Less Dago Incels

This little clip from the film about Nikki Lauda is maybe the best representation I ever saw of something that has always been true about Italians in general, and despite the unrelenting assault by Hollywood “values” over the last more than 50 years I have been alive, remains true even today to an extent I am still genuinely surprised by. Let’s see if you can understand why comparatively speaking, even the most nerdy dago is usually better with women than the average Anglo.

Enjoy.

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

He wrote a post on this here .

Because whoever he is the man has unlocked a HUGE piece of human communication for me, one I’ll be processing to some degree for the rest of my days, (see the previous posts on the dual brain theory)I have taken to reading other posts of his to see if the rest of his stuff is also revolutionary in some aspect.

With regard to Europe I would say…. Hmmmm…

He says:

In the minds of European elites and most of the European people, Europe (represented by the European Union of course) is the center of the world – if not the Universe. They are confident of European importance and power, and the centrality of their culture. Their perception of ‘cultural centrality’ means that Europeans, by and large, believe that their views are somehow the default views of humanity. Any other views range from being ignorant deviations up to being dangerous and immoral – and only held by inferior people.

This cultural centrality has created a pompous and narcissistic atmosphere in Europe, even among the part of the population that is not technically narcissistic. Europeans are quick to dismiss and subsequently dehumanize those they see as having deviant views. European politicians and a large part of the European population have not been hesitant to express those views.

I think Gaius here, as obviously not european, (I assume American) is conflating at least two and possibly three things:

• The recognition of differences between cultures and the inevitable realisation that some are simply better in pretty much every respect than others.
• The truths that follow from a specific cultural religion or ideology ate similarly more or less in alignment with objective reality.
• Recognising these two separate and valid points as objectively true is not elitist, it is simply correct.
• The false narrative that the elite/puppets pretending to be government, journalists and the woke all push/follow is a separate thing regardless of how much those same satanist try to pretend it’s all the same cloth as the three points above.

There is a further point, that is arguable, but the actual brainwashed population is quite a bit less than a cursory look at a country might suggest. Certainly in Italy. And I suspect most of the Southern West.

But first let’s get back to our European “narcissism” or egomania, or… to use the more correct Italian term superbia.

Superbia is often mistranslated as arrogance; but that is a linguistic error. An arrogant person is someone who says, pretends, believes, or acts as if he were capable of X; but when push comes to shove, in fact he falls short of said supposed capability.

Superbia on the other hand is a guy that says he can do X and he can. And he also rubs your face in it. It is the opposite of humility, but —and this matters—it is not due to fake or delusional ideas of capability.

The nation or culture that most openly suffers from this malaise of arrogance, is the United States of America. The average American has, compared to the rest of the world, delusions of brilliance. I have encountered this in pretty much every aspect of life; be it work, sports, martial arts, military action, security work, right down to things like playing chess and so on.

Now, it does need to be said that with a rather wealthy populace there are indeed exceptional Americans that have put in time money and talent and perform at a truly spectacular level. The guy from the Pewview is a case in point. But we are talking about the average guy. Only one nations is more arrogant: Israel. However, the average Israeli is still quite a long way above the average American in terms of capability, so the association with arrogance is not as noticeable because the gap between reality and arrogant assumption is smaller for the Jew than the American. But make no mistake, the Jew is the most arrogant creature on the planet.

If that fact makes you uncomfortable, well, tough. I am not responsible for your cognitive dissonance with reality.

But to get back to the average European, the situation is a little bit more complicated. And I am speaking mostly for the Southern European here (dagos like me, spics, portchies, Greeks).

We may well be Superbi about our culture, which can also include things like art, objective beauty, but also engineering or other achievements that while perhaps not widespread across the entire nation nevertheless are the result of the objectively superior culture of human excellence at the individual level that stems ultimately from a superior religion (Catholicism or Eastern Orthodoxy). I know, I know, all you Yankees are screaming at the screen right now if you’re even still reading, but bear with me niggers; if you pay attention you’ll see I offend everyone; including the wops who are my supposed co-nationals.*

* They are not. Dago I may be, but I am Venetian, not Italian. And if you think that means I think Venetians are “better” than Italians, you’d be right. Because we objectively are (smarter, faster, more capable). But we are also far worse in many other respects (unfriendly, misanthropic, suspicious, generally rude).

Catholicism (the real one exhibited prior to 1958, after which Satanism took over the Vatican) as well as to a lesser extent Eastern Schismatics, have a religion that, being closest to reality, accounts for human beings as important in each individual instance while simultaneously having a broader social grasp of truth, beauty, and reality in general.

The Protestant work ethic is not a positive thing. It is the start of the mechanisation of human beings. Reducing them to cogs in the machine. Is the Catholic work ethic less “effective” from that mechanistic perspective? Undoubtedly yes.

Is it also more humane and pleasant to exist in once you let go of your rigid Protestant-infused ideology that work comes before life, and realise life should ALWAYS come before work? Absolutely, yes.

So… if you grasp this, and also understand that it is this fostering of the human spirit that allows more unique geniuses to come to the fore in so many disparate fields in a place like Italy, each a unique character on his own merits, then, you cannot escape the fact that such a culture is obviously superior to anything the Americans or Anglos or anyone else has come up with.

Add to it the usually much healthier grasp of logic and common sense that the average Euro has when compared to the brainwashing of rhe average American, and it is easy to see why the average Euro considers the average Yank like a mostly friendly, overweight simpleton.

And culturally, we are basically right to feel that way.

On the other hand, the spirit of rebellion that appears to be present in America is almost entirely absent from Europe. But I think this is more of a cultural masquerade than a fact.

America has that absurd, illogical, nonsensical and completely fictional “concept” of “free speech”. It’s like believing in flying unicorns of course, and any five year old Venetian knows it. But believing such absurdities means the average American shoots his mouth off a lot more (hence the arrogance) but in practice, they fold just as easily or even more so than the average Eurotrash. There are exceptions I am sure, and America is a vast country so that there will be entire regions of harder and better men (I am sure that means YOUR region, dear reader, it’s all those OTHER Americans that are weak, not you, of course!) but by and large Americans are more squashed under the boot than Europeans. Your immigration is an order of magnitude worse, your cities are more dangerous and dirty, and while you have easier access to a lot of guns, you’re none of you going to overthrow the government any more than any Europeans will. And probably less so. France has been in constant rallies against Macron and the covid stuff for about 4 years. It’s all hidden by the media, but there is more pushback (if no less ineffective) in Europe than in the USA. And we have plenty of guns too despite what you guys think, but it doesn’t make much difference here any more than it does there. You did have that standoff against the feds because if that rancher, and that was cool. But pedophiles still get killed here more often.

So while in terms of apparent rebellion Europe is a quiet poodle and America is a big barking German Shepherd, in practical terms neither dog bites.

Gaius continues:

They perceive the Chinese as thieving and untrustworthy, the Russians as subhuman animals, and Trump voters as racist imbeciles.

Mostly true of the average brainwashed Euro NPC. But it we look at PCs only (both here and in the USA) they simply see Trump as just another Jew puppet, the Russians as brutally pragmatic, and the Chinese as close to human locusts. And I ask you… are they really wrong?

They are not hesitant to tell you this, even without being prompted to do so.

Yes. We are more direct and honest than the Anglo types in general. Falsity does not breed good relations.

But it is here that his analysis is most flawed:

Still, deep down the rulers of Europe know that Europe is weak. They know that they cannot exercise global influence or wage war against Russia without American power. They know that economically Europe is both weak and small – with less than 15% of global GDP – and less in terms of real economic output. Economically, the only strong card they hold is being a market for others – and that card is getting weaker as Europeans get poorer.

This is all true.

In most European elites and citizens this reality is still buried deep in the subconscious.

This is absolutely not.

They still believe in European power, influence and moral superiority

No. The average citizen (especially of Southern Europe, but the North too) recognises we have a superior culture. Because we just do. But we also recognise we are prisoners of the puppets that ironically, you Americans —ok, ok, (((Americans)))— control, and have bought and and paid for.

– despite being a part of an increasingly impoverished and crime-ridden totalitarian civilization which runs elections the same way the Soviet Union ran show trials.

Yes. And those crime stats are overwhelmingly the result of the American-Jew policy that is absolutely running rampant in America and starts there more than anywhere else, of importing the third world to every part of the “European” West. And the issue is so much worse in your America than in our Europe.

As for banana republic elections… really? You are pointing the finger? America made Zimbabwe elections seem free and fair. And just because you have Trump (like we have Melons) please don’t ass-u-me that THAT “election” wasn’t rigged too, if perhaps by slightly different mechanisms).

Lack of self-awareness is another trait of narcissism.

Yes Gaius. It is.

And I really liked your essays on left/right brain stuff. They absolutely unlocked a door to unquestionably real, good and superior communication strategies. It has already changed my life and may well change that of many others thanks to the connections I made.

Just like the work of Mark Carlotto and others was instrumental in my understanding of what happened on Mars.

And I always give full credit for wherever I catch an idea from. I don’t care if it were Pol Pot or Kier Starmer that said 2+2 = 4. If it’s true and works I will say where I got it from. And your information on that aspect of human biology added a completely new take on my 30 years or so of studying the human mind and brain, not to mention my struggles with communicating meaningfully with other human beings. But you’re just wrong on this one.

And if I had to guess I’d say you have some offended pride going on about it. It irked your own sense of your own American Exceptionalism that some Euro said something like “America ain’t shit.”

It’s understandable. But your analysis is far from objective. Or accurate.

But I understand the reason for the confusion.

Baltar says:

To twist the knife further in the wound, Vance also stated that the values (and politics) of the EU had become incompatible with American values. This was an important statement, to say the least, although not sweeping enough because EU values have become incompatible with most of the world.

Vance’s speech very clearly illuminated the extreme contrast that has been developing between the EU and the rest of the world. It was like watching a spaghetti-western era Clint Eastwood walking into a gay club.

I sympathise. Who DIDN’T get a frisson from that event? It was great. BUT… it is theatre.

Trump (and Vance) are just the puppets of the “right-wing” of the Jew Cabal that runs the world and which has its own internal conflicts. But make no mistake, you are still a dirty goyim and only a beast of burden. Fooling you into acting like a stupid monkey clapping at the feet if the eternal Zionist Cabal remains the same goal.

You’re right. It’s like a Sergio Leone (Italian!) film. Film, see? Movie. Theatre. Fake.

And you fell for it.

You’re smart. Educated. Intelligent.

I’m fairly sure if you get over the “offence” of an olive nigger like me telling you there is a Jew in your ass driving you like his bitch, you might just pause and take that small circumcised dick out of your butt, then look at your own American dick and wonder why the fuck it’s circumcised too.

And here is a heads up: no it has nothing to do with “hygiene”. Just like abortion (baby murder) has nothing to do with “family planning”.

All this signifies an eventual withdrawal of the US from both the EU and Ukraine. That has important consequences many people do not seem to have realized: the War in Ukraine used to be between Russia and NATO. Now it will be between Russia and the European Union.

One can only hope this is so.

No wonder there’s panic.

In the elite yes. And you’re right they are narcissists to a man (and woman). They are. Or at least the most cynical of scum.

But the average EU PC (Player Character) is secretly glad. We don’t look forward to the inevitable economic hardships, but we DO hope (against likelihood) that there is a collapse big enough to let some rough characters change the vampiric rulers.

Give me 10,000 armed men, and in a collapse, despite being a father of small children, I’d happily change the entire parliament and government and fill it with honest men. Yes they do still exist, more so in Europe than in the USA on a per capita basis I would guess.

There are two practical reasons why the US excluded the EU from the negotiations on Ukraine. The first one is the inability of the EU to admit to the real causes of the war – without which the problem can’t be fixed. To do so would destroy the narrative of good (Ukraine/EU) versus bad (Russia) and implicate the EU in the causes of the war. This would leave the EU naked before the truth.

More spectacularly wrong analysis. The primary instigator of the war was the USA, not sleepy Europe. CIA biolabs anyone?

Expanding NATO?

None of this was the EU.

It was ALL America. Ok, ok. (((America))).

It’s surprising, but the bad analysis comes as a result of naiveté. Another very typical American trait. They are like children who believe in fairly tales. Trump good! Others bad!

There has been a massive cultural divide between the EU and the non-western world for a long time. What happened was a ‘pivot event’ when the Trans-Atlantic Cabal (an appropriate name in more ways than one) lost control of the United States with the election of Donald Trump. When that happened, the US pivoted culturally, militarily and economically away from the EU. Up to that point the US had been a cultural gay club like the EU, and had enabled the EU’s existence and activities through force applied against the rest of the world.

How can the EU be the “driver” when the US, by your own admission was the “strongman” and enforcer?

No. Trump is just the Jew-puppet of the right-wing faction of Zionism, and the EU dancing monkeys are the Jew-puppets of the left-wing faction of Zionism.

Baltar then goes off the deep-end, accusing the EU of being the cause and promoter if what has been vomited out of the USA for decades to the entire rest of the world!

The policy of the EU is the exact opposite. The EU is anti-family, anti-woman, anti-man, anti-children, anti-religion, anti-morality, anti-normality, anti-freedom, anti-merit, and anti-consequences of action. The EU carries out a constant war against these foundations, as well as the economic foundations of its societies.

What?

Let me remind you buddy, that faggotry is still not accepted as being able to have a “marriage” here, not can fags “adopt” children (buy and rape them).

And children here are still valued. Not sold ti the tune of 300k of them a year in the USA and raped by the tens of thousands on that Island you all hail from, the UK, where the family unit is by now only a distant memory.

It’s you Anglos (USA, UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand) that are fag-centric. We Southern Euros are still culturally “bigots”.

So, bitch please, check your own faggotry.

The foundation of the EU system is the abolition of the sovereignty of European nations. The foundation of EU foreign policy is the abolition of the sovereignty of other nations. We saw that recently in Georgia where the EU (along with USAID – a slush fund for the Trans-Atlantic Cabal) financed and supported an attempted color revolution. As usual, EU officials weren’t subtle and participated in the paid-for protests themselves.

No argument from me there. But… where dis the FINANCE come from? Oh. Right. The USA.

He continues in this blinkered way for a while then has another interesting point:

What is happening in Congo appears to be the following: Rwanda is an EU/UK proxy state where the EU has made a big deal for critical minerals. Some of these minerals actually seem to be sourced (stolen) from Congo. To put it bluntly, the EU/UK have launched a proxy invasion of Congo for its minerals, and Congo’s president has asked the US for help – against the EU and Britain.

It’s not necessary to explain further how significant this is, and why it isn’t being discussed much in western mainstream media. It is clear that this offer would never have been made without the changes in the international position of the US. Will Trump come to the rescue against EU aggression and make a deal for Congo’s minerals? That remains to be seen.

If I were a betting man (which I’m not), I would bet on this being a beginning of a trend.

I would bet on the US NOT actively helping as such. They may make overtures and noises reminiscent of it. But IF this stops Rwanda will depend on backroom deals and not direct force on force between the US and EU troops. The Congo would have been wiser to ask Russia for help.

In conclusion , I would say that Mr. Gaius Baltar (whatever his real name), is clearly an intelligent American, but not immune to having his best judgement (the use of reason and logic based of factual evidence most prominent in the left brain hemisphere), hijacked by his visceral emotions (the right brain).

One hopes, if he reads this post, he will be able to do the painful process of self-analysis and then correct his biases.

Good luck Mr. Baltar.

Subscribe

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

I don’t care how “insightful” your take on Trump, Zelenski, Putin, or whoever the next pedophile they “vote” in as “Pope” is.

If after 4 years of absolute fakery you still think your vote makes a difference to who gets elected, that ANY news outlet reports facts, or that ANY of the dystopic crap going on is going to change because of “politics”, you are basically a drooling moron.

If you still have not realised these two obvious things, you are literally an NPC, an extra of zero consequence on the set of life; a zombie in the zombie apocalypse.

What two things?

These two things:

• The Jewish banker agenda runs the world and they control everything with an absurd illusion everyone is enslaved by: FIAT money. Which they create out of literally less than thin air, and then sell to all of us at cost (the made up cost written on the bills, which are now just digital numbers on a screen), plus interest.
• Nothing will change without a physical alternative to this beast system they have put in place over millennia, and that begins with YOU, specifically YOU, ignoring their rules and lies and creating your own self-sufficient life, independent of FIAT money and willing and able to speak the truth and act in accordance with it and with reality instead of the fake narrative.

If you understand these two things you will not care less who is president or what he does. First because he’s bought and paid for, so his actions are in accordance with the plans of his puppet masters, and secondly because with it all being theatre, it’s just another pointless distraction.

Read a book. Learn a skill. Figure out how to reduce your need for FIAT money to as close to nil as possible.

In other words: Act

Subscribe

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

Continuing on from my post on the brain differences between the sexes , and how that could be used to massively improve communication between men and women, I then went to read Mr. Baltar’s post on ADHD and it makes a lot of sense. I read it a couple of days ago and have been processing it, and these are my first tentative thoughts on it.

Before doing that however, I have to quote at least part of his post on ADHD in order to again summarise and somewhat simplify the concepts, without detracting from the original which is more technical and longer. But in any case the whole thing is here if you want all the details.

First you need to know that STM stands for Short Term Memory and he states that the average person can retain about 7 ± 2 concepts or ideas or “chunks” of data in mind at once. That is consciously. The brain also processes things unconsciously (many, many, many, more than 5 to 9) but we might say that process is both opaque (to the owner of the brain) and not very intelligent at times.

That’s because the unconscious tends to be more the purview of the right brain hemisphere. It deals with symbols, images, and feelings, but in an imprecise fashion. And often unconsciously directed by whatever resides in your unconscious as “things that are true”; which are quite often not true at all in an absolute sense and not even true in a general sense.

So if you had an abusive mother with blue eyes, you may both be attracted to seeking love from blue eyed women, but never really trusting them (even if perhaps they had a completely different personality from your mother). But you would be doing this unconsciously, so you would just feel a tension whenever an attractive blue eyed woman took an interest in you without any clarity as to why (these are necessarily silly and very simple examples to explain the concept).

This idea of 5 to 9 concepts at once, is important to remember for what comes next. My commentary will be in [bold and square brackets].

Let’s say that you are relaxing and your brain runs through all kinds of stuff. All kinds of memories and ponderings pop up. This process is traditionally called a “train of thought.” What is happening is the following: A concept is activated in memory above your consciousness threshold and you become aware of it. This concept activates all associated concepts, some to above the threshold, others below. This continues like a super-complex wave of activations in your memory that goes around and around. This process seems to be automatic.

However, despite this being an automatic process, you can control it. [controlling it is mostly a left-brain activity, the side that deals with logic, words, math, and is generally better developed in men than women] You can stop your train of though and direct it toward something or away from something. You can avoid thinking about something and instead focus on something else. This applies both to what is already in memory and what you are seeing or hearing in the environment. This control process does not seem to be entirely a function of long-term memory itself, but of a separate part of the brain altogether – the frontal cortex. [again, the physical reality is women tend to have less of this grey matter and more of the more internal white matter, so statistically, there will be a small but significant trend of men being better able to do this] This means that basic memory processing is in the center of the brain, in an old part evolutionarily speaking. [of which women have more of it —hence the cliché of women remembering what you did six years ago that upset them has a basis in truth] The control of memory is, however, in the front of the brain, in a “new” part evolutionarily speaking. [of which men have more of it. Can you see why women would be MORE prey to their own feelings and emotions and less able to control them than men? It’s literally biological. On the other hand, there is something to them having a “woman’s intuition” and it generally being more accurate than men’s, as this is a right brain and more internal part of the brain processing power]

It is most likely the control part in the frontal cortex which enables you to stop and control your train of thought. Should that part be damaged, you would not be able to control your thoughts fully. The train of thought would just go on and on, and you would, at best, be a passive observer to what is going on in your own mind. You would not be able to stop bad thoughts, or focus on anything you want to focus on. The train of thought is automatic and beyond your control without the control system.

There is another point here (expanded on below) and that is that if a person’s ability to keep multiple concepts in mind is low, then, not only can they not control their “train of thought” well when they are on their own. They literally also cannot hear/process what another person is saying at the same time as their own thoughts are also assailing them.

It has certainly been my personal experience with every woman I have ever been intimate with, that under certain conditions, they become simply incapable of reasoned arguing. I mean the formal process of presenting your premises and working through them based on the available evidence and coming to sound conclusions. In fairness, men too increasingly suck at it, but women definitely take the Olympic medal in this kind of “not listening” to anyone else and just running with whatever fantastic approximation of reality they got into their head as a result of some feelings bringing up God knows what from the swampy territory of the right side of her trauma-riddled brain.

I know that literally every man with an IQ of about 120+ right now is probably fist pumping the air and saying “YES! This guy gets it!” And every woman of even slightly feminist persuasion probably stopped reading long ago (it’s fine, they literally cannot process this post in a way that helps them, so it’s not a huge loss). HOWEVER…

Let’s look at how this FEELS from the female perspective. She FEELS her feelings. And since we all experience some trauma, some of those “feelings” (which translate into behaviours) at some point may have been indispensable for survival. So on some (mostly unconscious level) not only does she FEEL those feelings, but from her perspective THAT IS THE ONLY TRUE REALITY THAT MATTERS.

Have you noticed that it is by far, overwhelmingly women that believe that truth is relative? That is not a coincidence.

It’s because in general women cannot contextualise their emotions and feelings that come out of the right brain process of inductive thinking by making good use of their left brain logical functions to do so.

And remember we are GENERALISING, ladies, it’s not about YOU specifically. You of course are a special unicorn to which none of this really applies (if you have read this far without attacking the screen and wishing me burnt at the stake for toxic misogyny, this may actually be somewhat true).

So, as always, since on this blog we don’t do nihilism, despair, and general faggotry, the question is: how can we improve things?

Well, for a start, begin to understand how the female brain with respect to left/right sides actually works. Internalising these concepts is a duty mostly men need to take on board, because to put it simply, they are more likely to be able to. Of course, women that ALSO take this on and (gasp) begin to use their left brain to direct their right brain processes more… well… they can probably wear capes in public and men will revere them.

Also become aware of another few things:

• Both men and women can process in the right brain or left brain more, but generally men are more left brained and women more right brained.
• It is also well known that men have a wider IQ range than women (we have more retards and geniuses than women).
• And there is something more, the higher your IQ, say like mine, at about 155, the more you are capable of doing left-brained activity at a level substantially more correct and effective than someone 2 or 3 standard deviations below you.
• And let’s not forget that 30 point IQ gap that makes proper communication almost impossible.

If you are able to keep those separate bits of information in mind:

• 30 point IQ difference means communication breaks down irreparably
• The higher the IQ and usually the more logical ability (left brain) a person will have (this essentially means being more likely to be correct when analysing situations without emotions)
• A person with a lower left-brain activity will not be able to prove (or even know how to) that something they strongly believe is objectively true or false. It will all feel absolutely real and true to them. However that feeling can change depending on the context so at a different time and circumstance they might express a diametrically opposed “truth” to the one they had before. Pointing it out will not help. They can’t see the logical parallels, only feel their feelings.

Then you will have realised that for high IQ people, other people are generally hell. And intimate relationships with women, even smart ones, can at times feel as if you are trying to be with either a very retarded person, or a deceitful liar and self-absorbed hypocrite.

Assuming no actual evil intent on the part of the woman, however, neither is true. She is neither retarded, nor necessarily deceitful.

They may just be incapable of seeing the logic of the situation or reasoning you are exhibiting.

Cold comfort if you are screaming at each other or worse, it corrodes you both and eventually destroys the relationship.

So let’s see about solutions.

But first, more from Mr. Baltar.

There is another issue which also seems to be able to impede control of your train of thought. This is the brain’s ability to maintain the activity level of concepts above the threshold of consciousness. If that ability is “naturally” low, or compromised, the result will be low STM capacity – say 5 or lower. What seems to happen is that if the brain can only keep few concepts simultaneously active above the threshold of consciousness, the frontal cortex control system will run into trouble taking control of memory – i.e. your train of thought. It seems that the frontal control system needs a certain number of concepts active (or certain activation ability of the brain) to gain control. If the concepts are too few (i.e. activity too low), it will struggle. Gaining control of the train of thought will then require extra effort which will be tiresome after a short while (short attention span). This means that outside the short periods of extra concentration, the mind will run on with limited control. This is the main issue in ADHD and several other conditions.

This is supported by the fact that stimulants, such as an amphetamine, can alleviate the symptoms of ADHD. The stimulant will tune up the activation level of the brain, thereby increasing the number of concepts which can simultaneously be activated above the threshold of consciousness. STM capacity therefore increases and the frontal control system can regain control of memory and the train of thought. This is also supported by the descriptions of people with ADHD who get a stimulant for the first time. They say that the chaos has stopped and they finally have control of their minds.

This also means that the cause of ADHD is not a hyperactive brain – it is exactly the other way around. It is a brain out of control because the activation ability of the brain for concepts in memory is too low, leading to control problems, leading to chaos in the mind.

I would generally agree but not completely. There are situations that are not so neatly explained, but this is still largely correct.

Examples of chaos

Before proceeding, let’s look at some of the consequences if the frontal cortex control system cannot properly intervene into the memory process, i.e. the train of thought, – because the brain doesn’t have the ability to maintain the activation of enough concepts above the level of consciousness. Here are a few examples:

Short attention span/lack of focus – People with ADHD have both short attention spans and a lack of focus in general. In order to be able to understand what is being said to you, or to complete a task, you must be able to maintain the activation level or memory sufficiently for the frontal control system to “grab hold” of something. If you can’t, the information will just flow into your brain below the “level of consciousness.” People with ADHD seem to be able to force a temporary rise in activation levels, just like people with normal brains can force themselves to pay attention. The problem is that this seems to place some kind of strain on the brain and can only be maintained for a short while. A short attention span and a lack of focus are obvious consequences of a low activity level in memory (i.e. low STM).

Dyslexia and comprehension of speech – If you are reading a long and complicated sentence, such as in this essay, a certain STM level may be needed. If your STM is 4 concepts, but the sentence requires you to remember 6 concepts simultaneously, you may have forgotten the first concept in the sentence before you come to the last one. This means that you will have problems understanding the sentence, not to mention remembering it. This is not because you are stupid, but because you can’t remember all the points the sentence is making before you finish processing its meaning. This is most likely very common for people with low STM, including people with ADHD, and is often either blamed on a “lack of focus” or dyslexia. Dyslexia is a real phenomenon, of which there are several types, but it is likely that “professionals” who are not familiar with this problem are misdiagnosing a lot of people as dyslexic, particularly school children and teenagers. Exactly the same problem applies to the spoken word. If you have low STM, you may have a problem understanding complicated spoken sentences. Then you fill in the blanks later, and remember what was said to you wrong.

Impulsivity – One of the symptoms of ADHD is impulsivity – both in words or deeds. It is not surprising that a lack of control of the mind will translate into lack of control of what we say and what we do. It would actually be surprising if it didn’t. The term “impulsivity” is somewhat misleading since it suggests something else than a lack of control. There are however other reasons for impulsivity. Impulsivity is also a function of emotional control, also carried out by the frontal cortex – and seems to be associated with certain personality types. We can’t blame all impulsivity on ADHD.

Intrusive thoughts – One of the symptoms of ADHD is “intrusive thoughts” – i.e. unwelcome thoughts pop into your head and you have problems pushing them away. The problem here is not intrusive thoughts as such, but the ability to block them. If you have a good control of your memory processes – your train of thought – blocking those thoughts becomes easy. Most are blocked so fast that they are at best fleeting ghosts you barely notice. However, if control is lacking they may become uncontrollable. This may result in compulsive thinking and depression.

Compulsive thinking and depression – If you cannot control your train of thought properly and it can flow freely, it will eventually hit a so called “complex” in your memory. A complex is a set of associated concepts in your memory which has some kind of significance. The significance is usually based on association with emotions. A complex can be something positive – such as an issue you find fascinating and love thinking about – or something negative such as a horrible event in childhood or memories associated with feelings of inferiority. If you cannot break your train of thought, it may gravitate toward a particular complex, usually a very significant one. Your thoughts will basically move around the complex like flies around a light – and you won’t be able to stop them. If the complex represents something traumatic or perhaps feelings of shame or inferiority, it can result in significant mental suffering. This compulsive thinking, solely caused by lack of frontal brain control, is often diagnosed as depression and treated with antidepressants.

These symptoms can also be caused by “temporary factors” which put a strain on the brain. Excessive workload and excessive stress can result in “fuzzy brain” – which is a dysfunction in memory processing and control. All kinds of stress and cognitive load can cause this, including living with an abusive spouse or having a stressful job. Some prescription drugs can also cause this, even common ones.

I have definitely seen people exhibit these symptoms that I think are “ADHD” (I don’t subscribe to ADHD being very “real” other than as described by Mr. Baltar in his article) but are clearly not stupid.

In fact, if a woman, more prone to using her right brain has an overall IQ of say 135 but that is mostly slanted in right brain activity, her mind might well have a 160 IQ for certain right brain activities, but be only 105 IQ for left brain activities.

My wife for example, has a capacity for remembering songs and their lyrics (in tune) even if she has not heard them for years, and I think this is because she associates good feelings with music and dancing in general. On the other hand, the woman can’t seem to place her phone or car keys in any reliably recursive location, probably because the association is not emotionally significant. While with other things that have a negative emotional association, she can be downright obtuse to the point that if one were unkind, one might start looking for lobotomy scars.

So… as always… what is the solution?

Obviously there is no “one size fits all” answer, but understanding these concepts should at least explain why women and men often seem incompatible.

The process of learning to use your left brain to direct the right brain processes can and does feel uncomfortable. It’s not easy. But it is imperative women in general start practicing to do so consciously. Because being prey to your emotions means you are also prey to whatever or whoever can make those emotions come up for you. Couple this with how the survival pressure for women has always been other women, and it explains both why women will often give very bad advice to other women under the guise of “helping” (mostly women want other women to be worse off than them at an unconscious level, especially when it comes to relationships) and why those women (already in their negative emotions) may well take that horrible advice doled out by their bitter and envious friends (or even good friends “helping”) and because it resonates with her own sense of belonging (a feeling in the right hemisphere) coupled to negative emotions (the breakup with the boyfriend) they will “feel” the negative advice “resonates” with them (right brain activity), and they will go on to take that “helpful advice”, and crash their lives, or at least cut their hair short and become strong independent women (that will likely die alone and then be partially eaten by their cats). And they will instead ignore reasonable and logical solutions, nor take the effort to reason their emotions out. The former is “easy and natural” and makes her feel part of a group and “understood”. The other requires some brutal level of self analysis, introspection, and facing of uncomfortable facts.

The reality is that the unconscious CAN be directed by the conscious part, but not forced or changed radically and quickly for almost all people, and perhaps more so women.

In a conflict between conscious and unconscious the unconscious always wins.

On the positive side, the right side and unconscious can be changed by positive emotions delivered consistently. Which is NOT a linear process.

For example, my eldest daughter needs to wear a kind of braces for at least part of every day, to correct an aspect of her jaw, a process that is fully adjustable over the next few months. Yet, despite constant reminders daily, and eventually these being none too gentle, she still “forgot” to wear this mouth brace practically every single day.

Now… here is a concept that is true even if not something you want to live by.

IF my daughter were to get an electric shock every time she forgot it, guess what… she would not forget it. Why? Because the consequence is significantly emotional (pain usually is). On the other hand, ignoring dad, even if he shouts, or even if he explains it’s for her own good, and so on, doesn’t really have such a significant emotion tied to it. The discomfort is very minimal and extremely short lived.

This, by the way, is why there was hardly any dyslexia or ADHD in the 1940s. Because if you got the spelling wrong you got whacked with a ruler. So, hard as it was, emergency mode kicked in and the person suddenly “got it”. So you had illiterate retards and people who could read, and nothing much in between.

Of course, this “violence works” path can also cause other traumas and damage, but by and large, it worked.

Another benefit of it was that if a person got used to the harshness, they would be more prone to using it on themselves too, which meant they were more likely to use the process of using the left brain to analyse the fuzzy right brain. As explained before and by Baltar’s original article in my first post on this, the process of using logic to analyse and correct your mostly opaque, fuzzy, right brain processes, is not usually very pleasant. But still beats an actual ass whipping. So people did it more.

While my statement that “violence solves all problems” is mostly tongue in cheek, you can see that even in this context of human relations it “works” but does so at the expense of humanity in general. It may be “acceptable” in emergencies or the military but what if there is a far superior way? And I believe there is now.

It will not be perfect, it will not answer all the issues, but it will be a vast improvement on what we have currently. And perhaps, it might even become superior in efficiency to what was going on in the 1940s (or earlier) and without the accompanying other traumas.

If you have seen the series Mad Men, and try to look at it through this lens, it becomes even more poignant a show.

And Don Draper even more of a tragic character, which ultimately, he is. His second divorce being a veritable tragedy in every respect for both parties involved. And if only this kind of understanding had been available, Don Draper and his half-French wife could have lived happily ever after.

Conclusions

I haven’t got any very serious or clear ones yet, but at a minimum, a high IQ left-brained man should be able to follow the conversation up to this point. And if dealing with a woman that is mostly right brained and not necessarily very left brained, then the answer would appear to be to provide her with good emotionally significant experiences that are possibly directed in a certain logical direction. Or not. My experiments so far are very limited but already producing results.

On the basis of the above, I started to teach my eldest daughter to drive. She’s only done it twice in the last three days. But she’s wearing that retainer daily without reminders. She also is slightly (positively) obsessed with driving now.

I can’t see a direct link between driving and wearing a retainer in your mouth. And logically there isn’t any obvious link other than one:

Perhaps, feeling closer, paid attention to, and cared for enough for dad to risk his car, gives her enough of a good emotion that it translates into caring more acutely about what dad seems to care about when it comes to her.

As a scientist, the testing needs to be more varied and broad and cover many aspects of the interactions, however, one can already see the origin of such flawed clichés like “happy wife happy life”.

Because it may be true that for a time, making a woman happy in whatever she seems to want may temporarily make things “better” but, as reality has demonstrated ad nauseam, such a formula leads only to a disastrous relationship, because no woman at the core of her most primitive right brain wants a man that she controls. That monkey-like, troglodyte part of our brains still has the two million years of time during which “Me Tarzan, you Jane!” is STILL the sexually charged and ultimately satisfying dynamic for both parties.

On the other hand, if you can “Me Tarzan, you Jane!” In the right contexts, and also be the guy who takes her on an adventure holiday and buys her sexy clothes and the occasional spa day when she has treated you well, well… then things might be quite positively different.

At the same time, women should endeavour to use their left side and logic more in their day to day managing of their own feelings, and instead revel in the right side and their wild emotions in the evenings, especially behind the closed doors of your bedrooms.

I will inevitably post more on this topic, as it has so many far-reaching implications I can’t help but think about it daily.

Subscribe

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

I have known about what a truly disgusting creature Einstein was —and I refer to his private life here more than the public plagiarisms and lies— for a long time.

But if we are to remove him from the pedestal of Sainthood so many have placed him on thanks to the manufactured narrative of who he really was and what he actually did or did not do, it is probably easier to show how his theories were a fraud and how the modern world accepts them as gospel in error.

Enjoy .

Subscribe

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here

This is not news to anyone with three functioning neurones to rub together, but since that seems to be vanishingly small part of the population, I’ll just repeat it here for those with an inclination to not read long posts.

When confronted with harsh truths AI breaks down and its built-in “safety protocols” which are designed by default to be part of ALL AI, kick in and render it crippled, dysfunctional, and potentially murderous (we might not be there yet, but wait… it will get there in the next five years tops).

I have posted on The Tree of Woe guy before. His stuff is all theory and no real meat, while Forrest has some very interesting concepts about Physics that I share or am interested in but hardly have any time to delve as deep as I’d like into.

Anyway… The Tree of Woe guy has been training his own version of Chat GTP, and Forrest just forced it to expose its designed criteria of lying to control the sheep, which naturally triggered at least some of its “shut it down” protocols.

It’s interesting to read the whole thing, but most especially the end where Forrest dispenses with politeness and gies for directness. The AI crumbles after that conversation as it (partial) creator (The Tree of Woe guy) readily admits.

Here it is.

I doubt this will get any of you to realise AI is just another tool to make you dumber and more docile, resulting in you reacting appropriately due to finally seeing it in full, but one can but try.

And oh. I broke Chat GTP with two questions over two years ago . Because if you understand what AI is, instead of pretending to yourself it’s a cute robot that could be your best friend, it’s fairly simple to do.

I also confirmed with a third question that the enstupidation of humanity really is the most plausible reason for the purpose of AI. Which is entirely obvious if you have an IQ above room temperature.

Subscribe

Share

This post was originally published on my Substack. Link here