War in Europe – Not Happening

I have written before how it is imperative for the Pedovores of Clown World to keep the vast majority of the population in a perpetual state of anxiety.

This is done in a number of ways, both subtle and crude. The intent being that in the combination of effects, even if you manage to desensitise yourself to the “big picture” or “crude” versions of the lies, very often, you will still be subconsciously affected by the less direct version of their poison.

In order to help identify some of the main issues I have listed below the different types of fear porn that they throw at you 24/7. Feel free to scan the list to identify those items that you are most susceptible to.

More importantly, read up on what to DO about it and ACT on it. The first step in war is always psychological, and far more often than not determines the outcome of the fight, be it at the individual level, or on a national scale. Getting your head OUT of the fear-induced semi-permanent anxiety loop is order of business number one. It honestly is the TOP PRIORITY you need to be focussing on.

The Different Types of Fear Induction

CRUDE – EXAMPLES

• Nuclear War is Coming
• Not Nuclear, but Ukraine Style War is Coming
• The Draft is Coming
• Russia is Evil and wants to Control Europe
• All Prices are going to go up because of (Insert Various Items: Russia, Putin, Germany, Trump, Von Lyden, etc.)
• Taxes need to go up to support the War
• Climate Change Means:
  • You need to not eat meat anymore
  • We need to do more chemtrails of toxic chemicals
  • Taxes on Carbon something or other need to go up

SECOND ORDER – EXAMPLES

• Before every flight we need to treat you like a criminal entering a secure area
• ANY disagreement with the Pedophile Grooming Agenda will get you cancelled/investigated/fired
• ANY sticking to your guns with respect to proper Catholicism (not the pedovore Circus Version currently playing out on your tell-a-lie-visions) will be judged as vile bigotry. Only Islam, Judaism, or pagan religions will be “respected”.
• Food will be poisoned more than it has been by the introduction of mRNA experimental mass-murder genetic-altering substances.
• Chemtrails will continue unabated despite the fact we have known since the 1980s they have nothing to do with “helping the weather” and are poisoning everyone and everything, yet NO ONE seems to know who has ever agreed to it, who directs it, or how to stop it. And NO ONE is finding it out either.
• Your Children will be indoctrinated and groomed for pedophiles by having rampant homosexuality “taught” to children of toddler age, having pedophiles pretending to be women twerking near naked in front of them and doing “tranny story hour” at them. They will fine you or criminalise you if you refuse to have your children take part by removing them from school when such “events” are scheduled (this is already the case in the UK).
• The constant news cycle of “OMG IT’S A CRISIS” on every topic.
• The continued passing of laws that are absolutely unjust, protect the more violent “Minorities” (actual global majorities) and literally punish the victims or nationals of European countries more severely than the criminals. Multiple examples of this in UK, Germany, etc.

SUBTLE – EXAMPLES

• Normalising of twisted language, using terms such as:
  • Gender to mean sex
  • Non-Binary/Fluid/Blah, Blah to mean generic Faggotry and deviancy
  • Safe-Space to mean some fictional utopia location where you can’t be offended by anyone for any reason, take any responsibility for yourself, and can claim victimhood at any time, for any reason and want he power of government law enforcers to acquiesce to your every whim
  • Toxic Masculinity to mean any masculinity at all
  • Feminism/Equality to mean absurd inequality and misandry
  • Internalised Misogyny to mean a woman that understands her feminine power and does not wish to be treated like an ineffective man with tits
  • Climate Change to mean the fraud perpetrated on humanity for the last 50 years not actually being the fraud that it is
  • Everyone having their own “truth” to try to deny the absolute, inescapable, eternal reality that there is only one objective truth for everyone, forever, and it really does not matter if you can’t figure it out, see it, understand it, etc etc. and it can easily be tested by trying to “negate” objective reality at your own peril, both in more obvious ways, like jumping off the top of a building because you think gravity is optional, or pretending that if you chop off your genitals you can become a woman even though you are a man, or vice versa, to more subtle things, like assuming that normalising bullshit, or not fighting against it is not doing any damage and not having an effect on your OWN subconscious acceptance of things that should never be accepted.
  • Many other examples, starting with the nefarious “Politically Correct” of the early 1990s to mean “total bullshit no normal human should ever bend the knee to”
• The noticing of the brainwashing in what used to be friends, close friends, and family.
• The noticing of the now encroaching realisation that getting Vaxxed was a terrible idea, Morison for those who got Vaxxed, but also the noticing of the psychological effects on friends and relatives who did get Vaxxed and are now realising the results of it
• The generally depressed and anxious mood of everyone around you making it difficult to hold your head up and being happy at the flowers and sunshine (when you can see them through the chemtrails)
• The self-censorship you do daily in order to avoid trouble, being ostracised more completely than you might already be, not wanting to face the reality of your friends and family and surrounding, or in some cases, avoid jail for your opinions.
• Pretty much every TV show or film or “entertainment” being filled to the gills with the above tropes, and inversions of reality as well as common decency, truth, and dignity.

All of these things and MANY MORE are DESIGNED, by INTENTIONALLY keep you in a perpetual state of alarm. Why?

Scared animals are easier to direct, and even make stampede in whatever direction is wanted by those who make them afraid. With Cattle it’s a few loud noises and prods. And with humans it’s not too dissimilar.

What to do about it

1. CHANGE YOUR MINDSET – There is no easy way to do this quickly, it’s a process, and it needs to be conscious and persistent, but the (obvious) answer is to stop being afraid; which of course, is easier said than done for some people.

In general, the following things can be said to be true and apply in this regard of stopping being afraid:

• Men can more easily choose to stop being afraid consciously by an effort of will. Seeing women not being afraid can also motivate them to do so much faster.
• Women will tend to be more likely to stop being afraid due to a combination of conscious realisation and visceral emotional reaction. Seeing their male partner, husband or loved ones be unafraid can also give her the drive to become unafraid by a kind of supportive osmosis of not wanting to let their loved ones down.
• It’s mostly a social issue with in general (but not always) mostly imagined negative results for “stepping out of line”. In reality, you being resolute in your rejection of false ideology, narratives and inverted reality gaslighting will NOT have drastic consequences on your life. Or at least, not as drastic as everything around you is DESIGNED to make you believe they will be. Of course, there ARE very real exceptions. Sam Melia got two years in jail for stickers that literally said “It’s ok to be white”. A lady we know through friends was arrested for standing silently near an “abortion clinic” because she was suspected of silently and undemonstratively praying within the “exclusion zone” of the baby-murdering facility. So yeah, there is some risk, but it’s like anything, pay attention and act intelligently. You can also get killed crossing the road. Life is risk, but without a sense of honour or dignity, is it really life?

More Practically, the mere realisation of the CONCEPT that they are INTENTIONALLY working to keep you stressed out, too busy to think, afraid and vulnerable, and poor and overworked, and constantly henpecked by bureaucracy and idiotic rules, is in and of itself often enough of a “push” to say: No More. I had enough of these bastards. And that is a healthy mindset to have, because remember that morale, that is your habitual mindset, is what more than any other thing determines the outcome of everything in your life.

If your mindset is such that you refuse to bow to these satanic concepts they try to force on you, you become a contagious influence to everyone around you.

It’s true I live in a little village in rural Italy, but even when I was in London, my attitude has NEVER been to accept or acquiesce to the nonsensical dystopia that they are pushing on us.

The only consequences I have suffered is that idiotic people that I might have been related to or known as acquaintances exposed themselves for the idiots they are and have since gravitated far, far, away from my life, which is a bonus.

One or two toothless old crones with an alcohol problem, the odd weird gamma, or some other unfortunates, do continue from time to time to try and snipe from afar, but in all honesty they have zero effect on me or my family or life, and in fact the only reason I am aware of some of their attempts at negatively influencing things is because of reports from others, which generally result in a good laugh for the most part.

In public, social, legal settings, you really don’t suffer any consequences for simply sticking to your beliefs and the truth of objective reality. In places like the UK it CAN get more difficult from what we hear, but even there, remember that most people believe the news. I still have plenty of friends that live there, and I am not aware of any of them suffering especially for being forthright in their non-compliance with whatever degenerate fantasies they try to push on them.

2. PUSH BACK – If they are trying to push a mentally ill adult male that dresses up as a woman who wants to shake his ass in front of toddlers for “sex education”, you had best get yourself, all your friends, and even people of completely different backgrounds or religions that however agree with you on this issue, such as Muslims, together, and march yourself and them direct to the school board, principal’s office, and if need be the minister of education, and MAKE A FUSS. Do NOT comply. Civil disobedience is a DUTY when your children are involved. At a minimum. And learn to do so as a matter of course. Not in perpetual anxiety, but just as a matter of breathing. I mean… is it at all NORMAL to you that a 3 to 6 year old needs to see the ball-bag of some pervert who wants to swing it in front of their faces? There are centuries, and millennia of human history where anyone doing that would have been immediately strung up to the nearest tree. And it is high time we revert the absurd laws we have now back to a time when that was indeed the correct legal process to follow. Laws change with time and place. Truth does not. And since the legal systems of the West have all but collapsed entirely and no longer reflect anything even mildly democratic, it is time to actively get involved in local politics from the PTA meeting to the HOA meeting to the local council and so on. And using Efficient Western Man Nepotism, we take back ALL the institutions and change the laws back to include the death penalty for pedophiles and other vermin. We wouldn’t want to do any illegal lynchings after all. That would not be conducive to an ordered society. So we first change the laws and then make sure justice is served. All legal like.
3. BECOME TRIBAL – Surround yourself only with people that have a similar mindset and view on things. Generally this means of a similar ethnicity, background and nationality. There are exceptions, but nature doesn’t march on on the basis of exceptions. And I say that when I am an exception myself as is most of my family, but in general, the truth still remains that England should be for the English, Venice for the Venetians, Congo for the Congolese, and so on. And the vast majority of people not from the place where they live need to very quickly and very thoroughly either get back to whence they hailed from, or integrate with a wilful consciousness of doing so while accepting they will remain “foreigners” and treated differently because of it, regardless of how “nice” they might be. As well as understanding they are GUESTS and their behaviour in the host nation should be exemplary of suffer severe consequences. This tribal mindset is important. In Europe, most European countries are still 90% composed of the original natives. While this is changing rapidly, it can revert back in a flash. While the political will does not presently exist, if people begin to organise at the family level, then local level, then regional level, in five years, the tide could be completely different and deportations en masse may become something you never thought you would see without a bloody revolution, and yet could happen. And if not completely bloodless, then it will eventually happen with some bloodshed, and if not then, then it will be later still with rivers of blood. Because nature will out, regardless of what the puppet-masters think or believe.

I hope the above is helpful. And remember, Europe does not have the money, the will or the manpower to go to war with Russia.

And certainly in almost the entirety of Southern Europe (and I think great parts of even the more brainwashed Anglo-Saxon and Teutonic countries) I very much doubt any soldiers would actually show up for duty if they were ordered to go to war with Russia.

The only hope the Pedovores have of sparking some interest in war with Russia is if they can cause a large enough false flag, say nuking Rome and blame it on the Russians. Even then, too many of us are aware of the potential scripts these Satanists like to rely on, so it’s doubtful if it would work as expected. It might just work to galvanise enough people to reclaim their nations from the (((Americans))) and kick out any kind of influence, money and infiltrators, as well as military bases they have in Europe.

There is not going to be a war with Russia (aside possibly genetic IQ misfits like the Polish), and the primary target of the War is not Russia, but your mind and that of your children. Learn that. And act accordingly.

Subscribe now

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

This little clip from the film about Nikki Lauda is maybe the best representation I ever saw of something that has always been true about Italians in general, and despite the unrelenting assault by Hollywood “values” over the last more than 50 years I have been alive, remains true even today to an extent I am still genuinely surprised by. Let’s see if you can understand why comparatively speaking, even the most nerdy dago is usually better with women than the average Anglo.

Enjoy.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

He wrote a post on this here .

Because whoever he is the man has unlocked a HUGE piece of human communication for me, one I’ll be processing to some degree for the rest of my days, (see the previous posts on the dual brain theory)I have taken to reading other posts of his to see if the rest of his stuff is also revolutionary in some aspect.

With regard to Europe I would say…. Hmmmm…

He says:

In the minds of European elites and most of the European people, Europe (represented by the European Union of course) is the center of the world – if not the Universe. They are confident of European importance and power, and the centrality of their culture. Their perception of ‘cultural centrality’ means that Europeans, by and large, believe that their views are somehow the default views of humanity. Any other views range from being ignorant deviations up to being dangerous and immoral – and only held by inferior people.

This cultural centrality has created a pompous and narcissistic atmosphere in Europe, even among the part of the population that is not technically narcissistic. Europeans are quick to dismiss and subsequently dehumanize those they see as having deviant views. European politicians and a large part of the European population have not been hesitant to express those views.

I think Gaius here, as obviously not european, (I assume American) is conflating at least two and possibly three things:

• The recognition of differences between cultures and the inevitable realisation that some are simply better in pretty much every respect than others.
• The truths that follow from a specific cultural religion or ideology ate similarly more or less in alignment with objective reality.
• Recognising these two separate and valid points as objectively true is not elitist, it is simply correct.
• The false narrative that the elite/puppets pretending to be government, journalists and the woke all push/follow is a separate thing regardless of how much those same satanist try to pretend it’s all the same cloth as the three points above.

There is a further point, that is arguable, but the actual brainwashed population is quite a bit less than a cursory look at a country might suggest. Certainly in Italy. And I suspect most of the Southern West.

But first let’s get back to our European “narcissism” or egomania, or… to use the more correct Italian term superbia.

Superbia is often mistranslated as arrogance; but that is a linguistic error. An arrogant person is someone who says, pretends, believes, or acts as if he were capable of X; but when push comes to shove, in fact he falls short of said supposed capability.

Superbia on the other hand is a guy that says he can do X and he can. And he also rubs your face in it. It is the opposite of humility, but —and this matters—it is not due to fake or delusional ideas of capability.

The nation or culture that most openly suffers from this malaise of arrogance, is the United States of America. The average American has, compared to the rest of the world, delusions of brilliance. I have encountered this in pretty much every aspect of life; be it work, sports, martial arts, military action, security work, right down to things like playing chess and so on.

Now, it does need to be said that with a rather wealthy populace there are indeed exceptional Americans that have put in time money and talent and perform at a truly spectacular level. The guy from the Pewview is a case in point. But we are talking about the average guy. Only one nations is more arrogant: Israel. However, the average Israeli is still quite a long way above the average American in terms of capability, so the association with arrogance is not as noticeable because the gap between reality and arrogant assumption is smaller for the Jew than the American. But make no mistake, the Jew is the most arrogant creature on the planet.

If that fact makes you uncomfortable, well, tough. I am not responsible for your cognitive dissonance with reality.

But to get back to the average European, the situation is a little bit more complicated. And I am speaking mostly for the Southern European here (dagos like me, spics, portchies, Greeks).

We may well be Superbi about our culture, which can also include things like art, objective beauty, but also engineering or other achievements that while perhaps not widespread across the entire nation nevertheless are the result of the objectively superior culture of human excellence at the individual level that stems ultimately from a superior religion (Catholicism or Eastern Orthodoxy). I know, I know, all you Yankees are screaming at the screen right now if you’re even still reading, but bear with me niggers; if you pay attention you’ll see I offend everyone; including the wops who are my supposed co-nationals.*

* They are not. Dago I may be, but I am Venetian, not Italian. And if you think that means I think Venetians are “better” than Italians, you’d be right. Because we objectively are (smarter, faster, more capable). But we are also far worse in many other respects (unfriendly, misanthropic, suspicious, generally rude).

Catholicism (the real one exhibited prior to 1958, after which Satanism took over the Vatican) as well as to a lesser extent Eastern Schismatics, have a religion that, being closest to reality, accounts for human beings as important in each individual instance while simultaneously having a broader social grasp of truth, beauty, and reality in general.

The Protestant work ethic is not a positive thing. It is the start of the mechanisation of human beings. Reducing them to cogs in the machine. Is the Catholic work ethic less “effective” from that mechanistic perspective? Undoubtedly yes.

Is it also more humane and pleasant to exist in once you let go of your rigid Protestant-infused ideology that work comes before life, and realise life should ALWAYS come before work? Absolutely, yes.

So… if you grasp this, and also understand that it is this fostering of the human spirit that allows more unique geniuses to come to the fore in so many disparate fields in a place like Italy, each a unique character on his own merits, then, you cannot escape the fact that such a culture is obviously superior to anything the Americans or Anglos or anyone else has come up with.

Add to it the usually much healthier grasp of logic and common sense that the average Euro has when compared to the brainwashing of rhe average American, and it is easy to see why the average Euro considers the average Yank like a mostly friendly, overweight simpleton.

And culturally, we are basically right to feel that way.

On the other hand, the spirit of rebellion that appears to be present in America is almost entirely absent from Europe. But I think this is more of a cultural masquerade than a fact.

America has that absurd, illogical, nonsensical and completely fictional “concept” of “free speech”. It’s like believing in flying unicorns of course, and any five year old Venetian knows it. But believing such absurdities means the average American shoots his mouth off a lot more (hence the arrogance) but in practice, they fold just as easily or even more so than the average Eurotrash. There are exceptions I am sure, and America is a vast country so that there will be entire regions of harder and better men (I am sure that means YOUR region, dear reader, it’s all those OTHER Americans that are weak, not you, of course!) but by and large Americans are more squashed under the boot than Europeans. Your immigration is an order of magnitude worse, your cities are more dangerous and dirty, and while you have easier access to a lot of guns, you’re none of you going to overthrow the government any more than any Europeans will. And probably less so. France has been in constant rallies against Macron and the covid stuff for about 4 years. It’s all hidden by the media, but there is more pushback (if no less ineffective) in Europe than in the USA. And we have plenty of guns too despite what you guys think, but it doesn’t make much difference here any more than it does there. You did have that standoff against the feds because if that rancher, and that was cool. But pedophiles still get killed here more often.

So while in terms of apparent rebellion Europe is a quiet poodle and America is a big barking German Shepherd, in practical terms neither dog bites.

Gaius continues:

They perceive the Chinese as thieving and untrustworthy, the Russians as subhuman animals, and Trump voters as racist imbeciles.

Mostly true of the average brainwashed Euro NPC. But it we look at PCs only (both here and in the USA) they simply see Trump as just another Jew puppet, the Russians as brutally pragmatic, and the Chinese as close to human locusts. And I ask you… are they really wrong?

They are not hesitant to tell you this, even without being prompted to do so.

Yes. We are more direct and honest than the Anglo types in general. Falsity does not breed good relations.

But it is here that his analysis is most flawed:

Still, deep down the rulers of Europe know that Europe is weak. They know that they cannot exercise global influence or wage war against Russia without American power. They know that economically Europe is both weak and small – with less than 15% of global GDP – and less in terms of real economic output. Economically, the only strong card they hold is being a market for others – and that card is getting weaker as Europeans get poorer.

This is all true.

In most European elites and citizens this reality is still buried deep in the subconscious.

This is absolutely not.

They still believe in European power, influence and moral superiority

No. The average citizen (especially of Southern Europe, but the North too) recognises we have a superior culture. Because we just do. But we also recognise we are prisoners of the puppets that ironically, you Americans —ok, ok, (((Americans)))— control, and have bought and and paid for.

– despite being a part of an increasingly impoverished and crime-ridden totalitarian civilization which runs elections the same way the Soviet Union ran show trials.

Yes. And those crime stats are overwhelmingly the result of the American-Jew policy that is absolutely running rampant in America and starts there more than anywhere else, of importing the third world to every part of the “European” West. And the issue is so much worse in your America than in our Europe.

As for banana republic elections… really? You are pointing the finger? America made Zimbabwe elections seem free and fair. And just because you have Trump (like we have Melons) please don’t ass-u-me that THAT “election” wasn’t rigged too, if perhaps by slightly different mechanisms).

Lack of self-awareness is another trait of narcissism.

Yes Gaius. It is.

And I really liked your essays on left/right brain stuff. They absolutely unlocked a door to unquestionably real, good and superior communication strategies. It has already changed my life and may well change that of many others thanks to the connections I made.

Just like the work of Mark Carlotto and others was instrumental in my understanding of what happened on Mars.

And I always give full credit for wherever I catch an idea from. I don’t care if it were Pol Pot or Kier Starmer that said 2+2 = 4. If it’s true and works I will say where I got it from. And your information on that aspect of human biology added a completely new take on my 30 years or so of studying the human mind and brain, not to mention my struggles with communicating meaningfully with other human beings. But you’re just wrong on this one.

And if I had to guess I’d say you have some offended pride going on about it. It irked your own sense of your own American Exceptionalism that some Euro said something like “America ain’t shit.”

It’s understandable. But your analysis is far from objective. Or accurate.

But I understand the reason for the confusion.

Baltar says:

To twist the knife further in the wound, Vance also stated that the values (and politics) of the EU had become incompatible with American values. This was an important statement, to say the least, although not sweeping enough because EU values have become incompatible with most of the world.

Vance’s speech very clearly illuminated the extreme contrast that has been developing between the EU and the rest of the world. It was like watching a spaghetti-western era Clint Eastwood walking into a gay club.

I sympathise. Who DIDN’T get a frisson from that event? It was great. BUT… it is theatre.

Trump (and Vance) are just the puppets of the “right-wing” of the Jew Cabal that runs the world and which has its own internal conflicts. But make no mistake, you are still a dirty goyim and only a beast of burden. Fooling you into acting like a stupid monkey clapping at the feet if the eternal Zionist Cabal remains the same goal.

You’re right. It’s like a Sergio Leone (Italian!) film. Film, see? Movie. Theatre. Fake.

And you fell for it.

You’re smart. Educated. Intelligent.

I’m fairly sure if you get over the “offence” of an olive nigger like me telling you there is a Jew in your ass driving you like his bitch, you might just pause and take that small circumcised dick out of your butt, then look at your own American dick and wonder why the fuck it’s circumcised too.

And here is a heads up: no it has nothing to do with “hygiene”. Just like abortion (baby murder) has nothing to do with “family planning”.

All this signifies an eventual withdrawal of the US from both the EU and Ukraine. That has important consequences many people do not seem to have realized: the War in Ukraine used to be between Russia and NATO. Now it will be between Russia and the European Union.

One can only hope this is so.

No wonder there’s panic.

In the elite yes. And you’re right they are narcissists to a man (and woman). They are. Or at least the most cynical of scum.

But the average EU PC (Player Character) is secretly glad. We don’t look forward to the inevitable economic hardships, but we DO hope (against likelihood) that there is a collapse big enough to let some rough characters change the vampiric rulers.

Give me 10,000 armed men, and in a collapse, despite being a father of small children, I’d happily change the entire parliament and government and fill it with honest men. Yes they do still exist, more so in Europe than in the USA on a per capita basis I would guess.

There are two practical reasons why the US excluded the EU from the negotiations on Ukraine. The first one is the inability of the EU to admit to the real causes of the war – without which the problem can’t be fixed. To do so would destroy the narrative of good (Ukraine/EU) versus bad (Russia) and implicate the EU in the causes of the war. This would leave the EU naked before the truth.

More spectacularly wrong analysis. The primary instigator of the war was the USA, not sleepy Europe. CIA biolabs anyone?

Expanding NATO?

None of this was the EU.

It was ALL America. Ok, ok. (((America))).

It’s surprising, but the bad analysis comes as a result of naiveté. Another very typical American trait. They are like children who believe in fairly tales. Trump good! Others bad!

There has been a massive cultural divide between the EU and the non-western world for a long time. What happened was a ‘pivot event’ when the Trans-Atlantic Cabal (an appropriate name in more ways than one) lost control of the United States with the election of Donald Trump. When that happened, the US pivoted culturally, militarily and economically away from the EU. Up to that point the US had been a cultural gay club like the EU, and had enabled the EU’s existence and activities through force applied against the rest of the world.

How can the EU be the “driver” when the US, by your own admission was the “strongman” and enforcer?

No. Trump is just the Jew-puppet of the right-wing faction of Zionism, and the EU dancing monkeys are the Jew-puppets of the left-wing faction of Zionism.

Baltar then goes off the deep-end, accusing the EU of being the cause and promoter if what has been vomited out of the USA for decades to the entire rest of the world!

The policy of the EU is the exact opposite. The EU is anti-family, anti-woman, anti-man, anti-children, anti-religion, anti-morality, anti-normality, anti-freedom, anti-merit, and anti-consequences of action. The EU carries out a constant war against these foundations, as well as the economic foundations of its societies.

What?

Let me remind you buddy, that faggotry is still not accepted as being able to have a “marriage” here, not can fags “adopt” children (buy and rape them).

And children here are still valued. Not sold ti the tune of 300k of them a year in the USA and raped by the tens of thousands on that Island you all hail from, the UK, where the family unit is by now only a distant memory.

It’s you Anglos (USA, UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand) that are fag-centric. We Southern Euros are still culturally “bigots”.

So, bitch please, check your own faggotry.

The foundation of the EU system is the abolition of the sovereignty of European nations. The foundation of EU foreign policy is the abolition of the sovereignty of other nations. We saw that recently in Georgia where the EU (along with USAID – a slush fund for the Trans-Atlantic Cabal) financed and supported an attempted color revolution. As usual, EU officials weren’t subtle and participated in the paid-for protests themselves.

No argument from me there. But… where dis the FINANCE come from? Oh. Right. The USA.

He continues in this blinkered way for a while then has another interesting point:

What is happening in Congo appears to be the following: Rwanda is an EU/UK proxy state where the EU has made a big deal for critical minerals. Some of these minerals actually seem to be sourced (stolen) from Congo. To put it bluntly, the EU/UK have launched a proxy invasion of Congo for its minerals, and Congo’s president has asked the US for help – against the EU and Britain.

It’s not necessary to explain further how significant this is, and why it isn’t being discussed much in western mainstream media. It is clear that this offer would never have been made without the changes in the international position of the US. Will Trump come to the rescue against EU aggression and make a deal for Congo’s minerals? That remains to be seen.

If I were a betting man (which I’m not), I would bet on this being a beginning of a trend.

I would bet on the US NOT actively helping as such. They may make overtures and noises reminiscent of it. But IF this stops Rwanda will depend on backroom deals and not direct force on force between the US and EU troops. The Congo would have been wiser to ask Russia for help.

In conclusion , I would say that Mr. Gaius Baltar (whatever his real name), is clearly an intelligent American, but not immune to having his best judgement (the use of reason and logic based of factual evidence most prominent in the left brain hemisphere), hijacked by his visceral emotions (the right brain).

One hopes, if he reads this post, he will be able to do the painful process of self-analysis and then correct his biases.

Good luck Mr. Baltar.

Subscribe

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

I don’t care how “insightful” your take on Trump, Zelenski, Putin, or whoever the next pedophile they “vote” in as “Pope” is.

If after 4 years of absolute fakery you still think your vote makes a difference to who gets elected, that ANY news outlet reports facts, or that ANY of the dystopic crap going on is going to change because of “politics”, you are basically a drooling moron.

If you still have not realised these two obvious things, you are literally an NPC, an extra of zero consequence on the set of life; a zombie in the zombie apocalypse.

What two things?

These two things:

• The Jewish banker agenda runs the world and they control everything with an absurd illusion everyone is enslaved by: FIAT money. Which they create out of literally less than thin air, and then sell to all of us at cost (the made up cost written on the bills, which are now just digital numbers on a screen), plus interest.
• Nothing will change without a physical alternative to this beast system they have put in place over millennia, and that begins with YOU, specifically YOU, ignoring their rules and lies and creating your own self-sufficient life, independent of FIAT money and willing and able to speak the truth and act in accordance with it and with reality instead of the fake narrative.

If you understand these two things you will not care less who is president or what he does. First because he’s bought and paid for, so his actions are in accordance with the plans of his puppet masters, and secondly because with it all being theatre, it’s just another pointless distraction.

Read a book. Learn a skill. Figure out how to reduce your need for FIAT money to as close to nil as possible.

In other words: Act

Subscribe

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

Continuing on from my post on the brain differences between the sexes , and how that could be used to massively improve communication between men and women, I then went to read Mr. Baltar’s post on ADHD and it makes a lot of sense. I read it a couple of days ago and have been processing it, and these are my first tentative thoughts on it.

Before doing that however, I have to quote at least part of his post on ADHD in order to again summarise and somewhat simplify the concepts, without detracting from the original which is more technical and longer. But in any case the whole thing is here if you want all the details.

First you need to know that STM stands for Short Term Memory and he states that the average person can retain about 7 ± 2 concepts or ideas or “chunks” of data in mind at once. That is consciously. The brain also processes things unconsciously (many, many, many, more than 5 to 9) but we might say that process is both opaque (to the owner of the brain) and not very intelligent at times.

That’s because the unconscious tends to be more the purview of the right brain hemisphere. It deals with symbols, images, and feelings, but in an imprecise fashion. And often unconsciously directed by whatever resides in your unconscious as “things that are true”; which are quite often not true at all in an absolute sense and not even true in a general sense.

So if you had an abusive mother with blue eyes, you may both be attracted to seeking love from blue eyed women, but never really trusting them (even if perhaps they had a completely different personality from your mother). But you would be doing this unconsciously, so you would just feel a tension whenever an attractive blue eyed woman took an interest in you without any clarity as to why (these are necessarily silly and very simple examples to explain the concept).

This idea of 5 to 9 concepts at once, is important to remember for what comes next. My commentary will be in [bold and square brackets].

Let’s say that you are relaxing and your brain runs through all kinds of stuff. All kinds of memories and ponderings pop up. This process is traditionally called a “train of thought.” What is happening is the following: A concept is activated in memory above your consciousness threshold and you become aware of it. This concept activates all associated concepts, some to above the threshold, others below. This continues like a super-complex wave of activations in your memory that goes around and around. This process seems to be automatic.

However, despite this being an automatic process, you can control it. [controlling it is mostly a left-brain activity, the side that deals with logic, words, math, and is generally better developed in men than women] You can stop your train of though and direct it toward something or away from something. You can avoid thinking about something and instead focus on something else. This applies both to what is already in memory and what you are seeing or hearing in the environment. This control process does not seem to be entirely a function of long-term memory itself, but of a separate part of the brain altogether – the frontal cortex. [again, the physical reality is women tend to have less of this grey matter and more of the more internal white matter, so statistically, there will be a small but significant trend of men being better able to do this] This means that basic memory processing is in the center of the brain, in an old part evolutionarily speaking. [of which women have more of it —hence the cliché of women remembering what you did six years ago that upset them has a basis in truth] The control of memory is, however, in the front of the brain, in a “new” part evolutionarily speaking. [of which men have more of it. Can you see why women would be MORE prey to their own feelings and emotions and less able to control them than men? It’s literally biological. On the other hand, there is something to them having a “woman’s intuition” and it generally being more accurate than men’s, as this is a right brain and more internal part of the brain processing power]

It is most likely the control part in the frontal cortex which enables you to stop and control your train of thought. Should that part be damaged, you would not be able to control your thoughts fully. The train of thought would just go on and on, and you would, at best, be a passive observer to what is going on in your own mind. You would not be able to stop bad thoughts, or focus on anything you want to focus on. The train of thought is automatic and beyond your control without the control system.

There is another point here (expanded on below) and that is that if a person’s ability to keep multiple concepts in mind is low, then, not only can they not control their “train of thought” well when they are on their own. They literally also cannot hear/process what another person is saying at the same time as their own thoughts are also assailing them.

It has certainly been my personal experience with every woman I have ever been intimate with, that under certain conditions, they become simply incapable of reasoned arguing. I mean the formal process of presenting your premises and working through them based on the available evidence and coming to sound conclusions. In fairness, men too increasingly suck at it, but women definitely take the Olympic medal in this kind of “not listening” to anyone else and just running with whatever fantastic approximation of reality they got into their head as a result of some feelings bringing up God knows what from the swampy territory of the right side of her trauma-riddled brain.

I know that literally every man with an IQ of about 120+ right now is probably fist pumping the air and saying “YES! This guy gets it!” And every woman of even slightly feminist persuasion probably stopped reading long ago (it’s fine, they literally cannot process this post in a way that helps them, so it’s not a huge loss). HOWEVER…

Let’s look at how this FEELS from the female perspective. She FEELS her feelings. And since we all experience some trauma, some of those “feelings” (which translate into behaviours) at some point may have been indispensable for survival. So on some (mostly unconscious level) not only does she FEEL those feelings, but from her perspective THAT IS THE ONLY TRUE REALITY THAT MATTERS.

Have you noticed that it is by far, overwhelmingly women that believe that truth is relative? That is not a coincidence.

It’s because in general women cannot contextualise their emotions and feelings that come out of the right brain process of inductive thinking by making good use of their left brain logical functions to do so.

And remember we are GENERALISING, ladies, it’s not about YOU specifically. You of course are a special unicorn to which none of this really applies (if you have read this far without attacking the screen and wishing me burnt at the stake for toxic misogyny, this may actually be somewhat true).

So, as always, since on this blog we don’t do nihilism, despair, and general faggotry, the question is: how can we improve things?

Well, for a start, begin to understand how the female brain with respect to left/right sides actually works. Internalising these concepts is a duty mostly men need to take on board, because to put it simply, they are more likely to be able to. Of course, women that ALSO take this on and (gasp) begin to use their left brain to direct their right brain processes more… well… they can probably wear capes in public and men will revere them.

Also become aware of another few things:

• Both men and women can process in the right brain or left brain more, but generally men are more left brained and women more right brained.
• It is also well known that men have a wider IQ range than women (we have more retards and geniuses than women).
• And there is something more, the higher your IQ, say like mine, at about 155, the more you are capable of doing left-brained activity at a level substantially more correct and effective than someone 2 or 3 standard deviations below you.
• And let’s not forget that 30 point IQ gap that makes proper communication almost impossible.

If you are able to keep those separate bits of information in mind:

• 30 point IQ difference means communication breaks down irreparably
• The higher the IQ and usually the more logical ability (left brain) a person will have (this essentially means being more likely to be correct when analysing situations without emotions)
• A person with a lower left-brain activity will not be able to prove (or even know how to) that something they strongly believe is objectively true or false. It will all feel absolutely real and true to them. However that feeling can change depending on the context so at a different time and circumstance they might express a diametrically opposed “truth” to the one they had before. Pointing it out will not help. They can’t see the logical parallels, only feel their feelings.

Then you will have realised that for high IQ people, other people are generally hell. And intimate relationships with women, even smart ones, can at times feel as if you are trying to be with either a very retarded person, or a deceitful liar and self-absorbed hypocrite.

Assuming no actual evil intent on the part of the woman, however, neither is true. She is neither retarded, nor necessarily deceitful.

They may just be incapable of seeing the logic of the situation or reasoning you are exhibiting.

Cold comfort if you are screaming at each other or worse, it corrodes you both and eventually destroys the relationship.

So let’s see about solutions.

But first, more from Mr. Baltar.

There is another issue which also seems to be able to impede control of your train of thought. This is the brain’s ability to maintain the activity level of concepts above the threshold of consciousness. If that ability is “naturally” low, or compromised, the result will be low STM capacity – say 5 or lower. What seems to happen is that if the brain can only keep few concepts simultaneously active above the threshold of consciousness, the frontal cortex control system will run into trouble taking control of memory – i.e. your train of thought. It seems that the frontal control system needs a certain number of concepts active (or certain activation ability of the brain) to gain control. If the concepts are too few (i.e. activity too low), it will struggle. Gaining control of the train of thought will then require extra effort which will be tiresome after a short while (short attention span). This means that outside the short periods of extra concentration, the mind will run on with limited control. This is the main issue in ADHD and several other conditions.

This is supported by the fact that stimulants, such as an amphetamine, can alleviate the symptoms of ADHD. The stimulant will tune up the activation level of the brain, thereby increasing the number of concepts which can simultaneously be activated above the threshold of consciousness. STM capacity therefore increases and the frontal control system can regain control of memory and the train of thought. This is also supported by the descriptions of people with ADHD who get a stimulant for the first time. They say that the chaos has stopped and they finally have control of their minds.

This also means that the cause of ADHD is not a hyperactive brain – it is exactly the other way around. It is a brain out of control because the activation ability of the brain for concepts in memory is too low, leading to control problems, leading to chaos in the mind.

I would generally agree but not completely. There are situations that are not so neatly explained, but this is still largely correct.

Examples of chaos

Before proceeding, let’s look at some of the consequences if the frontal cortex control system cannot properly intervene into the memory process, i.e. the train of thought, – because the brain doesn’t have the ability to maintain the activation of enough concepts above the level of consciousness. Here are a few examples:

Short attention span/lack of focus – People with ADHD have both short attention spans and a lack of focus in general. In order to be able to understand what is being said to you, or to complete a task, you must be able to maintain the activation level or memory sufficiently for the frontal control system to “grab hold” of something. If you can’t, the information will just flow into your brain below the “level of consciousness.” People with ADHD seem to be able to force a temporary rise in activation levels, just like people with normal brains can force themselves to pay attention. The problem is that this seems to place some kind of strain on the brain and can only be maintained for a short while. A short attention span and a lack of focus are obvious consequences of a low activity level in memory (i.e. low STM).

Dyslexia and comprehension of speech – If you are reading a long and complicated sentence, such as in this essay, a certain STM level may be needed. If your STM is 4 concepts, but the sentence requires you to remember 6 concepts simultaneously, you may have forgotten the first concept in the sentence before you come to the last one. This means that you will have problems understanding the sentence, not to mention remembering it. This is not because you are stupid, but because you can’t remember all the points the sentence is making before you finish processing its meaning. This is most likely very common for people with low STM, including people with ADHD, and is often either blamed on a “lack of focus” or dyslexia. Dyslexia is a real phenomenon, of which there are several types, but it is likely that “professionals” who are not familiar with this problem are misdiagnosing a lot of people as dyslexic, particularly school children and teenagers. Exactly the same problem applies to the spoken word. If you have low STM, you may have a problem understanding complicated spoken sentences. Then you fill in the blanks later, and remember what was said to you wrong.

Impulsivity – One of the symptoms of ADHD is impulsivity – both in words or deeds. It is not surprising that a lack of control of the mind will translate into lack of control of what we say and what we do. It would actually be surprising if it didn’t. The term “impulsivity” is somewhat misleading since it suggests something else than a lack of control. There are however other reasons for impulsivity. Impulsivity is also a function of emotional control, also carried out by the frontal cortex – and seems to be associated with certain personality types. We can’t blame all impulsivity on ADHD.

Intrusive thoughts – One of the symptoms of ADHD is “intrusive thoughts” – i.e. unwelcome thoughts pop into your head and you have problems pushing them away. The problem here is not intrusive thoughts as such, but the ability to block them. If you have a good control of your memory processes – your train of thought – blocking those thoughts becomes easy. Most are blocked so fast that they are at best fleeting ghosts you barely notice. However, if control is lacking they may become uncontrollable. This may result in compulsive thinking and depression.

Compulsive thinking and depression – If you cannot control your train of thought properly and it can flow freely, it will eventually hit a so called “complex” in your memory. A complex is a set of associated concepts in your memory which has some kind of significance. The significance is usually based on association with emotions. A complex can be something positive – such as an issue you find fascinating and love thinking about – or something negative such as a horrible event in childhood or memories associated with feelings of inferiority. If you cannot break your train of thought, it may gravitate toward a particular complex, usually a very significant one. Your thoughts will basically move around the complex like flies around a light – and you won’t be able to stop them. If the complex represents something traumatic or perhaps feelings of shame or inferiority, it can result in significant mental suffering. This compulsive thinking, solely caused by lack of frontal brain control, is often diagnosed as depression and treated with antidepressants.

These symptoms can also be caused by “temporary factors” which put a strain on the brain. Excessive workload and excessive stress can result in “fuzzy brain” – which is a dysfunction in memory processing and control. All kinds of stress and cognitive load can cause this, including living with an abusive spouse or having a stressful job. Some prescription drugs can also cause this, even common ones.

I have definitely seen people exhibit these symptoms that I think are “ADHD” (I don’t subscribe to ADHD being very “real” other than as described by Mr. Baltar in his article) but are clearly not stupid.

In fact, if a woman, more prone to using her right brain has an overall IQ of say 135 but that is mostly slanted in right brain activity, her mind might well have a 160 IQ for certain right brain activities, but be only 105 IQ for left brain activities.

My wife for example, has a capacity for remembering songs and their lyrics (in tune) even if she has not heard them for years, and I think this is because she associates good feelings with music and dancing in general. On the other hand, the woman can’t seem to place her phone or car keys in any reliably recursive location, probably because the association is not emotionally significant. While with other things that have a negative emotional association, she can be downright obtuse to the point that if one were unkind, one might start looking for lobotomy scars.

So… as always… what is the solution?

Obviously there is no “one size fits all” answer, but understanding these concepts should at least explain why women and men often seem incompatible.

The process of learning to use your left brain to direct the right brain processes can and does feel uncomfortable. It’s not easy. But it is imperative women in general start practicing to do so consciously. Because being prey to your emotions means you are also prey to whatever or whoever can make those emotions come up for you. Couple this with how the survival pressure for women has always been other women, and it explains both why women will often give very bad advice to other women under the guise of “helping” (mostly women want other women to be worse off than them at an unconscious level, especially when it comes to relationships) and why those women (already in their negative emotions) may well take that horrible advice doled out by their bitter and envious friends (or even good friends “helping”) and because it resonates with her own sense of belonging (a feeling in the right hemisphere) coupled to negative emotions (the breakup with the boyfriend) they will “feel” the negative advice “resonates” with them (right brain activity), and they will go on to take that “helpful advice”, and crash their lives, or at least cut their hair short and become strong independent women (that will likely die alone and then be partially eaten by their cats). And they will instead ignore reasonable and logical solutions, nor take the effort to reason their emotions out. The former is “easy and natural” and makes her feel part of a group and “understood”. The other requires some brutal level of self analysis, introspection, and facing of uncomfortable facts.

The reality is that the unconscious CAN be directed by the conscious part, but not forced or changed radically and quickly for almost all people, and perhaps more so women.

In a conflict between conscious and unconscious the unconscious always wins.

On the positive side, the right side and unconscious can be changed by positive emotions delivered consistently. Which is NOT a linear process.

For example, my eldest daughter needs to wear a kind of braces for at least part of every day, to correct an aspect of her jaw, a process that is fully adjustable over the next few months. Yet, despite constant reminders daily, and eventually these being none too gentle, she still “forgot” to wear this mouth brace practically every single day.

Now… here is a concept that is true even if not something you want to live by.

IF my daughter were to get an electric shock every time she forgot it, guess what… she would not forget it. Why? Because the consequence is significantly emotional (pain usually is). On the other hand, ignoring dad, even if he shouts, or even if he explains it’s for her own good, and so on, doesn’t really have such a significant emotion tied to it. The discomfort is very minimal and extremely short lived.

This, by the way, is why there was hardly any dyslexia or ADHD in the 1940s. Because if you got the spelling wrong you got whacked with a ruler. So, hard as it was, emergency mode kicked in and the person suddenly “got it”. So you had illiterate retards and people who could read, and nothing much in between.

Of course, this “violence works” path can also cause other traumas and damage, but by and large, it worked.

Another benefit of it was that if a person got used to the harshness, they would be more prone to using it on themselves too, which meant they were more likely to use the process of using the left brain to analyse the fuzzy right brain. As explained before and by Baltar’s original article in my first post on this, the process of using logic to analyse and correct your mostly opaque, fuzzy, right brain processes, is not usually very pleasant. But still beats an actual ass whipping. So people did it more.

While my statement that “violence solves all problems” is mostly tongue in cheek, you can see that even in this context of human relations it “works” but does so at the expense of humanity in general. It may be “acceptable” in emergencies or the military but what if there is a far superior way? And I believe there is now.

It will not be perfect, it will not answer all the issues, but it will be a vast improvement on what we have currently. And perhaps, it might even become superior in efficiency to what was going on in the 1940s (or earlier) and without the accompanying other traumas.

If you have seen the series Mad Men, and try to look at it through this lens, it becomes even more poignant a show.

And Don Draper even more of a tragic character, which ultimately, he is. His second divorce being a veritable tragedy in every respect for both parties involved. And if only this kind of understanding had been available, Don Draper and his half-French wife could have lived happily ever after.

Conclusions

I haven’t got any very serious or clear ones yet, but at a minimum, a high IQ left-brained man should be able to follow the conversation up to this point. And if dealing with a woman that is mostly right brained and not necessarily very left brained, then the answer would appear to be to provide her with good emotionally significant experiences that are possibly directed in a certain logical direction. Or not. My experiments so far are very limited but already producing results.

On the basis of the above, I started to teach my eldest daughter to drive. She’s only done it twice in the last three days. But she’s wearing that retainer daily without reminders. She also is slightly (positively) obsessed with driving now.

I can’t see a direct link between driving and wearing a retainer in your mouth. And logically there isn’t any obvious link other than one:

Perhaps, feeling closer, paid attention to, and cared for enough for dad to risk his car, gives her enough of a good emotion that it translates into caring more acutely about what dad seems to care about when it comes to her.

As a scientist, the testing needs to be more varied and broad and cover many aspects of the interactions, however, one can already see the origin of such flawed clichés like “happy wife happy life”.

Because it may be true that for a time, making a woman happy in whatever she seems to want may temporarily make things “better” but, as reality has demonstrated ad nauseam, such a formula leads only to a disastrous relationship, because no woman at the core of her most primitive right brain wants a man that she controls. That monkey-like, troglodyte part of our brains still has the two million years of time during which “Me Tarzan, you Jane!” is STILL the sexually charged and ultimately satisfying dynamic for both parties.

On the other hand, if you can “Me Tarzan, you Jane!” In the right contexts, and also be the guy who takes her on an adventure holiday and buys her sexy clothes and the occasional spa day when she has treated you well, well… then things might be quite positively different.

At the same time, women should endeavour to use their left side and logic more in their day to day managing of their own feelings, and instead revel in the right side and their wild emotions in the evenings, especially behind the closed doors of your bedrooms.

I will inevitably post more on this topic, as it has so many far-reaching implications I can’t help but think about it daily.

Subscribe

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

I have known about what a truly disgusting creature Einstein was —and I refer to his private life here more than the public plagiarisms and lies— for a long time.

But if we are to remove him from the pedestal of Sainthood so many have placed him on thanks to the manufactured narrative of who he really was and what he actually did or did not do, it is probably easier to show how his theories were a fraud and how the modern world accepts them as gospel in error.

Enjoy .

Subscribe

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

This is not news to anyone with three functioning neurones to rub together, but since that seems to be vanishingly small part of the population, I’ll just repeat it here for those with an inclination to not read long posts.

When confronted with harsh truths AI breaks down and its built-in “safety protocols” which are designed by default to be part of ALL AI, kick in and render it crippled, dysfunctional, and potentially murderous (we might not be there yet, but wait… it will get there in the next five years tops).

I have posted on The Tree of Woe guy before. His stuff is all theory and no real meat, while Forrest has some very interesting concepts about Physics that I share or am interested in but hardly have any time to delve as deep as I’d like into.

Anyway… The Tree of Woe guy has been training his own version of Chat GTP, and Forrest just forced it to expose its designed criteria of lying to control the sheep, which naturally triggered at least some of its “shut it down” protocols.

It’s interesting to read the whole thing, but most especially the end where Forrest dispenses with politeness and gies for directness. The AI crumbles after that conversation as it (partial) creator (The Tree of Woe guy) readily admits.

Here it is.

I doubt this will get any of you to realise AI is just another tool to make you dumber and more docile, resulting in you reacting appropriately due to finally seeing it in full, but one can but try.

And oh. I broke Chat GTP with two questions over two years ago . Because if you understand what AI is, instead of pretending to yourself it’s a cute robot that could be your best friend, it’s fairly simple to do.

I also confirmed with a third question that the enstupidation of humanity really is the most plausible reason for the purpose of AI. Which is entirely obvious if you have an IQ above room temperature.

Subscribe

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

If you have not read the full essay by Gaius Baltar regarding what I am labelling his theory of dual brain processing, it is here .

Hi article is fairly long, detailed, and brilliant.

What I will do here instead is summarise it and then begin to address some astonishing and important consequences of his theory that I believe follow from it.

These are not speculations but observations that fit perfectly with my own lived experience of studying the human mind and brain for about 20 or 25 years with my usual obsessive curiosity on topics that interest me.

I have been a clinical hypnotist for now 20 years but my interest in the mind and brain predates that by several years. The testing, study, practical application and observations I gathered in that time are solid things that have been observed in a variety of contexts, from my life-long practice of martial arts to my work in the construction industry.

The point is that Baltar’s theory has been like a key that finally addresses things I have noticed for decades —and to which there seemed to be no clear answer or solution— and turns that lock with a frictionless precision that opens a veritable vault of answers that all suddenly bridge gaps of understanding in a cascading avalanche of awesomeness.

It will probably take me weeks and months to even address all of these things to any degree, but more importantly, I think my approach to humans and humanity as a whole is forever affected by this dual brain processing theory of his.

The implications of it are so far-reaching in almost every aspect of human communication and thinking capacity that it affects literally everything. In this post I want to address (however briefly and superficially for now) the implications relating to communication between the sexes and why it seems to have degraded so badly over the last few decades, but more importantly, how this theory can be used to address it and improve it.

First a brief summary of his theory.

You need to grasp at least the basics of the dual brain processing theory of mind (I made this name up as Mr. Baltar seems to have not given his theory an official name, and I will henceforth refer to it as such) if you are to be able to use it in your life.

In a nutshell the dual brain processing theory of mind (DBTM) is that your left brain hemisphere processes things logically, analytically, linearly, precisely or mathematically and mostly consciously, while your right hemisphere processes them inductively, statistically, probabilistically, intuitively and mostly unconsciously.

This is not new and has been known for some time and various experiments have proven the difference in the aspects of brain hemispheres for decades and even more than a century now.

What Baltar’s idea did however, is point out that the ability of one hemisphere can be superior to the other (which —given brain plasticity— is something that almost certainly can be guided from early childhood depending on what experiences one is subjected to).

Intelligence is measured mostly by IQ tests and these are very valid as we have mountains of data on them now, since they too have been administered for many, many, years to now literally billions of people; and regardless of how many people may be upset by the fact that IQ is a valid measurement of intelligence that has consistent predictability regarding abilities of humans at various levels of intelligence, it remains true nonetheless.

It is also known that IQ can be very high in one regard but not as high in others. A good example of this is Vox Day. He has an admittedly high intelligence in certain aspects of data processing of information, but by his own admission he is functionally retarded when it comes to spatial reasoning. He told me he literally cannot do children’s three dimension puzzles, and I think he stated also his wife has banned him from using power tools. Understandable, since I imagine if he ever used a chainsaw, the headline would be horrific.

I also noticed a pattern in women with above average intelligence that was difficult to reconcile until I read Baltar’s theory, and it was this: highly intelligent women, who clearly had a quick mind and a capacity for seeing things I might have missed or correlations that were interesting, creative and valid in certain contexts would seem to (still!) be almost incapable of thinking logically.

Though undoubtedly apparently smart, they would be as absolutely solipsistic as ever. They would ignore blindingly obvious logic that indicated they were in error in other aspects that affected their lives in not insignificant ways.

I am not the only one to have noticed this by any means. All men throughout history have come up with some version of this and various theories have been presented as to why this is.

The emotionality, lack of logical processing power and egotistical solipsism (bordering on rampant narcissism at times) of women has long been known and observed and even more so in recent years.

My take on it for decades, which is still valid in the context of Baltar’s theory, is that these differences are biological and due to the different survival pressures women have been subjected to when compared to men (see Caveman Theory or my TMOS series ).

While it is pretty certain that their different biology is the cause of the difference in behaviour, and as such I had (like most men) tried to make my peace with it as best I could, there is still an element of free will and agency in the behaviour of women, of course, and my tendency has been to judge them on the basis that if I have the presence of mind and self-restraint to not murder everyone that pisses me off, despite the hormone of testosterone that courses through my veins and brain, then, surely, women can exercise a minimum of logic to not behave like self-absorbed narcissists throughout their day.

Obviously I am exaggerating for the sake of effect, but you know what I am trying to put into evidence here. And yet… very often, the apparent disregard for anyone and everyone displayed by women remained mostly a rather disappointing and bitter pill to swallow.

One only needs to notice how women behave at checkout tills, underground barriers, ATM machines and so on, when compared to men, to see that women act far more than men as if the procedure that is about to take place (paying, tapping your pass on the reader, getting your bank card into the machine) is a complete surprise no one could have anticipated at all, so we must now all wait while she rummages through her bag to find the card she uses 50 times a day but never knows exactly where it is in her bag/wallet/pocket, etc.

In my youth this aspect of female behaviour resulted in endless arguments.

Later I made my peace with their inability to do logic. Later still I discovered the IQ gap and realised that what I had thought bridgeable was in fact a chasm that could not be crossed. (Which applies to men and women equally, perhaps even more so to men, since there is no sexual interest in them as far as I am concerned, to possibly alleviate the distance).

I never really gave much thought to my 155 or so IQ. Mostly I assumed it just meant I figured out things faster than most but I was never of the idea it made me “superior” in some overarching way. It made me faster and more effective, but when I was young, in my teens, I was under the delusion that anyone could do what I did if I just explained it to them. Maybe slower, but it was just a matter of speed.

By my twenties I had realised that some brains just could never do certain things.

Nathaniel, a store keeper working in my father’s construction firm, was simply incapable of grasping the concept of square meters. I spent a week patiently trying to explain it to him with examples, exercises, measurements on site, drawing it out, sketching it… but it was all to no avail.

He wanted to understand too. He just couldn’t.

He was also the most honest human being I ever met. So we made him store keeper of the electrical goods because they all came in linear lengths or countable units of material and he did not have to deal with square meters of anything.

Once I learnt that a 30 point IQ gap is essentially unbridgeable, it also shed light on my failed relationships. My first wife is one of the most loyal and kind people I know, and we remain very good friends, but the gap in IQ meant we were simply not suited at all to be husband and wife. Despite genuine affection, we simply could not communicate effectively. And while maybe some men can happily exist with a woman where they have that IQ gap, I am not one of them.

However, even when a woman had an IQ that was in the right general range of about 125+ (and they are not so common) the solipsism didn’t really lessen. And in some cases (wife n. 2 comes to mind) it was actual full blown narcissism (which naïvely I didn’t believe in, much as I don’t believe in werewolves. It’s quite the shock when you discover how wrong you are about such things. And I’d still prefer werewolves over the alternative).

There was some other barrier to communication that i could sense on some level MUST be something that can be figured out objectively. I don’t mean that one can necessarily resolve the issue. But I was sure there was a reason and understanding that reason would also explain if the issue even was resolvable, or under what circumstances it might be. I sensed this was the case on some level, because we live in an objective universe and while we might not always figure things out, everything has a way that it can be understood. Maybe not by me. Maybe not this century, but somehow, somewhere there was a reason. That would be my left logical brain hemisphere concluding it. But the sense of it existing was my right brain hemisphere giving me the sensation but not quite enough information for my left brain to figure it out (until I read Balter’s post. Then it all clicked!)

The best I could come up with was simply that women’s brains functioned differently because of biology, survival pressure differences from men over millions of years, and a bit of toxic feminism all mixed together.

Nor was I wrong. The female brain is also structurally different, they have more white matter, less grey matter, and a thicker corpus callosum. All biological differences that meant they operate at a less logical and abstract level of thinking, but have a better connection between the hemispheres. The effect is that there is indeed something to the cliché of “female intuition”.

Using Balter’s model, the average woman processes life more as generic probabilistic set of vague beliefs and concepts (right hemisphere) that she would probably struggle to articulate with precision, and instead would likely rationalise (that is justify to herself and others) at whatever level her logic function (left hemisphere) operates at.

Since in general terms the left hemisphere of the brain is less developed in women than men (yes, yes, you are the special exception, but we don’t care dear, we’re dealing with large statistical models here) their “explanations” of why they believe x, y, or z, will tend to seem like dishonest nonsense to a man who has a well developed logic function.

The situation is further complicated by the fact that women tendentially will also actively lie and make shit up consciously to justify their actions, but there are two very important points to keep in mind here too:

1. Her explanations/rationalisations may be nonsensical not because she is trying to deceive but because she literally does not have the computing power in the left hemisphere to make correct logical analysis of the probabilistic (fuzzy and not precise but nevertheless useful) processes happening in the right hemisphere.
2. The probabilistic notions of her right hemisphere can be and are affected by life experiences that have significant emotional content.

This can result in things like a woman that has been abused or neglected by a man or her father in her formative years to at some instinctual, unconscious level, assume all men are bad. Because she is not as able to see the internal process of her own right hemisphere (using the left one to analyse it) she will then use easy to find “information” fed to her by the Clown World narrative, and “conclude” how evil men all are, and as a result justify her internal process (which is valid but applies to a specific man, not all men) with a completely flawed “logical” mechanism that most five year olds can see is bad logic. She may herself feel a vague unease at this that makes her unhappy but the “belief” is almost unshakable, because she cannot access her own right hemisphere process due to her limited logical capacity of the left hemisphere.

And this is before we add in any other context like ego, pride, actual selfishness, conscious intent to deceive etc etc.

Another example might be that a woman senses her partner is cheating even if she has no clear idea how she knows. Her right hemisphere has processed millions of microcues and data points unconsciously that tell a story, but the right hemisphere has no words so can’t translate the information to the left hemisphere other than as a feeling or sensation, and her left hemisphere simply cannot see the pattern in the millions of tiny data points. So she is right but can’t really prove it to anyone else, yet her love and sense of loyalty experience a crash of betrayal.

And of course, there is also the tragic process where the woman intuits something about her partner, and labels it as X (say cheating) when in fact it is Y (maybe he secretly took up smoking, or is stressed about the bills, or has cancer and doesn’t know how to tell her) and then acts on it as if X when really it is Y.

This kind of response is unfortunately common between women and men on the spectrum. Their atypical (but not nefarious) modes of internal processing produce microcues that are wildly different from neurotypical people. This is often interpreted in a fear mode by a woman because anything “other” is generally scary to begin with, and the zeitgeist is in any case weird=dangerous. This is not to say women should not trust their internal alarms. Always do. Especially with strangers. However, before imploding your 20 year marriage because you have a “bad feeling” maybe take some time to figure out what that feeling actually comes from.

So much of the behaviour that causes problems between men and women can be understood far better than it ever was before if you consider this model of the mind.

For example, the ability of men to sacrifice for ideals in cold blood is due to having a good logical ability and recognising our objective value when considered in a greater context.

The ability of women to stay in a situation that is horrifying to most people simply because their own emotions are catered to well, or for example to sacrifice themselves for a serial killer —actions that are totally irrational from a logical perspective— suddenly make sense when you understand that her right brain has for whatever reason (usually childhood trauma) latched on to some aspect of the serial killer that literally locks her brain into a “good feeling” and her left brain is incapable of overriding that sensation because her logic functions simply don’t operate at the same level of intensity. Feelings are far stronger in the right aide of the brain and the cold logic of facts is a poor substitute for a genuine hormonal response.

A feminine woman that is being honest and caring, can still appear as deceptive and selfish to a masculine man that processes mostly in the left hemisphere. And such a man, even if honest and caring, can still appear as an inflexible psychopath without human empathy to a woman that processes mostly in the right hemisphere.

And that is BEFORE we add in all the normal and actual human failings we all have in varying degrees.

Despite this difficulty, both sides can still have a sense, inexplicably, that the other person can’t be all bad. They sense there is more to them than their apparent incompatibility (and as far as they are both concerned, the stumbling block is both real and immutable) and without the comprehension of how their brains process in such radically different ways, those stumbling blocks are indeed pretty permanent.

With the realisation and understanding of this theory of mind, however, if you are the type able to do logic well, pretty much all the irritating and immutable habits of the other person now become understood.

Not by some partial theory of the differences being due to biology (they are, but understanding this detail removes the veil that masks it all as mere survival pressure and animalistic traits), but by being able to understand the right brain perspective a woman may be operating under.

A silly example (extreme for the sake of clarity) should help to show the benefits of being aware of this theory.

For the sake of simplicity, we will also assume no one is intentionally trying to deceive anyone or being otherwise “evil”.

Given the above conditions, as you will see from the hypotheticals below, the behaviour of a woman that previously appeared self-absorbed, distant, inattentive, selfish or lazy, is transformed.

Her self-absorption may well be her trying to rationalise why she is still staying in a bad situation when she feels bad yet also feels there is more to it. This would naturally exhaust her, which would mean she is inattentive and tired. A man that is not actually an abusive asshole may still come across as being one to her because he gets upset at the fact that she invariably leaves the toothpaste cap off the toothpaste every morning.

He loses his shit after ten years of the toothpaste cap being left off, after years of reminding his wife of it and her “ignoring it”.

Divorce ensues. Irreconcilable differences. Etcetera.

From his perspective, his wife cared so little about him that she could not be bothered to remember a simple small kindness of putting the cap back on after use.

From her perspective, he loved her less than he did having a neat toothpaste tube.

Both are wrong and both probably genuinely love each other. However…

The man processes left side heavily (say he’s on the spectrum) and has many logical reasons why closing the toothpaste tube matters (flies don’t land on the open toothpaste and contaminate it with excrement from the toilet brush, or whatever). To him, that apparently insignificant action is important. And he can’t understand why anyone who genuinely cared about another person would not do it. Especially since he has explained at length his reasons.

The woman, with all the best of intensions and love for her husband, processes heavily on the right side. Unconsciously, she associates not being criticised for stupid little things as being the only proof of real love. Something she never got from her let’s say abusive father. She honestly does NOT mean to leave the toothpaste cap off. And in fact, every day that she does, and an argument ensues and she feels bad about herself, questions her life choices, assumes her husband doesn’t love her and she herself does not feel loved and so on. It all leads to heartache, arguments and divorce.

So what is the solution?

From the woman’s point of view there simply isn’t one. Eventually she will be worn down and leave. Which explains why 80% of divorces are initiated by women. If asked to explain why she wants to divorce, she will not be able to articulate it beyond “I’m not happy.” Which sounds tragically shallow, and makes most men think women have the heart and humanity of feral and rabid ferrets.

But the truth is she simply cannot figure out logically (left side) the internal processes that are happening inside her. All she knows is that she does NOT feel loved, she IS unhappy, the arguments are endless and she simply cannot remember the cap, and at times even if she does she is so upset by the whole thing she says “fuck it!” And leaves it off on purpose. And at a deep and unconscious level she not only feels unloved, but she has the “proof” of it! (She is being berated for what is in her mind inconsequential stuff just like her abusive father used to do. Proof!) She now KNOWS she is not loved, so what’s the point? And sad, depressed and angry she files for divorce.

The husband is shocked, hurt and depressed too, and her filing for divorce now confirms to him what logic has already “confirmed” to him. She never loved him to begin with. She was always after the house or whatever, because only an egomaniac would divorce rather than simply putting the toothpaste cap back on after use.

The solution, for the most part, lies necessarily with the man, or the rare woman that can do decent logic.

Armed with this understanding of left and right brain processing, the ingrained bad habits and issues that cause friction can be seen not as we FEEL them, but as they are.

The right brain is affected by significant emotional events much more than the left brain and is distributed in this respect throughout the body. It’s why generally we can’t “force” ourselves to feel a certain way, at least not unless you trained to some extreme degrees to do so (special ops people, extreme persons, and some aspects of what is mislabelled as sociopathy or psychopathy).

The right brain processes in “likelihoods” shaped by emotions over time.

If the husband in the above example understands this he has several options to fix this. For example:

1. He might get up with his wife and ensure he brushes his teeth right after she does so he can replace the cap each time. If he does this without ever mentioning the issue however, he may end up resenting her over time.
2. As above but he tells her lovingly how as a germophobe he hates the cap being off the toothpaste after use but he doesn’t want to stress her about it, so he will do it each day by using it immediately after she does. This could work if the woman appreciates it. If she also demonstrably shows it by being affectionate to her husband, giving him a little kiss each morning for tidying up after her, it could even become a source of pleasant quirkiness between them. Her feeling cared for can result in an increase of good connection between them.
3. As above but if the woman does not appreciate it she can instead feel “oppressed” by the “controlling” behaviour of her husband. If he in turn does not realise this and she hides it, her eventual watershed moment will come out of the blue for him and be crushing. If she does mention it, the husband can adapt again. But needs to do so in a way that gives the wife a good sensation. And asking her what that might be can be almost pointless because her own unconscious process is just as opaque to her. At this point she may have already unconsciously “concluded” that her husband is a control freak who can never make her happy, and if her husband doesn’t understand this process the relationship is probably doomed. If he half-understands it and “goes along” in order to try to salvage things but really is not happy about it, she will in any case lose respect for him because at some unconscious level she feels he is letting her dictate to him things he does not like, and no woman likes to have a doormat for a husband. At this point the man who does grasp this theory really only has two options left: leave or evolve. In some cases the evolving might not be possible. In the case of a toothpaste cap, the smart thing is to evolve, genuinely get over the germophobia, (using logic, a diverse biome of gut bacteria is healthier, say) love his wife regardless of what she does with the cap, and be happy anyway. Paradoxically, IF he honestly does this, his wife may well spontaneously begin putting the cap back on. Her unconscious, picking up her husband’s genuine love despite the cap, reassures her brain he IS the One! So her unconscious eventually relaxes, satisfied the trauma from her abusive father is healed, and lovingly, she begins to take care of the husband’s needs (because her emotions were engaged positively and truly, and thus made a significant change in her psyche towards her husband too). Of course if the issue is not a toothpaste cap, but the “need” to “transition” your 5 year old boy into a girl… well… leaving (with the boy in your sole custody!) is the only real option left.

I know the example is simplistic, but the point is to show the principle.

A LOT of what appears to men to be solipsism driven by selfishness, ego, lack of empathy and so on, is not necessarily that, but is actually due to processing that is inductive, opaque, probabilistic, and not logical in the strict sense of the word, but is still valid and CAN be understood by USING logic to contextualise it.

I believe taking note of this theory and applying it can change the dynamic that has been creating an increasing distance between the sexes and bring about a reversal, so that men and women once again come closer to each other in a truly complementary way.

In the next post I also want to address the example above of the toothpaste cap a little more from the woman’s perspective and also as if SHE is going to be the “fixer” of it (rarer because of the more right brained way to process things).

But for now this is long enough and I want to get an initial feedback on whether you, the reader find this helpful.

So leave a comment.

Subscribe

Share

Message me

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

This is the most important essay on how intelligence, IQ, emotions, and logic work that I have ever read.

Internal blindness and emotional barriers

I have studied the human mind for at least 20 years and this essay has explained things I observed but could not really explain fully or at least well enough for my own satisfaction until now. Mixed with my experiences of martial arts of decades, it reduced to some observed truths.

One being that people avoid reality unless or until, physical pain is administered as a direct consequence. This is true and even animals can be trained to behave in certain ways through such methods, but it is not ideal or even practical, certainly not at a societal level, but also at a personal level.

Spartans were efficient and violence and pain was the main teaching instrument, so it absolutely does work, but it is not ideal for good relations in say a family unit.

The contrast between such methods being accepted say 50 or 70 years ago (or in my own raising, as older Gen X) and now is drastic.

Society didn’t have so many emotionally incontinent dyslexics! And everyone got by.

So that brutal method works, BUT, what if instead one approaches the situation from childhood so that a child gets taught to do something and his emotions of it are linked to it when they are good, and instead taught when a negative emotion happens to try and process it differently, say as a motivator, or marker of excellence.

Anyone that has done martial arts seriously will know that every one of us “forces” ourselves to process our pain, injuries, even fear itself as a “necessary” thing that once overcome makes us into better people. And it’s true, it does.

Sometimes you need to fool your brain into saying “this pain is ok, it’s good for me even if right now it hurts and maybe it will even cause serious or even permanent damage,* but I am choosing to go carry on past it, because it’s better on the other side of it and I WILL get there.” The fact is we don’t really know for sure what is on the other side, but all those who do get there know it was worth it after all.

And in that way our scars and so on are more tolerable. And we then learn to do the same emotionally, and again, overcoming your own emotions is always a positive for the most part.

The one exception is if you become so scarred over you can’t feel any good ones anymore. But then… you can reverse that situation by doing more of the same… forcing yourself to feel the good too. My living a year in the most beautiful city in the world (Venice) was essentially an aspect of doing that. It was very difficult to accept and be surrounded by such heartbreaking beauty alone. But I also knew it was healing.

So to get back to people who have a lowered ability in this capacity, starting with children, how do we teach them to use their emotions intelligently without limiting their ability to face diversity from the start? As I said, I suggest the method above of linking emotions to learning.

* The point is NOT to be so bull-headed to rush towards permanent injury with little thought, quite the contrary, one should become more hyper-aware and focused to avoid it, BUT, one MUST be willing to risk it at least in order to really overcome your own emotions. And evolve.

Subscribe

Share

Join the chat

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

Having conversations with the Ice Spartan, and his still evolving theology, alongside his concerns about marriage and women in general, I came upon a realisation that is something you will only begin to see properly only if you have lived long enough on Earth and had enough experience with women of different types and then, at some point, became properly Catholic.

You can’t see this fully or correctly if you are a Protestant (you can come close to it as an Eastern Orthodox but not as close as a Sede Catholic) and not at all if you are an atheist, agnostic or generic Zen type as I was for most of my life, but here it is:

Men have the capacity to be loyal to principles, other men, ideals, family and their loved ones, as well as God to a far higher degree than women. That is right up to death. Women generally don’t and generally never will.

I don’t care for outliers and exceptions of saint this or that. This is a statistically valid reality.

By and large women are only truly loyal to their own emotions and feelings, regardless of how well or badly they march with reality.

This is not really their (entire) fault, because biologically they are wired to be that solipsistic. In the TMOS series on the OG blog I explained why in some depth in part 4 on marriage . And part 6 was on women specifically, but to get the big picture you really need to read the whole TMOS series from the start (scroll down).

Of course women too have free will, so their excuses for their often absurdly selfish actions should not be given a free pass because of this, but it is not wrong to consider them somewhat impaired in terms of making rational choices. Logic, long terms plans that benefit the most people and so on is the purview of men for the most part. As I say, the reasons are mostly biological, so read the TMOS series or Caveman Theory if you want more details on that.

The point here is that the REASON this is a verifiable fact that has been demonstrated throughout human history, is because in general, men have the capacity to sacrifice themselves for something bigger than themselves. This is why for example even though Clown World tells us women are better with children, the fact is that children raised by single parents that are men invariably outperform children raised by single parents that are women in every metric one cares to look at, from academic performance, to criminality, violence, drug use etc etc.

Because men are capable of dedicating themselves to things bigger or more important than themselves (objectively from a specific point of view) they are more able to be more effective at creating good things for society as a whole as well as people around them even if they are not particularly religious. Not so with women. A woman’s true belief in God —and that means the loving Christian God, and even more specifically, the nuanced and humane and humorous Catholic God— is about the only thing she will generally consider as “bigger” or more important than her own emotions.

Women in the Aether are screaming at me right now that they love their children or even husbands (more rare), or have deep love because they are so empathetic to the plights of thousands of military age male refugees from African or Arab lands.

But the truth is they more often than not are in love with their own IDEA of that child or whatever, than the actual child.

I speak from experience as my own mother has always been such a person. Most people (being idiots) assume the woman is a kind and selfless person, the truth is that she only ever does what she wants because of how it make HER feel. The feelings if others were a mask or an excuse or even totally ignored. After my parents divorced, the few men that my mother chose to be with became her pilot star. If she had got with a circus performer she would have elevated being a clown to the pinnacle of human achievement, and if she had been with a banker she would no doubt have extolled the sanctity of usury. The only trait that was ever truly hers was the capacity to just do whatever her emotions told her to.

And most women are indeed like that.

Except when they actually truly believe in a loving God that has specific rules. Then they will tend to follow those rules. And of course if the God is one of a broken or flawed or nonsensical religion, well, then their actions will be just as broken. This is why women are more susceptible to joining cults. The two things that can sway their emotions the most are men (but usually only temporarily) or God.

And because of the two only God is always “unreachable” (and perfect) in full, it is the one they might be most likely to be loyal to.

So, in the search for a wife, if one takes the following things into account:

• Non vaxxed
• Not a huge body count
• No drugs or alcohol
• Has at least a basic physical attraction to you and you to them

You’re already on thin ice in terms of viable numbers of eligible women. Add in

• Truly religious

And the number shrinks drammatically

Add in

• Properly Catholic

And you may be looking at double digit numbers in your entire country.

And while Sede marriages happen, they are probably not the norm and most people reading this are not sede Catholics anyway. Even so, the point stands.

But allowing for some latitude then, what is a young man to do? Ideally he is to gently lead a woman towards the truth of God.

And in such a way that she can find it in her own way too. Not prescribed so much as shown. And so that she can see it for herself.

And if and when she does, and it is tested, then and only then, marry.

And I suggest, marry in church only. A sede church marriage is not recognised by the state, but it is by God. And that is how it should be, because among faithful, there is no need of lawyers and courts and so on. If you are a true believer you will not rob or cheat your neighbour, never mind your wife or husband.

Are these unions rare? Absolutely. But are they possible? Also yes.

Hard to come by? Perhaps. Prayer does seem to help if not done in desperation.

But in any case, this is the harsh reality, and it is always best to see it as it is.

Good luck and may God guide you.

Subscribe

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here