Marie Antoniette, and had already begun to cause troublesome economic hardship right before the War of independence started in 1775.

From Wikipedia (hardly a bastion of historical truth in such matters, proving that even there these facts are not exactly refuted, even if not highlighted):

By the time of the Flour War of 1775, a series of riots (due to the high price of flour and bread) had damaged her reputation among the general public. Eventually, Marie Antoinette’s reputation was no better than that of the favourites of previous kings. Many French people were beginning to blame her for the degrading economic situation, suggesting the country’s inability to pay off its debt was the result of her wasting the crown’s money.[40] In her correspondence, Marie Antoinette’s mother, Maria Theresa, expressed concern over her daughter’s spending habits, citing the civil unrest it was beginning to cause.

The blame of the country’s economic downturn being laid at the feet of Marie Antoinette and her husband was a somewhat convenient approach to also removing the entire royal house from power, as was the main concern of Freemasonry at the time.

And the rumours persisted throughout the American Revolution to its end in 1783.

In 1783 the queen was busy with the creation of her “hamlet“, a rustic retreat built by her favoured architect, Richard Mique, according to the designs of the painter Hubert Robert.[92] Its creation, however, caused another uproar when its cost became widely known.[93][94] However, the hamlet was not an eccentricity of Marie Antoinette’s. It was en vogue at the time for nobles to have recreations of small villages on their properties. In fact, the design was copied from that of the Prince de Condé. It was also significantly smaller and less intricate than many other nobles’.[95] Around this time she accumulated a library of 5,000 books. Those on music, often dedicated to her, were the most read, though she also liked to read history.[96][97] She sponsored the arts, in particular music. Marie-Antoinette preferred to hold her musicales in the salon of her Petit appartement de la reine in the Palace of Versailles, or in the Théâtre de la Reine. She limited the audience to her intimate circle and a few musicians, among them the Chevalier de Saint-Georges. “Admitted to perform music with the Queen,”[98] Saint-Georges probably played his violin sonatas for two instruments, with Her Majesty playing the fortepiano. She also supported some scientific endeavours, encouraging and witnessing the first launch of a Montgolfière, a hot air balloon for the first time in human history; this extraordinary feat which represented a turning point in human civilization was done by Jean-François Pilâtre de Rozier.

Once the matter of the American War was over, the efforts to remove the royals redoubled:

Marie Antoinette began to abandon her more carefree activities to become increasingly involved in politics in her role as Queen of France.[118] By publicly showing her attention to the education and care of her children, the queen sought to improve the dissolute image she had acquired in 1785 from the “Diamond Necklace Affair”, in which public opinion had falsely accused her of criminal participation in defrauding the jewelers Boehmer and Bassenge of the price of an expensive diamond necklace they had originally created for Madame du Barry. The main actors in the scandal were Cardinal de Rohan, Prince de Rohan-Guéméné, Great Almoner of France, and Jeanne de Valois-Saint-Rémy, Comtesse de La Motte, a descendant of an illegitimate child of Henry II of France of the House of Valois. Marie Antoinette had profoundly disliked Rohan since the time he had been the French ambassador to Vienna when she was a child. Despite his high clerical position at the Court, she never addressed a word to him. Others involved were Nicole Lequay, alias Baronne d’Oliva, a prostitute who happened to look like Marie Antoinette; Rétaux de Villette, a forger; Alessandro Cagliostro, an Italian adventurer; and the Comte de La Motte, Jeanne de Valois’ husband. Madame de La Motte tricked Rohan into buying the necklace as a gift to Marie Antoinette, for him to gain the queen’s favour.

When the affair was discovered those involved (except de La Motte and Rétaux de Villette, who both managed to flee) were arrested, tried, convicted, and either imprisoned or exiled. Madame de La Motte was sentenced for life to confinement in the Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, which also served as a prison for women. Judged by the Parlement, Rohan was found innocent of any wrongdoing and allowed to leave the Bastille. Marie Antoinette, who had insisted on the arrest of the Cardinal, was dealt a heavy personal blow, as was the monarchy, and despite the fact that the guilty parties were tried and convicted, the affair proved to be extremely damaging to her reputation, which never recovered from it.[citation neede

The machinations continued not just in France but Austria and aBavaria too and by the end of 1793, both Luis XVI and Marie Antoniette had been executed by Guillotine and the monarchy had been abolished in France as of 10th August 1792.

The period of the French Revolution, from 1789 to the late 1790s also produced some of the worst crimes against Catholics since the time of Henry the VIII.

And the Freemasonic stamp of “fraternity” still echoes today in the French motto of Liberté, Ègalité, Fraternité, it’s always the same with them. Preach liberalism to be rid of the “oppressive” old “regime” and crowbar in degenearcy of every sort to weaken and demoralise the entire citizenry, then push the fable of “equality” between people, cultures, physical and intellectual abilities of vastly different capacities and possibilities, while masking it as “spiritual enlightenment” but in reality producing further corrosion of the capacity to maintain a functioning society. Not hard to do when 85 IQ semi-illiterates are now put in charge of say nuclear power plants, and you begin to have brown-outs if not total core melt-down, to select an extreme but obvious example.

From History.com:

IIn late August, [1789] the Assembly adopted the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen (Déclaration des droits de l’homme et du citoyen), a statement of democratic principles grounded in the philosophical and political ideas of Enlightenment thinkers like Jean-Jacques Rousseau.

The document proclaimed the Assembly’s commitment to replace the ancien régime with a system based on equal opportunity, freedom of speech, popular sovereignty and representative government.

In April 1792, the newly elected Legislative Assembly declared war on Austria and Prussia, where it believed that French émigrés were building counterrevolutionary alliances; it also hoped to spread its revolutionary ideals across Europe through warfare.

On the domestic front, meanwhile, the political crisis took a radical turn when a group of insurgents led by the extremist Jacobins attacked the royal residence in Paris and arrested the king on August 10, 1792.

The following month, amid a wave of violence in which Parisian insurrectionists massacred hundreds of accused counterrevolutionaries, the Legislative Assembly was replaced by the National Convention, which proclaimed the abolition of the monarchy and the establishment of the French republic.

On January 21, 1793, it sent King Louis XVI, condemned to death for high treason and crimes against the state, to the guillotine; his wife Marie-Antoinette suffered the same fate nine months later.

Notice how the intent of the Freemasons was to spread this war on the established systems of Europe throughout the land, not just France.

And the reign of Terror followed, and please note its central tenet: The abolition of Christianity. Which is and always has been the aim of Satanists throughout the ages, the Freemasons merely having been more successful than most at implementing their aims.

Reign of Terror 

Following the king’s execution, war with various European powers and intense divisions within the National Convention brought the French Revolution to its most violent and turbulent phase.

In June 1793, the Jacobins seized control of the National Convention from the more moderate Girondins and instituted a series of radical measures, including the establishment of a new calendar and the eradication of Christianity.

They also unleashed the bloody Reign of Terror (la Terreur), a 10-month period in which suspected enemies of the revolution were guillotined by the thousands. Many of the killings were carried out under orders from Robespierre, who dominated the draconian Committee of Public Safety until his own execution on July 28, 1794.

Did you know? Over 17,000 people were officially tried and executed during the Reign of Terror, and an unknown number of others died in prison or without trial.

The Crimes against Catholics, including horrific mutilations and tortures of babies and children was well-documented at the time even by the perpetrators, and was honestly one of the most horrific and disgusting periods of human action that undoubtedly pleased many demons in Hell.

All of the above is merely to give a TINY bit of context to the point that America was essentially funded with French money, the use of which was then used to blame and frame the French Monarchy and cause further revolution throughout Europe along with the rapid abolition of other monarchies in Europe in quick succession.

Austria-Hungary, Prussia, Germany, Montenegro, Portugal and Russia had ALL lost their kings by the end of the First World War. You might think some 120 years or so is a long time, but not really when your machinations to change the entire world of Europe from a Catholic and orderly group of individual nations to a homogenous grey soup of “Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity” that can then be fully controlled by the purse-masters of the world.

The remaining monarchies were abolished or made into constitutional republics by the end of the Second World War, which any historian worth anything agrees was really an extended continuation of the First World War. And the end result of all this was finally what?

The Establishment of the American Empire

It cannot be argued that America was founded by Freemasons and on Freemasonic Principles. Washington was widely known to be a Freemason and to this day, the various secret societies of Skull and Crossbones and so on are essentially Freemasons by another name. But in any case, of the 45 presidents America has had at least 15 are KNOWN to have been Freemasons without a doubt, Including the first, as already mentioned, as well as BOTH Roosevelts.

Theodore Roosevelt, who was president from 1901 to 1909, immediately followed by Taft, also a Freemason, from 1909 to 1913, and as everyone knows, the First World War’s start in 1915 was set in motion in these years, even if Woodrow Wilson was actually president during WWI, who is not known to have been a Freemason, but who is still widely thought to have been one of the worst presidents in American history. And probably still has that “honour” Since Biden clearly was not legitimately elected. Then again, who knows if Wilson was either.

We also have Franklin Roosevelt who just so happened to be president from 1933 to 1945, followed by fellow Freemason Truman until 1953, so the entire period leading up to WWII and quite a bit after it.

After WWII, by deft economic manipulations that both funded and started both wars, the American Empire was pretty much established globally.

The placing of American military bases all around the world as well the usurious practices of tentacled creatures like the IMF, the WEF, the trilateral commission and on and on and on, ensured that other states became vassals of America and were destroyed economically if they did not obey.

The establishment of the Universal Commercial Code set of rules effectively made pretty much every country on the globe a subsidiary company of the business of the United States of America. Look it up. It’s a giant rabbit hole. One I have been aware of for almost 30 years and that almost no one even has any idea about. Italy for example is STILL subjected to rules that are literally secret and not able to be seen by anyone in Italy, that were signed off after WWII and which fundamentally makes a mockery of the idea that the Italian state is in any way sovereign. That is in case you couldn’t figure it out from the over 150 American military bases placed throughout Italy. And the fact that our current prime minister, Georgie Tits, sorry, I mean Georgia Meloni, is absolutely known to have had a “master” in her 20s when she followed occult practices. And remember that having a “master” is a Freemasonic thing. And touting her as a “right-wing” leader is absolutely ridiculous and merely the posturing of the usual crack whores doing as their are told (with apologies to crack whores for using them as descriptors for journalists and the mass media), which is simply the usual Freemasonic thing of playing both sides of the fake “divide”.

With America as the powerhouse of the world, American “entertainment”, began making its way across the airwaves to literally every place on Earth. Sitcoms made in the USA are known throughout the world and if you think that doesn’t change the zeitgeist of the planet, then I have some transgender floating bridges to sell you in Shangri-La.

And all this stuff is all run by the (((usual suspects))) who, Cohen-cidentally, I am sure, are always, always, always, but only every single time, at the very root of ALL of these machinations, be their financial and economic, propaganda or “entertainment” or “news” based, and lately also “scientifically” based (don’t let me start of the incestuous plagiarist Albert Einstein and his lies, as this is long enough as it is!)

So, it can be now perhaps better understood why brown people who get the crap bombed out of them, their kids and families killed and used as training grounds for the absolute worst rejects and sad examples of “soldiers” America has produced since “generation kill”, might refer to the USA as The Great Satan.

What with their “soldiers” literally shooting peasants for sport and out of boredom in many cases, often via drones controlled from an air conditioned room tens of thousands of kilometres away, run as just any other 9 to 5 job, and this then being presented as “heroic war action”.

Pretty much regardless of whatever religion, culture, ethnicity, or IQ you may have, it’s not difficult to see why if your children or loved ones are on the receiving end of people that do what the CIA and NSA and Abu Grhaib and Guantanamo Bay “prison wardens-slash-torturers” do, you might think it’s perfectly acceptable to Strat 20kg of C4 to your chest and walk into the nearest American mall to detonate it.

Finally

So, yes. Unpleasant as it may sound, the real root of pretty much most of the evil present in our world today does originate from the USA. Which is not to say that the average American is specifically guilty of doing this.

By and large, the average American is a drug-addled fattie, stunned by GMO foods and processed crap that most animals in the wild would not dream to ingest even if starving, maleducated to the point that some Africans in small villages have a better grasp of reality, and thoroughly brainwashed into believing whatever the tell-lie-vision in their lounge, bedroom and even bathroom, tells them 24/7. In short, the average American is for the most part a victim of his handlers. True, he’s a lazy, cowardly sort, but one must understand that the brainwashing was very gradual and very well orchestrated. Think about it:

  • Most American men are circumcised. The “reasoning” is that it’s supposed to be more “hygienic”. And if you believe that, you probably believe men can get pregnant, that the wage gap is real and that women can fight in a war or in the ring, just as well as men. So, figure out why this is the case. Who did it? Why? And then look into why the royal house of Windsor (that is the British Royals) all have their maps circumcised by a Rabbi even though they are not Jewish and never have been.
  • They legal system is absurd and essentially allows for anything to be done. Which is why their food is unfair for animal consumption, yet is shovelled into their faces until they explode or die of the inevitable cancer it produces when you eat plastic cheese and fake foods.
  • They are maleducated to believe that America is the best country in the world because they “won” WWII, “went” to the Moon, and have the most nuclear bombs (ok, had). And somehow that translated to you, Johnny, the illiterate and innumerate teenager who reads at 5 year old’s level in the Europe I grew up in, being somehow “naturally better at everything” than the other people around the world. And they really believe it. Even after reality smacks them in the head with a brick repeatedly as soon as they step out of the USA.
  • The zeitgeist in America is driven by absolute terror of legal-warfare, that is being sued in one form or another, and making enough money (mostly to buy creature comforts that help rot your brain, but also to protect yourself from the legal-warfare). The concept of family may still exist in a few cousin-marring hillbillies or rednecks, but even if so is essentially limited to specific families or very small groups.
  • Money, and fame are the real American Gods, regardless of whatever veneer of “humanity” they plaster over themselves. And those few genuine people left who don’t think that way are not only a tiny minority today (as they are in most nations thanks to the American zeitgeist being exported) but are also completely ostracised from mainstream American reality.

I don’t blame the average American citizen any more than I blame the average Mexican or Italian or Chinese. But first and foremost, I really wish every single American (and Mexican, and Italian and Chinese) remained in his own country, and kept all of his ideologies, programmes and military in their own fucking country too.

Of course, the Average American has about as much say in where his government places American military bases as I do about Georgia Meloni’s letting boat after boat after boat of invaders land on the shores of Italy, which is to say, pretty much zero right now. And that’s because the average American has zero representation, because the entire system is rigged and the people who actually run the US government are mostly foreigners and their puppets.

And if you still have to ask who that is today, when you notice what the American government and deep state does, who it supports beyond any reason, and who it will jail you and cancel you and punish you for criticising or even just not wanting to deal with, well… If you STILL haven’t figured it out, I can’t help you. Just go back to your Netflix series.

But not to leave you on a downward note, let me assure you that my next giant post will be on what the solutions are for this apparently unsolvable situation and what you, at an individual level can and should and must do about it.

PS: I have NOT spell-checked this and my autocorrect inevitably mangles a lot of words, aside any errors I make myself. I will correct this as time permits over the next day or two, but hopefully you get the gist.

You might be interested in the following posts:

  1. Increasing pressure and the space of variations

By G | 15 November 2023 | Posted in Believe, Catholicism, Freemasons, Impostors and Frauds, Reclaiming the Catholic Church, Social Commentary, The Enemy Within, The Jews

Victory!

At least, that is how I would have to describe Vox’s enthusiastic response to my “theological challenge” if I were using the Western’s zeitgeist concerning the war with evil Russia and how they are now obviously on the ropes.

The Kurgan makes his pre-Vatican II Roman Catholic perspective clear in a recently published article; to which I may or may not respond at some point in the next ten years depending upon my time and interest.

As you can see he’s obviously a hair’s breath away from total conversion!

Be that as it may, and probably surprising to many that read his blog, Vox is actually a very subtle writer, and even subtler reader. I think he admitted it himself as being, if I recall correctly our conversation, a “literary snob”.

Which means the man can both read and write at a level that is today rapidly becoming as rare as finding an original Atlantean. So, totally unwarranted, but driven by my ungentlemanly curiosity, I will take a few of the things he wrote and comment on them.

Evil observably exists. Mankind is observably fallen into evil. The world is observably ruled by an immortal being that hates Man, Jesus Christ, the Good, the Beautiful, and the True. Jesus Christ, the Son of God and the Living Word, is literally and observably the only hope of Man.

And that is the full extent of the theology I am willing to assert and defend.

This, is why I have very little issue with Vox’s theology. In essence, his position is really not that different from the one of millions and millions of illiterate Catholic peasants throughout the ages that were in fact good catholics despite their inability to read or write. And yes, I know how this looks based on the previous paragraphs, but I am not actually taking pot shots. On a personal level, my own theology is not far from this either, with the only added point that, as far as I can tell to date, the REAL Catholic Church, has made no errors in dogma or doctrine, and even those parts I personally resist, or dislike, are objectively better for making as a whole to follow and in fact cause no harm in any case.

That being the case, it is absolutely of imperative importance from my perspective, to make as many people as possible (especially the fooled “Novus Ordo” laypeople) aware of the fact that, actually, yes, an infallible Church does exist, as reason and logic demand, and here it is. And yes it was fought against and infiltrated and also comprised corrupt men from the very start, because, duh: Humans. Do you even READ the Bible? Or LISTEN to the actual Church? They been telling you this from the start too. And yet, every single infiltration, usurpation and attack against it has ultimately failed, the doctrine remained unsullied and in fact more explicit and clarified as time passed, precisely to fend off the further and future attacks, culminating in the saintly and to my view obviously infallible and supernaturally protected Code of Canon Law of 1917, which comprised and summarised EVERY bit of Catholic doctrine, rule and law since Christianity began, all the way to 1917. And since the last valid Pope died on October 9th 1958, whatever other writings he pronounced ex cathedra, could also be added to it. I especially like his encyclical, Mystici Corporis Christi even if the link it’s from is from the current Satanic coven pretending to be Catholic clergy, so perhaps save a local copy before they start editing in how sodomy is part of it all.

The point of agreement I think are likely to be valid for both me and Vox are, aside from his above professed theology, the fact that human beings need rules for civilisation to thrive, as a generic but EXTREMELY statistical significant fact. And by civilisation he and I would both mean something both he and I would recognise as civilised and good and beautiful, despite possible minor details being different.

There are another two points he makes that I think can be seen as quite meaningful. The first:

Nor do I take my own occasional contemplations on the subject terribly seriously; I am from the “glass darkly” school of theological thought.

One can hardly argue with him on this point. In fact, it is a very wise perspective to have. One thing we can ALL be absolutely certain of, is that every single one of us is in error.

I think that once one really begins to appreciate the magnitude and type and kind of error you are in, you begin to be far more likely to think that perhaps, St. Augustine, which Vox is not particularly fond of, mostly, if my memory is correct, or at least in part, because of St. Augstine’s habit of referring to himself as the most miserable of miserable sinners and wretches and so on and on. I get it, when you have a healthy self-esteem, or you build one, as the case may be, for most of your life, you’re not likely to look favourably upon some guy grovelling in a manner that appears to you as some kind of worm-tongue looking to not be squished like the maggot he clearly is.

And that is indeed so.

Until you have a moment before a tiny part of the radiance of God. Or as in my case, and/or people Like Saul/Paul who tend to fall off horses and go blind for a few days when it happens. Then, when faced with the true dimensions of your multiple and seemingly endless errors, you begin to start, to have an inkling of an idea, that perhaps, good old St. Augustine, really did know something about reality. And probably a good fat chunk of it more than you or I.

Since we are ALL in error, it makes logical sense to some degree, that any absolute conviction about Christianity (or Catholicism, as it should be properly called, heh!) must be also in error. And absolute errors are bad, so should be avoided. Kinda.

Because far worse than a categorical and absolute error, is relativism. Putting an innocent man to death, or a young woman, in the case of Joan of Arc, is very, very bad (and in her case done by corrupt evil bastards too, so sort of beside this point), but letting all blasphemy and various crimes of ever escalating violence go unpunished, inevitably results in a failed civilisation, as history continues to show.

The difference, then between Vox’s theology and my own, as I suspected, comes down to the precise things he and I would agree or disagree are non-negotiables.

And I am sure there are some. But probably less than he suspects.

The Catholic Church itself has it as doctrine that while there is such a thing as Papal infallibility (explained many times of this blog, so use the Search Me link on the right if you are not sure what it is) and that the Magisterium of the Church is similarly infallible (hence why the CoCL of 1917 also is, since it was put together by the Magisterium of the Church and approved by two valid Popes), the Church itself is NOT necessarily always infallible.

There are doctrines that are deemed to be absolutely and forever unchangeable, of course, known as divine doctrine, as they come straight from God and there really is no question about them, or are evidently simple to understand and extrapolate from such rules (the idea of non-catholics not being valid catholic clergy being an obvious one) but other rules might just be for the running of the Church or apply in almost but not all cases and so on. A deep understanding of Roman law and Catholic doctrine may be required for some of these, but in essence the Church clearly states that ultimately, the only true infallibility comes from God.

Which is not to say that infallible doctrine might be flawed, but rather, that humans within the Church can and do make plentiful errors as well as some making consciously and known heretic attacks on it.

One of the points Vox makes that could be construed as a criticism is this:

My chief criticism of all theology and all theologians is this: they tend to artificially narrow the art of the possible, by which I mean they usually assign divine significance to one of several possible interpretations of a phrase – often a phrase that has already been translated one or more times – and then deny all potential legitimacy to the other possible interpretations.

I don’t really have any objection to this point, and I think Vox may have it possibly as being more familiar with the endless squabbling that goes on amongst Protestant theologians. But in this respect, it could possibly be applied to the idea that Peter was not only the leader of the Apostles but also the first Pope and the Rock upon which the Church is built, and what follows from it, as I explained in my original post from which this one stems from.

But the fact is that as far as I am concerned, the whole “Peter is the Rock” thing is absolutely not limited to one quote from the Bible. This attitude of selecting a tiny piece of text from the Bible and then applying it patch-work style to whatever nonsensical idea your average protestant is trying to defend, is really a Protestant hobby, not so much a Catholic one at all. And when I say Protestant, I include the fully Protestant, satanic Novus Orco Vatican II fake Church.

Peter being the Rock is borne out by not just one or two lines in the Bible, but several passages taken in context, as is the entire 2,000 year history of the Church. Christianity literally would NOT EXIST without THAT specific interpretation of it. And even more stunningly, is the fact that the Catholic Church is literally the LONGEST form of reign that has EVER taken place in the entirety of known human history. All the attacks against it ultimately failed. Including the Arian heresy during which 97% to 99% of ALL then existing bishops subscribed to it. Or as the current era when out of nearly 2 billion nominal “Catholics” there are maybe say a million Sedevacantists. This crisis too will pass. Because either the Catholic Church is true and real and infallible, as it has proven itself to be for two millennia if you bother to really look into it, or it is not, in which case ALL of Christianity is a complete fairy tale. Which happens to be what I USED to believe for over 40 years of my life.

The inescapable conclusion I make, is based not on this one, or that other single scarp of evidence, or quote, or Biblical sentence, or other evidence in its singular form. No, my conclusion is based on the absolutely overwhelming totality of evidence that:

  • Catholicism created the absolute best conditions for human beings bar none in the entire history of mankind we know of.
  • Catholicism in the main and almost alone in this was responsible for the creation of the actual, valid, real scientific method that ultimately created science, engineering and so on, and this was done precisely because Catholic doctrine hinges of God being a Loving, Just, Merciful and LOGICAL God. That is, reason is a thing. And that theological concept meant that the Universe could be studied and greatly understood. Protestantism both thanks to the explicit statement of Luther that “Reason is the whore of the devil” and the abundantly clear and obvious evidence presented by Protestants in general, rejects reason entirely. It’s all about the feels and possibly some foggy notion of following “God-breathed” theology, which is unfortunately indistinguishable from pastor-con-man-grifter farted theology.
  • Catholic doctrine and dogma did this and I can find no flaw or fault in it once I properly examined any specific dogma or doctrine as it actually is, instead of how people might tell you it is.
  • Catholicism literally is Christianity and “Christianity” that is not Catholicism:
    • Would not exist at all without Catholicism, since they are all bastardised and corrupted offshoots of Catholicism, first split-off in this specific manner by the fat German maid-raping, nun-banger, Martin.
    • Secondly has DEMONSTRABLY created a far worse lot for humanity, since it has slowly and consistently corroded Catholicism to the point that now we have accepted as a general, global whole: sex before marriage, contraception, divorce, and ultimately baby killing (abortion). And now have shifted on to “transgenderism” and tranny “bishops” in Protestant Covens oh… sorry… “Churches”.
  • And that’s just to scratch the surface. Keep in mind about 500 years ago, Jean Parisot Le Valette beat a man nearly to death for blasphemy and he did only four months in jail.

In 1538, while on Malta, Valette was sentenced to four months in a guva (a hole in the ground) on Gozo for nearly beating a layman to death, and he was subsequently exiled to Tripoli for two years to serve as military governor. Upon his return he was punished again for bringing a negro slave not liable for servitude. 

As you can see, even back then, Catholicism was way ahead of the rest of the world on even things like slavery.

In short, and to clarify, my position on Catholicism does not hinge simply on Matthew 28:18-20, but on, as I said, a staggering preponderance of evidence, of which the above are really just the highlights.

This is also the reason why I remain interested in further investigating the issue. If I were utterly closed to the concept, as many assume, I would not care to. And in truth, in MANY aspects of “Christianity” I have zero interest left in “exploring” the issue. Not because I am “closed off” but because those particular rabbit warrens have been thoroughly excavated, mined and blasted and there is simply nowhere else to go.

Catholicism (the sedevacantist one, which is the original one) is the truest philosophy of reality bar none that I have found to date. And it is so by many, many, many light years of distance from the next truest thing I had found up to then, which was a mixture of semi-Shintoists, Zen-Agnosticism, with elements of Feudal Japanese Samurai philosophy.

And surprising as the revelation of actual Catholicism being absolutely true AND the best descriptor of reality was to me, it remains the case. And the reason it was so surprising was because essentially, EVERYTHING I thought I knew about Catholicism was actually a carefully crafted network of absolute lies concocted by various “Christians”. What I thought was Catholicism, was in fact “Catholicism” or Novus Orco “Christianity” which is absolute Satanry of the worst sort. And of which, Protestantism was its initial offshoot of evil intended to pervert and twist.

So, there are some of my clarifications.

I look forward with baited breath to Vox’s additional, en passant, coincidental, possibly related, commentary on same, in the next fifteen to twenty years; probably without fail!

No related posts.

By G | 12 November 2023 | Posted in Catholicism, Sedevacantism

What you think is normal, is not

I have had several rather interesting conversations over the last few days and a recurring theme has been how so much of what is accepted as normal today, really is not.

Some are obvious things, that only the unhinged think are normal:

  • Mutilating children to supposedly give them the sex they “desire” instead of the one they were born with
  • That trans-anything is anything other than mental illness
  • And the consequent nonsense that men can be women or vice-versa
  • That math is somehow “racist”
  • That only white people can be “racist”
  • That there is any such thing as “White Privilege”
  • That Black Lives Matter is actually based on statistically relevant data concerning the incidence of shootings of black males by white police instead of statistically significant on the basis of incidence of violent crime by black males
  • That there is any such thing as the “gender” pay gap
  • That men and women are equal in any way (psychologically, or physically)
  • That diversity is a strength
  • That all cultures/religions are equivalent in civilisational values
  • That different ethnicities are equivalent in terms of IQ, physical performance of various activities, intellectual performance of various activities, and cultural approaches to different concepts

Then there are what I would call “second tier” observations, which really are (or should be) obvious is you realise the obvious issues above and simply extrapolate them a little bit:

  • That anyone on Earth is not somehow “racist” (literally anyone with a brain that works and eyes and ears that function will notice differences in people and will make instantaneous value-judgements on the basis of those differences. In short, you’d have to be deaf, dumb and blind, not to have what are intrinsically “racist” judgment calls. Literally everyone is “racist”. Including you. Deal with it and stop lying about it to yourself and others).
  • That sexual deviance is somehow “normal”. It clearly is not. Anything that does not naturally perpetuate the species is a deviant and unsustainable sexual dysfunction. that’s just a fact. More subtly, anything that is not geared towards a family unit comprised of one husband, one wife and the purpose of their lifelong marriage being to make and raise children is of markedly, objectively, lower civilisational value than any other set-up, even if they could reproduce children (polygamy of Mormons and Muslims for example, Polyamory, swinging, and so on).
  • Since men and women are not equal and since the best civilisational set-up is the one of the family unit as described above, it become objectively obvious that the roles of men and women are different and complementary in that family unit. Pretending otherwise, regardless of technological advancements is a recipe for disaster, since we have some 2 million years of biological wet-ware to over-ride and also a LOT of unchangeable hardware that simply is never going to go away or suddenly stop making us be men or women, no matter how many hormones and puberty blockers and deranged surgeon’s scalpels you go under.
  • In view of all the above and the historical evidence of some 2,000 years, it also becomes obvious that Catholicism has undoubtedly produced the very pinnacle of human civilisation around the world. this needs a little more fine-tuning to realise for a couple of aspects:
    • The Industrial Revolution was primarily a Protestant driven change, and touted as a benefit to mankind, but on deeper reflection, whether the Industrial Revolution really was of benefit to humanity is at best, very questionable, and rationally speaking, almost certainly a turn for the worst.
    • The working systems that came along as a result of the Industrial Revolution, similarly allow people to produce a higher output of work, but this is not rewarded by a correspondingly higher effect on people’s standard of living. In fact, it eventually settles down into a corrosive process that fills every waking hour of ever longer work-days, to fulfil and endless drive for “more”.
    • This “mechanisation” of human beings further corrodes time with family, the very dynamic of how a family works and operates, and consequently the type and level of education that the children in a family unit receive both directly and indirectly.
    • These are less obvious points and not applicable in all cases, but overall, the pattern’s statistics are as described in three above points.

And once you have digested all of the above, you begin to see a whole other level of reality that has been obfuscated by the creeping demonic lies that have been filtering into human life since the start but really took off after 1521 and then got turbo-charged during and after WWII and then started taking steroids in the mid to late 1990s and meth and cocaine from about 2008 on and finally a whole bunch of LSD since about 2016/7.

  • You begin to realise that corporal punishment in general, and the death penalty in particular, is absolutely reasonable and logical for certain level of crimes. No, not the ones that the current zeitgeist would put you to death for if they could, which might be calling Bruce Jenner, Bruce Jenner, or stating unambiguously that there are only two sexes and that homosexuality is a deviant sexuality that is not conducive to a natural continuation of the species, and that adoption by homosexual is in essence, child trafficking.
  • You realise that the desensitising to certain stimuli is beneficial while to others it is detrimental.
  • Given the above two points alone, the whole concept of training people like soldiers, police or other force on force/warrior types would drastically change.
  • As would the education/disciplining of children depending on their aptitudes and interests.
  • And intelligent education would be treasured and asked for by anyone who understood the above principles. And education that follows the baseline principles of things like the Trivium, the study of logic, reason. Basic principles of mathematics like ratios, sets, percentages, trigonometry, statistics, and algebra, taking the time with each not to just learn the formulae off by heart, but understand the principles. Along with a study of history beginning with the classics, explained and recounted at appropriate age level of understanding, starting with the Illiad and the Odyssey as stories and then the gradual introduction of the Greek classics, the study of Sparta and Athens, Rome, and the Roman Empire, and Egypt and its unexplained structures. As well as, of course, the study of dinosaurs, which really every child loves if properly introduced, and astronomy and geography, with a hint of exploration, archaeology and discovery. After which, biology and chemistry and physics can be tackled with a more reasonable background to build upon.
  • The study and use of various weapons and principles of martial disciplines.
  • The learning of basic home economics such as balancing a budget, the basics of cooking and keeping a clean home, and so on. All of these topics could be integrated into equal parts indoor and outdoor activities.

Described as I have above it all sounds like a super expensive classical education, but in reality it is something easily achieved by a group of parents that are willing and able to organise themselves and get this done.

And doing so would probably be considered some radical alt-right, Neo-nazi, eeeeeebil indoctrination of children. When in reality it would simply be giving them the tools to observe and evaluate the objective universe as it exists, instead of the lies it is presented as.

Do not accept the current twisted ideologies of Clown World. Study and re-learn what has been hidden from you and presented under a tsunami of lies and fakery the likes of which no generation before the present ones has seen.

Rebuilt the concept of objectivity and the study of both the physical and natural world as well as the metaphysical one.

You might be interested in the following posts:

  1. Clown World Fatigue

By G | 11 November 2023 | Posted in Actual Science, Ancient Technology, Catholicism, Farming Life, Human Performance, Increasing Happiness, Medical Science, Social Commentary

Oh No! Kurgan vs Vox Day Theology!

I know there are now going to be heads exploding in various gamma hives around the internet as they hope and pray to their slithering nether-gods for a major rift between myself and Vox.

While I am sure nothing of the sort is or will be the case. In fact, many moons ago, I asked Vox if he would be willing to have a friendly discussion/debate on Catholicism vs Protestantism, or to be more precise, my Sedevacantist Catholicism and his specific brand of Protestantism which I believe hinges on the original Nicene creed.

Even back then, somewhat to my surprise, he said he wasn’t against it in principle, but the time required for it (and I suspect utility of it) was not really worth it. Which, in general I agreed with.

That all said, my brain can’t help but want to continue down paths that in my view are likely to increase my understanding of reality. Christianity, is one of those paths that is essentially endless in this regard, so, like say learning to paint, or make music, is a lifelong continuous investigation.

With such endeavours, after a time, there comes a point where your understanding or skill in the topic is good enough to outdo the common men and women in the field and then even the well-known ones. In short, it becomes difficult to find other minds against which you can confront yourself in order to learn more of the topic that interests you. And when you do find one, naturally, at least for me, you’d like to investigate it and push and prod at it and test your theories and ideas and baselines against.

Well, Vox has such a mind. I also consider him a friend and few things in life are as enjoyable to me as philosophical conversation of some substance with a friend. Preferably over a good wine and light meal, or with decent cognac after a good dinner. Alas, distance and circumstance prevents such discourse in the customary civilised fashion I just described. So I find myself limited to this rather barbaric format. Blog to blog. Well, perhaps we might do a livestream on it one day, but be as it may, I will now simply dive into the post Vox put up which prompted this one for me: This is it.

As baseline axioms I think I have the following, which are:

  • Pretty sure both Vox and myself do not like having human authority over us. I think the generic difference might be that I am willing to go along with it for the greater good as long as the human with “authority” over me continues to follow the correct rules. As far as Catholicism goes, if the priest/bishop does not himself contravene Canon Law (as per Code of Canon Law of 1917) and his advice is in line with it, I will obey. The reason I believe the Code of Canon Law is correct is because at core, I believe that Jesus would not have left a FALLIBLE Church on Earth. He wanted a Church and we are instructed to use reason and logic to figure stuff out, but not that it’s all guesswork. Having read the CoCL twice, while I find rules that personally bug me, in objective consideration, even those rules are civilisational, and my personal preference is the one that is not ideal to building a truly civilised world. The classic example is duelling. I am all for it, but Catholicism forbids it, because, in general, duelling would be a sin of pride. Not really my problem, but if it were widespread you can see that the sin of pride would be what motivates it for most, instead of a burning desire to see justice done.
  • Pretty sure we both dislike dishonesty in general and especially dishonesty designed to lead people astray spiritually.
  • One thing I think we differ on is that I think Vox is more prone to the error of Erroneous Loyalty. Something I discussed in Reclaiming the Catholic Church at some length. It is an error I used to live myself for many years, so I think I understand the dynamic well. As an extreme and hypothetical example that ignores human laws for the purpose of the intellectual exercise, I recall a long while back, in one of his posts, Vox mentioned that under certain circumstances, a friend that was guilty of certain crimes would be best served by being handed a pistol with one bullet in it and leaving him alone in his room, giving him the dignity of suicide. I believe he was referencing a supposed “friend” of John Scalzi that had been discovered to be some kind of sexual predator, and if memory serves Vox’s comment was along the lines of what you would do if someone you considered to be a friend turned out to be, say a child rapist. In my case, my loyalty of friendship would NOT prevent me (again, in a hypothetical world of no human laws being present) from helping the man pull the trigger, or even doing it for him. You don’t want to leave these things to chance! In fact, as per my comments many times, I absolutely believe that the punishment for child rape should be the legalised and accepted method of burning at the stake. Suicide is considered a mortal sin by Catholicism and as such, judgement by the community so you burn at the stake gives you the chance to repent while you burn and possibly enter purgatory and eventually heaven instead of eternal Hell. So, in broad terms, I think Vox may be more prone to being loyal beyond the just point. As I say, an error I myself had for a long while in my youth, but that I gradually got out of over several years until I finally realised that the line of Justice is more important than the line of loyalty. Vox may have other theories on this, which I am unaware of but that’s the sense I have of it presently.

Given the above premises/axioms, I will then look at the above linked post critically. And consider that I am absolutely in no way defending the Boomertastic Doug Wilson. I read a couple of his post years ago, before I was even a Christian and the illogic and hypocrisy prevalent in Protestantism made me conclude he’s an idiot and not worth listening to at all.

  • One more difference between Vox and myself I need to point out, the man is certainly more patient than I am as well as far more forgiving. I remember we briefly discussed Jordan Peterson at the time and Vox stated the man was intelligent. I was astonished and asked why on Earth he thought that, he quite correctly pointed out that in order to spew the level of bafflegarble nonsense he does and fool a lot of people into thinking he is not some absolutely insane globalist with severe psychological issues, takes a certain level of IQ. Personally I evaluated the bafflegarble nonsense and concluded the man is mentally unstable and absolutely wrong and a liar. I can’t reconcile that with being intelligent, but strictly speaking, that is an error on my part conflating ethics and sanity with intelligence.

Vox concluded that Doug Wilson is a gatekeeper but still keeps tabs on him clearly, which is understandable, as I keep tabs on other gatekeepers like Milo and EM Jones and Taylor Marshall and so on. But perhaps does not condemn him as thoroughly as I do, and perhaps, in general he might not condemn the gatekeepers as thoroughly as I do. I may be wrong, but I suspect he is more forgiving than I am on such matters.

Anyway, to examine the post in more detail:

I will first note that this is precisely the same defense that is regularly offered up on behalf of other gatekeepers like Jordan Peterson and Ben Shapiro, and also of books like the Harry Potter series. Don’t criticize the obvious errors and the demonstrable falsehoods when they are otherwise doing so much good? Don’t you understand that if they tell the truth instead of lying, they won’t be able to reach as many of those who need the truth? Isn’t it better that they read godless tales of evil being portrayed as good than not read at all?

And the answer is no. This is a false, pernicious, and fundamentally short-sighted perspective. It is less a defense than an attempt to negotiate a guilty plea in exchange for a lesser penalty.

And so far we are in absolute agreement. For example, the Catholic Church teaches that it is better to leave aborigines in jungles alone and not instruct them at all than to instruct them with Protestantism. Because as per Church doctrine, a savage that has never heard of Christ might yet enter heaven judged by God on the merits of his own conscience, but one that has taken on a perverse version of Christianity is far less likely to escape the mortal sins of pride and in essence, choosing “me and my way” over “God and His ways”. I have always had the same idea. I met some of the last Khoi San that were free of any influence from so-called civilised men, and I found them to be honest, reliable, friendly, and just. Their society might be very primitive, but within the confines of that limitation they were essentially innocent and good people. Take a couple of generations of essentially Protestant “education” and a previously scrupulously honest primitive people become dishonest, haphazard, unpredictable and liable to suffer from everything to alcoholism to being criminals.

Let me be perfectly clear: No one who advocates equality of any kind, and no one who is a civic nationalist of any variety, and no one who falsely asserts that which is not a sin is a sin, should ever be considered a genuine or reliable advocate of the Good, the Beautiful, and the True, no matter what their other positive attributes might be.

Because liars cannot, and will not, defend the truth. They will always produce one reason or another for refusing to do so. And if you are foolish enough to trust or follow a liar, you will come to regret it, as all of you – and readers here should recall, the vast majority of you – who used to lionize Jordan Peterson and consider him to be a great intellectual champion should know.

Again, I agree whole-heartedly. Although, I realise Vox here was referring specifically to Civic Nationalism and so on, the fact remains that:

no one who falsely asserts that which is not a sin is a sin, should ever be considered a genuine or reliable advocate of the Good, the Beautiful, and the True, no matter what their other positive attributes might be.

And this remains the absolute point for me which I cannot reconcile with Vox’s theology.

Vox, is, after all, a Protestant. A very unique one he might be, but he (as far as I know) does not subscribe to the rules of the Catholic Church as per the Code of Canon Law of 1917 which in essence simple explains/extrapolates from both the Bible and Catholic (Christian) Tradition and has compiled and summarised all the various extrapolations, dictates, and dogma of the Catholic Church into one volume that covers all of those documents from the period of human history up to the year 1917. As a Catholic, you then may also wish to add the Papal ex-cathedra commentaries made from 1917 to 1958. After that we have not had any valid Popes since, so everything else can be safely ignored.

I am fairly sure Vox has not read the Code of Canon Law. And if he did I think the things he might object to are probably not as many as he might envision, but I am (foggily) aware he has some issue with some aspects of Mariology, though I am not sure what they are. I feel fairly confident he is well-read enough to be aware that Catholics do not actually “worship” Mary, but simply ask for her intercession, as we do to various Saints. In essence, the difference between catholics and Protestants is that we don’t stop communicating with our dead friends and people. We pray for them and we also ask them to pray for us.

One of the only times we briefly discussed my Catholicism (sedevacantism) and I pointed out some of the main issues he immediately said words to the effect of “Oh, well, those are Catholics I can get behind”. So again, I doubt the differences between us are huge in terms of theology.

He also agrees with me that in general humans need rules, otherwise they will pretty much eat each other alive in the street, which, to a certain extent we are starting to really see on a global level when Christianity fades.

We are also both smart enough understand that, while perhaps a certain optional rule for people may not really be designed for me or him specifically, we can’t really have rules for thee but not for me. And if there are exceptions, they should be based on sound reasoning, logic, and justice, not personal preference. So, in short, I ask myself:

“Why is Vox not actually a sedevacantist?”

I am presently only aware of one possible hitch which is his specific interpretation of the Trinty. Which I will not attempt to speak for him on as I would probably get it wrong. For myself, I do not pretend to know the intricacies of the Trinity, and I am perfectly happy to act in this regard very much as an illiterate peasant from the year 800. The Church says the Trinity works thusly, and I accept it as a given. I see no possible profit in trying to atomise that concept, nor do I have any interest in it.

While I may atomise the concept of not duelling and understand it very well, and instinctively want to say: “But Bishop, I don’t want to run that guy through with a rapier because I am proud, but because he defrauds little old ladies and steals candy from children, and blasphemes! C’MAWN…Just this one (ok, half-dozen) time?!” But intellectually I understand I must just bow my head and NOT challenge the man to a duel to the death. And if I do confront him, it would be a sin to smack the living crap out of him until he makes amends. I know that. Which makes it a bad sin. But… y’know… I’m only human. Maybe next time I’ll give him a warning first. You know, if I really see the error of my ways. Otherwise all I can do is really try to work on it over time. But in the meantime: no duels have been had. #winning.

So, it might be an intellectual disparity, perhaps the things that interest Vox to dissect are so different from the ones that interest me that it causes him a problem with Catholicism. And this, THIS is the real interest to me.

What are those details? Is he seeing something I am not, or is it vice-versa? Or is there a third possibility that we are both missing?

Such conversations, or investigations, if you prefer, are what fascinates me, and the ones that I think help us to see more truth when done with an intellectually honest person that is also curious enough and interested enough to examine such details.

I seem to recall for example that Vox also labelled Once Saved Always Saved as a retarded concept (he may have been more polite about it) and I would expect he similarly considers Sola Scriptura as absurd, but I never asked him the question. I also seem to recall that his generic approach to the Bible was not that this or that version was “better” but to just read one and go with it as best you can, which is “close enough” for really about 99.99% of people.

I suspect that his avoidance of hardcore Catholicism is linked to what he believes are “lies” or untruths that the Catholic Church has as various dogmas. What these are, however I am unaware, and it is my experience that most such ideas are usually rooted in some Protestant fake news about Catholicism. Several aspects of which, honest historians like Rodney Stark have pointed out even though they are not Catholics.

At any rate, I would certainly be interested in looking at what the differences between his and my theological philosophies are.

I suspect he doesn’t have the time, but the invitation is open.

UPDATE: A reader pointed out I have not explained the absolute point that anyone who advocates that a sin is not a sin should not be trusted. As often happens with me, I thought the point was obvious, but I failed to realise it is not as obvious to many as I think. So, to clarify, The very concept of Protestantism that each man can interpret the Bible as he wishes, is a pernicious sin of pride. Even the sola scriptura retards must know that man is perfectly honest, clean and good as well as smart and reasonable. It very clearly states this in Hebrews and elsewhere if memory serves.

Secondly, it is just as obvious that a good and loving God would not leave a DYI kit for interpreting His Will and what the rules He wishes us to follow are. Because given the fact we are all a bunch of retards to one degree or other, we are guaranteed to screw it up. And the idea a flawless and loving God would leave us a flawed theology is equally retarded.

Therefore, a FLAWLESS theology MUST exist. And there must be a way to know which it is. As it happens, there is. Jesus Appointed Peter as the Head of His Church, instructed the Apostles to teach His teachings and Paul tells us also that we are to reject things that are not as per their teachings as given to them by Jesus (that is, Apostolic succession, is a thing).

All of which would still screw up if it were not for the fact that Jesus also told us He would be with us to the end of time. Now, if Jesus is with us always to the end, and He commanded the Apostles to teach what He taught them, then their teachings cannot be in error. Not because even the Apostles are flawless, but because Jesus is.

That is the whole point of Papal infallibility. It’s not due to some superhuman characteristic of Popes. There have been plenty of greedy, power-hungry, deviants as Popes, but they did not teach erroneous dogma when speaking ex-cathedra because of the supernatural protection due to Jesus’ promise. Who can speak erroneous or wrong doctrine? People who are not protected by Jesus’ promise and who is that? People who are not the foundation on which the rock is based, which has two parts. The non visible supreme one, Jesus, and his vicar on Earth, which is the man holding the position that Peter held as leader of the Apostles.

18 And Jesus coming, spoke to them, saying: All power is given to me in heaven and in earth.

19 Going therefore, teach ye all nations; baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost.

20 Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and behold I am with you all days, even to the consummation of the world.

Priests can lie or be wrong. Bishops can lie or be wrong. Popes can lie or be wrong. But valid, legitimate Popes talking officially for the entire Church on matters of faith and morals, that is the foundational principles of Christianity, cannot be wrong. Again, not because they are infallible in and of themselves, but because Jesus specifically said he was specifically with them to the End of the World. And Jesus cannot be wrong, nor is he a liar. And what He taught the apostles is true and He also specifically stated he would build the Church on Peter,, renaming him from Simon to Peter, which in Latin, Aramaic and most Latin languages literally means Rock.

Regardless of whatever brain-twisting Protestants come up with to try and say Jesus didn’t mean or say what he meant and said, even a child can understand that if someone says, to a guy called Simon:

“Hey buddy, come here, gonna run a little test by you…”

And he does, and Simon passes, and the guy says:

“You know what buddy, I’m gonna call you Rock from now on, and on this rock, I will build my church.” It’s a fairly clear point that Good old Simon/Rock, is now the head of the Church. Seriously, a child gets it. You need to be indoctrinated into lies from birth not to see this as it is.

So, the first lie is to tell people that to not be Catholic is not a sin. It is. You’re ignoring God’s Will. And the entire retinue of sins that follows from anyone following that advice is literally endless. And frankly, it ALL stems from pride to begin with. Some German fattie with a penchant for sexing up nuns and raping maids and swearing and calling reason literally “the whore of the devil”, comes along some 1500 years after Christ and the Catholic Church which has been the ONLY valid Christianity to that point and he FIXES everything? It’s moronic. Jesus didn’t say:

“Oh, by the way, all the people for the next 1500 years or so that call themselves Christians, and all the Popes which everyone agrees for that long are the main dudes, yeah, well, forget about all of them, they are all wrong and Pagan worshippers that ask my mother and a bunch of dead guys of no importance whatsoever to put in a good word for them with me. Anyway, all those guys? Going straight to Hell. Only when that rotund German with the beer and all the sex comes along will AKCHUAL Christianity be fixed. And he will do it by changing the Bible before he says it’s the only thing you should refer to at all. But only the one he changed, not the one everyone used for 1200 or so years and that was put together by the same Catholics who got it all wrong. And oh that Bible that the German guy changed, which was also changed by the Pahrisees, you know, the guys who had me killed, for 700 years before him, that’s the good Bible, scrap that other one. And oh, oh, one more thing: The best Bible, it’s the one with 33,000 translation errors ordered to be put together by a flamingly homosexual English King. Jimmy boy, that’s his name. He also starts up the Freemasons, which are Satanists, but don’t let that bug ya, seriously, his version of the Bible is the best one.”

So… yeah. I hope it’s kinda obvious now.

No related posts.

By G | 11 November 2023 | Posted in Catholicism, Reclaiming the Catholic Church, Sedeprivationism, Sedevacantism, Social Commentary

Schizophrenia – Good for Writers!

As I continue book 3 in the overlords of Mars series, I am continually surprised at how much can enter the persona of one of the characters, then switch to a completely different one and get into a very different mindset.

It is a very useful exercise for reminding us that we are not our ideas, or ideologies or even our most deeply held beliefs. And yet…

Something at the core that is absolutely founded on a bedrock of truth must remain. The mistake most people make is to think that such a bedrock is also formed in part by their political affiliation, belief in this or that ancestor’s idea about this or that “truth” or “tradition”. All the while, most of it is if not arbitrary, at least just optional.

Once you destroy the ego monsters that keep what you think of as your personality, what is left is truly quite simple and small, yet eternal.

And when you go digging into that, and it does not reduce at all, then that little fire expands and eventually… you reach an inescapable conclusion. that fantastic as it first seems, absurd, unrealistic, and counter to everything you have been told from birth… in truth… becomes undeniable.

You might have hated the idea. You might have railed against it from time to time. I certainly did. You might have thought it all a lie or stifling, or a way to control the masses and evil. You might have been fooled by the VAST number in modern times of people who used this undeniable truth for their own evil and truly dark ends. Almost all of us have been fooled in this way, really. And yet… it remains true.

No related posts.

By G | 9 November 2023 | Posted in Catholicism

Karl does Bad Reasoning. Again.

I have criticised the boomer Karl Denninger before. Here, and here.

And now I will do it again, but on an entirely different basis, which actually ties in with a MUCH larger picture I have been trying to explain to other people for a long time.

Karl has a long very black pilled post about having children and the future, here.

In fairness to him, I think his overall point is not necessarily that high IQ, K-select people should not have children, as many have accused him of doing. I am quite sure he is merely pointing out why it is unlikely that they will. And insofar as his boomer level of analysis goes, he is “right”. That is, the average NPC will think and “reason” much along the lines Karl indicates. So my critique is not really with his observation of all the negative facts he points out. In the main he is “correct” about his individual examples of reasons why people are less likely to choose to have children.

The desirable people he and I both mean, that is, high IQ, K-select, generally honest and responsible, and reliable people with a good sense of justice, common sense and the ability to do at least decent levels of logic, math, writing and reading comprehension.

But as usual, Karl is missing the big picture. As is typical of the boomer mentality, that thinks primarily in terms of me, me, me, and even when describing global events is guided by their perennial laser-like focus on how anything affect them in the specific, he seems largely incapable of the very concept of synergism.

It is a rare skill generally, but it happens that some of us (mostly GenX) are naturally talented at it, so allow me to point out the errors of his thinking, starting from the exact opposite direction that boomer thinking begins at: that is, the REALLY big pictures frames first. The ones that ignore us, that is you and me specifically completely. Here we go:

1. Nature doesn’t care about you specifically

In the big scheme of things, those who do not reproduce sufficiently die out. Nature is pretty brutal about it and tends to operate on the principles of large numbers. And exceptions to that rule because of different large numbers.

It may just be humanity’s lot that we go the way of mouse utopia aka Universe 25. In which case, we’re all doomed and so are all our children. And if so, why worry about it. Worrying about it would be a total waste of time. Besides which you do NOT know this for certain, so assuming it off the bat is an error. So, as a function of reason and logic, this specific idea must be ignored.

Treating it as valid or true can only lead you to depression and misery in a situation where your irrational belief in a “certainty” you cannot possibly know is a certainty, becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. This point alone, the Universe 25 possibility, should make it obvious that similar thoughts that lead down similar (if less total) outcomes are also to be ignored.

So for example, the idea that “all white people will soon be extinct” or “high IQ people do not breed together because there is not enough of them” or the more common “marriage and children is a loser’s game because all women are whores and will divorce-rape you” and all the various variants of that kind, are in essence self-fulfilling, loser’s bets on life. The fact that your specific marriage may turn into a hellscape, or your specific life becomes a dead end is not relevant to the entire sub-species you represent.

Yes nature does not care about you specifically, but you specifically can and do affect nature. Make 15 children and chances are most of them survive. If they all too make 15 children from age 20 on, like you did, guess what the landscape of your tribe looks like 100 years from now if you just start out with you and your wife as Adam and Eve? On that basis, starting with you and your wife having had 15 children by the time you are both say 40, if all your children and theirs and so on do the same, meaning that every 40 years they all have a batch of 15 children each, if you lived to be 140, you would have over 17 thousand descendants. 17,275 to be exact. And if the average age of death was say 80, then almost all of them would still be alive, since the first iteration (at year 20) is only 135 people. And that’s only ONE family. Imagine if you have ten such families in the same area. You now have a small nation after one century. Which in the scheme of things is not so much time. And if the genetic serums actually sterilise and wipe out most of humanity, you will not only be a small nation, you will be the majority within it. And it might not be such a small geographical area after all. Now imagine them all of the same religion that takes no crap from depopulationist satanists like Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates and their pedophile friends.

“But people don’t make 15 children each, and how do you feed them all, and send them to college?!?”

Patience grasshopper. People who bought the lies and live in clown world no longer make 15 children. But people did do that for centuries in Catholic countries. And that was before the internet, and Amazon deliveries, and often before indoor plumbing and central heating, and certainly before electricity and tractors and industrial fertilisers and automated harvesting machines… so let that sink in a little and park it in your brain somewhere while we continue to look at reality and possibilities instead of the ghosts boomers put in your head.

“But even if smart white people with good ethics, strong Catholic religious beliefs and enough money/land/whatever start reproducing at that ridiculous and unrealistic rate, they will still be outnumbered by the millions of dumb, brown, evil, people!”

First of all, even if things were reduced to that simplistic level of thinking, realise that the number of white people on the planet always was a minority when compared to the number of non-white people. And probably always will be.

Remember when I said nature doesn’t care about you specifically and operates on the principle of large numbers, with the exception of other large numbers? White people, and the Japanese, are two such examples, just to pick a couple. Despite not being a majority, white people have managed to secure lands and space for themselves very successfully over the millennia. A combination of strong imagination, higher average IQ, and religious beliefs that fostered high-trust and co-operation, served them well when they ejected infiltrating and noxious tribes, ethnicities and behaviours, which they did in the past with ferocious attitudes.

Similarly the Japanese have retained a really quite unique culture on this planet by similarly ruthlessly avoiding to entertain the admixing of their population with the teeming masses.

A perhaps even more shocking example is Catholicism itself, which around 400 AD or thereabouts, when it really was a dark time on pretty much all fronts for humanity in general and Catholics (i.e. the only Christians that ever existed) in particular, St. Benedictine decided to retire to some apparently godforsaken regions and start monasteries. And some 600 years later, the Catholic world was (and remained for a long time) the utter pinnacle of human achievement in everything from the arts, to the courage of men, the safety of lands that were previously the domain of brigands, the ending of women and children as chattel, and generally the betterment of humanity as a whole while being perfectly capable and able to fight back against less civilised barbarians that hounded them.

And keep in mind that Catholic monks do not even reproduce at all! But just by their influence, they firstly created self-sustaining monasteries, then spread the gospel and civilisation all round them, so much so that they even converted the Vikings that used to raid and murder them mercilessly, by giving them lands and asking for their protection. And after a couple of centuries, those same blonde giants were off to the Crusades to defend Christendom. All this was supposedly impossible if you accept Denninger’s base premise which is simply that basic math has all the answers.

Basic math has a lot of the answers, but life is always more interesting that that. As I wrote almost 30 years ago, in original version of The Face on Mars published in 1995, when dealing with math and reality, the theory looks like 1+2=3 or perhaps x+2=3 so we can figure out x easily. In theory.

Better scientists realise that things are a bit more like x+y=3 so both x and y can have a wide range of values. And synergists like me realise life is most accurately described as x+y=z, where both x and y and even z have ranges of probabilities and while computers can in theory predict things very accurately (if the input data is very accurate) they cannot and will not ever be able to account for human nature and reality as a whole. Because the fly in the teleporting machine, the asteroid against the dinosaurs, and the “crazy” St. Benedict, or the iron minded King Leonidas, will throw your entire large number theory set right out the window. And in fact, a human mind that can see these patterns of relationships and figure them out analogously, usually has a better chance of getting it right than any computer prediction of the future.

So. The realisation from point number one is that while nature does not care about you specifically, you specifically can affect nature. Crazy as that sounds. And the main item required for you to have a chance to do so? Unreasonable belief that defies current “popular” thinking, but is based in sound synergistic principles, like large number theory, persistence, and of course, the most successful human belief system ever used by humans, actual Catholicism.

2. Becoming that different large number.

If you want to avoid becoming the leaf in the stream that just ends up being compost, and if your entire tribe, way of life, family, looks like it is just being carried on by world events, guess what, you need to become one of those large numbers that is the exception to the large number concept that you will become extinct. How do you do that? Simple, really, if you think about it.

By being utterly passionate, unreasonable, counter-intuitively absurdly dedicated and persistent, over an equally absurd, unreasonable and “crazy” length of time. St. Benedict didn’t just decide to try his hand at monastery creation and life for a few years. He spent the rest of his life doing it. Relentlessly.

The reason I have achieved so many different things, visited so many places, speak three languages fluently and a couple or three others haltingly, and learnt so many different skills at a high level enough that I could reasonably be considered a professional at several very different endeavours, is because I simply put in more time, more effort, more obsessive thought and action into those things that interested me than most people do, and even than most supposed “professionals” in that field do in many cases.

So, if you want your DNA to make it, you need to go counter to the zeitgeist. Which is healthy in any case since the current “Western” zeitgeist is that you should submit to different cultures and ethnicities than your own. That the family unit is evil, marriage terrible, and making children a very selfish thing unworthy of civilised people. Oh and you should also be gay. Or a cross-dressing, self-mutilating tranny. And make your kids, if you were so unwise to have any, become gay, underage drag queens too.

Really, regardless of your intentions, going 180 degrees away from the current zeitgeist in the West is healthier than not doing so on any scale. But if you want to go the whole hog, then peruse this blog and the various articles I wrote on farming, beating clown world, and so on, and above all realise two things:

  1. Yes it’s hard. Very. Get used to it. It’s just how it is.
  2. Win. Build it. Find the impossible way. Keep getting back up and keep saying “Fuck them”. Eventually everyone dies, so make your life here count.

You overcome the statistics of nature by becoming your own large number anomaly. So git to it, you unreasonable madman.

3. The black pill is a lie.

All fear is a lie, ultimately. And the black pill of doom and gloom is pure fear-based poison. It doesn’t matter what type of fear it is. Fear you will not have a job. Fear you will not have enough money. Fear you will hate your life. Fear you will be a bad parent. Fear your kids will suffer. Fear you can’t do it. Fear you will fail. Fear.

Well, let me reassure you: You will lose your job. Somewhere along the line, if you haven’t yet, you will. You will never have enough money. Never. Elon Musk still doesn’t. Just ask him. Your life will have giant events of major suckage in it. Everyone’s does. You will fuck up multiple aspects of parenting. Everyone does. Your best bet is to keep the damage to a minimum and try and ensure your children understand reality and still love you when they are all grown up. Your kids will suffer. Everyone does. You will fail. Multiple times, at multiple things. You will feel fear in your life. Many times for many different reasons.

There. Got all that? Good. Now get off your ass and go do all those scary things anyway.

No one learnt to walk without falling down. A lot.

No one learnt to read and write without scrawling and misspelling first. A lot.

No one has achieved great things without persistently improving on his or her own screw ups. Failing is not the problem. Quitting is. So, as I explained, become your own large number anomaly. And if God is gracious he will give you enough of a brain to realise the miracle point of when it is not worth bashing your head into the same rock and when, instead, doing so, will eventually form a thick enough skin and skull that you will break the rock and break through to a better place.

Life is hard. Bad shit happens. People die. Evil exists. And on and on. So what? You can whine and bitch and cry and hide in a corner and try and have someone, anyone, everyone, feel sorry for you, or you can get up and become a large number anomaly. Them’s the choices, and no one gets a free ride. So pick one. I picked mine long ago.

4. Being afraid of 10 things means you miss the big opportunity.

If you do go and read the whole long litany of fear compiled by Denninger, you might get depressed. You might think he has valid points and they stack. Let me present just one case or two of his flawed theory.

Then you think about the child getting older.  He or she is rather bright and would perhaps like a college education.  You see the bills pile up on those who are there now, and the growth of that price over the last 20 years.  You see $100,000 or more in debt larded up on someone who studies gender or black history and a “professor” who claims that capitalism is horrible — while pulling down a six-figure salary and forcing your child to pay the next kid over’s tuition in Calculus class because you, not your child, have more money than his parents do.  You think “oh, my kid is a math whiz and will study programming” which sounded great 20+ years ago but then you remember the many H1bs that multiple large firms brought in to replace all of their American citizen programmers, forcing said Americans to train their replacements before being fired in order to get any severance at all!  Thus that $100,000 taken on in debt to go to college, you realize, can be rendered worthless by said corporations even if your kid makes good choices as soon as someone from India will do the work for less money.  This wild escalation in the cost of an education is not by random luck either, which would be a risk everyone has to take — three decades ago there was no Internet and colleges were the only real place you could learn a lot of things.  Today anyone can learn anything from literally anywhere with nothing more than a $50 cellphone, a $200 laptop and $50/month for Internet service so why has the cost of learning and proving it at a college level of competence gone up by five or more times in the last 30 or so years instead of costing almost nothing to simply take a set of proctored tests and prove competence?  Reality is that all of this is due to the deliberate policies and actions of universities, governments and corporations which will screw your child without any possibility of redress when he or she grows up — and there is no evidence that it is slowing down or will be stopped.

So he points out that:

  • College/University is stupidly expensive
  • They don’t even teach anything useful in most cases
  • You can learn most things to a decent level by doing your own research on a $200 laptop

And yet he’s really SOLD on sending kids to college.

Can you see the boomer level thinking? Screw college. Learn how to distinguish and grow the plants that can be used to make tinctures and remedies for various things and sell them only to people who you know. I guarantee you that when the next load of mRNA crap embedded in food, “normal” vaccine shots, or anything else comes along, the people with a still functioning brain will not care too much about your lack of a PhD if the stuff you use on yourself and your loved one works for them too.

Do you really need a degree to be able to put plumbing pipes together, or learn the principles of electrical wiring? Sure, insurance and such is a thing and if you screw things up, or even if you don’t you might be sued into ruin.

Yes, these are real problems, and sometimes have good reasons for being there. I certainly don’t want a pedophile like Oprah’s John of “God” cutting into me or mine as if he were a surgeon. I’d like to know that anyone that needs to actually do a surgery is competent and properly trained; and can in turn be sued into poverty if he screws up because he is not.

But the problem is that over the last 4 years these supposed paragons of ethics have in the main been mass-murdering bastards who lied and lied and lied to your face. Like good old Fauci and his buddies did. So… while I am not really keen on the local witch-doctor’s bone-throwing, the local GP dispensing covid genetic serums is certainly not higher on the totem pole as far as I am concerned, thank you very much. Which means what? It means that firstly I will try to educate myself better. Without the use of google, thanks, because mostly google is also a lie now. And secondly I will go only to people I know, whose work I can personally verify and see for myself by meeting their clients, whatever their field might be.

Denninger hasn’t realised that the entire idea of college is dead. Why would you participate in it other than for a very few and very select reasons, and even then, who knows for how long? Clearly homeschooling and learning your own trade is the way.

Here is another and more “total” point he makes towards the end:

I could go on for hours with this but I think you get the point.  People don’t choose to have fewer or no children because “that’s how it is” as technology improves.  Technological improvement adds choice but society molds opinions and incentives — for good or bad, like it or not.

People make the decision to not have children not because they’re “selfish” but rather on an entirely-rational basis because they look back at their childhood for the baseline and then forward in time and what they see is not improvement but impoverishment, not prosperity but privation, forced compliance and costs shoved upon them while the mandating parties are immune from consequence even when they’re later proved wrong or worse, someone is injured or killed, rampant illegal immigration and destruction of the common person’s standard of living without boundary along with a documented history of forcing the voluntary costs taken by others down their throats along with myriad scams across the board.  When projected forward 20 years they recognize that any child they produce today is highly likely to be screwed blind and has a very low probability of having a good life, say much less a better one than they had.

Indeed if they judge that their childhood sucked they may well expect their kids’ childhoods to suck worse and nobody who actually cares about a child they’re contemplating bringing into the world voluntarily signs them up for that.

The people you want to bring children into the world are those who value children and have reason to believe their children will have at least as a good a life as they grew up with and enjoy now, with hope for even better, never mind a belief that their kids will have a fair shake and rational odds of success if they choose to apply themselves.

All of the policies of the last few decades of both government and industry have demonstrated beyond doubt that none of this is likely to be true and thus only those who don’t give a wet crap about their children’s future, or are so rich they believe they can guarantee it even if everyone else has their standard of living go straight to Hell, choose to reproduce.

About the only truly valid point he makes here is the very first one:

society molds opinions and incentives — for good or bad, like it or not.

That is essentially true. And as I have already pointed out, “society” in general today is very sick. That’s the problem. So what’s the solution? Simple: Firstly, realise, as I have been saying often and repeatedly since age 16, there is no such thing as “society”. It doesn’t exist. What you have is a large number of individuals and the large number probabilities that they produce. In reality you have a large number of in-DUH-viduals, which makes the illusion that such a thing as “society” exists quite realistic, but it doesn’t.

You have essentially zombie hordes. And zombie hordes are easily manipulated and pushed into this or that direction or over this or that cliff or fire-pit. So, as a first step don’t be a zombie. Don’t associate with them. Don’t surround yourself with them.

Secondly, begin the process of isolating yourself from zombies and building up relationships with other human beings. This in itself acts as a already quite a good “wall”, or defence from the zombie hordes, but over time, don’t be shy to build literal walls to keep the zombies out of your areas. And the more humans you have in your community that help to built them, the better.

Thirdly, do not let zombies in at any time. Exclude them and exclude anyone who allows them in the village. This sounds harsh, but is basic survival and also basic game theory. St. Benedict “won” precisely because of this point. He allowed in only Catholic monks that had dedicated themselves not only to Catholicism, but his even stricter rules added to the already rather strict rules for Catholic monks. That unwavering zealotry kept the monasteries pure and therefore effective. A bunch of men who spend all their time, praying, meditating on scripture, and working, will soon produce extremely functional communities. And in fact monasteries became wealthy, for they had a surfeit of food or other things they made, so that they became rich enough they became favourite places for the Vikings to raid. So the Catholic monks co-opted the Vikings too, and now Catholicism also added fearsome, pious warrior types to their ranks, alongside thoughtful, intellectual, pious, and studious ones.

If you refuse to allow any people into your midst that don’t subscribe to your general tribe’s zeitgeist (ideas, religion, world-view), then you cannot be corrupted, And over time, your converting of others increases your number. This is basic game theory and works in the natural world as it does in the abstract one of math. It works because it is again based on the principle of large numbers. A persistent, unexpected, but resilient statistical anomaly, becomes its own statistical normality.

Alongside with not rejecting “society” or if you prefer, forming your own, Denninger is (typical for a boomer) preoccupied with the hypothetical suffering of hypothetical children.

Well, guess what, the very vast majority of human beings, including the ones with really terrible lives, still prefer existing to not existing. We know this because aside from the odd cult, or recently mutilated confused teenager that has been indoctrinated into the child abuse ideology of transgenderism, most human beings don’t commit suicide. So, bad as it might be, life still seems to have the win over non-life. Pretty much for everyone. I know for a fact that every one of my children prefers to be here than not having existed. And it is that way for most people. So suck it up buttercup. Remember how I told you life is hard and everyone suffers? It’s true. But it still beats being dead or non-existent by a couple of light years, never mind country miles.

Finally he tries to justify his own weakness, cowardice and fear by appealing to your own sense of concern for your (hypothetical) children. In a most ridiculous manner if you have followed the discussion up to here; that is, by telling you if you really cared about your children, you wouldn’t have them, because they might suffer.

No Karl, no. They absolutely will suffer. And they will cry and feel pain and heartbreak. And then they will dust themselves off, get up and carry on. And make children of their own and if they need to fight off some evil bastards in the future that I didn’t manage to get to myself before I dropped dead, well, so be it, they will have got as much as they can from me in terms of learning how to do that.

Because guess what, you fragile and egomaniacal boomer, my grandparents went through two world wars, massive economic depression and yes, even lack of food. And they made children too. Otherwise I would not be here. And my children wouldn’t be here. And if I had continued believing the horse-shit your generation still shovels around a bit longer than I did, I might not have had any children at all. Instead now I have five of them. And my own daughter, off her own ideas, with no prompting from me on the matter, because she’s still young for me to discuss such things with her in any detail or seriousness, already has it as a pretty solid idea that she wants to have two children by her mid twenties. And if her babysitting of her younger siblings is anything to go by, she probably will, and be a really good mother at it too. And the smaller ones love each other even as they fight and argue and then play and hug a few minutes later.

Because what you missed Karl, in your ranting and raving at the injustices of the world, is the simple fact that yes, things are bad. And yes they could be better, and yes there is wild evil about, but… on one level or another, it has always been this way. Do you think the Spartans and Athenians about to be wiped out by the Persians had an easier life than you do? Or me?

And they would have been wiped out if it weren’t for a “crazy” guy who took his personal bodyguard to the Hot Gates and held off perhaps up to a million Persians for three or four days.

You Karl, with your fears and your impotent rage, ultimately, are more like a whiny, mostly fake, mostly gay Athenian. Me and mine are more like the Spartans that went with Leonidas. And yes, I include my wife and children in that, because she can keep up with me, which is rare and courageous beyond most women, well-beyond certainly all the normies out there worrying about their pedicure and whether they can land a guy with a six or seven figure salary if they just slut it up enough. And my children are on the same path, which can already be seen by the steps they take and the way they relate to the world and themselves in it.

And am I a lone voice in the wind? No. Not by a long shot.

Every sedevacantist family I know has multiple children, at least 4, and counting. And even we Sedevacantists are not even the only ones.

The current Mrs. USA for 2023 has 7 children and lives on a ranch. This is what she said at the finals for her beauty contest:

“When have you felt the most empowered?”

Mrs America 2023: “I have felt this feeling seven times now as I bring these sacred souls to the earth… after I hold that newborn baby in my arms. The feeling of motherhood…is the most empowering feeling I have ever felt.

So go on Karl, invent all the reasons why no one can have multiple children and then whine and whine and whine about it. Meanwhile, Catholics over two millennia created the best civilised nations on Earth by going precisely against every “point” you made, and under conditions that were almost certainly harder than any most people face today. Especially if you remove the conditions created by our own deficient reasoning, Karl.

Reasoning like yours is the real problem. The rest, human beings have dealt with successfully for millennia. And it won’t be the insipid Bill Gates and Klaus Schwabs of the world that will stop me and mine from being here another now and in the future too, a few millennia from now.

No related posts.

By G | 7 November 2023 | Posted in Catholicism, Farming Life, Human Performance, Increasing Happiness, Sedevacantism, Social Commentary

Fighting the Stupid Part 2 of an Infinite series

The previous post was a general one on the reasons why Stupidity, being a throughly noxious thing, must be beaten back despite the tsunami of idiocy that is the human race.

Here we will take a more detailed and practical approach.

First, however, we need to see who is qualified to even take the class.

If you do NOT believe in Christianity of any kind as being a good thing, and more specific a salvific thing, then this post is not for you. It’s fine, I was one of you for most of my life. Not all non-Christians are idiots. It’s just the amount of lies about it have been so many and for so long, it’s hard for anyone sane to take it seriously. Until you really take a good look that is. And you may have not got there. You could still follow the post as a general intellectual exercise with regard to the whole (idiotic) issue of “denominations” however.

Secondly, the extremely VAST majority of people who consider themselves “christians” are not in fact anything of the sort, and telling them this so brutally and without preamble usually upsets them. Tough titties. Such is the way of truth.

It is also true, however, that most of these would-be-but-are-not Christians are not necessarily evil people. The vast majority are not, I am sure. Nor are they necessarily idiots, though, sadly, the vast majority are, but that’s because the vast majority of humanity is composed of idiots too. So, on average, the percentage (always higher than you think, as the brilliant Professor Cipolla reminded us in his first law of human stupidity) remains the same.

Let us then, in vain attempt number 7,942, of an also infinite series, try to bring some clarity to the millions of Protestants that are… no… wait… to the thousands of Protestants that are not complete idiots, and who earnestly believe in Christianity, but for one reason or another, have been fooled into believing that Protestantism is actually Christian.

And let us illuminate this lesson by using the incoherent babbling of an SG denizen who unwisely, and when no one was saying anything, just fired out this beauty:

As it happens, I interacted with this gentleman before on various occasions and prior to this I think he was in general agreement with me on a variety of topics, as was I with him. For whatever reason, however, he decided to start his day with this absolutely retarded statement. Now, let me point out that I don’t think this man is evil. I also think he is probably quite honest and hardworking and generally not prone to extreme hyperbole or self-aggrandisement. That, at any rate, is my considered opinion after a while of general online interaction with him. All that said, that comment is pure, distilled, 100% proof, idiocy. As most of SG that noted it made him aware of, hence the replies.

Right away, we see the chasm that is the first crack. Mehitabel’s point has “nothing to do” with Wolverine’s point, and yet… it apparently really addresses a real issue that Mehitabel is supposedly wrong about that is part of Wolverine’s idiotic belief system. Hmmm.

Let us continue down this road built with stupidity paving.

A couple more people throw lifelines out to Wolverine. Trying to show him the obvious error of his ways and the utter stupidity of his initial comment.

Will our stubborn Protestant take the life-preservers offered?

He will not. So, I gentle reader, enter the scene, with a kind bitchslap to his stupid brain, couched in kindness and mercy, to try and wake him from his stupidity infection.

And here we have the final proof of utter, complete, absolute, mental retardation induced in an otherwise probably decent human being, as a result of lies and nonsense and the complete inability to do even elementary logic. A normal child, of normal intelligence, left to his own devices, aged about 5, can see Wolverine’s assumption is absolutely idiotic to the point of insanity. You can’t possibly claim a book that supposedly has all the answers, without tradition, or anything outside of the book being relevant, if you will not even look at how, where, when, and who put the book together. It is literally beyond stupid. It is a kind of mental retardation on a severe scale that makes the condition proper mental illness.

And what do you think his response will be? Anything even remotely sane, logical, relevant? Of course not.

He even spells Sola Scriptura wrong, but we’ll be kind and say that’s autocorrect. And we won’t ask him why he should use Latin to refer to anything Biblical. That might traumatise the poor dear.

The metaphorical stoning of the heretic has begun, albeit still gently and kindly, I assure you.

And after this, and his blocking TVCL, there has been only tombal silence. Not even crickets.

And for anyone that has read any of Tony’s books (TVCL) he is clearly far from anyone trying to prove to anyone he is a smart boy. Autist he may be, but he is a genuine and honest one, and has no agenda for individual fame or anything of the sort, I assure you, as I know him quite well. His interests are general and for the ultimate service of people in general and Catholics in particular.

In all honesty, no Protestant at all can reconcile the origins of the Bible with the acceptance later of the revised version created by Martin Luther.

Either you accept Christianity from the start, in which case only Catholicism, with its Popes and everything else, which all happened unchanged for over a thousand years before any schism, or you are just making things up out of whole cloth.

Even the first schismatics, the traitorous and backstabbing Eastern “Orthodox”, dare not rewrite the Bible or change it. They merely confine themselves to not being able to read properly and being butt-sore about the pope telling them what is and what is not good Christianity.

Besides, as I said, they are a traitorous and backstabbing lot, who 40 years after they “cut ties” with Rome, begged for help against the Muslim invaders, and the Catholics went and helped them and saved their lands, and their lives, only to be literally backstabbed, and even killed by the “orthodox” in cahoots with the Muslims, not for the first Crusade only, or the second, but all of three Crusades in a row, all launched to help them!

And then they bitched, and still do, like whiny little cowards, about the sacking of Constantinople in the Fourth one. AND if that were not enough, the Catholics kept, financed, and maintained the lands in the Outremer (the Middle East) Christian (Catholic) for 200 more years, before conditions in Europe made the constant drain of funds untenable. At which point the Catholics told the deceiving and traitorous “orthodox”: Hey, here, at least maintain a presence and keep these lands we re-took for you at least nominally “christian”. And did they? Nope. Let it all go to the Muslims. So, it is still quite clear that the only actual Christians remained the Catholics, despite the bad and corrupt Popes and the schismatic “Orthodox” the actual religion and the dogmas of it were not encroached upon by the orgiastic, power-hungry Borgia Popes and their kind. And some Popes were actually really awesome, like Celestino, and Pious X and others.

So there really is no way at all to try and reconcile the Bible being changed by a fat, German of Jewish origins, with a penchant for raping maids and having sex with nuns, that came along some further 500 years after the “orthodox” schism, and then immediately declaring his version of the Bible, the only one that everyone should believe, but without actually defining at all what those beliefs should be.

Or worse still, go on to take as the only and HOLY ONE, the “Bible” which happened to be created by the extremely gay English King called James, who got it “translated” with over 33,000 “errors”, and using the version of the “Bible” that had been edited for 700 years by actual Pharisees that hated Christ. That’s right, many Protestants think the King’s James Bible is the one and only true version of the Bible. Which one must assume sprung directly out of King’s James butt, fully-formed, like a miracle, for Protestantism to even have any possible validity at all.

That last paragraph may have made you aware of another little problem, and that is that Protestants have ZERO Apostolic succession, meaning their version of Christianity has NEVER been approved by ANYONE that can trace a direct lineage to the Apostles and having taken instruction by them, as Jesus commanded.

And trust me when I say that the whole origin of the Bible is merely the very tip of the iceberg when it comes to Protestantism. So many of their ideas about the Bible, Christianity, Catholicism, and even Jesus Himself are such utter insane rubbish that believing in unicorns that fly by farting rainbows is infinitely more sane.

And no, it is not about being a Sedevacantist Catholic Zealot ™ though I absolutely am and wear that badge proudly. No, it has to do with fighting the stupid. Imagine the kind of damage to souls this guy can do, with all the best of intentions I am sure, but stupid, very, very, stupid intentions. That result in much harm, in degeneration of actual truth and justice and above all actual Christianity, that is currently residing ONLY in the last remnant, of Christians, that is, ACTUAL Catholics. Which excludes all the Novus Ordo people who think any one of the fake Popes since 1958 on was actually a Pope, or even Catholic. None of them were.

And yes, yes, those details are rather complex to get into if you are unaware of them, but that’s why I wrote a 530 page book detailing them in excruciating detail (yet entertainingly enough it is not boring, by any account, yet). But that’s not what this post is about.

This post is only about abysmal stupidity, and why it is your imperative duty, for the sake of humanity at large, or at least for that minority of it not composed of absolute retards, that you fight the stupidity.

Push it back. create oases of sanity, and logic, and truth, and beauty.

No related posts.

By G | 5 November 2023 | Posted in Catholicism, Reclaiming the Catholic Church, Zombie Apocalypse

« Older Entries
Newer Entries »

All content of this web-site is copyrighted by G. Filotto 2009 to present day.
Website maintained by IT monks