What now Ann, and all the Ratzi followers?

So… blind, deaf-mutes amongst lost tribes of the Amazon are now aware that Bergie the Oleous is not Catholic at all, never was, and clearly is only a mockery of the very idea he could be Catholic clergy of any sort, never mind Pope.

But my question will be to the NEW, just 2022 Sedevacantists, like Ann Barnhardt, and all the people she has helped deceive into believing as she does that Ratzi-the-Nazi was an actual Pope, when he was an even more dangerous Satanist than Bergie, because Bergie, you see, is a blasphemous moron and plays his hand so heavy that like I said, those poor handicapped Amazonians are aware of it. Ratzi pretended to be a conservative, no less, which is hilarious since he was a principal architect of Vatican II and blessed a masonic fake Church, just like Wojytla did.

And my question is this: Ann, where, exactly, is your Catholicism? Every single “priest” and every single “bishop” or “cardinal” of your Novus Orco, fake Church goes along with everything Bergie does. So where are the Catholic clergy in YOUR Church, Ann?

Wait… what’s that? There aren’t any? Not a single one in the Novus Orc? Yeah. We know. We been telling you since 1958.

I know, I know, it’s a shock. Go on, take a load of, sit down. I ran out of tequila, Ann, so shots are out, but you can partake of this rather fine brandy, almost a cognac really. Take a seat. What’s that? Leave the bottle? Sure. No problem. I’ll leave a proper cognac snifter too. Decorum and dignity and all that.

We can talk about proper non-una cum masses in the morning. What’s that? Late afternoon you say? Yes, yes, of course. Probably best to have some food and string coffee first too, I understand.

This is counter intuitive for almost everyone, but the simple fact is that if you intentionally choose hardship, such as say going outside and learning a skill where you need to use your hands or play sports instead of eat cheetos and binge watch TV, you develop a different brain.

And of course a different body.

A brain that is inside a body that DOES things, functions at a much more efficient level. It doesn’t even matter if what you do is as seemingly pointless as play football, the reality is that moving your body, passing the ball, working with a team, affects you mentally, spiritually and physically in ways you can’t even begin to imagine. Choosing to read books instead of sitting on the couch and have stories fed to you by TV, forces you to use your imagination instead of merely being a receptacle for it.

IQ has declined about one standard deviation from the late 1800s, and part of it is the easy lifestyle we have now compared to then. Literally EVERYTHING was harder then, and because of it people had to use their brains more, and suffered far more dire consequences if they did not or did not succeed at it.

Today we have drooling morons questioning if the Earth is really a globe, and taking genetic serums that have always resulted in death in animal trials because the government tells them to.

So. Get out there. Read a book. Build something. Learn to hunt, track, butcher your own meat.

Plant a tree, plant some potatoes, climb a tree, fix something, learn to work wood, or strip and rebuild an engine.

Do stuff.

Chose the hard road.

It’s always funny when these products of people thought too criminally minded to inhabit the British isles attempt insult.

As usual, Adam gets it terribly wrong.

First he mixes an awesome interview with a frivolous bit of fun. Time and place Adam, time and place. It’s enough to make one realise the jailbirds were exiled to Australia not just for their criminality, but their uncouthness. Talk about generational sin!

Secondly he spells my name wrong. Not surprising given that literacy amongst Australians is about as frequent as astronauts in Cambodia.

Thirdly he gets it wrong, since in our conversation I explained that my favourite class is actually the mystic/paladin dual class, yes from basic D&D where alignment is limited to Lawful, Chaotic or Neutral, which is a far more open ended and realistic approach than the double axis of good-evil and law-chaos of AD&D, wherein Paladins have to be Lawful Good. It’s basically the difference between being a proper Catholic and being a puritanical Calvinist. Trust an Australian to not be able to tell the difference.

Fourthly he mislabels the version of D&D he referred to. He specifically stated he preferred AD&D (because, obviously, lacking imagination, having pre-set railroading fundamental personality traits like alignment helps him know how to play) yet on his sideswiping he refers to it as Second Edition AD&D; which, of course, is completely wrong, since while AD&D was the second iteration of D&D, 2nd Edition AD&D was actually a version of AD&D that existed in its own right, the second one, wouldn’t you know, as you would if you could read.

As it happens 2nd Edition AD&D was actually decent and better than AD&D but that’s not what he referred to. And anyway, the alignment problem remained.

Fifthly, he admitted he always played a thief character. Which is natural I suppose, what with him being Australian, and that whole nation having a penchant for “backstabbing”.

But sixthly and demonically, he also admitted to enjoying playing a half-elf female character with a high charisma who liked stopping fights by saying “hi boys!” And presumably dropping some item of clothing. If that doesn’t give a whole new twist to the kind of “backstabbing” he wanted to indulge in and is not an admission of latent homosexuality, I don’t know what is.

In all the years I played RPGs the only female characters PCs played was when the player was an actual female.

I think I can safely rest my case as to whose advice in life you may or may not want to follow. Never mind who you’d be safest playing tabletop RPGs with!