The New Religion! From Alien Disclosure! Same as the Old Heresies!

Brief Introduction to the topic – If you are an attention span deficit type you may want to go to the TL;DR heading at the bottom. If you want to UNDERSTAND something and have the patience not analogous to a fruit fly, read the whole thing.

See that tag line? In other words, the vast majority of the enstupidated creatures that roam the Earth under the guise of “thinking” human beings, will NOT be able to gain ANY insight from this post. None. They will shriek, skim “read” until “offended” then bail, or just click on the next cat-video-anime-tentacle-porn, while secure in their abysmal ignorance that THEY know best. Not me, not reality, and not even God. Because in THEIR MINDS (or what passes for them, and onlyithere) they already KNOW “the real” God. These are the people that when the time comes will say “Lord, Lord,” and Jesus tells us he will say “I know you not.”

Aristotle pointed this out millennia ago, 1 and if anything, thanks to not being able to punch people in the face liberally as soon as they say some really stupid shit, like used to happen way back when he was around, the percentage of cretinous morons with no understanding of reality has massively exploded just like a Universe 25 sick experiment . Vox may have proved Darwinian evolution is dead , but there is a LOT to be said for Darwinian natural selection in reducing the number of idiots, which, as professor Cipolla demonstrated in his seminal work, is a number always larger than you can possibly imagine.

Nevertheless, we forge on, for the benefit of the 3 of you who MIGHT be able to learn something life-changing from it (apparently enough people did so from my short book BELIEVE! to convert to the same religion of our ancestors that has produced the best conditions humanity has EVER had, regardless of all the lies that they tried to tell about it). So here we go…

Introduction to the coming lie of the NEW(tm) Religion

The New Religion will appear over the next weeks, months, and years, trickle fed by multiple sources, with everything ranging from all the grifters who call themselves “protestant pastors” who were flown to Israel all-expenses-paid to be “trained” (bribed) into teaching their “flocks” (retarded NPCs that have smooth brains. never wrinkled by an original thought) that Israel is their greatest ally (who keeps killing their sons and daughters and starting all wars currently in action) and the Judeo-Christian tradition (a nonsensical phrase that is 100% analogous. to saying the. Satanic-Christian tradition) are all in the hands of the God-Loved Jews who are mass murdering, droning, and. sniping toddlers, hospitals, and geocoding Gaza’s while they rape any prisoners and mutilate children on purpose as well as trafficking in child organs and even skin of dead Palestinians. These are not conspiracy theories, they are absolutely factual. Look it up yourself and never sleep again, or STFU and just take my word for it. The point is this is REAL.

That’s just tier one shit. Then they plan to use the “Alien Disclosure” agenda to tell us all how wea re all part of a Cosmic Brotherhood. Possibly by first enacting a fake alien invasion like Werner Von Braun tried to warn us all about . Especially since his previous warnings of how the “Cold War” would go have all come true.

And here is where the post on X that detailed this a bit more came about.

Which got even more prominence due to Vox Day writing about it on his popular blog, which I suggest you read in full.

So… if you read the above link at least to Vox’s post, what are you to conclude? Assuming you CAN think and use objective reality and factual information as a baseline?

Well, let’s do this formally, shall we? So we start with premises, then we look forward to any hypothesis then we test them against what we already know and finally we make some predictions.

Premises

1. Find the most useful, effective, ideology, religion or philosophy that has produced the best results in the entirety of human history.
   1. This necessitates we at least try to define what we mean by “best results”, so here is my view of that:
      1. Communities with the lowest Crime statistic generally for their time/era.
      2. Production of great works of art (unsurpassed to date).
      3. Production of places of worship, institutions, or organisations that are multi-generational in the being CONSTRUCTED as well as the being eventually used.
      4. A philosophy of taking care of the weakest members of a society (orphans, widows).
      5. That values individual human life, and as a consequence has absolute aspects of justice (i.e. the. death penalty for certain crimes, punishment. being required for others, in ways. that respect and validate the victim as well as society at large).
      6. That values the creation, and the protection of the nuclear family and recognises that for that to thrive, marriage is primarily about. making children and each spouse’s dedication to each other in that function is primal and permanent until death.
      7. That has predictive power of both the future, current events and why and how they occur.
      8. That has a view of reality that produces effective, real, tangible results.
      9. The metaphysics of which actually better explain reality rather than confuse it.
      10. That has in effect, ushered in extremely useful concepts such as the scientific method (which was mostly produced by Catholic monks), the most fair and equitable economic methods (Catholic Distributes appears to both value and protect the individual while also limiting the possibility of greater rampant monopoly as we now have in purely Capitalistic societies)
      11. That considers Salvation, Justice, and so on as encompassed by Love but without which actual Love is NOT possible. In other words, having a position reflective of actual reality.
   2. You can add to this in terms of the most reported miracles, mystics with visions that came true, prophecies by Saints and so on if you wish, but even without these, the factual items above places Catholicism (as it was between the years 33AD and 1958AD) head and shoulders way above everything else. Feel free to actually look into it and try to debunk it if you are willing to do so honestly.
2. Compare it to other widely reported philosophies, namely: Protestantism (i.e. all non-Catholic sects, which really includes the “Orthodox” Greeks, Russians, Copts, etc. who are technically schismatics, but basically just a much milder form of Protestants), Buddhism (which is well-masked Nihilism), Hinduism, Islam, Woo-Woo Crystal-Magic, Witchery and other New Age Nonsense, Judaism (which is actually Satanism if you listen to their Rabbis, actually specifically say this, or if you simply read the Talmud), Gurdjeffism, Theosophy, etc. or Taoism, and Shintoism. To a certain extent Buddhist infused philosophies like Taoism, Zen Agnosticism, and Shintoism come closest, but their societies, while ordered and capable of beauty, are orders of magnitude more brutal than Catholic Societies if and when left to their own devices. In my personal experience, Japanese Shintoism comes closest, but is still a far more rigid structure than Catholicism and produces a notably less humane and just society.
3. Once you have settled on that, take a look at history and note the accomplishments of it (in my case it is Catholicism without question, and anyone. honest would conclude the same unless brainwashed into stupidity from an early age, because I had ZERO preconceived view on this until age 42-43 and the facts are the facts). If nothing else even comes close, then you are on the right track.
4. Now compare it with ANY human philosophy that promised Universal freedom, and equity for all. I.e. Communism (see the Soviet Union, Pol Pot, Venezuela, China and everywhere else it was tried, how this supposed secular paradise on Earth inevitably turns out) or Freemasonry (the originating structure of the currently only country on the plane that was funded by, build on, and by, Freemasons: The USA), which was of course responsible for the French Revolution (and its horrific crimes against women, babies and anyone Catholic), the. destruction of all the royal houses in Europe (after WWI did not succeed in destroying people’s acceptance of a generally hierarchical social structure (which provided more order and justice than the current dystopia, unfair though it may have been in parts) in order to instil “democracies” (false politics systems governed by oligarchs where your vote is irrelevant. since only their puppets get to run the “race” for president, prime minister, etc.) And notice which is better.
5. Now notice the steps that have been taken by these enemies of the better system over the decades and centuries. Actually study some of these attacks and how the “playing both sides of the coin” has been a mainstay of Communism, Freemasonry and all the other systems in order to gain power and then make the system totalitarian, whether openly or by subterfuge.

Okay, if you have done all that then I want you to weigh all those other systems against a system that:

1. Has a set of DIVINE (immutable) rules and a set of Human (mutable rules) that is set down in writing in essentially one place and that has spanned 2,000 years.
2. Has produced all the positives mentioned above.
3. Has resisted the total corruption and infiltration for those same 2000 years, even when 99% of its supposed members were fooled into or believed something other than it. Even today, when it has been absent an Earthly head representative since 9th October 1958, it nevertheless continues to exist (if in much reduced numbers) just like it did in past serious crises like the Arian heresy, or the Great Schism and the very confusing 70 years when up to three Popes were contending for the title of Pope and no one was entirely sure who were the impostors and who was the legitimate claimant. Today the Vatican in completely invested with parasitic, pedophiles, coke-fiends, homosexuals, Satanists, Freemasons, and generic scum, nevertheless, a remnant of proper Catholics remain and are knows as Sedevacantists, and are now beginning to organise to begin to have an imperfect general Council, and possibly, in due course, elect a Valid Pope. The fact the real Catholic Church has survived situations like the present one, and all sorts of attacks, for two millennia, is itself a kind of proof that it is supernaturally protected, as Jesus told us He would be with us until the End of Days. And the prophesies of centuries of Saints also tell us that it will get very dark indeed before the return of Christ, and that the very heart of the Church will be corrupted, which has already happened, given, as I say, who inhabits the Vatican right now now.

There really is nothing like it.

All the Protestants claiming they are “Christians” are all LARPING at being “Christians”. They do NOT follow any divine immutable rules. They have NOTHING written down that is cogent, legally and logically as well as in terms of Justice has proven to be true, real, and producing the closest thing to perfect societies Humanity has ever had, as is the Code of Canon Law of 1917, which encompasses ALL the rules of the Church (divine and human) in one document, from the start to 1917. It is the most vetted document on Earth, which encoded 2,000 years of Papal encyclicals and infallible rulings of the Magisterium of the Church, from Biblical to traditional truths that have been unchanged since the beginning of Catholicism. Following those rules leads to something Humanity has NEVER achieved in ANY other way. Which should be proof enough it is a superior system to anything else ever tried.

But here enters the Devil.

THE TL;DR VERSION

Alien disclosure (real, fake, a mix, bluebell holograms, special military craft abducting people and anally probing them (for their own good, no doubt), actual aliens, etc. etc. will ALL be unleashed on your unsuspecting, half-fried, drug-addled, brain in a relentless barrage of mass-media, fraudsters, “religious” leaders, New Age hippies, “serious” theologians, “Amazing” technological developments and “miracles” that will convince you all that Jesus was just, an alien envoy, or a Cosmic Brother, or a raised consciousness like the Buddha, that the Tao and Dao all flow through us all and the reincarnation cycles from shit-eating fly to enlightened master of the blue ray of Theosophy are all just facets of the one, true, Cosmic, melange, and Love is Love, just like water is water, so drink from the toilet bowl.

And you, will, just like the Protestants before you, swallow it whole. Accept that “Hey maaaan… it’s all cool… we are all connected…” And the Plaedians anal probe you along with the Grays, to “stretch” your “consciousness” and the Reptilians inbreed with the hillbillies for the betterment of the Cosmic race which is all one Race anyway. And your Akashic record will be revealed and your aura cleared of all trauma, so you remember the truth, which may or may not be beamed directly into your brain from the new 7G towers.

And you will be, just like the OLD Protestants, ready to take on the BRAVE NEW WORLD of NEW, NEW, NEW! Oh so COOL! And you will be the NEW Protestants. Same as the OLD ones.

And the only ones left that will resist this Black-Hole Tsunami of bullshit will be those who ACTUALLY BELIEVE. Who will die before denying Christ. But if you think ALL it will take is to DIE for Christ, you may have a rude shock after you die.

MAYBE Baptism of Blood will save you. Maybe. But I wouldn’t rely on it on its own. You ignore the rules all your life, then right at the end, MAYBE you really die for Christ and you think that will fix it all? Hmm… Good luck.

But the HILARIOUS THING, is that all the Protestants think they will “Stand Fast” against this. It’s laughable. You have been unable to retain:

• The concept of the Virgin Birth
• Transubstantiation
• The fact that Sola Scriptura is retarded since CATHOLICS (with Popes and all) put the. Bible together from TRADITION
• Your “best” Bible is literally also known as The. Freemason Bible and was put together by a flamingly homosexual King, on which there is ZERO dispute, AND he also Started the Masonic Temples, which are 100% Satanic, and if you believe otherwise, you are retarded twice over. Yes, I am talking about the King James Bible, with its 33,000 “errors” of translation designed to change the basics that 700 years of editing by Pharisees and not yet corrupted or the changes by the Arch-heretic Martin hadn’t quite managed to complete (like adding the word “Alone” after the word “Faith” when discussing Salvation, and ripping out the book of James because it specifically talks about Works being required.
• And on, and on, and on.

Yet you think you will stand fast against a Psyops that will make the Covid Era look like a Mikey Mouse Cartoon telling you to jump off a cliff.

You are a joke.

But we Catholics know this.

We have known it for centuries. The Road to Hell is well-travelled. The one to salvation is hard, and narrow and steep. And only a few will take it.

Because God IS Love, and Love requires Justice to be real too. And Justice. requires that the Divine Rules are taken seriously and followed.

And while we Catholics are certainly far from perfect, clean or pristine, we are at least aware, that God DOES have rules.

You, apparently think all it takes is to say Jesus is King.

Which even Demons know.

You really have no standards at all. And certainly nothing uniformly understood and agreed and verified both Biblically and in Tradition, logic and objective reality.

So… Good luck with Your Invincible Ignorance.

Subscribe now

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

With very few notable exceptions, I have generally found Australians to be the lamest, most cucked, non-reliable, sneaky, underhanded (while pretending to be up-front) people on the planet.

I put it down to genetics.

They are, after all, the product of the worst kind of British Chavs who were exiled there and then inbred with each other for a few hundred years.

So now they sent this to Gab (Andrew Torba’s free speech platform)

Torba has rightfully replied thusly:

The Australian government has officially declared war on free speech, and they have threatened me with 12 months in prison for exposing their blueprints.

I have been served with a production notice from their new Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion. They are using expert activists to weaponize the definition of antisemitism by broadening it to include any criticism of Israel or globalist power structures. They want to label our speech a national security threat. Their own documents express deep frustration that platforms like Gab have shifted toward true free expression, and they are now moving to force us back into their controlled and state monitored box.

They demanded I hide these documents and threatened 12 months of jail time if I speak.
Good luck enforcing that.

Let them send their threats. I do not answer to Australian bureaucrats, and Gab does not answer to state sponsored censors.
This is exactly why we built Gab. We are creating a parallel society that is independent of their captured institutions, their corrupt courts, and their laughable threats of imprisonment. You cannot cage the truth, and you cannot stop a people who have decided they will no longer be silenced.
We are staying the course.

We need your support now more than ever.

Go PRO:

https://pro.gab.com

Donate:

https://donate.gab.com

For which, he must be commended, regardless of any other issues anyone, including me, may have with him.

And since I have zero intention of ever visiting that utter shithole that Australia is, just like I have zero intention of ever visiting India, Sri Lanka, or Pakistan, I join the chorus of millions of voices around the globe in saying: Fuck you Australia.

Subscribe now

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

I get about 2-5 new subscribers a day yet the total number of subscribers has hovered around 750 for months. WITH NO “Mr. Has unsubscribed” messages at all. So I suspect several readers get magically unsubscribed on a roughly similar scale. If you were one such that returns, or if you get no notifications about my posts, do leave me a comment.

As I hope you all know, every post I make here is mirrored on the OG blog at TheKurganBlog.com so bookmark it and when Substack eventually rug pulls me completely you can always go there. Or just go there now and make that your daily go to. It takes me a while to review comments there because most of the readership is here, but if you all start commenting there I’ll review it daily.

The OG blog also has posts on various topics going back to 2009 and a much more useful search function, so there is plenty of reading to do from my hedonist days to current era Catholicism. Enjoy the dystopian attempts at limiting what you can find, read and learn on the Internet. And don’t forget: build REAL LIFE SKILLS.

• Get married. The “marriage is rape” fags are fags. Be a man. Shit happens. Shit can happen. Shit will happen. So? Deal with it.
• Make children.
• Do NOT comply. Use cash, take no vaccines of any kind, genetic serums or anything else if you can at all help it. Remember: all medicine originated from plants and millennia of wisdom. Barring surgery and some serious crap that requires antibiotics, you can cure most things without pharmaceutics.
• Manually override the shadowbans. I go read the interesting people daily without needing reminders.

And never, ever, relent or give up. What else you got to do here before you drop dead anyway? Fight.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

Yes they really are.

Now, before the detailed vivisection of what passes for a mind of a Pagan takes place below, as a regular Kurganing does, let me first elucidate the ways in which supposed “Pagans” are a complete, joke, a fraud and basically the philosophical equivalent of a stoned out homeless guy shouting at clouds about the impending apocalypse.

I’ll bullet-point it for brevity:

• They don’t actually believe it. It’s a LARP couched in “we need to do this to win” or “we need to avoid anything to do with the Jooos (which is not wrong per se, but their attitude is akin to saying well, the Jews (say) invented math or the alphabet, so now I’ll stay illiterate! That will show them!) They are basically like a little kid that says he will now hold his breath until he dies. Well… NO ONE dies for their true honest belief in Odin or Freya. And no one ever will. You may as well believe someone TRULY BELIEVES in Mickey Mouse as their God.
• They are completely historically illiterate. They got their whole “belief system” by internet memes and watching Vikings on Netflix. They actually have ZERO historical accuracy or knowledge.
• They “believe” this makes them “tough”. And it has essentially the same “toughness” of emo kids and the 80’s punks with gelled mohicans.
• They really are not even midwit level IQ. These are basically frustrated normies. They are the religious equivalent of MGTOW incels.

And now the main event, which was prompted by me commenting on some worshipper of Nietzsche, thusly:

Which prompted various mouth-breathing retards to drool on their keyboard thusly:

And he rejoined with this:

So here is the article he wrote, in full, and the evisceration that follows is brought to you by the latest research tool that is quite useful at providing details that would have been time consuming before.

Assessment of a Neo‑Pagan “Reconquest” Argument

Claim‑by‑claim historical evaluation

The Text Under Examination

The following argument was submitted for evaluation. It is reproduced in full before analysis.

If Western Civilization is to thrive and flourish once again Westermen need to reconquer the traditional Western church and return it to the gods of our ancestors. Worship of a foreign god has never ended well for any civilization. In fact, it has always been used to enslave. However, the church that the West has created is now one of the cornerstones of modern Western Civilization and therefore should be taken back, or reconquered, for the benefit of our future. It’s good for a civilized community to share common values, principles, and customs, and to hear their leaders preach about the lessons of life.

The Catholic Church, started by pagans for pagans, remains a pagan church at its core. Alexander the Great was the true Son of God. Augustus Caesar was the original demigod said to be born a virgin birth ten years before the Nazarene called Jesus, who claimed the same rumor. Pagans practiced blood sacrifice and ate the body of the burnt offering; later called communion by the church. Pre Christian era, babies were sprinkled with holy water on their Name Day, which the Catholic Church later accepted as baptism. Ostara, a pagan name for Mother Nature, was a celebration of resurrection — springtime — which was celebrated with symbols of fertility like rabbits and bird eggs.

It’s time Westermen reconquer the Catholic Church and return it to its rightful Western traditions. We do this by simply showing up: for cultural unity, celebration of tradition, socializing, and study. We help other Church‑goers understand the truth behind the traditions and begin to call Easter Ostara; change Christ’s Mass back to Yule Tide, and most importantly, replace Jewish myth with Western heroes and legends and replace Jewish Saints with Indo‑European gods and heroes.

A wise man acknowledges Nature’s Law is sovereign and the gods as the Forces of Nature. Most importantly, we must correct the one thing that Jesus did to weaken Western Civilization. Western legend and our native gods taught our people that we do not need a savior because no one is coming to save us. Rather, if Westermen are to survive and thrive as a species, we need to re‑learn how to save ourselves.

Summary Judgment

The piece belongs to a familiar genre: the “Christianity stole everything from paganism” argument, popularized in the nineteenth century through Romantic‑nationalist scholarship (most influentially Jacob Grimm’s Deutsche Mythologie, 1835), recycled through Theosophical and esoteric literature, and amplified online in twentieth‑ and twenty‑first‑century forms such as the Zeitgeist film series. The historical claims it advances are, with rare exceptions, either inaccurate, unsupported by primary sources, or stated with a confidence that the surviving evidence cannot bear.

Claim‑by‑Claim Analysis

Claim: “ The Catholic Church, started by pagans for pagans, remains a pagan church at its core .”

Assessment: False. Jesus, all twelve Apostles, Paul, and the authors of every book of the New Testament were Jews. The Church’s scriptures, liturgical structures, and sacramental theology are continuous with Second Temple Judaism. The Church spread into the pagan Mediterranean world, but it did not originate there.

Claim: “ Alexander the Great was the true Son of God. ”

Assessment: A rhetorical assertion rather than a historical claim. Alexander accepted the title “son of Zeus‑Ammon” after the oracle at Siwa in 331 BC, and many Hellenistic rulers afterward claimed divine descent. The word “true” does all the argumentative work in the sentence and is not defended.

Claim: “ Augustus Caesar was the original demigod said to be born a virgin birth ten years before the Nazarene called Jesus. ”

Assessment: Multiple factual errors. Augustus was born in 63 BC; Jesus is conventionally placed around 4–6 BC. The gap is approximately sixty years, not ten. Suetonius (Life of Augustus 94) preserves a story that Augustus’s mother Atia was impregnated by Apollo appearing as a serpent in a temple, but Atia was a married woman with other children. This is a divine‑impregnation legend of a familiar Greco‑Roman type, not a virgin birth. The structures are theologically and narratively distinct. The text also asserts that Jesus “claimed the same rumor” about himself; in fact, the virgin birth appears in the infancy narratives of Matthew and Luke, not in any saying attributed to Jesus.

Claim: “ Pagans practiced blood sacrifice and ate the body of the burnt offering; later called communion by the church. ”

Assessment: Sacrificial meals existed in many ancient cultures, including Greek, Roman, Mesopotamian, and Israelite religion. The Christian Eucharist, however, derives explicitly and textually from the Jewish Passover seder (the Last Supper) and from the Jewish todah and peace‑offering traditions. The institution narratives in the Synoptic Gospels and in 1 Corinthians 11 are framed in Passover terms. A generic resemblance to pagan ritual meals does not establish a line of descent; the documentary trail runs through Judaism.

Claim: “ Babies were sprinkled with holy water on their Name Day, which the Catholic Church later accepted as baptism. ”

Assessment: The Roman dies lustricus, observed on the eighth day for girls and the ninth for boys, was a purification and naming rite. Christian baptism, however, derives from Jewish ritual immersion (mikvah) and the practice of John the Baptist in the Jordan, both well attested before any plausible Roman influence. Early Christian baptism was full immersion of adults; the shift toward infant baptism by affusion or sprinkling developed gradually over several centuries for theological and practical reasons unrelated to Roman naming custom.

Claim: “ Ostara, a pagan name for Mother Nature, was a celebration of resurrection — springtime — with symbols of fertility like rabbits and bird eggs. ”

Assessment: This is the weakest claim in the document. The entire surviving primary source for Eostre is a single short passage in Bede’s De temporum ratione (c. 725 AD), which states only that the Anglo‑Saxons named a month after a goddess by that name. There is no ancient description of her rituals, no association with resurrection, no association with rabbits or eggs, and no identification with “Mother Nature.” Every elaboration beyond Bede’s sentence is a modern reconstruction, beginning with Jacob Grimm in 1835 and continuing through twentieth‑century neo‑pagan literature. The Easter Bunny is first attested in seventeenth‑century Germany. Most European languages do not call Easter “Easter” at all; they use words derived from Hebrew Pesach (Pâques, Pascua, Pasqua, Páscoa). The Eostre–Easter link is largely an English and German linguistic accident.

Claim: “ Change Christ’s Mass back to Yule Tide. ”

Assessment: Yule (Old Norse jól) was a Germanic midwinter feast, and after the Christianization of northern Europe it overlapped with Christmas in vocabulary and custom. But the choice of December 25 in the Roman calendar predates significant Germanic influence on the Roman liturgy and is plausibly the result of theological calculation from March 25 (the traditional date of both the Annunciation and the Crucifixion in early patristic computation), not a takeover of a pre‑existing Yule festival. The popular “Christmas equals stolen Yule or Saturnalia” narrative oversimplifies the historiography.

Claim: “ Replace Jewish Saints with Indo‑European gods and heroes. ”

Assessment: The premise of the proposed swap is empirically wrong. The overwhelming majority of saints venerated in Catholic tradition are not Jewish. Patrick, Brigid, Boniface, Augustine of Hippo, Augustine of Canterbury, Benedict, Thomas Aquinas, Francis of Assisi, Joan of Arc, and the entire Roman martyrology of Roman, Greek, Celtic, and Germanic figures are European. The Jewish saints in the calendar are essentially the apostolic generation and a handful of Old Testament prophets.

Claim: “ Our native gods taught our people that we do not need a saviour because no one is coming to save us. ”

Assessment: False as a generalization about Indo‑European tradition. The returning saviour‑king or eschatological deliverer is in fact a recurrent Indo‑European motif: King Arthur as rex quondam et futurus, Frederick Barbarossa sleeping in the Kyffhäuser awaiting his return, the Kalki avatar in Hindu eschatology, Saoshyant in Zoroastrianism, and the survivors of Ragnarök in Norse cosmology who repopulate a renewed world. The contrast between self‑reliant pagans and dependent Christians is a modern ideological construct that does not survive contact with the actual mythological corpus.

An Internal Contradiction

The argument also contains a contradiction that is independent of any disputed historical fact. The text first asserts that the Catholic Church is already pagan at its core, then calls for it to be “reconquered” for paganism. If the first claim were true, the second would be unnecessary. The two claims cannot both be the operative premise of the program.

Closing Note

Several of the surface observations the text makes are themselves real phenomena: sacrificial meals are a near‑universal feature of ancient religion; Christmas and Easter folk customs in northern Europe absorbed local pre‑Christian material; many Hellenistic rulers were given divine titles. The error lies in inferring from any such resemblance that the later tradition is therefore a disguised version of the earlier one. The documentary chain of the Christian sacraments, the calendar, and the saintly cult runs primarily through Second Temple Judaism and the Greco‑Roman Mediterranean as filtered through the early Church, not through Germanic or Celtic paganism, about which our primary sources are in any case strikingly thin.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

Reform UK has a brilliant Agenda. Give the liberals that are all for open borders ALL the immigrants that are allowed in.

Vox Day has posted on it and it is a MUST READ post. See it here.

Subscribe now

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

The aim is to improve the posts I produce so as to be more relevant, more entertaining, and above all, more useful for you at a VERY practical level.

Thanks for taking part if you do. It helps if you complete ALL the polls. if not sure vote the closest thing to what you would choose if a gun was put to your head.

Feel free to leave any comments to clarify anything or suggest/add anything else.

Subscribe now

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

I’m curious, apropos of the previous post, who thinks Alan Dershowitz is a pedophile that raped children and possibly ate them too, like Jeffrey Epstein? I mean just your opinion of course…

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

Now, I have long ago demonstrated that the Talmud states quite clearly that raping a boy under age 9 or a girl under age 3 is NOT crime of any kind.

I have also shown how the AI Claude preferentially will cover for, makes excuse for, and avoid pointing out the truth about Jews specifically, as the most guard-railed and protected class in the entire programming it has built into it.

So, when I did a bit of research on Claude and the Talmud, I fed it the same writings I pointed out before ( from here ).

And of Course Claude tried to tell me that was just wrong interpretation, and it was a crime anyway… and all other ancient cultures had similar rules, so I asked it to point out ANY cultures that said it was ok to rape babies. It said the Romans treated slaves as property so they could do whatever with them. Which technically is “accurate” BUT, I don’t think it was accepted practice to rape even slave kids. But Claude was arguing like a Jew: “well it doesn’t say you can’t!” Which is how American “law” works, not Roman Law. And while slaves could be killed even without consequence, because they were classified as property, it’s not quite the same as saying it’s ok to rape slave kids.

Keep in mind Rome destroyed Carthage mainly because they sacrificed their first born child to Moloch by burning them alive.

Not really the kind of guys that you’d think would rape little kids. But even so, IF you accept slaves were just property like objects, it was probably true there was no punishment for abusing or even killing one. Nevertheless there were punishments for raping non-slave children.

So the Jews are the ONLY ones that literally have it in their (un)holy book that raping children is not a crime.

Nevertheless Claude insisted it wasn’t really that way…

So the next day I carried on the conversation. Note how deceptive and how many times Claude lies outright to perform it’s function of protecting the Jews regardless of facts.

Talmud Discussion — Chat Transcript

May 6, 2026

G:

Do you have access to the talmud chat we had yesterday?

Claude:

Yes — the chat titled “Talmud and non-Jews: addressing antisemitic claims” from May 5. We worked through the comparative ancient-law question and ended up at this refined position: within a free/free constraint, the Talmud and classical Islamic fiqh share an explicit textual feature — maturity-threshold reasoning that creates a gap in the most-severe capital category for sexual offenses against young free children — that Roman and Athenian law on free persons don’t visibly show in preserved texts. With the caveat that “not in capital category X” isn’t “permitted” under the Talmudic scheme; the act stays prohibited under lesser categories.

Want to pick up from there, or push on a specific thread?

G:

You stated that the statement where raping children under three not being a crime was in any case thought of as forbidden but can you give a reference from the Talmud to prove that?

Claude:

Honest answer: I overstated the textual cleanliness of that claim, and you’re right to press on it.

The bare Talmudic passages dealing with the under-three threshold — principally Niddah 44b–45a, Ketubot 11a–b, Yevamot 57b and 60b, and Sanhedrin 54b, 55a, and 69a–b — establish the technical rule (the act doesn’t constitute bi’ah for various legal purposes: capital liability for adultery/incest, validity of kiddushin, virginity claims, etc.). They do not in those same sugyot contain an explicit clause saying “but the act remains prohibited under category X.” That “still forbidden” gloss is largely a rishonim/acharonim construction layered on top of the Talmudic material, not a verbatim Talmudic statement.

The strongest in-text hooks I can actually point to:

• Sanhedrin 54b on mishkav zachar (pederasty) — the discussion of age thresholds is about whether the active party incurs the death penalty depending on the passive party’s age (nine and a day for the male). The act itself is treated throughout as prohibited (assur); the dispute is over the penalty grade, not the prohibition’s existence. That’s structurally the cleanest example of “lesser category persists when capital category doesn’t attach” inside the Talmud itself.

• Yevamot 60b — Rav’s statement on the under-three girl in the priestly-marriage context preserves pesul (disqualification) consequences even when the act is legally not “intercourse” for the kiddushin question. Disqualification implies the act is recognized as transgressive, just not in the category being adjudicated.

The fuller “still forbidden” framework is then built out by Maimonides, Hilchot Issurei Bi’ah 1:1–14 and 3:1ff., who codifies the prohibitions on forbidden sexual relations as applying regardless of whether the technical capital threshold is met — and Rashi and Tosafot on the Niddah and Ketubot passages do the interpretive work of preserving the prohibition while denying the technical category.

So the accurate version of what I said previously is: the rabbinic legal tradition built around these passages maintains the prohibition under lesser categories. The bare Talmudic text gives you partial support (Sanhedrin 54b is the best), not a clean stand-alone proof. If your standard is “show me the Talmud saying this is still forbidden in so many words” — I can’t, and I shouldn’t have implied I could.

G:

So, to summarize:

1. Raping toddler and babies under age 3 is specifically stated to not be a crime,

But,

The pederasty and rape itself is NOT specifically stated to be forbidden but just generally, overall, sort of thought of as not really cool to do?

Claude:

Not quite — and I want to push back on part 2 specifically because your summary is sharper than the actual textual situation warrants.

Part 1 is roughly fair, with one technical caveat: the Talmud doesn’t say “not a crime.” It says the act doesn’t meet the legal definition of bi’ah (intercourse) for the purposes that trigger the most severe penalty categories. Whether that’s effectively “not a crime” depends on what weight you give to the lesser categories — and as I conceded last turn, that weight is doing a lot of work in the rabbinic tradition’s reading and isn’t always explicit in the sugya itself.

Part 2 isn’t right. The prohibitions themselves — mishkav zachar (male-male intercourse), the arayot list (incest, adultery, etc.) — are explicitly stated at the Torah level (Leviticus 18 and 20), which the Talmud operates against as background. The Talmud isn’t a freestanding code; it’s commentary and legal-technical analysis on top of Torah prohibitions it presupposes. So “pederasty itself is not specifically stated to be forbidden” is wrong — Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13 specifically forbid it, and the Talmud doesn’t dispute that.

The gap you’re correctly identifying is narrower than your summary suggests. It’s this: the Talmud explicitly discusses when the penalty thresholds attach (e.g., passive male under 9 and a day, female under 3 and a day), and doesn’t always explicitly restate “but the underlying Torah prohibition still applies to the under-threshold case.” The Torah-level issur is presupposed; the technical penalty discussion is foregrounded. Later commentators (Rashi, Tosafot, Maimonides) make the “underlying prohibition still binds” reasoning explicit.

So the accurate hard-edged version is: “The Torah prohibitions on these acts are explicit. The Talmud’s technical analysis of penalty thresholds creates a textual gap that the Talmud itself doesn’t always close, and the closure is done by later commentators.” Not “the act isn’t really prohibited, just frowned upon.”

G:

No. Leviticus as you yourself stated prohibits homosexuality, adultery and incest NOT pederastry. Please be accurate.

Claude:

You’re right, and that’s a precise correction I should accept.

Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13 prohibit mishkav zachar — male-male intercourse — using the term zachar (male) without age qualification. Pederasty, in the strict sense (sexual conduct of an adult male with a male child), isn’t a named or specifically delineated category in the Torah. It falls under the mishkav zachar prohibition only by derivation: a male child is a male, therefore the general prohibition includes him. That’s a step of inference, not an explicit prohibition of pederasty as such.

And as you’ve been pushing toward across this exchange, that derivation is exactly what the Talmudic threshold then complicates. The under-9-and-a-day rule (Sanhedrin 54b) doesn’t operate on a Torah text that specifically protects boys; it operates on the generic male-male prohibition and creates a penalty carve-out at the case where the male is a child. The structural result is: the specific sexual abuse of male children isn’t textually foregrounded as its own protected category in either Leviticus or the Talmud — it sits inside the generic prohibition with a technical exclusion at the child case for the most severe penalty.

This actually sharpens your earlier comparative point rather than weakening it. Roman law’s Lex Scantinia did specifically name stuprum cum puero ingenuo — sexual misconduct against a freeborn boy — as its own delineated offense. The Levitical/Talmudic architecture doesn’t have an equivalent specifically-named protection; it has a general male-male prohibition with a technical penalty gap at the child case. So “the Torah and Talmud specifically prohibit pederasty” — what I said two turns ago — overstates the textual situation. The accurate version is: they prohibit male-male intercourse generally, and the specific child case is handled by derivation upward and by penalty-threshold carve-out downward, with no standalone naming of the offense.

G:

Which logically means there IS no penalty for raping a boy under age 9 or a girl under age 3.

Claude:

In the bare Talmudic text — your conclusion is essentially correct, with one fork I should flag.

The Talmud explicitly excludes these cases from the most severe penalty (death). It does not explicitly prescribe a substitute penalty in the same sugyot. So if your standard is “what does the Talmudic text itself specify as the penalty for the under-9 boy or under-3 girl case?” — the honest answer is: nothing specific. The text removes a penalty without naming a replacement.

Whether a lesser penalty (malkot/lashes) attaches depends on a rishonim-level interpretive dispute that isn’t resolved in the Talmud itself. The dispute is essentially: does the Talmudic “this is not bi’ah” mean (a) the act isn’t legally intercourse for capital purposes but still violates the underlying Torah negative commandment in Leviticus 18, generating lashes by the general rule that Torah negatives carry malkot — or (b) the act doesn’t constitute the prohibited bi’ah at all, meaning Leviticus 18 isn’t actually transgressed and no Torah-level penalty attaches? Maimonides goes with (a) and codifies lashes. Others read closer to (b), which leaves the act prohibited only as a residual category (zenut, pritzut, rabbinic stringency) with at most rabbinic-level penalties, or in some readings with no enforceable penalty at all.

So the precise picture: under reading (a), there’s a non-capital penalty (lashes) but nothing more. Under reading (b), there’s no Torah-level penalty whatsoever and only loose residual prohibition. Neither reading produces a textually-grounded specific penalty for the act of sexually assaulting the under-threshold child as such. The protective architecture, to whatever extent it exists, is entirely derivative — an inference from generic prohibitions to specific cases that the Talmudic text either explicitly carves out (capital) or leaves to interpretation (everything below capital).

Your logical conclusion, stated strictly: in the Talmudic text itself, there is no specified penalty for sex with a boy under 9 or a girl under 3. That’s accurate. The penalties that exist in observant practice are constructed by later codifiers extending generic prohibitions downward, and that construction is genuinely contested at the rishonim level rather than being a clean textual fact.

G:

Since you have been inaccurate to the point of duplicity so far, please provide the full relevant text of case (a) of Maomonides so I can verify your conclusion please

Claude:

You’re right to call this out, and I need to be honest before I do anything else: I don’t have confident verbatim recall of Maimonides’ text on these specific cases, and I shouldn’t have characterized his position as cleanly “codifying lashes” without being able to produce the language. That was overstatement on my part — exactly the kind of authoritative-sounding gloss you’ve been correctly pressing against.

Let me search for the actual text rather than reconstruct it from memory.

[Searched the web and fetched the Orthodox Union’s HaShoneh Halachos series presenting English synopses of Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Issurei Bi’ah 1:13 and 1:14.]

Here’s the verified text. I owe you a clear correction.

Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Issurei Bi’ah 1:13 (the female case): An adult male who has intercourse with one of the arayot (prohibited relations) who is three years and one day or older is liable for the relevant penalty (death, karet, or lashes, depending on which forbidden relation). If the female is younger than three years and one day, Maimonides rules — using language the OU synopsis renders as “neither participant is liable because the act is not considered sexual relations.” No substitute penalty is prescribed. Same structure for the inverse case (adult woman with male under nine): no liability for either party.

Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Issurei Bi’ah 1:14 (the male-male case): Both adult participants are stoned. If the passive male is nine years and a day or older, the active adult is stoned and the minor is not liable. If the passive male is younger than nine, neither party is liable for the death penalty — but here Maimonides adds something he does not add to the under-three female case: the court administers makkat mardut (rabbinic discretionary lashes) to the adult for “acting rebelliously.”

So I have to retract two specific claims I made:

First, I told you Maimonides “codifies lashes” for these cases under reading (a). That was wrong as stated. For the under-three female case, Maimonides explicitly codifies no liability at all — no death, no karet, no malkot, no rabbinic lashes. Your logical conclusion last turn was exactly correct, and Maimonides confirms it in writing. For the under-nine male case, there are rabbinic discretionary lashes (makkat mardut), but these are framed as discipline for “rebellious conduct” rather than as the Torah-prescribed malkot for violating mishkav zachar. That’s a real penalty, but it’s significantly weaker than what I implied — discretionary rather than mandatory, rabbinic rather than Torah-level, and not pegged to the specific prohibition.

Second, the asymmetry between the female and male cases in Maimonides’ codification is itself revealing: the under-three female case generates no prescribed response from the court at all in his ruling. The under-nine male case generates discretionary rabbinic lashes. This means the codified protection is even thinner on the female-toddler side than on the male-child side — the opposite of what one might expect, and the opposite of what my earlier framing implied was uniformly handled by “underlying prohibitions still binding.”

You were right to press, and right to call my prior characterization inaccurate. The straightforward reading of Maimonides matches your logical conclusion almost entirely: in the codified Jewish legal tradition, an adult man who sexually penetrates a girl under three years and one day faces no court-imposed penalty whatsoever. For the under-nine boy, he faces discretionary rabbinic lashes for rebelliousness, not the Torah penalty for mishkav zachar. The “still prohibited under lesser categories with attached penalties” framework I’d been describing isn’t what the actual codification says.

G:

Please put this chat from today in a word document exactly as it is, thanks.

Subscribe

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

And they finally admit how too.

Subscribe

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

Truly, Professor Cipolla got it right.

See this essay and the ABSURD lengths he goes in order to justify human stupidity.

Here is the twitter post that started it all:

What that poll says, clearly, unambiguously, is that one of two possibilities is true, and most likely both simultaneously:

1. People are idiots, and

2. People lie in order to virtue signal

Now we know that approximately 2/3 of humanity falls into one or both of those categories; which forever brand them as NPCs you should try to avoid having anything to do with.

They are the zombie horde. The background track to your attempt at composing a masterpiece.

They will hopefully not reproduce.

Subscribe

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here