This little video embedded below, of the real life gamma Captain Sobel in the excellent Band of Brothers series, demonstrates that the concept of the Gamma, and the worst thing that can happen, a gamma in a position of authority over others, is a real concept that has been well described by Vox Day.
As an aside, while it is true, and something I expected right from the start of the video that the men benefitted from the gruelling training, I feel that this was more despite Captain Sobel rather than it being an intentional effect he was going for regardless of personal cost.
The clue is in the fact that he was vindictive, held a grudge, and was overall a bad leader, but expected to be seen as the perfect Captain. His harassing the men on the smallest detail, had nothing to do with making them more efficient, and everything to do with making (in his own mind) him appear to be a “perfectionist” and/or having standards higher than everyone else. Which is also what drove him to take part in the training exercises, but, however, disappear for pretty much the rest of the time, where he clearly shirked the duties he instead piled on and gave to Winters.
I would bet that if had ever lead Easy Co. in actual combat for any length of time, it would have been quite likely that he would have suffered some fatal “accident”.
Bear with me, because the introduction to this one takes a little while, but is absolutely necessary in order for us to understand each other properly. I think you will agree, especially if you are not Catholic; as —perhaps to your surprise— this post is nevertheless for you too.
As usual, the Intro:
This is the fourth in the Theoretical Models of Society series of Posts. Use the category of the same name or the Search Me function on the right-hand sidebar to find all related posts in the series.
It is generally helpful to a reader if they are already familiar with some of my other work, in order for this stuff to have the most useful effect on your life. In particular, The Face on Mars and Believe! would be the top reads to have done to have the generic global perspective of reality well in hand. Systema and Reclaiming the Catholic Church would have the most impact on a more personal level. On health/security/self-protection, and on the reality of Catholicism as it was (and remains with Sedevacantists) before Vatican II and why the Novus Ordo Church is not only not Catholic, but Satanic at its core. I will repeat this little paragraph on each new part, as I think it is important to have a general foundation if one is really interested in more than skim-reading before returning to the general slumber we are all being attempted to be forced into.
In writing this ongoing series, despite the fact it was the most requested among the choices I gave on the Poll, the fact is that it is at times hard to determine if it is having the intended useful effect.
Of the people who read this blog regularly, only a fraction will reply to polls, and of that, possibly a part will be hate-readers trying to skew the stats.
That said, I received a private message that made it clear that at least one person, and a very good person at that, is finding it useful. Among a busy life, a relatively recent marriage and a new son, he is also busy trying to form a Sede community in a place where there isn’t even a proper Catholic Church. Sounds crazy? Well he is not, and amazingly, he is already having some material success, grouping the few Sedes and making them achieve a first contact with each other. Meaning he is becoming successful at creating one of those communities I tell you all you should be busy forming, of like-minded people, whether you are Catholic or not.
His comment to me was also helpful because it ties very smoothly into the next aspect of TMOS, and that is, the proto-cell of the whole thing: The Individual Man.
Introduction before the concept
In my explanation, the analogies and explanations are best executed in terms of the underlying Catholic (1958 Sedevacantist) spiritual underpinnings.
Now, possibly heretical though it might be, I do not want this to dissuade people who are not Catholic from understanding the baseline concepts. Remember that if the model works, you should use it. As I already explained in the first 3 parts, as long as you base everything on the spiritual reality that sustains the physical, you will achieve some measure of success, and there are many spiritual realities. It’s just that most are not good, and of the few that might be considered “good” all but one are less than ideal. And even if you don’t agree with me about which one that is, if you can do basic logic at all, you must concede that the truth can only be one, whatever it is. Nothing can be both true and not true at the same time.
It became my considered opinion, after some 4 years of intense investigation (between 2013 and 2017) that the original Catholicism that existed (mostly) and was promulgated by the Vatican until 1958, is the very best approximation or approach to reality that humanity has ever had. It has produced the best and most fruits globally, and therefore has an impeccable track record when compared to any other spiritual model.
That said, is it possible for a human being with some other philosophy to produce demonstrable and overall good effects in the world? Yes. Absolutely.
It is certainly possible for a truly pious, well-meaning Buddhist, or even Protestant, or even Muslim believer, to have interpreted what shrinking good there is in their false philosophies, just so, that they really do produce an overall net good that is certainly superior to that of a genuine Catholic, that however genuine in intent, may have misunderstood the basics of his own philosophy. We are all in error to some degree or other, and it is not a race to some finish line, so this is a bad analogy in many ways, but if we assume that in order to get into heaven you have to accumulate 1,000 points, starting out as a proper Catholic is like starting with 1,000 points right out the gate. You can certainly lose points in your journey, and it may be a lot easier to do so than you think maybe, but you sure have a better shot than someone who starts out as a Muslim, which might be like starting out with -500 points and generally in a lifetime you can only accumulate say 500 points max, and converting to Catholicism gives you a 1,000 points.
I mention all this not to try and scare you into conversion (I mean, hey, if it happens, and you chose it of your own free will, great) but only to identify that fact that despite there not being any salvation outside of the Catholic Church, in our path of life, it is possible (if not very probable) to find people who are not on the true path (Catholicism) that nevertheless can have demonstrable (good) effects in the world due to a variety of variables and factors.
There are also plenty of people that have demonstrable effects in the world that are using an underlying evil spiritual underpinning of course, but we are talking only to the “good” guys here.
And while I sure hope you would all become able to see the logic, beauty and truth of Catholicism, find yourself a real Church, a real priest, fall to your knees and beg for proper baptism in it, I am, above all, a realist. Which means I am aware of the war I face. And while I wish you all the Truth with a capital T, I know many, probably most, will not be moved an inch from your erroneous ideas any more than I was moved from mine for 43 years.
So, while I leave the details of your possible salvation by conversion to the Lord, because ultimately it is a job waaaaaaaaaaay above my station to even worry about, aside from pointing out, as crudely, simply, and correctly as my human flaws allow, the retta via (right path), I tend to work with what I have.
And if all I have are a bunch of Pagans, heathens, agnostics and autistic atheists, so be it. Within your errors, I wish you to find the best, the snippets, the shards of good that may exist, imperfect and insufficient though they are, for you to fashion weapons out of them and combat the enemy.
Do not think I will treat you as equal, or pray with you in your heathen ways, we are not the same; but also know, I do not hate you; and, in my heart, I wish you only well and that one day you too are saved, and get to heaven, by whichever tortuous path you might need to. My own path has certainly been far from straight, after all.
And now, with that out of the way, let us now get to this Part 4: The individual Man
The Proto-Cell: The Individual Man
Continuing with my imperfect analogies, and considering you as if you have already read and digested parts 1-3 (including 3a), I shall now explain why the individual man is the proto-cell.
The actually cell of human society is the nuclear family, and the only version of that that actually works analogously to a healthy cell within the body, is one that is composed of a Husband, Wife and Children, all operating under the foundational principles of a real spirituality, which I will from now on simply refer to as Catholicism. But feel free to substitute that with your own word for your philosophy of life; and if you do, yet are perceptive, you may notice that certain things simply do not work in your heathen ways, because you lack the demonstrable fruits throughout history to show you the truth of the matter, you lack the reason and logic that prove the truth of Catholicism throughout the ages, and on and on. I am not striking at you here, just making a point that you might want to take note of and verify for yourself.
Any other version of the nuclear family that is not composed of Husband, Wife and Children can be considered as a damaged, crippled or even a cancerous cell. Now, there are some cells, that can’t have children, but these too, if under proper spiritual underpinning, are genuinely positive and helpful. In each body there are cells that are specialised and appear to be slightly different, because they have a different role, but all are still healthy and required. Childless couples can improve the world by adopting children that might otherwise be lost, or help others in other ways, and they do. But the model is still based on the same foundations.
We will discuss the nuclear family in the greater context of the very practical and beneficial effects they have on society in later posts, but first things first. The proto-cell, if you like, the DNA of the cell, is the individual man. And I say man not coincidentally. Without a man at the spiritual helm, you get nowhere. The female may be considered the cell wall and other parts of it, you need both to form a real, proper, functioning cell, but the code of life is in the DNA and similarly, the code of a proper community and functional society is the individual man, both in each cell (family unit), as well as in greater society.
The second concept, that of the proto-cell in greater society will be a subject for a future post. Here, today, we will only examine the proto-cell of the individual man on its own terms. What makes a valid, viable, strong, Individual Man? That is going to be a good example that will perform well in both the complete cell (nuclear family) and/or in the larger body (community/society). This is what we will concern ourselves with in this post.
Trying to avoid my common error of skipping something obvious to me that turns out to be not so obvious to others, I also just want to say that why the individual MAN is the focus first, is because both in a family, as well as in society, it is ultimately men that create civilisation. Which is not to say that women are completely useless in the process, but women simply are not the civilisers of humanity. Men are. Always have been, and always will be. No matriarchal society has ever existed, and any attempts at creating one have invariably always failed in ways that are absolutely horrific. The current fruits of feminism most certainly included. But again, the details of the role of the woman, as well as the evils of feminism, etc. are for a post way down the line.
Accepting the above premise then, what makes a “good” proto-cell?
We already know he has to have a a sound spiritual foundation but on a more practical level, the key factor that makes the difference is self-knowledge.
The Oracle at Delphi was right.
Above all, Know Thyself
I need to emphasise something regarding the examples I make below. Whenever I insert myself in the discussion, it is not for some reach for glory, but rather because if I use an example from my own life, the experience is absolutely real and factual. In other words I am trying to show you it is based in reality. And it is not my “opinion” of some third party, but rather something I have personally tested and verified works. So keep that in mind.
Even from a very young age, possibly due to my touch of Aspergers’/High IQ I spent time imagining various scenarios life might throw at me and how I wanted to respond. Many were prompted by the fact that my life had been different from most children my age in rather extreme ways. My father moved us to Nigeria when I was four and we grew up pretty wild, being home schooled by my mother in how to read and write and do maths. Periodic returns to Italy were usually short lived and then my brother and I lived with out grandparents in rural Italy for a number of years too. When I enrolled in my first elementary school I was ahead of most of the other children in both maths and reading and writing comprehension. Socially I was never much of a joiner and this sometimes resulted in what today would be labelled as “bullying”, but I never took it and generally fought back regardless. It wasn’t that I was necessarily brave, as such, just that my sense of innate justice was more powerful than fear generally speaking. It was mostly a reaction, treat me bad, I treat you bad right back. The fact there are 30 of you and one of me is sort of irrelevant.
That was luck, genetics, some of my upbringing, and I stress, only some of it, or divine intervention that made me that way from early on, because I don’t think I can take any credit for it before say age seven or so for trying to foster that mentality consciously. But because Justice absolutely is a fundamental spiritual concept, that is closely aligned to Love, my spiritual foundation, even if shaky in many other respects, had at least one strong and unshakable pillar around which the rest of my personality could grow. If Seeking Justice is your main characteristic, you can’t really do it without developing Courage. Which is not easy to do, but is doable, I know, because I did. Courage may or may not come easier to some than others, but I certainly am aware I had to consciously work at it as a child and even as a teenager. It has been one of the constants in my life, to continually try to improve it. At age 55 my efforts are far less in the physical realm, but rather more on the intellectual, emotional, and spiritual level. By exposing perhaps more of myself to the wider world, there are costs to it, but I feel it is important and as such the type of courage required in it is of a different sort than facing, say, an armed opponent.
My point is that in order for you to be effective, you need to be congruent. I made conscious choices as to what type of man I wanted to be, and pursued those choices relentlessly. So I imagined all sorts of scenarios or situations in order to understand what was my natural inclination, and if I was happy or not with it, and if not, how to change it or improve it. By the time I was in my late teens, and certainly by my early 20s, my internal self-knowledge was pretty absolute. Certain events continue to happen in life for which you can never be prepared, but if you have a truly deep understanding of who you are, even the unexpected, tragic, surprising, and so on, can be at least survived, and often navigated and sometimes even taken advantage of and turned into an opportunity. If however, when life throws you a curve ball, you end up reeling in confusion as to what to do with it because, on top of the event itself, you also are unsure of who you are and, so are unable to quickly or even instinctively process it appropriately, life will definitely be harder for you.
Self-knowledge inevitably requires a deep delving into your philosophies of life, and if these are in turn based on false spiritual concepts, your efficiency in the world will, once again, reflect that.
Prior to my baptism, my overall philosophies of life were few and far between, and I always knew and said this too. They were limited to a set of ethics that I had investigated very deeply and knew was correct, but did not venture much beyond that. Justice was absolutely the core of it (and remains so, mostly), followed by the related concepts of honesty and honour (keeping your word, essentially) and courage. The rest I was pretty much agnostic about. And because I limited myself to the spiritual reality I could absolutely reconcile with reality, my foundation has always been solid. One can say it was incomplete, but not that it was ever unstable. Which is why, mentally, emotionally, and even physically, I have generally been able to outperform most people in terms of efficacy and results.
When I suddenly was presented with a huge revelation concerning the very bedrock of reality, I took time to simply sit and observe. Try to learn, as I did when I was a small child, by simply sitting and observing everything going on around me. Except I was 43, not a child. Which meant some things I could actively begin to investigate in more depth and detail right away, as soon as I became aware of them. And this search was done in the same relentless way I did my previous investigation of the fundamentals of reality. I suddenly had a gigantic, pivotal, absolutely core piece of information that I never had before, and had experienced it directly and unquestionably. For the first time I realised with absolute certainty that:
God exists, and,
God is Love, and Loves us, (despite ourselves!) individually, specifically, and personally.
It took some time (months for the basics at least, but it continues throughout life) to process my past experiences, my life to that point, so that I could verify that yes, those two points are absolutely true and everything in my life to that point actually proved them. Nothing contradicted or invalidated those two key points. Literally nothing. Including my “worst” or most “lost” moments. In other words, perhaps if I had been a more careful observer, I could have, or maybe I should have, inferred God simply by my surroundings and reality as we find it.
In fairness, the enemy does throw up quite the smokescreen at every level of our lives, so it’s not as easy as all that, but it certainly has been possible for others. My friend Tony for example, in pure weaponised autist fashion, became a Catholic purely as a result of following the logic of it.
So that was step one. Verifying that my Road to Damascus experience was rooted in reality; that is, in truth, that the aspects of reality I had shown did in fact fit my experience, observations, and logical deductions. And not only did they do so, but they did so to a level of precision, perfection and correctness I had not encountered even in engineering, which tends to be a rather “exact” science.
Then I proceed to step two, which was to test the model. This took longer (at least two years I would estimate) but once again, every experiment I did, as long as I did it correctly, fit the model. Of course, in experimentation, the failed experiments are worthwhile too, as they provide information on the processes that do or do not fit reality. To my astonishment, I discovered prayer absolutely works. It is a difficult thing to get right, and in some cases almost impossible at times, BUT if and when the conditions are repeated correctly, the result is invariably positive. In other words, the scientific method can be applied to prayer and the results it provides are proof enough that it is a real thing and works.
The issue with prayer is not that it does not work, but that in almost all cases, we are not applying the “formula” or “rules” correctly or sufficiently accurately, to make it work, and some of it is also possibly dependent on external factors beyond our control. Nevertheless it remains wholly and totally scientifically testable.
Say you want to prove that you could use ball-lightning to power something, say charge a battery fully in seconds. First of all you would need to test various models of engineered equipment to make it happen, but you also need the ball-lightning to happen too. Even if you have got all the equipment totally correct, but you do your experiment on a cloudless and sunny day, your results will be zero. If you then chalk that up as evidence that ball-lightning cannot charge a battery in seconds, or that the equipment used is faulty, you are making an error. In good science, the conditions need to be replicated in order to test a theory. So it is not easy to test for how prayer works and how to do it properly. Nevertheless, I have explained this in both Believe! and Reclaiming the Catholic Church.
Again, to summarise, I had a deep knowledge of myself, and this was based only on those valid principles of spirituality I was sure of because I could test and verify them to an absolute degree and see them reflected in physical reality as well. Then when additional information was given to me that showed me a whole aspect of reality I was ignorant of before, I immediately set about observing, exploring and testing it.
It is only in this fashion that I gradually came to my conclusions regarding Catholicism. In each step of the process, I tested, kicked at, explored, and verified, each additional element of the philosophies I was taking on.
The process, in very summarised format was as follows:
Road to Damascus moment leads to the observation that:
God exists, and
God is Love and does Love us, individually, specifically and personally.
At this point I could be defined as a Deist. Shortly thereafter however, observation and testing makes it absolutely clear that:
An enemy to God absolutely does exist and is actively trying to lead us as far from the truth as possible. In fact this reality is so obvious once you even begin to look, that the fingerprints and clues of the eternal psychopath are littered all over the place, as if the entire planet was a giant crime scene, which, in reality, it kind of is, and this too fits with reality as we find it, as well as the historical models of it.
At the same time, it also becomes obvious that the only possibly valid version of God that fits the experience and observations must be one of the following:
An open-ended generic Loving God that potentially (but not historically) could be associated with certain aspects or elements of: Shintoism, Zen agnosticism, Taoism. Vanishingly small chance of being the case, but not totally excluded.
Hinduism, Judaism and Islam are absolutely and definitely out, and not related to the reality of God at all.
Christianity is the only religion that descriptively and historically presents God (the father) as approaching the same reality I was aware of and tested to my satisfaction.
All of the other Pagan religions from the Aztec gods to the Zoroastrian ones, are clearly either nonsensical, or actively working for the glorification of the precise opposite of God.
Further investigation then makes option 1 potentially “valid” but without any real evidence of it throughout human history beyond some inference here and there. The focus then becomes Christianity as a whole, but necessarily the process must now include the question: “Which Christianity?”
Further observation and investigation very quickly makes it absolutely plain that everything and anything related to Protestantism is, in fact, almost certainly the work of the enemy and designed to secularise, destroy and confuse the truth. Every single one of the 40,000 denominations of it (more like 700 million, though since each person is an interpreter of the law onto him or herself) can be safely discarded with the same ease one discards the “logic” of a child that is trying to convince you that 2+2 is purple.
This leaves the Copts, the Eastern Orthodox and the Catholics.
The first two have a problem of not bearing anywhere near sufficient fruits to be the One True religion. The Copts are also almost extinct and never achieved much at all anywhere at any time. That leaves the EO, which are generally split into nationalistic versions, did not spread the gospel anywhere near as much as Catholics, did not achieve any of the civilisational markers Catholicism did, did not invent the scientific method, did not create as varied and beautiful palette of art in all its forms and has not been exactly the fountainhead of logic and reason that Catholicism has been since the start. They also betrayed the very Catholics that came to rescue them despite their schism from them some 40 years earlier, and literally tried to kill them by making pacts with the very Muslims the Catholics were saving them from. Three times in a row. And then are still bitching about when the fourth time round the Catholics sacked Constantinople (which as far as sacking of cities goes for the period, was really quite a gentle affair anyway).
Against that, I had a “Pope” that protected pedophiles, homosexual orgies fuelled by cocaine in the Vatican by supposed Catholic clergy, and this too could not be reconciled. While it was clear that human fallibility was always going to be a part of any One True Church, because humans gonna human, two things had to logically be true:
God’s real Church, if one existed, must, logically, be infallible, and also be able to be discovered (visible) and tested to be as such. This is no small feat. I have no problem with it being possibly difficult to find; or you needing to work your butt off to figure it out. All that is fine to me, because there is the enemy, and the smokescreens he shoots up are huge, and so on, but anyone truly earnestly seeking should, be able to find it. Logic dictates that a Loving God, even allowing for free will, would absolutely make it possible for you to find it in some way if you truly were seeking for the truth. So that was a thing, secondly, it had to be infallible despite the humans that represented it. Which it would and could only be by supernatural Godly protection, because you can bet every single human in it was going to fuck up some aspect of it in some way to other. And there is only ONE Church that makes that claim. The Catholic One. But even that claim could be fake, so you need to study what the rules of this Church are, and how do they fit reality, which leads to the second point:
The One True Church must —again, necessarily, by reason of the most basic logic— have rules. And at least some of those rules, like absolute truth and math, must be eternal and unchanging, because if a Loving God exists, that Love would NOT be actual Love if:
It was not inclusive of you having free will, including the free will to reject it, and,
Love without Justice (rules) is not Love. If Justice does not exist, then neither can Love. If your Love towards another is potentially never even acknowledged, or worse, is abused constantly, can it really be love? Or is it merely a perverse dictate without any goodness in it? Just as if you were forced to Love God, that would invalidate Free Will, if you were forced or only able to “Love” no matter the response, then it would just as identically not be actual Love, because Love, the real one, can ONLY be given as an act of free will.
Now, again, the only Church that has:
Visibility,
Infallibility, and
A Code of Conduct that is precisely spelt out
is the Catholic Church.
But far more impressive than that, it has had this from the start, has always proclaimed it, and the deeper into it you look, the more astonishing what you find.
You find that the Church has been protected from fantastically “successful” attacks, heresies, lies, and attempts to subvert and destroy it, for two millennia; and no matter how dark and desperate the times can be, even for centuries at a time, ultimately, it continually returns triumphant against odds that simply make no sense unless some divine intervention was taking place.
All of that made it pretty clear that Catholicism was probably it… except… Pedophiles.
In my heart of hearts, it could never be accepted and reconciled that the One True God that I personally experienced in that Road to Damascus moment could ever, or would ever, let His Church ever be represented by Pedophiles. That the odd pedophile pretended to be a member? Sure. Just like the thousands of fraudsters, unrepentant thieves, murderers, adulterers, whatever. But those would be “members” of it; but as a class, represented so repeatedly and dramatically in its upper echelons of the supposed “leadership”? No. It could not be. Cannot be. And yet, Catholicism seemed to fill all the other requirements. So what happened? I began to investigate if it was always thus, and discovered that no, it was not. And then I became aware that the real infiltration started in earnest in the late 1700s. And following that thread of Illuminati, Freemasons, Carbonari, Rosicrucians, Communists, Homosexuals, Jews, and Protestants that plotted against the Church over at least two and a half centuries, it became obvious that Vatican II was the culmination of those efforts and it usurped the Church almost (but not quite) entirely.
At this point one might lose hope if one was affected by rhetoric and appearances instead of fundamentally seeking only the facts. That is: Only the pure unadulterated truth as we really find it, and can test it in reality as we find it all around us.
And luckily for me (and some others too, I guess) precisely because I always had an instinctive understanding of the importance of knowing yourself —and basing it only on the truth that you can absolutely demonstrate is real and reflects reality as it is, not as you wish it were— I carried on digging.
I read the Code of Canon Law of 1917 by myself, and came across Canon 188.4 by myself. It was here that a light bulb moment went off. I had found the point of departure.
It was, indeed Vatican II, its instigators, and all its pomps. And it also confirmed that the impostors squatting in the Vatican not only are NOT merely human representatives of God’s Church, but they are in fact, working for the enemy.
Imagine then my amusement when I discovered that this too is prophesied both in the Bible as well as in the visions of many saints throughout the centuries of the Catholic Church. If you had taken this journey with me, even if perhaps you are the type prone to despair because of appearances, this discovery would undoubtedly provide comfort and joy.
Because although it is sad that the Catholic Church has now been reduced to only a tiny remnant of what it was at its peak, it at least explains everything. It explains precisely why things are as they are and, once again, it explains reality as we find it. The Pedophiles and their “Pope” protectors are Satanists, just pretending to be “Catholics”, and yes, fooling more than a billion people, but that too is to be expected. Again, we know that the large and well paved road leads to Hell.
Only at this point then, and studying and testing further to my satisfaction, did I realise that indeed, the position known as Sedevacantism is actually, simply, truly, mere Catholicism. The real one. The one that has survived other dark times like the persecutions by the Roman Emperors, the Arian crisis, the attacks by numerically superior Muslims, and now, the almost total infiltration of the Church by its enemies now pretending to be the rightful “Catholic Clergy”, but really only being servants of Moloch and other demons under Lucifer himself.
It all fits, the logic returns correct, the math works, the reality we live in proclaims every aspect and facet of this correctly, so I am now comfortable to take on the rules and ethics of the Catholic Church. As best I can of course, which is miserably imperfect, because as I keep saying, all humans are badly flawed, and me perhaps more than most in some ways, but nevertheless, I understand that the correct position is Catholicism and any errors or lacunae I make are mine alone.
The official processes, and rules and ways of Catholicism, are all written down in one volume, the Code of Canon Law of 1917, and it all stems from the Bible and the Catholic tradition that actually put the Bible together too. And reason and logic, verifiable in the world and reality all around you, if you can but do it.
Armed with all of the above then, I went from one solid pillar (Justice) to a veritable temple composed of many huge and unshakable pillars. Some that created themselves in some mystic fashion that I yet do not understand but cannot deny.
Added to Justice comes Love, Charity, Beauty, Virtue (in its many forms), Miracles, the sacrifice of Christ, and my very simple, but honest devotion to Him and His Church. The reality of the Saints and how we are eternally linked to and connected to them. The mystical effects that praying the Rosary has on your very Terrene and Earthly life.
I went from one lone column in the dirt of no man’s land, called Justice, with vines of Honour, Honesty and Courage growing upon it, to a veritable enormous and constantly expanding beautiful temple of many columns and rooms and altars of beauty that almost blinds the eyes.
My knowledge of self has expanded exponentially simply by having seen far more of the truth of the spiritual reality that underpins all of creation, and seeing exactly how it absolutely verifies all that we see in the world, both good and evil.
Aligning myself with that wider and deeper and far more beautiful spiritual reality, absolutely makes me more capable, more effective and more able to create more in the world in accordance with His Will, which I absolutely wish to serve as best I can, within the confines of my human flaws and any God-given talents I may posses.
And yes, Evil certainly appears to have the upper hand in this specific timeline. You can argue that it is in fact a reality and not just an appearance. But am I worried? No. Not at all. I am aware and I will fight to my last breath, but I am not unduly worried. Because even if it lasts for a few centuries, the Church is undefeatable, at least until the very end, at which point, it will rise triumphant, and more so than in any other human era, with the return of our Lord and the final cleansing of the evil spirits from this world, to be relegated to their eternal prison.
Now this last bit may seem to be absolute nonsensical fantasy to you. It certainly seemed so to me for some 42 years or so. And I certainly can’t prove it even now.
But what I can prove and have done so, first of all to myself —and then only very imperfectly and distantly to others through my books and words— is that the entirety of those things that the Catholic Church says that can be tested and that I have tested, have, without fail, proven to be true.
Therefore, I trust too, the extrapolated “big picture” for the future as well. But even if it were wrong, even if the ultimate big picture turned out to be an error, I still, cannot see a better way to live until it is revealed as such by actual events in physical reality. Which I doubt will happen in my lifetime.
So, once again, even if you have followed me here only as a secular reader, I ask you: What other system or model can even begin to provide the same level of recurring proof and evidence, as well as functional societies that come anywhere close to the beauty, glory, peace, serenity and joy that a real Catholic community exhibits? There simply isn’t one.
All of the above, to show you that my acceptance of Catholicism is based not on any kind of idiotic version of “blind faith” but rather on the detailed, deep, constant, probing and testing of all that I can observe and test within the dogma of Catholicism. And should I later find any “holes” in it, I’ll be sure to let you know, but, so far, there aren’t any. And there are gaping maws letting fetid water in, in every other system I have checked.
My self-knowledge has expanded and some of my reactions changed in light of this new information, that I have tested and continue to test daily, but that is not to say I am a different person. My soul is still the same, but as my understanding has evolved, my actions, choices and efficiency changes with it and shifts in expression and scale, all of which is normal.
The overarching point I want to make in this whole extremely long post then is this:
I have shown you (briefly and imperfectly, but I think well enough) the level and depth with which I look into things before I base any of my principles on them. How much work have you done? How much of this investigation into reality do you do, or can you do, before you get too scared of what you might find and stop? How much of it is based on true, objective investigation and how much instead because someone or multiple someones in your life have told you “Here be Dragons! Don’t you DARE go look in there.”
And to be sure, there are places that are absolutely dangerous to go look into, but I for one, will never tell one of my children “Don’t go there and that’s that!” I will instead say “My son, in that hole you will find a snake that is poisonous, it is of this shape and colour and general size. And you can smoke it out in this way, and kill it in this way, using this tool. Now, if I am still able enough, come, I will show you and you can see for yourself, and if I am not, then heed my warning, because I love you, and I trust whatever you decide to do, you will use your brain and your heart as best you can. Do not be afraid, but also, do not be foolish either.”
And with that last sentence as a guide, there is very little a man cannot more or less safely investigate.
So I tell you the same, reader, if you are still with me to this point.
Find out who you really are, and what you base it on. Discover what is absolutely true and what is merely a shadow created by your own ignorance, fear, or arrogance. And then decide who you are going to be once you discover the deepest truth you are able to. And don’t stop doing it.
Orion has a very successful YouTube channel, and I assume decent practice too. His videos are very popular and in general his advice is good to excellent from a secular perspective. This video interview he did recently was particularly revealing of his own way of seeing things, which in any case he generally tends to espouse in his advice on videos related to relationships and dating and so on.
It’s worth watching the interview for various reasons and points he makes, at about the 22 minute mark, he refers to Dan Bilzarian saying that after he has spent a decade having sex with who knows how many women, now he’s looking for just one person to devote himself to, while a bored housewife might be seeking a thrill and that is why she may end up stepping out of the marriage (cheat, divorce, get into swinging, etc).
Earlier he also made the statement that the only valid reason he sees for a marriage today is if you want to have children and are both committed to that. I find his views and general advice interesting because, given my history of basically doing pretty much what I wanted and with a rather large number of women, before I had my road to Damascus change, while I was still in my secular ways, I could definitely relate to this.
Another important point he makes is that there are many ways people can get stuck (or lost) in various aspects of the modern (secular) lifestyle we seem to all be mired in. He makes a point I was aware of even before I started to have sex with lots of different women, and it is a very important point: Some men get totally lost in the lust of the chase, of new conquests, and so on, to the point where their primary aim just becomes to have an ever higher number of notches on their belt.
I was in my first serious relationship for 13 years and I never cheated or anything of the sort the whole time, even if I did have a number of very well-presented offers. Sexually I was “inexperienced” in terms of the number of women I had been to bed with, but one can hardly say I was sexually inexperienced, given that I had sex pretty much daily if not multiple times a day for the entire period. When that relationship ended (by mutual accord and peacefully so) I did not have any difficulty in finding other female companionship, because in a sense I was already well-accustomed with interacting with a woman on a sexual level to the point that it did not hold a lot of mystery for me, and while each woman is unique, in a sense, —and I don’t mean to be crude— so is each bicycle, but the general principle of how to ride one tends to be relatively well-understood, no matter what local variance each one might require for maximum enjoyment.
The point is that even when I was in my first serious relationship, I could look at a man and recognise whether they were the kind that is always “thirsty”, regardless of if married or not, successful or not, rich or poor.
In one instance I recall a very well-to-do doctor who was married to a beautiful and intelligent woman, who nevertheless cheated on her repeatedly with younger women in the perpetual chase of his “youth”. He was far from the only married guy who still hunted around or used prostitutes in some vain search for “manliness”, and they seemed oblivious to the fact that whether it’s one or a thousand, it’s not the number of women you slept with that makes you what I would consider a man. In fact, the two concepts are only very mildly related if at all. Having been with many different women might make a man more aware of women in general, more capable of becoming involved with them, certainly, but almost invariably this is just a veneer, a superficial level of the qualities I would define as being essential to a man. In fact, some of the effects of being promiscuous with a lot of women may well degrade some of the essentials for some men.
So, Dr. Teraban is definitely correct in that men can get lost in the lustful side of the equation. And women too can get lost in various aspects of it too, if in usually different ways.
The larger and more important point however, the aspect that Dr. Teraban misses too, and not just in terms of missing it as a perspective, because intellectually I think he is intelligent enough to probably grasp it, even allow for it in his model of reality, but it’s something he clearly does not have in his life. He is missing this point without even knowing it really exists, and it is the reality, the truth, behind actual marriage.
I can recognise with ease that he is missing it, because I too missed it, as long as I was secular. And even when I did get married, my grasp of marriage was still secular. Yes, I believed in marriage, as a kind of team of two, the best descriptor of it I saw was in the film The Thin Red Line, and is provided by the monologue that Sean Penn’s character provides at the end, which in summary is:
The world is shit, life is hard and the humans in it are pretty much all assholes, so the best you could do is find a woman that loves you and you love her, and make an island of the two of you and leave the rest of the world behind.
It is true, that even at our most secular, it is men, ultimately that are the romantic sex. Women are far more pragmatic… in the secular sense.
But even that belief, which most women seeking a husband would be ecstatic to find in a man that wanted to marry them —regardless of whether they felt the same way or not about it— is not really enough to keep the world, the corruption, the degeneracy, the inevitable corrosion of your relationship at bay. Because unless you have something real and true and far deeper than the mere physical or even emotional and intellectual transactional nature of the secular relationship to base your values on, eventually, steel will wear down steel.
As much as you can be an honourable, successful, powerful, famous, funny, good guy, and as much as she can be beautiful, classy, great in the bedroom, funny, intelligent and able to discuss any topic well with you, ultimately, if your relationship is to move beyond the “perfect flashy couple everyone loves and wishes they were in”, the world, that is the secular world, will, invariably, inevitably, inexorably, wear you down.
Her looks and energy and vitality will fade. So will yours. Your fame and fortune, even if it remains to the end of your days will, eventually lose it’s lustre, because that is the nature of the human void that is never filled enough by material things. If I were given a few millions to retire with, never having to worry about money again, and a 70 foot white trimaran, I’d sure be happy, and because of my current mindset I’d be sure to enjoy it to the end of my days, but, with a secular mindset, it would only be a matter of time before I’d get bored of even the 70 foot trimaran and sailing the oceans.
The secular life is a constant trying to stay ahead of the encroaching reality that nothing material, ultimately, really matters. A man (or woman) that arrives at age 99, as a multi-millionaire that never lacked for anything materially at all, and that had all the sex, with all the supermodels they could possibly imagine, that achieved all sorts of fame and worldly success, who reaches there with no children, no grandchildren, no one, ultimately who really cares when he shuffles off this mortal coil, is, in truth, one of the saddest souls on Earth. You might not think so, you might be on the breadline and wondering where your next meal comes from and think I am talking complete bullshit here. Certainly the harshness of the world can make you feel and think that way, but in reality, in objective truth, a man who struggled financially all his life but raised a few good sons and daughters, is wealthy beyond measure compared to the lone multi-billionaire.
Or, alternatively, take Elon Musk, who has a bunch of children with various different women and is supposedly (but not actually) the richest man on Earth. Would I want his life? Not in a million years. I think if you offered me to trade places either with Elon Musk or one of the random natives of Sentinel Island, it would be about par, and in all truth, if I chose the Elon Musk life it would only be in the (vain) hope, that if I had his money I MIGHT be able to achieve something good that MIGHT affect more people than as a random native of Sentinel Island. But in terms of personal enjoyment, I genuinely think I would probably pick the Sentinel Island life. You might not believe me, and I understand that, but I promise you, this is my most honest thought on this matter. I express it, because if you are a regular reader, regardless of your opinion of me on a personal level, you will probably agree that I am not stupid. And if I say this, there is probably some value and truth to it worth noting. At least I hope you see that.
Because Dr. Teraban is not wrong. As far as the secular life of this world at this time goes, the things he says are correct. The math “works”. But… and it is a very important but, there is a reality that supersedes the one we are all familiar with. It remains invisible to most of us, but it actually informs and creates the physical, secular reality we are all familiar with.
The origin of all you know and see and can touch and perceive, is from a realm that is invisible to the eye and body for the most part. Yet… when you do get to “see it” it cannot be unseen. And once you become conversant with it, once you begin to see the truth of it, like Neo in the Matrix, once you see the code behind what you used to think was “reality” everything takes on a completely different meaning.
And it is from this perspective that I would like to inform you about marriage.
Once you can see in the unseen realm, you notice that random hook-ups are actually a general degradation of your own anchor to and ability to perceive that very same unseen realm.
And you also see that marriage, as it was intended to be, is something completely different from what any aspect of it is presented in the secular world. And yes it is for creating children and raising them, but also so much more besides, though that remains the main purposes above all. The reality of marriage (which applies also to people who maybe are not able to have children) is something that increases your anchor and ability to see the unseen realm of the fundamentals of reality, and in that context, you really perceive why it is a sacrament. A holy thing. Something beyond our mere mortal desires and hopes.
If you have no experience of this unseen realm that is the foundation of all reality, I can’t convince you of it with words. I can’t make you see it. And you are perfectly free to think I am just some bible-thumping moron that is pedastalising his wife, or a woman that will not divorce you, or some other worldly effect that you might think I am under the spell of. But I assure you it is none of these things. I have lived where you may be. I have been where Dr. Teraban is in terms of having figured out, insofar as secularism goes, the optimal way to live with women, relationships, hooking up, and even secular “marriage”, of which I have been through two of before really becoming actually properly, truly, married.
I can’t convince Dr. Teraban either probably (should he ever become aware of this post and bother to read it) of the truth of what I am positing here. The difference between being told about this and experiencing it is too vast to even be able to make an analogy, but maybe it would be like the difference between a primitive caveman being told about the ability of flight for humans and that same primitive man being placed in a rocket that fires him into Earth orbit for a few revolutions before flying back down to Earth.
From the exterior I look the same and my marriage may seem more or less conventional (more likely less than more, but still within “normality” I suppose) but internally, I assure you, it is far from that. The internal reality of it is Galaxies distant from either of my previous two secular “marriages”.
This element, which is hard enough to even define, is clearly missing from Dr. Teraban’s life both personally as well as in his philosophy. It is enmeshed however, as best as I could do so, in my book Caveman Theory which is only available in digital format, because it probably would get me banned from Amazon otherwise.
Both men and women are in a sort of relationship crisis mode, if for different reasons, and it will not improve for either side until this concept I am trying to get across to you permeates their psyche to a degree that is a lot higher than what it currently is.
It is also important for you to understand two things concerning this:
First: Despair is NOT the way. Your constant thinking that what I am discussing here is the equivalent of flying unicorns to find, or is nonsense, or just my delusion, or real but you are not clever, rich, good-looking, or whatever, enough for it to apply to you, is only going to give you a magnetic field that repels any possibility of you living it. Your accepting this reality, regardless of your own current circumstances, is going to make it a LOT more likely that you will find such a situation naturally. When I first discovered this reality, the concept I could ever even be in a long-term relationship that mattered to me at all was just a complete fantasy and mirage. I had no belief it would even be relevant to me. But I was not in despair. I just assumed that sort of reality was way beyond my reach. Like thinking I would not be the first man to land on Mars kind of thing. It’s just how it is, but I was aware of the reality. I saw it, felt it, knew it. And gradually, that knowledge alone put me in a position where I could relate to that reality and in fact even influence others towards it, including women, without even specifically discussing it. It was just a sense of things, of how I moved, of my general approach to women, even women I got involved with, that was noticeably different and produced different results.
Secondly: If you are honest with your own number (based purely on you looks on a 1-10 for women and on looks plus a blend of success (money/status/fame) for men) and realistic about it and look within your own range, and with this understanding of the unseen realm alive in your being, there absolutely is someone out there that would fit with you. And while finding them might not happen immediately, the likelihood that it does happen, as long as you are not in desperate mode (see First above) are decent at least, possibly good, and maybe even very good or inevitable, because if you learn to navigate that unseen realm, the physics there works very differently than from the secular world you and I and everyone else is familiar with. In that realm, just being aware and having a concept alive inside you, tends to bring that thing to you. It is when you grasp for it that you lose it, generally. It sounds like woo-woo New Age “Law of Attraction” bullshit, but it is not that. It is something true but as I say, unseen. Unperceived by us today almost entirely, but that was known in the past, that people were aware of.
It is related to how prayer works. To sensing the divine. To the underlying truth of reality.
And I truly hope this post at least, gives you some sense of it. Because until you have it, you are unlikely to be able to form a marriage that truly lasts till death do you part.
And I was always clear on the fact that even if I used the term Sedeprivationism originally, I was clear in my 2020 book Reclaiming the Catholic Church that I was using the term completely differently from what most people that call themselves Sedeprivationists do.
I (being elitist in my linguistics) was referring merely to the etymology of the word. Strictly speaking, Sede Vacante is Latin for Empty Chair Which is shorthand for there is no valid Pope. However, strictly speaking, the chair is not empty. it is filled with an impostor, never-was-Catholic, Satanist and protector of pedophiles on Earth, currently Bergoglio. And this illegal and usurping occupation prevents a real and valid Pope from filling it. Hence Sede Privationist, a mixture of Latin and English. The usurper is Jorge Bergolgio is preventing the legitimate occupation of the chair of Peter.
But of course, by absolute divine law, codified in the Canon Law of 1917, which in no way cancels the perennial Papal encyclical of Pope Paul IV titled Cum Ex Apostolato Officio* but in fact refers to it, it is every single adherent to the Novus Ordo (I call them Novus Orco — the New Orcs) “clergy” too that is ALSO not a Catholic at all, but in fact an enemy of the Church. The Satanists have made this sound very complicated, but it exceedingly simple to understand. A child gets it.
You cannot be Pope if you are not Catholic, and you cannot be Catholic if you promote, promulgate, and espouse concepts that go against the Catholic faith (which is ENTIRELY codified and therefore logically consistent and clear) and act in ways that go against it too and call yourself a Catholic. When you do this publicly, notoriously and repeatedly, it becomes clear you are simply NOT a Catholic. End of. It would be like me calling myself a leader in the sport of golf. I can say what I want. I can dress like a golfer, I can even get some clubs and go tearing up a golf course, but since my golfing ability is nil, never having done it even once, absolutely no one sane would ever take note, care, or listen to anything I am saying about golf. Nor should they.
The sedeprivationist position ORIGINALLY, when it was first presented in the late sixties or early 70s, by the noted and well-respected Dominican theologian, father Michel-Louis Guérard des Lauriers, who was later made Bishop, it was a potentially if very temporary charitable “way out” for all the traitorous and cowardly “clergy” that did not immediately reject the false “elected” and Freemasonic enemies of the Church, Roncalli and Montini and their Satanic Vatican II heresies. It was a (VERY charitable) way to say:
“Okay, look, maybe you guys were asleep at the wheel, your weak and cowardly natures, coupled with the long-standing tradition to simply obey what you consider to be your superiors, made you “vote” or “elect” this obvious at best apostate, at worst sworn enemy of the Church as “Pope”, but come on, it’s fairly obvious what he and his predecessor were, so let’s get back on the right track, find the right way to get together and kick his heretic ass out of the Vatican and put back in a real Pope.”
And that, of course was the error on which the Freemasons and infiltrators of the Church have relied on for at least the last 250 years to infiltrate and corrupt it to the point that we have not had a valid Pope since 9th October 1958, and what people think is the Catholic Church is in reality, just another branch of Satanic fake Churchianity. The error being that devout Catholics got complacent and started to “give the benefit of the doubt” and “respectfully” not question supposed “leaders” in the Church.
The Satanists ALWAYS appeal to your kinder, charitable, more forgiving nature in order to insidiously enter your home, like snakes, and poison everything and everyone in it. That is probably why God also allows ornery, unagreeable, rude, too-direct, pains-in-the-ass like me to exist.
My misanthropic tendencies aside, the reality is that my ability to reason and do correct logic and dialectic are far above those of the average person and also the average nominal cradle “Catholic” that thinks he or she is Catholic but has never once even asked themselves what being Catholic means, has no idea what the Code of Canon Law of 1917 is, has never even read ONE of the 16 documents of Vatican II, and could not tell you who Roncalli was and why he was invalidly elected to usurp the rightful place of Giuseppe Siri who HAD been validly elected. Twice.
And no, my simply and boldly stating this fact out loud is NOT a matter of personal pride. It’s just not false humility, which too is not a virtue. It’s just a fact, and despite dozens of Freemasons trying to “poke holes” in any of my arguments, they have all utterly failed, which is why some of my work has in fact resulted in people realising the truth and coming back to the real Catholic Church.
However, all of this, if you care enough (you should if you call yourself a Catholic, since your belief in God should be extremely important to you) requires quite a bit of reading. The details in RTCC that I put together are undeniable and in the last 4 years not a single valid argument has been made against any of the information and details I presented in that book. Not one. People have lied, people have misrepresented and straw manned the arguments, but no one has been able to engage with them honestly and people who had no dog in the fight but took the time to look at my arguments and compare them with the “criticisms” have, without exception, even when not Catholic, understood that given the base premises of Catholicism, my arguments are the only ones that hold water.
Now, I am not writing this to tell you what a good and perfect Catholic I am. Or how smart and handsome I am. Think of me as badly as you like, its fine, but engage with the arguments I make, if you will.
As I wrote in BELIEVE! a much shorter book that is far easier to read and more popular, I am not a particularly a good Catholic. But I am an earnest one. And I absolutely have the temperament to NOT keep quiet, when someone, regardless of who he is lies or talks logical nonsense with respect to the truth. Pretty much in any area I am knowledgeable of, but absolutely and particularly in respect of Catholicism.
All that said, however, and if you would rather digest the list of the Sedevacantism vs Sedeprivationism argument in video format, I have not come across a better short form version than the one below. I do, of course, have a whole series on it on Kurgan TV, along with some other very interesting and unrelated topics (the face on mars, the lies of history, etc etc) topics totalling some 160 hours of video.
In short, the entire theory of Cassiciacum, or the “official” position of Sedeprivationism is simply not logically tenable or valid. The only valid position is that of Sedevacantism. Or, in fact, of being Catholic.
The position and even name of “Sedevacantism” sounds complicated and convoluted thanks to the efforts of the Satanists that have usurped the Church, so it is probably more effective to simply say that:
I am Catholic, not Novus Orco.
* It is in fact referred to in Canon 188, of which part 4 makes absolutely clear that all the non-Catholic clergy currently squatting illegally in the Vatican are not Catholics but at best heretics, and given the time lapse, currently probably actually full blown freemasons Satanists
In parts 1-3 I have covered the fundamental abstract aspect of what sustains any kind of social movement, and in broad terms this boils down to how accurate your foundational spiritual model is with respect to objective reality. The closer to it it is, the more likely your social changes or your Theoretical Model of Society is to take hold in the real, physical world.
I have already shown —and history does it for me better than any argument— that Catholicism has been the absolute best at this, precisely because it models objective reality, including all the metaphysical and underlying spiritual and non-tangibles that the modern man is stupefyingly unaware of for the most part, better than any other religion or philosophy that humans have ever come up with. Historically this is simply undeniable. However, there is a subtle but important point to clarify, one that Vox in his recent post expressed rather well (as he has done for a long time):
A Germany full of Germans is an economic powerhouse. An area of 357,022 square kilometers in the middle of Europe populated primarily by German-speaking Turks, Arabs, and Africans will be neither German nor an economic powerhouse. This is not rocket science.
He refers here to the obvious replacement taking place of native Germans, which is simply a factual and mathematical reality
The dirt is not magic. The ideas are not material. People will always live according to their own natural preferences. The transplantation of White Anglo-Saxon Protestants to the New World is what made America what it was in the place of the American Indian societies that preceded it. Neither geography nor ideology nor language nor even religion are determinant in the end, as genetics ultimately and always dictates the destinies of nations.
That last sentence is the main point I want to cover “nor even religion”.
He is right… up to a point.
It is true that a Venetian Catholic is different from a Japanese or Zimbabwean or even just Spanish Catholic, HOWEVER, if the Zimbabwean is in Zimbabwe surrounded by his brother and sister Zimbabweans, and ditto the others, the coalition of Catholics around the world, at the level of nation to nation, is valid, helpful and good.
This is why Catholicism has been relatively unique amongst the religions of the world. While maintaining the national identity, sovereignty, culture, and ethnicity of each people, it also managed to have an over-arching belief system that conquered their souls enough to bring them into positive co-operation with each other. In real terms. Not in the usual, cynical, controlling lever that the elites invariably grasp for and use to try and make cattle of us and lords and masters of themselves and their offspring.
It is why until 1958, the Holy Mass could be said in any country around the world and it would be identical, regardless of the local customs or language. As soon as the impostors took over, and the Catholic Church was almost entirely subverted to the new orc cult (Novus Orco, as I call them) dedicated to paedophelia, homosexuality, fraud and Satanism, one of the very first things they did was to change the Mass and make it just like any Protestant quasi-ritual re-enactment of some theatre production of lunch. The solemnity, respect and truth of it was reduced to localised absolute parodies of it in a cacophony of languages and complete with dancing dervishes in colourful costumes. The true and holy mass was (and is) unchangeable by infallible decree and dogma embodied in the Papal encyclical Quo Primum, the fact the impostors pretending to be Catholics changed it was just further evidence of the fact they were absolute enemies of the Church.
This is an important aspect to also keep in mind.
I will expose the enemy in more detail in part 4 and why ultimately, Catholicism, the real deal, not the pedophile infested Novus Ordo impostors pretending to be Catholics since 1958, is not only unique, but historically, the only force that has resisted the predators that try to lay claim over every aspect of our lives.
I have to admit I was remiss in my previous post on how to find a husband. Luckily, reader A. a lady, asked a very valid question in a manner so forthright it matched the style of my post.
Here is the comment from that post:
All great information and thank you. Never had any problem getting attention. “Be a slut” sounds effective, but how can a woman tell she’s with a good guy?
This is a valid point. In fact a very valid one. Let us attempt to answer it in a rather detailed fashion then.
First of all, we need to define what is a “good guy”, and since women have more or less the ethics and understanding of concepts like honour and honesty of feral ferrets,* we will define what a “good guy” is by the more objective and universal male standard first, then add in some truth about what women really want too.
A good guy is, above all, a man who can keep his word. If he gives it out officially very rarely that’s even better. But generally it’s a guy who says what he means and means what he says and STICKS TO IT. No matter how hard things get.
A good guy is loyal to the right people. He’s the kind who dies trying to get his wounded buddy out of a foxhole. He’s the guy who comes to your place at 3 am to help you get rid of the bodies of the intruders you just killed and don’t feel like spending 20 years in jail for. Now, a man can, in fact, be loyal to the wrong people. And that can be a serious problem. A woman he loves can at times make him see this, but generally not by ultimatums. IF it works, it is usually only by holding true to her own values, and for the sake of her own and her children’s futures, letting him know she can’t let what are essentially strangers endanger her life and family. So if your guy is loyal to his good friends who are also loyal to him, great. But if he is loyal to the local pimp, not so great.
He’s also the guy who has an intrinsic, instinctive, sense of justice. Which often has little to do with the law of the land. And because everyone has been brainwashed for 70 years non-stop that “all violence is bad” now only the thugs that call themselves government tend to have the monopoly on it. And actual nothing-to-lose type criminals. Violence is unfortunate, but it absolutely can be a force for good. But a good guy is not going to step aside if someone tries to harm people he cares about.
A good guy is not a fool, and above all, he will not put up with any of your female bullshit. Your attempts to emotionally manipulate him, change him, nag him to become a “better version of himself” and whatever other nonsense you might come up with, will be checked. You will be told in various ways to leave off. If the offence is large, he will show you the door and that will be the end of that. If it is small and maybe cute, he may let you “get your way” with it, or laugh it off, or tease you about it. Or maybe, more dangerously for your relationship, say nothing and let you think you got away with it; all while he observes what you do next. If it is some gaslighting rubbish he will simply tell you to stop lying and leave. And he might not come back. He will not tolerate disrespectful behaviour from you, his potential wife, nor should he. Now, this does not mean he is a completely rigid puritan that can’t smile. A man has to be able to laugh at the world and take some of the female nonsense, half-truths, wild and unfounded accusations, hysterics, and general drama they bring with them, with a smile and a laugh, a pinch of salt, some patience, and the occasional light smack on the ass that is sexy instead of violent.
All of the above can be somewhat faked by men, at least for a time, but one thing that cannot be faked is a certain level of success. Some women require him to be a “provider” and in America especially, the female delusion bubble about what a man should earn before he can be with them is truly astonishing. Besides, women are fully capable of earning their own money too now, so that gap has certainly closed and in some ways is actually in reverse. So the point is not so much that he has to have a set amount of money, but he has to be capable. At least capable in general or capable at something specifically, or a few somethings.
Those are the basic points, but now let’s also dispel some of the myths that both men and also some women have about women in general.
I hear constantly how these days all women are just gold-digging whores, and if you are not a millionaire, you can’t even get laid, never mind engaged and married and so on.
Well, I am here to tell you: that is simply not true. Let me get specific.
Are there plenty of gold-digging whores out there? Sure. Just like there are plenty of lazy, drug-addled, loser men that will accomplish nothing in their entire life. Most humans suck. That’s just how things are in this fallen world. But assuming you are not an NPC, which is why you read my blog regularly, you both aspire to a bit more than an NPC wife or husband, and in order to be with a Player Character level husband or wife, guess what YOU have to be? That’s right, player character material. If you don’t know what an NPC or PC is, read this first.
As readers here know, I had a rather scandalous past before becoming a good, well, ok, devout, Catholic. And I assure you, that money was never a function of why women came home with me. There is no easy short way to say this other than crudely, but it transmits best perhaps what is even more powerful than money for most women and for almost all genuine women who just want a good guy: Balls.
Especially in my native language, the idea of “having balls” encompasses a great many things. It means being your own man, not taking shit from people, regardless of if they are powerful, rich or famous, or not. It means treating even bad guys fairly, because sometimes even a bad guy is not the real bad guy. It means doing the right thing even when it’s very hard to do. It means justice and your personal code of honour (which has to be rooted in real justice for it not to become something obscene) take precedence over even the (corrupt and fake) law.
I have known women that betrayed their multi-millionaire husband (who was not exactly a weak or beta type either) for the chance to be with someone that had that intrinsic sense of simply being a man who will go where he wants and do what he wants (not in a way that harms other innocent people) and not let fear or the narrative of lesser men get in his way.
In the course of my life, at least twice, and this was after my days working in close protection in South Africa, I ran into cases of corruption and fraud so extensive that my life was honestly potentially in danger. In one case the lawyer I hired to make my case warned me that it would be cheaper to have me killed than have any of the information I had become aware of get out publicly.
In the other case, my now wife, who was not even my girlfriend at the time, very reasonably pointed out that my taking down a giant machine of theft and corruption on a grand scale where millions were involved and would be lost by the people doing the stealing, was reason enough to have me have some kind of accident. In both cases, while I took various precautions (some of which remain in place) in the event I ever do have a suspicious accident, the idea of NOT doing the right thing, didn’t even cross my mind. The only thought that did, was: fuck these guys. And I did what I did and their corrupt enterprises suffered for it. These were not just the usual slightly “dodgy” business deals, these were people that were ruining families of honest people just trying to do their job properly so as to pocket millions on the back of their misery. So, yeah, fuck them.
Now, a genuine woman, will tend to be attracted and more than just superficially if she gets in any way invested, in a man of that sort, far more than a white collar banker that would crap his pants if faced with an aggressive drunk.
Money, and political power, and fame are certainly attractive to most women, but like most men, most women are kind of dumb, and superficial, because Law n.1. And who wants to get stuck with one of those. For a woman that is worth being with, at least in my personal opinion, money, power, and fame can all be attractive, but balls trump all of them. And if you have all four aspects, well, great, then you are the unicorn they seek and you can have a whole harem, if that is your fancy. If it is, by the way, congratulations, you are part of law 1. Any sane non-stupid man is aware that a harem is a bad, bad, bad, choice. Some of us find out the hard way, but believe me, it’s much better as a fantasy than a reality.
And this is where the concept that women liking bastards comes in. Now, it is true, I was born a bastard, but that’s my parent’s fault, not mine. I also go into this in a lot more depth in Caveman Theory, which by the way is useful for women too even if it is mostly addressed at men, but the point is that biologically, humans are still pretty much with the same wiring we had a couple or ten thousand years ago. Modern life has made us all weak pansies, that whine if the internet goes out for an hour, but we still have a lot of wiring that is not too far removed from apes.**
Which means that a man that genuinely acts without fear of other men, takes things on, is competent, and doesn’t put up with a lot of female nonsense, gets evaluated by a woman’t instinctive biology as a “mover and shaker”. Because back in cave times for the last 2 million years, that is the ONLY reason he would act that way. He was a genuine badass. Today, of course, he may be a drug-dealing pimp with the IQ of a lemur, and the unsophisticated woman who has not evolved past her base instincts will still “choose him” even if it’s a terrible choice, because her biology erroneously is still living in the year 10,000 BC instead of 2024 AD.
That biology is more powerful than you think. And just as I always said, that the most valuable material in a crisis is not gold, but rather copper-jacketed lead, in a crisis, a woman will drop her multi-millionaire banker for a Hell’s Angels criminal with a gun that can get her through the zombielands safely.
The infestation of gold-digging whores, is simply a reaction to the infestation of metrosexual half-fags that now populate the Earth, pretending to be men.
Now, in order for a man to have all the qualities identified above, he also does to need to be a bit of a bastard at times. Because humans, professor Cipolla, and a fallen world. If you prefer it in proper Catholic parlance, a man also needs to be as wise as a serpent, not just as innocent as a dove. And really, he needs to really be both. Have the curiosity and wonder of a child, but the wisdom and reason of an adult man.
Now, ladies, if you have become even just a little aware of how truly deluded some of your expectations are, that’s great, but now pay attention: Finding a guy that fits the above criteria is a LOT more important and better for your long term prospects of having a decent life, a good family and happy children. Like so much more so, that you have no idea. And the lucky thing is that while they too are rare, there are certainly more of them than there are billionaires willing to marry your 38 year-old, 7 in a good light, ass.
I hope this clarifies things for you and if not, A. I would welcome any further questions or comments you have.
* I cover this in a lot more detail in Caveman Theory, but in essence, these concepts work entirely differently for a woman, for reasons that are essentially part of her biology, so despite my rhetoric (they can after all modulate things more than they pretend they can in most cases) in a lot of instances, their inability to see these concepts as men do is simply unavoidable, and if you get upset by that reality as a man, you will only corrode your liver at that inevitable reality. you may as well get upset the sun rises in the East.
** Yes, yes, I know evolution as they tried to tell us about is complete nonsense, because it doesn’t work mathematically, I have known that since my 20s, that’s not the point.
In part 1 we discussed the importance of spiritual group cohesion. In part 2 we looked at how the more reflective of a true spiritual reality the religion or belief system is, the more durable and resilient it is in creating a physical group cohesion. These are the inevitable large scale realities of mass change, and need to be understood at their scale before anything meaningful that has a chance to create real change in a society can even take place. As usual, the Intro:
This is the third in the Theoretical Models of Society series of Posts. Use the category of the same name or the Search Me function on the right-hand sidebar to find all related posts in the series.
It is generally helpful to a reader if they are already familiar with some of my other work, in order for this stuff to have the most useful effect on your life. In particular, The Face on Mars and Believe! would be the top reads to have done to have the generic global perspective of reality well in hand. Systema and Reclaiming the Catholic Church would have the most impact on a more personal level. On health/security/self-protection, and on the reality of Catholicism as it was (and remains with Sedevacantists) before Vatican II and why the Novus Ordo Church is not only not Catholic, but Satanic at its core. I will repeat this little paragraph on each new part, as I think it is important to have a general foundation if one is really interested in more than skim-reading before returning to the general slumber we are all being attempted to be forced into.
You may have the most wonderful ideas of how to make a better society, but if you are unable to base them on solid spiritual footings that are widely acceptable to the masses, and also broadly representative of reality, so that the operation of these spiritual principles produces tangible effects in the physical reality we all share, your ideas will never even get out of the crib.
In this part 3 we are going to explore how even if you intellectually grasp the above points, your ability to create real, lasting effects in the world, are unlikely to produce any meaningful results unless you too, at a personal level, are driven by a spiritual reality that has tangible effects in the world too.
It is important to understand how this works, and thus, also, to understand that this works regardless of whether your spiritual reality is good or evil. As long as it reflects reality enough, it will produce results.
For example, the Joel Osteens or Jim Jones of the world, may be conmen, they probably don’t believe the spiritual aspect of what they are selling, at least not in the way they sell it to you, and the basis of the spiritual ideologies they sell is a con, a fake, but —and this is important— the spiritual reality they are selling has at least some elements of it based in a twisted form of the real spiritual dimension. And they do believe in that, aspect of it, at least for themselves.
For example the whole spiritual gospel of “Jesus wants you to be rich and happy and successful” sold by the Osteens of the world, is a twisted aspect of a loving God wanting the best for us. American society has been so corrupted for so long that “love” in today’s times is often interpreted as being material wealth and goods. The average man and woman in America (and elsewhere too) if given the magic wand choice of having all the material wealth they want, but no deeply loving relationship, or a deeply loving relationship but being mostly poor, will take the cash and things instead of a truly loving wife or husband. It is understandable therefore that such a false gospel would “hook” a lot of people. And when I say “false” I mean that ultimately it is a lie from the spiritual reality perspective, however, it IS based on a spiritual reality too; one which is ultimately Satanic. After all, it is indeed the general temptation even Jesus was presented with by Satan, is it not? Material goods now, for your soul later. So it does have a “solid” spiritual foundation, in the sense that Satan is the Prince of this world and we are indeed under his dominion, here on Earth. So, this kind of spiritual reality is certainly something that can produce results in the physical world too. All the Satanists, blackmailable Freemasons, and Illuminati in the film and music industry, who have to signal their membership by the usual “ok” sign over one eye and so on, will attest to the fact that if you are willing to commit your soul to the devil, you can gain material wealth.
You may personally not believe in the devil as such, but the physical reality of the associations of such people with spiritual rituals to Satan, is now undeniable. Enough of these people have come forward and either repented or spelt it out that it requires only a little bit of research for you to confirm this.
Now, while the spiritual reality being sold to the masses by a Joel Osteen, a Jim Jones, or an Imam or fake “Catholic” priest of the fake Novus Ordo “Church” is far from the truth, and far from the real Loving God and His Will, it nevertheless has some power because it is based on aspects of spiritual reality. They may not be the good side of spiritual reality, but the bad side exists too. In fact, in the world (using the word “world” in the Catholic Christian sense) the evil, corrupt, bad side of spiritual reality is in fact the main situation of how things are currently; especially over the last four years.
This is not to say all is lost, quite the opposite, the revelation of just how much corruption and evil there is in the world is becoming so prevalent that we may well be heading into an eventual spiritual awakening by the masses. Whether this happens before or after even darker times remains to be seen, but the point is that the spiritual reality is a fact. Whether for evil or for good it exists, and it informs the physical reality. And ultimately, your chances of achieving good in the world are best if you are aligned with the spiritual reality that is truly closest to the truth of the ultimate good in creation.
Personally, what I have been telling you, is that after some 42 years on Earth observing and trying to figure out the real truth of the essence of reality, it took a shocking and life-changing event, a literal road to Damascus moment, for me to finally have the illusions of the world collapse enough that I saw enough of the face of God to know with absolute and permanent certainty that God is Love.
And in my subsequent investigation of that aspect of God, the spiritual reality that most closely represented what I was made aware of was the original, actual rules of the real Catholic Church, which are founded in Love and reason to a degree no other ideology or religion has ever compared with, and which has been tested in time over two millennia, to produce the absolute best societies the human race has ever seen.
And while perfection in humans on Earth is not possible, actual Catholic communities have a true respect of both the individual, regardless of age, or sex, as well as of the family unit, which is described as the cell of the body of Christ, which is defined as the wider Catholic society that has given us some of the greatest thinkers, works of art, martyrs, Saints, and peaceful societies ever seen, all while also being able to defend itself from the evil that also exists in the world.
Now, you may or may not agree with me and you may or may not be a 1958 Sedevacantist Catholic like I am. You might be fooled by people like Ann Barnhardt and be a 2023 Sedevacantist who thinks Ratzinger was a Catholic or even a valid Pope (he was neither, of course). Or you may be a Buddhist, or have bought into the absurdity of one of the 40,000+ “demon-nimations” of Protestantism, or you may think Gurdjeff had it right, or L.Ron Hubbard, and so on.
But whatever your ultimate belief system, it is only going to produce any results insofar as you actually truly are of it and believe in it fully.
So, even if you truly do understand and believe the usefulness of say real Catholicism, and this 1958 Sedevacantism, intellectually, but if you personally are not truly a believer in it, it is unlikely you will be able to create very much in the world of the physical from it. On the other hand, if you are a true believer, but have little interest in proselytising to the masses, again, it is unlikely you will be able to achieve too much in the greater physical world in terms of changing things on a grand scale.
The point is that whatever your personal belief system is at a spiritual level, it too has to first of all be aligned with spiritual reality, secondly, it has to be practiced in order to produce those physical results in the world, and third, your greater mission both within the spiritual reality as well as the physical one, has to be aligned too, for results to begin to appear.
In my own case, the spiritual reality for me internally is strong, especially if I compare it to the average human, or even the average true believer. By those standards, I am a fundamentalist zealot that would have fit in just fine with the guys going on the first crusade in 1095. By my own standards, I am barely scratching the surface, and really only starting to begin to approach what I would consider a minimum level of actual proper spiritual practice and piety now, some 7 years and a half after being baptised.
As such, my concern for the wider world has been relatively superficial, and been encapsulated mostly in my short book Believe! And my subsequent far more detailed work focusing on Catholicism specifically, Reclaiming the Catholic Church. And in the wider world those works have already produced results, in the form of over a hundred souls returning to, or discovering, actual Catholicism and being baptised into it, and some of them going on to help others see it, and/or improve their own lives and those of others in various ways, and/or to form families and have children who will also be raised Catholic and so on. Some are even intent on forming proper Catholic (that is, not Novus Orco) Churches in their country where currently no real Catholic presence exists. And all of these are good things. But on a personal level, I am still putting together my own house, trying to get to as self-sufficient a level as I can, in order to be able to then become a hub, for more sedevacantists to move here and become a real physical presence of note in the world. The obstacles I face are huge, and not easily tackled, but there is measurable progress, and I know that once I achieve real independence from clown world, primarily financial, which is the hardest part, but also in every other respect, it will open the floodgates to other people being able to do it as well, and at that point, the Sedevacantist community near me as well as further afield that I am in contact with, will explode. But it will not happen in a day. And there are, will be, and continue to appear, all sorts of obstacles, people that get in the way of you trying to create something good, and so on.
That is simply the way things are. It is also why the Church here on Earth and its members is referred to as the Church Militant. Because it is a fight. It’s primarily a spiritual fight, but it can be also a physical one. Making your home and family self-sufficient and as off-grid as possible, while also being able to remain integrated in the beast world enough that you can be a model for others to follow or copy, and yet not feel you are too far removed from the “norm” for them to feel capable of doing so, is far from an easy task.
Add in five children, (soon six) a house that needed massive works on it and still requires regular maintenance and constant little upgrades, the running of a farm in an activity I have zero experience in, the bureaucracy of any venture in the world today, the need to rely on others for some elements of this, and the continuing need for enough income to sustain all of it, and you can imagine why progress might be slow. I spent the first year and a half just getting the house liveable. And within six months of our arrival here, a major event that had serious and long term ramifications that are ongoing also happened. The down side is that it impacted everything in multiple ways and at a practical level made everything far more difficult; the up side is that my daughter, who I had not been able to raise for the last nine years, nor spend time with for the last five of those nine years, has now been living with me for the last three years. And you can bet that if everything else had to take (and in many ways continues to take) a back seat, well, so be it.
Some of you may think that this means I will not bear fruit in the long term. But if so you are mistaken. What is happening here is that my personal aspects of reality are first of all aligning with my spiritual understanding, and this process is lifelong. As I have always been a man apart, so to speak, from most of polite society, regardless of which country or culture I may be in, it makes sense, that my own, personal situation has to resolve first at least to an extent that makes it good, and stable, and secure, to a point that it then becomes a foundation from which to move in the wider arena.
This applies almost always in this fashion if it is to be stable in the long term (I have also added my own timeline to it, in order to give a sense of the process as it may apply to you and your beliefs):
Personal Spiritual revelation—> [3rd March 2013]
personal change—> [2013 to present and ongoing]
Personal spiritual growth—> [baptised 25th May 2017]
Personal physical expression in the wider world—-> [Newly Sedevacantist friends appear and help us on the farm and in general – 2021-2022]
spiritual revelation in the wider world (to others)—-> [Newly Sedevacantist friends go on to spread the word, write their own books, get married, have children, etc. 2021-2024]
personal change in the wider world of people (the others go through their own spiritual revelations)—-> [2024 – first Sedevacantist buys property near us, more Sedevacantist babies are born, new sedevacantist budding communities are forming around the world, that are in touch with me/us/our friends]
spiritual growth in the wider world (expansion of the concepts, new members, attendance in churches goes up, etc.)—> [we are currently here]
growth in the wider world [this is the point at which wider communities begin to form and take hold]
What the timeline is like, to achieve strong, permanent, communities that will be able to resist clown world in true and meaningful fashion is hard to predict, but given the course of things, and the fact that while I have been aware of this process from 2014 onwards, I only really started to try to work towards creating something from 2018 at the very earliest in its protozoic form, I expect that within the next ten years there should be a definite sustainable group of sedevacantists where I am. It may happen sooner, depending on various factors, many out of my control whatsoever, but I doubt it will take any longer. And in 20 years I expect several strong such communities will exist around the world; some more successful than others, which will broadly speaking be a function of how close to the rules of Catholicism they actually stick to, with respect to things like non-una cum masses, and being proper Catholics, instead of binary thinkers; which is essentially a Protestant mindset, with merely a veneer of Catholicism over it.
From a personal perspective, frustrated and frustrating as I may find the slowness of the entire process, I also realise that in social, human terms, it is moving at breakneck speed.
My personal revelation was 11 and a half years ago (as of 2024), and it completely overturned pretty much all my lifelong zen-agnostic state of being. My own personal situation and challenges at that time seemed absolutely unsurmountable and beyond any possibility of repair to just “normalcy”, never mind actual achieving of “goodness”. But the only skill I always had that remained valid even spiritually was the inability to give up, or to stop fighting for what I believe is true, and being able to wait like a hunter if that is what is required.
There was no thought at all for even thinking remotely about building anything beyond the mere survival of whatever of my life I could put together just for my own bare minimum peace of mind. And that happened in the blink of an eye, so that by 2018 I was baptised and married in Church. It was only then, and only very much at arm’s length that I thought of the wider world; hence the two books, Believe! and Reclaiming the Catholic Church in 2019 and 2020 respectively.
Then the whole COVID takeover of human brains by the Satanists with the use of global fear, followed by widespread mass-murder by fake vaccines and draconian and dystopic intrusions in all our lives with MORE chemical poisons like chemtrails, the introduction of graphene in all anaesthetic injections now being reported on, the contamination of foods with mRNA murder “vaxx” and so on happened. And at that point I decided to take care of my family first. Hence the farm in Italy in 2021. But it was an investment in time and money that would be further along if the aspects of my personal life that actually led to my initial spiritual revelation had not also miraculously resolved itself in a completely unexpected but oh so welcome way.
Call me selfish if you like, but having my daughter with me for the last three years, whose childhood had essentially been stolen from me, matters to me far more than creating a city state of Catholics. And in any case, it’s not like it stopped those efforts, but the practicalities related to this event have certainly impacted on the wider goals considerably, and I am only now, starting to think about the wider goals, while at the same time also very aware that I first need to establish a self-sufficient hub here, first for my family and myself, so that I then have the possibility to focus on the wider issues. Even so, slowly, the wider community continues to grow, and even begin to form around me, because that is the power of being connected to a spiritual reality that is true and good. If you had told me in 2014 that in a mere 4 years later I would be married, and that 4 years after that I would have three more children and reunite with my first daughter, I would have assumed you were just making up the most fantastic lie to make me feel better. But all of these things happened as if by magic, only as a result of me internally and personally doing my best, imperfect as that is, to follow the spiritual truth I became more aware of and that became more obvious to me the deeper into it and the more I tried to follow and live it.
So, in this rather lengthy and apparently rambling post (but it is not rambling at all in reality, if you pay attention to the macro as well as the micro intent!) the point I am trying to get across to you is primarily one: whatever your belief system is, if you want to create something lasting, it has to be based in something real. And that reality begins in the spiritual underpinnings. All of life does. Even in my brief period as an atheist I understood that.
As to what spiritual underpinnings you choose, I would say be careful. A lot of them are not based in the good. There is only one true God of Love. And like it or not, such a God does have rules for us to live by so as to achieve what is best for us. Just like a truly wise and loving father will tell his children what the rules of life are, for their benefit, yet he will not compel us by force to follow them, because love necessarily entails free will.
So, I hope that given my personal example, which is presented only because it is a real, tangible, proof of the logic that I presented and in any case was aware of even long before I was Catholic or baptised at all, you too begin to see the entire process and how it works.
Furthermore, your life may be less complicated than mine, or you may already have enough wealth, so maybe you can do things faster or more efficiently than I have, but even so, if your spiritual foundations are based in falsehoods, ultimately your community will not form or will collapse or become perverted.
Lastly, you may be disheartened by the time it takes, especially to start from scratch, and even more so if your specific spiritual underpinnings have little history of long term success. I on the other hand have spiritual underpinnings that have been responsible for the literal invention of the scientific method, the use of reason and logic for the investigation of the natural world, and the creation of societies that have been the best in the world bar none, and have done so uninterrupted despite constant attacks for 2000 years. So I feel pretty confident that regardless of my own personal success or failure, I am most definitely on the right track. And even after I drop dead —hopefully in advanced but coherent old age, so I get to meet my grandchildren if not great-grandchildren— others will carry on whatever I managed to start. And that gives my children and grandchildren and great-grandchildren, a chance to create and live in a world that has been permanently rid of the kind of scum that are trying to murder you and make your children their disposable sex toys.
So, if you don’t have the strength to form your own community, at least, dig as deep into reality and your own heart as you can. Find the deepest spiritual truth you can, and then join and help whatever community that is based on that same spiritual truth that you can find.
As for me, I will never stop or give up, but all and any glory is only God’s.
If you understood part 1, then you know that the spiritual necessarily comes before the physical, but the physical too, is required. As always: The intro Paragraph:
This is the second in the Theoretical Models of Society series of Posts. Use the category of the same name or the Search Me function on the right-hand sidebar to find all related posts in the series.
It is generally helpful to a reader if they are already familiar with some of my other work, in order for this stuff to have the most useful effect on your life. In particular, The Face on Mars and Believe! would be the top reads to have done to have the generic global perspective of reality well in hand. Systema and Reclaiming the Catholic Church would have the most impact on a more personal level. On health/security/self-protection, and on the reality of Catholicism as it was (and remains with Sedevacantists) before Vatican II and why the Novus Ordo Church is not only not Catholic, but Satanic at its core. I will repeat this little paragraph on each new part, as I think it is important to have a general foundation if one is really interested in more than skim-reading before returning to the general slumber we are all being attempted to be forced into.
If your spiritual cohesion is weak, your physical one will be non-existent. If your spiritual cohesion is based on something real but partial (non-violence, do no harm, meditation on the abstract realities, communion with nature), that is lacking the other side of reality (violence is at times required so you better be good at it, a little harm early sometimes prevent a bigger harm later, practical considerations, dealing with humans as they are not as you wish they were) then our physical cohesion will only last while there are no real stressors to it. MS-13 gangs have it good… until an active government or group of vigilante citizens large and equipped enough decide they had enough. Then MS-13 gangs disappear or become the new government if they win. The Amish are fine… until the MS-13 gangs decide they want the Amish compound.
Only if the spiritual is holistic does the physical become resilient.
You may disagree with it, but like it or not, Islam is holistic. Suicidal zealots on one end and devout prayer on the other end. Because of it, it is resilient. Judaism is complex, because its spiritual aspect reflects both the concept of a higher power, but also the idea that you can circumvent its laws by clever rules-lawyering, and this translates to a physical cohesion that is founded on deception of anyone not part of the club to a great extent. It is resilient and successful… until the deception is understood and seen on a scale that tips the balance, then its exponents tend to get exiled and removed from polite society en masse.
China as an entity is resilient, and its people hard to counter in terms of work ethic or perseverance, but from a spiritual perspective their way of doing things, with mass subjugation to the state, is not sustainable for Western style civilisations. So they are insular and non-integrating. More of a slow rolling behemoth than an instant threat to survival.
Fake religions that only have veneers of ideologies, but are really just the equivalent of a spiritual fake meal and physical cardboard cutout, will have inconsequential physical manifestations beyond the zombie horde. Protestants, Novus Orco “Catholics” the millions and millions of agnostics and atheists, none of them make any difference. At most they are a brainless zombie horde that might be manipulated to stumble this or that way for a brief period of time; and yes, in that time they can make a lot of damage, but they don’t decide anything.
Eastern Orthodox are currently the pre-eminent resistors of clown world, but they tend to be isolationist (which is good but means you as a Westerner are not of them really) and stagnant spiritually. Physically they are solid and generally reliable and they have large enough numbers to make a difference. That said, the failure of their societies is built in: they are essentially tribal. Even the Mongol Empire collapsed when Genghis Khan died. And their own internal stresses prevent them from ever becoming a truly civilising force.
Tiny, low-numbers as it is Catholicism (Sedevacantism) is actually the only perspective that has a real chance. The spiritual element is solid and factual and has no problem pushing back as hard as required, right up to taking on even the fanatical elements of their enemies with calm and determination. Physically this too translates. Their weakness for now is numbers. But given each woman we know that is Sede has (or intends to) at least 5 or more children, we will become a larger force over time.
Pacifist in intent but not afraid to defend as hard as required, also makes us resilient. Building up Sede communities is the aim and process currently happening in real time. Organisation and forming economic communities is the next step. And after that, political and civil defence will come rapidly.
Regardless of if you heed my thoughts on what the best spiritual practice to provide a deep coherence is or not, the fact is that you need to create a physical coherence too. That is, a community of people in the flesh, that can stand united against whatever horror they may have to face, together, as a real community that shares pains and glories as required.
You can have all the best ideas in the world (I have several myself!) but if you don’t learn to create and be a part of a community of men that are willing and able to become warriors on the spot if events require it, you will not survive any SHTF events, nor the more likely constant and progressive squeezing you with taxes, laws, rules and increasing costs for everything.
You need to surround yourself with people that will work well together inside foxholes, instead of panic and crap themselves. And then you need to lead them if you can, and follow the leader if you cannot.
You simply will not achieve anything, no matter what type of “revolution” you might want to have, peaceful, educational, economical, or even outright war, if you do not have something prepared to replace whatever it is you are trying to do away with.
More women than I thought (that are unmarried apparently) read this blog.
So ladies, here are some general pointers. Just like I tell the men to become as presentable as possible, do the same.
*Wear clothes that highlight your best features.
*Wear SOME make-up (do not trowel the stuff on, it’s off putting).
*Don’t be a disgusting lard-ass. Stay healthy and fit.
*Personal hygiene is NEVER optional, and especially so for a woman.
*Unless you suffer from some disfiguring malformation, as a general rule, do NOT get any plastic surgery/botox/lip-filler, etc. Yes, we CAN see it. YES we DO KNOW, and no it’s not enticing. In fact, in almost all cases, it’s very off-putting.
*Learn interesting stuff. It doesn’t even really matter what, but a woman with a SKILL is unusual and makes a man pay attention. I dated for a time, quite seriously, a woman that was an underwear model, had been a model in general, then quit because she didn’t like the environment and she had no driver’s licence, so got around on a scooter, which only required a reduced licence. But she had a valid pilot’s licence. Now, I never needed her to fly a plane, but the idea of her being the pilot on some smuggling adventure in a Tales of the Gold Monkey style fashion, lived permanently in my head the whole time I was with her. All we would have needed was a small plane that could land on water, and a broom-handle Mauser pistol. If you have to ask why the Mauser, you will never understand. And if you have not seen that one off series, trust me, it’s absolutely worth it, get the set and binge on it. But I digress. The point is a woman that CAN change a tire, or use a spreadsheet, or, like my wife, has preternatural ability to find/buy the weirdest gadget I didn’t even imagine might exist, that turns out to be useful, and so on, is a bonus point. More so if it’s actually useful. BUT… DO NOT OVERSELL IT. Ok, so you know what a carburettor is, great, but don’t go on about it the way Vegans go on about their eating habits.
*Learn to actually LISTEN. For all that the running joke –in the dystopian narrative we live in– is that men don’t listen, the reality is that it is WOMEN that are almost functionally incapable of listening.
The way a male brain generally works is in one of these two ways:
Information comes in —> Gets processed in context —> action or response is taken within that context.
Nagging comes in —> gets identified as nagging —> internally ignores the nagging and ponders life, his bad choices in women, abstract math, and above all: What would a Roman Centurion Do? —> Makes noncommittal noises to pretend some random semblance of listening.
Women get upset and say men don’t listen in the second instance.
Unless you are good at really not listening.
Again, true story, I once had a girlfriend that was really almost a ten in looks and bedroom skills, but her brain was a close representation of tapioca mixed with random electrical discharges and she would start arguments with me for no earthly reason known to man. She once did this over the phone and I really wasn’t in the mood. Instead of my usual response, which would generally be composed of two words and hanging up, I simply put the phone down, far enough I could not hear a word she was saying, but just a squeaky kind of white noise and I proceeded to have my lunch. If the squeaky noise paused I’d grab the phone and go: “Hmmm.” And put it back down. I had a pleasant lunch that took about 30-40 minutes, and when I next heard a pause in the squeaky noise and grabbed the phone, the statement on her side of it was:
“Oh… wow, I am really impressed. this is really the first time you just listened to me without arguing back that none of what I say makes any logical sense. Thank you! Can I come over tonight?”
To which I said “Sure.” And to this day I have no idea what stupid shit she was talking about, but I guarantee you it was stupid shit, because she never brought it up again, not that evening when she came over, nor any other time or during any of the other arguments we had. Now, why is this? I’ll explain, it; has to do with how the female brain works when someone is talking to them, and it is invariably this:
Information comes in—>depending on how attractive/personally invested she is already in the person speaking FOR HER OWN MOTIVES, the ability to actually take in the information as presented and process it in context varies, from an effective almost 0% to a maximum of 80% even if she is madly in love and really trying. Whatever the information is, from a male perspective it would be the equivalent of you receiving truncated messages over radio. The information was: “Would you like a starter? Do you like pasta, like me? or prefer meat?” Depending on her level of personal investment in you this could be received as anything between:
“Would you lik… start…me?” To which she says an enthusiastic YES and expects you to take her to your place, or in the opposite case, throws a drink in your face and accuses you of attempted sexual assault.
AND
“Would [you like] pasta, me [meat]” If she is hungry and likes pasta but not you she will say “pasta.” If she likes you too she may respond “meat” with a meaningful glint in her eye.
The point is women do not hear the objective universe. They crush-grind it and funnel it through whatever emotion, random thought, specific obsession, or other thing in her head either temporarily or semi-permanently, is already lodged in there. And they generally never answer whatever question or topic you are asking them about, but at best a lose interpretation of what they THINK you might have asked.
Which is why engineers, rocket scientists, snipers, mathematicians, and basically anyone where people die if you don’t do detailed shit correctly, is male.
So ladies, despite your seething rage at the above few paragraphs, please understand two three things:
Men who understand women to a certain level are all aware that by our standards you are generally incoherent, batshit crazy, incongruent to a degree that would get men shot on sight, messy, chaotic, emotional and hormonal. Autists and men with little experience of women do NOT get this anywhere near as well.
While we understand you think the entirety of creation revolves around your wishes, needs and desires, the inconceivable and horrible reality is that it absolutely does not. It’s even much more worse than that in fact: The Universe doesn’t generally care about you at all, and even if God loves you, reality will still bitchslap you in the face all day long, every day, and continue to do it all your life. It would really be helpful if you learned to understand that:
Objective reality is COMPLETELY independent from how you feel about any of it
The more you are able to reason and do logic, the more it improves your life in every way, AND it impresses every man you know in ways you can’t even imagine
3. Truly, you ability to think and react logically and consistently will be like magic unicorns singing rainbows to any man that has had to deal with a few of the average women present in the West today.
Although different to the above, though very much related, always remember that while you generally get to decide who and if they have sex with you, pretty much at will, men get to decide who and if he gets married to them. Pretty much at will. So check your entitlement at the door.
And here is the absolute silver bullet for most men:
DO NOT BREAK HIS BALLS. DRAIN THEM INSTEAD.
Crude? Sure. True? Also real.
A woman who is a genuine help instead of a drag on a man’s already busy life, and who is kind, does not nag, and is genuinely and respectfully attracted to a man and shows it to him regularly, is like the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. Or to put it in even more crude, but really simple terms in meme format:
And the TL;DR version
Now, if you are an actual Church going, Catholic lady, forgive the crudeness, and bad language, but honestly, I very much doubt a proper Catholic woman really needs any advice on finding a husband. The sad fact is that twe have a complete TSUNAMI, of entitled, thinks-she-is-a-ten (when she is a six at best), bratty, ignorant, spoilt women who assume they deserve the best of everything all the time.
And that’s just not how reality works. Another VERY useful ability, is for you to rate yourself on the traditional 1-10 scale, which is ONLY used for looks. That is your overall face and body. You might not like it, it says nothing about you as a person, but men, simple creatures that we are, pretty much DO rate you this way. And while a man may well have sex with anything right down to a 0, they will generally NOT marry anything 2 points lower than them on the physical attractiveness scale. So select your potential match accordingly. If you are a 7, you’re NOT going to get a 9 who also has money and a decent career. That guy is not having any trouble finding sexual partners and has very little incentive to get married until he finds at least a 9 that is feminine, helpful, intelligent, submissive, sexy and entertaining. And he CAN find that, at his level.
A man will tend to marry maybe one point lower or two, if he is a generic Delta type who is himself either a 6-7 or hasn’t got a lot of self-esteem, and so on, but generally men are looking for something between a point lower than them and two points higher (which is their own delusion in many cases, but far less so than is the female delusions of what they can get married to.)
Anyway, those are the basic pointers and should really be plenty for most women. if there are any specific comments of emails that repeat a particular point, I will address it too.
Since this was the overwhelming lead in the recent poll, here it is:
First of all, read Caveman Theory. You can only get it in digital format from my E-store because it is unlikely to be published by any of the politically correct places. If you can’t be bothered to spend £20 and read for a couple or three hours and then apply what you read to your life, there really isn’t much anyone can do for you.
If you have other specific, unique issues, well, I do consultations on general issues, not just hypnosis, for £100 and hour, and plenty of young men had good results taking that specific advice. In fact they tend to end up in long term relationships, get married and make babies within the first year of marriage. But again, my time is limited and what I can do to help I have done both on the blog, on YouTube (both free) and in the Caveman Theory book. If you want more help, I think it’s fair you pay for my limited time.
I will write a few blog posts on how to find a husband however, as that is indeed less well covered in general.
TMOS Concepts – Part 2 – Reality is Based on Spiritual Underpinnings
If you understood part 1, then you know that the spiritual necessarily comes before the physical, but the physical too, is required. As always: The intro Paragraph:
This is the second in the Theoretical Models of Society series of Posts. Use the category of the same name or the Search Me function on the right-hand sidebar to find all related posts in the series.
It is generally helpful to a reader if they are already familiar with some of my other work, in order for this stuff to have the most useful effect on your life. In particular, The Face on Mars and Believe! would be the top reads to have done to have the generic global perspective of reality well in hand. Systema and Reclaiming the Catholic Church would have the most impact on a more personal level. On health/security/self-protection, and on the reality of Catholicism as it was (and remains with Sedevacantists) before Vatican II and why the Novus Ordo Church is not only not Catholic, but Satanic at its core. I will repeat this little paragraph on each new part, as I think it is important to have a general foundation if one is really interested in more than skim-reading before returning to the general slumber we are all being attempted to be forced into.
If your spiritual cohesion is weak, your physical one will be non-existent. If your spiritual cohesion is based on something real but partial (non-violence, do no harm, meditation on the abstract realities, communion with nature), that is lacking the other side of reality (violence is at times required so you better be good at it, a little harm early sometimes prevent a bigger harm later, practical considerations, dealing with humans as they are not as you wish they were) then our physical cohesion will only last while there are no real stressors to it. MS-13 gangs have it good… until an active government or group of vigilante citizens large and equipped enough decide they had enough. Then MS-13 gangs disappear or become the new government if they win. The Amish are fine… until the MS-13 gangs decide they want the Amish compound.
Only if the spiritual is holistic does the physical become resilient.
You may disagree with it, but like it or not, Islam is holistic. Suicidal zealots on one end and devout prayer on the other end. Because of it, it is resilient. Judaism is complex, because its spiritual aspect reflects both the concept of a higher power, but also the idea that you can circumvent its laws by clever rules-lawyering, and this translates to a physical cohesion that is founded on deception of anyone not part of the club to a great extent. It is resilient and successful… until the deception is understood and seen on a scale that tips the balance, then its exponents tend to get exiled and removed from polite society en masse.
China as an entity is resilient, and its people hard to counter in terms of work ethic or perseverance, but from a spiritual perspective their way of doing things, with mass subjugation to the state, is not sustainable for Western style civilisations. So they are insular and non-integrating. More of a slow rolling behemoth than an instant threat to survival.
Fake religions that only have veneers of ideologies, but are really just the equivalent of a spiritual fake meal and physical cardboard cutout, will have inconsequential physical manifestations beyond the zombie horde. Protestants, Novus Orco “Catholics” the millions and millions of agnostics and atheists, none of them make any difference. At most they are a brainless zombie horde that might be manipulated to stumble this or that way for a brief period of time; and yes, in that time they can make a lot of damage, but they don’t decide anything.
Eastern Orthodox are currently the pre-eminent resistors of clown world, but they tend to be isolationist (which is good but means you as a Westerner are not of them really) and stagnant spiritually. Physically they are solid and generally reliable and they have large enough numbers to make a difference. That said, the failure of their societies is built in: they are essentially tribal. Even the Mongol Empire collapsed when Genghis Khan died. And their own internal stresses prevent them from ever becoming a truly civilising force.
Tiny, low-numbers as it is Catholicism (Sedevacantism) is actually the only perspective that has a real chance. The spiritual element is solid and factual and has no problem pushing back as hard as required, right up to taking on even the fanatical elements of their enemies with calm and determination. Physically this too translates. Their weakness for now is numbers. But given each woman we know that is Sede has (or intends to) at least 5 or more children, we will become a larger force over time.
Pacifist in intent but not afraid to defend as hard as required, also makes us resilient. Building up Sede communities is the aim and process currently happening in real time. Organisation and forming economic communities is the next step. And after that, political and civil defence will come rapidly.
Regardless of if you heed my thoughts on what the best spiritual practice to provide a deep coherence is or not, the fact is that you need to create a physical coherence too. That is, a community of people in the flesh, that can stand united against whatever horror they may have to face, together, as a real community that shares pains and glories as required.
You can have all the best ideas in the world (I have several myself!) but if you don’t learn to create and be a part of a community of men that are willing and able to become warriors on the spot if events require it, you will not survive any SHTF events, nor the more likely constant and progressive squeezing you with taxes, laws, rules and increasing costs for everything.
You need to surround yourself with people that will work well together inside foxholes, instead of panic and crap themselves. And then you need to lead them if you can, and follow the leader if you cannot.
You simply will not achieve anything, no matter what type of “revolution” you might want to have, peaceful, educational, economical, or even outright war, if you do not have something prepared to replace whatever it is you are trying to do away with.
So build it first.
No related posts.
By G | 16 September 2024 | Posted in Social Commentary, Theoretical Models of Society