All you wishy-washy “moderates” sicken me.

How much sewage do you want in your ice cream?

No. Seriously, answer the question.

All the substacks trying to be “nuanced” about Charlie, or Trump, or the left, or the right… what a bunch of absolute faggots you all are.

If you are incapable of understanding these simple things, please, do us both a favour, fuck off from this Substack and go elsewhere. I don’t live off this, and even if I did I really don’t want to surround myself with moral cowards and retards. Here is the truth:

1. There is an objective reality.
2. This means there is a TRUE position that is absolute and above all others at any given point in time about any given thing you care to think or imagine.
3. This means all other positions are FALSE to one degree or other.

That’s IT.

Now… is it true we all, at times, make a mistake as to what that might be? Sure.

Is it true that maybe in some instances we may never be sure what that truth is? Absolutely.

And you know what you do when that’s the case?

YOU SHUT THE FUCK UP.

Because you don’t KNOW.

At most you can say: “I think this, and that, and the other, but that’s just my OPINION.” And that’s ok, because opinions are like assholes, as the saying goes: Everyone has one, and almost all of them, all the time, are full of shit. And even the ones that aren’t full of shit at a particular moment will be full of shit in a little while anyway.

Then there are a few saints, MAYBE, with colostomy bags. If you find one, be silent and listen. And still double-check for yourself.

So that’s point number one: If you don’t know, STFU.

Point number two: If you are reasonably sure but not 100% sure, say so. And leave it at that. But first ask yourself why you should speak at all. Why on Earth should your “maybe” matter at all to even be uttered?

Point number three: You’re really quite sure and certain, but telling the truth may get you killed. Okay, I think it’s fine for you to then say “It’s just my OPINION.” And anyone with a brain will know it’s more than that, but can’t officially argue the point with you.

Point number four: You DO know (or are deluded enough to believe you do). Then don’t mince your words. Because there is truth and there is lies. There is good and there is bad. Pick a fucking side, because sitting on the fence just means YOU are —at best— uninterested in the topic at hand, in which case: STFU. Otherwise, if you ARE interested, but you are sitting on the fence the whole time, you’re a liar, an idiot, or a coward, or a combination of all three.

So let me give you an example:

Charlie Kirk – This is what I think:

1. He was originally a complete shill for Israel. Was he aware of it, or was he genuinely naively thinking Israel is the good guys? I have no idea. I would assume maybe a bit of both, but you know what, I am 100% ok with assuming he was totally innocently believing it in genuine error because of his upbringing, or whatever. And I am running with that on a personal level. Charity is not my strong point, but I 100% am absolutely willing to truly think of it that way on Charlie, and do.
2. At some point he started to question the narrative of Israel being “the good guys” because they absolutely, objectively, 100% are evil scum, and I don’t give a flying fuck at a rat’s ass if you disagree, or think that makes me a Nazi etc etc (and fuck you if you do, since I’m no fan of the socialist party of anything, but especially the one of Germany) and he literally started to do this publicly.
3. He became very quickly aware that this was dangerous and could get him killed and he expressed this fear to various people. Who have come forward on several occasions since.
4. Israel killed him before his questions about Israel became too public; and are in fact now trying to make him a “hero” and “champion” of pro-Israel propaganda, when he had quite clearly jumped that ship. The vermin trying to do so, from the Jerusalem post (the very FIRST newspaper to post about his assassination), to Ben Shapiro, acting as if he was a good buddy to Kirk,1 to Netanyahu, who also was the very first world leader to praise Kirk immediately after he got killed, are typically of the view that YOU dear reader are too fucking stupid to put 2 and 2 together and figure this out, even though it’s staring you in the face.
5. If you needed any more proof, you got a skew-eyed street-shitter, pretending to be a boss at the FBI who fucked up the “we got him” at least twice, before he said we definitely have him. The same FBI who did all the other false flag bullshit since…oh well… J. Edgar Hoover. And the stuff they came up with, tranny messages on the ammo, the Mauser rifle supposedly appeared and disappeared, was disassembled in seconds (HOW? Do you even know ANYTHING about guns?) then appeared magically in a cardboard box and wasn’t even the type they said to begin with, etc etc. etc. It’s just a fucking farse. Any competent actual servant of law and order would be arresting every single Fed even remotely involved with this as spies, traitors and foreign agents working for Israel or in any case to the detriment of the USA and would be hanging them from the neck until dead after a quick but through trial.
6. And finally, yes, Trump and your whole USA (and my own government by Proxy, of course, along with he rest of Europe too) is totally controlled by the Talmudians and Donnie boy may as well have a fist all the way up his rectum making him say whatever Bibi wants. Because he too can die suddenly. Which is why there are alternate Trumps a foot lower than him pretending to be him doing whatever Israel wants. And it’s also why when Charlie warned Donnie about Israel Donnie apparently barked at him to STFU basically, as has been reported elsewhere.

INTERLUDE:

And yeah, the above is all my opinion, but I am also pretty certain it’s spot on. You do your own research.

And if you also think building 7 collapsed because of a fire (in what? a waste paper basket?) then PLEASE go read other sub stacks, you are too fucking stupid to be here.

END OF INTERLUDE

But to return to Charlie, the overall point is that even in the worst case scenario (from my perspective) let’s s ay he was a total knowing shill for Israel, and he started to talk about Epstein and the genocide in Gaza and so on, because he wanted MORE money, he was just greedy and a terrible grifter. Let’s for a minute pretend that was the case (I do NOT believe than, but for the sake of argument, let’s pretend).

If so, he could absolutely be considered my ideological absolute opposite. Ideologically, practically, and intellectually, such a person would be everything I despise. Even so…

Would I say he “deserved” to be killed?

No.

No I do not. I would never agree with that.

Publicly proven to be a grifter, humiliated with facts and truth, and proof of the bribery he received? Sure.

But killed? For TALKING?

Even if it was lies from morning till night (it mostly really wasn’t anyway) he absolutely did not deserve to be killed. His wife didn’t deserve it. His children certainly didn’t deserve it.

And if you are one of the POS that thinks he did, then keep the fuck away from me. You’re scum. And remember that once you use a tactic, technique, or weapon against your enemy, it absolutely becomes fair game to use it on you too.

So all you fucks that are happy he got killed? As far as I am concerned you are all perfectly fine with being killed yourselves for your shitty views. I didn’t make that determination. YOU did. By your actions.

And while I will not rejoice at your possibly being killed by someone that has had enough of your bullshit —because I am, objectively, despite all my many human flaws, an infinitely better human being than you and everyone like you— I certainly will NOT feel or say a word in your defence and you will not hear from me any kind of defence of your position, which is quite different from how I am discussing Charlie. Even if he had been the worst possible thing I can imagine with respect to his beliefs and actions, as explained above.

As it happens, I DO believe he was starting to see the truth and could no longer ignore it. And the Talmudians are quick to get rid of anyone that threatens the status quo they spent centuries trying to make everyone believe regarding their perennial victimhood.

My own system of ethics may be questionable to some of you, but at least I have one.

The Talmudians break every single aspect of anything that I consider moral, ethical, fair or just. And while I will not compromise my OWN ethics with regard to them, they DO have a special place in the list of ideological enemies I may have, real or imagined.

If you read this blog, and care to participate in discussions here, don’t you dare tell me about how morality is relative in any respect. It isn’t.

It’s a lie and a terrible one to pretend you can “make a deal” with evil, or that it’s ok to tolerate it, or anything of the sort.

If you are that kind of person, you are the kind of person that would find an excuse as to why a child rapist should be perfectly fine sleeping in your toddler’s bed.

And if you are that kind, as far as I am concerned, you deserve to be placed in the exact same hole that the child rapist belongs in. Which in case you are not sure, let me clarify: It’s a shallow grave in a fetid bog somewhere, marked only by the droppings of the reptiles that feast on such a disgusting carcass.

And fuck your moral tepidity, and lukewarm, stand-for-nothing-at-all bullshit excuse for a heart.

Subscribe now

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

[ X ]

This entry was posted in SubStack. RSS 2.0 feed.